...in nothing but boy shorts please. Thanks

(And yes, most chicks do have boobies, but if you build an obnoxious reputation around your tits while insinuating you are producing a show based on industry and intelligence, (you know, instead of your tits) it undermines your non-sexualized efforts.

Of course we all know that Script Girl's show is poorly thought out and poorly executed. And the fact that my formula is correct, (that after every TB her neckline drops a winsy bit more) indicates that being a wannabe Mary Hart is probably not her ultimate goal. She's just too inept and unimaginative to crack the public psyche any other way than using her tits to pander to whoever she can. (Cause she sure as hell hasn't got the face.)

If her tits hadn't been able to convince Harry's belly to help bludgeon her into our consciousness she'd still be lamenting her own YouTube obscurity.

Which brings me to my final point, shame on those who reocnigze her for her swangin' panderin' tits? Shame on her for using by and far her ONLY asset (She sure as hell can't develop an interesting show)to catch people's attention and then boring them with her droning uninspired show.

At least that Hotforwords chick, Marina brings something to the table and drops someting on the it other than her breasts.

Also whats with the random subliminal 1-second flash of that chick in a seductive pose?

Thinking a bad animation of Nazi's dancing is funny? Now that's just s3pid.

The essence of marketing is to attract attention, and she does that: people come in here every week to view the vid, complain in the TB--seems like a compulsion, don't it?

ScriptGirl owns the TB.

This is without a doubt, the most grammar and spelling error laden script I've ever seen written by a pro though. Truly mind-boggling. Loved the Sequence with Donny and Hirschberg in the theater. Really funny stuff.

To the guy asking about the girl feet closeups...I'd say without a doubt. There's a part in the script that's painfully obvious. I pray I didn't screw up the paragraph breaks.

One great movie (PULP FICTION)

The rest varies between good (DEATH PROOF), mediocre (RESERVOIR DOGS) and atrocious (KILL BILL 1&2, JACKIE BROWN, FOUR ROOMS segment).

This isn't QT's WWII movie. It's a a typical QT movie set during WWII. Is there a difference? Yeah. Most of the scenes that you'll be expecting from a dirty dozen movie aren't there. No real war scenes to speak of or balls to the wall action. In fact other than an introductory scene (in the aftermath of an ambush...the "big scenes" are all offscreen") which has the Bastards sitting around and executing one of the two remaining survivors, the Inglorious Bastards are completely absent from the first 84 pages.

Huh? A movie called Inglorous Bastards without the Bastards? Then who's the star? Answer: A Jewish girl named Shoshanna, who survives a Nazi massacre (actually, a four man massacre...again...everything in this movie is small) and flees to Paris to run a movie theater. Where she dreams of revenge (maybe this movie should be called KILL HITLER instead). This is where we are treated with the "black and white French new wave" portion of the film filled with looooooooong stretches of dialogue before we are into Chapter 4 and back to the Bastards.

There are some good scenes throughout, some good dialogue, and while I don't hate the script, it's definitely not fantastic. It doesn't jump out at you like Pulp Fiction, or even feel like a coherent movie like Jackie Brown or Reservoir Dogs. It's Death Proof/Dusk til Dawn level QT...he'll probably direct it a lot better than it reads, but it's really just juvenile mayhem (how many people die in the same way...a German and an American facing off and trading bullets until BOTH are dead, like the end of Reservoir Dogs. Is this is what it's come to...ripping off your OWN movies???) without the overarching pathos or emotion he showed in earlier films.

It's just a B (or even C) grade war tale. A mindless movie with a few scenes of over the top violence, a few really cool and tense scenes, and a whole bunch of QT meandering and overindulgence.

Case in point...the Chapter Titles. It upset me at first when I read the script, because it makes everything disjointed. Someone needs to tell QT that BOOKS have Chapters, and a movie is usually one cohesive narrative. Then, by the end, it dawned on me that DVDs also have chapters, and since his movies pretty much go straight there now anyway, I guess it's okay.

It's the lamest, most hackneyed thing I've ever read from Tarantino, and just looking at how badly it's written... just, Wow. I can't believe people still buy scripts from this mongoloid.

Here's to hoping this new flick will be a return to form.

That Nazi Pulp Fiction Dancing scene should be used as some kind of psychological therapy. For what disorder, I have no idea (perhaps the various problems Anchorite is victim of?) Whatever, it should prove more than adequate for some kind of shock therapy.