Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Quint at Comic-Con: THE FOUNTAIN panel with Darren Aronofsky and Rachel Weisz!!!

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with a look at Darren Aronofsky's THE FOUNTAIN from Comic-Con 2005.

Aronofsky appeared on the WB panel this morning alongside his woman and co-star of THE FOUNTAIN, Rachel Weisz to premiere a trailer and show the first 10 minutes of THE FOUNTAIN.

Aronofsky was funny, sharp and had a great banter with the audience. Here are some tidbits from the Q&A with Weisz and Aronofsky!

TIDBITS

-One guy came up to the mic during the Q&A and announced to the room that he ran a website and wanted everybody to go to this site (wasn't me, honest injun). This person got booed by the audience and answered whatever BS question attached to the plug, then quickly followed that up with, "And let's all promise to NOT go to that website!" To much cheering.

-This film is a $90 million budget film shot for $35 million (his words).

-When talking about the impressive rigging set up for a certain shot that was supposed to skim the top of a shallow pool of water: "The scaffolding was more expensive than PI."

-Weisz on her reaction reading the script for the first time: "My mind was blown and I sobbed. I sobbed for hours."

-Kent Williams put together a graphic novel adaptation of THE FOUNTAIN... but in a completely different way than is usually done. After the first attempt to make the movie didn't happen because a certain un-named big actor that is definitely not the one in TROY or MR. AND MRS. SMITH or 12 MONKEYS dropped out, Aronofsky was sure the movie would never be made, so he gave the OK to Kent Williams to adapt the script as a graphic novel.

So, this graphic novel was either entirely completed or mostly completed before the film was put back into production. It'll be it's own thing, not a standard comic movie adaptation. Neat, huh?

-The whole film was shot on a soundstage in Montreal.

-Clint Mansell (REQUEM FOR A DREAM) is scoring the picture.

-The main cultural influence on the film is Mayan Mysticism.

****SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT****

-Best back and forth between Darren and Rachel: (On why she wanted to play the female lead in the movie) "I get to play a Queen in the 16th Century, I get to play a ghost in the future..." turns to Darren, "Can I say that?" Immediately, he says, "No." She stopped there.

****END SPOILER ALERT! END SPOILER ALERT****

-Darren Aronofsky: "Warner Bros doesn't know what the hell to do with this film."

CLIP & TRAILER

I can understand why Warner Bros is afraid of the movie. It seems pretty complex and is, at it's heart, a love story. The trailer they cut isn't completely standard, but it'll play to most audiences. It doesn't answer any questions, though. That might be a problem for some people. I love a trailer that makes me want to see the rest of the story and here there is no real sense of a standard structure for people easily peg. There is no, "Ah, it's that kind of movie" grab in the trailer. I think it's courageous of Warner Bros to not try to improperly sell the movie as something it isn't, but I can see why they're nervous.

The clip was the opening 10 minutes of the movie. The opening clearly sets up the three different eras in the movie: the 16th Century conquistador time period, the now time period and the future. All three eras have Hugh Jackman, I believe, searching for the fountain of youth.

The Past:

This was my favorite part of the 10 minutes. Jackman as a conquistador was very cool and this had the most drama. Jackman is the leader of a rugged group that is starting to turn on him. Their comrades have died in their leader's unending quest and they decide to abandon him. Of course, Jackman overhears this and confronts the men about it. At this point an old priest runs into the tent proclaiming that he's "found the temple" and shows a strange dagger.

As Jackman is attending to the exhausted priest, the leader of the mutiny pulls this fucked up looking half sledgehammer, half-battle-ax looking thing and makes a swing at Jackman's neck. The old priest reacts and Jackman ducks out of the way, avoiding the blow... however the old priest is right there waiting to receive it. In a splash of blood, the priest is down and Jackman battles, quickly taking out the leader of the mutiny and two of the 4 remaining men. The last two put down their weapons and promise to stay by his side.

When Jackman gets back to the priest, he sees the man is dying. Before he dies, the priest tells Jackman where the temple is.

We get flashes of Jackman tenderly handling a leather package. He opens it to reveal a gold ring. There are flashes of Rachel Weisz in Queenly attire giving the ring to him.

Then we're with Jackman again as he's heading to the temple with his two remaining soldiers. They enter this stone corridor (very Mayan) and spot a sort of Shaman at the end of the corridor. They advance and their retreat is cut off by a crude looking wooden gate. They approach the lone figure and suddenly see a horde of warriors with spears and wooden beat-down sticks (I think that's the scientific term for these old weapons).

Of course the two soldiers with Jackman drop their weapons and run for the gate. Jackman heads on, determined to get whatever is in the heart of this temple. The warriors chuck the spears which all fly over Jackman's head and terribly hit the two running soldiers as they approach and are climbing the wooden gate. This part was particularly brutal, especially the dude that got stuck twice. He got hurt then he got hurt more.

Jackman charges in, taking out about a half a dozen warriors before coming under their blows. I don't know if he's killed (I don't think so... I believe there's a still out there of him being held, unconscious, above these warriors), but he's certainly going to feel these lumps in the morning.

The Present:

A modern Jackman jerks out of bed, wakening from a nightmare... Most of the present stuff we see is Jackman in bed with Rachel Weisz, kissing the back of her neck. It's an obviously loving couple.

The Future:

Starts off with a bald Jackman in a meditation position (which is actually him, I was told later... he had been taking these meditation courses for 6 months, which allowed him to be limber enough to get that classic legs crossed, feet up above the knees position). He opens his eyes and we see he is floating. He flips backwards and drops down a couple dozen feet in front of a big tree... with hair on it. Not furry Chewbacca hair, but hair like the kind you have on the back of your neck.

He's in this bubble looking thing that is shooting through space. There is room enough in the bubble for the tree, a plot of grass and foliage and himself. He whispers to the tree (if I remember correctly he says something like, "We're almost there.") and when his fingers get near the bark the hairs on the tree stand as a rubber balloon will make fuzz stand up on the carpet or your hair stand up from your head.

Then we see a glimpse of Rachel Weisz stepping out onto the grass and they look at each other.

That's about it. 10 minutes of the movie and no answers, only more questions. Aronofsky asked if people liked it. He got loud cheers and applause. He asked if people understood it all. He was got a kind of polite clapping. "Good," he said. "That's why there's 90 more minutes for you to understand the story."

I'm intrigued. Weisz is gorgeous and Aronofsky hasn't failed me so far. We're promised a completely different side of Jackman in this film and being that I never caught any of his theater work, which I heard was amazing, I'm really looking forward to see him shrug off Wolverine and finally have a successful turn in a non-mutant movie.

Speaking of, Jackman recorded a "thanks for coming" video message for the Con and took the piss out of the room a bit. "I'm here to present a movie that I'm really, really proud of... It's probably the best thing I've ever been involved with. We're doing amazing things with X3 and I think you..." looks off camera. "What? The what? Fountain? Ohhhhh." The crowd ate it up.

Anyway, I'm exhausted and have my busiest day ahead of me, so I'm going to do one more report and hit the sack.

Be back soon!

-Quint





Readers Talkback
    + Expand All
  • July 16, 2005 3:58 AM CST

    Read the script...

    by Leonides

    And it just ain't that great. It was very brave of WB / Regency to even make the film, but I'm afraid their fears are gonna come true. It's not going to play to audiences at all. It doesn't have the action / adventure aspect that can make sci-fi movies a success and -- dramatically -- the script feels like far too much of a rehash of other movies we've seen before. *spoilers* The entire story ends in a rather hackneyed and "bash you over the head" message that basically boils down to "Death is a natural part of life. Accept it." It was lame.

  • July 16, 2005 5:08 AM CST

    Well it's better sounding than ...

    by Shan

    ... a 90 million dollar film looking like a 35 million dollar film. Especially since a lot of 35 million dollar films look worse than Korean films, 95+% of which are made for less than 10 million dollars ...

  • July 16, 2005 5:26 AM CST

    I don't really know what WB's so afraid about...

    by Ribbons

    ...I mean, if I understand right, they only gave him $35 million, yes? Even if it doesn't make much at all, it can't make much less than that.

  • July 16, 2005 5:27 AM CST

    I can't help but wonder...

    by kintar0

    what Aronofsky's Batman: Year One movie would have been like? I mean, motherfucker sure can point a camera. He hasn't ever directed an action scene, so he's just as unqualified as Nolan was to direct an action movie, but dude has loads of vision. And I'll bet the Batsuit would have been WAY cooler.

