Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

first
by Magic Rat
Jun 20th, 2008
11:11:00 PM
woohoo!
Bugsy Berkley films...
by depalma25
Jun 20th, 2008
11:31:22 PM
have probably the most underrated dance sequences in Hollywood history. If I'm not mistaken' most of the dance numbers come at the end of the movie, but dialogue is sharp and witty enough to keep us interested. I've always enjoyed movies about the "behind the scenes," happenings whether on a stage play or movie.
I meant Busby, but Bugsy Malone with jodie foster
by depalma25
Jun 20th, 2008
11:32:16 PM
is pretty awesome too.
Finally a truly great film
by Outside
Jun 20th, 2008
11:46:44 PM
I'm a big fan of these films and glad that Quint finally got around to them. My favorite is Dames, though 42nd Street is right up there. Love Dick Powell and Joan Blondell. Highly recommended!
Nice
by redfoxone
Jun 21st, 2008
07:14:06 AM
Hey now, looks pretty good to me! JT http://www.FireMe.To/udi
I watched this one last week
by PaulW
Jun 21st, 2008
08:07:29 AM
in addition to Footlight Parade. Yeah, 42nd Street a great movie. It's fun to watch and gets better the more often I see it. I have a personal interest in this movie since it was primarily filmed on Stage 11 of the WB lot where I have been able to do a bunch of work in the past. Fun stuff!
Continuing on....
by PaulW
Jun 21st, 2008
08:09:32 AM
I haven't seen WonderBar yet but of the 10 or so Berkely movies I have seen my favorite numbers might be the ones for Dames although Footlight has a lot of good stuff as well. Anyway, keep the columns coming. You are doing some great work Quint.
Interesting...
by BizarroJerry
Jun 21st, 2008
08:52:41 AM
It's funny to see that on a site like this, even this type of movie will bring interested parties to the talk backs. I like this column, by the way, Quint. Considering how some people look at "old" movies as some dumb old things, or can't even watch black & white. Just like in music, I think you should be able to appreciate different genres and different eras.
Not nearly as good as Footlight Parade.
by Smerdyakov
Jun 21st, 2008
10:48:18 AM
With Cagney, Glorious Jimmy Cagney.
This is awesome.
by buffywrestling
Jun 21st, 2008
11:19:21 AM
I can't believe you're doing musicals now - I grew up on those. There's been a brief resurgence of Broadway to the big screen - I really enjoyed Hairspray when I finally got around to see it - but for awhile, the only *new* musicals you could get were all animated. And I'm not trashing them because of that but there really is a difference to see a full screen of people singing and dancing together flawlessly. And sometimes, I just love a movie where people break out into song for no apparent reason. It's just so cool.
Yeah
by Quint
Jun 21st, 2008
11:27:11 AM
It's weird that there hasn't really been a resurgence of the musical... with Chicago, Dreamgirls, Moulin Rouge and Hairspray all doing big business and gathering awards. Can you count Once as a musical? It's about musicians, but I wouldn't call it a musical... anyway, it seems that instead of musicals we're getting that sub-sub genre that I think started in the '80s with stuff like Breakin' and Breakin' 2. Dance off movies. There seems to be a huge audience for dance off movies (Step Up, etc), but not for song and dance movies... I'd love to see more musicals done today.
soylent
by Quint
Jun 21st, 2008
12:01:38 PM
Split the difference. :) Let us know how you like it (or don't). Gooooooodddd mornin'! Good moor-ornin', let's laugh the whole day through. Good mornin'. Good mornin' to you!
I loved Footlight Parade too...
by Manos
Jun 21st, 2008
12:44:55 PM
Cagney doing comedy was priceless. Quint - KEEP THIS THING GOING. This is hands down one of the best columns this site has had in ages. Good work.
Is 42nd Street even a musical?
by PaulW
Jun 21st, 2008
12:48:52 PM
I was thinking about this just last night. All of the singing happens in realistic real world contexts (on the stage for instance). Obviously there is some fantasy involved in the movie since the stage at the end really opens up to present musical numbers that could never be presented on a regular theatrical stage but in terms of singing there seems to be realistic context for that. Footlight Parade is like that as well. Now Dames on the other hand is a genuine musical.
Personally...
by PaulW
Jun 21st, 2008
01:05:08 PM
I would call 42nd Street a pseudo-musical. It's not as strictly realistic as Once but not quite a pure musical like Sound of Music or Hairspray.
Off we're gonna shuffle...
by Bob Loblaw Law Blog
Jun 21st, 2008
03:46:29 PM
shuffle, shuffle, shuffle...

shuffle off to Buff-a-lo!!!

Ahh... good stuff, even if you end up with that song in your head for weeks afterward.

i directed the stage version of this show...
by maxwell's hammer
Jun 21st, 2008
08:42:23 PM
...with middle schoolers, and debated long and hard on whether to include the "She only said no once..." line. I left it in and probably corrupted a whole class of upcoming actors in the process. I was amazed that no parents complained. Next season: "Vampire Lesbians of Sodom!!"
I grew up withthe Jackie Gleason Show
by Napoleon Park
Jun 21st, 2008
08:51:20 PM
and the June Taylor Dancers. it wasn't until later that I realized they were doing low budget Busby Berkeley routines.

Yeah, that human kaleidoscope stuff is groovy.

The modern musical
by Napoleon Park
Jun 21st, 2008
08:54:26 PM
So where to films like "Across The Universe", "I'm Not There", "Ray" and "I Walk The Line" fit in to the pantheon of musicals? Sub-genre?

Seems like a lot of musical movies, just not traditional "Broadway musical" type flicks. Except for the movie remakes of "The Producers" and "Hairspray", which, oddly enough, were.

Rock operas?
by buffywrestling
Jun 21st, 2008
09:41:44 PM
I always thought of some "music" movies in that term since "Streets of Fire" with Diane Lane and William Dafoe. "Velvet Goldmine" directed by Todd Hayes is my personal favorite. Not only does it have brillant actors but the tunes are great.
oops! Rock and Roll Fable!
by buffywrestling
Jun 21st, 2008
09:58:12 PM
Was how they tagged "Streets of Fire". (Wow, 1984 was a long time ago.)However, I still think the tag kinda works though for others in this subgenre.
Soylent Mean
by Paul Bucciarelli
Jun 21st, 2008
11:27:49 PM
Singin' in the Rain alright? It's great and you should have seen it a long time ago instead of wasting your time with an overrated clunker like Once. People who normally hate musicals and complain about how unrealistic musicals are with everyone breaking into song and dance numbers all love that fucking piece of shit. Once is as corny, contrived and unrealistic as any backstage musical from the 40's. The loser busker who's been annoying passersby for years until that fateful day when he meets his muse and suddenly gets his shit together. Then he hooks up with a Thin Lizzy cover band and despite the totally different type of music they play and their never having played together as a unit lay down some tracks that are so mind-blowing that the jaded producer not only stays up all night recording them but plays Frisbee with them in the morning. And don't get me started on how absolutley awful those songs were.
Soylent
by Paul Bucciarelli
Jun 22nd, 2008
12:23:06 AM
When you see a movie with good acting and a good story, let me know coz Once isn't one of them
Kudos Quint
by DGrayson
Jun 22nd, 2008
06:07:18 AM

by DGrayson
Jun 22nd, 2008
06:16:46 AM
I'll just echo the comment that it's great to see some classic examples of different genres reviewed on this site. I played Marsh in high school and despite the more serious theatrical work I've done since then it still remains a sentimental highlight. The work by the cast in this film is truly a top-notch example of how to treat, what can be ham fisted in the wrong hands, with aplomb. All those dance-off films would never exist without Berkley's influence. Of course than might not be so bad either.
Definitive Musical
by DGrayson
Jun 22nd, 2008
06:18:26 AM

by DGrayson
Jun 22nd, 2008
06:20:05 AM
Sorry Soylent, you just saw it. Maybe try Guys and Dolls, if you really want to see Brando out of his depth.
DGrayson
by Paul Bucciarelli
Jun 22nd, 2008
07:28:46 AM
He would not like Guys and Dolls. He would not be able to appreciate the fact that Damon Runyon's characters do not use contractions.
Dancer in the Dark
by Knuckleduster
Jun 22nd, 2008
08:25:52 AM
My favourite "anti-musical".
SoylentMean, Once IS a musical.
by Lenny Nero
Jun 22nd, 2008
10:13:25 AM
Musicals are not exclusively defined by "breaking the reality" so many people refer to (most of those people who don't like musicals, that is). This would exclude such movies as Cabaret, Phantom Of the Paradise, 42nd Street and, yes, Chicago (since all the songs are fantasy numbers).

Via Merriam Webster: "a film or theatrical production typically of a sentimental or humorous nature that consists of musical numbers and dialogue based on a unifying plot."

There are countless musicals that don't have people break out into song. It's a common misconception, but yes, for instance, Once is a musical. The songs frame their love, they fit into the plot, they are sung onscreen, etc. etc. etc.

What these people try to desperately define as musicals are just one sub-genre of the main genre.

I'm going to keep saying this on the boards until people get it.

No, Soylent, they are talking about...
by Lenny Nero
Jun 22nd, 2008
12:15:13 PM
...a subsection within the musical genre. One section. I know it's hard to believe, but, and I mean this with all honesty, take this as something to learn. Musicals ARE as pervasive as I might think, but did, in fact, fall away for a few decades. So did good horror movies. But I am saying what is definitive, and the common misconception is wrong. The "unifying plot" as in the songs are the movie.

What people "ARE talking about" is a mistaken understanding of something broader.

To go into your examples, the films you mentioned, for the most part, do not have enough of the songs and dancing to qualify as musicals (such as the songs in "Cold Mountain" that have NOTHING to do with the plot) but that's where we're just splitting heirs. "Once" is about music, about the songs, about the lyrics, etc. etc. etc. You hit the nail on the head. They are part of the movie AND sung, therefore they make it up as a musical. Are you telling me that when the woman is walking down the street, alone, singing to herself, the only thing that makes it a movie about music instead of a musical is that she has headphones on?

And to be fair, I do not like all musicals. Just like any genre, ANY, there are good an bad. If you've been to this column often (which you have), you would know I absolutely DESPISE stuff like Rodgers & Hammerstein, family heartwarming stage bullshit, and especially have it out for the overblown and pretentious (and poorly scored) Les Miserables.

But you are right. If you like Once more calling it a drama, then that's your right. But if we're talking criticism and history, that's another thing.

But, once again, I think to say one doesn't like an entire genre is shortsighted and not in the true spirit of being a film connoisseur or all-encompassing film fan.

Splitting hairs.
by Lenny Nero
Jun 22nd, 2008
12:33:54 PM
"Splitting heirs"? Why did my mind automatically go to a shitty Eric Idle/Barbra Hershey movie from the 90s?
Cagney in FOOTLIGHT PARADE
by thegreatwhatzit
Jun 22nd, 2008
12:56:20 PM
Sample the climactic "Shanghai Lil" number (remember, absolutely no CGI). Cagney was/is the best (ever), a true icon. Today's "stars" are bereft of his talent(s); who ya gonna call, Tom Cruise? (still hiding in the closet)...Brad Pitt? (yawn)...Don't want to even think about it. Love the character actors from the WB ensemble, e.g. Ned Sparks, Hugh Herbert (as long as his hoo-hooing isn't out of control, see SH! THE OCTOPUS), Frank McHugh, etc., etc. It isn't waxing nostalgic to notice that NOTHING today evokes the same sort of rapport (certainly not those damn OCEAN'S II bores with a clutter of overpaid actors winking at one another).
From the ONCE DVD special features:
by Lenny Nero
Jun 22nd, 2008
03:04:10 PM
"Featurette (Making a Modern Day Musical)."

So I'm going to go with the "creators" of the film on this. Why didn't I use this earlier?

And I still think you confuse what I'm saying. A musical isn't defined by otherworldly aspects. It's defined by music and its connection to the story. So the headphone scene does indeed make it fit. I'm just saying that if one simply took the headphones off of her, that would make it a musical in your eyes? Just one little thing? I consider that elitist, which I know is not your intention. But "farfetched"? That's not what defines a musical. Tell that to Kander & Ebb.

Some Broadway musicals that you could consider not over-the-top, garish or vaudevillian: Closer. Spring Awakening. Cabaret. Jersey Boys. Passing Strange. 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee. Falsettos. Parade. Noise/Funk. Most Sondheim works. Hedwig (well, that is garish, but it is done as a concert, but it has a story, and is a musical). etc. etc. etc. You just have to know where to look if you don't like something like "The King & I" or "Hairspray." It's all out there.

And I'm from a metropolitan area and have lived in five other ones across this great nation. Still living in one, in fact. And I wish there were more musicals that spoke to our generation. That's why the recent winner of Best Musical, "In The Heights," is so fucking good.

...how do "dance numbers" define a musical?
by Lenny Nero
Jun 22nd, 2008
07:25:27 PM
That is just absurd. Most of the Sondheim canon has no dance numbers, and those, sir, are musicals. How about "Evita"? No dance numbers there, save for maybe one third of a song early on. A musical.

I find it weird that the filmmakers who made "Once," who called it a musical, cannot sway your opinion of what the movie is, when they, the creators, say that it is a musical.

Fine, then I will start calling How Green Was My Valley science-fiction. Sheesh...

Unless you are joking...
by Lenny Nero
Jun 22nd, 2008
07:26:38 PM
...which means the joke is on me.

Why am I unable to use my apostrophe key? This is absurd, too!

...stopped caring?
by Lenny Nero
Jun 22nd, 2008
10:28:51 PM
Then I have failed as a teacher. *pouts and sighs*

btw, my video store has it under musical AND drama. But it's an independently run store staffed with well-paid workers who are required to have a near-encyclopedic knowledge of film and a well honed critical eye.

But I would say that a filmmaker's intention is the be all and end all of what a movie is intended to be, especially when they make their own special feature with the argument in question in the title. But that's just splitting heirs, starring Rick Moranis.

Absolutely, sir. Quite rollicking good film.
by Lenny Nero
Jun 22nd, 2008
11:40:57 PM
And a film at that.

Except I'm right.

nananananananana

See, that's the problem with the argument.
by Lenny Nero
Jun 23rd, 2008
09:53:05 AM
You say it's a delusion. I go for the director saying "What we're making here is a musical."

Great job. And House Of Sand And Fog is a romantic comedy.

GIVE ME THE AMULET, YOU BITCH!!!!
by DRACULA_WANTS_THE_AMULET
Jul 5th, 2008
11:01:29 PM
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.