Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

You saw 10,000 BC?
by jimmy rabbitte
Mar 7th, 2008
09:17:09 AM
...
by jimmy rabbitte
Mar 7th, 2008
09:18:29 AM
...sorry you had to sit through that...

...damned taking two posts for what could've fit into one.

Emmerich GOTTA EAT
by Se7en
Mar 7th, 2008
09:19:17 AM
yez
10,000 Bull Chud!
by FILMFUNK
Mar 7th, 2008
09:21:58 AM
I fancy the Bank job but hear it aint that good and I believe Revolver or was it Volver has finally made it to the UsA which i'd be interested to hear if that played any better over your side coz it flunked here but i thought it was confusingly entertaining!
Why does CGI suck so much?
by I Dunno
Mar 7th, 2008
09:29:33 AM
The CGI in Jurassic Park was great and it was the first movie to use CGI for anything realistic. Since then, no one can make a realistic CGI creature to save their life.

In Star Wars they threw a rug over an elephant and they had a Bantha that looked real. They couldn't slap come fangs on a tiger in this movie?

Bank Job
by Dr. Stanley Goodspeed
Mar 7th, 2008
09:31:16 AM
i think between that and in bruges my saturday afternoon is set.
bank job was a bore
by Holodigm
Mar 7th, 2008
09:33:35 AM
it was basically the real mccoy without mommy issues.
The Band's Visit
by mastidon
Mar 7th, 2008
09:35:18 AM
I hope it gets lots of attention. I really enjoyed that film abd I would say it was by far the best film I saw at the London Film Fest last year.
Wow, I will have to check out Bank Job now
by NomoredirtyjokespleaseweareYanks
Mar 7th, 2008
09:42:30 AM
Not for Statham, I gave up on him after WAR. But if Donaldson called the shots I'm there. Who knows, I may even like Statham again(BTW I used to think he was great in Lock, Stock and in Snatch. What the fuck happened.
Actually I still like Statham in both those flicks.
by NomoredirtyjokespleaseweareYanks
Mar 7th, 2008
09:43:57 AM
Donaldson Rules. WHOOOOOO!
Statham is garbage.
by Thrillho77
Mar 7th, 2008
09:56:20 AM
The guy has no range - and I know he shouldn't because he's an action hero, but he delivers those one liners with ZERO charisma. He always has the same damn intonation in his voice and stupid look on his face. I can't watch a movie where he is the main character anymore because he irks me so much. I don't get the love - he's just not a great action star! And that seems to be an unpopular opinion! He makes shitty movies, what can I say?
Save the Blue-eyed girl...!
by superduper3000
Mar 7th, 2008
09:58:33 AM
Or hell, save the green-eyed girl! When's the last time we got so see someone saving a hotness with yummy brown-eyes?

Oh that's right, Duran Duran's "Hungry Life the Wolf!" Respect!!

Watchmen Cast Pix!!

http://tinyurl.com/384o6a
No white heroes allowed??
by Andre the Frog
Mar 7th, 2008
10:08:41 AM
Ok fine, next time the Africans can clean up their own mess.
Re: No white heroes allowed??
by Flying Spaghetti Monster
Mar 7th, 2008
10:17:05 AM
What the hell are you talking about?
Emerich...
by MatDGZ
Mar 7th, 2008
10:19:40 AM
The dude should just stop making films. He'd make a good second unit director - he has an eye for pretty exciting action sequences. But as far as ACTUAL STORY is concerned, its waaaay beyond him. Stargate was a decent film, the script wasn't amazing but its by far the best film he's done. Well, either that or Universal Soldier ;-)
Stargate sucked because.
by Andre the Frog
Mar 7th, 2008
10:25:14 AM
They actually had to learn the LANGUAGE in the other dimension. what a freakin' bore that is.
10K BC? Jesus created the U.S. just 6K yrs ago!
by Baron Karza
Mar 7th, 2008
10:30:56 AM
Dont make nun gad-dum sense.
People who cry racism about 10000 BC...
by Phimseto
Mar 7th, 2008
10:32:19 AM
...took too much Critical Race Theory in college. Seriously, to those people, instead of everything becoming a tootsie roll pop, it becomes the shadow of The Man keeping them down.
Does anyone know,
by Stevie Grant
Mar 7th, 2008
11:09:03 AM
what that creepy, pinkish, mutant-looking person in the 10,000 BC trailer is? He reminded of that episode of the Venture Brothers where the boys' clones are released from the vats before they were done.
Amy Adams
by greyspecter
Mar 7th, 2008
11:21:02 AM
quite the fox. Delicious.

Nice to see the leftist Roland's true view of race relations.

Bank job should feed my hankerin' for a good old fashioned caper flick. Topkapi and the Sting are the best, haven't had a good one since Ocean's 11.

Good stuff Capone
by Darth Thoth
Mar 7th, 2008
11:25:54 AM
You're always on point.
they are called moa's i think
by BMacSmith
Mar 7th, 2008
01:26:09 PM
big scary birds.
Emmerich as Director
by Halloween68
Mar 7th, 2008
02:05:44 PM
Maybe now people will realize upon further examining his film catalog and will join in saying along with me, "Hey, this Roland Emmerich guy sucks balls." I've been saying that ever since laid eyes on ID4 for the first time that opening week so many days ago. People have kinda warmed up to the idea over the years. I dunno ... maybe some people have to see it 2 or 3 times to realize how blatantly stupid and lazy that film is. (Sorta how people are starting to come around with SCREAM, which I also declared horror for dipsh*ts when it came out.) Hopefully this will be the last straw, and the film will come off of everybodies "classic" scifi movie list, and so we won't have to witness it being run back to back to back to back on TNT's 4th of July movie marathon every year. Roland Emmerich stop making movies. You are giving Uwe Boll hope.
ZZZZ
by skywalkerfamily
Mar 7th, 2008
02:11:11 PM
Where's the 100 Semi Pro reviews?
Emmerich's Films
by MattmanReturns
Mar 7th, 2008
02:30:58 PM
The Patriot and Stargate still hold up well. I loved Independence Day when I first saw it, but I was young and stupid. Day After Tomorrow plays like an effects real, and it sucks whenever the "characters" open their mouths. I have a feeling 10,000 BC is the same thing.
The birds...
by twindaggerturkey
Mar 7th, 2008
02:59:20 PM
They are diatrymas or phororhacos, I think. They are a real thing. They did not co-exist with humans, though, let alone Egyptians.
Coppers in Pettigrew! (Question for Capone)
by Pervhoeven
Mar 7th, 2008
03:03:26 PM
I know its a bit shallow but i am! Anyways...I'm one of the police arresting a certian someone in the film. (Club scene) You see much of me?
Uh, Gollum looked pretty seamless
by skywalkerfamily
Mar 7th, 2008
03:18:55 PM
So did Watto, the Jurassic Park dinos, etc. It's all just opinion. We wouldn't even have Jurassic Park if we're still in the physical FX era.
How dare you speak ill of Handsome Rob!
by thebearovingian
Mar 7th, 2008
03:40:41 PM
Handsome Rob went back to London town and pulled off The British Job. Maybe Statham really wishes he was a gangster/criminal/thief?
Gollum looked like shit
by I Dunno
Mar 7th, 2008
04:01:30 PM
So did that fucking troll from the first LOTR film.
Statham....
by pumaman
Mar 7th, 2008
04:09:29 PM
Thank God he won't be using his fake 'American' accent in the Bank Job because its fucking terrible. Other than that , I think most of his films are great.
if you thought Gollum looked like shit i have nothing
by BMacSmith
Mar 7th, 2008
04:20:48 PM
more to say to you. You are a fucktard. He was a breakthrough. CG characters have definately arrived, and they can look fucking great, as Gollum proved. Of course, it can look like absolute shit (I am Legend), but it depends on the artiists involved. And in most cases, some combination of CG and makeup seems to work best.
Most of the LOTR creatures were models scanned
by skywalkerfamily
Mar 7th, 2008
04:58:54 PM
into the computer. Why can't people figure this out?
wow, 10000 bc was actually worse than i thought
by BMacSmith
Mar 7th, 2008
09:33:43 PM
how bland. bored throughout. completely devoid of anything original or entertaining. bravo!
I didn't mind I am Legend but the cgi was terrible
by NomoredirtyjokespleaseweareYanks
Mar 7th, 2008
11:50:28 PM
Gollum looks way better than what was achieved in Legend. If 'I dunno' really believes gollum looks bad he really is deluded.
Amy Adams
by BizarroJerry
Mar 8th, 2008
12:50:24 AM
I would do things to Miss Adams that would seem sort of wrong to do to someone so sweet and adorable.
I think the major problem
by Nabster
Mar 8th, 2008
06:36:16 AM
isn't the quality, but the fact its apparently boring. I thought the Patriot was his most sincere attempet to make a good movie, which almost makes it his least watchable, as he is completely out of his depth in terms of quality film making.
Gollum looked bad because he had no weight
by I Dunno
Mar 8th, 2008
07:53:51 AM
It was the same with King Kong. When they close upped on his face he looked fine. When he actually stomped around and tried to react to his environment he looked like every other CGI creature.
CGI with weight.....
by W3bzpinn3r
Mar 8th, 2008
09:44:12 AM
Jurassic Park 1 & 2 looked great. JP3 with it's "Enhanced physics" looked crappy.

Transformers CGI looked great. The robots' feet sank into the ground with every step. And, of course, Pirates of the Caribbean 1, 2, and 3 were FANTASTIC CGI. The fish people looked fantastic, as did the undead pirates. Also, look at the dragon in Harry Potter 4 - looked great and had a physical weight to it too. It had to "work" to get it's bulk off the ground to fly.

True, there are examples of good CGI
by I Dunno
Mar 8th, 2008
10:10:51 AM
Pirates being one of them. Even some shots in King Kong look good. The technology's there to do it right so it must be a matter of time and budget. It's like they blew their wad making Kong's face look good in closeup, so the brontosaurs look like they were rendered on a Commodore 64.
Yoda acted better than Hayden
by skywalkerfamily
Mar 8th, 2008
03:16:22 PM
It's a sad day when your CG creature acts better than flesh and blood.
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.