Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

Raimi does not exist in this dojo
by Cobra--Kai
May 29th, 2009
07:56:00 AM
At the risk of a doing a Harry style ramble...

I remember seeing CRIMEWAVE (anyone remember that one?), EVIL DEAD, and EVIL DEAD 2 back in the day, all within about a month of each other.

It was an important moment in the life of young Cobra as it was one of the first times my youthful brain comprehended what a 'director' does. Why a film isn't actually defined by its cast (as you think when your a kid), but why its defined by its director (this unseen wizard behind the scenes).

Raimi was the first of these 'wizards' that I discovered and for that he'll always be a glory boy.

Historical ramble over. DRAG ME TO HELL sounds great btw.


by Cobra--Kai
May 29th, 2009
07:57:08 AM
yeah, I reposted this from the other tb...

...least I didn't say first.

No First?
by lokipan
May 29th, 2009
08:00:31 AM
Hmm
Fly crawling up nose is FUCKING DISTRACTING
by turketron_2
May 29th, 2009
08:01:08 AM
The trailers look like shit (though the fly going up her nose makes me cringe every time I see it, so Kudos to you Mr. Raimi!) but I'm considering seeing this now. But as I said in the other review talkback, should I grab up a lady friend, or one of my b-movie loving hombres...
I always felt Raimi was inspired by Wise
by digital_soul
May 29th, 2009
08:01:09 AM
The way Wise moves the camera in the Haunting, giving that sense of an unseen force trying to push its way in to our dimension was very much Wise's trick before Raimi used it so effectivly in the Evil Dead flicks.
Movie looks cool
by lokipan
May 29th, 2009
08:02:04 AM
but the special effects in the trailer look a touch dated

by Cobra--Kai
May 29th, 2009
08:02:08 AM
"...grip the armrests and curl our toes with fear..."

Capone, nicely written review. Scariest film I saw in recent years was THE ORPHANAGE, that one really tickled my terror bone for some reason. Hope DRAG ME TO HELL does the same...

Okay then..... SECOND
by arthurrex007
May 29th, 2009
08:02:25 AM
I am looking forward to this now. I was afraid it would be too PG13 for my taste in horror. Love Rami so I should trust him. Except I could do without another Spiderman.
I've never seen the first Evil Dead...
by turketron_2
May 29th, 2009
08:03:23 AM
Need to do that. 2 and 3 are awesomeness, though I don't really need to say that to you guys.
Night of the Demon+Thinner+ Evil Dead =
by Bobman46
May 29th, 2009
08:03:54 AM
A damn good time. Very fun film, a great audience movie and very very loud.
Liked second Evil Dead the most
by arthurrex007
May 29th, 2009
08:07:19 AM
First did have the Tree Rape scene however, I think that was original!
Could have been title of S3 finale of Supernatural
by turketron_2
May 29th, 2009
08:08:06 AM
Yes?
Can't wait
by Fa_Tass_DinoMolester
May 29th, 2009
08:08:09 AM
Love the Evil Dead trilogy (especially the 2nd), and this looks like it's very much from the same mold. Seeing this tomorrow...sounds like it could be the first good movie of the summer!
Evil Dead
by lostbat
May 29th, 2009
08:08:33 AM
Never will forget that Evil Dead screening in my youth: An open air theater in a local forest in the north of Holland. People left the premises screaming,crying and vomiting. Spiderman 1 was a Spidey geeks wet dream come true. But Raimi will always be remembered for his Evil Dead!! Looking forward to this one.
I didnt much care for Evil Dead 3
by digital_soul
May 29th, 2009
08:08:55 AM
It was fun, but i don't hold it in the same regard as I do 1 or 2. Cobra I agree with you on The Orphanage, although Let the Right One in also did it for me. Seems theres about one really good horror film a year that properlly gets me. Last 3 have been LTROI, REC and The Orphanage, be good if an English language flick can now join the list!
Re: EvilWizardGlick, yeah, that's what I heard
by turketron_2
May 29th, 2009
08:09:59 AM
Also, that the first movie he wasn't actively trying to make it that hilarous but it was so bad-good that it was anyway.
turketron does not exist in this dojo
by Cobra--Kai
May 29th, 2009
08:10:20 AM
turketron, first EVIL DEAD is extremely low budget (it was gonzo before gonzo was even a word), but... give it a chance (watch it late night and alone) and you'll get a few unsettling chills, a good bit of gore, and you'll certainly see the genesis of the trademark camera flourishes and visual tricks of the later Raimi movies. Def worth a watch.

by Cobra--Kai
May 29th, 2009
08:14:21 AM
ps. turketron dont listen to anything EvilWizardGlick says.

He's evil. And he's wrong.

Oh, I have no doubt EVIL DEAD is worth the watch
by turketron_2
May 29th, 2009
08:16:13 AM
I'm definitely going to throw it on sometime soon, I don't know why it's taken me so long actually.

by Cobra--Kai
May 29th, 2009
08:20:39 AM
"Don't try to frighten me with your sorcerer's ways, EvilWizardGlick, we all know that EVIL DEAD 2 is not actually a remake of the original"

GUuuurrrghh... force choke... garrrggghh....

Tree rape? Might that have made The Happening DECENT?
by turketron_2
May 29th, 2009
08:21:50 AM
Damn son. Tree-rape in Evil Dead? Only other movie I've seen with something similarly disturbing is when the spiney vines kill the evil lady in the Silent hill movie.

Hmm, now that I think of it, if the climax of The Happening had involved sexually assaulting murderious plants, I might have bothered to watch it. The reviews that describe the assholes in the movie running from pollen spores in the wind or whatever, makes me curious to see it just for the laughs though.

wonder if theres any "Getting Equipped Zoom-In" scenes
by turketron_2
May 29th, 2009
08:24:44 AM
In DMtH? That shit's groovy.
The Quick and the Dead is my favorite Raimi film
by Stuntcock Mike
May 29th, 2009
08:45:24 AM
Fucking love it. As far as this one goes, can't wait.
hey asshats
by simondark
May 29th, 2009
08:52:46 AM
yeah you,you bunch of no talent ass clowns who keep reffering to the evil dead as a trilogy.It aint.There are two evil dead films and army of darkness.get it the fuck right...and you call yourselves fans...more like little girls who dont know anything about evil dead...bunch of asshats....everyone else..your cool.I'm out.
and another thing
by simondark
May 29th, 2009
08:56:46 AM
evil dead and its sequal are different films..the tone the feel the length the actress who gets killed...there different movies completely.2 is more about the book of the dead.1 is primarily about the people getting killed in the cabin.I could go on,but ive embarrassed you people enough.
This will make for an entertaining weekend.
by Yorick_Brown
May 29th, 2009
09:39:20 AM
EVIL DEAD marathon followed by an early morning showing of DRAG ME TO HELL. Summer starts NOW.

by Cobra--Kai
May 29th, 2009
09:54:51 AM
EVIL DEAD 2 when the girlfriend does a headless dance in the forest while Ash watches from the window features the most exquisite piece of piano music.

Always wondered if that musical piece was written for the film or if it was already out there.

