Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

Good Show
by Knthrak
Aug 5th, 2007
06:15:23 AM
Not great
Best New Show!!
by danton1000
Aug 5th, 2007
06:18:41 AM
This show has to get renewed! Milch is doing very amazing stuff.
def enjoying this
by autistk
Aug 5th, 2007
06:24:57 AM
but it seems to be getting more and more abstract every episode... not only story/characterwise, but even the editing and things feels looser. Not in a badly-edited way mind you.
Only two possible outcomes
by MyManD316
Aug 5th, 2007
06:48:23 AM
1) Something so extraordinary happens, be it a revelation or just something bombastically surreal, that it ties up all the crap that's happened so far into something meaningful. Thus propelling this show into TV lore.

2. It all adds up to nothing at all, and we realize the crap we've been fed is just that - pure, grade A pretentious bullSHIT. And David Milch laughs at of us all the way to the fucking bank.

With the way the show's been so far, I don't see a middle ground between the two possibilities.

Has HBO got a big set of steel balls? I hope so.......
by Riley Martin
Aug 5th, 2007
08:02:37 AM
Will HBO just look at the ratings and cancel the show, or will they realize how truly unique, fascinating & entertaining this show is and give us a second season?
Damn, this show is replacing Deadwood?
by Judge Briggs
Aug 5th, 2007
08:24:32 AM
Extremely sad if so.
Loved Deadwood....
by Wogga Wogga
Aug 5th, 2007
09:05:55 AM
but this is total crap. Yes, I've seen all episodes for some reason, but it's still crap. I think Milch is trying to impress David Lynch. Only thing missing is a character speaking backwards and a closeup of a sewerpipe. Bet the HBO bosses are going "Eeeek! Pull the fucking plug already!!! He's bleeding us dry!"
It took six posts before someone bitched about Deadwood
by Charlie Murphy
Aug 5th, 2007
09:18:07 AM
you guys are losing your touch.
enough already
by rainbowtrout1265
Aug 5th, 2007
09:28:15 AM
I'll watch these last two eps to see how the thing ends, but it really doesn't deserve another season. "Weird" is fine, but weird-for-weird's-sake is just pointless and pretentious. The show was a misire...it happens.
I like it
by sitchin
Aug 5th, 2007
09:40:40 AM
I've caught every episode, and I'm in it for the long haul. I think I read somewhere (maybe here) that this show was given a greenlight for season 2 before season 1 ever aired.

I think this show is going to be jaw dropping in the last episode as all is revealed, and all the haters will be praying for season 2 to start.
If you aren't watching JOHN FROM CINCINNATI, you suck
by ErnieAnderson
Aug 5th, 2007
09:43:31 AM
If it lasts more than two seasons, this could potentially out-weird TWIN PEAKS.
It's already out-weirded Twin Peaks
by sitchin
Aug 5th, 2007
10:02:48 AM
I don't know, Butchie, instead.
Show will soon be gone
by jocutus
Aug 5th, 2007
10:07:41 AM
You know it's true. Anyway, when John said 'Sean will soon be gone", the one question the guy(I cant remember anyone's names here) asked was what "Soon" meant. My first question was "What does GONE mean?" Dead? Moved to Cincinnati? Of course he didn't ask that question, it makes too much sense. Anyway, the problem with this show is the long periods of time everyone spends standing around in a parking ot looking at each other nervously while nothing much happens. And yet I still watch, right?
I'm wondering
by sitchin
Aug 5th, 2007
10:53:19 AM
If if all these guys who have witnessed the miracles are somehow going to be the Apostles after Sean is gone. I haven't thought about it much in detail, just a passing thought that keeps rumbling around in the back of my head. Are there parallels between characters and certain apostles? Who would be Judas? The nut who spent too much time in 'Nam would be John, he's the militant one. Who's Peter? Is the porn queen Mary Magdalene?
I just watched the first episode
by Charlie Murphy
Aug 5th, 2007
10:54:25 AM
i have all the episodes recorded, but i kept putting off watching them, but i must admit, i thought the first episode was pretty sweet. weird, but interesting, totally unbelievable, but i want to watch anyway. come on, anything that has ed o'neill yelling "up your nose with a rubber hose" is okay by me.
I think this show is a big figurative middle finger...
by Bullet_time_Facehugger
Aug 5th, 2007
11:26:20 AM
...to HBO from David Milch for canceling deadwood. I can just imagine the pitch meeting he had with the execs. Milch: "it'll be Twin Peaks with Surfboards!" Exec: Outstanding!" He hands milch bags of money, who snickers in return.
This shows cheap so it's easy to give a 2nd season
by GreatCzarsGhost
Aug 5th, 2007
12:18:44 PM
This show is very cheap to make compared to Deadwood or Carnival which being period pieces are more expensive. The only names are Greenwood (who's only been in half of the episodes) and De Mornay (probably the most annoying character on the show) are B list. The rest are all pretty much character actors(OK, Ed O'Neill might be a B lister to some). There are only a few small set pieces such as Yost house, Surf Shop, bills house, Kai's trailer, Mitch's room, Buckie's room, Cassi's hotel room, and the internet café. Exterior shots are outside Yost house, some street shooting, and the run down motel.

As cheap as this show is to produce, HBO shouldn't have any trouble going for a second season even if it means a not so large viewership but finishing the story. The whole run of JFC probably about as much as one episode of Rome. So come on HBO, just OK a second season so Milch can finish his story.

I hate it when...
by DanielKurland
Aug 5th, 2007
12:24:51 PM
The series creator of a show doesn't write the finale (or premiere). It just comes off as lazy in my opinion. Yes, I understand that they've probably given rigorous outlines of what needs to happen, and it's essentially their idea, but come on, it's your fucking show. If you aren't juggling a bunch of stuff, then at least try and write the first or last episode of the season. Does anyone else agree with this?
Finale written by Zach Whedon
by Rinse
Aug 5th, 2007
01:09:16 PM
Holy shit, brother of Joss Whedon. How come nobody's gone on and on about the Buffy-connection? :P
New aspect, John Frum Cargo Cult
by EvilWizardGlick
Aug 5th, 2007
01:58:19 PM
Look it up bitches.
Only 10 Episodes?
by Bungion Boy
Aug 5th, 2007
02:07:14 PM
HBO usually gives their dramas 12 or 13. I think the only show that has 10 episodes per season is Curb. This show has really breezed by and I wasn't ready for it to be over. Damn. Hope it gets a second season.
bacci40, Here is why it is great.
by EvilWizardGlick
Aug 5th, 2007
02:07:21 PM
It's great because Nichols nailed the John Character.

Because they ALL nailed their characters.

Because we see an emotionally stunted and traumatized group of people grow and bond outside their normal habitats.

Because the show suggests more than it reveals. It promises and hints at great unexplored depths while taking us their very slowly.

It's great because it reflects the everyday world. A world we can see. A world where we can picture any of the characters walking in the street with us.

It's great because the Nanday communicates telepathically with Bill.

It's great because the dialogue has specific meaning.

It's great because it has NOT used cheap and tawdry sex to prop up poorly written, acted and directed material. As we see with most tv.

It's great because it is written for adults and not teenyboppers.

Its great because you need to think about the show after each episode.

Its great because you have to think why the episode left you feeling something.

Its great because it doesn't assume you are stupid and needs to walk you through every developing aspect.

Its great because it is quotable.

Still am engrossed in the show
by JohnnyS2
Aug 5th, 2007
02:08:58 PM
Even though it probably thinks it's the Stephen Hawking of television. At times, some of the non-dialogue scenes are brilliant. Other times, it's so freakin' obscure it's ridiculous. One thing's for sure, it's unlike anything on TV in the past 2-5 years.
jocutus, Sean signed Linc's contract.
by EvilWizardGlick
Aug 5th, 2007
02:10:49 PM
Sean's on tour. At least that was the impression I got when we saw the signing and previously supported by the Dwayne Butchie conversation about scumbags.

Besides Butchie is the messiah, he is undergoing a second coming.

I think if you try to figure it out you miss the
by Trader Groucho 2
Aug 5th, 2007
02:12:30 PM
point. Try allowing the show to ride on a strictly emotional level.
What the show is about
by sitchin
Aug 5th, 2007
02:17:33 PM
It takes place in Imperial Beach, California, home to surfer slackers. One day a strange man shows up who, when pressed, says his name is John from Cincinnati.
John doesn't speak much English, much less surfer talk, so he mimics what others say, and somehow manages to get his point across. When Butchie tells him to stop repeating everything, and if he doesn't know the answer, just say, "I don't know, Butchie", instead. So John always says, "I don't know Butchie instead." Strange things happen after John arrives. Mitch Yost, Butchie's dad and Sean's grandfather, discovers he can levitate (great scene at the end of episode 1). When John is asked for something, anything, he can pull it out of his pants pocket. He can also do the "out of body" thing, as someone mentioned above, appearing to people and giving them insights into their personal problems, etc. He's always referring to his Father with a capital F. Oh, and he can heal himself.
The gist is, John is come kind of Messiah figure, or more likely, a John the Baptist figure, heralding the arrival of the Messiah, who is apparently Sean. Sean, 14, is a rad surfer with skills. He breaks his neck during a competition, but is miraculously brought back to life by a kiss on the cheek from a parrot that Sean himself had brought back to life earlier with a simple touch.
Lots of subplots involving Hawaiian drug dealers, gay lottery winners, an ex-Nam drug-addled vet, Sean's mom the porn queen, a wheeler-dealer sleezeball who owns a management company for all the great surfers, and a run down motel that seems to be the gathering place of choice for all these misfits and miscreants.
Where is it all going? Who the heck knows, and who cares? It's fascinating, and you can't wait to see what is revealed next. Is Sean Jesus returned? Will the world scorn him as before? "Sean will soon be gone", but where, and when, and why? If they gave us all these answers, it wouldn't be such a good show.
Oh, one more thing
by sitchin
Aug 5th, 2007
02:20:55 PM
John From Cincinnati = JFC = Jesus Fucking Christ
Butchie the Messiah?
by sitchin
Aug 5th, 2007
02:23:00 PM
EvilWizardGlick, why do you think Butchie is the Messiah? Why him rather than Sean? Sean is the one with the powers, he's the one who seems most "not of this world" and "totally innocent", not counting JFC of course.
either way...
by Judge Briggs
Aug 5th, 2007
02:40:27 PM
this is a boring show compared to Carnivale and Deadwood. one of HBO's few let downs for shure.
A question for those that pay attention
by rbrog77
Aug 5th, 2007
03:03:49 PM
Lately this "my father" business has had me asking the question would "my father" be the one in heaven or the one in hell? Cass did ask John at one point if his father meant well, and if I remember correctly John put him and her in a trance...you know, she folded up the cloth.

Seems like that's the question that needs answering here, not if it's a good show or not. People like it. People don't. Those that don't..........don't watch it........unless you think maybe, just maybe those of us here that do get it and enjoy it might actually be onto something.

I gave it a chance. I really did.
by GQtaste
Aug 5th, 2007
03:14:21 PM
But i've had enough.
My Father
by sitchin
Aug 5th, 2007
03:16:46 PM
I dunno, rbrog77, I haven't seen anything to even hint that there's something "dark" about JFC, or Butchie or Sean for that matter. Every miracle has been "a good thing", John's innocence seems genuine and his actions well intentioned. The only dark spot in the show is Linc, and he seems to be softening up.
I really want Tina the porn queen to be Mary Magdalen. But then that would make Butchie the Messiah, since she seems to be his love interest, so maybe I'm off base there.
I still think this is gonna be an "apostles after Jesus is Risen and gone" story eventually. Just trying to sort out who's who.
The antichrist?
by RokurGepta
Aug 5th, 2007
03:37:54 PM
could it be, could this show take a really dark turn?

I was hooked by this show from episode 1, but lately have been left feeling a little unsatisfied.... If everyone keeps on healing, it loses a bit of drama.... I dunno

sitchin into darkness
by Pabodie
Aug 5th, 2007
03:44:57 PM
"Does your father mean well?" was a key, maybe the key moment so far. Does John not know? Can he just not say? Or is he conflicted? Fascinating. My hope is that the season finale jumps into the abyss. Mitch's return tonight should shake it up a little, too.
Question
by RokurGepta
Aug 5th, 2007
03:55:18 PM
If John is supposed to be Jesus, then who might his 12 Deciples be? And in this modern setting, might some of them be women? Historically Jesus Christ and John the Baptist were cousins, so will we find out Shaun and John are cousins?
you can compare this to twin peaks
by punto
Aug 5th, 2007
04:27:22 PM
but only if it's the second half of season 2 of twin peaks. Otherwise, get the fuck away from the internets right now.
Thinking
by NudeandAroused
Aug 5th, 2007
04:38:43 PM
Renewed or not, the show makes you think!
sitchin, Butchie reborn
by EvilWizardGlick
Aug 5th, 2007
06:32:09 PM
yes, while Sean died (well not PHYSICALLY) Butchie is the one reborn.

If John ( John the Baptist, John Frum) comes to Butchie for something other than a link to Sean then he is the pre-cursor to the messiah.

If you go back to the family picture during the cookout Butchie appears twice with a dead guy in between. Through death is a link between the past and future.

Besides Sean as messiah is way too easy. And Butchie has yet to play his ace unlike Mitch and Sean.

Butchie reborn
by sitchin
Aug 5th, 2007
08:36:54 PM
JFC did come to Butchie first, right? In the first episode, at teh beach? So maybe you're on to something, Glick.
As for the Cass' question, I think it's more of a "good and bad" aren't terms that apply in the Heavenly realm. For instance, is death a good thing or a bad thing? It depends on the circumstances. Our value judgments don't apply since we don't have the big picture. JFC just didn't understand the concept behind the question, "Does your Father mean well?" If JFC has no concept of "bad", she might as well have asked him, "Does your Father mean socks?"
I see where you guys are coming from, and ratings-wise it would probably be the thing to do, but I just have this gut feeling it's not going in that direction. I sure hope it's not, that would be predictable. I want to see these clueless lost souls try to deal with having met God and figureing out what to do about it.
Animal Structure
by Hercules
Aug 5th, 2007
10:00:41 PM
Ask the guys you know when they start shooting.

The two top officers at HBO said at TCA a few weeks ago that no decision had yet been made with regard to JFC's second season.

Another John From Cincy
by avstar
Aug 5th, 2007
11:08:46 PM
Johnny Fever from WKRP was the chemist. Ah, useless info.
Question...
by RedJester
Aug 6th, 2007
01:10:04 AM
What's up with Milch not being credited as a writer for the remaining two episodes? Is there something I'm missing about how tv shows work or what??? It's Milchs show, it sounds an awful lot like Milch, yet he didn't write the episodes... Someone please clue me in!
Well dang
by sitchin
Aug 6th, 2007
01:11:34 AM
I don't think we learned anything new tonight, other than there are now lots of stick figures. WTF?
o-< o-< o-< o-< o-
by RedJester
Aug 6th, 2007
01:14:13 AM
Assuming next weeks season finale actually finds a way to pull everything together to make somewhat coherent sense, I think tonights episode was mighty good indeed O-
MAGIC
by proton45
Aug 6th, 2007
04:04:33 AM
I had been reading the responses posted here at "ainitcool" for a few months before I decided to post something myself. And over that time I have observed that for a lot of TV viewers their are only two kinds of shows, "great" and "crap"...JFC is a good example of the kind of show that garners this type of reaction. What makes good tv? A: A solid script(story), apropriate acting, and the "right time and place". What makes "Great" tv? A: All of the above coming together in such a way as to involve the viewer in the unfolding (progression) of the story in such a way as to emotionally invest the viewer in the experience of discovery and reward. "Magic"...Magic is what people call a great tv experience. Often I have heard people say, "the last 10 minutes of that show was pure magic" or "the way that show came together in the end was just magic!" Well, what is magic? Mystery,expectation,surprise and reward. And one of the key tools used in magic is "misdirection"... Mystery and misdirection is a technique that has been used to great effect recently. "Lost" is a good example of the use of misdirection (and in a fairly obvious way).The "Sopranos" used misdirection in more a subtle way by suggesting possible plot twists and turns through the use of editing misdirection (the final 10 minutes of the last episode is a good example. Just watch the sequence of Meadow parking her car...tension,building,suggest ion,innuendo...) Which leads me to why JFC met such harsh reactions... After the misdirected "let down" of the "Sopranos" finale and the (premature?) termination of "Deadwood", and after 3 seasons of "Lost's" judicious dealing out of "answers"...your average tv viewer has become apprehensive if not hostile to the idea of investing their time and energy on a show that may not "pay-out"... JFC has been playing with some pretty big themes (God,aliens,our place in the universe) and I think a lot of people are afraid that their is no reasonable or appropriate way to resolve the mysteries that JFC has been built on. I for one feel that their are enough good strong aspects to this show that it warrant's me tuning in each week to see what happens... BUT part of me is a little afraid that they will never be able to fill the shoes that they have chosen for themselfs.
PETER JACKSON IN ENTOURAGE!!!
by Evil Hobbit
Aug 6th, 2007
05:36:26 AM
Where's the talkback? Definately the best episode of the season.
Rando from cincinnati
by LORDRANDO
Aug 6th, 2007
06:46:45 AM
as someone born in the nati, can anyone tell me why he's "from cincinnati ' Ive never seen the show. I think its annoying , another way of saying, "back from the sticks, where no one important comes from, least of all LA types.." which is good, if you ask me.
was last night's ep. worth it?
by SantiagoAtez
Aug 6th, 2007
07:22:11 AM
I kinda gave up after last week's ep. Did anything interesting actually happen in last night's ep.?
Rando
by rbrog77
Aug 6th, 2007
10:10:25 AM
John basically came from Cincinatti due to his "parroting" effect. Butchie guessed it by saying something like you seem like you come from a small town, but not a suburb. My guess would be....

That's not exact, but that's the jist.

I DON'T KNOW BUTCHIE FLIGHT OF THE CONCHORDS INSTEAD!
by cekma
Aug 6th, 2007
10:11:49 AM
"Goodbye, Goodbye Leggy Blonde Goodbye!" Best new show on tv period. Hilarious episodes, hilarious songs, clever smart humor.
Proton
by rbrog77
Aug 6th, 2007
10:14:24 AM
Great post. I think you hit the nail on the head for the most part. I could mention ADD here, but people get angry if you acuse them of that. I think the major issue is impatientce or not being able to grasp the enormity of what's being conveyed. Might they have a hard paying off with John? It's possible, but in last night's episode the characters at least started discussing what it might be...and asking questions of each other regarding what might be happening.

For me, I'm putting my faith, such as it is, in the creators and writers. They start with a purpose, and I think they will pay off.

Entouage
by rbrog77
Aug 6th, 2007
10:30:44 AM
I guess it's all in the perception or what you're looking for, but I thought last night was the best episode of the season. I thought the Ari stuff was back to form or close to it, and I loved the Eric insecurity. He was almost channeling Drama.

And while PJ may not have been or will be the best actor, I thought the segment led to a great ending. I think Ineed an assistant.

It'll be nice to see how the office for each guy plays into the story too.

Deadwood is over.....
by Jak0lantern01
Aug 6th, 2007
10:33:23 AM
Get over it. JFC is awesome, my wife and I look forward to every episode now. I mean, I'm sure it's heading somewhere, but we're enjoying the ride, even if it can be aimless. The characterizations are what keep this thing rolling for me. Plus, Ed O'Neil taking orders from his parrot = priceless.
Nope
by rbrog77
Aug 6th, 2007
11:00:45 AM
I don't buy him being concerned over MJB. I buy him being plastic about being concerned over any client. You should have seen what his motive was in the firing of the 2 brothers...money. She makes it for him and his agency. The brother who stuck his brother's wife was the one fired because the other one made more money for his agency. When MJB said she liked the one Ari fired, he canned the other one.

Ari cares about no one but himself...and maybe his family. His character is the steriotypical agent, not only in Hollywood, but around the country and probably the world. I agreee the writing for Ari was down previously this season, but last night was typical Ari...and a damned good addition to the show.

"JFC will soon be gone"
by crackerfarmboy
Aug 6th, 2007
12:21:58 PM
Even my most diehard HBO friends have given up all hope of this show ever delivering any kind of story payoff. I still check it out and think it's entertaining in a bizarre sort of way. But I can assure most of you that next to no one else is making there way through this series. It's as good as gone. At least that way they can finish up Deadwood!
HBO ordered a 2nd season
by nicatron
Aug 6th, 2007
12:44:55 PM
This was confirmed by Kristen from Watch with Kristen on E. David Milch confirmed it in an interview. I love this show. Its no Carnivale but it does feel like Twin Peaks/ Wild Palms.
Telephone call from for Mr. Meh! Call for Mr. Meh!
by 2for2true
Aug 6th, 2007
01:17:08 PM
Saw the first episode and found it boring. Tivo'd the rest on the off chance I might go back....but just couldn't do it. Zero interest. Having more fun with Mad Men and Rescue Me.
don't you get it?
by Grendy
Aug 6th, 2007
01:22:03 PM
take the language... It's (to use an overdone phrase)... Shakespearian. I love the thug boys. There's your Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Just listen to the abstract way they (and everyone) speaks. I love just watching this show and drinking in the language. Though I dislike the character of Sissy, I await her eventual cosmic chilling-out. I love Ed O'Neal. He's finally got a meaty role he can lose himself in. And Bruce Greenwood. He's been a solid support player for years now and it's nice to see him get something like this. I will be sticking around to see how it plays out, and HBO, if you're listening... bring this show back again.
Why do people assume its about Christianity?
by fried samurai
Aug 6th, 2007
01:24:52 PM
The thing that really pisses me off is people who try to cram the meaning of every episode to something in the Bible.Why?It better not end up being yet another retelling of the Christ story?That would be so fucking lame if Milch went that route.Freddy said he saw a shapeshifter in a volcano.It could be fucking Xenu for all we know.Why must fundies invade every discusion with their bullshit cult.
This show is cult-like....
by Jak0lantern01
Aug 6th, 2007
01:27:19 PM
in it's followers and haters. Funny thing about the haters is, though, that they must be watching the show in order to be provoked to post their hate here. And if they're not watching, they have to business bashing a show that they obviously know absolutely nothing about. In other words: get a hobby.
NOT a TP rip-off
by cinema_obscura
Aug 6th, 2007
02:09:39 PM
This show is NOT a Lynchian wannabe rip-off like some of you want to think it is. I know those thoughts ran through my head during the first episode, but as the show progressed, it became something wholly different. Lynch brings to his material a distinctly alien, dreamlike quality. His characters are very detached from reality; walking metaphors, almost. This show has "real life" written into it in spades, thanks to Milch's unique gift for gritty, yet obtuse dialog, the Yost family dynamic, the "realistic" surfer vibe (casting real-life surfers was genius here), etc. Watching this show, you get the feeling that his Deadwood characters weren't speaking in the language of the time so much as speaking in a "Milchian" dialect. Much the same as Mamet characters all speak "Mamet" and Sorkin characters, "Sorkin". EvilWizardGlick, nice link about the "Cargo Cults". There are some obvious connections there. Also, your list of why JFC great is... great!
Great show FOR ME! Don't watch if not FOR YOU!
by monkeynutpik
Aug 6th, 2007
03:57:17 PM
This show is something that I enjoy and it makes me happy to watch it. I loved Twin Peaks, as well and it definitely has some Peaks like qualities. But why does it anger some people when others like something that they don't like. I understand that the TBs are here for debating and sometimes having friendly arguments about sh*t and the like, but it's okay if someone likes something that you don't.
Writing credits
by Add to Friends
Aug 6th, 2007
07:21:05 PM
From what I've heard from various industry types, and taking a class on tv writing from a working writer, it is not uncommon on a series for the showrunner (Milch) to occasionally throw a bone or two at newbie writers by giving them the writing credit on an episode or two, even if said showrunner (Milch) did some or most of the writing. Every show works a little different. My impression of Milch, from watching a Deadwood doc on the dvd, is that he seems to do stuff by the seat of his pants and rewrite on the fly. He may suggest a story to the writers, maybe do a draft or two, then let them finish it. Or the credited writers may have written most of the show, with Milch providing a final touch-up to give it his unique stamp. By rights he could claim credit, but since he certainly doesn't NEED the credit at this point, it's considered gracious of a showrunner to let the staff writers take a credit once in a while. I've heard stories of staff writers bitching about some showrunner who insists in hogging all the writing credits. Getting credits also helps staff writers work their way up to producer level (in tv land, "producer" is usually just a leg up on the writing totem pole, and is very different from being a producer on a feature film.) It all means more money and residuals for the writers.
thank you, fried samurai
by ashhole
Aug 6th, 2007
09:06:38 PM
every tb, somebody has to try to break down how the apostle roles shake out and who's jesus. that is too narrow in scope. this show has its roots firmly planted in gnosticism and monism. that is, knowing and being the divine. the locals of IB are doing both. they are coming to know and learning to find the divine in themselves and each other. that is why i think this show is great, bacci. the show is full of meaning for those who have the desire to cull it. i don't mean that to be condescending in any way, i just mean it's there for those attracted to the pursuit of meaning. this show is an exercise in finding the order in chaos, but doesn't pare it down to mere conformity. the story arcs of these characters are not lost in the dialogue, the dialogue is saturated with their dreams and devastations. this is why john repeats what they say. he does not repeat just what he hears, because he repeats lines spoken while he was not present. he does not repeat only phrases which apply to the current conversation, although they frequently do. he repeats the lines that marked changes in that person's perspective, usually for the better, and usually because of john's presence. most of all, this show is great because i have to and want to watch each episode two or three times. speaking of, time to go. monday's repeat is on.
this quote from Milch says it all...
by boast
Aug 7th, 2007
01:49:56 AM
"the tactics of fictive persuasion have nothing to do with reasoned discourse." JFC...the best damn show since Deadwood o-
So if a show...
by rbrog77
Aug 7th, 2007
07:46:25 AM
...is called Hazel and it's about a family's maid the story should only go about Hazel and not the family. And if a show is called the Charlie's Angels it shoujld never follow Bosley.

Ari is part of the Entourage's life, thus things that happen to him affect how he deals with the Entourage. Would it have been better if Ari fire the 2 twins due to something in the Entourage...maybe. But you don't count out a regular character in the show...a credited star in the show...if they are doing something outside the group.

A better question would be...
by _Maltheus_
Aug 7th, 2007
10:31:37 AM

...why do all the "lovers" take it so freaking personally when someone criticizes their show. It's a "talkback" not a fucking lovefest. I never have a problem with people on these talkbacks criticizing the shows that I feel border on perfection. But then I'm not a sensitive little girl with sand in my vagina. The only truly annoying people here are the ones screaming at those who won't drink the kool-aid with them. The "haters" here hardly ever attack the lovers, only the shows themselves. The make the lovers the true haters in my book and the haters only critics. I'd say the jury is still out on JFC and I personally don't understand how people can be all that passionate about it one way or the other at this point.

And I agree with fried samurai in that it would be too simple for JFC to parallel the bible. In fact, if that were the case, I would finally know how I felt about the show. It would suck. Religion aside, the stories in the bible are pretty lame and the characters are unbelievable. I know, the bible is reflected time and time again in fiction, but it's typically done through metaphor. If you're are indeed talking about an actual new biblical story here, you'll notice that the story and message changes each time from Judaism to Christianity to Islam and this would not be lost on Milch. Prophets are suppose to refine the word of God, not reiterate it. To have a one to one mapping for Judas and Magdalene would be uninspired and a sad epitaph from the one who brought us Deadwood. It's what you would expect from an E.B. Farnum.

I don't think I take the criticism personally
by Jak0lantern01
Aug 7th, 2007
01:13:32 PM
but it always seems to come from people that either don't watch the show or just don't get it. And if they're watching the show, how come they continue to watch? To have something to bitch about? Sounds like 'tough' guys who like to kick the crap out of homosexuals because they themselves are latent homosexuals, just in bitter denial. Get the analogy? :)
Sunday Night Lineup
by MinasTirithII
Aug 7th, 2007
02:46:50 PM
Still rocks, don't take it away HBO. Flight of the Conchords, I was eating a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, and when Conchods started on 8/5/2007, as they were debating whether to get the 'crouisannt' or not, I started laughing so hard that I sucked in Jelly to my windpipe, my lungs filled with grape jelly. I was choking with laughter literally. The pain finally relented about 36 hours later as the grape jelly was finally absorbed by my lungs.
re: Jak0lantern01
by _Maltheus_
Aug 7th, 2007
02:51:27 PM
Although this may not apply so much to JFC, the reason people still watch stuff they bitch about is because they liked it once and are hoping that it'll yet be good again. JFC may be new, but it attracted a lot of Deadwood fans who are desperate to regain something of what they once had. And given the history of stellar shows on HBO, no one wants to miss out on the next great hit. Also, I think it's fair to say that boards like this are indeed monitored by some show creators. Criticism isn't as pointless anymore because of that. I'd say an internet critic has a greater effect on what we see than most minor shareholders. As for those who don't even watch the shows, they are trolls. Every board has got em. Ignoring them is always the best medicine.
Ari
by rbrog77
Aug 7th, 2007
03:26:22 PM
I like the character, I hated how he was written earlier this year and loved him in previous seasons. i thought this past episode brought him back to Ari. You didn't, I do. We disagree...and hopefully move on.
johnny fever was the chemist!
by paulrichard
Aug 7th, 2007
03:34:29 PM
It's all coming together now. Venus Flytrap and Les Nessman from WKRP in Cincinnati need to show up next.
More Ari
by Jak0lantern01
Aug 7th, 2007
04:14:35 PM
Since we seem to be on the topic of Entourage, let me throw my $0.02 in. Just started watching the show three episodes ago. I didn't want another show to add to the list, I hate TV, but it was amusing, to say the least. I don't know why people are bitching about Ari's involvement, Piven is the bomb. He's probably the only reason I'd give the show the time of day. Pretty much anything Jeremy Piven is in is a notch higher than its material. Same typically goes with anything John Cusack and such personalities are in. Bitches, please!
actually...
by rbrog77
Aug 7th, 2007
09:38:57 PM
...your problem seemed to be in the early posts that he was used at all outside of the group of 4. I disagree. He's a major character, he's a star within the show, he has a "life" outside the group. Why not feature it at a point or 2? That's where my hazel and Charlie's Angels argument came in.

Throughout TV history there are storylines outside of the main topic of the show. Even the Sopranos went outside the immediate family into the sub family and their surrounding relationships. Why is it such a stretch to show us in 1 episode Ari deals with clients other than Vince?

Personally, I thought the crap they wrote for him being no longer the agent earlier this year was crap. I thought the shark had been jumped then. However, Sunday gave us more of less vintage Ari in a different setting. You seem to disagree with the setting. I don't.

BTW, rbrog is so formal. Please call me rb.

...and back to the topic at hand.........
by rbrog77
Aug 7th, 2007
09:46:18 PM
Johnny Fever took me by surprise. And I totally missed the krp in CINCINATTI "joke". Good job, casting.

For JFC, as someone else pointed out, the siminal (did I spell that right) moment was not this weeks' episode, but last week's when Cass asked if John's father meant well. WOW!! No answer. Instead Cass was put in a "trance"...for lack of a better word. No answer to that this week. No John this week. But big time discussions about who he is, what he is, what this means, etc. Now the question to us is, does John's father mean well or not. And when we find out the answer, we should know what Milch is doing.

Is this the story of the 2nd coming or the coming of the anit-christ? Or maybe it's something else all together. Depending on the answer, we could have a hell of a storyline come next season...hopefully.

Not only do I hope John is the antichrist
by paulrichard
Aug 7th, 2007
10:21:25 PM
I think it would be awesome if Bill would go all Son of Sam. It would be great if his birds started telling him to kill people.
JFC
by rbrog77
Aug 8th, 2007
08:17:27 AM
So if John was from Cincinatti and is the antichrist, would it be too much to assume he lived at 666 Perdition Ln?

;->

John Monad
by FrodrickFronkensteen
Aug 8th, 2007
12:13:38 PM
first post so i apologize if someone already brought this up elsewhere. hbo.com states that john's last name is MONAD. if you look up 'monad' in your favorite search engine you'll find some interesting stuff. also look for The Monadic Diaspora or Concept of the Monad. Anyway...here's a little bit about it... more info is here: http://www.btinternet.com/~gly nhughes/squashed/leibniz.htm "the soul is the mirror of the universe" All the plenum of the universe is entirely filled with tiny Monads, which cannot fail, have no constituent parts and have no windows through which anything could come in or go out. Every Monad is different and is continuously changing. All simple substances or Monads might be called Entelechies, for they have in them a certain perfection and a certain self-sufficiency. As they have some perception and desire, they may be called souls, but animal Souls are accompnied by memory. In dreamless sleep our soul is like a Monad. The knowledge of necessary and eternal truths distinguishes us from the animals and gives us Reason. Truths of reasoning are necessary and their opposite is impossible: truths of fact are contingent and their opposite is possible. When a truth is necessary, its reason can be found by analysis, resolving it into more simple ideas and truths. The final reason of things must be in a necessary substance, which we call God. God holds an infinity of ideas, and chooses the most perfect ones. Each simple substance has relations which express all the others, and, consequently, that it is a perpetual living mirror of the universe; though it represents more distinctly the body of which it is the entelechy. Each portion of matter is like a pond full of fishes, where each drop of its liquid parts is also another pond. Thus there is nothing fallow, nothing sterile, nothing dead in the universe. All the parts of every living body are full of other living beings, each with its dominant entelechy or soul. Thus there never is absolute birth nor complete death. Minds are images of the Deity, capable of knowing the system of the universe, each being like a small divinity in its own sphere. Whence the totality of all spirits must compose the City of God, where no good action would be unrewarded and no bad one unpunished. If we could understand the order of the universe, we should find that it exceeds the desires of the wisest men.
It's great because...
by danton1000
Aug 8th, 2007
11:22:27 PM
I can't explain it! That's how smart I am...
Worst. Show. Ever.
by criticalbliss
Aug 9th, 2007
05:52:44 PM
This show does not deserve a second season. I moved away from California because I was tired of drug-addled surfers. Why do we care about these idiots? Even Ms. Demourney is a screaming shrew who is worthy only of contempt. There is not a jot of depth or character to this series. Though it's good to see Ed O'Neill, an underrated actor in the only decent role in this steaming pile of a series.
WKRP?
by Powers Boothe
Aug 11th, 2007
08:40:06 AM
Anyone notice Howard Hessman on the August 5th episode of JFC? Virtually unrecognizable...but I'd recognize that voice anywhere.
so much potential early.....
by tristeele
Aug 11th, 2007
04:45:49 PM
now the last 5 eps have just kinda stunk. Im said as it started so well. I have no fucking clue whats going on and really don't care anymore.
What was the song when John & Shaun come riding in?
by Riley Martin
Aug 13th, 2007
02:54:56 PM
In the opening scene, when John & Shaun come riding in on the waves? Great song!
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.