Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

What's Stan Winston Studio Doing On James Cameron's AVATAR?

Sweet by bmocbull	Sep 10th, 2008 05:08:32 PM
This movie is gonna be fricking amazing.
First real test after the passing of Winston? by Heckles	Sep 10th, 2008 05:09:17 PM
Hope the high quality of work can live on.
"Practical" effects? by worldofwarcraft	Sep 10th, 2008 05:13:40 PM
Godzilla > Cloverfield
Stan Winston did not rape my childhood by nomihs	Sep 10th, 2008 05:14:09 PM
SWS has produced some of the greatest emotions from films that I have ever felt. Any project they are involved in will be missing a key ingredient. However, in the end, his legacy will continue. Unfortunatly without Mr. Winston to guide them, I hope it can still stand up on it's own.
this film sounds amazing by Fineus Fog	Sep 10th, 2008 05:14:45 PM
Ive got friends here who work at WETA and what very little they've told me sounds fucking amazing
I hope Stan comes back as SkyNet! by kravmaguffin	Sep 10th, 2008 05:23:23 PM
Stan you will always be the man! We miss you.
octagonproplex by DasMagnus	Sep 10th, 2008 05:53:04 PM
> is a mathmatic term meaning "greater than" < is a mathmatic term meaning "less than"
octagonproplex by kwisatzhaderach	Sep 10th, 2008 05:54:28 PM
I saw it too. It was a lousy post, hopefully one of the mods deleted it.
I Got Rid Of It by mrbeaks	Sep 10th, 2008 05:57:28 PM
And if you think wishing death on someone isn't rude, you're fucked in the head.
It's gonna be a happy day by kwisatzhaderach	Sep 10th, 2008 06:09:03 PM
the day we see the first footage of this. The Hack Pack will be out of their jobs.
more Avatar non-news by Rupee88	Sep 10th, 2008 06:11:53 PM
yeah I'm curious too but this is a non story
What the shit just happened? by JackBauer24	Sep 10th, 2008 06:14:26 PM
AICN just went psychotic. On the homepage there were about thirty very short news links with ridiculous titles and spelling errors (like 'Lucas and Sike Jonze') and all of them had about a paragraph of text in them in a strange font by god-knows-who (no 'Harry here' or anything) and about three comments each. Then everything went back to normal. That was weird.
Damn You Michael Bay by MCMLXXVI	Sep 10th, 2008 06:14:34 PM
Damn You Michael Bay
MCMLXXVI by MetalMickey	Sep 10th, 2008 06:37:43 PM
Now THAT'S commitment to a joke. Keep it up, buddy! I actually hope you make a few bucks selling your post as a t-shirt next summer when TINO2 comes out.
octagon by mrbeaks	Sep 10th, 2008 06:46:00 PM
This is uncivil: "The gayest, gossip mongering, Knownothing that's ever written for this site (and that's saying something). All this little twat can do to try and "show his street cred", is make snide little comments about other movies and actors (Tom Cruise). It's not working, and I'm on to your charade. You're a fake ass pompous bitch without one original thought. Get a damn clue!" Look familiar? That was you slamming me in my HANCOCK review because I said uncomplimentary things about LAST ACTION HERO. Now would be an excellent time to drop the indignation. Also wouldn't be a bad idea to stop posting in this thread unless you've something to add re: AVATAR. Just sayin'...
If FriendlyEddie (or whover)... by The Eskimo	Sep 10th, 2008 06:50:25 PM
...can get away with bad racist and revisionist humor on the Will Smith as Cap talk back...I don't see why the quick delete on a death to Georgie-boy. But it's your post you make the rules. Still my favorite columnist.
That Wasn't My Article, Eskimo by mrbeaks	Sep 10th, 2008 06:52:38 PM
I might've handled that nonsense a little differently.
Nuff said Beaks... by The Eskimo	Sep 10th, 2008 06:53:36 PM
...disregard my above post. Not defending that! As for Avatar it has had a lot of hype but I am totally unfamiliar with the source material. Was this a graphic novel?
Right, D.Vader by mrbeaks	Sep 10th, 2008 06:56:56 PM
That's precisely the way I put it.
the teddy got you to tear up? by Amy Chasing	Sep 10th, 2008 07:10:14 PM
dude, it was A.I. I got more fond memories of the teddy from Mr Bean.
