|
Published on Sunday, October 23, 2005 - 6:59pm |
|
Who's Seen SAW II?
Hi, everyone. "Moriarty" here with some Rumblings From The Lab...
Quite a bit of the online horror press, evidently. There was some sort of shindig this past week for the film over at Lions Gate, primarily for people who were big supporters of the first film. I wanted to like SAW, and I certainly respect the ambitions behind it, but I just didn’t care for big chunks of it. Still, enough of you did that there’s a sequel, and one of our spies took a peek:
Hey Harry, Mori...
Just came back from what was called "The North American Premiere" of Saw II, at the Montreal Madness Movie Marathon; a special 10pm-to-6am horror film all-nighter that's in it's second year of existence.
I attended the first marathon as well which also premiered the original Saw, so I was hyped up for this one, as this sorta crowd is very receptive to Jigsaw's wacky adventures.
Let's get down to the meat of it: Saw II is a much superior film to the first outing for a couple of different reasons. First and foremost, Leigh Wenelle has a written a much better and focused narrative this time around. Gone are the pointless time jumps from the original, and the useless Danny Glover side-story that seemed so tacked on in the previous outing.
This time, Saw II focuses on the killer's taunting of one detective; Eric Matthews, as played very convincingly by Donnie Wahlberg. This conflict between the two men is what everything Saw II revolves around, even when it doesn't seem like it during the course of the plot.
The main hitch this time, is that Jigsaw has kidnapped 7 strangers and plunked them in a fun house of sorts, and has video cameras installed to watch their every move. This was not for Jigsaw's benefit, but the police instead. Early on, Matthews and a Swat team are able to track down Jigsaw, and find the video feeds showing the 7 people arguing and wondering where they now find themselves.
Jigsaw, knowing his time is reaching it's end due to cancer, lets himself be caught so he can talk to Matthews face to face. This is also when he reveals that one of the 7 strangers in the house is the detective's only son, Daniel.
The house itself is slowly being flooded with a nerve gas that will kill each person, unless they can find certain vials of antidote hidden throughout the house. They have only 3 hours to do, or the gas will reduce each person to having "blood pour out of every orafice" as Jigsaw himself artistically puts it.
As always, Jiggy has left certain clues and nasty traps to make sure his subjects play the game by his rules. The tension of the film has a great build up, as Detective Matthews gets more and more desperate as the timer counts down, and he watches his son get deader and deader as time goes on.
The story is obviously simple, and it's this singularity that makes Saw II enjoyable. Rather then a time-jumping, flash-back ridden hodgepodge that I found the first film to be, Saw II lets you simply enjoy the blood and chaos that ensues. The 7 housemates are pretty standard; bitchy girl, tough guy, quiet loner, level-headed guy, etc...each actor works well with the material, and everyone hits the right notes, which is good for relative unknown cast. Shawnee Smith returns to reprise her role from the first Saw, as the only survivor of Jigsaw's games. You really sympathize with her, as it's just so...unfair she has to be put through this kinda ordeal again...
Saw II doesn't pull any punches when it comes to the red stuff, it's just as gory and satisfying as the first, but the various traps and tests aren't nearly as creative and fun as some of Jigsaw's earlier contraptions. They're just plain violent and spew alot of blood and pain.
The switch to Darren Lynn Bousman as a director doesn't seem to have had much of a different effect, as Saw II looks much like the first, and uses alot of the same visual tricks. The sets look pretty much the same, all the rooms having that dingy, venereal-disease ridden flavor that Courtney Love might feel at home in.
Speaking of which, if you are expecting the same twist ending as the first, then you won't be dissapointed. While it's simply not as shocking or as cool, it's still pretty interesting, and took the entire story in a different direction. Certain references to the first film also crop up near the end, and the audience gobbled it up. Great reactions.
So while Saw II isn't reinventing the wheel of horror flicks, it's still one of the better entries I've seen all year. So if you liked the first Saw, it's a definte must-see...but if you didn't dig the style and execution, this sequel won't make you a fan either.
If you use this, call me The Switcher!
As long as they don’t make the same mistake they did with that miserable Danny Glover subplot in the first one, I may well like this one more. Here’s hoping we’ll have some fun gore in the theaters next weekend. Thanks, Switcher!

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
Am I the only one who's
not at all interested in this? by mashman1212 | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:12:16 PM | second and bored. by unclefishbits | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:14:43 PM | i enjoyed the first... by movieman742 | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:27:36 PM | cant wait by Drillin Dave | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:32:08 PM | If your gonna make a
sequel...make a sequel to
somthing that was by goondock | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:39:32 PM | You say you're bored? Not
interested? by TenderBranson | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:43:37 PM | 'miserable Danny Glover
subplot'? by quinndog | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:44:01 PM | Like first Saw as a nice
little outing.... by Johnno | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:44:45 PM | The wrong Walberg by optimus122 | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:53:03 PM | the plot reminds me of the
tarantino CSI... by mrgreentheplant | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:55:37 PM | So what happens to the girl
from Becker? by I Dunno | Oct 23rd, 2005 07:58:54 PM | saw is definetly a divider
film by goondock | Oct 23rd, 2005 08:04:18 PM | Sounds like Se7en meets Cube by Neosamurai85 | Oct 23rd, 2005 08:19:51 PM | Fun house... by Neosamurai85 | Oct 23rd, 2005 08:23:11 PM | Oh and yes... by Neosamurai85 | Oct 23rd, 2005 08:24:53 PM | Lemme Guess.... one of the
house folks is in on it.. by LargoJr | Oct 23rd, 2005 08:24:55 PM | Sounds like another bad movie
coming out in October by AlwaysThere | Oct 23rd, 2005 08:28:58 PM | THIS is how the Joker need to
be portrayed... by ZeroCorpse | Oct 23rd, 2005 08:35:16 PM | Totally agree ZeroCorpse by Neosamurai85 | Oct 23rd, 2005 08:48:50 PM | Has to be better than the
first by Pdid | Oct 23rd, 2005 09:00:21 PM | Put me in the ZeroCorpse camp
on this one. by I Dunno | Oct 23rd, 2005 09:00:49 PM | "Arkham Asylum" being a
graphic novel from the
90's by I Dunno | Oct 23rd, 2005 09:01:58 PM | Saw ending wasn't a
twist... by stlfilmwire | Oct 23rd, 2005 09:15:28 PM | "deader and deader"?! by Sir Loin | Oct 23rd, 2005 09:35:31 PM | I've yet to watch the
first Saw by Orionsangels | Oct 23rd, 2005 09:47:38 PM | "Yes, there will be blood" by Osmosis Jones | Oct 23rd, 2005 10:02:04 PM | Damn enter key... by Osmosis Jones | Oct 23rd, 2005 10:03:26 PM | On twists... by Neosamurai85 | Oct 23rd, 2005 10:06:42 PM | thank you site editors for NOT
marking this a Spoiler article by white owl | Oct 23rd, 2005 10:24:17 PM | Sorry white owl by Neosamurai85 | Oct 23rd, 2005 10:29:15 PM | Maybe they should've
titled the sequel "SAW TOO
MUCH". (heh by JDanielP | Oct 23rd, 2005 10:30:45 PM | Oh... never mind. by Neosamurai85 | Oct 23rd, 2005 10:37:01 PM | I totally different direction
in the last part huh. by Meremoth | Oct 23rd, 2005 10:53:26 PM | Not Interested Mashman? by jodocus | Oct 23rd, 2005 11:27:27 PM | Correction! by jodocus | Oct 23rd, 2005 11:29:08 PM | White Owl by LordVoldemoo | Oct 23rd, 2005 11:33:11 PM | Saw 3: Look Who's Sawing
Too by Meremoth | Oct 24th, 2005 12:13:25 AM | "Like Saws 2: The Revenge or
Saw 2: Saw Harder." by Neosamurai85 | Oct 24th, 2005 01:19:21 AM | "Jiggy" by 1000yearFocker | Oct 24th, 2005 01:48:59 AM | That's pretty good neo,
but you forgot... by iamnicksaicnsn | Oct 24th, 2005 01:57:04 AM | no "good" by heystantheman! | Oct 24th, 2005 04:55:45 AM | So what you're saying
is..... If you haven't
seen Saw 1, by TheGinger Twit | Oct 24th, 2005 05:30:10 AM | But I still think that poster
with the cut off two fingers
is a by TheGinger Twit | Oct 24th, 2005 05:32:27 AM | Well stated Zerocorpse by Thirteen 13 | Oct 24th, 2005 05:40:02 AM | Mark Hamill's Joker still
the best by phelion2 | Oct 24th, 2005 07:53:05 AM | Saw 3: Gettin' Jiggy With
It by LargoJr | Oct 24th, 2005 08:12:16 AM | Darren Lynn Bousman by DannyOcean01 | Oct 24th, 2005 08:14:30 AM | like the poster by ABRNT1 | Oct 24th, 2005 09:47:18 AM | Alls Saw that ends Saw by Neosamurai85 | Oct 24th, 2005 10:14:38 AM | Mistake? by timmer33 | Oct 24th, 2005 10:14:50 AM | Harry just pulled a
'FEMA' with this one by white owl | Oct 24th, 2005 11:03:19 AM | Saw it not. by radio1_mike | Oct 24th, 2005 11:08:58 AM | So we're all agreed? I
get to write the next Batman
movie? by ZeroCorpse | Oct 24th, 2005 12:14:12 PM | Saw 2: Seen by ScreamingPenis | Oct 24th, 2005 02:34:22 PM | Saw Seven: Sisters of Satan by ZeroCorpse | Oct 24th, 2005 03:24:12 PM | ZeroCorpse by 3ple A | Oct 24th, 2005 04:03:47 PM | Mr. Matthews??? COULD THE
KILLER BE?? by dustinthewind | Oct 24th, 2005 04:16:35 PM | Looking forward to this,
but... by slapshot | Oct 24th, 2005 04:28:40 PM | Why stop there when you could
start a franchise? by Johnno | Oct 24th, 2005 05:34:44 PM | Sawlateral. Old Saw.
Sawderman. Resawvoir Saws... by iamnicksaicnsn | Oct 24th, 2005 07:24:49 PM | And THE ULTIMATE:... Saws on
a Plane. by iamnicksaicnsn | Oct 24th, 2005 07:25:25 PM | Saw 3: See Saw, Saw by FlickChick | Oct 24th, 2005 10:03:16 PM | 3ple A - That's GREAT
news! by ZeroCorpse | Oct 25th, 2005 12:00:59 AM | "at least it's not a
remake" by Malebolgia | Oct 25th, 2005 12:18:24 AM | It had me "SAW"ing logs
halfway through... by Kenshiro_Kane | Oct 25th, 2005 05:12:47 PM |
|
|