Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

Entertainment Tonight also butchers the new INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS trailer!

Devastator's BALLS by Trannyformers_Apologist	Jun 21st, 2009 12:40:50 AM

Who are the ad wizards who came up with this one? by caruso_stalker217	Jun 21st, 2009 12:41:52 AM
Take that, whoever the fuck usually posts that. I'm an asshole.
looks great by Judge Briggs	Jun 21st, 2009 12:43:52 AM
Taratino don't disappoint! Can't wait for Moon to get a wider release and was surprised how well done Outlander was! Good flick. Fuck the Weinsteins for fucking that movie. (first)
Melbourne Film Festival by Monkey Butler	Jun 21st, 2009 12:46:06 AM
End of July baby!
when i look into mary heart's eyes... by ZombiManos	Jun 21st, 2009 12:47:34 AM
i see a deer in headlights...who i'm pretty sure is going to bleach her hair blonde till she is 90... if you don't watch that shit show for 15 years and then watch it again, it's unrecognizable...
Revenge of the Giant Face by Monkey Butler	Jun 21st, 2009 12:50:05 AM
Fuck yeah!
And there's Trannyformers, right on cue by D.Vader	Jun 21st, 2009 12:56:35 AM
Sheeeeeeesh. I think this is starting to border on obsession.
ET clips are cool news now? by ebonic_plague	Jun 21st, 2009 12:59:30 AM
Did the latinos take yer JEORBS?!?!
indulge him by nolan bautista	Jun 21st, 2009 01:03:16 AM
love the way he says it
oopps.. by nolan bautista	Jun 21st, 2009 01:05:57 AM
..i meant when he says 'oblige him'
All ET cares about is Brad Pitt by BigTuna	Jun 21st, 2009 01:20:32 AM
Why would they talk about anything else concerning the film? It's all about the biggest stars. They couldn't care less.
maybe if you just TURN YOUR BRAIN OFF, it wont bug you by BMacSmith	Jun 21st, 2009 01:27:31 AM
seems to work when you watch Transformers. at least thats what idiots tell me.
masterful first sentence. by RedHorseVector	Jun 21st, 2009 01:35:17 AM
talk about a mangling. oy!
BMac the people who say that by Toilet_Terror	Jun 21st, 2009 01:43:31 AM
have never found the ON switch.
TOO MUCH CGI!!!! by lockesbrokenleg	Jun 21st, 2009 01:56:04 AM
Too many explosions. I can't follow it. Sorry.
How the hell does Mary Hart still look the same? by lockesbrokenleg	Jun 21st, 2009 02:10:08 AM
Does she clone herself, or what?
SLY, ARNIE, BRUCE, DOLPH not in, NOT interested by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 21st, 2009 02:49:27 AM

roth,myers,schweiger in NOT INTERESETED by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 21st, 2009 02:50:31 AM

TARANTINO DIRECTS? NOT INTERESTED by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 21st, 2009 02:51:03 AM

THE EXPENDABLES WILL OWN BASTERDS! by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 21st, 2009 02:51:35 AM

this will bomb! by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 21st, 2009 02:52:02 AM

caruso_stalker by TheExterminator	Jun 21st, 2009 02:54:44 AM
that would be the massive cunt wampa1
uhhh... by SunTzu77	Jun 21st, 2009 02:54:47 AM
saw this footage earlier tonight... looks meh.
STOP THE BOOST HARRY by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 21st, 2009 03:51:01 AM
the people are fed up with tarantino or should i say tarantina and his chick movies!
Yes! Show more! It gets worse every fucking time!!! by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD	Jun 21st, 2009 03:56:47 AM

Making Eli Roth a tough guy = FUCKING PATHETIC. by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD	Jun 21st, 2009 04:00:23 AM

