Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

Cameron on AVATAR - 3D will be 1.85 to 1 and 2D will be full Scope - read why!

Needs more GIANT PIG by GIANT_PIG	May 30th, 2009 01:52:39 PM
GIANT PIG!!!
James Cameron Fucks LA Nerds by Kief_Ledger	May 30th, 2009 01:57:28 PM
should've been the headline
Well here's hoping... by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 01:59:02 PM
... cos I've got a sneaky feeling Avatar is going top pull a Phantom Menace on us. A couple of things here make me think Cameron is hedging his bets.
.. in fact i sorta hope it does... by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 02:00:09 PM
.. just so that Motononous Kawasaki guy will tear off his own cock and fuck his own eyeballs with it.
Where did this eyeball fucking thing start, anyway? by seppukudkurosawa	May 30th, 2009 02:00:47 PM
I'm just curious, because so far we know diddly-squat about this movie, and yet simply because one talkbacker posts the same thing over and over again until it becomes a bonafide phrase, this has now become one of the most hyped movies of the year. That one talkbacker has probably generated thousands of dollars worth of publicity for this thing.
Hype by DanboJohnJ	May 30th, 2009 02:02:36 PM

He's just dying... by optimus122	May 30th, 2009 02:03:49 PM
to rip the shit out of the last 2 Terminator movies. You just know he thinks McG is a hack and he must hate T3 bigtime as that movie was average at best.
Why is he starting to turn down the hype? by Nickn328	May 30th, 2009 02:04:04 PM
He seems to be like "Woah lets not get crazy here", and that seems a little weird. Also, Harry, you haven't seen any footage yet, have you?
Nickn328 by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 02:05:53 PM
... Maybe he's seeing the finished footage and thinking "ooooooohh shit. There's still a ways to go with this digital 3D stuff."
(you need a new forum engine Harry) get one like Empireonline by DanboJohnJ	May 30th, 2009 02:06:17 PM
Hype,overconfidence and the relisation that its going to look like the phantom menace on acid
well, Avatar's hype is building, that's for sure by LabattsBleu	May 30th, 2009 02:06:20 PM
I mean, who knows whether it will be good or revolutionary or even hold a match to the expectations that people have for it. For me, every Cameron movie has been good to phenomenal, so I am sure it won't be bad at all...but who knows...Cameron also tried to temper expectations for Titanic as well, so I don't take him being cautious about the film to mean that he thinks it is bad at all. More like him being 'humble' about it (which is a misnomer considering his reputation)...oh, let the Cameron bashing begin...
Actually, James Cameron has claimed he really enjoyed by seppukudkurosawa	May 30th, 2009 02:06:48 PM
Terminator 3. "James Cameron recently talked with BBC1 and revealed he's very happy with how Terminator 3 ended up: 'In one word : Great. There was a small part of me that hoped it wasn't good - but another part of me hope'd it succeeded. And it did. And I'm so glad it did. Jonathon's made a great movie. Arnold's in great form. I really like what he's done with it'.
It's wise to be lowering expectations by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for	May 30th, 2009 02:10:01 PM
If it's just ok, then audiences will accept it more than if it was hyped up to be a life changing experience.
When you stare at computer screens all day 1:85 will feel natura by Pixelsmack	May 30th, 2009 02:11:03 PM
Yes, nearly all computer monitors or TVs are 1:85. So no wonder he thinks 3D looks better on it. You get use to seeing it on that medium. Oh well. I still don't like 3D and will gladly enjoy the proper 2:35:1 aspect at home with my 2:35:1 aspect screen.
I'm sure Cameron HATED T3 by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 02:11:13 PM
as much as we did. We all know what the guy's like - and more power to him. The fucker made Aliens and T1 & 2. The Abyss. True Lies! Everyone here knows that T3 was virtually a spoof of the last one. Make no mistake, Cameron knows that too. The other thing about T3 - that film was the most expensive budget ever at the time. I couldn't for the life of me figure out where that was onscreen. Except Arnie's salary.
or by DanboJohnJ	May 30th, 2009 02:12:13 PM
he's lulling us into a false sence of security because he thinks it's the most groundbreaking film ever?
I will cut off my penis to see ABYSS in 70mm! by standundermyumbrella	May 30th, 2009 02:13:14 PM
Lucky fucks!!!!!
Equally as feasible, Danbo. by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 02:14:15 PM
But I can't help it. As some bloke in some film once said, "I got a baaad feeling about this."
Yup by DanboJohnJ	May 30th, 2009 02:16:26 PM

Looking forward to this like everyone else, but by TheHumanBeingAndFish	May 30th, 2009 02:16:57 PM
... I really hope it doesn't end like the scriptment did, what with one neural network "downloading" another one. That's just too BS.
Wasnt Aliens in 1.85:1 by MANZILLA	May 30th, 2009 02:17:24 PM
I dont mind, in fact sometimes I miss wathing full screen movies, you closer look at the actors faces so on and so forth.
Oh stoopider, but you do by Kief_Ledger	May 30th, 2009 02:17:57 PM
your pleas of no won't be heard in the theater right before Avatar fucks the shit out of your eyeballs.
The Abyss that was shown... by kuldan	May 30th, 2009 02:18:07 PM
...was the version of "The Abyss" shown the theatrical cut or the director's cut? "The Abyss" theatrical cut is my number 3 favorite movie of all time, and I think I am one of the few who actually DID NOT enjoy where the director's cut went in terms of theme.
The concept art from yesterday... by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 02:18:49 PM
... certainly didn't even touch my eyeballs in an intimate yet slightly inappropriate manner. It looked like a scene from King Kong with a Transformer in it. But if you have to keep faith in anyone, it's Cameron I suppose. But we said that about Lucas in '99.
So what's the big fucking deal then? by Biffs_Pleasure_Paradise	May 30th, 2009 02:20:20 PM
The story isn't groundbreaking, the concept art doesn't look groundbreaking, and now Cameron says the technology and SFX aren't groundbreaking...so exactly what is supposed to be so damn amazing about the movie? I doubt he's playing things down. If you were doing shit you KNEW had never been done before, you'd be talking it up for sure. I think he's realizing the hype (which wasn't necessarily created by him) will not meet the final product.
Oh and Cameron can do wrong by Biffs_Pleasure_Paradise	May 30th, 2009 02:21:34 PM
While the tech was great, Titanic was a clunker.
Kashyyk by DanboJohnJ	May 30th, 2009 02:22:29 PM
or how ever you spell Chewbaca's homeworld was all i got,that and China/Thailand.
When Cameron / Lucas / Zemeckis by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 02:24:49 PM
... clearly start making films just to research, try, and push the tech envelope... I suppose we should be prepared for the actual films to suck. And no I'm not a hater and i REALLY don't want Avatar to suck. At all.
Terminator and Aliens 1.85 by Six Demon Bag	May 30th, 2009 02:47:38 PM
whatever..he can do what he pleases. hes uses the whole canvas so it really doesnt matter.
any news on a BluRay release for Aliens? by FalconJones	May 30th, 2009 02:53:15 PM
any news on a BluRay release for Aliens?
I Have An Idea For 3D Without Glasses by Media Messiah	May 30th, 2009 02:54:32 PM
Honestly, I don't know if it will work, since I haven't been able to test it, this is based on a theory concering current technology that I have seen displayed somewhere before a live audience. Ask yourselves this question: "What would be the point of having 3D for home use, and portable devices, if that would ultimately rival 3D presentations in theaters? It would immediately hurt theaters venders." The only way the industry can best this trend toward home 3D, is to create 3D imaging in theaters, without the need for the use of 3D glasses. It would take something like SMPTE to pull-off, what I am talking about, but if it were to work, "wow". Of course, theaters would have to install extra equipment to pull it off, and films would have to be designed to accomodate this effect whle filming and in post for in theater synch purposes. Now, regular theater owners might be too lazy or cheap to do it, so IMAX might be the place to employ such a thing, but I see it as inexpensive, and as a method that will serve to keep audiences coming to theaters, as opposed to staying home for the 3D experience...instead.
i was meh about Titanic initially to be honest... by LabattsBleu	May 30th, 2009 02:56:06 PM
was not a big Leonardo fan when it was released(though I've come around since The Departed and The Aviator)...I've come to watch it like It's a Wonderful Life - the initial half of the movie that 'humanized' Leo and Kate I skip over now - it's when that Titanic hits the iceberg that the movie really moves into high gear...that last hour and a half is really, really great...
I love that he hopes... by menstrual_blitz	May 30th, 2009 02:56:24 PM
a "few" scenes will be memorable. I would think you'd want the whole fucking movie to be memorable.
'The CG special effects aren’t necessarily revolutionary' by Se7en	May 30th, 2009 02:57:33 PM
So no. No eyeballs will be fucked on this one. Story will be stellar though.
I don't want 3D at home by Toilet_Terror	May 30th, 2009 02:58:30 PM
unless it's a projector-based system. Otherwise you would need to sit right in front of a huge television for it to even be worthwhile. I just want better frame-rates and resolution in 3D theatres.
Biffs_Pleasure_Paradise: What Is Groundbreaking by Media Messiah	May 30th, 2009 02:58:39 PM
According to reports, the 3D is supposed to be so good in regard to Avatar, that viewers feel a sense of being immersed in the visuals, or embeded.
You will see more in the 1.85 version... by blackmantis	May 30th, 2009 03:04:01 PM
Most 2.35 movies these days are shot 1.85 and then cropped at the top and bottom with black bars. For the 1.85 version of Avatar you will be seeing it without the bars. Only anamorphic films are truly 2.35, but cameron has never shot anamorphic, only 1.85 Super35 cropped to 2.35.
Whats the Abyss? by Series 7	May 30th, 2009 03:17:15 PM
If its not a franchise I don't really care about it.
The Humility is Frightening by bottombrick	May 30th, 2009 03:17:17 PM
Everyone is so used to the McGs and the JJs whoring their movies at every opportunity and telling the fans everything they want to hear whether the end product turns out to be shit or not, they are not used to seeing a master and this humility throws them off. Cameron is going to let the movie speak for itself and wants the you floored by how awesome it turned out, he doesn't need to build a hype engine for this - hearing him be that humble has me afraid of how awesome this is going to be. It's James Fucking Cameron folks, after all the water-downed shit you've been scraping by on over the years this movie is going to you fuck your soul, your eyes will be a broken window afterthought.
I prefer my directors to be more like by Series 7	May 30th, 2009 03:18:46 PM
The Wachowski brothers, where they are just complete fucking weirdos and don't do interviews.
Or like Matt Stone and Trey Parker by Series 7	May 30th, 2009 03:23:53 PM
Where they just make fun of everything. But man when was the last time they've shown their faces in public? Lettermen before Team America, or promoting season 10 of South Park? I wish those guys would get out more. They can't be that busy out of season, seeing that they make the show the day before it comes on.
CG rendering live by segundus	May 30th, 2009 03:24:51 PM
Not new. Henson has done it, and so has Framestore for Dinotopia. But agree that quality will improve - especially as GPU technology improves with the likes of NVIDIA, AMD and other vendors cranking up the teraflops on cheap graphics cards. Kudus to Cameron and his VFX team for using technology to their advantage (rather than the other way around) and not just doing it because "it's there".
Right, cause his staff would NEVER lie to him by V'Shael	May 30th, 2009 03:26:50 PM
or kiss his ass.
Series by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for	May 30th, 2009 03:27:03 PM
Do you also prefer your directors to make two good flicks then three fucking terrible flicks? If I made Speed Racer I wouldn't do interviews too.
McG... A boy playing in a MAN'S GAME by BillyMayesHere	May 30th, 2009 03:37:20 PM

Great stuff, thanks! BATTLE ANGEL next??? by ABking	May 30th, 2009 03:41:45 PM
GREAT report on Jim Cameron. I really wonder what is next after AVATAR. I hope it's still BATTLE ANGEL and I hope Schwarzenegger plays the cyborg hunter Ido. Cameron and Arnie need to team up since they had so many possible projects that never got made (ie PLANET OF THE APES).
Speed Racer by Series 7	May 30th, 2009 03:49:55 PM
Was the shit I fucking love that movie. I could see where you don't like it, but I fucking loved it. So yeah I would like my directors to make two amazing movies and two could have been awesome if they were just direct to DVD sequels.
seppukudkurosawa by optimus122	May 30th, 2009 03:50:29 PM
I would imagine he rather likes Mostow and of course he won't bash anything Arnie does so it kinda makes sense he would not bash T3. Still , most people on this site glorify this guy and those same people think T3 is utter garbage so how do they feel about Cameron knowing he thinks T3 was great?
Still don't know what this film is about and don't care. by JackPumpkinhead	May 30th, 2009 03:53:37 PM
I lost any interest about two years ago, when I heard it's based on some Japanese comic book or game, or whatnot. But it's nice to read about jabs at McG.
ABking by optimus122	May 30th, 2009 03:54:16 PM
Arnie is finished as a leading man , the dude will be in his late 60's by the time he is finished in politics if not early 70's. I assume he will run again in CALI-fornia?
PLANT! by Lemure_v2	May 30th, 2009 03:59:17 PM
well...it could be...
Speed Racer by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for	May 30th, 2009 04:08:22 PM
was like having my eyeballs raped by a kaleidescope. But each to their own.
If anyone worked on the Abyss do they know.... by hallmitchell	May 30th, 2009 04:19:03 PM
Why Ed Harris refuses to talk about the film?
Way past time they released those movies on Blu Ray. by Mr Nicholas	May 30th, 2009 04:22:58 PM

Speed Racer by smackfu	May 30th, 2009 04:27:52 PM
didn't need realism, because it was a 2 hour long batshit acid trip.
"Speed Racer was like having my eyeballs raped by a kaleidescope by smackfu	May 30th, 2009 04:34:34 PM
What can I say, my eyeballs like to party. In the kaleidescope's defense, your eyes wanted it.
bottomprick by The Gospel According to Bastardface	May 30th, 2009 04:36:14 PM
JJ does the opposite of what you just said. He's insanely secretive, which is why I love him. You know absolutely nothing about his projects. There's never a script leak, no test screenings, no trailers that give it all away. So, think before you talk shit.
Lazy Town by Series 7	May 30th, 2009 04:37:37 PM
IS THE SHIT AS WELL! Thats a fucked up show.
by Cobra--Kai	May 30th, 2009 04:38:32 PM
THE ABYSS directors cut is a looong fucker to sit through... but... so fucking worth it for that moment when the camera swoops over the undersea alien city and the symphonic music hits crescendo. Goosebumps man. If AVATAR has just one moment as stirring as that then it'll be essential.
Listen to the entire 43 minute Cameron Q & A here: by Rindain	May 30th, 2009 04:55:22 PM
http://tinyurl.com/lcsffp
Re: Cameron/3-D/Ed Harris by ArmageddonProductions	May 30th, 2009 04:58:03 PM
Up until recent advances in 3-D, ALL 3-D was shot in 1:85 using two film cameras, so this isn't exactly news, but electing to do so when you could do it in 'scope, using today's advanced processes, is odd. I prefer THE ABYSS Director's Cut simply because, when you compare it to the theatrical cut, you realize that about half of the finale was clumsily chopped out of it. I liked the little extras in ALIENS' Director's Cut, but even with the Acheron stuff put back in, I'm a little more ambivalent about that one. I believe Ed Harris got soaked on THE ABYSS because, when asked about his actors complaining what a hardass he was on the set in the L.A. Times, Cameron referred to them as "poor babies". I lived in L.A. when they were posting TITANIC, and you could always spot a Digital Domain employee by his or her's "I Survived James Cameron's TITANIC" tee shirt, replete with Cameron's "angry eyes" on the back.
by Cobra--Kai	May 30th, 2009 04:59:47 PM
I haven't seen SPEED RACER yet, because im not sure if i'm ready to let it go all the way with my eyeballs. I'm saving my eyeballs cherry for AVATAR. Be gentle with me Big Jim* *unlike your four ex-wives.
What about all the people who can't see 3D? by Mr. Moe	May 30th, 2009 05:08:28 PM
1/3 of the movie going public can't see 3D.
The only thing Speed Racer fucked with was my wallet by lockesbrokenleg	May 30th, 2009 05:08:55 PM
Shitty movie.
Re: 3D by ArmageddonProductions	May 30th, 2009 05:10:41 PM
I myself can't see in 3D (blind in my right eye), but I went with the missus to a screening of CORALINE in 3D a few months ago and, as long as you keep the polarized glasses on, the image looks fine.
Also, that quote of his about T3... by Mr. Moe	May 30th, 2009 05:11:07 PM
Was said publicly years ago, long before T4.
Re: SPEED RACER by ArmageddonProductions	May 30th, 2009 05:13:32 PM
SPEED RACER is a great example of having all the money, technology and even talent at your disposal to make what should have been an insanely great movie ... and STILL make boring, unwatchable crap. I had to recheck the credits on SPEED RACER to make sure it hadn't been written, produced and directed by George Lucas.
I can't see 3D, I just see double of everything. by Mr. Moe	May 30th, 2009 05:14:39 PM
My vision is good, just can't see 3D. My eye doctor told me to not worry about have weak stereo-vision, it doesn't have much of an impact on the real world viewing. But it sucks to not be able to see 3D movies, and I hope 3D doesn't take over cinema because that would kill movies for me.
Re: dioxholster by ArmageddonProductions	May 30th, 2009 05:21:19 PM
They make prescription polarized lenses. Check with your eye doctor. Of course, that's a hell of an expensive solution, so I hope you dig 3D movies!
ArmageddonProductions... by Mr. Moe	May 30th, 2009 05:23:39 PM
Thats the first time I've heard of those, I check into it ASAP. Thank you for the heads up!
AVATAR by FUCK_YOU_GEORGE_LUCAS	May 30th, 2009 05:28:22 PM
won't be the next The Phantom Menace or Attack of the Clones orrr Revenge of the Sith. Unlike Lucas, Cameron has his finger on the pulse of his fans.
what does George Lucas by Shaner Jedi	May 30th, 2009 05:35:44 PM
have to do with Avatar? Just another excuse to rail against him by some sad sodden man child
Lucas by FUCK_YOU_GEORGE_LUCAS	May 30th, 2009 05:41:13 PM
has nothing to do with Avatar, but somebody compared it to The Phantom Menace and I assure you it'll be better than that mess.
Speed Racer by Toonol	May 30th, 2009 05:42:54 PM
One of the top 3 movies of '08, in my opinion. And Cameron... I have a weird feeling for him, something I don't think I've ever felt for anybody associated with Hollywood. Could it be... respect?
Yeah who started that by dirtsandwich	May 30th, 2009 05:44:11 PM
"AVATAR: FUCKING YOUR EYEBALLS IN 2009" tagline anyways? I had heard that Ed Harris almost drowned during a long swim scene. Cameron's attitude towards it "Boo Hoo!"
I only compared it to TPM because... by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 05:51:09 PM
... Cameron has been gone a long, long time. Not making movies. Working on the technology. Refining it to fit his singular vision. Not at all unlike our bearded, be-chinned friend who burned us all upon his return in '99. Just remember that, back then, Darth Lucas had a 100% hit rate. Look what happened. Seriously, I'm 80% sure Cameron's gonna knock this fucker out of the park. I am. But stop treating this like the Second Coming. If we do, we're lining ourselves up for disappointment. For fuck's sake, let's learn from our mistakes.
Speed Racer was wonderful! by seppukudkurosawa	May 30th, 2009 05:51:54 PM
But it's probably out of the comfort zone of most Western audiences. It's truly a live-action anime, and unless you're wired up to watch those things, your brain will probably just switch off a few scenes in. It's garish, the dialogue is stilted, the acting quaint- but it's deep in its own Japan-like way. The Japanese like to do things from the outside in: the aesthetics come first and then the rest follows suit. The look and atmosphere is king and the rest is subservient. I'm not even knocking that- most of my favourite shit is Japanese, so I reckon there might be something to the way they do things. It's just those 250 years they spent cut off from the rest of the world before four American ships came and forced them to come back into the fold made them see things...differently from the West.
Re: Lucas' 100% hit rate by seppukudkurosawa	May 30th, 2009 05:55:09 PM
Howard the Duck anyone?
suppukudkurosawa by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 05:58:08 PM
Dammit! I was just about to amend and knock his hate rate down! Good call buddy. Howard the Duck... Some might say Willow, and the dicks would say Last Crusade. Settle at 80% and call it even?
I love you Harry... by bobbofatz	May 30th, 2009 05:58:30 PM
Given the chance I would surf your rolls. BTW James kicks all ass even though he is Canadian. Not that there is anything wrong with that.
"hate rate"?!?!? by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 05:59:06 PM
"Hit rate" I meant. Too many beers tonight, chaps!
70mm Question by Muki	May 30th, 2009 06:01:06 PM
Does a film have to be shot in 70mm in order for it to be shown in 70mm? Is it like how some Blu Ray players will 'upscale' regular DVDs? Where Aliens and The Abyss originally shot in 70nmm - I always thought that shooting in 70mm was prohibitively expensive for most films. Sorry if I'm sounding dumb - can someone explain it to me?
Ed Harris and The Abyss. by V'Shael	May 30th, 2009 06:07:30 PM
He has spoken about it in the past. In one of the DVD versions I have, there are a few interviews with him. It appears that for some of the scenes where he's underwater, they had divers out of shot with bottled air, and they were supposed to swim over to Ed and give him air when he signaled for it. Thanks to a fuck up on Jim Camerons part, the diver was further away from Ed than he ought to have been, and Ed thought he was going to die. (He came really close to drowning.) Aside from the trauma of almost drowning, and the shock involved in it, Cameron basically treated Ed like he was a diva having a histrionic attack, instead of someone who almost died because of his fuckup. (He moved the safety divers further away from Ed, to get a particular shot. To hell with safety regulations.) So Ed swore he wasn't going to work for someone who could treat his actors like that. ("I will never work for that kook again.") But as a professional, he finished the shoot. Though she doesn't talk about it on the DVD, I've read other reports that Mary Elizabeth Masterantonio almost drowned too. If things had turned out slightly differently, Cameron would be in the same group as John Landis, and Stephen Spielberg. Directors who ignored safety regulations, made child actors work after dark, and got 3 actors killed on the job. And of course, no one would talk about it because it would have been settled out of court.
WHY by thewizardofoz	May 30th, 2009 06:08:59 PM
were we not told about this event? where did everyone hear about it? please tell.
I think we all know by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 06:11:04 PM
that Cameron can be a cock of the highest order. But fuck it - he gave us some blinding films. And hopefully another, come Christmas. Personally, I always got a bit freaked out how he turned his female principals into big butch macho he-she warriors, in the case of Ripley and Sarah Connor. And that bit in True Lies where mousey quiet housewife Jamie Lee Curtis is basically terrorised in a dark room by Arnie and Tom Arnold, into becoming an ass-kicking superspy - that raises all kinds of issues, if you're that way inclined to thinking. But then a Harrier jump jet flies UP A FUCKING SKYSCRAPER, so all is well.
Most feature films by dirtsandwich	May 30th, 2009 06:11:15 PM
shown in IMAX are shot in 35mm and converted to 70mm using DMR. Parts of TDK was shot in 70mm using IMAX cameras.
J Cam has never made a bad movie... by bobbofatz	May 30th, 2009 06:13:07 PM
outside of Flying fish part 2. Avatard may not felate eyeballs, but guaranteed it will be a fucking show. Biggest movie in at least 10 years. Mark your calendars haters!
Landis / Spielberg incident. by V'Shael	May 30th, 2009 06:21:43 PM
You can read Dick Peabody's excellent article (no longer online) at the internet archive, here : http://tinyurl.com/nduofb
Return Of The Jedi Was DogShit by MANZILLA	May 30th, 2009 06:28:40 PM
Lord Lucas's decline didnt start with TPM, it started in 1983. There fore his evil had 14 to fester before he started releasing the SE's. Cameron has yet to show signs of George Lucas Disorder, or GLD.
Cameron has never made a bad movie? by lockesbrokenleg	May 30th, 2009 06:30:58 PM
Uh, all everyone ever says is how shitty Titanic is. Now, you're all patting his ass cause he's making another sci fi movie?
Notice how this talkback has become--- by seppukudkurosawa	May 30th, 2009 06:32:32 PM
a gathering of general geek gushing. It's because we know NOTHING about Avatar. It's a strange feeling...and I'm not sure if I like it.
So that shows Cameron tried to fuck up T3!! by performingmonkey	May 30th, 2009 06:36:52 PM
He told Schwarzenegger to hold out for as much money as possible. We know he got paid a fuckload of the overall budget and this surely affected the movie. Cameron did this deliberately in an attempt to scupper the flick! You can't blame him. Though he ripped the original Terminator idea from someone else, who he later had to pay, so this matters not. He also had the stupidity to shoot the 'smiling' scenes and other bullshit for T2 when the T-800 should have been shooting up Mexicans and fucking Sarah.
miatsyaia by rememberface	May 30th, 2009 06:44:08 PM
should suck a ship.
Hated T3? Imagine What He Thought of T4!!! by Judge Briggs	May 30th, 2009 06:51:02 PM
Fuck, what a shitty movie!
His original ending for T2... by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 06:55:07 PM
... if memory serves, was a flashforward to a safe, non-Skynet, non-nuked world, with John Connor as a Senator. We got a sequel with John Connor as a twitchy, gnome-faced, whiney tit, totally avoiding his destiny as a leader of men - therefore rendering the stuff he lived through in T2 totally null and void. There's no WAY Cameron liked T3!!!
Landis needed that helicopter lower by Toilet_Terror	May 30th, 2009 07:01:02 PM
child decapitations be damned
lol Toilet by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 07:02:42 PM
... wasn't there a death or two during the making of Blues Brothers 2000, too? I mean, apart from the death of Landis' talent and Ackroyd's dignity.
70MM and IMAX are NOT the same! by GordoSan#1	May 30th, 2009 07:07:11 PM
The confusion is that they both use the same filmstrip, but IMAX is shot with the filmstrip turned sideways. An IMAX image is as tall as a 70MM image is wide. This requires different cameras and different projection (IMAX needs a crane to lift the huge reels) Some 35MM films were simply converted to 70MM, similar to how they are today for IMAX. For the record, I saw Abyss shown in 70MM projection as a teen, and the surround sound was better than almost every movie's surround I've heard since, even though it wasn't digital. It was 100% enveloping. The huge screen wasn't bad either. 70MM THX was amazing! Saw Last Crusade the same way. Also amazing surround. I don't know why, but digital doesn't quite match that sound quality.
It's weird; he also did an interview with Quint on AICN by seppukudkurosawa	May 30th, 2009 07:07:26 PM
where he said this: "Then I saw ALIEN VS PREDATOR and it was actually pretty good. (laughs) I think of the 5 ALIEN films, I'd rate it 3rd." (Yes, I have a photographic memory to remember all these quotes).
MANZILLA by FUCK_YOU_GEORGE_LUCAS	May 30th, 2009 07:08:49 PM
The big space battle at the end of Jedi is crazy awesome. Aside from that I completely agree with you.
Eyeball fucking = Made specifically for 3D by Lutz	May 30th, 2009 07:10:38 PM
Isn't it obvious?
IndyAbbey--- by TommyGavinsEgo	May 30th, 2009 07:11:20 PM
--- that must be wrong. The girl who played Carol-Anne died during, or perhaps just after, Poltergeist III, which was years later and Spielberg had no involvement with whatsoever. The girl who played the other sister, Dominique Dunne, was killed after filming Poltergeist by her boyfriend, shortly before she was due to start work on "V".
I'd be very surprised by Bobman46	May 30th, 2009 07:45:13 PM
If this film lives up to anything near the hype already created for it. It would literally have to slip a slimy cock into your eye sockets the way folks are creaming themselves about it here. I'm hopeful it will be good. It all looks very like bits of Aliens to me and the 3D, well, I think it's just a fad - like it was in the 80s and before. It didn't take then....maybe now....who knows. I'm ok with 2D myself as long as the story is good.
James Cameron is Michael Bay, but intelligent and clever by terry1978	May 30th, 2009 08:21:42 PM
Honestly, think about. Persona wise they are both massive asses, but Cameron plays his jerkass nature off in a much more clever manner. Add to that his overall talent behind the camera and reputation for being a stickler, and you can't hate.
It's official. James Cameron turned into George Lucas by Orionsangels	May 30th, 2009 08:22:15 PM
Fuck real sets. Embrace digital and green screen. What the fuck happened to just making a good movie, with real sets, real actors? Stop making these lifeless synthetic films!
Jc on AVP: "I actually liked it. I actually liked it a lot." by seppukudkurosawa	May 30th, 2009 08:34:22 PM
http://www.aintitcool.com/?q=n ode/22405 I get that this guy's an event movie God, but honestly, there's nothing to read between the lines. He did like those movies. Stop using him as your mouthpiece.
T3. by imagin78	May 30th, 2009 08:46:32 PM
http://tinyurl.com/bsdswz However, Yahoo reported that Cameron didn't like how T3 turned out. Oh, and T4 is now officially a flop. It only grossed $5 million on Friday. It will be lucky to gross $130 million domestically. Now, Fuck off McG.
Ed Harris broke his embargo of Abyss by Redmond	May 30th, 2009 08:48:09 PM
Awhile back. He talks in the Making of doc on the Abyss DVD. Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio,though, has not talked about it. One look at the raw footage in that doc will explain why.
terry1978 by Redmond	May 30th, 2009 08:50:51 PM
The difference is Cameron is a great filmmaker who's made great movies, even revolutionary ones. Just like Michael Mann, Alfred Hitchcock, and David Lean. All asses, all inarguably great filmmakers. Bay's an ass because he's a spoiled child, not because he's some great, inspired auteur with a vision. I know people who've worked with Mann, Cameron and Bay, and with the first two, the asshole attitude is all about making a better film; with Bay, it's just being an ass its own sake.
Optimus by Redmond	May 30th, 2009 08:54:25 PM
Arnold can't run for governor again because of term limits. 2010 is his last year.
Dioxholster by Crow3711	May 30th, 2009 09:02:24 PM
Just because you're so homely and pathetic you can't get laid on this terrestrial sphere doesn't mean we should give you the means to annoy new and different species of women.
Marsellus Wallace by Jim Halpert	May 30th, 2009 09:11:03 PM
. . . got it in the piehole. Ouch! Glad I'm just boring old Jim Halpert.
can someone please die on the set of GI: JOE? by vaudeville villain	May 30th, 2009 09:27:08 PM
and by someone, of course, i mean all involved.
Uh, they're already finished filming it by lockesbrokenleg	May 30th, 2009 09:30:48 PM
God, people are dumb.
I want to see what he would have done with Bay's Pearl Harbor by terry1978	May 30th, 2009 09:36:19 PM
Just out of sheer curiosity.
Speed Racer Was The Worst Movie Of All Time!!! by Media Messiah	May 30th, 2009 09:53:47 PM
I loved the cartoon, but the movie was trash!!!!!
Uh-Oh...sounds like he's dialing down the expectations by Alfie Boy	May 30th, 2009 09:54:16 PM
That's a common technique used when you know your product is going to be received like shit. Play it down, then when it's released and it shows how long he's been away from being behind the camera, it's mediocrity won't look as bad. And responding to some comments posted earlier, I think it will make George Lucas look more impressive when you realize that he laid the cornerstone for Avatar beginning in the very late 90's, when he began shooting TPM.
TurdontheRun, but isn't he using a digital camera? by Orionsangels	May 30th, 2009 09:56:01 PM

