Of course, this has Del Toro's name attached to it, so I expect this site's objectivity will be checked at the door.

All I'm asking is why does this seem so interesting? Is it because of Del Toro? Naked tits? Cause if thats all its got going for it, count me out.

Yeesh, I think I must have gotten up on the wrong side of the bed, today.

geocentralize, man!

See, 'healthy' people are not 'fat,' although they can be 'big boned' and 'healthy.' Some people have a shape or form which isn't 'brick like' and honestly is very much attractive, especially considering the female form. If you're a 'fatty' or if you can't appreciate 'fitness' or the like perhaps you've just got issues with yourself.

Don't criticize attractiveness of a women just because she has the time to appreciate the beautiful body nature/God/what have you has graced her with and she takes care of it.

And don't criticize people for finding 'healthy' (ie, thin) women attractive. Perhaps you should take the 30 minutes daily (or less) to care for yourself and learn about the common knowledge of proper diet which is EASY to maintain if you want to be healthy yourself, which can feel great once subscribed to and won't leave you hungry either.

I've lost around 50 pounds myself (in 6 months) and have maintained it through what I now consider to be 'daily exercise' & 'smart eating' which, once one finds the motivation to do & stick to, creates a healthy appearance. Which is, yup, a thinner one.

Seriously, just because an actress (probably aware of such practices) looks 'in shape' doesn't mean she has an eating disorder. I'm not saying to be sexy you have to be thin, nor am I saying that thinness is the only way to be 'sexy' just that if someone happens to be that way, you shouldn't shun her because your own GF makes a comment about 'what is realistic or typical.' You're just justifying an unhealthy lifestyle and all the socio-political injustice that influences and in fact supports that sad existence.

It's mostly not about diet, but about exercise for the most of us. God knows, for me, it takes a strong principle of both.

This film gives nod to many others so far but genetics is a muse for horror films for the foreseeable future and this looks like a great and horrifying next step (if only a sideways one) along that genre's collection of talent. I'm looking forward to this and hope it scares the (bleep) out of me.

Not all mammals have enlarged modified sweat glands to produce milk... but who wants to fuck a dolphin?

That could be a new reality show during the writers strike: "Who wants to fuck a dolphin?" Hosted by Regis Philbin and Sandra Oh.

Other than that the images and talent behind this are good, just hope it has enough originality of it's own in the end to shake the de-ja-vu vibe i get from these concepts!

In any case, Anchorite should be pissed they're all using his likeness without permission.

To be fair though, he is typing on some nascent technology that has found a way to stop short-circuiting when drool hits the keyboard. Or he is writing with a crayon on a touch sensitive screen that is somehow translating his gibberish into postings.

BTW- this looks like the island of dr. moreau. Again. And species is good.

Was the last time you saw your father really when you were flying out the end of his cock as he quickly departed the 20 cent hooker dive your mother works in?

Who cares about banning the fuckin' cunt when you can just throw him to Wu's pigs?

Gabe, old chap- I think you need to go to the "life" shop and buy one.

G@BRIEL GR@Y - YOU ARE OFFICIALLY SADDER EVEN THAT TEGUJAI BATIR! FUCK OF AND DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEE!!!

Oh, and in today's topic news... SPLICE looks to be as distubring as hell. If Natali keeps this run of strangely upsetting movies going, he could well be the new Cronenberg, but with the body-horror morphed into machine-flesh fetishism. CUBE still disturbs me (take THAT, fucking SAW!!!) and this looks intensely creepy! I am already there.