And don't you fucking touch my internet you infantile cum-buckets!

Paramount and DreamWorks did the right thing. And it was ballsy to do, too. So yeah for America!

This incident is actually quite healthy. all parties had their say and a compromise was reached. There was no censoring. I do not see why anyone is getting worked up about it. It all worked out exactly like it is supposed to.

Do you really need to laugh at their expense?

Does having such a laugh outweigh the dignity of the less fortunate people who must suffer for your entertainment?

Is this really a free speech issue, or is it a moral issue?

to be truly side-splittingly funny, I think you have to push the boundaries a little bit.

this is why The Family Circus has been in syndication forever, but no one really likes it. I, in fact, am offended my it's unfunniness. Raymond I got a chuckle out of at least.

As for Pineapple Express, I'm not interested. I need a long vacation from Seth Rogan. Also, I watched Harold and Kumar / Gitmo yesterday and it was criminally unfunny. Shit, the only show that consistently makes me laugh nowadays is America's Funniest Videos. Am I getting old?

fuck, I need to find that, is it on DVD do you think? I haven't seen it in 5 years, but it's really damn good.

About the site.

Not the Clone Wars.

They should've used hand drawn animation like old Disney.

According to Harry's "future" review, I'd guess they should've hired a writer to write a good story with less cutsie crap.

Has AICN surrounded Warner Bros. studios with an armada of warships?

It's late and I need to get some sleep. So maybe it'll make more sense to me in the morning.

Ooh! Wait! Did you mean boy-cott?! Umm, aww shit, whatever...

For your review.

Get over yourself! Harry and Aintitcool.com are not above the law. If Warner Bros. decide to block any reviews of their movies with legal threats that could see the site shut down, Harry has zero power to stop that and must abide. This is not a new concept. Harry admitted in this here TB that he was unaware of an embargo preventing Clone Wars reviews to be published prior to release date and that's why his review was posted and subsequently forced down. The Clone Wars is a property of Warners and they can do whatever they want with it.

Frankly I wish every knee-jerk bitching tool was as easily defeated as you as TalkBacks would have vastly less fat. Tar, tar.

P.S. Considering what I just said, I realise this post may be redundant.

http://boards.theforce.net/liv e_action_clone_wars_classics/b 10467/28780874/r28948317/

Again, for your review...

And why are you still here? Breaking up should be handled like pulling off a band aid. Nice and quick. Don't look back, move on with your life.

Besides, going on and on about it here is just pissing in the wind, taking up space on a server, and possibly getting yourself banned if you post the review here.

You guys should be savvy enough to find something on the net if you really want to find it.

Hint: They call it... googal or sometimes google. Try it out.

You can't find me!

Kinda gives me a chill.

Hey! The dog shit. Good boy.

Curiously, over here, it's never the 'minorities' themselves making a fuss, only the 'liberal' middle-class white do-gooders; all Left wing and right-on. I bet you've got them over there, too. If not, I'm betting you soon will!

This isn't the future my mother warned me about.

I will also note that technically this has nothing to do with the First Amendment. They're not advocating government intervention, they're just trying to get the studio to change its mind. Granted, it's still ridiculous, but not quite as bad as the article makes it out to be.

Your ultra-feminist story is pretty damn funny. If those women wanted to denounce 18th century art they should have written a paper about it or at least taken part in a class discussion. The marketplace of ideas and all that. In that case a boycott does nothing. People like that give feminists a bad name. I've known plenty of feminists who are perfectly reasonable but often its about the noise rather than the number.

I would also like to add to the list the recent Kathy Griffin scandal where she told Jesus to "suck it."

Fucking weird.

When going into govt with fianna fail, the greens were told let us look after the economy. What the greens did was devious. The demanded and got the inclusion of carbon tax in the budget. for things like SUVS and yes we do have them here. All homes being built in the future will have to have a carbon guide regulator to see how carbon neutral your house is. next is meat. thats right, greens want everyone to turn vegetarian, because meat is linked to climate change, cows and methane. but perhaps the most insidious thing that I have ever heard is green movements attack on children. children and climate change. a bunch of interefering busy bodies in the UK, commissioned report which found that new born babies produced C02. This group demanded the reduction in child birth and argued that all men should get the snip after their second child and then there is space. Rockets produce C02. The greens are against space tourism. IN a nutshell, the green movement is attacking our way of life. IT wants us to stop driving cars, stop eating meat, Stop having children and stop flying in our areoplanes. It is time i feel o stand up to these bullies. but I think it is too late for that. they have the science on thier side so they keep saying. Anyone who disagrees with them is bopped over the head and silenced into submission.

http://news.bbc.co.u k/1/hi/enterta inment/7553560.stm

so there may possibly be a simple explanation for it - but if all these reputable reviews are out there, surely this embargo means jack shit?

And get over the "Fox News delivers both sides" garbage. You want to know what two sides they deliver? It's called their hand as they slap you with the front and back. CNN and MSNBC are garbage news outlets. In fact, referring to them as "news" is insulting to the few independent journalists out there that have maintained their integrity. But Fox News is a farce. And the fact that it's the number one rated cable news outlet means nothing.

1 out of every 3 Americans still approves of the job Bush is doing, the majority of Americans couldn't point Iraq out on a map or name one world leader and looking at some of the top ten TV programs (America's Got Talent, 2 1/2 Men, So You Think You Can Dance and Wipeout) reveals that we like our entertainment to be dumbed down and asinine.

Oh.

Ohhh.

Oh my.

Well. . . I'm still here, in case anyone cares, and I actually agree with Mori (Wow. That keeps happening. How weird.) and find a lot of the newer talkbackers who are raising a stink over this embargo situation to be classless losers.

Harry's taste is his own. Sometimes I agree with him, sometimes I don't, but I still respect his right to his opinion because IT'S HIS SITE and he's been kind enough to let me have a say here, in the talkbacks, for a very long time. The rules here are pretty loose, guys. We can curse, be downright obscene, and talk like film-loving geeks would really talk. Other sites insist on censoring our conversations, making them "work safe", and sanitizing our thoughts if they wouldn't be printable in the newest issue of "Highlights" Magazine. AICN has been the most open forum I've been in that doesn't have a bunch of 4chan dorks running around in it typing in idiot language.

So cut the guy some slack... He has to abide by the rules set forth for his review because he wants to be able to do more reviews and see more screenings of future films, and WE benefit from his ability to do that.

If you're going to blame anyone, blame Lucasfilm for putting out what appears to be a turkey, and then telling reviewers not to tell anyone about it until it's too late to save them their $10 admission.

I'll defend Star Wars most of the time, but Harry is entitled to his opinion, and considering he's more forgiving than I am when it comes to Star Wars, I'm definitely a bit worried about this film. . . But I will still see it, because it's Star Wars, and because I'm a huge geek and a complete sucker with my own opinions that may be different from Harry's.

Seriously guys--- Calm the fuck down.

There are no PC Police protesting this movie

This is all a marketing scheme to get everyone to rush to the theater to see what all the hub-bub is about, and to "stick it" to the man.

and Harry flopped for it like a dropped fish.

Zero - Retard has become a pejorative. Words and their meaning evolve over time.

Calling someone a "fag" or "nigger" qualifies as possible hate speech because those words have a history of violence associated with them. There was never an organized hate group formed against retarded people-- There's no Non-Retard Resistance. There's no church that protests at funerals with signs that say, "GOD HATES RETARDS" -- You just can't claim "hate speech" when it comes to a non-PC term being used in lieu of the PC term when the non-PC term has no history of being associated with hate speech, hate groups, or hate-spreading cults.

These so-called "liberals" who try to censor things are NOT true liberals. Maybe they think they're being sensitive to the plight of the average retard, but they're really just making fools of themselves and embarrassing other liberals. Their crusade is clearly a selfish one, designed to make them look like compassionate people who are "better" than you. It's not in line with liberal ideals at all.

As a liberal, I recognize that you have EVERY RIGHT to make whatever art you want, and say what you want within the confines of that artwork as long as you don't call for others do cause harm to a specific class of people.

Those white-power twin girls who sing racist songs? THAT is hate speech. They call for the demise of other races, which can only be construed as a threat.

"retarded" doesn't even mean what they think it means, these days. It's just a substitute for the phrase "extremely stupid" now. The original meaning has been lost, and shouldn't offend because it's almost NEVER used to describe the mentally disabled. It's almost always used to describe a normal person who just ACTS stupid.

Language these days more often calls Paris Hilton "retarded" than it would a kid with Down's Syndrome.

Well, let's just say the CIA or Secret Service (SS) aren't sitting on their asses all the time. They have work to do.

John Denver saved free speech in the 80s. Go figure.

Things are MUCH better here than in many places in the world. I'm just saying that we're not exactly Utopia yet. We're actually a few steps closer to Oceania right now.

I don't really care one way or the other. Revolutionary thoughts are for the young. I just want my neighbors to stop making so much noise and get their kids off my lawn.

In the end, the PMRC did more good for 2 Live Crew than any marketing ever would have. They downright sucked as a band, but because the PMRC (and Jack Thompson, especially) made such a fuss about them, they gaind a lot more fame than they ever would have if they'd been left to warble their lame lyrics on their own. The opponents just gave them a bigger megaphone, is all.

In retrospect, I'd rather listen to 2 Live Crew than Hannah Montana and that other Disney drivel. I'm just glad I was a Zappa fan.

WTG, Fish. Keep copying and pasting Rush Limbaugh's newsletter all over the Internets.

So I’m glad I didn’t re-post it, I don’t ever want to be banned, I like AICN, I’ve read it since…I don’t know, ’97 or ’98 even though I only started posting last year.

The anger displayed here is quite surprising. The whole Uncapie thing. Yeah, that was one mean post, but so many others insult the writers of this site all the time and in a far worse manner. I’m not defending Uncapie, but so many others write things just as bad and demeaning. Seriously, some people just use the talkbacks to insult the writers.

As a writer, I have written and posted things that I regretted later. So we should realize that some people write off the cuff and this forum is practically designed for such knee-jerk writing. I know, because I’m just as guilty as most of you. In all honesty, I love reading a talkback post that makes me smile or laugh. Though I am sick of so many people insulting the writers, but trolling is what trolls do.

Star Wars brings out the best and worst of us all. We have a passion for it, love it, hate it, sort of like it, ignore it or whatever. It surrounds us, penetrates us, and binds this geek universe together.

Some of us mature, some of us don’t. Some of the Star Wars films mature with us, some of them don’t. It seems that we spend so much time searching for the next film or series of films that will do to us what the original trilogy did. For many of us this is our quest, whether we’re aware of it or not. It’s sad and tragic, but we also carry that torch to find A NEW HOPE.

Of course there are many talkbackers that are mature. There are many talkbackers that don’t have the same connection to STAR WARS that many of us have or had. There are many talkbackers that understand. There are so many that don’t.

Banning destroys the freedom of this site. It also protects site. Paradoxical. Insulting the writers doesn’t protect the site. Being insulted by the writers doesn’t protect the site. Sometimes the writers themselves write the most disgusting and demeaning descriptions. I can literally go from one post that’s highly intelligent to another post that is pure trash. That’s why I like the site. There’s a range. AICN is a guilty pleasure.

I wish that AICN never had to apologize for anything, that Harry actually had the freedom to write whatever he wants, but that’s not the world we live in. There are consequences. There are laws. There are codes of honor that even a free-minded movie reviewer must succumb to. Even Harry must censor himself. But I respect what Harry wants AICN to be, the vision he has. It’s similar to what I want every STAR WARS film to be; something greater than itself that allows us to become something greater than ourselves

Seriously, though, you were spot-on.

If the medical establishment said 'pickle' was the new way of describing a mentally challenged person, Fred believe it would be the new insult word!

However, what I don't like is that most of the time Mori's only entrance to the talkbacks is filled with unabashed hatred at the tbers themselves. He's usually justified, I just wish he'd join in when he didn't feel the need to defend himself.

Yet I am amazed how quickly the media darling fell from grace in the eyes of liberals once he clinched the nomination.

And I can't stand Limbaugh, shitstain.

If your son can't fend for himself, it's not my responsibility to curb all my behaviors to make his life easier. Nobody cuts me that sort of slack, so with all due respect, I don't see why one person's son should have any impact on my vocabulary choices. It's no different than people who insist everyone stop eating peanut butter & jelly sandwiches because one kid in school has an allergy to peanuts-- That's not my problem. It's the kid's responsibility to learn to deal with the negatives of his condition and act appropriately in response to the danger. It's the parents' responsibility to keep the kid away from peanuts and teach the kid to be careful when near other people who might want to eat them.

In the case of a word your kid might think is mean, we're not even talking about the physical severity that a major allergy would entail. We're talking about wounded feelings, and you seem to think it's everyone else's duty to avoid saying something that, even though it's not directed at your son, might hurt his feelings.

This brings us back to the P.M.R.C. discussion we were having earlier. Tipper Gore and her fellows were trying to censor music lyrics because they were concerned about how *some* people might interpret them. But that's the whole point of art: The viewer must make the choice to partake of it, the viewer must interpret the end result as they see fit, and whether or not you're insulted, saddened, or angered by it is not the point. The point is that while it makes you feel one way, it makes someone else feel an entirely different way, and their interpretation is no less valid than yours (or your son's).

If you know a movie has the word "retard" in it, then don't go. Nobody forces you to partake of this art. You may leave it as you so choose, and find something less offensive to you in your specific role in life. That's what it is to be a citizen of a free country. That's what it is to be a parent of an autistic child. That's your choice and responsibility; Not the filmmaker's.

I loathe some of the things said by Rush Limbaugh, Michael Weiner Savage, Ann Coulter, and Bill O'Reilly, but I defend their right to say it (most of it, anyway. Sometimes they step into seriously racist speech, and that's a step away from hate speech). I wouldn't try to censor Ann Coulter, as much as I hate her and the things she says. She slings insults toward me, and my class of Americans, and these things ARE intended to be hurtful and cruel, but as long as she isn't calling for people to harm liberals, atheists, homosexuals, or other "enemies" of hers, I've got no problem with her being given the opportunity to speak freely.

Do I think it's in poor taste? Yep. But it's entertaining to HER AUDIENCE, and people pay for her opinion, her spewed words, and her bass-ackwards view of things.

You can write letters of complaint. That's cool, and it's part of your right to speak freely. Just don't expect a lot of action when they letter arrives. While I'm sensitive to your situation, I'm also not writing for an audience of one. I'm writing for whomever can see it, and what they take out of it will have a lot to do with whatever emotional baggage they bring with them.

You seem nice, but when it comes to this issue it's you-- not your son-- who is being kind of retarded.

Your son is probably not as broken up about this issue as you are. If he is, just remind him that everybody gets some insults directed at them, no matter who they are. I'm a geek, and plenty of people have called me a "fag" in my life, and meant it in the "you are homosexual" way. I've been a pussy, a nigger-lover, and a jew-lover. I've been a dyke-mike (opposite of a fag-hag), a pedo (dated an 18-year-old in my 30s) and a "Satanist" (I used to associate with Wiccans) as well as being a godless heathen atheist and a good-for-nothing, tree-hugging, hippie liberal commie bastard. Harry is a fatass, a geek, and a carrot-top (maybe even a ginger). Others here have had insults leveled at them based on their perceived personality traits.

If your kid weren't autistic, he'd be picked on for being short, or tall, or for his music choices, or his parents' income level, or his clothes, or his toys, or something else entirely. If his skin isn't thick enough to deal with it, even as an autistic child, he's not going to make it in this world and you'll spend every moment shielding him from words.

Hey, I get you. You love your kid. The thing is that I don't love your kid, nor do I even know your kid. If I meet him, I won't say anything mean to him or call him a retard, but I'm not going to censor myself when there's the possibility that he might stumble upon my words, or that you might see them and be insulted on behalf of your kid who will never see/hear them.

My job is to write what entertains the masses and gets my point across. Your job is to keep your child from reading or hearing my words if you think they'll be harmful to him.

You do your job, and let me do mine, and we'll all get along.

Now, a definition:

Retard: "Delay or hold back in terms of progress."

"Idiot, Imbecile, or Moron"

If you would like, I can stop writing characters who call each other "retarded" when they mean "stupid" and instead have them call each other "autistic", "intellectually disabled", or "cognitively disabled".

Given the choice, wouldn't "retarded" be better? We can certainly start borrowing the other words that DO have a modern association with your son's condition, if you insist that the old word that is not used clinically anymore is off-limits.

Just a suggestion. Not trying to be a jerk: Just illustrating a point.

I still want to know why other outlets are able to keep their reviews up. If WB is threatening legal action then NOBODY has deep enough pockets to tell them to screw off.

If it's just a request from them for outlets to take these down out of courtesy until the 15th, then that's a different matter altogether.

Kate Winslet had an amusing speech that she was doing a film about the Holocaust because she was tired of losing out on Oscars, as at the time she had been nominated four times, and that everyone who does a film about the Holocaust wins an Oscar.

Harry: "you can't threaten me. Im Harry Knowles, the guy famous for getting spy reports from all your secret projects."

WB: "so be it....journalist." *BLUE FINGERBOLTS*

Harry: "AUGUAUGUAUG FATHERGEEK!! FATHERGEEK HELP!!!" *bzzt bzzzzzt crackle bzzt*

Massabear: "hai guys! whats going on in here?"

Harry: "oh nothing. we're not reviewing Clone Wars because we'll lose our promo gigs and set visits."

Massa: "but...but...we're underground, maaan. voice of the people.. *rolls D10 to resist*

Mori: "dude, they took away my lab, they made Harry a corporate shill for crap movies. If they take away our SOUND-O-TEXT, then whats left?"

Massa: "dignity?"

Harry: *yanks updates*

(says the man who copied harry's review but is reluctant to paste it in tb)

well its not ta Picasso, Mister Knowles. Its childish scribbles with Crayola Crayons on the back of a Denny's Under 10 Menu. We're not impressed, and those that are, are only saying it out of a condescending 'isnt that sweet' adult-to-child manner.

You're done, man-baby. You refused to listen to me and many others who flat out BEGGED you to stop being an immature tyrant, and writing reviews geared toward the 10th grade readership (dude, he just said 'penis' in his review thats AWESOME!! LULCOWS!!), but you didn't listen. We tried to warn you that studio executives - y'know, GROWN ADULTS WITH A MODICUM OF RESPECT FOR THEMSELVES AND THEIR PROFESSION, would grow weary of your infantile antics. Your writers abandon you in droves like mice from a burning trash barge. Your readers have either washed their hands of you, or read the site believing in earnest that nobody would ever know they read it. You not only embarrass yourself daily, but the people who read it are embarrassed doing it. Its like accidentally opening the door to an occupied toilet. We're all terribly sorry for reading, and we back away blood-faced and wincing as we close the door quickly. You were asked, nay IMPLORED to grow up. You refused. You found yourself a bride and a stack of bobble-headed 'yes men' to validate your 'can-do-no-wrong' view of yourself, and now its come home to roost.

Apatow was on the money when he slammed this site on Conan. His basic assessment was 'wow things people say on this site are horrible. How horrible a person I must be. oh wait, its just full of idiots and immature wastes of human life, so no need to take it seriously.'

Thats what Mister Apatow things of this domain: its crude, crass, immature, and vile - and not to be taken seriously at all.

Once upon a time, a bunch of us did take it seriously. And there was a time when we and you could have worked something out, but you blew it. You blew it. There was a time but..

YOU BLEWWWWW ITTTTTTTT

yeah - I expect to be banned for my opinion and expect someone to delete this.

But as I stated earlier, google the web and you'll find VERY LITTLE about this massive push to inhibit free speech. Its a viral marketing campaign and at first I thought Harry was duped and fooled by it, but if that were the case, why is it in the column to the left where it cannot scroll away?

makes it look like he's actually PART of this viral campaign. More graft money. See what happened there? Now you dont know if the reviews here for that movie are real, or paid. You wonder if ANY of them are real or paid. We've seen a pretty major refund this morning for at least one studio, haven't we.

that or the fact I was baked out of my mind when I wrote the review....

Seriously- yeah, there is a lot of moronic stuff here but I've probably laughed as much or more at TB stuff than any Apatow movie. And there's a decent amount of insight too. So he should think twice. Think TWICE, Apatow!!!

You'd never see them boycott a movie just because it promoted some ideology they disagreed with like homosexuality, atheism, etc. You'd definitely never see them scare a studio into watering down the anti-religious/anti-Catholic Church aspects of something like the Golden Compass. You'd never see them boycott Harry Potter for promoting godlessness and witchcraft. You'd never see them try to get evolution taking out of school curricula. You'd never see them try and get books taken out of school libraries that offend their beliefs. You'd never see the conservative fundamentalist Islamists protest cartoons about Muhammed.

Seriously, if we could just get rid of these damn liberals, it would completely get rid of all the PC nonsense in the world, since again, conservatives never try to boycott/remove/pressure to have removed stuff with content they don't like or that offends them.

and LaserPants - yeah, Apatow was on Conan and he said he was on a website where someone called his movies a 'fart on American Culture' and that he actually felt terrible about it, and wondered if he was just a terrible film maker.."...and then I saw his name was Danny Glover's *BLEEP*blood so I *drowned out by audience laughter*..." and thats pretty much how it went down.

Word is getting out in Hollywood - this site is not to be treated like a serious movie news site. Its just a dung pile of hate and idiocy, and I still suspect that this 'embargo' is more of a "if you mention me or my property on your website again, prepare to defend your legal right to do so in a very expensive lawsuit - my bank account versus yours."

there are other sites online with negative reviews posted right now. Hmm.

Good show, ol' chap

"An Industrial Light - That's Magic!!!"

find that article, and suddenly you'll understand the events of yesterday and today in an all new...uhm.... light.

PS: yeah dont try searching here LOL - google or use the wayback machine (google that).

Post the review Harry.

No, the ugly elephant in the room is that he was threatened with lack of access to future WB movies. Early screenings, interviews, even merchandise. And that is inexcusable. Absolutely, 100 percent inexcusable. This is no different than "Access Hollywood" or "Entertainment Tonight", IF it's true.

I fear the worst, but I hope for the best. If this isn't explained properly by the time that stupid movie comes out, though, I will be forgetting about this place altogether. No, i'm not as big as Warner Brothers or Lucasfilm, but I had a hand in making this site what it is, just like every other reader. This whole thing is just sad.

They are removing ALL reviews at AICN ONLY. There are lots of sites with reviews posted online right now, some good and some negative. The fact is that Lucas/WB has placed a trade embargo (Phantom Menace, anyone?) on ANY AND ALL content here at this one website. Welcome to Aint It Yesterdays Embargo-Delayed News Dot Com.

And the embargo claims another for its unquenchable appetite.

That will solve everything.

There's gotta be enough to fill everyone's insatiable hate.

  First off, let me commend the Los Angeles geeks, stoners and slackers(or hybrids thereof)  who showed up (quite early, I might add) to get in line for this screening.  You either were very motivated (not stoned) or you were a complete stoner and 6pm was borderline “sleeping in” for you.  Either way,  it felt like high school all over again.   By that I mean the fact we were all up against the walls of the Sherman Oaks Galleria, looking … well… looking like the freaks and geeks that we are.   And cutting right through the center of our FNG experience was a steady stream of type-a, highly motivated, health conscious people going to workout at a popular LA gym.  Fuck them, fuck them in their fat free asses.   Those people suck squirrel scrotums (down by the seashore).     No, really, they do suck squirrel scrotums.  It's like steroids or hgh, only it doesn't show up on any blood tests.  It's LA, don't put it past us.

  Secondly.  Remember what I said, three senseless paragraphs, then my fucking review.   This is only number two.     And now that I’m wasting it explaining myself, I feel the need to pad it a little.     Did I mention the three security guys for the event were built like Oddjob?    They knew they were in for an easy shift with the assorted  slackers, geeks and stoners ( oh my!). And Mori, if that was you checking the names on the list, way to rock the ASS out of the  Michael Moore/Kevin Smith look.     Do you have a fanny pack that goes with that outfit?

    Fuck the third paragragh, let’s jump into this review.    This shit is funny, REAL fucking funny.  Fucking funny with explosions and shoot-em-outs and weed.   First and foremost, James Franco’s Saul Silver has out Spicolied Spicoli.   All I can say is, if you have ever purchased weed, or in my case lived upstairs from a weed dealer (for legal and professional purposes, that’s all I’m willing to admit to) , you know Saul Silver.  You have been in his apartment, sat on his couch and watched the equalizer on his hi-fi 90's era home stereo system dance in rhythm to something from the Bob Marley catalogue.  

   As for Seth Rogen – if Albert Brooks and a young Tim Robbins ( circa ‘Spring Break’)  were beamed simultaneously aboard the Starship Enterprise, and their DNA bonded on a molecular level like Jeff Goldblum and the Fly  (FUCK JEFF GOLDBLUM!), you would have Seth Rogen.   Maybe it’s because we have a similar build, but dammit, he is just a likeable guy.   And to you talkbackers who are on the “I hate Seth Rogen” tour bus, who gives a shit.  This is my review, I like the guy (but not enough to suck his dick, Danny_Glovers_Dick_Blood!), so fuck you, you fucking fuckwad fucking fucknuts who disagree.   It’s only my opinion, and we all know opinions are like assholes- no one likes theirs getting fucked with by a stranger.   

And how about Danny Fucking R McBride .  If the R doesn’t already stand for Red, he should go and legally change his name.   I am going to go as Red for Halloween.  

  As for the movie as a whole, I could go into the whole plotline, but why? Dale and Saul are the new Cheech and Chong… wait, no …. wouldn't that be Harold and Kumar? hmm    maybe they are Bill and Ted?   No, that sequel sucked.    Gotta be duo that rocked the shit on the big screen a few times....   Wilder and Pryor?   You know what, fuck it.   Harold and Kumar are far too motivated and productive to be the new Cheech and Chong.   Besides to be the new Cheech and Chong, you gotta have the "Chong" -  the perma-stoned- relax-meister-general.   Neither Harold nor Kumar fit that bill.  So, back to my original statement, Dale and Saul are the new Cheech and Chong.   That’s right…. I said it.    Superjoint is all you need to know. And the whole door buzzer scene is right along the lines of  C&C’s “Daves not here”  skit.  

Go see this and support quality R rated comedies.  

Fuck children under 17 without parent or guardian permission.   Leave them to see Brendan Fraser get one step closer to "Encino Man II: No Refunds Given"

Really people, we need at least 3 Dale and Saul movies to get the shit taste of the Mummy Trilogy out of our mouths.   Mummys are meant for horror movies you douchebags that supported that crap. 

  They Call Me Irrelevant Elephant

  And once again, should you disagree with any of what I have stated here today, 

  Opinions…

  Assholes…

  Neigh means neigh…

Instant fashion statement.

vally-news.com

usatoday.com

metroactive.com

hollywood-newsroom.com

In any event, the graphic showing Harry Knowles and Greedo with a caption that reads "Going somewhere, fat boy?" is hysterical.

http://tinyurl.com/578stp

You never go full retard, man, you never go full retard.

Like a butterfly you can transform

Finding your inner self through cheese

Brie

Chevre

Gruyere

Munster

Learning the love of cheese

Learning the love of you

Finding your inner cheese

Creamy

Tart

Dry

Moist

What kind of cheese are you?

What kind of butterfly are you?

Lucky tongue gets the first contact, teeth letting go. Surrounded in a process of melding, a bite or not. Embraced by the wonder of oneness...... Something for every want, be it subtle or intrusive.

Soft and pungent, crisp and sweet. Feel the headiness, let go and enjoy, laugh. A taste of English Cheddar with Apricots, blueberries. Without bounds, Dive in to a Divine cheese.

As a casserole topping All bubbly and brown, It will make your fine cooking The talk of the town.

As a spread for a sandwich Or a puffy soufflé It will help you to cope On your busiest day.

Its tang and its flavor Will tempt and will tease; ‘Most all of your dishes Can be sharpened with cheese!

Less hate, more cheese.

Stringy orgasm of cheese.

Happiness is here.

but, mainly, i just wanted to post some drivel in this thread. oh and to wish I was clever enough to have a screen name that would get people to mention it on tv. that would be sweet!! i'd probably get some free stuff too! SWEET!

Retarded - a person who has full mental capabilities but seldom or rarely uses them (also see dumbfuck)

I mean the WHOLE REASON AICN was so notorious was because Harry dared to take on the wrath of the Hollywood Suits and post many things which angered these same suits. Now, all Hollywood has to do is click its fingers and Harry complies.

In the words of the Joker: "I mean, what happened? Did your - did your balls drop off?"

Its the studios own damn fault for not making Harry sign a confidentiality agreement. What are they going to do if Harry keeps the review up? Not invite him to any screenings? Harry didn't give a rat's arse back then, why care now? It doesn't make any sense.

instead, the geek-led AICN said, "Screw our readership, we want to see the movie RITE NAO!!! and agreed to not actually do their jobs in order to see this movie super-duper early.

thanks for putting yourselves first, guys. After all, its you that pay the bills for the site, amirite?

If that aint the pot calling the kettle black.

I have to agree with what Robert Downey said. They do have the right to protest. Also, Tropic Thunder deserves to be seen in the way it as meant to be seen uncut.

An uptight asshole's an uptight asshole, regardless of political affiliations.

I heard the guy who's leading this "crusade" on NPR yesterday, and he admitted that he hasn't seen the movie. When the woman interviewing him asked him about comparing the use of "retarded" to "nigger," he said that if they had been using the N word instead, the movie never would have been made. Apparently he's never seen Blazing Saddles. Which, to be fair, probably WOULDN'T get made in today's climate of over sensitivity.

Fucking busybodies...