Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

uh...
by jimmy rabbitte
Mar 29th, 2007
08:01:45 AM
ok then...
all i want to know is does MJ survive?
by filmcoyote
Mar 29th, 2007
08:11:18 AM
cause if Kirsten doesn't buy the farm in this one i ain't watching it. i so want the introduction of Gwen to mean the end of Dunst.
biggest question is will they be able to fit everything
by just pillow talk
Mar 29th, 2007
08:14:37 AM
in the movie? Lets hope Sam doesn't shortchange characters due to all the plotlines going on at once. Still can't wait for this movie!
Well, I've felt from the get-go that Venom...
by Childe Roland
Mar 29th, 2007
08:19:07 AM
...seemed to have been shoe-horned into the picture. So this review doesn't give me a lot of hope that isn't the case.

But, hearing how familiar Sandman's arc is (criminal doing bad with noble intent), I guess I'll be glad for some diversion later in the film.

I'd really like this to be good.

So Sandman really DID kill Ben Parker??
by dropofahat
Mar 29th, 2007
08:20:38 AM
So Sandman really DID kill Ben Parker?? AAAARRRGHH!!! That's so... "Lost"
very true
by just pillow talk
Mar 29th, 2007
08:23:01 AM
I was hoping that it was just a mistake that Sandman killed Uncle Ben.
Re: So Sandman really DID kill Ben Parker??
by The_Maxx
Mar 29th, 2007
08:23:19 AM
Apparently yes, so there goes the last of resemblance from the original story away
Reviewer: Needing Money is the Only Reason I Like
by stlfilmwire
Mar 29th, 2007
08:28:41 AM
It is the most believable motivation for a criminal. What other reason should there be for Flint? Rule the world? That is stupid.
pillow talk & The_Maxx
by dropofahat
Mar 29th, 2007
08:34:49 AM
I guess there's a chance that the movie isn't exactly like the novelization, maybe it turns out someone made Peter think that Sandman killed Ben... But I guess not, seems like it's all tied in with Gwen & her dad. Argh. It's so... "Scream 3".
Really good work, Adam.
by Nordling
Mar 29th, 2007
08:44:16 AM
Also, there's some films that have had more stuff than what the novelizations told about, so although the book may be the majority of the story, I'm sure there will probably be a surprise or two.
Review The Pandora's Box Trilogy Book One:Into the Void
by dead youngling
Mar 29th, 2007
08:45:35 AM
Somebody wake up and review this new YA fantasy book! Anyone interested in this genre should not miss out! Middle schoolers are devouring this at my school. Yeah, it's self-published, but I know the author, and he wanted to take the Paolini (though his book is nothing like Paolini) route and have the publishers come to him through sales. This site could help launch this series into the stratosphere and take credit for it. See the teaser on the myspace page.
Does MJ take a load of Venom to the face !!!
by greekopa
Mar 29th, 2007
08:55:54 AM
Pig
Venom is a beanpole flag boy.
by Teh Suk
Mar 29th, 2007
08:59:25 AM
And cheets on his gotta eat too soon.
I hope they don't kill Venom
by kafka07
Mar 29th, 2007
09:08:53 AM
They should give Venom his own spin-off (pun intended). Hek since they're giving Wolverine his own movie. The final battle in Spidey 3 will be awesome though. I wonder what "door opens" at the conclusion of this film.
ZAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
by seppukudkurosawa
Mar 29th, 2007
09:13:39 AM
[/end injoke]

Nice review, Balmy!
dropofahat - I just don't like that decision
by just pillow talk
Mar 29th, 2007
09:15:40 AM
I hope Sam has something up his sleeve then. The thief who killed Ben is dead, dead I tell ya!
I know this is a book review and all
by Franklin T Marmoset
Mar 29th, 2007
09:22:19 AM
But it just doesn't seem right to review Spider-Man 3 without going on about how shit the CGI effects were. I mean, this Adam guy seems alright, but he should have gone the extra mile to imagine an animated Spidey made of effects that were not quite perfect and therefore worthy of tongue lashing the likes of which Mo Slater might give you.

Good work Adam, but you will be kicking yourself when you realise how much that extra paragraph about weight and physics and whatnot would have added to your article.

"Her father was first on the scene..."
by JackPumpkinhead
Mar 29th, 2007
09:50:47 AM
So I guess it's like Star Wars, where everyone knows one another and is from the same town on the same planet? I wonder if she's actually his sister...
"...actually a lot like Superman Returns"
by JackPumpkinhead
Mar 29th, 2007
09:51:23 AM
Oh, good heavens. Do you realize that such words are a kiss of death?
I'm betting this is nothing like Superman Returns
by skycrapper
Mar 29th, 2007
10:05:24 AM
The fact that this movie will have like 5 superhero brawls and Venom puts it above Superman Returns. Movie novelization almost always do no justice to the actual movie. They shouldn't even bother.
You're betting?
by Lost Prophet
Mar 29th, 2007
10:35:38 AM
I'm fucking praying. Never has one phrase killed my interest as much as that one.

The whole killing uncle ben thing bores me now. they should move on.

Book better than movie...
by Gatack
Mar 29th, 2007
10:41:52 AM
Oh yeah the Episode III novel was better. Makes me regret reading that first before the movie. http://tinyurl.com/29jx5y
Damn you Michael Bay
by MCMLXXVII
Mar 29th, 2007
10:48:05 AM
Damn you Michael Bay
Yeah... I HATE the fact that everyone seems to know...
by stlfilmwire
Mar 29th, 2007
11:09:34 AM
...each other. Can't someone be an absolute stranger that comes in and kicks ass? Why are all the freaks co-workers, best friends, and crap like that. That is what I HOPED they would change.
Everyone knowing each other IS Spider-man-ish.
by Style_92
Mar 29th, 2007
11:44:55 AM
They bent over backwards in the comics to make those connections. In Fact, Steve Ditko didn't want Norman Osbourne to be the Green Goblin. He wanted GG to turn out to be just a random guy. Sort of his message that "shit happens." Stan Lee thought it would be cooler if it was Osbourne, so that's what happened.

So don't be that surprised that Sam is gutting Spidey's origin just to make the villain connect better. (If anything, it's more Burton Batman than Lost.)
RE Gatack: Ep III novel/movie
by Style_92
Mar 29th, 2007
11:48:04 AM
When I first read and saw ep III in 2005, I agreed with you. But I ultimately let the novel go, when I realized that the novel cheated anikin more than the movie. The novel made it clear that everything he did was just for the sake of Padme. The movie admitted that there was hubris, wounded pride, and a lust for power involved too.
Singer did fumble the ball on SR
by Style_92
Mar 29th, 2007
11:53:33 AM
But he fumbled it in the best possible way: a love of the source material and love of the character and the attempt to do something new deep with him. Singer, in the end, just made a technically great but boring Superman movie. And pieces of it, such as Routh's performance, are excellent. It just doesn't come together well.

At least Spidey 3 has enough villains and action to mix it up. I just worry that they commited the sin of B&R and the movie is going to have TOO much happening at once. Also, I'm worried that the symbiote won't seem credible in Raimi's Spidey, which so far has had it's feet grounded in reality.
I could absolutely positively swear...
by Fecal Debris
Mar 29th, 2007
01:00:50 PM
...that someone at the Bugle, probably Robertson, mentioned Eddie Brock in 1 or 2. It was just a little throwaway phrase, like a nod to Venom fans at the time, but I swear it's there, which means, it doesn't make sense that Brock is 'hired' now. He was already working there.
damn, since I was gonna rewatch the first two
by just pillow talk
Mar 29th, 2007
01:02:52 PM
in preparation for the third one, I gotta check for that reference then Abom. I somehow missed that.
I ordered the novel but haven't gotten it yet
by Fecal Debris
Mar 29th, 2007
01:04:23 PM
from Amazon. I did, however, receive the 'storybook' for my kids, and it plays out like the above review. However, the story book for Spidey 2 was NOT the same as the movie. The part where Doc Oc goes for Peter Parker isn't by throwing a car through a coffeeshop window, but by grabbing Peter while he's riding his moped, and there's no wedding scene at the end. Rather, Peter and MJ simply decide that although they love each other, they'll just be friends, and that way Peter is allowed to keep being Spidey.
Style
by Lost Prophet
Mar 29th, 2007
01:18:54 PM
I violently disagree with that. Singer didn't love, let alone understand the character- the list is too long to go into, but the basic premise of Superman deciding to fuck off for 5 years is totally against character. Not to mention the pathetic stalking and other crimes.

Routh was good, and unlike everyone else involved with that atrocity deserves another chance, but not great.

Pillowtalk and SPOILERS, and Spidey's ass
by Fecal Debris
Mar 29th, 2007
01:25:32 PM
I'm trying to remember where it is, but I can't. I'm guessing it's in Spidey 1, right before Peter is hired, and Jonah has a hard-on for some Spidey photos, and Robertson or the other guy (the funny white asst. ed. guy with the glasses) says they have Brock working on it. Or maybe I'm crazy, and Brock isn't mentioned at all, and my brain retconned this whole thing. Probably both.

SPOILER ALERT!! I MEAN it!! Don't read if you don't want to know! Turn back NOW!! I will say this though HUGE SPOILERS the kid's storybook version of 3 has Harry FORGET he's the New Goblin and that he wants to kill Pete after Pete knocks him down in the alley and he hits his head. So, for a time, they are friends again. But SPOILER later his dad's ghost 'talks' to him again, he remembers he's goblin, and he attacks Pete, at which time Pete launches a pumpkin bomb at him and Harry gets disfigured. Oh, and SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER Venom enlists Sandy for help in nailing Spiderman, and yeah, Harry does come to help Pete. The story book is very vague and does not say how Spidey / Pete defeats Sandy, or whether Harry dies. It does indicate that SPOILER Peter uses the fact that he knows Venom will be vulnerable to sound. I won't say how he uses it. Other spoilers? OK. Gwen Stacy is a fashion model that Spidey rescues from a photo shoot gone wrong when a wayward crane shreds its way into the upper floors of an office building. Turns out Peter knows Gwen from school, and Gwen knows Peter (but not Spidey) because her dad was the first cop on the scene of Ben's shooting, and he, Capt. Stacey, saw Peter's grief. More spoilers? OK. MJ gets bad reviews on broadway and becomes a night club singer. She falls on Peter for emotional support because the reviews hurt her, but Petey, under the influence of the symbiote, doesn't care so much. Also, Peter's landlord returns--REEEENT!! Flint Marko returns home to visit his sick daughter after he escapes jail(lets call this the 'orange jumpsuit Marko'), but he grabs some clothes and goes running again after his wife throws him out of the apartment. Only then does he become Sandman, and according to the storybook, all this is after New Goblin attacks Pete and Harry gets hospitalized. And SPOILER the end of Spidey 3 will see JJJ and everyone out on the street, watching the battle royale at the construction site. How about a HUGE SPOILER, you say? Alright. This is a BIG spoiler--turn back! All this is in the books but if you want to be "pure" for the movie, read NO FURTHER!!

Remember Harry's butler in 2? The one who says, "Your father only obsessed over his work?" Yeah, him. According to the storybook, he is the one who ultimately reveals to Harry that his father was GG and died by his own efforts to kill Spidey. Oh, and Spider / Peter is so overwhelmed by the tag-team villains that he moves his bowels into his costume and there's a dark stain on his otherwise well-formed blue ass. Hey, I saw it in person when they shot 2nd unit in Cleveland, and that stunt guy is, well, even as a straight guy I must say, he wears that friggin suit in a way I cannot. But it doesn't look so good with a toilet chili stain. Whose ass does? Later kids.

Fecal Debris: Hired?
by Saluki
Mar 29th, 2007
01:34:54 PM
I still read that as him being freelance too.
hmmm...not sure I like being in the same sentence
by just pillow talk
Mar 29th, 2007
01:35:11 PM
as Spidey's ass. But since it is a "well-formed blue ass"...

Sooo, he had fecal debris in his costume?

Sorry, freelance, or whatever
by Fecal Debris
Mar 29th, 2007
01:41:07 PM
What I meant was, yeah, one of the previous movies mentioned Eddie as a freelancer or WHATEVER you want to call him, and that it would therefore seem odd that JJJ is pitting this new photographer against Parker, since Brock was already affiliated with the paper. Maybe it'll help clarify by saying SPOILER the storybook depicts Brock competing with Pete for taking Spider-Man pix, and that JJJ is planning on hiring only one of them, or of keeping only one of them on the job, and let's just say SPOILER Eddie Brock does not play fair.

Pillow, sorrow about putting your name in my "Spider-Ass" sentence. The placement was incidental, not malevolent or what have you. And with that, Shamoan!!

Nah, I was joking about the Spiderdiarrhea
by Fecal Debris
Mar 29th, 2007
01:47:30 PM
My kids and I met stunt-Spidey in Cleveland (twice, actually) during the week they shot the bank truck chase. I was joking about the poopy pants. He did not blow rectal chunks. His glutes were immaculate at all times, and could probably have shot silken webs. In fact, here's one of many (about 100) photos I took last April in Cleveland. The guy must be a gymnast or some shit. I pity the loaves he pinches

http://tinyurl.com/yowzyo

don't worry dude, just joking
by just pillow talk
Mar 29th, 2007
01:49:46 PM
And when I have taco bell, I can shit with the proportionate strength of a spider! Spidey ass indeed...
I think you made his spidey sense tingle...
by just pillow talk
Mar 29th, 2007
01:51:12 PM
if you know what I mean...
Damn you Michael Bay
by Damnyou
Mar 29th, 2007
03:23:36 PM
Damn you Michael Bay
It was obvious Spider Man 3 was gonna screw the pooch
by IndustryKiller!
Mar 29th, 2007
03:40:07 PM
You simply cannot throw everything butt he proverbial kitchen sink into a film and have it work. it didn't work for Episode 3, it didn't work for Matrix Revolutions, it won't work for Spider Man 3 or Pirates 3. If Sandman really did kill Uncle Ben that's just an undeniable flaw in storytelling right then and there. WHy must every villain be tied to Peters past somehow to have significance? That's just cheap storytelling. It proves the writer couldnt just bring in a villain and write him well enough to be interesting without a gimmick. And of course they completely fucked Venom. Anyone who ever had faith in that racket is an absolute sucker. The moment they hired Topher grace it was obvious Sam Raimi had no interest in the character as we know him whatsoever. And while Spider Man is now a bona fide hero of the people, I'm willing to bet Macguire still plays him as the loveable one dimensional sad sack we saw in the first two films, even know Peter shortly after high school actually becomes a cool, handsome, fairly well adjusted given the circumstances guy. Let's hope they get teh much mroe capable jake Gyllenhaal next time around. And what the hell was Raimi thinking when he made Harry this X-Games reject looking thing?? By whose estimation is that better than him actually taking up the mantle of the Green Goblin? Hell they had a chance to rectify that god awful Goblin costume of the first film but instead they make something that looks even more lame. And by the looks of it James Franco predictably couldn't drop his steely James Dean wannabe visage for two seconds in order to seem unhinged enough to play a super villain. From the looks of that trailer the only difference between Harry now and then is that he rides around on a hoverboard. Man they just need to stop making comic book films for a while and get some fucking perspective.
Superman can hear anything on Earth right?
by Smashing
Mar 29th, 2007
04:07:44 PM
So how is he a stalker for going to see the woman he loves after being away from her for so long. If he could have heard her from anywhere what him being there to actually see her tells us is that he is pining for her in a very human way. It is a deep film and full of moments that rely on you doing the equating, I thought S.R was an amazing movie, well executed and I also think Bosworth's Lois was perfect, she is not a super being so why should she be so bloody tough?, the new vulnerable Lois is more real in my book, and I like how after all these years she saved him for a change.
If I read Gradisil...
by Serious Black
Mar 29th, 2007
04:46:06 PM
...will I be protected from cervical cancer?
This really doesn't sound so good.
by superninja
Mar 29th, 2007
06:55:43 PM
Which is kind of the feeling the trailers left me with. So many things that just seem forced. I would've liked just one movie for the character to breathe a little.
Hmmmm....Do I read Tolstoy or Spider-Man 3?
by Rupee88
Mar 29th, 2007
07:02:33 PM
Actually, I'd read a Spider-Man comic book if it was good, but somehow reading the a Spider-Man "novel" seems retarded.
Wake up y'all....this is a kiddie movie!
by Rupee88
Mar 29th, 2007
07:05:01 PM
You guys are evaluating like it is supposed to be intelligent or well done. The kids will eat it up as will the adults with a child sized IQ. Spider-Man 2 sucked and so will this one. But it will still make a billion bucks with DVD merchandising, etc thrown in.
Peter David...
by HumanEnhancement
Mar 29th, 2007
07:48:37 PM
royally screwed up those "Star Trek" novels he wrote, much like his wife Diane Duane. Basically, the problem is that they turn the characters into the versions of the characters they wish they were, rather than the way the characters are actually presented. I would strongly resist relying on Peter David's presentation of the characters as any sort of accurate portrayal of the characterizations. His description of the plot is probably not too bad; he does a good job with plot, and as the reviewer indicated, there is something of a disconnect between the novelization and the finished film, 90 percent of the time.
We're all impressed with your sophistication, Rupee...
by Frijole
Mar 29th, 2007
07:49:54 PM
Really, we are. I'd say more but I'm on my way to a wine tasting.
Spider-Man/Venom/Green Goblin/Sandman Battle Royale???
by Cannabis Holocaust 69
Mar 29th, 2007
08:40:44 PM
That's worth the price of admission alone. I highly doubt this movie will be a trainwreck like X3 or a borefest like Superman Returns. You know it'll be cool so just chill out, kick back, and be happy movies like this are getting made.
the subject of superman
by sylabdul
Mar 29th, 2007
08:57:40 PM
the reference to superman returns shouldnt be taken negatively....that movie was deep! things were being said by not being said....it was about a *gasp* plot, not just some fighting and smashin every second....it had a story...its sad, most superhero fans have attention deficencies obviously right on smashing for your superman comments by the way
Damn you
by RetroActive
Mar 29th, 2007
09:01:41 PM
Dude... nothing's more humiliating than being late to the party. MCMLXXVII owns the phrase. Nice try though, copycat! BTW...I LOVE how certain talkbackers go on and on about the "crappy CGI" as if they could do better...yeah, yeah...don't need to crack an egg to judge an omelette, blah, blah, blah...but gimme a break! The CGI will never be perfect, but far better than most. GET OVER IT! That is all. We're talking about a guy who was bitten by a spider, after all...you know?!!
Frijole...
by RetroActive
Mar 29th, 2007
09:05:13 PM
Loved the response. Ironically, I sell wine for a living which made it even funnier. After all, it's just grape juice...right?!! Rupee88...go back to sleep.
Superman Returns
by sledgehammer5050
Mar 29th, 2007
09:55:12 PM
I'm tired of idiots trashing on Superman Returns. "oh my gosh....it actually had plot and deep story!" Freakin' losers with an attention span of a 3rd grader just gotta complain. Visually stunning, emotionally draining in a good way, and plenty of action sequences that no other 'superhero' could be a part of. Superman Returns was amazing...end of story.
Where the hell is 1976?
by thebearovingian
Mar 29th, 2007
09:57:15 PM
All I see is a bunch of copycats such as 1977 and Damn you. Quit wasting MCMLXXVI's flava!
Sledgehammer5050, Sylabdul and Smashing...
by avs28785
Mar 29th, 2007
10:22:02 PM
Completely agree with you on Superman Returns. GREAT movie, GREAT acting (much better than a lot of superhero movies especially the Spider-man movies). Loved the plot. Wanted a little more action but i was completely fine with the amount that it had. Hell the first Superman had the same amount of action. After every viewing of the movie i always want more of Brandon Routh's Superman. He did an amazing job. I really can't wait for the sequel.
Superman Returns "Deep Story"
by Defrost
Mar 29th, 2007
11:00:08 PM
That is the impression I got from Lex Luthor being an evil real estate agent, Superman being more Emo than Batman has ever been portrayed, some super brat showing up, and multiple out of character moments. No one in the movie is likeable except for the dude who played Cyclops.
sledgehammer5050
by FuzzyWhisper
Mar 30th, 2007
02:46:35 AM
I agree with you; Superman Returns is superb. The plot, pacing and performances work on multiple levels, so long as the viewer can suspend his prejudices and expectations long enough to appreciate them. The majority of criticism I've seen leveled at this film is nonsense verging on parody: grotesquely distorted fallacies caressly lobbed with no evident concern for fact. It's irritating to see so many people act as though it's the movie's fault that they have little skill in distinguishing between things that are objectively bad and things they merely don't care for, or understand. See critics of Peter Jackson's King Kong, the Matrix sequels, A Series of Unfortunate Events, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, Sin City and 300 for further reference. Bracing for flames in 5,4,3,2....
Regarding the new international trailer...
by BannedOnTheRun
Mar 30th, 2007
06:14:38 AM
Can someone in the biz tell me...is there really only one "blade being unsheathed" sound effect in existence?
I am not going to flame you
by Lost Prophet
Mar 30th, 2007
07:21:29 AM
but outisde of 300 which I haven't seen yet, and Sin City which I liked that is a list of some of the crappiest movies I have seen.

I understand all of them, they are just not good.

The pacing in SR was dire, the plot had more holes than albert steptoe's long-johns and Ms Bosworths performace was so bad she was very justly nominated for a razzie. It was terrible, boring shite.

I for one liked the CGI in Spidey 2
by Fecal Debris
Mar 30th, 2007
07:41:20 AM
I mean, it's a Spider-Man fighting a guy with robot arms on the side of a building and on a speeding subway train. They could not have made it look any more real than they did. The bank robbery and "butterfingers" fight sequence was the hard-on I'd been waiting for but never quite got with the first Spidey. When Doc Oc and Spidey are wrestling on the side of the building, man that's the shit. You KNOW it was. That's exactly how you bring an action comic to life onscreen. If it looked fake, it's only because you know in your mind it can't happen, so you start looking for problems with it, you force your eye to scrutize for technical reasons to discredit what you're seeing, and that's the part of your disbelief you've got to leave at the door when you see these movies. You shouldn't be afraid to enjoy being a geek. It's Spider-Man, right? You all KNOW it's about a guy who swings from webs and can lift cars, and who fights Sandmen and Lizards, right? I'm telling you, the movies can't look any more authentic than they already are. Just enjoy them, for fuck's sake. If you're gonna critique, then go after parts in the story you don't like, or the acting. Cuz the effects are spot-on. But I've said before, so far even the cameo characters in these flicks have been great--Peter's landlord, Bruce Campbell's usher and announcer, Mr. Aziz at the pizza shop, JJJ and Robbie and Betty Brandt, Rosie Octavius. Everyone has been terrific except Macy Gray, over whose appearance I still scratch my head. If Sam Raimi were before me, I'll lick his shoes.
Banned on the Run
by Fecal Debris
Mar 30th, 2007
07:42:46 AM
I'm not in the business, but I think no, there's no other sound effect for the unscabbording of a sword than, "SHHHHHHIIIANKK!" It's just an unspoken accepted thing.
the universe would collapse unto itself
by just pillow talk
Mar 30th, 2007
07:59:01 AM
if the unsheathing of a blade made a different sound. That's really what was happening in Spidey 2 and why Doc Ock failed.
SR peaked at the plane rescue
by Staldo
Mar 30th, 2007
04:57:57 PM
Superman rescuing the plane from being launched into space with the experimental shuttle was one of the coolest fucking things ever committed to celluloid. Nothing in the movie after that topped it. It should have been a short film, maybe a throwback to the pre-feature serials of olden times.
poeticwarriorII
by FuzzyWhisper
Mar 30th, 2007
07:48:36 PM
I think that's more of a rhetorical question, actually. Predictable use of the word pretentious = fail/10.
DO THEY KILL VENOM?!??!???
by Drath
Mar 31st, 2007
11:13:25 PM
That's like the only thing I'm really wondering about. If they do then this could be just as bad a waste as X-Men 3 was. If they don't, then the next time they use Venom, it could be great. I know it's goofy, but Brock with Fangs saying "hi, Parker," creeps me out prefectly. They need to not fuck that up by killing him off. Other than that, I say Elijah Wood or Josephy Gordon Levitt should replace Maguire in the next one. Sigh. ****************************** ************** While I'm glad to see some defenders of Superman Returns--it wasn't "superb." It was very slowly paced (with the exception of the plane/shuttle rescue, and then that wasn't built up to very well I didn't think), it depended a lot on a very bland portrayal of Lois Lane by Kate Bosworth, and it created a very furstrating plot twist with Lois's son and his powers. Apart from Alex Lane, however, it set up Superman for a new franchise very nicely, so I'm kind of pissed that people keep whining about not wanting a sequel (the bitches over at CHUD in particular). Just as Wrath of Khan was better than the movie that came before it, just as X-Men 2 was better than X-Men, I think Superman Returns 2 can be a worth-the-wait improvement. Do I think Singer should NEVER be allowed to make a first movie in a franchise ever again? Yup. Heck, SR wasn't even a "first" first movie, so he can't restart franchises either. But I do think he should make the sequel. Even if he doesn't, a sequel should be made! SR didn't fuck the whole character up, or sabotage future movies as the Hulk did (or as some claim it did). As I said, it created the problem of Lois's son which somehow has to be handled because it's a major thing for Superman (and the alternative is to just not mention Lois, which is just wrong). But it was certainly more worthy of a sequel than Fantastic Four! Unless we're equating quality with box office again, as I know some geeks are prone to do.
A slight misconception....
by dduane
Apr 1st, 2007
05:56:01 AM
Attn "HumanEnhancement": "Peter David ... royally screwed up those "Star Trek" novels he wrote, much like his wife Diane Duane." BZZT! Wrong answer. Diane Duane is married to novelist / screenwriter Peter _Morwood._ For twenty years now. As for "screwing up" characterization: Doubtless that's why Marvel asked me to do those first three original Spidey hardcover novels. Yeah, that's the ticket. :) ...But thanks for playing. (looks around for gofer) Somebody want to give this lucky contestant a No-Prize on the way out? Thanks.
that was quick - spam guy GONE!
by just pillow talk
Jul 5th, 2007
07:11:30 AM
bye-bye
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.