Re: Lucas by ArmageddonProductions	May 30th, 2009 10:09:35 PM
I compared the makers of SPEED RACER, a.k.a, the Wachowski Bros., to George Lucas, not James Cameron. In my humble opinion, SPEED RACER was both technically brilliant and creatively a dud. The whole movie felt like they were so hell-bent on making a live-action anime that they forgot that most anime has something approximating a story and pacing. In fact, I was stoned when I saw it and was STILL somehow completely bored me out of my mind. If you liked it, great, but as far as I'm concerned, it was still-born. As for anyone who has the audacity to defend Lucas, let me assure you, you're defending someone who got insanely lucky (or had the right friends and co-workers) one time and has spent the rest of his career cashing that particular paycheck. Lucas didn't define (or rape) my childhood, STAR WARS did. Hell, HE doesn't even know how he pulled it off. Before the advent of CGI (and more to the point, better compositing technology), special effects plates were often shot in 70mm and the resulting composite transferred to 35mm -- reducing grain from multiple film passes the plates had to make during the composition process. For a great visual example of this, watch STAR TREK: TMP, then watch STAR TREK II. You'll notice some hideous grain in TMP's effect shots, where the composites were made in 35mm, while the new effects shots (some were actually recycled from the first flick) in STAR TREK II, which were done in 70mm and bumped down to 35mm, look clean and smooth by comparison. Cameron's a jag-off -- that's what makes him a great director. He's not out there kissing people's asses, he's making great movies. So long as he continues cranking out the TERMINATORs and ALIENSs of the world, while guys like McG and Brett Ratner act like the film biz is one big schmoozefest, he can show up to the set dressed in a goddamn Nazi uniform and dab at the blood of human babies dripping down his chin with a hanky made out of puppy skin, as far as I'm concerned.
Fuck James Cameron. by scriptgirl_nipples	May 30th, 2009 10:15:38 PM
Loads of hype, then Avatar will turn out lackluster at best.
HAS GIANT ROBOTS by Sal_Bando	May 30th, 2009 10:30:10 PM
I'm there.
they should have asked him about BATTLE ANGEL ALITA (his next mo by lavatory love machine	May 30th, 2009 10:35:26 PM
need some info on that, the anime is great
Cameron probably didn't like T3 by Rupee88	May 30th, 2009 10:40:29 PM
In you haven't noticed, it is HOLLYWOOD....Cameron is friends with Arnold and isn't going to bash his movie. Or maybe he thought it was Ok but just played it up. I like T3 ok for what it is...it is much better than T1.
Cameron probably didn't like T3 by Rupee88	May 30th, 2009 10:40:32 PM
In you haven't noticed, it is HOLLYWOOD....Cameron is friends with Arnold and isn't going to bash his movie. Or maybe he thought it was Ok but just played it up. I like T3 ok for what it is...it is much better than T1.
It's one of two things by Tin Snoman	May 30th, 2009 11:21:55 PM
1. Avatar is crap (or at best just average), Cameron knows it, and is tempering artificially inflated expectations, or 2. Avatar is really really awesome and there's nothing Cameron can show us without making our brains melt and leak out our earholes. Either way, we need to get this over with.
At least Lucas shows you things when he's making by lockesbrokenleg	May 30th, 2009 11:30:00 PM
his movies. It's summer. Where's a trailer?
Fans are starved by There Are Twelve Models	May 30th, 2009 11:37:42 PM
for a real geek-out scifi movie. That's why the hype for Avatar: a movie that borrows plenty from existing scifi tropes I'm sure, but an adaptation of nothing but itself. All we've had lately is superheroes. Superhero as Adventure Flick, superhero as Angsty Rom-Com, superhero as Crime Thriller, superhero Deconstructed. That's weak wine for those of us looking back to the franchise launchers of the 80s, which we're forced to do because we're relentlessly reminded of them by shitty sequels. Dear God, T:S was a void of a movie, a shadow on a wall left by the earlier movies that justified its existence. It felt more like the unholy hybrid of the soulless Matrix and Transformers franchises than something spawned by James Cameron's brain. Cameron at the very least understands story structure and how to develop a character in film, things George Lucas also understood despite his disinterest in living actors. McG and the rest of these pretenders to the throne understand nothing, create nothing, string together action sequences like beads on a rosary as if mouthing Latin phrases they don't understand. And they don't care to understand, they're in too much of a hurry. So they'll keep wasting hundreds of millions on action sequences that would be terribly exciting if only you could bring yourself to care how they turned out. So far, aside from the casting glimmers of Star Trek there's been little enough this summer to feel excited about and little on the forthcoming menu to salivate over. Avatar retains enough mystery to arouse interest, so if we've got nothing else to hope for at least we can hope for that.
watching True Lies on A&E; the action is ridiculously censored by George Newman	May 31st, 2009 01:14:06 AM
[arnold on the truth serum]: "I'm going to kill you and that guard..use you as a human shield, etc." He shows the guy the picked handcuffs and the two deaths are Completely edited out!!! He just exits the room. no action, nothing
This just feels dirty, like a setup by Turd Furgeson	May 31st, 2009 01:30:40 AM
Like Harry on the phone asking Cameron what he should write, and Cameron telling him what to write, but write it like someone is emailing you from the event.. The Stallone shit is cool, feels real, this shit with Cameron just feels totally fucking staged.. Just some PR bullshit Cameron is pulling to grease the geeks, using "Headgeek." Fuck Cameron, I'm sick of this holy-er-than-thou bullshit. This fucking site has a credibility problem....
The Abyss is terribly underrated by darthvedder81	May 31st, 2009 01:35:28 AM
Very claustrophobic and cerebral flick. Stick with the theatrical cut though--the director's cut is shit.
The real reason for rewatching TRUE LIES today? by BenBraddock	May 31st, 2009 01:54:18 AM
Jamie Lee's striptease scene. Still got it, all these years later.
More interested in Solomon Kane. by Dingbatty	May 31st, 2009 02:10:40 AM

There was a blur dot covering the heinie! by George Newman	May 31st, 2009 02:11:55 AM
unbelievable
the dvds for abyss and true lies SUCKED! NO 16x9 by skiff	May 31st, 2009 02:59:32 AM
I would love to ask cameron why the FUCK he never released decent dvds of those films. Instead we got fucked cover which lied and said they were 16x9. I will never buy the abyss again.
The Abyss, The Schmabyss: I'll wait for the remake... by Flip63Hole	May 31st, 2009 03:00:35 AM
Just kidding. The director's cut rocks.
TurdFurgeson by HEADGEEK	May 31st, 2009 03:02:02 AM
I assure you. Cameron had a 70mm even in Los Angeles of ALIENS and ABYSS... and this was just some site reader like you, but lucky enough to be there and nice enough to send it in for all us folks to hear. I'm looking forward to the 'debut' at Comic Con of whatever they have planned there. As that's where I've heard the first footage is now set to be screened, though I don't have that from Cameron.
Sounds pointless watching movies on A&E by BenBraddock	May 31st, 2009 03:02:23 AM
How do they cope with SOPRANOS, for example? Each ep would be all of 5 minutes long!
Kuldan by BitterMan23	May 31st, 2009 03:11:19 AM
It was the theatrical version, despite the Aero website claiming a runtime of 172 minutes (which would be the director's cut). I was pretty pissed, since the theatrical version is damn near pointless once you've seen the director's cut. Looked great though. Aliens was the theatrical too, but I can go either way with that one. Anyway, a shame that Abyss still isn't out in anamorphic DVD...
i hope the mechs have chainsaw hand attachments... by HaterofCrap	May 31st, 2009 03:15:30 AM
..and they just run through groups of peaceful alien species and fucking chop them to pieces. that would be cool.
...I enjoyed the hell out of TERMINATOR: SALVATION. by Mike_D	May 31st, 2009 03:38:56 AM
Why so much hate? The first 5 minutes were corny as hell but the rest was okay.
whooa whoa go back a bit... by Talkbacker with no name	May 31st, 2009 03:42:13 AM
"A crew member from two of his films stood up and defended him." WHo? Cameron or Mann? what does this even mean? Stood up at the event? Was on the panel?
ArmageddonProductions by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 03:44:22 AM
Wait, I'm confused here. Are you saying that Doug Trumbull (who always shot VistaVision from what I understand) shot effects for "ST 2:TWoK" in 35mm? That doesn't sound right.
The smartest thing JC is doing with this movie by Series 7	May 31st, 2009 04:15:40 AM
Is that even if it isn't the second coming of Chewbacca, at least he has tried to make something new. He didn't go back to the well that has been tainted with run off since the last time he was there and make another rapping of ones childhood event film, ala Lucas/Spielberg/Favreau. So that way if its not as good as Twilight was too all of you, at least he didn't ruin your Harry Potter, Transformers, Bratz, Battle For Terra (oops maybe he does that one?), Night at The Museum, Howard the Duck or whatever it is that you hold sacred enough to scream rape over whenever anyone puts a hand on it once it is release to butt fuck our eyes out.
Man the AICN by Series 7	May 31st, 2009 04:17:32 AM
Overseers pulling an all nighter or something? Why are they up this late? Usually drinking 5 gallons of pop a day puts people to sleep by 9? Did McG start dealing cocaine to everyone to get on their good side again?
series 7. Favreau? by Talkbacker with no name	May 31st, 2009 04:51:39 AM
Lucas/Spielberg/Favreau!? sure you haven't been drinking too much pop and are now bouncing off the walls?
and in regards to pop by Talkbacker with no name	May 31st, 2009 04:53:37 AM
I'm pretty sure 5 gallons would keep you up until 9...the next day!
and the second coming of Chewbacca by Talkbacker with no name	May 31st, 2009 04:56:03 AM
already happened. it was rubbish. He was best friends with yoda.
and while i'm here taking you to task by Talkbacker with no name	May 31st, 2009 05:00:08 AM
who has suggested he is raping anything but eyeballs and all that shit. What a random outburst that was, you confusing lil fella x
get the fucking tape measure by mrbong	May 31st, 2009 05:48:05 AM
i trust Cameron these days about as far as i could throw him, find him, eat him and shit him. rather take a tape measure to the cinema with you kids and work out the dimensions yourself.
where did all this talk... by JAMF	May 31st, 2009 06:33:36 AM
of avatar 'fucking your eyeballs' come from anyway? it couldnt have been cameron or anyone involved in the actual production coz a lot of what cameron said in the article sounded like backtracking to me - his 'unusually humble' attitude sounds more like 'yeah i just realised the film is pretty average really, the only extraordinary thing about it is the ridiculously costly gimmicky way we made it. oops'
He doesn't sound too sure about his flick by alienindisguise	May 31st, 2009 06:36:42 AM
the eyball fucking may just turn into eyeballs crying. I'm catching a whiff of the phantom menace.
Cool by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 06:42:00 AM
Thanks for the link, nice to hear an intelligent filmmaker talk for a change, instead of morons like McG and Abrams.
Is this a remake or a reboot? by Donkey_Lasher	May 31st, 2009 07:10:40 AM
And is it a PG13?
The Sophie’s Choice situation by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 07:20:58 AM
Well, for starters, there's no sophie's choice situation about that, because the sophie's choice was about chosing between two negative posibilities, while for our friend Harry here it was to chose between too good things for him. It is a rather poor choice of wording there, Harry, and double consedering the story and themes found in the movie Sophie's Choice.
And about the choice... by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 07:24:17 AM
... for me there wouldn't be any doubt or hesitation whatsoever, i wouldn't even bat an eyelid, it would be the Aliens-The Abyss double-feature. Far superior entertaiment and film then those Back To The Future movies. Yeah, they used to be great... when i was 16. Aliens and The Abyss never dies.
I will be Fucking Camerons Eyeballs in 2009!!!!!!! by IHaveSeenEveryEpisodeOfPrisonBre ak	May 31st, 2009 07:25:12 AM
This will be a giant piece of pretentious SHIT.
TommyGavinsEgo by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 07:37:03 AM
Not true on the budget thing you said about T3. T3, was claimed had the biggest start shooting budget in Hollywood at that time. But the end budget is not even the most expensive movie ever made in holylwood. At all. It's not even the most expensive movie of the 2000s alone. Adjusted for inflaction, Titanic and Cleopatra are far much more expensive productons. And the most expensive movie ever made is the russian film War And Peace, which in 1965 costed 100 million dollars (that's more then twice Ceopatra's 40 millions of the same period). Adjusted to inflaction, W&P's 100 millions would be like today's 500-600 millions. Think about that, a 600 million dollars movie!
OK But change the title of this fucking story by britney spears rusted clit ring	May 31st, 2009 08:05:54 AM
cause it doesnt really tell us "why".
hallmitchell by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 08:07:37 AM
Well, Ed Harris was quite candid talking about The Abyss in the DVD's official making of documentary. Well, he didn't seem to get too well along with James Cameron, he resented the long hours and the constant pushing for takes and acting in the dangerous enviroment. But the thing that traumatised Harris the most was hat he almost drowned during one scene. It's part of the big dive scene his character does, until he reaches the atomic bomb that sits in the abyss's ledge. to shoot that scene, Harris had to sustain his respiration for real. That liquid stuff in the movie where it can be breadable (and it exists sinc ethe 70s), they didn't used for the movie, so, Harris was just holding his breath while he shoot those scenes with the diving suit, and every half minute a scuba-diver would give him oxygen. Now, the diving scne was shot sideways pretending it was a down dive. This means that Harris was dragged sideways to give the illusion of the dive. At one moment, he was pulled too hard and too fast, and he lost his concentation of lost all the air in his lungs. And the scuba-diver that was assiting him didn't realise his situation and he took too long to gave oxygen to Harris. By that time, he was startign to drown for real. He panicked really hard. During the interview where he talks about this moment, it's clear he is still quite shaken by it, and that doc was shoot 16 years after the fact. He was still in great pain to recall that moment and he still has great emotions about it. He also felt that Cameron should had been mroe concerned about him after the incident and he felt that ameron acted too cold for soemthing that was a near-death experience to Harris. Now, the story of Harris plat out refusing to talk about The Abyss happened in another ciscusntances. It was during the shooting of The Rock. Cameron is God to Michael Bay, and Bay took every oportunity to ask Harris about Cameron, and how Cameron directed, technical questions, how he did this, and that, and about The Abyss, everything. This happened everyday while Harris was shooting The Rock. And since for Harris The Abyss was for him such a troublesome and traumatic film to make, he was more then reluctant to talk about it, specially to a guy who was obviously asking how to make a movie like Cameron does to soembody who was just an actor in that movie. Bay was so persistent, that one day Harris lost his cool and told Bay to shut the fuck up and never ask him about Cameron ever again. And this happened on the set with the cast and crew listening. Bay did show a lack of tact with all his questions about Cameron on Harris, given that everybody in Holywood knew how hard the shooting of The Abyss was for Harris, how he felt about it, and how Harris and Cameron had came out of the movie on unfriendly terms.
PG13 it is, and "eyeball fucking" by mrbong	May 31st, 2009 08:17:58 AM
it's guaranteed to be a PG-13 film, with Fox hoping for some good marketing, whether it be toys for kids or a TV spin-off. this is why it is being made. as for the "eyeball fucking", it started by people who forget that James Cameron has made 3 good films - T1, T2 and Aliens. none of which, interestingly, were originals. why the fuck anyone is just slightly above interested in the latest from Cameron is beyond me. i mean, i had HOPED that he would one day return and make a decent film again. this will not be it.
IHaveSeenEveryEpisodeOfPrisonBre ak by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 08:20:19 AM
What is not pretentious to ou? And what is pretentious to you? Can you offer examples of both, so i can understand? It's one of my pets things to try to understand what others think is pretentious or not, you see?
New Groundbreaking Technology by rxse7en	May 31st, 2009 08:45:20 AM
is Cameron's choice of tennis ball.
AsimovLives by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 08:51:46 AM
The Under Pressure doc on The Abyss was shot in 1993, not 16 years after the fact. Harris and Cameron are friendly nowadays. I'd love to see a 20th anniversary Abyss DVD with a commentary from the pair of them.
AsimovLives by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 08:54:58 AM
IHaveSeenEveryEpisodeOfPrisonB reak thinks Avatar will be shit. Yet he has sat through every episode of Prison Break. Sheds some light on his mental condition, don't ya think?
Has anyone else listened by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 08:55:48 AM
to the Cameron Q&A? Great stuff.
HaterofCrap by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 09:16:23 AM
"i hope the mechs have chainsaw hand attachments... and they just run through groups of peaceful alien species and fucking chop them to pieces. that would be cool." That sounds like Republican Space Rangers. That's for those who know their GTA IV.
kwisatzhaderach by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 09:22:48 AM
i listened to Cameron's Q&A. He just confirms what i know of him in his audio comentaries of Solaris and T2 (Artisan DVD): he's one hell of a very funny guys, but also very informative as well. It's clear that for him, filmmaking is a total adventure. And unlikesome filmmakers who leave the tech stuff for others to care, he actually knows some of the technology he's using in his movies. And it shows in the movies. In that regar,d he's a bit like Kubrick or like Ridley Scott used to be. When directros actually know the technology they are using, there's some soul to the movies they made more then just being tools to show off. Cameron and his tech stuff is like what Kubrick did with the steadycam in The Shining. until then, directors used it to show off. Kubrick actually used it to help tell the story and make his movie look like something nobody had seen before, and helped construct the mood for the movie in a way no other peice of technology could. He advanced gfilmmaking in The Shining while still making a good movie. Cameron did that with the CGI for T2 and Titanic. Love him or hate him, soemthing is undelinable about Cameron: he really likes making movies. The movies are the end in themselves, and not just the means to get richer and powerful, unlike some other hacks going around (as if i needed to name names).
kwisatzhaderach by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 09:23:51 AM
Prison Break to me can be reduced to two words: Brett Ratner. Those two words give me enough reason to not give a shit about that crap.
kwisatzhaderach by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 09:26:11 AM
The DVD doc was made that long ago? I was udner the impression it was made much, much later, at the time when the DVD came ut, which was in the early 2000s. anyway, it's cool to know that Cameron and Harris are on good terms now, if that's the truth. And Harris directed one hell of a kick-ass movie with Appaloosa.
kwisatzhaderach by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 09:34:49 AM
Damn man, you've got the 'hater–aide' flowing for Abrams. It is a good interview with Cameron though. He simply tells it how he sees it, without pretentious boasting and self–effacing humour. Although, to be fair, I don't see Abrams boasting or being obnoxious.
Haha, Arnold can't lose. by Autodidact	May 31st, 2009 09:35:38 AM
"Okay James, because I owe you one I will ask the producers of Terminator 3 to pay me more money than anyone has ever received for a Hollywood film role. Just as a favour to you."
AsimovLives by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 09:37:01 AM
Are you talking about the doc "Under Pressure" about 'The Abyss'? Yeah, that was completed by Van Ling for the Laserdisc release of 'The Abyss'. I think the theatrical release was 1993, so it came out a few months later.
Blakindigo, asimov, kwis...hey guys, hwos it by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 09:57:39 AM
going? I listened to the Q and A on marketsaw yesterday, as you guys say really interesting and informative. The same as his commentires like you say Asimov...
All this tech stuff is fine and all but... by Mr Gorilla	May 31st, 2009 09:59:29 AM
As Cameron says on the DVD for 2001, the best special effect of all is a script loaded with mind-blowing ideas. Isn't THAT why we loved his two Terminator films, and Aliens? (Though I'm not saying they come anywhere close to 2001, neither I'm sure, would Cameron.) You know why I'm interested to see Avatar. Becuase of the Top Notch producing job Cameron did on Sodenberg's wonderful film of Solaris.
geeez guys, it really looks like we are going by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 10:03:38 AM
to have to wait for the end of this year for most of the good movies (avatar, where the wild things are, sherlock holmes...etc) Other than Mann's PE, the Summer has nt been too great so far. Hope UP is good (sure it will be, its Pixar for fucks sake). Though I enjoyed Star Trek (dont hate me Asimov..lol)
Mr gorilla....agree with you dude. Bit forget by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 10:05:32 AM
Strange Days, he also wrote and produced that. A very underrated little cyberpunk movie imho...Have you ever read the old avatar scriptment dude?
Bonging at home! by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 10:10:51 AM
I would much prefer to stay at home than go tio the theater, so fucking 3D at home songs great. Seeing Avatar through a fucking fog of bong smoke whilst devoring beer/nachos/space cake sounds awesome!!! I think Avatar while only occularly abuse your neural net pathways if you are heavily fucked up for it. While 3D is cool, I assume that in the trashed state I need to be in for this, to see and experience it the way intended, it would be hard to get over to the theater. Gone are the days where I'm willing to smoke a joint in the parking lot. Or trying to sneak liquor in the theater. I just wanna relax at home. Now if it's some normal movie no problem for me going out.
because there are a ton of ideas there, a lot by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 10:13:33 AM
of things we have really never seen done in live action. Really one of the main reasons this film interests me...
Oh...and mrgorilla..personally i want to see by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 10:16:14 AM
Avatar in 2D first. Want to see if it works/is good all on its own before I see it in 3D (though i have never seen a movie in 3D, or IMAX for that matter, so I really cant have much of an opinion on the subject..)
4.20 ratio by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 10:16:46 AM
Only way to goeZ!!!!!!!!!!!
Cameron wanted to film by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 10:17:33 AM
In 1.85, but realized that 4.20 was a superior ratio... just ask Harry
Technique/Mechanics vs. Ideas/Creativity by Autodidact	May 31st, 2009 10:17:58 AM
From what I've seen there are three types of people. First type is irrelevant as they are not concerned with creating anything. Second type is the wanna-be, who has no ideas, no real skills, and spends most of their effort on imitating or trying to repeat what other people have done. Third type is like Cameron, truly creative, spends most of their effort figuring out puzzles which they have created for themselves. Which are you?
Hey southafricanguy by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 10:18:14 AM
How goes it? Ordered your Avatar Pandora Field Guide yet? :)
AsimovLives by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 10:19:24 AM
Yeah the doc was made in 1993 for the laserdisc release. About time Fox gave us a loaded 20th anniversary DVD this year with anamorphic and commentary.
Where is LIGHTST0RMER these days? by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 10:21:40 AM
That guy knows his Cameron too.
LIGHTST0RMER by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 10:26:09 AM
Is me guys (true)
southafricanguy by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 10:27:54 AM
Strange Days is incredible!
Kwis....yup my friend I have indeed ordered it by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 10:33:37 AM
and yup Stange Days is fkn incredible. Most Cameron movie that he never actually directed...
Oh...im doing good dude. What time is it by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 10:34:41 AM
in your neck of the woods? And yeah where the hell is Lightstormer lately? These talkbacks need him...
blakindigo by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 10:56:59 AM
You don't find JJ's endless self-promoting obnoxious? And how about the fact he constantly streals other's peoples credits for himself? And the scripted praising he gets in all of his movie's DVDs? That's not obnoxious? In comparison, Cameron is nearly suicidal self-loathing.
blakindigo by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 11:01:19 AM
No, The Abyss was released theatrically in 1989. I should know, i saw it the same year of release. Or are you refering to the director's cut?
Stranger Days by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 11:02:32 AM
Directeed by Duece Bigelow Produced by James "Golden mangodboy" Cameron Synopsis: It's 2009, and Ralph Fines has had many baby's through hot Jungle lovin with his girlfriend (they hook up at the end of Strange Days 1) but he feels that his life as a leather pants wearing digital pimp may be coming to a close. So, he decides to write a screenplay about a mentally retarded Army Officer who can control "through his mind like abilities" a TARDATAR. A Tardatar is a genetically engineered retard (I know, not p.c.) that can be controled by people on earth, and will let them explore strange Alien Worlds and vistas via this Tardatar. Ralph Fines than decides to make the movie using his headsets, so people experience it in true 5D, with surround sound. But, in a twist of events, rapper MC Hammer is set up by the cops to take the fall for the Mortgage Crisis, and must be saved before the world goes to hell. Save the hammer, save the world.......
southafricanguy by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 11:02:38 AM
Yeah—now I'm fascinated about the 1.78:1 aspect ratio. He says it gives more vertical space and that I guess, enhances the immersive experience.It's hard to be patient when you want to see what he's talking about. The other techniques for filmmaking seem to be refinements of HD dailies. It's an interesting approach.
My eyeballs have some wild oats to sew. by JDanielP	May 31st, 2009 11:02:54 AM
Hey there, sexy AVATAR. You are looking so fine.
Can you rape a childhoods eyes? by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 11:08:24 AM
AVATAR will sure fucking try!
This has "Epic Fail" written all over it... by skycrapper	May 31st, 2009 11:17:27 AM
I hope I'm wrong but the overhype is just a bit too much. And 3D has always blown and I don't see how they're going to fix it.
Completing the trilogy by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 11:18:34 AM
Strangest Days: Rise of Vengeance Directed by McG Produced by McG Score by McG CG by McG A MCG film After Optimus Prime defeats the the evil Alien race Klacchkutuu, McHammer must pilot a TARDATAR into the Abyss. The Abyss was created after a detonation of a nuke in the FLorida Keys in '94, but wasnt discovered until just now. Using the technology originally invented for the headsets, Ralph controols a mini sub into the Abyss. Along side Hammer. But they discover something that will blow them away. The Titanic.
southafricanguy by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 11:19:31 AM
Hey friend, how are you? I agree with you that i'm mostly interested in watching Avatar in 2D. All that 3D stuff, however intriguing it might be, reeks of gimmickry to me. i have seen some new 3D stuff done recently, like the Beowulf and the U2 concert movie U23D, and so far i'm not all that impressed, to tell you the truth. It's still very artificial, it doesn't look naturalistic, and it certainly doesn't look like i'm watching things for real as they are in reality. In fac,t the human eye doesn't operate in teh same way that the 2D stuff operates. Ironically, the "d photography can replicate the way the human eye works then the 3D. The human eye and our brain processing is extremey selective. We don't always see in 3D, we select parts of the enviroment to focus our atention and we neglect the rest. We basically cannot process everything, not it's of the brain's best interest to do so. This deliberate blindness of the brain is what makes us suspectible to visual trickery like the persistence of memory, the very thing that makes we be able to watch movies becaus eof the illusion of movement created by stills passing very quickly. I do think that Holylwood is now too enamorated with the posibilities of such stuff as CGI and alçl the new computrer visual technologies, they might be created movies which wioll cause problems for the viewers. It starts withthe hyper-kinetic editing too many movies have today. Then it's the over-stuffing of the images wioth CGI details, mixed with the very fast editing, which creates this blur of images the brain perceives but cannot process fast enough. Bascially too many movies today have so many things happening in the frama and going on too fast in cuts which are very short for the brain to understyand what's going on. This causes a stress that is quite unproductive. At the very least it causes motion sickness. At worst causes such a state of confusion you migth bet total diziness not to mention something close to the feeling of the start of a seizure. i also believe it's this type of too-stuffed imagery with fper-fast cutting which causes the numbing down of the audiences, in that how many times you and others you ahve seen cmae out of the movie and they seem so passive, and they have trouble remembering exact details from teh show? The classic case of "i saw it and i alreadt forgot it". I'm not happy with the way movies are heading. I'm just hoping that Cameron is not following the bad examples of the present blockbusters and their hysterical over-editing and bad use of CGI to cover the asses of bad filmmakers.
......imagery with fper-fast cutting..." by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 11:23:03 AM
Huh?
Yes Favreau! by Series 7	May 31st, 2009 11:59:12 AM
What hasn't he rapped? He fucked up the Jumanji series, and made a terrible Ironman movie. Lets see how the original Jumanji director Joe does with a comic book film.
MegaBaltar5000 by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 12:00:40 PM
Don't be such a literalist, OK? It's quite easy to understand that what i ment to say was "imagery with super-fast cutting". Sure, it doesn't justify the bad grammar, but really, what's so hard to understand?
6pm here southafricanguy by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 12:07:59 PM
I'm muc more into the 2D version too, especially now it will be the only scope presentation of the film. The 3D version should be fascinating too though.
T4 is a bomb!!!! by Six Demon Bag	May 31st, 2009 12:21:37 PM
Box Office Chart of the top 10 movies this week Top Movies Weekend Gross* Number of Screens Per-Screen Average Weeks in Release Gross to Date* 1 Up Buena Vista $68.2 3766 $18109 1 $68.2 2 Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian Fox $25.5 4101 $6218 2 $105.3 3 Drag Me to Hell Universal $16.6 2508 $6630 1 $16.6 4 Terminator Salvation Warner Bros $16.1 3602 $4481 2 $90.7 5 Star Trek Paramount $12.8 3507 $3650 4 $209.5 6 Angels & Demons Sony $11.2 3464 $3233 3 $104.8 7 Dance Flick Paramount $4.9 2459 $1993 2 $19.2 8 X-Men Origins: Wolverine Fox $3.9 2263 $1723 5 $170.9 9 Ghosts of Girlfriends Past Warner Bros $1.9 1450 $1314 5 $50.0 10 Obsessed Screen Gems $0.7 679 $979 6 $67.5 See movie grades from critics and readers
"Apparantly there is no asshole shortage in America." by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 12:27:45 PM
That's a quote from everyone's favorite egomaniac southafricanguy on another TB. This is all this AmericaHater talks about! Mr. Racist movie exepert himself, who's working as a janitor in Korea (not that there's anything wrong with that)! Why do we suffer fools like this?
Fuck 3D! AVATAR - Fucking your eyeballs in 2009! by Motoko Kusanagi	May 31st, 2009 12:29:54 PM
Really cool news, imho! I love 2D and I love 2,35:1.
a terrible Ironman movie? by Talkbacker with no name	May 31st, 2009 12:32:07 PM
hahaha you are so boring
"they dont teach much geography where you come from..must be the by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 12:34:57 PM
Another racist quote from southafrican guy from another TB. Guess they don't teach much in the way of spelling in South africa (I won't dignify it with a capital letter), as APPARENTLY you don't know how to spell APPARENTLY (it ain't "APPARANTLY" fuck-nut)!
"dont teach...geography where you come from..must be the US" by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 12:36:48 PM
Another racist quote from southafrican guy from another TB. Guess they don't teach much in the way of spelling in South africa (I won't dignify it with a capital letter), as APPARENTLY you don't know how to spell APPARENTLY (it ain't "APPARANTLY" fuck-nut)! Let's just ignore this idiot!
Six Demon...Angels & Demon ain't burning fuel either, huh? by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 12:40:07 PM

