I mean, who cares if it struggles at the box-office to break even and takes three times as long as "Night at the motherfrakking Museum" to break $200 million at the Box Office.Who cares? Right? Who gives a rat's ass if it alienates a majority of the fanbase, with its idiotic revisions and sets the entire franchise back further than the previous movie that sent it into development hell for all those years, in the first place.

This whole sticking-close-to-the-source-m aterial thing just doesn't do it for me. We need silly revisions that don't vibe with the comics, crappy ( read: booooring) story-lines that don't make sense, annoying supporting actresses, and moody-deadbeat-dad-stalker lead characters, to really hit the spot. Anyways, Spider-Man just doesn't do it for me. Yet.

(......oh and in case you missed it,I enjoy being a contrarian blockhead just for the sake of being different; even when 90% of the crap I write makes less sense while making me look like an idiot. - Shout out to moto)

How I wish Brett Ratner had of brought Superman back

and I mean ever

have anything to do with the movie business. Other than buying a ticket, of course. A ticket, BTW, that they were forced to purchase with a gun placed against their head so Hollywood can continue to shove their crap down poor John Q's throat.

It's all about me, btw, cause I like, know everything

ah fuck it, Looks good anyway

Damn you, Sam Raimi and your Sony corporation buddies, for making these enjoyable and entertaining interpretations of the Spider-Man story! Don't you know you were supposed to cast Freddie Prinze jnr and put Spidey in some kind of black leather Matrix-y outfit?

I'm sorry, Batman Begins, I thought you were pretty good, but you annoy me for some reason.

ps. i fucking hate you

Please stop, MCMLXXVI, especially if your name is also your year of birth. If you have mastered the ability to type, there are better things you can do with your time.

If, however, you are some kind of trained simian, I hereby retract these comments. You are a very clever monkey.

That bit at the hospital with all the bats was great, though.

I have great admiration for the Spider-Man swings scenes. I don't understand this complaint about 'inferior' effects. I keep my inner geek in check most of the time, but he goes Spider-crazy every time Peter Parker goes sailing through the New York canyons. I think I could happily watch that final swing from the first one on a loop and never get bored with it.

And for the most part, in SP1 and SP2 you can tell when it is CGI and when it is a live person. It is the animation.

I still enjoyed the movies though, never bought the 2nd one. I'd rather invest that money on comics.

I wonder why Schumacker wants to do a sandman movie. Isn't sandman already on this movie? Weird.

I'll be seing Spider-Man Begins to Return in the theaters anyways. I wonder if Venom and Sandman merged it would feel like Floam.

But II was great, other than those ugli-rific Tobey emotional close-up shots...ugly.

Two scenes in that movie are as great as any scene in any Super-Hero movie ever. The scene after he has stopped the train, and when MJ first sees him without a mask. Brilliant.

And if the spoiler up above is true, and I hope it is for the sake of the story, then there's no reason III shouldn't be great.

Also, Venom will be in the movie for a bit longer than 5 minutes, I'm not sure how long, but rest assured. I don't think he will be the villain of the 4th film, though, so expect that storyline to be at least semi-wrapped up this film.