Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

Eddie Murphy will play Bilbo.
by Kurzinski Valentine
Jan 10th, 2007
06:57:44 PM
It's inevitable.
First?
by dregmobile
Jan 10th, 2007
06:57:54 PM
Oh my.
cue ringwearer
by BadMrWonka
Jan 10th, 2007
06:58:46 PM
and his magic elf cloak that protects him from Quint's logic!
Pj continues to be a class act.
by Zorak5
Jan 10th, 2007
06:58:50 PM
This whole ordeal is a shame. It sort of tarnishes the good vibes associated with the making of LOTR.
haha
by alb55
Jan 10th, 2007
07:01:50 PM
lolll
Oh no.
by dregmobile
Jan 10th, 2007
07:06:36 PM
Second will do. I'm surprised things are reaching this level. I hope it all points to New Line destroying their chances of a Hobbit film. Jackson back in action with the right cast in Hobbit would be a great conclusion to this saga. That and Jackson & Co. getting whatever cash they're due.

Now I'm starting to see why Rush Hour 3 took so long to get off the ground.
Well, OBVIOUSLY, Lord Jackson can never, EVER, do wrong
by TallBoy66
Jan 10th, 2007
07:06:43 PM
Its that he's 110% straightforward, classy, and would never, ever, be anything less than forthright and truthfull when it comes to money matters. Its all those GODDAMNED SLEAZY HOLLYWOOD money-grubbing types who sit in their ivory towers, wring their hands gleefully, and count their GIGANTIC PILES OF FUCKING MONEY whilst mockingly laughing the poor, downtrodden, indie-horror roots director. Yep. Its all their fault. Heavens.
frak those new line idjits
by occula
Jan 10th, 2007
07:07:02 PM
they are a bunch of suits just like any other company shitting on those who got them where they are. i will never understand why their in-house counsel just didn't settle everything quietly like they're getting paid a million dollars a year to do!
Mo Money, Mo Problems
by Pound Sand
Jan 10th, 2007
07:07:50 PM
And this is probably an obscenely large amount of money here. Quint: you say you hate the seedy underbelly of Hollywood, but really, that's one of the most interesting parts.
Bullshit like this...
by Zarles
Jan 10th, 2007
07:11:11 PM
...sucks every inch of fun out of going to the movies. I'd rather be ringwearer9's dorm roommate for 11,000 years than hear another word of this crap. Yuck.
Art vs Money: Final Conflict!
by Kasch
Jan 10th, 2007
07:12:34 PM
I hope New Line seriously fucks up royally. It would be great to Jackson topple "The House That Freddy Built."
Bilbo is going to be...
by James_O'Nasty
Jan 10th, 2007
07:12:46 PM
PAUL LYNDE!!! No, that's the Fight Club sequel... Shirley Hemphill for Bilbo! Dead, maybe, but she is sooooo hot!!!!
Fuck Peter Jackson
by CTU Mole
Jan 10th, 2007
07:13:12 PM
He was damned lucky to get this shot. It let him do that Christ awful Kong movie and everything after. He doesn't even have a dollar amount in mind, he's just quibbling about the books. So now because of Hollywood (and Kiwi) egos, everyone loses.

It's not like he's the only one who could do The Hobbit. It should have a different tone than LOTR anyway.

PJ is a gentleman.
by Judge Dredds Dirty Undies
Jan 10th, 2007
07:13:28 PM
I'm impressed with how he has handled all this. Bob Shaye is painting himself as an asshole.
Not surprising
by Nabster
Jan 10th, 2007
07:14:10 PM
Studios are infamous for underpaying when it comes to gross points or net points ( also called monkey points ). Even audits can be manipulated, Miramax was notorious for this practice, when the director asked to see an audit, it showed the movie had actually lost a 100 million dollars thus the director was not obliged to any of his net points, but then again Havey Weinstein is probably the worst the industry has to offer.
ITS NICE TO SEE...
by WISEBLOOD
Jan 10th, 2007
07:16:11 PM
...That PJ and Wingnut are taking the high ground and not bashing Shaye and New Line, instead expressing "highest respect and affection"...as opposed to shaye's attacks on PJ and the LOTR actors. If PJ and or WETA isn't attached in some way with The Hobbit, I wont see it in theaters, and will probably only rent it, just as a matter of principle.
I just read Shaye's words
by dregmobile
Jan 10th, 2007
07:22:33 PM
And I feel like I should be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he was saying he doesn't and never did care about Jackson's issues:

"But to think that I, as a functionary in [a] company that has been around for a long time, but is now owned by a very big conglomerate, would care one bit about trying to cheat the guy, ... he's either had very poor counsel or is completely misinformed and myopic to think that I care whether I give him [anything]."

Also, he is saying that Peter Jackson should just shut up and be happy with the money New Line gave him, rather than the actual money he is properly owed.

Yeah, I think Shaye shot himself in the foot with those comments. And I'll be sure not to catch whatever that film was he made and is promoting ...
So... Hollywood execs are like Denethor!
by white owl
Jan 10th, 2007
07:28:40 PM
And like Denethor they will all BURN TO THE GROUND.
PETER JACKSON GOTTA EAT!
by Aragorn II
Jan 10th, 2007
07:33:04 PM
Now I feel like I fit in.
I wonder if studio plants will flood this TB too?
by Daddylonghead
Jan 10th, 2007
07:33:13 PM
Names I've never seen before criticizing Jackson... fuck you & your paymasters.
It's clear who is in the wrong here.
by Judge Dredds Dirty Undies
Jan 10th, 2007
07:33:26 PM
And I'm sure PJ is more bothered about the principle than the actual money.
TomBodet suggested Uwe Boll for the Hobbit
by BadMrWonka
Jan 10th, 2007
07:36:24 PM
see above...doesn't that warrant a lashing? I don't care too much about PJ or the Hobbit, (other than that it brings Ringwearer out of the nerd woodwork, and he's always good for a few laughs with his nonsense) but come on, Uwe Boll? jesus christ...I hope you were Joking, TomBodet..
TomBodet
by Quint
Jan 10th, 2007
07:36:34 PM
I have a vested interest seeing a true continuation of the series that I love, yes. Jackson doesn't have to direct it, but the way New Line is acting we're going to see a Hobbit movie without the major actors in the roles we love them in and without Weta doing the practical and CGI effects. New Line's not just striking out at Jackson, but at the actors, too. Smart move. We'll see no Serkis as Gollum, no McKellen as Gandalf... those are for sures.

And my main worry is the look of the film. You can get a great director in there, I'm sure, as well as a good effects company, but it's either going to look nothing like the universe Jackson set up or it'll look like a copy of it.

I say if you're going to take advantage of the fanbase the original trilogy still has right now (a very rabid fanbase) and make a Hobbit film, it has to involve as much of the cast as they can get, be a true part of the LOTR story, not just an add-on. If you're going to make a totally separate movie, then wait. New Line can't really do either right now, so it looks more and more like they're either going to royally fuck it up or make sure it never happens. At least with them.

