Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

Three Readers Report Back From The LAND OF THE LOST!

SubliminalJones by SubliminalJones	Mar 27th, 2009 01:35:32 AM
Wow. Could this actually be good?
I'll look forward to renting by Aloy	Mar 27th, 2009 01:35:53 AM
Will like Adam Sandler needs to be seen at home in small doses to be enjoyed.
nice by rebel299	Mar 27th, 2009 01:37:33 AM
i'm quickly becoming a danny mcbride fan, so this excites me
hope it's good.. by deanbarry	Mar 27th, 2009 01:47:50 AM
i want to ad it to my Top 5 surprisingly good movies on Facebook.
Now I'm intrigued by slone13	Mar 27th, 2009 01:49:11 AM
I figured it would be crap
'self-aware' 'referential' by Projectedlight	Mar 27th, 2009 01:51:55 AM
These are not necessarily good things. How about some sincerity in a movie? A film that expects you to give yourself to its world and laugh at the humor that evolves from within, rather than mocking itself at every turn? 'Random', 'self-aware', 'referential'...The last thing we need is the feature length version of Family Guy.
Holy shit plants. by ErnestBorgNine	Mar 27th, 2009 02:00:59 AM
I'm totally looking forward to this movie, big fan of the tv show, I like Will Ferrell and Danny McBride. But these three reviews are so clearly and obviously plants. All three, in different ways, are desperately written to read as written by "regular" douchebags. The strategic misspellings gave it away.
3 jagoffs in La Jolla is "conclusive"? by Liberty Valance	Mar 27th, 2009 02:04:13 AM
So if you get 10 positive reviews, does that mean it's the greatest movie of all time?
"Stop being such an asshole Chaka!" by Bass Ackwards	Mar 27th, 2009 02:07:07 AM
That line makes me chuckle.
It's actually fun when plants try to appear non-planty by RandySavage	Mar 27th, 2009 02:16:15 AM
Ernest is right on. If a film looks like shit and smells like shit... well, you know the rest.
I bet you real money this will do well on this site! by Bones	Mar 27th, 2009 02:16:49 AM
Some of the lines will be used constantly on here, such as the above mentioned "Stop being and asshole, Chaka!" I could use some brainless fun this summer. I'm there.
Quick, someone water that PLANT! by Outlaw	Mar 27th, 2009 02:23:34 AM
The first 2 reviews seem to follow the same formula. I guess writing a review is as easy as "cut and paste" these days. And whenever a review states that they aren't going to reveal any spoilers, yet say how great the movie is...that's when I call shenanigans!
After seeing the latest cut of this film, the studio head... by RandySavage	Mar 27th, 2009 02:25:19 AM
... grabs his VP of Marketing by the lapels and screams in face: Get every goddam human being in this building on the internet right now, ten paragraphs each about how phenomenal this piece of shit movie is.
That 3rd review is so SPOILERISH!!! by lazygarfield	Mar 27th, 2009 02:30:19 AM
And the stupid guy who sent it in said that he would try to avoid spoilers!! the fool.
The Statue of Liberty is a pop culture object? by lockesbrokenleg	Mar 27th, 2009 02:45:01 AM
Kids today are such morons.
Good Lord, it's not even in the Coax section... by Ravetin	Mar 27th, 2009 02:47:14 AM
...yet I still clicked on the headline that has the word "Lost" in it. This is a sickness.
It's like a forest in here... by jsm1978	Mar 27th, 2009 02:48:06 AM
What with all the plants. First time I've called plant, couldn't resist. This movie looks terrible. While I know there have been plenty of good movies that have had deceptively bad trailers (and the opposite as well), something tells me this isn't one of them.
McBride needs to branch out a bit by BitterMan23	Mar 27th, 2009 03:05:06 AM
He's making Michael Cera look good in the range department.
Sounds like total shit. by AllPowerfulWizardOfOz	Mar 27th, 2009 03:58:54 AM
Exactly what I expected. I grew up watching Land Of Lost on re-runs as a kid. Now by any stretch of the means it was low budget and after all was designed for kids. Still it had some great writers on the show like DC Fontana and others from the Star Trek original series. If there were to be a movie I had hoped they would go serious and dark and really make a kick ass adventure movie. Well this is what we got a shitty fucking comedy with my least favorite comedian Will Ferrall. I am in the camp of haters and cannot stand his movies. Just not a fan. He may be a nice guy but I don't find him funny at all. I hate this movie before I even give it a chance and even more so since it seems to be the exact type of moron he loves to play. Fucking waste of a potentially good franchise that could have had some serious writing potential with the sleestaks and dinosaurs. Oh well.
I'm not a big Ferrell fan... by a goonie	Mar 27th, 2009 04:04:24 AM
...but this does sound like it has some potential. I'm hoping my love for dinosaurs can outweigh my usual dislike for Ferrell, who I still think can muster up the funny from time to time. In a summer filled with obligatory sequels, a raunchy comedy with dinosaurs could be a pleasant treat.
Cool. I wasn't expecting much from it at all. by Mr Nicholas	Mar 27th, 2009 04:09:36 AM

Defies all expectation by zapano	Mar 27th, 2009 04:11:25 AM
there was no way i was going to see this, but now I'm reconsidering
mmmm Plants by abigsmurf	Mar 27th, 2009 04:15:59 AM
First Review: "if you hate Will Ferral playing the same character in everything, don't worry, he's different and good here". Second Review: "If you love Will Ferral's regular performances, you'll love this!" That pretty much covers all bases there in an attempt to persuade both sides to watch this. Personally I hate most of his performances. Other than Stranger than Fiction, he displays no range, playing the same character in everything. His much praised improv is incredibly obvious and lacks any real wit. Him being in this is enough to put me off
Glad to see everyone's Plant-dar is on! by Potatino	Mar 27th, 2009 04:19:28 AM
Let me add to the chorus of Plant! Plant! ...I was thinking of seeing it but now I think they're selling it too hard and I don't want to see it because I think it'll probably be crap.
This sounds as cool as I hoped it to be. by hallmitchell	Mar 27th, 2009 05:30:54 AM
I will be there with buddies. Will had a bad 2008. He can redeem himself bigtime with this.
"first stoner/frat-boy/kiddie/mainstrea m/mom-and-dad movie?" by kikuchiyoboy	Mar 27th, 2009 05:45:00 AM
This movie just might completely suck.
3 plants in a row. by Sal_Bando	Mar 27th, 2009 05:48:26 AM
Gee.
it's going to suck by Gungan Slayer	Mar 27th, 2009 06:08:05 AM
trailers have suck written all over it
Plants-a-galore by ricarleite2	Mar 27th, 2009 06:39:04 AM
After I saw that bug sucking blood teaser, I knew this was 2009's Guru flick.
First... by Spider_Pig	Mar 27th, 2009 06:49:50 AM
...for me, that is. I had to join the chorus of Land of the PLANTS...my God!! Silly lurker like me was outing these guys half way through the first review.
Mouth breathers out in force today by Zardozap2005	Mar 27th, 2009 06:55:40 AM
Honestly, All screaming Plant plant plant! Give up guys. You just wanted to see the screening, so now your more whiny than the Republican Party.
"I will be doing bong hits and watching this DVD on repeat for y by Ray Gamma	Mar 27th, 2009 07:00:31 AM
FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS
and you bet AICN is complicit. by Ray Gamma	Mar 27th, 2009 07:02:27 AM
AICN is over. that's it. the whole site is mouthpiece bullshit. somebody start a new movie review website where real people review the films please.
Anna Friel by Chaosinabox	Mar 27th, 2009 07:28:38 AM
"Had no idea who the actress is." "Had to look her up online, and it's Anna Friel -- don't know her." And that right there, sadly, explains why "Pushing Daisies" was canceled.
who actually writes like that by walrusholder	Mar 27th, 2009 07:30:22 AM
these crappy made up reviews should insult everyone on here. This is what they think about you really. I wonder if they pay AICN to publish these reviews because they can't be that stupid to actually believe this crap.
re: insulting fake reviews by Ray Gamma	Mar 27th, 2009 07:42:48 AM
re: 'walrusholder' above, you're absolutely right. If these fucking arseholes really believe that lines like "I will be doing bong hits and watching this DVD on repeat for years" are the kind of remarks that will make us go out and watch this crap, then it says everything about what these studios think of us as an audience. The worst thing is, even these fake reviews are so badly written, (in the sense that they only convince readers of a two-figure IQ) not only is it insulting to us, but I honestly think any one of us would make a more convincing 'fake reviewer' if we sat down for 20 minutes with a word processor. This pitiful standard of viral marketing implies a terrible standard of employee right throughout the studio system. And if you ever doubt that, just look at how much cow dung Hollywood shits in our direction every month.
The reviews arrived all in the same hour by Hardboiled Wonderland	Mar 27th, 2009 07:44:14 AM
And you didn't stop to wonder if the plants needed watering?
"PATRONIZING STUDIO PLANT GOONS FUCK OFF YOU" by We_Are_Trapper_Keeper	Mar 27th, 2009 07:46:09 AM
Wasn't that the title of a late 70's punk tune? Love that song... I love people who rant "AICN is complict!!" "AICN is over!!" You're as cool as a sack of dicks!
MarshallWillenHolly are supposed to be a family, dangit by Catbarf the 12th	Mar 27th, 2009 07:46:55 AM
The reason this show is remembered so fondly is for how scary it was to its primary audience at the time. I'm bummed they don't have original "dad and two kids with no mom" family structure, that was a clue to the kiddies in the audience that this was pretty serious themed stuff. The fact that the show looks ridiculous now is funny, but it's largely missing the point of why the show is so loved. A bit less ha-hah, a bit more high stakes please to bring back that old "holy crap!" feeling, and I'd be on board. Oh yeah, the LOTL is a very mysterious place with all kinds of puzzles left behind by the original Sleestak that built it (I feel like the Dharma hatches on LOST are a slight nod to the Pylons in LOTL), so I hope they left a bit of that intact. Oh hell, this will be OK as a Dodge Ball yukfest but something very precious (and even franchise-making) about the (memory of) the source material will be, er, lost. They mostly just went for the easy laughs in the premise. Duhhhh. Oh, and if Holly bangs boots with Will Ferrel or the other guy it will still feel uber-creepy since my brain still thinks of them all as related! Please no! That will get lots of squirms and groans from the 35+ crowd and not in a good way.
I think these reviewers all work at the Wal-Mart Garden Dept. by rev_skarekroe	Mar 27th, 2009 07:56:30 AM
If you know what I mean. I mean they're plants.
EASTBOUND AND DOWN by Crow3711	Mar 27th, 2009 07:57:03 AM
was the funniest show to premiere on tv since Curb Your Enthusiasm...or maybe 30 Rock. But Still, those were the best 6 episodes of tv ive seen in awhile, anyone who didnt catch Danny McBrides genius needs to.
Nice, they're training the plants. . . by Nice Marmot	Mar 27th, 2009 08:01:39 AM
. . . to act all common man.
" I will be doing bong hits to this for years to come" by Yoda's Ball Sack	Mar 27th, 2009 08:19:22 AM
Loser. You smoke a plant because you are a plant.
Is there any question this will rock? by BilboRing	Mar 27th, 2009 08:24:12 AM
This looks completely hillarious. Can't wait to see it.
Three plants report back from Land of the Lost. by Yoda's Ball Sack	Mar 27th, 2009 08:30:08 AM
Yet again, another turd in the waterpipe of remakes. The tv show has more class than this shit bomb movie........and dare I say Will Ferrell.
"I looked it up and it's Anna Friel -- don't know her" by Thunderbolt Ross	Mar 27th, 2009 08:33:22 AM
"Later he tells the British Holly character (I looked it up and it's Anna Friel -- don't know her" Riiiiiiiight. Nice PLANTy touch.
Most Obvious Plants Ever Award by Thunderbolt Ross	Mar 27th, 2009 08:34:55 AM
In fact they're so plainly plants I thought maybe they're not.
Ugh you people are pathetic. by SantiagoAndDunbar	Mar 27th, 2009 08:39:56 AM
Do you just wait around for a new review to pop up so you can yell plant?
sorry, but I remember this for scaring the crap out my childhood by altoandando	Mar 27th, 2009 08:40:16 AM
something about it was so dark and unnerving... it had a profound effect on me as a 8 year old kid. the thought that it's being turned into a slapstick comedy just sounds wrong.
Danny McBride by Frank Black	Mar 27th, 2009 08:42:27 AM
is the reason to see this movie!
The first two review seem to be plants by Rob0729	Mar 27th, 2009 08:45:54 AM
Well, we at least know the studio's strategy now. They are going to try to sell that movie isn't as much of a kids movie as the first trailer made it sound. Sounds like someone in the marketing department screwed up the first trailer and they are doing damage control.
I guarantee you anything edgy will have been cut... by blackmantis	Mar 27th, 2009 08:46:07 AM
...by the time this makes it through test screenings, and will be shat out the otherside some lim dick PG kids flick ALA Journey to the Center of the Earth.
Thank you Capt. Obvious Reviewers by Jor-El23	Mar 27th, 2009 08:51:04 AM
Why would they make a movie geared towards kids based on a TV show that only adults know about? Not just adults either, but two different generations of adults, who grew up on the original show and the 90s remake. The show is not shown in reruns now so it's not like kids today are watching it. Obviously it's not a movie for kids.
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT by whitty	Mar 27th, 2009 09:03:40 AM
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT
Come on, AICN--what the fuck? by whitty	Mar 27th, 2009 09:05:12 AM
Seriously, Harry--you folks are SO asleep at the wheel if you actually thought people wouldn't realize these were written by plants. You, your staff and the idiots who actually WROTE these reviews are completely underestimating your audience, and you should all feel really stupid right about now, because no one--except for the plant who lambasted people for calling the writers plants--fell for it.
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT by whitty	Mar 27th, 2009 09:05:44 AM
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT by whitty	Mar 27th, 2009 09:05:58 AM
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT
No...the Talkbackers are all plants! by Drebin	Mar 27th, 2009 09:12:13 AM
Just kidding...you're all morons tho. Everyone on here feels so smart when they say "plant" to EVERY review. If you can't prove it just shut up.
"There's a Will Ferrel song and dance- need a I say more?" by D.Vader	Mar 27th, 2009 09:13:26 AM
UHHHHHH YES. Considering that description of a Will Ferrel song and dace number with a pterodactyl egg tells us ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
Drebin, you're a plant. by whitty	Mar 27th, 2009 09:33:44 AM
This time, I'M just kidding. But there's no reason to tell everyone here to shut up unless you ARE a plant, because it's OBVIOUS to anyone with eyes that the writers of those reviews ARE plants.
Can't be worse than Bewitched...can it? by StatelyWayneManor	Mar 27th, 2009 09:33:46 AM
Stop raping my childhood, Will! Thanks everso.
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT by whitty	Mar 27th, 2009 09:34:17 AM
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT
PLANT by venvariants	Mar 27th, 2009 09:35:21 AM
There is no way in hell this movie is good. I'm sorry, but there is no fucking way.
whitty by Drebin	Mar 27th, 2009 09:47:25 AM
No, you're the plant.
wow by macheesmo3	Mar 27th, 2009 09:49:10 AM
Those were the plantiest reviews ever. The first two people seem to have read the same "how to write a review for aintitcoolnews) script about this movie cuz they said the exact same things. The third one looks like it was thrown in to give an alternative view that is still in support of the movie. Planty!!!!!!!
Plant...I thought men like you were called a fruit by Jor-El23	Mar 27th, 2009 09:50:14 AM

Will Ferrell. Jim Bulushi. by Jodet	Mar 27th, 2009 09:58:29 AM
How is it these people get to make movies?
These plants are trashing my lights! by santi01	Mar 27th, 2009 10:10:05 AM
Seriously they're growing sooo big i cant see my lights.....they're upsetting Bryce now
"...a spot in the dessert that is a hole in time" by MattDomville	Mar 27th, 2009 10:11:10 AM
But what kind of dessert is it? A Boston cream pie? A vanilla cupcake? How can I attach this flux capacitor to my apple crumble? I need to know!
DerLanghaarige, believe RowdyroddyStriper by irritable	Mar 27th, 2009 10:11:21 AM
at your peril. He is, in fact Thunderballs aka BraneRobot aka AnimalStructure. Slobodan Milosevic's sole fan-boy in the civilized world. Probably the most bizarre, lying, hateposter ever to appear on these TB's.
I like movies. by Sixtyhurts	Mar 27th, 2009 10:12:49 AM
They are fun I like to eat the popcorn at the movies. 'Member?
THIS MOVIE LOOKS TERRIBLE, BUT I DOUBTED IT by jah_kingdom	Mar 27th, 2009 10:14:06 AM
COULD BE AS BAD AS THE TRAILERS MADE IT LOOK. BUT THEN THESE REVIEWS WRITTEN BY OBVIOUS PLANTS HAS SEALED THE DEAL. I WILL STAY FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE FROM THIS SHIT SANDWICH.
I thought whitty had some really good points. by bobbofatz	Mar 27th, 2009 10:29:34 AM
He should be an aicn reviewer. He is not quite as good as harry though.
When you anagramize "Harry Knowles" and "Plant"... by We_Are_Trapper_Keeper	Mar 27th, 2009 10:35:19 AM
You get "Perks thrown anally"! Hope this sheds some light....
Agreed: "Stop being such an asshole, Chaka!" by Darth Macchio	Mar 27th, 2009 10:42:44 AM
Is a singularly great line of dialog. I'm going to incorporate it into my daily speaking arrangements immediately.
how do the people that run this joint by dailysportspages	Mar 27th, 2009 10:54:17 AM
not know that these are plants>?
You people are ridiculous... by The Eskimo	Mar 27th, 2009 10:55:07 AM
...calling "plant" is one half step behind trolling. Just stop it.
Stop being such an asshole, Chaka by GunterMonkey	Mar 27th, 2009 11:23:01 AM
The new talkbacker catchphrase!!
"Quit being such an asshole, Chaka!" by GunterMonkey	Mar 27th, 2009 11:25:05 AM
Is the actual line, though....
But is it as good as Ringo Starr's CAVEMAN? by IAmLegolas	Mar 27th, 2009 11:25:12 AM
because that dinosaur/caveman movie is tough to beat.
I Have NEVER Felt More Inclined to Write the Word "Plant" by rotgut1	Mar 27th, 2009 11:27:44 AM
... than right now. HOW OBVIOUS, especially the first guy who's "gonna do bong hits for years!" WTF? What's going on AICN???
And I'm 43 Years Old - and Not That Cool - And Even I Can Smell by rotgut1	Mar 27th, 2009 11:29:22 AM
SERIOUSLY.
YOU GUYS by Ray Gamma	Mar 27th, 2009 11:49:49 AM
YOU GUYS ARE DEM STUPIDS AHM GONNA DEFENETLY SEE THIS FUNNY MOVIE CUZ IT SOUNDZ SO COOL LULZ, I GONNA SMOKE DEM BONG HITZ TIL MY BRAIN HURTS LAUGHING CUZ THIS MOVIE IS GONNA BE TEH BOMB SHITS. PEACE OUT MOTHA FUCKAZ GET SUM TASTE
Oh, and by the way... by whitty	Mar 27th, 2009 12:10:45 PM
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT
I can't take these 'reviews' anymore by Wee Willie	Mar 27th, 2009 12:19:12 PM
It's great that Joe Public sees these movies and wants to share their opinon, but they should either learn to write or AICN should edit these things for basic grammar and clarity. If not that, then AT LEAST for format.
Whitty by Wee Willie	Mar 27th, 2009 12:19:31 PM
You are not...
These reviews scream plants so much, by Ingeld	Mar 27th, 2009 12:20:41 PM
I thought they were revewing Day of the Triffids.
While you're in Land of the Lost by Cap'n Jack	Mar 27th, 2009 12:22:33 PM
Look out for the giant PLANTS!
Fuck you studio pig by The Brains	Mar 27th, 2009 12:28:22 PM
When the revolution comes you will be the SECOND to go.
I prefer taking bong hits by The Brains	Mar 27th, 2009 12:32:48 PM
and reading Chaucer, thank you very much. And shooting tin cans with my BB gun.
