Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

Bruce Campbell in Dallas Shooting SERVICING SARAH

Woohoo... by elwen	Jan 16th, 2001 04:20:28 AM
This rocks...
I hate Hurley, I hate Perry by Mintgiver	Jan 16th, 2001 04:29:20 AM
I'll be first in line. If Bruce Campbell is in it, just give me my tickets and pre-order my special edition DVD right now.
Bubba Ho-Tep by Crouton	Jan 16th, 2001 05:04:27 AM
Bubba Ho-Tep is the Bruce Campbell flick I'm looking forward to. I wonder why it hasnt been mentioned on this site? Bruce plays the LEAD--a 70 year old dude who thinks he's Elvis. He battles a mummy named Bubba Ho-Tep. Sounds pretty damn fun to me. If you don't believe me, check Bruce's official site.
"what the fuck is the fascination you people have with Bruce Cam by Mr_Intimidation	Jan 16th, 2001 05:14:45 AM
Mofo, get your dick out of that round anus you call a head. Bruce Campbell is the epitome of cool. He just fucking rocks. He's the everyday guy who'll put a chainsaw to your ass if you so much as look at him crosseyed. He's your next door neighbor who'll fuck your wife but still play basketball with you on Sundays. He's the kind of guy who goes to your house and slap you for being a bitch, then bend you over the couch and shove a hot poker up your ass for having your head stuck up it for so long. He's Bruce Campbell. What the fuck is there to figure out? Now go and buy more 10-cent words with that fancy edumacallit of yours. We don't need your anti-Campbell kind around her, beeyatch.
Gimme some sugar baby! by TheGinger Twit	Jan 16th, 2001 05:22:09 AM
Raimi needs to get his talent off Spider man and into the next Evil Dead flick! That's what I think. Go ahead. Dis-agree with me. Spiderman will be shit. Even if it isn't, non of you will like it.
Re: Mr. Intimidation by pedant	Jan 16th, 2001 06:04:05 AM
TO BILL BRASKEY!!!!
Well said 3- by Dash101	Jan 16th, 2001 06:10:45 AM
It is rather unfortunet that some individuals *Ahem.. Who shall not be mentioned, feel to use words such as 'cock' and 'ass' and other versions of profanity to try and prove a point. When frankly, the only point they've proven is how bloody small their vocabulary is.. sad... really.. -dash101 out.
This is news? by jmb	Jan 16th, 2001 06:23:13 AM
I can't believe this was printed on this site. I thought this site was called "Ain't it cool news." Are there going to be news stories ever time Bruce Cambell films scenes for his next video game appearance?
Freudian analysis. ANALysis? by human2	Jan 16th, 2001 06:49:18 AM
Look, I think it's largely been accepted by the scientific community that pretty much everything Freud said was fucking bollocks. I'm going to stay out of this Campbellian debate here, but please, Enema, in the future, cite some more credible sources of psychological analysis than Freud.
Mr. Intimidation by Howard_Roark	Jan 16th, 2001 06:59:38 AM
After reading many of your previous posts, I have come to the following conclusion: You sir, are a moron. I could go on, but frankly, you aren't worth the intellectual candle power. Moving on... This flick looks pretty formulaic to me. I can just see Bruce wearing a cowboy hat trying his best to do a campy J.R. Ewing, and Perry playing the only role he knows how to, saying things like, "Could I BE in any more trouble?". Meanwhile, Hurley does that slow, sultry, swishing walk that she does, throwing come-hither looks over her left shoulder, and... and... Okay, I guess I'm there afterall.
to 3 bag enema and others by HugoHeir	Jan 16th, 2001 08:49:55 AM
Although I was glad to read your response to the above post whith all the cock and anus references (I think we all know the one I mean), you still don't seem to understand why Bruce Campbell is so important to us. If you'll read an aicn article from the past (link at the bottom), I think you'll understand a little better. Bruce is not only a great actor, but a really cool guy that sees the same faults with hollywood pictures that frequent the aicn message boards. This, combined with the fact that there are few movies with Bruce as the star, leave us always wanting more. I know you're not a campbell hater, but try for awhile to be a Bruce Campbell fan. http://www.aint-it-cool-news.c om/display.cgi?id=7477
...and another thing by HugoHeir	Jan 16th, 2001 08:52:23 AM
Freud's theories on psychoanalysis revolutionized psychology. Although modern psychologists have made their own opinions on certain facets of Freud's theories, Freud is still recognized worldwide and refered to in not only modern psychology, but even in typical everyday conversation. SO BE NICE!!!
Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun by Warlord92	Jan 16th, 2001 09:15:32 AM
Well it looks like there is going to be a romantic comedy (lame ass chick flick) that I am going to be counting down the days to see. I just hope my girl will want to go see it, so I dont have to lose all self respect & beg her go to a chick flick! Or even by myself!!! Now then I would feel really lame! Lotr trailer kicked ass!
sharp as nails by reni	Jan 16th, 2001 09:24:28 AM
Bruce is a man of the people. Having a B-Movie status doesn't make him any less valuable. And the reason people harp on about him so much here is because he's starred in 2 of the best films ever made...Basically...
hey Reni by Wolvie6	Jan 16th, 2001 10:08:34 AM
He's starred in two of the WORST movies ever made!!!! Nuff said!!!!
Dr. T by Studio Snitch	Jan 16th, 2001 10:11:11 AM
Come on, Altman's "Dr. T" was cool.
I pay my shrink $175/hour when all I had to do was read this tal by helvis	Jan 16th, 2001 10:14:18 AM
It's all so clear now. Here I thought that my slight erection was caused by my fond memories of a naked Liz Hurley in Austin Powers, covered only by strategically placed breakfast foods. Thanks to this on-line therapy, I now realize that my attraction is for a B-Movie actor who chainsaws baddies to a bloody stump. And what would Freud say about calling yourself "3 bag enema?" I'm still waiting for the sequel to Monkey Trouble. That Harvey Keitel is quite the actor!
The last time their was a shooting in Dallas.... by Mother Plucker	Jan 16th, 2001 10:26:00 AM
...everybody flipped out. Hopefully things will go a little better this time around.
Mr. Bag? by FraudGawd	Jan 16th, 2001 10:51:19 AM
First, if you have to ask about the "Bruce" thing, you wouldn'y understand. To suggest it is because we fans have repressed homosexual feelings for Bruce is ridiculous. And as for the Psych 101 lesson. Anyone who calls himself Enima Bag should not be so quick to point out other's "quirks" "hail to the king, baby!"
"Yes, sir, yes, sir 3 bag enema...full?" by Uncapie	Jan 16th, 2001 11:30:04 AM
I don't know. I kinda like it. Still, that's a lot on enema bags though.
Speaking of Freud... by pedant	Jan 16th, 2001 01:11:13 PM
Often, the pioneers of a scientific discipline make more of a contribution by changing the way we think about and approach the topic than they do by making any actual discoveries. Freud's theories (really hypotheses) rarely pass scientific muster -- even in a soft science like psychology (that was flamebait). He played an important role in kickstarting the science of the mind, but most of his ideas are, in lay terms, wacky.
pedant and human2 by The Pardoner	Jan 16th, 2001 01:52:11 PM
Because Freud was not a rigid, experimental, mathematical psychologist does not in any way invalidate his work. His view of human psychology (and Jung's for that matter) is more like literary (as opposed to physiologcal) analysis. Lab-rat psychology notwithstanding, Freud's models can help to find motivations for some kinds human behaviour. Frankly, I don't think Freud himself added all that much beyond what Shakespeare (dramatically) and Nietzsche (critically and philosophyically) had already laid out. Still, the "scientific community" has a track record of gold-plating "wacky fucking bollocks" that don't even "pass muster" on the most cursory levels, and calling it truth. Hell, Leibnitz had Newton nailed to the wall inside six months of the Principia's publication. For my money, I'd take the "soft-sciences" over throat-cancer-causing antidepressant wonder-pills that advertise on TV any day of the week.
Oh yeah, and as for Mr. Intimidation's post... by The Pardoner	Jan 16th, 2001 01:56:44 PM
... funny stuff. You have to wonder if he's even aware of what he's typing.