oh DavidCarradinesAuto is that tarantina guy by Talkbacker with no name	Jun 21st, 2009 04:45:04 AM
oh DavidCarradinesAuto is that tarantina guy. hahaha makes perfect sense now. thought you had fucked off, dickhead?
What happened to... by codymr	Jun 21st, 2009 04:52:36 AM
QT & RR? They were THE dudes in the 90s that every film student wanted to be. But they stalled... They have the talent, it would be great to see something from them other than "retro violence."
"hey, it's not Shakespeare" by ZombieHeathLedger	Jun 21st, 2009 04:57:57 AM
I'm just going to say this to myself everytime I go into a movie so that I never have any expectation of any movie ever being any good, even movies that actually are Shakespeare because even those have Keannu Reeves.
Expendables doesn't have Bruce does it? by Guy Who Got A Headache And Accidentally Saves The World	Jun 21st, 2009 05:28:34 AM
Since when was John McClane in it?
zed by ZombieHeathLedger	Jun 21st, 2009 05:33:03 AM
I'm with you but that and "turn your brain off" seem to be the Summer Movie 2009 meme.
Anything DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot says... by Bastard_In_A_Blanket	Jun 21st, 2009 05:39:05 AM
... not interested.
DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD by Bastard_In_A_Blanket	Jun 21st, 2009 05:40:58 AM
I thought that, but to be fair, he does look okay in the role from the clips that I've seen. But - as much as I love Tarantino, I don't think BASTERDS will be the epic that Harry is building it up to be.
They haven't stalled by Arteska	Jun 21st, 2009 07:40:02 AM
It's just that all the people that used to admire them have become fatter, smellier and much more self-important versions of themselves and have been enabled by the internet to become an army of increasingly dumber Kael impersonators.
Yea This Definitely Totally Sucks by Crow3711	Jun 21st, 2009 07:50:20 AM
I don't even need to see it to pass full judgment on it. Who watches movies anymore anyway? I mean, really guys, whats the point?
Ed Prolapsed Anus? What? by Crow3711	Jun 21st, 2009 07:52:23 AM
and the rest of you unbelievable fucking losers copying DGDB with a random celebrity followed by a strange aspect of their anatomy are FUCKING PATHETIC LOSERS. Come up with something original for once in your god-forsaken lives. Edgar Wrights Prolapsed Anus? Could you try any fucking harder you incredible dolt?
Why Eli Roth??? by samuraiyao	Jun 21st, 2009 07:52:38 AM
Maybe Tarrantino has us fooled into believing he is Lee Marvin or something...
PALIN FAMILY COMPARISON by AyatollahSexyBack	Jun 21st, 2009 07:57:53 AM
Expendables = Bristol naked doing jumping jacks Basturds = Todd naked doing jumping jacks
Wouldn't be on ET if it wasn't for Pitt by Thrillhouse77	Jun 21st, 2009 08:27:05 AM
It's disgusting. Angie queefs and ET is all over it.
TARANTINO'S BIGGEST PROBLEM IS HE LACKS HUMILITY by AyatollahSexyBack	Jun 21st, 2009 08:33:30 AM
among many other problems.
tough crowd....... by theycallmemrtibbs	Jun 21st, 2009 08:44:36 AM
geez!
yawn by mrbong	Jun 21st, 2009 08:47:57 AM
Tarantino should have got Sly and the boys together in the first place, then his "dream project" wouldn't have looked like the farce this film appears to be. Harry, i know that a decade and a bit ago all fanboys had to suck up to Tarantino no matter what shit he made - we have all moved on, come follow us.
Death Becomes Her by FUCK_YOU_GEORGE_LUCAS	Jun 21st, 2009 09:13:15 AM
aka The Mary Hart Story. She's pushing 90 right?
Ed by Crow3711	Jun 21st, 2009 09:30:03 AM
For hating the guy so much, you sure seem to have a lot of time to spend on here bashing him. Don't you have your own life to make fun of? My guess is that any given minute of your life is a hell of a lot more pathetic than a whole month of Quentin Tarantino's life since 1992. Good job.
You Cant Butcher Something That's Already Butchered by MANZILLA	Jun 21st, 2009 09:46:43 AM
Sorry QT
Mary Hart is 58 by cymbalta4thedevil	Jun 21st, 2009 09:47:45 AM
Which makes her younger than Stallone and Schwarzenegger and Harrison Ford. And about six months older than Kurt Russell & Steven Seagal. NEWS FLASH: Your 80's ICONS are getting older. And so are YOU.
Buzz Maverik's EXPANDABLE BASTERDS by Buzz Maverik	Jun 21st, 2009 09:52:33 AM
"AW, RIGHT, YOU MORONS, LISSEN UP! MY NAME IS LIEUTENANT BUZZ MAVERIK & YOU ARE THE FATTEST BASTERDS IN WW II. JAMES, ALTHOUGH YOU ARE A DISGUSTING FAT BODY, IN MALL COP, YOU WERE THE CLOSEST THING TO AN ACTION HERO WE'VE SEEN IN A WHILE. BLACK, WHILE NOT TRULY OBESE, YOU ARE DEFINITELY CHUNKY! VAUGHN, ONCE YOU WERE A LEADING MAN, NOW, IF YOU CRASH A WEDDING ALL YER GETTING IS SECONDS AT THE BUFFET! WILSON, FERREL AND EVEN SPADE, FOR ACTORS YOU ARE ALL CONSIDERED FAT! FAT BOYS, WE ARE GOING TO GERMANY, THE NASSI HOMELAND, THE LAND OF CHOCOLATE, THE LAND OF PASTRY, THE LAND O' THEM BIG ASS BEERS! NOW, COLONEL KNOWS WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A BITE WITH YOU BOYZ."
Colonel Knowles by Buzz Maverik	Jun 21st, 2009 09:55:10 AM
Stupid lack of edit feature wreck my stupid joke about Harry...
Leave Tarantino alone... by Human_Bean_Juice_	Jun 21st, 2009 10:57:25 AM
the guy has given us plenty!
Seriously by Crow3711	Jun 21st, 2009 11:07:12 AM
QT has made, undeniably 2, possibly 3 or 4 for some people, films that will live on in the annals of film for all time as great, great works. Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction alone guarantee his place in history as a person who created some great films, and that is 2 more than any one of us will most likely ever even come close to being able to say. We will all be lucky if our grandkids remember we existed 50 years after our deaths. Tarantino will go live on in people like us for generations. So who the fuck are all of you to talk all this shit? Jealous fuckers, if you ask me. Reservoir Dogs alone guarantees my purchase of a ticket to every movie this man makes, whether I'm excited about it or not. His presence as a director has given me numerous hours of film much more enjoyable than the average film I see in any given week. Every single of you enjoyed Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown, and Kill Bill a hell of a lot more than fucking Wolverine or Spiderman, or Terminator or Watchmen or just about fucking anything. Anyone who denies that can take a dirt nap because you are just too bitter to admit you don't have an ounce of talent or taste.
To The Idiots Here... by dasheight	Jun 21st, 2009 11:25:25 AM
...who are knocking Tarantino and probably being paid by another studio to scrawl your illiterate attacks - SHUT UP AND MAKE A MOVIE. If you're knocking Tarantino, you obviously don't know ANYTHING about the movies, nor do you love them. I even saw a comment here that read, "Who watches movies anymore, anyway?" LEAVE THE SITE IF THAT'S WHAT YOU THINK. YOU ARE ON A MOVIE FAN SITE. And anyone who doesn't think "Basterds" looks like a f*cking blast hasn't seen "The Guns of Navarone", "The Dirty Dozen", or half of the films its having fun with. MORONS.
You guys forget.... by Orbots Commander	Jun 21st, 2009 11:28:49 AM
...that most once 'great' directors eventually fade away. It is only the very few, like the Spielbergs and the Scorseses that stay relevant, and most importantly, productive, decade after decade. Even Spielberg and Scorsese fell from view or relevancy for a good part of the 1980's to mid-1990's. Think of all the great directors from the 1970's whose productivity and/or fame and relevancy faded away. Same with Tarantino and arguable Rodriguez (though Sin City was a mini-comeback for him). These two cats arose during a time in the '90's when out of the box indie movies were getting attention. I think what did them in was their resultant fame (it's tough to live under the spotlight as a creative person) and the flood of crappy indie movies that aped their stuff. The huge directors of today: Christopher Nolan, Peter Jackson, Guillermo Del Toro, Cuaron and Snyder will likely fade away as well---unless they can stay productive and relevant.
And let's put to bed... by Orbots Commander	Jun 21st, 2009 11:32:58 AM
...the defense: "Well, go out and make your own movie then". What a stupid, lame statement. If that held in any other field, then we couldn't criticize or comment on books, music, politics, business or anything else.
dasheight by JAMF	Jun 21st, 2009 11:33:42 AM
its precisely because we HAVE seen ""The Guns of Navarone", "The Dirty Dozen", or half of the films its having fun with" that we can see just how shitty IB is and how great it COULD HAVE BEEN. MORON.
EDGAR WRIGHT by Kief_Ledger	Jun 21st, 2009 11:34:30 AM
You are annoying. No one finds your posts the least bit entertaining. At least DGDB brings the funny. You, a copy cat retard who can't even think up an original name, are not funny. It's annoying to have to sift through your shit to find talkbackers who have posts worth reading.
dasheight.. by nolan bautista	Jun 21st, 2009 11:41:34 AM
..touche! Its Tarantinos' turn to toss his hat in the WWII genre...plus the Fuhrers in it..im pretty excited about Quentins take on Hitler..also that shot with the guy running full bore w/ the machine gun..that looks pretty cool (as in aint it cool)
I just want to see Nazi get there heads smashed by Cronkit	Jun 21st, 2009 11:55:52 AM

"Tarantino's films are all contrived and forced" by kolchak	Jun 21st, 2009 12:12:56 PM
That's all I ever hear. And, honestly, it's bullshit. That's just bitching for the sake of bitching. If you're going to shit on a director shit on Eli fucking Roth or Michael Bay or Paul Worthless Shit Anderson because then it's deserved.
STOPPED WATCHING ET A DECADE+ AGO. by uberman	Jun 21st, 2009 12:27:48 PM
A 1/2 hr PR for agents/studios to prime the machine. It's to hollywood what FOX NEWS is to republicans-nothing more than pure, unadulterated PR with a glossy filter on the plastic people they call hosts. Eeewwww!
Shot his Wad with Pulp and Brown...only Ego and Smack keep him g by conspiracy	Jun 21st, 2009 12:42:07 PM
I predict this is the movie where Hollywood will turn on him. If he was smart he saved enough from Pulp and Brown to live off for the rest of his life...but he seems far to into the lifestyle to have done that. Oh well...if he didn't burn his Bridges at Blockbuster he's always got that going for him
"SHUT UP AND MAKE YOUR OWN MOVIE" by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD	Jun 21st, 2009 12:45:00 PM
Wow! Thats a fitting defense of the shit stain of cinema.
TARANTINO NEEDS TO LEARN HOW TO ENTERTAIN AN AUDIENCE by AyatollahSexyBack	Jun 21st, 2009 12:54:36 PM
instead of entertaining just himself.
Who would greenlight a movie with by Series7	Jun 21st, 2009 12:56:15 PM
Johnny Knoxville as the star?
This trivializes the Holocaust by Gwai Lo	Jun 21st, 2009 12:58:23 PM
It's a shame all those non-American Jews were such pussies, if they could have bagged as many scalps as the Basterds they wouldn't have had to get all gassed and shit. Maybe this is bothering me more than usual because I was literally just at Yev Vashem last week. Oh well, I guess I'll go watch an Ilsa movie to calm my nerves.
Mary Hart broke her arm masturbating with her vibrator by Orionsangels	Jun 21st, 2009 01:03:39 PM

Narrator - Brad Pitt is a man who walks over there. by Orionsangels	Jun 21st, 2009 01:07:06 PM
He's in a war called world war II. Brad pitt smirks, now he smiles. Brad Pitt hits something. We're ET and we think you're too dumb to understand trailers.
Rodriguez by Gwai Lo	Jun 21st, 2009 01:12:57 PM
I don't think Rodriguez was ever on Tarantino's creative level. He just drew a lot of talent by association from the guy. It helped that he made El Mariachi for $7000, and that Desperado seemed like he was charting a similar course to Tarantino's one two punch of Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction. Then they made Four Rooms and From Dusk Till Dawn. Nevermind that Tarantino's contributions to both of these films were much better than Rodriguez's. After that, though? Different story. The Faculty could have been directed by any number of 90s studio filmmakers, it didn't even try to hide the fact that it was Invasion of the Body Snatchers: Class of Kevin Williamson. The Spy Kids series, Shark Boy and Lava Girl, whatever that latest one is called: stricken from the record for being kiddie shit. Once Upon a Time in Mexico was a mess. Which leaves us with Sin City and Grindhouse, again both Tarantino collaborations. I give him credit for making Sin City as it was meant to be made, but it seems like his role was mostly technical where Frank Miller was supplying most of the decades old creative juice. Planet Terror was fun, but no one is calling it anything more than goofy entertainment. He's got an upcoming slate that's longer than his existing CV but seems too ADD and enabled by his garage studio to sit down and do one thing properly. Anyhow...
Oh yeah, my point was by Gwai Lo	Jun 21st, 2009 01:15:20 PM
Tarantino at least seems to care what films get his director stamp on them. In my mind, Death Proof is his only real questionable (as in not certifiably great) solo movie so far and I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt until I can at least see IB and form a proper opinion on it.
Ahh fuck it, I'm in for some Nassis by Stuntcock Mike	Jun 21st, 2009 01:26:24 PM

Zeddemore by Gwai Lo	Jun 21st, 2009 01:26:47 PM
Rodriguez is the better production manager, maybe. Depends on what you think a director is supposed to do. On one hand there's the "running the show" aspect, which Rodriguez seems to be good at. This involves coordinating all aspects of the production, people skills, getting the bugger made. The more important part to me, and the part that seems to separate the production managers from the auteurs, is the part that has to do with creative responsibility. The director calls every shot that appears on screen. If he thinks he has the goods, he's taking responsibility for whatever praise or criticism is to come. The director's job is to make a large crew of people doing drastically different things create something of artistic value. And when the images are captured and arranged in a method that tells a story, the director is taking the final creative responsibility for the product. "Directed by" means "Hello, my name is ____________ and I am giving you my personal stamp of approval that my movie is good."
This film needs one thing and one thing only. by Stuntcock Mike	Jun 21st, 2009 01:27:35 PM
Ass models.
Comparisons, then and now. by Orbots Commander	Jun 21st, 2009 01:31:48 PM
Tarantino's Inglorious Bastards may be a decent movie, but comparing them to past WWII 'mission movies', The Guns of Navarone and The Dirty Dozen will remain classics after Bastards is long forgotten. Pitt may come off fine in this flick, but there's no comparison between Pitt and Eli Roth vs. Gregory Peck and Anthony Quinn. I know that Tarantino is way talented, which annoys me that he keeps making homage, tongue in cheek movies. I'd be first in line at a theater if he directed, say, a straight ahead genre epic without the '70's drive-thru movie influences.
There is a point.. by Orbots Commander	Jun 21st, 2009 01:38:03 PM
...because you can create modern classics. Case in point: Saving Private Ryan is in the same pantheon as Guns of Navarone. It also proved that Spielberg despite his years in the movie business is still innovative. The opening beach landing sequence was amazing and has since been copied by countless filmmakers, right down to the film stock and exposure.
Poor QT & his boundless talents... by wacko3205	Jun 21st, 2009 02:13:46 PM
Wowy...peeps haven't even seen this on yet & theyv'e already marooned her to the bottom of the ocean flo! Hillarious. Atleast good ole' Brad Pitt's got faith in the man. Now, while I am & always will be a huge fan of Tarantino, from start to finish of his career, his style keeps adjusting & for better or worse it throws his critics & his fans into an uproar from time to time. No matter how you see it...he is working on improving. The man is four or five films into his career & he's already had 3 hits. Personally...Jackie Brown did it for me the most…thing is…I’m not really sure what people want or expect from QT. If you’ll watch QT’s flix for what they are (cerebral one on one character battles/dialogue fests) instead of what you want them to be (action heavy blockbusters w/boatloads of gratuitous violence & wot not) you might not have such harsh thoughts & opinions on his body of work. That being said…everyone is entitled to an opinon but in the end, like him or not, the man is talented & has & will produce flix of cinematic importance. No one can honestly say that Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill 1 & 2, & even Jackie Brown weren’t full of amazing character interaction & depth. I even dug on his little director's bit in Sin City. Now...whether or not Inglorious Basterds lives up to the previous war flix...that's all up to the critics...but I can't see myself not liking this one. We shall see.
Response To MAKE YER OWN MOVIE by Buzz Maverik	Jun 21st, 2009 02:29:11 PM
That's always a stupid deflection of criticism. One does not need to be able to produce art in order to critique it. You just need to have experienced a superior work in the medium, here film, and be able to state why it is superior.
This is gonna stink. Sorry guys. by BillyMayesHere	Jun 21st, 2009 02:30:23 PM

It's Not Like You Can See More Than 1 Movie by Buzz Maverik	Jun 21st, 2009 02:33:31 PM
Believe it or not, you can see both. Big Secret: the theater will be happy to sell you tickets to both. You can watch both. You can like both. You can hate both. You can like one and hate the other. You can like one a little, the other a lot, hate one a lot and like the other a little. Otherwise, I would have seen my one movie at age 3 when my parents took me to see a re-release of THE JUNGLE BOOK with THE WORLD'S GREATEST ATHLETE as a second feature at the drive in.
Damn my computer sucks. by Rufferto	Jun 21st, 2009 03:08:41 PM
I can't watch this. It's lagging like hell.
I can hear the annoying voice overs though. by Rufferto	Jun 21st, 2009 03:09:08 PM

mitortilla, Michelangelo was 33 by Continentalop	Jun 21st, 2009 03:13:43 PM
When he started painting the Sistine Chapel's ceiling, which it took four years to do. Just wanted to set the record straight (plus I just saw "The Agony and the Ecstasy" again).
Now I get it... by Django The Bastard	Jun 21st, 2009 03:13:52 PM
It's comedy! Hilarious!
Tarantino Writing and Rodreguiez Directing? by biggerjohn	Jun 21st, 2009 03:53:41 PM
Never gonna happen. Oh yeah- it happened like ten fucking years ago. From Dusk till Dawn.
QT sucks royal monkey dick. by Motoko Kusanagi	Jun 21st, 2009 03:58:42 PM
Damn this totally fucking boring one-trick pony and his dumb followers to hell.
Entertainment Tonight.... by HollywoodPictures	Jun 21st, 2009 03:59:49 PM
is no better than reality television, Spencer Pratt, Melrose Place, Heidi Montag, Lauren Conrad and cunts everywhere
Once again by Hellbastardo	Jun 21st, 2009 04:35:26 PM
I call bullshit on 90% of you fuckers . You dipshits haven't even seen the movie .But you douchebags just like being douchebags for the sake of being douchebags .I guaranfuckingtee you hypocrites will all see this movie
Do or Die, QT by madCanada	Jun 21st, 2009 04:40:42 PM
Quentin ... I am worried about you. This smells like your Waterloo. I lov'd (100%) your pre-Y2K work. Luuuved Jackie Brown. Loved 30% of KILL BILL. Loved 15% of DEATH PROOF. Really believed you were just joshin' us, till your next masterpiece. Read your Basterds script. Ohhhh, Quentin. Worried about you. Cheers.
rodreguiez a better director? by slappy jones	Jun 21st, 2009 04:41:26 PM
hahahahahahahaha hahahaha hahahahahahaha i have read some stupid shit on this site over the years but that takes the prize for the silliest load of nonsense ever posted here.
THIS MAKES A MOCKERY OF THE HOLOCAUST by AyatollahSexyBack	Jun 21st, 2009 05:07:11 PM
I am not amused.
The rancor is in direct proportion by Subtitles_Off	Jun 21st, 2009 05:11:10 PM
to the acclaim. Both are quite exaggerated. For me, Tarantino has proven his worth with RESERVOIR DOGS and JACKIE BROWN. I even like, though to a much lesser extent, the stylistic gimcrack cleverness of PULP FICTION and KILL BILL VOL. 1. But, of course, VOL. 2 and DEATH PROOF insulted my intelligence. It comes down to IB's weak advance word-of-mouth, its cast - particularly Pitt, who has ruined anything he's in with the exception of SEVEN, and story, which holds no interest for me. Still, to come on here and suggest Snyder or Rodriguez are better directors would be akin to idiocy.
it´s part of the charm by Ditko	Jun 21st, 2009 05:18:05 PM
Quentin will never make another Pulp Fiction, just like dinosaurs will never look better than they did in Jurassic Park. Now, can anybody explain that to me? i mean, I caught King Kong on TV the other day and jeez...
We can't retire by Subtitles_Off	Jun 21st, 2009 05:22:51 PM
"turn your brain off" "make your own movie" "raped my childhood" or "you're all gonna see it anyway" because these are meaningless comments made by people who can't reason. They can't debate a point intellectually because they lack intellect. And, if we retired those kinds of arguments, the only people who would be left to post here would be The Firsters and DANNY_GLOVER'S_DICK_BLOOD.
saying rodriguez is better is bad enough did somone by slappy jones	Jun 21st, 2009 05:29:49 PM
seriously suggest zak snyder is better too? I take back what I said about rodriguez being better being the silliest thing ever said here. Anyone who thinks snyder is a better director is a complete moron.
My dad fought in WW2 by Castlemonster	Jun 21st, 2009 05:57:08 PM
Using that or any modern war for exploitation has never really grabbed me. Oh well, I don't really go out for Tarantino anyway.
THIS MOCKS ALL THE REAL SOLDIERS WHO LIBERATED THE CONCENTRATION by AyatollahSexyBack	Jun 21st, 2009 06:30:57 PM
This is an outrage.
CAMPS by AyatollahSexyBack	Jun 21st, 2009 06:31:18 PM

by MRTHEBOXOFFICE	Jun 21st, 2009 06:44:07 PM
I am super pumped for this film.
SHUT YO MOUTH AND MAKE YOUR OWN MOVIE! by The Penultimate Gunslinger	Jun 21st, 2009 06:50:20 PM
I've also got to stick my oar in here as well: I fucking hate comments like that. So I can't criticise a book unless I'm a published author can I? I can't say a song is shit unless I've had a top 10 hit? If I go to a public toilet and there's shit all over the floor and the urinals are smashed to pieces, am I not allowed to criticise because I've never been a toilet cleaner?
Stalingrad is for pussies. Ass models are for men. by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD	Jun 21st, 2009 07:26:55 PM

Penultimate Gangster... by Red Ned Lynch	Jun 21st, 2009 07:50:16 PM
To answer your questions, in order. Yes you may. Yes you may. No. You need to walk a mile in that shit, man.
Tarantino, will get no more money from me. by Banditmania	Jun 21st, 2009 07:50:27 PM
The last few movies sucked.
He'll get my money. by Red Ned Lynch	Jun 21st, 2009 07:54:37 PM
I wasn't crazy about Death Proof. But I liked pretty much everything that came before it quite well.
The Main Problem with Tarantino by cymbalta4thedevil	Jun 21st, 2009 08:28:56 PM
Is his lack of productivity. When he first came out he seemed like a Script Machine. Two he directed himself (2 & 1/2 if you count Four Rooms), and three directed by other people. Then he adapts an Elmore Leonard novel. Then we have a SIX YEAR wait until Kill Bill Vol 1. And another 3 years between Vol 2 and Grindhouse. By taking so long between projects he makes every film he does seem like a MAJOR EVENT, and some of them simply aren't going to be able to live up to that. It's not just that people in his age group like Rodriguez and Kevin Smith have been more productive than he has. EVERYONE has been more productive than he has. Scorsese,Spielbe rg,the Coen Brothers, Woody Allen, Spike Lee, Ridley Scott etc. etc. Those guys are ALWAYS making movies. Some of them are great. Some of them are good. Some of them are mediocre. But they keep cranking them out.That's what a director is supposed to do. I hope this is a good movie. It doesn't look like it's going to be a great one. And if it's as mediocre as Death Proof, he will have given us two half assed movies in a row and taken FIVE YEARS to do it.
Stanley Kubrick by SAILOR_RIPLEY	Jun 21st, 2009 09:22:32 PM
Made 3 movies in the last 20 years of his life. I don't think that's Tarantino's problem. I think he needs to lay of the weed just a little. Death Proof was not so great, but the others before were all stellar IMO. Jackie Brown by far the best. Anyone who's seen that and Pulp Fiction and thinks the man has no talent should just wait for Transformers 2.
This site is FUCKING LAZY. This is the only post in 24h by DoctorZoidberg	Jun 21st, 2009 09:25:50 PM

Well, at least they aren't advertising Sears towels by Whtshark	Jun 21st, 2009 09:36:16 PM
:\
what's the deal with this other Pitt movie by CherryValance	Jun 21st, 2009 09:46:53 PM
some baseball thing just got pulled at the last minute. http://tinyurl.com/nrojwt I never heard of something like that happening before.
Bloodthirsty kikes! by Mr. Bad Example	Jun 21st, 2009 10:15:37 PM
If I wanted to see Jews wacking the helpless, the unarmed and committing hideous atrocities against civilians I'd go to Israel this summer and see it live ... you'll love it from the first "Shalom"!
SHERLOCK HOLMES Poster! PUBLIC ENEMIES clip! by onezeroone	Jun 21st, 2009 10:15:42 PM
All over internet, but here. Or is it that only JJ projects are worth salivating over now?
I guess my problem with Tarantino is by Castlemonster	Jun 21st, 2009 10:18:40 PM
I don't like stories about hitmen or pimps or guys that send squads of karate assassins after their wifes. Doomed bank-robbers are okay I guess, though.
like the weinsteins would ever allow holocaust mockery by martinlutherkrangjr	Jun 21st, 2009 10:32:33 PM
im sure that the weinsteins, being the biggest jews in hollywood, would love to put out a movie that mocks the holocaust. people need to chill on this holocaust shit. we got it, nazis are evil. if i see another fucking schindlers list or boy in the striped pajamas or jacob the liar i am going to flip. holocaust movies are emotional pornography.
Emo-Porn by SAILOR_RIPLEY	Jun 21st, 2009 10:47:25 PM

Tarantino peaked with 'Pulp Fiction' by GunterMonkey	Jun 21st, 2009 10:51:30 PM
The guy has been severely overrated ever since...bloated screenplays (loves to hear his characters talk) and stylized violence (rehashing grindhouse trash from the 70s) does not make an artist great...can we just get over him already?
And I agree about the over-holocausting in art by GunterMonkey	Jun 21st, 2009 10:55:50 PM
...It actually begins to diminish the impact of the event itself. There are other emotionally charged moments in human history to explore...how about the Native American holocaust? What, too controversial? Jewish holocaust=fodder for hip art. Native American holocaust=taboo.
so glad t see so many defend Tarantino around here by future help	Jun 21st, 2009 11:05:46 PM
for once in a great while. RESPECT to QT. ALL of his movies rock (not so much Death Proof...should of been a 1 hr. drive in flick) Anyways, God bless QT for the quality and skills. I think Pulp and Jackie Brown are amazing.
Native American Genocide by SAILOR_RIPLEY	Jun 21st, 2009 11:05:52 PM
Because most of these movies are American made, we like to point out the atrocities of other countries. We Americans are hypocrites who don't enjoy pointing our fingers at ourselves.
GunterMonkey by kolchak	Jun 21st, 2009 11:06:22 PM
It's not that it's taboo so much as it is people caring less.
kolchak and sailor ripley by GunterMonkey	Jun 21st, 2009 11:10:21 PM
Good points--taboo was probably the wrong word and gives too much credit to America. Instead, we like to bury our past and highlight other country's dirt...and many Americans do care less about how we got here.
GunterMonkey by SAILOR_RIPLEY	Jun 21st, 2009 11:16:46 PM
Sadly it is true. Most Americans could give a fuck less that we pretty much wiped an entire race of people off the planet to create a country of "our own". That's why I always get pissed when people bitch about immigrants and this is our country bullshit.
OK, I'm going to produce a movie... by GunterMonkey	Jun 21st, 2009 11:18:39 PM
...called "Inglorious Indians" about Native Americans who kill the people crossing the plains as revenge on the American scum who wiped out their tribes...I'll have a rockin' soundtrack taken from the 60s and 70s ("Cherokee People," anyone?), and have my Indians talk about what a quarter pounder of buffalo meat is called in Europe...give me the Oscar now.
I think the holocaust by kolchak	Jun 21st, 2009 11:20:12 PM
is shocking to viewers partly because A) it was perpetrated upon white people. We're not used to seeing that. And B) it was in 1930's Germany. It's one thing to see Native Americans massacred in the lawless confines of the newly settled west. It's quite another to see systematic genocide in what was supposed to be a civilized society.
Well shit its not just america Sailor_Ripley... by DrBrianOblivion	Jun 21st, 2009 11:21:38 PM
...no country wants to point out the terrible stuff they've done. France didn't allow paths of glory to be shown in the country for 20 years.
Yeah, the whole civilized society couldn't do this by GunterMonkey	Jun 21st, 2009 11:22:32 PM
is quite shocking...I mean, you have nazis throwing bodies into furnaces and then going home to dinner with the wife and kids...sick, sick stuff, yet these are "normal" people like you and I...the human condition is definitely fucked up...
Workaholics vs. Hermits by Nasty In The Pasty	Jun 21st, 2009 11:26:40 PM
I'd actually prefer directors who only did a movie every three or four years and knock it out of the park every time to the Scott/Spielberg/Spderbergh approach of shooting a new movie every three months and having MAYBE a third of them be really good and the rest ranging from okay to terrible. Yeah, I wish we had more QT movies to enjoy, but he hasn't made a movie I've disliked to date (yes, Death Proof was awesome too), so he can take as long as he fucking wants between projects (as long as it's not TWELVE FUCKING YEARS like Jimmy Cameron)
I'm sick of WWII/the Holocaust and vampires by CherryValance	Jun 21st, 2009 11:28:00 PM
I don't need anymore of those kinds of movies.
This site is no different... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 21st, 2009 11:30:45 PM
than imdb.com. disrespectful fanboys dissin' on Tarantino because they feel they've outgrown what someone has referred to in an earlier post as "retro violence." That's the same shit that insprired dozens of flicks post PF. BTW, Fuck ET. I heard Angie blew her nose, go gleefully film it, jerk-offs.
Obviously nobody likes to admit by SAILOR_RIPLEY	Jun 21st, 2009 11:32:37 PM
their wrongdoings. It just seems that so many in this country don't even realise what happened with the indians. It's like a mass denial. That's just something that's always struck a nerve with me.
WWII/the Holocaust and vampires... by SAILOR_RIPLEY	Jun 21st, 2009 11:36:10 PM
Isn't that Rob Zombie's new project?
Nasty in the pasty... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 21st, 2009 11:37:21 PM
you hit the nail on the head with that one, dude.
Did you hear? ENTERTAINMENT TONIGHT IS #1!!! by Darkplanet	Jun 21st, 2009 11:39:49 PM
It's only when a business is in dire trouble that they overuse the "We're #1!" shtick.
Agreed, axel fff by GunterMonkey	Jun 21st, 2009 11:50:51 PM
I'm not a fan or critic either, but from my perspective, Tarantino "supporters" would have the burden of proof to show why he deserves praise at this point in his career. I'll grant 'Pulp Fiction', but I just don't see his recent films as holding up critically or in the collective consciousness of future viewers...
axel fff by SAILOR_RIPLEY	Jun 21st, 2009 11:51:11 PM
Good Points. But I still say it's early for him. He's only made what, like five films. Most of Scorsese's early films were similar in a lot of ways. As I said before, if he can put the bong down for awhile, I think he has potential for a Scorsese type career. Although he seems to be stuck in all this 70's B-movie homage stuff. Death Proof was not a great leap in the right direction.
DEATHPROOF sucked by frank cotton	Jun 21st, 2009 11:51:19 PM
just admit it; you know it's true, and you will feel better for it. doesn't make you a traitor
I believe... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 21st, 2009 11:54:38 PM
Jackie Brown to be quite underrated. Also, it didn't entirely have that familiar Tarantino feel.
Jackie Brown by SAILOR_RIPLEY	Jun 22nd, 2009 12:00:16 AM
is Tarantino's best. People rarely mention it when it comes to Tarantino. It's always Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction.
Yeah... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 22nd, 2009 12:08:05 AM
I should've stated in my previous I believe it to be his best. IMHO, I just like PF more. The signature direction of it. I can always respect whatever opinion. Not an ounce of troll in me.
and the real redundancy comes from director... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 22nd, 2009 12:13:22 AM
T.Burton. The pompous ass has about 18 different dancing animated skellingtons in every flick. Aim your guns at him...
well harry - if he's such a good friend of yours as you say he i by flatulence	Jun 22nd, 2009 12:24:15 AM
Then where's YOUR fucking exclusive preview/trailer from your "good friend" Quentin? If you were ever wondering how low this site has got, between Script Girl, DrewMcW leaving and the total lack of any real scoops, this is your smoking gun.
Tarantino to play Lenny in OF MICE AND MEN by The Brains	Jun 22nd, 2009 12:28:00 AM
True story.
True Romance... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 22nd, 2009 12:34:32 AM
As well as FDTD. I acknowledge QT's writing before his directorial talents.
Tarantino as writer by SAILOR_RIPLEY	Jun 22nd, 2009 12:54:35 AM
Would have liked to see his version of Natural Born Killers. Even though I love Stone's film.
Vincenzo Natali by solyom_szem	Jun 22nd, 2009 01:36:46 AM
Vincenzo Natali for the ALIEN prequel!!!! He made CUBE and it's one of the best films ever made on low budget
Nasty in the Pasty by cymbalta4thedevil	Jun 22nd, 2009 02:09:28 AM
The problem with the "Hit One Out of the Park Every 3 to 4 Years Plan" is: What if he BUNTS? I want more films from filmmakers I like, not less. He's directed 7 films in 17 years, and that's if you count Kill Bill twice, and we all know that's just one long movie. So let's say Six. Scorsese has also given us 7 feature films in the same 17 years. (1992-2008). If you throw in the documentaries and concert films from the same period his number goes up to a dozen or more. The Coen Brothers have done nine. Robert Altman also did nine and almost that many things for TV. Robert Rodriguez has done 10. Ridley Scott has done 11. Spike Lee has done 11 and numerous docs for TV. Spielberg has an even dozen to Tarantino's six. And the Champ? Woody Allen has made SEVENTEEN films in the past 17 years. Are all of them masterpieces? Of course not. But a nice mix of comedies and dramas, three period pieces and a musical is nothing to sneeze at. He didn't make us wait 6 years for any of them. And he has yet to make a film about a guy who kills women with his car. It's amazing how prolific you can be when your art is more important to you than groupies and drugs.
Dogs by Lost Jarv	Jun 22nd, 2009 02:49:54 AM
See, I like this film. But- I'm not blind to it's flaws. To begin with, the very fact that it's wholesale ripped off from City of Fire automatically diminishes it. Whoever said that it had a different impact in the early 90's is spot on- because it got banned, which, in hindsight, was the best thing that ever happened to it and QT.
Meh, I liked Death Proof more the Planet terror by Geomancer21	Jun 22nd, 2009 04:54:52 AM
never got all the hatred for that movie.
RODRIQUEZ IS BY A MILE BETTER by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 22nd, 2009 06:46:24 AM
and has more talent in any form, he does what the movie needs and not forces something that doesnt belongs into a movie, which quentin always does!
tarantina was good before he became a chick movie maker by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 22nd, 2009 06:51:10 AM
and that was until "pulp"! his last good movie and the rest shitty, boring chick epis no one cares about and are only made each one of them, to get the chance maybe he gets laid buy famous/vip chick. cus one thing is for sure, he is butt ugly and needs to write great big and supporting roles for ladies to get maybe in their pants as a favour for a good role. nothing other than that is the fact why he made "brown" "bill" "death" and now this new shitfest "basterds". he didnt had big women roles in dogs= not one! he had 2 very small roles in "pulp" for women and after that he became maniac and only worked for the pussy!
i will never watch a movie from tarantina by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 22nd, 2009 06:52:08 AM
where chicks have leading roles!
because of chick leads he fucks the stories up by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 22nd, 2009 06:57:38 AM
in favour they will not be mad at him and maybe dont let him into their panties! watch "deathproof" if someone says he liked the chicks in "death" he has no freaking idea of movies! everybody went 2 see a badass kurt in a tarantino movie and what did this hack do, he gave him 1-2 good lines and then FUKKED SNAKE UP BIG TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!! if someone says he is a fan boy/movie lover and then bangs jack burton/snake pissken up in the ass...he aint shit! no one cared about those 3 ugly bitches and a tarantino from "pulp" days would have pissed his sick mind in a rape scene of this cheerleader chick with this redneck BUT...the lady lover quentin and the chick autor he is today would never do that, cus he dont want a possible bed bunny to be angry, because she has a shitty rape victim role!;) he`s done for me and this will bomb!
wann see badasses watchTHE EXPENDABLEs! by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 22nd, 2009 07:00:15 AM
the only choice in 2010!
Tarantino's next project should be... by ZombieHeathLedger	Jun 22nd, 2009 07:14:04 AM
...about this guy who is an obsessive movie fan who works in a video store. One day he gets it in his head to start writing his own scripts slyly ripping off great obscure movies that most other people haven't seen. He gets lucky and gets to make his own movie where he again slyly rips off other great obscure movies. He's suddenly lauded as an outsider boy genius wunderkind whereupon he makes his greatest film and wins the Hairy Palm Du Jour at SoupCannes France, now audiences are catching on to his secret stealing but buy into his take that they are 'homages' because it is the fin de siecle and recombinant nostalgiac art has become hip because the current zeitgeist is that we're all gonna die in a Y2K tragedy and gee, aint it fun to reference all of humanities prior achievemants. Act 2- The young guy ain't so young anymore, whereas he was once the hungry outsider, he's now THE ultimate insider and loses himself in coke, booze and self-importance. He wakes up six years later to make DESTROY ROY vol. 1 and 2 where he resurrects the career of MichaelDavidHutchenceCarradine and shows that he has honed his regurgitave style to the point of effortless emptiness. Flashy and successful but something is now missing. Act 3 The once wunderkind is now a sad, aging, bloated shell of exhausted hubris. His talent and vision have left him, all the self-referencing having spiralled inward to it's obvious inevitable conclusion of having finally eaten itself as in now passe'. With movies like MORTALITY IMPOSSIBLE, a B-Movie car ego fueled disaster, and GLORYHOLEUS RETARDS, a revenge movie set at the gay special olympics starring Drab Shitt, the once champion of geekdom has lost all of his fan love, lost his mind, and lost his soul. Hollywood accepts him as another permanent residence of the Hotel California but has moved on to the next hot young thang. Ending shot is the protagonist in his final Elvis in Las Vegas phase, weighing 400 lbs. directing Eddie Murphy movies til his inevitable death all alone by pill fueled cardiac arrest in his Vegas mansion masturbating to porno mags on the crapper. Fade to black.
OH SHIT, IT'S FUCKING BUZZ MAVERICK by LaneMyersClassic	Jun 22nd, 2009 08:20:52 AM
NOW WE HAVE TO ENDURE HIS FUCKING PSUEDO-FUNNY, ALL CAP RAMBLINGS ONCE MORE! I GUESS WE REALLY DON'T "HAVE TO" SOMEONE COULD BANISH HIS ASS BACK TO 2002 WHERE HE BELONGS. I GUESS I SHOULD TALK, RIGHT? BUT I JUST HATE THAT FUCKER! I'D RATHER READ CRAZY ASS SHIT FROM TODD INSTEAD! HELL, I'D RATHER WATCH BEAUTICIAN AND THE BEAST THAN READ COMMENTS BY BUZZ MAVERIK!
Where you been by The Brains	Jun 22nd, 2009 08:42:48 AM

THIS IS NOT YOUR FATHER'S HOLOCAUST MOVIE by AyatollahSexyBack	Jun 22nd, 2009 09:36:29 AM

"EMO PORN" by AyatollahSexyBack	Jun 22nd, 2009 09:39:17 AM
A meme is born. Very professional.
THE ONLY TRUE HOLOCAUST WAS ELI ROTH'S BIRTH. by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD	Jun 22nd, 2009 10:08:42 AM

ZombieHeathLedger -- I like your concept. by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD	Jun 22nd, 2009 10:10:50 AM
But you got one detail wrong....his cause of death. We all know Quentin is going to go out like Carradine, hanging in the closet with a bloated purple dick that looks like a dead possum in the sun.
Hi Lane! by Buzz Maverik	Jun 22nd, 2009 11:01:42 AM
How ya doin'? What's on yer mind? How was yer weekend? Have some coffee! You want a bagel? They're fresh.
Buzz! What's up? Love you, man! by LaneMyersClassic	Jun 22nd, 2009 11:36:26 AM
I brought this on myself.
DGDB- addendum by ZombieHeathLedger	Jun 22nd, 2009 12:13:06 PM
LOL. That works, too. Add scattered extreme close up pictures of Uma Thurman's feet all around his corpse and I think that's a wrap.
Rodriguez and Tarrantino's skills... by ufoclub1977	Jun 22nd, 2009 01:13:46 PM
Rodriguez is a good editor and special effects supervisor (getting it done with bubble gum and strings) Tarrantino is a good writer of scenes, he's a great second pass author who can enrich dialogue once someone who is a good storyteller lays down the foundation of a solid (non fragmented/episodic) narrative. Tarrantino is a also a good director of acting (especially intense over the top scenes). He's also a great musical director (picking great temp music, songs, moods, etc).
DavidCarradinesAuto... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 22nd, 2009 02:02:37 PM
'The Expendables' is a badass idea that's way beyond its expiration date...
I'm sure... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 22nd, 2009 02:05:04 PM
You were all jerking off to 'Pulp' when you in your sandbox years of geek filmdom. No, I would bet my life on it.
It doesn't matter whether it be Dane Cook or Tarantino... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 22nd, 2009 02:10:49 PM
Fanboys only feel comfortable ripping apart their once almost creepy admiration...I bet the haters use to have names like 'Mushroomcloudlayin'motherfuck er.'
Basturds will tank. by Yoda's Ball Sack	Jun 22nd, 2009 02:14:40 PM
My money is going to Sly's movie.
"SLY, ARNIE, BRUCE, DOLPH not in, NOT interested" by Yoda's Ball Sack	Jun 22nd, 2009 02:16:06 PM
I second that. Basturds sold out and got lame Brad Pitt.
"THIS IS NOT YOUR FATHER'S HOLOCAUST MOVIE" by Yoda's Ball Sack	Jun 22nd, 2009 02:19:55 PM
Because it has Brad Pitt?
ET butchers the trailer... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 22nd, 2009 02:57:45 PM
Just like the world butchers the embarrassment that is ET.
Tarantino's Legacy = FECAL DEBRIS by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD	Jun 22nd, 2009 03:35:14 PM

People who watch ET need to eat some fuck! by ZodNotGod	Jun 22nd, 2009 04:29:54 PM
That black dude with the creepy teeth on Entertainment Tonight needs to die alongside Mary hart's yammering maw.
ur right@yoda SLY,ARNIE...NOT IN NOT INTERESTED!!! by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 22nd, 2009 05:13:11 PM

@itsjust...funny i hated "pulp" watching it first time! by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 22nd, 2009 05:15:38 PM
i always loved "dogs"!!!! i liked "pulp" rewatching it a year later! anyway...tarantino with chick leads=suckfests!
THE EXPENDABLES eat basterds for lunch! by DavidCarradinesAutoEroticRobot	Jun 22nd, 2009 05:17:00 PM

"tarantino with chick leads=suckfests!" by kolchak	Jun 22nd, 2009 05:43:08 PM
Really? Kill Bill was a suck fest? I can see people not liking it, but it wasn't that bad.
"tarantino with chick leads=suckfests!"...FALSE. by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 22nd, 2009 07:28:12 PM
...Pam Grier anyone?
I always hear... by itsjust_notcool_anymore_baby	Jun 22nd, 2009 09:54:10 PM
Grindhouse sucked. Never seen it (other than maybe 15 min. of 'Death Proof'). IMO I don't think he's ever made a "bad" movie either.
I Don't Think He's Made A Bad Movie Either by cymbalta4thedevil	Jun 22nd, 2009 10:27:49 PM
My complaint is he takes too long to make them. I've seen nothing on Inglorious Basterds that explains why he had to sweat over this script for so many years.It's not like he had to do research. This will be a cartoon that has nothing to do with WWII or actual history. He's been writing it since before KILL BILL and DEATH PROOF. If it turns out to be the greatest thing he's ever written I'll be the first one to say so. Everything I've seen so far just makes it look violent and silly for no apparent reason.
Footage by Cobbio	Jun 23rd, 2009 01:57:00 AM
"ET" = ha ha! vaccuous braindead people without a clue. I liked the "Basterds" footage, though. Scary and brutal, yet funny at the same time. Not an easy combination to pull off. I'm thinking of Tarantino's latest as an alt-history WWII story, in the same vein as an S.M. Stirling, Harry Turtledove, or H.G Wells novel, but a little slicker and bloodier. I think it could be pretty damn good.
Oh my fuck by DuhVarth	Jun 23rd, 2009 07:11:53 AM
This is my first time sifting through the comments section on this site, holy shit you motherfuckers need a life. I'll no longer be wasting my time here, bye losers.
Robert RIchardson earning his money by TuskDude	Jun 23rd, 2009 08:57:24 AM
Despite Brad Pitt's bad accent (and it's bad), I'm still optimistic about this one almost strictly based on the subject matter, which I find really cool (especially the altered reality bit). But take a close look at what we can see of Robert Richardson's work so far. In those two minutes, we can almost go ahead and confirm that the movie will deliver visually.
JACKIE BROWN almost doesn't even seem like Tarantino by Subtitles_Off	Jun 23rd, 2009 11:39:20 AM
It really is good. With little of the "Hey look at me! I'm clever!" Tarantino trademarks.
Aw, DuhVarth, we hardly knew ye. by Subtitles_Off	Jun 23rd, 2009 11:41:17 AM
Usually, after bashing Tarantino, Burton, Lucas, or whoever, we all get together for cupcakes and jerk off to Christopher Nolan's "genius." You're gonna miss all that.
You know what this movie needs? WWII ROBOTS!!! by MrMysteryGuest	Jun 23rd, 2009 12:02:08 PM

might as well shutdown the site by just pillow talk	Jun 23rd, 2009 12:08:28 PM
With no more DuhVarth posts, what's the fucking point? Subtitles_Off - I thought this week was brownies? Shit.
It's BASTARDS you reterd by madCanada	Jun 24th, 2009 05:27:47 PM
I'll tell you why I think the "Basterds" film title is misspelled. Dyslexic Quentin typed it that way. Weinstein (or someone) corrected him. Quentin threw a hissy fit, & said "I'm QT, and whatever I type is gospel!" So ... typo now replicated on posters & press releases, now & forever ... Am I right, Quentin?

Talkbacks

Entertainment Tonight also butchers the new INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS trailer!

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks