I did enjoy the second Bourne film more than I thought I would after a lukewarm experience of the first. So I guess I'll be giving this a shot.

But I happen to love the shakycam when it's used well. The combat sequences at the end of "Children of Men" utilized the shakycam to engineer a grippingly intense drama. That sequence wouldn't have worked with a steady cam, or it would've at least been far less memorable. When gratuitous and unnecessary, as it sometimes seems to be, shakycam work detracts from a film or television show. But when used with an artist's eye and thought process, the result can be glorious.

I wouldn't paint shakycam as simply good or bad, I'd classify it as a new technique that's sometimes used well, sometimes not. Hopefully Fresnadillo uses it well in "The Bourne Ultimatum."

And I encourage you to see the latest Bond flick. It does not disappoint.

I read the books and look at the badass I've become.

Agreed on the lack-of-action cover-up. Shakey cam is used because Matt Damon runs like a little girl, wrists limp and hands flapping behind him like the fringe of his petticoats. He's also incapable of carrying the role of 'action hero' - he's a fleshy Charlie Brown.

I would feel insulted, but I think I have just failed to adapt to your new revolutionary style of posting.