Then again, I haven't seen it yet so I might hate it, but not because it's "depressing." Since when did all comedies ever, with no exceptions, have to be full of loveable people getting into silly situations which are 100% resolved come the 90-minute mark (anything longer than that is a total yawn-fest)?

Harry is the Cuba Gooding Jr of critics. He loves everybody!

Harry also wants us to share as openly as possible within reason. Some of you just come here to trash talk and troll; I admit, some of the stuff that talkbackers create is infuriating yet fascinating. Some come here to see and say something funny.

Freedom of speech is great, it’s even better when there’s a forum like this one. This whole site, this whole KIND or CLASSIFICATION of site is a result of Harry and us talkbackers. Harry allows this site to have a raw edge without a team of editors; this gives AICN an authenticity that doesn’t exist in print (and probably couldn’t).

I just think it’s time that the next step is taken and that all of us realize how this whole thing works. Bashing Harry for mostly writing positive reviews is a waste of time. Think about all the movies and books and music that Harry is exposed to. Writing a half-hearted review or description is pointless; it’s not worth Harry’s time and it’s not worth yours.

What’s truly awesome about this site is that I can completely change my mind on any topic at any time or just pop in and write something funny, stupid or pointless.

Without further ado lets keep doing what we do.

producers of the movie paid you in order to advertise their movie?

i dont have any problem with the movie,but i have a big problem with the attitude of this site.

u know,although i am not a vivid talkbacker,i was a visitor of the site since its beginning.

and it always seemed to me as the best place not only for geek news,but as a place who informed,brought to attention and advertised not only the big studios movies,but also the less known,but equally interesting movies.

aicn was a place where u could discover movies u havent heard before and learn things u didnt know,for movies u loved since u were a kid.

indepedent movies,big studios but low budgeted movies,movies of present,upcoming movies of the future,cult classics of the past,very famous movies and creators,unknown movies and creators,everything,just everything u could find out about,well aicn was the best place for.

ok i understand that aicn is the same shit,it still does provide what i have already mention,but really i just visited today the site,and i watch that half of the sites front page is about the movie OBSERVE AND REPORT.

interviews,reviews,news,etc etc etc.is this movie so good that simply at this point of time,the rest of the upcoming and now playing movies,dont have the right to be equally hyped?

or the simple answer is that,well,aicn is all about business and nothing else.

not that doing business is a bad thing.people work in this site,they have to live and take care of their families,the site has expenses etc. so u have to earn money somehow.thats life.real life.

and what u do it to get paid to over-advertise the studios upcoming blockbuster movie,or u just suck the studios balls in order to have access to information for its future project,so u can maintain the sites popularity and population.

but this thing,as i said already,isnt bad.its how life works.but that doesnt mean that i should happy and not criticize about how the site has become,how it has lost its enthusiasm and love about all kind of movies,how it promotes the big names and not that much the smaller names.

anyway,i am only an old nostalgia guy crying for past romantic things.

You may also have noticed how he has raised the projected US deficit to $21,000,000,000,000.00

You may have heard that he's gone back on multiple campaign promises, including the Iraq withdrawal timetable, retroactive prosecution of warrantless wiretaps, pursuit of gun control laws, among other things.

And if you were watching, BO has failed to address the issue of the US citizens taken hostage by pirates/terrorists.

Not to mention his poor vetting of major cabinet members, and his failure to fill a 100's of important administration posts.

Say what you want about McCain, but I dare say he would have had a better first 100 days than this.

Remember when folks here were saying that BO lacked experience and the presidency wasn't the time for on the job training?

Well, Danny, this is what BO's on the job training looks like.

I will say that we should pin Harry down and force him to use a chocolate crispy donut rating system; so we know how much he actually liked the film.

Seriously. It wasn't that funny. Didn't know if I was suppose to laugh at certain scenes or just enjoy the atmosphere. The audience seemed to consist of crickets. That is all I heard the whole time.

This was a great step for him. He showed some chops. He was likable and pitiable at the same time. He showed some believable ranges of emotion. He was also scary at times, especially when he went off his meds.

I enjoyed this movie. Loved the original ideas. The whole "party" sequence with his friend Dennis? Demented, disturbing, unexpected and strangely funny. And the final showdown between the Rogen and the flasher? Loved how that ended up. Again, totally unexpected.

I wouldn't call this great, but it was something worth paying attention to for 90 minutes. I respect it. And I know mainstream America will RUN from this thing.

...but maybe there's still hope...

then I saw the name Ray Liotta - I stopped reading