"so whatchu gon' do about dat, hammer!"

"i'm gon' turn this mutha out!"

Good Lord, that will fucking rule because it's great.

You put these WB-drama asshole kids in the iconic roles of superheroes, and you're going to get a shitty movie. SHITTY MOVIE IDEA.

In the conspiracy portion of my heart, I think it's a Hollywood producer who has a fucking boner for KILLING superhero pictures, so he pulls a fucking 'Kid Stays In the Picture' and produces a 'Popeye' of a superhero movie. Fuck this pile of shit.

The people with the money like a return, sure, but they're not just fuckers with cash, they have opinions...so when you put one of these fucking dingalings in charge of something that has a built in fanbase without any knowledge of the product, or WORSE, a bias for a certain type of thing within that product, you get things like the fucking giant spider in Wild Wild West.

When you're the douche that gets his nuts cracked over the giant spider thing, and the buzz is that you're a kookaburra with a fucking hard-on for giant spiders, and your 'brilliant' giant spider idea gets lambasted and delivers a steamy pile of cinema like WWW, you'd probably get fucking pissed off with the people who make fun of your shitty ideas. Hence, killing off superhero movies.

Now, it's either deliberate...one of the money fucks with a hard-on for killing off the genre that made them look like a toolbox...or it's just the fucking hardheaded stubbornness of the out of touch fuckbag who thinks they know what the people want.

If they truly listened to the 'people' they'd see that this Justice League Movie is a BAD FUCKING IDEA...The fact that they're using the guy who's more famous for Babe than Mad Max just says that they know that they've got themselves a gelded fucking 'maverick' director, a guy who KNOWS what side of the creative bread his butter's on. So, expect this shit to be shitty, bad, bad, bad, a BAD CW Made for Television Superhero Movie starring fuckpants 'Young Television Hollywood Types'. Why would they want to kill these flicks off? Who the fuck knows? These are the same people responsible for the coke boom in the 80s and things like Glitter.

BWAH-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!!

What scares me is they'll probably try and take the humor of the Giffen League and try to smush it into this film to make it hip. Instead, it'll be tragic. $10 says the Manhunter eats Oreos and Batman gets busted on for being grim.

(not awesome)

Ouch.

Sorry, attack of common sense. I'll get over it.

And no, Alan Moore-inspired movies do not count.

Shouldn't WB be investing in a quality sequel to Superman Returns, or giving Nolan's vision of Batman room to breathe? It disgusts me to see the suits trying to cash in on their "hot properties", I'd probably feel differently if the people involved in the production were taking their time with it, caring about making something worthy of being filmed, but judging by how it's set for a 2009 release date (!!!), all signs of giving a fuck about quality are apparently out the window. I'm betting this movie will be something along the lines of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.

Personally, I don't care. I was never all too interested in seeing a live action Justice League come into fruition, however, I WILL care if this piece of shit fucks up or gets in the way of Chris Nolan's (possible) sequel to The Dark Knight.

Um, who the hell is Henry Potter?

What will it take to convince WB about the suck factor of this god awful cinematic atrocity? Do they know something that we don't? Shouldn't it be obvious to them that they're fucking up in every possible way that there IS to fuck up?

Isn't it awesome how the fate of superheroes in cinema fell upon the time it took for hollywood writers to sort their shit out?

That said, WB are looking for a kiddie movie guy to make a WB Kids version of the JLA, with kids playing the parts, to boot. So here's my analogy.

If I tell you Emeril Lagasse is going to make me a pie, and his ingredients are clotted vaginal blood, rotting zombie flesh, sweat from a buffalo's balls, and parsley, I'm not really excited about the pie he's gonna bake up for me.

My greatest worry is that the guys holding the purse strings are going to fuck about with the flick script changes for licensing rights and toy ideas, and Miller's just the guy to say 'Whatever you say, fellas, I'm not emotionally invested in the characters or the property, do whatever the hell you want with it!'.

He's not the creator, nor does he seem to give a fuck what's up with these characters, as evinced by the hiring of fucking COMMON to be John Stewart, and the two kids he's got for Flash and fucking kids he's gonna hire for Batman...fuck this vaginal blood pie right in its ass. Sorry, I have no faith in this....I'm moving for a vote of no confidence. Just like Amidala. :)

Anyways bring on Hawkman, teh hell with Aquaman. And it can't be nealy as bad as the 1990's JL (CBS) pilot which I can only watch the first 10 minutes before turning my DVD player off. I'm somewhat optimistic that this may be actually good.We can't really judge a product till it's actually finished now can we? Remember Tim Burton's Batman?

Miller directing it (even if his hands are tied with the marketing-directed casting) means they didn't hire some fuckwit. Wanna roll the dice again, fuckos?!

And as far as "getting it right" goes, the only way to marginally do that is the dumb simple thing of making the character visually match the drawings in the comic (as in general fave artist). Not saying that Iron Man will be lousy at all, just that it's a canny move. "Oh! Look! You can SEE they're doing it right!" 'Cause God knows you fanboys fight amongst themselves/ourselves so much you're never going to please everyone with the story/interpretation of the character. Even within the comics themselves.

P.S. What's with Batman's "bra" in that Dark Knight costume? Does it cover the nipples?

It's called thin-slicing, and it's a valid form of decision making. I hope to eat crow, but I have a feeling this will be shit pie.