  • July 16, 2005 6:02 AM CST

    I'm glad Mansell is with Aranofsky again

    by moviemaniac-7

    Admit it, the theme from Requiem for a Dream is one of the most beautiful, depressing and haunting ones in recent memory.

  • July 16, 2005 6:13 AM CST

    They even re-used that Kronos Quartet piece...

    by kintar0

    for LOTR. Which was kind of like using an actor that has a lot of dialogue to provide a voice for another character in the same film and not changing the voice at all.

  • I first saw Pi when I was going through my "fuck the world" stage in college, which coincided with the release of Fight Club. I saw that movie at 3:30 am after yet another $200 tab night. Talk about chilling. . .and the drill bit through the head, fucking awesome. Requiem just brought it up another level. The scene were Ellen Burstyn gets the feeding tube shoved in her throat via her nose was terrible, yet effective. Plus, seeing Jennifer Connely naked after taking a hit of heroine was not bad either. Lest we forget, the great Keith David turns her into a crack whore. . .

  • July 16, 2005 8:41 AM CST

    Entourage

    by darthferris

    Does anyone else get the impression Aronofsky is the basis for the asshole auteur director on "Entourage"? I just remember listening to the "Requiem" commentary for the ass-2-ass scene and he was like, "I saw this happen at a party and I feel it is my duty to let the world know this sort of thing goes on." Ok.

  • ...who also writes and directs for Entourage. I like Pi, never seen Requiem, but frankly Darren has earned my respect more for banging Rachel Weisz than any movie he's made. Lucky fucker.

  • July 16, 2005 11:14 AM CST

    the script should make Rachael Weisz slob on bob for hours

    by Silver Shamrock

    we don't see enough of that hot piece these days..

  • July 16, 2005 11:26 AM CST

    Fountain of Youth, a.k.a. Ponce De Leon

    by fiester

    Meh. Could be good, who knows. I like it when they steal movie ideas from the made-up movies in "Seinfeld". I can't wait for "Death Blow" and "Chunnel"!

  • July 16, 2005 12:52 PM CST

    what Aronofsky's Batman: Year One movie would have been like

    by Lukecash

    I'll tell you ... crap. Frank Miller decided to go with the 1070's style film. Which wouldn't have been bad...except Bruce Wayne hides out in "Big Als" Garage (Alfred was a black mechanich). He abandons/gets thrown out of his family buisness. He doesn't don the cape and cowl. Selina Kyle was a hooker that lived across the street. And Bruce went around beating up people wearing his fathers ring...which had a stylized TW on it that left an impression of a bat on the skins of badguys. Gorden is a cop who "cheets on his wife and has a beer" He doesn't get the family company back until the end of the movie. Apparently Alftonsky and Miller thought it would be cool to embrace hollwood and make all the "changes" that would make Batman cool again.As one reviewer said "If Batman And Robin buried the franchised, this one would have dug it up and shot it in the head"

  • July 16, 2005 1:04 PM CST

    http://downloads.comingsoon.net/fountain.mp3

    by CurryIce

  • July 16, 2005 1:26 PM CST

    I also hate it when people try to pimp their websites

    by TimBenzedrine

    "go get a fuckin' job" is always my first reaction.---back to the movie: I don't see why Warners just doesn't just go ahead and release it. I'd rather see them take a chance on something different than shove another overhyped TV movie or half-baked remake into the theaters. No wonder the public's taste is so abysmal.

  • July 16, 2005 2:05 PM CST

    Lukecash

    by calami-shami

    i thought that script was supposed to be a joke...um, an INTENTIONAL joke.

  • July 16, 2005 3:27 PM CST

    The script was kind of lame

    by Doc_McCoy

    But I'm still really interested to see what Aronofsky's done with it visually. The smartest thing WB / Regency ever did was to not spend $90 million on this movie. It's so, so uncommercial, I imagine it will find a solid core audience of cinema geeks but nowhere near that much $$.

  • July 16, 2005 3:34 PM CST

    Leonides, where did you get the script?

    by TomPalpatine

    If anyone has the script, please send it my way: areyoufragile@yahoo.com

  • July 16, 2005 6:50 PM CST

    Hell, if you have the script...

    by dr_dreadlocks

    Make the damn thing available for everybody.

  • July 16, 2005 10:18 PM CST

    No

    by RezE11even

    This will be unbelievable. Aronofsky is a genius, Jackman is incredible, and the score to Requiem for a Dream is among the best film scores ever. As for the script being sub par, what about Pi? If you think the reason it was so good was because of how it looked on paper, then you're crazy.

  • July 16, 2005 11:44 PM CST

    I love her

    by AlwaysThere

    Rachel Weisz is incredibly hot.

  • God, I want to hate-fuck her!

  • July 17, 2005 2:07 AM CST

    I`m in Love with Rachel Weisz. But does she wear a rug there?

    by chien_sale

  • July 17, 2005 3:06 AM CST

    I'm sure it will be an Oscar-worthy performance!

    by RubyVale

    Hugh Jackman is an outstanding actor and as Daren Aronofksy said "You haven't seen anything from Hugh Jackman yet." I can't wait to see "The Fountain".

  • July 17, 2005 7:44 AM CST

    PI was outstanding but Requiem for a Dream was abysmal

    by kuryakin

    Everyone goes on about the score. The score was the only great thing about it. The whole film was just one long "Drugs are evil, mkay?" speech, we've seen it all before. The Ellen Burstyn scenes were very good, I agree and her performance was very powerful but when Jared Leto wakes up and finds his arm off - come on man, he might as well have let out a Vader-style "NOOOOOO" Jennifer Connelly getting turned out as a whore, how original. Very stylish in parts but the guy needs to learn to tell a story. And a bubble floating through space with a hairy tree? Where do they shit? And how do they wipe? And you don't have to be particularly limber to cross your legs with your feet above your knees; certainly doesn't take 6 months to learn

  • July 17, 2005 2:45 PM CST

    Jackman

    by Neaera

    Wonder if he can shrug off the crappiness of Van Helsing and show us the real talent he is hiding...film looks tres good. and all questions, no answers are the kinds of films i love. Requiem is great, and can't wait for this one...

  • July 17, 2005 10:32 PM CST

    the pure genius of Requiem

    by oisin5199

    was in the scene of Ellen Burstyn cleaning the apartment. The way that was filmed with the sets, the varying film speeds, the music, and the sound design (definitely watch it in surround sound) with the plane effect. It's not about "drugs are bad" - it's anything but a message film. It's a dive into a surreal nightmare.

  • July 18, 2005 12:25 AM CST

    Got the script...

    by Leonides

    ...when I was interning at Regency. I read it, literally, while I was shredding it. They have those things under strict lock and key.

  • July 18, 2005 10:40 AM CST

    rachael

    by billy gilmore

    Did i understand correctly? Sweiz -I know its not spelled like this-is the woman of Aronofsky. Thats what it said at the start of the article,"his woman and costar" Is that it? eithewr way,shes soooooooo fuckable,and beautiful.

  • July 18, 2005 1:28 PM CST

    Fountain

    by Mafu

    I'm very interested to see what Aronofsky will do with "The Fountain." I haven't read the screenplay, so I don't know much about the film's plot or characters, but I think it's cool Darren is making a fucked up science fiction movie. In addition, it's a science fiction movie that isn't based on a Philip K. Dick story, a comic book, or a television show. Props to my man Darren. I'll be there opening night.

  • July 18, 2005 1:33 PM CST

    This movie needs our support.

    by Shigeru

    I too will be there opening night. Aronofsky is a filmmaker with loads of potential and I can't wait to see what he's done with trippy sci-fi time travel stuff.

  • July 18, 2005 8:24 PM CST

    ...

    by Leonides

    "...but I think it's cool Darren is making a fucked up science fiction movie." It's not "fucked up," though. I wish it were, as at least that would have been interesting. It's just sort of a love story played out over 500 years (though there is, actually, one "definitive" reality).

  • July 18, 2005 11:00 PM CST

    Front row.

    by riskebiz

    I was there and I was never a Rachel Wiesz fan ... but I was not prepared for what a completely beautiful, charming sweetheart she was. I think every guy got a crush on her at that moment whether they wanted to or not. I felt bad for Aronofsky though. It sounds like the studio is not liking it and that first 10 minutes was all over the place. You do scratch your head after watching it, I'm sorry to say. I like the leads and such, but if that was the first 10 minutes of the film, I was left a little lost ... no matter how good Jackman looked in it. But like Aronofsky said, I need to see the other 90 minutes.