Pound Sand, sure it's interesting when looking back on it, but it's like watching Politics. I feel so dirty afterwards... I agree with Zarles. This kind of stuff takes the magic out of filmmaking for me.
Ain't It the National Enquirer?
by morGoth
Jan 10th, 2007
07:37:49 PM
Great freaking orc poo...enough with this crapola already Quint. Save this squalid mung for the gossip and business rags.
the whole mess
by PantherMatt
Jan 10th, 2007
07:40:09 PM
Fuck Bob Shaye. You fucking asshole. It's been a long time since Nightmare on Elm Street pt.1, which is the only watchable one in the series. Aside from Coming to America ,Nightmare 1, and LOTR what else have you given us that's superior to, say, a Golan Globus production? I'm not saying there's nothing out there that isn't superior to a piece of shit, it's just that I can't think of anything. Fuck you Bob Shaye. And, CTUMole: you aren;t incorrect in the idea that PJ shouldn't be the only one considered for The Hobbit (although, in my personal opinion, he got it right on LOTR, so why wouldn't you just fucking hire him for it anyway?) but to suggest that PJ should be happy with the chance he got, and never mind the compensation, regardless of contract is straight up retarded. May you only be employed by those that do business like Shaye: You should be THANKFUL for the chance to bag these groceries, therefore I have decided to only pay you $2/ hour, despite our former agreement of $7.50/hr.
..."Greed Is Good"
by The Dum Guy
Jan 10th, 2007
07:45:04 PM
I was watching Enron: The Smartest Guys In The Room last nite, and can't help but wonder how underhanded are most large companies? Even in movie-land people are greedy (like that's even suprising).
Let the Jackson haters bitch...
by Kraken
Jan 10th, 2007
07:50:23 PM
It just makes them look as foolish as Bob and his statements. Some people just like to hate and bitch because that's all they have in their lives. They like to tear down people that have done something creative because they are impotent to do so themselves. So, bitch and hate... we all see right through you with every ignorant word you type.
Hollywood power struggles = People magazine
by CreasyBear
Jan 10th, 2007
07:50:25 PM
I want to go in-depth into the power struggle squabbles about as much as I want to read People magazine's who's-dating-whom. I don't care about the stars' personal lives and romantic dysfunction, just about the movies some of them make. In the same way, I don't care for the depressing ruination of artistic possibility by the "suits", I just want to know about the good finished products when decent movies actually do get made. Movie geeks analyze flicks with the care and focus of literature professors discussing Hemingway, but movies -- because of their collaborative nature and the enormous expense involved -- have to deal with more non-artistic, business-side bullcrap. Not dissing Quint for putting up this article, just sad that there are so many roadblocks (and egos) stopping potentially cool movies from being made in the first place.
An anniversary video
by CherryValance
Jan 10th, 2007
07:50:46 PM
Who knew it could be that important? LOL
...but since we're cheering PJ...
by morGoth
Jan 10th, 2007
07:53:49 PM
Eglerio! Praise him! Praise him with great praise! ** Didn't someone used to post that on AICN all the time? And why not? After all, he did film the unfilmable and made an already great story, in some peoples opinion (though not mine), even greater. Sure he took some license but wasn't the crumbling stair scene in Khazad-dum worth it? Yeah, yeah...Arwen at Helm's Deep...get over it already, it didn't happen.
So your an up coming
by nationalmaverick
Jan 10th, 2007
07:55:33 PM
So your an up coming director in Hollywood, You have the next big script and all the talent in the world and your guaranteed to make a studio a billion dollars. You get a call from Bob Shaye and while your talking, you suddenly have a realisation "wait a minute, arent you the guy who fucked over pete jackson?" and you slam the phone down. Jackson Fans Unite You fuck with Jackson, you fuck with us. I for one will be boycotting most if not all of new line cinema's shit heaps for the next few years until bob shaye steps down. You mother fucker, how dare you short change a guy you yourself credited with saving new lines ass!
If only you knew...
by Gil Brooks
Jan 10th, 2007
07:57:00 PM
...PJ's got a great public image, but it's his behind-the-scenes business antics that have me siding with New Line.
Hobbit would make money without P.J....
by Womb2dooM
Jan 10th, 2007
07:57:06 PM
... but moving ahead without original cast members is suicide. Consider this movie, in it's current form, dead in the water or doomed from the outset and that is damn sad to me.
Hey Dregmobile, If your gonna claim first...
by kurdt420
Jan 10th, 2007
07:57:18 PM
then dont be a little pussy and put a question mark after it. stand up and shout it! If your gonna keep up this pointless and over used tradition at least have some BALLS!
Shaye's gonna lose his job
by The Ref
Jan 10th, 2007
08:03:29 PM
Just you watch. The legal issues are one thing, but a tactless, public disregard for A-list talent is not how you run a studio.
Syndicated humor columnist Art Buchwald
by Trader Groucho 2
Jan 10th, 2007
08:03:39 PM
was the guy who sued Paramount over Coming to America. He's a writer, but not a screenwriter, and for all intents and purposes, a Hollywood outsider, so he had nothing to lose by way of contacts or reputation or relationships in taking Paramount to the mat.
New Line messed up and now there's no backing out.
by jimmy_009
Jan 10th, 2007
08:06:09 PM
It will only end when they are legally required to reveal how they fudged the books, heads at New Line will roll, and hopefully when that happens, the half-assed Hobbit won't have been filmed yet. Then the new reps at New Line will approach P.J. with heads hung low and apologies in hand. There's is no angle I can see this from where it's P.J.'s fault. New Line thought they pulled one over on him, offered hush money in the form the Hobbit, and is now striking back in the only way it has left, public opinion. Unfortunately for them not only are the public against them, but soon the courts will be too. Heads are gonna roll.
I want more seedy underbelly, dammit!
by Doctor_Sin
Jan 10th, 2007
08:07:32 PM
The more the spotlight is on these fuckers, the more accountable (no pun intended) and aboveboard everyone can be hoped to act. Fuck the Bitch Surfer's irises. This is where the real news is. This is reality. You wanna work in film? Get used to a bunch of backstabbing, malicious jackals cheating you and getting away with it because they can hide behind the bigger wrought-iron property gates. Power to the people! Don't ask for more gossip about Brad/Angelina/Cruise! Ask for more real, hard exposes of the slimy, corrupt underbelly of Hollywood! The snake that eats its own tail!!!!!
Gil Brooks =
by buffywrestling
Jan 10th, 2007
08:08:45 PM
PLANT!!
Wow, AICN must really enjoy the LOTR movies.
by Mike_D
Jan 10th, 2007
08:08:46 PM
I think they're boring. But thats just me.
Boo hoo.
by Quake II
Jan 10th, 2007
08:11:37 PM
Whiny little Hollywood millionares. It breaks my heart.
I agree, it's not that another director couldn't...
by morGoth
Jan 10th, 2007
08:12:54 PM
...do the Hobbit but rather the loss of continuity with PJ's LoTR. Is it really so hard to understand how disappointing that is? What if another director took even greater license with the Hobbit? What if it ends up like that abominable Rankin-Bass cartoon? ** What was that other thing some dip used to post all the time...oh yeah, "Trust PJ!"
btw, Shaye will be hustling popcorn by month's end
by Doctor_Sin
Jan 10th, 2007
08:16:42 PM
"Popcorn eatin' beeyatch!"
This is clearly...
by Christopher3
Jan 10th, 2007
08:19:21 PM
Shaye's lawyer v. Jackson's lawyer. Shaye and Jackson probably aren't even reading these releases.
QUINT, CAN I RELATE THIS TO LUCAS AND GIBSON--
by Deus Vult
Jan 10th, 2007
08:23:26 PM
Okay Quint, 100% serious question here--are problems like these the precise ones guys like Lucas set out to avoid by owning and running his own studio? Not only to prevent the New Lines of the world from controlling the movie process but also the finances? Is that also why Mad Mel Gibson paid his way through The Passion? Just trying to tie this into two guys who catch alot of flak on this site but seem to have some pretty savvy business sense.
...and who, exactly, would fire Shaye???
by Womb2dooM
Jan 10th, 2007
08:24:50 PM
He RUNS the company and is PROTECTING the shareholder's money. I think he's gonna be just fine.
Please my colon sucks...
by morGoth
Jan 10th, 2007
08:26:20 PM
...continue with the first story or start the new. That's some hilarious stuff my man. ** Awp, better stay on topic...BOB SHAYE SUX! There, that oughta do it.
Lucas and Gibson
by Quint
Jan 10th, 2007
08:29:53 PM
I don't think anybody can say Lucas isn't a genius businessman. Not with a straight face, anyway. He built a series, somehow retained the rights (thanks to keeping the toy licenses, if I remember correctly) and started his own studio. I'm not a fan of the prequels... precisely because Lucas is such a good businessman. I feel he treated them as assets. Hell, he's said he only did them for the money in interviews.

But the man knows his stuff. What was the Pespi deal he made? Something like $6 billion for all 6 Star Wars licensing rights... so Doritos could have Yoda on the bag and Pepsi could have Natalie Portman and JarJar on the can? That is incredible.

Gibson's move was more of a passion... if you'll excuse the phrasing. He made the movie he wanted to make, the movie no one would give him the money to make and it paid off for him. Good on him. John Sayles does that exact same thing. So does Steve Buscemi. They make the movies they want to make, sometimes putting their own cash into it, sometimes making deals that fold in their smaller films with a big job.

I think that passion, that spirit is essential, even if it results in films you might not like. I have no idea if that's what you wanted, but I'm a bit loopy at the moment, having been up since 4am this morning. Add in a reference to canned ham somewhere in there and it's perfect!
I really don't care if a millionaire gets more money.
by Angry Mean Panda
Jan 10th, 2007
08:30:15 PM
Maybe that's just me. I like Jackson. I like his movies. I don't give two shits if he gets another few mil.
kurdt420?
by dregmobile
Jan 10th, 2007
08:31:27 PM
Point taken!
Gil Brooks
by dregmobile
Jan 10th, 2007
08:32:38 PM
Enlighten us.
Colon, continue your story. My kids' gotta sleep!
by Doctor_Sin
Jan 10th, 2007
08:33:54 PM
ps - Can't majority shareholder(s) oust someone who is ruining their interests?
New Line HOBBIT = JURASSIC PARK III
by dregmobile
Jan 10th, 2007
08:33:58 PM
Unless they give it to Sauron.

I mean, Cauron.
SCREW HOBBIT!!!
by wackybantha
Jan 10th, 2007
08:36:01 PM
A SPIN-OFF ARWEN ACTION FLICK IS WHERE IT'S AT, BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"...and just who would fire Mikey Eisner?
by Ravetin
Jan 10th, 2007
08:41:06 PM
I mean...He RUNS the company and is PROTECTING the shareholder's money. I think he's gonna be just fine."
Witchking Movie!
by warp11
Jan 10th, 2007
08:42:38 PM
Come on a Witch King Movie from the tales before the hobbit would be amazing and epic. There is so much material there.
Or, err a World Of Warcraft Movie?
by warp11
Jan 10th, 2007
08:43:29 PM
It would almost be the same thing right?
"Legolas - Episode I: Elf Taint Smells Like Apple Pie"
by Doctor_Sin
Jan 10th, 2007
08:45:16 PM
"Legolas - Episode II: The Coming of the Uncircumcised Dwarves"
This Is Crazy
by DarthDooku
Jan 10th, 2007
08:46:05 PM
Seriously, movies should be fun. Making it into this bickering business is stupid. Money isn't everything.
Paramount's president stepped down today
by Doctor_Sin
Jan 10th, 2007
08:50:52 PM
Reasons unspecified. I believe a perceived failure in exercising her charges is to blame.
NEW LINES' COOKIN THE BOOKS!
by DOGSOUP
Jan 10th, 2007
08:51:34 PM
Fact.
Legolas - Episode III:
by nationalmaverick
Jan 10th, 2007
08:52:26 PM
Legolas - Episode III: Revenge of the Homoerotic Pigmies-who-are-miffed-at-him- waving his-tight-ass-in-their-faces-w hile-they-supress their-Inner-desires-because-th ey-have to-go-to-a-fucking-volcano...s on of a bitch
christopher3
by Trader Groucho 2
Jan 10th, 2007
08:53:04 PM
au contraire mon frere. The stakes here on both sides are way too high to simply leave this whole thing to the legal eagles. It's clearly about the accounting on not one movie, but three, which means tens or possibly hundreds of millions at stake by the time all participants are taken into account. It's also so obviously about The Hobbit, as New Line early on had attempted to use the LOTR payments issue as an incentive, positive or negative, to bring Jackson around to doing the Hobbit soon. New Line's impatience is understandable. They would have liked to see a Hobbit movie on track while there's still good heat from LOTR and before actors like Ian McKellan are actually as old as the characters they portray. From everything I've seen, PJ is the kind of guy who responds more positively to a carrot than a stick, and really doesn't like being offered a carrot while a stick's being held over his head. New Line made a power play on Jackson. New Line calculated so badly they're still trying to figure out why they've got powder burns on their faces. The fact this whole thing is public - sour icing on the cake.
Ravetin... Eisner is a different scenario...
by Womb2dooM
Jan 10th, 2007
08:53:43 PM
He was making stoopid decisions that were jeopardising his movies and therefore, box office take. Shaye is literally protecting tens to hundreds of millions of dollars that may payable if the Towers and Rings audit goes ahead. This money would, of course, adversely effect New Line's holdings (after all, we aren't talking pocket change here). If New Line has been cooking the books, Shaye is doing the right thing by keeping them out of the lime light and Jackson at arms length.
If Jackson thinks he got screwed, fine
by CTU Mole
Jan 10th, 2007
08:56:05 PM
But how much money has he lost now that he's passed on The Hobbit? "It's the principle of the thing" you say? Fine, Jackson's the most principled guy in the biz. Super. We should make him an award for that.

I don't even care about the fucking Hobbit.

CTU Mole why the fuck are
by nationalmaverick
Jan 10th, 2007
08:56:38 PM
CTU Mole why the fuck are you on these boards if you dont care about films? Damn fucking right we should make him an award, if it wasnt for him sticking to his guns he would turn into fucking brett ratner and make XMEN FUCKING 3 THE BIGGEST PIECE OF SHIT IN THE ENTIRE WORLD.
HEY QUINT
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Jan 10th, 2007
08:57:17 PM
Haven't the LOTR actors been through some shite with New Line before anyway? Wasn't it Viggo Mortensen that brought to light the bonuses they were all supposed to receive if FOTR made a certain amount of money? Wasn't New Line sitting on their hands, playing dumb, and quietly hoping that no one had gone back to actually READ their contracts?

Did I get that right or am I misrepresenting it a bit? Anybody else remember that?

Quint!
by BadMrWonka
Jan 10th, 2007
08:59:46 PM
Do you think the problem for Jackson is that he's sort of a half-Lucas? he has a trilogy that was an unqualified success, and a semi-studio full of peopl ethat he works with in WETA, but he just doesn't have the assets to fully fund a large scale film on his own? or do you think he really has no desire to? certainly if he was paid 250 mil for LOTR, he could have funded lovely bones on his own, but that doesn't have the return on revenue potential (read: guaranteed) that the Hobbit has.

I guess what I'm saying is, how much of this is really about money, and how much is about the fact that new line has the rights to something that Jackson would like to have all his own (within reason)? maybe there's something else going on behind the scenes with New Line and the hobbit, and Jackson wants to wait it out so that MGM can let him do the picture he really wants to do. I do think it's more likely that New Line really does have a lot of shady stuff they want to keep in their closet, as you've said, but I just thought I'd throw another thought out there.
This is simple
by erikharrison
Jan 10th, 2007
09:00:20 PM
PJ has invested almost every penny he made from LoTR into building top notch production and post production facilities in Wellington. PJ is a businessman, this isn't work for hire, this is New Line hiring Peter, Fran, Phillipa, Weta Limited and Weta Digital to make a movie. The contract has a clause to permit -either- side to have a third party audit, and PJ is suing to be permitted to do what his contract says he can do - and that's exactly what a good businessman ought to do when he thinks his businesses (Weta, et al) are being screwed over. This is not rocket science.
Gil Brooks - You're a liar.
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Jan 10th, 2007
09:00:39 PM
If you've got proof of your accusations, post it. Otherwise, you're a coward who is simply throwing TB grenades and talking out of your ass.
Help me out here, Womb...
by Ravetin
Jan 10th, 2007
09:08:25 PM
..."He was making stoopid decisions that were jeopardising his movies and therefore, box office take." My first post was mostly a joke, but I think the scenario is the same. It's just the scope of it that's different. Either way, aren't there going to be people at NL unhappy with Shaye? And what happened with Mike Lynne in all this?
Sigh
by Neutron
Jan 10th, 2007
09:15:03 PM
He lost me at "our legal action is about holding New Line to it's contractual obligations and promises." Anyone who doesn't know the difference between "it's" and "its" doesn't deserve to make the Hobbit. So much for attention to detail.
Woot! Quint agrees with me!
by Zarles
Jan 10th, 2007
09:15:40 PM
[rudolph]He thinks I'm cuuuuuuuute![/rudolph]
THANKS QUINT!
by Deus Vult
Jan 10th, 2007
09:16:14 PM
'preciate the response, and it works without question. I think people like lucas had a vision to cut out the studios and do his own thing without them interfering when making movies. our friend PJ should learn this lesson.

additionally, lucas learned he could get rich from running his own studio, which I don't think was his initial intention by the way, and his current net worth is $3.5 billion so when "clever" talkbackers call him LUCA$ they're not kidding

finally, anyone in any form of entertainment should take a lesson from the hiphop community of the late 80s who realized the art form would always be a bit tainted by white record execs, and thus began the great "rapper-owned" studio crazer of the early 90s which continues to this day. I suppose what I'm saying is PJ should starting laying down some hot tracks or waxing poetic...or something...and won't have to worry 'bout no punk ass newmuthafuckinline--does u her meh?

PETER JACKSON IS A GREEDY FUCK!
by wolvenom
Jan 10th, 2007
09:17:37 PM
A QUARTER OF A BILLION DOLLARS ISN'T ENOUGH FOR THIS FUCKFACE FOR MAKING 3 MOVIES? WTF IS WRONG WITH ASSHOLE?
http://www.outlawthemovie.com
by supermarch
Jan 10th, 2007
09:18:54 PM
http://www.outlawthemovie.com

Sorry but this looks crazy good.

I'm surprised Football Factory never got mentioned at all on this site.

I think Randall Graves said it right
by Turd Furgeson
Jan 10th, 2007
09:19:01 PM
When he said "Those fucking rings movies were boring as hell."
Sure $250 million is a lot but...
by Ravetin
Jan 10th, 2007
09:21:22 PM
...Jackson doesn't have benefits that Lucas did. Things like 100% of merchandising profits for life and working in an era when a huge genre film could be made for less than $20 million. Jackson's definitely THE up-and-coming empire builder, but I think he has a handful of blockbusters to go before he can afford to do everything on his own.
You gotta look at the BIG picture, Ravetin...
by Womb2dooM
Jan 10th, 2007
09:22:32 PM
... as several people at this site have clued to, something dodgy is happening at New Line that Shaye is trying to keep secret (potentially cooked books). If this secret is exposed AND money has to be paid the Jackson & co., then obviously this will not help New Line's holdings. Of course, one could argue that it would be in everyone's best interest to just pay Jackson and let him make The Hobbit but Shaye's refusal to do that simply exposes how huge this situation potentially is. The point I was making is that, as head of NL, Shaye is not going to fire himself and, it's clearly in the shareholders best interest to keep him in control til this mess is blown over. In regards to the comparisons you raised , I don't believe (and I could be wrong) it's the same thing. While Eisner was immoral and had sex with children, he was never in a position like this. His presence hurt Disney while Shaye's presence, I believe, is actually protecting NL, even if the result of which frustrates a whole bunch of fanboys.
Gil B. and the PJackson vs. New Line
by Freefinger
Jan 10th, 2007
09:27:49 PM
Gil if you say is true, I could actually believe it. Hell that's half of the Hollywood Industry right there. The all have somekind of holier than god attitude once they hit it big. But it's also in many industries that have high paid CEO's or Artists in the music industry.

I wouldn't blame him if he did. Some of these Directors are described as Dicks and Jerks, but then again have you ever been in charge of a movie? Hell I just went back to the HBO GreenLight Projects and that was hell on earth for little million dollar movies.

Imagine once you get the big budgets what pressure you have to deliver something without losing money and actually turning a great profit from it all for the Studios.

What is important in this TB is that New Line aren't letting anyone near the books. Kinda makes you think that something's fishy about the whole situation. And hell if they did skim a little bit off the top for actors, imagine the piece they might've cut out from under Jackson?

I'm no fan of him, hell I thought King Kong was the best comedic masterpiece of the past 5 years. The whole running with the Dinosaurs part was hilarious, some places they looked like they were running front left to right, but the dinosaurs were also running in a weird angle making this some of the worst CGI ever.

And casting Black, I mean, I like his funny stuff, but this was just bad casting.

As far as the money goes, if Jackson is being ripped off then he should get what they offered from the first day. No more and surely no less.

Refusing acces is one big billboard for "Hey now, we didn't do that, now come on, why would we do that? You don't need to look into it, we told you we gave you everything scouts honor!" and that's as good as "We guilty as hell! And we don't want to pay you a cent!"

Hell the Studio heads who don't want them in the books are probably skiming some off for themselves and they should be fired and charged.

Anyway I'm all for this being posted, it's good to see all sides of the business, not just the happy perfect side all the time. As long as it's not tabloid material and we start posting "Peter Jackson is suing New Line Studios, and his baby alien is mad as hell!"

an actual point, taint & faux ebonics in the same post
by Deus Vult
Jan 10th, 2007
09:27:53 PM
either I'm on fire boys or its time I take a break from posting. $5 via paypal to the first talkbacker who thinks I should take a 24 hour break from posting. here we go now--my email is infitior@gmail.com so lemme have it!
Cuaron's Hobbitt would work for me
by DinoBass
Jan 10th, 2007
09:29:47 PM
Haven't seen CoM but his was my fave Potter installment, and when I heard PJ would probably not be involved with the Hobbitt he was my first thought. Verbinski would be good, too. Raimi I'm not so hot on. But all this negative press around the movie could scare off all those guys anyway.
Well, I guess you're right, Womb.
by Ravetin
Jan 10th, 2007
09:30:59 PM
Now that I think about it, I suppose there's even non-NL execs who will want Shaye to keep quiet since Jackson getting his way could lead to all sorts of shit. Like studios being forced to post DVD sales figures and whatnot. Wow, Jackson's fucked.
Deus (money bags) Vult...
by Womb2dooM
Jan 10th, 2007
09:31:37 PM
Why don't you give that money to poor kids and stick around? Hehe, it's funny coz poor kids can't access paypal...
wolvenom - could you be a stupid fuck?
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Jan 10th, 2007
09:36:00 PM
Let's see - say you worked on a project for nearly 10 years. Then let's say this project was immensely successful and (yes) earned a ton of money. However, when you go to balance your checkbook, you suddenly realize that you're short millions of dollars - money that not only belongs to you...but the people who worked so hard, day after day, for nearly 10 years to help make your project work.

If a 3rd party audit would help to determine the nature of these missing funds (through perfectly legal and professional means), wouldn't you want to know if you actually received all deserved rewards for your labor?

The folks who think this is about PJ's "greed" are insane. Simply because it involves dollar amounts that probably none of us will ever see in our lifetimes doesn't make it something that PJ should just let slide.

and yes...
by Freefinger
Jan 10th, 2007
09:41:26 PM
I'm also on Randall Graves side when he said "Those fucking rings movies were boring as hell".

Man... Lotsa stuff to cover, and even more that never did make it to the films, but they were boring...

Like K. Smith said all they did was walk and fight a giant spider, Hell even the trees in that movie walked.

Being a "half" fan of the books (I liked them just didn't fu**ing foam at the mouth at them like some did) I was not hyped up at them making these to a movie in the first place.

I just didn't see this as an "EPIC". All that walking and those 20 different endings at the end, I was just hoping that some nuclear explosion would manifest itself and kill 'em all.

And freaking Elijah Wood, could someone ask him do try to do another face while filming? He's always got that idiot dumbass beaten dog look with his eyebrows tilted. I would've pushed him off in the volcano if I was there!

womb2doom I needed that shot in the arm
by Deus Vult
Jan 10th, 2007
09:42:25 PM
hilarious and I'm sincere here, no classic talkback sarcasm. I've used that $5 hook a dozen times in the last few days and not a single person has emailed me for the money but if they had I wouldn't be moneybags for long mind you.

by the way, my wife teaches poor kids (or tries to) and she says "they steal"

Cuaron
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Jan 10th, 2007
09:43:48 PM
He did a hell of a job with "Children of Men" but I'm not entirely sure he's a good fit for "The Hobbit". Strangely enough, I was not really impressed with his Potter film either. But I don't really blame him...I blame the lousy franchise.
I love how people come onto
by nationalmaverick
Jan 10th, 2007
09:45:36 PM
I love how people come onto a message board packed with interested parties on either side and then says "I dont give a shit about this or that and I think it was boring" Likes its a que for all of us to shut up because they are right lol.
Bob Shayne obviously
by Irresolute
Jan 10th, 2007
09:49:16 PM
has a beer and cheets on his wife
As if anyone here...
by Saluki
Jan 10th, 2007
09:49:38 PM
... Wouldn't fight for the $20 million they were owed, if not more. New Line screwed themselves up the creek with this one.
enjoy it while it lasts nationalmaverick...
by Deus Vult
Jan 10th, 2007
09:58:21 PM
because when the commies (chinese), socialists (hugo chavez) or the wahhabi muslims take over, the first thing they'll do is shut down any site that allows people to talk about anything that could be considered recalcitrant or malcontent behavior. naturally a website where people talk about movies will be first in line to get shut down.

or will classic austin liberal harry knowles join with them and tell us its good for us? now THAT'S a topic worth discussing!

By messing with LOTR
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
10:01:27 PM
New Line has brought about our destruction, Apophis is coming...in 2029...just in time for Cameron's AVATAR.
Deus Vult
by Saluki
Jan 10th, 2007
10:04:46 PM
Keep going... This is could become even funnier.
Womb2Doom
by 4815162342
Jan 10th, 2007
10:05:58 PM
Your logic about the Shareholders protecting the NL head ass wipe is flawed. If NL is inded cooking the books, then the studio brass has falsified the actual income generated by the trilogy. Not only does that screw over PJ, but then that also means that there was probably coinage made that wasnt reported in the bottom line to the shareholders either. So if they are willing to shit on PJ, they are willing to shit on the guys holding the stock too. If I were a shareholder, I would want to know that all of the profit is getting reported so that I know I'm getting my cut too. I would also want an exec who's not out trashing the actors/directors and nameless herds of toadies that make the movies that earn my dividens. Sure, The Hobbit could be done by anyone of a number of people, but only PJ's name makes me want to pay the sitter so I can be there opening night.
my dear saluki...
by Deus Vult
Jan 10th, 2007
10:07:51 PM
forget it kid, I'm done. for God's sake, it's 10:20pm on a wednesday, I should have been in bed an hour ago if not more. I'm an old man! I'm confused! will you take me home?
PJ's certainly got some novel legal theories
by Ye Not Guilty
Jan 10th, 2007
10:07:57 PM
According to the New York Times: "What makes Mr. Jackson's suit draw such widespread interest here, other than his clout in the industry and the amount at stake, is one specific allegation about New Line's behavior. The suit charges that the company used pre-emptive bidding (meaning a process closed to external parties) rather than open bidding for subsidiary rights to such things as "Lord of the Rings" books, DVD's and merchandise. Therefore, New Line received far less than market value for these rights, the suit says. Most of those rights went to other companies in the New Line family or under the Time Warner corporate umbrella, like Warner Brothers International, Warner Records and Warner Books. So while the deals would not hurt Time Warner's bottom line, they would lower the overall gross revenues related to the film, which is the figure Mr. Jackson's percentage is based on. According to people on both sides of Mr. Jackson's lawsuit, the claim strikes at the heart of the modern vertically integrated media company. One of the apparent - though largely unproven - benefits of media integration is the ability of conglomerates like the Walt Disney Company, Time Warner, the News Corporation, Viacom, Sony and General Electric to sell subsidiary rights to the many divisions within the company. By painting this corporate synergy as "self-dealing," Mr. Jackson's lawsuit and similar suits filed in the last few years, called vertical integration lawsuits, argue that the idea of the media conglomerate is at odds with the interests of the creative minds behind the content."
TAINT no business like show business.
by Judge Dredds Dirty Undies
Jan 10th, 2007
10:15:13 PM
Taint it cool!
Books in those legal theories
by DinoBass
Jan 10th, 2007
10:16:13 PM
are probably all those "Making of..." and "Artwork of..." books and such.
Mark Ordesky
by TheSeeker7
Jan 10th, 2007
10:19:19 PM
I kinda am curious to know where he stands on all of this. Because he is (or at least was, for all I know) one of the executives at New Line, but obviously as we all know from the DVD documentary material he was very closedly involved with the production of the trilogy and right there next to Jackson for enough of it.
ahh, a breath of fresh air, from a taint near you!
by Deus Vult
Jan 10th, 2007
10:21:15 PM
you're a good man judge dredd. hey, how come no one has used the "gotta eat" deal tied into how skinny PJ is these days? I don't even use the gotta eat catchphrase and it seemed pretty obvious to me.
4815162342, fair point...
by Womb2dooM
Jan 10th, 2007
10:26:28 PM
However if this thing is as big as it potentially is, then, if it's exposed, this could send NL into the ground, thus fucking the shareholders regardless. I'm sure if all this miraculously sorts itself out without further ado, Shaye won't last much longer as, like you said, it's probable that's he's fucking the shareholders as well. Until then he's the only thing standing between potential collapse and anonymity.
Parallels to the Iraq situation...
by mcflytrap
Jan 10th, 2007
10:26:39 PM
New Line won't show the books therefore they MUST be hiding something! Is this coming from the same people that argued against the idea that because Saddam wouldn't let UN inspectors do their job, he was up to something as well? Could it be, a double standard? Nah.
So...
by Saluki
Jan 10th, 2007
10:32:49 PM
We're going to bomb New Line, and then hang Bob Shaye? I'm willing to sacrifice about 30 troops for that, but then I'm going to get tired of the occupation and scheme up some bombing of other studios...
I'm thinking of making a porn movie called...
by Womb2dooM
Jan 10th, 2007
10:34:33 PM
... "My Cleft Lipped Sally" It's a cumming-of-age comedy about a mentally challenged cleft lipped girl and man who loves her. Thoughts...
This is getting complicated
by CherryValance
Jan 10th, 2007
10:34:59 PM
Didn't David Duchovny cause a stink once because he was concerned that his royalties from the X-files were going to suffer because of that whole synergy thing? Like they'd sell the syndication rights to themselves for next to nothing and then he would have gotten totally screwed. But that was a long time ago and I don't remember how that turned out.

The next time I heard anything about that kinda stuff was when Sean Astin went on Regis & Kelly to promote one of the movies, probably TTT. And Ripa told him to go back and get more money since they were so successful, since they'd done all their negotiations before the even started filming. It's probably all her fault.
Down with Shaye
by Cobbio
Jan 10th, 2007
10:35:24 PM
Kick New Line's ass, Peter! I'm so sick of corporate fucks like Bob Shaye thinking they don't owe anyone anything, and then when the case goes to court, an Enron result happens. Bob Shaye must be shitting his pants over this.

I love it.

I think there's a rule in Hollywood that you take what you're given, enjoy your fame and success, but don't question the specifics of how much money you're actually owed. It's existed that way for almost a century. But then cases like "Coming to America" happen, and the nasty, greedy, corrupt, asshole-infested underside of Hollywood are exposed. I'm glad Art Bushwald sued for what he was owed, as was everyone else who worked on that film. Bob Shaye wants Peter Jackson to just take the money New Line so graciously paid him and not ask questions.

But look what happens when a now-famous director actually ASKS questions and doesn't settle for the bureaucratic bullshit the studio wants him to swallow. You're the asshole here, Bob Shaye. You and your crooked, fuck-the-artist who made us money policies. I realize you have shareholders to appease, which is why you're going on the offensive, but for all the people everywhere who hate corporate suits dictating our beliefs, I hope Peter Jackson takes you down hard. To the mat, your sniveling, weaselly motherfucker.

Right on, Peter.

The Paramount and "Coming to America" meme
by Ye Not Guilty
Jan 10th, 2007
10:41:37 PM
What PARAMOUNT did with "Coming to America' is completely different than the situation between PJ and New Line. The "Coming to America" lawsuit involved questions over profit participation, whereas PJ's lawsuit is a question of gross points. Two different studios, two completely different cases. I think AICN is over its head in this case.
re: my screen name
by CherryValance
Jan 10th, 2007
10:45:52 PM
The Outsiders. I didn't remember the other one although I have seen it.
Re: Ye
by Cobbio
Jan 10th, 2007
10:57:45 PM
"LOTR" and "Coming to America" involve different types of legal cases, it's true, Ye Not Guilty, but the principle of the studio not meeting the specifics of its agreed-upon contract with the artists are the same, in my opinion.

This is big, fat case, one that could shake the entire industry. If New Line is compelled to open its books by a court, and anomalies are found, and those anomalies amount to tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, the carry-over effect in the industry would be huge. New Line doesn't want this to happen, and they're pissed Pete Jackson is persisting in his pursuit of his owed money.

You may look at "Coming to America" and "LOTR" as fundamentally different types of cases, which is fine, but in both cases, millions of cooked-book dollars were and are on the line.

I don't care how much money Peter Jackson made off "LOTR", because the studio made much, much more than he did. Jackson wants to cut through the bureaucratic bullshit and get what he's owed. Bob Shaye wants to plug the festering leak in the dam before it collapses on himself, his reputation in Hollywood, and especially New Line.

Deus Vult=Taint Crusader
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:01:48 PM
Hey Deus Lo Volt(if you're feeling irregular), I don't suppose you've played the board game. You can find it at boardgamegeek.com
quint, you remind me of the host of 'cheaters'
by BendersShinyAss
Jan 10th, 2007
11:03:26 PM
this is the part of the show i hate. bullshit, you love it!!
Bob Shaye needs a taint lashing!
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:04:16 PM
Saw CHILDREN OF MEN again tonight
by YackBacker
Jan 10th, 2007
11:07:50 PM
Go see this fucking movie, people. BSB, have you seen it yet?
New Line book cooking=Flames on taint
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:08:41 PM
I always get WildCherryTaint at the movies
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:10:05 PM
Friend of mine saw Children, didn't care for it
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:12:17 PM
but this is the same guy who DID like Nacho Libre, so not a whole lotta stock in his opinion.
This is all a work
by Fried Gold
Jan 10th, 2007
11:13:42 PM
Bob Shaye will be cutting an in-ring promo next Monday and Jackson will run down there for a big face off.....only to chairshot Zaentz.
re:Children of Men
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:20:28 PM
I keep hearing about this long 1 take scene that is awesome. The first time I ever noticed and appreciated such a scene was in Hard Boiled, when they were in the hospital, very cool.
Cobbio
by Ye Not Guilty
Jan 10th, 2007
11:22:31 PM
"If New Line is compelled to open its books by a court, and anomalies are found, and those anomalies amount to tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, the carry-over effect in the industry would be huge." You're right, it would be huge, but you and I both know it will never get that far. Both sides will eventually agree to settle, probably for about $60 million or so. Unfortunately for Peter Jackson, his lawyers will probably get most of it, and he'll be left with maybe $25 million or so, which isn't bad, but considering he could have pocketed maybe up to $150 million for the two "Hobbit" movies instead, it makes you wonder what kind of crack PJ is smoking these days. Sure, by agreeing to do the Hobbit movies he would have been allowing New Line to weasel out of paying him some money, but by sticking to his principles, he's screwing himself out of way more money and out of a two picture deal, plus burning his bridges at New Line. I just hope this won't have a ripple effect, resulting in PJ losing out on directing gigs at other studios as well. If PJ is unwilling to compromise, then other studios may well decide it would be better to avoid employing him.
you know whats really going to happen?
by BendersShinyAss
Jan 10th, 2007
11:23:08 PM
Jacksons going to get his money and he's never going to work inhollywood ever again. he'll be a BIG indi producer from new zealand. He's pissing in the big pond now, being an outsider who has gotten himself somewhat pissed off at the dealings of hollywood. the truth is guys, new line wouldn't be the only studeo cooking the books - that said, i think other studios would be somewhat curious about this state of affairs - and there would be a real hesitation in the future to work with someone like jackson again. the mans a loud mouth. I'm not saying what new line did was right. there's nothing worse than being screwed out of your hard earned cash.... but lets not be feeble here - Jackson is nothing unique on the list here. in hollywoods eyes, he's a trouble maker.
Why stop with the Hobbit/New Line conflict reports?
by theadamschellenberg
Jan 10th, 2007
11:24:02 PM
I really enjoy reading whatever new developments come to pass. Am I suppose to learn about whats happening to one of my favorite film franchises on MSNBC instead of AICN?!
No, but I saw Hitchcock's TAINT!
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:28:14 PM
Haven't seen ROPE that I recall, but there are a lot of older movies that I've seen all or part of AND don't remember the names, I sometimes lack in that department.
the thing about Hitchcock's taint
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:30:48 PM
little to no hair and distinguished profile, go figure!
ROPE was awesome!
by Womb2dooM
Jan 10th, 2007
11:36:15 PM
Actually it was intended to look like just one take but they could only fit 8 minutes or so of film in the camera at one time. It's actually a really great black comedy as well. IT'S FUUUN TO LEARN!!!!
ROPE GOTTA EAT!!!60yrs later
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:39:06 PM
10 shots of Rope?
by DinoBass
Jan 10th, 2007
11:39:23 PM
Sounds like Peter North
DinoBass... Who the hell is Peter North?!?!
by Womb2dooM
Jan 10th, 2007
11:42:49 PM
Why the fuck would you bring up a name nobody knows who it is? That's stupid. I don't know him. I don't even download porn... I like boobies.
BSB, my condolences on stooops
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:43:13 PM
I made a joke about stalking you on another thread a day or two ago, just to keep you on your toes.
Damn you Jar Jar Binks
by darthbinks1220
Jan 10th, 2007
11:50:40 PM
Damn you Jar Jar Binks
Bringing Sexy Back
by Ye Not Guilty
Jan 10th, 2007
11:50:58 PM
I think I have razor burn on my taint after shaving down there.
Peter North creates doomed womb, ironic...
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 10th, 2007
11:51:48 PM
=>........*:(
BSB
by YackBacker
Jan 10th, 2007
11:52:06 PM
Yeah, I'll probably try to catch it tomorrow night if possible- alone (I think when the new movies come out on Friday, it may be pushed out of my local theaters and I'll have to see it in the city instead, in which case I will pull a double-feature and see Pan's Lab as well). Man, Apocalypto gotta eat, ya know?!
Ben Affleck as Bilbo
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 10th, 2007
11:52:37 PM
Matt Damon as Gandalf. Yes, I know that the reverse casting would work better, but clearly better isn't the point...
hello ford turns down new starwars
by skiff
Jan 10th, 2007
11:52:55 PM
Why hasn't antbody talked about that pissing off starwars fans. The guy would make firewall but not a new starwars film. Well ladi fucking daw
skiff, what are you talking about?
by YackBacker
Jan 10th, 2007
11:56:33 PM
Harrison Ford turned down what Star Wars project?
Bobby DeNiro as Gandalf
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 10th, 2007
11:57:00 PM
Joe Pesci as Thorin. Chuck Norris as Beorn. Bilbo animated in Rankin-Bass style.
Hitchcock's best flick
by DinoBass
Jan 10th, 2007
11:58:46 PM
Peter North-by-Northwest. It starts off with a ton of long shots, then a few smaller shots and then--surprise! More long shots! That movie drank a lot of protein shakes or something.
The Hobbit With An All-Girl Cast
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 10th, 2007
11:59:08 PM
Like a "women in prison" flick but on the road! Oh wait they already made that for cable and it sucked.
Yeah Skiff WTF?
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 11th, 2007
12:00:47 AM
And did you choose your name for the inexplicably appealing Tatooine vehicle?
I feel bad for MGM
by Freakemovie
Jan 11th, 2007
12:01:52 AM
I even forget their role in this, but they have some stake in it. They're not involved in the New Line/Jackson fight, but they're stuck right in the middle of it, and they know Jackson is the one who should be making the Hobbit. It's like the mutual friends of a couple that's going through an ugly breakup. Poor guys.
George Romero Should Direct
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 11th, 2007
12:02:56 AM
If you are gonna screw it up at least screw it up with class. The logic being that LOTR was good in large part because of Jackson's zombie-horror chops.
HARRY,you need to keep writing about this matter
by pipergates
Jan 11th, 2007
12:03:02 AM
Not just for us to know all the sordid details but because we all need to help push these company guys into doing the right thing.Even if Jackson is somehow not telling the whole story,these incredibly ignorant people at New Line can not be allowed to mess up a project so loved by so many,as is the Hobbit made into a movie.Dont they understand the money they are losing on this?How many people that want to see Smaug and Beorn and the spiders of Mirkwood and the treasure-cave?
Ordesky in the extended editions
by Freakemovie
Jan 11th, 2007
12:03:44 AM
I just remember Mark Ordesky of New Line on the extended DVDs jokingly calling Jackson a sneaky bastard (in that case for forcing him to announce that the premiere of ROTK would be in New Zealand). Sad to look back on the fun times.
I read a Ford/Star Wars story too.
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 11th, 2007
12:07:28 AM
according to the story Ford turned down 40mil for a new flick, I think the whole thing is bullshit.
You fucking losers...
by Fleet
Jan 11th, 2007
12:08:20 AM
I love how practically all of you destroy any possible credibility by making your comments and then giggling stupidly about Taint-sniffing and repeating fucking stupid "Gotta Eat" jokes... Seriously... It's like a kiddy-talk-back in here...
Harrison Ford WAS Offered New Stars Wars
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 11th, 2007
12:08:43 AM
Recently! Right before Indy 4. Ceck it out via googlenews, it just broke. Damn.
According to Britain's Daily Star, so all bullshit IMO
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 11th, 2007
12:11:51 AM
"Harrison was horrified," a source tells the Daily Star. "He told George he just couldn't face being stuck in a spaceship with Chewbacca again."
More dignified, so he wouldn't go for your ass
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 11th, 2007
12:19:13 AM
at least not at first, right?
British Tabloids=Flames on Tainted Nipples
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 11th, 2007
12:20:36 AM
American Tabloids=Nipples on Flaming Taints
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 11th, 2007
12:22:30 AM
Do you know how I know that Ford story is bullshit?
by YackBacker
Jan 11th, 2007
12:27:49 AM
Because Lucas could have hired Mark Hamill for $10 and he would have shown up instead. There was no place to put the OT actors in the new movies. Silly rumors being peddled by the British rags. Have they proven Pricess Di was assassinated yet?
Oh, I just read the "story"- so there's a 7th SW movie?
by YackBacker
Jan 11th, 2007
12:29:58 AM
OK, my bad. "Star Wars Episode VII- Squeeze The Corpse Dry For Blood" is in the works it seems!
Even if this gets settled,Peter's become too expensive
by Greg7007
Jan 11th, 2007
12:32:09 AM
New Line had an extremely lousy year in 2006, but should bounce back in 2007 with Rush Hour 3 and the film of the first His Dark Materials book trilogy. The fanboys should accept the harsh reality that even if New Line settle their dispute with Jackson and vice versa (which they definitely won't), he's now too expensive to make The Hobbit for them, as he'd understandably want at least $US 20 mill upfront and probably 20 % of the film's cinema and DVD profits, which is just too much, not unless Saul Zaentz (who individually made even more from ther 3 LOTR films than even Jackson did) was quite happy to pay PJ those prices.
BSB, I think that's a "you know what" my colon typed...
by YackBacker
Jan 11th, 2007
12:38:06 AM
T-A-I-N-T!
OH MY GOD YOU FUCKING GEEEKS! YOU AND THIS TAINT!!!
by YackBacker
Jan 11th, 2007
12:45:36 AM
Hehehe. I love when people spaz over silly words like "taint." People, it's a silly word, relax. It won't hurt you... unless you are not careful when shaving it, isn't that right Ye Not Guilty?
I love how everyone automatically just assumes...
by Sledge Hammer
Jan 11th, 2007
12:58:15 AM
...that Jackson *must* be the one in the right here, and that *everything* must be the fault of "those evil, greedy fucks at Newline". Blind fanboy loyalty reigns supreme. Forget that Jackson basically started this mess by trying to blackmail Newline in the press, rather than just letting the whole legal process run it's course. Forget what Newline did for Jackson. There's no shared responsibility, no greed and ego on BOTH SIDES going on here at all, no, surely it all has to be evil Newline's fault. Christ. I love Jackson's films too, but that doesn't excuse his own poor behaviour here. This is after all a man who started out by saying that he wasn't even sure that Newline had shortchanged him, he just wanted to make sure they hadn't, but later changed his tune as things got more and more bitter and twisted between the two parties, and the egomaniacal blame game raged on between the two. While Newline originally offered to make good on what Jackson apparently *thought* was owed as part of the Hobbit deal, starting out being apparently willing to compromise until everything blew up and got out of hand. My only point is both sides are being stubborn egotistical whiny dicks who refuse to budge an inch, and have forgotten just how much the other has contributed to get them where they are today, and at the end of the day they're both going to wind up worse off for it, and so are the fans.

And in response to someone who said "how can you possibly sue someone and still stay friendly", this isn't the real world, it's hollyweird, and in Hollyweird litigation is a way of life. It's all about the business, legal action over monies allegedly owed or deals allegedly broken happens all the fucking time, only it's usually conducted more professionally between parties and doesn't get this ugly in the press, and in the long run usually some sort of compromise deal is made between parties. I mean Connery has rather famously sued pretty much every film studio that he has ever worked for at one time or another, and yet that didn't stop him getting work (before he apparently retired at least), and while I'm sure there was some bitterness afterwards in some cases, ultimately the business of making new films and new money still came first, and it could have been the same here if they'd kept things professional while legal did it's bit. Doesn't mean it would have, but it *could* have. Not much chance of that ever happening now, thanks to the bitter public actions and back & forth mud slinging of both sides though.

my colon, you are one interesting motherfucker...
by YackBacker
Jan 11th, 2007
01:02:30 AM
G'night dude. And BSB, I'll do my best.
GOTTA
by THE KNIGHT
Jan 11th, 2007
01:14:18 AM
love studio execs... such greedy fucks...
wait, Kiss and makeup?
by s0nicdeathmonkey
Jan 11th, 2007
01:17:49 AM
Gene Simmonds is involved?
Sledge Hammer - You are absolutely right
by SiskoDK
Jan 11th, 2007
01:22:39 AM
But having AICN looking at anything regarding Jackson objectively is about as likely as Harry giving a bad review to a film directed by Tarantino, Cameron, Rodriquez etc. This site is so biased that it is almost funny. When Fox changed the backstory of Dr. Doom everybody went ballistic and HATED the film before a single frame was shot. - Im not saying the film ended up a masterpiece but at least I waited undtil the final product to pass judgment. But when Raimi (maybe) changes the Spiderman backstory by making Sandman the killer of Uncle Ben it is suddenly "it will be interesting to se where they are going with this...", "If handled right it could be great..." and so on The fact is that NOBODY knows the whole story behind this. And New Line's unwillingness to open the books is NO ADMISSION OG GUILT (What happened to innocent until proven guilty ?). How many companies would just open the books to any claim they found not to be valid ? Finally - I love the Ring trilogy and would love for Jackson to make the Hobbit. Bu I am also certain that another director could make a great Hobbit movie. Actually o think it could be quite funny to se what Harry would do if Jackson was dropped and Cameron, Raimi og Tarantino where handed the job.
Actually...
by scrivener
Jan 11th, 2007
01:23:34 AM
Jackson's calm, respectful, thoughful reply makes Bob Shaye seem even MORE like a manipulative, whiny asshole than I originally thought. How 'bout this Mr. Shaye - we all stop seeing your movies and buying your DVDs. There's a lot of Geeks out there you are seriously starting to piss off. Never enderestimate the power of faceless masses of overweight, underwashed dorks ready to fight and die for their entertainment idols.
Profits
by ye olde shiza
Jan 11th, 2007
01:29:58 AM
I don't pretend to know the differences between the Paramount "Coming to America" case and this one, but as a layman, I would think the main concern for folks here would be to see if someone was screwed in contractual obligations.

Not taking any sides at all, The Lord of the Rings was a huge, huge, HUGE risk for both New Line and Peter Jackson to undertake, and it just so happened to pan out. Fate paid it forward for those guys, but now that it's a hit, the books need to be checked even moreso. And if the books being checked just so happens to fund a new movie from WETA or give a $200 check to some of those guys who played orcs, then why the Hell not hope for the best? If the books are clean, and New Line has nothing to worry about, then what's the big deal?

I don't understand the logic of some people. A contract is a contract. EVERYONE has to pay the fuckin' piper! So, stopped your fucking whining.
Bob Shaye's Friendly Chat with the Local Grocer
by Dick Nicely
Jan 11th, 2007
01:35:32 AM
Phil: "That'll be twelve-fifty, sir."

Shaye: "No problem, son. Here's ten bucks."

Phil: "I'm sorry, sir, that's twelve-fifty."

Shaye: "I just gave you ten."

Phil: "Yes, sir, but I need another two-fifty, or you'll have to return some of these items to their rightful shelves."

Shaye: "Listen, you little punk. This tinned corn and cereal don't buy itself. I come in here and justify the existence of you, the corn, the cereal and that ridiculous name badge you're wearing. Have some self-respect, son. I just handed you ten bucks. If you'd studied math instead of flunking cashier school, you'd know ten bucks is ten bucks more than zero. So take this Alexander Hamilton and go back to reading your comic book."

Phil: "I'm sorry, sir, but unless you pay for all your groceries, I'm going to have to ask you to leave."

Shaye: "Kid, you have no idea who you're messing with here. You'll never sell lunch in this town again."

I took the initiative, Colon...
by Dick Nicely
Jan 11th, 2007
01:36:15 AM
Hope you don't mind.

And lo, the sun rises, and American insomniacs and workshy Europeans unite.

Nicely done
by ye olde shiza
Jan 11th, 2007
01:38:04 AM
The cashier bit with Bob Shaye is some good shiza.
My Colon Sucks ... you, me, and all that ...
by ye olde shiza
Jan 11th, 2007
01:43:15 AM
Thank you so much for brightening my rainy Northwestern US day with the infinite poop-loop quote ...

I wish they would have nominated that kid for a best supporting actor Oscar and used that scene in the montage. Fucking best scene in the whole movie.
Snakes on a train!!
by Snikkar124
Jan 11th, 2007
01:44:47 AM
deees nuts
Dick Nicely, apt name
by nationalmaverick
Jan 11th, 2007
01:58:13 AM
Dick Nicely, apt name btw thats pure gold dude, worthy of Wilde
"Jackson's dignified, thoughtful reply"
by Ringwearer9
Jan 11th, 2007
02:01:24 AM
You know, that's why Shaye is kinda fuming, because Mr. Jackson has been playing at being a kind, dignified, loving human being, at the same time that he's been using this Geek Tolkien and AICN readers to paint New Line and Shaye as evil and unreasonable. Do you really think that line in his letter about "deep affection for Bob Shaye and all the upper managment at New Line" is anything but the most vicious sarcasm designed to produce the exact opposite feeling in his opponent? There is nothing admirable about that ... it's deeply calculated and snotty cattiness, from someone who thinks his media campaign via Internet has his opponent on the ropes. Jackson's viciousness in this game is scary. I'd never want to be part of any project he worked on from now on. His true colors are flying black with skull and crossbones.
Ringwearer9. WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG
by nationalmaverick
Jan 11th, 2007
02:07:05 AM
Read peters bio? Mark Ordesky and petey boy are huge friends, in fact have been since brain dead days. Oh and as if theres any chance in the universe he'd even ask you to wipe his dogs ass
Am I the only who's enjoying this?
by Franklin T Marmoset
Jan 11th, 2007
02:09:07 AM
As a frequent viewer of DVD extras and whatnot, I am mightily tired of these Hollywood types glad-handing one another and talking about how so-and-so did 'a great job'. It's boring, and you also know it probably isn't true. Just once, I would like to hear a director, on a commentary track, say: 'Jesus, that actor was an asshole. Total egomaniac. We could hardly shoot some days from all noise coming froming his hooker trailer.'

It's a shame the end of the result of all this will likely be a crappy Hobbit film, but I am enjoying very much these public spats between rich guy #1 and rich guy #2. Someone above made a joke about wrestling, but I think he could be on to something. A cage match, or maybe an all-hobbit lumberjack match, might be the only way to settle things here.

It's early
by Franklin T Marmoset
Jan 11th, 2007
02:14:34 AM
Which is my excuse for the many errors in my previous post. Froming? What the hell, Frank? The end of the result? Clearly, the English-speaking centre of my brain does not come on line until after I've had more tea.

P.S. Good to see you, Ringwearer9. You may be onto something with that skull and crossbones line. Didn't Jackson cameo as a pirate in ROTK? Maybe he was trying to tell you something...

Commentary Tracks - sweet!
by ye olde shiza
Jan 11th, 2007
02:17:15 AM
FTM - That's a great idea. Then, that warning in front of all the DVDs about how "commentary tracks are not necessarily the opinion of ..." would actually mean something.

One of my favorite tracks of all time is still the Big Trouble in Little China track, which has its share of "so and so's great" bullshit, but it was just fun to listen to Kurt Russell and Carpenter talk about how fucking retarded, yet wonderful, the movie was.

For some of what you want, you can listen in to the commentary tracks from Mr. Show's DVDs. I think they've read everyone's minds and just attempted to poke fun at the whole idea of commentary tracks in general. Some of the best stuff was listening to bits where they'd get two DIFFERENT actors to voice-over whatever skit was playing, making a completely different, usually more retarded skit than the first. Or, the bits where they'd invent totally new characters and voices to comment on shows that had nothing to do with them. Mr. Show ... man, I miss them.
Peter North? Peter North hit me in the face once...
by Mace Tofu
Jan 11th, 2007
02:43:19 AM
knocked me on my ass. You never forget someone like that. Show the man some respect! ROPE was cool.
Well played, Quint.
by DocPazuzu
Jan 11th, 2007
03:10:30 AM
I'd like to compliment you on your excellent owning of Ringy in the last TB. The sweetness was accentuated by Ringy's hilariously bad attempts at saving face in being shown what an ignorant, petty scumsucker he is. Kudos, sir.
Quint
by kwisatzhaderach
Jan 11th, 2007
03:10:45 AM
I never saw an interview with Lucas where he said he did the new SW films for the money. Can you point me to one please?
Hey Ringy.
by DocPazuzu
Jan 11th, 2007
03:27:43 AM
You were fucking owned. Big time.
What gets me...
by DocPazuzu
Jan 11th, 2007
03:37:19 AM
...is the attitude some of the PJ haters have. You see, to me it wouldn't matter how much I hated a director or how many billions of dollars that person owned. I would never say, "Well, serves that fucking richer right since he already owns billions, that no good, riching richer!" The time to say "No, you're not worth more than X million dollars and X% of the profits" is DURING NEGOTIATION. A deal is a deal, no matter how you look at it. If New Line is playing fair and square then they shouldn't have any problem making their records known to an investigation by the involved parties. I can't believe some of you tools saying that if PJ REALLY loved Tolkien then he'd let a studio which has possibly fucked him and his associates out of millions of dollars have an opportunity to fuck him out of millions more while he at the same time EARNS even more millions of dollars for the same people. If PJ is wrong about his concerns, then I'm sure he's a bigger man than Ringwearer9 and can actually apologize after being owned by New Line.
ye olde shiza
by Franklin T Marmoset
Jan 11th, 2007
03:55:10 AM
I agree on the Big Trouble In Little China DVD. In fact, I like all of the Carpenter/Russell commentaries. They're refreshingly free of the Hollywood bullshit. I wish they'd do one for Escape From LA, which I think is an underappreciated film.
New Line's website
by kwisatzhaderach
Jan 11th, 2007
04:46:11 AM
Take a look at all the great films on the New Line website. The Nativity Story, Snakes On A Plane, Take The Lead, Just Friends, Code Name: The Cleaner. Bob Shaye knows jackshit about quality filmmaking.
I kind of like New Line
by Franklin T Marmoset
Jan 11th, 2007
05:02:00 AM
Who else would risk money on films like Seven, Boogie Nights, Glengarry Glen Ross or A History Of Violence while also releasing many, many shitty horror films?. I have even enjoyed some of those shitty horror films.

Thanks, Bob Shaye, you apparently greedy bastard.

What gets me...
by Franklin T Marmoset
Jan 11th, 2007
05:03:31 AM
...is that bit in One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest when Chief Bromden makes his escape. Very moving.
What gets me...
by Franklin T Marmoset
Jan 11th, 2007
05:04:53 AM
...is people who misuse the expression 'it's the exception that proves the rule'. Think before you speak, people.
What gets me...
by Franklin T Marmoset
Jan 11th, 2007
05:09:49 AM
...is when a film is turned into a musical and the musical version of the film is turned into a musical film version of the musical version of the original film. Popular culture is eating its own poop.
You cant FUCK with peter jackson
by knifeandfork
Jan 11th, 2007
05:13:50 AM
Im pretty sure he can handle himself in a fight. Him and shaye should just settle this dispute in a no holds barred cage fight. The hulkster can be the ringman."i want a good clean fight brother ! "
Stefen Fangmeier should direct The Bobbit
by Finklestone
Jan 11th, 2007
05:19:57 AM
Stefen Fangmeier deserves a second chance after Eragon to redeem himself as a director. His experience with special effects he would make an ideal candidate to take charge of The Bobbit.
How many times will this Coming to America "theory" be
by JackPumpkinhead
Jan 11th, 2007
05:38:53 AM
posted? Anyway, it's such great news to see Hackson kicked out of The Hobbit. At least now I know that Thorin won't be a slapstick joke, Bard won't be a sleazy thug, and the company won't be expanded with a 'tough female warrior'... oh, and that the film won't be 72 hours long and scored by a Canadian who can't write a single note of memorable music.
franklin marmoset with a T
by BendersShinyAss
Jan 11th, 2007
05:49:08 AM
watch the extra's on the abyse and see the shit storm that set was. i always laugh when people say here "Mr Cameron, bring back Ed Harris - his performance in Abyss was his best."

Ed harris was ready to kill James Cameron in his sleep!

Ronnie Corbett for Bilbo
by Finklestone
Jan 11th, 2007
06:31:53 AM
Ronnie Corbett should play Bilbo in Stefen Fangmeier's The Bobbit. You know it makes sense people! http://tinyurl.com/y5s7cv
Peter Jackson
by Seph_J
Jan 11th, 2007
06:32:02 AM
I love you. You are a God. Bob Shaye is starting something he cannot finish. Jackson, you have everyone behind you.
in this last round of back and forth
by just pillow talk
Jan 11th, 2007
06:34:07 AM
it's clear Jackson has presented himself in the better light. (he also doesn't block as much light as he used to...) I would prefer to have him as director, if only so that WETA and the actors would not be lost. While I understand everyone's problems with the movies, they really were remarkable. I'm not sure if I've left a theatre in a more amazed state of mind than after Fellowship. Except for Godzilla, where Hank Azaria was fuck'n hysterical!
BendersShinyAss
by kwisatzhaderach
Jan 11th, 2007
06:57:25 AM
Tru, but Harris also said he would not have missed the experience and that his feelings would soften over time, which presumably they have. So Jimbo get Harris in as a general in AVATAR!
Amazing how this thread
by kwisatzhaderach
Jan 11th, 2007
07:00:39 AM
has turned into a Cameron one too. Where's Part 2 of the interview Harry?
Legolas Star Wars: The Original Trilogy
by teh ran
Jan 11th, 2007
07:23:40 AM
You know you want it...PJ make it so! BTW I am bored with PJ's oh so nice personna, I'm sure he didn't accidentally stumble onto his cut of the trilogy takings, it sounds like he's using the audit as a smoke screen for the fact that Kong was crap and the studio don't really want him to make the Hobbit, he thought what can I do to get back at them...I know an audit of the books...much back-stabbing ensues
Fuck you Robert Shaye and New Line
by MasterKenobi
Jan 11th, 2007
07:26:16 AM
I´ve been critical in mention of Peter Jackson in the past about Kong and Halo, but that had more to do with creative choices on Kong and the too high budgets for Kong and Halo. But this is just fucking insane from New Line to attack a director like this, who brought them more money than all other directors in all their history as a studio. Shaye says he gave the director a quarter billion, fine, but then he goes on and reveals how much more Jackson should get, 50 to 100 million if Jackson . Of course he should sue those fuckers. He calls Jackson arrogant, and says he Shaye has been in this business for so many years: Well it´s time for you to retire, you old dumb fuck. You are the arrogant one. Jackson brought you on the map with the trilogy and you haven´t paid him enough. Someone said Jackson should forget about this business, go ahead and make the Hobbit and earn more money than from suing New Line. I´m sorry but it´s always better to get what should have been yours in the first place before you go ahead and work with a company again which tried to screw you.
A Hobbit movie could only work if...
by Doctor_Sin
Jan 11th, 2007
07:48:10 AM
They renamed Smaug "Robert Shaye" and had him say, "Fuck you, Jackson" as he counted his gold.
Brett Ratner's THE HOBBIT
by biggles2_22
Jan 11th, 2007
08:01:35 AM
The of the limited possibilities.
sorry
by biggles2_22
Jan 11th, 2007
08:02:32 AM
Think of the limited possibilities. bad morning...sheesh!
WELL DONE NEW LINE !!!!!!!!!!
by whatever57
Jan 11th, 2007
08:08:45 AM
Bob Shaye is TOTALLY correct on this. Jackson signed a LEGAL CONTRACT with New Line and should NOT have signed if WETA didn't *originally* agree to the terms. Do you see Alfonso Cuarón, Mike Newell or Chris Columbus doing the same trick since they directed ROWLING'S work ?
whatever57
by DocPazuzu
Jan 11th, 2007
08:20:11 AM
Hmmm, don't recall ever seeing you in TB before.
Quint... RE: GIBSON...
by -guyinthebackrow
Jan 11th, 2007
08:30:51 AM
I'm suprised that (when you were writing about Mel and "The Passion" and how much money he had) you did also write about how much money Mel was owed but (much like Peter Jackson) actually got. PJ apparently got screwed by the studio. Mel got screwed by the theatre owners. You see when you're a big Hollywood distribution house the theatre owners will always give you back the money that you deserve, however, when you use a small distribution house some theatre owners will 'cook' their books and say that they really didn't sell that many tickets. The theatre owners will do it to the smaller distribution companies because they aren't afraid of them. It's not like screwing over Warner Brothers. If you did that then WB just wouldn't let you show the next Batman movie or the next Harry Potter movie. So in summation... Mel Gibson took in the ass from the American and International theatre owners. They simply lied about how many tickets they sold and then only gave Gibson a fraction of what he should have been paid. Much like PJ.
Money & Scabs
by Bedlamite
Jan 11th, 2007
08:37:18 AM
P.J. made millions, and people are calling him a greedy bastard for wanting more. How many of you don't occassionaly take a 2nd look at your pay check and make sure it's right? If he made two billion dollars would it matter? If someone says your making X amount of money then you should be paid X amount of money. Not a version of X decided by the guy or gals dolling out the money. As if New Line didn't make alot of cash on the whole deal. Another director takes over the series and does Hobbit, which I don't believe we even need to see, wouldn't he feel like a scab? Maybe a well paid scab, or a scab that had better have a damn good contract and a lawyer, and the ability to suck it up and walk away when he doesn't get the X amount of cash he was promised. As for not covering this anymore on the this site. Hey thanks for picking and choosing the stories based on them being TECHNI-COLORED. Good or bad this is some interesting behind the scenes stuff. If this were a ROCKY BALBOA thing we'd probably be on a ticker running at the top with point by point highlights updated more than a presidential election. This isn't Paris Hilton being called some silly ass name, this is a pretty major even for alot of geeks out there, and I'd like to see it continued being covered at my preferred "news" site. SO COVER IT. Please and thank you.
PLANT!!! whateveer57 GOTTA EAT at Newline
by Col. Tigh-Fighter
Jan 11th, 2007
08:49:43 AM
Smells of fish
So Peter Jackson acting like a mature rational adult
by CrichtonAstronut
Jan 11th, 2007
09:02:35 AM
is really an evil manipulative ploy, huh? I guess he's just lucky that Robert Shayne has choosen to act like a spoiled lunatic child. Hey, maybe if Pete's so much better at putting a desent public front for himself and the people he's responsible for and since Shayne is clearly so bad at it, maybe the boardroom boys should make Peter Jackson CEO of New Line.
Jeremy Irons for Aragorn!!!
by Finklestone
Jan 11th, 2007
09:12:31 AM
Third times the charm.
"whateveer57"
by whatever57
Jan 11th, 2007
09:15:37 AM
I am not a plant and I don't work for New Line or any other studio at all, never have. Nonsense. This is an objective opinion of a situation. A Director trying to manipulate a Studio's accounting dept. after he signed a legally binding contract IS INSANE. That is suicide. It will be thrown out by the courts. PJ should have negotiated this BEFORE instead of trying to hold THE HOBBIT for ransom AND by using his Tolkien's fans to leverage control. It won't work. You don't see the Potter directors, or any other director doing that do you? Why not ? Isn't that out of control ? It is called not knowing when to stop, not negotiating correctly and manipulating other people's talent while mistaking it for your own.
Brett Ratner's Hobbit, starring Chris Tucker
by Doctor_Sin
Jan 11th, 2007
09:21:34 AM
"Gaaan-Daaalf! Puh-leeeeze! I'm all 'bout gettin' that gold, but daaaaamn - there's a dragon? D'you understand the words that are comin' out of my mouth???"
But Doc P., don't you see...
by Childe Roland
Jan 11th, 2007
09:22:28 AM
...it isn't a matter of "wrong" and "right?" It's a matter of business that has become a legal matter. How often are wrong and right (in our general sense of those terms and the value judgements we associate with them) even considered in such cases? In this instance, the only "right" anyone is concerned with is their right under the law. PJ had the right to ask to see the books. New Line had the right to refuse. PJ had the right to sue. Both still have the right to (and probably will) settle. The only places where people did anything "wrong" (and the use of this term is wholly in terms of decisions made against what I would've offered as advice) were when Pete took his case to the fans via the media and New Line publicly blacklisted him as a result (both of which, by the way, those parties had every "right" to do...I just think both moves were dumb as fuck-all and will only delay the movie and the settlement). I don't hate PJ. I love his Rings movies. But I think he completely misses