Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

INSPECTOR GADGET review

what was he smoking?... by Flatlands	Aug 5th, 1999 11:10:22 AM
When Broderick signed onto this. I mean, he's proven himself to be a terrific actor, but then he goes and does movies like Godzilla and this... ...maybe it's the truckload of money they dumped on his front lawn....hmmmmmm....
No-Go Gadget Movie by KingKrypton	Aug 5th, 1999 11:32:14 AM
I stayed home to day while my family went to see INSPECTOR GADGET. It really didn't look appealing from the promos I saw. Then again, neither did that stinkbomb WILD WILD WEST...
5 out of 10? by Vicki	Aug 5th, 1999 11:38:36 AM
You hated this movie, yet still gave it a 5. I don't think I understand your rating system.
John Brown, Harry by Bret-11	Aug 5th, 1999 11:42:32 AM
Harry, John Brown was not just some "murderer hung by his neck before the Civil War." He was a rabid abolitionist who killed slave owners and those who supported slavery. Even though credibility doesn't matter so much when you're doing a review of Inspector Gadget, in the future you should really check your historical references to make sure you have it all right, or else you'll be in danger of losing more credibility, such as when you reversed your opinion of a certain big movie.
It's Obvious by DylanB.	Aug 5th, 1999 11:43:55 AM
that all of the flack that Harry has been receiving lately about his credibility, etc. has taken a real toll on him. This review is obviously an effort to regain some of his long lost credibility. Let
* * FEAR ATTRACTS THE FEARLESS * * by Darth Maui	Aug 5th, 1999 11:47:28 AM
I could defend this movie and talk about how I found it very amusing, but instead I think I'll just take quotes from the site and paste them together... these include "going to the movies is all about having a good time, you shouldn't watch a movie expecting it to be something, you should see how much fun you have with it" "this is for the kids, we who have grown up don't understand how good kiddy movies really are" "the haunting was much better than i thought it would be" I liked this movie, but it was probably cuz I saw The Haunting a few days ago... NExt to the Haunting EVERYTHING looks like gold! Who the fuck cares if it's not "true to the cartoon" Go rent the fucking cartoon! This movie is a very inventive little kids movie. I didn't LOVE it, but if I was 5 I certainly would have. I suppose you were expecting a transexual Haley Joel Osmont to play Penny and an animatronic dog, right? Mayhbe you wanted Bruce Campbell to play Inspector Gadget and Dr. Claw to be voiced by Gary Oldman. I suppose it would have been nice to see a more developed Brenda character. Perhaps she should have had a backstory about how she was the daughter of Dr. Claw.. IT would have been cooler if someone's head got bitten off by a lion or someone's eye got plucked out by an organ string. PUT YOUR FANBOY WET DREAMS TO A REST EVERY NOW AND THEN GUYS! GOOD GRIEF!!! That guy who said that the internet would end up hurting the quality of movies was right! oh and Harry this isn't directed at you, this is directed at everyone in general. Kudos to Disney for making a movie with balls enough not to add gratuitous sex or violence. This is one fantastic kids' movie. And you people in talkback who HAVENT seen it, give it a try on video before you form an opinion. Then again The Haunting is ALMOST a great movie, right? What do I know?
Was those helpful hints at the end of the Inspector Gadget Movie by spike lee	Aug 5th, 1999 11:48:52 AM
and did Wynona Rider play in Cool as Ice?
Nice try, Harry. by Uncle Junior	Aug 5th, 1999 11:54:47 AM
You wanted to show how you are a big, tough reviewer, right? How you can slam a movie with the best of them, hmm? How you AREN'T the Will Rogers of movie reviewing. So let's go out and trash Inspector Gadget. Wow, nice target there. Good and safe. Well, Mr. Geek, I'm not impressed. I'll tell you what, though, Inspector Gadget, while bad, was certainly better than THE HAUNTING. That movie was a steaming pile, and you gave it a good review. You'll need to do more than trash a nice safe target like Gadget to win my respect.
Harry's right on target by RK Maroon	Aug 5th, 1999 11:55:12 AM
It's this kind of review that confirms my faith in Harry that might have been shaken by the BWP brouhaha. Dylan, you obviously haven't seen the outrage called Inspector Gadget. And Vicki, that number 5 beneath Harry's review is a place for YOU to rate the movie. It's not Harry's grade. Click on it and you can slide the number up and down.
Um..Vicki...re:5 out of 10 by Ouranou	Aug 5th, 1999 11:59:06 AM
"You hated this movie, yet still gave it a 5. I don't think I understand your rating system." I think you ARE a bit confused... that rating place is where YOu vote for a rating for the movie, 5 is jsut the defualt until you change it. Harry doesn't rate movies.
as long as it makes money... by The Reverend	Aug 5th, 1999 12:03:42 PM
...which it will, the makers of this film will deem it sucessful. Art and or intelligence have nothing to do with it. Why would any discerning adult looking for a decent, or even fun, film to see consider this. I wonder if Matthew Broderick tries to affect that nasally Gadget voice? Poor bastard.
Harry's Cardinal Sins. by RodimusPrime	Aug 5th, 1999 12:08:11 PM
1) The Godzilla review. I mean the "Beach Ball" one. The one that he seems to have erased off this site. . . 2) That horrible "Good Will Hunting" review. So self-centered and egomaniacal, it was hilarious. Do a site search and read it! . . . 3) The Phantom Menace debacle. "Mesa Luved Him!" changed to "this movie sucks". A flip-flop like that is unforgivable in a critic. Ebert shoudl have called and chewed Harry's ass off. . . 4) The Haunting. He actually thought it was good, better than TPM. Is that evidence of a severe mental problem or what? Have this man examined by a psychiatrist! . . . 5) The Blair Witch project + The Iron Giant. Excessive hyping and grandiose ass-sucking. I've read the Salon article and talked to the author. I am convinced that AICN is compromised somehow. Maybe there is payola hanging out of Harry's shorts. . . 6) One more cardinal sin and I think this site will be finished. Its on shaky ground right now as I hear tell....
-=Phreindly neighborhood Phreak=- by Phr33k0uT	Aug 5th, 1999 12:13:52 PM
Here was your first clue this movie was faithful in the slightest to the cartoon: -YOU- -SEE- -DR.- -CLAW-. I loved this show as a kid, and I still watch it. No self respecting Gadet-fan would have gone to see it, because you see Dr. Claw's face!! And it's -Dr.- Claw, you Disney monkey fuckers! Not "Just Claw"!! FUCK!!! This is what they should have done. No Gadget back story. No visible shots of Dr. Claw other then his arm or chair. Penny is a genius who solves the crimes, and lets Gadget -THINK- he did. Brain should have been a robot built by Penny (I always thought that would rock as his backstory). Dr. Claw's face should -NEVER- be revealed. Did I mention Don't show Dr. Claw's face!?!
Should have been called "Defector Broderick" by The Graduate	Aug 5th, 1999 01:08:37 PM
Matty, Matty, how could you do something as delicious as ELECTION and then follow it up with this junk? Now listen, I hate it when people who haven't seen the movie bitch and moan in the talkback about the review, basing their opinion purely on conjecture about the concept. But you know what? I'm gonna do it here! I refuse to see this movie. And I see everything. But like Harry, I grew up with Inspector Gadget, it was my favorite cartoon, and I knew every single running gag by heart. My favorite joke to pull on friends was: "Hey, did you see Inspector Gadget yesterday? No? Oh, man, they showed Claw's face!" And they'd freak out. But I don't understand why they would make this movie and then discard everything that made Inspector Gadget the show it was. Basically ignore 90% of the concept. The joy of the show was that we all knew these gags, and we still laughed. Gadget was a bumbling fool. Penny solved the cases with Brain and that neato computer book. Quimby got blown up every episode in a dig at MISSION IMPOSSIBLE. And best of all, you never saw Claw, never knew who he was or why he was so evil, and he always blasted away in an airplane or a speedboat or a rocketship or whatever at the end of every episode. It was great! Now this may seem like fanboy whining, but it's not. Would it be right to change the backstory or character of Superman or Batman? No! Those are icons, and while the plots can be played with, we expect Batman to have a tragic past with two dead parents, and we expect Superman to have come from Krypton to earth as a baby. Well, Inspector Gadget is like that, an 80s cartoon icon we grew to love because of those things we knew about him. Disney certainly can make a movie about a mechanical cop. Hell, cast it as a comedy version of ROBOCOP or THE SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN. But don't call it INSPECTOR GADGET. Because it just ain't.
You guys never cease to amaze me by Quint	Aug 5th, 1999 01:11:19 PM
Harry writes a good review and it's all about him being a hype master and selling out to whatever studio strikes your fancy that week. He writes a bad review and it's because of you and your pathetic excuse for an opinion. "Oh, Harry wrote a bad review. It must be because I posted that he liked every movie he saw. He must be changing for me! It couldn't be because he DISLIKED THE MOVIE!" I've known Harry for over 3 years and not once has he written something that he didn't feel was true. But, I can hear you say, but what about Godzilla? If you don't think your surroundings effect the way you view a film, then you are just plain ignorant. As for the Star Wars stuff, what he wrote is still valid FOR THE TIME HE WROTE IT! He, along with many other Star Wars fans, are suffering from Star Wars burnout right now. It happened to me around viewing number 5, but when I saw it again with a friend that hadn't seen it yet, and knew nothing about it I might add, I fell back in love with it. It happens. So, he loved the Haunting. I liked the Haunting, too. So, he hated Inspector Gadget. Odds are I'll hate it too, but I haven't mustered up the courage yet to go see it, myself also being a child of Gadget. But, please people. Lighten up. Not everything is a conspiracy against you. If you can't, then at least quit bitching about it. I look at talkback now and cringe because it is a red, festering pimple of hate that's ready to pop. I just had to say my piece. Have fun spouting off your bullshit as usual, at least as much fun as I had spouting off mine. -Q
Criticism of Harry by michelle21	Aug 5th, 1999 01:11:52 PM
Could we please lay off of Harry? It seems that no matter what he writes you people will find some reason to bash him. If he gave Gadget a positive review, you would have been screaming for his head. But he gives his honest opinion about the movie and you start screaming about how he's trying to restore his credibility with you. Get over yourself! Do you really think Harry gives a shit if you like his review? Do you really think he lies awake at night pondering how he can restore his reputation with a bunch of disgruntled envious computer geeks? Harry wrote this negative review because he was genuinely disappointed in the movie, not to impress you. As far as the claim that he's never met a movie he didn't like, he usually only reviews movies that interest him and that he wants to see. This site is simply a forum to discuss movies, not to rate evrything that comes out of hollywood. His review of Gadget was so harsh because, as a fan of the cartoon, he wanted to like it. And trying to dig up harry's past reviews in some sort of smear effort? Give it up! They're his opinions. You're not going to agree with him on everything. So he liked Armegeddon? Big deal! We all have our guilty pleasures. I like Howard the Duck, for god's sake! But just because you like a bad movie doesn't in any way make you any less qualified to be a reviewer. I think the main reason everyone is so critical of Harry is envy. He works hard on this site and is noticed by the media for his efforts. as a result he gets invited to screenings. You're jealous of that. You wish you were at the set of the Mummy. You wish you could go on Siskel and Ebert. You wish people cared what you think. Guess what? THEY DON'T! Quit whining! Stop tearing down what Harry has built and do something constructive. If you don't like his reviews, write your own. Start your own site. Just do us all a favor and stop coming here and spewing your petty jealousy. In closing, keep up the good work, Harry. Many of us appreciate your work and enjoy spending our free time at the office checking out your site.
Dead On by echo31	Aug 5th, 1999 01:13:27 PM
This is my first Talkback! But my Hatred of the Inspector Gadget Fiasco (I hesitate to even call it a Movie) and your word for word psychic download from my mind that is your review just made me want to say thank-you. How could they destroy one of my favorite childhood icons. Why do they write something for a 2 year old, but make it much more violent than a two year old should see. We thirtysomethings deserved an Inspector Gadget to be proud of... not disgusted!!! Thank-you for the use of your forum to vent.
c'mon mofos, cut the man some slack by Z	Aug 5th, 1999 01:15:03 PM
like one of the posters above me, I totally avoided the movie because of the whole "you see Dr. claw " bit. That was the only tip off I needed, and avoided this movie like the plague. The rest of you scalawags can bite it. You don't like the way the man does reviews: don't read 'em. Yer pissed that he changed his mind about TPM? I am too, but guess what? It's his site, it's his mind and he's entitled to change either whenever he feels like it. AND, kids movie or not is NO FUCKING EXCUSE for making a piss poor movie. Nothing makes me laugh more than some stupid sod going off about "your fan boys wet dream about darth maul and a 20 minute lightsaber fight is not going to happen in this Kids movie". EAT MY SHORTS. The fact that there are few kids movies does not mean that the ones that do get released should be defended. If they're crap, they're crap. They fucked with Gadget, they get to take some shit. If you take a crap in my yard, expect me to throw some stones.
Attention, all of you whiners that incurred his wrath as of late by r_dimitri22	Aug 5th, 1999 01:44:58 PM
Harry, this was a good read. I enjoyed it. Even if reviewing films like this saps some of the enthusiasm for film out of you, you must have had some fun ripping it to shreds. Some of the best (i.e., funniest) reviews that Ebert has written are his zero star reviews. I read them just for a laugh. This review was certainly in that spirit. By the way, I don't plan on seeing this film. I never even liked the cartoon. The theme song was way too annoying.
Are you people gluttons for punishment? by Morbid Spice	Aug 5th, 1999 01:45:03 PM
I don't understand it... people yesterday are bitching about how all movies coming out are shit, bitching about the site being corrupt or something- Heres a tip, if you don't think a movie looks like it has any value, DON'T SEE IT. If you think a website is Bullshit, DON'T READ IT! If you think broccoli tastes bad, DON'T EAT IT!! Whats the point of coming to the site and readin the supposedly BS reviews and then bitching about it? Just don't read them, and you save everyone time!!! Don't be dumb!
* * FEAR ATTRACTS THE FEARLESS * * by Darth Maui	Aug 5th, 1999 01:55:13 PM
call me crazy, but I think this is the most educated talkback of all time, the only thing is, everyone(except for liek 2 of you) seem to be at EXTREMES. some of you are like "HARRY SUCKS FUCK HARRY BLAH BLAH BLAH" and others are like "THIS IS HARRYS SITE! GO AWAY AND DONT ARGUE WITH HIS REVIEW" ummm you're both wrong. While I'm always up for a good movie debate, I never BASH Harry in my talkbacks if you've noticed that, cuz I often agree with his stuff. And to you guys who say "back off and shut up" well then what's the point of talkback? to kiss ass? no, it's to make an educated argument or agreement or support or whatever. So what if Harry likes 9 out of 10 movies? Maybe he's easy to please! It's HIS opinion that's why he has his own fucking site, so I don't see why that's so much of an issue with you guys. So what if he got excited bout Blair Witch and rasied people's expectations through the roof, he may have enjoyed it more than you or I... that doesn't make him WRONG. That just makes him a human with an opinion. You guys just need to chill and stop attacking character. If you liked Inspector Gadget say "this is why I like Inspector Gadget and I disagree with your review" you can cuss and yell i mean i honestly doubt he cares, just stop with all the "payola" shit. And the little "your post gave me a headache" bit. I don't think Harry ever claims to be a "professional movie critic" whatever that is. He has a cool as hell site that all of you visit everyday, right? And he enjoys posting his opinion for so many people to see. I think that movies like Inspector Gadget are looked at from a wrong perspective when ADULTS watch it, because I guarantee you talkbacker, and Harry included that if you took your 5 year old nephew, he'd go nuts for it. If adults hate it does that make it a bad movie? I'm not so sure, cuz if you took a 5 year old to see Eyes Wide Shut I kinda doubt he'd share an adult's opinion, get my point? Inspector Gadget is no Iron Giant, but it's a "cute" movie. Please argue with my OPINION and tear it apart. Lay off the "you suck" aspect of the posts here. Thanks :)
dang by Bret-11	Aug 5th, 1999 02:04:08 PM
Shit, this whole debate about bashing Harry and all that crap seemed to have started after my "credibility" comment. I really don't give a fuck about any of the issues you've all been throwing back and forth, I just wanted a more responsible use of an historical allusion (the John Brown murderer one). That one guy is right, thought, there are a lot of freakin' loser idiot morons amongst you. Believe me, as a graduate of Carnegie Mellon University, I'm an authority on you people And don't worry about defending Harry; he's a big boy, I would guess he'd be the first one to tell you.
criticism of harry by michelle21	Aug 5th, 1999 02:18:47 PM
I'm not saying that we shouldn't express our opinions on something if we don't agree with Harry. I disagree with a lot of his opinions. I'm just saying that some people need to stop tearing him down everytime he says something that contrasts with their own personal opinion. He's only human people! He's not going to be right all of the time. I think we all know that. If you disagree with him, fine. As the poster above said, stop coming up with these elaborate conspiracy theories to explain his reviews.
Pissing and moaning by Simon Darkstar	Aug 5th, 1999 02:25:19 PM
I totally agree with Quint and Michelle21. I've been coming to this site for awhile and never been much on posting for the simple reason that MOST of the idiots who post here are the same type of idiots who hang out in AOhelL chat rooms, and its only gotten worse. If you've ever been (in your gullible early net years when chatting was a novelty) in the AOhelL chat rooms you know who I mean. Those "look at me I"m cynical rude and mannerless" generation manson, woodstock '99 (if you don't know why that's bad, you're one of THEM), 'modern rock "alternative"' radio station listenin to, self-absorbed children of the 90's (and no that doesn't mean I think all of the young ones are like that or that all who are like that are young, its a general mentallity). You people who don't know the different between 'having the RIGHT' and something being 'RIGHT'. Just because you have the 'RIGHT' to say you don't like Harry, doesn't mean its the 'RIGHT' thing to do. After all, how much do you have to pay to read all of his scoops, gossip, and reviews? How much does Harry charge YOU to get in to this site? Hmm? what's that you say? NOTHING? its completely FREE?!? well that's odd since so many of you act like Harry OWES you something. If you hate Harry so much, if you don't respect him, if you don't like his reviews, JUST....DON'T.....FUCKING..... READ THEM! Don't stand around and harass the man who works so hard to provide you with all this FREE stuff. If you don't LIKE the free stuff, DON'T TAKE IT! I know if I were Harry I would've dissolved the talkbacks long ago and sent your ungrateful asses packing. But Harry's nicer than I am and he continues to GIVE you whiny selfish babies a place to piss and moan about him. You wanna know why this site is on shaky ground? Take a look around the talkbacks, and try to think about all the work it takes to keep this site up to date, every day, and how almost every single post seems to tear the man who does it down.
"A smart Brain? No, that's crazy...self-aware, jive-talking Gad by SnapT	Aug 5th, 1999 02:47:14 PM
The same people who decided it was crazy for Brain to act like his cartoon counterpart (which could have been easily accomplished with Jim Henson Creature Shop-style animatronic puppetry if not the more expensive and probably crappier-looking CGI alternative) probably didn't give a second thought to the insanity of a Gadgetmobile who is sentient and talks with the voice of a black man. If they felt the need to explain the origin of Gadget, why not also tell us how the hell the artificial intelligence inside the Gadgetmobile was created? It's much more impressive than some undead guy with a bunch of hardware and oilslick (uh, I mean toothpaste) impossibly stuffed inside his body. I kept thinking throughout the movie "Strip Gadget of his badge and make Gadgetmobile a cop! He's a hundred times smarter, and he's ALSO full of gadgets!" Once again, The Man (Chief Qwimby and crew) holds the black man down. Gadgetmobile should kick brain-dead, lily-white Matthew Broderick's ass.
Harry feels the need..the need for a negative review by spideysenses	Aug 5th, 1999 02:50:38 PM
So you been getting a bit of pressure from the disbelievers who (unjustly I believe) accuse you of selling out to the big studios...what to do...what to do...eureka!!!...I'll post a review of the film that has got more negative press than any other this summer...that'll get me out of trouble!!! GIVE ME A BREAK! Does anyone else truly believe that Harry would have reviewed this film were it not to counter the criticism that he never gave negative reviews. I mean come on the movies been out for three goddamn weeks and not a word about it on this site.... Harry, word of advice...if you like a film that everyone elses dislikes..who cares!!!! Just don't deliberately post a negative review to calm the naysayers...that in its own way is selling out too..... By the way love the site!
Jar Jar Binks to star in Boogie Knights II: The Chlamydian Years by Rolande	Aug 5th, 1999 02:52:32 PM
Do you think Harry is busily scanning the asscrackery that makes up this particular Talkback to see if his readers bought the harshness of his review? If you have a small child, Gadget would be good entertainment, no doubt about it. If you sit at your computer entertaining fantasies involving Dark City, then no, probably wouldn't appeal to you. And since I'm betting 90% of the people who read this site are not yuppies with toddlers, it makes for much more interesting rebuttals in talkback. Rock on and let's refuel those flamethrowers.
So then... by Typhoon	Aug 5th, 1999 03:12:21 PM
Did you not get chills when Gadget first says, "STOP in the name of the law!" :)
WOW! by red7ine?	Aug 5th, 1999 03:12:42 PM

WOW! by red7ine?	Aug 5th, 1999 03:16:40 PM
Boy, talk about being on the cutting edge! I am so glad to have gotten this review before this movie hit the local ceniplex! Whoa, dodged the bullet on thi-- hey, waitagoddamminnit! This movie HAS been out for a couple weeks! Every other reviewer hated it! Good job Harry...I don't know what's worse; getting your slobbering drool infested fanboy review 2 months ahead of time, only to have it retracted once the movie is out, or to have a piss-ass review a coupla weeks after the movie has already slinked down the ol' Hollywood drain.... I think the 'Bo said it best: Bite me, fanboy
Fear attracts morons by Z	Aug 5th, 1999 03:27:36 PM
no seriously though, my five year old nephew knows suck from doesn't suck. When I was a kid, I knew suck from doesn't suck. I may not have liked eyes wide shut as a kid, but that doesn't mean I liked sucky films as a kid (well maybe a few guilty pleasures). Sheesh. If you or your kid enjoyed Inspector Gadget, more power to you. But don't tell me I don't or can't get it cause I'm not a kid. Besides, many kids'll eat candy till they puke, doesn't mean you should condone it, or that it's good for them. Just say "NO" to bad movies. They'll appreciate it in the long run (they won't grow up to be degenerates and Carnegie Mellan graduates, who "know" what idiots the rest of us are). he he.
criticism by fonebone	Aug 5th, 1999 03:28:57 PM
When you criticize the work of others, either in a positive or negative way, you open yourself up for criticism. Harry is a critic, and he should be judged by the quality of his criticism. The whole purpose of "Talkback" is to allow people to offer their own opinions. Of course, you can also criticize the criticisms of the criticisms (i.e., calling someone a "buttboy" isn't all that probabtive of an argument). But we are all allowed to offer our own critiques, even of Harry. Remember -- judge not lest ye be judged!
Maybe... by Jonique	Aug 5th, 1999 03:48:29 PM
... Harry truly hated the film, ever consider that.
just to clarify... by Simon Darkstar	Aug 5th, 1999 03:55:39 PM
I'm wasn't talking about agreeing with harry, the whole point of these talkbacks is to have a debate. Nobody like a good debate more than I do. I wasn't even talking about good natured ribbing. This has gone beyond good natured ribbing and become a question of downright rudeness. And I'm well aware that its 'kewl' or whatever to be rude online and have no respect for others. But once again, that doesn't make it right. I'm left to wonder if this high school mentallity is being stretched out longer and longer, if our society is becoming more and more obsessed with MTV subculture ,or if most people simply never grow out of it.
I gotta admit.. by -Donner	Aug 5th, 1999 04:38:34 PM
...that Harry is a hundred percent on target with this review and THAT'S coming from someone who STRONGLY HATED his reviews of The Haunting, Wild, Wild West, and Lake Placid. Those movies may have been bad, but Inspector Gadget was OFFENSIVLY bad. I'd rather have my kids watch the South Park movie than this hollywood fluff movie. I hope it BOMBS!
Amusing by Marcion	Aug 5th, 1999 04:48:43 PM
It is so fun to watch you guys bash each other over something that matters very litttle in the grand scheme of things. Inspector Gadget?! Come on; there is so much that is worth discussing besides a little movie, and someone's review of said film. Let's engage our minds in something less destructive and more intelligent. let's build each other up instead of tearing each other down.
Critics by M. Doonesbury	Aug 5th, 1999 04:54:20 PM

DWD: Larks Tongue In Aspic Part Three! by DwDunphy	Aug 5th, 1999 05:14:37 PM
Yeah, like any of you are going to give a crap about my opinion on this topic. Well, my opinion is that we all knew this was just one more Disney redux of old tv. Anyone who paid money to see "My Favorite Martian" and then went and paid to see "Inspector Gadget" deserves to suffer a little. And as for the Harry bashing, nothing is going to satisfy you ravenous Knowles-knockers out there. You'll bash him for all his positive reviews, you'll bash him for his negative reviews. Fact is, you're just out to bash. Honestly? Maybe it's time to stick to news and rumors and do away with the reviews altogether. It sounds harsh, but a review is a thoroughly subjective piece of work and if everyone out there can't play along, perhaps it's time to grab the ball and take it home. My Harry beef was solely on the notion that he didn't seem to solidify his opinions until after his review was written, and therefore, the review would not be an accurate impression from the writer. So sue me for reading too many Strunk and White writing manuals. However, if he likes a movie considered to be art but bombs like the Enola Gay, or if he likes a movie that screams awful but becomes a hit, so what? That's life. Nobody agrees with everyone 100% of the time. Now, having gone through all of that, could we FINALLY get to some NEWS and pull all this garbage behind us? Daaaang...
Critics - Take 2 by M. Doonesbury	Aug 5th, 1999 05:18:58 PM
Ask yourself this one question - Ultimately what does Harry's opinion mean? Absolutely nothing. Nothing more than yours or mine or anyone else's. But here's the difference between Harry and the rest of us - he's a professional reviewer. Does that mean he is necessarily right - no. It doesn't mean he knows more about film than the rest of us, it doesn't mean anything. The only difference between us, is he gets paid (and it doesn't matter how much). Here's another question - would you personally attack Ebert if you disagreed with him? I doubt it. Here's the problem you all see Harry like yourself, young, in love with film, and with an opinion. You all think you can be him - well you know what you could, but most of you won't. It's the same way most people think they can write a better film - but they won't. It's not that they don't neccessarily have the talent, it's the fact that they won't execute on it. Face it we all have ideas, the difference is some people execute on them - and unfortunately some of the executors have inferior ideas. So go out there, take your energy you use bashing people and go create something. Now, to me, one of the really troubling things about the net is the anonymity - it seems to suck the life out of intelligent conversation. If you met Harry at a bar would you really attack him personally because of his opinion? I don't think so - you'd discuss the film and that's it. His looks, intelligence or past would never come into conversation. The net seems to be taking away civilized conversation. Just because you're anonymous doesn't mean you can treat people any way you want. Why don't you act like you would if you met somebody face to face. Anyways, remember this, we're all critics - but the professionals are forced to see everything so we don't have to- so go find critic you trust, with your same tastes and listen to them. I guarantee you won't agree with them 100% of the time.
Inspector Gadget Fucking ROCKED!! by Baron Karza	Aug 5th, 1999 06:08:00 PM
This movie puts 'THE ROCK' and Armageddon to SHAME! IT ROCKED!! IT FUCKING ROCKED.. I love Jar Jar
There Harry goes again. Now trying to get "credibility" back. by RadRacing	Aug 5th, 1999 06:47:17 PM
Come on now buddy. Bashing Inspector Gadget? Everyone knows that movie sucks and won't win any awards come December. So now you have balls? Good for you. But to say to me and all of your readers "Never watch this movie" and then give it a 5??? What if a movie rated a 1 on your scale? I'd love to see that one chief
I have a few new ideas of why people bash on other people on the by Private_Hudson	Aug 5th, 1999 08:12:49 PM
Hudson here. First of all, let me tell you all a little story. One night, lying awake in bed I let my mind wander, then finally, at some point in time, somehow, I started thinking about why people were so friggin' rude on the internt. I'm sophmore in high school and I play football. So naturally I have a tendency to make fun of the so-called "geeks" even though deep down inside, I am one too. Like this one kid named Cory Herron. He's slightly obese, is addicted to porn and will never shut his yap. So I make fun of him. THEN people like Cory Herron go home to their computers after taking their bashings at school or what not and they log onto the internet. They then roam around the cyber-jungle, visiting a few porn sites on the way until they find something they just don't like. See, in the REAL world, most of the people who talk crap to Harry have the brains (usually) not to be a smart-ass as at the school or workplace. Because most of them know that if they are, that they will get beat up, so they stay quiet. Anyways. They see this and like magic. They become lean-mean shit talking machines and they take out all their frutrations out on someone they meet online. They know this because the miracle of the internet is, that your anonymous. Noone will beat you up. Anonymous. So in order to feel good about themselves for one brief moment, they trash-talk to seemingly good hearted people like Harry. I mean, come on. What 30-40 year old goes to see a movie like Inspector Gadget and think that they will actually enjoy it. Espicially if you were 20 when the show was on and you watched it. I mean, come on. I have read most of Harry's reviews and I agreed with most of them. Actually almost all of them. However, I did not agree with him on inspector gadget. I watched the show when ui was little and I loved it, like most people did. And when i saw this movie I was hoping it kept with the show. Granted I think they should have sjown claws face in the movie, but not in the promos. Maybe at the end. I thought it was good that they made Inspector Gadget smarter and YES Brain DID talk at the end, albeit one line. Penny helped out a little bit by stalling old whatshisname before he could destroy the eveidence. And he said THE LINE. "I'M ALWAYS ON DUTY" and I like Matthew Broderick, he was a good choice for the role and is good natured. Like his infamous role as Ferris Bueller. OK, the car was a bit annoying after a little bit but it was a nifty little vehicle. And their were some corny parts. But overall I think they stayed true to the show. (Now's about the time when rocks get thrown at me) So now in the later talkbacks I [plan to take beatings like Harry, only this time because I Like the film. I guess you just can't please everybody. By the way, that brings me to another point. YOU CAN'T PLEASE EVRYBODY! IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN HARRY. There will be idiots out there who bad mouth you but I hope you will still continue to working oin thsi site because it is an excellent one. If they DIDN'T show Claw's face, people would probly say "It's the movie, they should have showed Dr Claws face" and if they didnt show the origins of Dr Claw and Inspector Gadget, people would say, "I've always wanted to know the oprigins of Dr Claw and inspecotr gadget." It's a hopeless ongoing battle and hopefully maybe one day people will realize that that Disney did the best it could to make a quality movie. Honestly, do you think a CEO would release a movie full knowing that they think it could be better? Meaning Better movies=more money to company=makes Disney happy=makes Disney want to make better films. Then again, maybe I'm wrong After, when It comes to movies. A few more things to live by in the movie world. 1)YOU SHOULD BE YOUR OWN CRITIC. 2)IF THE MOVIE LOOKS BAD IN THE PROMOS, DON'T SEE IT. 3)IF YOU SEE IT AND DON'T LIKE IT, OR DON'T AGREE WITH ANOTHER PERSON, DON'T BAG ON THAT PERSON, KEEP YOUR REMARKS TO YOUR SELF. Good reviews, good site Harry. Keep up the good work. Sincerly, Ryan McElwain Hudson out. (whew)
What rating system? by jbreen	Aug 5th, 1999 08:29:19 PM

Harry, what's wrong with you???? INSPECTOR GADGET WAS A GREAT FU by quentin2	Aug 5th, 1999 08:43:31 PM
Inspector Gadget was a beautiful portrayal of the tough and painful life of drug addicition on the streets. Real and gritty, Inspector Gadget had a certain cynicism to it that made it an obvious intelligent film in my view... And if you believe THOSE comments, you obviously have very little faith in mankind...either that, or you agreed with the comments!
PS: Harry didn't give the movie a 5, u dumb fuck by quentin2	Aug 5th, 1999 08:47:24 PM
5 is the number the javascript rating system is set to for default.
This rating system by jbreen	Aug 5th, 1999 09:01:26 PM
Bollocks to the Enter Key!! Damn pesky thing. Anyway. I am curious about the 5 out of 10 thing some people have put up I couldn't see this anywhere in Harry's review. The only 5 I saw was the 5 in the interactive Rate this movie part, which is obviously not Harry's own numerical rating but the default number for the pulldown numerical choice. As for Harry - what a curious thing it must be for him to have put up a fan site three or so years back for his, and his buds, fanboy ramblings only to see it turn into thousands of others live or die lifestyle; and an excuse for sad gits who missed that boat full of geeks (too busy at frat parties and playing football?) to channel their envy into vitriol. Who is Harry really? A big, big guy who has found a passionate love of film and has used the Web to tell us about it. Sure, he has some power but just how much does he appear to abuse it? Do you think the guy secretly lives in a hilltop mansion in LA? Does he have a horde of minions cleaning the crumbs from his table while he negotiates just which after screening bash he will attend? I doubt it. But, damn it, even if he went to every opening, took a little payola here and there - so what? Do you sad f##ks really think that you get some kind of post-life pat on the back for spending your life being humble and credible? Me, I think you take life's pleasurable offers where you can. But Harry, God Bless Him, seems to be genuinely concerned about film and about his audience. He addresses your concerns - even admits to the occasional nice film industry offer. He lets you spout your holier-than-thou rubbish in these talkbacks with a more than reasonable amount of non-censorship. Why you keep coming back to a site that annoys you mystifies me - especially considering that there are a few million others out there for you edification and entertainment. I hope Harry continues to enjoy his life and his love of film. He is doing something I truly admire and envy but I, unlike a lot of you, don't feel a need to dump any of my perceived inadequacies ont someone else. If you disagree - fine. If you are someone who feels this site no longer has anything to offer you, then go away, start you own site or shut the hell up. I like the fact AICN exists - it gives me a little something to look forward to each day. I trust Harry as much as trust anyone I have never met, because he seems an up front guy (no pun intended). But I am not going to lose any sleep over the veracity of his reviews because he's either telling it like he sees it or having a good time. Most likely it's both.
inspector gadget/Ooh hoo by FredMan	Aug 5th, 1999 09:43:51 PM
People, people! Brothers, sisters...Can't we all just get along? I'm kinda new here, so this is my first post but we gotta be a little more thick skinned and not go after each other like this -and over THIS movie of all things. No I haven't seen the movie, but I don't want to. That's my bag. If Harry wanted to and was let down, that's his bag. It's his website, isn't it? Hey, I was pretty amped about Phantom Menace, too but it seriously lost its luster the second time. Ya can't form a lynch mob because you didn't agree with Harry, and then he had time to think about it and wanted to re-phrase his editorial. Hey, as long as the info on stuff that HASN't been done, in the works, rumors, etc. keeps comin' with what I find to be amazing accuracy for the internet-Everyone here is entitled to their opinion. From the people who have nothing but bad things and insults to say...to the people who have nothing to say ("I'm first!") Course, that's yo mama's opinion...she could be wrong.
Harry's scathing reviews by Matt Martinez	Aug 5th, 1999 09:44:54 PM
I don't know if anyone's mentioned this yet (since I don't quite have time to read through all these Talk Backs), but this isn't the most scathing review Harry's ever given. If you want that, make your way to http://www.aint-it-cool-news.c om/display.cgi?id=2365 where he reviews the Paul Anderson film Soldier (with Kurt Russell). This is well before all the current controversy and it is a very heartfelt review. Harry explains exactly why he hates the movie and lets us know where his words come from. To tell you the truth, I felt exactly the same way he does about Soldier. It's a wretched abortion that never should have seen the light of day. Like another reader wrote, the reason we see so many positive reviews is because Harry chooses to see movies he is interested in and which he thinks he will like. Besides, as far as the hype for The Iron Giant goes, why in the hell would Warner Bros. pay him to hype this movie of all the ones they have coming out. I mean, it seriously seems as though they couldn't care less about it. If they were to have him hype any other film, don't you think it would be WWW?
A note to Harry and to the TBer's from someone new by Mr. Love	Aug 5th, 1999 10:13:00 PM
I've been reading this site for over a year now and I love it. Except for the petty arguments that go on in Talk Back, that is. First off, do you TBer's not realize Harry is an actual person and not your movie-rating genie? You sit on here and talk about Harry like he's this mythic creature you made up. But he reads this stuff too! So, if you guys have a problem why not talk to Harry....like I'm going to do now. Harry? Hi, long time listener, first time caller ;) I know you get sick of the shit they say about you, but why respond to it? Did you ask these people to read your site? Did you ask them to judge you as a human being because of one part of your life? Screw 'em Harry. If they don't like your site, they can go somewhere else. You like to make people happy, thats why you do this, but its not your JOB to do it. Keep on doing what ya like to do, and I'll keep on reading.
You stupid fool, it's not a 5 out of 10 by Niiiice	Aug 5th, 1999 11:56:27 PM
See, you point the little mousey cursor on it, and the magic numbers can change!!!!!!! Man when I read Vicki's post she sounded so freakin cocky and full of herself like "oh, what kind of rating system is this?"
Harry sprouts balls, slams movie by Darth Taun Taun	Aug 5th, 1999 11:56:48 PM
It's about damn time we saw some vicious hatred for a truly pathetic movie. But the readers do bring up a valid point: why so late? And besides, if you won't go to "Runaway Bride" because you don't like Richard Gere, why not avoid this movie like the bubonic plague when you KNEW they would show Dr. Claw. Harry, save your readers some money and come out with the negative review before they have the chance to chuck their hard-earned cash. For your next trick, try slamming a movie some other critics actually like. (An eery silence fills the room as Harry crawls from the primordial ooze and rests on the beach as his spine begins to form.)
Various Rantings by Dlhstar	Aug 6th, 1999 02:24:41 AM
People will see movies that they know will be bad if the subject matter interests them. For example, I saw Batman and Robin. I heard how bad it was before I saw it, but I was out with friends and so on. Now I had the severe good fortune to see Gadget for free at the theatre I work for and let me tell you, this movie could have been SO MUCH BETTER. Even the people I work with thought that we misplaced a reel somewhere in the movie because it didn't flow very well. The truly sad thing is that we are a 6-screen and just lost A. Pie and Big Daddy, while we're keeping Gadget but not getting Iron Giant tomorrow! The moment I came out of this film I thought that so much of this film was wrong. I saw this and thought "Here's a better Idea: Inspector John 'Gadget' Brown (Brilliant, but absent-minded, investigator who builds little gadgets to fight crime) is an Interpol cop who is chasing down terrorist Dr. Claw. Then they could film a live scene from the opening of the cartoon where the handcuffed Claw is actually a bomb, Brown is severely injured until Interpol decides rebuild him as a cyborg using hitech upgrades of some of his personal gadgets. As a side effect, the brilliant part of Brown's mind is overcome by the absent-minded part with no one really noticing except Penny and Brain (who decided they have to look after Uncle Gadget to keep him safe). The rest is an upgraded episode of the cartoon." True, not much better, but sure as hell not any worse. It would make more sense for a huge organization like Interpol to do something like this instead of a rinky-dink little city's PD. Also, then they wouldn't have to throw in the "dead father" angle or the "power of the human heart" angle. Let's face it, all the useless crap that were tossed at us in this film but none of it important.
Harry and Gadget by BorisCJ	Aug 6th, 1999 03:20:20 AM
For those out there that wonders why Harry was so worked up about this movie, Harry has been looking forward to it for ages since the rumours started. Imagine being keyed up about something from your childhood for so long, then having your dreams dashed. You'd write this too... It could have been so much better, and even from the small trailer I saw, I hated it. That takes a lot of work....
Inspector Gadget by Futureboy	Aug 6th, 1999 06:05:32 AM
My ex-wife actually said she loved this movie. Christ, no wonder I divorced her.
No mo Gadget Please! by Khoast	Aug 6th, 1999 06:07:27 AM
Ok... I'll keep this brief. GADGET SUCKED. Ok. Thank-you. No really. Can anyone movie interpritation deviate more from the original purpose of the TV show. NO! This movie was way to geared to the kid movie goers. You know the ones that didn't grow up on the show! How many kids do youthink just flipped by Nickelodeon and said... "Look Mommy, they made Inspector Gadget into a TV show." 1/2 an hour later... "That stunk, it was anything like insepctor... Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa." sigh Well I won't go into what went wrong with the movie... I'd be here for hours... Khoast out.
To Bret-11 re: John Brown by marsyas	Aug 6th, 1999 08:21:20 AM
Okay... so Brown was "a rabid abolitionist who killed slave owners". So why is "murderer" an inaccurate label? Sure, it doesn't tell the whole story, but this is aint-it-cool-news.com, not aint-it-trivial-antebellum-his tory.com.
adding my voice lest we be drown out by Valinor	Aug 6th, 1999 11:26:20 AM
I heard bad things about this movie from many sources, I didn't realize how much of a travesty it was (I am a big time Inspector Gadget fan) And it sounds like Harry was too. I'm surprised this review got put up at all, except that he wants to warn us how much it diverges from the true gadget (Harry, you are in my head, NEVER see claw, Brain MUST be special, these and more points my friends and I have already come up with..) Harry you're tops.
Harry... I've got an idea... by Mean Ween	Aug 6th, 1999 12:10:04 PM
wipe out the talkback. just get rid of it. you'll increase the good karma on the net and you won't have to deal with all these lunatics. Jeez. I mean, look how the talkback has influenced the content of your site, your reviews, and your "editorials" (mostly for the worse). -- meaner
Dear Harry by BigSis	Aug 6th, 1999 02:05:31 PM
Dear Harry, I usually just lurk on the Talk Backs here--scroll through them quickly and see if there's anything interesting. Usually there isn't--usually it reminds me of the crappy BBS's in college and before that, high school, when people still thought using crap, shit, fuck, etc made them look like they reallymeant* what they said, rather than just illiterate and uncreative. Anyway, that's how I missed this sudden debate over your credibility as a reviewer. Well, I guess it's not 'sudden', but we've already established that I wouldn't know one way or t'other. I like your reviews. Sometimes, yes, I think they're cheezy. Sometimes, it's true, I completely disagree. But I have a good idea of how your opinions fit in with mine, and so I know when to listen and when NOT to listen. Keep on keepin' on, Harry. Yours are the realest reviews ever. --BigSis
I miss the old-style Harry reviews... by LoveChild	Aug 6th, 1999 03:14:15 PM
I have enjoyed reading Harry's reviews for quite some time. I especially enjoyed the way Harry described the way his day was going before he walked into the theater. I knew immediately that I liked this site because of the background information as well as the content of the review. Case in point: I had a terrible day before I went to see BWP. I was thinking about my husband going away and how much I was going to miss him, my crappy job, the way my jeans were too tight and were cutting off my circulation...none of this helped my movie-watching experience in the least! As a result, I walked out of BWP not the least bit scared and feeling let down...I intend to see it again with a mindset of getting scared, maybe at the latest showing I can see in a scary neighborhood...I don't know, but do you get my point! Harry, what were you doing before you saw Inspector Gadget? Did someone talk you into it? Were you hoping that seeing Claw's face would be the only disappointment? I really miss that voice, and it would help me to figure out where your head was when you went to see IG. P.S. All those negative people obviously have missed the passion and spark in your writing that are obviously your drive behind reviweing movies, not some desire to please. To thine own self be true...Later!
Who Hasn't Killed A Slave Owner, Or Two, In Their Time? That' by mrbeaks	Aug 6th, 1999 03:37:35 PM
The problem is THAT HARRY GAVE THE MOVIE A "5!!!!!" What a fucking hypocrite! I may not know diddly squat about movies, but I have an opinion, and, by Don Knotts, I'm gonna voice it. I hate him! I hate him! God almighty, I fucking hate him! He..... Ooh, Brokaw's about ready to do "The Fleecing Of America." Screw you, clowns..... I'm outta here.
Quick Note by The Big T	Aug 6th, 1999 08:35:21 PM
Big T here. Seems like the big thing here is claw and the showing of his face and i agree it shouldnt be done. As for a backstory I think for a film one is necessary but should have been better. As for claw i will say this he is not the diet coke of evil or the pepsi one of evil he is the mellow yellow of evil. Big T out.
Harry - A Professional Critic? by Goodgulf	Aug 6th, 1999 09:07:55 PM
To call Harry, who in many cases has to BUY his own ticket to see a movie, a PROFESSIONAL CRITIC is preposterous. I mean have you read his reviews? By the time I get finished reading what Harry had for breakfast and what the weather was like in Austin and how a friend came over and they decided to watch Nosferatu for the two millionth time in a month on DVD and then went to the theatre where we are tantalized by the title of the movie he is reviewing, which throws Harry into flashbacks of another movie he saw with Father Geek when he was 9 and then flash foreward to the auditorium where Harry describes everything except the movie until finally he says, "I liked it. She had big bazookas". No, I'm sorry, Harry isn't a professional critic. If he is getting paid "anything" for his reviews, it's too much. But if Harry is just a fan of movies, and not just the movies, but of the whole "spirit" of movie going, from the early anticipation after seeing a trailer to the smell of the popcorn as one enters the theatre on the opening day, the interplay among the others in the crowd, the silly slides and "pop" tunes that dropped off the charts months ago and the after hours talk about the movie or if it sucked, the talk about other movies that didn't suck, then Harry is just a huge fan, writing as he feels at the moment. Tomorrow he might change his mind. Movies that you thought were great when you were a kid, are not so great now, or they are greater becuase of their depth. And even movies that we saw last week and thought they were great, will be displaced by new films, and on and on. So Harry isn't a professional critic. He isn't even a "critic" per se. He couldn't be. He hasn't got the heart for it. He likes films too much to be a real critic. We all know that. It's been mentioned many times here in Talk Back. I think - no, I KNOW that Harry knows he's not a critic in the journalistic sense. And he's certainly not an historian. John Brown an "infamous murder". Gawd. Harry, there was a movie made of John Brown's life. I'm surprised you haven't seen it. Raymond Massey stars.
Bitch, Bitch, Bitch by Khaless	Aug 6th, 1999 11:44:51 PM

Bitch, Bitch, Bitch (the director's cut) by Khaless	Aug 7th, 1999 12:07:03 AM
Man, could you please cut this man some slack? I've been checking out this site for more than a few months and I honestly don't see how he puts up with some of your shit! The man loves movies, so maybe he'll cut a film a little more slack than you or I would. That doesn't make him a sellout any more than you hating every movie makes you a "the people's reviewer"! Agree, Disagree, but don't rip on the guy himself because of his opinion! We all have movies that didn't exactly make the API 100, but for some reason, we love'em. Two of my "guilty pleasures" as michelle21 calls them, are "Cannonball Run" and "Tank Girl". I like em'. I know there's nothing I can say that can convince someone these movies are worthwhile. But then again, I don't care. I know that there are people in this world for whatever reason are never happy with what you do. So I don't go out of my way to please them. I really doubt Harry does either, or it really would become the sellout website all you Chicken Littles are clucking about. So Harry, before I put on my asbestos pjs I'd just like to say, Keep the faith man.
Inspector Gadget origin by Wyr	Aug 7th, 1999 01:01:56 AM
Apparently, you missed an episode of the TV show.. The Inspector was chasing a purse snatcher, slipped on a banana peel, and then needed an operation.. This gave him all the gadget junk
Disney!!!!!!! by Ventura	Aug 7th, 1999 03:31:34 AM
I don't understand why, but WHY does Disney keep filming bullshit films like Gadget and My favorite Martian
South Park Rules by mbaker	Aug 7th, 1999 07:56:39 AM
Hello: My Name is Marc Baker, and I would like to say that the only great movie this summer has to offer is "South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut". It has the most important message to come in the wake of that fucking littleton incident that I am getting tired of. That message is that baby boomers who don't spank their kids are the ones to blame for their kids doing bad things. Plus, it is flat out funny!!!This movie is A great continuation of the show, and A huge improvement as well. Where as "Wild Wild West" destroys the TV show only to keep it aflote by Will Smith's mouthy, and non existant charm. You can call me A racist if you want to, but I DO NOT see Will Smith as James T. West!!!! It is the worst casting choice ever to be made!!! Don't get me wrong, I admire Will, but I do have to question his motives for playing James T. West. It realy pisses me off that "WWW" opened on the same day as "South Park", and the media having A field day over "WWW". Well, Screw that film!!! Trey, and Matt should be very proud of the amount of effort they put into this movie. If you're A South Park fan, I wonder if you got the chance to see Trey, and Matt on "Dennis Miller Live" A feww weeks back? If you did, It was A fun show, and they make alot of good points on the film. And another thing, I am not A "Star Wars" basher, I just never became A huge fan like the rest of society. I should feel guilty, but I could change over time. "South Park" is one of the few bright spots in A long line of TV. cartoon to movie translations over the years (A very overlooked aspect in the Animation industry.) The only difference between those movies and stuff like "WWW", "The Avengers", and "My Favorite Martian" is that the Cartoon films are made by most of the people that were involved in the series from which they are based on. Now the Cartoons that get Basterdised in live action films (ala "George of the Jungle", "The Flintstones", "Popeye", and "Inspector Gadget" seem to fall in the same category as the TV show bastardisations as well. Well, I hope I made my point, but as Dennis Miller always says, "Of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong."
so the movie sucked eh by scully8	Aug 7th, 1999 11:14:28 AM
er, so I take it the movie sucked, eh? well that's good - it hasn't even been released here in the UK yet, and a saddo like me really wanted to go and see it and all! cheers. although, i too was disappointed to see that Claw was to be finally revealed, which is wrong because he was never meant to be shown, only as a claw or by his cat. but don't diss Rupert everett on the role - he kixx ass despite the dialogue! (ie. "it's not mr claw - just claw. you know, like madonna" - or whatever) well however u rate it, it has to be better that staw wars ep 1 the phantom menace, which was c**p, apart from the lightsabre fight @ the end!
Well... by Cyclogeek	Aug 7th, 1999 03:55:10 PM
I read Harry's review just to get another perspective. I didn't like the movie. Could also care less about details of showing Claw's face, how the Inspector came to be, etc. I made up my own mind, hence I had a human reaction and decided to find someone elses opinion out, and there was Harry's review. Whether he did it to counter his detractors or not doesn't faze me. I didn't like the movie. Thats all that counts. I wanted to know if he did, he didn't. Time to move on. He is not your guideline or what you should live up to. Form your own opinions, it's called being an individual, not a drone. Sold out.
Harry... You Forgot One.... by Young Indy	Aug 8th, 1999 08:48:17 AM
THE GADGET-MOBILE!!! The cartoon had a cool ass car that... gasp... DIDNT TALK. What was the point of making the car talk like a ghetto boy. In my opinion, that was the worst thing that was done to the movie. FUCK DISNEY!!!!
Harry: if you only read one thing, read this by Pitfighter	Aug 9th, 1999 01:35:50 AM
Ignore all of these jerks. I can imagine that it's tough and it hurts, but ignore them. Pay them no mind whatsoever. I've got faith in ya bud.
Inspector Gadget vs Eyes Wide Shut by litestorm	Aug 10th, 1999 03:35:27 AM
According to Variety, Inspector Gadget has taken appox. $62million at the Box Office compared to Eyes Wide Shut which has taken $52million. And Harry saw EWS 3 times on the first day. But what the hell would the general audience know what to watch.They shouldn't go to films to be entertained but to EXAMINE important social issues put forward by the "GREAT" Stanley Kubrick.
montag606 and Stanley Kubrick by litestorm	Aug 11th, 1999 01:50:20 AM
montag606 reckons that box office is irrelevant, let us then look at the Oscars which are supposed to reflect quality and exactly how many Oscars did the "GREAT" Stanley Kubrick win I'll tell you "0" that's right 0. So montag606 the public are stupid and so are the Academy. Which means the world should really turn to you and people of your ilk for guidence. please bless us all. PS: WHY DON'T YOU READ THE LATEST POSTINGS ON HARRY'S REVIEW OF EYES WIDE SHUT. I am sure you will enjoy them.
No Time For The Old In And Out Love...Just Here To Post A Talk B by Alex De Large	Aug 11th, 1999 04:46:05 AM
First off, am I wrong thinking that Stanley won an Oscar for A CLOCKWORK ORANGE? Maybe it's just my mind playing tricks...but on to my point. The egos on some of you people...to think that Harry wrote this review to appease the gods of negativity, and to appoint yourselves to said dietyship...it's disgusting to say the least. It's perfectly obvious to me that Harry, like myself, is a child of GADGET. That he cares a great deal for the original cartoon, and is upset with Disney for sacrificing our sweet memories with this Hollywood garbate. If I ever was able to muster up the courage to subject myself to this 'film,' I wouldn't simply write a negative review, I'd write a friggin essay. Artistic liberties indeed! And to Harry, on behalf of all the true film lovers out there, we apologize for those who choose to berate simply for the pleasure of it. Please don't be discouraged by their ignorance, and keep up the good for Quint, Moriarty, and all of the other site regulars that I have come to respect highly. I have a suggestion on how to handle all your devout Harry-Bashers...just give them a jolly good shot in the yarbles...if they've got any yarbles. Oh, and to Michelle...I LOVE HOWARD THE DUCK! Until next time my one and only friends...
My Amazing English Ability by Alex De Large	Aug 11th, 1999 04:51:55 AM
I just want to apologize for my misspellings...I know how some of you talk back regulars love to attack at the first sight of a typo, and I just wanted to get in first. In my defense it is 4:45 in the morning. Stupid I before E bunk...And just so this post isn't completely wasted...Thanks for the great review Harry, keep it up!
Inspector Gadget? I hardly know her! (insert rimshot) by Down10	Aug 11th, 1999 12:50:45 PM
You know what's strange? I saw a preview for this G-rated crap before "Election," which was rated R! Just because they both feature Matthew Broderick playing yet another hard-luck goofy white guy, doesn't really mean I'll like them both. I saw "Election" and liked it. "Inspector Gadget?" I'm avaoiding it like the plague.
one good use by Hotwire	Aug 12th, 1999 04:13:52 AM
before I mention the single usefull feature coming from the Inspecter Gadget atempt at a film, I ould like to let Harry know that I have agreed with his review about 80% of the time. I went through all the old reviews to make sure, then I started relying on this site for my movie reviews, if you people dont agree with Harry's reviews, find someone you do agree with and save us the download time on talkback. NOW! there is one good use for Disneys inspecter gadget. get about five or so of your friends, go to a showing of this psudofilm that is sure to be empty AND MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATOR 3000 THE HELL OUT OF IT!!!!!!!! thank you
HARRY KNOWLES I LOVE YOU MAN! by PipsOrcle	Aug 12th, 1999 07:21:21 PM
Dude, you are a brilliant man. I encourage you to help all, and everyone to make Inspector Gadget the movie DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE! Super Mario Bros the movie SUCKED SHIT and so does this. God bless you, Harry.
It's Not For You by Spadook	Aug 16th, 1999 06:04:13 AM
Harry, you make the same mistake that a lot of other critics make, including one of my favorites, the late Gene Siskel, in that you think this movie was made for you, an adult. I saw the same movie that you did, and share pretty much the same opinion, but my nine year old daughter, Five year old son and two year old son absolutely loved it. They didn't get to experience the original run of Gadgetmania and therefore weren't jaded. They just sat back and enjoyed the shinanigans. Bottom line is that this is a movie geared towards todays kids, KIDS! Just like "George of the Jungle" and "Flubber" before it, "Gadget" is a lame reproduction of an insired original, but at most it is a kid movie and mine loved it.
suggestion for Talk Back by Nr 1	Aug 17th, 1999 10:10:26 AM
I know what's missing from talk back: a voting system. people should be able to vote over which posts shall be deleted, or who is to be banned. btw...there seems to be something wrong with the chronological ordering of the talk backs. It's really hard to figure out which response belongs to which post (ok, maybe not "hard", but it's still a pain in the ass)
Remember that scene from The Simpsons ... by Gabe007	Aug 17th, 1999 03:15:31 PM
where Homer plays Poochie the dog and the crew of itchy and scratchy meets the people from springfield in the cartoon shop? We all know, that Claw should not be seen and that stupid car should not talk and all the other things that should not be the way they are. But still you should not ask these questions to Hollywood - People who DO NOT CARE!!!!! There was the most amazing Caravan Pictures logo at the very end I have ever seen, isn't that enough?
One thing, real quick... by Schmendrick	Aug 18th, 1999 01:56:44 AM
Um, guys...? Just a thought here. Has it occured to any that perhaps Harry, in all of his reviews, simply states his feelings about the film, end of story? As opposed to painstakingly crafting each review to appear however negative or positive will make people think highly of him(as so many posters seem to think)? Agree or disagree with his reviews to your hearts' content, but it's nauseating to watch everyone's pointless aggression as they randomly hurl stones at Harry accusing him of either being "afraid to give one kind of review," or "giving another sort simply to look ballsy" or whatever. Just coming up with totally unsubstantiated reasons to attempt to discredit someone off the top of one's head is a pretty deplorable practice, folks. Give the poor guy the benefit of the doubt and assume that what he puts down are his actual opinions, because when all is said and done, he's got no reason to do otherwise. Goodnight, all.
Disney bastards by PipsOrcle	Aug 18th, 1999 12:34:27 PM
I hate Disney... Hate hate hate hate those stupid assholes.. They've turned Inspector Gadget the movie into a modest success, when lots of faults and inaccuracies remained. ASSHOLES! Just remember as long as we live and love movies, no live-action movie cartoon or video game will be excellent, until fucking Disney assholes and other studios learn that you don't change the acting and look of the origin! DAMN YOU DISNEY!
The common man by Napolean Solo	Aug 21st, 1999 04:56:21 PM
The reason I like AICN's site in the first place is because Harry is not a reviewer!!!! YOU HEARD!!! He is like your good friend who sees a pick then tells you what he thinks of it. Harry is like a human being who in giving opinions of a movie, tells you what he went through emotionally and phsycologicaly. That is precisely why he doesn't lose an ounce of credibilty for changing his opinion. Because he is not in that genre of critic. Harry even makes me go "???" sometimes when he seems to love every movie, but aren't we entitled to like a movie in this day and age??? Times are a changing boy. Let me ask you something how many times have you seen a movie that you didn't like and after a while, changed your opinion on it? When I saw Dracula in the cinema I hated it cause I was expecting a horror pic and got to see more of a romance than Stanley and Iris. Now it has become one of my all time greats! Now can't that happen the other way around. Anyway it's late and I'm tired of typing so I'll leave you with this thought... IF YOU DON'T LIKE HIS REVIEWS THAN STOP READING THEM YOU BUNCH OF GEEKY, NO GIRLFRIEND, REVENGE OF THE NERDS WATCHING PLONKERS
Inspector Gadget Script 2.0 by CTP	Aug 22nd, 1999 03:46:07 PM
First I want to add my voice to the lay off Harry crowd. He says what he likes and doesn't like. PERIOD. For God sakes this place is the only review in the galaxy nowadays.. Secondly I grew up on Gadget and developed MY own orgin/story which I think would have INFINATELY been preferrable. (though I love the tie the handcuffs to the claw and it's a bomb-very good rememberence). Alright Gadget (true name whatever) is a parking meter attendant whose brother is a spy. (cute I know but work with me). He sees claw's signature car is overparked and writes a ticket as the agents of whatever super secret international agency try and capture Claw and his gang as he escapes (in robes or unrevealing shots). Gadget gives chase and gets caught up in whatever trap the super genius has left for his persuers and mistaking Gadget for one of their own the agent spends 1 billion dollars (as opposed to six million) putting him back together again. Due to budget problems this LITTLE oversight causes them to recruit him. Claw has a plan for world domination and this time it's surpiseingly for ANY genre a good one (start a small nuclear war while agents under his command are the only ones who will survive in the remaining government that is destroyed is the one I usually use). Penny recieves her "powerbook" in the mail mysteriously from dad and Brain is HIS dog genetically altered or something weird. He's been murdered by MADD is what the Chief has said and this was his last gift. Short version, Gadget bumbles his way through Claw's plan as magnets, goons, etc are dealt with in usual Penny fashion (it's she who reprograms the missles to disarm as Gadget sprays the centeral controls for them with toothpaste "shorting" them out for witnesses) until the scene where Claw escaped and IF we HAVE to see Claw's face make it where it counts and have him be penny's father or SOMETHING.... That's my gadget. Charles Phipps
The cat looks like Mr. friggin' Bigglesworth! by AllisonRoad	Aug 23rd, 1999 10:51:58 AM
I have no desire to see Inspector Gadget (though I suppose I liked the cartoon), and my dad and stepmother were pulling for the movie instead of Blair Witch. This must be a summer of remaking old cartoons, because Dudley Do-Right comes out on Friday. I hope it flops. The cartoon was incredibly stupid.
BOYCOTT "BROKEDOWN PALACE" by SMACKAVELI	Aug 25th, 1999 03:21:52 PM
JOIN THE BOYCOTT! DO 'NOT' WATCH THE NEW MOVIE "BROKEDOWN PALACE'S" STARRING THE "PERSONA NON GRATA" herself, "CLAIRE DANES" [Celebrities are saying they will 'not' go see the Claire Danes' new movie, Brokedown Palace's. Bruce Willis, Oprah, Denzel Washington, Rosie O'Donnel are just the few celebrities who publicly declared that they'll join the boycott. "I can only hope she chokes on it." said Oprah, talking about Ms. Claire Danes' acerbic tongue] --People's Magazine ["Claire Danes might want to take a few public speaking classes next semester at Yale." said Hollywood producer Glenn Klein. The 20-year-old actress turned freshman is being sharply criticized for comments she made about Manila, Philippines where she filmed her current movie Brokedown Palace.]--CNN Showbiz [The city council of Manila voted 3 weeks ago to ban all movies featuring Claire Danes because the actress dissed the Philippine city in the current issue of Premiere Magazine. "She is declared persona non grata," councilor Kim Atienza tells the Associated Press. At Magazine issue is Danes' public recollection of the months she spent in Manila earlier this year while shooting scenes for Brokedown Palace in a dilapidated mental hospital. The city "just f--king smelled of cockroaches," she told Premiere Magazine. "There's no sewage system in Manila, and people have nothing there. People with, like, no arms, no legs, no eyes, no teeth.. Rats were everywhere." This wasn't the first time Danes had spoken out against Manila; in the April issue of Vogue Magazine she described it as "a ghastly and weird city." But this time, Atienza and his colleagues had had enough.]--Newsweek Magazine [Philippine President Joseph Estrada, a former movie star, said he believes Hollywood actress Claire Danes should be banned from entering the Philippines for having disparaged the country's capital. "She should not be allowed to come here. She should not even be allowed to set foot here," Estrada said Thursday in reaction to a decision by Manila's city council Tuesday to declare Miss Danes "persona non-grata" and ban all her movies from being shown in the city.] --Manila Bulletin ["She deserved to be banned" said Tom Hanks "Those are irresponsible, bigoted and sweeping statements Claire Danes made."] on an interview in Entertainment Tonight [Claire Danes' reported comments have also been widely debated in newspaper columns and editorial pages, with some newspapers castigating the actress including New York Times and the Washington Post.] on CNN Showbiz show by reporter Shiela Schultz ["Her remarks were uncalled for." Lisa Kudrow said] MTV 1515 News [Claire Danes were known as an actress with a bad attitude. "She(Claire Danes) seems to be a very rude actress especially towards the movie set crew staff and her make-up artist"] explained "Romeo & Juliet" Assistant Director Richard Meyers In a statement released last week, the actress attempted to clarify her position. "Because of the subject matter of our film Brokedown Palace, the cast was exposed to the darker and more impoverished places of Manila. My comments in Premiere Magazine only reflect those locations, not my attitude towards the Filipino people. They were nothing but warm, friendly, and supportive." But nobody seems to be accepting Claire Danes' apology. Atienza dismissed the statement as an "excuse made by Danes' Hollywood agents and not a genuine apology."
Harry habe mucho credibilcia dumpkoffs!! by Zachsmind	Aug 29th, 1999 03:49:36 AM
To any losers out there still "questioning Harry's credibility" your very presence here posting and questioning his credibility only verifies that he has credibility. If you really don't like him, GO AWAY. IGNORE HIM. What GIVES Harry credibility is the fact people come to his site and read what he has to say. If you don't like him, go somewhere else. You bore me. Your repetitive drivel only backfires. If I didn't know better, I'd think you were just friends of Harry Knowles posting "hate mail" in order to get responses from people like me so Harry finds out just how many people honestly love and appreciate what he does here day in and day out. Actually, that's probably it. Because it's hard for me to believe there are so many idiots out there who would spend so much of their time purposefully trying to downgrade Harry's popularity, or that there are so many idiots who honestly believe anyone would suddenly start disliking Harry just because they hear other people dissing him in his own message boards. Again, if you honestly don't like him, shut up. You're not helping your own case and you're boring the rest of us.
Matthew Broderick is A PORNO ACTOR! by nikifor	Sep 4th, 1999 12:27:35 AM
...maybe he should take addittional acting lessons. BRODERICK DISGUSTS ME! DOWN WITH PORNO ACTING!
ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss by UFatSelloutBitch	Oct 1st, 2002 04:22:24 PM
ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Hey, he's a fuckup himself. He can't help it. by Wolfpack	Aug 20th, 2006 09:36:44 PM

No SHIT by Escape From San Francisco	May 9th, 2007 02:44:36 AM
I can't believe you saw this fucking movie. It so fucking sucks it's like sucking shit through a straw and giving birth to Paris Hilton. Or fucking her, if you're gay.
This is the worst movie by Escape From San Francisco	May 9th, 2007 02:45:28 AM
I'm just saying this is the worst movie evar.

Talkbacks

INSPECTOR GADGET review

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks