The guy is hit by a something that will kill him and makes it hard for him to go out in public on an everyday basis.

Now you get this clown that sends you a very bad joke about him not being the editor and instead of flushing it, or removing the line, you post it.

C'mon guys, show some class and respect to a great man.

If you have disdain for jump cuts, just call them Avid Farts™ like Vern does.

Also, stop all the defense of Michael J. Fox. Let him know about this asshole reviewer and he can come to the boards to defend himself, as long as he gets someone to type for him. Just because he IS a great guy doesn't mean there aren't some jokes to be had. I suppose people will be okay making comments on people's "shakiness" and referring to MJF only 20 years after he's dead. THEN it will be okay. But because the man is still alive? HEAVEN FORBID!!!

Ummm, didn't 'Death Race' only come out a couple of months ago? How fast does this person think films get made? Not even the 'Saw' films get produced that fast.

I'm not equating debilitating diseases with race here, but Michael J. Fox didn't choose Parkinson's and black people would probably rather not CHOOSE to be black (ZING! It's all relative!. Anyway, where was I? I don't know. I think I made a point, maybe not.

By the way, see a show called Avenue Q. Brilliant song about everyone being a little bit racist. It's very true.

As a fan of thought-provoking, ass-kicking science fiction, I'll admit "Game" sounded paper thin from the beginning. Video gamers likely dream about this shit as they waste their lives away doing nothing. And *nothing* here means: playing WOW six to ten hours a day, every day, until they're not doing anything except playing WOW. Which is why the premise for this movie is so silly. It's gamer-fantasy spooge splattering the screen.

Seriously... fucking yuck.

I agree with others: what the hell were you thinking, Michael C. Hall and Gerard Butler? Grab your paychecks, sure, but you can't ignore the fact you're both slumming in teenage-fantasy gamer-porn. It's not even science fiction, really, since good science fiction wouldn't stoop to such a silly, obvious, and contrived idea.

Can I make another point? Gaming, as a fad, sucks. I know it allows people to explore fictional heroics in a non-violent way, but when those brainfart impulses infuse artforms that require drama, the result is always faddish and forgettable. Whether it's an Xbox-inspired film or a film like "Game" that pushes to explore gamer fantasy, the result tastes like day-old fast food.

Butler will likely put a few people in the seats, but a dramatic, original, well-written, ass-kicking science fiction story would've made a lot more money. Short term profit wins. Oh well.

Having held the hand of my uncle on numerous occasions when I was younger, I know he would've laughed pretty damn hard at the Michael J. Fox editing analogy.

So please get over it, people. Bring something less politically correct to table here. Because that shit's boring.

Thanks.

Whoops!

What I was trying to say was that you have successfully united the talkbackers and deserve congratulations.

Except they are united in thinking you're a tit.

But you really can't expect anything other than derision for a 'review' that explained nothing about the film and was full of garbled English, spelling mistakes, the constant use of the word 'shit' to mean 15 different things, as well as the obvious fact that you don't understand the difference between 'who' and 'whom'. In fact, you even make this mistake in your talkback post.

I don't expect poetry in a review of what is clearly a cheap and nasty film, but for fuck's sake man, this was shit.

Meaning shit

I don't think Michael J. Fox would give a shit about this particular comment, so why should you?

Who has been given more chances than Butler? Then, when he finally gets a hit with 300, he pisses it away with crap like this and Butterfly On A Wheel (straight to fucking cable). I'm, not a fan of his really (he seems to have a distracting speech impediment that affects his sibilants and he's a rather limited actor) but I can totally understand his appeal and it's nice to see a convincingly tough looking guy after years of Farrel, Marky Mark, Jude Law and Bloom getting to do action flicks. I think it's clear, though, that the man is either a dim bulb or has awful, awful taste.