Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

O.K
by jimmy rabbitte
Jun 19th, 2007
02:44:17 PM
.
That's HUGE!
by Yack Backer
Jun 19th, 2007
02:45:17 PM
wowzers.
Hey,
by jimmy rabbitte
Jun 19th, 2007
02:45:40 PM
he's denting the roof of that cruiser...
The Bat Crotch Rocket
by DonkeyTron
Jun 19th, 2007
02:45:51 PM
Bad Ass. Can't wait.
second is the new first
by garcicr
Jun 19th, 2007
02:45:54 PM
Yessss
He looks like a Transformer with a cape.
by Snookeroo
Jun 19th, 2007
02:45:55 PM
Just sayin'.
"Hey Bat-Dick, get off the roof of my car!"
by Yack Backer
Jun 19th, 2007
02:46:05 PM
Seriously, what an ass. :)
Damn it
by garcicr
Jun 19th, 2007
02:46:42 PM
stupid delay
wow
by Mastashake
Jun 19th, 2007
02:47:11 PM
umm wow
Health and safety no no....
by UndeadXeke
Jun 19th, 2007
02:47:58 PM
I have visions of his cape getting caught in the back wheel and mangling him...
Just Diggn the yellow bat
by w_woody
Jun 19th, 2007
02:49:43 PM
Or has no one noticed the bat on his chest is yellow. The other stuff will be hidden, much like any or lack of detail in the last film. Batman is mostly out at night so unless he's standing under a streetlamp...like in said pic...he's going to be all dark and black...so I'm very cool with it.
KEVIN O'HAGAN...
by DoubleFantasy
Jun 19th, 2007
02:50:12 PM
...is the lead designer involved with this scene with the Bat-pod and according to him and his second art designer, Chris Murray, who is working on The Dark Knight, this little baby can reach speeds of up to 150mph which it does in one scene at least.
Seems like the cape
by Crestfallen
Jun 19th, 2007
02:50:13 PM
would get tangled with the rear tire everytime batman slows down. --- despairandcoffee.blogspot.com
Yo dudes
by captainhamsack
Jun 19th, 2007
02:51:27 PM
I'm a registered n00b at this site, although I've been visiting it for months lol. Anywho, the Bat Pod looks pretty cool. I just hope they don't end up to cram too much into this sequel
Isn't Batman sort of Anti-Gun?
by Kraken
Jun 19th, 2007
02:51:29 PM
Just saying, those cannons of the Bat-Pod don't look very hippie friendly.
But can he bend and flex?
by RobRed1
Jun 19th, 2007
02:51:47 PM
Just hope he can move smoothly, gracefully, and with some flexibility. Not like the rubber incased figures from the old movies. The action figures had more range of motion than the actors.
I really dig this bike its...
by kingoflight
Jun 19th, 2007
02:51:49 PM
Got the consistancy from the first film with the chunky tyre and the exposed wheels, pretty cool.
cape in tire...
by w_woody
Jun 19th, 2007
02:52:19 PM
If you look at the pod..the feet rest on the back of the thing just in front of the wheel...it's like he's lying down on it...the cape stops short of his feet so...I don't see how it could get caught unless he sits up in the thing to far. Of course there's always that chance and saftey would say it needs a fender on the back tire.
Just got back from the embiggening, and...
by jimmy rabbitte
Jun 19th, 2007
02:53:35 PM
I think I see a nipple...
Finding the bat on his chest is like Where's Waldo
by Snookeroo
Jun 19th, 2007
02:53:46 PM
There's so much crap to sift through, it takes thirty minutes to find the damn bat.
No one would cut you up on the school run on that thing
by Gabba-UK
Jun 19th, 2007
02:54:26 PM
Me likey like. Can I put me name down for one.....
WHERE DOES MATTEL GET THOSE WONDERFUL TOYS
by Lane
Jun 19th, 2007
02:55:15 PM
courtesy of the suits at WB of course. bat-copter here we come. sorry nolan, this is what you get when you helm a $100+M pic.
not to whine
by lionbiu
Jun 19th, 2007
03:00:06 PM
but the bat pod aint exactly practical when it comes to 90 degree turns or more. It looks cool though :)
Dark Knight needs atmosphere
by Crestfallen
Jun 19th, 2007
03:02:55 PM
I like Batman Begins, but it was lacking atmosphere. It had a gritty, pseudo-reality driven feel, I suppose like the Bourne movies, but nothing of the fantasy/gothic tone which the comic batman is associated with.
oh it's practical alright...
by Lane
Jun 19th, 2007
03:03:25 PM
for high-speed violent cape removal via the back tire.
Test...
by w_woody
Jun 19th, 2007
03:04:45 PM
If the stunt driver wrecks this thing via the Cape in the back tire...and it doesn't show up on Youtube Immidiately...I'll boycott this movie. That would probably be the funniest thing ever...
Still no Bat-Anti-Shark-Spray?
by DerLanghaarige
Jun 19th, 2007
03:05:42 PM
Dammit.
"Yeah, I'm standing on your car... what you gonna do?"
by modlight
Jun 19th, 2007
03:06:54 PM
great pic. Still a little Bibleman.. but the Bat-pod is awesome its just the name Bat-pod is a little buzzwordy.
Looks more like the Lawmaster than the Lawmaster!
by Judge Dredds Dirty Undies
Jun 19th, 2007
03:07:24 PM
The should have had this in the Judge Dredd movie.
Batman's outfit looks like a big tire tread.
by Snookeroo
Jun 19th, 2007
03:08:03 PM
Word has it "Goodyear" is stamped on the batbutt. Draw your own conclusions.
I agree with someone from the last TB...
by stones_throw
Jun 19th, 2007
03:08:40 PM
...Nolan loves making Batman look gay.
with the talent involved in this film
by mrbong
Jun 19th, 2007
03:11:00 PM
"The Dark Knight" looks pretty close to being an entirely unfuckable project, does it not? i too am dubious about multiple vehicles featuring in these films, but hey, rather this curious looking bike that some sort of blatant quadbike product placement, no? i just hope that the "BatPod" is not in this film at the expense of a scene where a handy can of Bat Shark Repellant would be of use.......
lookin
by tehgreekhammer
Jun 19th, 2007
03:11:03 PM
pretty bad ass.

cannot wait for this movie

this is what you get when you have a director and writer that really cares about the material.

Not some bleached blonde, too tanned cokehead who only wants to put his stamp on things.

Keep it up Nolan.

Anyone know when the first trailers going to be popping up?

This is very cool.
by Quintus_Arrius
Jun 19th, 2007
03:13:06 PM
Yay!
So cool!
by MrFloppy
Jun 19th, 2007
03:15:19 PM
And hot XD
Seems cool...
by broken ring
Jun 19th, 2007
03:22:39 PM
This seems cool enough, but... Why doesn't he just use the tumbler?
I don't think it is really a bike.
by Dosomo
Jun 19th, 2007
03:24:59 PM
Looking at how minimalist it is, and the name "Bat Pod". I think it may be something like an escape vehicle from a damaged or destroyed batmobile. The batmobile is about to blow up, and Batman hits a switch and this thing breaks free with him on the back. Just a thought.
I can just about live with the batsuit...
by henrydalton
Jun 19th, 2007
03:25:35 PM
...but the bike? Hmm. There's a lot in this film that could go wrong (ahem Ledger ahem), but I've got faith in Mr Nolan, he's never let me down yet :) Oh btw, my girlfriend worked on this film and just so you know, 1) Chris Nolan is a grumpy man, 2) She touched a plaster cast of Christian Bale's cock, and 3) I've got a little bit of miniature Gotham City on my desk :)
THE "GUNS" ON THE FRONT LOOK MORE LIKE FLAMETHROWERS!!!
by Err
Jun 19th, 2007
03:27:52 PM
Awesome!
It's Mr. Mackey's IT Scooter, I tell ya.
by uss cygnus
Jun 19th, 2007
03:28:47 PM
I'm not sayin'...I'm just sayin'.
THIS YEAR'S LITTLE MISS BATCOPTER!!!
by Err
Jun 19th, 2007
03:28:55 PM
Go Batman Go!
Not a huge fan of robo-batman
by Undercover Fanboy
Jun 19th, 2007
03:29:14 PM
But then lighting will play a large part on the way it looks on film. I mean, ideally Batman's really nothing more than a silhouette anyway, right? Got nothing against a sort of "realistic" origin of the suit itself, but I guess I was just hoping it'd be a little sleeker the second time around. And why the hell haven't they gone with white contacts, like what they used in that fan-made Batman/Aliens/Preditor movie a few years back? Or silver lenses? That'd be creepy shit.
The problem with machine guns on movie bikes
by eraser_x
Jun 19th, 2007
03:29:14 PM
is that they fire only straight ahead, which seems highly limiting, given that motorcycles are not like airplane fighters--i.e., a bike rider can't just go pointing his bike in any direction! And a bike has very limited distance/time to avoid a blown-up target! Yes; I am a nerd.
What a movie motorcycle needs is a way
by eraser_x
Jun 19th, 2007
03:31:27 PM
to decouple the left handlebar from the right handlebar such that the right handlebar separately controls the (recoil-compensating) gun on a dedicated turret while the left handlebar controls the bike. Yes; I'm still a nerd.
I just don't see where this fits on the tumbler
by Ricky Henderson
Jun 19th, 2007
03:34:23 PM
for him to eject from. it's a big car, but not big enough to hold this bat-pod thingy.
I think Dosomo is right
by darquelyte
Jun 19th, 2007
03:36:11 PM
I had the same thought when I saw it and read the name. It comes out of the Batmobile, as an escape pod...thus the name. Look at the tire...Yeah, I'm thinking that's EXACTLY what it is.
I can see how to suit works honestly...
by Datascream
Jun 19th, 2007
03:36:16 PM
the parts in the suit where the fabric and the (leather?) separate looks to help improve upon maneuverability. How I see it the open areas where the leather separates looks to be a more durable stretching fabric that allows the limbs and torso to breathe and bend, unlike the X-men costumes where they were basically all one piece as it seemed cost a lot of movement and flexibility. So the whole "tron" bullshit everyone has been screaming about actually has a purpose and allows more freedom then the other suit did. I'd say the upgrade is well worth it honestly, and it actually looks cool too.
New suit befitting for movie title
by syoreed
Jun 19th, 2007
03:37:11 PM
I was also a little worried about the suit variations, but if you take into consideration the title THE DARK KNIGHT, the suit looks a little more like knight armor... or maybe that's just wishful thinking.
"I got a huge robot bat on top of my car!"
by Ricky Henderson
Jun 19th, 2007
03:37:35 PM
and he's pissed! requesting backup!
I think it has something to do with speed
by trombone
Jun 19th, 2007
03:38:01 PM
Joker is fast and Bats needs to be able to catch up with him and respond quickly. I like the new suit, I just wish it had nipples.
Mereidth Vieira Link
by darquelyte
Jun 19th, 2007
03:38:16 PM
The link Merrick posted has one too many ? in it. Here is the 25 character Tiny Url: http://tinyurl.com/yvm5on
Tron called........................
by Stuntcock Mike
Jun 19th, 2007
03:39:13 PM
He wants his shit back.
Will the BatSkateboard be far behind???
by Doctor_Sin
Jun 19th, 2007
03:40:53 PM
Huge ass wheels...teeny-tiny board.
For those who dont understand or something
by emeraldboy
Jun 19th, 2007
03:43:22 PM
Bruce wayne seems himself as a knight. A crusader if you will against the forces of greed, corruption etc. Hence the armour and the title of Dark Knight.
Oh, and the headlights are too tiny
by Doctor_Sin
Jun 19th, 2007
03:43:57 PM
Giving Bats a visibility of like 3 while driving.
Looks like the Green Machine.
by rev_skarekroe
Jun 19th, 2007
03:47:23 PM
Except, y'know, not green.
the bat man on the bike is the old suit!
by erichaislar
Jun 19th, 2007
03:50:44 PM
so that means he gets this suit for some other reason in the movie.
the batsuit and tumbler didn't look that hot in pics
by antonphd
Jun 19th, 2007
03:52:11 PM
but kicked ass in the movie in the right lighting and motion. i expect the same from the new suit and the bike. when i extrapolate what they should be like in the movie based on that thinking... they look sweet as fucking hell.
Sure hope his cape doesn't get caught on the back tire.
by kikuchiyoboy
Jun 19th, 2007
03:59:49 PM
No capes.
From batman on film. Sounds sweet!
by erichaislar
Jun 19th, 2007
04:00:33 PM
The "look" of Heath Ledger as The Joker according to "The Goon": * The Joker’s face is different, yet similar, to the pictures that have been released. * Extremely different both look-wise and in manner to the two previous live-action interpretations. * The white face looks to be “cracking” -- like dried-out face makeup. * The Joker’s hair is long, greasy, and colored blondish/brown with green “highlights.” * His clothing gives off a “…a demented Willy Wonka” vibe. The Joker also “…wears a long velvet purple trench coat with a diamond pattern purple shirt, a green vest, and very waist high purple pants. He sports purple gloves and a very long chain wallet.” * There is nothing, and I mean NOTHING funny about TDK's Joker. He's one sadistic bastard. He'll be hated. * From what “The Goon” has heard, Heath is taking The Joker to “…all-new f***ed-up levels.”
"I saw this move in that Teen Wolf movie!"
by Yack Backer
Jun 19th, 2007
04:02:40 PM
Okay, Bats, now seriously, get off my roof!
So...
by BrooseTheScharuk
Jun 19th, 2007
04:07:29 PM
...I'm noticing that the two shots with Batman are from the same publicity shoot. If you look behind Pod-Bats, it's the same building in the background behind the same police car with its lights switched off. ANYWAY, does no one realize that we're getting this suit basically as a result of all the complaints about the lousy camera work in the fight scenes? The reason they shot it that way was because they couldn't make bats look like an ass-kicking ninja with that chunkie, restrictive "neckbrace" suit he was wearing. How does a guy look agile and graceful in that? Although it may be a bit busy design-wise, he's going to strike a way better silhouette. Also, there are no nipples on the suit (or is that just a running joke, because it's pretty tired). Nor is the bat on his chest yellow- that's just reflected light, I think (for proof, check out the camera phone pics of the stuntman in the shitty rubber version that are posted at Batman on Film). Lastly, THE POD IS PART OF THE TUMBLER. I'M SURE OF IT. I think the tumbler probably gets munched or blown-up or something, and Batman makes his escape out the front. Doesn't anybody remember the rocket-launcher position Bats assumed (and later Gordon) in between the two seats in the car? Doesn't it look like he's just sitting on that, but outside the car? Use a little informed speculation (ie: remember how things played out in Batman Begins, remember that Nolan's body of work is nothing like Joel Schumacher's, remember that the entirety of planet fucking earth has made it pretty clear to Warner- who want your money- that another Batman and Robin or even Forever will not be tolerated). I think a lot of the bitching goes on here because a lot of unimaginitive and ill-informed people need some way to sound smart, and petty disparagement is the only way they know how. Are there going to be brand new toys to sell to the kiddies next summer based on that new suit design? You betcha. The thing people aren't getting here is that you will never EVER get away from that. But this series- as overseen by Chris Nolan- is the furthest away from a shiny toy commercial that any big-screen live-action Batman is ever likely to be. Bitch away about your fantasies of a cloth suited, white-lensed or Alex Ross-looking Batman, but you're just not going to get that. It just doesn't make sense for film (especially when Nolan's trying to give it as much real-world believeability as possible). And if you all had any sense, you would be thanking whatever you thank when you do your thanking that we've got a director who knows that, instead of some sucker at the teat of nepotism who doesn't know shit about filmmaking and insists that it "should be more like the comics". This new suit design will do wonders for batman's mobility, so that he can finally move in the way Batman is supposed to move, instead of looking like he's wearing a hollowed out marble bust over his head and shoulders. Plus, we'll be seeing a lot less of that puffy rubber bendy look at the elbows and shoulders that makes him look like just an actor in a rubber suit. Don't you people want that?
Nolan likes him some big ass tires
by monorail77
Jun 19th, 2007
04:07:52 PM
First tumbler, now this. Safety first, children. Actually I support the speculation that this is an escape device from the tumbler.
meredith viera link
by monorail77
Jun 19th, 2007
04:08:24 PM
Hilarious. Grind it, Mer!
Green Machine: HAHAHAHAHA
by monorail77
Jun 19th, 2007
04:10:36 PM
Well done rev_skarekroe. I knew I had seen that thing somewhere before! Can it be long before I'm buying my kids a new pedalling Bat-Pod/Green Machine? I think not.
Somewhere, 2 fat kids are chest bumping
by Puddleglum
Jun 19th, 2007
04:11:36 PM
or is that kind of thing reserved solely for Transformer movies?
Wussup wit the guns
by Phategod2
Jun 19th, 2007
04:12:17 PM
What happend to the "BATMAN CODE"
Harry got it right this time...
by lynxpro
Jun 19th, 2007
04:13:16 PM
It does seem to be an homage to the Speeder Bike. To me, it seems to low to the ground. Why would Bats waste money on this when he could simply have a badazz street bike like Blade?
the armor
by Silverglade
Jun 19th, 2007
04:14:12 PM
To my eyes, the armor looks very much like that in Batman Begins when Lucius (Morgan Freeman) was introducing Bruce to the various tools and so on, he pulled out that drawer with the kevlar body armor that supposedly cost 300 grand a pop. This looks much like it before Bruce had spray painted it all black. That armor also had the muscular shaping.
I said that too SG
by Phategod2
Jun 19th, 2007
04:18:47 PM
It looks like the suit without spray except for the cowl. I have to look at that now in Hi res
I too
by Bloo
Jun 19th, 2007
04:18:47 PM
was thinking that it shot out of the tumbler, that Bats would lean down like Gordon did to fire the gun, and this would pop out, of course that would mean that your drivers seat would have to line up exactly with the driver's side tires and I'm not sure how that would work out
maybe it come out the middle
by Phategod2
Jun 19th, 2007
04:22:43 PM
and there are hidden tires in the middle of the tumbler or the tires converge like in Batman Returns.
The costume looks fine
by zambonike
Jun 19th, 2007
04:23:46 PM
but it looks a but too advanced say like iron man. But the two wheeler looks pretty pathetic and not so cool.
it looks rad to me.
by mr. brownstone
Jun 19th, 2007
04:25:22 PM
seriously, I want one.
I agree, Bloo
by Silverglade
Jun 19th, 2007
04:25:55 PM
I agree with your idea. The tumbler seems rather confined in the "cockpit" with not much room to move, say, to the back seat to eject on some pod bike. The front gun chassis device would certainly make sense.
stop it
by Shakes
Jun 19th, 2007
04:30:55 PM
alright, quit accusing the toy company of being responsible for the new bat suit as an excuse to sell variants. In the first two movies he wore the same suit and they still had they constant variations. And in Forever and 'And Robin they had a couple different suits in the film, but dozens of different suits on the figures.
suit WAS different in Returns
by Lane
Jun 19th, 2007
04:35:29 PM
abs looked more like vents as opposed to ripe pears.
I thought Bats worked for the Gotham Trans. Dept
by Puddleglum
Jun 19th, 2007
04:38:44 PM
which is why he was driving a steamroller and paving roads at night/ No?
I LOOOOOVVVVVEEEEE NOLAN'S BATMAN!!!!!!
by Playkins
Jun 19th, 2007
04:39:19 PM
FUCKING AWESOME!!! I can't WAIT to see this on the bigscreen!!
About the different costume....
by Playkins
Jun 19th, 2007
04:41:30 PM
The suit has been different in EVERY "Batman". In Forever and B&R there were even different Batsuits within each movie. Serioulsy, why would anyone want to see the same thing again and again?
pure escapism
by Marillion
Jun 19th, 2007
04:42:34 PM
Chalk me up as one in favor of the bike being part of an escape device from the tumbler. Otherwise, wouldn't they call it a bat-bike or bat-cycle? "Pod" would make one believe it's an escape mechanism... At least there still aren't any Goddamn floppy fins or neon on it... Love the suit..
Toys and Geek Culture
by the_ro_show
Jun 19th, 2007
04:44:29 PM
Even if the toy companies are responsible for the new batsuit, what exactly is the big deal? Practically everything people on this site love was created to sell toy. You think National Comics commissioned Bob Kane to create Batman for artistic reasons? They wanted to sell more comics. The more comics they sold the more ad space they could sell. Ad space used to sell... toys. That worked out ok, so to all the haters can I ask you why you think this somehow won't?
You are right Phategod2
by mikethemeek
Jun 19th, 2007
04:44:44 PM
Batman has never used guns. The three guns on each side may shoot something besides bullets, but it surely doesn't look that way. some of you have suggested that they shoot flame. That would really be a bad idea while he is moving forward, especially with his face wellplaced to be engulfed in flames that would be pushed over him by the air current of his forward movement. also, I'm thinking that a cape drapped over the back wheel of this motorcycle-ly pod-thing is a bad idea. Make for hillarious outtakes though. Oh, and one more thing. When they add Robin to this series, he won't need a side car; he can just jump on Bat's back- Ace and Gary style.
Paul Pope-inspired?
by donnarumsfeld
Jun 19th, 2007
04:46:56 PM
It looks like the fold-up batcycle from Paul Pope's Batman Year 100.
why is it called a pod?
by BadMrWonka
Jun 19th, 2007
04:49:29 PM
I'm still at a loss there. why not just called it the iCycle? I mean, if you're wanting to go that route...
much better batsuit
by Admiral Kirk
Jun 19th, 2007
04:52:20 PM
his head was too big in the last one- reminded me of the first batman movie where keaton couldn't turn his head so he had to turn his whole shoulders everytime he looked in a different direction. The only thing I'd change would be the ears- I want them to pin backwards in a more aerodynamic fasion and just be more subtle. Kindof like the production art for wolverine's mask for xmen 1- Speaking of keaton- the enormity of the worst cast superhero in history still hasn't worn over the years- if you're gonna cast a batman who is so unsuited for the role that he needs a prosthetic jaw just to look remotely like batman in the suit- why not use your dead grandma and prop her up with chicken wire and sticks- it would work just as good with the right makeup-yes I'm still bitching about the first one.
Oh dear ....
by livrule
Jun 19th, 2007
04:54:38 PM
AND ... his bit of cake is UGLY in this one too!!
photographer's reflection
by Jubba
Jun 19th, 2007
04:56:55 PM
is that a reflection of the photographer in the batman picture? if so, well done...at least he wasn't naked.
Oh no......
by Cleyu
Jun 19th, 2007
05:07:35 PM
Batman is starting to get silly again. Shame...........
To be fair..
by Gozu
Jun 19th, 2007
05:11:37 PM
The "Tumbler" looked stupid when I first saw a photo of it, but it worked in the movie. I'm willing to give this and the Robocop suit a chance. Also, I suspect it comes out of the Tumbler much the way in "Batman Returns" the Batmobile was able to split right down the middle in case Batman needs to go down a really thin alleyway. He thinks of everything. Would also explain why it's a "pod" (as in escape pod). Otherwise it's just a very silly motorcycle.
BrooseTheScharuk-I completely agree!!!!
by ckone
Jun 19th, 2007
05:22:40 PM
The first suit in BB was bulky and if everyone remembers a mix up of all the things Bruce had at hand thanks to his training. the talons were part of his Ninja outfit that he kept in the batsuit design..this new one shows that he has brought his suit to the next level, time has passed and he has augmented and improved the suit. Nothing on it is wasted...each piece has a function, it LOOKS great but it also serves a purpose. Armor?check,utility belt? check,talons that shoot the hell out??? check, moveable headpiece?FINALLY check! It's not like they gave him green tiger stripes or some thing right??? ALSO, the guns on the Bat-pod thing, they could be any number of non-lethal weaponry, they could shoot out bean bags for all we know.. but for everyone who says Batman doesn't use guns, YES he is against them, but that doesn't mean he wouldn't employ them when necessary, and that still doesn't mean the he shoots people with them...he could use them for all different types of things...C'mon, after Nolan delivered such an achievement as BB, you guys are gonna freak over that??? I for one would hope that the B-pod is not an escape vehicle as it would mean that A)they are retreading a storyline (however vastly different) from a previous Batflick and B)Would rather not have the Tumbler be so gimmicky...that said, I trust what Nolan is doing. Can't wait for this one!!!!
BAT IS YELLOW!
by w_woody
Jun 19th, 2007
05:26:57 PM
The bat on his chest is yellow. Look at it in the gap between his pecks. It's still a light color when it should be shadowed if it was black. I thought it was the light too but I'm pretty sure it's not.
Let the micro over-analyzing begin...
by DoctorWho?
Jun 19th, 2007
05:30:29 PM
...oh, I see that it has. "Wha?... big fat tires? Man this movie's gonna suck ass!!!!"
When do we see a bat-segway?
by MrCere
Jun 19th, 2007
05:30:39 PM
Are they saving that one for the big climax of the film or will they release that image too? I hear it has really cool yellow bat symbols on the wheels.
Mighty Morphing Power Batman
by azzezino
Jun 19th, 2007
05:35:07 PM
I don't like this new look and I certainly don't like the big futuristic hillbilly ATV. What is this, Batman Beyond?!?!?
Agreed it does look like they want to sell toys.
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
05:35:22 PM
I don't like it
by grandlarseny
Jun 19th, 2007
05:39:38 PM
one bit. How is a motorcycle supposed to work with such gigantic and flat wheels? And I already griped about this before, but I'm done with the whole modified batsuit thing in every fucking batman movie. Still can't wait to see it though
The sillhouette is much better, especially with
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
05:41:30 PM
the cowl. But ditch the pattern, or better yet - do not light up the Bat like a friggin' Christmas tree!
Maybe this will be like another recent superhero
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
05:45:04 PM
film where Bats is on top of the world, stopping crime in Gotham, wearing showy suits, and then..BAM...enter the Joker. Also, there will be a Bruce Wayne dance number.
Whatevah
by Obi-Have
Jun 19th, 2007
05:47:41 PM
This flick will rock whatvah the crappy design of an very expendable-ish bike and you know it.
those Gloves are mean looking! i want em
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
05:48:05 PM
the shoes however looks like old-fashioned dancing shoes with long ugly socks sticking out. haveto admit the whole thing looks better in hi-res...still looks to Tronized...those abs?
The Pod
by Turd Furgusen
Jun 19th, 2007
05:48:56 PM
I'm pretty sure that the Pod is the front and back tires on one side of the Tumbler. Ol' Bats uses it as an escape when the rest of the vehicle explodes.

It's not supposed to be a mobile as bike, but is the precursor to the "Bat Bike".

Now where is Daniel19 the douche or whatever the name is to tell me that "We know."? The guy just didn't get my comment in the other talkback.

I wish people could read sarcasm sometimes.

said it before: Codpiece is not intimidating enough
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
05:52:23 PM
heath ledger has seen much worse than that!
remember in dark night returns...
by ckone
Jun 19th, 2007
05:53:23 PM
Y'know , the Frank Miller comic, Batman is fighting cops, and is running accroos a clothesline? His Inner monologue is saying somthing like, "why else would I have a bgi yellow target on my chest?" after he gets shot in the chest , and you see a bullet proof vest under the bat Symbol?? IF they do make that bat yellow, or gold on this suit..that's gotta be why..I wonder how it would look. hmmmmm
Ahh yeah, now THAT'S a bike!
by DDeRosia82
Jun 19th, 2007
05:53:41 PM
Although I'm just as worried as everyone else about his cape getting tangled up back there.

As for the guns, they're positioned low to the ground, so I would guess they're exclusively for slowing cars down with some blasts to the rear tires.

He might bust out with a dance
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
05:54:12 PM
number on top of that car.
Of course his cape won't get tangled up in it
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
05:55:14 PM
it's just a movie. His cape makes shapes, remember?
that bike would look good on DREDD
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
05:56:46 PM
they have to do a Bats/Dredd flick with Bale and Vinnie Jones! Simon Bisley doing all the designing! Motorhead doing the soundtrack!
I have to agree with Merrick
by Turd Furgusen
Jun 19th, 2007
05:56:59 PM
I don't like the suit that much either. It looks like they are trying to hard.

Hopefully it's an in-between stage for a much cooler suit in the third installment.

Hopefully with a yellow or gold bat like ckone mentioned. Gold would look cool.

So...no one remembers...
by Al Delvechio
Jun 19th, 2007
05:59:21 PM
the fake batmobile they left outside the studio to fuck with the "spies" while filming Batman Begins?
Al makes a good point.
by Turd Furgusen
Jun 19th, 2007
06:04:00 PM
It could be a fake to throw us geeks off.

How's Arnold's holding up? Tell Potsie he still owes me $5 for taking Mary Ellen to that "special" Doctor.

I'm sure the Today Show is in on that one.
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
06:07:04 PM
BINO ! BINO ! BINO ! BINO !
by Pound Sand
Jun 19th, 2007
06:08:46 PM
Or is it 'Beano," ..., no wait, that's the stuff to swallow after you hit Del Taco after hours, but well before you hit Meredith Viera.
the overall design looks more Quasi-Scifi
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
06:22:00 PM
Which is not a bad thing. Inventions nowadays are already taking us into a quasi-scifi age and who should be more cutting-edge and advanced than Bats? I didnt like the Tron-suit at first but looking at it hi-rez together with the mean design of the pod...And the grizzly new Joker...I realize this is going to be one amaaazing film.
re: BrooseTheScharuk and ckone
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
06:35:39 PM
right on. This marks an evolution and escalation. The suit looks good for Nolan's batman. This is his and his crew's interpretation. This is the only cinematic interpretation that I would even compare to the great comic interpretations. Only BTAMS (and JL/U) is better in my opinion. This is Batman. Hey I thought Burton's movie was cool but that wasn't "really" batman. Or at the very least it has fallen down the list because of Nolan's vision.

Also I expect the escalation to also encompass the action and to a certain degree the violence we can expect from this film. Shit if he has daggers shooting out of his gauntlets then I will be "shooting" all over the screen mydamnself. This batman is going to FUCK PEOPLE UP.
Is Batman on trial and dancing on the hood
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
06:39:24 PM
before he's off to court?
waaahh
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
06:40:38 PM
The suits too tron-y. Waaahh the ears are too long. Waahh, Denny O' Neil didn't right the screenplay. wahhh Jim Aparo doesn't get a cameo.

Seriously?
Good point about this Batman going destructo on
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
06:41:27 PM
police property. First running his Tumbler over the cop cars (not to mention all the resulting property damage) and now he's jumping down on the hood causing a dent.
re: Superninja
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
06:42:27 PM
Then Solomon Grundy comes out with all the other people from Gotham Cemetery dancing and singing, "Cause this is thilla"!
Followed by
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
06:44:48 PM
"Clock with You" by the Clock King?
Then PYT
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
06:48:35 PM
"Pretty Young Thing" sung lovingly to Ben Grimm in this DC/Marvel Crossover Giant-Size!
Once upon a time, Batman did have a gun...
by khaos751
Jun 19th, 2007
06:52:29 PM
Everyone remembers Year One, but few remember the green tripe that was Year Two. http://tinyurl.com/29rw6u FEAR THE REAPER...or something.
Batman had a gun in the very first issue of his
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
07:00:57 PM
comic book, very pulp. They later revised the character and gave him less lethal weapons.
Is it Just Me...
by evolution1085
Jun 19th, 2007
07:02:16 PM
or does it look like the caped crusader is wearing platform shoes... gayness
Batman Action Figure variants...
by TheGreenStyle
Jun 19th, 2007
07:03:26 PM
Are a long Standing toy tradition, and too a certain, limited extent, just plain makes sense. Don't be hatin'!
Batman stopped carrying a gun in 1940
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
07:06:30 PM
Forget about guns in Batman '89 he strafes and launches missiles from the Batwing and in Returns he roasts a guy with the jet exhaust of the batmobile. Nolan batman has killed no one yet (he didn't save Ras though).
Yeah, Batman briefly had a gun 68 years ago.
by TheGreenStyle
Jun 19th, 2007
07:07:40 PM
Doesn't mean he ever should again. (Guns on his vehicles, though, that's a gray area. Burton did it. And so did Nolan. I don't really like it though.)
Continues to be the only comic movie worth seeing
by ScamsAndFlams
Jun 19th, 2007
07:09:40 PM
Oh my God, a bat-suit that could potentially be turned into a toy? UNPRECEDENTED!!!!!!!! this site gives positive reviews to Fantastic Four and complains about the best looking batsuit yet? fuck off.
Shoes!!
by monkeytrousers
Jun 19th, 2007
07:11:46 PM
He's wearing slip-on shoes?! Seriously??! 'Bat Slip-ons'??!? So I guess in the next movie we'll see Bat Brogues and maybe even Bat Flip Flops... I can't be bothered dissecting every goddamn minute detail of a press-release so waaay before the film is actually going to be released. Okay the bizarre 'reveal' of the joker was a little mis-handled and that pic of Ledger got me a little concerned but I trust Nolan and the suits seemed to have learned from the mistakes (see: nipples) of the past. I can't f***ing wait for this.
REALLY fucking cool.
by dekionplexis
Jun 19th, 2007
07:11:56 PM
That is all.
He clearly just landed on the cop car
by ScamsAndFlams
Jun 19th, 2007
07:12:11 PM
For all you nerds know, the cops could be dead and Batman is there to wipe up the bums who killed 'em. God, you are beyond asinine. The only valid complaint is if those pointy things on the bat pod (ok, there's another) are guns.
It looks like they have an array on there.
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
07:15:54 PM
Maybe the top are grappling hooks, grenades on the sides, lights, smoke bombs, etc.
Not to take a huge stance on this...
by khaos751
Jun 19th, 2007
07:16:58 PM
...because I wasn't a fan of the story, but Batman Year Two came out in '90 (I think. I'm not digging it out). He carried a gun, but I'm pretty sure he never used it.
I'm just saying that Batman seemed to have a
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
07:19:07 PM
misunderstanding with the cops in the funny books, but he wouldn't ram their cars with the Batmobile, or lead them on a high speed chase endangering other people. In fact they generally could not even get close to him unless he wanted them to (in Gordon's case).
I am not saying batman should carry guns...
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
07:21:13 PM
Quite the opposite. However he may need some soft of projectile to blast holes in shit (like on the tumbler). Only for defensive purposes. Not like burton who purposely killed and/or maimed people. Also the suit looks kickass
bat-flip-flops!
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
07:22:38 PM
the next fashion statement
YOU ARE ALL IDIOT'S!!!!
by theblueroom
Jun 19th, 2007
07:22:52 PM
alright...i've had enough!!!!! please...everyone... take off the fag geek goggles for one minute to see what these batman films are really all about! the only thing different about these films and the previous monstrosities, is the bat nipples. there has yet to be a descent batman feature film. realistic??? a batmobile climbing buildings and jumping rooftops?? come on people!! this was the most ridiculous concept of all the batman films combined! im only assuming the 'bat pod' will also realistically climb walls and leap buildings in a single bound! and whats with batman sounding like spawn with a hangover???!!! this is not dark. this is not moody. this is ABSURD! batman trained by ninjas??? the list goes on... and once again ladies and gentlemen...we have a batman with a new and improved costume...as one talkbacker so eloquently put it...'right out of bibleman.' pathetic. now superman is a spineless wimp who gets his ass pathetically and deservingly whooped. spiderman a weeping sobbing pussy...yes folks. last film anyone?? broke down into a weeping mess not once...not twice...not thrice...BUT FOUR FUCKING TIMES!!!! and now batman is a growling beast in black bibleman armor...who jumps buildings in his batmobile and has ninja training!! can anymore damage be done to further rape my years of joyful childhood comic book reading?? take off the beer goggles people. the state of comic book adapted films is at an all time low.
all time lows...
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
07:26:27 PM
I 'd vote for Corman's Fantastic Four closely followed by the recent Fantastic Fours..and oh yeah motorcycle helmet Captain America.
C'mon Batman has martial arts training in the comic
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
07:29:46 PM
books for days. The gruff voice is also a characteristic when he's dealing with criminals. The Tumbler only jumped the rooftops because he had no other means of escape. They made it obvious the Tumbler was chosen because it could jump the waterfall into the cave. Those were the least offensive things about BB. Gotta agree with you about Supes and Spidey, though.
theblueroom
by wonderllama
Jun 19th, 2007
07:31:17 PM
I don't know what concerns me more, those ludicrous tyres or you're use of an apostrophe in the word IDIOTS...
Captain America is uniquely atrocious.
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
07:31:27 PM
!!!!
by theblueroom
Jun 19th, 2007
07:32:05 PM
'martha stewart's sucking the chrome off the titanic...it's all going down!!!'
So, Batman kills now?
by DarthBakpao
Jun 19th, 2007
07:33:13 PM
Look at those guns!
Blueroom is obviously Adam West
by NHRonin
Jun 19th, 2007
07:33:39 PM
They should have cast you in Batman back in 1989, Adam, and had "KAPOW" and "ZAP" when you fought the Joker. Box office bonzo, baby!
superninja - I think he was more
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
07:33:54 PM
concerned about rachel at that point in the film, alfred even grills him on the destruction he caused and he says 'Rachel was dying.'

theblueroom - what? How did you want Batman to train? What is wrong with Ninjas? Surely Batman has always been a ninja? He uses martial arts, hides in shadows, uses graple hooks, smoke bombs to confuse bad guys etc.

All these things Ninjas do in reality so surely Batman would have Ninja training if he wanted to acheive the same effect.

Batman, Guns and Respect of Human Life
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
07:34:18 PM
A gray area. Or a gray and dark blue area. He doesn't kill outright but he does what it takes to win...like exploding the monastery with all the ninjas in there... He saved the detained supposed murderer but might have blown up a bunch of martial-artists. I guess it doesn't make sense to imply that he would go out of his way not to seriously harm anybody. Cause that would not be very realistic, if he was holding back and putting himself in danger. Which brings us to the bat-blasphemic argument of what legality/justice is he protecting anyway by being a dangerous vigilante? Who cares, you cant make an omelet....
Spidey 3
by khaos751
Jun 19th, 2007
07:35:25 PM
A lot of flaws in that movie, but the one thing that stuck with me the most was...Topher Grace should have been Spiderman and Tobey Maguire should have played the beanpole girl in the apartment next door.
Blueroom...serisously
by NHRonin
Jun 19th, 2007
07:37:00 PM
You lost all credibility when you made the claim that the current crop of superheroes films are the worst ever. Apparently you're not old enough to rememberthe atrocious Captain America films, Shazam, Spiderman television show, Dolph Lungren Punisher, Howard the Duck, etc. No way is this even close to the worst bunch.
pjdon, that is a fair point. I think quite a number of
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
07:39:01 PM
things are potentially excusable since he is just starting off in BB. However, if it continues in that vein it will be less so.
It's blindingly obvious what the Batpod is
by Bob of the Shire
Jun 19th, 2007
07:39:48 PM
It's an escape pod from the Tumbler. They already said that the Joker forces Batman to modify the Tumbler in the movie, it's pretty obvious he added this feature. Oh, and in Begins when he fires the missiles, the car moves him down into position to fire, that position just so happens to be exactly the same as the position Batman is in when he's on the Batpod. That's probably not a coincidence. Neither are the facts that it has the same tires and look of the Tumbler and it's called the fucking BatPOD.
wonderllama
by theblueroom
Jun 19th, 2007
07:39:55 PM
obiously...you have to attack the apostrophe in idiots because its there is nothing else in my rightful tyraid that you can honestly defend.
And I love the new costume
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
07:40:24 PM
it just looks very solid and effective.

And the new cowl means he will be able to move for the first time in a batman movie.

Bob of the Shire
by Sparhawk38
Jun 19th, 2007
07:45:08 PM
Is right.
Looks Good!
by Gatack
Jun 19th, 2007
07:46:12 PM
This thing s going to have an insane amount of toys... http://tinyurl.com/23fzv5
theblueroom - there is plenty to defend
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
07:46:29 PM
BB is not only one of the greatest superhero films of all time (alongside the original Superman movie and Spiderman 2) but it is widely considered by movie critics (not comic book fans, just movie critics) to be one of the best films of the last 10 years.

What is the better Batman film you seem to remember. The Burton films scraped through as being good by simply not really including Batman in the plot so they wouldn't have to deal with his character.

escalation
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
07:46:35 PM
I think BB was Bruce's Year One so at times he probably was not as confident in his abilities as he will be in "Year Two". Also some guy was like where's the "detective". Well once again the first one was origin, setup, etc. Now here is the shit.
Letting Ra's die was more of a personal act for Bruce, a closing or a door so too speak. And honestly the fucker know his secret identity so fuck him. I think Batman should not judge and find all life worth saving but honestly, like anyone else, it's either you or me and it definitely ain't gonna be me. This movie the action is going to be ball to the fucking wall.
Superninja - I think
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
07:48:04 PM
within movie logic you have to kind of ignore the innocent bystanders in car chases etc, i think you are supposed to kind of assume no-one really gets hurt or killed.
and where are you hiding supermarch?
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
07:49:31 PM
what is he calling himself these days?
earlier films...
by theblueroom
Jun 19th, 2007
07:52:08 PM
at least those earlier films didn't have the cash/special effects/or budget to back them up. a hundred million++ budget...there is no excuse? and who and the hell read and cared one shit about howard the duck?? a superhero?
i wouldnt mind seeing him breaking some legs and arms
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
07:53:18 PM
and plain maiming those evildoers
Batman should always
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
07:55:31 PM
worry about letting people die. He is not doing this for kicks, he is doing it because he is tired of corruption and crime in the world. We live in a world where some people are above the law due to corruption, Batman has found a logical way of dealing with this by becoming a symbol that would be feared.

If he starts killing bad guys then he would be as bad as they are.

Batman Killing
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
07:57:08 PM
Let's put it this way.
Batman always finds a way to save the joker (or the Joker saves himself) because even though he is a homicidal fucker he still has a sense of self-preservation. Ra's (in this incarnation) was a zealot who was extreme and was willing to go to the extreme. Killing millions, his own men, himself to reach a common goal (war or terror?).
Nolan's batman is not a killer. Burton's most definitely was.
As someone that didn't like BB
by Immortal_Fish
Jun 19th, 2007
07:58:36 PM
Sorry, but there are some 30-something fanboys that are displeased with BB, despite the casting and direction (read: story).

Anyhow, as someone that didn't like BB, this Pod crap smacks of the Schu with all the subtlety of a 2x4.

And, hey -- does Gordon get to drive it before he cheets on his wife?!

critics?
by theblueroom
Jun 19th, 2007
08:01:05 PM
there has yet to be a good batman film. and as for the critics??? i hold all of them in contempt. come on people?? we are the ones who grew up reading and loving these comics and should also be the ones to hold these films up to some form of high standard...actually, any standard at this point would make me happy...but obviously im in the wrong talkback forum... any true comic/film fans out here?? please tell me where to go??
Like blowing up a whole factory?
by The Dum Guy
Jun 19th, 2007
08:01:11 PM
I still enjoy watching Burton's Batman(s), but he really didn't get the character right.
the batsuit went
by christpunchers2007
Jun 19th, 2007
08:03:39 PM
for a diet!
Looks better in high resolution
by lost.rules
Jun 19th, 2007
08:04:58 PM
is it 2008 already?
Looks better in high resolution
by lost.rules
Jun 19th, 2007
08:04:58 PM
is it 2008 already?
NOT GUNS
by zelusfin
Jun 19th, 2007
08:05:10 PM
It was mentioned that he "needs" the damn pod thing alien transport woman grinding bike. it doesnt have guns either because that just doesnt make sense ever for batman to have. anybody ever think that they are huge grappling hooks to launch him across buildings or scale walls. it could also be something to take down walls ala farrels spear thing in swat. they could launch a number of things not in the obvious like bullets. just you wait.
phoenixmagi
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
08:07:37 PM
If Batman didn't destroy the EL then all of Gotham is torn asunder. Ra's started with the narrows because that's where arkham is. Also they only attacked the poor part of town and that's ok? WTF?
Unless your joking then I am like oh ok that fucking funny.
but then again...
by zelusfin
Jun 19th, 2007
08:09:19 PM
the more i look at it... NO NO NO!! it doesnt make sense! not guns, no bullets just grappling hooks or yes, flame throwers or...BUT WHY ARE THERE THREE OF 'EM!!!! aarrgggh!!! ONE OF 'EMS GOTTA BE A GUN!!
Batman Toys
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
08:09:42 PM
Are they mostly from Wayne Industries and their weapons division? So even if there are guns he wouldn't use them. Nolan's batman is cool not a murdering dick like burtons.
Hey, I complain a lot (particularly about TF) but...
by YackBacker
Jun 19th, 2007
08:09:49 PM
I'm not worried about Chris Nolan and this movie. Call me crazy, but with BB and THE PRESTIGE under his belt, I'm digging Nolan's storytelling. Was BB perfect? Oh hell no, but it was extremely good in many, many parts. And for the first time EVER, I felt like Batman had come to life onscreen. That's not a knock against Michael Keaton (who is a fantastic actor), but he was playing the character of Batman more than being Batman. Bale became Batman. I'm telling you, I wouldn't be surprised to see on the news tomorrow that he was caught jumping off the Empire State Building wearing a hanglider. He's a crazy dude!
Comic fans upset?
by khaos751
Jun 19th, 2007
08:10:07 PM
At what exactly? The tumbler on rooftops? Trained by ninjas? This is the same hero that fought the KG Beast and Man-Bat. You want to see them on the big screen? You might as well watch Van Helsing.
re: Yackbacker
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
08:10:37 PM
yep.
i don't like his shoes?
by lost.rules
Jun 19th, 2007
08:11:28 PM
What! Are you guys all fashion designers? Yeesh. FAGS!
theblueroom - most of us are true
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
08:11:52 PM
comic book fans, most of us love BB. Why do you hold critics in contempt? Because they love films but actually got of their arse to make a career out of it wheras you just bitch about films to yourself.

I have always loved Batman and BB while having its faults ws exeactly what me and most Batman fans have always wanted from a Batman movie.

I have nothing but respect for WB for taking such a risk, istead of using a viable franchise to make a kids movie and sell toys they gave it to a beloved director to actually make a film which requires you to think.

Although I suppose you're just upset because Schumacher didn't get the job again.

No worries, but...
by Pabodie
Jun 19th, 2007
08:19:58 PM
A big part of the fun in BB was the "origin story" of the tumbler and various bat components. I hope they don't go gratuitous with the gadgetry this time. I think it's a lot more fun to keep the "utility" in "utility belt." Rock on.
This just in: Adam West fans are pissed.
by PUSSY ON OPTIMUS
Jun 19th, 2007
08:20:13 PM
New Batsuit shows too little of his "batarang".
critics criticizes just to be critically cool
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
08:24:28 PM
apart from the good ones, like moriarty and harry here. and a lot of tb'ers act the same way too...
Go ahead and bitch about Burton and Keaton
by Immortal_Fish
Jun 19th, 2007
08:27:41 PM
When those garage doors were cut horizontally via machine gun fire in '89, I myself, was on fire.

Despite that, yeah, bats doesn't kill. He doesn't use guns to smite crime, but when it all comes down to it -- if his maw cooks the breakfast without the hog, then today was a good day.

yeah the bataran's too small
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
08:28:31 PM
heath joker ledger has seen plenty worse and will not be impressed
Fenders
by Dokkalvar
Jun 19th, 2007
08:29:08 PM
I agree with someone who responded earlier that this thing could use a fender in the back, but it could also use one in the front as well. A tire that big is going to pick up any moisture on the street and throw it right in your face. That's my only nit-pick, aside from that ..Meh.
jeesh blueroom guy
by Admiral Kirk
Jun 19th, 2007
08:29:26 PM
You didn't know that batman had ninja training in all those years of your childhood-loser! As for a good batman film being made yet and any true comic fans out there- well batman begins was basically miller's year 1 with son of the demon mixed in. I thought it was pretty good for a story about a maniac who likes to dress up as a rodent. The suit's big head and the fact that his eyes never glow white where the only things I bitched about and those have always been the case until now. In this new movie his eyes will glow white when using xray nightvision. It's in the script. It's leftover from the failed batman vs superman movie- the script for that one had superman using his xray vision and batman, not to be outdone, turns a knob on his belt and his eyes glow white and we see that he has xray vision too- I forget but he says something to superman like- I like pink too while checking out lois.
The Wheels Are Officially Off
by The Brewhammer
Jun 19th, 2007
08:30:44 PM
1.) The Leadger 'Dead Presidents with Lipstick' Joker. 2.) The new Robocop & Tron had a baby Batman costume 3.) Guns on a Batbike. Err - Bat'pod' or what-the-Hell-ever new hipster phrase they're using now. I think most of this is due to Goyer's absence on the sequel. Without Goyer, it didn't take Nolan long at all to devolve back into Burton and Schumacher country. At least Schumacher owed up to his mistakes and apologized - we'll see if Nolan will do the same after he sinks the new Batman franchise.
Admiral Kirk, is that true?
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
08:34:29 PM
I love that Lois line, brilliant. I do think they need to go with white eyes, i'd love to see a scene though where bruce takes of his cowl and he still has the black eye-liner on underneath
meredith viera
by imageburn13
Jun 19th, 2007
08:35:17 PM
had no business sitting on that thing. It looked like it was going to eat her.
Admiral Kirk
by khaos751
Jun 19th, 2007
08:38:37 PM
Are...you...going to share a link or copy of the script in your possession?
I can't believe some of you idiots
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
08:39:54 PM
are dissmissing a whole film on the basis of a picture of a bike.

Yes I'm sure it will be just like Batman and Robin just because you think the bike looks silly (just like the tumbler did, eh!)

All Chris Nolan did was make a good Film..
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
08:40:09 PM
He came out the gate good. And he's getting trashed. Sounds like Burton and Schumacher damaged a lot of souls out there. If you don't like BB then that's your opinion but all of you with your we are headed towards "Schumacher territory" sound like battered wives or abused children.
HEY BATMAN! Judge Dredd wants his bike back!
by Zombie Vig
Jun 19th, 2007
08:49:24 PM
Either way, the bike and the suit looks good.
I will judge this movie when I see it.
by lost.rules
Jun 19th, 2007
08:49:36 PM
And so far, Nolan has not let me down. The only film I didn't love of his, and only liked was Insomnia. But I attribute that to the fact that I watched the original first, and loved it. In general, I don't like remakes of movies that are already great to begin with. I serioulsy hope The Dark Knight kicks ass!
Green Hulk People.
by Dokkalvar
Jun 19th, 2007
08:50:54 PM
You know, everyone of you lousy fan-boy assholes bitching and moaning the new suit are the same stupid shits who complained to heaven and hell about what the Hulk would look like. In the end, you got exactly what you wanted. A Hulk that's as green as the jolly green Giant in ridiculous stretchy purple pants and it looked absolutely atrocious. Just shut the hell up. The Grey Costume would look like a nightmare. It would, just ask Adam West. Don't give me that night-fall crap either because he looked like a gay wrestler and everyone who bemoans a black-armoured suit is in some weird state of denial about it. Please, you're not helping. Your ideas stink. I appreciate your love for the comic-book but that's illustration and ripped muscle men don't look right in spandex or cloth..Your idea of what Bat's should look like will ultimately look like clown shoes.
pjdon, Andillformthehead... THANK YOU
by YackBacker
Jun 19th, 2007
08:51:16 PM
Keep speaking sense here. This is Chris Nolan we're talking about here. He's the ANTI-Schumacher. Have a little faith. This isn't Mike Bay!!!
God, I want to watch THE PRESTIGE right now
by YackBacker
Jun 19th, 2007
08:52:43 PM
I want to marinate in this guy's work. He needs to make 50 movies before he's done.
pjdon, right back at you
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
08:55:08 PM
Imagine if any of the other directors contacted was brought on instead of a storyteller a la Nolan? And let's not discount Warner's letting the franchise "rest" for 10 years.
Imagine if...
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
09:00:18 PM
WB had hired Paul WS Anderson to do Batman, it would have been more commercially viable...

Sony had hired Tim Story for Spiderman and Freddie Prinze Jr for peter, it would have made financial sense at the time...

These studios don't have to hire good people or put effort into these films, they can do it shit and still make tons of cash (Fantastic Four).

Hollywood is a business and so everytime they take a risk when they don't have to I appreciate it.

Keep the utility in the utility belt!
by 'Cholera's Ghost
Jun 19th, 2007
09:04:36 PM
The batpod got me worried about Nolan and co. going overboard with the gadgets. Keep it practical and real (ish). I want to see some more shots like Bale in the machine shop, sculpting bat-stars! And I really hope we see detective work. By the way, I'm not taking any risks. I'm locking myself in a survival shelter stocked with food I will not be leaving until 2008 so I can give myself the highest possible chance of living until this movie opens.
Batman TRIUMPHANT
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
09:04:53 PM
Schumacher: "Uh I can do dark". Warners: "We are greedy fucks but eh, no. We are greedy but not greedy and stupid like those stupid Fox fucks".
Dr Gonzo - "Mr Garrison's transport" Hilarious!
by Laserbrain
Jun 19th, 2007
09:05:04 PM
:)
wonderllama
by wonderllama
Jun 19th, 2007
09:07:56 PM
Seriously, you are never going to make a comic book into a satisfactory drawing simply due to the fact that it is a completely different medium in which you are presenting the story. Enough of the "sooky la la" comments already. Look at Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy for example, it was a book, a radio series, a TV series and a movie. All were quite different yet worked in different ways with respect to the format used. Batman movies are NOT going to be the comics. The sooner some people come to terms with that, the happier they will be. It's a different market, you can't cater for just the comic readers who might have a tanty if the movie portrays a different version (again) of your beloved Batman. These films are trying to cater to a wider audience. There is no skill in just regurgitating what people have already seen in a comic word for word, image for image...movies are about reinventing a style, retelling a story, reinvisaging a n already successful character. If you wanted the same thing, you'd reread your comic books. Did people complain when Indiana Jones got Hitler's autograph? "Oh, that never happened, they're making that up!". Of course not, it is poetic licence, it is clever, it is not about sticking 100% to preconceived ideas or portrayals...
oops...typo
by wonderllama
Jun 19th, 2007
09:09:13 PM
satisfactory movie I mean.... Dammit, lost all credibility now...
phoenixmagi
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
09:11:28 PM
I guess you would have rather had a psychotic Gotham tear itself apart with probably hundreds of thousands dead.
Shit, I think you are joking!!!!
lost.rules, you watched the original Insomnia?
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
09:15:14 PM
what,you speak Norwegian?
kongens norsk?
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
09:16:54 PM
eller bare koedd?
GUNS GUNS GUNS
by aboriginal
Jun 19th, 2007
09:19:37 PM
What's with the guns? Better be rubber pacifiers and incapacitating foam launchers. The Bat does not kill.
Aronofsky's Take
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
09:21:21 PM
Would only work if Uma comes back as poison ivy and batgirl is Jennifer Connelly with the batarang ass to ass scene. yes....
I saw the original Insomnia...
by The Dum Guy
Jun 19th, 2007
09:25:28 PM
And used subtitles.
But how will that bike lean into a turn going 150 mph?
by kikuchiyoboy
Jun 19th, 2007
09:29:10 PM
It looks cool to me, but I'm intrigued to see how it turns. The tires seem a little to fat for banking. It looks cool, but it needs flames.
was it better than Nolan's Insomnia?
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
09:29:39 PM
i didnt see the original
Where's the engine and the ammo?
by Sappers Forward
Jun 19th, 2007
09:31:15 PM
Oh what the fuck. Yet another cheesy, totally unrealistic, and stupid looking bat vehicle? That motorcycle thing doesn't even have an engine. What's with all the guns up front? Where the hell do you think all the ammo is being stored? Oh, let me guess, all the ammo is where the engine should be and Batman has to pedal. Now I'm pissed. Wasn't anyone in the armed forces? Couldn't they have hired someone that knew anything about shit like that? It is after all a multi-million dollar budget. Fuck, hire me damnit!
wonderllama - I know
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
09:34:07 PM
people seem to forget that books, comic books and movies are all very different.

If i gave you a song and said I want you to make a painting to illustrate what this song means it would be very different.

True Comics and movies are quite similar but like you say if the just copy the comic there is little point.

People complain if a movie contemparises something that was made 50 years ago in a comic. Well it was only like that because the comic was written 50 years ago. A film should reflect the time in which it is made.

Look what happened with Superman returns, people will look at it in 20 years and say that while it was made in the 00's it copied the style of the 70's film so it doesn't say anything or represent the time in which it was made.

Rant!

agree phoenixmagi, nolan needs a bit of that
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
09:34:32 PM
he could be a bit less realistic in that regard, and he would be close to prefect
more detective and brainpower, more noir, nolan
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
09:41:22 PM
play with the shadows&light, and show us why batman always wins in the end- cause he's smart.
pjdon re: returns
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
09:42:03 PM
I think Singer was more interested with the genesis camera cause this guy used to be all about character but return's was soulless but bright and colorful like a Saturday morning cartoon in the 80's. Maybe that's what he thinks of Supes? Or maybe just a flawed film form a good filmmaker?
t.piper.gates i'm sure that
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
09:43:53 PM
is what we will get this time, even Nolan has said he wants to make him more detective like.

Don't forget with BB Nolan was forced to use Goyers script and had to kind of stick to what WB wanted to a degree. This time he will be making the film he wants.

t.piper.gates., Insomnia original....
by The Dum Guy
Jun 19th, 2007
09:45:50 PM
Is different than the Nolan one, honestly I would like to say I like them about equal, but the original's ending is a bit different than Nolan's and in a way I liked that film better for it. I won't spoil it, but it does make the film different overall, I'm not trying to be pretentious, but it's a more existential ending. Worth checking out if you liked Nolan's.
Andillformthehead I don't doubt Singer
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
09:49:57 PM
we all liked what we saw in production just never translated well on screen.

Kind of like he couldn't see the wood for the trees.

He probably didn't realise how the film would play until it came together.

I think the bigest problem was Lois and Clark, they had no chemistry, hell they didn't even really have a scene together. They should be like best buddies, that's the energy which keeps Superman alive and adds the humour and heart.

Ben Roethlisberger wants one
by bat fastard
Jun 19th, 2007
09:50:58 PM
VROOOOM VROOOOM SCREEEETCH BLAM!!!
looking forward to see DK going all Holmes
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
09:51:55 PM
finding the clues....i want to see that original Insomnia,it sounds good. the vikings make good movies.
pjdon
by wonderllama
Jun 19th, 2007
09:51:57 PM
Exactly...
pjdon, the list of flaws in SR is much longer than that
by YackBacker
Jun 19th, 2007
09:54:22 PM
The very premise of Superman turning his back on Earth to only act surprised at how Lois was angry at him was ridiculous. The kid thing was poorly handled. The romance, as you said, was not working. And how about Lex's plot to destroy the world's ability to make money so he can sell ugly real estate at steep prices? Wha????
Guns are cool!
by radjac33
Jun 19th, 2007
10:00:03 PM
Cuz Tim Burton said so! Batman had guns in his movie but nobody said sh!t...did they?
DK would look really good in Sin City style
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
10:01:30 PM
keeping the story realistic in BB style but playing with the images, distorting the shadows, using a gray color combination with just an occasional brighter color. noir man.
It's started
by JackBristow
Jun 19th, 2007
10:02:00 PM
Pointless gadgets being included just to sell toys. How long until Christian Bale is brandishing the Bat-Visa card?
pjdon and yackbacker
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
10:02:13 PM
World's Finest eh?
Supes Returns main problem was that you could not get emotionally involved with any of the characters. I personally didn't care that much about Clark, lois, super-ish kid, etc. Oddly that's the point: it wasn't the suit (how big is the "S", that not red it's maroon) it was the story and the actors and the direction. Photography was hot. Everything else "eh". And it wasn't a horrible film maybe we just need a "begins" instead of a "returns".
t.piper.gates - Dark Knight Returns
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
10:04:15 PM
they should make that film in Sin City style with a bunch of old school actors.

Kurt Rusell as Bats

Richard E Grant as the Joker

Paul Newman as Comisioner Gordon.

It's official
by Colonel Activity
Jun 19th, 2007
10:06:12 PM
I'm sold. Looks awesome.
Superman Returns at least can...
by The Dum Guy
Jun 19th, 2007
10:06:25 PM
Make whatever sequel it gets, seem like a better film. I wasn't really all that impressed with X-Men, but thought X-2 was a vastly supperior film. Then again, I thought SR was worth five bucks to watch (at least it wasn't as bad as most of the shit Marvel is churning out).
its hard to make an interesting Supes movie
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
10:07:40 PM
hes such a brightly colored and caped boyscout. and invulnerable too. i bet Brad Bird would find a way with him.
re: The Dum Guy
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
10:09:50 PM
In my opinion all you have to do is watch Superman '78 then watch Returns. Then watch Batman '89 then watch Begins. Which recent film wins?
Andillformthehead - Singer
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
10:11:27 PM
went on and on about how he didn't want to do an origin movie but then went and used a origin story structure with the first hour introducing the character back to the world.

I wanted (after waiting for over 10 years) for a NEW Superman, one which would represent the times in which WE live.

Not a conveluted re-make of the 70's version with the heart ripped out.

Still I respect to a degree SR and Spidey 3 because the directors tried (even if they failed) and that is much better than studio suit made shit like FF or X3.

What I believe...
by Bronx Cheer
Jun 19th, 2007
10:12:30 PM
I believe his boots have soles that are too thick. This is not supposed to be Platform Batman. I mean, that's not Tom Cruise in the suit; lifts not required. I believe this Batman puts the crunch in so much of the police hardware because he disrespects the corruption that taints the entire force. I believe that it is inappropriate to make value judgments about a film one has not seen, or even has not even been completed yet. I believe that is dishonest. I believe Batman does have a gold Bat emblem on his chest, and I do not understand why he rides a motorcycle with such large tires. I believe the name "Bat Pod" can only be meant for toy sellers, and even then, that Steve Jobs will be offering it in 30 and 60 gig versions. (The REAL Bat Pod will be a regular iPod with little bat ears attached to the case. Perhaps the tires are so big because the pod comes out of the Batmobile, but seriously, if it does, that's lame. I am very much looking forward to the film, as I believe Nolan is a very good director and knows how to give an audience a good show. This is what I believe.
Begins, but only because it...
by The Dum Guy
Jun 19th, 2007
10:14:28 PM
Wasn't just worth the price of the ticket, it was worth the price of the DVD.

Believe me when I say I liked Superman Returns, but I in no way loved it. Now, with Begins, I can say that film was something that anyone can enjoy. My opinion in a way is biased, since I've been reading Superman comics since I was a kid (although I haven't read one in years, maybe ten), and I like the character. I can only say, watch Superman 4, then watch Superman Returns, and ask which is more of a reason to continue the story line.
I think the only way to make an
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
10:14:45 PM
interesting supes film is to limit his powers slightly. There is no tension unless he sweats a bit.

And kryptonite is a lazy plot device in my opinion.

That is why i was so pleased they went with organic web shooters in Spidey because otherwise it would have been used as a lazy way to increase tension "Oh no, i've run out of web, just at the worst possible time to run out of web, again, just like yesterday, mmm."

pjdon
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
10:15:14 PM
Exactly....Could'nt have said it better. Reverence is one thing but Jesus ease off the clutch!
pjdon, re-DKR: Dolph Lundgren as bats
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
10:18:03 PM
could be the one perfect role for him. Oh yeah it would blow minds done Sin City style.
White Bat Symbol?
by david19
Jun 19th, 2007
10:18:04 PM
Is it just me or does his symbol look whit or gray? It may just be the light...
I agree with t.piper.gates
by Bronx Cheer
Jun 19th, 2007
10:19:25 PM
I still want Nolan's films, but I would love to see a highly-stylized, German expressionistic noir version of Batman. Burton got halfway there, but he's too enamored of freaks to concentrate on the heart of the character. Make it virtual, make it black, and make it hurt. Batman is a tough SOB. Make me feel his power. And linger in the shadows.
Bronx Cheer - I believe....
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
10:20:00 PM
....in you.
The Giant Penny = Awesome Name
by Ribbons
Jun 19th, 2007
10:21:13 PM
Props, yo.
How is that not cool?
by jrbarker
Jun 19th, 2007
10:22:34 PM
I like the new Batbike.
re: Begins, but only because it...
by Andillformthehead
Jun 19th, 2007
10:22:39 PM
Only more reason to do a reboot. Supes IV was direct to video quality. And do a post-Crisis type Superman. I think Singer wanted a fifties-type Supes that was pretty much indestructible. Miller with DKR eluded to that with the whole Superman getting regenerate from the Earth thing. Singer's Superman was all over the place and not "grounded" as a Golden-age-ese Superman would be. Nolan's Batman is noble in a 21st Century way.
Damn, now I feel like Tinkerbell.
by Bronx Cheer
Jun 19th, 2007
10:23:15 PM
I had it coming.
metropolis batman?
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
10:25:06 PM
interesting...
t.piper.gates - I think if
by pjdon
Jun 19th, 2007
10:25:22 PM
they did it green screen they could use effects to change the actors proportions, like in LOTR.

Bruce and Gordon should be giant towering men, like 7 ft tall and nearly as wide.

I agree with you pjdon, about Supes
by Bronx Cheer
Jun 19th, 2007
10:26:33 PM
Cripple him, bring him down, and then have him regain his identity and powers, but not through cheap gimmicks. Face it--Supes is not a great character for drama. It's cool to watch him fly, but just as it's cool to watch Spidey webslinging, the fellow's got to land sometime, and that's where the story really is. Supes is a crashing bore.
Fix the second image
by Onset
Jun 19th, 2007
10:27:38 PM
Fix it.
BB is the only film to get Batman right.
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
10:30:12 PM
They made him sympathetic yet strong without turning him into a total dick. Bale's Batman is great. He's young and cocky but is still wrestling with something, reaching for greatness in a way that hasn't been portrayed in a superhero film since Reeve's Superman. For that alone it gets a pass from me. Still, I could do with some more atmosphere and backing off of the fake realism.
New Suit
by david19
Jun 19th, 2007
10:30:36 PM
I was unsure about the suit at first but now that i see it high res it looks amazing. It looks mouch more mobile and instead of Tron-y as people have suggested it looks like plated armor over kevlar, much more practical. And I have a feeling this Bat-pod is going to be in th movie less then we think it is.
Oh
by david19
Jun 19th, 2007
10:31:40 PM
and the symbol is either whit or gray, not yellow. Or maybe niether. Could be the light.
Supes is a great character for drama, just not a
by superninja
Jun 19th, 2007
10:31:46 PM
big showy drama but a subtle, quiet one. Have you ever read Superman for All Seasons?
hey what happened to all the usual rantings?
by pipergates
Jun 19th, 2007
10:32:22 PM