"If you like Eastbound and Down, you'll laugh alot" by BanditDarville	Mar 27th, 2009 12:43:12 PM

Those "reviews" do seem unusually similar by Rupee88	Mar 27th, 2009 12:43:15 PM
seems like a coordinated plant attack
Sweet mother... by Dollar Bird	Mar 27th, 2009 12:44:48 PM
If these reviewers are plants, they really have no idea what will get my bo-po in the theatre. The line, "I will be doing bong hits and watching this DVD on repeat for years" is, in fact, the anti-make-me-see-movie thing to write. And I even like stoner films, but to say, "I will watch this movie at home while under the hazy influence of controlled substances" does not in my mind equal "This is a good movie you should see in the cinemas before it's gone." For crying out loud, you stupid choad whore, that was just a stupid thing to write. I watched this show all the time as a kid. It was my ideal show—dinosaurs, lizard men, sci-fi stuff glaore, and special effects. That doesn't mean I wanted the movie to be turned into "The Dark Knight" and taken super-seriously. I could have handled a tongue-in-cheek film. But this just sounds stupid. Stupid.
Wee Willy by whitty	Mar 27th, 2009 12:46:30 PM
Wee Willy wrote: "It's great that Joe Public sees these movies and wants to share their opinon, but they should either learn to write or AICN should edit these things for basic grammar and clarity. If not that, then AT LEAST for format." That's all fine and dandy, except you're overlooking something: They're PURPOSELY written like that, in order to seem as if "Joe Public sees these movies and wants to share their opinon." Those so-called "reviews" were CLEARLY written by studio plants, and the wording was carefully chosen. Notice, for instance, that with a huge list of people calling them out for being plants, not one of them has corrected anyone. If they were, in fact, just readers of this site, they'd have been checking to see if their reviews had been posted--and, more importantly, what people had to say about them. Seeing the overwhelimgly negative reaction to them, they would have defended themselves. They haven't--because they're plants. As for the idea that "AICN should edit these things for basic grammar and clarity," AICN doesn't do that with its OWN articles--why the heck would it do so with those submitted by studio plants?
First review is a definite plant by James Westfall	Mar 27th, 2009 12:47:11 PM
This might not suck but I'm still not seeing this. Even with the smoking hot Anna Friel in it.
"If you like Eastbound and Down, you'll laugh alot" by BanditDarville	Mar 27th, 2009 12:48:19 PM
I have to call bullshit on that. EBD is the funniest thing on TV since Arrested Development, and running from T-Rexes with hairy little monkey boys is quite different than vacuuming coke with Clegg in the back room of Shaboom's.
Pineapple Express was stupid by The Brains	Mar 27th, 2009 12:48:23 PM

The bottom line... by whitty	Mar 27th, 2009 12:50:51 PM
...is that the studio miscalculated with these plant reviews, which were so BADLY done. Pretty much no one--except for those running AICN--fell for it. And I'm sure the studio suits are scratching their heads right now, trying to figure out how it backfired. Well, here's why, studio suits: because you have NO idea what the average moviegoer wants to see, let alone how they express themselves. Yes, the people who run AICN are poor writers, but if the reviews submitted from the outside come off as disingenuine, readers can spot them as plants from a mile away. Hire someone competent to write your plant reviews.
Yeah they shouldn't hire stoners by The Brains	Mar 27th, 2009 12:54:24 PM
And just 'cause you smoke pot it doesn't mean you should lower your standards and not have goals.
Or "write" Pineapple Express. by The Brains	Mar 27th, 2009 12:55:19 PM

Or this movie. by The Brains	Mar 27th, 2009 12:56:01 PM
Or greenlight it.
Raped Again by LordMoon	Mar 27th, 2009 01:24:45 PM
Thank you Hollywood for taking another childhood favorite and raping it. You took a property that could have been turned into a long term franchise and made it a quicky piece of farcical trash.
Plant or no plant by drewlicious	Mar 27th, 2009 02:14:04 PM
At the very least it sounds completely opposite from what I was expecting. And that's a good thing. Plus a T-Rex with a personality, that's also a good start.
line that proves this is a plant: by altoandando	Mar 27th, 2009 02:27:43 PM
I will be doing bong hits and watching this DVD on repeat for years to come. come on, for f**k's sake now!
In regard to the "bong hits" line... by GunterMonkey	Mar 27th, 2009 02:48:31 PM
...you honestly think this indicates a plant? Have you not read the "real" reviews that are regularly featured on this site? This is something Harry would write in headline, for fuck's sake. I think it's hilarious that a site that where the founder uses oral sex metaphors (Blade 2 review, anyone?) would question a reviewer's evaluation just because he measures the film's merit based on bong hits. And the issue of bad grammar--yes, it's unprofessional. Yes, it is distracting. But, this is Ain't It Bad Grammar News, people! What, now we're criticizing how bad articles are written? Again, take a look at what the "professional" "real" reviews look like on here...
Stop being such an douche bag plant, Chaka by Yoda's Ball Sack	Mar 27th, 2009 02:48:40 PM
C'mon you brown little turd........just stop.
I guess what I'm saying is... by GunterMonkey	Mar 27th, 2009 02:50:32 PM
... that the entire site should be a plant, according to the standards here. Then again, maybe it is...maybe it is.
Stop being such an douche bag, Will Ferral by Yoda's Ball Sack	Mar 27th, 2009 02:53:59 PM
C'mon you over grown brown afro turd.......just stop making these movies.
More Filth from Ferral.. yippie.. by hatespeech	Mar 27th, 2009 02:55:39 PM
his kids are proud of him I'm sure.
Guntermonkey by macheesmo3	Mar 27th, 2009 03:04:24 PM
Nope, the bong hit thing isn't what told me they were plant reviews, it was just an overwhelming feeling in my brain whilst I read them. they covered all this ground, tried to be hip but did it poorly, didn't even have an accidental spoiler in there that they misse. It all was designed to read like a 23 year old guy from Modesto wrote it. But the dialogue came off as false as an episode of Dawsons Creek.
I will be doing bong hits and reading AICN by Ray Gamma	Mar 27th, 2009 03:07:49 PM
for minutes to come. Seriously Harry. It's a nice site, but this site and I are over professionally man.
Sex jokes in Land of the Lost? by Dingbatty	Mar 27th, 2009 03:59:38 PM
Where's the "inappropriate!" guy from Conan O'Brien when you need him?
New rule - non plants include spoilers. by cant_stop_yawning	Mar 27th, 2009 04:08:10 PM
I got the same impression - all three of these people happen to go to the same screen and know your site and wanted to write long, detailed, spoiler free reviews? May be a fun movie, but I'm not buying these reviews. Also, they all sound like they were written by the same person trying to adopt different writing styles. Try and filter this crap.
Also - Harry, if your arent a tool, call these plants by cant_stop_yawning	Mar 27th, 2009 04:12:17 PM
Virtually everyone who read these tagged them as planted by the studio. Where is your credibility? You just throw up whatever they send you? Put down your action figures and exercise some editorial discretion.
" From Jizz in My Pants to this." by Yoda's Ball Sack	Mar 27th, 2009 04:19:24 PM
Reading plant reviews. This is an early April Fools right???
Put down your action figures and exercise some editorial discret by Yoda's Ball Sack	Mar 27th, 2009 04:20:49 PM
Can't stop laughing at that line!!!
Hollywood: Raping Your Childhood for 30 Years! by oisin5199	Mar 27th, 2009 04:28:41 PM
It just sucks that they're doing this shit? What's next? H.R. Puffinstuff? I wish they would just leave our memories alone. Plant or not, if the person says they don't know the show, they're not qualified to be review. And if they don't know the luminous Anna Friel from Pushing Daisies (god, I hope she gets better work than this!) then I won't listen either. But wait, there's a 'hole in the dessert'? Is that an apple pie or chocolate pudding?
three Plants come in and post shit on AICN. by Sal_Bando	Mar 27th, 2009 05:01:53 PM
Next.
Attention soulless, bloodsucking planty FUCK: by DocPazuzu	Mar 27th, 2009 05:09:40 PM
"I was under the impression that this would be some soft family film with some wisecracky Will Ferrell jokes and lots of big fx set pieces. BOY WAS I WRONG." Translation: I so want you guys to believe that this movie will kick your asses. "the beautiful HOLLY (no idea who actress is)" Translation: See, I'm, like, just some ordinary guy just like you who can't remember every actor's name. "Okay....guys, cut that shit down! Who cares?!?" Translation: See? I hate talky stuff just like you guys! "it is the fucking most genius HILARIOUS flick I've seen in years." Translation: I'm a studio whore fuckbag who wouldn't know teh funny if it jumped up and rammed a pineapple up my ass. "I LOVE LOVE LOVE this movie!" Translation: I'm also a fucking douchebag tard-o-tron who steals blurbs for my gardening projects in service of my ghoulish studio overlords. "I will be doing bong hits and watching this DVD on repeat for years to come." Translations: I consider you losers to be potheads with no taste and will do ANYTHING to get you to think this will be one of your cult faves in the future. "a spot in the dessert that is a hole in time." Translation: See? I can misspell words, too! Even if it's the only one in the whole text. "This is NOT for the little one, guys." Translation: I want you to think this movie is hardcore, cutting edge entertainment that will get you pussy if you see it. "But its the most witty, entertaining, self aware, referential comedy I've seen in a major studio movie in sooo long." Translation: I have now addressed each and every single major complaint regarding studio releases in the past ten years or so. "I have NO IDEA how the movie-going public will react to such a wild movie. But I so applaud these filmmakers for just going balls out and saying 'fuck it'." Translation: I know EXACTLY how the movie-going public will react to this movie, but I'm trying to get as many of you poor slobs in during the opening weekend as I can before that reaction actually kicks in. ------------------- Seriously, studio people -- how much longer are you going to rely on these useless sacks of shit to do your gardening? How many more times do Lost Jarv and I have to offer our services before you realize the value of what we can bring to this game? For the umpteenth time: YOU DON'T SOUND LIKE US. Stop trying to blend in. You suck at what you do. Big time. If you want a plant to sound like a talkbacker, then fucking HIRE A TALKBACKER.
To everyone screaming "They raped my childhood!" by OBESE_WAN_KENOBI	Mar 27th, 2009 05:29:06 PM
Really. I watched this show as a kid. It sucked! They would almost have to TRY and make a movie worse than the TV show. It's not like they're taking some revered piece of literature and destroying it! Stop yer bitching and go back to playing with your action figures.
To OBESE_WAN_KENOBI by cant_stop_yawning	Mar 27th, 2009 05:44:46 PM
I don't see people really doing that here - you are off topic. People are complaining about plants. Also, you are used my line without crediting it - don't really care, but it is kind of sad that you can't make your point with your own material. Also, exclamation marks are over used - try sticking to periods...or the ellipse...fatso.
To oisin5199 by cant_stop_yawning	Mar 27th, 2009 05:48:31 PM
"the luminous Anna Friel from Pushing Daisies"? What is wrong with you? Are you serious? Get out of your mom's basement and meet some women, freak.
OBESE_WAN_KENOBI by Immortal_Fish	Mar 27th, 2009 07:36:43 PM
I see nothing wrong with wanting to enjoy a repackaged piece of my childhood with my children. Looks like I can't do that here. Evidently, this movie wanders into the same realm as "Sam's happy time" urinating Bayformers. My kids are more highbrow and expect more than the usual Shrek dreck.
One time... by TedKordLives	Mar 27th, 2009 07:48:09 PM
Blue Beetle fought this guy who could control PLANTS. Maybe he's the guy behind this.
Who was that... by TedKordLives	Mar 27th, 2009 08:22:44 PM
That guy that wears green? Hung out with the Thunderbolts a few years back? Oh, yeah, it's PLANT-MAN!
Or Radioactive Man, the walking nuclear by TedKordLives	Mar 27th, 2009 08:28:08 PM
PLANT!
DocPazuzu by tbransonlives	Mar 27th, 2009 08:39:05 PM
You win the talkback! Seriously that was good stuff.
Plant by squarin	Mar 27th, 2009 09:17:49 PM
I wrote the third review. I live in San Diego and I work at a crappy not-for-profit. I got a flier walking out of I LOVE YOU MAN. I only wish I were a plant because I'd probably be making a hell of a lot more money than I do now. Isn't going to be an award winning movie, but really, it's not that bad. Like I said, it was fun and funny. I've read this site everyday for the last several years. It just so happened this is the first screening I'd been to and I was excited. What a bunch of kill joys you suckers are. Oh yeah, and I'm still not a plant.
La Jolla? Fucking La Jolla? by conspiracy	Mar 27th, 2009 09:22:55 PM
And here I thought the only thing they knew about plants down in La Jolla was that their Mexican gardeners changed them out with the season. Trust nobody from La Jolla..the home of the $20 Valet ticket and seas of gray haired golf course urchins...Pastels are still in fashion in La Jolla people, half the town thinks Bob Hope is still alive and Mitt Romney has a house there. Not saying this movie might not be silly/stupid fun with a bong and some Natty Ice....but nobody in La Jolla even knows what those are. Pllaaaaaant
Beaks, how can you call Will Farrell "great?" by crankyoldguy	Mar 27th, 2009 09:23:10 PM
He's a one-trick pony and fucking annoying; I'd pay regular, non-matinee ticket price to see his face get blown off in a film. He's only been tolerable as a secondary character in a few movies. That race movie? Unwatchable. Those other movies where he plays the same guy again and again in different jobs/situations? Unwatchable. Waiting from some numb-brain to call him the modern-day Jerry Lewis. Then I'll start a telethon to have him boiled in oil.
Three plants report back from Land of the Lost. by Yoda's Ball Sack	Mar 27th, 2009 09:38:48 PM
I'll be doing bong hits for years to come after reading fake ass reviews from plants.
This makes me mourn for Jurassic Park 4 by SoylentMean	Mar 27th, 2009 10:46:03 PM
Yet I'll still end up seeing it. Such is life.
OK kiddies... lets see if we can reverse engineer the talking po by MurderMostFowl	Mar 28th, 2009 12:11:44 AM
OK kiddies... lets see if we can reverse engineer the talking points: Matt Lauer parody is SOOOOO funny Will Farrel in true form, but he's not that annoying if you don't like that sort of thing, so please stil lgo see this movie It's nothing like you expect, so you need to go see it. OK maybe I'm just in a bad mood tonight.. .the 3rd report seems legit, at least he had some comments that make sense when seeing an unfinished film and weren't knob polishing Still the 3 interviews together... each one getting increasingly detailed, and increasingly accurate about actors names, character names etc... I dunno.
Of course, the ol' "the original was crap / by Dingbatty	Mar 28th, 2009 02:36:58 AM
not Shakespeare / was meant for kids / etc." argument rears it's lame, ubiquitous head in this thread. It may look cheesy by today's standards, but the original had some sophisticated concepts created by top scifi writers, and a palpable, creepy/fearful ambience; the characters were constantly fleeing to their claustrophobic, exposed cave-shelter, (the T-Rex would snap it's jaws at the cave mouth). The property just needed the right screenwriter to help it realize it's full potential, not have someone take the easy route of silly mockery.
Can't_stop_yawning by OBESE_WAN_KENOBI	Mar 28th, 2009 07:38:33 AM
Ok, first I only used 2 exclamation points. Second your line wasn't that great, but if you insist. IN MY EARLIER POST I USED A THROWAWAY LINE BY CAN'T_STOP_YAWNING. HE'S PROBABLY NEVER COME UP WITH A FUNNY LINE LIKE THAT IN HIS LIFE, SO HE GETS QUITE UPSET WHEN SOMEONE STEALS IT OFF HAND IN A MEANINGLESS TALKBACK ON AICN!!!!! I'M SORRY!!!! ALL BOW TO THE NEW GOD OF HUMOR... CAN'T STOP_YAWNING!!!! Hmmm... Too Many exclamation points?
Squarin by whitty	Mar 28th, 2009 08:34:25 AM
Squarin wrote: "Oh yeah, and I'm still not a plant." Yes, you are. And no one bought that feeble attempt to prove otherwise. Man, these studio plants are idiots.
Squarin by whitty	Mar 28th, 2009 08:34:54 AM
PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT PLANT
Wow, sounds like shit by m_prevette	Mar 28th, 2009 08:52:41 AM
Even with the "rave reviews" it sounds like a steaming pile. Ferrell sucks. Always has, always will. A no talent buffoon.
"My kids are more highbrow" by Thunderbolt Ross	Mar 28th, 2009 08:59:10 AM
Congrats
When does this movie come out? by dingleberryjerry	Mar 28th, 2009 09:00:13 AM
Anyone know? Smells like a big turd dropped from Chaka's ass.
First RED DWARF clip from new film online by Col. Tigh-Fighter	Mar 28th, 2009 10:17:11 AM
Ive informed the powers that be here, but no postings yet http://www.guardian.co.uk/c ulture/tvandradioblog/2009/mar /26/red-dwarf-back-earth PLus new websites with stuff on them for you to figure out lol http://www.listerscominghome.c o.uk/ http://www.ouroboroscrate.co.u k/ Enjoy!
To Whitty... by squarin	Mar 28th, 2009 01:57:27 PM
See, I can do it too asshole! And guess what, I'm STILL... not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant not a plant :)
squarin... here's how to prove you're not a plant by MurderMostFowl	Mar 28th, 2009 03:49:27 PM
Tell us this movie sucks and anyone who would pay for it is an idiot, then stay on the TBs offering opinions on other movies for 6 months. Then mix up some ash with water and the blood of a lamb and wipe it on your forehead.
Sounds Awful by christian66	Mar 28th, 2009 06:30:12 PM
Way to go, Hollywood Hacks. Throw in sub-ironic dick and shit jokes to appease a bunch of young morons. And sorry, "quit being such an asshole, Chaka!" is STUPID and reveals exactly the level of "humor" the film revels in. The problem is these comic geniuses are surrounded by talentless yes-men who will guffaw whenever Ferrel makes his boring patented sotto-voce bewilderment or laugh at McBride playing the same hillbilly part he can only play...toss in hack screenwriters who get their comedic inspiration from youtube and you have a total waste of time and money. Sid and Marty Kroft will be ashamed. And the kids only disappointed. Oh, and I really like your new PLANTS.
Here's what PLANTS want you to believe: by DocPazuzu	Mar 28th, 2009 06:34:16 PM
1) That they're "long time readers, first time posters, LOOOOOVE the site". 2) That they were walking along, minding their own business, when all of a sudden -- they're force-handed freebie tickets and whisked into a screening, after which they sit at home wondering, " So I've just seen this flick and am dying to share my experience with someone online. Oh, what to do? I know! I'll finally register a username on that site, AICN, which I've been lurking on for years without posting, just so I can share my mind-blowing Land Of The Lost experience. Because, like, there has literally been no other reason for me to open my maggot-infested gob on this site in the past. Land Of The Lost has CHANGED me in this way." Fuck each and every one of you soulless, cretinous, troglodytic fucktards with a purple, 11-inch, glow-in-the-dark rubber dick.
Tyrannosaurus lex by ObiWan Knievel	Mar 28th, 2009 10:01:28 PM
I'm disappointed that Land of the Lost is going to be a comedy. I'd much prefer to see a mature take on the Land of the Lost concept. I love the old TV show for it's sci-fi underpinnings and melodrama, not the goofiness that occasionally crept in. If you're interested in Land of the Lost, you might want to visit my fan site with coverage of both versions of the TV series and the latest news on the upcoming movie. http://personal.linkline.com/e nik1138/
Watch "Kings" on NBC by DeadPanWalking	Mar 29th, 2009 06:23:46 PM
If these guys are going to waste our time with planted marketing, I'm going to throw my two cents in. I checked out "Kings" on NBC last on Brooklyn Time Warner cable channel "Prime Time On-Demand." Anyway, it's a cool concept, fantasy alternate reality where basically the US is a monarchy and the president is Swearengen from Deadwood (Ian McShane in his best performance since the brilliant HBO anti-hit series.) Anyway, if we're going to shill here, I'm going to shill something worth watching.
Will Ferrell/Pterodactyl egg/'A Chorus Line' dance number by Trazadone	Mar 29th, 2009 06:31:43 PM
Thanks, that's all I need to know to skip this and wait for Netflix.
Jerry, this comes out June 5, 2009... by StatelyWayneManor	Mar 30th, 2009 12:22:17 PM
...and out of theaters about a week or two later.
Thanks StatelyWayneManor.... by dingleberryjerry	Mar 30th, 2009 02:11:37 PM
Thanks for the info.. after reading this I realized that they just had a test screening a few days ago!! This thing isn't done yet (sfx, music) and it's supposed to be in theatres JUNE 5th!! Whenever I hear a film isn't going to be finished until a few weeks before release..always a bad sign. Rush jobs do not end well.

Talkbacks

Three Readers Report Back From The LAND OF THE LOST!

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks