Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

Spoilerish tidbits on SCREAM 3

NO by Loki Trickster	Apr 13th, 1999 12:00:38 PM
There they go, falling victim to the rules. The heroine should survive this movie...and it should also be the last movie. Scream should not fall victim to the "let's milk this for all it's worth" theme that the Nightmare and Friday movies are victim to. Let the films complete the trilogy, and let it go down gracefully...but killing off Sidney is exactly what every other horror movie does. Of course, Williamson could be creating the rumors as a mis-information tactic...we never know. Regardless, I will go see this film, hopefully with a cute girl who likes to be scared out of her mind. -Loki
Should Sydney bite it in the beginning? by BadAshe	Apr 13th, 1999 12:06:27 PM
I am a huge fan of "Scream" but I absolutely despised "Scream 2". Billy's mother?!? I still shudder after hearing that phrase. In fact after I saw the movie, I decided to read the script that was leaked on the net and found that to be a much better story. The ending was still kinda weak, but that's the way the genre works. As far a Scr3am goes, they should begin like this: Open on a young man sitting in front of his computer typing away at what looks like a screenplay. Have the phone ring. He answers and it is a friend and they talk about the new screenplay that the man is working on. He can say that it is a new kind of horror film. He describes it a new twist on the teen slasher film. He can talk about how cool it would be to have a bunch of kids that grew up on horror films thrown into a similar situation. call waiting beeps and he clicks over...and it's our pal Ghostface! He begins to taunt and tease the man, but the guy isn't buying it. After a little debate Ghostface pops up behind him and they start to fight. The twist this time is to have the man beat the living puss out of ghostface. He punches, kicks, and throws the killer around the apartment. However, just as he stands over the beaten killer... another Ghostface pops up and rams a blade into the guys back. He falls on the ground dead with his eyes open. Wes can then come in for a close up on the eyes and, ala part one, have both Ghostface's appear in the reflection of the man's eyes. What do y'all think (uh-oh, you now know I'm a Texan, not Harry though)? what Scream 3 needs is to ttwist the series the way Kevin and Wes twisted the traditional slasher film with Scream. By establishing up front that there are two Ghostfaces, it could make for some interesting plot twists.
Oh God... by dokden	Apr 13th, 1999 12:07:24 PM
Sounds to me like Neve didn't want to do the movie so they said "Well, just come in for a few days, and we'll kill you off" and now the movie is going to be bad
SCREAM 3 IS FOR ME!!!! YEAHHH! by JaneDoe33	Apr 13th, 1999 12:27:42 PM
I can't wait for Scream Part 3! Oh boy! It's going to be sooo scary! And Urban Legend Part 2 is also going to be scary! Oh boy! I hope they make another sequel to I Know What You Did Last Summer. The first two were really scary! Oh wait, I've gotta go now. I gotta go read my Teen Beat magazine and listen to some N-Sync. Corey Haim is soooo cute!!!
Scream 4 by Luc	Apr 13th, 1999 12:36:11 PM
Yep. I would like to say that Neve Campbell doesn't want to do this movie because she already has plans to spend the next 6 months locked up with me in a room full of bouncy castles and strobe lights, eating nothing but jelly off of my naked body but it is more likely she just doesn't want to follow up the pile of shite that was scream 2. Anyway, after Scream 3 they will probably go on to make a 4th which will more than likely be another piece of post-modern bullshit revolving around murders during the filming of the Scream trilogy.
BadAshe by Loki Trickster	Apr 13th, 1999 12:39:50 PM
Please enlighten me on how having two Ghostfaces is going to twist the series at all...both the first and the second movie had two Ghostfaces working together to kill off people...well, what could be done with the series? Sidney could be the killer this time though, that that'd be very unsatisfying for me (and lets face it, sequels are all about satisfying the public's need for more of the same), there could only be one killer Ghostface, there could be a new type of killer all-together (which would also be unsatisfying, because the Ghostface mask is very very scary; they could have something ala "Clue" where everyone is involved in the murders; or they could have one of the established characters be the new murderer, also unsatisfying. Whatever happens, Dewey will get beat up again (he can't be the killer though, he's too beat up to walk, much less kill), Sidney will get picked on, and perhaps will die...but if she dies, that gets rid of all the motivation for the Ghostface to kill...I hope Williamson is better than thinking up these plots than I am, because anyway I can conceive it, it's going to suck...of course, I thought that was what was going to happen with Scream 2, so I'll be eagerly awaiting this new sequel. -Loki
JaneDoe, are you like some 16 year old airhead or something??? by quentin2	Apr 13th, 1999 12:47:18 PM
JaneDoe, I'm sorry but urban legend was a fucking piece of shit. It should've been flushed down the toilet, but some stupid idiots decided to distribute it and call it a "film". And lemme just say, Loki, bro, I understand what you're saying. But actually, I would like it alot if neve died. To me, THAT would be the unique plot twist! If she survived YET again, how typical would that be??? Just like the last two movies! How orginal could this movie be if she just went through it all over again just like she did the first two times??? I really really love it when main characters die in movies. Especially when they die in the middle of the movie. I love how that happened in Pulp Fiction and other movies. I just love to see a story through a "main" character's eyes only to see them die a brutal death and the story transfers over to someone else. I just love when that happens. That's one of my favorite plot devices in a movie. And the more we like the main character, the better it is when he/she dies! I mean, we've watched Neve for two movies as she survived all this. She's our little heroine, and we want her to live. Imagine how GREAT it will be when she dies! I hope they make her death really painful and graphic... It's not that I don't like her, I DO like her! The more I like a character, the better it is when they die. It is...tragic. Imagine what a shock it'll give you! And it's not even the end of the movie! We've seen main characters die in the end of movies, but usually not in the middle! In the "Freddie vs Jason" Talk Back, I said that I hoped Scream 3 wasn't gonna be made. ....Now I think I've changed my mind. If Neve dies here, it could be the best movie of the trilogy.
Oh... JaneDoe, u were being sarcastic, right? by quentin2	Apr 13th, 1999 12:51:08 PM
I mean, that's what I got. But I know that teenie-boppers have shit for brains these days, so...
Ash is dat you? by Elan Vitale	Apr 13th, 1999 12:52:07 PM
I'm bad Ash, and you're good Ash!
Hey You Get Your Damn Hands Off Her by Elan Vitale	Apr 13th, 1999 01:05:17 PM
She wasn't kidding those are great movies and you know what else they should make a sequel to "Lawenmower Man 2: Jobe's War" because that movie was awesome it's right up there with "Can't Stop the Music" and "Spacehunter: Adventures in the Forbidden Zone".
Ash is dat you? by Elan Vitale	Apr 13th, 1999 01:08:43 PM
I'm bad Ash, and you're good Ash!
Quentin2 by Palmer Eldritch	Apr 13th, 1999 01:08:44 PM
Seek therapy.
Three things............. by RobinP	Apr 13th, 1999 01:19:34 PM
1 How come AICN wasn't updated since Saturday, thus sending me in to a culture shock induced depression. I needed my fix, man !!! 2 Jane Doe, are you for real ? I hope you're not, because if you are, there are people on this website who'll eat you alive. Fortunately, I am not one of them. Trussssssssssssssssst meeeeeeeeeeeee !!!!!!!!!!!! 3 Yep, kell her off ! No, not Jane Doe, you fools ! Sidney. Sidney should die....early. Hey it worked in the original stalk'n'slasher, Psycho. Why not again, the Scream series thrive on being derivative, and that's not an insult, it's what makes them fun !!
Attack of the Gorten Fisherman by GodBear	Apr 13th, 1999 01:37:16 PM
Jane Doe, you've got 'em all confused now. Poor guys. I know you were joking because anyone who actually liked "I Know What You Yada Yada Yada" must be drinking formaldehyde with their Cheerios and as such could not get to a computer. Any movie who's main badguy is taken right off the opening credits of Scooby Doo and who's plot, acting, and execution pales in comparison to that same Scooby Doo episode, should not win first prize at my junior high media fair. Then what would I have won? As for Scream 3, I think killing off Sydney early is a good idea but I think they should do it even earlier. Before the movie starts. In fact, have the entire plot of the movie take place before the movie starts and then you don't have to make this movie at all.
Scream-Trilogy.com by MrPointy	Apr 13th, 1999 01:53:47 PM
The Hollywood storyline has been confirmed in Variety and other resources. And let me just promote my website at http://www.scream-trilogy.com/ sorry bout that....And they would never make a 3rd I KNOW movie right?? because the last one FAILED. And Urban Legends had the worst writing I have EVER seen...well recently.
urban legand 2? by kadabra	Apr 13th, 1999 01:59:40 PM
Ugh, no! I can't believe anyone came out of Urban Legend wanting to see more of it! No, that message a while ago must just be a figment of my imagination trying to torment me by reminding me that I paid five bucks to sit through that movie.
Trying to polish a turd by BadAshe	Apr 13th, 1999 02:02:45 PM
Loki- You make some good points. First off, this movie shouldn't even be made. I mean Dimension could take the money they are going to blow on this piece of celluloid flotsam and blow it on an entirely original piece of celluloid flotsam. It doesn't matter though, because no what any of us say, Scream 3 will get made. So all of us about the decision to make the film is pointless. My opening idea was just a suggestion of what how they could throw a new dimension into the film. We all know that there are going to be two killers (hey, Billy's father is still out there), but seeing only one ghostface seemingly appear in different places at once is tired. In the Scream 2 script that was originally planned, they had 2 killers running around chasing after the victims and I thought that it was a great idea. We are so used to seeing the killer (Jason, Freddy, et al) chasing someone and then suddenly appearing in front of them a mile down the road. By saying, "Ok folks, we have two killers, but who are they?" gives Kevin the opportunity to spend more thought on creating a logical reason for why the killers are working together (met in the Psycho chat room? I thought they closed Prodigy?). I wish I could talk more, but I have neglected Half-Life for far too long. And Elan, I'm Bad Ashe, you're good Ashe. Goody-goody two shoes.
Random/Impossible/Lame Scream 3 Idea by ccubed	Apr 13th, 1999 02:12:16 PM
An army of Ghostfaces descend upon the nation on the Millenial New Year's Eve. They run amok slaying and generally abusing all the drunken party goers. The first party should be all the surviving cast of the first two flicks, and they should get greased quickly, yet colorfully. Then the army of ghostfaces continue their rampage until the army is called in and a bloodbath ensues. In the end, the leader of Ghostfaces should be either Wes Craven or Kevin Williamson. Either that, or have the Ghostface win this time and he kills everybody and doesn't get caught and lives out his/her life peacefully after ending the series.
I Know What You Did Last Summer by Corran Fox Horn	Apr 13th, 1999 02:38:33 PM
IKWYDLS was realistic, grounded, well-acted (Prinze Jr did seem a little slow), creepy, well-directed, well-written thriller. It had a mysterious/slasher killer, which is the only reason it can be considered horror, but I think the reason horror fans didn't dig it is because it didn't have any goofy characters, humor, over-the-top crap, instead it played it straight. Maybe if I was a horror buff I would dislike it too, but as it is I thought it was pretty good, for the genre. The sequel however, chucked all that, as well as it's cast and crew (except for Hewitt and Prinze Jr). It was a ridiculous, predictable, gratuitous POS, who script was chosen from the best submitter in a score of hopefuls. And we all know Danny Cannon isn't that great a director...
sarcasm by Carey N.	Apr 13th, 1999 02:55:53 PM

sarcasm by Carey N.	Apr 13th, 1999 02:59:44 PM
Sorry about that. Anyway, I can't believe how many people don't recognize sarcasm when they see it. Having the main character die in the middle of Psycho worked because nobody had done it at that time and nobody expected it. With Scream 3, half the people on the talk back expect it. By the way, to the person above me, I Know What You Did Last Summer wasn't good by any stretch of the imagination. It had horrible acting, repellent characters, and a stupid killer.
Scream 3 by W. Leach	Apr 13th, 1999 03:10:50 PM
First off, SCREAM 3 is not going to be a hack job. Kevin Williamson always said that he envisioned a trilogy. I enjoyed the first SCREAM, didn't really care for the second one (it seemed a bit overlong and rushed -- the original first draft script was a hell of a lot better than the finished project), and am looking forward to the third (and final) chapter. Personally, I think killing off Sidney in the opening will be a shocker (and I'm all for shockers). The original SCREAM was ruined for me because I knew ahead of time that Drew Barrymore would go to that big ranch in the sky. The goddamned critics SPOILED it for me!! Stuff like "Drew Barrymore's cameo in the first ten minutes of the film..." and "Drew Barrymore meets a gruesome end in opening sequence of new shocker..." stuff like that. Believe me, I thought Barrymore had a huge role in the movie, what with her in all the posters, and receiving a special "And Drew Barrymore" credit. From the time she appeared on screen, I knew she was going to bite it. Ditto the second one. I read a few reviews prior to seeing it, mentioning Jada Pinkett meeting an untimely end in the opening. That ruined it for me ... but the death of Randy DID surprise the shit out of me. What really bothers me is the character of Deputy Riley. In the original script, he dies after being stabbed in the back by Ghostface. The scene at the end with him being led out of the house on a stretcher came AFTER the film was shot, as the character was well liked. Fine enough. But to have him survive the SEQUEL?? Come on. The guy was savagely butchered. I really thought he was dead...until the final scene, which kind of was a replay of the first film. Good ol' Dewey being led away on a stretcher...very much alive. Why? Well-liked character. Randy's death was great because it was so unexpected, that even as it was happening, I didn't believe it. I think another survivor of the first film should have died as well. Almost everybody left standing from the first one is left standing in the second one. If Sidney dies in the third one, it will come as a shock, even though I know it may happen before hand. It will be a lot more effective than having an established star meet his/her end, because we went through hell with Sidney the first two times. She's the typical heroine who beats the evil and comes out of the tunnel into the light. If she is killed in the opening, NO ONE will be safe. Although I read somewhere that Neve Campbell doesn't want to return (another 54, anyone?) having her appear for ten minutes seems reasonable enough. She wouldn't have to carry the movie, and her death would haunt it, just the way Randy's did in SCREAM 2. Here's what I DON'T want to see: Matthew Lillard. Don't get me wrong. He was one of the best things in SCREAM. But I heard (it's probably just a rumor, but still...) that he will return as Stu's twin brother. Uh, no thanks. Basically, I'm not a fan of the current crop of slasher flicks (you don't want to know how much I despised URBAN LEGEND), but the original SCREAM worked for me. Hopefully the closing film will be as fresh and creative. With the right cast and director (Wes Craven?) this could be the final word in '90s teen slasher pics (but I wouldn't hold my breath)
RE: You get your damn hands off her! by DocBosch	Apr 13th, 1999 03:36:45 PM
Back To The Future RULES!!! Doc Bosch
New Heroine by 2muchcola	Apr 13th, 1999 04:08:48 PM
I've heard a rumor that after Sid takes a dirt nap Katie Holmes will be the new heroine.I also heard that the entire cast of Dawson's Creek will make special cameos and be possible victims.We all know that Josh Jackson had a cameo in Scream 2 so it is very likely he will return as the same character and maybe the killer following in classmate Mickey's footsteps.I've been a huge Scream fan and I hope that Dewie will finally die since in my opinion he is worst character in the trilogy(how can you kill ghostface with one hand?)
my drama teacher used to babysit Nevie Campbell in Toronto by Tall_Boy	Apr 13th, 1999 04:28:00 PM
That's what they called her, "Nevie". She says she was a bitch then, and she's still a bitch now (because she tottaly cut herself off from her family in Canada, she sez). Funny part is, we're doing a play of "Aresnic and Old Lace" and one character is updated from Drama Critic Mortimer to Film Critic Mortimer and I get to rag on Neve Campbell a few times. That's about it. Oh yeah, kill the bitch at the beginning too. I'd feel alot better (and so would my teacher) PS- this isn't bullshit. Why the hell would I make up a story as inane as this one? Everybody knows-somebody-who-knew-somebo dy famous somewhere. . .
SCREAM 3 should mock post-modern 90's horror flicks by Tall_Boy	Apr 13th, 1999 04:33:44 PM
i mean, SCREAM was a send up of 80's movies, SCREAM 2; sequels and SCREAM 3 should take responsiblity for all the crappy teen-slasher flicks it released upon us and properly tare it apart. (or it'll either be a comment on the general slimy nature of hollywood movie-making.) BTW, I liked the idea for the "script" opening of Scream 3 way above. Either way, I just wanna see it to see Dewey get the crap kicked out of him again. Even though THERE'S NOBODY TO EXPLAIN THE RULES!!! ARGGGHH!!! WHY RANDY WHY, GOD, WHY?!!!
Randy Ain't Dead by Guld Korn	Apr 13th, 1999 05:04:09 PM
I don't care what I've seen, I still don't believe it. This guy was the maestro, knew everything about horror movies, and dies right out in the open. Strange methinks! He was even a little wacky himself and with the Hollywood premise going down doesn't it seem like it has Randy all over it? Why wasn't he killed in the first movie when he was just hanging around? Different killers I know, but still! Many people adore the character, why not allow him to come back? The baddies at the end of the first were pretty beat up but they were still swinging blades around, besides it seems to me that they could've certainly used Randy's expertise. It's a goddamn conspiracy I tell you! What the hell, I'm a crack-fiend and I know it. And about this whole early bird Sidney slicing, I'm not completely buying it. With her out of the way who do you have left? That Cotton guy, Dewey, and Harmonica. They were good supporting characters but Sid was central. Who cares if no would see it coming? It is moving off the Scream plate and onto something else...something else ripe for more sequels. A good writer shouldn't just end his/her main characters for jumps from the audience. Where's the integrity? I did my part, now I want back!
What i want in 3 by EdVille	Apr 13th, 1999 07:02:11 PM
I would love it if gail died in the middle of the movie, or somewhere, but GAIL should die! Think of the possibilities. everyone is talking about Neve dying, but the first two movies were as much about gail as they were about neve. The killer shouldn't be craven or williamson though, leave that shit somewhere else. Also, wouldn't you think by the time a third Ghostface killer comes around that there would be a shitload of copycat killers all over america? Scream supposedly takes place in the real world, but it wouldn't be the real world without copycat killers. Hoverboards don't work on water! You need POOOWEHH!
Scream Goes Hollywood by Bongo	Apr 13th, 1999 07:32:32 PM
The first mistake was killing Randy off in the second. How can they set this final chapter in Hollywood and not have Randy geek it up with Sydney in movieland? I could see Randy biting it after dissing Jon Peters's treatment of the Superman and Batman franchises, but not like he did in the second. Other than that, I see great potential for this one, something along the lines of "Wes Craven's New Nightmare" with a potential for very witty, but hopefully not too many, inside jokes. I think part of the problem with the second was the way it milked the sequel angle. Williamson, if you're going to have your post-modern film students make mention of "Godfather II" and "sequels better than the original" you better raise the bar and make damn well sure your sequel is better than the original. "The Faculty" gave me hope, "Dawson's Creek" doesn't. Two more words of advice: Don't kill off Sydney early. She has to pull off her usual Lazarus act or end up being the killer, one scream queen who's fed up with being the victim. Also, don't end it at the high school prom, please...unless the final chase takes place during the filming of one a scene like that from one of those typical teen romantic comedies cribbed from old HS cliff notes. That might be a nice tongue-in-cheek touch. Finally, I think with the talent behind this project that this franchise, and hopefully the rest of the teen horror genre, can go out with a bang. Hopefully, the two years off have given both Craven and Williamson time to think of precisely how to end this properly.
by Bongo	Apr 13th, 1999 07:41:34 PM
Well, not a hope in a peace to all humanity way, but hope in that Williamson still knows how to do derivative right.
Scream 3.0.4 by DeeJay	Apr 13th, 1999 10:28:01 PM
I get the feeling that Neve Campbell wants to limit her involvemnet in tis final installment of the trilogy. If that's the case, then I recommend going the Charleston-Heston-Beneath-the- Planet-of-the-Apes route. After a brief stint in act I, Campell's character Sidney can be killed off at the end of act II... making act III that much more intense. I would also recommend making the 2 new killers over-the-top fans so obsessed with Sidney that they are killing as a tribute to her. When Sid gets killed in act II (however that happens), both the killers and the heroes could blame each other for her death (thus escalating their conflict for the final act). Let David Arquette's character Dep. Dewey live, but have him so phsyically limited that the killers simply ignore him (or consistently shove him out of the way if he tries to interfere). Placing the film in Hollywood opens the door to having some pretty outlandish characters. I think it would be funny to see a southern LA psuedo vampire killed off by ghostface (as an homage to early Dracula films)...
Scream 3.0.4 by DeeJay	Apr 13th, 1999 10:28:06 PM
I get the feeling that Neve Campbell wants to limit her involvemnet in tis final installment of the trilogy. If that's the case, then I recommend going the Charleston-Heston-Beneath-the- Planet-of-the-Apes route. After a brief stint in act I, Campell's character Sidney can be killed off at the end of act II... making act III that much more intense. I would also recommend making the 2 new killers over-the-top fans so obsessed with Sidney that they are killing as a tribute to her. When Sid gets killed in act II (however that happens), both the killers and the heroes could blame each other for her death (thus escalating their conflict for the final act). Let David Arquette's character Dep. Dewey live, but have him so phsyically limited that the killers simply ignore him (or consistently shove him out of the way if he tries to interfere). Placing the film in Hollywood opens the door to having some pretty outlandish characters. I think it would be funny to see a southern LA psuedo vampire killed off by ghostface (as an homage to early Dracula films)...
Sorry for the double-post!!! by DeeJay	Apr 13th, 1999 10:29:48 PM

Surely Randy is the killer in Scream 3? by Martin Q Blank	Apr 14th, 1999 03:29:06 AM
Surely. If they did that, all would be forgiven after Scream 2. It just seems so right. In fact it would more then make ammends. It would be worth the annoyance of Randy's death if we were to find out it was faked. It would provide closure. And remember, it wouldn't be the first time someone had faked a death in the Scream series (Billy)!!!
I still think... by frog	Apr 14th, 1999 07:53:51 AM
You know, when I was anxiously awaiting the release of Scr2am (sorry, i hate the new logo), i figured dewey would be the one behind it all. i'm holding to that theory. see, he was the mastermind behind the first one, hence the all-too-convenient non-fatal wound. the second one he did NOT organize, and really got lucky. so here he is, orchestrating his sequel, but the franchise's third. he doesn't have to be up for any action, just a lot of organizing. i mean, look at scr1am. remember the phone call syd got while at tatum's house? "DEWEY!!" and he just happens to come out at the end of the phone call? mmhmm... sure, yeah, whatever. and maybe randy is still behind it too...and the conversation in the restaraunt was them trying to figure out who they can blame as suspects...and then dewey said "maybe you are a suspect" to randy, and randy says "well if im a suspect, you're a suspect" so they stop thinking about that. oh man, im on to something...goes off to formulate more horrible theories
Arsenic by Bud	Apr 15th, 1999 06:43:16 AM
Sorry to stray so far from the subject, but updating Arsenic and Old Lace?!?! That's almost as bad as a Harvey remake..why do so many high school and community theatres feel the need to update everything? Leave it alone! Okay , now I have to leave work, go home and put a cold compress on my head.
