Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

SNAKES ON A BALLBUSTING EDITOR!
by The Ghoul
Jan 22nd, 2007
05:15:30 PM
There, I said it.
Quint...
by The Ghoul
Jan 22nd, 2007
05:17:00 PM
have some Red Bulls and keep writing. Your updates have been very informative!
I am more excited about Alda as a ballbuster
by Doctor_Sin
Jan 22nd, 2007
05:22:53 PM
This sounds really cool, actually.
Why won't Hartnett leave us alone?
by IndustryKiller!
Jan 22nd, 2007
05:29:45 PM
They guy has proven he doesn't have what it takes time and time again. Taht's not just me picking on the "easy target Hollywood it guy" either, that's me, all bias aside, stating a fact that Hartnett is completely and utterly uninteresting. First of all he makes wood look like Daniel Day Lewis, second of all he chooses films with cliche scripts in which the only thing that could get an actor by is charisma and charm. That would be fine if he had any of either. He routinely comes off as the dullest man on the planet. Like the character of Chance from "Being There". Just a total limp noodle. Excuse me I have to go take my blood pressure medicine now.
I sorry but Interview sucked.GiveLove To Rocket Science
by Lovecraftfan
Jan 22nd, 2007
06:18:29 PM
I'm all fine with two people yacking away in an enclosed space for an entire film, but what Quint forgot to tell you is that they are two boring insufferable, and annoying people. There is nothing interesting or engaging about them despite great performances. A shallow film that was a waste of my time.
MM, MMM BITCH!
by Hella
Jan 22nd, 2007
06:24:25 PM
THATS JUST THE WAY I TALK!!!
Interview
by Bloo
Jan 22nd, 2007
06:49:44 PM
sounds interesting...almost like something David Mamet would do, interested in seeing Besucmi's (I misspelled that, I know but am kinda lazy to look it up correctly, sue me) take on it...and good call on Harnett just...lacking. He seems sincere and enjoys acting, but he just seems to coast through his roles, never taking anything to challenge him or working with a director who will challenge him
Interview
by Vicenzo
Jan 22nd, 2007
06:58:02 PM
Van Gogh was a better personality than filmmaker. Most of his films I found unwatchable but Interview was an exception. The film was interesting because of the chemistry between the leads and the concept of two people talking in one room, which sounds boring, was used quite effectively.
David Mamet would write something interesting
by Lovecraftfan
Jan 22nd, 2007
06:58:35 PM
It is very David Mamet if Mamet wrote about annoying and most distressingly dull people. Imagine 80 something minutes feeling like 3 hours.
It's a solid 'Good'
by Dr Gregory House
Jan 22nd, 2007
07:15:23 PM
This may be the new "It's this year's Little Miss Sunshine"
STELLA!
by BannedOnTheRun
Jan 22nd, 2007
08:48:48 PM
Little Miss Sunshine was last year's Little Miss Sunshine. Synchronistically speaking.
Lovecraftfan
by Bloo
Jan 22nd, 2007
09:22:08 PM
Mamet did that already it's called Olenna...I'm kidding, that was a good soild movie with thought provoking issues that worked so much better as a play then as a movie. I have a feeling Interview is the same way
SNAKES IN THE RING!!!!!
by TheUglyBaby
Jan 22nd, 2007
09:43:05 PM
He he he
THEO VAN GOGH GOTTA EAT!!!
by Mr_Incredible
Jan 23rd, 2007
06:01:43 AM
Oh wait, he's already dead! Can't fathom why anyone would want to remake his movies.
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.