|
Published on Friday, April 4, 2008 - 8:25am |
|
Massawyrm Loves, But Can't Quite Recommend, LEATHERHEADS!!
|
I have this buddy Jason. He’s one of those “Coolest guys I know” kind of characters. After a bad marriage disintegrated, Jason decided he was going to live in the reality of his own choosing. And that reality happened to involve Dean Martin records, martinis and a living room right out of a copy of the Uptown Living Fall 1958 Catalog. It’s hideous. And he loves it. This past weekend I was out furniture shopping with my wife and we came across a store that was selling this old school hipster furniture. Tucked away in the back was a mock den that looked as if it were pulled right out of one of Jason’s wet dreams. You could almost see the grit, grain and fuzzy, smudgy, out of focus photography of the classic Playboy shoot that took place on the couch. I smiled at my wife. “Oh my God, how bad would Jason want this den?”
“Yeah,” she laughed “but it’s not for us. Come on, that lamp is making me queasy.”
That den? That den is Leatherheads. It is not for everyone. It is for that special breed of person who often pines for another cinematic time and place. Persons like myself. And Harry. And Moriarty. Now that’s not to say that we don’t in any way enjoy the film styles of today – I think that’s pretty self evident at this point – but rather it is for those that occasionally like to go back. To experience an age when innuendo prevailed over raunch, when a screwball chase inevitably led to someone quick changing into their pursuers clothes, when a good joke was an incredibly subtle joke.
It is very clear what Clooney was thinking when he directed this thing. He’s made no bones about his intense love for the Coen’s and this movie definitely feels like he’s aping the period those two went through earlier this decade. Unfortunately for Clooney – and much like what the Coen’s later experienced – this doesn’t in any way capture the same kind of broad appeal that O Brother Where Art thou? managed. In fact it doesn’t feel anything at all like their films, despite seeming to try. Instead this feels more like the great 1998 indie classic The Imposters, which was another niche attempt at making a 30’s era screwball comedy – that time harking back to the screwball buddy movie.
I love The Imposters and I love this for all the same reasons. I love the return to a bygone era. I love that the film refuses to throw in some anachronisms or tries to get us to laugh at the ignorance or customs of the period. They aren’t winking at the camera every chance they get. Clooney legitimately is in love with the period of time he’s putting us in. And he legitimately loves the style of filmmaking.
Now, that said, anytime you make a movie that the people who love it feel the need to explain themselves, well, you’re in trouble. While I think this movie is very funny, and I adore its heart and its pining for the times of innocence, I can’t strongly recommend it. Not to anyone who isn’t already sold by now. It is a film that is so specific about what it is, it delivers little to those looking for something a little diffeent. Unlike the brilliant Down With Love which parodied the style of filmmaking while being in love with it, Clooney’s decision to play it straight both delivers a unique experience and narrows the band on the audience that will really get into this. Not that Down With Love had a broad appeal – but this one is even slimmer than that.
Now, I don’t think that many, if any people, are going to think this is a particularly bad film. Just that most will shrug not quite sure what to make of it. But if this has sounded in any way enticing or if the mention of The Imposters really rang your bell, then this is definitely worth a look. For what this is, it is perfectly executed – not on par with the greats of the era, but definitely on par with the really goods. But if a period screwball comedy sounds just a little whack to you – you might want to take a pass on this and leave that den where it belongs. In the dreams of others.
Until next time friends, smoke ‘em if ya got ‘em.
Massawyrm
Got something for the Wyrm? Mail it here.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
George sucks by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 08:26:41 AM | Because he was not first. by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 08:27:59 AM | Clooney's Cool by Underoos Hero | Apr 4th, 2008 08:28:24 AM | Hopefully by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 08:30:49 AM | Underoos Hero by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 08:34:14 AM | Series 7 by Underoos Hero | Apr 4th, 2008 08:37:23 AM | You Should Go Read by Underoos Hero | Apr 4th, 2008 08:39:40 AM | Massawyrm by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 08:47:32 AM | The "Brilliant" Down with
Love????? by C.K. Lamoo | Apr 4th, 2008 08:59:41 AM | Clooney Sucks by BanAllFIRSTPosters | Apr 4th, 2008 08:59:47 AM | Underoos Hero by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 09:03:07 AM | DOWN WITH LOVE by abcdefz7 | Apr 4th, 2008 09:12:30 AM | I'm done with Clooney by Spandau Belly | Apr 4th, 2008 09:13:34 AM | The reason you can't make an
"old fashioned movie" by C.K. Lamoo | Apr 4th, 2008 09:24:53 AM | C.K. Lamoo... by haggardatbest | Apr 4th, 2008 09:44:58 AM | Mass, you've convinced me that
the film is for me. by beastie | Apr 4th, 2008 09:49:33 AM | regarding spielberg as 'utter
shite' by Jackie Boy | Apr 4th, 2008 10:30:31 AM | Spandau Belly by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 10:33:31 AM | Jackie Boy by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 10:41:03 AM | laughs in O Brother by ArcadianDS | Apr 4th, 2008 11:19:47 AM | dammit by ArcadianDS | Apr 4th, 2008 11:21:27 AM | Down With Love! by Bass Ackwards | Apr 4th, 2008 12:05:50 PM | This looks closer to The
Hudsucker Proxy. by skimn | Apr 4th, 2008 12:23:32 PM | Loved Hudsucker Proxy by C.K. Lamoo | Apr 4th, 2008 12:50:27 PM | thanks for the warning to stay
away from this by Rupee88 | Apr 4th, 2008 01:03:21 PM | CK by skimn | Apr 4th, 2008 01:07:47 PM | Series 7 by skimn | Apr 4th, 2008 01:18:06 PM | C.K. Lamoo by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 01:22:05 PM | Naw I missed Conan last night by Series7 | Apr 4th, 2008 01:28:01 PM | This movie looks like shit... by neverhed | Apr 4th, 2008 01:59:46 PM | Series by skimn | Apr 4th, 2008 02:11:16 PM | Massa, a question by CasperVonSidecar | Apr 4th, 2008 02:18:11 PM | Szymanski.... by C.K. Lamoo | Apr 4th, 2008 03:21:27 PM | CK by skimn | Apr 4th, 2008 04:13:51 PM | If Clooney looks a little smug
and like he deserves his
success by skimn | Apr 4th, 2008 04:44:32 PM | Meant by skimn | Apr 4th, 2008 04:46:21 PM | Hey, Massa... by 433 | Apr 4th, 2008 04:48:37 PM | Massa, you hit it right on the
head... by antibody | Apr 4th, 2008 10:16:03 PM | Down with Love rules as does
Hudsucker by 18to88 | Apr 4th, 2008 11:08:00 PM | Tim Robbins fell out because by brobdingnag | Apr 5th, 2008 07:05:32 AM | Am I the only one who didn't
get the Michael Clayton hype? by Spandau Belly | Apr 5th, 2008 08:45:20 AM | This is a Clooney anti-US
military rant disguised as a
period co by punisher5150 | Apr 5th, 2008 10:20:14 AM |
|
|