|
Published on Thursday, April 4, 2002 - 7:36pm |
|
FRAILTY Review
Going on a road trip to Dallas just to watch a movie is not something I want to make a habit of, but this afternoon, night and early pre-morning hours were a blast to hit I-35 out of Austin headed for the trash décor of a suburban Dallas Cinemark.
Around 1400 (CST) The lovely Dorothy Parker arrived at Geek Headquarters to await the arrival of Patch’s muscle car. You see, on this trip, when I’m hitting the highway to see the feature directorial debut of Bill Paxton (aka Chet aka Hudson aka Severen aka Hurricane Dixon aka Morgan Earp aka Simon aka Zachary Cody aka Bokky and Hank Mitchell). Dorothy and I begin to try and talk, but the evil telephone never ceases ringing with morning show radio requests… ugh.
1533 (CST) Hits and the deadly Patch arrives with the rumbling muscle car sound on her road monster. We felt its roar in our sternums and knew this would be a wild ride. Patch and Dorothy Parker begin making fun of me… I realize that I-35 will become a river of my own tears as these two will destroy my will to live. By the end of the evening, they’ll of made me wear a felt hat, a coonskin hat, a Muppet skinned boa, Lolita’s sunglasses and I’d love every minute of it. But I’m weird that way, so Rav says to me at night.
1545 (CST) We hit I-35 laying rubber due North. It was like something out of CLOCKSTOPPERS as even at one moment the Amtrak train alongside seemed to be going so slow in comparison as to look like it was moving in reverse. Patch had removed all the numbers from her speedometer… it seems she knows when she’s going fast enough, which I’m told would mean she’d be in bed and asleep.
1550 (CST) Waco flies by in a blur.
1600 (CST) We sit in the parking lot of the Cinemark 17 with attached IMAX and wait for our souls to catch up, we believed they were left somewhere back in Pflugerville, but the winds would carrying them to us.
1830 (CST) Our souls arrive at the theater and we begin to consciously perceive our current location. Why is it that Cinemark theaters seemed to have been colored by the same people that paint aquarium rocks? And why is the lighting like a really bad discotheque?
1845 (CST) Bill Paxton arrives at the theater as numerous Dallas attendees begin screaming like crazed heroin junkies eating Lucky Charms in pursuit of that ebony black kettle of golden delights.
1915 (CST) We three swingin’ geeks hit the screening room, where I notice to my horror that I will have to ascend a 136 and three-quarters cliff face to get to my seat. Having seen CLIFFHANGER twice in theaters and VERTICAL LIMIT once too many, I clear the trip with little to no problems. I slipped only once and maybe broke my legs, but Patch tells me the Nazis will fix me up, and Dorothy Parker warns that I may talk under scopolamine. They begin giggling like the children of the damned.
1930 (CST) The feel of this soulless monstrosity of a theater is like that of the Tall Man’s Mausoleum had it been designed by the rejected visual artistes of the Teletubbies. The energy in the room is dead. Just no buzz, no vibe. It is like recording music in a concrete box… no warmth. The audience seems to not be pumped up, not excited.
1932 (CST) The audience has a mini-eruption of applause and cheers as Paxton enters the screening room. The applause dies quickly as the Regional Vice President of the Cinemark Theaters hits the microphone. Paxton takes over and gives a very lackluster introduction that just kinda tells ya that he knows the movie is about to play and he hopes you make it through the film. He then leaves instead of staying around for the film. Patch, Dorothy Parker and I all look at each other as if to say, "What the fuck?" Instantly the energy in the room sucks it back a bit.
1940 (CST) The movie begins.
Coming into this movie I was excited by three quotes:
"Electrifying. A tale of madness and elemental evil that keeps you guessing until the very last shot." – James Cameron
"The most disturbing horror picture I’ve seen since THE SHINING" – Sam Raimi
"It’s unique, thought provoking, edge-of-your-seat entertainment." -- Stephen King
The quote from Sam Raimi was the one that got me. I wondered… Had Sam seen HENRY PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER? Probably not, because frankly I find that film far more disturbing than Kubrick’s masterpiece. However, that’s beside the point. This was a movie that reminded Sam Raimi of the feelings of uneasiness that was throughout THE SHINING.
Personally I feel that Sam’s quote does a disservice to FRAILTY, by bringing that film up, I felt that I was forced to think throughout the film, "This is no where near as good as THE SHINING." Which isn’t fair to FRAILTY.
Bill Paxton’s first directorial effort is creepy, atmospheric and disturbing. It is. I think Stephen King’s quote is completely fair. However, James Cameron’s quote also was a disservice because you should not be trying to guess what the twist is going to be. That should just hit ya. Just ta-daaaaaaaa… That sort of thing.
Ok, what’s FRAILTY about?
Imagine this… You’re 11 years old. The biggest most important thing in the world to you is whether or not you’re going to go see FERRIS BUELLER’S DAY OFF or BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA the next day. You and your little brother doze off to sleep when suddenly your wonderful father… Dad, who never has crackpot theories, who has never beat you, who has never done anything out of the ordinary… Suddenly he comes into the bedroom waking you up from your sleep telling you he had just had an audience with an angel sent from God. That JUDGEMENT DAY is on the way and that Satan had already released Demons upon the Earth and that the final battle was at hand, and your family. You, your brother and daddy were going to be given 3 magical weapons with which to combat these demons. You and your family would become the hand of God in the final battle.
Yeah. You’re 11 years old, Dad’s never been crazy before. What do you do?
That’s about as much as you frankly need to know. Suffice to say the magical weapons are an axe named OTIS, a pair of ratty gloves and a cinch pipe. Not exactly the Joshua’s Horn or Moses’ Staff or the Ark of the Covenant, but hey.. We live in mediocre times, God left all the really good ideas back around the times of the pyramids. Oh well, he’s pretty old.
What follows is a really terrible situation. Sort of the anti-Atticus Finch type of Dad. Paxton plays Dad as a loving and caring man that must destroy Demons that the world believes are regular people. He doesn’t like what he has to do, but who is he to question the will of God. And his sons… Well, they must believe, lest upon that Judgement Day they be sent to Hell instead of being embraced into the bosom of Heaven alongside his lovely wife. What he does to MAKE them believe…. Shivers mate shivers.
Paxton playing this father with the simple loving nature quality gives it an air of creepiness that really is quite pervasive. I actually began associating this understanding father with my dad. And given my mother had a complete 180 personality shift that left me wondering if the Invaders from Mars had poked the back of her neck… This sort of parental weirdness was easily within my ability to buy.
Matthew McCounaghey is the surviving brother that is telling the entire story of youth to Powers Boothe, an FBI agent in Dallas, Texas. All of this plays out very good.
Truthfully, I liked the movie while I watched it, but since I’ve left the theater, had the discussions on the road with Patch and Dorothy Parker, I’ve come to like the film even more. In fact, I like the film more at this point of the review than at the beginning.
Why is that?
Well, there is a lot here that I don’t want to talk about, but I like how this isn’t just a SLASHER FILM. How this movie deals with questions of sanity, faith, family and duty. I like the way Paxton plays with the nature of childhood in the film. The boy, Fenton… he’s the older boy. He really is quite wonderful, not only as an actor, but also as a character. He knows that all of this is wrong. He wants to not be a part of this. God doesn’t exist, God wouldn’t ask his father to start killing people and if God existed he’d make his father stop. Right?
FRAILTY plays with these questions very well. It shies away from the scary horrible gore. It instead focuses on Paxton’s DAD character and the two sons: Adam and Fenton. By focusing on this instead of the acts of horror they are conducting, you are making the horror more personal and less ejaculatory. This isn’t a Fangoria horror film, this is that creepy by yourself what if horror film.
My problems with the movie? Personally I didn’t care for the intentional underlining of the final resolution. I preferred a more ambiguous ending that left the questions as questions instead of answered. Though at least on our car ride through the blackness of Texas back to Austin there was a bit of debate over what really happened and the perceptions of all that. Was the film a 2 dimensional film about mental illness and murder? Or was it something else? Personally I say it was something else. I like that, its creepier, scarier and more disturbing if you interpret the movie in that other direction.
But then I’m the guy that believe Arnold was in the RECALL chair the whole time through TOTAL RECALL. Simply because I like that.
This isn’t a great film, but I thought it was damn good.
After the film, Paxton went on a nearly hour long Q&A with the Dallas audience that I was completely fascinated by. You see, I’m so spoiled by Austin audiences and the Q&A’s there that I couldn’t believe I was hearing confrontational questions coming at filmmakers. So much so that at one point Paxton said, "Damn this is a tough audience."
It seemed that they didn’t come to enjoy the film so much as they came to pick at it. Questions drawing a parallel between his movie and killing abortion clinic doctors and how he apparently endorses that… That this is a pro-child abuse film… That he stole this element from here and there… These were not the standard filmmaking questions or career questions. Nobody really asked about Chet or Hudson… There was a question about Sam Raimi, but none about James Cameron. A pretty hostile audience. That’s something I have never seen in an Austin special screening. VERY STRANGE. Patch, Dorothy Parker and myself were all a bit stunned. Amazed. Perplexed.
On the way back to Austin we talked about visions, what would you do if you woke up in the middle of the night with an angel from God asking you to take action? When would you believe? When would you have faith? Is there anything you could see that could compel you into actions like those in the film? It was a wonderful ride back, where we were enveloped in discussions about things that could be a bit of undigested gravy as we slowly passed a MASH helicopter on the way home…. Three times. Life is weird, and so is this movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
First by CrapHole | Apr 4th, 2002 06:42:27 PM | Oh yea..and by CrapHole | Apr 4th, 2002 06:44:51 PM | sounds like a bug hunt by durhay | Apr 4th, 2002 07:44:11 PM | Some thoughts.... by rubby | Apr 4th, 2002 08:37:12 PM | When I see the words, Harry
here, I run for the hills... by SK909 | Apr 4th, 2002 08:38:27 PM | "but the evil telephone never
ceases
ringing wit by Tall_Boy | Apr 4th, 2002 09:08:48 PM | We're in some real pretty
shit now man! by JacksonsBane | Apr 4th, 2002 09:53:00 PM | Tough audience? Paxton is
KING!!! Respect his
AUTHORITAH!!!!! by Psyclops | Apr 4th, 2002 10:19:18 PM | Hmm... Jeepers Creepers
anyone? by Afext | Apr 4th, 2002 10:40:14 PM | I read this when drunk, and
thought Harry was travelling
through by PoshKittyKat | Apr 4th, 2002 11:06:53 PM | yeah i like my horror movies
less ejaculatory too.... by General Idea | Apr 4th, 2002 11:45:31 PM | Paxton's Grand Inqusitor by DallasDick | Apr 5th, 2002 01:45:58 AM | Arnie was in the chair??? by Antiriad | Apr 5th, 2002 03:01:36 AM | Yes, Hicks... by Gregzero | Apr 5th, 2002 03:16:23 AM | Dallas vs. Austin by DoogieHowitzer | Apr 5th, 2002 03:26:12 AM | BILL!!!!!!! by i'mYOURman | Apr 5th, 2002 04:15:44 AM | Isn't this basically
Unbreakable done Willie
Aames-Bibleman by ToiletDuckHuffer | Apr 5th, 2002 05:36:08 AM | Harry - If you think The
Shining or Henry POASK are
disturbing.. by Chilli Kramer | Apr 5th, 2002 08:14:13 AM | yes, wicker joe by rev_skarekroe | Apr 5th, 2002 10:24:43 AM | Review by LeeScoresby | Apr 5th, 2002 10:39:27 AM | Paxton rocks!! by SeanMiller | Apr 5th, 2002 10:47:46 AM | You Actually thought "Henry:
Portrait of a Serial Killer"
was Be by NoCureForFools | Apr 5th, 2002 11:05:07 AM | As far as "Total Recall"
goes... by CineRam | Apr 5th, 2002 11:52:25 AM | total recall by dustable carnage | Apr 5th, 2002 12:02:47 PM | GET TO THE REVIEW ALREADY! by aDJustafresh | Apr 5th, 2002 12:11:52 PM | Harry's Famous! by FreeJack | Apr 5th, 2002 12:35:22 PM | KILL BILL!!!!!!!!! (okay this
is a punt) by TarantinoWebsite | Apr 5th, 2002 12:51:17 PM | Good For Paxton! I Support All
Other Filmmakers Who
Didn't G by Buzz Maverik | Apr 5th, 2002 12:51:21 PM | Fish heads, Fish heads
Rolly-polly fish heads by BadAshe | Apr 5th, 2002 01:06:28 PM | Does anyone really take
Harry's reviews seriously
anyway? by vich1 | Apr 5th, 2002 01:09:38 PM | Somebody actually mentioned
SESSION 9 on this website? by Psyclops | Apr 5th, 2002 01:35:09 PM | Tough audience by Juggernaut125 | Apr 5th, 2002 01:40:26 PM | it is a sign of an ego run
amok by Aquafresh | Apr 5th, 2002 01:53:51 PM | BTW, how the hell are these
talkbalks sorted? by vich1 | Apr 5th, 2002 02:23:25 PM | Call me weird, but Henry =
Lard. by Afext | Apr 5th, 2002 02:34:52 PM | Cuato lives! by Det. John Kimble | Apr 5th, 2002 03:41:51 PM | 'They Live' raised all
these issues before. by Det. John Kimble | Apr 5th, 2002 04:03:35 PM | Funny Ganes is disturbing by KingCoal | Apr 5th, 2002 04:20:12 PM | Let's not take this too
seriously... by SecretLotusGem | Apr 5th, 2002 04:58:11 PM | Impossible to Get to Dallas in
2 Hours by optimalprimus | Apr 5th, 2002 05:36:36 PM | Cinemark 17 is not that bad... by TheMatarife | Apr 5th, 2002 09:56:23 PM | "C'mon! C'mon
muthafucka, I haven't got
all day, c by Tall_Boy | Apr 6th, 2002 12:12:21 AM | to the idiot that thinks
Kubric can do King better than
King can by magic_ninja | Apr 6th, 2002 12:45:30 AM | Wanted to read the review, by Latenighter | Apr 6th, 2002 01:33:52 AM | "Check it out. I am the
ultimate badass! State of the
badass ar by The Human Bullet | Apr 6th, 2002 04:49:53 AM | A little more of Paxton's
genius there for ya. Seriously
tho by The Human Bullet | Apr 6th, 2002 04:52:00 AM | "Well do you think they're
having fun being CATATONIC in
a c by Eugene O | Apr 6th, 2002 06:24:00 AM | what it is that i really
can't stand about this
review, and by arkhan77 | Apr 6th, 2002 02:12:41 PM | More Paxton! by NapoleonWilson | Apr 6th, 2002 04:48:55 PM | Great review... by Neonclaw | Apr 6th, 2002 04:54:01 PM | fish heads, fish heads...
rolly polly fish heads... by ARZAK | Apr 6th, 2002 05:29:56 PM | Rant... by Silent_Boba | Apr 6th, 2002 06:17:09 PM | Weird Science by Lord Xenu | Apr 7th, 2002 03:12:21 AM | Don't listen to Harry,
he's an idiot. by Brock Linehan | Apr 7th, 2002 04:56:45 AM | I know who the Godsmack Killer
is. by Kurt S. E. | Apr 12th, 2002 05:38:40 PM | Why don't you people talk
about the movie?? by Scud | Apr 12th, 2002 10:17:03 PM | Remember... by Craniac Ten | Apr 13th, 2002 12:12:29 AM | bill paxton by 81666 | Apr 13th, 2002 03:23:34 AM | umm shut up and talk about the
movie what about this? by Mike on Crack | Apr 14th, 2002 10:24:56 PM | What about good ol'
Matthew? by pink sugar | Apr 15th, 2002 01:24:05 AM | Jesus Freak II: The Wrath of
God by Metatron | Apr 15th, 2002 09:19:14 AM | Worst...movie...ever. by hudsucker | Apr 15th, 2002 05:47:24 PM | BAD BAD BAD film. Avoid it at
all costs. by vorpalbuni | Apr 15th, 2002 07:55:55 PM | Arkhan77 by Almost Sexy | Apr 15th, 2002 08:00:19 PM | Off to a bad start by Azgad2322 | Apr 15th, 2002 10:44:42 PM | One of the best horror films
in years. by Confabulat | Apr 16th, 2002 01:47:31 PM | Confabulat, you are mistaken:
THIS MOVIE IS BAD!!! by vorpalbuni | Apr 16th, 2002 07:19:04 PM | a great movie that will gain a
"Wicker Man" like cult
following by Confabulat | Apr 17th, 2002 12:29:28 AM | You asked, I answerd by vorpalbuni | Apr 17th, 2002 08:14:11 PM | You asked, I answerd by vorpalbuni | Apr 17th, 2002 08:16:07 PM | I noticed the "Curtis" thing
too by otis von zipper | Apr 17th, 2002 08:42:10 PM | Victim list by BigFire | Apr 17th, 2002 09:38:27 PM | great review harry! by drjones | Apr 19th, 2002 04:35:30 PM | anyone else notice.... by goonie928 | Apr 19th, 2002 05:39:39 PM | FRAILTY by tradervic | Apr 19th, 2002 05:53:55 PM | This film rocks. End of
story... by HappyHamster | Apr 20th, 2002 03:29:51 AM | Frailty by Silverkat | Apr 20th, 2002 01:19:56 PM | Huh? by MisRosemaryCross | Apr 23rd, 2002 12:09:11 AM | huh? by Damer1 | Apr 24th, 2002 04:47:50 PM | this bible reading Christian
thought it was a well made
movie... by MovieStud | Apr 28th, 2002 02:43:33 PM | this bible reading Christian
thought it was a well made
movie... by MovieStud | Apr 28th, 2002 02:44:46 PM | If you haven't seen
FRAILTY, don't READ THIS
TALKBACK! T by roctiv | May 10th, 2002 04:52:12 AM | ^^%$^%#*^%!! by roctiv | May 10th, 2002 04:58:12 AM | Frailty Screening in 11/01 Q&A by verlouria | May 23rd, 2002 01:11:49 AM | I didn't like the twist
ending, because it was a
different movie by Drath | Jun 25th, 2003 03:20:32 PM |
|
|