Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

first
by PVIII
Nov 27th, 2007
10:39:46 AM
eat it.
First
by TiVo1138
Nov 27th, 2007
10:40:20 AM
This is gonna be great
Damn you, PVIII
by TiVo1138
Nov 27th, 2007
10:40:51 AM
Mere SECONDS before I post mine.
OH, HELL YES!!!
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 27th, 2007
10:41:15 AM
Me likey alot.

I've got to get me a pair of those socks...

hmmm
by v for vienetta
Nov 27th, 2007
10:41:33 AM
i was sold before, but that pic has actually made me think twice. not so sure anymore...
yuck
by alphachemwolf
Nov 27th, 2007
10:41:56 AM
DO NOT LIKE
Good stuff
by abcdefz7
Nov 27th, 2007
10:42:28 AM
Very nice.
NOICE!
by parallax_r
Nov 27th, 2007
10:43:17 AM
he looks sinister... i love it.
I SUPPORT THE GOTH CARROT TOP ON THIS ONE!
by Pound Sand
Nov 27th, 2007
10:43:23 AM
Empire magazine, I can always count on you for the combination of ugly fonts and schizophrenic text layout...You put Wired to shame.
Kind'a of a gay clown thing going
by soccerfan33
Nov 27th, 2007
10:43:47 AM
slightly
Clown from Twisted Metal?
by Baron Karza
Nov 27th, 2007
10:43:53 AM
Wasnt there a fucked up clown in that game that looked similar?
looks
by lb
Nov 27th, 2007
10:44:25 AM
...pretty cool!!!!
It's a miracle!
by xias
Nov 27th, 2007
10:44:40 AM
Do my eyes believe me? Can it be? Is this AICN reporting on The Dark Knight? Surely not!
I'M DR. ROCKSO! I DO COCAINE!!
by Baron Karza
Nov 27th, 2007
10:45:17 AM
And kill.
i wonder if he lubes up any dudes in this one
by BMacSmith
Nov 27th, 2007
10:45:53 AM
i hope and expect Batman sequel to be good, but i still hate heath ledger for sucking ass on screen his whole career
I wish I could figure to kill you.
by all
Nov 27th, 2007
10:46:09 AM
This looks great.
If it looks like a turd and smells like a turd
by Frankenbastard
Nov 27th, 2007
10:47:26 AM
WOW, this is nothing like i expected it to be, it’s way worse! You have got to be kidding me. Retarded doesn't begin to describe the look of what they are calling "the Joker". Thank god the franchise will be dead again. With any luck the Watchemen will be decent and they might reboot the Batman franchise with The Dark Knight Returns. The only people who honestly think the Joker looks cool here are the producers and the idiots that bankrolled this future turd.
Yawn...
by hank henshaw
Nov 27th, 2007
10:47:44 AM
Looks like a Joker henchman, or something.
Reminds me...
by DirkD13"
Nov 27th, 2007
10:50:38 AM
...better get down to the newsagent.
Ha ha!
by Animorganimate
Nov 27th, 2007
10:50:41 AM
Ledger is gonna own your asses and your first borns...he's that good...as the Joker.
This is great...
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 27th, 2007
10:50:55 AM
Watch as the Talkbackers divide into at least two camps:

one that hates the make-up and thinks he doesn't look dapper enough.

and

one that loves the old-school comic look and can't wait to see this dark, sinister portrayal.

(There should also be an auxiliary third camp that is set aside specifically for anchorite and I am Batman.)

You guys are high
by Cracker_Thompson
Nov 27th, 2007
10:52:19 AM
This looks great!!!!
is that Jim carrey?
by Pipple
Nov 27th, 2007
10:55:18 AM
He's a mean one, mr. Grinch.
Did anyone else
by Series7
Nov 27th, 2007
10:56:16 AM
Notice the Mummy 3 preview in the corner of the mag? Really a mummy 3, i remember hearing something about changing directors but how is it going to be anything besides something that should have gone direct to DVD?
That's a shitload of cool right there!
by KillaKane
Nov 27th, 2007
10:56:41 AM
Gagging for a decent trailer! This film's going to rule next summer.
I like it...
by KillDozer
Nov 27th, 2007
10:57:11 AM
Really looking forward to this film.
Baron Karza
by Series7
Nov 27th, 2007
10:57:43 AM
Yeah it totally looks like Sweet Tooth. Hopefully he's half as crazy as sweet tooth is.
I'm no longer excited
by darrenspool
Nov 27th, 2007
10:58:22 AM
It's just another picture. This offers no insight into what he'll be like in the film. He doesn't look creepy either. Just a tad uninteresting.
Wish he looked more like
by Series7
Nov 27th, 2007
10:58:40 AM
This http://www.all4humor.com/image s/files/Sewer%20Clown.jpg
Nothing to get excited about.
by JDanielP
Nov 27th, 2007
11:01:02 AM
There is nothing in any of the visuals, that I've seen thus far, to make me feel enthusiastic. I don't understand why these stories can't be told while having a look that creates more interest. Everything, including Batman's convention-level suit, looks cheap. But I'll go see the damn movie. I just won't be excited about it.
On the other hand...
by Frankenbastard
Nov 27th, 2007
11:03:44 AM
He kind of looks like Keaton as the joker and that’s kind of funny. Why does everyone on the planet just accept shit nowadays? I just don’t accept this, take it back and redo it please. What I love is that some people are looking at these pics we’ve been getting and secretly praying that it’s some sort of in-between stage of the Joker and that by the end of the movie he’ll transform into what we see on the pages of the comic. It ain’t happening bright eyes wake up.
Oh yea
by Frankenbastard
Nov 27th, 2007
11:05:53 AM
LMAO! Pound Sand, great observation.
The Gotham Times.com
by Anschutz
Nov 27th, 2007
11:06:13 AM
Don't forget to check out the The Gotham Times website for more information on what has been happening in Gotham since the release of the fear gas in the Narrows
I love you retards
by gavdiggity
Nov 27th, 2007
11:08:17 AM
people who can determine how good a movie is going to be based on one picture from a magazine cover are a pack of unbelievable assholes. Congratulations, pricks.
"AICN REPORTS ON DARK KNIGHT SHOCK!"
by IAmMrMonkey!
Nov 27th, 2007
11:09:09 AM
Good grief! Dark Knight news on AICN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MEH. That's right, I said MEH.
by Boneyard
Nov 27th, 2007
11:09:32 AM
In the immortal words of Lloyd Benson: "I knew the Joker... and you sir, are no Joker." Between this movie and the killing of Bruce Wayne in the comics I might have to quit Batman all together. (Yes, I realize that statement is ironic)It's been a nice 40 year run but these idiots are screwing it all up.
haters.
by Gatsbys West Egg Omlet
Nov 27th, 2007
11:10:35 AM
this is as good as a movie Joker will ever look.

maybe as good as it COULD ever look.

count your blessings, thank Jeebus Nolan isn't going to fuck this up, and have your geekgasm.

Hey...
by Frankenbastard
Nov 27th, 2007
11:12:26 AM
If that joker showed up to my house at 3 am I’d show him a Detective comic with the real Joker in it quickly sculpt and appliance, apply it to his face, and impale him on my lawn gnome. Then I’d go back to watching V for Vendetta or Sin City.
Can't believe some people don't like this!
by IAmMrMonkey!
Nov 27th, 2007
11:13:38 AM
I look at that picture and I see the fucking Joker which is exactly what I'm meant to be looking at. I'm sure people just want to argue for the sake of arguing here!
"Hey kid, want some candy?"
by chrth
Nov 27th, 2007
11:13:45 AM
And for what'd I rather see...
by Boneyard
Nov 27th, 2007
11:13:59 AM
http://www.kryptonsite.com/pat ientj.jpg
Er...
by Frankenbastard
Nov 27th, 2007
11:14:25 AM
I meant quickly sculpt "AN" appliance. Thank you :)
why is it the British magazines
by ewokstew
Nov 27th, 2007
11:15:41 AM
always seem to get better pics/exclusives of American movie stuff than American Mags do? For that matter, why are British magazines better, period? I'm tired of spending $10-15.00 a magazine to get a decent read. Starlog? HA!
wow
by godhelpus
Nov 27th, 2007
11:20:05 AM
nice work, the smile is perfect
Boneyard
by xias
Nov 27th, 2007
11:20:11 AM
You're an idiot. Goodbye.
Yeah Boneyard
by fat bears
Nov 27th, 2007
11:23:31 AM
You're a fucking moron.
Awesome.
by 7pointedstar
Nov 27th, 2007
11:24:29 AM
This Joker is shaping up to be everything I was hoping it would be.

And to anyone who wants to try and bring up Patient J or even Batman: Dead End as the end-all-be-all of Joker/Batman portrayals, go fuck yourselves. Patient J is vastly overrated, and I can't stand that guy's take on the Joker. It's like he took Mark Hamill's voice, made it even cheesier then applied some white cream make up and a fake chin. That Joker would never work in an actual film. And, as for Batman: Dead End...it just wasn't that good. For the money Sandy Collora had, it looked great. But the Joker was a bit lame in it. Same deal as Patient J. Dead End's Batman was pretty decent, though...but I like the Begins take on it.

Again, this pic looks great, and I think Ledger is really going to surprise some people.
colors
by godhelpus
Nov 27th, 2007
11:25:31 AM
are more saturated on the magazine, i think on the heiscoming website they are more accurate to the film
Punkalicious!
by FILMFUNK
Nov 27th, 2007
11:28:07 AM
I was worried he wasn't Batshit crazy enough from the fotos we've seen thus far but riddle me 'cited now he looks freakin awesome!!!
knowthyself...
by Gatsbys West Egg Omlet
Nov 27th, 2007
11:33:44 AM
you are my hero.

there is no way someone could argue that Nolan's take isn't lightyears beyond than Burton's.

omg
by imkida
Nov 27th, 2007
11:34:09 AM
you haters are seriously douchebags. he looks rad and it looks plausible as well. nolan, well done.
The long fingernails
by Reynard Muldrake
Nov 27th, 2007
11:34:33 AM
sweet! says i. like saruman - there's just something c hilling and bizarre about a madman with the long nails. i'm in, completel y - nolan's worked up tons of 'benefit of the doubt' in my book and no one can prove otherwise. also - trailer soon? all these secret/newspaper sites...something's gotta happen soon
His makeup won't always look that smudgey
by Oski
Nov 27th, 2007
11:35:17 AM
If you look at the pic released during the comcicon scavenger hunt where's holding a knife to Maggie Gyllenhall, it's a lot cleaner than that, same with the leaked pics that show that scene from a different angle. That is how he looks after he's been arrested and in the leaked pics, where Batman is kicking his ass in the interrogation room.
Me likey.
by isispop
Nov 27th, 2007
11:46:27 AM
1 More positive vote. I love it. Just for the sake of conversation I would submit that I wonder what this same look, make up, etc., woulda looked like on C Glover or some of the other names that were bounced around. I love it here though & for one can't wait. Bats Begins ruled. I'm figuring after this one I'll get rid of all the Batman movies in my collection that were made before 2000. Burton's original Batman is the only one even close to watchable in that group. Hopefully after The Dark Knight I'll have the guts to finally dump all those old vhs tapes.
Frankenbastard
by Nice Marmot
Nov 27th, 2007
11:51:19 AM
You're right and I know we won't get the comic version of the Joker by the end of this film, but I definitely think this is just Nolan's "Joker Begins." I think we'll be seeing him as the crazy, daring up & comer Joker, and if that's the case, I think he looks just fine. Whether or not we ever see Ledger's Joker in his prime, more powerful, polished, and Batman's ultimate pain in the ass remains to be seen. I have more complaints w/ Batman's new suit than the new Joker's look. Just because it's called The Dark Knight doesn't mean he should be wearing a medieval suit of armor.
Awesome!
by BLEST
Nov 27th, 2007
11:53:35 AM
AICN covers TDK. Awesome! Oh, and the pic is cool too. :p
The hair
by Reynard Muldrake
Nov 27th, 2007
11:55:19 AM
It would be nice if it was SERIOUSLY died completely green...not just some color gel in the hair, but i'm with Oski - he's been beat around and smudgy in jail or something
But what about Rachel?
by Pipple
Nov 27th, 2007
11:56:20 AM
Will she suck out screen time once again in a limp dick love story that goes no where?
I hate to be a whiny fanboy...
by GiggityGoo
Nov 27th, 2007
11:58:47 AM
...I really do. The clothes look great, the hair looks great, the bat-shit insane look on his face is great... but I'm bummed that his pasty whiteness appears to just be make-up. I was hoping for a chemically-altered snowy-white-skinned Joker, like the comical books. Still, I guess we haven't seen the entire movie yet, but... I was just hoping he'd be Joker "all the way".
not a DC guy...so this looks good to me
by just pillow talk
Nov 27th, 2007
12:04:36 PM
a lot better than Nicholson's, that's for sure. I can't wait to see what Nolan does for a follow-up....
Sick of ripping on Burton...
by BigTexas42
Nov 27th, 2007
12:10:35 PM
Hey all. Just a quick (or not)though. A whole lot of people are ripping on the Burton version of the Batman movies saying how lame they were compared to the Nolan incarnations. Now don't get me wrong, I loved Batman Begins, and i reckon I'll love TDK, but I think back to the summer of 1989, and I can't help but remember how much that film rocked my socks off. When you consider what had been done at the time, and were we were as a society (smack dab in the middle of glam rock 80's), the Burton batmans were quite dark. and the budget and special effects were the likes of which a comic book movie had never seen. The burton films paved the way for ALL comic book movies that followed, even the shitty ones. Yes, the nolan ones are more dark and gritty "real world", but we've been though a hell of a lot of shit as a society (the general malaise of the grunge era, two wars, the terrorist attacks) and our movies are fittingly getting darker and more "real". I guess what I'm trying to say is that yes, I agree that the Nolan/Bale batmans are better than the Burton/Keaton batmans, but only because it is an evolution. These new films wouldn't have been able to exist without the ealy ones. Burton didn't get it wrong, he just got it early. Thank you, I'll crawl back into my hole now. (steps down from soapbox, unwraps a grape blowpop)
If you want to see the Joker's purple gloves...
by Oski
Nov 27th, 2007
12:13:51 PM
Do a google image search for The Dark Knight + Knife
How'd that nursery rhyme go? "Marilyn Manson had a pie..."
by JackPumpkinhead
Nov 27th, 2007
12:17:40 PM
"Marilyn ate it with a cry?" God, this looks wretched. By the way, for a freak with alleged fetishism for "realism", Nolan sure loves to plagiarize Blade Runner's phantasmagorical cities for his "realistic" Gotham.
Half Joker, Half Riddler.....all awful
by godhatesyou
Nov 27th, 2007
12:17:55 PM
This is the most dissapointing thing ever. He looks like a drunk with leaves in his hair. I think I'll give this one a miss.
"He doesn't look right!"
by IAmMrMonkey!
Nov 27th, 2007
12:19:26 PM
Shut the f**k up.
"His face isn't white enough"
by IAmMrMonkey!
Nov 27th, 2007
12:21:59 PM
Shut the f**k up.
Thank heavens the real Batman film is still there, though.
by JackPumpkinhead
Nov 27th, 2007
12:23:21 PM
And the one true screen Joker Nicholson, too.
"He's not the Joker I wanked over in the comic"
by IAmMrMonkey!
Nov 27th, 2007
12:26:01 PM
Yup, shut the f**k up.
Beetlejuice Returns
by Pipple
Nov 27th, 2007
12:27:13 PM
It's showtime!
He makes Nicholson's Joker look good...
by Bill Clay
Nov 27th, 2007
12:33:38 PM
And I thought no one could do a worse Joker than that! This is Cesar Romero territory.
it aint 'new's anymore .com
by ironic_name
Nov 27th, 2007
12:39:04 PM
http://tinyurl.com/36q3h2
I'm confused by this picture
by Kraken
Nov 27th, 2007
12:39:07 PM
There are a lot of little subtle things wrong with this. Is there a horse hoof coming out of the Joker's ass? Also, did the graphic artist draw little dicks coming out of the spray paint... yeah, they're suppose to be paint drips, but you know they were laughing about it when they were making the cover... and the biggest thing wrong... MUMMY 3??
Rachel was a complete misstep, Memories
by Pipple
Nov 27th, 2007
12:41:08 PM
When was that ho in the comic book? fuck, what's wrong with hollywood and their love of the damsel in distress cliche?
To all the haters..
by Redfive!
Nov 27th, 2007
12:43:41 PM
Wait till at least a trailer comes out to start bashing the flick,Begins was a movie i had no excitement seeing then it turned out to be pretty much my favorite superhero film ever.Personally I think ledgers gonna blow it out of the water..and F*&K Jack Nicholson as the joker,that was NOT the joker,it was jack in makeup.
I'm just gonna wait for the movie...
by sundancekeed
Nov 27th, 2007
12:46:57 PM
before I make up my mind on this one. Frankly, I'm a little underwhelmed by how Ledger looks. But then again, I haven't seen the script and I don't know WHY he looks like that. Are they planning on explaining Joker as a victim of the fear toxin? If you visit the Gotham Times viral website, there's an "article" regarding how exposure to the toxin has caused outbreaks of mental illness among Gotham's population. This would fit in with the "real world" aspects that Nolan's Batman inhabits. Otherwise, it's a shitty makeup job.
TOO JOKERY!!!
by dancinggopher01
Nov 27th, 2007
12:47:25 PM
Jesus fucking Christ this looks great. A bunch of whiney bitches in here.
Looks Good
by EliteStance
Nov 27th, 2007
12:48:39 PM
There is no room for earlier, dapper Joker incarnations in a film built on the world of Batman Begins. Now way in hell. You want that take on Joker look elsewhere. Simply put no joker ever in film has ever been menacing. Now, I'm going to wait until I see him in context, but from what I've seen so far this is a belivable, menacing joker. The look sure implies to me someone capable of anything... while remaining rooted in the half realistic world created for this Batman. I'm really curious what certificate this will get given it looks way darker than Begins which barely sqeaked into the lower ratings as it was.
Batman Forever
by Series7
Nov 27th, 2007
12:49:09 PM
It looke like two face from that movie. I personally really like Batman Forever, its ridiculos yes, but its more a send up to the cheesy TV show. And for whoever is wondering about why this is coming from Empire, well yeah this may be an American founded movie, but like everyone in it is british. Everyone except Women Cruise and Morgan Freeman was british. And by British I mean all the isle's and australia. So why wouldn't it be on Empire?
My user name gives me the authority
by Dark Knight Lite
Nov 27th, 2007
12:55:34 PM
to say THIS LOOKS GREAT. The "meh" crowd can eat it and go back to their Mommy's basement. Dark Knight Out.
He's doing a Two Face impression
by I Dunno
Nov 27th, 2007
12:58:01 PM
At least they're trying to do the Joker right, instead of just being so grateful to get Nicholson that they just let him do whatever he wanted. Otherwise though, the Burton films were good. The set design and art direction were better and Michael Keaton was a more daring choice for Batman.
people not liking it just makes me feel good
by ironic_name
Nov 27th, 2007
01:02:05 PM
dumb people are raising their blood pressure yelling about the joker, stupid.
I like it! It's real and it's frightening...
by Zardoz
Nov 27th, 2007
01:06:55 PM
He looks like a guy that fell into some industrial chemicals...WTF did you think he would look like? It's very reality based, which is the theme of Nolan's Batman, and it works for me. Now, let's just hope the movie rocks, like I'm sure it will...
will we get a toy of this?
by ironic_name
Nov 27th, 2007
01:07:21 PM
a shitty toy, or average toy?
I hate people who hate people that hate on people who hate
by SpyGuy
Nov 27th, 2007
01:07:55 PM
So that gives me the right to say...Ennnh, better than Jack Nicholson's Joker, but still not as cool as Brian Bolland's Joker.
Nicholson was great through the first hour
by deathbird
Nov 27th, 2007
01:08:18 PM
Like the movie itself, Nicholson's Joker devolves at the point when he becomes infatuated with Vicky Vale. Before that ludicrous turn, he was note perfect. Don't tell me the first hour of BATMAN wasn't enormously effective.
There are some nice touches
by flossygomez
Nov 27th, 2007
01:13:07 PM
He obviously knitted together his own socks...that in itself is scary enough. Probably humming "Home Sweet Home" while he was watching a victim struggling to stay above the surface in a candy syrup vat.
Memories-Of-Murder
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 27th, 2007
01:15:18 PM
What, no "Bayformers" reference?!

Unprecedented!

As Far as Nicholson goes
by flossygomez
Nov 27th, 2007
01:16:48 PM
Campy. FAT. OVER THE HILL. Baked ham in clown white. Nothing to match there. His only good scene was the shooting of Boss Grisom in the first act. Was this the frighteningly thin and lithe Joker we were expecting. Um...NO.
HE LOOKS GREAT!
by THE KNIGHT
Nov 27th, 2007
01:22:22 PM
Very realistic take that'll fit in Nolan's world.
If...
by Tourist
Nov 27th, 2007
01:23:13 PM
...anything, he's a little too colourful, a little too close to the faggot funny book character for children.
Hows about we wait to see how the movie is?
by AshkeNasty
Nov 27th, 2007
01:23:31 PM
I will defend the look of the Joker in as much as A: its a nice change of pace from the Nicholson Joker and B: It fits within the utilitarian world that Nolan has built. Either way Nolan/Warner Bros. has my $12 come July.
Nice
by Omar B
Nov 27th, 2007
01:23:33 PM
I like it a lot. He looks like a real world version of the Joker and that's what they were going for so I think it's successful in that sense.
Word
by Muldoon
Nov 27th, 2007
01:25:32 PM
badass... but he looks like a child molester, which is probably a good thing... in this context only...
I dont know what you people want....?
by awesomebri
Nov 27th, 2007
01:25:40 PM
I'm not a fan of the make up, or the cut smile, but that looks like the Joker to me. what else do you want?
Totally-
by AshkeNasty
Nov 27th, 2007
01:31:31 PM
This looks like the kind of Joker where the things he laughs at are only funny to him...cause he's INSANE. I loved the 89 movie very much but I totally dig the cut smile over that ridiculous appliance that Nicholson wore...but then again, tha makeup with with the somewhat surreal world that the Burton movie created so who knows.
They want...
by Tourist
Nov 27th, 2007
01:33:42 PM
...Him to look like he does in some of the funny books and that awful Batman vs. Predator short film. In other words, an extremely bright, goofy looking Disney villain that would be laughable for 99.9 per cent of the audience who have had outside exposure to the world. No offence comic book people, but you make him look and act like he does in the cartoon, or the TV series, or the more childish incarnations of the comic, and the film will be laughed off the screen. Nicholson's joker looked far more removed from the most common versions too, plus it sucked, and people don't whine about him too much.
It all comes down to...
by AshkeNasty
Nov 27th, 2007
01:39:00 PM
...how he's played on film. And no one is going to know that until July. I dig the look but it really all comes down to the performance. Besides- Warner Bros/Nolan isn't paying us for our input or opinion so it really doesn't matter what we say! On top of all that, the movie is going to make bank regardless.
PERFECT!
by supermarch
Nov 27th, 2007
01:47:51 PM
I'm fucking floored...
No the Haters are right...
by micturatingbenjamin
Nov 27th, 2007
01:47:53 PM
It's never better than that fucking idiot version of Joker with his moustache showing through the makeup from the tv show, with the comically oversized mallets and jack in the boxes. Yeah, that was threatening. When you hear about clowns doing evil shit in real life? They look like John Wayne Gacy. This guy looks like a fucked up dude, not some fucking gaytronic-ass clown prince of crime. I'd be scared of this Joker,and the Dini cartoon Joker looked like this guy on the inside.

Fuck, he's not going to be the Jack Nicholson version, or the Batman '60s version. He's not dapper enough? I don't get you guys sometimes. Fucking children.

I saw the Wizard World footage this last summer...
by riskebiz
Nov 27th, 2007
01:49:27 PM
... and I was sold 200% on Heath. He is FRIGHTENING as the Joker. Creepy. Scary. I was blown away. I am so looking forward to this flick.
I love the whole Dave McKean vibe of the new Joker's styling
by KillaKane
Nov 27th, 2007
01:49:57 PM
You just know he's batshit cazy and truly psychotic. Nolan's take is going to be significantly edgier than the Joker buffoonery of previous incarnations; more 'Killing Joke'in it's representation or Bat's arch enemy.
That was actually my issue with Batman Begins:
by AshkeNasty
Nov 27th, 2007
01:50:17 PM
I'm kinda sick of every superhero needing a damn love interest. Batman does NOT need a love interest. He's waaaay too messed up for that. And too much of a loner. (my opinion) And Katie Holmes was just a blight on that movie. (universally accepted truth)
Frankenbastard...
by micturatingbenjamin
Nov 27th, 2007
01:51:45 PM
Yeah, I'd show him a picture of the 40's Joker, adjust my smoking jacket and turn off my Ovaltine-sponsored episode of 'Little Orphan Annie' on the radio, inviting him into my parlor for a few shots of the old egg cream, and whilst I perused the most recent issue of Collier's or Look! magazine, I'd remember "Oh, yeah! Everything in the world moves forward in time, and I should probably move my calendar forward." Then, this Joker would shoot me in the face, crack wise, and paint a grin on my face in blood.

Killing Joke:
by AshkeNasty
Nov 27th, 2007
01:52:36 PM
Let's hope so. Alan Moore's Joker was really F@#ked up.
Hoping there's a personal vendetta for the Joker
by drewlicious
Nov 27th, 2007
02:00:09 PM
That's what makes him such a great foil for Batman. He knows exactly where to hit him where it hurts and makes it more tempting each time kill him once and for all. After all, if he does that the Joker wins. If he just turns out to be no more than a charismatic psycho I will be pissed.
Isispop
by KristianUK
Nov 27th, 2007
02:01:04 PM
Hopefully after The Dark Knight I'll have the guts to finally dump all those old vhs tapes. You still have VHS?? And they cast Ledger as the Joker....
Don't get you guys
by Turd Furgeson
Nov 27th, 2007
02:05:39 PM
I think this looks fantastic.. I have no doubt the performance will be right on.. Except for the casting of Mrs. Cruise for Begins, she looked too young, everything has been perfect. The make-up and the clothes look perfect and the look on his face taunting the camera is great...
Shades of Beetlejuice!!!
by Andre the Frog
Nov 27th, 2007
02:09:08 PM
Looks like Keaton has switched to the other side.
Gary Oldman?
by lagomorph
Nov 27th, 2007
02:09:12 PM
Is that you?
The Begins-verse is an Elseworlds...
by stones_throw
Nov 27th, 2007
02:12:32 PM
Yes it is.
Obviously they can't have bleached white skin...
by stones_throw
Nov 27th, 2007
02:16:19 PM
Because if a killer clown who fights a billionaire who dresses like a bat has white skin it just isn't realistic!
How about we retire the word "hater" forever, huh?
by kevred
Nov 27th, 2007
02:21:41 PM
Regardless of how I feel about any given story, I'm fed up with everyone lazily tossing off the word "hater" left and right. It's a cheap, derogatory shortcut in place of actually making a point. If you can't even manage to make a coherent statement in defense of something, then just spare us all the talkback clutter and don't post, okay? No one really wants to see your four-word offhand remark anyway.
THIS BLOWS SHIT CHUNKS!!!!
by rev_skarekroe
Nov 27th, 2007
02:21:48 PM
WHY CAN'T THEY GO INTO MY BRAIN AND MAKE THE MOVIE I HAVE IN MY HEAD!!?!?!? IS IT THAT FUCKING HARD!?!?!
Well said, stones_throw,
by kevred
Nov 27th, 2007
02:25:32 PM
Well said. I'm neutral on the makeup/skin question, but the way you put that cracks me up.
Well said, rev_skarekroe,
by kevred
Nov 27th, 2007
02:27:28 PM
Well said. It's a perfect satire of everyone's complaints, because it's *exactly* what we're all thinking, whether we admit it or not!
This image maintains my disappointment
by Organs
Nov 27th, 2007
02:30:57 PM
If anyone remembers me from the last Joker thread, I was severely disappointed in Heath's Joker. I still am. In one picture, he looks like an emo boy. In another, like Leona Helmsley. And in this image, like a rapidly-aged bar fight victim. Keep in mind I'm sure he'll act it out just fine and I'm sure the script and screenplay and everything else is fine. But again, the look is so important, and even my mom was disappointed in the images of Heath as Joker. Still think I'm nay-saying just for the sake of it? Alright, let's imagine the last movie, "Batman Begins", except Batman's suit has an ocean-blue cape, cowl, boots, and speedos, while the pants and shirt are a pale gray and he has the yellow oval on his chest. And no other change. Would it still be the same movie? Ehh, probably, but you know that look would have really ruined it. Likewise, this Joker will have a severe negative impact on my viewing experience of this movie.
RE: sones_throw
by Organs
Nov 27th, 2007
02:34:11 PM
Why not have bleached-white skin? They had fear toxin in the last movie and a villain who remembers Rome being burned. Not to mention, it's all the unnatural aspects of the Joker that makes him so unnerving. Believe it or not, Nicholson's came a lot closer. Oh, go ahead and hate me for it, but look him up and compare him to a comic image. He was a lot closer, and it's the contrast of psychotic madman with a neat, clean look that really spooks people.
LOVE IT!
by kyle051554
Nov 27th, 2007
02:35:21 PM
This is awesome. People complaining that he doesn't look like he does in the comics probably also complained that Wolverine didn't wear yellow spandex in the X-Men movies.

Translating comics to film is about capturing the feel of the source material, not necessarily the exact imagery. The Joker is supposed to be batshit insane, and judging by the photo, I am completely convinced that this is the correct appearance for the character in the movie.
RE: Memories-Of-Murder
by Organs
Nov 27th, 2007
02:43:03 PM
Rose-tinted glasses? Keep in mind, I was a nay-sayer of Nicholson's for a long while, too. He was just a bit old, a little thick (I know, the Joker's supposed to be lanky thing) and at least six feet tall. But he had an outlandish thrill for killing people, and he had that huge grin. The grin is important. It's as important as the purple suit and the green hair. I'd even forgive the substitution of makeup (in the story) for the falling-in-a-river-of-chemical s angle if they could just get the grin right. And they didn't.
That is kinda fucked up how Nicholson's more comic accurate
by Pipple
Nov 27th, 2007
02:44:53 PM
Never rub another man's rhubarb.
RE: a villain who remembers Rome being burned
by tompiltoff
Nov 27th, 2007
02:47:15 PM
I don't think it was implied that fake Ras remembered Rome burning, just that his organizations history goes back centuries.
Looks like the make-up gun was set to "whore"
by Mr. Waturi
Nov 27th, 2007
02:48:07 PM
Downtown Detroit late at night?
by wowsucks
Nov 27th, 2007
02:49:29 PM
Look like a white boy who ventured into downtown Detroit late at night, got his ass beat, then tagged with green paint after shopping at Hot Topic.
CLOCKWORK ORANGE
by abesapien
Nov 27th, 2007
02:51:00 PM
I love this pic. Not sure if anyones mentioned this but the pose and the look in the eyes is very Clockwork Orange. I love the fact that they are incorporating that influence. Hardly surprising since Clockwork is one of Nolans favourite films and was reported to be a starting off point for Heath's take on The Joker. Can't wait for this movie. I love Clockwork Orange.
how could any serious fan of batman comics not like this pic?
by slappy jones
Nov 27th, 2007
02:54:43 PM
he looks fucking amazing.now obviously this could still be shit...if the past 15 years of film has taught me anything its don't believe it till you see it but this picture is fucking perfect as far as I am concerned. The Joker is my favourite character of all time whther it be film, movie, comic whatever. I love the joker and this picture to me looks perfect. I like nicholsons version but unfortunately nicholson was too old and round for it to really ever feel like the real joker...this picture nails how he should look. for me anyway.
Napoleon dynamite wants his hair back
by Pipple
Nov 27th, 2007
02:54:48 PM
So it's makeup?
by GrandMuffTarkin
Nov 27th, 2007
02:55:15 PM
I'm not thrilled with that. But if you can't fix it, you gotta stand it.
I honestly dont know hoe people can hate this...
by RockLobster800
Nov 27th, 2007
02:58:06 PM
I mean he looks like a fucked up, homicidal, demented, emanciated clown dandy-whic is whatthe Joker IS!! I dont know what people want-all the joker could ever be was Heath in makeup-just as he was Ceaser in makeup, Jack in makeup-the fact that they made him a creepy as crazy as fuck looking Heath in makeup deserves kudos...I mean they could have done mr.J with huge chemcal burns and worn down skin if they were going to have the whole "fell into chemicals" thing, but they are doing some thing slightly different that looks spot on....and his clothes are perfect! How can you hate this? What were you xpecting?
skywalkerfamily do you measn not as subtle as the joker in the c
by slappy jones
Nov 27th, 2007
02:58:23 PM
because he i so understated....silly.
Looking good, Mr Nolan
by football
Nov 27th, 2007
03:02:05 PM
Can't understand what all the jitters are about. I have faith in this being the best Batman film in the series. Also, most of you wining maggots will go and see it despite all your bitching and you'll sit there with your pathetic little hard-ons hidden beneath your popcorn enjoying every fucking single minute. Don't say I didn't tell you so.
RE: football
by Organs
Nov 27th, 2007
03:05:20 PM
Who's having the hard-on? The critics or the fanboys? And you know what, the fact that there's this much division in the reception of this and other images shows that this movie will not get the heightened appeal the last one did.
WTF is eggy yaaa?
by Eyegore
Nov 27th, 2007
03:08:28 PM
I did a google search and got this frigging talkback. English? Do you speak it??
By Halloween and convention season next year...
by Anna Valerious
Nov 27th, 2007
03:09:18 PM
You might spot a few cosplayers (Which would be males)/crossplayers (Which would be females) dressed as him. Looks way better than DJ Tanner trying to do Nicholson's with that Mardi Gras-looking mask...
Memories-Of-Murder
by Organs
Nov 27th, 2007
03:16:05 PM
So tainting beauty supplies with Joker venom and flaunting it on national airwaves isn't characteristic of the Joker? Killing a man with a lethal shock hand-buzzer and laughing it up as he's cooking isn't characteristic of the Joker? He's not perfect, and I have my complaints on Jack's take on it, but he had his merits, too. Not to mention effort was put into his GRIN.
Look at Arkham Asylum: A serious House...for the perfect Joker T
by conspiracy
Nov 27th, 2007
03:17:32 PM
It did not mess with who the Joker is, but made him gritty, real, and not the least bit "funny". I still am at a loss as to why Nolan though he had to dispense with DC Canon (Chemical disfigurement) in order to make a realistic Joker. All hope is that this guy has the acting chops to somehow make this mess the Joker; instead of simply looking like a West Hollywood bottom who got rolled on his way home from a night of Extasy fueled buggery.
Agreed about Begins having split anticipation..
by BLEST
Nov 27th, 2007
03:28:54 PM
The film barely cracked 200 mil and it did so slowly, over multiple weeks. It was word of mouth that made the film great and kept it going. Half of the people didn't feel like giving Bats another pass until they heard good recomendations. That said, most non-fanboys/non-talkbackers I know are REALLY looking forward to this movie. And Joker looks perfect.
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice!
by Larry of Arabia
Nov 27th, 2007
03:30:07 PM
Anyone getting a Michael Keaton vibe?
Once someone uses "meh"...
by slone13
Nov 27th, 2007
03:30:53 PM

...they effectivley reneder any and all opinions they may have had completely void. If one can't even form a coherent simple sentence to express his or her actual feelings, why should anyone bother listening to anything they have to say?

Concerning the topic at hand, after Batman Begins, I have complete faith in Nolan's Dark Knight.

kevred
by slone13
Nov 27th, 2007
03:33:41 PM
I concur with your stance on "hater". Let's do the same with "meh", too.
"Mere superficialities..."
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 27th, 2007
03:34:03 PM
Hardly, M-o-M. More like the utter failure of a hygenically impure Timothy Burton. Jack's take on the Joker is just ONE interpretation. Some of it was great; some of it was hamfisted. Considering the goth-camp world it took place in, I hardly fault his performance for the dismal result that is the 89' film.

Point being: people like and will continue to like different takes on the Joker. If you don't like one (or the other), just say so and move on.

Sure beats trying to tell people what to think. Or haven't you learned that yet?

Gotta chime in about the Nicholson Joker
by gavdiggity
Nov 27th, 2007
03:43:41 PM
I recently re-watched the first two (Burton) movies, and while I loved it at the time, Nicholson really is chewing the scenery in that first movie. Maybe I was too young to notice it when it first came out, but it hasn't aged very well. Personally, I'm all for a dark, maniacal, version of Mr. J. Also, anyone who's complaining about continuity changes in the new movie and not mentioning that Burton had the Joker as the guy who killed Bruce's parents, maybe you should watch Batman '89 again and get back to us.
I want that pic all over my door!!
by ludmir88
Nov 27th, 2007
03:57:22 PM
colorfull and creapy. That's the joker at first sight.
Can Ledger even act?
by Olee Starstone
Nov 27th, 2007
04:05:05 PM
I've seen alot of films with Ledger in and they all sucked. His brief cameo in Lords of Dogtown was the only performance I liked.
IMAX Dark Knight
by kafka07
Nov 27th, 2007
04:08:42 PM
1, the IMAX version of TDK will be in 3D. 2, DC just announced they are NOT killing Bruce Wayne. And 3, this Joker fucking owns.
Olee: Yes.
by Mostholy
Nov 27th, 2007
04:09:47 PM
I just saw him in I'm Not There last weekend, and it's a completely different side of Ledger than I'd seen before. He'll do quality work as The Joker, of this I'm sure.
Dark Knight, Watchmen and Indiana Jones
by zooch
Nov 27th, 2007
04:12:52 PM
my three most anticipated films.
Dark Knight footage in two weeks
by kafka07
Nov 27th, 2007
04:24:12 PM
8 minutes from TDK will be shown in front of I Am Legend
Heath Ledger is good for the part
by zooch
Nov 27th, 2007
04:24:21 PM
because he can disappear into the role unlike a Jack Nicholson with paint on his face.
Dark Knight, Iron Man and Pineapple Express
by SpawnofAchilles
Nov 27th, 2007
04:26:09 PM
are my three most anticipated movies right now, Summer 08 is shaping up nicely
He looks great. Fuck the "Meh"-ers.
by Lance Rock
Nov 27th, 2007
04:27:57 PM
yes, you
Now that the taste of Shumacker is off
by I Dunno
Nov 27th, 2007
04:29:47 PM
I expect TDK to make more than BB. Most of the people I talked to just assumed that BB was a sequel or prequel to the shitfest that was Batman and Robin. It was only 7 years later afterall. Now that Shumacker's stench has been aired out, I think this will be better received.
Complaining about "meh"
by MC-909
Nov 27th, 2007
04:38:06 PM
Cut out the fucking wannabe-hip-shit. There is nothing wrong with saying "meh". There are times when that is the perfect phrase to describe something that illicits no emotional response one way or another. Plus, it's a perfectly bland looking word. Which I guess is kinda the point.

As for this Joker though, I am very much not meh. I think it looks pretty fucking sick so far. Too bad this won't be rated R. That would be the cat's meow.

Or should I say the bat's meow. Hahahahaha!

What if they cast Keaton in Justice League? As an old school Bat
by Stormwatcher
Nov 27th, 2007
04:40:49 PM
All geriatric and pissed off at the younger generation? Wonder, this Joker rocks though.
Stormwatcher
by MC-909
Nov 27th, 2007
04:43:24 PM
Because Diane Keaton would make a terrible Batman at her age.
It works.
by Movietool
Nov 27th, 2007
04:49:06 PM
I admit I'm more a fan of the Animated Series Joker - but that's not the world Nolan created in Batman Begins - it's just not. I'm interested to see just HOW insane this version of the Joker is. Should be cool.
Still don't like it.
by ZeroCorpse
Nov 27th, 2007
04:57:56 PM
The Joker is crazy, but he's a sociopath, not a psychopath. There's a difference. This Joker is "playing with his own feces" crazy-looking. He's unhinged, totally psychotic, and apparently has no grasp of what is normal. The real Joker is a sociopath. He's fully aware of the fact that he's not normal, and he revels in his being so strange and quirky. Most of all, the real Joker sees himself as HILARIOUS and FUN. This Joker doesn't look like he thinks he's fun. He looks like he thinks he's ready to put on a suit made from pieces of women stitched together.

However, I can accept this as an ELSEWORLDS kind of tale. This is a different kind of Joker, but since when has DC ever put the mainstream DC Universe characters into live action? They always change them significantly. Whether it be Superman being cast way too young and skinny, Lex Luthor being cast as a funny guy, Batman having nipples on his batsuit, Bane being a mindless zombie, or Poison Ivy being a vamping idiot rather than a subtle murderess with an unhealthy obsession with her plants, DC characters are also substantially different from their comic book counterparts.

I mean, you all fucking loved the Penguin as a goo-spitting slob running for Mayor. You applauded the representation of Selina Kyle as a mild-mannered secretary who gets powers after falling in kitty litter, so a Joker that is one part Droog and two parts Manson is just the ticket.

I'm still waiting for them to get a DC movie right, but so far they produce what they THINK people want, rather than duplicating what has stood the test of time in the comics for 40+ years.

Spider-Man stuck pretty closely to the look and feel of the comics. Huge success. Spider-Man 2 did the same, and it was also a huge success. Spider-Man 3 deviated from the comics in MAJOR ways (Pete never broke into song when he was wearing the black costume) and it STANK.

Case in point. Don't change what works.

I'll see Dark Knight, and I'll treat it like an Elseworlds tale. It's a what-if... As in "What if Charles Manson became the Joker?"

Looks Great!
by Buckys_Kick_Ass_Arm
Nov 27th, 2007
05:08:30 PM
So glad that my instincts were correct on this one. Would've been horrible if he was... horrible
It must be the socks
by Spifftacular Squirrel Girl
Nov 27th, 2007
05:12:09 PM
Seems creepy enough for me.
DAPPER...ARE YOU SERIOUS??
by SpawnofAchilles
Nov 27th, 2007
05:27:04 PM
frankly, having a guy run around with full on perfect clown make-up on is stupid...it was stupid when Jack did it and it would be even more ridiculous in the world Nolan has created which is less campy and more rooted in reality then burton's and THATS WHY IT WORKS, make it more real and people can connect with it, your average moviegoer will appreciate it more and while the fan boys and geeks will bitch and moan (see above) the movie will be better for it, it's not a comic, it's a movie BASED on a comic...plus who among us has ANY right to doubt Nolan after what he did with the first film? He's the reason (along with bale) that we are all foaming at the mouth for TDK to begin with and zerocorpse, the definition of psychopath fits much better for joker the sociopath, a sociopath is someone with an antisocial disorder who cant tell the difference between right and wrong, a psychopath is someone who is sociopathic but this manifests itself in aggresive, perverted, criminal or amoral behavior without empathy or remorse(but perhaps WITH glee muhahaha)...which sounds more like the joker to you? heath will nail it, plus, we are neglecting to look to the people who have seen footage (someone above mentioned seeing it and that heath is scary as fuck and looks great) and michael caine who said when he first encountered heath in character he was so scared he forgot his fuckin' lines and he's been doing this acting shit for a couple years (granted he was probably embellshing but its still a great sound byte) in summation, whiney fan boys...eat a bowl of dicks
Nick Stahl is playing Batman in JLA...
by Lutz
Nov 27th, 2007
05:27:55 PM
There was a big article on here a few days ago about how Bruce Wayne is John Conner.
WHY AREN'T YOU LAUGHING????
by performingmonkey
Nov 27th, 2007
05:28:34 PM
The best moment in the whole of Batman is when The Joker and Batman are both laughing at the end of The Killing Joke. I wish they'd make a hard R movie.
I take a Slim Ledger over Fat Nicholson any day
by Monkey_King
Nov 27th, 2007
05:30:21 PM
Nolan's incarnation harkens to the styling of the comics and WB cartoon, but with a decidedly John W. Gacy/Clownhouse feel.
It's maybe not ideal
by JonQuixote
Nov 27th, 2007
05:34:03 PM
It's so hard to tell from just a still. I could nitpick. But it looks like they put a lot of thought into it. They could have just layered on the make up and gave him a bright purple suit and a big grin, cast Dane Cook and then go home and count their money. I prefer my Joker with a bleached white face, sure. This is Nolan's take on the Joker and I can't see one way in which it's illegitimate - the Joker can be feral and Gacy-esque, sure. Why not? He's a disfigured homicidal psychopath with a clown motif. Am I seeing a disfigured homicidal psychopath with a clown motif? Why, yes I am. At that point, I'm shutting the fuck up. I'm also recognizing that Rev_Skarecroe's comment is one of the most prescient this site has ever seen. Besides, I can't see one way in which Nolan has done something to squander the trust and goodwill he earned with BEGINS.
Ouch!
by Hatemachine76
Nov 27th, 2007
05:36:09 PM
He looks like a Wal-Mart greeter gone bad...if said Wal-Mart greeter tried smoking a cig and huffing from a bag of gas at the same time.
Nolan is actually remaining so true to the source material that
by William Landis
Nov 27th, 2007
05:39:11 PM
when some clowns cry "but it's make-up!" *SPOILER* At the start of the movie, The Joker applies make-up which is ephemeral. By the end of the movie it is permanent, so you've got your canonized Joker! Caine hinted at it recently but what he did not mention is that The Joker cannot take his make-up off. You may have noticed his look is what some might call "off-the-rack" and what he applies to his face is cheap & nasty shit. Voila, he is chemically scarred which is what we realise as he's taken into custody. And Nolan is British so it is only right that he pays tribute to Kenny the Tiger from Phoenix Nights! *END SPOILER* HahahAHahAhAAahaaHAHA!
That should be
by William Landis
Nov 27th, 2007
05:43:04 PM
"Nolan is actually remaining so true to the source material that IT HURTS when some clowns cry "but it's make-up!"" Forgive me, I chanelled Jack Nicholson as The Joker.
MC-909
by Professor Falcon
Nov 27th, 2007
06:00:09 PM

Regardless of your opinion on the non-word "meh", the fact of the matter is that its inception into the English vernacular is almost solely due to the large number of whiny disenfranchised youth of this country who felt the need to create a new word to convey their lack of opinion on whatever it is they are discussing. The fact that said youth feel so compelled to tell complete strangers that they just don’t care about a particular subject matter to begin with is not important (though it IS highly amusing).

Long gone are the days when people would bother expressing themselves in a thoughtful, properly worded, grammatically correct manner. No, nowadays it's "cool" to show your lack of concern (or more accurately, lack of creativity) by simply typing "meh". Why take the time to say "I'm not impressed" or "That does nothing for me"? Stating that something "illicits (sic) no emotional response one way or another" is far too much work, right? I mean, you've taken the time to post on a public forum for the sole purpose of expressing your absence of feeling, why bother taking another couple seconds to articulate your thoughts in an even remotely interesting manner?

I’m sure the irony is lost on you, MC 909, but YOU are the wanna-be hipster here, not those seeking a moratorium on the use of the non-word "meh". You, sir, are the very type of person who can't be bothered to use the language you were taught back in 3rd grade to properly express your sentiments despite the fact that you’ve taken the time to make sure everyone knows that you couldn’t care less about whatever it is that is being discussed. You, sir, are a "meh-er". Worst of all, you then go on to end your post with a horrible pun, and follow that by laughing at your own pitiful "joke". Shame on you and your kind. I weep for the future.

Class dismissed.

Caesar Romero's Joker Was Better Than This Crap
by James Westfall
Nov 27th, 2007
06:01:30 PM
This is still crap, and Nolan is still very dead to me. In fact this shit is so bogus it makes not want to see 'Batman Begins' ever again.
It just... doesn't look like the Joker.
by samsquanch
Nov 27th, 2007
06:10:41 PM
He looks like a college freshman dressed up like the Joker for halloween.
looks fucking great!
by zodiac1012
Nov 27th, 2007
06:19:17 PM
Ledger will pwn this role.
I like Nicholson's joker...
by Zardoz
Nov 27th, 2007
06:20:12 PM
... but that film was flawed. It's okay, but I really hate the Prince songs and Kim Basinger and they totally screwed up Batman himself: using guns and bombs to kill bad guys? Blasphemy! I like "Batman Returns" much better. (And "Batman Begins" was nearly perfect, IMO) Forget using Nicholson today, it's just ludicrous! And I actually think Ledger will be good in the part and that he looks great! So, everybody relax and enjoy the ride...
Catwoman = Evan Rachel Wood
by CarmillaVonDoom
Nov 27th, 2007
06:30:33 PM
Ledger looks completely scary as the Joker: as it should be!
Right. That's It.
by IAmMrMonkey!
Nov 27th, 2007
06:30:44 PM
When THE DARK KNIGHT comes out, I ain't reading the TalkBacks for it.

All of the same critics from this TalkBack will be there spouting exactly the same rubbish about why they hated Heath Ledger's Joker. It's true and you know it.

Every single person who has criticised his look on this TalkBack will walk into THE DARK KNIGHT determined not to like him and, after really enjoying themselves for an hour and half (probably even giggling in glee at some of the great stuff that they see), they'll come onto the TalkBack and go on and on and on about how his portrayal wasn't right, how he didn't look like the comics they read, how Jack Nicholson was better etc etc.

Why? Because they won't want to admit that they're wrong! They won't want to admit that they wasted so much time whining and arguing when their energy could have been put to better use elsewhere.

When exactly did Nolan make a bad movie? I can't remember it. Must have missed that one. When did he show the Batman fans that he didn't know what he was doing or that he didn't care for the material? Guess I must have missed that too!

Professor Falcon
by systemsbroom
Nov 27th, 2007
06:53:44 PM
Not to defend lazy locution, but my dear professor, surely you realize that language changes over time, and that certain novel pieces of vernacular (such as the to-you odious "meh") are the very lifeblood of innovative discourse? Otherwise I fully agree with you.
Falcon
by MC-909
Nov 27th, 2007
07:05:20 PM
I must concur with Systemsbroom. Falcon my dear chap, do you not realize that "doh" is in the dictionary?

Oh, and I stand by my pun.

oh...
by MC-909
Nov 27th, 2007
07:06:31 PM
...and third grade was hard.
The Joker has chosen viral websites and here's why...
by Err
Nov 27th, 2007
07:17:25 PM
He knows that the Dark Knight will be this year's Little Miss Sunshine.
Hellz Yeah!
by sirbroiler
Nov 27th, 2007
07:29:25 PM
Heath is the JOKER!! Looks awesome. Naysayers die - or go spank it to Fantastic Four.
So until "meh" makes it into the dictionary...
by crazyhorse2099
Nov 27th, 2007
07:29:30 PM
...why don't we drop the feigned lack of interest routine and actually string together a sentence with real words? Cause you just sound like a pissy 13 year old girl when you use "meh".
Michael Keaton
by kferris61
Nov 27th, 2007
07:42:19 PM
I showed my wife this picture and she immediately said to me that looks like Michael Keaton wearing the makeup. I have to agree!
Brokeback Puddin'
by Barry Convex
Nov 27th, 2007
07:50:04 PM
Heath Ledger does NOT look like the Joker. Nolan should have cast someone with a thin angular face like Christopher Eccleston or Adrian Brody. The Joker's nose is supposed to be pointy, not pudgy.
Jake Gyllenhall: "Why is the Joker looking at my ass like that?"
by MrMysteryGuest
Nov 27th, 2007
07:54:32 PM
Cue "Brokeback Mountain" music!
Whats wrong with the Tim Burton Batman?
by WolfmanNards
Nov 27th, 2007
08:23:12 PM
I like watching that movie.
You know who would have made a great Joker....
by vadakinX
Nov 27th, 2007
08:24:22 PM
Jack Nicholson....but wait...he's already played the Joker, so what the hell am I talking about?

I'm talking about a little movie called "The Shining"...THAT was great Nicholson Joker...

Imagine Crispin Glover in that same makeup.
by GibsonUSA
Nov 27th, 2007
08:28:58 PM
Now that would be badass.
"The Joker's nose is supposed to be pointy, not pudgy"
by pdennett316
Nov 27th, 2007
08:31:04 PM
Oh grow the fuck up please!! And the rest of you to - "the real Joker blah blah blah.." THERE IS NO REAL JOKER - theres whichever interpretation you happen to like, doesn't mean the other interpretations are wrong. Oh, and Nicholson fucking ruled as the Joker - this Joker looks nothing like him, and I'm pissed off. See how that works? Difference is, I'm not actually pissed off about something so stupid as someone re-imagining the Joker for THEIR take on the universe. Oh, and the various comics suck ass just because they're comics, and as such poorly written though extremely well drawn.
lol it DOES look like a college freshman dressed up for Hallowee
by GibsonUSA
Nov 27th, 2007
08:46:26 PM
lol after someone mentioned that and I looked again i lmao, its true! :)
performance
by Silverglade
Nov 27th, 2007
09:02:28 PM
I hear the complaints and the praise and I... think I can see both arguments of it. But based on the folks that saw the Joker in action at that whatsitsname convention, they said its the acting and performance that is... well... batshit insane. This Joker is nuts. I just hope the entire package is good. I am already planning (hoping) to hear about a 3rd one with Bale and friends.
Wake Me When It's Over.
by Colier Rannd
Nov 27th, 2007
09:12:09 PM
This picture is as boring as Batman Begins and everything else Nolan is involved in. Wake me when people realize what a hack he is.
Fuck Aintitcool
by robzass
Nov 27th, 2007
09:13:55 PM
The talkback on this site sucks. Seriously, I'm quitting. Whiny fanboys with no legitimate reasoning for their complaining. Nothing is ever positively recieved on this site. ever. I don't mind criticism but fuck whiners.
Burton's 89 Batman hasn't aged well.
by Barry Egan
Nov 27th, 2007
09:15:19 PM
And Nicholson is horrible in it, almost as bad as he was in The Departed. Besides About Schmidt, has Nicholson been good in anything in the last 20 years?
robzass
by James Westfall
Nov 27th, 2007
09:26:07 PM
A lot of us who can't stand Nolan's Joker *have* given legitimate reasoning for it on previous Talkbacks. I'll restate mine for you. I do not like the Joker's look here. I don't like the splotchy make-up instead of the bleached skin. I don't like the jagged, sewn-up mouth scars or the "pornstar after a shoot" lipstick job they've done over it. I don't like that he looks dirty and soiled, like someone just pulled him out of an asshole. To me (a lifelong Joker fan) this is *not* the Joker, and I can't support the film. As I said earlier, this is so bad that it sours me on the previous movie as well - it's *that* bad.
i'm...
by blackthought
Nov 27th, 2007
09:28:14 PM
dying to see this. or more apt to kill to see this...hmm...
This Joker is already more effective and scarier than any other
by performingmonkey
Nov 27th, 2007
09:36:12 PM
For a start, the fact that he paints his face, cuts it, lets it rot himself rather than falling in some chemicals instantly makes him much more of a fucked up human being, which is what he needs to be for the character to work here. The chemicals are always going to kill the reality, so it had to be done differently. We've already had the 'comedy' Joker on several occasions. The definitive comic book Joker is definitely in The Killing Joke and you can't tell me he isn't mentally screwed in that.
This is not the real Joker.
by Barry Convex
Nov 27th, 2007
09:57:18 PM
This interpretation of the Joker is wrong.
Where's the fun?
by darthvedder81
Nov 27th, 2007
09:57:58 PM
"Batman Begins" was OK but it almost seems like Nolan was so worried about not making a Joel Schumacher-type Batman film he let the pendulum swing way over in the other direction. I don't mind a "darker, more serious" Batman but Jeebus, have some fun with the characters once in a while. At the end of the day it's a comic book tale about a dude in a Batsuit who fights crime with gadgets. Don't take yourself too seriously.
performingmonkey
by James Westfall
Nov 27th, 2007
09:58:05 PM
If 'Killing Joke' is the definitive version of the Joker (and I'd agree with you on that) then why deviate from that? In the 'Killing Joke' he was chemically scarred yet you're telling us that simply won't do - while at the same time explaining that the 'Killing Joke' is definitive.
New viral game with a safe to crack...
by BLEST
Nov 27th, 2007
10:11:51 PM
http://www.whysoserious.com/m ausoleum/ Superhero hype has the story on it, and the emails that people recieved with different months of the year, out of order. Codes for the safe maybe? Hope the trailer is inside.
robzass is quitting AICN?
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 27th, 2007
10:19:22 PM
When did he start? Does anyone remember seeing that guy?

;^)

Where's the fun?
by JonQuixote
Nov 27th, 2007
10:25:01 PM
Jeez, guy. It's not like BEGINS was SCHINDLER'S LIST. The stuff about getting the car and building the suit, Batman's interactions with Gordon, Alfred's pithy comments, the fun Bruce had playing the shallow playboy were small but healthy doses of comic relief and levity. Yeah the movie had plenty and plenty of dark and scary moments and treated the "mythology" as something worthy of intelligence and consideration, but there's room for that type of Batman movie. You have plenty of movies and a t.v. show that emphasizes how goofy and stupid Batman can be. Let's see some that are more interested with how dark and brutal his stories can be too. Something that evokes the spirit of stuff like YEAR ONE, DARK KNIGHT RETURNS, BLACK & WHITE, y'know... the source material that's generally considered to be the BEST stuff out of the 65 years worth of writing. Please? Can we? Naw, I'm just kidding. Keep complaining. That's the only way we'll ever get a movie that satisfies everybody's slightest whim and preference.
ZOMFG
by That 70s Venom
Nov 27th, 2007
10:26:17 PM
Heath is gonna freakin ROCK.
Baron Karza is right! It's Dr Rockso!!!
by br1947
Nov 27th, 2007
10:27:44 PM
Dark Night Come
by Khronos80
Nov 27th, 2007
10:35:33 PM
This movie will own the 90' version. Khrono- News about everything. http://www.popculturerx.com/
So...
by BLEST
Nov 27th, 2007
10:42:45 PM
Whats inside?
Latest info on joker puzzles
by Oski
Nov 27th, 2007
10:44:42 PM
That email was the clue to find the site with the safe(whysoseriou/mausoleum). Everything is broken down at the new wiki for the viral campaign http://b atman.wikibruce.com/Home http://batman.wikibruce.com/Wh ysoserious.com/m ausoleum
I hope The Joker has a Hannibal Lecter-esque role in Part 3
by TiVo1138
Nov 27th, 2007
10:45:38 PM
As in the third part of the trilogy, The Joker is now confined to a prison cell in Arkham Asylum and Batman is working with him reluctantly for information.
Oh...
by BLEST
Nov 27th, 2007
10:46:15 PM
So nobody's cracked it yet? The fans'll have it by morning then. :)
Nice Marmot
by Frankenbastard
Nov 27th, 2007
10:52:05 PM
Thanks Nice Marmot for calmly writing something that makes sense and it’s refreshing to hear another person’s point of view, it’s a rare thing nowadays. All I’m saying is the look of this Joker and the direction they are taking it isn’t my cup of tea. From the look of the amped up Batsuit to the new Joker it just smacks of kids Halloween costumes. For the record when the Tim Burton version came out I hated it…I saw it 9 times in the theater but I hated it. The only thing that worked in that film was Elfmans score. It was all they had at the time so I tolerated the film but now there is zero reasoning for getting this wrong. The Watchmen (movie) creators might be getting it right for a change, you already have the conceptual art so put it on the screen.
Can someone please explain the fascination
by systemsbroom
Nov 27th, 2007
11:19:06 PM
with Crispin Glover? More specifically why do so many people feel he should be the Joker? I understand that Glover and the Joker are both skinny weirdos, but Glover has never seemed to be able to convey more than annoying/dismissable freak, instead of menacing freak.
Joker In Burton's Batman
by WolfmanNards
Nov 27th, 2007
11:21:34 PM
The Joker in the '89 Batman was a good portrayal of the character. There were plenty of well done Joker moments. From Joker promising to give free money away to the people of Gotham only to gas them and laugh as he watches them all die before his feet to him shooting his right hand man for the hell of it. I loved how sincerely upset and saddened Joker was when batman "took my balloons". Come to think of all the great Joker moments in that movie, what exactly about the portrayal wasn't like the Joker? I can't think of any moments that go outside of Joker's motivations.
TiVo1138: He probably will be the Lecter
by deathbird
Nov 27th, 2007
11:22:49 PM
The Batman/Joker relationship is awfully close to Graham and Lecter's; I suspect Nolan will capitalize on this. Can you imagine the interplay between the two, what with Dent's tragedy still fresh? Hell, I venture that the second last scene of Batman 3 will take place in Mr. J's cell, wherein our hero makes his moral triumph known to the clown.
Joker Rocked in '89 Batman
by WolfmanNards
Nov 27th, 2007
11:25:52 PM
More great joker moments- Joker Burning his girlfriends face to make her a living piece of art. "MIRROR!" When Joker finds out his face is bleached beyond recognition, he laughs about it. The monologue he has with a toasted corpse. Just him and the smoking burnt corpse as he talks to it like its listening to him. When he's hanging for his life by his fingers on top of the cathedral, he can't help but laugh at how dramatic his situation is. I honestly don't see what ISN'T right about this joker. You guys don't really have a problem with him, do you?
Micturatingbenjamin...
by Frankenbastard
Nov 27th, 2007
11:27:04 PM
Micturatingbenjamin I have to admit I was impressed with your use of the word egg cream. This joker would be too busy listening to My Chemical Romance to shoot anyone in the face. You are right I had no idea that the Batman comic has moved on since 1939. Why should they pay attention to what’s been written in the past at all? Hey why not make him some tall guy that stopped off at Hot Topic and got some crappy spray on faux punk rock hair color and some Woochie face paint…oh wait they are doing that. Look if you’re going to make a movie about one of the biggest comic icons in history and you want to say comics are great literature (and not “the funny papers”) up there with Shakespeare then don’t mess with the source material. That I dislike the look of this guy isn’t the real problem, that I have to see it magnified tenfold at comic cons by every idiot with access to their mothers make up drawer is what chaps my hide. Movie viewers nowadays are just like the scene in A Christmas Story where Ralphie is told on Santa’s lap he would like a nice football and he shakes his head in a agreement…”yes football”. Well I don’t want a freakin football!
seems way too soon.
by dr.bulber
Nov 28th, 2007
12:20:55 AM
i wonder if they should have waited until march or april if at all. too much saturation already. the viral stuff is fun but it gets tired after a while. even if the film is great people will feel let down because of all the build up.
Hey, hey, hey...
by BLEST
Nov 28th, 2007
12:26:19 AM
Nobody's dissing on Batman 89. (well, a few are but I'm not.)I loved it when I was a kid, and I'll still give it look if it's on now. But Nolan has made a better Batman. And from what I see so far, he's made a better Joker. What do I mean by better? I can't exactly say, other than the dangerous, more realistic approach appeals to me.
Tourist you're right
by messi
Nov 28th, 2007
12:47:16 AM
and I love it when idiots like JJonz say they want a Cloth batman complete with Trunks which is fucking retarded.
James Westfall you are a loser
by messi
Nov 28th, 2007
12:49:38 AM
how does it feel to punch walls Superboy-Prime. Fucking loser. Fat cunt.
Colier Rannd
by messi
Nov 28th, 2007
12:54:44 AM
kill yourself
James Westfall
by messi
Nov 28th, 2007
12:55:58 AM
Killing Joke is the deifnitive joker in his characterization, not origin. It's a silly origin, like most DC characters. Joker - Fall into a pit of chemicals and go insane.....shit. Luthor - pre crisis, lose my hair and become evil. Post crisis - superman upstaged me so i will kill lots of people. Eat shit fanboy.
performingmonkey
by Dr Uwe Boll
Nov 28th, 2007
01:24:41 AM
Amen, Killing Joke is a beautiful, beautiful thing. Bolland's art is gorgeous and the ending with Bat's and the Joker was sweet.
Just got off the phone with Ronald McDonald
by sleeptones
Nov 28th, 2007
01:48:49 AM
..he says Joker will die
well done AICN
by gonzofreak
Nov 28th, 2007
02:16:57 AM
Yet another story half the internet beat you to. Well done indeed.
killing joke sucked balls..
by ironic_name
Nov 28th, 2007
02:28:29 AM
alan moore is a hack, bolland aint that great, and the ending was dumb.
you are not Barry Convex
by ironic_name
Nov 28th, 2007
02:31:38 AM
your interpretation of you is wrong.
wally pfister
by ironic_name
Nov 28th, 2007
02:32:47 AM
was in the game.. you could beat the tar outta him.
If you hate this...
by Madines Sideshed
Nov 28th, 2007
02:34:43 AM
...because of the deviation from the comics then you should pretty much hate most of the movie representations. Jack's joker was over egged and too, well, fat. The Penguin was pathetic. And every character in the last two films were progressively so hammy and overdone that it killed the franchise stone dead.

Drop to your knees and thank Nolan for giving us his vision of Batman.
"alan moore is a hack"
by Dr Uwe Boll
Nov 28th, 2007
03:05:38 AM
The man who created D.R. and Quinch is a hack - bwaaahhaahahahahaahahahahaah!! !!!!!!!!!!! While I'm gabbing, the Brokeback Joker doesn't look too bad, Ledger has acting chops, god knows Nolan aint no f*ckwit - at the very least it'll be an interesting addition to the Batman canon (still a big fan of Cesar Romero though).
Come on
by EliteStance
Nov 28th, 2007
03:54:05 AM
What did you expect in this incarnation. Look, everyone is entitled to their opinion... but... Nolan created a 'near real world' feel with Begins and is clearly sticking to it. We had equipment come from a military background and a batmobile that was believable and a serious take on Batman character coupled with realistic villians Do you think for a moment its likely that suddenly Nolan's going to accept characters with totally implausible looks or the ability to come out of dips in toxic vats with white skin and green hair? For this Batman you either 'get real' or give it a pass (or complain!). The only Joker I ever imagined was one who's state of mind informs his look, who's look could be achievable in a 'near real world' way and who was frightening. This looks to me likes a madman who choses to dress a cetain way and who(based on comments from Caine) ends up truly twisted and lost within a persona that began as a creation and ends up as reality. To me that's interesting. While some Joker incarnations in the comics are great I would honestly struggle to accept them in a film. With Buton's Batman Joker worked for a while as the context enabled you to accept the toxic vat stuff and the initial in the shadows menace held up. But once he was out and dancing it was just good old Jack wearing face makeup.
Shakes the Clown 2: Even Shakier!
by Iowa Snot Client
Nov 28th, 2007
04:13:57 AM
Sorry, I'm not feeling it, although it may work very well in context of the film. Put me in the "more dapper" camp; I like the effort the Joker put into looking his best despite it all.
Shoot me for saying this...
by Iowa Snot Client
Nov 28th, 2007
04:22:58 AM
But when I read "Where's the fun?" above, I was reminded of the line from Face/Off, and then I thought of Nick Cage in that movie and what a good Joker he would have made.
I'm having it...
by Pawprint
Nov 28th, 2007
04:42:38 AM
Works for me.

Batman 89 was great at the time, but hasn't aged well. The only way I could use to describe B89 is 'proto-emo'; it's all a bit too angsty and existential and gothic romance for me - great when you're 17, but not when you're 35.

And as for Nicholson's Joker - since when was the Joker an old, fat day-glo clown?

Should've looked more like this...
by Ghostball
Nov 28th, 2007
05:03:18 AM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi kipedia/en/thumb/c/c1/Hr1-chat terer.jpg/800px-Hr1-chatterer. jpg Now THAT'd be a adult level Joker reboot!
Whine whine whine.
by Super Joker
Nov 28th, 2007
05:41:39 AM
Moan moan moan. That's all you people ever do. This is the first time posting on here but all of the ridiculous rabid fanboy criticism made me compelled to post something. "It's not like the comic" - no shit Sherlock, like it matters. It really, really annoys me how so many of you haven't even seen the movie, and yet you're ready to have a go at Heath Ledger, constantly referencing his appearance in Brokeback Mountain as a negative thing. "lol he played a gay lol rofl!2!!1 He's Gay Joker hyuk hyuk!!1!!one" Get out from under your little inbred rocks. This is what people do, they take the idea and put their own spin on it. If you want the comic, read the damn comic. I don't understand people who want a carbon copy of the comic. Also, why can't Ledger compliment Nicholsons Joker. Why must he be constantly be comparred all the time? Why must there be a definitive Joker? The only definitive Joker, or Batman or whatever, is in the eye of the beholder. It depends on the comics you read, and as we know Batman comics are as old as the hills, done by many people, different times, different attitudes. My version of what Batman/Joker etc is is different. Some people expect Harley, some don't. It's open for interpretation and this is exactly what these films are, an interpretation. Each interpretation slightly different to the last. Nolan does it his way, just as Burton did it his, and Schumacher did it his way. I know the ones which I prefer, and the ones I dislike, but I understand that my interpretation isn't ever going to come to fruition unless I make the movies myself. Big deal. I like seeing how other people have interpreted these characters, I may even learn something or see them differently in a way I hadn't seen before. If you don't like it don't watch it and leave the cinemas free for those that have an open mind.
Colier Rannd
by warm_turtle
Nov 28th, 2007
06:24:41 AM
Have you even seen a nolan film? Everyone please just wait til its out. I think he looks pretty good but to be honest its his acting that i care about.
Paint on Joker = Flames On Optimus
by Guy Who Got A Headache And Accidentally Saves The World
Nov 28th, 2007
07:17:26 AM
What the hell else is he supposed to look like you fucking cry babies, fuck you and your sense of self-entitlement.
Terry and Greg's French bulldog
by Barry Convex
Nov 28th, 2007
07:21:09 AM
Is this Joker going to eat chocolate pudding?
He looks like...
by Ghostball
Nov 28th, 2007
08:03:49 AM
someone you want to punch, not run from
The next viral for Cloverfield will make me
by William Landis
Nov 28th, 2007
08:13:29 AM
pork Tim Kring in his sleep so I can see a picture of a crab/octopus/fish/jellyfish crossbreed which is a social comment on the exploitation of fossil fuels by fictional Japanese conglomerates, to which it will be greeted by a chorus of "it's a lion! a fucking lion!"/"cthulhu"/"J.J. Abrams raped my Lovecraftian childhood".
thats right, Dr Uwe Boll
by ironic_name
Nov 28th, 2007
08:22:50 AM
hack.
I think Mr Freeze
by William Landis
Nov 28th, 2007
08:30:07 AM
should be a serial killer who freezes his victims in water baths while they are alive. I would have him dispatched in a low-key fight at his apartment towards the end of the second act. I suppose Two-Face would have to destroy vital evidence which could have helped Gordon and Batman find Freeze before his last kill: Lucius Fox. Then I would have Bruce 'n' Harv drink Slusho until they turn into the size of skyscrapers and have a battle royale to end all battle royales; "This town ain't big enough for the both of us, Harv"/"Come get me, you rotten giant bat!". Warner Brothers, if you use this treatment credit story to Harold Pinter.
ruven76
by ironic_name
Nov 28th, 2007
08:30:52 AM
it sorta is the best of both worlds,

there was a rumour that the koker may have been seriously affected by the fear gas..

and when i saw the water purification photo on hahahatimes, with 'germs' in the water drawnin, with "i survived" being circled from a news item above the ad, and the red circle having a line pointing to the water,

I figured it was true, the joker is affected by chemicals, but not a vat of n20 and peroxide.

super joker
by RockLobster800
Nov 28th, 2007
08:32:50 AM
hear hear!!
the joker was affected, too
by ironic_name
Nov 28th, 2007
08:33:40 AM
not just the koker.
super joker
by RockLobster800
Nov 28th, 2007
08:33:55 AM
hear hear!!
Iowa Snot Client
by ironic_name
Nov 28th, 2007
08:40:47 AM
nic cage would make a far better creeper,

remember cage looking in the mirror and smiling at himself? or saying that hes not 'him' - but 'HIM'.. and you hear travolta?

what if he saw a half naked, jaundiced version of himself in the mirror?

Looks like he had a date with Paris Hilton
by Knobules
Nov 28th, 2007
08:50:17 AM
Whatever that means.
I like it
by Dasher
Nov 28th, 2007
09:07:29 AM
I was also kind of lukewarm on Heath as the Joker. This pic and some of the soundbites I've heard ("Starting tonight..") have started to convince me that he will nail this role.
THIS! IS! JOKER!
by jdl82
Nov 28th, 2007
09:29:19 AM
That, my friends, is what happens when tasteful realism is applied to the Batman universe. There aren't many comicbooks that translate well onto the big screen, but this one does. I'm not exactly sold on the clown pose he's in, but hey whatever. I can totally see him doing all of the horrible, terrible things he does in the comics. Let's just hope he makes it to movie three this time and isn't offed in his first encounter.
Villains who should never appear in a Nolan Bat-film
by jdl82
Nov 28th, 2007
09:34:55 AM
Mr. Freeze, Riddler, Clock King, Clayface, etc. Realism is going to sell this thing. And in the next film, I hope Batman actually gets to capture some actual American street thugs, like an inner-city gang leader or someone. BTW, why is it that none of his villains are ever African American?
might as well put my two cents in....
by RockLobster800
Nov 28th, 2007
09:35:02 AM
the way I reckon the Dark Knight should go (it wont, but hopefully it will be something better)...(inhale)so the Joker is this fear gas affected nutjob, who is doing the rounds with bank robberies and murder-he's got the same motif as Batman where he dresses like a clown cos they scare him, and he thinks dressing like an exceptionally nuts one will scare the crap out of people-while at the same time Bats and new friend Harvey Dent are being a real pain in Maroni's ass. So Maroni sends out for the Joker to take the two down-which he does, targeting Batman on the streets and Dent by getting closer to home by murdering Dents new love interest Rachel Dawes(leaving a trademark smile etched on her face)-however that also majorly pisses off Bats, Dent AND Maroni (just because the Jokers methods are causing so much chaos in Gotham)and so Batman eventually captures him and beats the shit out of him in an interrogation room, to Gordons dismay. Eventually Maroni has Mr. J broken out and accosts him for screwing up so badly, to which Joker casually murders Maroni and starts taking over mob activities. Meanwwhile Dent is in the midst of a stress induced break down, while Batman begins questioning his own methods on what is right and wrong-thats when the Joker decides to that bank robbery majigger we've heard aboot-sending the mob after Batman while he sets about throwing Gotham into project Mayhem styled anarchy (the other Batmen playing a part there). So by the films end Batman has managed to foil most of the Jokers schemes and has chased him across the city to a bomb rigged chemical plant. While in there the incredbly intelligent Joker has managed to get most of Bats armour off (not the mask, cos frankly he doesnt care who he really is, he's more intent on destroying the symbol) and is beating him up pretty badly. Then Dent arrives (having been following the progress of the chase on the tv and police radios) intent on flat out killing The Joker. He keeps threatening him with a gun, and Batman trys to talk him down (big speech about true justice etc), but while he does that the bombs start to go off and Joker gets away. Dent and Bats try to flee but as the chemicals and flames fly everywhere Dent gets horribly burnt on one side of his face. Batman is torn between rescuing his injured but still alive friend, or chasing down the Joker. He leaves and unconcious Dent outside (police ambulances on the way naturally) and goes back in for mr. J. He finds him near the chemical dumping tubes, leading out to the Gotham river. They fight and eventually due to the building being on fire Batman tells the Joker that the only way out is with him. Joker thinks "fuck it" and throws himself into the chemical reservoir leading out into the river. Batman escapes just in time. He and Gordon look on at the plant being put out, as they discuss the nigths events-Harveys in a stable condition in hospital but needs major surgery. Gordon reckons the Joker is definatly dead-Batman isnt so sure. Meanwhile we see Joker arrive back at his hideout, his remaining minions treating him. He looks in the mirror to see a horribly bleached/ burnt face and cant help but notice the irony of looking like a clown permanently-cue hysterical laughter. In the hospital Dent wakes up-hes pissed at Bats for not letting him kill the Joker, pissed he left him for dead (in his mind anyway) and then he sees his face- He throws the mirror at the wall, and cue credits!
Quick change?
by BigTexas42
Nov 28th, 2007
09:46:15 AM
Anyone see Quick Change with Bill Murry and Geena Davis and Geena Davis's breasts? One of the most underrated movies from the late 80's imho. That had a clown bank robber thing in it too. I'll die laughing if Heath Joker comments about how a watch has a moon on it. I say a news segment about some new skin bleaching cream that many black/brown people are using to look "whiter". I'm pretty sure Michal Jackson knows what I'm talkin about. ANyway, it was on the news because it is all toxic and stuff. Perhaps joker got his hands on some of that, thought it was makeup. So then the movie starts out as him putting on the clown makeup, but throughout the movie, his skin gets whiter and whiter. Pretty soon he can't dance or jump higher than a phone book, and his skin it the Joker white we all know and love. Eh? What say you, good Marcellus?
Its the kind of thing that has
by Nabster
Nov 28th, 2007
10:29:07 AM
to be seen in motion to be judged, only then can we judge the look of joker. Although, I wasn't a big fan of begins, didn't hate it, however, I did thing the action was poor. Batman Returns is still the best Batman to date.
ANNNNND the third film....
by RockLobster800
Nov 28th, 2007
10:32:10 AM
starts with Dent breaking out of hospital into the sewers...Batman is busy taking down "minor" crooks who have started becoming more flamboyant to capitalise on the Jokers impact-so you have slight freaks versus the mob story. The mob itself is in shambles and leaderless gang warfare is all over the city. Thats when we see that some are getting killed off, while the newly emerged Harvey Dent aka Two Face has come to them with the need for muscle-he's taking Gotham to his new sense of justice (the coin flip). He's got a personal vendetta agaisnt Batman, the mob and the Joker. Mr. J is also quite pissed at Batman for screwing up his plans and forcing him to escape into a vat of chemicals, which has turned him a really intensely freaky, scary guy. He's started to up his ante and is slowly rebuilding everything, employing the minor freaks to help him out. Batman starts his hunt for Dent, tries to keep and eye on the mob and now is slowly getting harassed by the Joker (mocking random acts of anarchy ,worse than those that came before,springing up with personal notes left for Batman). Meanwhile Bruce Wayne has caught the eye of a new socialite, Selina Kyle and they develop a love story. So Two Face is taking over the mob, Joker has an army of freaks to help him. The operations Joker are planning are so big he has certain people to help him-the most prominent being Edward Nashton (played by Sean Maher), a recently laid off games designer with a penchant for puzzles, who calls himself Edward Nygma. He starts co-planning Jokers minor city wide pranks which are notable as they really focus on riddles and intellectual ability. Eventually Two Face tracks down the Joker and offers him the chance to combine forces to destroy Batman and take over Gotham together. Mr. J accepts, all the while Batman is closing in. He tracks down Nygma and fiercely beats him for the Jokers whereabouts, which leaves Nygma with a severely pissed off atitude toward Batman. He manages to evade police capturing him, but the experience has left him driven now to set off after everyone who has oppressed him, Batman and his former boss, Lucius Fox. The final confrontation is distinctively Dark Victory-esque, as the extremely stressed Batman (questioning his own sanity)fights the Joker, having targeted him as his main priority. Dent steps in to intervene and Batman and Two Face finally face off. Two face, having killed off most of his enemies viciously through the film is no longer Harvey Dent and Bats finally realises he cant save his friend. Of course during the big moment Joker steps back in, shooting Dent , with a "Jesus when will this guy learn you cant trust me" kind of swagger,and sending him tumbling to his "death". Batman and the Joker have a big final fight, the two now established as complete mortal enemies and fianlly Batman beats him into submission, and sends him to Arkham. Once again he and Gordon lament over events,and sadly acknowledge to death of a friend toward their cause...and the fate of the Joker. Batman goes to visit him in Arkham, and the two establish a Will Graham/Hannibal Lector style relationship. In the final scenes we see Dent is actually alive, Edward Nygma has begun his harrasment of Gotham under a new guise-the Riddler, and Bruce begisn to admit he has feelings for Selena Kyle.
ricarleite
by ironic_name
Nov 28th, 2007
10:33:38 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =vBENAx50yt0

i thought maybe cesar romero, but i googled.. sorry.

"Feira da fruta HEY, feira da fruta HAA!"
by The Chosen
Nov 28th, 2007
11:03:58 AM
"Feira da fruta HEY, feira da fruta HAA!"
by The Chosen
Nov 28th, 2007
11:04:17 AM
Not the only brazillian in AICN
You doubting thomases have all noticed...
by playerhater
Nov 28th, 2007
11:07:36 AM
He's got the shoes on the wrong feet. Genius touch from an actor who is going to own this part come July!
Some people are unhappy with this?
by NomoredirtyjokespleaseweareYanks
Nov 28th, 2007
11:12:27 AM
I'll never work you wankers out.
Don't know if it's...
by DocPazuzu
Nov 28th, 2007
11:17:48 AM
...been mentioned yet, since I have the FUCKING WHITE SCREEN OF DEATH, but in that pic he looks like one of the Chiodo Bros' Killer Klowns - not that that's a bad thing.
Huge Batman Fan - Happy with how he looks BUT
by wilsonfisk89
Nov 28th, 2007
11:22:45 AM
The fact is, ideally we wouldnt see any stills, or anything of him until in the actual film. We would be shocked, awed, and made to feel like the fanboys we are, in short, we would be very happy. However, seeing him in this static, motionless medium is a little anticlimatic, and even though he looks fantastic, its not his best introduction.
DocPazuzu
by NomoredirtyjokespleaseweareYanks
Nov 28th, 2007
11:31:32 AM
Hell yeah he does. I fuckin love that terrible flick, and I could totally see Ledgers Fucked up clown in that mix.
Still...
by NomoredirtyjokespleaseweareYanks
Nov 28th, 2007
11:33:33 AM
I'd prefer a Sequel to the Citizen Kane of clown movies SHAKES THE CLOWN. "As soon as this shows over, he's gonna fuck that little dog."
Realistic?
by MC-909
Nov 28th, 2007
12:28:47 PM
Batman? Gritty, maybe. But realistic? Guys, he wears a cape and has pointy things on his head. Unless he's the emperor of Rome, I don't think "realistic" is the word you're looking for.

That is all.

He's squatting to take a dirt
by Abominable Snowcone
Nov 28th, 2007
12:29:54 PM
And that's why he smiling. Those socks have to go. And can't we get away from the purple and green look for the Joker? I don't read the comics anymore--does Joker really look that way in the 90s-00s? Leave the makeup the way it is and put him in a Hans Gruber armani suit if you want me to take him seriously.
We Need To See Him In A Trailer
by That 70s Venom
Nov 28th, 2007
12:38:55 PM
Before we can really say if he's up to snuff. All these static shots don't prove shit.
Hey Mostholy!
by Olee Starstone
Nov 28th, 2007
01:02:12 PM
Whats that film about - I'm not there... I just seriouslt doubt his acting credibility. But as for the picture, i think its great. I love the look of this new Joker. I loved Nicholson's too.
prestige gives me hope
by wilsonfisk89
Nov 28th, 2007
01:38:23 PM
i agree w 'i am batman', bb was average and mostly lackluster, cept for fear gas trippage, but viewing nolan's excellent 'the prestige' gives me hope for tdk. it was a much better film than bb, and i hope he carries that success over...
Creepy
by Cobbio
Nov 28th, 2007
01:41:00 PM
I like it.
I am Batman
by Olee Starstone
Nov 28th, 2007
02:15:51 PM
I am Batman Nov 28th, 2007 01:20:01 PM ''Something so pedestrian can cause so much glee. BEGINS was boring, forgettable, poorly-filmed AVERAGENESS.'' You are right, sir. Batman Begins was boring. I prefer Burton's work. It was niteresting to look at. Nolan isn't one for visuals. His Batsuit and villains were the worse designed of the entire series.
MC-909 you unintelligent cunt
by messi
Nov 28th, 2007
02:32:53 PM
you're thinking from this world, but put yourself in a world where superhero comics don't exist and a guy dresses as a bat and fights crime and is good at it, that is realistic. who says a dude wouldn't do that?
I am Batman you fail at life
by messi
Nov 28th, 2007
02:34:46 PM
kill yourself, stop annoying people with you being alive.
How many people ragging on Begins
by messi
Nov 28th, 2007
02:36:24 PM
Saw it more than once? If you have only seen it once then shut the fuck up because the second time you see the greatness.
Olee Starstone man you are fucked
by messi
Nov 28th, 2007
02:57:29 PM
you know fuck all about anything. burtons movies are incredibly dated. Begins looked like a detective comics arc. if you didn't like it, too bad because that's fucking batman.
Another version of the cover
by godmode
Nov 28th, 2007
02:58:10 PM
http://www.empireonline.com/he iscoming/
By "realisti" I mean...
by jdl82
Nov 28th, 2007
03:35:24 PM
I mean that they realistic explanations to absurdities (i.e., why he dresses up like a bat, how he gets his toys, etc.), and avoid situations that could never happen in a real-world environment (people who wear tights, villains who have obsessions with clowns and coincidentally fall into vats of chemicals that turn them into clowns).
Joker's past and present should be applauded.
by mrfan
Nov 28th, 2007
03:43:24 PM
It is a very hard character to do and I sure and hell wouldn't want to do it. Loved Romero and Nicholson in the part. Cannot wait for Ledger to strut his stuff onscreen. Looking forward to the movie. I think we are in for a good time.
I am batman
by odo19
Nov 28th, 2007
04:05:51 PM
Right..........exactly the same situation.
I am Batman = Loser
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 28th, 2007
04:20:05 PM

M-o-M
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Nov 28th, 2007
04:51:09 PM
You hit a nail "ON" its head.

It may be time to update your book of English colloquialisms.

Kripes...
by Organs
Nov 28th, 2007
05:12:23 PM
Look, each movie has its ups and downs and there's nothing wrong with disliking or liking any Batman movie. I loved Batman Begins, but I can admit its flaws. I didn't like how the fight scenes were shot, I thought it'd be cooler if Batman had to get by without a Batmobile and realized from experience that one was necessary, and I thought adding Rachel Dawes was contrived. Also, I think it would have been cool if Batman had a cloth getup without armor. Because it'd be cool to see him vulnerable. Because he actually does get stabbed and shot at in the comics and Alfred has to stitch him and bandage him to the point he looks like a war soldier from the trenches (which he sort of is, I guess). And for what it's worth, the Burton movie was more flawed than Nolan's, but it did a few things right and it is an enjoyable take on Batman all the same. You can tell because the movie has fans, therefore, it is enjoyable.
Ehh...
by Organs
Nov 28th, 2007
05:32:48 PM
I understand all of that, but it seems like a cop-out to me. With special effects, choreography, and every other technique available, the fight scenes could have been done in a different way and, in my opinion, been more effective.
It's just that Ledger's face doesnt look like the Joker.
by GibsonUSA
Nov 28th, 2007
05:34:17 PM
Yeah Joker has had various incarnations...but I think we all get pretty much the same general comic book image when the name "Joker" is mentioned...and he doesnt look it....find a skinny guy with a face like Jokers and makeup becomes less of a factor or complaint-worthy.
Memories-Of-Murder
by Organs
Nov 28th, 2007
05:52:28 PM
So, the lack of continuity of having a different actress play the same role isn't going to affect anything? They tried that in the third Matrix movie and it didn't fly then. It might have worked if Katie's replacement looked somewhat like her, but she won't, in spite of Maggie being the better actress.
Memories-Of-Murder
by Organs
Nov 28th, 2007
05:56:16 PM
So, because I have issues with the fight scenes in "Batman Begins", I'm a geek? Fine. Does that make me flawed for some reason? Remember, there's no absolute rule and Nolan isn't perfect. He did the best take on Batman thus far, but it's not the perfect work of art so many make it out to be. That said, it's still a great movie; I saw it three times in the theaters. But I don't have such a hard-on that I can't believe it could have been better in certain instances.
Hmm
by MickXII
Nov 28th, 2007
06:15:35 PM
Don't forget that the Joker is supposedly going to be in part 3 as well. Would we really see him in a cell without any kind of makeup? I find that hard to believe. That picture looks great, especially on the side of his face that has a slight smile. Batman Begins is one of the most rewatchable movies, in my opinion. Batman 89 does not hold up at all, except for the scenes with Batman. The talkbacks are ALWAYS like this for promo shots. Remember guys, we are only seeing what they want us to see. Bring on the trailer!
JOKER SAYS FUCK! WAV INSIDE
by spidermanfreak20
Nov 28th, 2007
07:11:39 PM
Holy shit the Joker says fuck! I too questioned the validity of this audio file but got it straight from the whysoerious.com website. Looking through the whysoserious website. Usually when you click the pic after "Only sensible way to live in this world is without rules." I expected to hear "Tonight your gonna break your one rule." But heard "You could fuck a diaper in this nonsense." Instead. I had to do a double back. I decided to record what I heard with Camtasia and sure enough the site changed it back. Keep in mind PG-13 allows one F word and it makes sense to give it to Joker. Youtube wont lemme upload says failed so i uploaded to my website http://www.tg3h.com/episodes/j okersaysfuck.wmv (make sure to unspace where neccesary)
sorry above link was my youtube wmv here is wav
by spidermanfreak20
Nov 28th, 2007
07:13:39 PM
http://www.tg3h.com/episodes/j okersaysfuck.wav
Tim Burton's newer "stuff"
by Err
Nov 28th, 2007
07:21:50 PM
Big Fish and Corpse Bride were excellent. Planet of the Apes was okay.
Effectively balancing villains...
by Err
Nov 28th, 2007
07:26:22 PM
Nolan was able to effectively balance Scarecrow, Falcone, and Ra's Al-Ghoul. I have high hopes that he can balance Joker, Maroni, a possible Scarecrow return, and the introduction of Two-Face.
One Rule mp3
by spidermanfreak20
Nov 28th, 2007
07:43:06 PM
http://assets.whysoserious.com /audio/onerule.mp3 That's where Diaper was JOEKR SAYS FUCK
Proof Joker says fuck.
by spidermanfreak20
Nov 28th, 2007
07:45:09 PM
http://assets.whysoserious.com /audio/diaper.mp3 SEE IT WORKS
Flek
by spidermanfreak20
Nov 28th, 2007
07:56:34 PM
http://www.flektor.com/webflek /view/_1196301266_109976_1492_ 0_1_001
I havemy doubts...
by Gatack2
Nov 28th, 2007
08:59:47 PM
I really shouldn't since I think common sense will prevail but I'm not sold on this dirty ass club kid look that the Joker has. Of course seeing him in action could change my mind but I'm a little hesitant on this one. http://tinyurl.com/27yr6q
Mystery Men II: Isn't Invisible Boy in a Wheelchair??
by Dr. Allison Cameron
Nov 28th, 2007
09:38:35 PM
But seriously. That rules
Really?
by Frankenbastard
Nov 28th, 2007
10:28:27 PM
Alright, that’s it! I’m tired of people saying that the Batman Begins universe is rooted in reality when you have men sword fighting on glaciers, a guy in a rubber bat suit, a rocket propelled car (hummer thing) that drives on rooftops, a guy in a rubber bat suit, a man that walks miles and I mean miles across frozen tundra, memory cloth that allows the hero to sprout hang glider type wings, a guy in a rubber bat suit, A massive make believe city that has a monorail going through it 20 stories high, Katie Holmes as a district attorney, a guy that shoots hallucinogenic gas in people’s faces, (although I’ve seen people in Walmart do it before) and my personal favorite a guy in a rubber bat suit. Yea Nolan did a good job with the material that he has access to and it skates around a more realistic universe than its predecessors did but it’s not like turning on the news and seeing it all play out for real (well as real as the news will allow) the way people are touting. So stop saying it’s based in reality because it’s taken from comic book reality which is where The Joker comes from so he shouldn’t look like any actor he should look like the fucking Joker. Oh yea, see you guys there opening day. Much love, Frankenbastard
Chris Nolan has nasty smoker's teeth
by Dokkalvar
Nov 28th, 2007
10:40:20 PM
Jesus, would it kill you to brush every once and awhile?
Got more records than the Kgb
by RichardWalker
Nov 29th, 2007
01:28:22 AM
Hillary clinton goes to mars
by RichardWalker
Nov 29th, 2007
01:29:23 AM
Remember the first Joker pic?
by cromwell1666
Nov 29th, 2007
02:38:50 AM
He looked so detatched and vacant. I thought a drastic interpretation was being created. I know Nolan will make a gret film, but I would've loved to see a character that was built around the mood of that first pic. No smiles. Long vacant stares. A mix of the deeply twisted and the uncomprehending.
FUCK YEAH!!!!....
by poeticwarriorII
Nov 29th, 2007
03:38:50 AM
Now all we need is ninja mazes and microwaves that do absolutely nothing to the bags of water standing next to them to make this as fucking stoopid as the first one!! FUCK YEAH!!!
MNG
by Lost Jarv
Nov 29th, 2007
04:25:15 AM
give up- I've told him repeatedly to stop using colloquilisms as it reduces his borderline English to gibberish, but he just doesn't listen.

He's like a retarded kid that won't stop rubbing shit in his own hair.

fuck a diaper?
by ironic_name
Nov 29th, 2007
05:21:53 AM
the joker is nuts.
Memories of Murder...
by Ghostball
Nov 29th, 2007
05:30:40 AM
You're pitching your two cents about a Batman film before it's even out on AICN, and you're NOT a geek? Lol! I think Nolan was brave in trying to come up with a new(ish)way of shooting fight scenes, something a bit less 'Wow' and a bit more nightmarish, whoozy and delirious - but it didn't work. As seen in Equilibrium, Bale is fully capapble of pulling off some killer choregraphed interpersonal obliteration, so let's see it. The last movie was great, but but people didn't pay their money to see Law and Order. Nolan had a Formula 1 Ferrari to work with and used it to deliver papers.
Watch Begins more than once before talking
by messi
Nov 29th, 2007
06:15:49 AM
I thought it was a good movie when i first saw it, the second time I saw it I was blown away. Then I saw what a brilliant movie it really was.
frankenbastard
by RockLobster800
Nov 29th, 2007
07:15:15 AM
oh come on lets be honest-at what point in batman did you see a guy in a ruber bat suit? Your just plain lieing.
frakenbastard
by dr sauch
Nov 29th, 2007
07:38:34 AM
what did you want the joker to look like? i mean, its going to be a movie about a fucking homicidal clown vs. a guy in a batsuit. it's retarded, but also one of the coolest superhero mythos ever. ledger will silence all naysayers. you are a gay homosexual, your mother is a whore, and i hate you.
Frankenbastard
by DannyOcean01
Nov 29th, 2007
09:14:24 AM
GIVE IT UP!!! We had the 'comic' Joker, and it didn't work. Nicholson was camp, stupidly kitschy and not one iota scary. You've been told by people in this TB that the pic is clearly taken from the police station where Joker gets slapped about so the make-up isn't going to be perfect, and boo hoo, you didn't get the exact hair, the exact suit to the exact measurements. Stop being such a stupid fanboy prick and accept these films will NEVER, EVER be exactly like the comics. Because a film isn't a bloody comic. They're two distinct mediums, and if you can't see that or if you're being nothing more than an annoying little troll then I pity you.
Joker . . .
by Thall_Joben
Nov 29th, 2007
09:39:36 AM
Let's wait and see, I hear Gary Oldman was raving about Heath's 'fearless performance'. As Gary can seriously act I'd say that's the best reason we have to be optimistic. It's a brave choice anyway you slice it. I hated the old Batflicks, every single one of them. Folks talk like they where so dark and moody - bullshit. David Fincher does dark and moody not Tim 'the cocaine clown' Burton. His directorial style feels like the work of a pathetic manic depressive teenager who's dad fucked of to the circus to get away from his adolescent whining. I swear if I see one more of his damn annoying (not to say repetitious) candy spirals I'll go fucking postal. Jack was way to fat as the joker, and that glued on smile looked dumb. Michael Keaton as the dark knight WTF!? Who okayed that? Danny Elfman has only written one score in his life, he just puts a different title at the top of the page. As for Joel Schumacher's neon rubberfest, childish brain-dead crap. I'll never forgive Tim for murdering the only chance we had for getting Planet of the Apes back in a serious way. It could have been so great with a decent 'grown up' director.
beatleju- um, frakenbastard!
by ironic_name
Nov 29th, 2007
10:29:16 AM
Jude Law did some great Joker-esque sneers in Slueth
by ODM
Nov 29th, 2007
12:21:47 PM
I'm sure Ledger will come through though.
This site needs an Enema
by NomoredirtyjokespleaseweareYanks
Nov 29th, 2007
12:27:10 PM
to clean out all the arseholes ehehehehe.....
Cesar Romero died for your sins...
by Frankenbastard
Nov 29th, 2007
12:53:27 PM
Hoo Hoo Ha HA! Dr Sauch thanks for at least having an opinion and for making me almost spit my morning coffee out, too funny. Gay homosexual is kind of redundant thought but then again so are my post and my mom would have to be a zombie whore ™ but that’s only after her ashes reassembled in an I don’t know, some sort of zombie whore ash molecular reassembly thingy machine. Now DannyOcean01, look kid and I am almost sure I’m old enough to call you kid, when I was a preteen watching the 76 King Kong I knew when the beast showed up that I wasn’t seeing King Kong. It had nothing to do with the fact that I wasn’t seeing what “I” wanted to see it’s that I wasn’t seeing what it was supposed to be on the screen. My whole talkback here isn’t about what “I” want to see it’s about the way things are supposed to be and that people settle for what’s handed to them. Make Hollywood work for our money, you know… do a little research. Years ago I was sitting in an office at Universal ( the black tower building kiddies) waiting for my meeting to begin. This guys office was fantastic, full of really great memorabilia he had a huge poster for Madman on his wall when he showed up we made small talk and I commented on the giant Madman poster, he said “yea we just got a script for that I think but I don’t know anything about the cartoon” and I thought hmm you don’t know what it is but you have a giant poster of it on your wall? My friend that is how the moving picture business works, they don’t give a shit because they know you don’t give a shit. It’s real easy, you go to someone like Rick Baker ask him if he’s available for the show and if he isn’t, maybe one of his staff could create a believable makeup and bingo you have the Joker. I have no doubt Heath is going to do an awesome job and Nolan has brought the best interpretation of this character to the digital screen. Although the horns and high water trunks are kind of fun on the old serial Batman. Yea, I see that the picture is in some sort of “facility” I don’t need a talk backer with a hard on to tell me that over and over but a retard could tell you this is a publicity picture taken totally out of context with the film and even possibly after they’ve wrapped the scene. You see, (since you seem new to the whole thing) they take these publicity photos to hand out to various publications, toy companies, websites, in an effort to get everyone on board and amped up about their upcoming product (that would be film). They stage the actors in all sorts of wacky poses so we can set them as desk tops or marvel at how good or bad they look. When did we have the comic book Joker? All I remember was Jack Nicholson acting like Jack Nicholson. I remember watching the Burton Batman and thinking why isn’t the guy in the flashback shooting sequence the Joker? Someone mentioned Fincher, man I’d love to see the guy make a Batman film. Last but not least, how dare someone point the Fanboy finger at me. Look man if you post on this site or even take the time to stop and read something on this site you are a “Fanboy”. I spend my time watching all manner of movie making and not just Sci Fi fantasy tripe, so please. Welcome to the fold brother. People aren’t afraid of opinions just the ones that pan out. PS: I just asked my 5 year old daughter if she thought that guy with the green hair on AICN looked like the Joker, she made a stink face and said “no”, closed the browser, pointed to a picture I have of The Man Who Laughs and said “Daddy, that’s the Joker”. Kids are so perceptive.
First hour of Burtons Batman was great
by Knobules
Nov 29th, 2007
01:05:34 PM
Then enter Kim Bassinger and her enless screaming. The circussy bs Burton likes to throw in got old fast also.
Burton and Apes
by Frankenbastard
Nov 29th, 2007
01:08:01 PM
Ahh that’s an easy one. You see Tim reluctantly accepted the Apes project in return for making a few films of his choosing. Namely Big Fish, Charlie and Sweeny Todd
APOLOGIES Correct Link
by spidermanfreak20
Nov 29th, 2007
01:34:54 PM
Whysoserious.com updated with a vault. They even have this mp3 if you use firebug to find it but (they must have took it down or wanted to test it then reveal it) so I put it in this video with the "One rule." http://www.tg3h.com/episodes/j okeronerule.wmv
Unspace and seriously AICN just allow links.
by spidermanfreak20
Nov 29th, 2007
01:36:54 PM
This is such a stupid flaw. Just fucking update your shitty design like digg.com's talkback and fucking allow url linking honestly its 2007 for heavens sake.
Memories-Of-Murder
by Thall_Joben
Nov 29th, 2007
02:27:21 PM
Ouch, interesting, I didn't know that. I still love the old flicks. When I think how they could've ramped up the emotional and action impact with a new version, instead of that pile of Borton balls. The possibilities for plotting were endless, what with all we now know about the genome , genetics etc, it could really have packed a punch. Russell Crowe wouldn't have made a bad successor to Heston, well let's face it anybody but Marky Mark!
SWEAR TO ME!!!
by zooch
Nov 29th, 2007
03:40:27 PM
Batman '89 AKA Burtonman sucked!
by zodiac1012
Nov 29th, 2007
03:48:31 PM
It was just another Tim Burton movie with Joker and Batman in it. People should stop comparing BB to Batman '89. Batman Begins was about Batman while Batman '89 was about Tim Burton and Jack Nicholson.
I agree with ya Memories...
by Frankenbastard
Nov 29th, 2007
04:30:04 PM
and not to tip my hand but trust me Tim bitched through that entire Apes production. But the part that hurt the most was when he was forced to tack on that ending, that horrible shitty ending. In my opinion though the guy pre redeemed himself years ago with Ed Wood and Sleepy Hallow.
New Joker Pic
by khaos751
Nov 29th, 2007
04:55:08 PM
from Wizard = http://tinyurl.com/33lmmu
Apparently Nolan should start over....
by CarmillaVonDoom
Nov 29th, 2007
05:32:02 PM
...seeing how Frankenbastard's 5-year old kid doesn't approve. :P
CarmillaVonDoom...
by Frankenbastard
Nov 29th, 2007
05:54:13 PM
LMAO! Thanks i deserved that.
Re: New Joker Pic
by jdl82
Nov 29th, 2007
06:13:57 PM
Blech. That's the worst image yet. And Wizard put it on their cover?? Wow.
Joker Re-Imaged As John Wayne Gacey, Eh? Works For Me!
by LaserPants
Nov 29th, 2007
06:52:23 PM
Loved Begins. Loving where this is going. Hope it turns out as good as it looks.

Recently, I've been reading alot more DC books, and realized that Batman is really almost completely out of place with the rest of the DCU. More or less all the other heavy hitters -- Supes, the Lanterns, Martian Manhunter, et al -- are all big deal super powerful superbeings. Whereas Batman is really just a regular human being in peak condition, a ninja, and a detective. The more I read of the DCU, the more I'm convinced that Batman should be written as if he is completely separate from the large DCU. Anyone else feel this? Just curious.
Wizard cover
by MickXII
Nov 29th, 2007
07:00:33 PM
I like that Wizard cover shot a lot. I watched "The Laughing Fish" last night from the animated series and the Joker is just perfect in it. This shot reminds me of that.
that Wizard cover
by zooch
Nov 29th, 2007
07:01:46 PM
it looks like his face is starting to deteriorate...possibly from the chemical spill?
Does this Joker ever smile?
by zooch
Nov 29th, 2007
07:06:47 PM
Joker smiling...
by MickXII
Nov 29th, 2007
07:13:45 PM
.. is the money shot, they aren't ready to to give that up quite yet.
The makeup deteriorates...
by khaos751
Nov 29th, 2007
07:17:38 PM
...as the film goes on. I believe he starts with a full white face, but as the film progresses, and the Joker sweats, fights, etc., the makeup starts to come off. You can see in some of the pics in this link (http://tinyurl.com/2rf3k2) that he does have the full white face at one point.
Let Ledger have his shot at it...
by Uncle Salty Walt
Nov 29th, 2007
08:52:14 PM
I didn't exactly buy Christian Bale as a suitable Batman before I actually saw "Batman Begins", but he was pretty impressive. Everyone expects something different, but how about waiting to actually see the damn flick before judging it? Face it- even you haters will plunk down 10 bucks for admission when next summer comes along.
I like his socks.
by buffywrestling
Nov 29th, 2007
09:59:04 PM
Are those argyle?
Ledger will never compare to this guy
by RichardWalker
Nov 29th, 2007
11:18:41 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0JK PNdcWsAk Probably the most honest portrayal of what the Joker is, was, and always should be.
Glad I'm keeping an open mind.
by Super Joker
Nov 30th, 2007
06:56:25 AM
I'm just very glad I have an open mind on this, and will almost certainly enjoy this film, just as much as I enjoyed Begins, Burtons two films and the incredible Bruce Timm Animated Series' and the hilarious Adam West adaptations. I'll also slightly relish with Joker-like glee that half of you miserable narrow minded nay-sayers are going to be crying into your bucket of popcorn over the fact a "mere", "unworthy" "gay cowboy" and "pretty boy" is playing the Joker while you grasp desperately for your masculinity by masturbating over Poison Ivy pictures. Hopefully one day you'll realise that these are adaptations and that YOUR version of what you deem as "definitive" probably won't happen, because nobody fucking agrees (and therin lies the beauty of it all). For all those that believe Ledger is no more worthy than Nicholson or any of those cosplaying muppets on youtube; shove your "definitive" suggestions of The Joker up your own arse, I've never seen such an exhibition of such ridiculous self-entitlement. "It should be this guy" "No it should be him" "It can't be this guy", "It should be more camp" It should be realistic" Please, do go hang yourselves. Who gives a f*ck? Why the pessimism? Can't you people just hope instead of living oh so very successfully up to the typical angry-comic-nerd stereotype? I hope it's a great film. I think it'll be great. I hope those that have an open mind and a sense of interpretation enjoy it too :)
New Pic from Wizard that was posted...
by BLEST
Nov 30th, 2007
01:40:16 PM
is the top story on SHH.com. I sent it in here, but have seen nothing of it. An interesting pic, kinda goofy. But sadly, no mention of it yet.
Re: Super Joker
by jdl82
Dec 1st, 2007
01:32:15 AM
I agree entirely. And to be honest, I have little doubt that this film will present the most faithful adaptation possible in a realistic setting.

Incidentally, I myself played the Joker once. When the first TDK publicity site came online, I was the one who quickly made a MySpace page with that same page title as my URL and set up a Joker page. For those of you who don't remember it, it was the one that featured the song "Mr. Sandman" in the background, a red smiley face for a photo, and daily blog entries that, honestly, I had to stop writing after only a few days because they were starting to affect my personality negatively when I had difficulty separting myself from the character himself.

Having said that, I was amused when I later heard that Ledger was writing a Joker journal of his own to help him get into the part. However, I find myself concerned about his state of mind. I had to quit and remove the MySpace site after only about a week for the aforementioned reasons. I wonder how he's dealing with it, now after several months.

Re: Super Joker
by jdl82
Dec 1st, 2007
01:32:41 AM
I agree entirely. And to be honest, I have little doubt that this film will present the most faithful adaptation possible in a realistic setting.

Incidentally, I myself played the Joker once. When the first TDK publicity site came online, I was the one who quickly made a MySpace page with that same page title as my URL and set up a Joker page. For those of you who don't remember it, it was the one that featured the song "Mr. Sandman" in the background, a red smiley face for a photo, and daily blog entries that, honestly, I had to stop writing after only a few days because they were starting to affect my personality negatively when I had difficulty separting myself from the character himself.

Having said that, I was amused when I later heard that Ledger was writing a Joker journal of his own to help him get into the part. However, I find myself concerned about his state of mind. I had to quit and remove the MySpace site after only about a week for the aforementioned reasons. I wonder how he's dealing with it, now after several months.

Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.