Alfie Boy, get a life. by imagin78	May 31st, 2009 01:04:57 PM
Underoos Hero started the racist back and forth on the other talkback. SAG did apologize for any derogatory things he said. Also, if you are going to attack someone's spelling, make sure yours is perfect("Mr. Racist movie exepert himself..."). So, get over it.
Angels and Demons. by imagin78	May 31st, 2009 01:10:00 PM
Angels and Demons has done fine. The majority of its' money will come worldwide. It has grossed over $100 million domestically and more than double that in foreign markets. It will end up making more than $500 worldwide. That is a success. On the other hand, T4 will struggle to make $130 million in North America. It could end up making $400 million worldwide. For a $200 million dollar tent pole that probably cost double that with marketing and distribution, T4 will be a flop. McG can officially fuck off.
THE MATRIX TRILOGY OWNS YOUR ASSES by Johnno	May 31st, 2009 01:15:32 PM
And Speed Racer permanently ran all over them! And once Cameron releases Avatar and blows our minds and rapes our eyeballs and all the crazy filmmaking technology is passed around, the Wachowskis will use it to fuck recepticles in your corneas that you never knew you had!!! Speed Racer 2 will be in 4D bitches with the 3D and the moving seats and possibly the entire theatre in one of those NASA things where they put the astronaut-in-training into and then spin him around and around to simulate the G-Forces we should expect when the Wachowskis launch us right out there into the stratosphere!!!
AsimovLives by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 01:16:35 PM
I was bustin your balls. I wanted attention. And no one was responding to my Strange days ideas, so a little baiting did the trick, thanks grammar police!!!!!!!!!!!!1111one
have seen Aliens in 70mm by most excellent ninja	May 31st, 2009 01:18:21 PM
Excellent. I wish it was filmed in 2:35 though.
Alfie Boy by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 01:36:44 PM
From what i know of southafricanguy, he had to be provoked to go in your alledged anti-american rant. And you can make anybody look back by copy and paste statements taken out of context. I coud say "I don't think that america is filled with retards", and you would take only the "america is filled with retards" from my coment and turn it into a bashing post from me. You see? From whaty i know of the guy, xenophobia is the last thing i think of him. He's a south african living in South Korea, for christ's sake!
MegaBaltar5000 by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 01:43:09 PM
In that case, that's OK, man. I'm sorry nobody was taking notice of you. And i really didn't wanted to be grievous with you. Sorry for the harsh tone, i have been dealing with a particular thick-head today in here, and i got carried away. If you want to chat, shoot away, let's talk.
Alfie Boy by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 01:47:26 PM
I correspond with an american guy,a nd he does say that the majority of the americans are quite ignorant of what happens outside their borders. all he knows about the world, he learned by himself, he was not taugh. And he says that it's history and geography trhat are the main flaws in the average american knowledge of the rest of the world outside the USA. That was an american talking. And considering that you once had a president, George W. Bush, who didn't even had a passport while he was already president, which such an example from the top, it makes his claim not too hard to believe.
Ass-imovLives by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 02:05:27 PM
Let's see. I corresponded with one human who says the earth is flat, so therefore that must be correct! There is an example of your fine logic. And Imagin78, there's a diff between a typo and what is clearly a common eror in spelling a word. southafricanguy is an America Hater. I understand the world's generalized mental illness that makes people hate #1, but I'm sick of having to listen to it, and sick of my self-hating countrymen sitting back and agreeing with you second rate jingoistic jack-asses who mouth off to hide the utter failures that have been your societies.
I'm with Motoko by kwisatzhaderach	May 31st, 2009 02:26:29 PM
2D and 2.35:1 all the way!
MegaBaltar5000 by SylarTheCylon	May 31st, 2009 02:54:29 PM
Your movie ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter
dioxholster by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 03:04:49 PM
Better watch out....he probably has a friend who could shrink your head!
Alfie Boy by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 03:10:36 PM
What the fuck is your problem? Is it too hard to write my nick, moron? If you want to make a point, what about trying to act like a human being? What the fuck is wrong with you?
Alfie Boy by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 03:15:25 PM
And the paranoid stuff is cute. "Everybody is envious of us amwericans, bnecause we are number one because i want us to be number one. USA!!! USA!!! USA!!!!" That's childish!! Envy!!! That's the best you can come up with? Guys like you give americans a bad name. You are doing your country a terrible disservice. And also, you have terrible manners. First person that disagrees with you, you come one name calling. That's so smart, hem? That totally puts you in such a bright light, does it? That makes you look so good, deon't it? That totally makes your point, doesn't it?
dioxholster... by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 03:35:44 PM
...I think he's saying.. America is number One Portugal is number TWO! If you get my drift!
film talk only ladies by Six Demon Bag	May 31st, 2009 03:40:12 PM
take your misguided nationalism/patriotism to FOXNEWS. regards, 6DB
dioxholster by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 04:13:15 PM
I'm saying i don't give a shit who's number one. People obsessed with being number one are assholes.
DrMorbius by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 04:16:56 PM
Portugal is much down the list. And many times i think it deserves to be even lower. I like my country, but that doesn't mean i'm ignorant or abide to the bulslhit. and frankly, with the government we have here, they are getting it too easy. If we fall deeper, i«'ll not be suprised at all. My country's government is filled with incompetent assholes, the portuguese version of the Bush administration. My only consolation is that i didn't vote for those assholes.
Six Demon Bag by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 04:19:54 PM
Thanks for correcting us on the right path, friend. You are right, of course.
Re: blankdingo by ArmageddonProductions	May 31st, 2009 04:31:45 PM
Douglas Trumbull didn't do the effects for STAR TREK II. ILM did. In fact, he didn't do all that many effects for THE MOTION PICTURE, he was basically hired at the last minute to replace the bunch of idiots who were hired to do the visuals in the first place (and because John Dykstra was once again too slow in turning in his effects shots). They recycled a couple of effects shots from TMP in STAR TREK II, even modified a few models from the first one to use in the second, but it was ILM, not Trumbull, who did the actual visual effects for II.
Re: Correcion' by ArmageddonProductions	May 31st, 2009 04:38:14 PM
Sorry about misspelling your name ... "blakindigo".
dioxholster by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 04:46:54 PM
You must have heard that from your own ass. You listen to your ass a lot? Is it who does the talking for you?
ArmageddonProductions by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 04:50:53 PM
What is Trumbull up to lately? As far as I am concerned, 2001 had the best, most realistic space sequences by special effects EVER! Going back a little further, SILENT RUNNING.
ArmageddonProductions by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 04:51:52 PM
Wasn't John Dykstra fired from Star Wars or something? Of all of those classic SFX guys, he's the one i like the less. All his movies which he did the SFX on his own, i don't like them much. I think Richard Edlund and, of course, Douglas Trumbull are much better. You say that Douglas Trumbull did little work on TMP, ad yet there's a lot of SFx in that movie which has the distinctive fingerprints of Trumbull. And they are not that few.
DrMorbius by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 04:56:33 PM
Douglas Trumbull for me is like a god among SFX. And he is a pretty good director as well. Silent Running is one hell very well made movie. It's far more smart then many give it credit, and not on the more obviosus tuff like the theem or the special effects. There's directorial moments in the movie which are brillant, and they are minor character moments. The kind of stuff that only a talented director pulls, not a techno-whiz hack. And as a SFX artist, his work is beyond reproach. There was another mvoie he did called Brainstorm which i think is also pretty underrated.
"Most 2.35 movies these days are shot 1.85 and then cropped..." by J.B.M.A.	May 31st, 2009 05:03:01 PM
...er, no they're not. It's far more common to shoot anamorphically than go own the Super 35 open matte route.
Ass-imov, your atrocious spelling says everything about you by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 05:04:18 PM

AsimovLives by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 05:07:06 PM
Yes, BRAINSTORM is a very good movie. It was also Natalie Woods last movie, which for me is rather bittersweet!
If memory serves me correctly, Richard Edlund... by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 05:08:04 PM
...goes back to all the Gerry Anderson ITV marionette series. Space 1999 too. That guy has "street" cred. and skillz.
BRAINSTORM...severely underrated. by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 05:09:53 PM
Does anyone else think that the end visuals, finishing with the "angels" has been copied over and over in films too many to begin listing.
It's funny that Trumbull's name comes up here in this Avatar pos by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 05:11:40 PM
I think professionally he and Cameron are very similar.
The BEST parts of Space:1999.... by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 05:24:20 PM
...were the miniatures and models. I have a 24 inch version of the EAGLE TRANSPORTER in my Den. Call me a geek if you will, but I love looking at it all the time. I think the Subject box is limited to 64 characters/spaces. Hate reading the subject line and it gets cut o
Do you know how hard it is to fuck an eye? by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 05:29:35 PM
...You need real dedication and tenacity. And that's just the actual sex act itself. First you have to arouse the eye with fingers and tongue, until it is slick with it's own lubrication.
Although by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 05:32:16 PM
...It is a little bit easier if you remove the eye first. I recommend a sharpened spoon to really get back behind and leverage it. The sharpened bit allows you to cut the nerve while simultaneously popping the eye out.
Unless by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 05:35:14 PM
...leaving the nerve intact so that the person can watch you forcibly penetrate their cornea is your kind of thing, in which case, you need psychiatric help, you fucking nutjob.
Any way you do it by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 05:39:34 PM
...I'd advocate practicing on something larger and less complex than a human eye at first. Babies have this wonderful soft spot on the backs of their skulls that is remarkably similar in shape and feel to an eyeball that has had its pupil cored out for the fucking.
I once had SEX with.... by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 05:41:10 PM
...a girl with a glass eye! She would take it out and want me to screw the socket! After she'd ask if I liked it, and if I would be coming back for more. I'd say it was a little weird but fine, and yes I would come back again. She said "Then I'll keep an eye out for you".
The primary differences by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 05:41:53 PM
...between the two being size, of course, and the fact that the baby's head will most likely be thrashing about a bit at first. Don't let this deter you. A few firm thrusts and the thrashing should stop. AND THAT'S HOW 3-D IS MADE.
Cameron's 250 million dollar "CG effects aren’t necessarily revo by zooch	May 31st, 2009 05:46:16 PM
and it may not make film history? This worries me.
Alfie Boy by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 05:47:02 PM
Go fuck yourself with your grammar complains.
Alfie Boy by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 05:49:36 PM
And yes, the angels visuals at the end of the movie were ripped off with gay abandon ever since that movie was released. And you can still go fuck yourself with your grammar complains. And next time to you want to call my attention, call me by my nick, my REAL, nick, not your dumb ass version. Is it too much to ask, you Republican Space Ranger?
GrippyLongstocking by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 05:50:18 PM
To cut down on the thrashing, may I suggest a plastic bag over the head for a minute or two. Nothing Fatal, cause that would be just WRONG!!!
DrMorbius by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 05:51:00 PM
The Eagle spaceships (which you call the transporters) from Space: 1999 are awesome. Some of the best ever designed spaceships ever. They were beyond cool.
Terminator:Salvation died from too much hype by zooch	May 31st, 2009 05:51:45 PM
and it only turned out to be okay at best...this maybe has JC spooked.
Grippy Longstocking... by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 05:52:25 PM
... longs to work for the CIA.
zooch by AsimovLives	May 31st, 2009 05:53:20 PM
Terminator: Salvation died the day McG was hired.
It's funny by lockesbrokenleg	May 31st, 2009 05:56:14 PM
People say they hate CG movies, but sites like these always hype the shit up before it comes out.
Yeah to that end by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 05:58:25 PM
...I was going to suggest getting the baby really good and stoned. The rookie mistake is to get it drunk, but alcohol thins the blood and makes the brain clammy and cold.
Just made myself dry-heave! by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 05:58:50 PM

Was the actual story to T3 really all bad? by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 05:59:42 PM
I actually liked the end bit.
AsimovLives you are right by zooch	May 31st, 2009 06:00:53 PM
but despite McG hiring expectations were still very very high. But look at films like Iron Man and Star Trek...expectations were low...and they were hugely successful.
The BEST part of T3 by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 06:03:16 PM
was seeing how built Arnie was in the movie, and then seeing him in person about a month after T3 came out, at Squaw Valley all flabby with manboobs.
Cameron is a dickhead by FamousEccles	May 31st, 2009 06:06:39 PM
end of story
All you non-Americans, put away your shithead to english diction by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 06:07:45 PM

dictionaries by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 06:08:08 PM

actually it's not the end of the story by FamousEccles	May 31st, 2009 06:08:32 PM
Cameron couldn't even fuck a woman let alone my eyeballs
AsimovLives by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 06:22:13 PM
There were many Eagle Spaceships. When the middle section as exchanged for another they became: Transporter Eagle Rescue Eagle Freighter Eagle Lab Pod Eagle e.t.c. Also, in your post to AlfieBoy, complaints would be the right word in that context. Wanting him to use your real nick, then calling him a RSR isn't the best way to rectify the situation. Just sayin'
..was exchanged... by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 06:23:30 PM

Oh, if only the design of the Eagles could be by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 06:44:54 PM
applied to our space vehicles today. Modular, multi-purpose. That's one thing that Space 1999 always had a good feel for. The usefulness of the equipment. Sure, there were the "far out there" designs, but there was a workability to many of the props in that series.
Just make a good movie by twogunjames	May 31st, 2009 06:46:56 PM
I really don't care if you revolutionize something. Just tell me a good story.
Or by Grippy Longstocking	May 31st, 2009 06:53:18 PM
REALLY, REALLY revolutionize something. In that case, fuck the story, stories are a dime a dozen.
I'm more into... by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 06:57:09 PM
..."EYEBALL REAMING", to each his own!
There evidently aren't new stories... by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 06:58:29 PM
..thus the glut of re-makes, re-imaginings, re-boots, prequels, etc. One could only hope that stories were a dime a dozen.
oh my god Alfie, are you still going on about by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 07:00:09 PM
this crap? Are you that fucking insecure about your nationalism? Geez dude, get a fucking life..ok? If it helps you sleep at night thinking im anti-American then please have at it. Though its amazing that you post my response to you about America not having an asshole shortage, but you neglet to point out that that was in response to you calling me a janitor first. And by the way Alfie? How many languages do you speak? You sure are arrogant towards non-native English speakers on these talkbacks....
And im really not sure how you can continue by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 07:02:03 PM
to keep harping on about my supposed anti-americanism, while you are so blatantly anti-african. Are you really that oblivious to the hyprocisy in your posts?...
Dioxholster.....just please do everyone a favour by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 07:06:45 PM
and grow the fuck up. And just get over yourself, do you really think you can lecture me about racism? As if it has not and does not exist in your country. So where is this mythical land where you live? And you dont even know what the fuck you are talking about anyway....Just stay there in 1983 dude where you are obviously stuck and no great movies have come out since the OT, that way you can continue to delude yourself thats its the one and only great thing that ever existed...
Honestly, I speak 3 languages...and I'm by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 07:10:08 PM
learning Italian as we type away here. Why? Because I want to immerse myself more deeply into my favorite form of cinema, Italian NeoRealism.
Oh, I forgot southafricanguy, I read a 4th language by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 07:11:21 PM
I must have the ability to understand ASSHOLE, since I can read your posts.
Trumbull was like a god to me as a kid— by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 07:11:50 PM
I know ILM did the effects for Trek II, I was just wondering if Trumbull's shots were grainy. Thanks for clearing that up. By the way is it me, or does it seem like most innovative visionaries go over budget, especially in SPFX work?
southafricanguy by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 07:12:18 PM
Mon, did you escape from the home again? I know its you Mom, if I told you once....nobody says Oh My God anymore, its OMG! The home called and said if you're not back soon, no pudding for a week!
Christ, Alfie Boy are you on the hunt AGAIN?! by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 07:15:42 PM
Geezus.
OMG!!!What the fuck is OT? by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 07:16:10 PM

No. And I didn't know that Christ was on a hunt! by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 07:17:00 PM

I think he means OT = Original Trilogy by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 07:17:24 PM

Alfie...just let it go dude. Seriously you are by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 07:19:18 PM
putting way too much time and effort into this. Just answer for me why its ok for you to insult other people's cultures/nationalities, but if anyone says anything even resembling what you see as anti-americanism, you fly off the handle and rant and rave?
What's it all about ... . .. ALFIE? by DrMorbius	May 31st, 2009 07:19:36 PM

also, why am i the asshole since as Imagin78 by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 07:22:27 PM
pointed it was underoo that began the whole "racist thing". You then proceeded to insult me by making a factually incorrect statement about farm invasions, thereby implying that you could nt tell the difference between SA and Zim. And at least I had the balls toapologize for saying anything offensive to anyone. Whats your excuse?
SouthAfricanguy/asimov = classy fucking dudes by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:23:44 PM
Leave these guys alone1!
just that southafricanguy is a pretentious... by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 07:24:22 PM
...snob that was ripping into another Avatar related TB'er and had to drop the America Hater bullshit on him, so I wanted to make him see the light that his revered homeland was not Eden. At this point it's just fun to continue to rile up the asshole.
Also by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:26:52 PM
AVATAR is looking to be rather banal, unfortunately. Cameron on the one hand says "wtf, these WETA shots are fucking LMAO guys" and then turns around and bashes T3 (which he once supported) and then says the CGI will fucking be average and there may be a few good shots in the film, and then goes on to talk about new technology he developed BLAH fucking whatever????? Haha Avatar could fuck a wet sponge in a ShamWow factory....
but Alfie you are nt riling me up dude. you are by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 07:27:41 PM
just making yourself look like a self righteous a-hole that has been sooo insulted and wounded by my comments. And now you must pursue some kind of jihad against me.
COULDN't by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:28:00 PM
fuck a wet sponge in a Shamwow factory I meant
I ripped into a guy for making jokes about by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 07:29:01 PM
people dying og aids, and children becoming orphaned....yeah what pretentious snob behaviour right?
Not that that made sense anyways by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:30:43 PM

TITBAG, where have you been? by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 07:30:54 PM
We started drinking without you. My bad. That Trumbull is a visionary, isn't he?
and where did I ever say SA was eden? geez by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 07:30:55 PM
dude, i think you have read way too much into some of my comments. Obviously SA isnt Eden, one of the reasons I live in Korea.
You're still writing about me asshole. I moved on by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 07:31:45 PM
to SPFX guys and Space 1999, and your foul stench came across the digital ether once again. You, MB5K, and Ass-imovLives need to go and get a room as the butt-buddies you are. BTW, shouldn't you be watching the DMZ on our behalf?
Sorry Alfie, but It seems you may be putting by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 07:32:12 PM
far too much time and thought into this...
SouthAfrican by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:34:03 PM
Well, here in America, we think AIDS is funny because pop culture has chosen to ignore the massive global implications and instead turn it into a sick joke (see many american shows). What's funny, is as I type this, there is some commercial about the Lost cast raising money for AIDS kids through Soccer or something. LOL
Commerical on my TV by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:35:06 PM
I mean't
Is drinking required for this thread? by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:36:57 PM
If so I'm fucking shit faced right now, slow work day here at the office..............
Nah..this is just a goof to me. You actually have by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 07:37:54 PM
some decent things to say about flicks. I just wanna' pound on folks who keep bringing up the ugly-American stereotype. You may think it's arrogant, but a good chunk of the planet owes the USA a pat on the back, not a kick in the ass.
Oh...this peasant TITBAG is so annoying. by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 07:42:49 PM

Absolutely MegaBaltar5000— by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 07:43:32 PM
—Or maybe something even stronger…
Since this thread has slowly derailed by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:44:07 PM
I'm going to post up a fake myspace page I made today. What's funny is that my friends and I have always had this long running joke. I look kinda like Jake Fucking Gylenhall (spelling...??), my firned looks like Ben Affleck, and my other dude I know looks like Tom Hanks. We all of course barely resemble these guys, but it's funny. We had this funny idea for a Spinal Tap type of documentary called ARMORED MULLET. It's about a band with the same handle that is made up of our alter egos. It's a slow day here so I designed the album cover and created a myspace for Armored Mullet. Armored Mullet is ; Tom Hanks - Vocals Jake - Drums Ben - Bass Some dude from Queen who actually can play Music - Guitar myspace.com/armored_mullet
Dude...take a nap! You obviously are stoned! by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 07:48:03 PM

Armored Mullet Bitches! by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:55:18 PM

Titbag by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 07:55:44 PM
LOL!
Alfie....well I would mostly agree with you by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 08:00:26 PM
America has given the world a lot of good things. You guys gave us Stan Lee, Spielberg, hamburgers, Cameron (yeah i know he is originally from Canada, but his career was due to America), to name just a few. Oh..and thank you so much for Megan Fox!
And as I have said Alfie I apologized for some by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 08:04:13 PM
of my comments precisely because I realized they could be offensive to Americans on the talkback, especially SIXDEMONBAG, and ROUGELEADER66. However if someone (like dioxholster) is going to always attack me for apparantly no other reason than that im South Africa, the i have a right to in sult him and nhis natioanality too (even though its the laziest way to attack someone)...
So lets consider the matter closed, and by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 08:06:17 PM
move on....ok?
So who'll see this in 3D? Who prefers 2D? by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 08:08:32 PM
Let's see a show of hands.
Mega...hmm, yeah thats unfortunate as its by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 08:09:38 PM
such a massive social problem in some parts of the world. But thanks for the info dude...
black...i want t0o see it in 2D first. by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 08:10:25 PM

2D for me by MegaBaltar5000	May 31st, 2009 08:11:16 PM
After Journey to the steaming-bowl of dick located approximately in the center of the earf, 3D is a gimmicky fuking POS. True 3D would be some kind of Strange Days set up. Thats my not-so-humble opinion.
TITBAG…? Are you going? by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 08:11:47 PM
2D or 3D?
3D by imagin78	May 31st, 2009 08:13:43 PM
I guess I am in the minority, but I will see it in 3D first.
…M…Must you remind me of that MegaBaltar5000… by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 08:16:16 PM
Do you really want me to drink?
We'll see...I'll keep an eye on you! by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 09:03:48 PM

2D first, then 3D with some Fioricet for the headache. by Alfie Boy	May 31st, 2009 09:04:20 PM

