Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

First?
by Wed Vid Guy
Nov 12th, 2007
06:27:40 PM
First?
Woot!
by Wed Vid Guy
Nov 12th, 2007
06:28:06 PM
First!
Here come the Cylons
by MeshGearFoxx
Nov 12th, 2007
06:30:26 PM
if that don't scare management, nothing will BTW that's a pansy First. You don't post First?, you post First!.
Woot?
by -guyinthebackrow
Nov 12th, 2007
06:30:40 PM
What the fuck is "Woot"? Is that some interweb acronym I don't know about?
I have Jabba the Hutt fantasies about Katie Sackhoff
by Sick Fixx
Nov 12th, 2007
06:32:42 PM
Soon she will learn to appreciate me. :licks her:
Christ I hope this strike ends soon
by Charlie Murphy
Nov 12th, 2007
06:43:52 PM
when there were first rumblings of a strike, i was like "this'll blow over after a few days" but now i'm getting pretty fuckin antsy. only nine Pushing Daisies? 10 to 12 Supernaturals? no 24? delayed Lost? Jesus H Christ, this is too much! not to mention some on the bubble shows may have to get the axe... i'm talking Chuck, Reaper, Journeyman, Moonlight... and shit, if the writers can strike over this kind of stuff, what's stopping the actors from doing the exact same thing? do they get compensated for stuff writers don't? anyway, it's nice to see everyone rallying behind these writers, i'd like to be a writer one day, but as a big time tv fan that watches at least two programs every night of the week except saturday, i'd like to see this strike end as swiftly as possible.
A Buffy Day?!? You're killing me...
by tonagan
Nov 12th, 2007
06:45:05 PM
just killing me.
guyinthebackrow
by spacechampion
Nov 12th, 2007
06:45:32 PM
Yes, WOOT is an acronyn meaning WithOut Obvious Testacles.
Buffy?
by phaedrus007
Nov 12th, 2007
06:48:46 PM
And what, no Automan fans joining in? Slackers.
I'm marching in supporting of the out-of-work caterers
by chrth
Nov 12th, 2007
06:52:50 PM
and key grips. It'll be the "Blue Collar Flunkies Adversely Affected By White Collar Salaried Professionals March", or BCFAABWCSPM.
Ohhhkay, ENOUGH.
by CatVutt
Nov 12th, 2007
07:00:15 PM
I'm on the side of the writers. I really am. But what are the odds they'd be getting in line to, say, picket some factory in Detroit. Or the stagehands that walked out on Broadway. Nope, sorry, drawing the line here. Writers, more power to you. Seriously. You should ABSOLUTELY stand up for what you think is fair, negotiate any way you feel is necessary to ensure your livelihood. I get that, and we should all have that same right, whether it's to negotiate our own salaries or contracts, or work-for-hire, or whatever. But it's your fight, not ours. Fans, guys, the best way to help is to simply NOT watch whatever reality show crap and reruns the networks throw at us. But you don't need to be down there. This is what the union is for.
Stop siding with the writers
by Sick Fixx
Nov 12th, 2007
07:11:23 PM
Can't you see they don't give a shit about us? If they did, they wouldn't be holding their art hostage like this. If they truly cared about their storytelling, they wouldn't be striking.
Yes, all art should be done for free with no pay
by Siguy
Nov 12th, 2007
07:14:52 PM
And the corporations should make billions on it!

Pretty high standard, don't you think? Why not just ask everyone to work for free, out of the love of their work.
I find it suspect that
by Sick Fixx
Nov 12th, 2007
07:14:53 PM
Hugh Laurie has been oddly silent about his stance on this strike, considering House is one of the many shows affected.
Siguy
by Sick Fixx
Nov 12th, 2007
07:15:45 PM
What does that have to do with us? They're depriving us of our favorite shows over a private matter.
Good on you Herc!
by buffywrestling
Nov 12th, 2007
07:27:25 PM
I'm there in spirt. Did you get to see/talk to Joss?
I SUPPORT THE WRITERS ON THIS ONE.
by Pound Sand
Nov 12th, 2007
08:00:08 PM
The show, I'm lukewarm on.
"private matter?"
by insane_asylum_messiah
Nov 12th, 2007
08:03:42 PM
Since when is getting paid for your work a private matter? What do you make or do or work at, Sick Fixx? Can I have it? For free? For ever?
Did the writers blow the roof off the Nakatomi building?
by MrMysteryGuest
Nov 12th, 2007
08:15:04 PM
And did John McClane kill 'em all?
I'm sorry, I didn't realize the writers worked for free
by chrth
Nov 12th, 2007
08:15:41 PM
Oh wait, they don't. They already get paid. They're arguing for more money, and putting people who don't receive weekly residual checks out of work.
Thank you, chrth
by Sick Fixx
Nov 12th, 2007
08:48:19 PM
Good to see not everyone has sided with the 'artists' just because they're 'anti-corporate'. I'm anti-corporate too, but I'm insulted by this shit. I worked an 11 hour shift the other day and dehydrated myself, but kept on working. And yes, I got paid, but not as much as they get paid. I have NEVER asked for a raise. I EARN my raises.
My point is
by Sick Fixx
Nov 12th, 2007
08:49:51 PM
They insult the working class people. They should all have second jobs if they're not going to be working all year long like the rest of us. I know a guy who has THREE jobs. Time for them to check back in to reality. Suffering creates better art anyway.
A question for herc
by NudeandAroused
Nov 12th, 2007
09:04:17 PM
What are you hearing for the duration of this strike? Sooner, later, or way later? Either way, the writers are right and I am glad I signed the petition.
I don't want to argue.
by CatVutt
Nov 12th, 2007
09:23:26 PM
But I've made tons of money, and I've made very little money. The suits will take you for WHATEVER THEY CAN GET. Everytime. It's not at all about what anybody is WORTH. No Baseball player, no Hollywood actor is 'worth' any dollar amount. It's distribution of what is THERE. The writers are striking because they think that what is THERE is not going equitably to THEM. That's all it is. If anybody was actually paid what they were WORTH in this country, a hell of a lot of our school teachers would be fucking millionaires. But that just aint the way it works. This is just your basic negotiation crap, folks. The writers have every right to say 'we don't want to do business this way' just like you have the right to ask for a raise and threaten to walk if you don't get it. Yes, I know the union makes it more complicated than that because it's en masse, but that's basically it. But I totally agree with anybody who thinks 'fans' should be out on the goddamned line. That's patently ri-goddamn-diculous.
I botched that last part.
by CatVutt
Nov 12th, 2007
09:25:05 PM
Should've said 'I totally agree with anybody who think 'fans' should NOT be out on the goddamned line.'
No, they are NOT getting paid...
by insane_asylum_messiah
Nov 12th, 2007
09:38:23 PM
...for their work when its shown on the internet. Its like saying, hey, if you make something, and I sell it in THIS store, I'll pay you. But if I sell it in this OTHER store, I won't. Oh, and by the way, I'm probably gonna close that first store soon, and I'm only gonna sell your shit in that other store...the one you don't get paid in.
it about not getting screwed...
by animebigboy
Nov 12th, 2007
11:08:18 PM
all of ur favorite shows are ur favorites in a large part, because of the writers. screwed writers are unhappy writers, are lazy writers, and are controlable writers and that means bad shows and bad movies. if they need to pull back the creative tit to work out the balance between money and art then for the sake of stronger work later than i am for it. and before someone uses the excuse that most tv/film writing sucks keep in mind that the 10% that is good is done by good writers who do it despite getting screwed.
Do you hear the people sing, singing the songs of angry men?
by snowpuff
Nov 13th, 2007
12:20:49 AM
I completely agree with the writers in principle, but I think their tactics are horribly wrong. Their piety is amusing but completely undermines their cause. This isn't fucking Les Miserables. The writers really DO think they are the center of the universe and this is some righteous cause.

It isn't. It's a contract dispute.
PS to Herc
by snowpuff
Nov 13th, 2007
12:23:25 AM
I did not mean to imply that Joss Whedon is not the center of the universe.

Sincerely,
Snowpuff
Striking isn't the answer
by CeejayNightwing
Nov 13th, 2007
01:00:10 AM
All this strike does is get the additional crew laid off and penniless while the writers still get their loyalties etc from thier previous deals. Union reps get paid, Actors get paid but the rest of the crew members are treated as cannon fodder in this crap. It takes more than just a writer to make a show and when one faction goes on strike the rest suffer. I think when this strike is over, the lighting guys should goe on strike for a month, then the catering guys for a month, then the make-up artists, SFX guys etc just to show these idiots that it takes a combined effort to make a show for the studios and the fact the writers don't get paid extra for internet broadcasts is something for them to renegotiate with in the conditioning of future contracts. Right now they should stick to what they signed up for and keep the show on the road for everyones sake, the selfish bastards!
support the writers after Season3?
by SantiagoAtez
Nov 13th, 2007
01:10:50 AM
Shouldn't we be asking for several hours of life back?
Proof that some fans are indeed idiots
by IAmMrMonkey!
Nov 13th, 2007
02:12:25 AM
I'm also with the writers here. I understand what they're trying to do but, CatVutt is right - this is not their fight. Why the hell are they getting involved other than to get together and sing songs from "Once More With Feeling" together. If the government threatened to shut down a hospital I wouldn't expect to see the fans of Doctor Who protesting outside. This is plainly ridiculous.
so say we all Muthaf%*#@#
by ewokstew
Nov 13th, 2007
02:16:14 AM
Wait
by ewokstew
Nov 13th, 2007
02:17:12 AM
Sam Jackson was in Star Wars not Galactica
by ewokstew
Nov 13th, 2007
02:18:10 AM
Writers: Try getting a real job
by FlandersBum
Nov 13th, 2007
02:34:50 AM
I have zero symphathy for the writers. Sorry, just don't. Sitting in front of a word processor all day is hardly a demanding or taxing job. Toughest part of the strike for them is deciding on whether to drive the porche or the corvette to the picket lines.
makes ya wonder..
by theonecalledshoe
Nov 13th, 2007
02:49:06 AM
Is it the special effects or writing that makes shows anymore? Just an observation. Hopefully Eureka is going pretty strong in the ratings dept. ...and writing is overated nuff said.
Man I wish we still had proper unions in the uk
by Reelheed
Nov 13th, 2007
03:41:05 AM
Sucks to be freelance here...
I am astounded.
by buffywrestling
Nov 13th, 2007
05:07:44 AM
Flabbergasted.

Chrth, I have always enjoyed your posts, especially from the "Heroes" TBs (Last season I participated but this year I wasn't interested enough and I tried not to be so negative to come on here and bitch about it.)

I honestly would have thought from reading your in depth fan sight into the episodes - and they have been eye opening to me, at least - that you would have had more appreciation for the people who crafted the stories.

I worked as a 2nd asst camera (had a union), then as I got older and I couldn't hustle as well as I used to, so I went in for MUFX (a different union). I have had on and off jobs outside of the business to make ends meet. But the people who write *give* me my jobs. I depend on them to give me something to create, to try to excel at and to be a part of a team. The end of a shoot is an accomplishment - big or small. And when the studios take advantage of the accomplishments of one sector, it takes advantage of us all.

PS: Snowpuff makes me smile. Sincerely.Ï

Have a read!
by buffywrestling
Nov 13th, 2007
05:53:22 AM
http://preview.tinyurl.com/2tw 8oq

Especially you Sick Fixx, because artists suffer for you, you sick bastard.+

HOW ABOUT SUPPORTING THOSE BELOW THE LINE?
by Babba-Booey
Nov 13th, 2007
07:20:59 AM
SCREW THE UNIONS!
Below the line?
by buffywrestling
Nov 13th, 2007
08:11:18 AM
How far does "below the line" incompass? Because I see people that have their own unions in every part of the industry supporting the strike. Everyone wants to get paid - the writers just had the unfortunate luck of being "First!!" SAG is next, then Directors and then....Well, if and when it gets to that point.....I hear there are a good novelists out there.
RE: FlandersBum
by Real Deal
Nov 13th, 2007
09:01:10 AM
Can you write a TV show well? Or at all? I'm going to go out on a limb here and say NO!
sick fixx, you ignorant slut
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 13th, 2007
09:07:46 AM
really, they insult the working class people?

i have 2 good friends who are writers, and they do have 2nd jobs even when they are writing. this myth that all writers are living a luxurious lifestyle is bullshit.

since when did asking for more money mean that it isn't deserved or earned?

i'm working class, and have asked for several raises, and received most of them (in addition to raises and promotions i didn't ask for)

so you are anti-corporate, but you are all for the studios making more profits off of dvd's and online content and keeping it all to them selves. i suppose you support big oil as well?

also, if you worked an 11 hour shift and dehydrated yourself, you have just proven what a complete and utter moron you really are. it's called a "water bottle" dipshit. if you really don't know how to keep yourself hydrated, maybe you should stop working the french fry bins and stick to cleaning the bathrooms

and lastly, FUCKING WAAAAAAHHH, I CAN'T WATCH TV CAUSE THE WRITERS ARE ON STRIKE!!!!! (fortunately for you, gay porn doesnt require writing)

RAZOR last night
by PVIII
Nov 13th, 2007
09:42:53 AM
was amazing. BSG holds up amazingly well on the the big screen and even my girlfriend who makes fun of me for watching all this geeky shit really liked it. RDM mom was there too.
Flandersbum:real job?
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 13th, 2007
10:58:34 AM
i dare you to come out to l.a. and try to make it in any job in the entertainment industry (hell, i dare you to come out here doing whatever it is you do and be successful)

you'll be in front of manns chinese in a beat up spiderman costume, begging for handouts within 2 months. by month 4 you'll be giving handjobs in the 3rd stall of the greyhound station downtown.

you couldn't write a limmerick on the back of a toilet stall door, much less write a seasons worth of episodes.

you're bitterness towards people who attempt to make a living being creative is transparent.

what creative field did you fail at/never even attempt to pursue?

Couldn't go ONE post without mentioning Buffy.
by ZeroCorpse
Nov 13th, 2007
12:37:18 PM
You're an addict, Herc. Seek help.
Saw RAZOR last night as well
by ewokstew
Nov 13th, 2007
12:54:27 PM
Very well done. Can't wait for the extended DVD version in December. It always bothers me though how stuff shot for TV never holds up on the big screen resolution wise. It wasn't distracting enough to make it a bad experience, but it was distracting at times. They should have shot that sucker in 4K if they couldn't use film, but, the again, the main venue wasn't suppose to be the movie theatre.
Sick Fixx - Wrong on two counts!
by spud mcspud
Nov 13th, 2007
02:44:13 PM
(1) If you did something at work that your boss got paid for over and over again, that he was incapable of doing alone and that you created from start to finish, and he just kept on getting paid for your one piece of work year after year, you'd probably wonder how come you only got paid once and he got paid over and over again, right? I fucking would.

But I knew I couldn't trust your judgment from the moment you said you'd lick Katie Sackhoff. Come ON! She's a MAN, baby!

To those who don't support the writers
by spud mcspud
Nov 13th, 2007
02:50:09 PM
At least fucking understand the argument they have. It's not that they are arguing about whether or not the stuff they write should generate constant revenue - it already fucking does!! The question is - if you wrote a fucking pilot, it gets made, the pilot is turned into a series, the series does well, fucking shitloads of money comes pouring in, you get your residuals -- and then the studio keeps all your money as the series is now only shown on the internet and your contract doesn't allow you payment for net streaming shows - you're telling me THAT's fair? What fucking work exactly do the exces at the studios do then? Because if writing was so fucking easy, THEY'D be doing it and cutting out the middle men, which happen to be the people who create EVERYTHING you see!

Writers are the creative force behind everything in entertainment. An actor without a script is just a body on a stage. A director with no script is unemployed. A cameraman with no script has nothing to shoot. A crafts person with no show to cook for is out of work and shit out of luck. EVERYTHING begins with SOMETHING to shoot, and that is - THE SCRIPT!!!

Damn, but there's some thick fuckers on this TB tonight. Up and at 'em!!!

Sick Fixx
by spud mcspud
Nov 13th, 2007
02:50:49 PM
(2) Sackhoff is a MAN, baby!
insane-asylum-messiah
by spud mcspud
Nov 13th, 2007
02:53:26 PM
Couldn't have put it better myself. I tried, mind you.
the AVERAGE Writer makes $200,000.00 a year...
by Drknight09
Nov 13th, 2007
03:14:14 PM
Kinda hard to feel sorry for the writers when they make that much money...
i second spud mcspud
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 13th, 2007
03:14:26 PM
you can take a great script and make a shitty movie, but you can't take a shitty script and make a great movie

i love reading these cry baby posts about how people are being "robbed" cause there won't be new tv shows for a while

BOO-FUCKING-HOO! read a fucking book, do voluteer work for habitat for humanity, interact with other human beings!(actually, ix-nay on that last one...that could be a scary proposition... maybe just spend more time playing 'second life')

if no new tv is the worst thing in your life, you've got it pretty fucking good

i dont sympathise with writers
by aestheticity
Nov 13th, 2007
03:31:59 PM
ten times their own number out of work because of their decision to strike over an issue that doesnt even exist right now. all this talk of digital profits. id really love to get a studio exec in a chair with a pair of pliers and have him tell me exactly how much they make from new distribution methods. because from what i can see its squat. people still watch tv, thats the end of it. i know noone who uses an ipod or buys episodes online. i know plenty who pirate the shit illegally via bittorrent. theyre all saying theyre striking for the next generation of writers - how about leaving them to do it themselves when the time actually comes to call for their share of the profits. and their lower paid colleagues will still get shafted. an entire section of the entertainment industry with a complete lack of grounding in reality over other people less fortunate than thems situations and the consequences of their own actions.
Drknight09
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 13th, 2007
03:40:25 PM
the issue isn't how much the average writer makes a year, the issue is how much the studios make off that writers end product and how much of that profit actually makes it back to the writers.

it's hard for me to feel sorry for the studio execs making multi-millions per year

so there should be a residual cap for the writers, but no profit cap for the studios? interesting... interesting... retarded logic, but interesting...

I support a writers raise, but I also don't think fans should ge
by Novaman5000
Nov 13th, 2007
03:49:16 PM
involved. It's sort of ridiculous, isn't it? The writers are actively withholding (and possibly killing) the fan's favorite shows, and then have the balls to say "come on out and march with us!"
drknight09, do a little research
by oisin5199
Nov 13th, 2007
03:49:46 PM
and learn math. Like how to subtract about 160,000 dollars. Only the top percentile of WGA writers make that much money. If you've been paying attention, you'd know that the average WGA writer is a working schlepp who doesn't make a lot of money, is not guaranteed steady employment (with a very high unemployment rate), and is getting screwed by the studios. This is all about residuals, everyone. It's not about 'more money.' If the studios don't make money, neither do the writers (or anyone else). But if the studios do make money, so should the people that create the material that made the money. Think about it - residuals are what help creative folk pay the bills when they're not on a gig. These used to come from syndication and repeats, a system that is steadily going away with the rise of new media. And the studios are saying that they refuse to pay writers (and crew, directors and actors, mind you) for work that is shown on the internet, an increasingly common platform for these writers' work. Studios get advertising money for these online broadcasts. So they do make money. Just ask Ron Moore about the whole BSG 'webisode' fiasco. When he tried to pull the plug because the studio wouldn't pay anybody, they actually demanded that he turn over the footage. This is as simple as greedy studios screwing over creative folk and refusing to budge on very basic economic concepts. And I can't believe people here are still arguing about. I agree with the person who said, go read a book. You can't have 24 this year. So sad. These people are trying to make a living. I really hope that this forces a paradigm change in Hollywood. I'm not holding my breath. But this is going to affect more than just the writers - it's going to influence what the directors get (DGA) and what the actors get as well (SAG). I do hope it gets resolved so that Joss can start making Dollhouse. Yes, I said 'Joss'! Whedon!!! eat it, zerocorpse.
did we just travel back in time
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 13th, 2007
03:54:47 PM
to the 30's and 40's? what the fuck?

why not lay the foundation now for future generations?

the licensing and merchandise for the three stooges makes millions a year, and the stooges and their heirs see jack shit of that- all because back in the 30's and 40's the studios basically forced artists to sign contracts (without representation) that signed away all of their future rights.

i suppose the civil rights leaders in the 60's should have just shut up and let the future generations fight for themselves?

the studios are equally if not more responsible for this strike than the writers are- but that is somehow irrelevant?

and since when were strikes supposed to be convienient for everyone? a strike with no adverse consequences is basically a coffee break...

drknight - 200k, really
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 13th, 2007
04:00:14 PM
how far up your ass did you have to go to pull that number?

did you wave to your head as you passed it?

check out Lindelof's NYT piece
by oisin5199
Nov 13th, 2007
04:21:13 PM
http://tinyurl.com/28o2z3
Just hurts us in the end
by Silv
Nov 13th, 2007
05:38:58 PM
Not saying I'm for or against the strike, but you guys do realize that if the writers get their way, it will result in higher ticket and DVD prices for us, right?
Glad I'm not the only one
by bismarckf
Nov 13th, 2007
06:20:39 PM
who thought Flandersbum is full of it. I don't even know you, but I can guarantee that you can't write. At least, not a screenplay or a teleplay.
CHANGE
by Frank Black
Nov 13th, 2007
07:00:20 PM
I've said this so many times and I will say it again! It is a new age and the artist can have control over their art, and the answer is simply not to go through these corporate studios anymore. Oh but you need the studio's money to make your expensive serial? Ah! Is that the rub? We would have no Lost or Battlestar Galactica without the studios to foot the bill? F*ck this! I read the Lindelof NYT piece and thought it was good and reasonable but he made another important point which is soon our widescreen tv's will be computers and we will be watching the internet instead of network television. We need to stop watching network television because we have given these studios too much power! F*CK THEM ALL! Seriously, and I see this knowing that tv has rarely ever been as good as it has gotten lately. My point is that the formula has gotten old and I am sick of watching commercials and sick of being at the whim of studios who cancel new shows before they have a chance to breathe. TV shows are serialized movies and movie makers and creative people need to stop going through the networks and studios if they want to control their work. My friend and I have talked about producing our own show and selling it straight to DVD without commercials and who would own the rights and have access to the profits then? Yup, us! Like Radiohead and many other musicians who are tired of sharing profits with corporations who don't work for their money, storytellers with an independent spirit don't need networks and studios anymore. Imagine a low budget show like Lost being released every year on DVD instead of airing on network tv. I didn't even watch the first season of Lost on tv but bought the DVD when it came out and watched it in a week. Like it or not, we the viewer are going to control our destiny and there is too much great entertainment and too little time and we are too poor to afford everything so we are going to be very selective. If this strike means things change and even perhaps the absolute death of Hollywood than it is a wonderful thing because things need to change. The way things are rated need to change, the way we watch things need to change (when commercials start including nudity or lesbians making out I'll watch them but never again will I watch a commercial when they are not a part of the story I am watching.) Watching Battlestar Galactica Razor last night on the big screen without commercials only made it more obvious that a show of such quality needs to be seen without interruption. Writers take the money you have made and start your own studios and make your own products. If the artists, writers, directors and everyone else involved teamed up they wouldn't need the studios. There is no excuse to use them anymore other than for the fact that they have a monopoly and stranglehold on how things are distributed. I challenge people like Lindelof to make a tv show independent of the studios and stream it and sell it direct online without any studio involvement. I have my credit card in my hand and am waiting. I would pay $100 a season of Lost not to have to play these waiting games with the studio and these delays and half seasons they have subjected us to. Imagine Veronica Mars beyond network tv and resolutions to your favorite shows that are canceled without a warning. People are lazy, short-sighted and so stuck in their ways that they believe that there is no other way than to sit in front of our tvs and wait to be spoon fed and I know for a fact it isn't true. At 37 I would rather play XBox, surf the net, read, and watch my favorite shows on DVDs I have legally purchased than ever sit through another network aired show. Having moved to the West Coast from NYC, all I have to say about Hollywood is that I have seen it with my own eyes and there is more greed than a love of cinema or great entertainment going on out here and it is heartbreaking and sickening! Hollywood is a cesspool and the corporate studios can kiss my ass before I am ever a slave to their programming again and the writers should empower themselves and walk away! Us fans will support you with our money and energy. I would rather watch a show produced by a bunch of midwestern film buffs these days anyway. It can be done. It will be done and everything will change. I could produce a show (mini-series or 8 episode show on no money with nudity, violence and whatever I wanted and not have to submit it to any ratings board, sell it through my web site and share the profits with the group involved and the studio wouldn't get a dime! No studios! Yes, the unions make sure that health insurance is available for these artists and perhaps they would make less money, but maybe they would make more. It is a different world. I wish the writers the best because I want my shows like Lost and Battlestar Galactica but for all of the shows ruined by studios like Twin Peaks and Millennium I hope the big studios fall to their deaths and smaller, more reasonable operations spring up! This country needs change and it is time to take action and stop fearing it.
tell it Frank Black!
by oisin5199
Nov 13th, 2007
07:45:08 PM
I hear you. We can dream. Hey, can you get me a date with Kim Deal?
oisin5199
by Frank Black
Nov 13th, 2007
09:24:37 PM
Kim Deal would love to go out on a date with you! She just doesn't know it yet!
OK Two Things
by Colier Rannd
Nov 13th, 2007
09:35:40 PM
One, if you don't see that what the writers are going to do is set precedent so all can get their fair share you're blind. Support the writers not because of some erroneous information that the average makes $200k/year. Support them because when they get their share at the end of this thing, then actors, directors and even teamsters will get theirs. And side note: Do you think any of the execs your supporting will be coming to strike for you either? When they are recieving bonuses of several million dollars? Don't think so. Also I did a search on the site and couldn't find one but I hear that Jason Voorhees is making an appearance on "Supernatural". Here's the URL. http://tinyurl.com/34ye6t
What can you say about a society...
by Premiere Warlord Bush
Nov 13th, 2007
10:20:22 PM
...That takes to the streets by the thousands when Battlestar Galactica is threatened; but cannot be roused to protest corruption and incompetence in it's government.
Oh, but that's different, Warlord Bush . . .
by gruntybear
Nov 13th, 2007
10:51:37 PM
. . . We mustn't criticize our current theocracy, because then the terrorists might win and freedom would be forfeit and the childrens might suffer an ounce of inconvenience. * ROLLS EYES AS FUCKING LOUDLY AS HE POSSIBLY CAN *
That's a really good point Premiere Warlord Bush
by IAmMrMonkey!
Nov 14th, 2007
12:49:47 AM
I hadn't actually thought of that.
irrelevntelefantwhateverthefuck
by Sick Fixx
Nov 14th, 2007
01:24:12 AM
It's not stupid. I'm unstoppable. I just keep going, baby. I don't stop. Dehydration can't stop me. Flat, swollen, bruised feet can't stop me. NOTHING can stop me!!! That's all I know how to do, irrelevntelefant! Baby, I JUST WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN!!!!
Aesthicity
by spud mcspud
Nov 14th, 2007
06:12:54 AM
"id really love to get a studio exec in a chair with a pair of pliers and have him tell me exactly how much they make from new distribution methods. because from what i can see its squat."

So none of these offical torrent sites have advertising on them, then. Telling you to buy this Lexus, drink this Coke, watch this football game. Those ads are paid for by the companies that they are promoting. The money the ad agencies pay to put these ads on the site goes to the guys who run the site - ie the fucking Studio. Are you with that, turniphead? Or does tis still confuse you?

I'll make it easy on you: that fucking annoying SHAUN OF THE DEAD 12" figure advert by Sideshow Collectables on the top right of this talkback? Paid for by Sideshow. Paid TO Harry Knowles, for him to show the ad on his site. See? That's how come Harry doesn't have to work for a living: THE ADS PAYMENTS ARE HIS LIVING!!!

If Harry didn't get paid, the site would close. If the wrtiers don't get residuals on net screenings, then when one day TV goes exclusively net - and this could be broadened to include cable, satellite, whatever - the writer will get NOTHING for the show that would never had existed before THEY put pen to paper. You fucking moron.

The reason the writers do not get support from me is...
by qweruiop
Nov 14th, 2007
08:51:40 AM
because they chose a profession where they knew that it's either make or break in Hollywood. For those lucky few writers that have made it, they're enjoying hundreds of thousands of dollars with each script and great bonuses. But there's obviously many many many more writers out there that have not made it, and are either making a moderate to a very low income, and they're at the forefront of pushing for all these increases in revenues and avenues of technology because of that fact. (Which brings up my opinion on the writers' new wants for this new contract. Yes on the extra DVD revenue, but no on the 2.5% gross of the movie. When writers begin investing money in their own movies, then they should receive a gross from the movie. Otherwise no way). But what they fail to understand is that that's the nature of the business they're in, which is a lot like acting. You're either lucky (either by writing a good story, or by knowing the right people, or a combo of both) or you're not. If one willingly goes into that type of business one should not expect a lot of sympathy when things do not go right. These writers want to have their cake and eat it too, in an environment that for decades promises only a big success to a minute amount of people.
sick fixx...
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 14th, 2007
09:40:44 AM
nice... um rant... why do i picture you in bicycle shorts and a wife-beater tank, doing hulk-hogan-esque poses while yelling that at the top of your lungs?

most companies do their annual health benefits enrollment this time of year, might i suggest the hmo with the free 25 mental health visits....

top 10
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 14th, 2007
10:51:26 AM
Top 10 reasons sci-fi/comic book geeks don’t protest our current government administration…. Here we go… Number 10. We are waiting for the mothership to come take us back to our home planet, (we’ve always known we didn’t ‘belong’) Number 9. Organizers always seem to pick Wednesdays to protest- don’t they know that’s when the new comic books come out. Number 8. George Bush is no Lex Luthor, so how bad could he really be? Number 7. The White House website doesn’t have a cool talkback section or post pics of hot half women-half reptile chicks, so why even bother Number 6. Cuts into our ‘World of Warcraft’ gaming. Level 70 doesn’t come to those who waste time protesting…. Number 5. When Dick Cheney is on TV, it’s like he can see you… and he knows what your thinking. And he’s just out there, lurking…. Number 4. Cause we could just Tivo the Babylon 5 marathon weekend and watch it later, but where is the fun in that? Number 3. The Prime Directive dictates we don’t interfere Number 2. If it guaranteed hot chicks will finally dig us, we might reconsider And number 1 Cheney is scarier than anything in “The Mist”
top 10 (with paragraph breaks this time)
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 14th, 2007
11:02:05 AM
Top 10 reasons sci-fi/comic book geeks don’t protest our current government administration….

Here we go…

Number 10. We are waiting for the mothership to come take us back to our home planet, (we’ve always known we didn’t ‘belong’)

Number 9. Organizers always seem to pick Wednesdays to protest- don’t they know that’s when the new comic books come out.

Number 8. George Bush is no Lex Luthor, so how bad could he really be?

Number 7. The White House website doesn’t have a cool talkback section or post pics of hot half women-half reptile chicks, so why even bother?

Number 6. Cuts into our ‘World of Warcraft’ gaming. Level 70 doesn’t come to those who waste time protesting…

Number 5. When Dick Cheney is on TV, it’s like he can see you… and he knows what your thinking. And he’s just out there, lurking…

Number 4. Cause we could just Tivo the Babylon 5 marathon weekend and watch it later, but where is the fun in that?

Number 3. The Prime Directive dictates we don’t interfere

Number 2. If it guaranteed hot chicks will finally dig us, we might reconsider

And number 1 Cheney is scarier than anything in “The Mist”

Would they read my script if I come to support WGA?
by JeffManSixtyFo
Nov 14th, 2007
12:17:17 PM
About as likely as my last job giving me residuals on the training manuals I wrote as they continually use to train people.
hey spud mcspud....ummm
by blue1622
Nov 14th, 2007
12:32:36 PM
you know writers get paid a salary, right? Staff job or one off, they're getting a paycheck...it's how they pay their agents/managers/whathaveyou. It sounds like you want us to believe that ancillaries, residuals and royalties are their ONLY source of compensation...
blue 1622 umm...
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 14th, 2007
12:52:15 PM
it's like with sales- you get a base salary then commision based on the revenue you generate.

if you generate a shit load of revenue, your commission will usually well exceed your salary

you do know those base salaries for writers are typically low, and the residuals are what keep the writers eating/paying rent between jobs(that and waiting tables/tending bar) don't you ?

yes, but...
by blue1622
Nov 14th, 2007
01:23:19 PM
Typically low compared to what? Base pay for a staff job on even a garbage network show like Chuck is far, far, far more than bartender/waiter money.
touche'
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 14th, 2007
01:42:17 PM
but shows get cancelled, writing staffs get replaced

the industry in general is very transitory, there are no guarantees you will work week to week.

think of it this way, getting a secure/steady writing job on a network show is like making it to the nba or nfl- only a small, small percentage actually make it (as in under 5% in the entertainment industry- sag/wga- make enough to not have to take a second job waiting tables/tending bar)

so if you are skilled and lucky enough to write 2, 6, or even a full season of episodes, you can still find yourself out of work and scrapping to get your next job- the residual checks are what help get you through the in between periods.

i don't care if they make 35k or 200k, if a studio one year makes 10 mil profit off your creation, and the next year makes 30 mil profit, you as a writer should get a piece of that increase. is that somehow unreasonable

and for the record, bartenders in l.a. can make pretty good $. our happy hour beers are $5, its re-god-damn-diculas

One step ahead of you
by Sick Fixx
Nov 14th, 2007
02:10:22 PM
I already have an appointment with the shrink Dec. 5th! :D
I guess I just can't wrap my head around the need for
by blue1622
Nov 14th, 2007
02:38:11 PM
Collective bargaining in fields where success is attained on the strength of both individual achievement and personal representation (lawyers/managers/agents.) If you are in demand, your team will negotiate for as much as they can get for you...and if the jobs you're getting aren't paying what you feel you're worth, then the onus is on you to raise the value of your brand. Also, the insular, closed shop environment of tv and studio film doesn't seem to be helping the quality of output. Real talent shouldn't be afraid to compete on the open market. Also, yeah, I'm in LA, too (Calabasas, anyway)...I know bartenders here who're doing better than general practioners.
SkFx- go for the medicinal card
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 14th, 2007
02:38:31 PM
only if your state law allows (of course)

tell them you have anxiety and lower back pain

blu1622
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 14th, 2007
02:53:46 PM
the studios had almost a year to make an attempt to negotiate. they refused to even come to the table and talk.

it's like in the pilot mini-series of Battlestar. The human representative kept showing up for 40 years, but the cylons never came to the table to negotiate. when they finally did, look what happened....

also, one thing I have learned in my 10 years in l.a., you have to be (to some degree) batshit insane to try to make it in the industry. and if you do end up making it, that remaining percentage of humanity is then completely overtaken by the ego and thats when the fun begins.

i love my writer/actor/producer buddies, but they are all fucking crazy to some degree...

myself, I like a steady paycheck, retirement/401k and health benefits and do my creative shit on the side as a balance.

I support the strike except for Lost. I need to
by AdrianVeidt
Nov 14th, 2007
04:20:04 PM
fucking know what the hell happened.
AdrianVeidt
by spud mcspud
Nov 14th, 2007
04:29:36 PM
The strike may be good for LOST - you know they DON'T really have an ending planned, don't you? This way, they got months to figure out a great ending - they just can't technically write it yet!
Can someone please explain WTF a writer's union is?!?!?!?
by wolvenom
Nov 15th, 2007
02:10:55 AM
Seriously, this is fucking hollywood. WTF ARE THERE UNIONS IN HOLLYWOOD?!?!?! This is a serious fucking question. WTF ARE THERE UNIONS IN HOLLYWOOD?!?!?! players sports associations i understand because some professional sports players are paid shit. BUT AREN'T ALL HOLLYWOOD WRITERS FUCKING BALLS TO THE WALLS RICH?!?!? We need fucking unions for people who work at wal-mart struggling below the poverty line not people who drink fucking starbucks and shit alaskan king crab every mother fucking day. I thought we lived in a free market... Why can't the studios tell these writers to go fuck themselves and hire poor people like us who struggle through our jobs and probably have a hundred times more creative juices flowing through us because we aren't crapping money. What happened to the starving artist? I cant relate with a story written by someone who eats truffles for breakfast while reading his 50k gold laminated morning paper. Then going to feed his dog rover with dogfood thats more expensive than my entire grocery budget for a year. Then jumping in his lamborghini and driving 150mph down a school road while screaming obscenities about how he didn't get first class tickets for his trip to the bahamas where he can 'work' on his latest shitty script "COUGH" some shitty heroes episode a monkey could write "COUGH". I swear there is going to be another fucking class revolution just like the french revolution if the rich keep pulling this crap. I dont see the god damn stagehands going to their unions screaming give me more than 10 dollars an hour. I dont see the cameramen going 'HEY WE ACTUALLY SHOOT THE SHOWS AND MOVIES. WITHOUT US IT WOULD BE FUCKING PLAYS ON BROADWAY' and screaming for more than 15 dollars an hour.
screw you aicn for supporting these rich sycophants
by wolvenom
Nov 15th, 2007
02:17:14 AM
Where is your support for the teachers of america, the construction workers who build your houses, and the farmers who keep harry happy?!?!
How many of them had LATTES at this picket hercules?!
by wolvenom
Nov 15th, 2007
02:19:24 AM
I wish i was near this picket line so i could bring a group of working class wal-mart employees to picket with you to show you how ridiculous you look.
I'm on your side, wolvenom
by Sick Fixx
Nov 15th, 2007
02:25:33 AM
They're not fooling me. I don't care what information they trump out. If they're not working all year long, then they should be hitting the bricks to search for second jobs while they wait for the hiatus to end. Because, you know, being out in the world, suffering, interacting with regular people who are usually the ones who are the most irregular and fascinating characters to draw inspiration from, is actually healthy for the creative mind.
I should get paid residuals for providing excellent service...
by wolvenom
Nov 15th, 2007
03:27:59 AM
to customers who keep coming back to the store where I work to see me and continue to buy more things. Why cant I call my excellent service to our customers my intellectual property?!?! GO FUCK YOURSELF WGA
Sick Fixx and Wolvenom
by spud mcspud
Nov 15th, 2007
03:39:23 AM
So the creators of a product that can still be sold decades into the future - a product which, without the writer, WOULD NOT EXIST - should only get paid once, while the studio - who didn't do the writing, didn't create the concept, didn't do any of the creative work AT ALL - should carry on getting paid for the concept that the WRITER CREATED - and they should keep getting paid for the product they DIDN'T INITIALLY CREATE just because they put up the money. Am I right? Is that what you believe?

Right, Wolvenom. So if I sell one script to one network once, that means I'll be as rich as Joe Eszterhas, right? So the guy who writes balls like MANSQUITO is getting paid the same as Carlton Cuse and JJ Abrams? You get paid the same as your manager? I suppose you think all novelists get paid the same too - like every Mills and Boon book pays as well as J K Rowling got paid for the last HARRY POTTER book.

You're so fucking dumb, Wolvenom, that there isn't yet a word in the English dictionary to describe the fucking monumental inanity of your lack of intellect. You have all the intelligence of a pulsating, festering turd. Maybe you ought to consider a life as a studio exec. I think you'd be great up in there.

Not everyone gets paid the same, you THICK FUCK!!!

You're the thick headed one you tool...
by wolvenom
Nov 15th, 2007
04:23:37 AM
STUDIOS MAKE THE FUCKIN DECISIONS you tool. They are the ones taking the risks. The writers don't take the fucking risks. Lets look at it this way. Should the fucking soldier be getting paid as much as the queen?!?!?! heck no. or better yet, should the pompous aristocracy (the writers) be getting paid as much as the queen (the studio).... BALLS TO THE WALL FUCK NO! Instead of a horse drawn carriage these writers drive around in fucking lamborghinis screaming obscenities and yelling 'let them eat cake'. While the Studios (the queen) sit back and watch it all go down laughing. Here's a SOLUTION! INSTEAD OF bickering over money between the studios and the talent...wtf dont they just make movies and shows fucking cheaper so i dont have to spend half my paycheque to buy a dvd. Instead of watching the aristocracy and the queens fight each other over our hard earned money we should be in the streets with pitchforks taking back society and getting rid of the capitalist evil that is continually growing more and more evil all the time. I kid though. It hasn't gotten that bad yet. But who's to say it won't. It did in france. To say that we're not on our well on our way to another era of 'let them eat cake' is kidding yourself too.
the divide between the poor/working class and rich is growing...
by wolvenom
Nov 15th, 2007
04:27:12 AM
dont believe it... look at the numbers. The more it keeps growing the more angry I get when I see the rich fight the rich for my money.
you know who pays for it when the writers get their way?
by wolvenom
Nov 15th, 2007
04:32:23 AM
NOT THE STUDIOS!... the consumer pays for it when the studios inflate the prices to compensate for the writers' and studios' greed
Wolvenom
by spud mcspud
Nov 15th, 2007
04:44:21 AM
Yep - there's the rub. YOU want cheaper DVDs, so that's the writers' fault. YOU think the writers are being greedy when asking for residuals on the product THEY created. The irony is, it's THE STUDIOS who make DVDs so expensive - pays for their yachts and Lambos - and it's THE STUDIOS who inflate prices when the writers demand payment for what THEY have already done. They could just reduce the bonuses for the studio execs, who, let's face it, do fuck all all day bar making phone calls to other studio heads and their own bankers, doing blow and fucking prostitutes. Or am I not being stereotypical enough? This fucking champagne lifestyle you describe regarding writers applies to maybe the top 5% of writers - the rest are struggling. It's the same tier system as with actors. And if you think everyone's getting paid the same... man, just fucking read VARIETY. SCREEN INTERNATIONAL. Read some fucking writers' blogs. I can't believe you're so dumb you think all writers get paid the fucking same. The class system doesn't stop at writers, y'know.

Oh, and as for writers not taking risks - if you choose to put in hundreds of hours unpaid labour to write a screenplay and re-edit it through several drafts to get it as good as it can be - those hours are UNPAID, by the way, unless the script is already commissioned - and then you start shopping it round studios, there's no guarantee that anyone will option or buy it. If they don't, those hundreds of hours spent writing it and rewriting it are lost. Unpaid. Who's not taking the fucking risk there?

I smell chlorophyll. You're a fucking suit, aren't you?

About the relationship between creator and investor...
by spud mcspud
Nov 15th, 2007
05:02:14 AM
"Where is your support for the teachers of america, the construction workers who build your houses, and the farmers who keep harry happy?!?!"

What, you think the studios would pay these people what they're worth?

Like it or not, movies and TV shows are BIG FUCKING BUSINESS. This means that, no matter what you think of capitalism as a social structure (and I'd agree with you, it's frequently unfair, it's wide open to abuse, it doesn't take care of everyone and is generaly pretty fucking far from perfect), every time a TV show gets watched or a movie gets watched, the money generated has to be split between people fairly. You're saying that the creators of that movie/TV show/whatever should not expect future payments for what THEY created, while the guys who ponied up the money but precious fuck-all else, should take all the future prifts too. Right?

Here in the UK we have an entrepreneurial show on TV called DRAGONS DEN. An inventor, entrepreneur or whatever with little or no money comes in to see a bunch of rich investor bastards who watch the poor sap pitch for their investment in their product / invention / whatever. The dragons - the investors - then tear these poor bastards to pieces, and maybe decide to invest in them and get their product mass-marketed and into production.

Do you know what kind of proportion they offer? Around 60% of the business to the inventor, 40% to the investor. It can go as far as 70% / 30% in either way, but rarely more or less than that.

Writers get 0.4% of the profits on each DVD sold on what THEY created or wrote for. 0.4%. That's fucking peanuts. It's crumbs offthe table of the studios. Or , put another way: the writer has had to develop as a writer to create scripts good enough to get past their own agent, into a slush pile, into the hands of a script reader, past the script reader, to a studio exec that can greenlight, who then tears the script (whose structure he understands fuck all about) to pieces with other execs before agreeing whether or not to make it. Then you get loads of inane comments like "Can't this Ripley woman in this ALIEN script be a fucking guy?".And the writer has to watch a talentless non-writer tell HIM how to do HIS fucking job. Then the movie gets made - or not - and the talentless exec takes most of the movie, and now wants ALL the money made from internet distribution, which they well fucking know is the next big thing in giving entertainment to the masses.

The analogy of soldiers to queens doesn't work - soldiers actually DO something for a living. The Queen does fuck all. If you're arguing should nurses get paid as much as the suits who run the hospitals - well, hell yeah! Who's doing the more important work? Obviously the fucking nurse. The suit isn't gonna save your life - SHE is. But in the case of a studio and a writer, without the writer doing what they do, there is nothing for the suit to promote, sell, or ultimately, make any profit on. Without a writer, a suit and his studio is out of work. The writer is worth way fucking more than these studios are saying they are.

wolvenom
by bismarckf
Nov 15th, 2007
06:15:54 AM
Your description of the average writer is sheer science fiction. The vast majority of the WGA already have other jobs, so they could easily mingle with the Walmart crowd. (And then you have the sheer gall -- or ignorance -- to excuse sports unions?!) You may want to branch out and learn what the writer WORKERS are actually like before you get back to dismembering them. btw, you do see the irony of your "I dont see the god damn stagehands... screaming give me more than 10 dollars an hour" comment, don't you? Especially after what happened on Broadway last weekend?
irrelevntelefant and spud mcspud
by bismarckf
Nov 15th, 2007
06:19:22 AM
Thanks for keeping up the good fight and trying to spread some light to a seriously darkened world. It's shocking how many movie buffs are ignorant about the entertainment industry.
Bismarckf - You're very welcome
by spud mcspud
Nov 15th, 2007
06:35:15 AM
It amazes me that a problem that's as clear-cut as this - bunch of non-talents with money want to take the small amount that they pay the talent even lower, or in the case of net streaming NON-EXISTENT - can even be considered unreasonable. I'd be damned if anyone was going to keep making money off something I DID in the future, while I went without. I heard someone compare the situation to an artist painting a painting, selling it for a large amount of money, then the work of art being either exhibited for money (in admissions to the exhibition) or being sold for a larger amount. The argument asked: should this artist get a cut of whatever the new owner of the painting gets by either exhibiting it and charging admission or selling it on to another collector? Well, people may think it ludicrous, but Damien Hirst is doing just that with a diamond encrusted skull he created worth £18 million - he has rights on it that kick him back a portion of anything made on it if the person he sold it to ever decides to sell it or exhibit it. That's the future of modern art - for good or bad. But the crucial difference between the paiting and a movie or DVD is that when exhibited, downloaded or sold as a DVD, the movie WILL make more money in future - so why shouldn't the writer, the creator (and sometimes progenitor) of the piece make some of that future earning? Why is this okay for singers and authors, but not writers in film and TV? It all seems fairly obvious and cut and dried to me.
Why The Writer's Are Right
by buffywrestling
Nov 15th, 2007
10:30:23 AM
http://tinyurl.com/3c3kc7

Also, for more information, the fans4writers.com site has some links to various blogs and such. I've been favoring the unitedhollywood, Variety Strike watch (Scribe Vibe), and Deadline Hollywood Daily. John August's blog has been an interesting read as well.4

Wal-Mart employees and screen writers....great comparison, idiot
by IAmJack'sUserID
Nov 15th, 2007
11:28:32 AM
Really, we all know it takes a special, college-trained, creative person to work at Wal-Mart, and that their work at Wal-Mart is something that will be remembered for lifetimes. Sounds to me like these people who are hating on writers are suffering from sour grapes syndrome. You can barely write out your half ass posts, so I doubt you could sit down long enough to work that undersized brain enough to come up with a story or treatment or even a tiny idea.
wolvenom, you retarded load
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 16th, 2007
01:25:47 AM
studios take risks? i guess that explains all of the remakes in the theaters, or the cookie cutter sitcoms on tv

it's amusing how distorted your perception of hollywood really is. come out to l.a., seriously. meet these "rich sycophants" who live on "king crab" every other day. you want to see the divide between the rich and the poor, this city is a fucking thesis on the divide.

as for collecting residuals on your "excellent customer service", i guaran-fucking-tee that if your company was making millions a year directly off your service, you wouldn't settle for .4%

you support players associations but not the writers unions. SPORTS ARE ENTERTAINMENT, YOU FUCKWAD!

athletes make millions because the entertainment they provide makes the teams owners multi-millions/billions. it's the same premise with writers, the entertainment they provide makes the studios a shit load of money

based on your logic, athletes should just be happy making 200k a year and the team owners should keep the rest. icons like michael jordan shouldn't get a piece of the merchandising $ that they generate.

do you really believe that if writers/actors/directors chose to cut their earnings that the studios in any way would pass on that savings to consumer? you are fucking living in wonderland if you believe that, alice

it is big business, and big business is all about making product as cheap as possible, and then selling it at the highest profit margin possible.

you don't think studios dangle the "we can find someone to do it for less" threat over writers on a regular basis. move out here, test your "creative juices". you and sick fixx can be roomies/writing buddies.

the one thing i agree with you on is that teachers, cops, and other in the civil service industry make shit- but their paycheck comes from the government via the taxes we pay. last time i checked, our taxes weren't funding movies and tv. and the second to last time i checked, it IS a free economy, meaning if you don't like the price of luxury items (which is what dvd's, cable/satellite, cd's, movies in theaters are) DON'T BUY THEM! if i was poor and struggling through my job as you seem to claim to be, guess what? I'm not at WalMart loading up on DVD's. and when was the last time you bought a dvd because the writing sucked? you can take a great script and have if fucked up by producers/actors/directors/edi tors , but no amount of production, directing,editing or acting can make shitty writing into a great movie

Speaking of WalMart, go pick up "The high cost of low price". talk about the rich screwing the lower classes

and lastly, 'wolvenom'? really? you combined wolverine with venom? really... wow... thats some serious compensation...

"who hurt you... who hurt you?"-peter griffin

i'm done with this topic, gotta go argue about 'ki-ki-ki' vs "ch-ch-ch'

Comparing Show "business"
by buffywrestling
Nov 16th, 2007
04:25:39 AM
to any other business is - like any other sort of Star Trek-y business - futile. There *is* no other business that models itself after the writer's contract. They can compare it to songwriting, novels or plays but it is still an singular contract that is unlike any other else. To those that try and compare it to "Wal-Mart" or in fact, any of the other Unions, are not grasping the finer points of the original contract, and not getting the point of the strike.

The Writer's Guild is creative property union...but not really. It is also a labor union....but not really. It is a union that spans writers who make $5000 a year to Showrunners that makes $250000 a year. This is who they have to incompass when it comes to negotiations - the entire spectrum of their guild . Because they made a bad business decision in '88, they are not allowed to re-negotiate their contract today? Now is *exactly* the time to to negoiate. T

Sick Fixx? Wolfie?
by buffywrestling
Nov 16th, 2007
08:06:52 AM
Give me something...
give up buffywrestling,
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 16th, 2007
09:03:28 AM
guys like wolvenom and fixx are just bitter

they basically feel they are underpaid for what they do, and that anyone who makes more than them doesn't deserve it.

it's like short guys who are angry at tall guys all the time. like we had anything to do with them being short

they wouldn't last 5 minutes trying to pursue a career in a creative industry. not because they don't have the talent (they may... it just ain't writing though) it's because they are delusional about how the business works. l.a. is filled with people who believe that all they need is talent and the will to succeed. it's also filled with people who will exploit the naivety every chance they get.

they like to catorgorize people by generalities and stereotypes... it's easier that way...

they talk about how they work hard and suffer for little to no money, yet they do nothing to get a better lot for themselves in life

"i earn raises, i don't ask for them" that statement alone says it all.

and for the record.... it's 'ki-ki-ki-ki'

Give up?
by buffywrestling
Nov 16th, 2007
10:15:10 AM
"Nev-ah!" ( I said that in Ralph Wiggium voice when he was playing Washington in the school play.)

I'm not going to insult them personally or deride their tastes but talkbacks by definition run their course when they are off the main page (Lost TB, notwithstanding). The last few TBs I have participated in - re: strike - I've been getting the last thoughts in and it just doesn't feel right. I keep expecting better pitches down the middle. So far, it's just been balls.



BW- I hear ya'
by irrelevntelefant
Nov 16th, 2007
11:09:08 AM
although, i am all for insulting them in any and all manner possible

if for no other reason than it it just PLAIN FUN!

if you haven't checked out the friday the 13th remake debate of"ki-ki-ki" vs "ch-ch-ch" IT IS FUCKING CLASSIC!

Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.