Where can I worship at the altar of bruce in the big d? by TheMatarife	Jan 16th, 2001 02:10:26 PM
Will he be hanging around any places with us mere mortals?
Mister Intimidation rarely responds to talkbacks (but since this by Mr_Intimidation	Jan 16th, 2001 04:07:47 PM
Dear Mister Enema Bag, I have to say i didn't actually read all of your posts (how many did you post, a dozen or something?). It's okay, we believe you, you probably did go to school. In fact, I know YOU'RE SMART because ONE) you feel obliged to spend your time on a fanboy talkback site on the net with us mooks discussing the merits of Bruce Campbell. TWO) you impress us with your ability to read a psych book and copy it line by line onto your computer. THREE) you consider it impressive that some mooks (clearly intellects like yourself) had rave reviews for your 'witty and insightful' comment. FOUR) you waste your time here instead of spending your large intellect impressing college professors on lecture tours discussing the merits of a man who calls himself "ENEMA BAG" (or something likethat) on an anonymous internet sit with obviously youngsters like myself and others who hasn't hit their 20 mark yet. FIVE) you clearly spend quite a bit of time writing posts, then coming back and re-reading your own posts, the posts of others regarding your post, and then assuming that because another talkbacker with the same intellectual capacity as your own responds, that your life as a loser has somehow been legitimize. FRANKLY -- Mister enema, i don't know what's funnier -- that you think of yourself as ABOVE the rest of us fanboys (and yet you STILL keep coming here, don't you?) or that you actually think posting and then reposting to comments CONCERNING your post will legitimize your loser existence. At least the rest of us realize we're idiots. Frankly, Mister Intimidation rarely reads posts in response to his (I do have a life, you know, unlike yourself, apparently AHEM, but I digress), but since this is a Bruce Campbell matter, I saw fit to clear up some misconceptions. Namely that you are a little man with very little self-confidence that he needs to come on an anonymous board and spout 'intellectual dialogue' that he hopes others will see it as a sure sign of his 'smartiness.' oh yes, and i was wrong -- Bruce Campbell would STILL fuck your wife (if you could ever get one, I'm pretty sure you have a small penis), but he definitely WOULDN'T play basketball with you. Like myself, Mister Campbell HATES little pretensious pussies who thinks that because he can copy lines from a psych book that he's somehow "smart." Mommy, i can read -- I'm smart! That is the end, Mister Intimidation will no longer write any more in regards to this matter. It has been said, so it shall be ended. BEEYATCH. (Yes, yes, a man who talks about himself in the third person has issues; at least I admit it.)
See? I was right! by Howard_Roark	Jan 16th, 2001 04:47:15 PM
He is a moron!
click here by phatjacck	Jan 16th, 2001 06:42:33 PM
who's bruce cambell?
Mr. Intimidation by Qatseri	Jan 16th, 2001 08:11:20 PM
Please, stop defending yourself. You keep using the words 'we' in your posts, presumably referring to all other talkbackers and it's becoming embarrasing. Since you acknowledge being an idiot and that you 'has not yet' reached your twenties, go to an arcade and smoke pot or something. Wait until you can read and speak english before posting again. Thank you for your consideration. Peace through random violence
i don't get it either by jfantastic	Jan 16th, 2001 08:12:48 PM
I'd just like to say that I think Mr. Enema Bag had some good points. I was also thinking there were some weird sexual references in that first post defending Bruce Campbell. I don't understand the whole Bruce Campbell thing either. He's like some kind of geek's god. And Freud is still the man, despite the fact that he had some weird ideas. But he hasn't been discredited at all. In fact, anyone who has studied psychology at all knows a lot of it is based on his ideas.
wowwee!! ihas not reached my twenties yet neither! by kojiro	Jan 16th, 2001 10:32:14 PM
Yet I manage to not be a fuckwit. Fancy that. If I may interject something about Freud, as I understand it he never studied mentally sound people(though they may not exsist, you know what I mean, nuts) and I know he used no scientific processes. Studying the fuct up and applying your explanation to the entire population of the world probably doesn't create the most workable theories. I'm not saying he wasn't damned intelligent, may have been brilliant,just something to keep in mind. BTW, Native American societies had a fairly advanced concept of the unconscious, but lack of a written language just might have prevented them from elaborating on it too much(thought that was rather interesting). The groundbreakers in many disciplines seem to have been those who write their theories down and make them known to the general public first. About Bruce, it's like the old Bell Atlantic cachphrase: "If you don't get it, you just don't get it" For me it's been Ash(chainsaw on hand, shotgun, and better one liners than Arnold ever had), growing up on Brisco County Jr., and in general the deliciously over the top but dead serious style of acting he is known for. This was supposed to be a short post. Damn.
Pardoner... by pedant	Jan 17th, 2001 08:11:24 AM
Freud's claims are not based on experimentation, therefore they are ipso facto not scientific. They would never pass a peer review today. Does that invalidate them? Yes and no. There may be truth to some of them, but it is not yet and may never be verified. In science, you are not innocent until proven guilty. All claims are treated with skepticism until verified (and even thereafter). It is not up to science to invalidate Freud's claims, it was up to Freud to have validated them in the first place. Many of them are, in fact, unfalsifiable, meaning that there is no way to construct an experiment that will either confirm or deny their truth. This is not science; this is metaphysics. If you want to laud him as a writer, a philosopher, a mystic, etc. go right ahead. But he was only a scientist in the broadest sense of the word. *** By the way, how do you think we KNOW whether or not a particular medication is correlated with an increased risk of cancer? It isn't Freud who's telling us, it's science. If you don't like seeing those ads on TV, blame the pharmaceutical companies, blame marketers, but don't blame science.
Amateur analysis of my Brucian desires by Madolan	Jan 17th, 2001 10:33:49 AM
Freudian or not, I cannot deny my extreme sexual attraction to Bruce Campbell. I don't fear crack psychoanalysis, however, as I'm female and therefore inherently permitted to dream of giving him some sugar. I'm looking forward to this movie not for sublimation of my daydreams but as a vehicle for mass Bruce exposure. Some good names are attached to the picture; it will garner massive publicity and wide reviews. I expect it will attract Bruce Campbell virgins, thereby exposing a significant portion of the Campbell-less moviegoing public to the manly presence and talents of our beloved star. I'm all in favor of proselytizing when it comes to Bruce. Whether you claim neutrality or fervant devotion to him, the mass exposure gained by this film can only convert more fans and swell our ranks.
Late to the BC Party... by PencilSharp	Jan 17th, 2001 10:12:51 PM
Oy. I go away for a few days, and everybody goes all Freudian on me. Now, listen kids to old man (29 in fact) Pencilsharp... FIRST: While his fundamental (fun and mental?) theories re: Id, Ego, and Superego are generally given a wide berth today, most of Freud's ideas showed more about just how wacky ol' S.F. was than anything else. Freud is dead. Let him rot... SECOND: Bruce rocks because he is the guy you wish you could be. He's good looking, famous, and well-built. And he probably could score with any wife in America (and abroad) if he put his mind to it. Fortunately, he prefers to use his talent for good rather than evil. THIRD: All this homoerotic talk lies squarely in Moriarity's animated ear and Harry's undersized wardrobe. FOURTH: None of this really matters anyway, because anyone who would post this late in the game proves his idiocy just by posting. Ergo, this entire post should be disregarded. By the way, FIFTH: will you kids please run a spellcheck on your posts before you take the plunge. 10-Q! --------- Day late, dollar short...Ps
The Nate Dog by The Nate Dog	Jan 18th, 2001 11:53:11 AM
When I sent in the details I didn't expect a backlash against "The Jack Of All Trades". I mean we all know the guy is a "B" movie actor BUT he is the best in his field! Well I'm just looking forward to seeing more of Elizabeth Hurley. (Whoah Momma..Whoah Momma)I mean what did she ever see in that Cheeky Englishman Hugh Grant? "uhh uhhh pardon me officer I was feeling a bit peckish" (that was his best role) Anyways Ash is in my hood filming a flick. I'll send more info when I get it. Oh yeah and Chandler Bing is cool even if he did have a pain-pill addiction (lol)Peace and Chicken Grease!!! -The Nate Dog

Talkbacks

Bruce Campbell in Dallas Shooting SERVICING SARAH

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks