Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

first
by livahd
Nov 25th, 2008
12:04:10 PM
always wanted to do that
Thanks greatly for this...
by Pdorwick
Nov 25th, 2008
12:04:18 PM
...now we just have to sit still for 6 months.
i want to see this
by ArcadianDS
Nov 25th, 2008
12:05:13 PM
looks very good now
livahd: Was it everything you thought it was going to be?
by Pdorwick
Nov 25th, 2008
12:05:19 PM
...idiot...
Is it just me?
by JohnNadaUK
Nov 25th, 2008
12:07:02 PM
That thinks this is a terrible trailer? And who wants to punch that kid at the beginning? In fact who wants to punch the older Kirk? Guy's got a face like a slapped ass. Nice to see Nimoy but this movie looks garbage.
Neat-O.
by BGDAWES
Nov 25th, 2008
12:07:46 PM
X-mas came early for Star Trek TOS dorks.
That was sweet
by mattforce7
Nov 25th, 2008
12:08:55 PM
And full of old man boobs
JohnNadaUK: trust me, it's just you.
by Pdorwick
Nov 25th, 2008
12:09:37 PM
...try to get some find some taste before you post again, or you could just wait for the inevitable Transformer's TB.
Film would work just as well without Mr N
by catlettuce4
Nov 25th, 2008
12:09:57 PM
That warmed my heart!
by fractureJonze
Nov 25th, 2008
12:10:42 PM
Thanks!
I ain't cranky about this...
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
12:19:46 PM
Now it really is looking like Trek. Spock with Amanda? Sulu swordfighting and more...Were those in there before?? I haven't checked and old trailer yet. But those bits strike me as new, along with, of course, Nimoy! The truly gives the trailer gravity, in so many ways. And he looks older than post-Nemesis TNG/DS9/Voyager era, but considering that's sometime after the Unification TV episodes; clearly work on Romulus and elsewhere has taken it's toll on the legend. Hoping for a Shat surprise pre or post-credits; we'll see.
Movie might be good BUT
by Continentalop
Nov 25th, 2008
12:21:19 PM
I trailer did not send me (you are not alone John Nada). Sure the action looked right, and so did the costumes, but not the tone. My fear now is that is it is going to be some big soap opera in space, all full of young angst, unrequited love and characters trying to prove themselves to the world - and to themselves!

Its like Varsity Blues set in space.

Old age make-up or is Nimoy really that decrepit now?
by BenBraddock
Nov 25th, 2008
12:24:59 PM
I liked the first trailer and I like this one too. I think this'll be a winner, you fan-boys should stop whingeing now, please.
Well, whadaya know?
by JumpinJehosaphat
Nov 25th, 2008
12:25:20 PM
I'm surprised that after the harsh treatment fanboys gave the trailer they'd bother. It seems the geek crowd, in it's typical negative reactionary way, would've shut themselves out of any more specific information from Paramount on this. They must've seen something in the numbers that indicated otherwise.
Old Spock!!
by red_five
Nov 25th, 2008
12:25:38 PM
His appearance is great to see. However I am still restraining my internal hype-ometer, hoping this doesn't just feel like a film cobbled together with old faces to help garner interest. Here's to hoping it can be a solid new Star Trek that we've all been waiting to see.
NICE!!
by ATARI
Nov 25th, 2008
12:26:04 PM
Now that is cool news.
Fantastic!
by cameron1975willi
Nov 25th, 2008
12:26:17 PM
Good to see Spock again.
Wow
by richievanderlow
Nov 25th, 2008
12:26:32 PM
That was huge for such a tiny addition.
Pretty sure it's old age makeup
by cyrent
Nov 25th, 2008
12:27:01 PM
I mean, he's old, but he's not THAT old.
benbraddock....
by red_five
Nov 25th, 2008
12:27:51 PM
Leonard Nimoy is 77 yrs old...how do you expect him to look?
I'm really having a hard time...
by m_reporter
Nov 25th, 2008
12:28:25 PM
... to produce even a smudge of excitement for this film. J.J.'s TV work is ok, but MI-3 was really awful.

Then again, I was never a big fan of Star Trek...

one new shot? that's it?
by Kizeesh
Nov 25th, 2008
12:28:28 PM
wow, so they moved the Eric bana line earlier and stuck 3 secs of Nimoy looking suspiciously like my dead Grandmother in at the end.

It's not quite cum in my pants material now is it?

Vulcan's live alot longer than humans so...
by cameron1975willi
Nov 25th, 2008
12:29:01 PM
...this Spock must be very old. That leaves room for him to return in sequels.
Spock's gotta eat!
by MisterE
Nov 25th, 2008
12:31:20 PM
Hopefully this turd will make enough money to keep him in cat food for his sunset years.
I've already got a good idea for the sequel.
by rev_skarekroe
Nov 25th, 2008
12:33:29 PM
You make Q the baddie. Q can do anything right? So he brings together all the surviving members of all the Star Trek casts to date! And he makes them all have a big battle royale!

Or he makes them have a big orgy.

Or both. Let's go with both.

My head just exploded
by The Chosen
Nov 25th, 2008
12:35:07 PM
Only one extra shot. Totally worth it.
Apple.com
by Conrad Straker
Nov 25th, 2008
12:37:42 PM
This has been on Apple.com as an "exclusive" for the last week.
Maybe all old Vulcans eventually
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
12:37:54 PM
look like an 88 year old Dame Judith Anderson.
buncha ageist cretins turning up here
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
12:39:57 PM
and I'm nearly three decades from 77 m'self. Why don't you anti-age people go see Twilight...it's for kids.
Orci and Kurtzman
by KillDozer
Nov 25th, 2008
12:41:35 PM
Sorry, there's just no way I'm paying for another movie written by these hacks. The trailer looks fine, but it also leaves out any of the wackiness that (much like Transformers) seems like it will pervade this movie based on the early footage previews (giant hands, paralyzed tongues....I wonder which cast member is going to utter the phrase "My bad"?)
Hmm!
by PITCHPERFECT
Nov 25th, 2008
12:43:59 PM
There are so many ageist little pricks that post on these chat backs.
KillDozer...
by rev_skarekroe
Nov 25th, 2008
12:44:49 PM
...the character most likely to say "My bad" is Scotty. If this was a Next Gen movie it would be either Data or Worf, because it's so hilarious to see those characters saying silly things!

Oh Data, will you ever learn what it REALLY means to be human?

Conrad
by ThomasServo
Nov 25th, 2008
12:44:58 PM
No, this trailer is slightly different. It has an extra scene at the end. RTFA before sarcasm.
Conrad Straker = DISEASED CUNT
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
12:47:15 PM
Was that Nimoy or did they just splice in some...
by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
Nov 25th, 2008
12:49:51 PM
Curious Case of Benjamin Button footage?

Seriously, AICN. Paramount gives you an "exclusive" which consists of EXACTLY the same trailer as the previous one, bar a few minor alterations and you're ready to gobble cock quicker than JJ can fuck up franchises.

(THANK ALL OF YOU...very much...for making this possible)

You sound like Halle fucking Berry!

And YackBacker, your Spies Like Us observation was right on the money. Kudos, sir.

rev_skarekroe, by that logic, "my bad" will Spock's line
by Big Jim
Nov 25th, 2008
12:49:59 PM
as Data was TNG's Spock character (on DS9 it was Odo, Voyager had The Doctor, Enterprise had the other Vulcan)
I missed you Spock!
by DrPain
Nov 25th, 2008
12:50:17 PM
That was sweet.
To the fans who wanted Shatner in this....
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
12:52:55 PM
I get you wanting him back for nostalgia sake and if Nimoy is in it, you're thinking why the hell not?

But would you really want Shatner in this? Really? Isn't he sort of a joke now? He is like a parody of himself almost. How can you take him seriously trying to look all bad ass again? I don't know anyone could take him seriously ever, to be honest. He is sort of the weak link in this franchise. I say stay the fuck away....

Its still written by hacks
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
12:53:05 PM
Save the money for Avatar instead folks.
GOOSEBUMPS!
by Zarles
Nov 25th, 2008
12:53:57 PM
And I'm not talking about R.L. Stine, either. Wow.
No Workie!!!
by Xian042
Nov 25th, 2008
12:54:44 PM
link wont work :(
Sweet
by odysseus
Nov 25th, 2008
12:54:48 PM
But Why Does He Wreck the Car?!
by cowboyone
Nov 25th, 2008
12:55:03 PM
It bugs the shit out of me every time I see the trailer.
Am I a total fanboy?
by erikharrison
Nov 25th, 2008
12:55:16 PM
BOYCOTT AVATAR!!
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
12:55:34 PM
We can end James Cameron here and now. He is against the ropes. One final blow and he's gone forever!
But you see, Big Jim...
by rev_skarekroe
Nov 25th, 2008
12:56:44 PM
...on the original series they didn't have as many moments where Spock said out of character things for a laugh. Somebody might have a laugh at his expense and then he'd raise his eyebrow quizically and everyone at home would chuckle at the funny alien. At least until Star Trek IV when he comically swore. Actually, the reason I predict it will be Scotty is that he's being played by Simon Pegg, and it's almost too easy to imagine him saying "My bad!" in a Scottish brogue after pushing the wrong button or something.

by AllieJamison
Nov 25th, 2008
12:58:26 PM
I don't know shit about Star Trek. I never found something that made it seem intriguing enough that I'd feel the urge to explore that Universe and its different incarnations or ages and crews and spaceships and whatever. But this film looks like it could actually offer an intriguing Sci-fi story. So maybe this film will be my gateway into the Trek world...
Danny, Danny, Danny...
by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
Nov 25th, 2008
12:58:41 PM
If you think Camerons against the ropes you've lost your fucking mind. And don't kid yourself, you'll be first in line to see Avatar, even if its just so you can say "I've seen it and its shit."
I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:00:43 PM
Fuck me that is a long motherfucking name.

And I'm kidding. Of course I don't think Cameron is against the ropes. He has far too many fans on his site begging for a taste of his sphincter sweat.

Nope. Sorry. I won't see it. I'm not interested at all.

DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
01:01:23 PM
Stop talking out of your ass, you're embarrassing yourself.
I would only want to see him at end to...
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
01:01:26 PM
...close the book on that era, so to speak, because his Kirk death was so botched and yeah, a big mistake. Sure, it's nostalgia - I'm old enough to have watched the original as a kidlet, plus the first series of reruns-syndication way back. However, I honestly think he's mighty funny in Boston Legal (which I admit to only watching every so often, though) - my mom watches it and said "I never knew I liked William Shatner." So I'm only thinking the pre or even better, post-credits thing; I don't think it could sink the pic in the least. Plus, these writers are not worse than Akiva Goldsmith - talk about hack work in most cases.
I
by gamerawangi
Nov 25th, 2008
01:01:36 PM
I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:02:53 PM
BUT.....the thing is. Does he have an audience anymore? I'm not so sure. There is no way to know. He has been out of the game for awhile and his name doesn't carry much weight with families and passive moviegoers. If this film is a disappointment financing, which it very well might be-- I have a feeling he might just produce or focus on documentaries for the rest of his career.
I'm sure someone else has brought this up, but...
by gamerawangi
Nov 25th, 2008
01:03:15 PM
Does it sound to anyone else that the kid gives his name as James CYBERIUS (sp?) Kirk? And sorry about the former post. Stupid return button...
pdorwick
by livahd
Nov 25th, 2008
01:04:11 PM
no, i was rather disappointed and kind of want to shower now.
Pandering.
by HoboCode
Nov 25th, 2008
01:04:15 PM
:-P Fuck Trekkies. Obviously traielr was edited just for them. Don't let them near this film or they will fucking ruin it. And for the record, morons, it's the exact same trailer only they inserted Bana's line in the beginning and ahdded old Spock in it's place at the end. Everyting else is the same.
another "feh" to Avatar...
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
01:04:50 PM
maybe, maybe a Netflix rental. Cameron made Titanic and I hate that film, even if he did do Terminator. Avatar's story looks like a patchwork of sci-fi tales from different eras which could spell Mess.
crankyoldguy
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:05:04 PM
He is funny on Boston Legal. He is good with comedy. Thats what I'm saying he is a funny comedic character. Could audiences take him as some bad ass today? That 4 foot 11, pudge ball?
why not?
by Lord Iktarr
Nov 25th, 2008
01:05:08 PM
They should remake STAR TREK II
IN SEARCH OF... THE MOTION PICTURE...
by krull rules
Nov 25th, 2008
01:06:02 PM
Greatest TV Show of all time, right behind THATS INCREDIBLE and REAL PEOPLE... The voice of Spock, Moog keyboards, and bad re-enactments... Ogopogo Monster, Easter Island Massacre and Bermuda Triangle episodes rocked a childs imagination...
I just wasn't sure, Hobo, as I
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
01:06:24 PM
didn't save the first one to check or anything like. That. And a hearty fuck you, too. What are you a fan of? Tell us, please.
yeah, i didn't really think of that...
by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
Nov 25th, 2008
01:07:31 PM
when i signed up. Its a pain in the ass.

Sphincter sweat or not, I'd take Camerons Avatar over any of the shitburgers JJ and his minions serve up any day of the week.

I fucking love the MOOG.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:07:51 PM
Uhura undies!
by StovetopStuffin'
Nov 25th, 2008
01:08:45 PM
goddamn she's hot. Gonna be the next big thing? I could see it! I thought she could have been a great love interest for Jack Sparrow, but they had him lusting after Keira Ducklips.
Nimoy hasn't appeared on every fucking thing
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
01:08:53 PM
like Shatner, so he still carries a bit of mystery about him. Between his Priceline commercials and his bloated peacock preening on Boston Legal (with drink in hand), Shatner would take us right out of the picture. Sure, of the original cast (that's survived) he's made the most of his career. Christ, who'd thought he'd be picking up Emmys at this point of his career. But as far as Trek, he'd be a liability.
I_am_not_the_droid
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:09:01 PM
Well the designs for Avatar look like shit. Anyone saying otherwise is high on Cameron's Kool-Aide Cum.
skimn -- my point exactly.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:09:32 PM
I'm a fan of many things.
by HoboCode
Nov 25th, 2008
01:10:17 PM
Can you be more specific?
fuck. This footage isn't in this new trailer....
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:10:29 PM
http://tinyurl.com/o36d5
Naw Danny, I don't want to see him in action...
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
01:11:27 PM
which I laughed at when I typed the words "in action." I certainly know better than that. But toasting Spock with Romulan ale or the like at the end. something along those lines - yeah, pure fanboy moment, but again, it would bring closure and such to the nostalgic pangs of many, that's all. Now let's invite some Mormons over and tell them we're worshippers of the black mass, which doesn't mean the cancer called Mitt.
Danny
by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
Nov 25th, 2008
01:12:27 PM
It's true that he's been out of the game for a while, but as soon as the Avatar marketing begins, barraging you with From the director of Terminator, Aliens and Titanic, blah blah blah, people will jump back on the band wagon.
"Save the money for Avatar instead folks." Nah. I'll see both.
by Se7en
Nov 25th, 2008
01:13:39 PM
Sweet to see Nimoy.
ballad o' bilbo...a classic...
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
01:13:45 PM
gee, why don't they use that in the upcoming Hobbit flick? Also, don't forget Nimoy's other Dr. Demento hit, "Highly Illogical."
"i'm with dannyglover"
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
01:15:47 PM
Good luck!

;^)

I_am_not_the_droid
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:16:29 PM
I don't know man. Its a completely different audience now. I wouldn't count on that. People around here may be pumped but the rest of the world may not give a fuck.
YackBacker!
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
01:16:31 PM
How goes it, sir? You're a TREK guy - is this looking good to you?
they'll market avatar two ways...
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
01:21:49 PM
for fanboy types, from director of Terminator, Aliens and for the non-scifi/action women especially, from the director of Titanic. When those women find out there's not sap love story in it (or is there??), they'll be nice and pissed.
This movie will be ...
by Jodet
Nov 25th, 2008
01:21:58 PM
the greatest space adventure of all time. Count on it.
Danny
by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
Nov 25th, 2008
01:23:48 PM
It's true that hard sci-fi (which JJ's star trek does NOT look like) is a tough sell these days, what with shit like Twilight raking in the dough. But the guys got some serious pedigree, and also the whole 3D thing going for him and every Hollywood talking head will be blabbing on about how fucking great it looks. We'll see what happens, and while it may not be a massive hit, a la Titanic or TDK, it will still be very successful. Shit, if rubbish like Hancock or Mummy 3 can be hits, then Avatar certainly will.
I guess I have a high Cameron resistance
by Continentalop
Nov 25th, 2008
01:24:29 PM
…Because I really have no interest in Avatar. I don't check up on it and the only time I ever hear about it is when one of you guys mention that it is going to eye-fuck me in 2009. I'll wait to the reviews or word of mouth before I decide to see it or not.

Of course, I am older, so I guess I am more resilient to hype. Never saw attack of the Clones, only saw Revenge of the Sith because it was a free screening and I promised a friend I would go with her, and never did get around to seeing X2 or Spider-Man 3.

On the negative side I have seen Twilight twice now.

Me likey what I'm seeing so far
by moondoggy2u
Nov 25th, 2008
01:24:50 PM
Why the hell wasn't this the trailer they used in the film?
This looks sweet, but...
by Ribbons
Nov 25th, 2008
01:24:59 PM
"You've always had a hard time finding your place, haven't you? Never knowing your true worth? You could settle for a less than ordinary life, but you feel like you were made for something bigger."

Who writes this stuff? That doesn't even make sense.
scuze me.
by moondoggy2u
Nov 25th, 2008
01:25:23 PM
Why the hell wasn't this the trailer they used in the Casino Royale sequel?
thanks AICN, that rocked.
by heavenlykid
Nov 25th, 2008
01:25:42 PM
Now on a totally different note, I hope Next Gen doesn't get forgotten. Seems like everyone's jumping on the 'Next Gen sucks' bandwagon that pretty much got started when Ron Moore started trashing the show on his drunken, chainsmoking BSG commentaries.
thank you JJ and AICN
by ArcadianDS
Nov 25th, 2008
01:29:24 PM
For the 3.8 seconds at the very end that hauntingly resurrected the original theme.

If that's in the movie, then epic win.

POLICE ACADEMY 8 - with Steve Guttenberg back.
by Ray Gamma
Nov 25th, 2008
01:30:04 PM
With Steve Guttenberg back in it. You heard it first here folks. He's just been on UK Radio confirming it. Fuck Star Trek, Police Academy 8 is happening!
a theory on why he drives over a cliff
by ArcadianDS
Nov 25th, 2008
01:33:39 PM
he's actually trying to get to the construction site in the distance, and the mad-made (quarry?) chasm sort of surprises him.
amazing that Moore trashes his DS9 work
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
01:33:44 PM
I'd rather watch some of its best eps over Battlestar Galactigloom-and-doom.
So can you guys defending the new Trek
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
01:35:27 PM
explain to me why it will be good? Given JJ's directing track record, not to mention Kurtzman and Orci's 'writing' history? Gonna laugh when the Avatar trailer blows everyone into the middle of next week.
Don't forget Short Circuit.
by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
Nov 25th, 2008
01:35:59 PM
Another Gute classic
If vulcans age slower
by ArcadianDS
Nov 25th, 2008
01:36:16 PM
why is middle aged Spock kneeling at the bedsite of his early 30's mother?

Or does Nimoy cameo as Surok?

wow....people trashing Avatar?
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:37:59 PM
Where the hell have you people been? I thought I was all alone in the world when i said I wasn't interested in the slightest.
Arcadian
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:39:28 PM
Bunch of crazy time travel shit going on. Thats his mother pregnant with him, right? So he goes back to tell her something or some shit.

And the cliff thing.....what if the kid just has balls of steel and he flies his car toward the cliff and jerks the brake to see just how close he can get it to the edge without falling over. This time he fucked up and took it too fast.

Gute going all nebbishy in Cocoon
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
01:39:36 PM
"Are you going to eat my face?! You're not going to eat my face are you?!"
Whatever happened to Digital Domain?
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
01:42:37 PM
Could it not compete with ILM and the smaller digital houses that cropped up?
The Gute...
by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
Nov 25th, 2008
01:43:00 PM
From Wiki...

On May 6th, 2008, Guttenberg was a guest on the Howard Stern Show. On the program, he claimed to have a 10 inch (25.4 cm) penis, and professed that it is the source of "a lot of confidence."

I am not a fan
by SUPERJIM
Nov 25th, 2008
01:43:56 PM
Of Start Trek. As far as I can recall I never seen a single episode of any of the TV shows. I vaguely recall seeing one of the movies as a kid, something about a whale? Something about "butchers they call doctors thinking they can fix him by drilling a hole in his head!". There is no way in this world I will be able to get anyone I know to come and watch this at the cinema with me, but I am sure going to try. It looks kinda cool, a DVD rental at the very least.
skimn
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
01:44:18 PM
Digital Domain just did Benjamin Button.
skimn
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:46:22 PM
I know Cameron bailed on the company right after Titanic. They still exist. They just do much smaller portions of film effects. Like only a few scenes as opposed to being the main effects house.

I know Fincher is using them for some stuff in Benjamin Button.

Avatar Is already overrrated and it ain't even out yet!
by Darth_Kaos
Nov 25th, 2008
01:49:44 PM
That first trailer better be the second coming.

I like what JJ did with MI3, and I'm looking forward to his Star Trek.
Avatar could have actual Jesus cameo..
by ChittyChittyGangBang
Nov 25th, 2008
01:52:13 PM
to signal second coming and people will still claim it is overrated.

YES!!! TOGETHER WE CAN DESTROY CAMERON!!
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:52:18 PM
Pretty sure Nimoy's got some make-up on...
by Dragon Man
Nov 25th, 2008
01:53:20 PM
It's funn how predictable I am
by Leafy McPlantsalot
Nov 25th, 2008
01:53:54 PM
ha, was unsure about the trailer. Excited for more trek but scared of what was new and different but throw 3 seconds of nimoy in and boom, i am there! can't wait! JJ might actually pull this off. pulling in old and new fans. please don't suck movie. me loves me some star trek
Avatar test footage...
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:54:22 PM
http://tinyurl.com/6aaggy
Pretty sure Nimoy's got some make-up on...
by Dragon Man
Nov 25th, 2008
01:54:39 PM
The guy's been out and about and he doesn't look like that. They grayed him up extra.
It's a sorry state of affairs
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
01:56:07 PM
when some of the people on here are attacking Cameron yet backing up Abrams, Kurtzman and Orci. Strange days indeed.
Nimoy's nose is fucking enormous.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:56:58 PM
Probably bigger than JJ's trailer.
CAMERON'S GOING DOWN!
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
01:57:27 PM
Damn this thing is taking a long time to download.
by bobjustbob
Nov 25th, 2008
01:58:36 PM
And I own two Moogs.
Thanks for the update..Benjamin Button's
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
02:03:06 PM
supposed to have tremendous effects. Fincher has always used digital to its best advantage.
The glassy 'lens-flare' effects
by Ray Gamma
Nov 25th, 2008
02:04:17 PM
Anyone else noticed how copiously they've used the glassy 'lens-flare' effects in Star Trek? Nearly every effect shot has a horizontal internal streak from lens internal reflection. Look at the trailer again.
Glorious QuickTime?
by p0llk4t
Nov 25th, 2008
02:05:29 PM
No. Quicktime is shit and has been for years. Horrible, bloated shit-ware.
Ribbons
by ledbetter51
Nov 25th, 2008
02:06:01 PM
Makes sense to me. Whether it's good writing or not is another matter.
Avatar
by ledbetter51
Nov 25th, 2008
02:12:34 PM
I don't know about everyone else, but I'm not particularly excited at the prospect of my eyeballs being fucked. Sounds unpleasant to me. Cameron has a great track record (though Titanic was waaaaaay overrated and his old "scriptment" for Spider-Man just plain sucked), but what very little I've seen from it hasn't excited me much.
Unless we're led to believe that there are cameras
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
02:13:02 PM
in space recording the action, lens flares make no bit of sense. Firefly/Serenity had the mini zoom ins and slight focus correction to give us that feeling. But lens flares? Are they just psychological? We'd think something was missing if they weren't there?
Is Nimoy selling "Old Glory" Robot Insurance?
by Rickey Henderson
Nov 25th, 2008
02:18:21 PM
Old Glory covers anyone over the age of 50 against robot attack, regardless of current health!
Avatar
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
02:21:20 PM
I don't get the bashing? You know nothing and have seen nothing of the finished product. Whereas the hype is due to the fact it has a good pedigree, and for those saying the fanboys know fuck all about it too, some have read the scriptment (which I have if anyone wants it) and that maybe why we are looking forward to it.
Dannyglovers
by richievanderlow
Nov 25th, 2008
02:22:18 PM
Don't worry.. Cameron still has Aquaman if Avatar fails.
AVATAR and "...what very little I've seen..."
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
02:23:08 PM
Exactly what have we seen? Some discredited alien concept art? Pictures of guys on a mo-cap stage? Anything else? Because there certainly hasn't been a trailer or a hi-res screenshot. In fact, all we have seen from AVATAR is a photograph of film canisters that may or may not contain some sort of production preview. Beyond that, we've only got interviews with folks like Cameron and Weaver and statements from folks (Favreau) who have seen early footage.

So, I sure would like to know what people have seen that's got them so unimpressed.

Okay, that was pretty sweet
by Mr Slippy Fist
Nov 25th, 2008
02:23:54 PM
I'm only a fan of the movies and Next Generation, but that was pretty fucking cool to bring back Nimoy. Bring back Shatner to complete the nostalgia trip!
SPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCK!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!
by jimmy rabbitte
Nov 25th, 2008
02:26:20 PM
Very cool.
That's not Nimoy with Winona Ryder
by Kage
Nov 25th, 2008
02:26:54 PM
That's Ben Cross as Sarek. Just, you know, wanted to clear that up.
Figgered it'd be something like that.
by Half-Baked-Goggle-Box-Do-Gooder
Nov 25th, 2008
02:32:32 PM
Wasn't exactly expecting a shot of Shat screaming "THERE'S SOMETHING ON THE WING OF THIS SPACESHIP!!!!"
Fuck that! I want Tribbles!
by strongbadmonkey
Nov 25th, 2008
02:36:39 PM
YackBacker
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
02:37:22 PM
And a happy Thanksgiving to you as well, sir!

I think you and I are in agreement as far as the skepticism goes. I found the trailer to be altogether pedestrian and not very exciting. The bit with the car going over the cliff was horrendous...

But I was never a big STAR TREK fan to begin with (I dug TNG back in the day and I only cared for the original cast's films). That being said, I do remain hopeful. Because when TREK works well, it's usually pretty cool stuff.

In Pondering This Over-Coverage...
by Aquatarkusman
Nov 25th, 2008
02:37:50 PM
... I'm reminded of Bill Shatner on SNL in the mid-80s: "You know, before I answer any more questions there's something I wanted to say. Having received all your letters over the years, and I've spoken to many of you, and some of you have traveled... y'know... hundreds of miles to be here, I'd just like to say... GET A LIFE, will you people? I mean, for crying out loud, it's just a TV show! I mean, look at you, look at the way you're dressed! You've turned an enjoyable little job, that I did as a lark for a few years, into a COLOSSAL WASTE OF TIME!"
Spock and the car
by DiernaSoul
Nov 25th, 2008
02:41:21 PM
First off... Squee!!! Old Spock (or as the toy companies are calling him, Spock Prime)!! He's still nummy. :D That's not Spock with Amanda...well it is...but the Vulcan leaning over her is Sarek. Amanda is holding baby Spock. As for the car. It belonged to either his dad or his uncle. His dad died in a ship explosion and he was raised by his abusive alcaholic uncle. So yeah...he's all emo and decides to be all rebelious...and then some 30 years later forgets completly how to drive a stick shift while on a gangster planet..
it looks like they opened Nimoy's eyes up more...
by iamnicksaicnsn
Nov 25th, 2008
02:41:57 PM
to conform with Syler's. Or is that just me.
re: The glassy 'lens-flare' effects
by Dr_Zoidberg
Nov 25th, 2008
02:42:16 PM
Looks like they might have used anamorphic lenses, old style. Part of the RETRO ACTION. Wonder if I get some LSD with my ticket.
A week ago
by alanmoore
Nov 25th, 2008
02:42:27 PM
...I was against this completely. But now? Maybe; perhaps even probably.

Look, I'm a longtime Trek fan; I'm 33 and I have fond memories of the original TOS and I remember - laughingly, now - my own skepticism about The Next Generation when I first saw that shit preview for it on the VHS tape of Star Trek IV. Later on, I grew to love Next Gen, when it actually came out. I even enjoyed those first couple of so-so seasons. Even later I got into DS9 and I was hooked like my grandma was on her "stories" every day. (You can puke now.) Further on, Voyager came out, and ...

I hated it. It was utter crap. I may get filleted for saying it, but Enterprise was a better show by far: Better characters, a cooler captain, a niftier ship, fun stories. Perhaps that more than anything - yes it rewrote canon like crazy, but it brought the FUN, an ingredient that Voyager had lacked entirely. I own all four seasons of Enterprise, and to be fair, it's no Next Gen, and it's no TOS. But it was cool and fun, and that's why I eventually paid good money to own what many others consider a "shit" series.

Coming back to this movie, I had only a week ago seen merely the original trailer with the guys building the Enterprise. I'd of course read all the buzz and was HIGHLY skeptical, and just didn't know if Orci and Kurtzman had it in them to write a decent movie. I thought the characters and dialogue of Transformers blew, and I thought that they manhandled their own ideas in The Island, a flick best defined by the word "salvagable" but not much else. Also a week or so ago, I had little faith in J.J. Abrams and even less in Orci and Kurtzman.

Then came the new trailer, the original version of which we just saw a couple of days ago, and now we have this version.

And while my Nerd radar is still blaring out "Alarm, alarm, nonfan a director! Alert, alert, major canon revisions - again!", I can't help but have a little optimism. The visuals look tight; so does the action, and so do the characters. Young Spock and Kirk look "right," and Simon Pegg's Scotty feels right, too, not to mention Karl Uban's McCoy. Yes the dialogue - especially that stupid "Buckle Up!" line - is a little off-feeling.

But you know what? So was the dialogue in TOS a lot of times. And the dialogue in ST V. And the dialogue on the first couple seasons of TNG and ENT. So, a few things not withstanding, I'm ready to give it a chance, at least the same chance I gave everything else listed above.

One last thing that gives me hope: Orci is a self-professed "Trekker," and he's also a self-described "canonist." If he can deliver on the mere implications of those things, I'll be there Summer 09.

zom-bot.com
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
02:42:57 PM
Quote: "crummy blue alien chick art."

You mean that old picture that Cameron discredited? Or, are you talking about the more recent stuff that surfaced that no one seems to be able to confirm?

And if the alleged concept art is not to your liking then so be it. I just think it makes SO MUCH MORE SENSE to wait for something a bit more substantial.

I'm just getting dead links.
by Smashing
Nov 25th, 2008
02:43:26 PM
Is it only available in the USA?
Hey Nice Gaius and Yackbacker
by moondoggy2u
Nov 25th, 2008
02:44:11 PM
I think I'm cautiously optimistic as well. Curiously, I too am a TNG/TOS movie fan.
Smashing -- yes. this trailer is for John McCain supporters only
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
02:45:56 PM
I got it to work then my PC crashed.
by Smashing
Nov 25th, 2008
02:47:36 PM
It says it has recovered from a fatal systems error, what the hell does that mean?, uh oh.

I just saw Leonard Nimoy playing Spock again, I can die happy.

Danny G
by Smashing
Nov 25th, 2008
02:49:09 PM
Did you notice the other night during the Bob Orci moments he never answered a single one of my questions?

I wanted to feel the love too, I loved Transformers, maybe I should have opened with that?

what did people not like about Enterprise?
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
02:49:19 PM
Smashing
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
02:51:12 PM
I noticed he was extremely grateful I put him on the receiving end of the Michael Bay dick-suck-fest. He lit up like a Christmas tree when I told him how good Bay's hair smells.
FUTURE SPOCK TO YOUNG KIRK: "TAKE MY HAND, YOUNG KIRK"
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
02:51:44 PM
Kirk: "What is this? Is this a mind meld?"

Spock: "It is ... Pon Farr."

Kirk: "What's that?"

Spock: "Shut up and enjoy it."

Kirk: "Oh ... oh ... oh yeah ..."

F*ck you douchebag shit sayers!
by Dead_Geek
Nov 25th, 2008
02:52:15 PM
The New Trek film looks like it's going to be fun. Now move out of your parents home and go kiss a girl. Kirk Rules!
KARL URBAN IS STILL THE HIGHLIGHT
by Friendo
Nov 25th, 2008
02:52:25 PM
It's so fleeting, but if you freeze the trailer and click through the 7 or 8 frames of McCoy on screen... he's fucking channelling Deforrest Kelly so perfectly. There's a moment when he is kinda cross eyed and looking directly into the camera and his teeth are clenched and his mouth is all contorted by outrage. I love it. This movie is gonna be such a freaking blast.
I am Spocks...
by Dead_Geek
Nov 25th, 2008
02:53:24 PM
... Cock up you mothers ass!
Mr. Nice Gaius
by Bouncy X
Nov 25th, 2008
02:53:48 PM
i think the same can be said for those who seem to think Avatar is the next coming of movies. I have nothing positive or negative to say or think for that exact reason, we've seen nothing.
RIGHT-CLICK ON LINK AND DOWNLOAD TARGET
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
02:53:56 PM
then open it.
Tack on Nimoy in an attempt to add credibility to the Trek Babie
by Monkey Man Zero
Nov 25th, 2008
02:54:26 PM
JJ knows how to pander to nerds. He should apply some of that to making good movies.
alanmoore Enterprise over Voyager?, really?
by Smashing
Nov 25th, 2008
02:54:57 PM
Each to there own, I enjoyed some episodes of Enterprise but it really felt like a Carry On version of Trek, the slow pace, the English dude with pink lippy, the worst dressed Vulcan ever, the worst actor in Travis, ever, endless this list is.

Made even more perverse by the coolest sets and production design ever on a Trek, season 4 was great but I still remember during season 2, the episode where Archer lost his phone on a planet and they all worried over it, I tuned out after that for a while.

Voyager kept me entertained right up until the end though, yes it went mental around season 6 but it was always funny, and I even liked all the Borg stories, I felt they expanded on the Borg like TNG did with the Klingon's, yeah the Borg kids sometimes sucked but even they got some cool moments.

I'm a Doctor...
by Dead_Geek
Nov 25th, 2008
02:54:59 PM
... Not an Elevator! Deforrest Kelly Rules!
Should read: Babies Franchise
by Monkey Man Zero
Nov 25th, 2008
02:55:25 PM
ran out of room for my important thought.
Screencap
by Orionsangels
Nov 25th, 2008
02:55:49 PM
http://tinyurl.com/5rjhj4
I'd say this will be "Speed Racer 2009", but...
by JackPumpkinhead
Nov 25th, 2008
02:55:52 PM
...it will make a ton of money, because this guy Abrams is great at moichandising. He could take crap like "Cloverfield" and make it into an instant moneymaker through ads alone.

Unfortunately for viewers, making ads is the only thing he can do.

Bouncy X
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
02:57:11 PM
Agreed.
STAR TREK 9:0:210 ... PON FARRING YOUR EYEBALLS IN 2009!!!!
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
02:57:29 PM
Rated Ar-ruh!!!!
Mr. Dickblood, do you have all day?
by moondoggy2u
Nov 25th, 2008
02:58:23 PM
The poor acting from Scott Bland-ula, the extremely tired time travel stories, the horrifying opening theme, the annoying accent from Tucker, the uninteresting set, and the obvious, straw-grasp of less-than-subtle T&A.

But why stop there? Lets throw in a dash of exceedingly unoriginal "prequel-i-tus," scripts and dialogue that were usually more cringe-worthy then memorable, and the fact that any one of the cast members of TNG, even Will Freaking Wheaton, was more charismatic and superior in acting than anyone in Enterprise. Shall I continue?

BOB ORCI IF YOU'RE READING THIS ... FIST BUMP!!!!!
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
02:58:27 PM
*Holds fist out, waiting for Orci*
Avatar...
by Dead_Geek
Nov 25th, 2008
02:59:18 PM
... Box office bomb 2009!
JackPumpkinhead ---- uhhh Speed Racer made no money.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:00:21 PM
If anything, AVATAR will be the Speed Racer of 2009. Watch and see.
My Star Trek dissapointment first appeared in 1995
by moondoggy2u
Nov 25th, 2008
03:01:16 PM
I believe that was the year that Star Trek Generations came out, wasn't it? I mean, I absolutely loved TNG (3rd season to 7th)and was dumbfounded by how bad Generations sucked. Hell, First Contact wasn't exactly anything to write home about, either, and don't even get me started on Insurrection or Nemesis.
I would just like to say for the record that...
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
03:02:08 PM
...I would gladly date Jolene Blalock...even if she wore her T'Pol outfit ALL THE TIME.

That was one sexy Vulcan bitch.

moondoggy2u -- NO PLEASE FUCKING STOP!!!
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:02:12 PM
I haven't seen a second of that show. But I thought costumes and production design looked fucking fantastic in the tv spots. Thats a damn shame it wasn't better. I thought that show was going to to do what this new film looks like it will do and make Star Trek cool for the non-fans.
The Avatar trailer will tear internet asunder
by ChittyChittyGangBang
Nov 25th, 2008
03:03:57 PM
I admit I am curious to see what the fuss is about, but really, installing icon status to a movie based on techniques that are new and the track record of a director is the perfect recipe for a nice bowl of LETDOWN.
Jolene Blalock
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:04:12 PM
There is something kinda fucked up about her face. Her body is tight. But she looks like she had surgery go wrong. She's sort of a Cro-Magnon looking bitch.
The big surprise in the movie ...
by Darth_Valinorean
Nov 25th, 2008
03:04:40 PM
... is Shatner is in the movie. Everything else is sleight of hand - the distraction for the big HOLY HECK moment. JJ and Shatner and everyone else is managing that ... about how they contacted Shatner who insists they did not etc etc etc. I think Shatner is in the movie.
Friendo
by HoboCode
Nov 25th, 2008
03:05:44 PM
Totally agree. Urban's line and delivery about space give me chills.
Watchmen=Speed Racer of 2009
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
03:06:03 PM
Chitty
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:06:44 PM
Exactly. Thats the thing that pisses me off about Avatar, all the Cameron fluffers saying "Its gonna revolutionize CG!!" Who fucking cares? Thats seriously why you're excited about it? The fucking hardware they use? Give me a fucking break. I understand the excitement for shit like The Abyss, when it truly was the first time we had seen anything like that, but now we have pretty much seen it all. The only thing he can innovate is the way in which the effects are achieved. And people get hard over that? Fuck me that is so dorky ass shit.
But don't get me wrong
by ChittyChittyGangBang
Nov 25th, 2008
03:06:46 PM
I hope that it is a thrilling experience, but I like to see completed films before I start heaping praise or slinging shit its way.
Oh yeah, the production was superior--thats true
by moondoggy2u
Nov 25th, 2008
03:07:00 PM
As for it drawing in non-trek fans, I never really thought that would happen. Frankly, on TV, Star Trek has been trying its hardest just to get back its TNG ratings numbers.
TREKEROTIKA VOL. 3: REAM ME UP, SCOTTY
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
03:07:01 PM
Passions explode in the transporter room, a/k/a Scotty's Dungeon of Love.
I predict Watchmen does well...and Avatar bombs.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:07:44 PM
She's sort of a Cro-Magnon looking bitch...
by Dead_Geek
Nov 25th, 2008
03:07:56 PM
...Like your mother, DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD?
Dead_Geek
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:08:49 PM
My mom is not dead, so how is that funny?
That shot of Nimoy...
by Hugh G Rekshun
Nov 25th, 2008
03:09:35 PM
...at the end of trailer caused me to well-up a bit. This is now at the top of the list for 2009. Oh, and I wouldn't watch Avaturd if it were the only movie released next year.
Jeri Ryan's tits look to be made of steel....
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:10:07 PM
....I would love to run up a step-stool and jump kick her in the chest just once.
Watchmen from the director of 300
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
03:10:17 PM
AVATAR ftom the director of T2, Aliens, The Abyss, Titanic, the tv spots alone will make AVATAR a 100 million
we need to start a BOYCOTT AVATAR campaign...
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:10:49 PM
RE: Blalock
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
03:11:33 PM
Now that I think about it, I would prefer to date her as T'Pol.

Jeri Ryan, I hate to say, hit the wall pretty hard. But she filled out a Federation body-suit with the best of them.

JJ makes films for the fans, Cameron makes films for himself.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:11:36 PM
This is why Harry defends this movie and will give it an A++
by SomaShine
Nov 25th, 2008
03:11:39 PM
Just like his NY (ahem)presentation review (defense). JJ knows if he dangles tablescraps like this AICN will sit up and beg.
GENERATIONS SUCKED BECAUSE OF SHATNER
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
03:12:41 PM
And the rest of the movies sucked Brent Spiner was able to crawl up Rick Berman's ass and somehow make the whole series all about fucking Data.
WhinyNegativeBitch
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
03:12:54 PM
It took you three attempts to make that lame post?

MAGNIFICENT FAIL

DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
03:13:28 PM
you heard the Pinapple Express commentary? you get another shout out, they think your a 12 year old asian kid?
Jesus Caviezel, look at those cans!!
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:13:37 PM
http://tinyurl.com/6879fe
CharyouTree
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:14:06 PM
Are you fucking kidding me?!
Nope sorry lol
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
03:14:44 PM
WhinyNegativeBitch
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:15:34 PM
Yeah, it was like you were Michael J. Fox trippin' out as he typed...
CharyouTree
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:16:07 PM
OH FUCK ME.

Grow up you talentless cunts!!

CharyouTree
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:17:24 PM
Who says it....and how far in to the film is it?
Jolene Blalock
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
03:18:14 PM
Look at her in the direct-to-dvd Straship Troopers. Looks like she stumbled in a backroom plastic surgeon office, requested the "Jolie" and got butchered by a near-sighted drunk. Nice rack tho.
skimn
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:19:21 PM
Thats what I'm saying. She looks like she is probably 10 years older than we think....
Yeah I think based on Cameron alone Avatar will get more looks
by ChittyChittyGangBang
Nov 25th, 2008
03:20:42 PM
But it would be in his best interest to put out a great product.

Avatar is shaping up to have what I call "Waterworld Syndrome". When a movie gets so much hype that it becomes impossible for it to live up to it.

Just like there were people begging for Waterworld to sink (no pun intended) just to relish in the fact that a very expensive movie failed.

Now we will have a whole new generation of people just foaming at the mouth for this thing to fail.

I'm talking about nit-picking the ever-fucking shit out of it and having an entire internet to point out it's flaws 24 hours a day.

Let me put it this way: If this movie is average then it will fail. If it is good then it will fail. It HAS to be the best ever just to be considered good, due to both the negative cunts rags out there and the people that have hyped the fucking cum out of it.

Chitty
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:21:48 PM
Is it painful to hype the cum out of something?
I cant remember the context fully
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
03:22:08 PM
and I had commentary on subs, but near the end at the ear shot off scene I think it was, something about people moaning on the internet then your name and then something like I bet hes a 12 year old asian kid sorry dude
CharyouTree
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:23:20 PM
Thanks for the lead my friend. Mitt Romney loves you for it.
Chills
by ballyhoo
Nov 25th, 2008
03:23:36 PM
Gave me fucking chills.
I just reread that Danny
by ChittyChittyGangBang
Nov 25th, 2008
03:27:14 PM
I guess getting cum out in any form has to feel good, as I have masturbated and it felt good.

I also have had the pleasure of sliding my cock in and out of a nice, tight, wet vagina and it felt good as well.

Of course hyping the cum out of something could also mean looking down at your dick and yelling "You are the biggest dick ever! You will vomit out a quart of jizz! Your viens are arranged like the Flames on Optimus! You will stab that cunt into submissive servitude!"

And then the girl laughs the first time she sees it and it goes limp.

I think JackPumpkinhead means like Speed Racer
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
03:27:38 PM
this will be pretty to look at, with little substance, but in case make a ton of money. When you revive a franchise, curiousity alone will bring out the audience. Look at Superman Returns. And if JJ is anything, he's a pop filmmaker.
"My bad," prediction...
by Dr.DirtyD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:29:00 PM
... Ext-Enterprise: Someone fires a photon torpedo at the shuttle craft carrying Spock's parents. Capt.Kirk: Whoa, who fired that torpedo, that wasn't good! McCoy: No, Jim it wasn't good. In fact it was very bad. Capt.Kirk: Well, who's bad was it? Uhura: Captain, a message coming in from engineering, it's Mr. Scott sir. Capt.Kirk: Go ahead, Scotty. Scotty: (over Com) Sorry Captain, it was My Bad. I had to do it. Actually, I'm on this new Treks side. I just don't take anything seriously. See haters; you can be clever AND optimistic.
About the Hype for AVATAR
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
03:29:29 PM
I remember people wanting Titanic to fail miserably, all the stories about it being badly over budget, stars tripping on stale bread?! (unconfirmed) and while I in no way particularly enjoyed Titanic I think it did sell a couple of tickets didn't it? Now even Cameron says he himself doesn't know if its going to be a good movie but he promises we won't have seen it before and from his past and the scriptment I have, I t(H)rust IN him
The only interest I have in Avatar
by VAWitch
Nov 25th, 2008
03:30:16 PM
Is seeing how Cameron's pushed the visual tech-envelope. As I've heard very little about the story, that's the only thing of interest to me.

As for those nay-saying Orci & Kurtzman - as a collector & fan of TFs since 1984 in multiple formats - it wasn't perfect. But other than the Bee peeing & Prime's "my bad" (which was funny if only cuz that is NOT the kind of line you'd expect Peter Cullen or Prime to say) - it could've been a LOT worse. Nice nods to fanboys (&girls), but general enough to snag Joe Public's interest to warrant a sequel, which can get more into using the various types of Transformers. It got my parents to be fans - and they've only had to put up w/ me raving for 25 yrs. I'll give ST:the reboot the benefit of the doubt. It reinvents, yes; but looks like there's enough of the *spirit* of the source material to be enjoyable for current fans (a la Xmen 1&2 - don't start me about the $hit that was X3).

this looks like fucking dynamite
by mthrndr
Nov 25th, 2008
03:32:29 PM
I cannot wait for this. I predict that if the movie lives up to this trailer, that everyone beating up this in comparison to the (shitty) old star trek movies will suddenly go silent after watching it.
".....stab that cunt into submissive servitude!"
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:35:00 PM
Awwwww, good to see you have read The Book of Mitt as well. Learn it well, for we are all equal (except bitches and dogs) under Lord Mitt.
ballyhoo -- glad to see Chitty's post had the same...
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:36:34 PM
.....effect on you. I too got chills when I read the line, "I also have had the pleasure of sliding my cock in and out of a nice, tight, wet vagina and it felt good as well."

ALL HAIL LORD MITT IN 2012!!

Danny, you have seen that Matt and Trey
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
03:37:52 PM
are planning a musical based on John Smith??
skimn -- yeah its called Twilight.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:39:35 PM
I wish instead of AVATAR, Cameron was doing
by mthrndr
Nov 25th, 2008
03:39:44 PM
Neuromancer. Or Hyperion.
WhinyNegativeBitch
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 25th, 2008
03:39:56 PM
Quote: "...every watery, protein and zinc deficient load he drops on our faces..."

Well, he must have missed me by a mile because I sure as hell don't sing his praises.

i like the look of this
by chipps
Nov 25th, 2008
03:39:57 PM
but then i can never be a true trekkie - i prefer battles with the borg and develing into myth making more than movies about saving hump back whales. to me the star trek universe is facinating. it is just that so many of the movies (not so much the showes) insist on being dull. (not boring just dull) obviously this one has a better budget than most, but it looks fantastic. why can't star trek be more actiony? any at the moment my favourite star trek movie is first contact (mostly because james cromwell is awesome) but i think this will give it a run for its money
I like WhinyNegativeBitch...
by Dr.DirtyD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:40:19 PM
...Because he/or she, is so up-front about everything. There's no pussy-footing around with WyNB. You know exactly where WyNB stands. Now, DyGlDkBld...that's a whole other ball game. You'd have to be Criswell to know what that dude is thinking.
WhinyNegativeBitch
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:43:14 PM
Uhhhhh your reasoning for paying to see Avatar is fucking pathetic. You think the treatments, concept, and creature designs are all shit-- yet you'll pay to see it because Cameron promised it will be visually groundbreaking?!! Congratulations. You're the dumbest motherfucker of the week! You seriously have the nerve to come here and slam JJ's Star Trek? Would it make you feel better if he pinky promised it would be groundbreaking like Cameron did?

Oh fuck off with that bullshit man.

Bend over for Mitt and prepare for a rectal punch bitch.

Dr.DirtyD
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:43:44 PM
I thought I was pretty up front. What do you mean?
Okay, I'm not totally on board with this, BUT...
by DatoMan413
Nov 25th, 2008
03:45:28 PM
Seeing Spock at the end of the trailer did make my eyes bug out. For a second there I went hardcore GEEEEEEEK! Still, we'll wait and see...
Will Chris Pine motorcycle from talk show to
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
03:50:47 PM
talk show and show up on BET? God, remember Cruise and his MI3 escapades?
Holodeck
by mithrandir16
Nov 25th, 2008
03:54:03 PM
Could the car crash scene at the beginning of the trailer be a holodeck simulation? I am a big fan of TNG and DS9, but I no almost nothing about the original series. Did they have holodeck's back then? I am really hoping that scene is not supposed to happen in the real world, because it makes absolutely no sense for him to let the car go off a cliff. Any Trekkers who know when holodecks were invented in the Star Trek universe, please chime in.
re: anamorphic lenses
by Ray Gamma
Nov 25th, 2008
03:54:06 PM
you can't use anamorphic lenses on a shot that has been entirely digitally created.
We've officially reached overkill saturation in spin
by gruntybear
Nov 25th, 2008
03:55:03 PM
Fuck. This. Shit. "Dawson's Trek" will satisfy no one. The Trekkies fought hard such that Berman and Braga wouldn't foist on us that perennial non-starter of an idea for "Trek Jr.:Starfleet Academy;" and whaddayaknow, ol' JJ goes and resurrects that lame-ass shit and claims it'll draw in the big bucks non-Trek audience. Ain't gonna happen, people. Ain't gonna happen. This film will not make back its production costs, let alone what will surely prove to be the astronomical amounts of money that will be spent trying to up-market this little niche "sciffy" film. It's a losing proposition, spearheaded by Mr. Shiny-Shallow. "Alias" was a disastrous tangle of plot, just as "Lost" continues to be. "MI:3" failed to re-ignite the once powerful Cruise career and "Cloverfield" made me desperately want to exterminate the "naught" generation on sight - preferably via some painful piggybacking twitter-loaded techno-virus. "Dawson's Trek" a/k/a "Starfleet Academy Redux" will follow "Speedracer" and "The Incredible Hulk" into middling nerd obscurity - regardless of the umpteen thousand stories you pump through AICN over the next 6 months. It's futile, JJ. Absolutely futile.
No
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
03:56:08 PM
holodeck girl. Thats bananas. B-A-N-A-N-A-S.
I know DyGlDkBld...
by Dr.DirtyD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:56:49 PM
...I was just making a joke. I've barely been paying attention, honestly. Today I've been mostly getting a kick out of all the names , and how the messages do or do not match them. It's social observation day for me. I like how you recognized the Acronym I made up for you.
GetEveryone (RE: Star Trek II)...
by MisterE
Nov 25th, 2008
03:58:10 PM
Read the "Space Seed" part of Khan's Wikipedia entry and you'll be good to go:

http://tinyurl.com/259xjm

gruntybear
by chipps
Nov 25th, 2008
03:58:18 PM
won't earn back cost of production. i expect you to rub it in my face if you are right, cause this looks like a winner to me.
the Shat is NOT in!!
by performingmonkey
Nov 25th, 2008
03:58:29 PM
Face it, if the writers are interested in canon for real they can't use him. Kirk is iconic but the point is to make him a NEW icon for the next gen and not pander to 40 year olds whose lives mean nothing until their fantasies are brought to life.
Kurzinski Valentine
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:59:30 PM
Uhhh....if I choose not to buy a pack of game I'll say "I'll save my money."

Fuck off.

game = GUM...........FUCK
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
03:59:58 PM
dirty
by chipps
Nov 25th, 2008
04:00:16 PM
personally i still can't figure out whether or not he likes aptow films. he is yet to make himself really clear on the issue
Dr.DirtyD
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:00:54 PM
It is odd how you know when someone is speaking to you, and just a few letters can catch your eye. Some people just put DG, and somehow I know its for me. Interesting.
My predictions (or, so, big fuckin deal)
by skimn
Nov 25th, 2008
04:01:03 PM
Will open in the 75 - 80 million range. Critics will average it 3 stars, or 70% on Rotten Tomatoes. It'll top out at 180 million domestic.
BringingSexyBack (RE: Generations)...
by MisterE
Nov 25th, 2008
04:01:59 PM
BsB, I think that all of the Next Generation movies sucked (I did like the middle seasons of the TV series, though), but check out the "Kirkless Generations" fan-made cut of that movie if you can find a copy. It plays like a double-length TNG episode. I downloaded it via bittorrent.
Wow. A blank screen.
by StarWarsRedux
Nov 25th, 2008
04:03:13 PM
So the new "Star Trek" isn't just ripping off "Star Wars", but "THX 1138", too! Seriously, though, that there's some crummy linkage.
I WANT TO SEE THIS NOW!!!
by SithMenace
Nov 25th, 2008
04:03:31 PM
Because you know it's going to kick the asses of the last four Trek movies, which sucked. Yes, I said it, First Contact is not as great a movie as everyone says, it was just the best of the shitty TNG four.
I love how so many cunts say "Non-fans will not see this"
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:06:40 PM
The marketing worked on me. For the most part I can't stand Star Trek. This will be the first Trek film I ever see in the theater. The only Trek film I've ever been remotely interested in. So keep telling me non-fans don't care and Trekkies don't care and this will bomb. Fuck off.
It's getting old gruntybear...
by Dr.DirtyD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:07:13 PM
...really old. How about a little humor in your bullshit prediction. "...not make back it's production costs." Do you actually believe this shit, or are you just bored? A little of both perhaps? I like how talkbacker who whine about all this lacking creativity throw around lame ass, tired short hand descriptions like "Dawsons trek". Although I kind of like "Starfleet Academy Redux" Everyone in the real world that I know, and i'm not bragging; but i know a shit-load of people(nature of my job)...Everyone, trekkie or no trekkie, is excited about this. And that 's just with a short trailer out. Once the market machine starts, we'll have lines around the block, like for Star Trek 4.
WhinyNegativeBitch
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:07:51 PM
Uhhh yeah. I listed to Harry's opinion all the time, and I'm only interested in this because he told me to be and in exchange he'll give me an H.J.
WhinyNegativeBitch
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:09:56 PM
And yes, paying to see a film because Cameron said it is visually groundbreaking makes you a fucking moron.
STAR TREKS ARE OVER
by turketron
Nov 25th, 2008
04:10:58 PM
*dances away*
and Cameron is all for the dumbing down of cinema....
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:13:51 PM
...please see T2 for reference.

Computer effects....oooooooooohhh...aaa aaawwwwwwwwwwwwww....

This movie should be called!
by ThaJackaL
Nov 25th, 2008
04:14:18 PM
STAR TREK EPISODE ONE: The Phantom Boxoffice Seriously does anyone even give a shit about Star Trek anymore?
DyGlDkBld.
by Dr.DirtyD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:14:30 PM
I like mine better. Plus, everyone knows that DG=Dude, guy. Do i have your permission to make " I 'heart' DyGlDkBld" t-shirts?
Dr.DirtyD -- Absolutely.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:15:49 PM
May Mitt Romney bless your tribe.
bacci40 "TAKING THE PIPE"
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:16:45 PM
Does that mean you're smoking crack or sucking dick?

Either way, we're gonna have some fun.

Bacci40
by Dr.DirtyD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:20:48 PM
You do realize this is an early trailer and is pumped with adrenaline for marketing purposes. Still, it will be the most action packed trek, but not quite as seizer worthy as this. I think you can safely see the film without heart pills.
try right clicking
by LarryTate
Nov 25th, 2008
04:23:30 PM
and "save link as" to your desktop. Let it download and enjoy.
STEPHANIE MEYERS' STAR TREK: INSURRECTION
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
04:24:09 PM
The crew discovers a polygamous planet and Kirk will do everything he can to protect this paradise.

Featuring Sulu as captain of his own starship many lightyears away because Shatner does not want him on the set.

YOUNG SULU TO YOUNG KIRK: "WANNA CROSS SWORDS?"
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
04:25:50 PM
"You mean sabers?"

"No, I mean these swords."

*Unzips pants*

Stll haven't FIXED the "REVERSE NEGATIVE" scene!
by da-giez
Nov 25th, 2008
04:26:12 PM
...the 2nd time where Spock has Kick by the neck, the whole thing is reversed. Kick should be to the left, Spocks insignia is on the wrong side... I'm surprised they missed that.
jesus
by mikeyone
Nov 25th, 2008
04:29:29 PM
it looks really fucking terrible. terrible.
I don't want Avatar to f*ck my eyeballs!
by Alex Mack
Nov 25th, 2008
04:30:58 PM
That seems like it would be painful. Cameron is overated. Titanic and Abyss sucked! Terminator 2 was weak. Btw...The Watchmen looks gay!
da-giez, Maybe it's the Mirror Universe...
by MisterE
Nov 25th, 2008
04:31:21 PM
nyuk nyuk nyuk!
TREK is looking good. Cameron's Furryfest, not so much
by DeCypher44
Nov 25th, 2008
04:32:23 PM
So this trailer has me a little more hopeful for JJ's Trek movie. However, from what I've seen and heard, Cameron's Furryfest 3-D movie just sounds lame.
Spock is a pussy. Mitt Romney needs no such potion....
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
04:32:55 PM
....to fuck 12 year olds.

LONG LIVE LATTER DAY SAINTS!!

is Majel Barrett the voice of the Enterprise?
by the milf lover
Nov 25th, 2008
04:36:53 PM
because it's not Trek if Majel Barrett isnt voicing the Enterprise.
Avatar and Star Trek
by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
Nov 25th, 2008
04:39:35 PM
Firstly, every cunt on this talkback will see both films and they are delusional if they think they won't.

Secondly, I am looking forward to Avatar like no other film. I think it will be great, and I base this purely on my faith in Cameron as a filmmaker. I've not read the treatment, I've not seen the concept art that wasn't real anyway. I want this flick as fresh as possible.

Thirdly, I have never voluntarily watched Star Trek in my life. I've seen one of them in a movie marathon over a decade ago. I barely remember it, but it's the one where they brought back the shat. Anyhoo, I do remember that I hated it, that it sucked ass and that it was fucking terrible.

Lastly, although I hate it, I will end up seeing the new one. Everyone on this TB will. I fucking guarantee it. Maybe because they are a fan of the show, a fan of JJ (are those people out there?), or like me, really hope its as shit as it looks so you can tell people "Yes, I've seen it, and its fucking terrible." If, by some miracle, its good. I will eat my words and readily admit it. But, for fucks sake people? Lost, Fringe, MI3, Cloverfield? They are all fucking rubbish! Surely the best you could hope for is for it not to be awful.

The one last thing I wish to say is, although I hate star trek, it did inspire a great comedy from a few years back that they sorely need to do a sequel to. A little ditty called Galaxy Quest.

"By Grabthar's hammer, by the sons of Worvan, you shall be avenged."

And that's all I got.

Discuss.

DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
04:45:42 PM
You called The Abyss shit? Congratulations, you know nothing about filmmaking. Enjoy your JJ Abrams shitfest.
You don't care, so you...
by I_am_not_the_droid_you_are_looki ng_for
Nov 25th, 2008
04:47:23 PM
click the Star Trek link, watch the trailer, scroll down to the TB and post that you don't care. Keep dreaming, Mr. Zeddemore.
actually, the Abyss is...
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
04:52:00 PM
boring shit
NEEDS WHALES!!!!
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
04:53:39 PM
Two of them!!!
STINO!!!
by SingingHatchet
Nov 25th, 2008
04:54:17 PM
But I am still going to be first in line! I'm such a loser.
FUCK GUM!!!!
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
04:55:11 PM
Listerine Pocket Strips is where it's at. Orange flavored, baby.
I_am_not_the_droid...
by MisterE
Nov 25th, 2008
04:56:29 PM
Isn't this new Trek film an unofficial sequel to "Galaxy Quest"? The trailer looks like aliens abducted some guys from a Star Trek convention.
What I mean is I WOULD say that, just like Speed Racer did...
by JackPumpkinhead
Nov 25th, 2008
04:56:58 PM
...the Abrams Trek might FLOP badly, but it won't - because Abrams is a master of snake oil sales, and even if this thing is as bad as Uwe Boll's pieces, he will package this in such a shiny box that it will sell better than Popplers. Sadly, writing and directing ads and ad campaigns is the only thing Abrams excels at.
crankyoldguy
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
04:57:52 PM
you should love this Abrams shitfest then. You probably loved Superman Returns too.
the Abyss is indeed boring shit
by the milf lover
Nov 25th, 2008
04:59:42 PM
Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio was hot back then, but other than that it was a shit film.
the milf lover
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
05:00:23 PM
explain to us how the Abyss is a shit film. Please.
I wouldn't call "The Abyss" boring shit...
by MisterE
Nov 25th, 2008
05:02:26 PM
...just boring.
wow
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
05:03:44 PM
Three posters slating The Abyss. What happened to this site? I should know better on a JJ Abrams talkback I suppose.
STAR TREK VS. TERMINATOR
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 25th, 2008
05:03:46 PM
"I'll be back."

"When?"

"I'm back."

"Huh, you didn't go anywhere."

"Yes I did. Space-time continuum. Long story."

I thought SR was mediocre, yes, but...
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
05:04:09 PM
my son loved it and that mattered more. Maybe you wouldn't get that, being too busy sucking off Cameron's pecker.
I admit it-that looked a lot better
by Mr.LordBronco
Nov 25th, 2008
05:06:33 PM
I haven't read any TBs from you guys, but as the first and foremost first trailer hater-I have to admit that was a fuck of a lot better... baby Kirk car scene doesn't grate on my nerves like it did before... hmmm-maybe i was wrong-LOL -MLB
Why he crashes the car.....a theory
by Dolmes
Nov 25th, 2008
05:07:28 PM
Given that the plot is about the Romulans going back in time and screwing up history one could assume they went back and fucked with his car.
kwisatzhaderach...
by MisterE
Nov 25th, 2008
05:08:09 PM
kwisatzhaderach, don't mistake a dislike for "The Abyss" as love for JJ Abrams (please).
crankyoldguy
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
05:08:10 PM
No, where I come from you don't suck a guys cock because you like his film. Must be different where you're from I guess.
MisterE
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
05:08:41 PM
Fair enough, my apologies.
J.J, Sky Movies interview
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
05:08:50 PM
he said this is not made for the old fans and he is trying to build and introduce a new fan base.
One good thing about Avatar,
by Archive
Nov 25th, 2008
05:16:17 PM
and the primary reason I'll see it, is that it's original science fiction content for the screen. It was never a book, never a comic... Thank God. Rather than adapt a vision, whatever Avatar ends up being will live and grow in the filmmaking process, with actors, designers, and the writer and director... Now that the vocabulary of film is so well understood (or is it?) we should be seeing a lot more of this kind of content than we are. One hundred years is long enough to get the toolbox down.
Archive
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
05:24:19 PM
The reason we don't see more projects like Avatar is that most filmmakers don't have Cameron's passion and vision. Cameron gets into the nuts and bolts of his worlds and makes them totally believable. That's why I have a hard time understanding anybody that says a film like The Abyss is shit. I mean, Ed Harris' performance in that film is unbelievable.
William Shatner Responds to Star Trek Director JJ Abrams
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
05:25:41 PM
http://tinyurl.com/594da2 pretty sure you guys will have seen it, though could be fake to throw people off, I only really care for Shatner to be honest, the mans a BEAST
10 Bucks?
by p0llk4t
Nov 25th, 2008
05:30:47 PM
I'm much better off wiping my ass with a 10 dollar bill and flushing it rather than paying 10 bucks to see a film I think is mediocre. Vote with you pocketbook shit-birds. Lame, fuckstick idiots who see half-ass, shitty movies are the ones that help to make 90% of what hollywood puts out unwatchable.

"What's the big deal, it's only 10 bucks, what you gonna spend it on socks?"

No fuck face, it's 10 bucks I don't want to go to the soulless, creatively-bankrupt douche nozzles who run the studios. Way to keep hollywood laughing all the way to the bank.
kwisatzhaderach
by the milf lover
Nov 25th, 2008
05:30:52 PM
why? You're not looking for me to convince you it is shit and change your opinion. Besides, I havent seen it in like 18 years, I just remember it boring me to no end, and have no desire to see it again.
Looking for that interview now Mr Zeddemore
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
05:31:31 PM
I'm sure it was on Sky Movies just before the trailer.
the milf lover
by kwisatzhaderach
Nov 25th, 2008
05:37:29 PM
I know it isn't shit, jut curious why you think it is. Doesnt matter though man, whatever.
GOT IT
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
05:43:03 PM
"this movie has not been made for fans of star trek but future fans" 10.10 http://tinyurl.com/6o63lv make of that what you will gentlemen, adieu!
Avatar is going to SUCK
by MattmanReturns
Nov 25th, 2008
05:55:25 PM
I base this on absolutely nothing.
Potential I think
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
05:56:21 PM
But I wouldnt mind a nice apartment on the Death Star, nice views, safe neighbourhood.
I like the way
by CharyouTree
Nov 25th, 2008
06:00:24 PM
the Interviewers eyes widen as he says it, as if to say "oooo you are gonna get ass fucked by a Klingon wearing a pinecone condom"
one thing is for sure
by disfigurehead
Nov 25th, 2008
06:00:32 PM
There is no way in hell it will be as good as Wrath of Khan. I want to be entertained at best. Seeing Nimoy makes me want to see it more. However, if it sucks, you bet your ass I will be on here talking shit about it.
10 bucks?
by Geekgasm
Nov 25th, 2008
06:21:31 PM
I could actually use some new socks. Anyhoo, this flick has one, maybe two, weekends to make its bank, and then people will move onto something else. Trekkies are a small, aging demographic of increasingly dwindling importance, and everybody else doesn't give a shit about Star Trek, no matter how many bras they put on it.
I bumped into Zachary Quinto today...
by Zardoz
Nov 25th, 2008
06:22:58 PM
and I had to control myself not to geek out and start pestering him with Trek and Spock questions. The trailer looks cool; let's hope the film can live up to it...
What a shithole this topic turned out to be.
by I am the Terminator
Nov 25th, 2008
06:28:08 PM
Geeks arguing over Avatar???? It hasn't even come out yet you fucking morons. Quit being ignorant about shit and raise the ceiling on IQs around here.
JohnNadaUK
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
06:43:47 PM
i want to punch that kid too - why does boy-kirk want to steal then destroy a priceless museum piece like that vette? - and why does he look like a kid from an 80s action movie? - why do we need to even see kirk as a boy? - why does my juju hurt when i peepee?
Cameron's Passion and Vision?Hahahahahahahahaah
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
06:44:41 PM
like the TOTAL PIECE OF FILM DUNG TITANIC???....too bad he wasn't aboard, you too, Kwissy-boy.
Mr. Zeddemore
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
06:45:34 PM
laurence olivier is a fantastic actor - quinto is just an actor
Dentures
by GeorgieBoy
Nov 25th, 2008
06:54:33 PM
Nimoy's dentures looked like they were about to fall out. Ick.
Mr. Zeddemore
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
06:57:31 PM
based on his role in heroes? - as if no other actor his age could play that part - but he does look like a young spock
Harcourt Fenton "Harry" Mudd should be in this
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
07:00:12 PM
for the old fans - like me - along with some very hot android women - all identical - but numbered
kirk needs to make out with a green belly dancer
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
07:01:55 PM
wait... that was pike that did that
Thank you!
by luckycreature
Nov 25th, 2008
07:04:19 PM
I was wondering when we would see Nimoy! Awesome!
To all those saying "This trailer is shit"
by BendersShinyAss
Nov 25th, 2008
07:10:33 PM
I say wholeheartedly "fuck you"
Wrapped in Darknesss[snockt] and silence
by pmarq
Nov 25th, 2008
07:39:58 PM
Couldn't they have looped that line again so Karl isn't clearing his nasal passages whilst saying it?
In a word, bitchin'
by Heckles
Nov 25th, 2008
07:49:57 PM
Felt the same way about the trailer. I really liked it, but felt it was missing something. That was it. I was already locked in, but I am super geeked now. Bring it on, now!
gary sinise shoulda been bones
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
07:50:25 PM
he looks just like bones
Two hot guys going at it
by The Brains
Nov 25th, 2008
07:52:56 PM
Gay.
Fuck this Avatar debate talkback
by reflecto
Nov 25th, 2008
08:04:06 PM
What a bunch of cocks.
Wax those boners because
by dirtsandwich
Nov 25th, 2008
08:04:31 PM

Avatar might have a trailer in early December.

An the first 3D trailer will probably show up when we get our next PG-13 or R rated 3D film. Which then Avatar will be having foreplay with our eyeballs.

Caruso has two looks
by crankyoldguy
Nov 25th, 2008
08:19:43 PM
sunglasses on; take sunglasses off.
Star Trek Returns
by BLEST
Nov 25th, 2008
08:41:48 PM
I said this in the other trailer TB, but this will be like Superman Returns.

Young, crappy director? CHECK.

New design to costumes and construction? CHECK.

Bunch of too-young actors, one in particular a dead-ringer for the original? (Sylar=Routh) CHECK.

Added to that now is: Bring back old actor from originals for 2 min. screen time to "link" the films? (Nimoy=Brando) CHECK.

Remember, BLEST coined it first: Star Trek Returns.

JimmyJoe RedSky, The Green Babe...
by ericinwisconsin
Nov 25th, 2008
08:46:26 PM
... You're right, it was Pike. BUT, not to be outdone, Kirk had TWO in the series. (If ya count the cartoon series and accept that it happened somewhere between "Hello" and the Klingons showing up...)
speaking of klingons...
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
08:59:08 PM
are there any in this? - and if so will they be the oily cossack/mongol klingons of yore or the bumpy fore head variety? - what is star trek without klingons?
will a red-shirt be turned into a cube?
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
09:01:12 PM
will kirk throw his hands up and bug out his eyes...
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
09:02:13 PM
when stunned?
Make fun of me all you want...
by kittychatalot
Nov 25th, 2008
09:02:41 PM
but I actually cried a little when I saw him! Please God, let them get his right, and not be like those last three monstrosities of movies that George Lucas tried to feed us!
will uhuru have killer thighs and a sweet fat ass?
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
09:03:06 PM
will chekhov have no upper body strength...
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
09:05:59 PM
and get his ass kicked (like every time he had to fight in tos)
kittychatalot
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
09:07:56 PM
get it right? - jj doesnt even like star trek - he made this for 18 year olds that never seen an episode of tos
the tribal tat on bana is so darth maul...
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 25th, 2008
09:10:03 PM
how 90s
I smell desperation!
by careyleefisher
Nov 25th, 2008
09:25:55 PM
The release of this 2nd trailer with Nimoy spliced in at the end, a mere week after the original trailer premiered, reeks of damage control and desperation. You don't have to be a cynic to know that the only reason this version was released was for damage control.
why would Nimoy Join this shit?
by darthwaz1
Nov 25th, 2008
09:48:51 PM
has he no respect for the greatness that the show was?
If Nero ends up being Spock's bastard son . . .
by aboriginal
Nov 25th, 2008
09:56:00 PM
No. No. No.
BLEST...
by Dr.DirtyD
Nov 25th, 2008
09:58:16 PM
Your logic is flawless. You've somehow worked out a perfect scientific formula for deducing a films performance and quality. congratulations on showing us how brilliant you are. Now, can you just leave these Star Trek talk backs and come back once the film is out so we can all discuss how great it is. Seriously, just wait for the fucking movie.
darthwaz1, no...
by randie1313
Nov 25th, 2008
09:59:01 PM
It happens that Nimoy's not the brainless dickeater that you are.
careyleefisher...
by Dr.DirtyD
Nov 25th, 2008
10:01:22 PM
...Or, the filmmakers are just being nice and giving us, on AICN a little holiday treat. Which is what the post says it is. What damage control? All of the footage reviews have been positive. There shall always be haters.
kwisatzhaderach -- FUCK YOU
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
10:15:29 PM
I love cocksucking motherfuckers that misquote me. Its a very effective weapon.

Copy and paste my post where I called Abyss shit. I feel it is Cameron's strongest film by far. I think it is a bit slow...but I still enjoy it.

SO FUCK OFF AND SHOVE A SCREWDRIVER THROUGH YOUR CHEEK YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT.

Doesn't really look that compelling
by Gozu
Nov 25th, 2008
10:16:58 PM
I mean, it looks like a big dumb summer action flick, which is fine, but after this much hype and build up, I kind of wanted something more.
Cameron's passion.....oh fuck off with that bullshit.
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
10:19:15 PM
He showed a ton of passion while delving deep into that heart-warming father/son relationship in T2.

Please stop gargling Cameron's semen and come back when you're ready to talk real films.

FUCK YOU DANNYGLOVERS DICKHEAD
by I am the Terminator
Nov 25th, 2008
10:22:29 PM
you spamming bastard. I am not amused.
I am the Terminator
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
10:27:10 PM
Spamming? Anyone who points out the fact that Cameron is a shit director is a spammer?

Ok. I can't amuse you, really? You're obviously easily amused if brain dead shit like T2 can keep your attention.

I'm laying down the gauntlet now.
by critch
Nov 25th, 2008
10:28:21 PM
Star Trek will outgross Avatar.
I'm not talking about Cameron or T2, DICKHEAD
by I am the Terminator
Nov 25th, 2008
10:28:51 PM
I'm talking about your spamming ass. Shut the fuck up loser.
I am the Terminator
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
10:37:49 PM
Okay buddy. Cameron is great. There...can we be friends? I like your name by the way.
never was a Trek fan...
by watch_the_world_burn
Nov 25th, 2008
10:40:04 PM
...but the trailer has got me interested in seeing this, my friends and I will catch it in the cinema.

As for Avatar, I'll reserve judgement until a trailer. Cameron has had a spotty career, progressively getting worse - Aliens, The Abyss, Terminator 1 & 2 all good, then came True Lies (funny but imperfect), Titanic (dreadful) and those stupid doco's of his. I hope Titanic's (totally undeserved) success didn't go to his head and cause him to rest on his laurels. Going back to sci-fi is a good move, but leave the self-indulgence at the door please mate.

Avatar will reinvent cinema
by ChittyChittyGangBang
Nov 25th, 2008
11:12:29 PM
Just like New Coke reinvented the Cola Wars.

You can only do so much with the ingredients so to speak. What more can we get from a cinema experience that we have now? Can the bar really be raised that much higher?

We are in the age that many moviegoers fifty years ago would stand in awe of what we see on the screen, but if Avatar is going to raise the bar even higher, then let me see it for myself. I just think many are setting themselves up for a letdown.

Yes, I hope it *ahem* fucks my eyeballs, but I want to see a trailer first.

maybe Cameron will personally suck everyone's dick....
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 25th, 2008
11:19:21 PM
...in the theater one by one. It might feel good for that massive schnoz to massage my pubic mound. Maybe thats how he's gonna get the good reviews.
Pandering?
by Sgt.Steiner
Nov 25th, 2008
11:35:40 PM
Plopping Spock at the end of a trailer many despise? Ash: "It's a trick. Grab an axe."
Spock looks younger than people made out
by Mike Hunt
Nov 25th, 2008
11:37:56 PM
Earlier descriptions had him looking ancient. He looks old, granted, but not as old as I had envisioned.
Dirty D.
by BLEST
Nov 25th, 2008
11:42:13 PM
Hey, I for one liked Superman Returns. Point of fact, I will be seeing this Star Trek film. (my pop is a HUGE tos fan.)

That said, it has many eerily similarities to Brian Singer's not-so-successful "reimagining" of the Superman universe where things were shiny looking and people were younger.

Now Superman Returns is an oddity: at best, an interesting side film that will have no sequel; at worst, a bastardized film that nobody considers cannon.

Here's hoping that Star Trek Returns doesn't end up in that same place, along with the Bond film Never Say Never.

Cameron giving blow jobs?
by ChittyChittyGangBang
Nov 25th, 2008
11:50:05 PM
Oh well, a mouth is a mouth.

And I did pay the money...

old age makeup?
by BadMrWonka
Nov 26th, 2008
12:20:14 AM
the dude is 77...are we serious? just don't put any ACTUAL makeup on him, and there you go...
OK-Shatner excluded see the video
by Mr.LordBronco
Nov 26th, 2008
12:24:58 AM
I'm rescinding my apology for hating on the trailer! I officially retake my first position as "First Trailer Hater"!!! Because of the lack of Shatner... This movie is going to make Toxic Avenger look like Hancock! It's going to make Leprechaun 4 look like Alien 2! It's going to suck balls, and screw you JJ dumbass-you raped my childhood! -ahhh that feels better. -mlb
BIG ST/TF SPOILERS!
by SingingHatchet
Nov 26th, 2008
12:35:47 AM
This movie really sets up a universe cross. At the end of Star Trek.. they find the planet... SPOILER AHEAD... Cybertron! A really old Optimus Prime (resurrected, just like Spock) sits around with Spock, saying things like "Live long and prosper." "Transform and roll out." and "My bad." The sequel Trans Trek will open against Avengers. You know it to be true.
And the director of Trans Trek is...
by SingingHatchet
Nov 26th, 2008
12:38:31 AM
The first half will be directed by Michael Bay. It will be mostly explosions. The second half will be directed by JJ Abrams. It will mostly be an convoluted plot that no one will follow and will leave about, say a dozen unexplained loose ends. And Spock will have flames tattooed on his forehead.
Shatner made Generations without Nimoy...
by Bill Clay
Nov 26th, 2008
12:42:57 AM
And DeForest Kelley was left out of Generations, too! The parts Scotty and Chekov played were originally supposed to be filled by Spock and McCoy. So Shat shouldn't feel so bad that he got left out of this one. Generations was his swan song.
And since someone mentioned Enterprise...
by Bill Clay
Nov 26th, 2008
12:55:00 AM
The first 2 seasons sucked. The 9/11 story arc in season 3 was mildly entertaining. But season 4 ROCKED! Almost every episode had a connection to TOS Trek and actually followed established canon. We even got an episode explaining why Klingons developed head ridges! If they could have started with the season 4 production team right at the start of the series, they would have made the show a success.
Look, all I know about Avatar is it's supposed to...
by Johnny Smith
Nov 26th, 2008
02:03:24 AM
...rape my eyeballs and do terrible things to my boner. If that's supposed to be positive hype for this movie, it's not working. I never wanted James Cameron anywhere near my boner, but now I don't even want him on the same continent as my boner. As for Star Trek and Watchmen, I hope they get them right. I really do. As a life-long fan of both, 2009 looks to be quite the interesting year. And James Cameron/Avatar/whatever, stay the fuck away from me. You got that?
hi, I'm DGDB
by wash
Nov 26th, 2008
02:03:54 AM
dick fuck sick shit ass blowjob crack edgy!!! thanks goodnight
what's with the robot cop from THX-1138?
by lynxpro
Nov 26th, 2008
02:14:09 AM
Was that a nod?
Cameron believes his own hype
by Ray Gamma
Nov 26th, 2008
02:53:27 AM
And while he HAS made some great movies, believing your own hype is the first step towards the end of your career.
This Movie Is Really Cheap Looking???!!!
by Media Messiah
Nov 26th, 2008
03:00:06 AM
This doesn't look like the epic film, in terms of scope, that Paramount and JJ Abrams promised!!! No, instead it looks like a regular episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation.
abyss
by chipps
Nov 26th, 2008
03:00:18 AM
couldn't get into it
oh, look at me!!! I'm dune boy!!
by chipps
Nov 26th, 2008
03:05:02 AM
I know so much about movies that my facts out weigh your opions on what is in fact an art form. you like pearl jam? FOOL! don't you know you are listening to the wrong music? don't like blue poles? would prefer to look at irises? idoit! you just don't understand fool.
and t2 ruled,
by chipps
Nov 26th, 2008
03:09:50 AM
oh danny you poor misguided fool.
to chipps
by awesomebri
Nov 26th, 2008
03:12:39 AM
your ego is so hilarious (and I haven't even read what your fighting about) it warrented a comment more then seeing Spock again did. your facts out weigh my ass.
hmm
by chipps
Nov 26th, 2008
03:16:07 AM
maybe i wasn't clear. i was trying to point out that it absurd to think that if a person dosn't like movie a, they therefore know nothing about movies. i was trying to mock earlier statements to that effect
and as for my ego
by chipps
Nov 26th, 2008
03:18:40 AM
it knows no bounds. I AM THE GREATEST MAN ALIVE!!!!!
So (new) young Kirk is apparently a fucking MORON
by Big Dumb Ape
Nov 26th, 2008
03:21:14 AM
I'm young Jim Kirk! Yeah, look at me! I swiped a car and now I'm driving underage! I got flat farm land all around me and I'm putting this baby through her paces! Damn, a cop on my tail! I could turn up this dirt road... go up that dirt road... or since I'm flying like a bat out of hell cut across this field. Oh, wait, here's a better idea. Even though I'm in the middle of fucking Ohio with flat areas all around me to every conceivable side, I think I'll drive RIGHT TOWARDS THAT CLIFF WITH THE GIANT DROP.

You know, I'll see this the same as most summer movies to get out of the house for a bit, but that opening better have a good explanation for why Kirk is suck a fucking moron and horrible driver even as a teen. Future starship Captain my ass! That's not the REAL Jim Kirk! Young Shatner Kirk would have lost the cop AND jumped the car over the canyon!

Who cares when AVATAR is fucking our eyeballs in 2009?
by Motoko Kusanagi
Nov 26th, 2008
03:43:20 AM
nobody
YOU'VE GOT IT WRONG:
by silentbobafett2
Nov 26th, 2008
05:38:20 AM
The only real thing missing from that trailer was Jerry Goldsmiths AWESOME star trek theme! If that is not in the new version I'll be pissed off! Thats like Star Wars with out the theme, Superman with out the theme, Indy with out the theme etc. Star Trek has one of the single coolest themes ever and I'd love to hear what M Giachinno does with it! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PUT IT IN THE FILM and make a KICK ASS TRAILER WITH IT ON!!!!!!
Couldn't Paramount have just released the last 5 seconds?
by photoboy
Nov 26th, 2008
05:51:58 AM
I mean I downloaded the 110MB 720p file just to see 5 seconds of the real Spock tacked on the end?

When they've got rid of the USS Apple Storeprise and stop doing stupid things like having Kirk being a peeping tom on Uhura the film might be OK.

And what's the point of having Nimoy in the film if the story is going to contradict everything that has come before? Is this a reboot or a continuation of old Trek? They needed to make their minds up about that before they started filming.
shatner's response-
by Maniaq
Nov 26th, 2008
07:03:27 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =3fu656gGkhI

remember about the spaces...

After I read that Nemoy was in the trailer...
by rbatty024
Nov 26th, 2008
07:53:51 AM
I kept on re-watching the old ones to find the old bastard but he wasn't there. I think his age suits him well.
"MY NAME IS JAMES TIBERIUS KIRK!!!"
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 26th, 2008
08:11:20 AM
"Your name is about to be sweetheart, son."

*Unzips pants*

link
by fxmulder35
Nov 26th, 2008
08:24:24 AM
These links SUCK
Why is the roof up?
by snappy
Nov 26th, 2008
08:25:12 AM
The roof is up on the Stingray at the beginning of the trailer, but down by the time they reach the cliff edge. Was baby-Kirk so far in front that he decided to stop & lower the roof to make the chase more interesting? Or did he know he'd have to bail out and couldn't fit through the side window? We need answers. As for the movie, colour me unexcited. The SFX looks good, but JJA has a knack of overcomplicating stories and leaving in plot holes you could drive a bus through.
SORRY I POSTED ABOUT STAR TREK
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 26th, 2008
08:38:56 AM
I didn't know this was an Abyss/T2 talkback ...
"this movie has not been made for fans of star trek but future f
by CharyouTree
Nov 26th, 2008
08:42:58 AM
http://tinyurl.com/6o63lv at 10:10
FUTURE SPOCK TO YOUNG KIRK: "SPOILER ALERT ..."
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 26th, 2008
08:45:03 AM
"Bastard Klingons will kill your son."
FUTURE SPOCK TO YOUNG KIRK: "SKIP STAR TREK V"
by BringingSexyBack
Nov 26th, 2008
08:52:58 AM
"It will be the worst of the series."
Oh hell yeah....
by BlindOgre
Nov 26th, 2008
09:13:26 AM
They should have left Nemoy on the first trailer. Why does a funky lookin' old white dude throwing nerdy gang signs get me all goose-pimply? :/
What the hell is wrong with you people?
by DocPazuzu
Nov 26th, 2008
09:13:55 AM
You're now reduced to bitching about continuity in a fucking trailer. Jesus, you cinetards must be the same droolcups who were bleating your incomprehension and indignation at the "CGI American flag" in the Indy 4 trailer TB.
Why would I pick Avatar over Trek?
by Dr_PepperSpray
Nov 26th, 2008
09:43:08 AM
Aside from Avatar being something new? James Cameron > JJ Abrams. Cameron has a better track-record and also knows how to finish a story properly. Don't forget he made one of the most successful movies of all time, and even though it pandered to little girls, he made it because he was very interested in the subject matter and wanted to see/photograph the Titanic personally. Why is JJ making Trek? He's not a fan and has said so personally. Its not a property dear to him, He just sees a dying franchise and knows he can make a solid buck by pimping the ride and turning it into something it isn't.

I can concede that perhaps Star Trek will be analogous to what the Ultimates did to the Avengers -- although can film do what comic books can? The characters aren't nearly as fluid in film. Drawing styles and artist interpretation are excusable or even encouraged with comic books but with film faces and voices have been assigned to the names. Shatner is Kirk, Kelly is Bones. It would be like going to thanksgiving dinner and seeing your Aunt and Uncle replaced with a unconvincing stand-in. The novelty of new would make it interesting, but watching them over-exaggerate the idiosyncrasies of people your familiar with would ring false. Who the fuck are you people? I still speculate that this will look very much like Superman Returns in the end. The fact that JJ went out of his way to place this into common Trek continuity (yeah, I know continuity has been compromised before) makes this thing sour. Ok fine, something went wrong with the time line. Then its sloppy writing, a Abrams hallmark. At least Nolan had good sense to make his Batman a fresh start. But JJ doesn't care. He's simply banking on the old Berman axiom: if it says TREK they will come. But I can lay the knife down and be reasonable for a second - I could be dead wrong and Star Trek might work. JJ just has a heavy head-wind against him. Either way, Paramount will get its money and be encouraged to continue right or wrong - usually wrong.

"droolcup"
by Lost Jarv
Nov 26th, 2008
10:18:08 AM
I'm officially stealing that. And no, you won't be getting residuals.

Star Trek? yuck. No thanks.

Coolness
by Thot
Nov 26th, 2008
10:39:37 AM
Dig the new bit with Nimoy/Spock. Obviously, Spock is done up to purposely appear much older. Nimoy is getting up there, but they could've made him look quite a bit younger but the story demanded otherwise. It's GREAT to see Spock on the big screen at least one more time! Live long and prosper Mr. Nimoy!
Brilliant Marketing
by DeeJay
Nov 26th, 2008
11:42:55 AM
This "second" version of the trailer is brillaint marketing, to say the least. Abrams and company can credit themselves with good use of the "just seeing if you were paying attention" technique. After all... who among us *wasn't* hoping it would be Nimoy at the end of the trailer? I suspect that the Abrams crew is going to put this franchise back on the map with this film. the only real question is whether it can generate as much revenue as "Transformers 2." Its almost as if Bay and Abrams are playing poker with one another, right now. By the way... do we know, for a fact, if any other prior "Star Trek" characters will be appearing in this film?
Kurzinski...
by DeeJay
Nov 26th, 2008
11:47:11 AM
... don't let the negativity get to you, fellow poster! Just as we saw with the criticism of the ship being constructed on Earth (which was how has the "gravity well" explanation), this will all be revealed in time. Fellow posters like Ape just want to show their passion for the franchise in their own way. When all is said and done, would you expect any less passion for a fictional universe that has essentially generated so many real-life scientists and scientific products?
re: Big Dumb Ape - Kirk being a Moron
by OneBuckFilms
Nov 26th, 2008
12:25:24 PM
Kirk is has big brass ones (The Corbomite Manuever), and has a lot of daredevil in him (Star Trek V, the Kirk drop-kicks in TOS). That combined with the fact that kids will do the dumbest things, even when they should know better, tells me this is plausible and in character. It would take that kind of energy, stubbornness, defiance and stones to become the youngest captain in Starfleet history at that point.
snappy - roof being up
by OneBuckFilms
Nov 26th, 2008
12:29:02 PM
The sequence might be longer in the film than in the Trailer. Something probably happens to the roof on screen.
This looks like a steaming pile of shit.
by NeonKnite70
Nov 26th, 2008
12:37:15 PM
You heard it here first folks.
which makes Avatar diahrrhea then
by crankyoldguy
Nov 26th, 2008
12:54:31 PM
NeonKnite70
by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD
Nov 26th, 2008
01:08:04 PM
Dont act like you're all original. You're probably the 34th person to say this looks like shit.
Kirk is BADASS...the trailer told me so...
by Darth Macchio
Nov 26th, 2008
01:16:16 PM
...in case you didn't know or maybe have been in a coma for 40 years. I heard he punched his mom in the tits right after he was born. Mom's tits + Kirk Punch = BADASS!!! (Did JJ say BADASS? Cause he really really means BADASS!!!)
This is what the trailer needed
by harmil
Nov 26th, 2008
01:37:18 PM
I came out of whatever film it was saying that leaving him out was a huge mistake, and I'm glad to see they've fixed it. That said, why the heck would you open up on a scene with a child Kirk?! That's a huge mistake as well. It sets the view on the path of looking at the entire film as "Trek Babies" and that's not what it is at all. I haven't seen the film, but just from the material shown here, I would think that a slow reveal of Kirk seeing the Enterprise being built would have been the right place to start. You need to establish a sense of wonder and reverence for the franchise and what it has meant to people. Just throwing a kiddie Kirk at us feels like a slap in the face.
Avatar vs Trek?!
by harmil
Nov 26th, 2008
01:42:35 PM
You must be joking. Why on Earth would any self-respecting SF fan miss either one?! Cameron has been waiting for the tech to do Avatar right for a decade. Trek fans have been waiting for the end of the Voyager/Enterprise take on Trek for longer. It's time for Avatar and for Trek, and I'm going to love every minute of both.
If the success of this film depends on Nimoy...
by NeonKnite70
Nov 26th, 2008
02:12:32 PM
It's obvious they didn't feel very confident in the material. That fact he's included at all just shouts that this is going to be lackluster. I'm sure even the general public will see through this blatant pandering. Sad. Very sad.
this looks like campy pop garbage
by purplepurple
Nov 26th, 2008
02:22:40 PM
JJ Abrahms was a bad choice to direct this. The guy playing Kirk has stupid pretty boy written all over his face
The question we should be asking is...
by NeonKnite70
Nov 26th, 2008
02:26:32 PM
Will Trek survived this disaster?
Harmil...
by DeeJay
Nov 26th, 2008
03:03:34 PM
... I respect where you're coming from, but disagree completely. Starting off with a shot of the Enterprise assumes that most people (in theaters) viewing the trailer would know what it was. Like it or not, that's somewhat questionable these days. Starting-off with a present-day muscle car, showing a rebelious kid, revealing that this is all happening in the future and *then* dropping the bomb that this was about "Star Trek" was complete genius. Using the "pegs" of Kirk riding a motorcycle and wearing a leather jacket enhanced the reasonance of Kirk's character being a rebelious personality. Focusing on some of Spock's fascinating cultural heritage was also brilliant. After all, how many non Trekkies/Trekkers even know that Spock is biracial? Checking out Google Trends, one can see that the trailer has increased interest in the film around the globe (though primarily in western nations). In short, goal #1 has been met... and it looks as if Paramount was wise to push the release back to summer 2009.
DeeJay, people don't know what the Enterprise is?
by MattmanReturns
Nov 26th, 2008
03:32:16 PM
You show any random person on the street a picture of the Enterprise and they'll know what it is. I know girls who could give two shits about Star Trek that know what the Enterprise is. Of course there's always somebody who's been living in a cave who doesn't know who Darth Vader is, who Spider-Man is, or what the American Flag looks like. You can't search through your channels at any given time without coming across Star Trek. So please, don't tell me that movie audiences don't know what the Enterprise is.
And
by MattmanReturns
Nov 26th, 2008
03:34:38 PM
When I saw Quantum of Solace, nobody in the theater gave a shit about that trailer until the kid announced he was James Kirk, then I heard "Oooh"s and "Whaaat"s throughout the audience. And when they play that familiar theme at the very end, people started cheering.
Arcadian, DannyGlover
by MattmanReturns
Nov 26th, 2008
03:42:09 PM
That's not middle-aged Spock with his mom. That's Ben Cross as Sarek.
When did JJ become Michael Bay?
by jambone
Nov 26th, 2008
03:53:32 PM
Could it look more like a Bay movie? Nope.
Klingons & stuff
by u.k. star
Nov 26th, 2008
03:57:53 PM
Eric Bana is fighting a couple of Klingons in that trailer, and judging by the masks they are the bumpy head types.

The trailer has worked as well as any trailer can at attracting the target audience. Also yes, there are many,many people, especially outside the Us where Trek movies make hardly any money (U.K & Germany excepted) who haven't got a clue about the old school Enterprise. they "MAY" be able to guess what it is based on similarty to next gen enterprises, but TOS is a show of the 60s repeated in the 70s with movies (mostly) in the 80s. You could very happily be born in 1990 nd never have seen the old 1701 or 1701a on tv or movie screens. As sid above the purpose of starting the trailer (and the movie) with things that look like they could be from today is to ground it and THEN to go to the sci-fi / Star Trek stuff. It works, it's a fact that can be verified all over the net. It's also a reason I suscpect the Spock clip isn't on the "real" trailer, it ends the trailer with an old guy, more so anyone that has just been convinced that maybe Star Trek is not just for geeks, has themselves reminded of a classic "geek" thing. That's not to say I have problem with it, merely seeing t from the point of view of having to attracty a new fanbase for Trek to survive.

This trailer...
by ccchhhrrriiisssm
Nov 26th, 2008
04:06:34 PM
...actually has me quite excited about the possibilities. This might just be a good film.
Does anyone remember...
by red_five
Nov 26th, 2008
04:08:58 PM
The TOS episode "Piece of the Action"? It wasn't very good, but talking about Kirk driving the Vette got me remembering it. that particular episode is set back in the mob wars of 1920's Chicago. I remember Kirk and Spock getting into an old car. Kirk doesn't know how to drive it....hmmm? There goes another piece of screwed continuity. If he can supposedly drive a Vette like that, he would have had no problem with that other old car. I know, I'm a geek.
fuck both TREK and AVATAR
by the milf lover
Nov 26th, 2008
04:16:20 PM
you all need to watch this instead:

http://tinyurl.com/64sa65

Whoa, red_five, that's impressive.
by kabong
Nov 26th, 2008
04:25:41 PM
I didn't remember Kirk not knowing how to drive until you geekcalled it.
A piece of the action
by u.k. star
Nov 26th, 2008
04:31:20 PM
Yeah, we can file that one along with bumpy headed Klingons, and dozens of other "continuity" errorsthat happen because a show lasts for over 40 years, and hundreds of episodes of tv and movies. It's the people that really care about it that you have to worry about.

I always remember this one guy who was in a state because TIm Russ, played Tuvok in Voyger, but he was a speaking extra in Generation. the poor guy was trying to get someone to tell him why this had happened, and sounded like he was gonna die when he was just told, TIM RUSS IS AN ACTOR who had different parts. Ah good times, good times.

"Live Long, and Prosper...
by pokadoo
Nov 26th, 2008
04:55:04 PM
Live TOO long, grow Grey & Wrinkly" - Ancient Vulcan Proverb.
yeah they're really pulling out all stops on this campaign- REAL
by Maniaq
Nov 26th, 2008
05:14:05 PM
to the extent you can expect to see a FULL SIZE ENTERPRISE coming to a town near you - according to JJ:

http://tinyurl.com/6hl4rg

also, was the CLOVERFIELD MONSTER in the previous version of the trailer? Didn't notice it before...

no, but the red monster / creature thingy
by u.k. star
Nov 26th, 2008
05:31:03 PM
was in the other trailer...
Mattman & Red_Five
by DeeJay
Nov 26th, 2008
05:40:09 PM
...UK Star precisely articulated what I was getting at. Also; the audience reaction you mentioned was primarily a by-product of the Abrams crew not hammering you with an image of the Enterprise right off of the bat... especially considering the fact that some people would either not know what it was or perhaps, not recognize it right off of the bat. Introducing James Kirk and *then* showing the Enterprise was the right thing to do, because the character of Kirk (which is basically tied to all things William Shatner) is far more recognizable than any Starfleet craft. By the way; if the girls you mentioned like genre fans such as yourself, then I'm SURE they'd make themselves at least partially familiar with the Enterprise :-) Red_Five... you make an interesting point, but if the car in "Piece of the Action" was a 1920's-era vehicle, I'd go so far as to say that some of those vehicles aren't as driveable as an early-60's speedster. Heck, some cars circa 1920 didn't even have accelerator pedals, so I'd question how many posters on AICN could get such an engine running. Just read Wikipedia's description of the Model T, and you'll get a sense of what I mean. I don't mean to nitpick you here, but you do realize that you're criticizing what has to be one of the most meticulous crews in Hollywood, don't you?
Maniaq...
by DeeJay
Nov 26th, 2008
05:48:03 PM
... the life-size Enterprise is likely going to be some form of 3-D holography. You know those laser projectors you can link-in with a laptop (and, as a result, "paint" a light image on the side of a high-rise)? If you're intentional enough, couldn't you also make a 3-D image that could be viewed with the cheap version of the plastic glasses? If so, the main challenge would be finding something akin to a screen that you'd be able to project a moving image.
DeeJay
by MattmanReturns
Nov 26th, 2008
05:55:16 PM
I'll buy that. Makes sense. I do like the way the trailer catches you by surprise. Very clever. The girls I was talking about mostly hate Star Trek. But they know what it is. They didn't familiarize themselves with it after meeting me. In fact, I was never that huge into Star Trek (I liked the movies, didn't keep up with the shows) until after I worked on the web site for one of the actors in this particular movie. My point is the Enterprise is just one of those iconic images that I think 99% of people will recognize.
iconic
by u.k. star
Nov 26th, 2008
06:14:48 PM
It's still an iconic image, but 1st off, the shot of it in the trailer, being built in the midst of the support scffolds etc isn't neccessarily recognisavble to a non fan, or to the person that's seen a pic or 2 of it years ago. It has enough of a "is that...? what is that?.. it kinda looks familiar, about it. 2ndly I think it's like I said before. TOS Trek basically ended in 1991 with Trek VI. So you could be 22 now and the last TOS movie was out when you were 5. After that bar the odd daytime reru of a Trek film at Christmas or Easter, you could never see The Enterprise. Britain's probably the biggest Trek fan base outside the US (although again based on movie grosses outside the Us that doesn't mean too much, and I can promise you there's plenty of people under 25 here who wouldn't have a clue about what the old enterprise looked like. Just like they don't know the "iconic" poncho - cigar - hat of the man with no name, or (until May when we "older" guys went nuts" the incredibly iconic (to my peers) Fedora and whip of Indiana Jones. Some things just get a little less well known, with younger people, over time.
Mattman...
by DeeJay
Nov 26th, 2008
06:40:26 PM
... in that case, your girls might be good judges as to whether the Abrams' crew is successful in making Star Trek "hip" and contemporary. Overall, I think this film project is going to generate a *lot* of wildly divergent discussions.
not impressive...
by darthwaz1
Nov 26th, 2008
07:25:51 PM
and after watching a marathon of trek season 3 remastered, I can honestly say that this trailer does not hold up to the original. ps - randie1313 is a fucking idiot
NNNNEERRRRDSS!!!!!
by Emperor_was_a_jerk
Nov 26th, 2008
08:27:29 PM
This movie is the story of two outsiders
by Teddy Artery
Nov 26th, 2008
11:54:45 PM
Spock and Kirk. It's right there in the trailer. I think Abrams is taking just the right approach here and I'm hoping this will become the definitive Star Trek movie (not to diminish the others in any way).
Run, Jim. Run.
by TheDesolateOne
Nov 27th, 2008
12:51:50 AM
Shatner should be happy that he's not in this piece of shit.

Nimoy won't live it down.

Thought it was going to be some tribbles
by JoeSixPack
Nov 27th, 2008
03:34:37 AM
Tribbles have to be in the movie. A naked Robin Williams can play the part.
maybe they blow up the Enterprise?
by Maniaq
Nov 27th, 2008
07:37:32 AM
I was thinking along the lines of a blimp, but yeah I guess lasers or some other kind of high brightness projection would do it too
i just watched "nemesis" again last night...
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 27th, 2008
12:11:13 PM
and i really enjoyed it - for what it was - i dont understand all the hate that movie gets - i think you have to really like the next gen crew to really like the latter films - which i do - even though i never faithfully watched the next gen on tv - nemesis is pretty good imo - great fx - interesting premise - too bad its totally forgotten - first contact and insurrection are good too - or at least i like them - someone here said in another tb, they (jj & co) shoulda kept it going forward - new crew, new ships etc - instead of making a prequel/reboot
Going forward
by u.k. star
Nov 27th, 2008
01:09:23 PM
The problem with setting it in the "future" of Trek is it kinda still infers a need to have een a certain amount of Trek to be able to see the movie. One of the main aims for Paramount is to go through thatt ceiling (around $140m worldwide) that Trek movies have fallen into. Similar to Batman Begins & Bond, theyt've gone right back to the beginning; prety muchsaying it doesn't matter if you've never seen Trek, this is the start of it all. I'm not saying it's a good or bad idea, (although it's clearly worked wonders for Batman & Bond), just saying what a major reasons.
TOO SOON!!
by Pageiv
Nov 27th, 2008
01:47:15 PM
Watching this movie will be like watching the Lions on Thanksgiving.
Nemesis synopsis in pictures
by quintana007
Nov 27th, 2008
04:22:03 PM
http://tinyurl.com/2g7ud Funniest thing ever, a real classic. Yep it sucked in a glorious way. "This is like playing Quake with "God Mode" turned on. Gotta love fanboy writers." lol
u.k. star
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 27th, 2008
04:51:35 PM
batman begins and casino royale stayed true to their source materials - they didnt change history - owing a lot to their success imo
quintana007
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 27th, 2008
04:59:02 PM
funny link - made me laugh - but i still like nemesis - what you dont realize is that the same kind of sarcastic dissection could be made for nearly every genre movie ever made - including this new trek movie
Not a Fan looping....
by seniorspeilbergio
Nov 27th, 2008
05:29:58 PM
I agree with the other talkbackers who say they should keep going forward in time with a new crew/ship. Does this movie look visually dynamic? Sure. More so than any Trek in a long while? Absolutely. Did Star Trek need new creative talent at the helm to push it in a fresh, new direction? No doubt. But all the cool images I just saw would have worked just fine with a new crew and a new ship. Trek, like Star Wars; is set in a vast landscape of imagination with enough breathing room to where there's no need to repeat anything seen previously. Both creative universes span an entire galaxy so I really don't understand looping back on this enormous timeline to reinvent characters and events we're already familiar with. This isn't Bond or Batman where it's already established that different actors come in to take over the reins from the old. Both of those properties are more about iconic, archetypal characters that are more symbolic images that have always transformed to take on the asthetic(?) values of the changing times. Not Trek, though. The characters are tied to the actors who play them. Indiana Jones is the same way. Who else can play that character? No one. Oh, sure. River Phoenix stepped in to play him as a teenager in a brief flashback but no one else could ever replace him inside the canon of the actual adventure/quest. In much the same way, the idea of seeing Kirk as a 12 year old is just fine with me as opposed to seeing someone else besides Shatner play him in Command Mode. I don't like these giant SF properties having to "revisit" anything from the past when it's constantly implied that there's much more going on outside the stories we've been told than can ever be shown. In much the same way, I hated seeing the same alien designs in the background of the Star Wars prequels that I had already seen in the original trilogy. That nightclub in Attack Of The Clones is just unforgivable. Watching that sequence, I could literally feel the Star Wars galaxy shrink in my mind. And now, in Trek, we have to loop over familiar territory yet again, in a future where we're told only 15% of the galaxy has been explored by the Next Generation era. I would have preferred it if these filmmakers had decided to explore some of that, especially with a director/creator at the helm who insists "he never got into Star Trek", or whatever the quote was. As some others have said, "I preferred the idea of Trek more than the execution". I think JJ feels the same way, so why not play with the idea and simultaneously separate yourself from previous executions. Even the originator of this universe found new success doing just that. And that doesn't mean you can't still pay homage to the other shows and movies. I would have loved to have seen a new adventure that took place a hundred years after TNG with a crew who are all in an enormous starship (bigger than any we have seen before)being awakened from suspended animation after finally reaching the Andromeda Galaxy. The first Federation crew to do so. Have them encounter all new alien races that look nothing like humanoids. This is a galaxy not seeded by humanoid-looking Preservers so Trek can finally be freed from that idea and get REALLY CRAZY with alien designs. Have an alien captain who is part human, part alien who is a the grandson of Kirk. The product of one of Kirks' many alien love affairs. His first officer is a female descendant of Picard. The offspring of the two greatest Captains in Starfleet history. There's just too much new territory to explore here without reinventing old characters and old situations. As many have pointed out, Star Trek is about moving forward, not backward. And feel free to criticize my story examples. There only that. Examples of what could be done. I still think it's possible to please the fans and still excite a new audience, that's all I'm saying.
Not a fan of Looping...
by seniorspeilbergio
Nov 27th, 2008
05:32:22 PM
Is what that heading should read. my bad.
seniorspeilbergio
by JimmyJoe RedSky
Nov 27th, 2008
06:33:20 PM
i could not agree more - the movie you described is one id like to see - unfortunately, that take on the property wouldve been a bigger gamble for the suits - too bad, i like your ideas
JimmyJoe RedSky
by seniorspeilbergio
Nov 27th, 2008
07:09:11 PM
Thanks man. Maybe one day after the corporate stranglehold on hollywood finally looses its grip.
A lot of good ideas, senior . . .
by kabong
Nov 27th, 2008
09:07:55 PM
Unfortunately, he crew running Star Trek now fear anything 'science-fictional' and want to destroy Roddenberry's concept because they haven't got the balls or brains to go beyond it.
Kabong & JimmyJoe
by DeeJay
Nov 28th, 2008
10:30:55 AM
... while it's clear that the Abrams crew wants to incorporate better visuals, interesting camera angles and Spielberg-style pacing into the upcoming "Star Trek" film, don't you think it's a little unfair to say they "fear anything 'science-fictional?'" The movie is still more than 5 months away, and it's already generating dialog about 2 different scientific concepts (the gravitational well & practical holography). JimmyJoe... wouldn't you agree that there would be some huge challenges with placing a story further into the "Star Trek" continuum? The first being that the general public now acknowledges that we have no idea what society will look like at that time. Heck, we can't even effectively cast characters to play humans for a future that far off, because it's doubtful that we'll even look anything like most current visions that are a few centuries forward (the ones that might be scientifically sound would be less than marketable in the eyes of most Hollywood execs). Ultimately, it just doesn't look as if going forward is practical in this particular scenario... and I'm someone who's almost always in favor of advancing a genre project's narrative/storyline forward.
IMO
by 24AliasFan
Nov 28th, 2008
02:47:17 PM
I've been watching Star Trek since I was 10 back in 1978. So TOS holds a lot of nostalgia for me. I thoroughly enjoyed TNG and came to appreciate the true depth of DS9. But TOS is the one that really hits home for me. I don't know how many thousands of hours I've spent watching those episodes, but I've enjoyed every minute of it. While there are certain parts of the Star Trek canon that are sacred, many are not. Whether the Enterprise was built on Earth, in orbit, or the Utopian Planitia Yards on Mars is insignificant. And such minutiae as whether Kirk could drive the car in 'A Piece of the Action' based on the opening scene in the trailer isn't even worth thinking about. Continuity IS important, but even TOS couldn't stay 100% consistent with itself. It contradicted itself more than once during its three-year run. Hell, in the very first episode, he was James R. Kirk instead of James T. Kirk. I for one am glad that JJ has blown the dust off the old franchise and look forward to May 2009. It may not (and probably cannot) live up to my heightened expectations, but I feel that it will be lightyears better than most of the movies have been.
Ever since First Contact ST changed
by Orionsangels
Nov 28th, 2008
10:18:06 PM
The look of the ships, the villians, enterprise TV show had that look. The only ST next gen film I liked was the first one.
"Shall I continue?"
by AICN fanboy dork
Nov 29th, 2008
04:25:08 AM
Why do people think that saying a whole lot of nothing is saying a lot? I mean, really, what did you learn in school when you wrote all those papers or spoke in front of the class? Saying that something is bad, is lame and sucks isn't giving three explanations. Of course, what usually follows is that something is bad because it sucks. Is it really that difficult to answer "why"?
Pdorwick: No its not just him
by Vision
Nov 29th, 2008
12:45:30 PM
Seems all the immature teenagers think this looks cool, adults think it looks like rubbish.
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.