All the secrecy and non-news and non leaks of Avatar means one t by HamsterDK	Sep 10th, 2008 07:14:11 PM
They are fucking confident they have a winner on their hand. They don't have to put out photos (T4 example)to gauge the Internet response. They know that what they have will blow us all away. And I know it too since I actually know some stuff about that production that none of you geeks know ;-)
It's how Alien the whole planet looks not just the race by G100	Sep 10th, 2008 07:20:45 PM
The only reason for making this incredibly C.G. heavy is because there is no way on earth you could do the effects any other way. So the whole planet, not just the creatures, must be pretty unbelievable. Because Alien managed a completely alien (albiet far simpler)planet decades ago with a completely alien construct and creatures. While Aliens showed, via Mr Winstons godlike powers, that even a massive inhuman creature could be done without recourse to C.G. I think what we are looking at is a planet as strange as or stranger than those featured in the "Revenge of the Sith" montage of the death of the Jedi by the clone troopers. But hopefully looking far more real as Sith still had the computer game sheen that infects far too much C.G. I also hope Cameron doesn't overdo the Bioluminescence in the main creatures. I could see a good reason for having it like communication such as cuttlefish employ but the danger is they just look like his Abyss type aliens. Still definitely looking forward to this even if some are in danger of killing it with hype.
i still dont like the title by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 10th, 2008 07:24:03 PM
sorry - but youd think the "film of the decade" would have a more original title - especially considering the existence and popularity of a certain "air bender"
its funny how much hype this is getting... by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 10th, 2008 07:39:23 PM
and no one knows or has seen anything of it - it might be lame - who knows? - i doubt it will "destroy" all other genre movies or "put the hacks outta work" as so many cameron worshipers think - based on t2, aliens, the abyss and titanic and the fact that camerons been mia for yrs, my expectations are luke warm at best - i know it will be all cgi except for some actors and some makeup fx and it will be in 3d (bad idea) - beyond that i dont know squat about this except the title - which doesnt excite me - if anyone else was making a similar movie (as described) no one would care - remember what rampant hype did to "the phantom menace"? - like it or not, it was fan hype that turned so many against it - on 3d - im sure this new tech is cool, but lets face it - its a gimmick - a movie should stand on its own - from what ive read i gather it was this new 3d tech that got the ball rolling on this 15 yr old script - if its so balls, why wait for 3d implementation to produce this> - all of camerons other films were in 2d and did very well - my point is, this looks more and more like its about the 3d venue rather than the movie itself (journey to the center of the earth)
Piltdown Joey by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 10th, 2008 07:44:27 PM
right - and if lucas was making this, all of this hype would be replaced by bashing - this is basically "sky captain" or "300" (both of which i like) but on a giant mega budget scale - it seems all the cgi haters sing a different tune when James Cameron is at the helm - ya know what other movies were nearly all cgi except for the actors and some practical fx? the sw prequels - and, i hope the poster above was misinformed on the "glowing cat people" - that sounds silly - the aliens should be at least as original as the ones in "The Abyss" - which come to think of it were glowing too
This just in: they are going to reshoot the entirety of AVATAR.. by PirateEmery	Sep 10th, 2008 07:59:48 PM
...using Stan Winston's Studio rather than WETA. Set to debut: December 2019!
octagonproplex by long live the new chris	Sep 10th, 2008 08:18:55 PM
who gives a shit if you and beaks are cool? you aren't gonna be buds. just admit you got owned and quit sucking him off. and seriously, how did you not know what < and > meant?
A taste of Avatar before the end of the year? by performingmonkey	Sep 10th, 2008 08:33:10 PM
I would love a little preview, even if it's just a second of dialogue or whatever, just SOMETHING to get everyone thinking. Attached to Quantum of Solace, perhaps. As for movie of the decade, personally I think we've already had it - The Dark Knight. Or Snakes On A Plane. No no wait it's definitely Mamma Mia!
Certain movies change things by dirtsandwich	Sep 10th, 2008 08:43:14 PM
The Exorcist, Jaws, and even TDK. I think some movies from now on because of TDK will put the ratings board member's panty hoses in a bind. Pressure from the studio to keep it PG-13 and pressure from the film makers to keep the stronger content in. I would assume that the studio is going to aim for a PG-13 for Avatar to make their $300+ mil back. Not sure where JC stands on this. I don't remember anything in the scriptment to rough to give it a R.
Superbowl- by dirtsandwich	Sep 10th, 2008 09:05:19 PM
would be a good time for a teaser for Avatar. Then they could put the first trailer for Avatar in front of the sequel for The Hottie & the Nottie 2, and Hottie 2 would gross a $100mil because of it.
and there you have it by BadMrWonka	Sep 10th, 2008 09:06:32 PM
35 posts in, octagon finally mentions Avatar... dingbat...
Nolan doesn't by dirtsandwich	Sep 10th, 2008 09:14:04 PM
usually have a director's cut. I think he's whatcha see is whatcha get. And he's not into 3D either. I'm hoping though that after Avatar that he'll consider it. No movie in history is going to have a bigger plow on the front of it then Avatar. Nothing we'll be the same after it. I just hope the story and characters is as good as the imagery. Well even half as good would be awesome.
mrbeaks > octagonproplex by gringostar	Sep 10th, 2008 09:55:25 PM
That is all I have to say.
I don't think you can compare Beaks to Ben Lyons by IndustryKiller!	Sep 10th, 2008 10:05:36 PM
Beaks wrote what may have been the single best review of Indiana Jones 4 in the entirety of the internet. Ben Lyons is an idiot douche bag that you hate talking to because his idiot douche bag opinions on film are so infuriatingly uninsightful that you can't help but want to punch him. The fact that the only reason he has his job is because of his father makes it even harder to listen to his idiocy.
Yes, don't talk down Lucas. by Amy Chasing	Sep 10th, 2008 10:19:38 PM
Just his recent films.
"Film of the decade".... yeah ok..more like by dirtsandwich	Sep 10th, 2008 10:40:47 PM
"The fuck of the century". This movie will be better then getting a blowjob from Sarah Palin's whore daughter even if at the same time she can spin 3 marbles on the head of your dick.
Teaser on Day The Earth Stood Still? by Rindain	Sep 10th, 2008 11:32:05 PM
It would make sense for Fox to debut something one year before the release.
UnknownUser by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 11th, 2008 12:00:01 AM
the fallout between lucas and this site is unfixable - lucas frouns on 2 things most of all - 1. fucking around in his office without permission when he isnt around 2. accepting illegally obtained copies of his scripts then posting reviews of them online - this site is guilty of one of these 2 things - at the risk of sounding corny or preachy, im an artist of sorts by trade - and im very protective of my work - especially the work that pays my bills - ask any artist and theyll tell you, they dont like their shit being taken without their permission - taken then shown to the world and judged long before it was meant to be - having said that, i like this site and moriarty (as an internet personality anyway, i dont know him) - but hey man, accepting stolen property for the bragging rights to an early "script review" is well... what did you expect - studios yank teasers if theyre posted early
on practial fx vs. cgi by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 11th, 2008 12:06:04 AM
using the "cgi sucks" argument, which was better - the briefly glimpsed life size animatronic kong in the 1975 version or peter jackson's cgi kong - i watched kong (2005) again recently - and like the movie or not, the fx (even the hated bronto stampede) pretty much wins the argument for me - amazing stuff and all cgi
WhinyNegativeBitch by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 11th, 2008 12:30:35 AM
kong looked like shit? - really? - compared to what? - a real gorilla? - it sounds like knowing going into the movie that the pay off (kong) was going to be cgi is what killed it for you - suspension of disbelief is half the trick - kong looked like shit, huh? - thats why Cameron went after the same team behind kong for "avatar" - because kong looked like shit, right? - Cameron wants his glowing cat people to look fake like kong, right? - your username is perfect
kong looked as real as cgi can get by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 11th, 2008 12:36:37 AM
and anyone that cant see it is either too dumb or too uptight to enjoy a good monster movie - you want to see some kick ass fx, check out "planet of dinosaurs" (1978) - a real gem of drive-in cinema - poorly shot and acted (pornstar level acting) - but full of some incredible stop motion dinosaurs that would do ray harryhausen proud
AVATAR - Fucking our eyeballs in 2009!!! by Motoko Kusanagi	Sep 11th, 2008 03:11:21 AM
nothing else matters
Mr_Saxon by kwisatzhaderach	Sep 11th, 2008 08:37:06 AM
Nope. I'm pretty sure it's just 'Avatar'.
they should release Avatar same weekend as Terminator Salvation by BurgerKing	Sep 11th, 2008 10:33:32 AM
Just so James Cameron can shit on those who took his franchise and pooped on it.
Just because practical elements are there on set by pmsc	Sep 11th, 2008 12:05:36 PM
In no way guarantees they'll end up in the final print. Practical effects suck ass yet those guys still get paid even when we have to go in and completely replace their shitty animatronic with a cg version
It makes sense Cameron would use practical effects by photoboy	Sep 11th, 2008 01:05:31 PM
He's always said that you should never use just one type of effect in a shot. By combining live elements with models with CGI you prevent the viewer from being able to easily recognise what sort of effect is being used.
Marketsaw has first blurry picture of a Na'vi... by Rindain	Sep 11th, 2008 01:21:00 PM
http://tinyurl.com/5k88m2
Thanks for the link, unknownuser...and Kong's Cgi by Rameses	Sep 11th, 2008 02:20:35 PM
That ZBrush Winston tribute, is awesome!!!!!As for Kong's cgi I too was watching it the other day and noticed that it kept going from ultra photo real to obvious cgi , from one scene to the next.It seemed to be all down to how a scene was lit, Kong often looked a little flat and overlit , compared to his surroundings , but every now and then it all came together perfectly.I think Cgi can already Do anything in a totally real way.It's just that it's down to how it's used.Plus a convincing T-Rex seems easier than a Gorilla..everyone knows what a big ape would actually look like if it was in front of you.
JimmyJoe!!! by TheWaqman	Sep 11th, 2008 03:21:04 PM
Lucas deserves the bashing. So quit saying such bullshit like "James Cameron gets hype and Lucas gets bashed?". The asshole hasn't done anything good since...well ever. His shitty Star Wars series isn't even respectable any more. He's milked the shit out of it, 3 games every year, countless novels and books, crappy CGI movies and TV shows etc. However, James Cameron's Avatar is a completely original property. One that will probably have no sequels or maybe only one sequel. AND James Cameron is capable of blowing us away visually BUT also making it a good movie too that doesn't completely rely on eye candy.
Oh AND Kong's Dinosaurs looked like shit... by TheWaqman	Sep 11th, 2008 03:24:52 PM
The movie was good (at least I enjoyed it...although there were length issues). But the ONLY good CGI was in the bugs and Kong himself. The bronchiosaurus (whatever the fuck their names are) the long necked ones they looked like garbage. Aswell as the T-Rex. Avatar will make fucktard Transformer fanboys wet their pants and worship the alter of Cameron!
Jimmy Joe Redsky by TurdontheRun	Sep 11th, 2008 04:10:00 PM
"based on T2, Aliens, the Abyss, and Titanic..my expectations are lukewarm at best" Is that supoosed to be a fucking joke? based on a slew of exceptional films your expectations are low? or do you live in a different universe than the rest of us where aliens, t2 and the abyss were shit? cameron has proved himself OVER and OVER again - that is why those of us looking forward to this give him the benefit of the doubt. and anyone else bashing this, please do some research before mouthing off. all those whose who say 3d is just a gimmick or a 'bad idea', or heavy digital work is going to mis-step, etc. - it amazes me the amount of ignorance I read here sometimes. on what evidence do you base these claims? absolutely none.there's a reason why cameron is a visionary, ground-breaking and hugely successful director, and why some of the negative wannabes here are reduced to working at the local drive-thru and whining on forums - because he KNOWS stuff you don't.
TheWaqman and TurdontheRun by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 11th, 2008 07:05:25 PM
"Avatar will make fucktard Transformer fanboys wet their pants and worship the alter of Cameron!" well put, so this movie is for "fucktard Transformer fanboys" - great - but too bad for me - and TurdontheRun, yes - based on those movies and the gaps between jc's camera time - my expectations are lukewarm - t2 feels dated and heavy handed - what it did on arrival was help revolutionize fx and tentpole movies - the acting and dialog makes me cringe - furlong was that movies jake lloyd - aliens? i liked alien 3 more - jc again here really put on a big cool looking show but he didnt improve upon the first (alien) and his space marine machismo was juvenile and annoying - the abyss - great fucking movie - my favorite of his and his best to date (terminator 1 being a close second as my fave) - titanic? - not my cup of tea - but millions of teen girls loved it - his undersea docs are great - i admire his pushing the tech forward - but now im like "ok, avatar what?" - like someone else said, dances with wolves on an alien planet - when did cameron become some cinema god beyond reproach? - i assume most of his rabid fans here grew up watching aliens t2 etc on cable in the 80s 90s - so that makes sense - his big movies were a steady diet for young viewers and helped shape theri definition of cool genre cinema - but not me - i saw t2 when i was an adult and wasnt blown away by it - i didnt cry when arnie became furlongs dad and melted himself at the end - oh, i forgot, true lies is pretty good - i liked it
oh and TheWaqman by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 11th, 2008 07:10:44 PM
good fx - digital or practical - arent always measured by how real they look - it depends on the intent of the effect - the movie or story - the period in which they are produced (available tech) and most importantly the viewer's perception - all of ray harryhausens stuff doesnt look real but it is masterful none the less - as is the original kong (1933) by willis obrien - nowadays the more fx strive for photo realness the more obvious it is that theyre fx
also TurdontheRun by JimmyJoe RedSky	Sep 11th, 2008 07:15:53 PM
i dont doubt jc's abilities - but his driving force for this movie seems to be his desire to push the current tech - not the movie itself - remember, him and lucas are pals - they both want everything in the vein of sw and terminator etc to be in 3d - thats the real point of this movie - 3d - not a groundbreaking 15 yr old story - which has a less than eye brow raising title - "avatar"? - and features a main locale/planet called "pandora"? - c'mon - will it have cyborgs and space marines too?

Talkbacks

What's Stan Winston Studio Doing On James Cameron's AVATAR?

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks