Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

Great show
by forceofgravity
Aug 15th, 2007
12:28:24 PM
I caught the pilot for this and it looks to be one of the best shows this season. Very quirky and enjoyable.
Second!
by Giphangster
Aug 15th, 2007
12:38:36 PM
I know, I know- it's not as big a deal as being first, but I've never been second before, so there! The show looks ok. Herc's recommendation has convinced me to check out an episode or two.
I Couldn't Take More Than Five Minutes of It
by Birdys Piano Teacher
Aug 15th, 2007
12:38:58 PM
This show really got on my nerves.
I really enjoyed it!
by Col. Tigh-Fighter
Aug 15th, 2007
12:42:05 PM
Had an excellent Burtonesque look and feel about it. And it is plenty funny too. If Tim Burton did Desparate Housewives meets Ghost Whisperer it might look a bit like this.
Burton + Quirky= please shoot me.
by Giphangster
Aug 15th, 2007
12:45:31 PM
I'm one of the very, very few film geeks out there who really dislikes Tim Burton. I'm not a huge fan of Sonnenfeld, either. And I don't like quirky comedy [which this show seems to reek of.] So...I retract my previous enthusiasm, though I'll still give the show a chance, even if it doesn't sound like my thing.
Daisies is Wonderfalls 2.0
by Mazzke
Aug 15th, 2007
12:57:35 PM
I found both shows entertaining, but I very much doubt it will last. It's got a great feel, but like a lot of shows that have such an odd approach, the characters seem kinda cartoony without depth. Maybe, they will overcome it -- Dead Like Me did -- but I doubt it.

I think the premise and style of Daisies would have made a great, very charming, fairy-tale like movie.
It's not Burtonesque..
by Avert Therapy
Aug 15th, 2007
01:05:08 PM
I would say it's a far more obvious try at the style of Jean-Pierre Jeunet and 'Le Fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain'.

I enjoyed the pilot but I think it's limited, he's got a dog and girlfriend he can't ever touch. Maybe body condoms are in order.
From the trailer I saw....
by C.K. Lamoo
Aug 15th, 2007
01:07:52 PM
The guy makes money bringing the dead back to life, solving their murders, and collecting the reward. Couldn't he make more money just by having relatives pay him to resurrect?
Los Angelenos?
by CerebralAssassin
Aug 15th, 2007
01:19:47 PM
The only people who call Angelenos "Los Angelenos" are people who don't live in L.A.
CK Lamoo
by TheWumpus
Aug 15th, 2007
01:21:09 PM
there is a plot device to prevent him from doing so: He can only bring people back to life for 1 minute if he touches them once. If he touches them again, they'll live, but someone nearby (re: innocent) will die in their place.
nice pilot, but...
by danowen
Aug 15th, 2007
01:59:12 PM
I enjoyed it and it was very stylishly shot by Sonnenfeld, but I could also imagine it getting very irritating with all that whimsy and childlike narration. I think it would have made a better film, really. Oh, and only Anna Friel made an impression on me, acting-wise. The others were rather bland.
OK THEN!!!
by C.K. Lamoo
Aug 15th, 2007
02:17:01 PM
So catch the murderer, put him in the room with the body, touch the body, the murderer dies and the victim comes back to life. Viola. I assume that the hero is immune to his own double resurrection clause. The only real problem is that in most murder investigations, there's an autopsy. In an autopsy, a sample of brain tissue is taken and the rest gets flushed. So, anybody he brought back would be missing their brain. Obviously, the writer learned human anatomy watching old Bayer aspirin commercials.
Correction, The Wumpus...
by FilmCritic3000
Aug 15th, 2007
02:17:22 PM
If Ned touches someone dead, they'll resurrect. If he touches them again, they'll die and stay dead forever. However, if Ned touches someone and does not touch them again within one minute, someone else in the vicinity will die.
Herc, you're such a TV writer groupie
by Dannychico
Aug 15th, 2007
02:54:21 PM
You love all these old Buffy writers.
I enjoyed the Adams Family movies
by Mike_D
Aug 15th, 2007
02:57:53 PM
maybe I will enjoy this too. its by the same guy who did the flicks.
Variety: "the fall show with the most spring buzz"
by Kid Z
Aug 15th, 2007
03:25:04 PM
...New York Magazine: "funny, imaginative and smart"... Televisionary: "surprises you with its dazzling beauty, pitch perfect cast, and its casual ability to create a whole world that you never want to leave."... Pilot Buzz Central: "beautifully filmed, carefully crafted, and well-acted."... TV Guide: "ABC has found its next Lost!"... Yep! This one's guaranteed be pulled after about 4 episodes!
I am not enthused
by INWOsuxRED
Aug 15th, 2007
03:31:06 PM
I'm tired of gratuitous CGI inserted to make shows seem creative and magical. I'm tired of quirky for quirky's sake. Most of all I'm tired of watching hyped pilots and either hating them or having them cancelled shortly after liking them, and I'm gussing one or the other will happen.
What if Ned touches a corpse way out in the desert?
by C.K. Lamoo
Aug 15th, 2007
03:41:45 PM
so there's no one in the vicinity. Does Ned die? Does Death get pissed off with Ned for trying to bend the rules? What if Ned is caught touching himself?
When does the show actually start on the air?
by Yeti
Aug 15th, 2007
04:59:32 PM
I'm not in LA and I'm becomming more intrigued about this show the more I hear about it.
In this heat wave!? Screw that.
by -guyinthebackrow
Aug 15th, 2007
05:08:14 PM
Maybe if it was screening someowhere inside... with some serious A/C.
daisies hits ABC
by Hercules
Aug 15th, 2007
05:19:40 PM
Oct. 3
And it won't be hot at 8 p.m.
by Hercules
Aug 15th, 2007
05:21:06 PM
bring a jacket.
I hope I hope I hope I hope
by Charlie Murphy
Aug 15th, 2007
06:16:14 PM
this show does well. not only is the show great... bryan fuller deserves a fucking break.
Do I dare hope this won't get cancelled right away?
by Drath
Aug 15th, 2007
06:30:55 PM
It's not on FOX, so that's encouraging, but Bryan Fuller has been cheated twice now and I fear that it won't change. It's amazing he keeps going while Joss Whedon, who had a fair amount of success before Firefly was killed and Angel cancelled out of spite, has quit. I hope this show is my cup of tea and that it stays for several season...and that Fuller stays on it and isn't pushed off like with Dead Like Me (although I think that show was good even after he left).
Actualy Pushing Daisies is Dead Like Me 2.0
by The Outlander
Aug 15th, 2007
09:06:17 PM
It was envisaged as a sequel/spin-off of Dead Like Me.
Loved the pilot but am worried about one big thing.
by Bungion Boy
Aug 15th, 2007
09:13:46 PM
Sonnenfeld directed it with his usual wonderful visual flair. The pilot looks fantastic. But I'm worried that future directors won't be able to make the show so visually exciting and appealing. I remember when Sonnenfeld directed the pilot for The Tick. It was one of the smartest, funniest, and best looking shows I'd seen in years. The rest of the shows were good but never got anywhere near as great as the pilot. I hope the same thing doesn't happen with this or to the Kevin Smith directed pilot Reaper.
so let me get this straight
by Trader Groucho 2
Aug 15th, 2007
09:22:42 PM
If he touches someone who isn't dead and then doesn't touch them again within one minute, someone innocent dies? So the second touch then doesn't constitute a fresh touch, therefore all of his touches must come in multiples of two. So, when he has sex, does he have to end with an even number of thrusts??? Does touching through clothing count? What if the fabric is very thin, or has a hole? From the get-go, the rules of this world feel arbitrary, as in, not grounded in any mythology that the average culturally literate viewer could relate to.

Buffy, by contrast was simple, and sprang from very familiar vampire mythology. She's the "chosen one", she's strong, she kills vamps with a stake. Subtracted, more or less, is the old-school mind control element (which helped make Dark Shadows such fun). The fresh element Whedon mixes in is that to overpower the undead, a passing familiarity with martial arts may be beneficial. As they introduced fresh demons, much of the fun was in watching these characters figure out the rules to doing them in.

To the credit of the show's creators, on Reaper they at least divined and copied that part of the Buffy model for dealing with the supernatural. Okay, that and the self-aware pop culture references.

Pushing Daisies, unless there's something stupendous about this show I'm missing, may well quickly be doing just that.

Trader...
by Avert Therapy
Aug 15th, 2007
10:40:30 PM
He can touch as many people as he likes who are alive, as long as they aren't people he's bought back from the grave with one touch. The second touch kills them permanently.

So:
touch a dead person = back to life
Touch them again = they die for good
If he doesn't touch them within 1 minute = somebody random dies.
Looks like death covered all the bases.
by C.K. Lamoo
Aug 15th, 2007
10:46:55 PM
But really, doesn't the Reaper have better things to do than keep jerking Ned?
question
by RokurGepta
Aug 15th, 2007
11:28:09 PM
Is the main character the only one with the magical powers of bringing people back to life?

Will we at some point later in the story be introduced to an evil character that has a similar power?

I'm usually right with ya Herc,
by Oozer3993
Aug 16th, 2007
01:06:37 AM
I loved the "girly" shows you did (Gilmore Girls, The OC) and I agreed with you on the quirky comedies (Arrested Development, Andy Barker) and of course the geeky shows (24, Heroes). But for the life of me, I can't see what's so great about Pushing Daisies. With the exception of Anna Friel, everyone seems to think they're in a middle school play. I kept expecting them to turn to the camera, wave, and mouth "Hi Mom!" And the narration gets to be too much within about 5 minutes (the little "life length" thing was cute the first time, but got tiresome almost immediately after that). And the central conceit of the show annoys me too. Ned really likes a girl, but can't touch her. Cue the groan worthy "special moments" they then have because of their lack of physical contact.
Dead Like Me, Wonderfalls, etc.
by Satans Pool Boy
Aug 16th, 2007
02:00:01 AM
Yes, this show is very much the bastard child of "Dead Like Me" and "Wonderfalls" but SO WHAT?! It's still more original than 99% of the tripe that we're spoon-fed on network tv.
"and wrote some of the best episodes of “Heroes”"...
by couP
Aug 16th, 2007
07:01:52 AM
Is this some quote ABC/Bryan Fuller is forcing you to use, coz i've seen it in every damn related article
What if he touches someone 3 times really fast?
by Kid Z
Aug 16th, 2007
07:46:57 AM
Do they become undead and develop a taste for brains? Or what if he's working out at the gym and sweating a lot. If he forgets to wipe down the weight machine and the next person gets his sweat on them, do they die or just get really sick?
Sounds fun and different
by Lovecraftfan
Aug 16th, 2007
10:28:58 AM
I dont know there's so many bitter people on this board.
I was in Hollywood last night...
by -guyinthebackrow
Aug 16th, 2007
11:59:42 AM
At 9PM it was 80 degrees. The only guy I saw wearing a jacket was a pimp. The jacket was purple.
I really liked the pilot, hope this actually lasts
by Wldmk
Aug 16th, 2007
01:31:24 PM
Time will tell...
So he touches a dead body...
by Kid Z
Aug 16th, 2007
03:38:02 PM
... it comes back to life, doesn't touch the formerly dead person within 60 seconds (it was 60 seconds, right?)... another person dies. So he doesn't want that guilt on his conscience, so he touches the newly dead person whose death he caused by not touching the original dead person a second time and re-killing him/her. But then another 60 seconds go by without him touching the second formerly dead person in the series a second time (thereby re-killing that person)... and a third person then dies, so he touches that person and so on, and so on, and so on... and, he eventually dies of exhaustion chasing a wave dying people all over town to resurrect them all... or he goes bug-fuck insane (I know I would)! I liked Dead Like Me, but its internal logic was never very consistent. Though I have yet to actually see it, from what I hear, that appears to be the problem with this show as well.
I hated Pushing Daisies
by tiger_robot
Aug 16th, 2007
04:52:16 PM
Too cutesy and stylized with annoying characters. And I LIKED wonderfalls.
Great show
by cooper2000
Aug 17th, 2007
12:09:45 AM
I saw it a few weeks ago and loved it. I just hope that people watch it instead of some reality show or dumb comedy that might be opposite it.
Ellen Greene
by Gorgomel
Aug 17th, 2007
06:08:50 AM
The only reason I will watch this show. She's the most underrated actress. Watch her acting in Talk Radio, Lady Chance, Little Shop of Horrors, Glory ! Glory ! and even her small part in Heroes!
Or see Greene in "The Pope of Greenwich Village"
by C.K. Lamoo
Aug 17th, 2007
12:36:55 PM
Where she and Christopher Walken are the only attractions.
you mean "Next Stop Greenwich Village"
by Gorgomel
Aug 17th, 2007
05:14:05 PM
^^
Finally saw it
by BeatsMe
Aug 18th, 2007
01:05:35 AM
It's cute, but I can't see how it could possibly last as a show. The cop character is completely wasted in that first episode. He needs a reason for being there, and fast.
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.