Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

First...
by jones1899
Oct 13th, 2007
09:55:03 PM
Foo's new album is great!
Fighting Foo
by shmu65
Oct 13th, 2007
09:55:05 PM
is better than saying the f word.
jones1899 is
by shmu65
Oct 13th, 2007
09:55:38 PM
a fag
How many drinks will I need before I buy the TZ set?
by tonagan
Oct 13th, 2007
10:05:10 PM
I think it's usually two before I make a questionable $50 purchase, three for a $100 purchase... so four, maybe?
Looking forward to..
by haggardatbest
Oct 13th, 2007
10:10:18 PM
..seeing what else is on at 11:30 tonight.
if we get only 1 Jovi musical set and 1 Foo musical set, write a
by TallBoy66
Oct 13th, 2007
10:22:18 PM
This show needs to have 2 Foo Fighters musical sets, at least. I'm fine with John-John doing his thang as long as it doesn't take away airtime from the Fighting Of The Foo. And Johnny boy should just play "You Give Love A Bad Name" or go home.
"a" = "angry letters"
by TallBoy66
Oct 13th, 2007
10:23:11 PM
Well, whaddya know, it doesn't cut off your titles anymore when you type them. Shit.
Kubrick?
by vicnameless
Oct 13th, 2007
10:23:46 PM
Noticed the Eyes Wide Shut HD-DVD was NC-17, hmmm. Hope these are definitive, and not the crap they just shelled out for 2001 "collector's".
FOO SOON ! ! !
by Pound Sand
Oct 13th, 2007
10:37:26 PM
I hereby nominate Dave Grohl for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2008.
WHY'S IT SO FREAKIN' HARD TO SIGN IN TO ACN???
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
10:38:56 PM
Ever since y'all ditched the verification per post process it's been nuthin but headaches.
They've used this "OH!" shtick several times as of late.
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
10:48:05 PM
The best was the gay/italian couple on Weekend Update.
HOLY SHIT! BRIAN WILLIAMS!?
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
10:51:31 PM
That could be great.
"ohhh" sucked ass...
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
10:53:55 PM
...except for Wiig's Jersey broad. Yeah, I'd fuck 'er.
LOL Brian Williams hosting SNL
by nam0krut
Oct 13th, 2007
10:56:32 PM
Unintentional comedy will never be the same again
Jim, nah, Williams will be fantastic.
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
10:57:26 PM
If you've ever seen him on Conan, you'd know what I mean.
zombie dance
by sith_rising
Oct 13th, 2007
11:02:01 PM
kicked my ass
The Digital Shorts never fail to deliver.
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:02:04 PM
/clap
punched
by maxwell's hammer
Oct 13th, 2007
11:04:17 PM
That kind of reminded me of the "Kicked in the Nuts" videos from Channel101.com . (where Samburg did the amazingly funny "The 'Bu" videos). I think maybe Andy plagerized a little!

and if you've ever seen Brian Williams on Conan or on The Daily Show, you know the guy has a decent sense of humor. I think he'll make an interesting host.
Shitty first half hour.
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:05:59 PM
The only good thing so far was the last half of that short. The rest was shite. And this hader italian guy sucks ass too. Goddamn it.
Italian guy RULES!
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:10:42 PM
RULES!!!
Italian Guy...
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:11:18 PM
Not so good.
SNL=
by Regina V. Dudley
Oct 13th, 2007
11:17:02 PM
Still Not Laughing
Italian Guy...
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:17:24 PM
VERY GOOD, and I'll tell ya why.

Too often these talk show skit will rush guests on and have no real purpose or ending, here it had the perfect length, wasn't over the top, and mot importantly, Hader's character was likeable. If I was Lorne, I'd keep this as the only reaccuring "talkshow" sketch along with Amy & Mya's Jersey housewife deal.

Meaning NO MORE Prince show....EVER!
When the hell are they gonna get Tim Calhoun...
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:22:06 PM
...back on Weekend Update?
Italian Guy better than Prince show?!?!??
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:22:59 PM
Prince wants you to go step in front of a bus.
New Foo Album
by Darth Melkor
Oct 13th, 2007
11:23:52 PM
Is incredible. Their best album I think. They're just so damn good.
Italian Guy
by Terry the geek
Oct 13th, 2007
11:27:54 PM
IS the shit! It needs to recur more often.
My uncle is a dead ringer for Dave Grohl.
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:30:47 PM
Well, he was when Dave had the short hair.
Whoa. When did Pat Smear come back to the Foo Fighters??
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:31:51 PM
Pat Smear in the House? No way.
by Pound Sand
Oct 13th, 2007
11:31:51 PM
That chick playing the cello is hot!
by BackRiverCatfish
Oct 13th, 2007
11:32:21 PM
Or is it a viola? Either way the Foos performance is the highlight of the show.
Yeah, I noticed Smear back with the group...
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:32:53 PM
...during their VMA set.
Pat Smear=pap smear
by BackRiverCatfish
Oct 13th, 2007
11:34:51 PM
i just got it.
The non-Foo highlight of the show?
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:35:20 PM
The digital short, or possibly Fred's bit on Weekend Update.
I swear to god, Keenan only has one boice for every character he
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:38:38 PM
Tonight he played a southern black cardassian.
sorry i meant to say "voice"
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:39:02 PM
sorry.
fake Danne Cook
by BackRiverCatfish
Oct 13th, 2007
11:40:39 PM
funnier than real Dane Cook
Am I being too easy on the show tonight?
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:41:35 PM
I really dug the purse sketch.
Purse sketch was good
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:42:59 PM
not awesome but a perfect post-12:30 sketch
i hate dane cook
by sith_rising
Oct 13th, 2007
11:44:18 PM
so much
JON BOVI!!!
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:46:11 PM
ugh.
Ok, premature "JON BOVI!!!"
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:50:32 PM
What a wasted oppurtunity to relive a terrible excuse for a sketch.
Boy, the local ads here get depressing...
by tonagan
Oct 13th, 2007
11:51:28 PM
After the 12:30 mark, you get Al-Anon and Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints ads, or old "Plant A Tree" commercials from the 1970's. Really makes you aware of your mortality. Sigh...
They put in a plug for Universal HD.
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:54:39 PM
That channel rules. I watched Real Genius in high def the other night. Killer.
JACK!!!
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:55:46 PM
FUCKING JACK!!! HOLY SHIT!!!
Man Jack was looking a little round.
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:56:13 PM
He's still the man though.
Jack???
by JKrow21
Oct 13th, 2007
11:57:20 PM
I dont have a tv nearby
That was the highlight of the show right there.
by Shermdawg
Oct 13th, 2007
11:57:30 PM
Too bad J.B. aren't playing something decent to close out the show.
Are You Fucking Kidding Me?!!!!!
by TallBoy66
Oct 13th, 2007
11:57:39 PM
2 Bon Jovi sets and 1 Foo Fighters set? Horseshit!!!
hurm.
by zati1
Oct 13th, 2007
11:57:43 PM
This was actually a pretty terrible episode. Bon Jovi wasn't too bad an actor...but he was really only in what...3 sketches? (Why wouldn't they just make him the host and musical guest if he played more music than acted in skits, anyway?) Week 2: No political cold open.
Jack. As in, " You can't handle the truth!"
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:58:06 PM
Ya know. Jack!
This song sounds exactly the same as the other song they did.
by zool43
Oct 13th, 2007
11:59:53 PM
Is it just me?
Did the Bionic Woman get Bionic titty implants?
by zool43
Oct 14th, 2007
12:00:52 AM
Her Bionic cleavage rules!
FUCK THAT.
by El Scorcho
Oct 14th, 2007
12:04:00 AM
Fuck Bon Jovi. What a waste of time. Why did they even schedule Foo and fool us all?
BEST MUSIC HOST SINCE....
by Series7
Oct 14th, 2007
12:06:41 AM
Johnny Cash!!!! Seriously, does anyone else remember the 80's SNL he hosted?? Well i really don't either because I am not that old, BUT it was on a repeat like a year ago and it was fucking horrible. I was quite surprised how well Johnny Cash acted is his bio movie Walking The Line. No I am lying again I never watched it. Nor did I watch Ray.
How come to SNL young = using the term wicked awesome?
by Orionsangels
Oct 14th, 2007
12:19:04 AM
Since the early 90's whenever an SNL cast member portrays a teen. They say wicked awesome. When did anyone say that? Unless you were from Boston.
Darrell Hammond =
by Series7
Oct 14th, 2007
12:22:18 AM
Next Tim Meadows. As in is going to over stay his welcome a good 10 years too long. And then disappear into nothing. Kinda of like David Alan Grier and Dave Foley did after there 90's show ended (THOUGH Dave Has a much underrated pixar movie with a huge Star Wars reference in it) (while David Alan Grier put his brother on the show Clean Sweep!) I think all 4 of these guys should make a sitcom and call it "How Come We Never Got REALLY famous?" Because the potential was there (we'll say Dave Foley may have actually reached his) but there was something not clicking. And Fred Armisen is the new Chris Kattan, just he doesn't have anyone funny to leech off of.
Wicked
by BastardBoy
Oct 14th, 2007
12:47:26 AM
If you actually paid attention, you would have seen at the opening of the sketch it said "Burlington, MA" which is where Poehler hails from. She also went to Boston College, hence using wicked. The only other sketches I recall with wicked being used were the Red Sox sketches and the term is completly appropriate. As someone who went to college in Boston, people young and old use the word.
Dane Cooke
by Series7
Oct 14th, 2007
01:22:56 AM
Man seeing his promos getting made fun of made me realize two things: (1) Did not known that the Rockies are in the playoffs fucking hope they win (finally I can wear all that Starter Gear I bought 93 with pride). (2) Why the fuck is TBS in HD and not fucking FX???? Even though 90 percent of what FX shows per day is crap (while TBS has 100%) there is that hour of some days where either Nip/Tuck, Rescue Me, Sunny and I guess The Shield (never seen it but heard good things! According to thevoiceOReason071704 Antony Anderson is quite sexy on the show. If you are a Bear sort of guy thevoiceOReason071704 said) and the show with the chick from Sunshine and 28 Weekends Later in it as well as the guy who contributed to Norms Early death on Cheers. OHHHH and the Riches play on that channel (which I have been known to enjoy) (no in all serious it was the show to watch last winter I loved it) and all of those show are more cinematic then pretty much 90 percent of all reality TV and normal TV save from..... Dexter???? Or Lost??? Or Prison Break??? WHAT I am trying TO get at here is that WHY THE FUCK IS FX not in HD IN MY AREA???? THEN again I would have to pay $20 (thats a lot of pesos and not that many quid (if you got Sky) to pay for a TV Channel in America just for Showtime). In the end all I can say is that the new Foo Fighters single, One of these Things, Is fucking horrible. God I miss the good ole days when Kurt Cobain raped what ever the fuck his name is who plays the drums for Kyle Gass and Probot into doing what he does best.... playing the drums. Harry you should have been a lot more adamant about the importance of the Tenacious D movie then you where with the Nacho Sauce movie.
Wicked awesome
by BizarroJerry
Oct 14th, 2007
02:00:32 AM
Yes, as a denizen of Massachusetts all my life, the mid to late 80s included extensive use of the phrase. In fact, wicked is still used, though not often along with awesome anymore. Amy's mention of the Worcester Centrum really got me, cuz I am from right near that area, and that venue hasn't been called that for years since it's renaming.

It does appear that a lot of SNL folks since the 90s like Massachusetts references, even if they're from New York. Sandler is one of them. One of his CDs includes a toll booth operator heard saying "Welcome to Worcester". The Fallon/Dratch "Boston kids" sketch came about thanks to Dratch being from Mass. Poehler's from Massachusetts, as she's made reference to a lot. Even Seth Meyers is from NH, which is close enough. So ends my little New England / SNL lesson.

Yuck! I Need A Shot Of Whiskey
by phoenixmagi
Oct 14th, 2007
02:05:14 AM
to get the taste of this horrible episode out of my mouth. one Foo performance and two by Bon Jovi? Really? you have the host be the lead singer of a band and bring in Foo as the musical guest but they get one perofrmance in and the host's band gets two? really? why not just have bon jovi be the host and musical guest?! why was the host hardly in the show? and then you throw in a wtf cameo by Jack Nicholson!! man tonight was horrible!
Punched Before Eating was f'ing GREAT!
by Kirbymanly
Oct 14th, 2007
02:29:00 AM
Random violence can be very funny... and so can random zombie dances
I think the Foos are a greater acheivement for Grohl than Nirvan
by dr_buggerlugs
Oct 14th, 2007
04:46:25 AM
"A million people clutching In Utero then attacked poor Buggerlugs..."
Foos>Nirvana
by LUZER
Oct 14th, 2007
05:56:54 AM
complete agree
Banana Splits>Foo Fighters.
by TomBodet
Oct 14th, 2007
07:00:46 AM
You know it to be so.
Bon Jovi should do "Sounds like" Nirvana.
by TomBodet
Oct 14th, 2007
07:04:19 AM
And Grohl and co should have done "Wanted Fred or Alive". You gotta know it's in there.
Holy shit, they used Simmons' sketch?!?
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
07:37:22 AM
Bill Simmons (the Sports Guy on ESPN.com Page 2) did a podcast with one of the SNL writers, and suggested a 'Dane Cook screwing up all the names in the playoffs commercials' sketch. I can't believe they ran with it.

That'll teach Dane Cook to say 'Who's Bill Simmons?' the next time he's in an ESPN.com chat.

chrth
by Petro45
Oct 14th, 2007
07:45:31 AM
Chrth, I listened to the podcast, but missed the show. Did they really do Simmons' sketch, ie having Dane Cook mispronounce the ballplayers' names? Or did they run with his idea but change it up a bit?
Petro45: I didn't see the show, I'm just going by the comments a
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
07:47:29 AM
Sounds like it, though
dr_buggerlugs
by feckdrinkarse
Oct 14th, 2007
08:07:51 AM
Foo Fighters better than Nirvana ? Fuck you up your stupid ass, you motherfucking arsecandle! I like Foo Fighters but Dave Grohl is yet to write a song rivalling the greatness of Come As You Are, Lithium, Pennyroyal Tea, All Apologies, Sliver etc. The list goes on and on. His voice is pretty shitty compared to Cobain's as well. That man could scream.
feckdrinkarse
by Dwide Shrewd
Oct 14th, 2007
08:26:47 AM
When you say Grohl's voice is shitty compared to Cobain, I KNOW you aren't talking about actual singing ability. Because that would just be too fucking hilarious. Cobain sang like a $2 crack whore. It fit the music well, and he could wail, but Grohl can carry a tune, can sing clean, AND can scream. Plus he is 500x the musician that Cobain was. Songwriting? Adv: Cobain, but Grohl has written some incredible fucking rock songs. See: Everlong. Foo>>>Nirvana
Brian Williams
by obiwayne
Oct 14th, 2007
08:32:10 AM
He was on last years season opener starring Dane Cook. He showed up at the beginning of weekend update only to find they had chosen Seth Myers over him. He was actually very funny. Seth: "Oh, congratulations on being the number one news anchor in America." Brian: "Don't, uh, patronize me Seth"
Dwide Shrewd
by feckdrinkarse
Oct 14th, 2007
08:41:33 AM
"Cobain sang like a $2 crack whore." I'm not sure what that is supposed to mean:-) But if you've seen the Unplugged concert you'd know that Cobain could sing "clean" as well.
Cracksmokers
by fiester
Oct 14th, 2007
08:43:46 AM
Anyone who thinks the Foo Fighters are superior to Nirvana, that's what they are.
fiester
by feckdrinkarse
Oct 14th, 2007
08:50:44 AM
Good man.
Foo Fighters band on the run cover
by palewook
Oct 14th, 2007
09:35:43 AM
is the worst cover i've heard in 2007
Ahhhhh...the old Nirvana v. Foo Fighters debate.
by rbatty024
Oct 14th, 2007
10:22:41 AM
I thought this argument died out in 1999. Of course Nirvana is better. Nirvana was able to mesh everything from rock-pop to indie rock, to punk, to metal into their sound and still be wholly unique. If Grohl wants to put more metal into his songs he has to create a whole other side project (Probot). Lyrically Nirvana's dadaesque ruminations are superior to Grohl's sometimes sappy heart on his sleeve songs. As far as singing ability, as subjective as this is, I believe that Cobain has the more personality in his voice and one hell of a range. Think about "Something in the Way" compared to "Milk It," They're not even on the same planet (of course a lot of this has to do with artistic choices). Of course, I'll admit that I really like Foo Fighters. They're an immensely enjoyable band that are at they're best when they're just rocking out. They're not artistically transcendent, but they're fun. Easily one of the best bands on the radio. Whatever you say about Kurt Cobain, no single person has altered the cultural landscape as much as him, and thanks to the continual decline of the zeitgeist (due to the internet) I don't think we'll see any other single person have as much of a cultural impact in our lifetimes.
To anyone who thinks the Foo Fighters are better than Nirvana
by Garbageman33
Oct 14th, 2007
10:37:47 AM
Thank you. You're the reason bands like Nickelback exist. Much appreciated.
ATTN: SNL writers:
by mraig
Oct 14th, 2007
10:41:15 AM
Living in New York has caused you to overestimate the comedic potential of parodying swarthy Italian-Americans from New Jersey.

ADDENDUM: Doing a bit in which the immigrant cleaning lady writes your Weekend Update jokes due to a potential writers' strike only works if the regular jokes are actually *funnier* than the intentionally bad ones.

THIS JUST IN: SNL sued for stealing "Lady Captain Loses Purse" sketch from 1952 Reader's Digest cartoon.

At least the Foo Fighters stay down when they're punched...
by tonagan
Oct 14th, 2007
10:59:26 AM
None of this "Full Recovery" nonsense a la Jon "I can only take a joke so far" Bon Jovi.
Herc, will there be a Adult Swim Star Wars TB?
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
11:30:10 AM
I think so. We can compare and contrast!
Foo and Nirvana
by Wrath4771
Oct 14th, 2007
11:46:42 AM
The Foo Fightrers are an incredibly talented an awesome band and let's face it, for those of us who were around in the 'Nam we were all pretty surprised to see how amazing Foo Fighters turned out to be. That said, you have to be a complete crack whore, or born after 1989 to think Foo Fighrters could even think about carrying Nirvana's jock strap. Make fun of Kurt all you want for committing suicide, but that dude not only put Alternative on the map, but he flat out killed Hair Metal all by himself. If not for his music and charisma, we'd all still have a ton of aqua net in our hair or listening to New Kids. I just thank the Gawds that I lived in a lifetime where I got to experience both bands.
Cultural Impact
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
12:02:31 PM
The following people have had a greater cultural impact than Kurt Cobain (in no particular order):

Bob Dylan. Jimi Hendrix. The Beatles (all of them - yes, including Ringo). Keith Moon and Pete Townsend. Roger Waters. Woody Guthrie. Pete Seeger. Bruce Springsteen. Joan Baez. Miles Davis. John Coltrane. Eric Clapton (maybe). Frank Sinatra. Elvis Presley. Louis Armstrong. Salvador Dali. Pablo Picasso. Theodore Gericault. JMW Turner. Thomas Cole. Benjamin West. Bill Cosby. Mary Tyler Moore. Lucy Arnaz. Matt Groening. Charles Schulz. Joan Baez. Phil Spector. Aaron Spelling. Norman Lear. Stephen King. Jack Kerouac. William Shakespeare. Alfred Hitchcock. Orson Welles. Frank Capra. John Wayne. Cary Grant. Marilyn Monroe. Twiggy (the model/actress, not the robot). Isaac Asimov. Carl Sagan. Jacques Cousteau. Ray Bradbury. L. Ron Hubbard (I didn't say the impact was necessarily positive). Martin Luther. Martin Luther King Jr. Spike Lee. Harry Truman. Stephen Ambrose. Abraham Lincoln (indirect impact). Benjamin Franklin. Nathaniel Hawthorne. J. D. Salinger. Ray Kroc.

Whew, that's enough for now. Maybe I'll come back with more later.

My argument wasn't that Kurt was the most influential person...
by rbatty024
Oct 14th, 2007
12:25:19 PM
in history, but that he is the last. I agree that a lot of those people are more influential than Kurt, but (correct me if I'm wrong) all of them made their initial impact well before 1991. Also, ask yourself if these people changed the way people dressed in the morning, how they thought about gender, impacted the kind of films made, changed the face of commercial and underground music (obviously), created the last true subculture, pervaded every social group and age group, and did this while alive during an incredibly short time. I'm not saying that none of these people have done so, and certainly many of them have had a more positive impact, but I really believe that Kurt Cobain is the last individual to have a substantial impact on the cultural zeitgeist.
RE: Cultural Impact
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Oct 14th, 2007
12:28:48 PM
SPOT ON, CHRTH. Well done.

The phenom known as Kurt Cobain/Nirvana is one of the most overrated and misunderstood in the history of music. But thanks to the vacuous nature of the industry (circa the early 90s), a "next big thing" like Nirvana was a no-brainer. And unfortunately, the industry exploited the "Nirvana Model" for the subsequent decade (i.e. Bush, Silverchair, Creed, Nickleback, and on and on and on...). God-awful, overwrought rock; churned out for the masses on the most basic, lizard-brained appeal.

The Foo Fighters have been reduced to industry whores. Kind of a shame because Grohl is a great drummer who happens to write hummable pop/rock tunes.

(Oh, and I didn't watch SNL...)

Looking back on my original post, I realize I left out "since hi
by rbatty024
Oct 14th, 2007
12:33:03 PM
Sorry for the typo.
rbatty024: trust me, they did
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
12:34:33 PM
Besides, it's even arguable that Nirvana wasn't even the best act of the grunge era. I recognize the fact that Cobain was influential. But to attribute all that to him ('how they thought about women'? wtf?) shows tremendous short-sightedness and a lack of historical understanding.

Dammit, I forgot Little Richard and Buddy Holly. They should've definitely been in there.

"put Alternative on the map"
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Oct 14th, 2007
12:36:11 PM
No, he didn't. The industry coined that phrase as a way to market the underground indie-college-rock scene that had been slaving away FOR YEARS. Husker Du, Dinosaur Jr., The Pixies (and many, many others) all laid the groundwork. Nirvana was very fortunate (?) to have arrived when it did. I find their niche in music history more tragic than artistically significant.
Joan Baez
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
12:36:41 PM
I included her due to her influence on Bob Dylan (just finished reading Chronicles Vol 1). Probably a reach.

Pat Boone had a huge cultural impact too, ironically enough (not in regards to Dylan).

MNG: Don't go overboard
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
12:38:39 PM
We can argue until our eyes bleed whether or not grunge was worthwhile. But the fact is that it DID have an impact, just like the Boy Bands and Britney and her ilk had an impact on the latter half of the decade. The merits of each impact is up to the listener to decide.
"Cultural impact" has nothing to do with talent, which is where
by Flim Springfield
Oct 14th, 2007
12:40:04 PM
...Dave Grohl beats Kurt Cobain.
by Flim Springfield
Oct 14th, 2007
12:40:34 PM
chrth
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Oct 14th, 2007
12:43:05 PM
Agreed. And I don't deny it. But as a musician who has paid close attention to these trends, I find it odd that people tend to place all their eggs in one basket when it comes to the music of their time.
But the same can be said about just about anyone on your list.
by rbatty024
Oct 14th, 2007
12:46:15 PM
(I was pretty sure you would come back with that argument). Nothing happens in a vacuum. Buddy Holly wouldn't have been popular without all of the African-American blues musicians not to mention contemporaries who did it first and better like Chuck Berry. The point is, Buddy Holly brought black music to white America. He was the face of rock and roll and had the biggest cultural impact, even though rock and roll should not be completely attributed to him. Likewise Soundgarden signed to a major label first, but didn't do all that well before Nevermind hit. Without Kurt Cobain the entire grunge culture would have been ignored by everyone outside of Seattle, much like most of white America would have ignored rock and roll without Buddy Holly. Sure, there were other factors, but he was the face of early nineties culture and the driving force. Take a look at the film Hype, which is about the grunge boon. Models in NY were wearing grunge down the runway because of grunge and Nirvana. My original post was confusing because I meant to say he was the last individual who has had a major cultural impact, so I apologize for the mistake. Your list is a good one, but they all exist before Kurt Cobain came onto the scene. Every now and then someone talks about who will be the next Kurt Cobain but the fact of the matter is there won't be one. The internet has changed the way the culture has worked, now things aren't being marketed to the entire culture but rather small subgroups.
Actually, the Beatles are a different case
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
12:47:47 PM
Mostly because they had TWO major impacts on music.

First was they reversed the death of Rock in the US. In a short period of time at the end of the 50s, Holly dies, Presley is drafted, Jerry Lee Lewis marries his cousin (and is forced off tour), and Little Richard becomes a preacher. Popular music becomes doo-wop, Motown (which is still good as its own genre) and girl bands singing pop tunes.

In the UK, however, the bands kept rocking. The Beatles, coming to the US, undid all the damage and brought rock back to the States (I'm not arguing that there wasn't any rock bands in the US; in terms of popularity and cultural impact, though, it was non-existent)

Then of course, the Beatles meet Dylan, claim they're bigger than Jesus, and stop touring. As a result, they revolutionize music. Rubber Soul begets Pet Sounds begets Sgt. Pepper's. Norwegian Wood uses a Sitar and suddenly it's the most popular 'extra' instrument. When bands are touring, they're limited by what they can play on stage (until Lip Synching came along) ... that's why there's that Led Zeppelin song they've never played in a concert because it has a choir of some sort (I forget the details). But the Beatles stopped touring, and opened up the possibilities for artists because they were no longer encumbered by what they could play on stage.

Then of course there's the individual impact of each Beatle ... but that's a different TB post entirely.

rbatty024: there will be one
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
12:55:07 PM
Considering the "End of History" was supposed to happen with the fall of the Berlin Wall (yet somehow History keeps chugging along), I'm averse to the concept of finality.

You're also misreading the potential of the Internet. The Internet accelerates the process. A revolutionary artist could arrive, and hit like an atom bomb *because* of the Internet. Obviously, not everyone is a Dylan or McCartney (no matter how much they think they are), but to think they revolution is dead is a horribly pessimistic way to think.

That should say "think that revolution"
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
12:56:17 PM
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF CHEAP TRICK, LIVE AT BUDHOKAN
by Pound Sand
Oct 14th, 2007
01:07:24 PM
Argue all you want. You can have your grunge, hair metal, prog-rock, and folk shit. Just give me Rich Nielsen with a five-necked guitar and Bun E. Carlos smoking twelve packs of cigarettes during a concert and I'll be fine with whatever direction this TB takes next. As long as it's not horse-f@cking...,
I am Batman: You're way off
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
01:08:07 PM
Seriously. You need to look at what they did in the studio. Forget the screaming kids, forget Ed Sullivan. Look at Abbey Road Studios, Pet Sounds by the Beach Boys, and Dylan plugging in at Newport. This was a revolution, and the Beatles were at the head of it.

Like I said earlier, whether you like it or not is subject to the listener. When it comes to the impact, the Beatles second act by itself outshone anything anyone else had ever done (with the possible exception of Elvis Presley). Throw in the first act, and it's obvious why they're tops.

Pound Sand and I am Batman
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
01:10:10 PM
Pound Sand: But what about The Flame? I shudder to think how popular that song was.

I am Batman: Marvin Gaye and the Ramones both had a bigger cultural impact than Nirvana. I have them both on my iPod as well.

In the end, all that matters is ...
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
01:11:48 PM
Jim Steinman is still writing 'em, and Meat Loaf is still rocking 'em.
Oh, George Martin deserves credit too
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
01:13:44 PM
But considering what they did after the band split, and the fact that George Martin was a part of the 1978 movie, and I think I'd give Brian Epstein more credit that Martin.
I actually think this is a good thing.
by rbatty024
Oct 14th, 2007
01:14:21 PM
What I'm referring to is the long tail theory of economics (http://tinyurl.com/8tau9). To put it in capitalist terms, no longer can one product (music, films, television) be marketed to the culture as a whole and instead you have to market to small segments of the population. I remember reading somewhere that I Love Lucy was watched by 2/3 of those with televisions. That's an unheard of amount by todays standards, even American Idol can't compete. Look at television today. Cable is marketed to small segments that appeal to certain groups (sci-fi, comedy central, history channel, etc., etc.). The internet has opened up music thanks to online radio and mp3s, so no longer does music have to be filtered through major corporations so that they can get their songs on the radio. Nirvana was the last major band to take advantage of this old system and affect the cultural landscape in the way they did (even if others had more of an affect before them). The zeitgeist was just a tug and pull between the populace and major corporations. Nirvana is an example of a small moment of time where the populace won. However, as many people pointed out, look at what happened afterwards. A ton of copy-cat post-grunge bands that didn't have one-tenth of the wit or humor of Nirvana, Soundgarden, Screaming Trees, The Melvins, or any of the other original grunge bands who came out of Seattle. Corporations went back to the old business model as soon as possible so they could market a predictable sound to the populace without having to make unpredictable guesses about trends or actually try and get feedback from people about what they wanted to hear. They wanted a one-way street, with them giving the buyer their product and the buyer dishing out money without thinking. Now that the internet has come along the buyer can choose other avenues for their product. While major music labels have been losing sales small labels have been having a field day. Small label bands like The Shins and Spoon have actually made it on the Billboard top ten. This is unheard of. So I think the death of the zeitgeist (dramatic, I know) is actually a good thing because it allows more options for the individual and a more democratic economy.
Let's not go too crazy overstating Nirvana...
by Flim Springfield
Oct 14th, 2007
01:21:35 PM
They weren't even THE musical revolution of the moment. Garth Brooks was having a bigger impact on the music and cultural scene.
Back to Cobain
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
01:22:10 PM
Can anyone actually argue that Cobain had a bigger cultural impact than Britney Spears? Think about it. She was the crest of music sub-genre (Teenage Chick Rock). She influenced dress styles (six year olds dressed as hookers). She even had her own Courtney Love in Kevin Federline (just kidding, Love fans). Plus, since she didn't put a bullet in her brain (arguably she should have), we're still dealing with her as a figure in society.

Would anyone have You Tubed "Leave Kurt Alone!!"?

Now, in my opinion Cobain > Spears musically. But that's the odd thing when it comes to culture. Sometimes the least gifted become the most popular and have the most impact, while the most gifted languish.

And with that little discussion-killing gem
by chrth
Oct 14th, 2007
01:23:11 PM
I'm off to Babies R Us. Ciao!
Wiig as Bjork
by haggardatbest
Oct 14th, 2007
01:31:04 PM
Oddly sexy. Come to think of it, Wiig as anyone is sexy.
One last statement, chrth (for now)
by rbatty024
Oct 14th, 2007
01:34:20 PM
People actually listened to Nirvana across demographics. There's a statement in Cobain's diary where he points to the fact that Gen Xers and Baby Boomers were listening to the same music. It's true, I knew plenty of middle aged people listening to Nirvana, even though they knew next to nothing about his punk roots. Both men and women were dressing in flannel (unfortunately). I only knew of teenage girls dressing like and listening to Britney Spears. The attention she's receiving later in life is our pathetic obsession with celebrities rather than the art or culture they leave behind. Oh, and I Am Batman, admit that you have "The Underdog" on your ipod...set to repeat...for the last three weeks. Don't hate on Spoon they went from aping The Pixies to Beach Boys studio wizardry on some wonderfully well crafted songs.
The great Debate
by 1drXX
Oct 14th, 2007
01:43:39 PM
Saying Nirvana and particularly Kurt Cobain is great is ignoring a lot of important facts because of emotional facts. If Nevermind comes out a couple months later they would have been behind Soundgarden, Smashing Pumpkins, and Pearl Jam. They didn't change the music genre, it had already changed, they just released first. To talk about the debate about Grohl vs. Cobain, you just have to look at a fact that Cobain admitted on several occasions -- he had tried to push Grohl out of the band because he was afraid Grohl would begin to be more important to the band than he was. This doesn't mean Grohl is better, but it definitely shows that he has a lot of talent. Grohl wrote a lot more of the Nirvana songs than he is given credit, including a lot of the guitar parts. Cobain's voice isn't beautiful, it is distinct. It was a voice for a generation (that I am part of) unlike any other voice before or since. Cobain and Nirvana were great because of the unique quality of Kurt Cobain. I love Nirvana and would spit in the drink of anyone who says they aren't great, but Foo Fighters are a better group of musicians that make more musical music. But who you like more isn't limited to technical merit. Cobain wins the heart contest by a wide margin, but Grohl wins the talent contest.
Wiig as Bjork and "Full Recovery!" made me laugh
by AnimeJune
Oct 14th, 2007
02:22:50 PM
But the Weekend Update was dead in the water. What happened? It's usually the funnier part of the show. I'm sorry I can't take part in the music discussion - I alway tune out during the musical numbers.
Good points...
by christian66
Oct 14th, 2007
02:23:12 PM
..that don't change the fact that SNL sucks.
I like Foo Fighters
by fiester
Oct 14th, 2007
02:49:35 PM
They have some good songs. But don't compare them to Nirvana. And I don't buy that ret-con crap about Cobain fearing Grohl's emerging talent. Grohl is certainly very talented. No one I know really thought Foo Fighters would be anything other than a vanity project but they turned out to be a pretty decent band. But Cobain wrote the songs in Nirvana. Come on. Heck, he probably wrote all the song's on Hole's "Live Through This" album as well (check it out--they sound a lot like Nirvana songs in structure). I think Grohl learned a lot from Cobain about songwriting. I still enjoy those old Nirvana albums. I don't want to get into a full-blown debate about cultural influence and all that bullshit, but please stop the madness of claiming the Foo Fighters is, was, or ever will be superior to Nirvana. That's just plain silly.
the nirvana vs. foo dick measuring contest becomes more complex
by s0nicdeathmonkey
Oct 14th, 2007
03:37:35 PM
you consider that latter band's best song is about the former band (everlong). Everlong might be the best pop song of our generation. But can it really be better than the work of the band it's about? It becomes a chicken and the egg thing. Of course, Courtney Love is the best writer of the bunch.
Dave vs. Kurdt (Nirvana fans will get that)
by Loosejerk
Oct 14th, 2007
04:20:40 PM
Personally, I enjoyed Dave's first Foo record the most out of everything he's done. It was kind of a sonic bridge between Nirvana and the mainstream stuff he's putting out now. So as a whole, I think Nirvana was a more interesting band creatively.
Grunge lasted 1992-96 or so. Hair metal c.83-81.
by TomBodet
Oct 14th, 2007
05:15:56 PM
And you know--outside of Pearl Jam and our guys in Foo-What grunge bands are still out there doing much? Dinosaur Jr? Candlebox? Live? Belly? Screaming Trees? Stone Temple Pilots? Basically you have Pearl Jam and then the rest are either gone or oldies acts already.

Then there's Bon Jovi, still out there selling well and doing the big stadium tour routine. You see more of Poison and Motley Crue and Def Leppard making the touring rounds than you do the Seattle-lites. It's just how it seems to be right now-the Eighties nostalgia stuff is what people still wanna hear.

Kurt Cobain was wildly over-rated by the media, but yes he was important. To me he was basically Jim Morrison but not as good. Sorry that's jest the opinion nothing more.

Giant Robots make things better. Put some into the next Foo video.

I meant 1991
by TomBodet
Oct 14th, 2007
05:16:26 PM
I'm a go-bot I know.
Foos make fun tunes.
by TomBodet
Oct 14th, 2007
05:26:02 PM
I liked their whole Mentoes-ad parody they did some years back.
Grunge that's still around.
by rbatty024
Oct 14th, 2007
05:27:44 PM
The Melvins are still around and kicking all sorts of ass. Screaming Trees frontman Mark Lanegan has had a long and illustrious career from his solo stuff to his work with Queens of the Stone Age and the album he did with Isobell Campbell (which is the weirdest collaboration I've heard of). Mudhoney is also still around. And although they're not really grunge, but 80's punk, Dinosaur Jr. released an album this year that was far better than it deserved to be, in fact I count it as one of the best of the year. True, most of them have hung up their flannels, but a good handful are still kicking and making surprisingly good music. Most of the bands that formed after the Seattle bands hit it big I don't really count into the grunge category. More hangers-on than anything else.
Soundgarden over Nirvana
by Jon1drfl
Oct 14th, 2007
06:49:48 PM
I loved the raw energy Nirvana unleashed when they debuted in the early 90's but I'm sorry to say they were heading for the self important pretentious super highway by the time Cobain killed himself. I'm sorry....I have no sympathy for someone that talented who has reached the proverbial mountain top AND just had a newborn daughter and he's just soooo pained he'll throw it all away. Grohl is better off without him and what he's accomplished is incredible even though he peaked on The Colour and The Shape. And by the way, Soundgarden OWNED Nirvana back in the day...Best..Band..EVER
Van Halen is charging way over "state fair" prices...
by Flim Springfield
Oct 14th, 2007
06:59:45 PM
...and people are paying.
Soundgarden > Nirvana
by Little Dick Wick
Oct 14th, 2007
07:45:48 PM
I'm a Nirvana fan, but Soundgarden made them their bitch, hardcore. As did Smashing Pumpkins, Alice in Chains, Stone Temple Pilots, Dinosaur Jr., the Melvins, Foo Fighters (just to name a few)... I'm thankful for Nirvana's contribution to mainstream music and the changes that they brought, but they're definitely one of the more overrated bands in recent history. Oh, and the term "grunge" is pretty much just an oversimplified way of cramming a bunch of diverse bands with individual flavors under the same umbrella.
Foo Fighters > Nirvana
by avengerbri2
Oct 14th, 2007
08:16:38 PM
1) Both bands made good music 2) Both bands had Dave Grohl as a member 3) Kurt Cobain was weak and a failure. He removed himself from raising the daughter that he sired. That girl will grow up never knowing her father, because he had no fucking spine. Fuckhead. If I believed in hell, I'd be happy knowing he's there.
Eight days, 23.5 hours until Kristen Bell on Heroes...
by Pennsy
Oct 14th, 2007
08:31:24 PM
GRAVITAS, baybee!
Foo Fighters' first two albums...
by Little Dick Wick
Oct 14th, 2007
08:35:18 PM
...are better than anything Nirvana ever did, period. I would even venture to say that The Colour and the Shape is one of my favorite albums of the 90's.
Fine Music Discussion aside, SNL STILL SUCKS!!!
by Bumpasses Dawg
Oct 14th, 2007
08:39:37 PM
The "Oooh!" sketch was funny (mostly), and the Dane Cook Impression was dead on. I still think Bill Hader is a young Dan Aykroyd and Darrell Hammond does a GREAT Al Gore impression. That being said, this show is a huge waste. Because Lorne and his producers have turned this franchise into the Menudo of Comedy (no new hires over 30), the comedy has become purile. Those who thing the punched while eating short was funny have been sniffing too much of their own gas. I will admit that a few of Andy Samburg's shorts have been really good when musically based - "Dick in a Box," "Lazy Sunday," (Parnell got pwned) and that "Iran So Far" were decent and gave me a smile. But crap like "Punched" and "Laser Cats" and that "where's Andy" are just AWFUL crap that presume that everyone finds him just as cute and irresistable as he finds himself. NO ONE could like him as much as he likes himself, except perhaps for Lorne Michael, who has a sweet young boy crush every few years. Once Adam Sandler left, Jimmy Fallon filled Lorne's NAMBLA wet dream. Now it is Samburg. I'm not saying that SNL should bring in a lot of old people... Jesus, watching Chevy Chase click his dentures like Grandpa trying to entertain the grandbabies made my stomach flip a few weeks back -- but I want Lorne to remember that Phil Hartman was closer to 40 than 30 when he started at SNL. Look for funny Lorne. Find decent writers who KNOW funny. If you continue on this path, there is only one really old mind that should leave SNL in the hands of someone younger. YOU.
I am Batty.
by TomBodet
Oct 14th, 2007
09:01:25 PM
Well--last I checked--Poison was playing to 10K a night, have been since '99, ummmm even guys like Ratt/Cinderella/Dokken are able to do close to that in there whacky little package tours.

To Quothe someone here--Hair Bands is a nice little over-simplification of a large amount of diverse bands that cover almost a decade in time. Like it or not, that's just the way it works.

Of course, would this also refer to your flannel wearing stoner brother? your LookatMeI'mso Ironic TinyToons tattooed/starbucks glugging Seven Mary Three listening Self? Sheesh gimme a break. For everything you despise about all things Winger Whitesnake and Warrant, the same can be said about STP, Candlebox and Soundgarters. Gimme a fucking break-Most of these guys were ARENA ROCK BANDS, just one group aped KISS and the others a combo of Zepp and the Clash/Sex Pistols(but secretly wanted to be KISS, too!).

Here that's really what I was getting at below.
by TomBodet
Oct 14th, 2007
09:10:59 PM
http://tinyurl.com/2gvdf4 And it's not like this is NEW, it's been going on since about the height of all things 'Behind the Music' some ten years ago.
More on Nirvana
by Wrath4771
Oct 14th, 2007
09:41:17 PM
Yes, there was definitely Alternative before Nirvana as one of the posters noted such bands as Husker Du and the Pixies. However, a lot of people didn't have access to that kind of music (pre internet days) and it wasn't until Nirvana that the spot light was shone on the genre - thanks in large part to Kurt dragging every band possible into the light. Kurt was the first one to say they weren't the first and that can be seen and read in interviews where he always praises bands like The Melvins and Sonic Youth. I still think they were the best grunge band, but if Mother Love Bone had lasted they probably would have held the title and we wouldn't have had to deal with Pearl Jam (great live band, but ho-hum albums mostly). And I have to agree with the above poster that said The White Stripes are the best band out there. Jack White has a rare gift - he can play just about any type of music and pull it off. Kurt still killed Hair Metal to the Hair Metal apologists. Poison might be drawing 10,000 a night, but most of those people aren't there to hear anything created after 1991-1992. As for where have all the Grunge bands gone - some are still out there (Screaming Trees), but it seems too many of them like Kurt and Lane had personal demons they couldn't defeat.
Yeesh
by BizarroJerry
Oct 14th, 2007
09:45:45 PM
Did I get redirected to a music history message board? Good Lord. Did someone use the word "zeitgeist"?
I Want to hug and kiss Kristen Wiig!!!
by wackybantha
Oct 14th, 2007
11:03:02 PM
Who's with me???
Seth Rogan SNL was better
by JeffManSixtyFo
Oct 14th, 2007
11:59:03 PM
We thought last weeks show was funnier but look at what you had to work with ...Jon Bon Jovi I said WHEH!
ok, this one's battin' .750 . . .
by aboriginal
Oct 15th, 2007
12:20:50 AM
. . . where almost all over the last several years have been .222 or less. Understand that most of what worked last night was '80's derived, and not just the opener. Man, more of that and TiVo's not the only one watching it.
chrth: Pete/Moonie>Burnt Cocain?
by Napoleon Park
Oct 15th, 2007
03:53:44 AM
Why specify half that band? THE WHO has/had/have more talent in my litle finger than Nelvania/Fog Biters/Derogatory Euphemism For Vagina cumulatively ever dreemt of having. You specify "even Ringo" even though his solo career can barely fill a greatest hits single disc, but that's fair enough. Still, chart position aside, John Entwistle's solo albums > Ringo's. Admittedly solo Daltrey could barely fill a moderately interesting best of EP but still, could Burnt Cocain play Tommy? Ann Margret swimming in chocolate syrup and beans > Nelvania.

And thank whoever that SNL is doing shows that don't open with a political sketch and actually include the guest host in the opener.

Not a fan of BanLon von Banjoboy, but calling the Italian guy talk show host on the fact that he's speaking gibberish was pretty funny.

Foo's fuckin rule!
by RobFromBackEast
Oct 15th, 2007
05:33:05 AM
Best rock band on the planet right now. Fuck you all very much
Fuck Nirvana
by kilik777
Oct 15th, 2007
09:20:11 AM
They were just the right band at the right time. Foo Fighters musically is way more talented than Nirvana ever was. Its a shame how loved the overrated Nirvana was. I will never forgive Nirvana for essentially killing the art of the guitar solo in mainstream rock. http://tinyurl.com/pv8do
Napoleon Park
by chrth
Oct 15th, 2007
09:53:18 AM
Ann Margret swimming in beans and chocolate > everything

I said Townsend and Moon specifically because 1) Townsend was the most impactful of the entire group, and 2) Because Moon killed himself, just like Cobain did. I honestly do not know/understand Daltrey and Entwhistle's contributions as I'm working backwards right now (just got Orbison, Presley, and Jerry Lee Lewis out from the library) and haven't pushed into the late 60s yet (outside of the Beatles, which is where I started). I didn't want to cite Daltrey because I didn't want to be exposed to a "Daltrey is only a pretty boy with a good singing voice, Townsend is the whole band" argument.

As for Ringo, I was actually speaking of his work as a drummer for the Beatles, not a solo artist. Very under-rated, and quite the talent. Besides, Octopus Garden!

I never realized there's a whole Nirvana v Foo Fighters
by chrth
Oct 15th, 2007
09:54:26 AM
argument. Interesting. If I ever make it to the 90s I might have to listen to them (as I just mentioned, I just skipped back to the late 50s).
Count me with those who think...
by Abominable Snowcone
Oct 15th, 2007
10:57:58 AM
Nirvana were a good band, but mostly very lucky--right song, right place, right time. The planets aligned for them and "Nevermind." Other bands of that ilk were arguably better musicians / songwriters (Alice in Chains, Soundgarden, Pearl Jam), and this is coming from a guy who isn't a huge fan of any of them. Queens of the Stone Age is another good one, although if you have to classify music that band would be more "stoner" rock than grunge or "alternative." I hate the word "alternative." It doesn't mean anything anymore, if it ever did.
TO:I am Batman- You are more wrong than anything ever
by Emperor_was_a_jerk
Oct 15th, 2007
01:17:51 PM
The Beatles may have been helped with marketing when they were mop tops, but history has proven they were/are much more than that.
wackybantha
by haggardatbest
Oct 15th, 2007
07:18:26 PM
I'm with you, if by "hug and kiss" you mean "impregnate after multiple sweaty, back-twisting tries"
Christ now there's a Nirvana Vs. Foo Fighters...
by Kid Z
Oct 16th, 2007
03:39:27 PM
...dickfight? The very notion of it is just idiotic to begin with! Can't you nerds just go back to whacking off to your Tivos of Fatney's VMA performance?
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.