YES!!! -- I discovered that I CAN see this new 3D!!! by JDanielP	May 31st, 2009 09:07:39 PM
Holy cow,...I had nearly (cue exaggeration) dropped into a depression, for being convinced of not having the eyes for 3D and James Cameron's AVATAR. But in having a tiny bit of hope, I took the family to see Pixar's "UP" in 3D...and was committed to staying for the entire run, even if it meant watching a blurry movie (for me). I had expected to see something like what you might see without the glasses, even with the glasses on. I have a powerfully dominant eye which affects my depth perception. Even so, I was flinching and nearly dodging some 3D effects! Thank the maker, I'M GONNA SEE AVATAR IN 3D!!! HOLY $#!T I FEEL LIKE THROWING A PARTY!!!
Awesome Q&A by TheMandrakeRoot	May 31st, 2009 09:25:44 PM
Great listen as usual with Cameron. The guy really knows his shit. Sounds like some footage is gonna be shown pretty soon which is cool. Even though it sounds like hes trying to temper expectations, I still think with his track record (Titanic was good and you know it) were gonna have something great. Either way it'll be interesting. Now I just with these fucking talkbacks werent populated with assholes getting all heated over stupid shit people say, and maybe people could actually discuss the topic at hand. Is it really that hard?
mandrakeroot...agree dude, it was a great lis by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 09:42:26 PM
ten. Whatever someone may think of him, there is no question he's a smart guy.
Hope you re right about us seeing something by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 09:43:01 PM
soon.
3D first of course by Rupee88	May 31st, 2009 09:45:42 PM
He's not adding the 3D to the film as an afterthought or as a gimmick. It is central to how he is shooting it. Beowulf 2D does not compare to 3D and Avatar will probably be similar, although live action is different than all CG of course.
Imagin78..my friend its not that i dont want to by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 09:46:04 PM
see it in 3D, but as i have said I have never seen a movie in 3D, si I simply want to see Avatar in 2D first, so that I canjudge it purely as a movie on its own terms. Otherwise im worried my reaction to it will different because of it being my first time experiance of a 3D movie. But if Avatar is as awsome as I hope it to be, then I will go check it out in 3D afterwards.....
That's fair, SAG. by imagin78	May 31st, 2009 09:52:34 PM
I respect that. I agree with other TBers that 3D is a gimmick. However, I do think it has come a long way. I thought Coraline was tremendous in 3D and I figure Cameron will really push the limits of 3D so as to reduce the gimmickry inherent in the format.
imagin78...yeah i think it may still be a by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 10:04:39 PM
gimmick, but I guess it depends on the movie its being used for right? Movies like Coraline or Avatar which are about someone going to a different world/reality I can see how 3D could enhace the actual experiance and what the movie is trying to do...But I dont think 3d will be used all the time, hopefully just where it adds something to the story/experiance...
Prolificacy by imagin78	May 31st, 2009 10:15:37 PM
I hope that Avatar is the beginning a prolific new chapter in Cameron's career. I would hate to see him disappear from filmmaking if Avatar is either a flop or blockbuster. I would like to see at least 4 new Cameron films by the end of 2020.
go see a 3D movie you losers by Rupee88	May 31st, 2009 10:35:08 PM
I can't believe how many people here have no seen films with the newer 3D technology. And btw, if you save your glasses, you only have to pay the extra price for 3D one time. Later, just buy a ticket to some other 2D movie in the same multiplex and reuse your glasses for the 3D one.
Rupee..thanks for the advice dude. I must by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 10:58:16 PM
admit to being a loser as I have not seen a 3D movie lol.
Imagin78...totally agree my friend. Would really by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 11:00:58 PM
like to see more movies from him. Hopefully he goes straight into BAA after he finishes post prod on Avavtar. And if Avatar is sucessful would be very interesting to see him make a trilogy out of it as he has said he would do if successful. Would nt mind seeing him take on a WWII movie....
The Dive by imagin78	May 31st, 2009 11:10:15 PM
Cameron also has his film about the married divers called "The Dive". He could probably film that quickly. If Arnold gets back into acting, I would love True Lies 2. All I know is that I better get at least a good 15 films from Cameron before he is done.
3D for me and then 2D—I just have to by blakindigo	May 31st, 2009 11:18:43 PM
see the new innovations. I need to see how he cuts an action sequence for the stereoscopic space. How will he work to provide with the immersive experience for the audience. What challenges and pitfalls are inherent in the format and will he sidestep them or sink?
imagin78....yeah dude, im agree. And by southafricanguy	May 31st, 2009 11:27:36 PM
unfortunatly he aint a young dude any more, so I hope he gets way more prolific....
southafricanguy by imagin78	May 31st, 2009 11:33:16 PM
Do you know when Avatar comes out in South Korea? I was just looking at the release dates and saw that France actually gets to see it two days before the US.
French have only 1D by MegaBaltar5000	Jun 1st, 2009 12:01:34 AM
Like their tanks, their movies are of very inferior tech.....so Cameron was like wtf here's the film early I feel bad................ROFL
Megabaltar...lol dude, you mean like their by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 12:45:27 AM
tanks have an extra gear? R for retreat. Just kidding, no offence meant to any french people here.
Imagin78...good question man. I really dont by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 12:48:42 AM
know. I have heard nothing about it here. But there are a lot of 3D theatres. The Koreans do love their movies and they useally stay on top of all the latest tech...
Dick Peabody article is a joke by MattmanReturns	Jun 1st, 2009 01:25:28 AM
He makes terrible accusations without offering any proof other than claiming "eyewitness statements" which are never backed up. You guys will believe anything.
How Dare you criticize MR. PEABODY? by DrMorbius	Jun 1st, 2009 01:34:57 AM
SHERMAN will set the WAYBACK MACHINE and .....Oh, Dick Peabody, never mind!!!
mattman....who the hell is dick peabody? by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 01:37:26 AM
and what is this article that is a joke...if I may ask?
Hey southafricanguy.. by DrMorbius	Jun 1st, 2009 01:39:42 AM
Do you know who Mr. Peabody is?
Peabody by MattmanReturns	Jun 1st, 2009 01:45:16 AM
http://tinyurl.com/nduofb Somebody above posted it... because for some reason or another The Twilight Zone tragedy got brought up at some point.
zooch by AsimovLives	Jun 1st, 2009 02:26:21 AM
Expectations for JJ's Star Trek have been stratospheric from the first day.
DrMorbius by AsimovLives	Jun 1st, 2009 02:29:21 AM
But in title of my post to call his attention, i didn't called him a Republican Space Ranger, did I? That's the point. Republican Space Ranger was the insult after the name. I'll always call him by his nick because that's howe she choses it and i respect that even from such a loathsome prick like him.
Caught some of T3 on TV last night by kwisatzhaderach	Jun 1st, 2009 04:24:30 AM
Absolutely terrible. When Arnie is walking around with the coffin painfully heldu by wires, sheesh. And the action looks like it was shot by the 2nd unit team responsible for The A Team and The Fall Guy. Woeful film. And LaserPants thinks its better than T2. Crazee.
Hey Kwis...whats up dude? Welllll...you do by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 05:14:53 AM
know that crazy is pretty much laser's stock in trade, right?
and yeah mostly agree with you about T3, but by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 05:16:05 AM
at this point im personally having a hard time deceiding which was worse T3 or TS....all I know it either way we just lost...
It's a smart move by tomimt	Jun 1st, 2009 05:19:20 AM
I think it's pretty smart from Cameron to downplay the hype: he knows, that the result will be ripped a part no matter what.
tomimt....yeah I think you are dead on pal by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 05:32:40 AM
Cameron is smart enough to have taken notes from what happened to the prequal trilogy and the matrix sequals imho....
hey southafricanguy by kwisatzhaderach	Jun 1st, 2009 05:33:13 AM
Terminator Salvation doesn't open here in the UK until June 3rd. Not planning on seeing it though. All the footage i've seen so far looks terrible.
yeah hyping the shit out of it will only lead to disappointment by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 06:29:41 AM
watchmen not included (of course)
Well Kwis allow me to save you the time and by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 08:39:20 AM
money my friend. Just avoid unless you want to be very dissapointed. After you see it, you will just get more and more annoyed/angry the more you think about it...
But kwis I can tell you that in my opnion I can by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 08:43:44 AM
now see why Cameron chose Sam Worthington. This guy really impressed me, he is really the best thing in the movie even though he is saddled with some really bad dialouge. He does struggle with his American accent a bit, but hey so did Connery...Otherwise I found him to be very action friendly, you really buy himin the action scenes, and he comes across as such a regular guy. Has a very bullshit free persona. Also suprised me how much warmth and humanity he brought to the role. In short consider me sold....
Hey SDB, hows it going dude? How was the by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 08:44:42 AM
wedding? Did you have a rough nite? lol...
Hey SDB, hows it going dude? How was the by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 08:44:47 AM
wedding? Did you have a rough nite? lol...
What idiots would make a terminator movie without you? by KevinMuller	Jun 1st, 2009 08:55:22 AM
God, amazing line by Cameron. Arnold had more emotion playing a robot than Bale did the entire movie. God, was that movie so god damn medicore.
Kevinmuller..yeah it was was nt it dude? Thats by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 09:07:24 AM
a good way to sum it up..mediocre...
T:$ - wow...someone should get fired for that by LabattsBleu	Jun 1st, 2009 09:31:49 AM
who ever was in charge should be fired. 90 million? it'll be lucky to crack 120 million domestically. A massive bomb by any measure...
Peter Griffin said it best by KevinMuller	Jun 1st, 2009 10:52:58 AM
Do we really need another another Terminator?
Cameron toning down his ego worries me... by fassbinder79	Jun 1st, 2009 11:28:19 AM
Does that mean he doesn't have a lot of faith in Avatar living up to the hype? Because that would bum me out.
SAG by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 11:34:54 AM
whats up yeah it was a good wedding...much is a blur..the wife and i pretty much spent the day recovering yesterday
kwisatzhaderach by AsimovLives	Jun 1st, 2009 11:36:16 AM
I also did watched some of the new Terminator movie, and it depressed me. I'm not expecting much from it. But even that is not an enough good bet anymore. I have had low expectations from nmany blockbusters and they mannage to be even worst then my worst fears. Is it me of are Hollywood blockbusters totally fucked up? This summer is an atrocity exhibition!
I don't think Cameron hyped Titanic prior to release either by LabattsBleu	Jun 1st, 2009 11:38:45 AM
so, the concern people have isn't consistent with past actions, where Cameron didn't hype work previously as far as i can recall...and all that work turned out well. That's not to say Avatar is going to be a watershed moment in film, but I don't think you can leap to any conclusions based on what he has said (or not said) to this point in time.
Poeple saying he's tossing his ego by AsimovLives	Jun 1st, 2009 11:39:40 AM
It's funny but in that interview he doesn't sound anything diferent then in all his interviews from all over this career. If there's anything different, is that he seems to have overcome his inicial press shyness. Check out his interviews in the ALIENS DVD made at the time he was directing the movie, and you see a guy who clearly is terribly uncorfortable being interviewed and can't wait for it to end.
LabattsBleu by AsimovLives	Jun 1st, 2009 11:41:53 AM
It's not Cameron that will be a problem. It's 20th Century Fox marketing that will be the real problem. When tyhey wuill hype the movie to kingdom come because it's from the director of Aliens, T2 and Titanic. They will say it's form the director of the most sucessful movie of all times. They will pump this shit sky-high. It's 20th century fox who will be the problem here, not Cameron.
I Have No Expectations For This by LaserPants	Jun 1st, 2009 11:56:06 AM
So odds are I'll thoroughly enjoy it. I reckon that all of you psychotic Cameron fanbots who think its going to be the Second Coming of Kubrick (aka The One True God Of Film) are going to be very disappointed. Or, hell, maybe I'm wrong. Nothing would make me happier than coming here to apologize for all I've said about James "Overrated" "Cameron over the past few months. I really hope its good. Hell, I really hope its GREAT. Sadly, I think it will be, at best, OK.
Cameron really has never HYPED his films. by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 11:57:34 AM
titanic was in hype overdrive because it was WAY over budget and delayed from summer to winter...the media wrongly attacked it as a failure. Cameron even gave back his director's salary. After opening day, media shut the fuck up quickly.
Laser--tread lightly in these waters by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 11:58:42 AM
you better be on your best behavior.
Don't bother with T:Salvation if you haven't seen it yet by bullet3	Jun 1st, 2009 12:04:19 PM
It's the biggest fucking wasted opportunity I've seen in my life. They had 200 million dollars to make a movie about the future war, and they don't show ANY of the fucking future war!!! There's isn't a single battle with more than like 1 terminator on 1 person, so lame. Not to mention it completley disregards the future talked about in the original movies. People keep saying "well this movie takes place before the future from the original movies", but the problem is, why didn't they make this about that future? There is no reason to tell the story in T:Salvation, its utterly perfunctory, doesn't add anything or develop anything. Seriously, Harry was correct, all that happens is John Conner gets his scar, big fucking whoop. And judging by the box-office, these guys fucked up their chance, now we'll never get to see that future movie we always wanted.
Six Demon Bag by LaserPants	Jun 1st, 2009 12:09:00 PM
All our differences aside, I will gladly offer my most humble and sincere apologies if, come December, AVATAR kicks my brain with awesome. Oh, and, btw, DRAG ME TO HELL is the best movie of the summer.
LaserPants by AsimovLives	Jun 1st, 2009 01:23:55 PM
So, you sill think that T2 is shit?
Yes...yes he does. by imagin78	Jun 1st, 2009 01:34:14 PM
It didn't have enough Steadicam shots.
Asimov--explain to jag off Laser what IRONY is by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 02:10:17 PM
schools out for me and im bored
Southafricanguy:Well I saw TS on Saturday by rogueleader66	Jun 1st, 2009 03:42:41 PM
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be, but definitely could have been better. There were many things I did like about it, but some things i did not like. I won't go into great detail but I will just say that I don't think it was terrible, but it also could have been better.
Six Demon Bag by AsimovLives	Jun 1st, 2009 04:16:46 PM
Irony is like the touch. Either you got it or not.
rogueleader66 by AsimovLives	Jun 1st, 2009 04:20:13 PM
You know what puzzles me the most about what i have seen from T4? The fighing is done in BROAD DAYLIGHT. And the war seems to be fought in the middle of the desert, instead of the ruines of los Angeles. And those human rebels are extremely well equiped. Helis? A-10 jetfighters? Where the hell they get all the fuel for the jets? They have a oil refinery working just for them? And what's with the transformer robot that acts like it's the tripod machine from The War Of The Worlds?
And why does that big robot has... by AsimovLives	Jun 1st, 2009 04:21:30 PM
... the shoulder cannon from Predator?
Asimov by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 04:25:10 PM
yeah i mentioned that earlier...one of my biggest problems is that it is not consistent with Cameron's TRUE version. nuclear war would blot out the sun..or so im told. it was fought in ruins...not in tempe arizona. it was like they tried to give it a global scope, an epic feel, but came up way short.
Approach by Cobbio	Jun 1st, 2009 05:18:23 PM
I like the fact Jim didn't seem to hype his film too much. He answered questions, made a couple of jokes, but didn't pimp his film too much. I like this handling of it. Also, "Aliens" in 70MM? Holy sheeeyit, I'd love to see that!
Too much by Cobbio	Jun 1st, 2009 05:20:27 PM
Too much "too much." Sorry. Should've edited a bit. Replace the second "too much" with "to high heaven." Thank you.
Robot = Daddy IS NOT IRONY by LaserPants	Jun 1st, 2009 06:18:07 PM
The fact that the Terminator is programmed to be a father figure is not "irony," it's a plot contrivance and marketing ploy. BUT, there is irony in T2, and I find it TOTALLY FUCKING HILARIOUS that you totally missed it (probably has something to do with not knowing what irony means). The one irony that I see in T2, and its a tragic one, is tied in with a time paradox, and is directly related to T1. Essentially: that it was the Terminator's arrival, destruction, and detritus retrieval which lead to the creation of the Terminator in the first place. THIS is IRONY (tinged with paradox). The same thing is present in classic myths like the story of Oedipus in which, Oedipus, terrified that his dark prophecy will come true -- he will kill his father and marry his mother -- goes to insane lengths to avoid his destiny... only to find that it was his very efforts to avoid his destiny that causes it to happen! Again, THIS IS IRONY. Robot = Daddy is NOT irony. It's a plot contrivance. You're welcome. Class dismissed.
Wow...Laser is actually being a nice guy...and by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 06:30:03 PM
reasonable too. Thanks for proving me wrong that you actually can engage in a conversation without just shouting crap in caps.....Now you know I totally disagree with you dude about your assesment of T2, but you are most welcome to your opinion....For me after the mass dissapointment of Indy4 and the prequal trilogy, Cameron is the last old great sci-fi action director that has a shot at delivering imho...
SDB, Rougeleader66, Asimov, whats up guys? by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 06:32:47 PM
how are things? Yeah what more can we say about TS? It had a few good things, but overall it was just a complete wasted oppertunity. The future war they showed was a joke, and as you say completely inconsistent with what we were both told and shown in the first 2 movies...
laser-you dumb fucking cunt by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 06:35:20 PM
i will say it agin for the idiots in the cheap seats: simple defintion---The simplest definition of irony is "the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: Situational irony is the disparity of intention and result: when the result of an action is contrary to the desired or expected effect. Likewise, cosmic irony is disparity between human desires and the harsh realities of the outside world (or the whims of the gods). a terminator, created to destroy mankind, is reprogrammed to protect the savior of mankind. By seeing the "humanity" in the terminator (a killing machine), Sarah regains hers. in no way in T2 does Arnold "become" a daddy to John. he doesnt take him to softball practice. he doesnt get ice cream with him. you're mad at you father, Jim Cameron forgives you.
But He Did Exactly What He Was Programmed To Do! by LaserPants	Jun 1st, 2009 06:45:15 PM
How is this irony? How is this an unexpected outcome? Robot was programmed to be a Good Guy Daddy Bot. This is NOT irony. Its a gimmick, its a plot contrivance, and for some people that worked, but its not irony. Sorry! Its not. By that token, Data from Star Trek being programmed to feel emotions = irony. Its so unexpected! Robots don't feel! I mean, c'mon. No offense dude, but its not ironic. Again, see my post above for elements of T2 that actually are ironic. Thanks.
Alanis wants her misuse of irony back. by imagin78	Jun 1st, 2009 06:49:47 PM

SDB....guys, cmon neither of us are going to by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 06:53:10 PM
ever convince the other. So lets just all agree to disagree. This constant fighting and insulting (which obviously im just as guilty of is really getting tiresome now) Though I am right there with your assessment of T2 SDB. As always my friend you are fkn professional in your opinions...
hey imagin 78, whats up dude? by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 06:54:10 PM

Yes IT did what IT was programmed to do by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 06:56:33 PM
its ironic that John and Sarah followed him. they, especially Sarah, have no reason to trust the terminator, but end up trusting IT. the irony doesnt have to lie in the hands of the terminator either. He chose to make a statement (ironic one at that) that "these machines can kill us, yet we are the ones who created them, and programmed them" that would be a situational irony, but that was introduced in the first film.
you know laser its interesting that you revere by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 06:57:43 PM
Kubrick so much considering how much he respected Cameron. When Cameron went to meet him for the first time in the mid 90s in England, Cameron just thought it would be a short meeting over some tea/coffee type thing. Instead Kubrick broke out his print of True Lies and insisted they watch it on his projector. So Cameron ended up spending the afternoon watching True Lies with Kubrick while Kubrick constantly asked him questions about how he pulle dof many of the visuals and sequences in True Lies. Tis a true story...
SAG--i should just let it go..Laser is actually acting better by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 06:59:30 PM
my bad LAser, we can continue this conversation in a civilized way from now on.
So you realize that if Kubrick was still alive by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 07:00:18 PM
and you had an oppertunity to meet him, if you told him that Cameron was overrated, he would have just looked at you funny, and then proceeded to find the fastest way to get away from you...
Yeah SDB, lets all just all be zen from now on by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 07:08:33 PM
dude. lol.
Thanks Turd...will get right on that. Man you by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 07:10:20 PM
are just 100% fkn professional....
Morning, SAG. by imagin78	Jun 1st, 2009 07:15:37 PM
It is great to see a détente forming between everyone and Laser. Let us celebrate with a screening of Terminator 2 and 2001. Something for everybody.
not a fan of 2001 by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 07:20:53 PM
just kidding
Imagin78...yeah dude, lets all just get back to by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 07:28:09 PM
discussing film. Actually guys I must admit that I really am not a fan of 2001. Now before you call the men in white coats to haul me away, I absolutely respect how technically revolutionary it was, and make no mistake its expertly well made. Also love some of Kubricks films (Full metal jacket, barry lyndon, eyes wide shut, the shining). But for me I just find 2001 kind of boring. And its a very cold movie. Also, I always felt the end was just a cop out, like they had answers and so just went for complete ambiguity. imho thats not particularly creative, its almost like a get out of jail free card. Pose all kinds of interesting, complex questions...and then provide no answers of any kind, just make it so ambiguous so anyone can attribute any meaning they want to it. Thus everyone is wrong and/or right depending on what they think it means...
AsimovLives by rogueleader66	Jun 1st, 2009 07:28:12 PM
Yea anything we have seen previously shows the fighting being done at night, because as Reese said in T1, "you lay low during the day but at night you can move around" (not the exact quote but close enough). So that's a bit odd. As far as the resistance being well equipped, I am at a loss. I can only assume that not everything was destroyed during Skynet's initial attack. But it does seem like an awful lot of supplies were there for them. The giant robot, well I thought it was cool, but not really needed. Probably an attempt at pandering to the Transformers crowd. I did like the cycle Terminators though. One big complaint I have is the the middle of the movie didn't really feel like a Terminator movie, I said to my buddy who I saw it with "For a Terminator movie there don't seem to be many Terminators in it. The last 1/3 of the movie kinds made up for it, but for a short time I forgot I was watching a Terminator movie, and I should not have. Overall I would say it was an entertaining movie, the action sequences were well done, but there were many things that could have been done better. Sam Worthington was decent, I could see him becoming a decent action star. The Arnold thing at the end was, I have to say, pretty damn cool, and although i did not see Wolverine, my buddy said that it was a thousand times better than how they did Patrick Stewart. The CGI for the scene was pretty flawless. I admire the fact they they tried to do something different with this movie, and the good stuff in it just makes me think had they tried just a bit harder, it could have been a really great movie.
And while i get that that works for many by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 07:30:13 PM
people, I could just never get into it...
Cameron is speaking live on Avatar right now at E3! by Orionsangels	Jun 1st, 2009 07:31:10 PM
But since AICN is lame and doesn't think much about gaming. They aren't covering, but later when they catch up. They'll post something about it.
E3 by imagin78	Jun 1st, 2009 07:34:16 PM
Yeah, I'm listening to the conference right now. He did say the ending for Avatar would kick ass.
Avatar Release Date December 18th?? by JediMindTrick	Jun 1st, 2009 07:42:19 PM
Did I just hear him right? He said December 18th was the release date! I'll have the clip up later tonight!
Avatar Release Date December 18th?? by JediMindTrick	Jun 1st, 2009 07:42:25 PM
Did I just hear him right? He said December 18th was the release date! I'll have the clip up later tonight!
Yes. by imagin78	Jun 1st, 2009 07:46:28 PM
December 18th has been the release date for a while now. However, if you are lucky enough to live in France, Belgium or Egypt, you get to see it on the 16th.
imagin78...dude im unable to listen to it now by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 08:03:45 PM
could you please tell em if there has been any footage shown? Of either the film or game? And did he really say the ending would kick ass?
SAG by Six Demon Bag	Jun 1st, 2009 08:10:29 PM
wait for the official link to this..and not just a bunch of TBers..wow im jealous.
Tease. by imagin78	Jun 1st, 2009 08:23:46 PM
Yeah, Cameron didn't show anything, which is probably for the better. He did go into detailed description of the film. Told people not to confuse it with The Matrix. Said the female protagonist would be a hot, kick-ass heroine. He spent over a year just designing everything in the film. Said they made thousands of designs. He said that everyone who has seen parts of the film have described it as being in a dream. They called it the most immersive footage they have ever seen.
Cameron at Ubisoft E3 Press Conference by Johnno	Jun 1st, 2009 09:11:34 PM
Told us a lot of details about a lot of cool things! Release date of Dec 18th, Ubisoft making game in stereoscopic 3D... They'll probably demo the game behind closed doors for press under NDA... But a part of me hopes that maybe those rumors about Sony incorporating 3D into PS3 are true and we get to see a glimpse of it at their press conference... of course probably only the audience can see the trailer/whatever in 3D... Anyway... Marketsaw has some screenshots from the game up! Looks colourful! :D
SDB...dude, turd is right aicn is very slow by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 10:55:25 PM
/late with news (sometimes days) or they dont even post stuff. You really have to go elswhere for the latest stuff. Talkbacks really is the only reason to still come here.
Ok..just got back from checking out those by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 11:08:55 PM
pictures at marketsaw.com...Holy shit! That stuff looks incredible, based on what ive read in that old scriptment, and those pictures....man we could be getting one of the most epic, and just outright damn cool action set pieces ever....
for me personally, just those few pictures by southafricanguy	Jun 1st, 2009 11:12:59 PM
are way better, and have me more excited than anything I have seen out of the big action movies this summer (be it the movie or a trailer) Like TS (which was crap imho), star trek (which i really enjoyed), TRansformers 2 (should have good spectacle, but will be the useal braindead bay movie), and gijoe (which lets be honest just looks retarded the more we see of it)
This is it. by imagin78	Jun 2nd, 2009 12:09:25 AM
I have a feeling that Cameron might have finally made the quintessential sci-fi land battle. This is what the Future War and the Battle of Naboo should have been. I get a sense that this will be for sci-fi battles, what LOTR was for fantasy. This really could be for old fashioned sci-fi what Raiders was for serials. With Tom Swift, John Carter of Mars and this, maybe we have some good stuff to look forward to. Boy, I am really gushing here. I am not sure I believe my own hype. Oh, hell. I do. I can't wait. Don't fail me Big Jim.
Imagin78....preach brother..lol. Yeah I think by southafricanguy	Jun 2nd, 2009 12:34:22 AM
you just put it better than I ever could have. Especially your comment about this doing for sc-fi battles what LOTR did for Fantasy battles...
Can't wait. by imagin78	Jun 2nd, 2009 12:45:30 AM

December can't get here soon enough. by imagin78	Jun 2nd, 2009 12:48:23 AM
Anyway, I got to get some sleep. Have a good one southafricanguy. I will talk to you tomorrow. In the mean time, check out this trailer for the upcoming Star Wars game that someone in another talkback posted. I wish Lucas could have done something like this in the prequels. http://tinyurl.com/nmnf3m
you and me both dude. What do you think of by southafricanguy	Jun 2nd, 2009 12:48:37 AM
that picture that shows a gunship being attacked by those blue dragon type creatures? Fucking awsome to me...
forget their name from the scriptment, but I by southafricanguy	Jun 2nd, 2009 12:50:03 AM
love their design. Also love how the mech armour and the secfor troops look. Shit...im really starting to get hyped about this...
okay imagin78, have a good sleep dude. And by southafricanguy	Jun 2nd, 2009 12:51:15 AM
thanks for the link. Though I think we all wished Lucas had done it different
southafricanguy by AsimovLives	Jun 2nd, 2009 02:28:09 AM
2001's ambiguity is the reason why we are still talking about it today, 41 years later.
southafricanguy by AsimovLives	Jun 2nd, 2009 02:36:51 AM
And if Caemron read your coments on your opinion of 2001, he would look at you funny. For starters, that's his favorite movie. He claims he saw it 20 times at the theaters back when it was released. Think about that, 20 times. He even put an hommage in Aliens, when they adapted one of the music used in 2001, Aram Khachaturian's Gayane Ballet Suite, and had James Horner re-arranged to be the Aliens opening and closing title theme. That's not incidental, that's a deliberate quote and hommage. Again, 2001 is Cameron's favorite movie. and i'm sure he could go with great lenghts to you ex+plaining why it's not a cold movie. I'm also certain he would dispute the accusation it of being boring too.
Asimov...you are right my friend. But I never by southafricanguy	Jun 2nd, 2009 02:47:48 AM
slammed either 2001, i didnt say it was shit, did I? I said it was expertly well made, and that I can appreciate its technical accomplishments. And there is no question that its been very influential. Also, I never slammed Kubrick. The man was a filmaking genius. Cmon Asimov..you know that that is the difference between what I posted and how others post where they call things crap. I made it very clear that what I said was nothing more than my opinion/personal tastes. I just happen to love Kubricks other movies much more. For example I happen to think Eyes Wide Shut is very underrated...
While Laser passes his opinion off as fact by southafricanguy	Jun 2nd, 2009 02:51:27 AM
by saying that Cameron is overrated or crap, and then he argues it repeatedly while useing only very subjective points to put his position across..etc. Now you know thats not what I did Asimov....
I would never attack anyone for liking 2001. by southafricanguy	Jun 2nd, 2009 02:52:52 AM
because I am able to stand back from myself and admire and respect 2001/Kubrick for what it is, even if it doesnt personally appeal to me...
Now...that being said...Asimov, how are you? by southafricanguy	Jun 2nd, 2009 02:53:55 AM
What you been up to dude? Have you checked out those new Avatar pictures at marketsaw?
OMG! Those pictures are making me salivate. by blakindigo	Jun 2nd, 2009 03:38:56 AM
What the hell is Cameron up to? Geezus, my expectations just jumped up a notch. Southafricanguy, how're you doing? Asimov what's good?
Blakindigo...im cool dude, whats up with you? by southafricanguy	Jun 2nd, 2009 04:42:12 AM
yeah, how fucking awsome are those pictures? Im really starting to think this realy could be the next big sci-fi movie (ala star wars, matrix etc..)
southafricanguy by AsimovLives	Jun 2nd, 2009 07:09:01 AM
In my own characteristic emphatic way, i was just stressing a point. I'm quite aware that you didn't bashed 2001, not even remotly. i know that you praised it. I just the need to point out that it's the movie's ambiguity whoch made it a classic, and also, that it's Cameron's all time favorite movie. And that he got to meet Kubruick in his lifetime must had been a complete elation to him,probably one of the best personal and professional events of his life. Too bad the movie Cameron got to watch with Kubrick wa his True Lies. The Abyss is the closest thing that Cameron ever did as his own 2001. And or course, there was Solaris, which he produced.
And Eyes Wide Shut is underrated! Yes indeed! by AsimovLives	Jun 2nd, 2009 07:10:16 AM
And what suprises me the most is that only know are people coming around to it, 10 years after it's releas. but then again, this has happened with all of Kubrick's movies after Dr Strangelove.
southafricanguy by AsimovLives	Jun 2nd, 2009 07:11:23 AM
I'm deliberatly avoiding watching any new stuff from Avatar. I'm sure you can understand why.
southafricanguy by AsimovLives	Jun 2nd, 2009 07:12:32 AM
I'dlike you to watch this, it's an online review. Checkl it out. The guys there say many things i fully agree with. Hope it enlights tyou a bit as well. http://www.youtub e.com/watch?v=U_yyhm9rZHo
blakindigo by AsimovLives	Jun 2nd, 2009 07:15:31 AM
Hi friend, I'm not too bad, and yourself? As for what i'm up, well, sicne msot of the more interesting talkbacks are now doing out, i'm not doing much in here. And avoiding being spoiled about Avatar. And desperatly waiting for Moon and District 9 and The Road to be released. Last weekend i saw parts of T4, and it totally cut any remaning enthusiasm i might had about it, which was low to begin with. I'll watch it this weekend, just for the hell of it.
T3 Haters are like lemmings by Eyegore	Jun 2nd, 2009 08:57:42 AM
Cameron liked T3 because it didn't suck. Simple. Sorry, does that not mesh with your groupthink mentality? Who told you it sucked? You probably hated the Matrix sequels too, for the same reason.
T3 Haters are like lemmings by Eyegore	Jun 2nd, 2009 09:22:11 AM
Cameron liked T3 because it didn't suck. Simple. Sorry, does that not mesh with your groupthink mentality? Who told you it sucked? You probably hated the Matrix sequels too, for the same reason.
southafricanguy by rogueleader66	Jun 2nd, 2009 12:03:37 PM
Whats up bro? Did you read my comments on TS? All is good here, well sorta...got a family member on the brink of dying, not a cool situation. Otherwise, all is well here. AsimovLives, did you get a chance to read the article I posted on my blog about The Hidden? If you are interested let me know. Carry on fellas talk to you later.
rogueleader66 by AsimovLives	Jun 2nd, 2009 12:30:19 PM
Goddammit, i forgot!! Can you link me again, please? It would be nice to read the thoughs of somebody who also knows that little underrated movie. There's something in that mvoie which for me was the first time i ever seen in a movie before: a blind magazine quickloading of a pistol. Kyle McLahlan does that when he's shooting the hooker with the alien inside, i think (the hooker was non other then Ivanova from Babylon 5).
rogue--sorry to hear about your family member by Six Demon Bag	Jun 2nd, 2009 05:03:30 PM

Asimov, SDB by rogueleader66	Jun 2nd, 2009 06:37:36 PM
Asimov, I will gladly give you the link again, enjoy. Feel free to poke around my blog if you want to, I have not done anything on it in months, but there's a lot there. I am gonna get back into it soon. http://movietalktime.b logspot.com/2008/11/blast-from -past-4.html SDB, thanks, went to see her today, doing better but the outlook is never good for pancreatic cancer, but we are hoping for the best.
Opps asimov by rogueleader66	Jun 2nd, 2009 06:39:49 PM
if the link doesn't work, I noticed that the b and the l in blogspot are separated so you may have to correct that. LOL
sorry to hear about your family, rogueleader 66… by blakindigo	Jun 2nd, 2009 07:43:05 PM
Best of wishes…
blakindigo by rogueleader66	Jun 2nd, 2009 08:15:14 PM
Ty for your well wishes, it is appreciated. Hoping for the best.
I have complete confidence in his ability to push the boundries by fisheater	Jun 8th, 2009 11:02:36 AM
Cameron is a master at this so i wouldnt worry about him messing this up. I am just dying to see a fucking trailer though, wtf.
Cameron should make 'Starship Troopers' by DocMHumphrey	Jun 8th, 2009 11:38:16 AM
I mean the real Heinlein 'Starship Troopers'. Obviously (and referenced by Cameron himself) his inspiration for 'Aliens' and look at the mech shots for 'Avatar'. I would love to see his concepts, action, and the truly foreboding feel for a humanity not certain of winning a war against two alien species at the same time. I bet that he could really bring a gravitas to the boot camp training (ala Kubrick's 'Full Metal Jacket'). Instead of the Camp Cheese of Verhoven's training, which included the hardship of showering naked with ladies. How about the harsh training of dropping the troops naked in the middle of a forest during winter to fend for themselves only with a knife, to essentially become a survivalist out of nothing. It is 'Band of Brother' for the Sci-Fi crowd. Cameron is the man to bring that kind of awesome to the screen.
I'd be pissed about 'Terminator Salvation' as well. by DocMHumphrey	Jun 8th, 2009 12:06:49 PM
'Terminator' and 'Terminator 2' are fun, great sci-fi films. The brought some great effects (The T-1000), some interesting characters, introduces the concept of a time paradox (What came first, John Connor being born at all or John Connor first living to send Kyle Reese back in time to be his own father?), etc. SPOILERS First off, inhertitantly, we have three Terminator films that only hint at a future war with machines (which, I can honestly say that 99.9% of us want to really see) and deal with time travel. To me, time travel in all the Terminator films to a plot device to get everything to work. You can say that, not only was it the basis of the original film, but it was SkyNet's "Last Ditch" effort to wipe out John Connor's existance before the man was even born. Nasty plan, but effective. It was also stated by Kyle Reese that the Resistance "had won". The Arnoid sent back in time was it's final effort...that if it killed Connor in the future, that it wouldn't make any difference. Bringing things up to speed to 'Terminator Salvation'. Let's make a film, that totally ignores the canon of the original 2 films, tacking on parts of the third film for major plot devices. Mainly speaking of the following contradicting/continuity issues: If SkyNet knows who Kyle Reese is and his importance, why not just kill him immediately? Holding him takes away the concept of even building time travel in the first place, unmaking not only plot points, but the other films altogether.Why even make a T-800 infiltration unit, when you have already made the Marcus Wright super infiltration unit?How does John Connor survive in a fight against the T-800, the same model that punched through Bill Paxton with one hit in the first film?Why is everyone using computers? On the technical side of things, the film's cinematography is horrible. NOTE TO CINEMATOGRAPHERS & MICHAEL BAY SHAKEY CAM MIGHT LOOK COOL ON A SMALL EDITING COMPUTER SCREEN WHEN THE HUMAN EYE CAN FOCUS ON A SMALL AREA. IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD ON A LARGER THAN A HOUSE SIZED SCREEN. Speaking of editing. One of the worst editing jobs I have seen. 'Jolting' is the only adjective I can think to describe it. Completely cutting the pace of a scene, without continuity into another scene, sometimes in the middle of dialogue.
Sorry for the rant, but.... by DocMHumphrey	Jun 8th, 2009 12:19:07 PM
Writers - amuature and professional - come to this site for whatever reason that we all come here. We love movies. Things are pretty simple when writing a film into an already established series with set rules. Get a giant white board - They cost about $100 bucks for a good one of respectable size. One that white board, you list everything established, in this case original source material written only by Cameron (it is agreed the only source that matters). Now everytime that someone has a idea, premise, scene, concept, thought, sidenote, anything...match it against what's on that board. Heaven forbid that you have to watch the original films to take fucking notes. Secondly, foreshadowing sucks. Example: "Wow, you have a strong heart." later having it be the pinnacle plot point. That is hack amuature crap. We all know it. Ted: "Bob, where did you get that garden hose?" Bob: "Well Ted, I don't know where it came from but it's going to be important in the future somehow." Later on the garden hose is used to kill aliens that are attacking a planet with a high humitidy atmosphere to abduct entities that are 80% composed of water. NOT ORIGINAL, STUPID, ILL-CONCEIVED, and ABOVE ALL INSULTING TO YOUR AUDIENCE.
3D means my prescriptions must be on by obriensg1	Aug 6th, 2009 04:42:16 PM
I have horrible vision in my left eye but perfect in my left. I never wear my prescription glasses. That means when I plan to see a film in 3D I have to put the glasses on in the morning to adjust my eyes to them and put the 3D ones over it. I forgot to do this for UP, and while some stuff looked cool, I know by discussions with friends I couldn't fully see some effects. That said I look forward to Avatar in IMAX 3D and even more forward to Tron Legacy in IMAX 3D. Beowulf was amazing in that format

Talkbacks

Cameron on AVATAR - 3D will be 1.85 to 1 and 2D will be full Scope - read why!

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks