Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

First?
by iron pills
Jan 3rd, 2007
12:55:35 AM
Uhh, yeah?
Fond memories of "The Dark Crystal"...
by iron pills
Jan 3rd, 2007
12:58:22 AM
Curious to see how this pans out. Hardly anyone uses puppets these days.
Tartakovsky is the man.
by Darth_Chicken
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:00:09 AM
I have faith in this.
Genndy
by Frederika Bimmel
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:04:42 AM
can do no wrong. YOU ROCK!
oh lord
by BadMrWonka
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:05:38 AM
I wills ee this no matter if michael bay directs it from a paul haggis script! I lvoe the dark crystal more than snorting coke off salma hayek's breasts on a pile of money that is goin g to be donated to AIDS charities.
ok, I took that too far
by BadMrWonka
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:06:25 AM
I would never see anything that paul haggis wrote...
As I've said before...
by Leadley
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:13:12 AM
If you want to re-imagine a popular 80s film, might I suggest one that would actually have a chance of MAKING money instead of LOSING it? One that DEMANDS our attention as filmgoers. One that COULD NOT BE IGNORED if and when it was released? Five words, folks: TANGO & CASH IN SPACE. (T&CIS)
Creepy
by scrivener
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:13:15 AM
The predominance of black sort of has me creeped out.
Wow I Haven't Seen Fantasy Art
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:15:25 AM
Like this since the margins of my sixth-grade math class notebook on off days. Hey no offense or anything but I could make a better Gelfling out of a sack of felt and a few sequins....
I remember dragging my parents to "The Dark Crystal".
by kikuchiyoboy
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:19:50 AM
I think my mom dosed off. But man, did I thank them for taking me to see that. That world just blew me away. Watching it now I can see why they didn't get into it. The film is a little inconsistent, but damn that world is just simply amazing. It's brilliant. The magic they created still hasn't faded after all these years.

That "Dying Forest" looks epic! Tartakovsky seems to really be on the right track. Looking at these made me dust off "The World of the Dark Crystal" booklet.
cool
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:23:28 AM
think ive seen some of these before but cool deal none the less.
hmmm....
by streakerfreak1983
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:37:58 AM
I just don't know about this. But you know what, I am curious as too how well this might be done.
I hope this doesn't suck.
by SWR 77
Jan 3rd, 2007
02:14:34 AM
I'd hate to hear that Tartakovsky raped anyone's childhood....
POTDC T-shirts available at Henson.com
by Monkey_King
Jan 3rd, 2007
03:05:10 AM
Another shirt features concept art from POWER OF THE DARK CRYSTAL(a Gelfling in armor and more).
Looks Dark.
by Mace Tofu
Jan 3rd, 2007
03:48:08 AM
Moody.
Sketches look cool but will the final film?
by Reelheed
Jan 3rd, 2007
05:08:57 AM
It is the muppet lotrs after all. Although we have loved the original at the time it now looks disturbingly like the woeful Return to Oz flick.
CaptDanielRoe -These are xeroxes
by Ray Gamma
Jan 3rd, 2007
05:21:15 AM
you moaning nobber
Seriously, does anyone really care about this?
by Trazadone
Jan 3rd, 2007
06:15:28 AM
The original was a flop. Besides, I stopped caring about Muppets when I was 9-years old.
Weren't these shown
by SithMenace
Jan 3rd, 2007
06:35:01 AM
on this site months ago? I remember seeing most of them.
HIGH SCHOOL NERD DRAWINGS ON A PEE-CHEE GOTTA EAT
by Pound Sand
Jan 3rd, 2007
08:06:06 AM
Oh They're Xeroxes All Right....
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 3rd, 2007
08:16:37 AM
...But bad xeroxes don't crud up overall forms of character and anatomy, or lettering and design.
Faxed, Actually....
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 3rd, 2007
08:18:26 AM
But we'll see....
Yeah, Traz, people care about this.
by Childe Roland
Jan 3rd, 2007
08:24:01 AM
Some of us have pretty fond memories of the first film and are excited to see Henson involved in something other than a Muppet Wizard of Oz. That's actually why most of us came into the talkback. Except you, of course. You came in to tell us all far more than we ever cared to know about you and your childhood history with muppets. Thanks for sharing. And don't worry...your dirty uncle can't reach you with that Ms. Piggy hand puppet from the federal pen. It wasn't your fault.
"WAAaaaaSHHAAAAHHHHHhhhhhh!"
by future help
Jan 3rd, 2007
08:25:51 AM
-Samurai Jack.
Dark Crystal was quite successful...
by Teko
Jan 3rd, 2007
09:08:53 AM
Leadley, etc, the whole reason that Henson Co is revisiting Dark Crystal and doing things like Mirrormask is that the original movie, while it tanked in theatres (being released opposite of E.T. will do that), has made boatloads of money on home video now that it's a cult classic.
Cult Classics
by CaptDanielRoe
Jan 3rd, 2007
09:42:19 AM
Start with works that are fit to be worshipped and evangelized. You have to ask yourself whether someone coming out of the nerd cocoon in college would show it to his or her first serious girlfriend with every naive expectation that it would be a lifelong bonding experience. (Do not attempt the above with "Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me.") I don't see that quality in those sketches, my comments about junior high margin-scrawling notwithstanding.
DARK CRYSTAL didn't "tank" in theaters
by LaudnerGomez
Jan 3rd, 2007
09:48:52 AM
$40 mil dom, 27 mil intl on a 22 mil budget is no flop. Perhaps Universal and Henson were bummed it didn't break out, but the film made money. And home video/DVD? The film is a cash cow.
GELFLINGS = THE OLSEN TWINS
by tylerzero
Jan 3rd, 2007
10:12:05 AM
Anybody else notice the uncanny resemblance?
Reelheed
by scrivener
Jan 3rd, 2007
10:12:54 AM
I always though Return to Oz was great. Woeful maybe in box office bucks - but great nonetheless.
WAY TOO SILVER!
by Wasserman
Jan 3rd, 2007
10:13:40 AM
-nt-
CaptDanielRoe
by Deuce Hexx
Jan 3rd, 2007
11:21:57 AM
Are you saying Dark Crystal isn't a classic because it won't get nerds the gals? Cause it totally does. My girlfriend loved it. Although she is a special case. The first movie we ever watched together (which has now become "our" movie) was Forbidden Zone.
i'm with childe
by occula
Jan 3rd, 2007
11:30:24 AM
this film was very important to me as a kid, MUCH more important than 'the muppets.' one of the high points of recent years was finally getting to meet brian froud and telling him to his face his work on that film was the reason i became a production designer. ps - the gelflings look EXACTLY like the olsen twins. they should do mo-cap.
well, that shows me very little
by finky089
Jan 3rd, 2007
11:36:56 AM
I'd settle for a re-release of Darl Crystal rather than have a new production that merely capitalizes on the original production. Sequel or not, I'm just not sold on this new film.
Teko, DC wasn't released opposite of ET
by finky089
Jan 3rd, 2007
11:39:31 AM
At least not in the States because I remember seeing a trailer for DC when my parents took me to ET (and I remember it b/c the skeksi and the moaning of the Mystsics scared the crap out of me. Nevertheless, my hippie parents took me to see DC in the theater later on and I loved it. Thanks mom and dad!)
E.T. came out in June 82, CRYSTAL came out in December
by LaudnerGomez
Jan 3rd, 2007
12:05:44 PM
Simple homework, people
GenTar is gonna knock it outta the park
by S-Mart shopper
Jan 3rd, 2007
12:10:41 PM
keep an eye out for Samurai Jack in a cave drawing
I still try to hope
by Durendal
Jan 3rd, 2007
12:43:11 PM
I know this one wont be as good as the original, but I keep hoping that it will at least be decent. The concept art on those shirts makes me wonder if it will even be that. Gelflings in full armor? That's kind of a violation of the mythology. Gelflings were never fighters. And the hackneyed writing that brings back the Skeksis, Garthim, etc is still present, it seems. You'd think that if they wanted to put a lot of time and effort into a sequel, they'd at least make sure they stick to the story and rules that have already been established.
Is that Mary-Kate or Ashley Olsen?
by Little Beavis
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:25:52 PM
fookin anorexic gelflings...
Durendal
by Deuce Hexx
Jan 3rd, 2007
01:59:24 PM
RE: "the hackneyed writing that brings back the Skeksis, Garthim, etc is still present, it seems. You'd think that if they wanted to put a lot of time and effort into a sequel, they'd at least make sure they stick to the story and rules that have already been established." All the plot synopses I've seen have said that the Crystal gets split and a shard is removed, which is what caused the urSkeks to split into the Mystics and Skeksis in the first place. So I don't see how that is contrary to the "story and rules that have been established".
Durendal
by Deuce Hexx
Jan 3rd, 2007
02:01:19 PM
RE: "the hackneyed writing that brings back the Skeksis, Garthim, etc is still present, it seems. You'd think that if they wanted to put a lot of time and effort into a sequel, they'd at least make sure they stick to the story and rules that have already been established." All the plot synopses I've seen have said that the Crystal gets split and a shard is removed, which is what caused the urSkeks to split into the Mystics and Skeksis in the first place. So I don't see how that is contrary to the "story and rules that have been established".
Deuce Hexx
by Durendal
Jan 3rd, 2007
04:41:39 PM
For one, the UrSkeks were present, and in the end of The Dark Crystal, they leave. Second, Froud expanded on the universe (Henson approved and published), creating a backstory where the UrSkeks entered the crystal during the previous Great Conjunction in an effort to purge their capacity for evil. Unfortunately it split them into good and evil counterparts. The crystal was cracked by a Skeskis shortly after. The act of cracking the crystal did not split the UrSkeks.
My ass copied on a Xerox...
by Little Beavis
Jan 3rd, 2007
05:29:11 PM
...came out looking more clear than these fookin scans.
Art
by alienindisguise
Jan 3rd, 2007
05:36:09 PM
ok so i can't get a job as a concept or storyboard artist to save my life but these scribbles are what flies for art on a major film? That's nearly criminal!!!! www.tonytreloar.com
i'm assuming...
by occula
Jan 3rd, 2007
07:12:22 PM
that since you put your website up, tony, you're looking for feedback. as a professional storyboard and concept artist, i think your work looks nice, but you might want to have some boards that have camera or blocking on them to show you really know the medium. even if you just boarded a sequence from an existing film or commercial, that would be what companies like storyboards inc. or frameworks would want to see so you can get representation. i would also push your concept work to be more inclusive of active environments like key art. if you want to see the kind of work that is more typical, check out craig mullins' work at goodbrush.com. the sketches for this dark crystal movie aren't usual because they're going off the original froud work, plus i wouldn't call them concept...i'd call them ideation. good luck to you and don't give up on the storyboarding companies - they are hardasses, but they will get you lots of work!
Durendal
by Deuce Hexx
Jan 3rd, 2007
07:35:13 PM
I stand corrected. Touché. Also I double posted. I am a douche. Still... Froud is involved in this, so hopefully it will fit nicely into the Dark Crystal world.
froud
by jedimindflayer
Jan 3rd, 2007
08:23:39 PM
does anyone know for certain that these are froud sketches? they look froudian, but there is no mention of any involvment on frouds website, and i'm not certain just how involved he is in this... i'm hoping alot.
Appreciate it occula
by alienindisguise
Jan 3rd, 2007
08:25:21 PM
much thanks!!!
Boo-shay boo-shay boo-shay
by Osmosis Jones
Jan 3rd, 2007
10:45:57 PM
.
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.