Try these:

1. Why no McTiernan?

2. Please Explain the score for LF DH, did you ask Marco for it to match up with the prior films? He kind of hacked Terminator 3 and I am worried for LF DH.

3. And finally, is Jeffrey Wright in the film? He is listed on IMDB, but no one else has confirmed that.

Thank you! you rock!

And i think it's funny that the Stallone/Arnold/Bruce ensemble movie question always comes up. I think Sly answered the same question for us all last time. but who cares. I won the fuckin Bruce Willis geek lottery today.

Maybe I chose the wrong words: I did not mean that LFoDH won't be good, in fact I expect it to blow me through the back wall of the theater. But if it's really going to be PG-13 then it can't be like the first DIE HARD.

Ok, now I will shut my trap.

Just kidding. Thanks Bruce for answering that.

Talking about things been throwing in at some point ;-)

I recently started reading "The Watchmen" and I probably never would have gotten around to it had I not stopped by this web site and started hanging out in the Talkbacks. It's an amazing work, and my bias against the form kept me away from it, and other works of its kind. So I owe a measure of gratitude to the people who hang out here, and the people who run this site, for helping me to open up my middle-aged mind to other forms of expression.

As for Bruce's participation here, I think it's an interesting trend that I hope to see continue. The trick is maintaining trust; this cuts both ways. The thing that interests me about this trend is the elimination of the filter that the media generally provides. Yes, I realize Harry selects the questions, but he hardly resembles the types who run your typical entertainment news or interview programs. I can't speak for Bruce, but I would imagine he feels somewhat liberated having this sort of access to his audience.

Even if there are TBers who believe they have an impact on the overall performance of a film, the truth is this: every individual votes with his or her ticket purchase. Collectively, the audience decides the fate of the product.

I think it's cool that artists such as Bruce Willis take chances such as this. There's a chance the experience could be akin to dipping his hand into a tank full of pirahna, or it could be like landing on a tropical isle and being greeted by friendly denizens bearing flowers, but regardless, it's a bold direct reach toward his audience, and I thank him for taking the time to answer these questions.

And DH4 will suck because it is rated PG13.

I tell you what...if you are really upset that the movie has fewer "fucks" than you need, I'll come to the theater where you see the film and sit directly behind you and to the back of your head I'll say "fuck" and "fucker" and "fuck you" and I'll even toss out a copy of "fuuuuuucks" out there followed by a smattering of "motherfuckers" so that you'll have a grand ol' time at the movies. Fuck.

I saw 28 Weeks Later last weekend and a family came to see the film with a toddler and a baby. And that film is rated R.

Rope doesn't suck suck. The single take nature of it, the stagey, almost anticinematic style of it...I found it unnecessary. The majesty of cinema resides in the CUT, so to make a film that resists editing, that to me is just silly. But Alonzo makes a good point, and I stand corrected. My dislike of the film stems from a dislike of gimmick filmmaking.

Contrast the entirety of Rope with the long takes of Children of Men and I feel you find a compelling contrast.

Of course that is not something to appeal to the teenage demographic that make up the majority of the movie-going audience, so the chances are slim of it happening...

Let them say what they want. All the rest of us make up our own minds as to what to believe (spoilers exempt, that's just mean-sprited IMO).

If people want to act like jerks, we can tell that they're being jerks. No need to hijack the TB any further. (TAPS/Lost, anyone?)

Now I'm just as guilty for hijacking the BW TB.

*Sheesh!*

My humble apologies.

I wish more stars would come and do the same.

Living a couple of hours a day broadmindedly in the broadband has nothing pathetic in it. There's surely enough non-cyberworld living for everyone; in eating, walking, dressing up, shitting, buying, undressing, sleeping, cleaning up, taking the trash, taking a shower, drinking alcohol, and for me, also in splitting beavers... Have a smoke, a Cuban or Jamaican.

I would like to see some of you cut back on using "homo" as a put-down. Some of your favorite actors and athletes are homos, they just haven't told you. So be kind to the behind...and stop being asses.

Nope, it is more important. Because I can imagine, in the hands of a talented director, suspense replacing gore and still getting something that works, however, replacing a note fucking perfect action script and characters, and their fates (I am talking about the original DH only here), with computer hackers, flying cars and language acceptable to Barbara Bush, well that I have rather well founded fears about...

That kicks more ass than a movie full of blow'd up cars and whatnot.

PS: we're long overdue for a Moonlighting movie, plz and thank you.

Anyway, I'm a little gutted I missed this. Also, I kind of wish I had asked a more intelligent question. I assumed I had no chance of getting answered, so I went with the daftest question I could think of. Thanks for having a sense of humour, Mr Willis.

And fuck PG-13 -- anybody seen the RAMBO clip? Fucking A man, fucking A!