Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

Let the Right One In...
by cripeman
Jan 1st, 2009
09:18:11 AM
A vampire flick that isn't just teeth and blood...I really wanna see this.
LET THE RIGHT ONE IN
by palimpsest
Jan 1st, 2009
09:20:01 AM
Doesn't open in the UK until April, dammit!
Spielberg's movies just aren't rewatchable anymore.
by Knuckleduster
Jan 1st, 2009
09:20:03 AM
I can watch his older movies every single day and never get tired of them. Jaws, Close Encounters, Raiders, Schindler's List. But lately? I really enjoyed Catch Me If You Can, War of the Worlds and Munich the first time around, but on repeated viewings they just bore the life out of me. Looking forward to Lincoln, though.
good list and...
by logicalnoise01
Jan 1st, 2009
09:23:46 AM
your 1941 is my HOOK. It came out when I was a kid and will always be enjoyed by my friends and I.
I had chili for lunch.
by Godovhellfire
Jan 1st, 2009
09:25:26 AM
and no Cloverfield
by Varakor
Jan 1st, 2009
09:27:06 AM
NICE!! this is the best 10 ten list I've seen on aicn. Not to start up on the speed racer thing, but it really is a fun film. AND NO FUCKING CLOVERFIELD! NICE!!!
Lina Leandersson MAKES LET THE RIGHT ONE IN
by kgerm
Jan 1st, 2009
09:32:54 AM
I can honestly say if not for this little girl and her making you believe the relationship between them and not see her as a monster, but a victim this movie probably would've been lame as shit. It earns its ending wholeheartedly.
To be fair, he wasn't Indy in Last Crusade either.
by I Dunno
Jan 1st, 2009
09:43:16 AM
Really. Think of Indy's first reveal in Raiders after he whips the guy's gun out of his hand and Indy comes out of the shadows. Now think of Indy sitting at the table in Temple of Doom in his James Bond tux. Now, quickly, think of Indy's goofy ass expression as he falls down the spiral staircase in Last Crusade.

You got the bends from that transition, didn't you? There are nitrogen bubbles coursing through your veins as we speak from that drastic change in coolness-pressure. That's why I was hopeful but not optimistic about Indy 4. Why people have such affection for Last Crusade, I don't know but it was almost as silly, just without the CGI.

Nordling - Worst film of the year? Seriously?
by theyreflockingthisway
Jan 1st, 2009
09:51:26 AM
I sometimes think I'm the only one who enjoyed Crystal Skull on the same level as the previous films.

My favourite Indy moment was the opening of Raiders. Trying to get the idol in a mysterious temple in a remote part of the world with all those traps around just left me wanting more. But we didn't get more - the closest we got after that was right at the end of Last Crusade. Finally Crystal Skull gave me what I wanted - a non stop adventure, exploring these old temples. It was like the opening of Raiders but as an entire movie.

For the record I love Raiders and Crusade (not so much Doom, however) and I honestly rank this one close to those two. I can't put them in order - each has things in them I love, but Crystal Skull was definately a worthy addition for me.

Fair enough if you just don't like it, but it seems to me you're just nit picking at cgi effects, the fact they use aliens instead of religion and that it's not exactly the same as the Indiana Jones you saw in the 80's. To me it's an entertaining Indiana Jones adventure movie - as an Indy fan, I'm sorry you didn't share that.
harvey milk is famous
by Timahh
Jan 1st, 2009
10:07:58 AM
because he got shot because some guy ate too many twinkies.....i havent seen the movie yet but tell me it mentions the twinkie defense.
The Last Crusade
by Powers Boothe
Jan 1st, 2009
10:18:16 AM
Do people not remember how weak The Last Crusade was? Indy 4 (despite it's flaws) is actually an improvement on that film.
SPEED RACER's race to cult status begins today...
by Chishu_Ryu
Jan 1st, 2009
10:20:15 AM
Start your engines!
jumping on the Indy 4 band wagon
by johnnyangel
Jan 1st, 2009
10:22:28 AM
I'll go even further. Indy 4 was better than Indy 3 and Indy 2. That screeching bitch from Indy 2 just drove me crazy. I wanted to kill her after her second scene.
Worst Film?
by lochkray
Jan 1st, 2009
10:24:15 AM
Some people really have to learn the difference between "Worst" and "Most disappointing". Was KotCS massively disappointing? For me, yes. Was it the worst movie of 2008? Not by a LOOOONG shot. It was okay - and for an Indy movie, okay isn't enough, I agree. Worse than "the hottie and the nottie?" Worse than "Epic Movie?" Worse than "Prom Night" remake? Even worse than "Day the Earth Stood Still?" No way.
SPEED RACER was awesome...
by JackIsLost
Jan 1st, 2009
10:34:01 AM
Yes, it was 20-30 minutes too long (cut the mid-section and it's an almost perfect film) but if you cannot look at that delirious bit of cinematic joy with glee then I have no use for you. I still think WALL-E was at best second-tier Pixar...
I agree with others about Indy 4...
by JackIsLost
Jan 1st, 2009
10:35:27 AM
Most disappointing? Absolutely. Worst? No way in hell. DISASTER MOVIE, Nordling. DISASTER MOVIE!!!!
And SPEED RACER has a score by Michael Giacchino...
by JackIsLost
Jan 1st, 2009
10:44:17 AM
And it's awesome. How can you not love that movie?
Nordling is talking out of his ass
by kwisatzhaderach
Jan 1st, 2009
10:52:33 AM
Crystal Skull could have been better but no way is it the worst film of the year. And I agree with DerLanghaarige, at least Skull wasn't a comedy version of Raiders, as Last Crusade was.
Am I the only one who saw The Visitor?
by Speed Fricassee
Jan 1st, 2009
10:53:31 AM
Easily better than Speed Racer, Slumdog and Milk. Don't get me wrong -- those three were great, yes -- but The Visitor was just THAT good. Why the snubs?
To be fair...
by Nordling
Jan 1st, 2009
11:00:16 AM
I LIKED the aliens in CRYSTAL SKULL. I thought it made an interesting contrast considering the movie was set in the 50s. No, the movie had a lot more trouble than that.
Let the Right One In - Cats *Possible Spoiler*
by Touche_Douche
Jan 1st, 2009
11:00:42 AM
*Possible Spoiler* I loved this movie. The only issue I had was a very groan-worthy CGI cat attack. Am I alone in this? Is was horrible.
I didn't rank DISASTER MOVIE or MEET THE SPARTANS because...
by Nordling
Jan 1st, 2009
11:05:18 AM
I didn't see those two movies. I don't eat my own shit, either. Coincidence? NO!
QUINT: Instead of 10 best of year list...
by Bobba Phat
Jan 1st, 2009
11:07:50 AM
how about a list of the 10 movies you're most looking forward to seeing in 2009?
SPEED RACER
by Lucasblows
Jan 1st, 2009
11:22:23 AM
I find it stunning anyone has put this on their "Best of" lists. I get a headache just thinking about that mess. However, I whole heartily agree with Indy being the worst film of the year, or at least the biggest disappointment.
Let the Right One In
by Anti-fanboy
Jan 1st, 2009
11:38:06 AM
Great movie. Had a hard time with the love story, moreso in retrospect -- I keep seeing Oskar, decades later, robotically killing for Eli and being disposed of just like his predecessor. Wonder if the novel foreshadows this or some other fate...?
indy 4 sucked
by logicalnoise01
Jan 1st, 2009
11:47:50 AM
no matter what any apologisdt says last crusade was wy better indy was indy, sean connery still owned everything with the scottish charm and honestly you can rag on crusade all you want at least the action was competent and worth watching name one sequence in indy 4 which matches or even comes close to thw tank chase. Indy 4 was shot in a studio and it was blatant.
Touche_Douche
by BrooseTheScharuk
Jan 1st, 2009
11:48:05 AM
I completely agree about the cats, although Let The Right One In is one of my favorites of the year. It just didn't even feel like it was part of the same movie, with the same sense of realism. It's a testament to the greatness of the rest of the film that this scene did so little to hurt it, although I'm sure it'll cause me some cringing on repeated viewings.
re: The Cats
by Nordling
Jan 1st, 2009
11:50:22 AM
I think that scene was meant to be funny. Just the way she runs off with all those cats clinging to her was a comic image to me.
Anti-fanboy
by BrooseTheScharuk
Jan 1st, 2009
11:51:52 AM
I'm pretty sure that's the effect the movie is supposed to have on you. The audience is supposed to sense the parallels between Oskar and Eli's previous "friend" pretty early on in the movie I think.
Nording
by lochkray
Jan 1st, 2009
11:56:09 AM
Fair comment on Disaster movie and Meet the Spartans. But, as a movie geek, you must have seen The Happening. Surely you have to rate The Happening as being worse than KotCS. Again: I'm not saying Indiana Jones wasn't disappointing, but...man...the worst? It's not like it had Indiana Jones being chased by a windy field.
Running from the wind...
by JackIsLost
Jan 1st, 2009
12:02:00 PM
Maybe the worst scene in a major motion picture ever? Especially when the wind sweeps over you and... nothing happens. THE HAPPENING is without question one of the worst films ever and what's amazing is that as lame as the gimmick is... it could have been turned into at least a half-way decent flick. But it's the execution that kills it. The script, the direction, the acting... if you ranking movies with real potential (DISASTER MOVIE clearly had none), then THE HAPPENING was far and away the worst film of the year.
Didn't see THE HAPPENING either.
by Nordling
Jan 1st, 2009
12:02:54 PM
I normally rank my Worst as the film that most disappointed me that year. I can't rank Shyamalan because the guy can't disappoint me - I normally avoid his films now. I disliked SIGNS, hated THE VILLAGE, and hated LADY IN THE WATER, so I didn't bother with THE HAPPENING.
Fine, Nordling...
by JackIsLost
Jan 1st, 2009
12:13:51 PM
Just say WORST FILMS I SAW... I know that should go without saying (because how can you review films you didn't see?) but there is sometimes this idea that when someone makes BEST and WORST lists, that they have seen everything (those words are kind of absolutes, no?). The point is... INDY 4 was not the worst film of the year--but either the worst film you saw or the most disappointing (I'm still not clear on that, simply because Indy wasn't THAT bad, tepid as it was).
The Happening
by Powers Boothe
Jan 1st, 2009
12:15:00 PM
Hated it when I first watched it at the cinema back during the Summer. Got talked into watched it again on DVD. During the 2nd viewing I kinda 'understood' what M.Night was going for here. You guys may roll your eyes as you read this...but I eventually realized The Happening was DELIBERATELY done in the style of a 50s Sci-Fi B picture. M.Night instructed all of his cast to deliver their lines in that style. On a 2nd viewing I also noticed that the script has lots of intentionally funny moments...moments that I misinterpreted as bad writing on a first viewing.

Isn't this what Tobee Hooper attempted to do with his mid 1986 film Invaders From Mars? Or even that other mid 80s flick, Strange Invaders.

Fell free to rip me apart for this but I just wanna let you know that it's really not the stinker a lot of you think it is.

Disaster Movie, ______ Movie, etc.
by TheBlackKnight
Jan 1st, 2009
12:18:49 PM
Do they really count? I mean, really? I think giving them worst movie of the year is glorifying them too much. We should just be ignoring them instead of giving them any kind of accolades, even if it is an insulting one. We know they're going to be terrible, which takes the joy out of granting them "Worst Film of the Year." It's like, "Well, duh."

Give the title to something deserving of worst. Something that strove for greatness or strove for something specific but failed massively.

I love your name, POWERS BOOTHE...
by JackIsLost
Jan 1st, 2009
12:19:52 PM
Unless you really ARE Powers Boothe, in which case I just love your acting. But I do not think THE HAPPENING is intentionally bad. That's a cop-out explanation of why the movie failed. Now, they are a few scenes that I like (I acutally think Wahlberg apologizes to a fake plant is pretty damn funny) but no... even really bad B-movies from the 50's are way better than THE HAPPENING (stupid title, by the way).
Schwoops
by TheBlackKnight
Jan 1st, 2009
12:20:40 PM
Nordling beat me to my opinion while I was reading the talkbacks and writing my response...
Milk & Speed Racer?
by cifra
Jan 1st, 2009
12:37:43 PM
Like, COME ON! Milk is not 30% of what it could have been. Speed Racer is flashy nonsensical visuals with a predictable, stupid plot. Beautiful to look at it, but you get dizzy after a while
who the fuck is Nordling?
by 40ozToFreedom
Jan 1st, 2009
12:44:02 PM
and why should I care about his top 10 list. nothing personal, but i'm more familiar with dannygloversdickblood in the talkbacks than i am with this nordling guy's work.
Where was the fun in Speed Racer
by Lovecraftfan
Jan 1st, 2009
12:48:22 PM
I mean was I really the only utterly bored to death.
Nordling is the owner of your ass. That's who Nordling is.
by Zarles
Jan 1st, 2009
12:49:46 PM
Good list, man. Speed Racer fans unite!
Indy 4 WAS the worst film of the year.
by brock landers baby
Jan 1st, 2009
01:04:20 PM
DerLanghaarige you dumb cunt
by most excellent ninja
Jan 1st, 2009
01:05:28 PM
is that what you think the joker is, that it's that simple? fuck yourself you cunt. that was a great performance.
Indy 4
by brock landers baby
Jan 1st, 2009
01:06:12 PM
South Park were spot on. 99% of it shot indoors too.Awful. Just lazy.
Re: the Cats
by Touche_Douche
Jan 1st, 2009
01:07:28 PM
The cat attack got a lively laugh in the theatre. To me, it disrupted the creepiness vibe I had going...to date, no movie but this one did it right. I agree that the movie is done so well that it is only a minor bitch. Yeah, repeated viewing might exacerbate the crappiness of the effects.
lucas gets to much blame for indy 4
by slappy jones
Jan 1st, 2009
01:16:43 PM
At least there's no Benjamin Button crap.
by SmokeFilledTavern
Jan 1st, 2009
02:09:53 PM
It's far worse than Indy 4.
The Happening
by Tin Snoman
Jan 1st, 2009
02:31:05 PM
"Trying to make a B movie" is the biggest cop-out ever. Even if that actually was what M. Night was going for, today's audiences are either too sophisticated to accept bad dialogue and wooden acting, or they're too stupid to appreciate the homage. Either way, it's unacceptable. And say what you want about Last Crusade, but at least it doesn't have a phoned-in retread Williams soundtrack and its violations of realism are mainly limited to the artifact in question. And Connery > LeBoeuf. And Last Crusade has no fake CG monkeys, or any fake CG at all really...
Let the Right One In...
by dingus khan
Jan 1st, 2009
03:19:58 PM
...I heard they are remaking this in America. So glad I saw the Swedish version, first. The cat scene bugged me, but only because all of the other effects were real. (like the man being dropped from the hospital window)
Indy 4 proved:
by Logan_1973
Jan 1st, 2009
03:33:00 PM
You can put a fedora on a lump of shit. But in the end it's still a lump of shit. And yes, hurts to admit that.
Speed Racer
by chaoslover01
Jan 1st, 2009
03:36:43 PM
Long, boring, nausea inducing. A tremendously horrible piece of crap, start to finish. There was, in my opinion, NOTHING redeeming about even a single moment of this movie. And I would have to rate Indy 4 as one of the biggest disappointments, but definately not the worst movie of the year. But seriously, Speed Fucking Racer?
And another thing (Indy 4):
by Logan_1973
Jan 1st, 2009
03:38:48 PM
You cannot have real action without real peril. The action sequences were not believable in Indy 4 thanks to the over-used CGI. Say what you will about Crusade...but the fight scene on the tank which preceded Indy being dangled off the gun and slammed into the wall was believable because it was real peril. That alone makes it a better film.
worst movie of the year
by chaoslover01
Jan 1st, 2009
03:39:17 PM
Sorry, I was going to include this in my last post. I have to agree with others. The Happening was even worse than Speed Racer. M Night needs to direct someone else's script. I love his visual touches, but his writing has just gotten worse with every film since Unbreakable.
TheBlackKnight, I see where you are coming from
by Big Jim
Jan 1st, 2009
03:43:09 PM
but I think they deserve the distinction of "Worst" of the year, of the decade, of the century, of ever. Ignoring them only makes people think they weren't as bad as they thought. No inclusion on a "Worst of" list is as good as saying they're not that bad. Giving the film a pass because "it wasn't supposed to be good" is giving special treatment to something that deserves to be derided.

Someone gave the Movie-movies duo $20 million to make their 4th film and Disaster Movie was the result. The complete lack of effort that went into that putrid excuse for a motion picture is despicable. These movies, and those that make them, should not be ignored; they should take their rightful place atop every "Worst of" list for all to see. As a result, hopefully, the next time a film is billed as "from the guys who brought you Disaster Movie & Meet the Spartans" people all over the world will say "you mean the guys who made, according to every film critic on the planet, the two worst films of last year? NO THANK YOU!" How will the studios know these films are shit if Mary Hart doesn't say it? They obviously can't tell by just looking at them - the seem to need to be told.

Big Jim
by TheBlackKnight
Jan 1st, 2009
04:56:54 PM
I can see where YOU'RE coming from. The pits of Hell!!!

But no, seriously, I do. However, those movies make their money from schmucks that probably don't look at top 10 lists, best or worst. I agree that news of their terribleness must be spread to every living soul paying to go to the theater, and I believe the studios know how shit the movie is by looking at something like Rotten Tomatoes (not that it's the end-all of determining a film's worth, but I think a 2% for Disaster Movie is pretty deserving).

But how to get through to the masses? Perhaps we should fundraise and contract Kanye West and Fall Out Boy to write songs about how bad the movies are, then the idiots who listen to their music will stop being the idiots who pay for "____" Movies.

The Batman Voice complain
by MrClark
Jan 1st, 2009
05:18:03 PM
Is utterly retarded, its not the most pleasant sound in the world, but its not supposed to sound like Michael Buble. Its supposed to do two things A. Make him sound more scary and intimidating and B. to disguise the sound of his normal voice so people dont recognise it. Why people can't accept this and actually appreciate that the film makers thought of this I'll never understand. One of the things that drove me nuts about Superman was that no one think hes this guy looks exactly like Clark Kent and sounds exactly like Clark but no it cant be Clark. I mean come on! how did MJ not think that Spidermans voice sounds exactly like Peter Parkers!
I second that MrClark
by TheBlackKnight
Jan 1st, 2009
05:21:00 PM
That's the same defense I give verbally to friends who are naysayers, Clark Kent reference included.
Although...
by TheBlackKnight
Jan 1st, 2009
05:24:41 PM
Since he's so goddamn rich and has so much advanced technology, you'd think he could have something around his throat changing his voice electronically or something. Or just carry around one of those Scream voice change thingies. Right? Am I right?
Speed Racer!?! Are you on crack?
by Chuck_Chuckwalla
Jan 1st, 2009
05:31:36 PM
Seriously. Dude.
TheBlackKnight
by Logan_1973
Jan 1st, 2009
05:50:48 PM
That's a good point if he were Iron Man. Last I checked we can see Bat's mouth.
the Indy "backlash" is funny
by Bouncy X
Jan 1st, 2009
06:09:07 PM
i'm not some huge nerd who's always checking the net but until the new Indy movie came out, i never heard or read any negative comments about the first 3 movies. And then Part 4 comes and suddenly its all "well Part whatever was never really that good". Its hilarious and reminds of me Star Wars. Before the special editions, the original 3 were PERFECT!!!!!...then the special editions come, the prequels start and then "oh...that one always sucked, i hated it even back then. Its just pure hilarity to see that sorta stuff. And you cant compare a movie made in 2008 with one made in the 80s, times and technical issues were different. In 20 years CGI will be the "old school" effect and something else will be around and then people will bitch "remember when movies were done with CGI, those were the good days". Yes....its funny seeing people act like that. :)
Disaster Movie, etc
by drave117
Jan 1st, 2009
06:14:28 PM
I don't think anybody ever puts those on their lists because nobody considers them to be real movies. For me to choose a movie as the worst of the year, it actually has to aspire to something and miss. Then again, I don't call my award the Worst Movie of the Year award. I call it the Show Me On the Doll Where the Movie Touched You award.
DerLanghaarige
by slowgraffiti
Jan 1st, 2009
06:17:07 PM
You couldn't be farther off on Heath Ledger. That man was a brilliant actor and it's evident when you look at his body of work. He would disapear into the greatest of his characters. Take a look at Brokeback Mountain for instance. There was no point in that movie where I felt I was watching an actor, but watching the charactor. That lip licking coughing shit that you mentioned is EXACTLY the kind of stuff that needed to be brought to the role of a Joker. Um, *cough*, he's supposed to *lick lips* be *eye role* psychotic! Being in the mental care field, nervous ticks run rampat in the mentally ill. I mean, I love Jack Nicolson, but Ledher's Joker made complete fucking clown shoes out of him. I used to be a big fan of the Burton Batman until I rewatched it this summer. It's not even as impressive as Caeser Romero's from the television show. Not knocking Jack, I'm sure he had fun. But that's all it was. Ledger was both horrific, terrfiying, amusing as hell, and hilarious. Not an easy feat. That being said, the only actor I felt did a really good job in the Burton Batman movies was Michael Keaton. I mean, he was actually pretty amazing and I never bothered to notice when I was a kid. Where the hell is that guy? Let's make another movie where he works in the automotive industry. The timing is right.
SPEED RACER WAS AWESOME!!!!!!!
by Earthquake WestCoast
Jan 1st, 2009
06:21:46 PM
Hands down the most fun and creative film to come along in a damn long time!! Unlike other films that came out this year, Speed Racer will become MORE POPULAR while those other films will lose fans.
Yup! Speed Racer kicked ass!
by Alex Mack
Jan 1st, 2009
06:31:56 PM
Seen it 7 times already and it gets better every damn time!!
Christina Ricci was cute in Speed Racer!
by Alex Mack
Jan 1st, 2009
06:44:10 PM
She also looked hot when she was all goth-up during the desert race!!
Logan
by TheBlackKnight
Jan 1st, 2009
07:24:10 PM
Hence the reason I said around his throat. I don't know, they could make something up.
A la Mission: Impossible III
by TheBlackKnight
Jan 1st, 2009
07:24:45 PM
Which were the juggernauts of 2007?
by Amy Chasing
Jan 1st, 2009
08:20:08 PM
It's odd that some people are saying 2008 was a bad year for film when there's been Dark Knight, Iron Man, Wall-E, Kung Fu Panda, In Bruges, etc.

While 2007 had Diving Bell & The Butterfly, The Band's Visit, No Country For Old Men, There Will Be Blood, Ratatouille, etc. 2007 had some better dramas perhaps. I liked 2007 but was more entertained by 2008. Not because I don't like dramas, but stuff like NCFOM and The Band's Visit while very good aren't what I call great and memorable.

In contrast I'll remember 2008's films (especially Dark Knight and Wall-E) as being perfect examples of film making and marketing. Perhaps that's why people didn't like 2008. Hollywood won.

wow , worst film of the year huh ?
by t40stunt
Jan 1st, 2009
08:36:24 PM
hey buddy , your a fucking moron .
2007 and 2008 were excellent years
by Logan_1973
Jan 1st, 2009
08:58:39 PM
Both years brought works that I will always consider favs. '07 gave us There Will Be Blood, Pirates 3, The Assassination of Jesse James, The Darjeeling Limited (sorry, but I hated No Country). 2008 is right on par with Knight, Wall*E, Iron Man, Ben Button, Doubt, and hopefully Gran Torino. I think 2009 has a lot to live up to.
QUINT AND NORDLING ARE BOTH FUCKING ANGELS......
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 1st, 2009
11:17:33 PM
Nordling-- you did that E.T. write up, right? Yeah I emailed you about that shit. I read it every once in awhile and still get a tear. Fuck. I'm serious.

And Quint-- you are the man for resisting cashing in on the Top 10 list. Don't become anything like Capone and you'll be just fine, dude.

Nordling-- finally someone has the balls to tell it like it is..
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 1st, 2009
11:22:06 PM
FUCK INDIANA JONES IV. AND FUCK YOU SPIELBERG!
100% correct about Indy
by Alfie Boy
Jan 1st, 2009
11:51:50 PM
The film should be panned. For the original Producer, Director, and Star who don't really need the money, to allow that drivel to be released was a crime. A complete show of disrespect for the audience and fans who made them what they are. Worst movie of the year.
The best Batman film is The Return of the Joker
by Dingbatty
Jan 2nd, 2009
12:30:18 AM
The DCAU owns the live action stuff that is embarrassed of it's source material.
Fuck SPEED RACER. Fuck it to hell!!!
by Motoko Kusanagi
Jan 2nd, 2009
12:43:28 AM
You brought this unto yourselves...
Quint, I applaud you
by Organs
Jan 2nd, 2009
01:02:59 AM
First of all, I applaud that you didn't make a list. I'm starting to get tired of top whatever lists everywhere I look. It's just some goofball's opinion, and no top whatever list is the be all/end all list of anything. Everything's subjective.

Also, I'm glad you liked Speed Racer. I did, too. While it wasn't a particularly great movie, it was fun and it wasn't at all bad enough to warrant going into hysterics and hyperbole.
juggernauts of 2007
by Series7
Jan 2nd, 2009
01:30:39 AM
Like what? Transformers? 07 was over rated, every time I left the theater I was underwhelmed and not impressed and wondered just how good some of those actors/directors balls really tasted. Because people sure couldn't get enough of them.
STEVEN SPIELBERG -- PLEASE KILL YOURSELF
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
02:12:32 AM
Actually, Harvey Milk was shot
by The Curious Dr Humpp
Jan 2nd, 2009
06:52:49 AM
because he talked during movies. So I guess that murder was pretty much okay by AICN-standards.
Vine-swinging isn't Lucas' fault, amazingly.
by NinjaRap
Jan 2nd, 2009
07:30:28 AM
In the previous script that Lucas was unhappy with but Spielberg LOVED, the one that was written a couple years back and which leaked online this very summer... the vine-swinging and the monkeys are in it. Except it's Oxley that does it, because Mutt wasn't in that draft. I'm not sure how Spielberg could love this idea, but I submit to you the following: Harrison Ford swung on a vine a couple times in the first Raiders. It looked difficult and had serious weight and heft behind it as he struggled to swing out over the river or across a small chasm or whatever. If they did it for real, and made it look rough, and didn't have it look effortless and weightless and magic with a crapload of CGI like it did in this movie, we wouldn't be bitching. But they did, and we are.
Indian Jones the worst?
by Big DM
Jan 2nd, 2009
09:43:26 AM
That's like that quote whore Ben Lyons saying I Am Legend is one of the best movies ever made. Perhaps Crystal Skull disappointed fans of the earlier trilogy, but it was in no way a sub par movie. Not as trite and pandering as a Tyler Perry movie, or as simplistic and money hungy as the latest Saw. And speed racer felt like someone threw an open keg of Skittles at me.
NinjaRap
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
09:48:02 AM
Thats been my point exactly. All these people crying "But they did ridiculous shit in the first 3 Indy movies too!!" need to wake the fuck up. It is not the concept itself that is shit. It all lies in the execution. The vine swing and the waterfall ride would have been fine IF they were executed with some fucking class and if Spielberg used part of his brain for something other than counting his suitcases full of cash. The Indy world should be all about the practical. Learn to limit yourself to the exact sort of methods you would have used in the 80s you dumb fucks. I'm not saying make it look dated. Used today's tools, sure-- but don't make ridiculous cartoony shit you wouldn't have done back then, its that simple. If you wanna throw a jeep off a waterfall-- fine. Throw a jeep off a real fucking waterfall and people will love it.
You know, Wall-E wasn't really about the environment
by D.Vader
Jan 2nd, 2009
10:01:33 AM
It was about rebellion.
Tyler Perry's movies are shit, but they exist
by Alfie Boy
Jan 2nd, 2009
10:52:38 AM
with a history of other shit Tyler Perry movies. In other words, he's (is he even a he...really?) giving the fans of his shit more shit who like shit like that. Prior Indy gave us a look at a more expanded adventure tale. This Indy was just ludicrous, with a shit story, and shit characters (what is with Spielberg and his love for this Shia anyway?), and shit situations that made it look silly. Fuck Harrison Ford, who puts down Han Solo but who has the indecency to accept the shit he did in Indy4. Talk about a money whore. I guess it costs money to keep a younger girl like "Ally McBeal" happy.
Nord
by unionJACKass.webs.com
Jan 2nd, 2009
10:52:52 AM
Watch GET SMART, OUTPOST, TIMBER FALLS, MEET THE SPARTANS, THE COTTAGE, THE HAPPENING, THE PROMOTION, PROM NIGHT and ADULTHOOD - then tell me that INDY 4 was the worst film of 2008.
unionJACKass.webs.com
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
11:15:07 AM
You sat through all those? Hahahaha.
Indy 4 good outweighs the bad
by jrags1138
Jan 2nd, 2009
12:01:39 PM
I have it with Crusade, nobody can make time travel but the first two films in the series almost does. Lack of memorable soundtrack, mystery roads in jungle, awkward magnet "chase" in the warehouse, monkeys, and I think it needed one more location, perhaps when you say your going to England one needs to go to England in a film. The villians, Oxley, the kid, Marion, Cold War paranoia, and the aliens and their reason to be here was all fun. Name a better fourth in a series, Bond excluded!
Harry Potter was a better 4th....
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
12:23:45 PM
Hook was terrible...
by Forsakyn
Jan 2nd, 2009
12:32:08 PM
But The Lost World (Jurassic Park 2) was horrid. As far as "blockbuster" movies go Spielberg made my favorite film (Jaws), and my most hated film (The Lost World).
Indy IV was so boring i couldnt wait for it to be over
by BMacSmith
Jan 2nd, 2009
12:32:14 PM
so over the top i just stopped caring . i couldnt suspend disbelief anymore and just assumed Indy and his family were some kind of invincible supermen (maybe clones created by nazis to fight commies?). the three waterfalls bullshit sealed it. even worse than swinging shia.
yeah Lost WOrld was Spielberg's worst movie
by BMacSmith
Jan 2nd, 2009
12:33:40 PM
but only by a hair over Indy IV. you could tell he just wasnt in to them.
What the fuck is up with Lost World hate?
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
12:36:41 PM
To say it is worse than Indy IV is just fucking asinine. No fucking way was there anything in Lost World as bad as Tarzan Shia or CG Gopher or Jeep bending a branch Looney Toons style. No fucking way.
DG_DB
by BMacSmith
Jan 2nd, 2009
12:44:45 PM
i cant remember exactly, its been awhile. i just remember begging for all the good guys to be eaten. they were insufferable. While they were so busy trying to save the dinos, the dinos were eating everyone they could get their hands on. you would think some self-preservation would kick in eventually. when that dumb julliene moore bitch replaced the bullets with tranqs while T Rex is eating everyone, i was like "someone please kill this bitch".

plus it was just lazy directing, but really both movies sucked ass.

DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
by unionJACKass.webs.com
Jan 2nd, 2009
01:03:15 PM
Other shitty films I saw were: THE OXFORD MURDERS, 10,000 BC, NEVER BACK DOWN, SAW 5, FUNNY GAMES and DOOMSDAY.
LOST WORLD has the 2 T Rexs vs. the Winnebago Scene.
by Nordling
Jan 2nd, 2009
01:05:01 PM
Still one of Spielberg's best action sequences, even if the rest of the movie's just mediocre.
And HANCOCK was shit, too
by unionJACKass.webs.com
Jan 2nd, 2009
01:06:34 PM
I've said many times on these boards - some great action sequences aside, the film was a utter disaster.

I think I'm getting sick of Will Smith.

unionJACKass.webs.com
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
01:16:30 PM
Jesus Christ, I fucking pray they were bootlegged copies.
unionJACKass.webs.com
by brokentusk
Jan 2nd, 2009
01:58:10 PM
I think the difference here, and I realize that it's an obvious one, is that a lot of people expected those movies you listed to be crap... whereas they hoped INDIANA JONES AND THE CRYSTAL SKULL FUCK would be great.

It therefore makes it worse than those other films.

Not saying I necessarily agree that it was the worst film of the year (hello THE LOVE GURU) but there you go.

Lost World has some slick camerawork by Spiels&Kaminski
by D.Vader
Jan 2nd, 2009
02:01:03 PM
I enjoy the hell out of that movie everytime I see it. And BMacSmith, you need to pay better attention. Vince Vaughn removed the bullets, not Moore, no one EVER replaced them with tranqs, and it definitely didn't happen durig a Rex attack.

If you're going to come here to talk movies, you better know what the fuck youre talking about.

Indy 4
by speedroc
Jan 2nd, 2009
02:17:31 PM
Nordling, I have to agree with you on Indy.Fantastic waste of a film.
Maybe we should have a new category
by skimn
Jan 2nd, 2009
02:31:13 PM
Worst Film To Gross Over 300 Million

Then we can add Spiderman 3, Transformers, Pirates At Worlds End and Shrek 3 to the list.

And bitch as you may about CGI monkeys, gophers, nuking the fridge (can AICN officially take credit for that term?), aliens, Shia and the rest, I still say Spielberg can stage and shoot action set pieces (the rocket sled room fight, and yes, the jungle truck chase) with the best of them...

Indy 4 was not the worst, but the biggest disappointment
by just pillow talk
Jan 2nd, 2009
02:42:05 PM
No matter one's hopes that Indy 4 would have delivered something to the same level as prior films, the massive disappointment some may feel does not make it a worse movie than say, oh Baby Mama and What Happens in Vegas. Yes, even with the tons of dumb shit that occurred in Indy 4, it is by no means a worse film then those two inhumane acts that were created to wipe clean one's senses.

D.Vader - Lost World did have the gymnastic kick (GYM-DINO-KATA!), which one could argue equals Shia's vine swinging moment.

Vader you're absolutely right.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
02:48:07 PM
Vaughn took the bullets out of Postlewaite's gun to fuck him over.

And no fucking way is the gymanstic raptor kick anything like Shia's vine swing. For one thing its a practical effect which automatically makes it 10 times more tolerable. And secondly, it makes sense with her charactetr-- as she is discussing gymnastics the whole fucking movie. Shia swinging on vines, communicating with monkeys, and sword fighting like Douglas fucking Fairbanks is such a whacked out, out of fucking nowhere shockingly "What the fuck is happening?!!" moment it makes me want to spit. There is absolutely no comparison here.

and I've said before, any WORST FILM list....
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
02:51:40 PM
...needs to take a whole lot into consideration. Obviously we are not counting straight to DVD Troma type films which budgets under 150k. And you can't really count movies like Meet The Spartans in my opinion. Even the filmmakers themselves understand these are just products to milk cash out of dumb hard working fucks. They never intend for these to be actual films. They know they are making shit. You wouldn't compare an Ed Wood movie to a Spielberg movie because they are just totally different animals.

Given the budget, the cast, the caliber of production talent involved (not even counting the first 3 films mind you) Indy IV was the worst film of the year for me, hands down. Something like the Incredible Hulk is fucking Chinatown compared to Indy IV.

"gymnastic raptor kick"
by just pillow talk
Jan 2nd, 2009
02:56:57 PM
Practical effect or not, it was horrible. I suppose if Paula Dean was in Lost World, she would have cooked up a deep fried raptor recipe to save the day, and since it was her character, that would have made sense too.

Sigh. Both scenes blew in each of the movies. I mean, WTF are they thinking when they initially kick around these ideas. Do they really think they will work and look good?

"gymnastic raptor kick"
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
03:02:07 PM
It does suck massive balls. I'm just saying that doesn't compare to 35 minutes of horrible nonsense in Indy IV. Shia getting whacked in the balls repeatedly by branches. What the fuck?!! Who other than Sarah Palin's retarded infant finds that shit funny?

That trigger-happy vet that blasted the dude in Benjamin Button for talking. He should have shot Spielberg in the face instead.

shooting Spielberg in the face was too harsh....
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
03:06:02 PM
....I'm sorry. How about we just make it a shot in the face with a stream of urine instead of a bullet? Okay. Lets go with that.
How bout shot in the face with...
by D.Vader
Jan 2nd, 2009
03:12:25 PM
One of those gag squirt-gun microphones that got Tom Cruise last yr?
oh that would be amazing...
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
03:13:44 PM
...people can shit on Cruise all they want-- but he handled that like a fucking gentleman.

"Why did you do that? Why would you do that to me? I'm answering your questions. I'm doing my job. Why would you do that?"

Thanks Danny
by D.Vader
Jan 2nd, 2009
03:17:09 PM
Hope the holiday season was nice to you (and you too pillow talk). I haven't been around because the season has been incredibly busy and I haven't had access to a real internet connection until now.

Regarding the "gymnastic raptor kick", my problem with that scene is that it takes WAY too long. I mean, Kelly yells "Hey YOU!" and the raptor turns and stares at her in AWE for god's sake. It would have worked MUCH much better if we didn't get the silly premeditated twirls (I recall this happens before the raptor even jumps up to the second floor), or the raptor's reaction. She should have jumped to the poles the second the raptor landed, did one twirl maybe to gain momentum, and then yelled her line right as she was swinging for the Raptor so that the poor dino had no time to react once he saw what was coming. As it stands now, the raptor looks mesmerized by her gymnastic ability.

As for Shia's swordfighting, Danny, I have to chip in that, like Kelly's talk about her getting cut from the gymnastic team, Shia's skills with a blade are setup early in the film through innocent conversation. He tells Indy that he'd been in many prep schools and had taken fencing classes too.

As far as his character goes, I wish there had been a little bit more development early on to show that he was smarter and more skillful than your average greaser biker, so that when these moments popped up, they weren't so outlandish. Would have made him a better rounded character too.

I'm with you on that one Danny
by D.Vader
Jan 2nd, 2009
03:18:49 PM
That gagster was an ass. I mean, really. A world-renowned actor gives you the time of day so your website/newspaper/whatever can have a brief interview with him, and you... squirt water in his face? I'd do the same thing Tom did. He didn't go nuts. He didn't start cursing or have the guy thrown out. He laughed initially when he realized what happened, but then got serious about how immature the whole thing was.
That's why I think it took balls for Capone
by skimn
Jan 2nd, 2009
03:22:15 PM
to name Speed Racer worst film, and not obvious drivel like Meet The Disaster Hottie Movie. Those were designed to seperate the "young-dum-and filled with cum" from their allowance.

Argue his point, but admit he didn't choose the obvious. Yes Danny, I'm basically repeating what you just said. Capone's conclusion was just different.

By the way, just caught Ghost Town last night, and was suprised (not by Ricky Gevais) that it was such a cleanly directed, well paced, tart but still sweet romantic comedy that didn't end with the obvious. Keopp may be a better director than script doctor.

I have to agree...
by lovecraftian
Jan 2nd, 2009
03:27:26 PM
I guess South Park said it all for me. It's not that it was actually the worst thing released this year. Let's be honest. There are quite a few worse movies that made their way to the big screen. But nothing was so promoted, nothing so attached to American film iconography, and nothing so deserving of being adored, as this movie. And it stunk up the theater. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I'm not buying the DVD. Hell, I didn't even go to see it more than once. It's such a strange thing too; because I just don't get how Spielberg went from regaining so much integrity with MUNICH to this in a few short years. It doesn't make any sense. Is he bi-polar? Simply put, it was the worst BECAUSE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE BEST. There's just no excuse for that kind of incompetence. This wasn't about suits dictating to Spielberg or Lucas how to make a kick-ass adventure flick with one of pop culture's greatest heroes. We all know that didn't happen. This was them. All them. Even if Spielberg was beating his head against the wall to deal with Lucas's ego, he should've cut his losses and ran at the script's mention of monkeys and a "snake rope."
DEAR ZACHARY
by Nordling
Jan 2nd, 2009
04:27:39 PM
My # 3 film of the year, DEAR ZACHARY, plays at 11 PM EST on MSNBC this Sunday. Do yourself a huge favor and see this compelling documentary.
is he BI-POLAR?
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
04:37:19 PM
hehehehe. hilarious.
Nordling...what the shit-- you don't have a black box?
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Jan 2nd, 2009
04:38:22 PM
Your taste in film is 10 times that of Capone's. And not only does he get a black box, but I hear a vicious rumor he actually gets paid to spew his retarded bullshit.
What the fuck about "TOWELHEAD?'
by jah_kingdom
Jan 2nd, 2009
05:03:51 PM
Am I the only one who thinks this movie is brilliant. It's like a Pedro Almovodar film on crack. What American filmaker has tried to deal with so many issues seriously and in an engaging and intellectually satisfying way. this movie's got balls and I'm amazed it even got made. Time will be very kind to it.
Lost World v. Indy 4
by Logan_1973
Jan 2nd, 2009
06:52:34 PM
The Winnebago/window dangling off the cliff sequence VS. the monkeys and the nuke fride sequence. NO CONTEST.
Geek posturing
by Bubba Gillman
Jan 2nd, 2009
09:00:25 PM
to call Indy 4 the worst film of the year. I don't care if you were disappointed, hated it or whatever. Calling it the worst film of the year, saying Lucas and Spielberg have lost it, etc. is just more of the same internet party line. As for me, I just watched it again and found it just as entertaining as the the first time I saw it, and consider it at least on par with Last Crusade. There's no more an over reliance on CGI here than there was an over reliance on matte paintings, models and styrofoam giraffes in the originals. I wish the script, particularly the denoument, had been given a few more run throughs (even though I don't mind and actually like the aliens/chariots of the gods angle). But the action scenes were well staged, the pace brisk and most of all I got a glimpse of the guy I grew up idolizing - Harrison seemed like Harrison again. And that, friends, is my two cents.
War of the Worlds was HORRIBLE
by 18to88
Jan 2nd, 2009
10:29:47 PM
Way worse than KOTCS, which was at least half of a good movie. Last half hour was lame.
WORST doesn't mean BIGGST DISSAPPOINTMENT
by Mr Gorilla
Jan 3rd, 2009
05:23:30 AM
Just to be clear.
Or deven BIGGEST
by Mr Gorilla
Jan 3rd, 2009
05:25:15 AM
Either way, the point is, KOTCS was a fun, silly, entertaining two hours. What were you expecting? Was swinging on the vines any siller than that big in Temple of Doom when the mine car comes off the rails - and lands right back on the rails?
What a Douche Bag Nordling Is
by SamuelLappDance
Jan 5th, 2009
08:01:14 AM
No way is "Indy IV" the worst of the year. It's just the latest "Lucas Didn't Make the Movie I Wanted" flick to make $700 million worldwide and disappoint the geeks who schedule their years and income around ComicCon. For the rest of humanity, it was a fun romp with Harrison Ford returning to form as Indy, some crazy action, and a plot ripped not from today's headlines a la the Bourne and Bond movies but the headlines of yesteryear just like the first three. I hope they make another one.
Nordling?
by yodalovesyou
Jan 5th, 2009
09:22:13 AM
Cunt would be more appropriate.
I Hate You
by lagomorph
Jan 5th, 2009
10:10:38 AM
I automatically hate you and everything you stand for if you included Indy 4 or The Happening on your worst list. The worst films this year were far more mediocre (10,000 B.S., Let's Not Meet Dave) just as I Know Who Killed Me was not the worst film of last year thanks to its aggressive lunacy.
The Good The Bad and The Wierd
by BigFo
Jan 5th, 2009
11:58:13 AM
director didn't do The Host. That was Joon-ho Bong. Ji-Woon Kim did the awesome Tale Of Two Sisters.
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.