Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

From the Middle East comes a report on what should be called EATERS OF THE DEAD, but is instead THE 13th WARRIOR

Hey folks, Harry here with this report from Dubai on the recently released (there) THE 13TH WARRIOR or what should be called EATERS OF THE DEAD had Disney had any amount of coolness whatsoever. From the advance word I've heard this will be one of those films that some love and some love to hate, while still others merely forget it. I know many were really hoping for this to be a homerun, and personally I hope the film hits me right. I want to like it... but... we'll see.

Harry,

It feels strange, intimate even, calling you Harry when I only know you from reading your site. I live in Dubai in the Middle East and yesterday went to see "The 13th Warrior" which went on wide release here two days ago. I thought this might interest you because I didn't think this film had opened yet in the states. (BTW, wide is a relative term as there are only 8 cinemas here!!!)

I almost did not bother going to see it because, although I had read the book and quite liked it, I had heard that there were delays with the film and a fallout between McTiernan and Crichton. It felt like these problems did not bode well for a good movie.

Weellll....

I liked it. It was exciting, cinematic and interesting. It came across as kinda like Zulu with Norsemen. The battle scenes were gruesome without being overdone and the pacing of the movie, with the possible exception of a slightly slow start, was good. The film was given a very earthy look, with lots of mud and rain, as though the idea was to show a "real story".

I do not understand why there was rumoured fallout between the director and Micheal Crichton as I thought the story very closely followed the book. The only difference I noticed was in a slightly different ending, with the film eschewing the gross-out aspects of the book. I think this may have disappointed me as I was sorta preparing myself for it. I certainly thought this film was better than Entrapment that I had seen the day before. Especially nice was the use of Arabic phrasing in the movie in that when AB's character was showing a norseman that he can "draw sounds", he uses the phrase "There is no God but God and Mohammed is his prophet." There is also a neat transistion from Viking Speak to English that was reminiscent of The Hunt for Red October. (Yes, I know, also by Mctiernan.)

My only question was: Why was Antonio Banderas wearing so much eyeliner during the first 30 minutes?

Best Regards

Zube

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Click for previous story Talk Back Click for next story

User login

Reader Talkback

By The Way...
by Roderiq
Aug 14th, 1999
05:44:09 AM
I'm fourth dickheads!!!
by bruce le
Aug 14th, 1999
05:52:23 AM
Another BTW...
by lucie
Aug 14th, 1999
08:30:08 AM
Y2K
by Charlatan
Aug 14th, 1999
09:02:30 AM
Title means nothing? What are you smoking?
by Cineman
Aug 14th, 1999
10:22:40 AM
5760
by Dmann
Aug 14th, 1999
10:24:35 AM
OK, enough now
by Wonders
Aug 14th, 1999
12:18:36 PM
Fact or Fiction
by Silver
Aug 14th, 1999
01:09:36 PM
title changes
by thinker
Aug 14th, 1999
02:39:35 PM
it doesn't work like a McTiernan!!!
by MichaelB
Aug 14th, 1999
03:07:21 PM
the goldsmith score is BAD
by MichaelB
Aug 14th, 1999
03:10:10 PM
Disney...
by BlueHarlequin
Aug 14th, 1999
03:36:32 PM
Dubai???
by poppies
Aug 14th, 1999
03:47:12 PM
oh dear
by poppies
Aug 14th, 1999
03:53:23 PM
millinium
by tom416
Aug 14th, 1999
08:10:57 PM
D.Vader
by BlueHarlequin
Aug 14th, 1999
09:37:53 PM
title town
by Powerslave
Aug 14th, 1999
10:52:54 PM
The title thing
by Debaser
Aug 15th, 1999
02:24:22 AM
it looks *real* ;-)
by MichaelB
Aug 15th, 1999
03:49:36 AM
y2k?
by morpheus
Aug 15th, 1999
05:18:53 AM
Just to clear things up...
by Nasir Dalek
Aug 16th, 1999
05:30:09 PM
Do the dead just not taste right?
by Wolfpack
Aug 24th, 2006
08:30:35 AM

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.