simondark is gonna be ripped apart soon
by T 1000 xp professional
May 29th, 2009
09:57:19 AM
lol not by me. i'll just watch...here's a preview though. Evil Dead . Evil Dead 2. ( same names and character). Evil Dead 2 ends with Ash back in time where Army of Darkness begins. Same character and continuation of story. I've sounded enough like a dork, I will cease and let somebody else call you names.
oh and that same argument says The Dark Knight
by T 1000 xp professional
May 29th, 2009
09:59:00 AM
is not a sequel to Batman Begins. One Batman movie and one umm Dark Knight movie.. lol.
Thanks for the segue, T 1000! To "simondark":
by gigantis2000
May 29th, 2009
10:06:23 AM
Simon, I don't know what the hell your deal is, but you sound like a dickish retard who is somehow a fan of Evil Dead. To be clear, I don't know what the hell your "argument" is supposed to be, but Army of Darkness is the sequel to Evil Dead 2. Evil Dead 2 is often (understandably) mistaken for a remake of the first Evil Dead, but the beginning section is just a (slightly altered) review of the first movie; Army of Darkness does the same thing at the beginning.
This movie seems OOOOOH GOOOOOD.
by Warcraft
May 29th, 2009
10:42:02 AM
WHAT DON'T YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND? See this instead of terminater, duh!!!
Saying you've never seen a classic?
by Flip63Hole
May 29th, 2009
11:14:23 AM
What the f#ck do you want, a cookie? Jesus Christ...
simondark
by Fa_Tass_DinoMolester
May 29th, 2009
11:44:46 AM
From Wikipedia: "A trilogy is a set of three works of art, usually literature, film, or video games, that are connected and can be seen either as a single work or three individual works. Most trilogies are works of fiction involving the same characters or setting...others are connected only by theme". Now piss off, you big-mouthed bitch!
And I know Wikipedia is useless
by Fa_Tass_DinoMolester
May 29th, 2009
11:48:14 AM
but that definition happens to be correct. "I've embarrassed you people enough", indeed.
do the end credits say"VISIT UNIVERSAL STUDIOS"?
by Six Demon Bag
May 29th, 2009
01:59:00 PM
ask for babs?---that would be awesome.
Gypsy curses
by Baryonyx
May 29th, 2009
02:10:44 PM
Drag Me To Hell sounds great. But I have one problem with the plot, and that is the whole 'gypsy curse' set-up (also used in Stephen King's Thinner.) How come these gypsies can summon demons, or make you waste away (as in Thinner), but can't meet their mortgage payments? Couldn't the gypsy have used the demon to bump off some, I dunno, mobsters to get some money to pay for the house and not have to beg for it. Now, I haven't seen the film yet - so maybe this is explained (perhaps it's a one-off curse or something.)
@Six Demon Bag: Yes, they do.
by growltiger
May 29th, 2009
04:39:23 PM
It was fun to see the old tram.
Entertaining but not great
by growltiger
May 29th, 2009
04:54:49 PM

I think I am growing weary of the empowered pixie motif. Yes, I am.

SPOILERS...

No complaints about Ms Lohman, but I fear the perky heroine is wearing out its welcome (with me). That, and, well, she kind of had it coming. Christine could have helped Mrs Ganush but she chose not to do so. And it seems that Christine also sacrificed the kitty and that was just so wrong. And her at first willingness to pass the token was off putting. No mercy for you, young lady, even if you did take responsibility at the end. And if you cannot like your heroine, where does a viewer go from there?

Justin Long was fine, as were the other supporting players. I liked Dileep Rao as the swammy with a fondness for Carl Jung. I think I would have liked more of a debate between Long (the academic) and Rao (the spiritualist), but more exposition would probably have spoiled the fun.

So was it fun? Well, IMHO, some episodes of this years batch of Supernatural were more effective than this movie. And more compelling, too. But it was fun to have the zaniness and creep-fest that the Evil Dead series has given us. Fans of the Evil Dead should attend this movie as a vote of confidence for the production of Evil Dead 4.

Off I go... scampering into the jungles of the night.

Trite - It's a horror film for novices
by Dark Knight Lite
May 29th, 2009
05:01:15 PM
I just got back from a 2:45 showing, and I'm angry as hell. I bought the hype, and was truly looking forward to the "return of true horror." What I got was an extended episode of TALES FROM THE CRYPT. This would have been fine as a 45 minute segment of an anthology horror movie, but as a feature, it offers nothing new. Neil Marshall has nothing to worry about.
Predictability was part of its undoing
by growltiger
May 29th, 2009
05:48:53 PM

Without going too deep into (any more) spoilers, one complaint I had was that there were key plot developments that were telegraphed early on and made key plot turns inevitable. Which is sad because there was a lot imaginative action delivered by the film that reminded me of the Evil Dead series.

I found that I was neither enamoured by the plot nor the character of the heroine (with all due respect to the actress), and so the fun and excitement of the effects festival was not enough for me. So I expected more from Sam Raimi.

Did they get their $10,000 back?
by Odog
May 29th, 2009
06:49:29 PM
The bad cgi really took me out of the movie. Doing this stuff in post was a real let down to me.
I loved this movie, just not as much as Up
by SoylentMean
May 29th, 2009
08:06:14 PM
Still, Raimi effectively re-earned my respect after the down right terrible Spiderman 3. This movie is going to play a lot better to older audiences that grew up "discovering" Evil Dead (and its subsequent sequels, funny how that works, sequels being subsequent) from their local video store.

I don't think the kiddies are gonna dig it as much, seeing how at the showing I was at, during a scene involving an anvil, a teenage girl eloquently (and loudly) observed that it was "just like a cartoon". Thanks child, next time shut the fuck up.

Of all the things to like in this movie my favorite are Mrs. Ganush, the sound design, and the fleeting glimpses we get of the Lamia. That's Lamia, not Labia folks. I know some of you on here are deathly afraid of labias so I thought I'd help clear that up.

Overall, this is probably one of the best Horror movies to come out in theaters in years.

If you like the Evil Dead films or just old school Horror in general, you have to go see this in theaters.

I've been up since 3:45 am, time to watch the Evil Dead trilogy
by SoylentMean
May 29th, 2009
08:15:04 PM
Yep, these three films do not form Voltron but they do make a well known and established TRILOGY. Not sure what the guy up above is trying to prove by saying otherwise.

While I get the whole "Evil Dead 2 is a bigger budget remake of the original" argument, I personally don't buy it. And that's my opinion, I'm sticking to it.

I win.

I'LLSWALLOWYOURSOULI'LLSWALLOWYO URSOULI'LLSWALLOWYOURSOUL
by Nasty In The Pasty
May 29th, 2009
11:41:58 PM
Predictability?
by RabidDogma
May 30th, 2009
12:07:03 AM
The movie is called DRAG ME TO HELL. The plot is in the title. Come ON.
Don't believe the hype....
by Creator75
May 30th, 2009
02:31:36 AM
(sorry if I make some mistakes, English is not my main language) Just got back from the screening, and was HUGELY disapointed. Why is everybody giving this a good review is beyond me. The movie fails at being funny and it fails at being scary. Obviously the movie aims for stupid fun. It has some good ideas, but it's not as clever as it pretends to be. It was a very low quality movie. Predictable, some awful acting, a lot of pacing and editing issues (awkward moments where nothing happens) and.... Among the worst FX I have ever seen. Not bad in a "wink to the 80's" kind of way, just plain awful, low budget and very distracting CG. Everything from green screens to that goat, jesus just bad. I am pissed because it could have been the fun scary ride it tried to be. But I think a movie like 'Jeepers Creepers' (I know it's not the same kind of movie) is by far superior at having a fun-scary-inventive jab at horror movies. And at least it had decent FX. Well, it seems like I am the only one out there... but that was a big waste of time for me.
Nice concept; terrible execution
by kolchak
May 30th, 2009
06:33:33 PM
I was psyched to see the opening titles of this movie. They gave the film the atmosphere of the old Universal horror classics. The plot isn't bad. I can't even recall the last time Gypsies were used in mainstream film. The classic example, of course, is the wolf man. Ultimately, it didn't work. There were great ideas that ended up being drowned in a pile of CGI and contrived bullshit. There were pacing issues, over editing (we can assume to thank the studio and their PG-13 mandate for that). Also basic logic flaws that bothered me. A Slavic gypsy summons...a creature from Greek mythology? Okay. Maybe. But then that Greek mythological creature responds to Spanish commands? You can't just pick and choose aspects of cultural mythologies you're going to apply and disregard others. Could have been awesome. It's a respectable attempt, but it misses the mark.
Honestly, so many gushing reviews out there....
by Creator75
May 30th, 2009
10:01:19 PM
From Bloody disgusting: "quite simply the most PERFECT horror film I've seen in a long, long while" "Although Raimi got a taste of CG work on the SPIDER-MAN series, he says that he doesn't believe in using the process unless it's the only option. DRAG ME keeps the CG to a minimum" - What?! You must be kidding me? Fuckin crappy CG is everywhere in that movie. That's what happen when geeks become movie reviewers, they get so excited for the most stupid things they become blind with excitement.
Well, just saw it and......
by Touche_Douche
May 31st, 2009
01:09:55 AM
I just don't get all the love for certain Directors, actors and movies you guys have on this site. Sam Raimi has given me some fond memories but in hindsight those stopped with Army of Darkness. Did I enjoy the movie, yes. Is it on par with something like UP? Heck no. Do I understand the mostly positive reviews? NO.
I liked it, but...
by vettebro
May 31st, 2009
01:27:12 AM
Nothing surprising there at all. The movie in all aspects was very predictable. Not original at all. It was fun though.
Absolutely unoriginal
by Drunken Rage
May 31st, 2009
06:47:10 AM
Not funny, not shocking, not scary; as was written above, this would have been a second-rate "Tales From the Crypt" episode. "Surprises/plot twists" are telegraphed (if you didn't see that ending coming, you're an idiot), characters are pretty much all unlikeable, at times the soundrack overwhelms the dialogue, etc. Cheesy SFX but not in a good way. Not a major disappointment, as it was at least okay, but a disappointment nonetheless. At best this is a netflix movie.
Awesome
by DefyThis
May 31st, 2009
10:46:43 AM
Oh look, an actual horror movie - and a PG-13 one that actually had some scares. Works for me. The amount of fluids was hilariously gross... my buddy's pothead perspective: http://fullybakedreviews.blogs pot.com/2009/05/guest-review-d rag-me-to-hell-2009.html - apparently the goat got his attention. yeah, that's a plug :P
Alison Lohman was weak. Dug the shit outta this flick
by Stuntcock Mike
May 31st, 2009
04:05:35 PM
just the same
There were 9 people in the theater with me.
by Stuntcock Mike
May 31st, 2009
04:07:07 PM
Sunday 1pm showing though.
There is other cursing in the movie.
by cyberskunk
May 31st, 2009
05:15:36 PM
Somebody says holy (such-and-such). Few people were in the movie theater over here, either. I had a 12:15 showing. Two people walked out (rot13 encoded) jura vg ybbxrq yvxr gur znva punenpgre jnf tbvat gb tb guebhtu jvgu xvyyvat ure xvggra.
Made for SciFi Channel?
by Regularman
May 31st, 2009
05:36:28 PM
DRAG ME TO HELL is as forgettable as anything made for the SciFi Channel. Nothing about this film is remarkable, scary, or even that interesting. I was checking my watch half way though. If you want an enjoyable thriller, watch POLTERGEIST for the fiftieth time. Sam Raimi should be ashamed.
Bobman46 - 'Curse of the Demon' for sure!
by Jackson Healy
May 31st, 2009
06:52:49 PM
The movie is absolutely an homage to Curse/Night of the demon, from the concept of passing on a curse, down to the final sequence of.... SPOILERS! SPOILERS!! SPOILERS!!! Someone being run over by a train in the climax. Everybody should check out this seminal of all horror films, Curse/Night of the Demon to see how a great story line unfolds.
Free streams of 'Evil Dead 2'
by FEARnet
Jun 2nd, 2009
03:49:31 PM
For those of you who mentioned not having seen the Evil Dead movies, FEARnet.com is offering free streams of 'Evil Dead 2'. http://www.fearnet.com Jack with FEARnet
Lohman's wet t-shirt at the cemetary was very nice...
by HB_Dad
Jun 3rd, 2009
03:20:51 PM
mmmmmmmm!
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.