SIDNEY IS THE KILLER! by irishboxer	Apr 16th, 1999 10:41:00 AM
Ok, check this out. I think that the only way to end Scream 3 is to have Sidney be the killer. Just look at what she's been through - she's got to have some psychological problems by now! While Sidney's filming STAB 2, she's keeps on claiming that she shes Mr. Ghostface, but no one belives her. Then people start getting knocked off, first some actors, stage crew people... At the end, we find out it's Sidney murdering in attempt to show that Mr. Ghostface is still out there haunting her. Sidney will die, but not by Ghostface, but by one of her co-stars/ (attempted)victims. I think that it should be played kinda like in the film "The Innocents" (Based on The Turn of the Screw), where we're not quite sure if Sidney's actually seeing Mr. Ghostface, or if he's just a figmint of her imagination. One word of advise to Williamson, MAKE THE DEATH SEQUENCES MORE DRAMATIC. The Deaths in Scream 2 had no drama to them and they weren't really masterminded deaths. Think of Original ways to kill of the characters, rather than merely Hack and Slash. And is it just me, or is Scream 1 a pure ripoff ( or if you must - "HOMAGE") of Halloween? Watch the 2 films back to back and you'll see that a lot of the scenes are identicle. That's my 2 cents!
erm..hi by whoiskeysersoze?	May 2nd, 1999 08:56:29 AM
ok this is my first comment,so i just wanna introduce myself to no one as none of you will read this 'cause it's been weeks since this newsy bit was posted.I had to get my word in as 'scream' is my favourite film.Notice how i say 'scream' not 'scream 2'. 'scream2'=better than i make it out to be cause i had high expectations.It was good, but not good enough.I wont go into it's problems ( i.e. the stoopid killers,a certain character's death halfway that I WAS REALLY PISSED ABOUT!!!!!!!!!!!) but there u go it was a slasher ,people die in slashers, no need to dwell (WHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHYWHY!!!!KEVI N WILLIAMSON WILL PAY FOR WHAT HE'S DONE!!!!)I am bitterly dissapointed by williamson through his choice of plot,It's an idea that's been hanging round for ages and it would have been great if he'd thought of something more surprising. I've got my own idea on a plot for scream 3 that would make EVERYBODY happy (which i wont say in case williamson has thought of it already and is just throwing a smokescreen-i can hope). As much as i would love to see Randy's return i'd rather not see him as the killer.It would destroy the character and his whole point ,williamson has made a mistake in killing off the best character (and taking away the best performer in jamie kennedy)in the series.And am i the only one not to find it a shock??? i don't see how ,i guessed before i even saw the sequel that Kennedy would die. Clues: He wasn't on the poster.He isn't in one of america's highest rated TV shows. He doesn't come from a well-known acting dynasty established by his older sister's.And as the scream movies are 'different',you knew they would have to kill one of the survivors from the original,or it would been deemed as stupid . In this case ,i'd have preferred it to be labelled as stupid. williamson and craven have shot themselve's in the foot ,i will see scream3 ,but my expectations are low ( maybe it'll seem better for that).And if they even think of producing a carbon copy,cardboard cut-out imitation to replace him ,i'll fucking throttle everyone involved!!!!!! And another thing ,those untalented,annoying twats from dawsons creek better not turn up anywhere.i'm sick of seeing their overrated ,puny little faces everywhere i go .Everytime i see them i want to tear out their bloody eyeballs.
Aaaaah! Aaaaah! Aaaaah! by Wolfpack	Jul 19th, 2006 01:44:31 PM

Aaaaah! by Wolfpack	Jul 20th, 2006 10:33:22 AM

Talkbacks

Spoilerish tidbits on SCREAM 3

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks