Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

Bartholomew & Phool2056 Visit 10,000 B.C.!!

Caa Caa, Do Do, Shit by BatRastard	Mar 4th, 2008 08:49:39 AM
first!
First by Maceox	Mar 4th, 2008 08:49:58 AM
Loser!
no shit sherlock by JBouganim1	Mar 4th, 2008 08:52:21 AM

Who in there right mind by erichaislar	Mar 4th, 2008 08:53:09 AM
thought this was going to be good?
by roninhobbit	Mar 4th, 2008 08:57:52 AM
So this guy liked Independence Day and Day After Tomorrow, but didn't like 300? Congratulations, I no longer care what you think about any movie.
Tic Tics with Pine! by Kloipy	Mar 4th, 2008 08:57:54 AM
any UCB fans out there?
It's no Citizen Kane by David Cloverfield	Mar 4th, 2008 09:02:19 AM
People have to stop saying that especially in reviews. I'm a man of serenity, but that sentence annoys the hell out of me for various reasons. The movie sounds hilariously offensive though :)
what's sad by Bloo	Mar 4th, 2008 09:04:08 AM
is that I have friends that not only WANT to see this but are eagerly EXPECTING this movie, which means thanks to my hookups as a movie reviewer I'll be bringing them along when I go see it for my column and they'll enjoy it and I'll probably be lukewarm to hating it and that makes me sad what was the last good caveman/caveman type movie, Clan of the Cave Bear with Daryl Hannah? Caveman with Ringo Starr?
i think their history is off by 5,000 years or so. by Dr. Sid Schaefer	Mar 4th, 2008 09:06:30 AM
10,000 BC? huge cities and monuments? seriously? that's some fine detective work there, lou!
by ForkTongue	Mar 4th, 2008 09:32:14 AM
"I'm kind of surprised that Emmerich would be relegated to a second-tier blockbuster such as this one, but hey, that's the way things are." Hasn't this been Emmerich's pet project for years? He got it made probably because of the success of Day After Tomorrow. And Independence Day sucked. Hate to break to to you.
SHOCK NEWS! by kwisatzhaderach	Mar 4th, 2008 09:50:54 AM
Roland Emmerich makes terrible movie.
THIS JUST PROVES ONE THEORY by Bean_	Mar 4th, 2008 10:28:34 AM
That Bob Marley's music is timeless.
Best caveman movie? by Darth Macchio	Mar 4th, 2008 11:02:07 AM
Come on dude! That's easy! Quest for Fire!!! Naked Rae Dawn Chong jumping around on all fours!?! No dialgue!? Ron Pearlman? More naked Rae Dawn Chong?!?!?! Are you kidding?!?!
Did I step in dogshit or does this movie just stink? by LargoJr	Mar 4th, 2008 11:13:52 AM
Wrap it up folks, this ones going to be available in the chap bins in 2 months just in time for summer zombie movie time after work
Emmerich for Tomb Raider III by Billy The Fish	Mar 4th, 2008 11:15:01 AM
...Because the first two movies just weren't quite shit enough.
PLANT by BigTexas42	Mar 4th, 2008 11:22:31 AM
oh, wait...nevermind. Force of habit.
Get ready for 9,999 B.C. on Sci-Fi. by Diagnostic	Mar 4th, 2008 11:27:16 AM
They should make this the absolute last movie made in HD-DVD format.
Am I the only one that read . . . by Nice Marmot	Mar 4th, 2008 11:36:22 AM
. . . that the new Dark Knight trailer, focusing on Harvey, was going to be shown before this flick? Apparantly I just imagined it or read incorrectly.
Bloo by Lost Jarv	Mar 4th, 2008 11:39:03 AM
That would have to be Troma's epic "Nymphoid Barabarian in Dinosaur Hell". It's certainly better than anything Emmerich could do. Where are the brigade of flora to post "C'mon guys, give it a chance"?
Huh? by Sithdan	Mar 4th, 2008 11:52:51 AM
What was wrong with Apocalypto? I thought it was a masterpiece.
It's no "Drop Dead Fred"..... by Quake II	Mar 4th, 2008 12:15:28 PM
I'm tired of the Citizen Cane references with bad movies. Let's be more realistic like "It's no Scarecrow" or "It's no Man With The Screaming Brain". This movie has no appeal whatsoever. The trailers are weak, the history is absurd and the CGI creatures look like XBox 360 enemies. Oh well. Not even worth a post, really.
Day After Tomorrow... by Kid Z	Mar 4th, 2008 12:34:56 PM
...was dumb as a bag of hammers, but great FX and entertaining in it's mallet-headed way. This one sounds like it's just low rent and moronic. Too bad. Sounds like Emmerich's on the skids now, career-wise. He'll have to slide a lot further to be a Uwe Boll, though.
Apoclypthreehundred B.C. by knowthyself	Mar 4th, 2008 12:57:05 PM

I didn't think they could save it... by Knoll	Mar 4th, 2008 01:00:55 PM
A friend and I saw it last year at a test screening in London. Barring the lack of CG present, it was very clear the film was a mess. When your lead hero's passive, the prophecies mentioned don't amount to anything, and the story is trite, you can't really expect much. It's not an aweful film, just terribly mediocre.
You know what I miss? by JumpinJehosaphat	Mar 4th, 2008 03:00:38 PM
Surprise hits. Fairly mainstream movies with "crapfest" written all over them at first glance that come along and just knock me out. I think the last one of those I saw was The Matrix.
Who would of thought? by sfgeek	Mar 4th, 2008 03:09:57 PM
This movie looks like complete shit... if anyone had their wits about them they would have picked that up when the main character was speaking in English (in 10,000 BC) which is obviously the way that it was because we know that English was around during those times. Not to get to wrapped up in the language, but it is the most frustrating thing about that potential piece of poop. Even Gibson had the balls to have his characters speak a completely dead language in his period pieces. I just can't get past it, forget the whole part of it clearly being a 300 ripoff among other films. It feels like Meet the Spartans, but trying to hard to be serious. It is hard to face the truth... Hollywood is suffering.
com'on guys give it a chance by Bloo	Mar 4th, 2008 03:16:14 PM
a chance to SUCK!!! thanks for the entries guys, I totally forgot about Quest for Fire and I've never heard of the Troma one, but will be checking it out
Really,..this sucked...you're kidding? by Sappers Forward	Mar 4th, 2008 04:52:36 PM
From day one I knew this was just going to be a pile of shit. When they spend so much money on comercials trying to brainwash you into thinking you want to see it, you know it's going to suck balls.
roninhobbit by catlettuce4	Mar 4th, 2008 04:53:27 PM
maybe that's because 300 was absolute garbage. at least ID4 was entertaining. though day after tomorrow was as if not more worthless than 300.
I hadn't even heard of this... by pdennett316	Mar 4th, 2008 05:11:14 PM
Until I saw a trailer on late night TV here in the UK. From only a brief glimpse the CG looked pretty mediocre, but I thought it could be fun. By the sounds of it, no such luck. I want a decent dinosaur movie, not had one in ages, 15 years by my count.
What were you expecting!? by FILMFUNK	Mar 4th, 2008 08:16:24 PM
The guys Euwe Bolls dad!
Note to self: by phool2056	Mar 4th, 2008 09:08:32 PM
Reducto ad Citizen Kane is no longer a valid movie-looking-at thing. I will take this under advisement. So pleased to receive constructive criticism.
I agree plant by Miyamoto_Musashi	Mar 5th, 2008 12:10:09 AM
I am sure the film is much much worse than what they are saying
woolly mammoths > leobloom by a_loco	Mar 5th, 2008 01:01:14 AM
that shit should be hella entertaining
borrowed from jurassic park? again??? by cloudrider`	Mar 5th, 2008 01:30:03 AM
must be emmerich's fav movie. he borrowed it once for godzilla. borrowed it again for the wolf scene in day after tomorrow. and now again? i still think he has great visual talent though(unlike w.s. anderson and those second rate directors he produced movies for), it's just originality that he lacks.
Mothra will unleash hell on earth if this flick is No. 1 by Behemoth	Mar 5th, 2008 10:03:34 AM
Let that be a warning to you spineless Hapsburg Chimps who will flock to this like flies to a fetid mound of dung. MOTHRA IS REAL!!

Talkbacks

Bartholomew & Phool2056 Visit 10,000 B.C.!!

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks