Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

First!
by TheBloop
Aug 11th, 2007
06:04:16 AM
Dead Alive Remake Coming! Starring Jason Biggs, Mandy Moore. CGI effects replace makeup! And will be directed by TIM STORY!!!
FIRST!
by vezner2007
Aug 11th, 2007
06:04:31 AM
If Shaye doesn't eat crow and bring Jackson back, it will be the dumbest decision (financially speaking) that he could ever make. If I were a stock holder, I'd be royally pissed at him right now and demanding that he bring Jackson on at whatever price he asks.
what's with this "greenlighted"?
by half vader
Aug 11th, 2007
06:05:12 AM
as opposed to "greenlit"?

I was wondering what was happening with this, don't they only have 'til the end of the year?

ah shiz...
by vezner2007
Aug 11th, 2007
06:05:20 AM
somewhere behind firsT!
Uwe Boll's "The Hobbit," starring Shia LeBeouf
by Mullah Omar
Aug 11th, 2007
06:10:19 AM
Maybe Shaye got worried over what might happen and who might take over if the cast and crew of the LOTR trilogy sat this one out. Then again, he probably just got pressured from shareholders to not screw up their cash cow.
Tim Story > Uwe Boll
by TheBloop
Aug 11th, 2007
06:11:42 AM
Tim Story is one of the great visual filmmakers of our time. Uwe Boll? Pffffffst. I guess he can box ok.
Why all the guessing? Just ask Jackson.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
06:33:26 AM
I thought he and Harry were friends?
Fuck Peter Jackson.
by C Legion
Aug 11th, 2007
06:35:49 AM
The Hobbit is full of Dwarves, did you see how he treated Gimli? Comic relief. He turned the Hobbits into a bunch of pussies, especially Frodo. Other than financial reasons there's no need to bring Jackson back, and I couldn't give a shit about their profits, I want a good film (the film will make loads regardless) There's no way he should be directing this, get John Boorman.
Oooo let the people with no lives get the knives out!
by Jugs
Aug 11th, 2007
06:43:18 AM
..Jackson sucks blah blah I'm so important in the film world that what I think matters blah blah Never mind that I've never made a film in my life, but I still know better than that kiwi hack blah de blah and so on and so forth.
New Lines Smart..
by Redfive!
Aug 11th, 2007
06:43:28 AM
They relize Jacksons the only one who could and should do The Hobbitt.
Probably means...
by Kurgan
Aug 11th, 2007
06:43:55 AM
...that an Executive Procuder offer is on the table.
C Legion, that's hilarious
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
06:46:28 AM
Nobody will go see The Hobbit if Peter Jackson doesn't direct it. Nobody. The Hobbit will be awesome if Peter Jackson directs it, anybody else, not so much. Besides, dwarves are always comic relief, just look at all the Warwik Davis' talkback responses. Uncontrollably short=funny. Oh, and as for Hobbits being made pussies by Jackson, um yeah, they were always pussies, which is what makes Frodo's journey such an amazing feat. I guess they should juice up and go all Viking on Orcs instead of being peace loving people terrified of violence (but capable of it when necessary).
I never got the worship aspect.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
06:47:24 AM
The Lord of the Ring movies were pretty good, but they're not great films. And now that each film is represented by an Extra Bloated Edition, they suffer from what hurt them in their theatrical versions: excess.
Jugs
by C Legion
Aug 11th, 2007
06:51:18 AM
This is a place for people to give their opinions, what do you expect? Must we all have made a film in order to give an opinion? Do you need to be a great Chef in order to criticise a shitty meal? A top politician to criticise the idiots in power? Grow up you prick and accept the fact that others see things differently from you.
Extended Editions vs. Theatrical Editions
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
06:53:17 AM
One can definitely see why things were cut, but it's still a fuckin' cool concept to have both versions. What sucks is how New Line put out the theatrical cuts, waited awhile, put out the extended editions, waited awhile, and then put out the combos. I totally understand the greed that causes this but it would be nice of studios to let consumers know that they're putting out these different editions in advance. Of course that would be ethical as well, so nevermind.

As for worshipping the films, I can't say I've ever done that, but I was fuckin' impressed by what I was seeing on film. All three Best Picture nominations were warranted I say. Warranted!!!!!!

Jugs is starting to sag
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
06:54:06 AM
Damn you age!!!!!!
yes people see things differently legion, but to think
by bongo123
Aug 11th, 2007
06:58:29 AM
about making the hobbit with a completely different director, cast and without weta is just plain fucking ignorant and stupid when the first 3 films where a: bloody brilliant movies from the guy that made bad taste of all things and b: made enormous sums of money both theatrically and on home dvd... yeah.. opinions like yours, while just an opinion which your entitled to is still fucking stupid to say the least mate
Sherlock II and the needs his medication boogaloo
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
07:01:26 AM
WTF man? WTF?
Mutual love and respect brought them back together!
by JackPumpkinhead
Aug 11th, 2007
07:02:12 AM
Jackson respects and loves money. And so does Shaye.
SoylentMean.
by C Legion
Aug 11th, 2007
07:04:31 AM
Judging by your post you clearly have no understanding of Tolkien's world. As for saying that "Nobody will go see The Hobbit if Peter Jackson doesn't direct it" that's bollocks, ask the people that watched LOTR who directed it and 90% won't have a clue, just as with most blockbusters (Spielberg may be the only exception). Internet Geeks and film buffs know about directors, the vast majority of people couldn't give a shit.
More info here - incl. Gandalf's thoughts
by Koola_Norway
Aug 11th, 2007
07:07:41 AM
So, you guys should also check out Kristin Thompson's well-written blog-post about all this... she has found quotes from Ian McKellen that supports the rumor that things might be moving at New Line... http://www.davidbordwell.net/b log/?p=1135
Clearly, yeah, what's an Orc?
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
07:08:18 AM
C Legion not only are you funny but you said "bollocks" in your last post. You sir, are a genius. As for only "Internet geeks and film buffs" knowing who directors are, that's um, how do I put this nicely, retarded! Don't make me say what the "C" stands for in your name! Don't make me do it!!
There's no denying Jackson's formidable talents.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
07:12:31 AM
I should say that the films, especially taken as a whole, do represent a monumental undertaking, and by most measures they are wildly successful. As much as I admire the craft of them, I never had the urge to see them a second time. But that's just me. I seem to be one of the few who thinks Gladiator was a silly mess, so there's the power of one opinion for you.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
by TomBodet
Aug 11th, 2007
07:13:29 AM
Hire Mikey_Bay for it instead. You'll be glad you did.
X-MEN 3 directed by Brett Ratner....
by C Legion
Aug 11th, 2007
07:16:49 AM
made more money than the first two. I rest my case.
"lighted" or "lit" are both acceptable.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
07:18:30 AM
You don't see "lighted" used much anymore, I think mostly because it doesn't sound sexy and Madison Ave favors "lit" for that reason, but as far as usage goes, "lighted" is okay.

HOWEVER...the word is "green-lighted." It's a hyphenate.
THE HOBBIT: A BRETT RATNER FILM
by BringingSexyBack
Aug 11th, 2007
07:19:38 AM
That's what would happen if this Bob Shaye character sticks around. Time to eject this useless suited douche. Whose dick did he suck to get to a position where he can have a "personal quarrel" with Peter Jackson?
I want Peter Dinklage to direct THE HOBBIT.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
07:22:37 AM
Is that wrong of me?
Bob Shaye gets a lot of shit
by King Sweyn Forkbeard
Aug 11th, 2007
07:32:41 AM
But it was he who had the balls to allow PJ to make three films in the first place. He deserves more respect than he gets for gambling the studio on something like that, something that was far from a surefire success.

IF they can get the LOTR crew back together to make the Hobbit through New Line then that would be the best possible outcome in the whole situation. Anything else would be a compromise.

LIVE FREE OR DIE HOBBIT
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
07:33:07 AM
Willis is Baggins. Get Sam Jackson to come back for a spin as Gandalf. Throw in some reincarnated Alan Rickman action and you've got GOLD, baby. Directed by Nora Ephron.
Peter Jackson or don't bother...
by Bono Luthor
Aug 11th, 2007
07:38:21 AM
He and his team took some stodgy, at times rather dull material, that had the potential to transfer well to the screen and made some of the best films ever. Go on Tolkie geeks, attack me! Fact is you have your books just the way you like them and unless you all direct your own individual versions of the movies that you have had in your own heads all these years then you'll never be satisfied. I went into the cinema not looking forward to Fellowship due to the fact that I had an ambivalent reaction to the books and ended up having the best time in a cinema that I had since I was a kid. People now know Jackson like they know Lucas and Spielberg. Get out of your basements, wear another colour other than black and stop wasting your time playing role playing games. Essentialist? Moi? Do your worst. I'll be on a boat in the sunshine for the rest of the day. See ya!
King Sweyn, the intrawebs are full of that crap.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
07:39:35 AM
It's like a kid's game. Set up the producers as the bad guys because they don't understand ART, but it's the producers with balls the size of Texas who help realize the creative vision of people like Jackson. As much as Saul Zantz makes my skin crawl, that man has put his money on the line for some good films. But people still rip him. Yes, he's somewhat noxious. That's sort of an essential ingredient of what makes great producers unholy ass-whompers.
And I don't buy that Jackson is the sine qua non.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
07:43:04 AM
It's a fairy tale. Their have been some wonderful films made over the last twenty plus years by some wonderfully talented people. Did Jackson make most of them? No.

I'd like to see Mira Nair do The Hobbit.
Bronx Cheer!
by HeWhoCannotBeNamed
Aug 11th, 2007
07:48:08 AM
You witty bastard! You're cracking me up this morning. Glad you never changed your name (I recall you pondering this months ago; I believe you moved to Brooklyn or whatever). Never change it bro. Be well.

On topic, I love these LotR flicks (I prefer the "bloated" ones as someone quippy described the extended versions), however I am not that interested in The Hobbit. Haven't read any of the four books, but the ring trilogy suffices for me. Maybe they will surprise me with this one as they did with the last three though.....

I'm procrastinating...it's laundry time.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
07:52:26 AM
But hello to you too, HeWhoCannotBeNamed. The Ring stories are certainly much more majestic and rich than The Hobbit, but there's always room for a good fairy tale. If it's handled with grace and charm, it could be a lovely little movie. This is one reason I think Jackson's a bad choice. It would like getting David Lean to direct a drawing room farce.
It would be the smartest thing New Line could ever do
by cornponious
Aug 11th, 2007
07:55:29 AM
... and everyone knows it.

I'm also trying to find my high school yearbook.

Damn you Michael Bay
by i kick tits
Aug 11th, 2007
07:56:35 AM
I miss that dude.
cornponious
by i kick tits
Aug 11th, 2007
07:58:38 AM
What year is it from?
i kick, seriously, your screen name is odious
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
08:03:18 AM
Can I give you five bucks to change it?
Lots of delusion on both sides here.....
by Hint of Smegma
Aug 11th, 2007
08:06:34 AM
......fuckwits, all, posting such rubbish along the lines of 'no-one will see it without Jackson directing' or 'Jackson sucks'. You are all kidding yourselves on either side of the camp. Whoever directs The Hobbit, it will rake in the cash due to the success of the LOTR trilogy. And while I don't think Jackson is the messiah of fantasy film making so many seem to think, he is a very talented director with more vision and originality than a good 70% of other working directors whichever way you cut it, although for my mind his best so far is King Kong, not the LOTR trilogy which I thought was overblown and not nearly as good as it was painted - Randall's diatribe against it in Clerks 2 was dead on. He knows the worst of the source material to leave out, (Tom Fucking Bombadil for evidence) and what needs to be in, he just needs to tighten up the scenes for any Hobbit movie if LOTR is anything to go by. If he does take it on, great, if he doesn't, so what? Just leaves him free for more interesting projects.
Oh, All right then, I'll direct the Hobbit.
by Ingeld
Aug 11th, 2007
08:14:54 AM
I have a few free weekends in November, anyway. Now, can't we all just get along?
jeez rabid fanboism
by Volstaff
Aug 11th, 2007
08:17:03 AM
When you say nobody will see The Hobbit without Peter Jackson you must also believe that his name spells box office success.So..what happened with King Kong?Didn't exactly knock that one outta the park did he? There are other directors out there that could do a decent job with this. But seriously who really gives a shit about The Hobbit? The best of Tolkiens story to be told was LOtR.Lets move on to something new.
McG's THE HOBBIT
by Piltdown Joey
Aug 11th, 2007
08:28:06 AM
'Nuff Said
I'd prefer it to be Jackson who directs, but
by gingeracrockford
Aug 11th, 2007
08:29:28 AM
whoever it is, just GET ON WITH IT! I don't want to have to wait as long for this one as I have for Indy 4. It's a surefire hit, why are they faffing around with their massive egos and ridiculous disputes? I've wanted to see a good Hobbit film since I was five! Getting McKellen, Serkis and Weaving back is a must, and for the rest of the cast how about Martin Freeman as Bilbo, Brian Blessed as Thorin, Oliver Platt as Bombur, Billy Connolly as Balin, Brendan Gleeson as Beorn, Brian Cox as the voice of Smaug, Christian Bale as Bard the Bowman and Paul Bettany as Thranduil?
Wow, what an interesting development.
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Aug 11th, 2007
08:38:53 AM
As for Shaye's/New Line's reasoning, I'd be willing to bet that it's a combination of all the factors that Quint mentioned. I would like to see a clear cut decision announced sometime soon. And I really hope they can get the whole crew back together and let bygones be bygones.
King kong made $553,080,025 pretty fucking good
by bongo123
Aug 11th, 2007
08:41:31 AM
in my book, LOTR $868,621,686, Towers $926,284,377 and King $1,129,027,325, thats a fucking helluva a lot of money on just cinema tickets alone for just 4 films! the guys a fucking license to print money and to do the hobbit without him is tantamount to complete and utter lunacy... if i was newlines shareholders id be calling for the head of the cunt that lets jackson and co slip
over 3 fucking billion on just 4 movies!!!!!
by bongo123
Aug 11th, 2007
08:43:17 AM
give it to jackson and anyone that says anything else is an rtard
gingeracrockford
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Aug 11th, 2007
08:44:35 AM
Those are some excellent suggestions for casting. Nice calls all around especially Platt and Bettany.

As for Smaug, I think he requires a truly majestic and sonorous voice. While I love Brian Cox, I don't think his timber would be appropriate. I can't think of anyone in particular right now but that will be (IMHO) one of the most crucial elements of the film.

And did you all feel the Earth move?
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Aug 11th, 2007
08:45:13 AM
Ringy is coming...
best news i could possibly have...
by Reynard Muldrake
Aug 11th, 2007
08:59:52 AM
over coffee on a saturday morning. thanks, quint! even though it's not "news" yet, i know i know.
Dammit, another great one dead: Tony Wilson, RIP
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
09:32:55 AM
If you don't know him, and you love great music, then you know him.
No Spielberg = No Indy 4 / No Jackson = No Hobbit
by abovo
Aug 11th, 2007
09:36:37 AM
Would anyone want to see Indy 4 without Spielberg? No! So why would anyone want to see The Hobbit without Jackson. All of us see how well X3 turned out without Singer.
Mr. NG, Bronx
by half vader
Aug 11th, 2007
09:43:21 AM
Hey Nice Gaius, I was thinking exactly the same about Ringy. We need some entertinment in here. Boy I remember when I stumbled in not realising what a pathetic little troll (no pun, etc.) he was and foolishly tried to tell him why design decisions are made that have less to do with logic than tone and symbolism and so on. Boy did I ever waste some time there!

Thanks Bronx. Yeah but I guess "lighted" just looks and sounds so retarded. Actually no it just sounds like a 4 year old is saying it. "I lighted the candle Daddy!" - ya can't even rely on the dictionary these days with all the stupid shit that's in there now. I hear people use the redundant "fantasticAL" and slap my forehead. Yeah so I'm anal, at least that's on topic, being a Rings tb and all!

Over 3 billion from 4 movies. Pffft.
by half vader
Aug 11th, 2007
09:47:35 AM
Amazing, but means nothing - watch out or you'll become a Michael Bay apologist, with your B.O. = taste argument.

I don't even need to use Armageddon - Remember Chuck and Larry opened with a 38 million weekend the other week and topped the B.O. Could there be a better illustration of my point?

Let me put the boots to this dead horse...
by Gus Van Rant
Aug 11th, 2007
09:50:54 AM
No one wants to see the Hobbit...and there is only one "Return" and it is "Of the Jedi" not "the King". FU LOTR NERDS!!!
Peter Jackson
by MaleSheep
Aug 11th, 2007
09:56:05 AM
It's good to hear that he might be working on the Hobbit, but I really hope he doesn't do the "split it into two movies" idea that was mentioned on this site a while ago. Also, does anyone else think he would be a good director for the last Harry Potter film? I know it probably won't happen, but it's the only Harry Potter he seems suited to direct. It's epic and very different in many ways from the other books.
Two Part Hobbit=Milking It
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
09:58:58 AM
So they'll probably do it. And yes, Peter Jackson would be an inspired choice for HP7, if they cut in two. Which would be more milking, but it's the only Harry Potter book that would truly suffer from anything being left out of its big screen translation.
Gotta love film industry accounting practices...
by Yeti
Aug 11th, 2007
09:59:15 AM
shadier than Linday Lohan's mother's parenting skills.
Let an English Director do a REAL version of this book.
by livingwater
Aug 11th, 2007
10:01:24 AM
Let an English Director do a REAL version of this book. PJ has had enough.
It's not just Jackson
by King Sweyn Forkbeard
Aug 11th, 2007
10:02:03 AM
It's Weta

They come as a package. As would Serkis, McKellen, and the vast majority of the creative team behind the Trilogy. Axing that whole connection to a unit proven in this world and starting afresh would be abject lunacy on the part of the studio.

And Brian Cox is a must for the voice of Smaugh, although John Rhys-Davies will probably do it.

Just saw Ghost Rider last night
by BringingSexyBack
Aug 11th, 2007
10:09:27 AM
Someone please put that director out of his/our misery. WTF was that?
shyaye with his tail between his legs
by pipergates
Aug 11th, 2007
10:13:26 AM
bout time
Jackson better shoot some footage with McKellen now.
by Yoda's Ball Sack
Aug 11th, 2007
10:14:24 AM
Because by the time all this bullshit gets over with he might be dead.
CUARON
by The Artist FKA Vesuvio
Aug 11th, 2007
10:16:10 AM
C'mon, what's wrong with you people? Peter Jackson - Executive Producer alright, but The Hobbit is the kind of movie Alfonso Cuaron has BORN to make. And what a amazing fantasy-themed, character-driven, road movie it will be. Now, my only concern it would be on how the screenwriters would deal with the inevitable, studio-imposed cameos by characters such as Aragorn, Legolas et cetera.
pay him what you owe him, you fools!
by pipergates
Aug 11th, 2007
10:16:57 AM
show him the books and settle
yeah Cuaron would do it better. Vaughn too.
by pipergates
Aug 11th, 2007
10:18:52 AM
Jackson is too unstable, undependable.
Yes you can Bronx Cheer
by i kick tits
Aug 11th, 2007
10:19:31 AM
I will accept PayPal if you are really serious. But I see your own name contains "Bronx" which leads me to believe you are from New York City. Well I am from Brooklyn, if you want we can meet in person and work this out, we can do that too. Up to you.
half vader, I agree...I saw a sign in a window for
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
10:23:49 AM
a "well-lighted place." I thought, what a dope!, until I realized it is proper usage, just a little uncommon. It's not just you.
Forget The Hobbit, Quint, what about Dambusters?
by Andrew Owens
Aug 11th, 2007
10:26:14 AM
C'mon a year ago you did those interviews where Jackson said they had almost finished preproduction and were well underway, then we heard Stephen Fry was writing, then... nothing. Any buzz you can share about it? Oh, and James McAvoy for Bilbo and Wing Commander Guy Gibson.
i kick, I actually live in Brooklyn now.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
10:30:16 AM
How's about it folks? Who wants to see me and i kick meet? I'll cough up five bucks for the name change, but I would need some assurances that i kick will not change the name to i punch instead!~~~

If this happens, I'll post photos online.

I won't expect this to be a unilateral act. I'll offer to change my name to Neck Boy permanently in honor of the day I regrettably defended George Lucas' neck pouch from the ridicule by Talkbackers.

BROOKLYN HERE AS WELL
by THE KNIGHT
Aug 11th, 2007
10:33:05 AM
*puts on mob boss suit*
The greatest borough of NYC...Brooklyn AICN summit?
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
10:36:33 AM
We could all get together and burn Memories-of-Murder in effigy. (Just kidding, M-o-M. I need you around here so I don't feel like the massive windbag that I am.)
Back to the flick...Mira Nair for The Hobbit.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
10:37:25 AM
Because it would be magical, and because nominating people for jobs in films really works!
What about Guillermo Del Toro for the Hobbit?
by Reynard Muldrake
Aug 11th, 2007
10:38:19 AM
I mean I'm all for Peter Jackson and love the man to death...but thought I'd throw it out there. Oh, and Liam Neeson as the wise kindly sage - I know the Hobbit doesn't have it, but this is the one epic he hasn't been in yet for his role.
I was hoping for a remake of Finding Forrester
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
10:41:32 AM
with Neeson in the Connery role and Chris Tucker as the disciple. Gold, I tell ya!
bRoOkLyN iN dA hOuSe
by i kick tits
Aug 11th, 2007
10:47:53 AM
what neighborhood? im in bay ridge
There are two types of people who come or came to this
by emeraldboy
Aug 11th, 2007
10:48:34 AM
site. people who love movies. but the talkback has been hijacked by people who really dont understand how movies are made. To some peter jackson is a god who made three of the greatest films of all time. They dont like it when it was pointed that jackson never read his contract or at least the small print. that didnt matter because to the people who revere jackson say that movies are about art not commerce and all execs are stupid and again the people who revere jackson he got screwed by the ugly face of corporate america. They applaud the fact that jackson is not a business man and were on side when he decided to take on New line. I know someone who is at a certain crossroads, this person has done well has won numerous awards internationally. This person knows that awards are nice and all but there comes a time when you get real and setup to the plate commercially and start to make an income. This peron that I know is in it for that for the long haul. This person that I know runs a small film company and this person that I knows that you cannot stay small forever. One can make great movies that are commercially successfull. there is nothing wrong with making money out of the movie business.
Even if things are resolved,PJ has become too expensive
by Wayne6000
Aug 11th, 2007
10:51:42 AM
Even if Mr. Jackson's payment dispute is resolved (which I doubt it will be), he's become far too expensive and would want at least $US 20 mill upfront and / or a heavy cut of The Hobbit's profits to write and direct. They're better off getting a cheaper director.
Do it emeraldboy, you know you want to
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
10:54:03 AM
Name drop me boyo, let us know who this mysterious "person" you know is.
No one will go see it if Jackson doesn't direct?
by rev_skarekroe
Aug 11th, 2007
10:59:03 AM
Bullshit. Let me let you guys in on a little secret - the general public doesn't care about directors. That's film geek territory. Call it "The Hobbit" and they'll go. And frankly, I'd rather not have Jackson direct. He's apparently wanting to turn into some sort of dark epic, which it is very much not. Raimi seemed to understand the book - get him on board.
Please do it before Holm and McKellen get too old...
by ZeroCorpse
Aug 11th, 2007
11:00:36 AM
or die. Jeez.
Young Strider and Legolas will be in The Hobbit!!!
by ebolamonkey
Aug 11th, 2007
11:02:51 AM
They get their memories wiped by Gandalf so they don't remember anything later on. They'll follow up with the "Young Strider Chronicles".
emeraldboy, most people don't know how films are made
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
11:05:05 AM
It's a strange business sometimes even to the people who work in it. But you make the best point of all in that it is a business and that movies are products. Peter Jackson knows this as well as anyone. If he was all about the art, then why would he care if New Line took a few extra bucks? Principle? Give me a break. He's a solid business man who reminds me of the greats like Mayer and Goldwyn and Lucas, great producers who know how to create spectacle that gets butts into the seats. Money. That's what keeps the cameras cranking. And there's nothing wrong with that! Big profits allow studios to get arty and allow brilliant filmmakers room to work. But all films are not made by the Bigs. The little guys have to eat, too.

But I wouldn't complain too much about people hijacking these TBs. The Talkbacks are here for any number of reasons. This isn't a reasonable debate about this and that. This is AICN for fuck's sake. Relax!

Jackson to produce...
by Billy Oblivion
Aug 11th, 2007
11:07:59 AM
WETA for effects, and ... wait for it... Terry Gilliam to direct. The Hobbit is actually quite funny, but Jacksons take on humor is rather unsubtle for the material IMO. The Hobbit needs a bit of the Munchausen touch to truly capture the book.
Holm can't play Bilbo young, we need Martin Freeman
by Evil Hobbit
Aug 11th, 2007
11:08:20 AM
for young Bilbo!
Chiller TV's Direct Your Own Horror Movie Contest
by WriteFromLeft
Aug 11th, 2007
11:14:40 AM
Maybe Peter would be better off directing for Chiller. http://www.chillertv.com/Dare_ To_Direct/ And he won't have to audit New Line anymore.
Oh and I think Jackson and his team has to come back
by Evil Hobbit
Aug 11th, 2007
11:16:17 AM
At least to produce the flick, I always thought that Alfonso Cuaron would be the best choice to direct the series. I think Jackson would do a marvelous job but maaaaaan it will be such a difficult task for him to top his trilogy. If they allow someone new to give the story a fresh vision I think the film itself will benefit from it. Together with Jacksons and Weta's production guidance we can expect a great Hobbit masterpiece. Think that would be the ideal combination. But if Jackson directs, hell I'm there opening night!
Which means Raimi is free for Spider-Man 4
by tompiltoff
Aug 11th, 2007
11:19:02 AM
I hope.
Loads of directors could pull this film off besides PJ
by DirkD13"
Aug 11th, 2007
11:19:13 AM
Let's be honest, who thought that he would pull off the Rings trilogy with such panache, after a few low-budget splatterfests, a murder fantasy drama and a mid-budget box-office flop? But directors who could make a great Hobbit are more than 1. Gilliam, Del Toro and Cuaron are obvious choices, but there are surely other great talents out there who could do this (who's to say Antonia Bird wouldn't be ace? or Neil Marshall?)
Raimi needs to leave Spidey alone.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
11:24:52 AM
Please. The first was fun, the second was terrific, and the third left me tattered and depressed. Raimi doing Spidey 4 = Men with Vaginas. Just wrong.
I KICK TITS
by THE KNIGHT
Aug 11th, 2007
11:26:03 AM
Crown Heights! The beautiful ladies are out in full swing today!

IESB is saying Raimi still wants a crack at the Hobbit... I could see Raimi Directing with PJ Executive Producing.

Martin Freeman as Bilbo, Cuaron Directs, Jackson Prod-
by pipergates
Aug 11th, 2007
11:26:49 AM
uces. right on.
Eough of the Hobbit
by Ingeld
Aug 11th, 2007
11:32:46 AM
Don't you think it is about time they remade the LOTRs, anyway? Give it a fresh new perspective, get a way from the dated 90's and early 2000s feel of the original. They can employ the latest special effects technology, etc. It can be LOTR for this generation. Oh, alright, if you're that married to the original you can have Elijah Wood play Bilbo if you want.
Why does Bilbo have to be 'young'?
by half vader
Aug 11th, 2007
11:39:53 AM
I'm no expert here but the bit that confused me in Fellowship and what people are saying about Bilbo in the Hobbit is why he needs to look younger or be played by a younger actor.

They go on about how Bilbo hadn't aged and Gandalf becomes suspicious about the Ring because of that, right? From the moment he found the ring he hardly aged so basically when he found the ring in The Hobbit he looked pretty much as Holm did at the start of Fellowship, right? So why do they need to get a younger actor? The only thing I can think is that they tried to make him look younger in the Fellowship flashback because it's a film language thing where your average audience may not realise it's a flashback if he doesn't look younger. But then why have all the going on explaining how he hadn't changed because the ring had kept his appearance constant?

Explanation will be appreciated.

Except from raving lunatics like Ringy.

Oooops
by WriteFromLeft
Aug 11th, 2007
11:43:02 AM
http://tinyurl.com/2joncm
Cuaron would be an awesome alternative
by Transmetropolitan
Aug 11th, 2007
11:43:48 AM
he kicks ass
Id prefer someone else
by BRUTICUS
Aug 11th, 2007
11:44:30 AM
LOTR had to many homoerotic hobbits as it was, imagine a whole movie about a hobbit?
Jackson should do the final Potter movies..
by Judge Briggs
Aug 11th, 2007
11:45:23 AM
because Order sucked so many hairy balls. Fucking travesty. Perfect example of a studio trying to get as many people sat and out faster than Bush's approval ratings dropping. We need a Jackson for the final Potter movies! PLLLLLLLEASE!
DirkD
by half vader
Aug 11th, 2007
11:45:53 AM
The Hobbit should probably have some good characterisation. Go back and look at the clichéd, misogynistic, simplistic so-called characterisation and motivation in that film. Groovy moments of claustrophobia but fuck me the characters are shit.
no more dvd/bluray/hddvd news? reviews?
by skiff
Aug 11th, 2007
11:49:19 AM
You guys have had no video news for ages.I figured harry would have both bluray and hddvd by now. With all the big movies coming out this fall harry would be right on top of things.
Err, sorry Dirk.
by half vader
Aug 11th, 2007
11:49:25 AM
That made no sense, as I edited out the bit where I started talking about THE DESCENT! Woo. Fuck me indeed! I'm goofy!!
New Line needs a hit pretty desperately.
by Barry Egan
Aug 11th, 2007
11:50:20 AM
Hairspray looks to be their first $100 million grosser since Wedding Crashers 2 years ago. They need a hit and they need it badly. With Jackson directin The Hobbit they are looking at a film that would gross between $750 million and $1 billion worldwide. For New Line to mend fences with Jackson just makes smart business sense.
And posting again at 3 in the morning.
by half vader
Aug 11th, 2007
11:50:27 AM
Woooop! Wooooop! Wooooop!
As much as I loooove LOTR...
by BrooseTheScharuk
Aug 11th, 2007
11:55:59 AM
...(and I'm talking the "bloated" version, which is -- for me -- the only version), I was still more excited when I heard Peter Weir's name mentioned for the Hobbit than I am about Jackson. I know that all that name-dropping that went on about it a few months ago was really just New Line dipping a few morsels into the water to see if the fish were nibbling, but I'd really like to see new blood (as long as they still prioritize overall track-record over associtation with current box-office success). I really don't want it to play like a "prequel", and that is -- of course -- what we'll get from Jackson. It's not anybody's fault, it's just the laws of the universe. Hell, we'd probably get some sort of approximation of that from anyone who directs, including Weir. I think it kind of sucks that this is getting made after the fact. Imagine how cool it would've been to have the Hobbit come out and be this really charming, comparatively light fantasy yarn, and then -- a few years later -- along comes Fellowship, saying "Hey, kids! Remember the funny little invisiblilty ring that little Mr. Bilbo had so much fun with in his little movie? Well, about that ring..." Of course, we don't know if fate would've played things out as lucratively for the studio in the long run (they would've been different movies made in a different time, and in a different world), but conceptually, it could've been a real H-Bomb! I think that the only way to counteract some of the impact-dulling effect of telling story number one after you've already told story two, is to come at it from a different angle. I know I'm probably in the minority, but I don't go see movies out of heart-sickness for the familiar (although I do sometimes fall ill with that bug, I'll admit). I'd rather see The Hobbit stand alone as a movie than see it as sort of a pop-cultural part two. Who knows really, though -- maybe Jackson feels the same way. Maybe he wishes the Hobbit could've come first. Maybe he'll make it fun and farcical. Maybe There won't be an ominous melody underlying the score every time we see or hear of the the ring. Oh, and I don't think there was anything "gay" about the hobbits in LOTR. In fact, that quality that people who have never watched a movie from the early twentieth century or read any classic literature interpret as "gay" (I know I keep putting quotes around it, but think of it sort of like the way you might hold a dirty diaper or a bag of dog shit; gingerly and at arm's length), could be better described as "old-timey" or, if you want to express it with dislike, disdain, disgust, whatever, you might say "dated" or "archaic" or "naive" or "sentimental" or "maudlin". Of course, the word "gay" would actually be quite at home in the world of Middle Earth, and if you were using it that way -- to describe the joyous, pleasure-loving nature of the little gippers -- you were absolutely correct. But if you want to speak in a more current form of english, you might want to just say "emo". "Gay" is from when I was a kid, which is actually a while ago, when people were stupid (and "gay"). Get with the times. Oh, and finally, to end this appropriately bloated rant on the subject of Tolkien movie adaptations, I STILL CAN'T GET THE IDEA OF MARTIN FREEMAN AS BILBO OUT OF MY HEAD!! Whovever originally threw that out there in the talkbacks, you're a genius! I wannit! I wannit!! Say no to digitally de-aged Ian Holm!
I dont know where it came or from who but
by emeraldboy
Aug 11th, 2007
12:02:36 PM
someone made it out that jackson was a bit naieve. the story goes that while he was prepping, the two towers, he re-read his contract and that his when he discovered that when it came to the DVD's jackson, the financial winners were new line cinema. Jackson then contacted his lawyers, who told him him to wait untill the return of the king came and if he wanted to sue New line then he would be free to do so. I dont know if all of this has been settled yet. Jackson did say he the past that the relationship between wingut films and Newline was never all that comfortable. The whole business regarding the DVD's is very odd. I dont know whether the the story about him finding out while prepping the two towers is true or not. Oh and this person I know. Well lets just say that I mentioned this person before on this site and I into got very serious trouble for doing it. Suffice to say, i have to very careful when talking about this person. Seemingly, others in his choosen field got on his case. I learned a lesson, that is you have very careful and never ever relay conversations, especially private ones on the internet especially on talkbacks.
Robert Shaye was quoted as saying...
by WhoDis
Aug 11th, 2007
12:04:43 PM
"They backed a truck full of money up to my house! I'm not made of stone!"

Now let's stop this nonsense and get this Hobbit thing started while Ian McKellan's still young. And I second Martin Freeman for Bilbo.

Whew
by calnorso
Aug 11th, 2007
12:19:01 PM
At least Raimi won't be doing this now which is a HUGE relief. I could picture his version of the Hobbit, Bilbo would have a dance number or whatever the hell that was in Spiderman 3
So basically we have to take you at your word emerald?
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
12:24:34 PM
That's great. Um, yeah, so let me just say that I don't believe you. No offense, but seriously, how the hell can anybody believe this "person I know" stuff? It's AICN after all.
Regarding Cuaron...
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Aug 11th, 2007
12:27:30 PM
If you guys are talking about the Cuaron who directed HP3/PoA... NO THANK YOU. If you are talking about the Cuaron who directed Y TU MAMA TAMBIEN and the amazing CHILDREN OF (FUCKING) MEN, I can see what you're driving at but it would almost be like Scorcese or Spielberg doing it. There is a certain whimsy and sensibility that I've not seen from him that I think would be necessary for THE HOBBIT. No way am I convinced he's the right alternative.
Peter Jackson is the shit!
by Brian_De_Man
Aug 11th, 2007
12:33:07 PM
If they don't do Peter Jackson as the director, then the Hobbit will go from great to a piece of shit.
Bob Shaye should direct "The Hobbit."
by Uncapie
Aug 11th, 2007
12:34:16 PM
"The Last Mimsy" is cinematic work of art. The "Citizen Kane" of the 21st Century. All you "Mimsy" hayters out there just don't understand. You never gave the film a chance. I hate all of you and I'm going to bite my "Star Wars" pillow in my "Yoda" jammies to prove it! Sniff.
Who would play Bilbo?
by AllPowerfulWizardOfOz
Aug 11th, 2007
12:36:16 PM
I mean you can bring back everyone else including Ian Mckellen, but Ian Holm is too old at this point to play Bilbo and I would imagine he would decline if he was asked.

So who could fill those shoes???
No, Fuck You C Legion!
by Mr_Incredible
Aug 11th, 2007
12:38:03 PM
You obviously don't have a clue what you're talking about.

Peter Jackson is the only one who should be directing The Hobbit. Period. I'm not saying that there aren't any other directors that could turn The Hobbit into a great movie as well. There are. But... It's just that with Peter Jackson and his crew that we will have the guarantee that there will be a visual continuity between The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings.

Oh, and Bob Shaye is the biggest tool in Hollywood. Time Warner should fire his ass.
AllPowerfulWizardOfOz...
by BrooseTheScharuk
Aug 11th, 2007
12:40:17 PM
...Thanks for giving me an excuse to say this again....MARTIN FREEMAN!!
MARTIN FREEMAN AS BILBO
by BrooseTheScharuk
Aug 11th, 2007
12:41:18 PM
MARTIN FREEMAN
Smaug's Lair (CUARON Style)
by The Artist FKA Vesuvio
Aug 11th, 2007
12:46:38 PM
Let us take a moment to picture a 5 minute sequence of Bilbo infiltrating Smaug's cave, non-stop takes (even if faux ones) like in Children of Men? I get happy thinking about that. BTW Gaius, IMHO, HP3PoA is the better of them all, and I loved the way Cuaron portrayed Hogwarts students acting like, you know, students. Maybe they shoud have saved him, or kept him, to Goblet of Fire. Perhaps by doing this, teenagehood and its rites would've had some relevance in that borefest.
How amny have here have seen a short animated film
by emeraldboy
Aug 11th, 2007
12:48:42 PM
called Agricultural report.
The Hobbit done in a LOTR Style
by King Sweyn Forkbeard
Aug 11th, 2007
12:48:55 PM
Is exactly what Tolkien wanted to do anyway. He had long planned to rewrite it in a more mature style to bring the two works closer together.

Jackson doing it in the same style as he did the Trilogy is right, and it's only sensible TBH. For me, the juvenile style The Hobbit is written in doesn't suit the story.

More Peter Jackson updated HOBBIT news!!!!
by melanarus
Aug 11th, 2007
12:49:30 PM
First, let me just point out as much as I dislike BOB SHAYE, he is the reason we have the LOTR trilogy and he was also the one who told PJ to make the LOTR into 3 movies and not 2 as PJ had planned!!! Obviously Bob Shaye and New Line are out to make money and whatever money PJ feels owed to him legally or not I think Bob And NL planned to "payback" to him with a big cut of the Hobbit but I don't think Pj agreed. PJ feels cheated as do a group of actors from the trilogy who also recently sued NL over money owed to them!!! New Line stands to make half as much on Movie tickets (multiple viewing by moviegoers), Dvds and the Dvd box sets and cmon all that merchandising!!!!! They could loose out on hundreds of millions of dollars if they don't get him back and Weta, the actors and not to mention filming in New Zealand. And now NL has not been making big moneymakers either and need the Hobbit, not to mention anyone finacially backing the Hobbit wants PJ and not ANYONE else. The Shadow cast from LOTR trilogy onto anyone else "trying" to make the Hobbit will be compared by EVERYONE who watched it! That's probably one of the main reasons Bob and NL may have had trouble with a director and cast without PJ, no one wants to touch that!!! I love Peter Jackson, but PJ when the hell can you do this one with Lovely Bones and that Tin Tin movie going on? Won't this take like at least two years to start and finish?!! PJ it's to talk back to the talkbackers!!!!
C Legion - Dwarves
by MattmanReturns
Aug 11th, 2007
12:50:44 PM
Did you even read the Hobbit? The dwarves were treated as comic relief in that too. They make a huge mess of Bilbo's house, driving him nuts, and in the end they start a war.
More Peter Jackson updated HOBBIT news!!!! Part 2
by melanarus
Aug 11th, 2007
12:55:24 PM
Peter, it's time for you to go and save New Lines ass again!! But this time get real paid!!! And while I'm talking, I could easily see two versions of PJ's the Hobbit. a Kid oriented cut and a more mature Lotr style 4 hour cut for everyone else. All I know is PJ, when you announce you are onboard the Hobbit I'll be saving up a few thousand bucks for all the merchandise that will go with my LOTR collection!!
What? Have I got aids or something?
by half vader
Aug 11th, 2007
01:08:33 PM
I was being honest about my age/casting question. Not even you Broose? You were going on about it after all. Fuck it. Now it's four in the morning...
Do or Die...Bed-Stuy
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
01:15:31 PM
The Knight, we're practically neighbors.
Danny DeVito Should Direct "The Hobbit"
by WriteFromLeft
Aug 11th, 2007
01:16:51 PM
No more Peter Jackson head injuries on the set from all those low door frames.
Let's just make that "DO"...there's no "die."
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
01:18:04 PM
But in a couple of weeks, I'll be Williamsburg.
Hobbit wouldnt be the same..
by GavinVanDraven
Aug 11th, 2007
01:20:28 PM
without Peter Jackson on board you also lose the services of WETA, and the entire look of the film would be different not to mention the ACTORS Mckellen = Gandalf Holm = Bilbo Weaving = Elrond Serkis = Gollum Ryes-Davies (as Gloin) i'm sure he would wear makeup again, for a hefty paycheck. Bloom (as the Mirkwood king's son, just a cameo....) but yeah, imagine if they recast the top 4 there. recasting = disaster
commas
by GavinVanDraven
Aug 11th, 2007
01:22:00 PM
need to learn how to post things with commas.... *hits self in head again*
oh fuck not this again
by mrbong
Aug 11th, 2007
01:29:59 PM
Mr Jackson did an excellent job adapting three tiresome contrived novels to the big screen. The Hobbit was a mildly more interesting read, but who gives a fuck if it is filmed or not? as for Jackson, well, his reputation took a hefty knock with the King Dong debacle, didn't it - that will teach directors not to hire that retard Jack Black.
bollocks
by misnomer
Aug 11th, 2007
01:32:19 PM
the whole point of the hobbit is that its a kids book. why retroactively change it to make it more in line with the LOTR films??? bollocks. id rather jackson didn't direct this given what his approach will be. 1 movie. 1hr 45 minutes. returning cast. directed by raimi, petersen, whoever. co produced by jackson. weta. done.
They shouldnt
by emeraldboy
Aug 11th, 2007
01:35:45 PM
New line should just cut there losses.
I could care less if Jackson is the director
by INWOsuxRED
Aug 11th, 2007
01:39:18 PM
The only character who ever really conveyed any type of emotion in the LOTR films was Frodo's sidekick. IF Peter Jackson can make his characters likeable AND he can make a FUN movie, then he should do the Hobbit, but I really didn't see any proof of him being able to do that in LOTR or Kong. Maybe he should just supervise the effects...there aren't any bronto stampedes in the Hobbit, are there?
Battle of Five Armies
by Veni Vidi Vici
Aug 11th, 2007
01:43:34 PM
would look fucking amazing on the big screen, not to mention Riddles in the Dark( i get giddy just thinking of that chapter being brought to life). get PJ and the rest of the crew to do this film.
Peter Jackson is ver capable of making a fun movie
by GavinVanDraven
Aug 11th, 2007
01:48:43 PM
frighteners? dead alive? bad taste? anybody think he cant make a fun film? family film though..... hmmmm. i thought LOTR had some great comedy moments...
I'd rather see BATTLE OF THE FIVE BOROUGHS
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
01:50:30 PM
I think I'll write a post-apocalyptic film wherein the five boroughs of NYC are engaged in a savage battle. The winner decides the borough that will be allowed to host the daily tapings of MARTHA and THE TONY DANZA DANCE HOUR.
the changes in LOTR were not that big of a deal
by GavinVanDraven
Aug 11th, 2007
01:52:13 PM
PJ explained the changes in Faramir's attitude toward the Hobbits on the DVD. the whole idea of a human inviting them for milk and cookies seems a little out there when you look at the flow of the film.
Tim Burton's "The Hobbit"
by Hervoyel
Aug 11th, 2007
01:53:28 PM
Johnny Depp as Bilbo Baggins who can't wear a ring because he's got scissors for hands. Everyone could wear black and white striped waist coats and socks.
Bob Guccioni's "The Hobbit"
by Hervoyel
Aug 11th, 2007
01:56:27 PM
All the dwarves are played by Penthouse Pets and it ends with the orgy of five armies.
Bard the bowman....
by GavinVanDraven
Aug 11th, 2007
02:01:59 PM
Liam Neeson.
Peter Jackson's THE HOBBIT
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
02:02:35 PM
Three hours and forty minutes of smiling, trees, hugs, and reaction shots.
Peter Jackson for JLA... *sigh*
by UltimaRex
Aug 11th, 2007
02:06:08 PM
George Miller could "do a Jackson" and actually pull it off but if the real Peter Jackson is sitting over there then... why? I'm off to cry now.
Give it to Ron Jeremy
by ThePilgrim
Aug 11th, 2007
02:12:51 PM
He'll do Anything...
Wnanahara7
by GavinVanDraven
Aug 11th, 2007
02:16:17 PM
i have to disagree with what you just said. but hey, no worries. i am kind of looking at it from the casual viewers perspective. if you hadn't read the book, the book version of Faramir wouldn't seem to fit. IMHO. to each his own. i guess the thing is, nobody will ever make it perfect for everone. somebody will always hate what you do.
The reason Jackson excels is because of emotion
by starlesswinter
Aug 11th, 2007
02:31:25 PM
The last hour of ROTK has more emotion than most films today have in their entire running times. I have never cried as much in a film as I did in those moments, and it's because the film was all about character. You can have as many special effects as you want, but they don't cancel out the emotions of the characters. From the "For Frodo" line, to the reactions of the fellowship when they think Frodo might be dead, to "the end of all things" between Frodo and Sam, to "You bow to no one", Frodo's "threads of an old lie" voiceover, and finally to the Grey Havens, the emotion is almost overwhelming. It shines out any CG effect in the film. That also gave us a better ending, because it allowed us to the see the continuing characterization of Frodo and the emotional effects of his journey on him. It wasn't a quick 5 minutes of "everything's happy!"; it showed us that in all wars, people change from their experiences. Faramir's changes were not a big deal. Only purists care about that. It made the character BETTER and gave him a journey, unlike the Faramir in the book with no journey. The book canceled out the rules of the Ring's power in order for some oh-so-convenient help from a new character. It was inconsistent, almost like Tolkien was thinking "I've been too hard on these guys...I need to bring in some help, even if I am changing why this ring is so evil in the first place." I swear, some people only like what's in the book and dislike anything else just because it wasn't in that book. But if it WAS in the book in the first place, then they'd love it. Movie adaptations aren't about directly translating everything from book to screen; take the chance to make things better if they need it, which Faramir's story certainly did.
Isn't the point of a remake to "reimagine" it?
by starlesswinter
Aug 11th, 2007
02:36:07 PM
I certainly don't want to see the same exact story retold. Change it a little. I didn't mind the "love story" in Kong, even though it was more of a family-type love than a romantic love. It offered a unique approach on monster movies, giving us a bond rather than the typical "run away! he's coming" plot. However, King Kong as a whole was far too long and bloated. It was still an enjoyable movie, just too long.
starlesswinter and Wnanahara7
by GavinVanDraven
Aug 11th, 2007
02:39:05 PM
i couldn't agree more.
Faramir
by starlesswinter
Aug 11th, 2007
02:40:59 PM
I don't think Faramir was a carbon copy. Unlike Boromir, he was able to resist the power of the Ring in the end, which is radically different. EVERYONE in the film is tempted by the Ring, so to say Faramir is a copy of Boromir is to say that Isildur is or that Gandalf is. Faramir and Boromir are just similar because they have the same motives. You can't deny that Tolkien set aside the characterization of the Ring in the Faramir chapters. I realize what he stands for, but you can do that without changing how your world works or making an unbelievable angelic character.
He STOLE it?
by starlesswinter
Aug 11th, 2007
02:44:13 PM
So, if he had stayed closer to the 1933 version, would he have stolen that too? Monster/Horror films...we have enough of those...sorry, I just happen to think the family-bond story of an ape and a human girl is more interesting. You have 1-18-08 if you want a monster film.
Ok, I'll play the game...the love aspect of KK is from
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
02:45:15 PM
MIGHTY JOE YOUNG. MJY was a riff on the original KK, so I suppose it's only appropriate that later versions of Kong would borrow from a borrower.
kong reminded me of that episode in the simpsons
by emeraldboy
Aug 11th, 2007
02:47:25 PM
WHere ned flanders house gets demolished by tornado and homer in an unprecendented act of both kindness and stupidity rebuilds flanders home. but homer knows noting about DIY and fucks the rebuilding of Neds House. Thats what Jacksons king kong was like.
Get Peter onboard NOW
by performingmonkey
Aug 11th, 2007
02:53:15 PM
I only want to see The Hobbit directed by Peter Jackson. It needs to be in the same world he created for LOTR. It needs WETA coming in and doing what they do best. It needs the Battle Of Five Armies to be fucking huge, it needs the Bilbo/Gollum riddle sequence to be classic, iconic like everyone remembers it from the book, it needs Thorin Oakenshield to be played by BRIAN COX and no-one else, it needs Andy Serkis, Ian Mckellen and Hugo Weaving back. They could also potentially cast Orlando Bloom as Legolas's father (who's in this as a bastard elf king who throws Bilbo and the dwarves in his dungeons).
They beter get a move on - no one (including myself)
by Yeti
Aug 11th, 2007
02:58:19 PM
is getting any younger.
King Kong Lives
by WriteFromLeft
Aug 11th, 2007
03:06:54 PM
Now, what I would do is have Dino DeLaurentis produce the sequel to Jackson's King Kong, only have it be a remake of King Kong Lives, with a guy in a monkey suit doing things. If for no other reason than to hear Dino say, "Oh my God! She's a bigga flop!" after the weekend grosses come in.
Wnanahara7, agreed.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
03:08:41 PM
But it's still accurate to say they borrowed from themselves. As I said, it was a riff on the original. And I agree with you about the remake of Mighty Joe Young. It had a lot of appeal. And I also agree that the King Kong we saw in Jackson's version was a most amazing creation. While the movie had many problems, one of them surely was not the main character. Astounding work by all involved.
Lets have a rumble.
by i kick tits
Aug 11th, 2007
03:09:03 PM
When you're a Jet you're the top cat in town. You're the Gold medal kid with the heavyweight crown.
BATTLE OF THE FIVE BOROUGHS
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
03:10:47 PM
I can work a Romeo Juliet story in there and make it a musical. Gangs of NY with dance numbers.
LOLZ
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
03:19:29 PM
That got the first chuckle out of me today. Well done, Douchebag! (There, that more like it?)
more crying hobbits i cant wait
by Meatbiscuit
Aug 11th, 2007
03:20:32 PM
boring...they probably wont show the dragon till after 3 hours of crying.
Three and a half hours, Meatbiscuit.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
03:24:46 PM
Give Petey 210 minutes and he'll give you a dragon.
3 hours of crying?
by starlesswinter
Aug 11th, 2007
03:30:06 PM
You need to watch again if that's all you got out of it. I love the hobbits as heroes. They deserve to cry after what they've been through. And it's not all they did; sure they do at the end of every movie, but it's for a realistic reason, you know. I certainly don't want macho heroes who can do anything. Men showing emotion: who would have thought?
BOERUM HILL REPRESENT!! (That's the top of Park Slope)
by slone13
Aug 11th, 2007
03:32:44 PM
I don't have much to say that hasn't been written here about Jackson and the Hobbit already (i.e. they shouldn't bother if he ain't involved), I just wanted to further represent my borough. Money Makin' Brooklyn, baby!
Hobbits are basically the rabbits of Middle Earth
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
03:33:29 PM
So yeah, after repeatedly defeating death (while witnessing others succumb) I'd fully expect hobbits to cry. Of course I'd also expect them to eat their young in times of famine...
Hey New Yorkers, your city is scary!!!
by SoylentMean
Aug 11th, 2007
03:35:35 PM
Seriously. What do tourists have to wear so they don't radiate "Mug Me" pheremones? Oh, and how many damn movie theaters do you lucky bastards have within a 10 mile radius?
They only want Jackson back because...
by Fridge
Aug 11th, 2007
03:42:47 PM
...it's the only way they'll get people like Ian McKellen from the first three movies back. There's no way those people would be involved with this movie unless Jackson was.
Holy hell, SoylentMean, you kill!
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
03:44:50 PM
Rabbits?! That was effin' hilarious! Thanks for the laugh.

If you don't want to get mugged in NYC, don't come to town wearing a camera on your chest. Don't wear I Heart NY shirts. Don't block the fucking sidewalk so others can walk unimpeded. Don't point at things. AND DON"T WADDLE. Seriously, you can tell a tourist by the waddle.

And don't worry about getting mugged. Come to NYC to enjoy the greatest city in the US. Better to worry about the damned monster rat that tore the head of the SOL. He looks pissed. But I bet he doesn't come to Brooklyn, because we'd kick his cheese-eating ass.
Zombie Hobbits...Zombits
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
04:17:05 PM
Now THAT would be good for Jackson.
Honestly, Sir Petey Jax would the best choice sure.
by TomBodet
Aug 11th, 2007
04:19:31 PM
BUT-und it iss a beeg Butt-it Won't exactly be the End of the fucking World if someone Else ala Peter Weir or Ridley Scott or Cauron gets to direct Hobbit instead, you know? All of these guys are GOOD, hell I think even Sir Petey'd admit that, say, Peter Weir could do this. It wouldn't be Jax's Hobbit, no-but still, I'm sure--it'd be pretty good anyways. Just a thought that's all. I still think when all is said and done, Of Course the Kiwi is gonna be doing it. Makes the most sense.
After starring in Three of the biggest films of his
by emeraldboy
Aug 11th, 2007
04:31:33 PM
career recently and back to back. Orlando bloom will not do this film just yet. The guy needs space and time as do the others. It is going to take a hell of a lot to make all this happen. it took 4-5 years of pre-production to build those sets in New Zealand, lord of the rings didnt happen over night. Making three films back to back was unprecendented for everyone. New line has to be certain that there is an audience for this movie. Everyone is saying that hiring jackson and the cast means that the movie will happen. Well i am not sure about that. Lord of the rings was a massive production and it needed to be. Putting massive amounts of money into a film is nothing new. The best example is titanic which was beset by shooting delays, it did break box office records but look how long it is taking cameron to come back. a decade. and there is no guarantee that camerons new film will be blockbuster. That is all in the future. either the hobbit is made or not. but it should not be made on the hasty demands of the fans. They should take thier time.
Crying Hobbits?
by Veni Vidi Vici
Aug 11th, 2007
04:31:58 PM
They are more dwarves than hobbits in the book, so you can quit your bitching about seeing more crying hobbits.
Jurassic_Kong-what went wrong-
by TomBodet
Aug 11th, 2007
04:45:09 PM
Well, lemme see here-what was wrong? Rushed out there for release w/out the story being properly edited down, w/out the movie being properly edited down(hello Jimmy the Cabin Boy! 50 minutes before you hit the Island, etc), Very bad miscasting of Jack Black(this role Screamed John C Reilly or Oliver Platt or someone like that), too much emphasis on goofy overkill F/X showcases ala the 3 way Dino fight, the bugs, the Bat-things, etc. You know the drill. This just was half-baked.

Now what worked? Kong himself was really good. Ms Watts was pretty effective. The biplane attack, Ummmm lemme see I actually enjoyed the whole shooting bugs w/ Tommy Guns shit, etc. that was kinda fun if F-Troop level. It was NOT by any means TERRIBLE, but you know-I enjoyed it on the same level as I did say Mummy Returns or Spidey III or hmmmmm actually I liked Big Fucking Robots Hitting Each Other MORE, so that's out. I think you got the general idea here.

Half Vader-about Bilbo. Bilbo was about ummmm what, 51 when he was car-jacked into the whole Lonely Mtn thing, which would be about 33ish for you or me. Early middle age or so. I think the ring Slowed down his aging, but it CERTAINLY didn't stop it right then and there. I agree that they should hire someone else to play him. Whomever said 'Martin Short', well at least that's being creative, if nothing else.

CGI John Candy as Bofur.

CGI John Candy as Bofur.
by misnomer
Aug 11th, 2007
04:54:42 PM
best sentence ever written.
No Jack City
by i kick tits
Aug 11th, 2007
04:57:47 PM
I have lived in New York City for my entire life and have never, ever once in 21 years of life been mugged. Never. Once a gang of 16 year olds demanded I "run my pockets" but I said No and they cursed at me. That's about as close as its gotten. You must've been wearing a fanny-pack or something because I have no clue what you're talking about. Never mugged. Groped by mentally ill sexual predators plenty of times, but mugged- no sir.
You promised you wouldn't talk about that again.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
05:06:44 PM
I told you a hundred times, "I'm sorry."
PLEASE! Let Peter Dinklage direct and star from a Mamet
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
05:24:09 PM
script. Set it in Chicagoshire and have Gandalf be a beat cop.
New Line Cinema's position is basically indefensible
by Gozu
Aug 11th, 2007
05:24:34 PM
Studios should pay their directors the money they owe them. Directors shouldn't have to sue in order to get paid. I hope "The Hobbit" happens, but more-so I hope Jackson gets his fair share. Sure he's made more money than God off "LOTR" but it's the principle of the thing.
The Hobbit has chosen HD-DVD, here's why...
by Johnno
Aug 11th, 2007
05:54:23 PM
It's curent sales are as high as it'll ever grow.

That said, I look forward to a Peter Jackson Hobbit. You'd be dumb to change it up! And while they're at it they might as well make Similirion or however that's spelt too. Or if there's nto much there for a concrete story, make anime shorts of it leading up the Hobbit's release. It worked well for Animatrix and Batman's doing it too, heck, just look at the short for Heavenly Sword... But whatever...
How Boring. Let's go back to the Harry Potter thread
by Ringwearer9
Aug 11th, 2007
06:09:22 PM
http://tinyurl.com/2pxsuh
If they owe him $20 million, they should pay up.
by Gozu
Aug 11th, 2007
06:11:03 PM
If they don't owe them anything, then they don't. We might find out if this goes to trial. What I'm saying is that if an employer pays you less than what you've earned or what they said they'd pay you, you have to challenge that. It doesn't matter if you're the fry guy at McDonalds or Peter Jackson.
The Silmarillion,
by Lornsorrow
Aug 11th, 2007
06:15:36 PM
that is all I want to see. Edited down into an understandable movie. The juvenile story of The Hobbit was never that great for me. I've read it, and read the LOTR trilogy a few times, but I never could find the time to get all the way through the Silmarillion (yet). That's the one that looks real interesting to me, and would probably be a worthy film successor to the LOTR films. Unless someone wants to shoot The Hobbit in a more mature manner and drop some of the juvenile stuff in it.
Jackson....nah just dont
by Fudgemonkey
Aug 11th, 2007
06:28:42 PM
Produce it? sure! get Weta, Serkis Mckellen et al on board? fuck yeah! but for me, Jackson screwed the pooch with the ending of the last film. A montage Pete? honestly? slow-mo homoerotica? You're shitting me right? taking away the original ending which for me defined the greatness of the book (the whole post first world war, you cant go home again, scouring of the shire bit) was the biggest directorial fopar since Michael Bay said "yknow pearl harbor really aint about the fight in Hawaii, lets get Afflec in a love story for 3 hours!" Lets get some fresh blood in with a sense of what makes Tolkein's works so compelling please!
re: Lornsorrow, the Silmarilion as a movie
by Ingeld
Aug 11th, 2007
06:45:51 PM
While I enjoy the Silmarillion, I do not think it would make a good movie. What makes the Elves interesting is the sense of otherness and mystery. In LOTR, book and movie, they are represented mostly by Legolas. He is otherness is enhanced by the comparison with humans. A movie only about Feanor, Turin and rest of the elves would have to dissolve that otherness and mystery and make them more human and common. Something certainly would be lost.
MORONS
by runfoodrun
Aug 11th, 2007
06:51:59 PM
Anyone in the talkback who says Jackson should lay off because he's already made 168 million and should worry about 20 more is an idiot. What person in their right mind in any profession would just walk away from any sum of EARNED money because the people in control refuse to give it to him. He MADE this MONEY and DESERVES it. People don't make movies only for the love of the craft, they do it to MAKE MONEY and get PAID. Foolish comments.
Curon
by runfoodrun
Aug 11th, 2007
06:53:06 PM
And if not Jackson, the very best choice, how about Curon.
Hulk SMASH puny hobbits
by BetaRayBill07
Aug 11th, 2007
07:08:33 PM
Hulk no like Shire. Hulk no like puny Gollum. Smash puny ring!!
SPOILER- Bilbo seen in Pizza Delivery Garb!!
by BetaRayBill07
Aug 11th, 2007
07:09:25 PM
Sorry, I had to throw that out there.
Fred Savage will work for cheap.
by Flim Springfield
Aug 11th, 2007
07:19:29 PM
New Line Gotta Eat
by CherryValance
Aug 11th, 2007
07:26:20 PM
So fitting. Really I don't know what they were thinking. Hopefully it will turn out right.
Other directors dont have the guts
by silent 1
Aug 11th, 2007
07:45:16 PM
I wont be surprised other directors would have turned down this project it's to big of a task to meet the requirement that Jackson and his team have done.
Silmarilion with a script done by Neal Gaiman
by pipergates
Aug 11th, 2007
09:19:56 PM
Silmarilion is basically just a long list of historical happenings, someone with Gaiman's flair for legends full of life, could mine that book like a miner mining the richest ore...and there's enough for a lot of movies there. Pirates of the Caribean could be peanuts compared to the possible earning power of this one.
Homoerotica?
by starlesswinter
Aug 11th, 2007
09:30:23 PM
Wow, people really need to get over this...the hobbits' relationship is a TRUE friendship with feelings, not "gay" whatsoever. All they ever did was hug and got a kiss on the head; nothing homosexual about that. Sorry if I sound like a fag to you, but I'd rather have a strong friendship like the hobbits' than one of today's so-called friendships: "Hey man, I got some pussy last night...awesome! Let's go get high off our asses!" where everything is about sex. And you obviously need to watch the ending of the ROTK again...there was no montage. We got the idea that all was not right after the war just from Frodo's voiceover "...when in your heart, there is no going back..." That was strong and emotionally effective enough; we didn't need to draw it out with yet another battle.
Emeraldboy, Starless
by half vader
Aug 11th, 2007
10:09:20 PM
"Massive amounts of money" Each film cost 86 million, 260 all up. Yeah I guess that's sort of massive by itself, but not in relation to other films. I'm still trying to find out whether that's American or Kiwi dolars. US I think. But anyway they made that money go a long way.

Starless, settle down there and get over it yourself! The gay thing, and the crying thing, especially in regards to the hobbits, is now a time-honoured AICN tradition. Stop being so stuffy about the baiting, ya big girl. ;)

but the emotional starings of Frodo was way overdone
by pipergates
Aug 11th, 2007
10:10:56 PM
and yes they did make the friendship look perverted, with all that exaggerated drama...Jackson repeated the overblown emotional staring scenes in King Kong.
What was so exaggerated and
by starlesswinter
Aug 11th, 2007
10:28:14 PM
What was so exaggerated and perverted about the friendship, other than the staring?
Nothing, they're just goofing.
by Bronx Cheer
Aug 11th, 2007
10:33:46 PM
But there was way too much crying. You can't be crying that much if you were armor or carry a sword: RUST!
Curon couldn't handle this movie?
by runfoodrun
Aug 11th, 2007
10:37:07 PM
BS, all he's done is make the Harry Potter franchise watchable, a brillant road/coming of age movie in Y Tu Mama and the brillant, extremely well design and played Children of Men, he'd be perfect for the Hobbit if PJ doesn't do it.
Cuaron
by starlesswinter
Aug 11th, 2007
10:54:52 PM
I like Cuaron more as a visual guy than a storytelling guy, but that's not to say he's bad at all. I particularly love his long takes. The only thing I have against him directing the Hobbit is that he has a very dark visual style with everything he does, and the Hobbit isn't anything like that. I like the Prisoner of Azkaban film, but I think he butchered my favorite moment of the entire HP series, which was the Shrieking Shack scene. The scene was wonderful for me in the book because we get a little more shocking information at a time until you are spellbound by all the threads being tied together in that moment and recognizing all the earlier clues. In the film, it was just rushed through with the facts, making it a little confusing for some people. I completely understand time in adapting a book and am not a purist at all, but sometimes savoring the moment works better.
Terry Gilliam for the Hobbit
by MasterShake
Aug 11th, 2007
11:12:35 PM
Is that wrong of me? As much as I love PJ's LOTR, I think Gilliam could blow our minds with the Hobbit.
crying hobbits
by GavinVanDraven
Aug 11th, 2007
11:31:59 PM
as far as i can tell... bilbo is the only hobbit in majority of the book... and i dont think he cries to much. the whole "gay" thing is really retarded. ive seen very tough guys cry because they went through something emotional. your friend or parent dies, you just got married, had your first child, you threw a game winning touchdown pass, you survive a car wreck, you saw a great movie that got to you.... any man would cry in any of those situations. the hobbits went through some traumatic shit in those books. they werent humans remember, they were innocent beings. they were more like children in that respect. so i would expect a little more emotion from them. i think PJ got it right. i didnt see anything gay about the movies. crying is normal. "i did my best." sniffle sniffle "i did my be-e-eeeeeest"
Peter Jackson will produce...
by Bones
Aug 11th, 2007
11:32:58 PM
...And someone else will direct.

Possibly Raimi...or DelToro...

That way, the New Zealand Crew will be involved, The Wingnut crew will be there for the assist--and There will be new blood in the director's chair giving it the difference it tone it needs to have.

The Hobbit, unlike Lord of the Rings, is a children's story and should have a lighter touch than the LOTR Trilogy--but it should still feel like it is connected to those films. Having Jackson on as a producer is the best solution--plus it is an olive branch to the fans, from whom New Line wants money...

His Majesty's Dragon
by scrivener
Aug 11th, 2007
11:36:58 PM
Wasn't Peter Jackson doing Temeraire after Lovely Bones? I'd like The Hobbit, too... but the man can't be everywhere at once and... damn, if it wouldn't be a hard choice.
The Silmarilion? Hmmm.... I don't know
by The Artist FKA Vesuvio
Aug 12th, 2007
12:00:49 AM
Am I the only one who thinks The Silmarilion simply doesn't belong to this particular 'age' of cinema? It would be like, I don't know, trying to produce The Matrix back in the 40's. Possible, of course, but somehow unfit. Oh, almost forget... ALFONSO FUCKING CUARON.
Thanks, Tombodet
by half vader
Aug 12th, 2007
12:55:02 AM
I just thought I remembered Gandalf or someone saying "You haven't aged a day" or something and then being suspicious. Thanks for the info.
I Don't Know Why They Won't Give Him Whatever He Wants
by skoobyx
Aug 12th, 2007
01:23:28 AM
Its a slam dunk. They pay him $100 mill they still turn a profit on it. Even before the 17 disk collector's edition DVD with life size Gollum statue. I thought studios were all about business.
Well, at least keep Howard Shore
by starlesswinter
Aug 12th, 2007
02:40:59 AM
I don't know if Shore would be willing without Jackson on board, but Shore's score for the trilogy is amazing beyond words. The level of thematic complexity in the scores (over 80 developing themes!) is simply astounding. Hearing the ominous "History of the Ring" theme when Bilbo finds the Ring would be chill-worthy, but it really shouldn't be used other than that moment...that might be overkill. But what an opportunity for the gorgeous male choir Dwarven music heard in Moria! Or a reprisal of the "Menace of Gollum" theme with the cymbalom during Riddles in the Dark. Even variations of the hobbit material used for the Shire.
Time Warner stock holders are Cookin the Books!!!!!
by DOGSOUP
Aug 12th, 2007
03:46:20 AM
We know it's true
Fuck the Hobbit
by 300spartansinhell
Aug 12th, 2007
04:37:18 AM
I still have hopes for Beowulf and an epic dragon fight, cgi or no cgi. That golden dragon looks kick-ass. Who needs lame Smaug who got killed with one arrow.
starlesswinter
by 300spartansinhell
Aug 12th, 2007
04:42:39 AM
the jumping in bed with Frodo scene that takes forever, was exaggereted. I was suprised Legolas wasn´t pulled into bed too by the Hobbits. When Frodo says "Oh Sam" for the tenth time in the films, it was exaggerated.
STEALING TOKYO DRIFT
by messi
Aug 12th, 2007
05:24:44 AM
Okay I stole it too but i'm blatantly putting it there: Tokyo Drift FUCK YOU
I kick tits...
by cornponious
Aug 12th, 2007
05:25:21 AM
1989, sadly.
in all this hobbit and tolkein talk
by emeraldboy
Aug 12th, 2007
06:59:05 AM
there is one figure, who the fans dont like but he is an important figure none the less, christopher tolkien has said that he will not allow anyone to get their hands on the work bequeathed to him by JRR Tolkien.
The only big movies left
by messi
Aug 12th, 2007
07:04:36 AM
since Transformers has been done are The Simarillion, Justice League, Infinite Crisis. That's it. Can't get any bigger than that. The Revelation is a fucking shitty story, not epic or well written.
jekyll
by palewook
Aug 12th, 2007
07:22:14 AM
best new series of 2007 and not one talkback about it. wtf.
There will never be a SILMARILLION movie.
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Aug 12th, 2007
08:35:00 AM
It's too complex and there is no central protagonist.

Don't get me wrong, I fucking LOVE the book. But the idea of a film having to introduce a new character every 3 minutes while covering 10,000 years of Middle Earth history is ridiculous.

The best new series...jekyll?
by emeraldboy
Aug 12th, 2007
08:40:21 AM
No not by a long shot. to each his own i guess. I couldnt Stand it and I found Nessbits overacting incredibly irritating. I hope that if nesbitt gets dr. who he tones his compulsion to overact. the idea of him and tate, will be enough to make me never watch the show again.
Silmarillion-animated ala Samurai Jack.
by TomBodet
Aug 12th, 2007
09:29:15 AM
Well why not-? Turin, Tuor, Thingol(is he still Thingol-?), Finrod, Feanor, Fingon, Fingolfin, Finwe, Earendil and the Fnirkl Twins. All compelling characterizations awaiting the Akku treatment, am sure.
Re: the money Jackson thinks he's owed...
by Monkey_King
Aug 12th, 2007
10:21:04 AM
What're you trying to say here Quint? Are you siding with Shaye and New Line on this, or just being a jealous fanboy prick that Jackson & Co are right and always have been right? Shaye should pay up what Peter's owed, let Peter make THE HOBBIT and reap the benefits of what it will make without screwing over Peter again.
RIP Merv Griffin I see.
by TomBodet
Aug 12th, 2007
11:04:20 AM
Dead at 82. CGI Merv as Dwalin.
Christopher Tolkien will probably be dead soon
by King Sweyn Forkbeard
Aug 12th, 2007
12:17:41 PM
No more problem there.
why is so much chris tolkien
by emeraldboy
Aug 12th, 2007
02:17:58 PM
hate. I mean, he doesnt what he inherited filmed. The ralph bakashi thing was well over 20 years ago. but if he doesnt want what he has filmed, its his decision. What is the problem.
SILMANIMERILLION
by Johnno
Aug 12th, 2007
02:33:48 PM
Make a bunch of anime shorts covering all that stuff and toss it on a DVD. DIfferent directors, different art styles, whatever... Get Miyazaki, Shoji Kawamori, any other US or Japanese director you like that can do fantasy in there and boom good to go...
Wnanahara7 thats a great idea
by slappy jones
Aug 12th, 2007
03:57:59 PM
just let the studios pay what they want regardless off what they are legally obliged to. If they want to cut someone 20 - 30 MILLION dollars short then the person owed should just be greatful they got anything. jesus christ....
Kiss And Make Up? Has PJ Apologized For KING KONG Yet?
by LaserPants
Aug 12th, 2007
04:15:33 PM
"Look, I'm sorry, I lost my head! I thought since I made a such a sucessful epic with LOTR, that I could do anything! I could take, for instance, a 90 minute monster movie and make it 387 hours long and everybody would love it! HOW WRONG I WAS! It was a bomb! Even the few people who liked it fell asleep. Children were weeping, relationships ended, money just burned on the altar of my hubris! I AM SORRY! I AM SO SO VERY SORRY!!! Please don't make me go back to making hilarious splatter movies! I AM AN EPIC FILM-MAKER! Can you blame me for freaking out? Look what happened to Lucas! Of course, I pulled a Wachowski and went from Lucas '78 to Lucas '99 in just under a year, but, think of my issues! My damage! Psychologically transferring my copious bulk to the utter failure that was KING KONG?! I WAS A FAT KID AND FINALLY I WAS THIN! I had money, women suddenly wanted to talk to me and I... I... lost my head... I, I'm sorry. As penance, I promise I will hire an editor for my next movie which I also promise will be under 90 minutes... and good."

This is the best news I've heard in a long, long time.
by brokentusk
Aug 12th, 2007
04:15:50 PM
Despite what some people may think about Peter Jackson's LORD OF THE R