Roll credits.

Hilarity ensues.

Starring Warwick Davis of course.

They burst into flames.

Roll credits.

Though Burt was okay in it, dealing with those new graboids with small arms fire and some form of hand-to-hand combat.

Now, if it was indigo...

Seriously I've heard female mates throw around the words 'feminist' and 'girl power' around with this pile of shit show. If this is feminism exerting itself then god damn get the whole lot of them back in the kitchen quick. Admittedly it's introduced a lot of nice impressionable girls that being a slut and shagging around is acceptable since ironically all men are bastards, so i guess it balances out.

Since the movie seems to have taken the risque element out of the equation though then what ungodly purpose does it serve. Bah.

Problem solved.

Now, if you CAN'T imagine being one of those characters (say you're male, straight, country lovin', non-American, religious, nice, etc.), you see the show through a very different lens, and what you see is shallow, self-indulgent, possibly horrifying.

I promised the wife I would take her. I better get some buttsecks afterwards!!!

Could not have been put better.

egg86, what rape imagery? That's just how you viewed the headline.

If you ever see a woman order a cosmo at a bar, you can be sure she lives and dies by this show, and you can read her like a book from there.

But I'll repeat my axiom. If you and your girl have to drag each other to movies, if the same movies (or TV shows for that matter) don't click with each other, it's not going to work.

Which gives them all the more reason to not put up with this trash really.

A bad film is a bad film.

Love it. Makes me think there is some pool of horse-face chicks out there praising the success of another horse-face. I wonder if all the horse-faces get together for meetings.

''I just couldn’t get over how much this shared in common with BRATZ''

Harry give this guy a break! or does Massa actually seek out these flicks over normal movies!?

1. "Add to that the fact that it is extraordinarily light on plot to begin with and you might understand why I was beginning to crave the cold taste of steel from the barrel of a colt about 45 minutes in."

2. "Montage after montage after montage with each and every problem finding a solution by the fabulously dressed four getting together, squee-ing in a pitch that will deafen dogs and neuter most of the males in the audience, and realizing that friendship will get you through any bout of rampant self-absorption."

3. "Oh, so this is what happens when you leave Bratz dolls in the sun too long." Ouch.

4. "I pity any man who walks into this with his girl thinking he is in for just the usual hour and a half ass pounding only to discover that instead he’s entered a two and a half hour oubliette from which there is no escape.

Instant classic. Thank God for this site.

On the other hand there's a show like Seinfeld, which had shallow characters, but made it clear they were awful people. They were not heroes. Instead, the audience is supposed to recognize their own failings in the characters without putting the same characters on a pedestal.

But what do I know. I can count the number I've times I've seen Sex and the City on one hand.

The key difference between the shows, other than the respective talent involved, was that Seinfeld never never never never EVER took itself seriously.

See, related to horse face Parker.

I'd agree with Emu, though. Guys get much better/realistic roles in SATC than women do in Entourage.

Help me. I am in Hell.

This show, while vaguely entertaining in small doses years ago, is incredibly annoying now--and Kim Cattrell's hot body is not enough to make me watch it. I will be seeing Indy for the first time this weekend, rather than "Horseface, Her Shoes, Her Bitchy Friends and Their Mom in the City".

That's sorta rhetorical. I know the answer.

My favorite line of this review: "squee-ing in a pitch that will deafen dogs and neuter most of the males in the audience". The icing on a great cake.

I have no concern for or interest in this film, but sight unseen, 2 1/2 hours still sounds staggering. Even two-part season finales on TV don't go that far.

Note: don't do this trick for the second or third date, and don't do it too often. Also, your best bet is to continue having problems for the rest of the night, even after you've left the theater.

really?

I think i've confused this movie with The Dark Knight.

I don't want to see this.

I think i've confused this movie with The Dark Knight.

I don't want to see this.

And I saw one episode of this show and never wanted to again. The 'insights' of the voiceover were laughable, especially since the writers seemed to think that what they were seeing was all deep and insightful about relationships. Instead, it's just shallow, narcissistic bullshit. I will never see this movie.

Not that I'm complaining or anything. That's entertainment, baby!

Much like the women who it portrayed, and a lot of the ones who watched it undoubtedly saw much of that in themselves.

And I haven't seen a ton of episodes, but I have seen enough to know that they're no more sexually promiscuous than alot of tv characters. They have alot of sex, but the only one is who fucking people off the street is Kim Catrall's character. Kristin Davis' is the epitome of the prude. I actually admire how upfront the show is about sex, wish more shows had the figurative balls to follow suit. I found the show to be fairly entertaining, if shallow. It is not on my top 20 list of favorite shows or anything.

As for them being whores, I don't think i need to point out the obvious double standard here. Men can have casual sex till the cows come home and it's fine, but when women do it, they're branded sluts? or cougars? How many single, 40-year-old men would turn down sex with a good looking woman 10 years younger than him? Not many.

I just don't get the hate for something so innocuous. Especially when there is so much love on this site for its male counterpart, Entourage.

.........

YES I'm being sarcastic. Even trying to sound like an AIC apologist makes me feel a little sick inside. :(

Also lay off the title, it's perfectly in keeping with his style. There's a good chance that he might have liked SATC if it was a good film. Now go buy yourself some pretty shoes and let us guys talk, ok toots?