Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

First!
by xWeaselx
Dec 25th, 2006
02:54:29 PM
I really hope they don't screw this up but it's Hollywood so they will
Nice Headlights
by Evil Chicken
Dec 25th, 2006
02:56:00 PM
My finger is still cramping from hitting the mouse to replay the trailer. Too cool - Merry Christmas BTW.
Damn.
by beerbaby
Dec 25th, 2006
02:58:35 PM
I think that looks great. Really clasic combined with movie cool. Yea the flames kinda look stupid, but the robot is cool. The only thing that wories me is that the other robot designs dont look like the cartoon characters, I have seen bumblebee and he does not look like bumblebee. Heres to hoping they try and at least make them look SOMTHING like the robots in the series.
Got my issue on Friday
by Teamwak
Dec 25th, 2006
03:01:50 PM
Been reading it in the bath. Due anotehr bath tomorrow. Will tell you what happens.
Flames on Optimus = Flames on Optimus
by scrivener
Dec 25th, 2006
03:05:46 PM
:(
Looks so-so and on Superherohype two days ago.
by McGsStepson
Dec 25th, 2006
03:05:57 PM
Merry Christmas!
the key will be michael bay
by reckni
Dec 25th, 2006
03:10:11 PM
I just hope the movie is entertaining, already decided to throw away all the expectations I carry from the comic to the toys to the TV show.
I'll say it again
by Cory849
Dec 25th, 2006
03:10:31 PM
I don't care what they look like. I care that the script isn't Transformer centric. Optimus should be the star not the kid that owns bumblebee. Oh well, there'll hopefully be more depth to Optimus in the inevitable sequel. Also: Megatron is Optimus's brother. How stupidly cheesily typical.
Does Optimus Have Seckel Syndrome?
by georges garvaren
Dec 25th, 2006
03:12:05 PM
Because his head looks abnormally small. Exactly what size is abnormal for a robot head though? And why no hat-wearing Transformers? No style at all, really, with those fellas. Anyway, see ya!
The whole robot looks too big!
by 433
Dec 25th, 2006
03:16:14 PM
Take a look at an original Optimus figure, then look at this picture. Check out the size of the headlights, the wheels, the doors...what, does the railer transform as well or something? Ugh.
I hope Michael Bay drowns in egg nog this xmas!
by wolvenom
Dec 25th, 2006
03:18:59 PM
That fucking piece of trash needs to rethink what he's doing to a potentially great franchise. FLAMES FUCKING BLOW!!! FLAMES ON OPTIMUS = NIPPLES ON BATMAN
Looks crappy
by Lucasblows
Dec 25th, 2006
03:20:54 PM
Just like the trailer.
Why is the hate
by emeraldboy
Dec 25th, 2006
03:23:21 PM
for Bay so personal? ie saying stuff like i hope he dies. I can understand criticising his movies. But to criticise him seems unfair. besides we are looking at this movie through the internet. This is a big screen movie.
its nice to see that people remember its just a movie..
by torpor_haze
Dec 25th, 2006
03:25:15 PM
or not.
The Trailer Looked Like Five Bucks
by georges garvaren
Dec 25th, 2006
03:27:34 PM
Not ten and certainly not a million. But a fiver and not a fiver I get from breaking a fifty (who am I kidding, a twenty). It's a fiver I found in my pants back pocket, moments before I gave them their bi-yearly washing.
torpor_haze
by georges garvaren
Dec 25th, 2006
03:32:11 PM
Really, it's not just a movie. It's time & money & effort & emotional involvement (good or bad). Those things add up and for some, more than others.
They better make sure Frank Welker is Megatron.
by Shan
Dec 25th, 2006
03:40:52 PM
It's bad enough we don't have Soundwave.
this is the 2nd time around...
by The Dum Guy
Dec 25th, 2006
03:41:19 PM
I don't know about this, the trailer looked like this will be an alright movie to see... At least if this completely sucks, I can always just watch the animated Transformers movie. I just want to know when that live action Jetson's movie is going to get made.
Damn you Michael Bay
by Elmore Rigby
Dec 25th, 2006
03:57:47 PM
Optimus on Empire = Demi Moore on Vaniy Fair
Nipples on Batman != Flames on Optimus
by scrivener
Dec 25th, 2006
04:00:59 PM
That's like comparing "Colorized Three Stooges" to "Greedo Shoots First."
My childhood returns
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
04:13:14 PM
Say whatever shit you want about that image, but it's iconic to me.
As a true hater of virtually everything so far...
by tile_mcgillus
Dec 25th, 2006
04:31:54 PM
I dig this. I really don't HATE Optimus' design and with he intense lighting and glowing eyes, its cool.
I find this Transformer TB Threads really creepy
by emeraldboy
Dec 25th, 2006
04:33:10 PM
I bought the toy, saw the cartton . I am 32 years old and After watching the trailer I dont seem to want to do what the rest of you want and that is to burn down bays house with him in it. Its almost as if bay has crossed a line or something by making this film. Its a summer movie. that is all and to attach some form of emotional involvement to the cartoon that is the part that creeps me out. Most people but away thier chilhood things.
Flames on Optimus = Melodramatic fanboys
by MetiphisLabs
Dec 25th, 2006
04:33:53 PM
Who gives a shit if he has flames, it's the most insignificant visual thing to bitch about I have ever heard.
I know someone who will not see the 20th anniversar
by emeraldboy
Dec 25th, 2006
04:37:05 PM
ed of ET and wont see it . I saw that movie and I couldnt understand the berg's decision to remove the guns. He said it had something to do with 9/11. But i dont buy that.
Damn nerds
by We
Dec 25th, 2006
04:43:27 PM
Wouldn't it look stupid if the live-action Optimus Prime looked the same as the cartoon one? Certainly it'd become something similar to "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" Or maybe not. Anyway, they said they tried the original Optimus design during pre-production and reportedly it looked stupid. I believe 'em.
Why this movie will blow:
by Barry Egan
Dec 25th, 2006
04:49:18 PM
Bay tried to make a real movie with The Island and it was a commercial underperfromer. I think this will make him go back to relying on his worst instincts as a filmmaker. The trailer looks great but every Bay film makes a nice trailer. His movies are undeniably pretty. Hell, Pearl Harbor had a great looking trailer. I think he should go back to making commercials since he clearly has not idea how to tell a story.
looks cool
by shakermakerman
Dec 25th, 2006
05:01:23 PM
i cant understand why ppl are moaning the design looks great and i grow up with transformers.
Why people hate Bay, my perspective....
by Doc_Strange
Dec 25th, 2006
05:04:51 PM
I think people hate Bay because of the fact that he took so many liberties with a franchise that wasn't broken. I believe we were promised a G1 movie when it was announced only to have them renege and then have Bay direct. Bay might be able to do good explosions and dumb entertainment, but having waited to see this on the big screen for 20 years I was expecting a hell of a lot more in terms of script, production design, characters, and yes, the director. With that said, I think many people feel the same, even moreso given the fact that people hate Bay with a passion, and that he has never made a movie that is worth watching over and over. Will this movie rock? I think to the lowest common denominator, yes. Me, I want something I've never seen before with a proven director who's worth his salt. Michael Bay doesn't even come close.
Spielberg turned hippie around Lost World.
by bioforge
Dec 25th, 2006
05:13:39 PM
But I found ET's stupid cgi face (floating eyes and so on) far more revolting then the missing guns. Still he could teach Lucas a lesson on how not to piss off fans while meddling with movies.
Wel-ker! Wel-ker! Wel-ker!
by Aragorn II
Dec 25th, 2006
05:21:06 PM
Just in case Bay's attention span is short. Do it, Mike. Seriously.
Damn you Michael Bay
by MCMLXXVI
Dec 25th, 2006
05:25:12 PM
Damn you Michael Bay
yes!! Quint thank you so much
by BadMrWonka
Dec 25th, 2006
05:47:04 PM
any of you that know my posts know my unholy obsession with nerd arguments. I can't get enough! when the dude above posted about how this wasn't a scoop due to superherohype.com getting it 2 days ago, I laughed WAY too hard. how can that even be a site? anyway, a huge pic of optimus and the ensuing "nerdscussion" is the best Xmas present I could ever have asked for!
Even among nerds...
by CTU Mole
Dec 25th, 2006
05:48:28 PM
people who are emotionally invested in the fucking Transformers need to get a life. The less similar the designs are and the more you hate it, the more the intended audience...children, will like it.
What is there to fuck up about the Transformers?
by rjcjr9
Dec 25th, 2006
05:50:50 PM
Please help me understand - What is there to fuck up about the Transformers in taking it to the big screen? It was badly written, was badly animated, and had terrible character designs. The big bad guy was a gun. That's as laughable as the robot building that Tom Hanks mocked in Big. "If we see these robots actually acting like the ones we know and love..." Is this a different Transformers than the one I remember? Because the Transformers I remember was populated by one-dimensional cartoon characters with as much individual characterization as the Smurfs.
IT SUCKS!!!
by Shermdawg
Dec 25th, 2006
05:57:03 PM
The photo that is. I don't know if its th photo f the mag, or the mag itself, but I think its a bit of a bad move using a pic of Optimus thats really not all that detailed. It looks a bit cartoonish, of course maybe thats what they wer shooting for, but I would have went all Car and Driver and made sure every inch of him shined. I love the design though. I just wish Starscream looked this good.

Seriously, that's the main thing thats irking about this film. Fucking Starscream. He should be a dick, not a "cock-monkey".
Transformers and J Brown
by Kawaii
Dec 25th, 2006
06:10:02 PM
Dont give a shit about James Brown. Dont know him.....never will. Transformers looks damn good. All those idiots who want the original designs. Hire aload of wrestlers wearing cardboad box costumes painted by some kids. You fuckers would be bitching if they used the origenal design, on screen it would look so shit. Although, i thing Bumblebee should still be a Beetle. Paint work on optimus? Dont care. Worse case senerio.....bay could of made him a skoda. lol
That doesn't suck as much as I thought it would
by INWOsuxRED
Dec 25th, 2006
06:23:41 PM
I dislike his chest, but the rest of him isn't bad, I guess. I agree with those that say this image looks a bit cartoony, and not in the good overall design, but in the lack of realistic detail. Part of that might be the lack of a realistic background to ground it in reality. As long as they don't kill this guy and make Hot Rod the leader, things might yet turn out mediocre. This slightly corrected Prime seems to indicate they are bending to the will of the fans. I wonder how much that pisses off Bay and/or Murphy to have their "vision" rejected before the film even comes out. Hopefully next up is a corrected Starscream and a corrected script.
It looks like.......
by Briannicus
Dec 25th, 2006
06:29:36 PM
Well now, it looks like Optimus Prime, It'll sound like Optimus Prime, I don't see why SO many people are bitching....I mean we "could" have this instead. http://www.3dblasphemy.com/OPT IMUS_HR.jpg
The Haters have officially lost their minds.
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 25th, 2006
06:38:03 PM
And I can't abide the attitude any longer. Prime looks great, I'm still optimistic, and I think this movie stands a good chance of surprising everyone.

Merry Fuckin' Christmas.

Just take the flames off his chest plates!
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 25th, 2006
06:38:17 PM
They could keep'em on his forearms or better yet change the color scheme of the flames so they're not so..what's the word...oh yeah GAY! Nailing Optimus, and to a lesser degree Megatron, is the key to making the movie work if at all watchable. Fuck the human perspective! Who out there thinks Shitty Lebarf, Fergies boy toy or Black Ty are going to make this movie a blockbuster? They aren't the ones selling tickets, nobody cares if they win or lose. Every single person interested in seeing this is going for one reason, the fucking TRANSFORMERS! Example: Ang Lee and The Hulk. Ang Lee is a great director, he creates characters and stories that become the FOCUS of the movie. BUT!!! Hulk failed or at least disappointed because no one was interested in a character driven piece because HULK SMASH, he doesn't emote. The Transfomers themselves are the focal point and thats how the movie should be treated. Optimus & friends vs. Megatron & cohorts creating a shit storm on earth, THEY are the main ingredient while the humans should be no more than a pinch of salt...and pepper, sorry Ty.
most of the assholes are opening presents
by troutpencil
Dec 25th, 2006
06:49:33 PM
I am just posting on christmas to document my patheticness :(
Even though...
by Lone Fox
Dec 25th, 2006
06:51:16 PM
they were at the tail-end of my childhood, and a blatant lame merchandising attempt whichever way you look at it, and a shit cartoon at that, AND it's now a film by Mr Bay... after seeing the trailer, I cannot frigging wait to see big alien robots smashing each others heads in. Nice cover.
i'm with nice gaius and emeraldboy
by So-Crates
Dec 25th, 2006
06:52:22 PM
These transformers threads are definitely getting super-duper creepy, and the haters have lost their minds. I save my personal hatred for those who might, say, kick my dog or punch me in the nose for no particular reason. Bay is a guy who does what he does and he does it well, hating him for making good popcorn flicks is absolutely absurd. Even if they were bad popcorn flicks it would still be absurd. So he got hired to turn a cherished childhood memory into a movie and he's not doing it the way you like it. Deal with it. No need to ratchet up the petty animus for man who you will never meet. Sheesh. Talkbacks in general have come a long way from what they used to be (though the Sly talkbacks gave me hope), but this Transformers shit is getting absurd. Oh yeah, whomever is bitching about being "promised" a true G1 flick and now you're not getting it, grow the fuck up. I don't think anyone promised you anything but a movie based on transformers, and certainly not personally, and life is about disappointment anyways, so let's tone down the rhetoric. WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO JUST WAITING FOR THE MOVIE TO COME OUT AND WATCHING IT BEFORE BITCHING ABOUT HOW BAD IT IS?
Roll out!
by blackwood
Dec 25th, 2006
06:58:01 PM
Verily GIANT and convincingly ROBOT.

I think they nailed enough of Optimus to be sufficiently Optimus - we'll see whether or not it excuses the other liberties, or exacerbates them.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, JESUS!
So-Crates speaks the truth. YAY
by Kawaii
Dec 25th, 2006
07:01:08 PM
Truth in the flesh. The origenal transformers only looked like that cos of the animation techniques at the time. Who wants blocky robots? That would be so shit.
Someone on another talkback....
by Doc_Strange
Dec 25th, 2006
07:05:42 PM
Mentioned something about leading a million-man-march against this movie. All I gotta say is can I be your second in command? Seriously.
HAHAHAHAHAHA BELLY LIGHTS!
by DOGSOUP
Dec 25th, 2006
07:10:39 PM
The trailer didn't say this would be a comedy!!
Hey Doc_Strange
by j-bot
Dec 25th, 2006
07:11:45 PM
I got news for you. The cartoon was dumb entertainment. Its soul purpouse was to sell the toys. I'm a huge fan of the original cartoon but it wasn't deep and there wasn't anything to the scripts or characters because it was made for little kids. ...So by your reasoning it sounds like Michael Bay is the perfect choice to direct this movie.
INTERNET = WONDERLAND
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
07:15:57 PM
It's all a crazy exaggerated realm, kids. My generation, 20+ yearolds still remembers when all this broadband and youtube shit didn't exist and we had to wait ten minutes or more for one friggin page to load. Oh we had it tough in the old days, fucking dialup... ;0 That's why I don't take all this Bay hate seriously. His movies are ok junkfood. Who the fuck doesn't like junkfood?
Flames on Optimus = Bay smearing his faeces on the wall
by photoboy
Dec 25th, 2006
07:16:51 PM
Seriously, did they think adding the front of the truck would help? He still doesn't look like Prime and this doesn't help those fucking awful designs for any of the other Autobots. I hope this film flops so badly Bay has to go back to directing music videos and torture porn.
C'mon, Doc
by blackwood
Dec 25th, 2006
07:19:23 PM
What better publicity could a filmmaker ask for? You've just pushed the weekend numbers through to Pirates waters

Too many people are bound and determined to hate on this film because of some REALLY SILLY fealty to the source material. I love Transformers - I always have. And I fondly remember when Eric Idle's garbagebot led the autobots in a rousing chorus of "Dare to be Stupid." Transformers are cool because of the premise. I can tolerate the characters I know and love staying as cartoons, and this film being an exploration of a really fucking cool idea.
I'm looking at you, Harry
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
07:24:20 PM
:O
That looks fucking cool...
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 25th, 2006
07:26:29 PM
Sorry. But while i was sorta feeling kinda sorry for the nerds who wanted boxy toy models, after seeing that i don't fucking care anymore. There's a reason those people at ILM get paid a shitload of money and that there photo is justification; anyone who thinks that looks shit is, quite frankly, a fucking sad bitter individual. Roll on July.
Yeah, seems kind of odd...
by TheRevengeOfBayouWilly
Dec 25th, 2006
07:33:43 PM
I can't understand how people can get so worked up over this. I mean, isn't it all based on a children's toy? What is the artistic merit of a hunk of plastic built by an eight-year-old Cambodian kid?
All these people dismissing the complaints
by photoboy
Dec 25th, 2006
07:39:45 PM
It seems like the film-makers have hired some people to spread some positive buzz around here by talking rubbish about people getting worked up. Get lost guys, we know you're plants and that Bay's designs look shit.
Flames on Optimus= no eyes on the Surfer...
by iron pills
Dec 25th, 2006
07:40:17 PM
O.k., so it's not the exact, headlight for headlight, tire for tire design from the cartoons but it's not looking that bad to me. I'll hold off final judgement till I'm walking out of the theatre that 4th of July weekend. I don't get it. People condemning the film before anyone has even seen it. Production, design, script, etc... This film could be fun. Bay could have only learned from his past films, what worked and didn't work, and we may get a pretty good film out of it. By the way, I think the Silver Surfer design looks pretty good also. Can't wait to see him in motion. And oh yeah, Merry F'n Christmas...
Reading the threads at the Transformers sites..
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 25th, 2006
07:40:19 PM
I think theres a fucking shitload of haters who are changing their tune radically; they admit it. Looks like they'll be giving Michael Bay their money this year after all.
I am no plant
by blackwood
Dec 25th, 2006
07:42:03 PM
I'm just not a douche.
No photoboy
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 25th, 2006
07:42:49 PM
I guess the regulars at tfworld and seibertron are all on Don Murphy's paylist too eh? Get a clue you simple cunt. Why dont you and Phategod go fucking lurk in a shithole somewhere since you're only posting here on Transformers talkbacks. I think YOU my friend are the fucking conspiracy here; a conspiracy of nerds hijacking this site to push your theory that EVERYONE at AICN hates the new Transformers flick. Please. Fuck off.
Nope, not a plant.
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
07:44:30 PM
Just someone with a level-head. It looks badass to me... lifetime transformer fan. Take from that what you will.
Do you guys even understand....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 25th, 2006
07:44:50 PM
Do you guys even understand what FLAMES ON PRIME=NIPPLES ON BATMAN even means? It means Bay has Schumachered Transformers, it means Broderick's Godzilla, X3, AvP, any Hollywood remake, LXG, Superman Returns, and of course Batman & Robin.

How can you people not be sick and tired of Hollywood telling you something you love is shit and going ahead and remaking it in their image? How can you defend Bay when he has admitted knowing nothing about Transformers and has made a film about a boy and his first car? This movie is not about the fucking Transformers it's named after, and that comes directly from the mouth of the goddam director.

Our passionate hatred of this film isn't just about the Transformers, it's also about how most of Hollywood thinks we the genre fans don't fucking matter at all. Thank god there's people like Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson out there who actually give 2 fucks about their source material.

You guys remember Raimi and Jackson right? Spidey and LOTR have made near $1 billion each, or how about the Harry Potter films also true to their source and also raking in near $1 billion each?

Transformers could have been a billion dollar movie, instead it will do Fantastic Four business, profitable but disappointing.

Because we haven't seen the movie yet
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
07:48:44 PM
It's very simple.
Hairy,..
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 25th, 2006
07:49:12 PM
How can you possibly say that TF will do Fantastic Four money when it's clear that the people at the Transformers fan sites, who were ALL fucking raggin on this movie, are changing their tune and saying they are psyched for July.

For the record, as much as this pains you, hollywood is telling NO ONE, what to like and dislike. Everyone who has posted a positive post about that image has drawn that conclusion for yourself. Face it. You are the minority here.

As for Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson, as much as i love Transformers the franchise does not compare to Lord of the Rings. No where fucking near.
"Show me..."Robocop 2"! *DING* *FLIP*
by uss cygnus
Dec 25th, 2006
07:50:32 PM
All he's missing is the Minigun on the arm. Is Nancy Allen far behind?
Merry Christmas. and im thankful that James Browns
by future help
Dec 25th, 2006
07:59:03 PM
talkback has more post that this cartoon robot. RIP Godfatha'!!!!
Yeah well, at least Optimus didn't beat his wife.
by Shermdawg
Dec 25th, 2006
08:01:27 PM
Or did he? *scratches chin*
Bay movies aspire to be popcorn flicks
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 25th, 2006
08:03:04 PM
He makes flashy slideshows for smucks that have the attention span of a methed out pug. Let Speilberg take absolute control, his quasi endeavors are better than Bay's "howdidwebecomeblockbusters"!
Genre fans don't fucking matter at all.
by rjcjr9
Dec 25th, 2006
08:04:27 PM
Rob Campbell
Do you want the Cartoon....
by Evil_Imp
Dec 25th, 2006
08:05:57 PM
Or do you want a Movie? ( addressed to the Whiners ) Take off the Nostalgia Goggles for crying out loud and wait till you see the movie before you pronounce it a Failure. The cartoon was just a stupid kids show! and was not that good in retrospect. Flames ? Who gives a Shit? i guess Nerdy Cartoon fans who still have yet to move out of mom's basement and have nothing better to do, do.
Do kids today not use their imagination?
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
08:06:51 PM
That thing in your brain that makes you almost truly believe magic is real... Just a random question. I was pissed at the flame stuff, but I can imagine there's some reason for it or maybe it's just bay's thing, what the fuck ever. I can imagine it not even being a problem when I'm there sucking down popcorn enjoying all the shit getting blown up. Maybe that's just me.
Ah another new registrant signing up..
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 25th, 2006
08:07:44 PM
Seriously..don't you have anything better to do than fucking sign up for multiple accounts to call this movie worse than shit. It's blatantly obvious what you are doing. Go crawl back in your hole.
Actually..here's a question for YackBacker..
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 25th, 2006
08:10:05 PM
The regular here. In the script you read was there a mention of Teletran 1? I only ask 'cos, on tfworld, the official Paramount promo art mentions that by name. I thought all the 'details' were lost.
Genre fans don't matter?
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 25th, 2006
08:11:46 PM
Wonder why horror flicks and comic book movies are the order of the day then. I guess Star Wars was originally an across the demographic board kinda movie along with LOTR and HarryP
nutsack
by So-Crates
Dec 25th, 2006
08:13:02 PM
"Our passionate hatred of this film isn't just about the Transformers, it's also about how most of Hollywood thinks we the genre fans don't fucking matter at all." Passionate hatred of the film is one phrase for it. Irrational rage is one I would choose. You think Hollywood thinks genre fans don't fucking matter at all? I got news for you bro, they don't care about anybody but Andrew Jackson and his currency cohorts. You think that your passion for a particular work of fiction is some sort of unique quality (which it's not, by the way) that must be defended with insane ranting. I would argue that radical interpretations (attempts to make money) of beloved fiction has been going on for much longer with works of fiction more venerated than a comic book (not dissing comics, just saying there have been much more influential and important works of art in human history that have been fucked up by movies). The Wizard of Oz, which I'm not saying is a better book than the Transformers is a transforming-robots cartoon, is nothing like the movie. Shit, even real people have their stories fucked by Hollywood. But, they don't react with what you term as passionate hatred (which is an idiotic term because hatred is pretty much passionate in and of itself) and rant and cuss about how bad a *person* is for their interpretation instead of just being content to dislike the interpretation with some valid points (as opposed to 2-year old like wailing). Our point is that a desire to dislike everything without actually seeing it is quickly becoming a prerequisite to post on any internet message board, and for some creepy reason, it seems to have reached a new frenzied height with the Transformers TBs. I'm 29 and loved Transformers as much as any of you motherfuckers, but I don't define it as one of the DEFINING moments of my life. If someone made a movie of my life right now (a horrible decision considering it's relative lack of, you know, entertainment) and completely fucked it up beyond recognition I wouldn't hate the director or the idea of the movie as much as some of you hate Bay and this movie. It just doesn't make sense to me. Finally, and I believe I'm stealing this line from Sorkin, I gotta laugh every time people think that Hollywood acts as one united body and make the same decisions, as if it were some sort of actual entity. I have a number of friends working in Hollywood (the city, not the entity) in most of the non-creative (i.e. acting) aspects, and their input and everything I read leads me to believe if you were to poll the prominent residents of Hollywood in an effort to get a consensus about anything, you'd have a harder time getting that consensus with a question like "like at the hollywood sign and tell me how to spell hollywood" than you would with something like "which small group of fans of which piece of beloved fiction should we fuck over today."
off topic but
by So-Crates
Dec 25th, 2006
08:16:51 PM
How does a mothafucka get a line break in one of these posts?
Prime has a tiny head
by alienindisguise
Dec 25th, 2006
08:18:08 PM
really...it looks like he was hit by the witch doctor in Beetlejuice!!!
Genre fans don't matter?
by rjcjr9
Dec 25th, 2006
08:22:34 PM
"Wonder why horror flicks and comic book movies are the order of the day then." Those are genre films, a generally derogatory shorthand. Everyone going to see genre films are not genre fans. Mostly, they are just people going to see movies. "I guess Star Wars was originally an across the demographic board kinda movie" Yeah, I Googled the original release and it was a pretty immediate, unexpected success. Also, I'm not certain how it works, but I believe Star Wars fandom didn't exist until after Star Wars was released. "along with LOTR and HarryP" You mean the adaptations of (1) one of the twentieth century's most successful novels, originally published in 1954 and (2) a hugely popular children's book series?
We might need to form a "I actually think it's not bad"
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
08:23:22 PM
Support group fellas
The reason I hate on this film......
by Doc_Strange
Dec 25th, 2006
08:24:57 PM
Is not because I necessarily hate Bay, but because I think something this big should have been handled a lot better. What you guys can't seem to grasp is that the script really, REALLY sucks. I also don't respect Bay as a filmmaker due to the fact that he has not made a great movie. Sure he does dumb entertainment, but like I said, it all appeals to the lowest common denominator. If I'm paying ten bucks to see a movie, maybe I want something more, something Michael Bay can't provide: A movie that stands the test of time that you can come back to in another twenty years and say that was a damn good movie. The possibilities with Transformers are, like star wars and LOTR, unlimited. But they took the simpleton route and essentially settled on a sophomoric script and a mediocre director who has no vision. The designs are awful. I guarantee no one will like what they see when Megatron and Starscream appear on screen. But to those trying to punk me it's OK because the movie's just big, dumb fun. Sorry, I'd rather see fairly smart, story/character driven entertainment. Sure blocky robots wouldn't look cool onscreen but there's a medium to where you do the characters justice or you straight out disrespect them. I think they chose the latter.
Wow.
by JediWuddayaknow
Dec 25th, 2006
08:31:41 PM
Good lord. I can't believe grown men are complaining about the TRANSFORMERS movie. Seriously. And the funniest thing is people going "Optimus looks cartoony!" Newsflash, folks...Optimus WAS a cartoon. And if you've hinged the past twenty years on waiting for a live action TRANSFORMERS movie, then sorry, my friend. you've wasted the last twenty years of your life. And I like the asshole who is so in denial that he's taking these completely logical arguments and calling people "plants". Grow up, fella's. It's Transformers. I loved them as a kid too. But I'm not going to wish death on a guy because he's not making an exact replica of the cartoon. Which you would probably bitch about being too cartoony anyway. And no. I'm not a plant. I'm an adult.
I'm a veteran of the star wars prequel wars
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
08:32:23 PM
So I know what you're saying and respect that opinion, but don't talk like we're just idiots who are sucking bay's dick because of a trailer. That image looks good. I said it looks good. Now I'm through. If bay fucks up, I'll let him know it. For now I think we all shouldn't accuse each other of being shit we aren't and just judge the film when it finally arrives.
Oh bullshit So-Crates....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 25th, 2006
08:34:58 PM
There's nothing irrational about my hatred of this thing, I have very specific reasons, all of which are valid. It started with the shit robot designs and continued on through the even shittier script along with all the shit much of Hollywood keeps trying to feed us. I could sit here and explain point by point why I think this movie is crap, but instead I'll just say that I have seen absolutely nothing about it so far that makes me believe it will be anything more than another crappy summer flick. So for you mouth breathers who only care about MORE SPLOSIONS I say enjoy this stinkfest. Those of us who actually expect something more intelligent from our entertainment beyond titties and fireballs will be skipping it.

Eyeball, there was no mention of the Ark or Teletran 1 in the February script.

Again
by blackwood
Dec 25th, 2006
08:37:23 PM
"For now I think we all shouldn't accuse each other of being shit we aren't and just judge the film when it finally arrives."

It bears repeating.

(And So-Crates - br inside < > )
Just to clarify...
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 25th, 2006
08:39:12 PM
genre films are not made for their fanbase but rather for the easy to please "let's go to the theatre mob mentality public who just want to kill time by eating popcorn surrounded by strangers not really caring what's flashed on the screen even though we paid $20". *breath* I'm just trying to understand the statement that was made, that's all...
It actually looks ok
by Darth Thoth
Dec 25th, 2006
08:40:14 PM
I'm a long time Transformers fan and I'll be honest, I enjoyed the trailer and I think this pic is cool. It at least captures the general essence of Prime. We'll have to wait and see what else they have in store for us.
looks good to me...
by mr. brownstone
Dec 25th, 2006
08:40:42 PM
seriously.
Just like the PT haters
by Evil_Imp
Dec 25th, 2006
08:41:53 PM
Haters of this Film Hate it because it does not match THEIR vision. ( Though none have seen it yet ) It's really quite laughable.
"Those of us who actually
by rjcjr9
Dec 25th, 2006
08:43:27 PM
"Those of us who actually expect something more intelligent from our entertainment beyond titties and fireballs will be skipping it."
And seeing John Sayles' Honeydripper instead?
Brilliance in Motion
by Grayle
Dec 25th, 2006
08:45:46 PM
i'm still wondering why all these genius film makers on this forum can only piss and moan about every little detail and have yet to make this perfect movie that'll make billions, that they always claim to know just how to do.........
"I'm just trying to understand the statement"
by rjcjr9
Dec 25th, 2006
08:47:41 PM
I was just repeating one of Hairy Nutsack's comments verbatim, albeit out of context, to irk him. It is true, though.
ugh... well pt haters have actually seen the film
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
08:50:26 PM
pt haters have actually seen the films. thats all I'm saying. *walks away* from inevitable star wars rants.
Titties and Fireballs
by rjcjr9
Dec 25th, 2006
08:50:32 PM
"Those of us who actually expect something more intelligent from our entertainment beyond titties and fireballs will be skipping it."

And seeing John Sayles' Honeydripper instead?

(Sorry, I just had to repost under that subject.)
craposity
by kahootz
Dec 25th, 2006
08:51:07 PM
Anyone blathering about character design, listen up. The original character design has at least one thing that this abominatin doesn't. That is...weight. Solidity. These Michael Bay visions of transformers don't convey any real sense of dimension. They are all flat and thin parts that fit together like a shell. The original designs are solid shapes and areas that convey mass. Holy shit, I need a life.
HEY HARRY & AICN CREW!
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 25th, 2006
08:56:40 PM
Just wondering if the whole idea of the talkback is for people to support, without question, opinion or debate, movies in all phases of their creation? Cause if it is then I'll stop posting here and become a cock smoking Murphy stooge. But, if Tb'ers are in fact encouraged to express themselves through this forum, then fuck all you assclowns who have a problem with people getting geeked out(good or bad) about shit!
Then S mart shopper....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 25th, 2006
08:56:43 PM
...please explain how it's possible Spidey, LOTR, and Potter can all be so faithful to their source, perfect no, but faithful for sure. I mean what's the point, Hollywood is just going for the theatre mob mentality right?

Somehow those filmmakers managed to make films that please both the original and new fans, people who have never read the books or comicbooks enjoyed those films. Billions of dollars later we're going to get another faithful Spidey flick, more faithful Potter films, and maybe even a faithful Hobbit film if we're lucky.

So I ask you all, are you honestly glad this movie was made in the image of Bay and not in the image of the original? This movie will probably be "alright" in the same way that the Prequels were "alright", and just like the Prequels people will forever wonder what the movie could have been like in other hands.

This may actually be WORSE THAN NIPPLES ON BATMAN
by robogeek.com
Dec 25th, 2006
08:57:19 PM
And we haven't even seen a full-blown daylight shot yet. Eek. Paramount/Dreamworks: LOSE THE FUCKING FLAMES. They're absolutely retarded, gain you _nothing_, and are costing you dearly. (And since Prime's a CG character, it should cost relatively little to fix at this point.)
"So I ask you all, are you
by rjcjr9
Dec 25th, 2006
08:59:21 PM
"So I ask you all, are you honestly glad this movie was made in the image of Bay and not in the image of the original? This movie will probably be "alright" in the same way that the Prequels were "alright", and just like the Prequels people will forever wonder what the movie could have been like in other hands."

By other hands, I guess you must mean, um, not the creator's hands?
Awesome
by Don_Knotts
Dec 25th, 2006
09:02:46 PM
Looks great. It wont replace the animation for me, but this live action movie will likely be great. And lets hope it causes a legit reguvination of the animated series.
S mart shopper
by Evil_Imp
Dec 25th, 2006
09:05:00 PM
Everyone IS entitled to their opinion. and i'm entitled to LMFAO! at people who's biggest gripe is Flames on a Talking walking Truck. lol Fanbots are Fanbots, and that's allowed, just as Calling a spade a spade is.
I want a more faithful adaptation...
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 25th, 2006
09:11:21 PM
not a Bay explosiveFuckfest. I thought I expressed that earlier. I'm not saying remake TF down to the stilted writing of the cartoon but, for godsakes, give a healthy nod to the G1 fans by TRYING to incorporate all the cool shit some remember. I hate this having to refresh shit, my comments are out of place and obviously misunderstood but whatthefuckever...
rjcjr9....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 25th, 2006
09:19:15 PM
In other's hands, I mean in the same way Empire is superior to all of the other Star Wars movies...combined.

Sorry, S mart, I obviously misunderstood your take on all of this then.

I don't take the flames issue personally
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 25th, 2006
09:19:53 PM
I just offered suggestions. The only reason I don't hate on those who bust their nuts on the issue is because it's nice to know that there are people who care about source material. It means that there is the slightest of hope that adaptations in the future will stay true Because of the fans.
whine whine whine whine whine
by Datascream
Dec 25th, 2006
09:22:37 PM
whine? Here's some cheese, to go with it.
but.....
by Evil_Imp
Dec 25th, 2006
09:27:44 PM
....It's just that. SOURCE MATERIAL. I personally don't think a Film maker is obligated as far as adapting a cheesy 80's cartoon goes to be faithful whatsoever. It's a reinvention. anyways , carry on
Nothing to do with TF
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 25th, 2006
09:28:30 PM
But one of my Christmas presents was the fact that MSN had Ultraviolet as 06's top ten worst movies. Maybe there is a god afterall...this movie is another example on how people can get played by a trailer.
The flames are amazing!
by Orionsangels
Dec 25th, 2006
09:35:28 PM
i just pulled my pants down
I'd love some whine and cheese
by Pipple
Dec 25th, 2006
10:06:03 PM
*walks back* I gotta say, I never truly believed in hell until I started wasting my life on the internet. *walks away*
big difference
by So-Crates
Dec 25th, 2006
10:11:48 PM
about caring about source material and going overboard in the complaints. My problem is not the dislike with what people have seen so far but how overboard it's gone for this particular movie. Other talkbacks have had some problems with aspects of movies before they're made, which is obviously fine, but the manner in which it's being conducted on all the transformers TB is getting a little out of hand in the eyes of some.
Would I rather this movie be closer to the cartoon I loved as a kid? Sure. But I don't know to what extent, because not everything translates well to film. I'd probably have more of a problem with them physically showing a gigantic robot transforming and shrinking to the size of a big handgun than with them doing something a little different with the character that is more physically consistent. But I'm accepting the concept of a robot from another planet transforming at all, so whatever.
And let's face it, the cartoon was pretty popcorny. Lot's of cool battles and shit. It's not like you were sitting at home with your dinobots and having them read Sartre or anything. The eps were mostly about energon cubes as I recall. Speaking of which, I wonder if there are energon cubes in the movie. If there aren't any, I'm just not sure I'll be able to bring myself to go to the movie.
For the record the scorpion decepticon does look awfully stupid. I would have liked if they had remained, for the most part, jets. That does disappoint me.
All this complaining about the flames
by Yautja
Dec 25th, 2006
11:05:37 PM
and Optimus Prime's head being too small is just like the people who thought Superman Returns sucks because Superman's "S" is too small and Brandon Routh was too skinny. This is the most ridiculous reason to hate a movie. Optimus's head is no smaller proportionately in this design than in the original design. I don't care for decals on cars under any circumstance and I still think they look fine here. They don't make it great but they don't ruin it either and at least they add a bit of aesthetic flare rather than having simple solid blue and red colors. Optimus's proportions don't look any different from previous incarnations, Of which there have been many and far worse than this (wasn't he a fire truck once?). Ask yourselves honestly, if there weren't going to be a movie and this design had turned up as one of the toys would you have hated it then? My point is: the design looks just as good as any of the many incarnations of the toys, flames don't really matter, his head isn't too small, and Brandon Routh looks almost identical to Christopher Reeve so how can he be too small to be Superman when the same people who say so hold Reeve in such high regard? Will this be a good movie? likely. Will it be a great movie? Hopefully. Will it be a heartfelt work of film that moves you and warms your heart? Probably not, but it's Transformers so no reasonable person should expect it to be.
to all the complainers...
by omnislash 2.0
Dec 25th, 2006
11:14:18 PM
if you guys got issues with the TF movie...go find $0.50 and call somebody who cares...^_^
Yack
by blackwood
Dec 25th, 2006
11:24:10 PM
That's really disheartening.
Flames on Optimus = Arguments in the Talkbacks
by BadMrWonka
Dec 25th, 2006
11:25:03 PM
and I frickin' love it...flame on, nerds!
Dimension?
by wanna_bannana
Dec 25th, 2006
11:39:15 PM
I am a fan of the original cartoon, i grew up with the series, my first transformer was soundwave,followed by prime..i also get warm fuzzy feelings when i hear the theme song, but not for any other reason then the era, and the childhood memories that accompanied it. People want this movie to resemble G1 because they want to recapture their fond nostalgic memories and to get those same warm fuzzy feelings, but the truth is, we do not live in that era anymore, and this needs to be translated to todays younger tweens and kids, in a way that fits with todays society. This is not about G1 fans it is about money, and tweens today are not going to pay to see the old familar *to us* transformers movie, they want action, they want explosions,a young hot female star, cool cars and jets...they want bad ass. I am not sure if some cheesey 80's tune playing while prime blasts his way through decepticons, is going to turn their crank. It is NOT going to have the same feel as the original. I had a good laugh when someone mention that the new movie will not have the "dimension" of the old cartoon series, it was a cartoon, a fun one yes,good memories yes, and there might have been "some" depth and dynamic between the characters. But it was very cut and dry "good Vs evil" "friends to the end" "freedom for all races and beings" if dimension means having tons of cliche's and cheesey one liners, i am sure this movie will be close to the source material. " freedom is the right of all sentient beings" "autobots roll out" now thats deep! reeks of "dimension" if you ask me. It was a cartoon, a good and fun one yes, but realisticly you are holding on to the nostalgic feelings of childhood, not the quality of the original source material...lets remember ,it was created for children. The feeling it gave us as kids, will never be the same,regardless of how close the new film is to the original...because now that we are older we dont look at the world through doey star sparkled eyes filled with wonder and amazement. We are synical,jaded,tortured meat sacks, who need to learn to loosen up and not take cartoons so seriously. I plan on seeing the movie, if it sucks it sucks, if it is enjoyable its enjoyable ,if it kicks ass...great!! but it will be what it will be...we still have G1 DVD's to look forward to.
one more thing
by wanna_bannana
Dec 25th, 2006
11:55:28 PM
The tranformers threads here are somewhat mild then others i have seen. There was a guy in another site thread who clearly told other people on the board " i like transformers, i want see cool movie, i go to theatre and have fun, this is warning to anyone who talk during movie or make fun of...i will give you warning and if you dont listen, you will pay..there will be other people then just nerds there!" so feel good about yourselves, even if some posts here lack intelligence and just state "dam you micheal bay" or "this movie is going to suck" I dont click off the site, wishing i would have rather had a drunk chimp shave my ballsack with a rusty razor. and the schumacher comment balls...because i had allready stated in another thread that if the guy who created "nipples on batman" did this movie it would be about sexual shapeshifting robots and would instead be called "Trannies" now does that thought not get you hard?!
georges...
by torpor_haze
Dec 25th, 2006
11:57:23 PM
I understand where you're coming from...I'm a big fan of Transformers too. I used to watch it as a child. Where I come from there weren't many cartoons on tv and it was one of the highlights of the week for me. Maybe I shouldn't expressed my opinion that simplisticaly and for that I apologize. To expand on what I was thinking...Transformers is a brainchild of the 80's and we can all agree the world was much different then. We could only dream of live action version of it back then. But we live in different time now, and as with any franchise, the owners of it want to expand on its viewership and leaving it as it was wouldn't cut it. I know of Micheal Bay and his work, but to say it was only him who was deciding how they will look in the end is ridiculous. The fans may not care about what I just said but it is what it is. I will always remember the concept of Transformers and nothing I saw up to now say they're trying to sabotage it. I know I'll be there when it opens, and like any work I'm fan of I'm hoping it will be good. And some people who say that they read the script and think that it sucks, well I'm sorry and I hope they changed some stuff I around which they probably did. Come July 5th we'll all be here we'll discuss it...until then...calm down...breathe...and go to that happy place for next 7 months.
Quint if it doesn't resemble the cartoons....
by IndustryKiller!
Dec 26th, 2006
12:05:42 AM
Then whats the point of making it at all. It bothers me that its acceptable that it only bears a passing resemblence. Even if its a sort of fun ride (the best we can possibly hope for at this point) that means we just wasted our shot at a cool Transformers film for a "sort of fun ride". It's a waste of everyones time.
spoilers
by wanna_bannana
Dec 26th, 2006
12:08:32 AM
So yackbacker, if you have read the script...you know that bumblebee dies in the 4th act... at the hands of bonechrusher,while trying to rescue Sam? And that this was why spielberg was adamant that it was important for Bay to make the audience "like bumblebee" and "so they feel the relationship between Sam and bumblebee early on in the film"? it is after all about " a boy and his first car"
Yack, does Soundwave even have a cameo?
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 26th, 2006
12:14:57 AM
He's the Darth Maul of Transformers!
THESE PRETZLES ARE MAKING ME THIRSTY!
by INWOsuxRED
Dec 26th, 2006
12:27:18 AM
Is it okay if instead of taking one side or the other, I choose to hate everyone on this site equally?
yawwwn
by slkboxrman
Dec 26th, 2006
12:28:06 AM
ya know sometimes i feel like a broken record but it must be because of the total lack of intelligence of some of these "i hate michael bay" folk... i consider myself a fairly intelligent person and ive seen all of the movies that he has "directed" and they all were awesome...i give the screenwriters and production crew credit for giving michael bay a continuous string of great movies to "direct"...it must be hard being a "director" having to work a script that "someone else" wrote and concept images that "someone else" drew....and polish that into a great movie.... after all a "director" "directs" this paragraph may be a bit deep for the retarded anti-bay fans to comprehend, i fully realize that, but thats the fun in it ..hahah
my theory
by slkboxrman
Dec 26th, 2006
12:38:13 AM
and its been holding true since i first stated it..... to the few that claim they have read a script, which i think is BS, i keep asking over and over and over for those individuals to post a link to said script, and no one has ever responded EVER... so until someone links me a site where this "supposed" script is, i dont believe a single thing theyre saying...... a prime example (no pun intended) was days before the trailer came out there was an "insider" that said he saw the trailer and there were "no robots", gave a long winded paragraph about how it was nothing new and lots of u guys just took whoever it was at their word, not me.... the trailer was all new and had robots so the guy saying there werent was talking out of his wide anus.......so i wont name names but i dont believe any of it, and i doubt a script that is nearly a year old was not updated before the final shooting script which im sure no one outside of BAY had access to..... thats all i have to say about that
yes yackbacker
by slkboxrman
Dec 26th, 2006
12:42:21 AM
i thought pearl harbor was a visually stunning movie, considering the subject matter has been pounded into the ground as much as say .....titanic.......meaning we all knew that pearl harbor was going to be bombed, just like we all knew that the titanic was going to sink and dicrapio was gonna be a frozen corpse......but as for the visuals , pearl harbor was very awesome.......honestly never saw the island, but if u put the island and pearl aside did any of the other movies he "directed" suck ?
I guess my beef is really the title of the movie then
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 26th, 2006
12:43:27 AM
You don't name a movie after characters that only make an apperance in the film if that is in fact the case. That's like calling SNL the Finesse Mitchell Show.
and you don't post without spellchecking
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 26th, 2006
12:50:26 AM
unless of course you don't give a shit! appearance, bitches!
I just Googled my handle...no really
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 26th, 2006
12:53:27 AM
kinda weird actually
he looks pretty gay.
by Cotton McKnight
Dec 26th, 2006
01:02:53 AM
I'm just saying.
YackBacker is a Dumbtalker
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
01:06:14 AM
His importance in this world never existed. If you ignore his lies he will slice his throat and no one will attend his funeral. He talks shait continually. He lost the battle with the new kickass trailer- receiving cheers everywhere. It's over junior- you lost, like always.
well
by slkboxrman
Dec 26th, 2006
01:09:07 AM
if u have a problem with silly characters speaking silly dialogue and so on and so forth, blame the screenwriters not the guy that has to film it.....obvioulsly ur giving the screenwriters too much slack and blaming the "director" since some have posted definitions, here is what dictionary.com gives as the definition of DIRECTOR the person responsible for the interpretive aspects of a stage, film, or television production; the person who supervises the integration of all the elements, as acting, staging, and lighting, required to realize the writer's conception. notice "the writer's conception" part.... thanks ...and what u linked me still says "february 06"...still nearly a year ago
Speaking of definitions
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 26th, 2006
01:14:01 AM
In ancient Egypt, Shait was the first season of the year, beginning in what would have been the month of June. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
YackBacker is a DoucheTalker
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
01:17:19 AM
No, you are trying to prove that you are smarter and cleverer than your betters. You fight over EVERYTHING ever since that dodgeball game in third grade. And you are still a wankoid. You are not giving an opinion because your opinion is based on nothing tangible- you haven't seen the film. You have decided to mock and therefore want more mockery. You are a loser without form or substance.
PharteGoddPrime is the trolling antichrist of AICN
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 26th, 2006
01:25:23 AM
Have you got new material this time around?
its over priiiime!
by roxyprime
Dec 26th, 2006
01:34:56 AM
frank welker is megatron.....am gonna watch my special ed of the proper movie now. again. for the umpteenth time. to remind me of what i will be missing. but trailer still hyped me up. i like robots...really i do!
YackBacker is a sidewalk chalker
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 26th, 2006
01:49:11 AM
thought I'd give it a try...
YackBacker is a Mall Walker
by DOGSOUP
Dec 26th, 2006
03:34:56 AM
An hour around the second floor starting at Sears and ending at the remodeled Spencer's Gifts and then lunch at 1 Potato 2, awwwwww yeah....
childish cocksuckers....
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
03:39:00 AM
well its been refreshing to hear some people wishing bay and the movie good luck. All you other pricks why dont you go and do something constructive with your life rather than dismising someones work? and dont give me that ' i work in the industry' shit. Fuck off with your tea boy at some 2 bit studios dry. IT WAS A FUCKING CARTOON its never going to be 'War and Peace' FUCK ME. Just get out of your parents house and grow the fuck up, c**ts!!oh and merry christmas!!!
I'M BLAH!!!
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 26th, 2006
04:13:52 AM
Thanks for the props Quint...saw the new trailer with Rocky tonight...im pretty psyched...flames or no flames
HATE
by Mirrorball Man
Dec 26th, 2006
04:30:16 AM
I hate Transformers, hated Transformers as a kid, hate the toys, hate the characters, hate Michael Bay and all his movies, and I hate all of you, so I'm having a pretty good time right now.
Erm...
by Dick Nicely
Dec 26th, 2006
04:31:28 AM
Sorry to be last year's genius, but can someone please explain what this "Flames on Optimus" shit is all about? I couldn't give a fuck about big robots, but I've seen this mentioned all over the talkbacks so I'm looking for a little peace of mind...
A few replies to you guys
by Mace13
Dec 26th, 2006
04:31:34 AM
Phartegoddprime-Go back to the murphy boards where you belong you f***ing stooge. If you can actually argue a valid point in your posts then fine, But if all you're gonna do is throw idiotic insults at somebody for posting their opinion then who needs you? Shouldn't you be busy working on ways to f**k up the WE3 movie now or something? So-Crates-Personally I believe the reason that you're seeing such a more prominant backlash of fan posting for this particular movie more so than others is because of just how many of the fans that the makers of this movie have pissed off. They seriously underestimated the fanbase for the G1 Transformers. I know a lot you like to use the argument about how there have been all of these different incarnations of transformers over the years and etc.,etc.,(looking at you Roland)and that this is just another incarnation.Which is true. I'm not gonna argue that. But out of all of those different incarnations which one is still around in one form or another? It's not Armada.It's not G2. It's not RID.Thats right it's G1. Generation one has been around in comics,toys,video games,statues,pvc's,t-shirts,a nd etc.,. since it's premiere in 1983 right up until the present.You can't say that about any of the other incarnations. I'm real sure people will still be buying comics and memoribilia based on the Armada or RID line 20 years from now.(That was sarcasm by the way.) So as for them screwing up and not really playing up the built in fanbase for this movie,yeah they f**ked that up. We were originally promised a G1 movie to begin with. But Bay and everyone had to do their version of what transformers would be instead. So thats what we got.This movie will probably do pretty good when it opens. But it could have done a lot better if they had done it correctly. So I completely agree with what Yackbacker is saying about comparing it to Spider-Man or LOTR level quality. Allseeingeye-- I dont know what crack you've been smoking but I haven't been seeing fans who have been complaining about this movie on the TF sites suddenly being born again because of this new trailer being released.I frequent a couple TF sites and have not been seeing that. Things are still the same. So either you're just mistaken or reporting false information. -----Something I would like to clear up while i'm here. One thing that a lot of you pro-movie guys piss me off about is saying how us G1 fans aren't happy because it's not an exact translation of the G1 toon. Thats not the case at all and I have yet to see anyone even make that statement. So please quit using that as a ways to justify your arguments and to discredit ours. I'm all for updating the characters for a movie based in the here and now. But done correctly. Which this movie is not.Most of the robot designs suck. They look like walking piles of scrap metal. Especially the Decepticons. The vehicle modes suck. The autobots look like they should be called "The Redneck Brigade" or something. A couple of the decepticons vehicles are alright but the rest are bad choices. The script for this movie sucks. But what did you expect from people responsible for Catwoman and The core? This just seems to be overall a very dumbed down,blowem up,no story movie. I hope that all of us complaining about it are wrong but all information points otherwise.-- One more thing. For everyone telling us to shutup and quit complaining about it and just accept it. I do not want to see one of you guys complaining about any other movie being made whatsover. Or your just gonna prove what a hypocrite you are. I'm sure when another movie comes along thats based on some source material your particularly fond of screws something up you're going to be on here ranting about it yourself. So just the f**k up yourself and let us have our say.
And while I'm at it:
by Dick Nicely
Dec 26th, 2006
04:40:39 AM
Who is Don Murphy and why is he synonymous with typos?
Dick Nicely
by Mace13
Dec 26th, 2006
04:51:07 AM
The flames on Optimus thing. Prime has never had flames before but he has them for this new movie. Most people feel that they are very unnesessary and basically gay looking. Kind of like the whole nipples on Batmans costume that Schumacher added in his movies of that character. Hence the Nipples on Batman=Flames on Optimus postings.
WE3 movie sounds badass
by DOGSOUP
Dec 26th, 2006
04:52:02 AM
MMMMEN ST!NK!
my biggest fear is that...
by DarthBakpao
Dec 26th, 2006
04:53:55 AM
the movie would focused more from our point of view (human), which means that the robots would serve just as secondary characters. It reminds me of Dolph Rundgren's Master of the Universe where He-Man himself felt like a secondary character to the teenagers in that movie.
Cheers, Mace13
by Dick Nicely
Dec 26th, 2006
05:06:09 AM
I think this is a debate best left to those who care, but at least now I know what you're all talking about. Even if I think you're all mad. And DarthBakpao, you've just reminded me of the time I saw Masters of the Universe on television, many Christmasses ago. I was only a wee lad, and it scared the shit out of me. I still remember watching the bit where some chick is hiding under a table from hairy monsters. I watched it with my hands over my eyes! Ah, those were the days.
Mace13
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 26th, 2006
05:16:09 AM
dude...it was a toy line, ok...not fucking poetry...oooooh fighting for energon cubes...epic...blah blah blah...ur emotionally attached to a robot diguised as a truck...think about that for a sec. how old r u? i'm pretty much as big of a nerd as they come but jesus man, im sick of all the bitching about the fucking FLAMES. besides the animation in TF was shit anyways...things transformed like they were made out of clay rather than moving metal parts. cool idea but not worth getting this mad over. and tell me, when u were a kid did u really give a shit about the plot? no, you didnt. you liked big fucking robots that shot each other, end of discussion.
Gotta love Empire
by DirkD13"
Dec 26th, 2006
06:11:29 AM
Shame it's still a week away from being delivered. Looks good, surprisingly.
the_shogun_gunslinger
by Mace13
Dec 26th, 2006
06:20:11 AM
And when exactly did I bitch about the flames? Someone asked about them so I told him what the deal was. I wasn't bitching.Something wrong with answering somebody's question? I didn't realize I wasn't allowed to do that on here.Gee, me sorry. And secondly whats the stuff about the "animation in TF being shit anyways!?" What the hell does that have to do with anything? How does that relate to anything anyone was saying? Could you explain that please? Are you trying to compare 2D 1980's animation to todays cgi rendered robots? Is that the point you were trying badly to make? Thats like comparing a club to a gun. Of course it's going to be better rendered in cgi than 2D animation. Who exactly was arguing differently? I was just saying that robot designs look like crap. The outer shell pieces are too broken up in their robot modes for my tastes.They'd look a lot better if they were more solid instead of all over the place. And personally I prefer a decent story over big explosions anyday. I realize the cartoon wasn't exactly shakespeare in it's day but what was? Apparently your of the denominator that this new bay movie was made for. All eye candy and no thinking involved. You'll most likely enjoy it. When you can actually come up with some valid points of argument or comprehend what everyone else is posting about(Whichever happens first)feel free to post to me again.
Yack's 100 percent correct about the script.
by Cameron1
Dec 26th, 2006
07:01:50 AM
Really, it's Herbie the transforming car for 75% of the movie. I did fie myself laughing a heck of a lot at the bits with Sam and Bumblebee but that's partly because it's just so far removed from a film about Autobots vs Deceptacons. Ho hum.
Gundam?
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 26th, 2006
07:16:54 AM
Are you having a fucking laugh?
WOW! It´s toy!
by CuervoJones
Dec 26th, 2006
07:53:46 AM
I´m NOT shivering with anticipation
Well that looks fine
by godzillasushi
Dec 26th, 2006
08:31:14 AM
In shadow he actually looks cool.
Mace13...Again
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 26th, 2006
08:42:32 AM
i think its pretty funny that you seem to think that a poorly animated toy commercial is worth typing that much about. you say you like story...as do i. however, you seem to be forgetting that the transformers nver had a good story in the first place. dont get me wrong, i loved the toys when i was a kid, but take them for what they are (and that goes for all the ppl on here screaming about the lack of story, regardless of the fact that none of us have seen the finished film) and no i'm not comparing 2D to 3D animation. i'm saying to you that the cartoon was poorly animated. none of the autobots or decepticons looked like the were rearranging their parts...just kind forming them. i think the new designs will add to the flexability of thr characters. you forget that 2D animation takes a lot of liberties with the way things move. if they used the original designs the characters wouldnt be able to move very well at all, and that would look mre laughable to me than a few exposed parts. and dont insult me, ok...i dont prefer explosions to story, but this is the kinda movie that i can take for what it is and always was...mindless fun and cool visual shit. but i guess you guys wont understand just how rediculous ur praise of G1 is until you stop exclusively reading books with pictures on every page, preferabley colorable, right?
and
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 26th, 2006
08:44:06 AM
dont try to call me on spellchecking my shit, cuz i could really give a fuck about grammer on these boards
Mace13
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 26th, 2006
09:03:20 AM
The tfworld forums are full of people saying they now love/want to see this movie. I read the whole topic where the pic was posted. It's a similar story at other fan sites, i just love reading some of the rediculous excuses that 30+ year old men can concoct. So you're either mistaken or just posting misinformation. Then again, alot of the haters are so utterly blinded by it that they can't see whats right in front of them if it contradicts their opinion.

As for complaining about movies, well, usually when people assume a movie will suck, the reason is fairly obvious; it's usually one glaring problem. Most people though LIKE what they see and that's what truly annoys you. That everyone here isn't of the same mind as you. What's more ludicrous is that the reasons for the hate change depending on who exactly you are responding to. In this movies case, the reason changes every two minutes, "we don't like the designs", "we hate Michael Bay", "we hate that it's not took the cartoons origins", "we hate the script". Truth is, you don't know what to hate, you just want to hate it. This movie is no guiltier than any other cartoon/comic iteration of the franchise. Things move on and develop, it's time some of you moved on too.
On one of the first Transformers talbacks on AICN, the original complaint was the designs. The big ones being flames on Optimus, (which is no fucking big deal), and that the robots weren't chunky looking G1 designs. Then the sensible ones among you realised that G1 couldn't be fully translated to live action without change and so, because the decision was already made to hate the movie, it turned into a script issue. At that time none of the people quoting the script had actually read the damn thing. As i recall, the link to said script was posted in that very talkback and it became a clamour to see who could rip it to shreds first. For the record, latino review ALSO reviewed the same script, (and the reviewer was a Transformers fan), and he gave it top marks. Since Latino Review get regular script scoops and, for my money, are usually spot on i'll take their word for it any day.
Comparisons to MOTU are unfair
by sapno_krei
Dec 26th, 2006
09:13:17 AM
MOTU was a dud because it was released at (or just after) the peak of the cartoon and toyline's popularity -- and it did not follow the storyline well AT ALL. (He-Man on modern-day Earth!?! Come on!) TRANSFORMERS, on the other hand, has been around for decades in many different incarnations, with only strands of continuity among the series. The new movie looks like an intro to the world of the Transformers, initially told from the POV of the humans. There's nothing wrong with that. I'm confident that the Autobots and Decepticons, as characters, will be driven to the forefront around the end of the second act of the movie. That's standard storytelling for movie's like this: ground your audience in a reality they understand first, then flesh out the more fantastic elements...
Everyone deserves to speak their opinion
by Yautja
Dec 26th, 2006
09:46:26 AM
Everyone who supports this movie keeps posting rants telling the people hating to shut up. Then the people hating come back with occasionally intelligent arguments concluding with "Stop telling the people who hate to shut up because we're just as entitled to our opinions, so shut up." It's ridiculous. You're all entitled to your opinions. Telling each other to shut up is stupid because no argument either of you give is going to silence the other. Everyone has their opinions and their entitled to argue them and even if you don't think they are they will anyways. You can't control whether someone posts an opinion by telling them to "shut up." Also, you people saying that everyone arguing over Transformers need to get a life and do something, stop it. You're here too posting on the same message board. You're no better than everyone else, and making up some wild claim that you're someone important or that you're Patrick Swayze (I really saw that one once), does nothing to validate your point because you can't prove it. Posting on a message board to say that people who post on message boards don't have a life is redundant. I think this movie looks good so far. I agree that it'll probably be about the same quality as Fantastic Four but that doesn't make it terrible. I don't care about the flames though I do wish they had stuck closer to the original designs, especially Megatron (Jagged metal is evil, how original) and Bumblebee. Bumblebee is the reason I like VW Beetles, But I heard Volkswagon wouldn't let them use the Beetle anymore. But I'm still looking forward to the movie. It's still Transforming robots, their still from cybertron, it's still going to be cool. Though it does sound like it won't be as great as it could have been. But a mediocre movie is better than a terrible movie (D&D or anything by Uwe Boll).
scary
by lionbiu
Dec 26th, 2006
09:49:59 AM
why a transformer fans such fucking retards?!?! The show was stupid and pointless, had no plot and was a fad......just like Pokemon! The toys were cool, the animated movie was dreadful and the storylines were non existant. I have read the script (not sure if they have used all of it) and it was stupid but fun, just like the fucking series. GET THE FUCK OVER IT, LOSERS!!!!
did some background before posting...
by biggles2_22
Dec 26th, 2006
09:52:50 AM
Actually went to youtube and watched some Transformers clips. They were pretty inane. I don't get it. Maybe if I was 7 or something, but you dudes who are still holding a torch for this stuff should go back and review it. Help me out here, TV-toon to movie translations are iffy at best (even with great source material). How do you expect anything but a suck-fest? Not slamming your belief sytems in worlds were giant robots turn into shite = great storytelling, but there's not even cool writing here. (and yeah, I get the cool toys angle) Scooby Yabba Dabba Doo you Underdog-stand what I'm saying here?
You hater-whiner schmuck fucks...
by slone13
Dec 26th, 2006
09:53:20 AM
Too bad Santa didn't bring you lives with your toys this Christmas. You Trannies are hopeless.
fuck transformers...
by brassai2003
Dec 26th, 2006
09:54:40 AM
what happened to the FF2 teaser we were promised?
stooopider
by biggles2_22
Dec 26th, 2006
09:58:25 AM
How's about we redirect our hate and anger at worthwile movie-making instead of studios pumping money into shit that doesn't even sound good on paper? Just askin.
Shogun....100%!!!
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
10:01:29 AM
Yup in a nutshell my friend.Its robots that turn into shit... Flames on optimus=nipples on batman= get a fuckin life...to all of you that have read the script and feel you are in a position to comment, do you work on the industry? Are you script writers or is this some sad pathetic way to get closer to your belief that you are part of the mechanics of hollywood? Jesus Christ!!! I suppose the only thing to do is to never make an adaptation of a childrens show as your always gonna get some people who cannot handle interpretations of their childhood heroes.And as for that twat 'MCMLXXVI' get a fucking life freak!!
HATERS GET A FUCKING LIFE! TOUCH YOURSELF (AGAIN)!
by kinghenryVIII
Dec 26th, 2006
10:06:48 AM
Jeeeebus! You guys salivating with hate over this thing really do need to get a grip! What if they made an Airwolf movie and took some liberties? Would you still be pissing and moaning about how Jan Micheal Vincent was not cast? The dude can't even speak or walk (loved hearing him on Stern) and you guys would be fucking blabbin' like a titless tot. Get a fucking life. Megatron was a fucking gun! What is he gonna do in this - bounce around on his ass / handel? What the fuck! Get over it! Leave your parents basement - you're 28 years old for fucks sake. The cartoon was awful, the animation was shit. And playing with the toys when you were 7-12, pretending you were something bigger .... I was spanking my baby sitters ass when I was 10. The slut! I'll send ya a picture - ya fuckin' haters - it'll be the closest thing to pussy you'll ever get if your only purpose in life is to bastardize this movie before it comes out. Leave the basement tards!
All Hail King Henry The 8th!
by DrTobiasFunke
Dec 26th, 2006
10:11:23 AM
Exactly. Like I've been saying, what's worse? Some guy deciding to make a movie about a 20-year old cartoon or some guy complaining that the movie version of a 20-year old cartoon won't have all the right details? Get a life please. This movie (though it may not be that great) will still make tons of money and there's nothing you can do to change that. Fission Mailed.
yackbacker - crusade
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
10:12:23 AM
oh shit i didnt realise you were on a crusade for the search for truth and justice , i just thought you were a pimply 20 something thAt hadnt grown up. MY MISTAKE I APOLOGISE.
Yack, you've proven to be quite intelligent..
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 26th, 2006
10:12:42 AM
But how can you accuse the people who actually don't have a problem with this movie as being people "who love shit shoved down our throats" and followers of "stupid simpleton ways" simply because we refuse to accept your take on this movie?

Infact, were we to all be swayed by your words would we not also be guilty of the same thing you lambast us for?

I am reminded of an email full of quotes and sayings i was sent many years ago; "Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one". Perhaps more suitable to this talkback,(and one i freely admit to being partly guilt of), "Arguing on an internet message board is like competing at the special olympics; even if you win, you're still a retard".
Trannies
by Professor Falcon
Dec 26th, 2006
10:13:53 AM
'Trannies' has got to be the best name I've heard for a group of obsessed fans in a long time. It will now go down in history with the likes of 'Trekkies'. And yes, there's a big difference between 'Trekkers' and 'Trekkies'. Class dismissed.
Hi yack--long time no see, huh?
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
10:19:13 AM
Dont pay any attention to guys like stooop and what not. No matter how many insults fly on these boards or tired old comments like "Get out of your mommy's basement" are made, in the end, these people are trying to defend the notion that a film maker like Michael Bay should be given the benefit of a doubt. M I C H A E L B A Y. As far as I can tell, that alone means its an up hill battle for anyone to justify their case.
I think most people that say "get laid" etc., havnt
by godzillasushi
Dec 26th, 2006
10:27:05 AM
Why is that the fallback insult? Im pretty sure people that say that either have not, or have not in a long time....its funny actually.
yack you totally miss the point...
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
10:29:09 AM
The major problem that I and other people have with your attitude is that it is towards a movie over 6 months away from opening. It doesnt matter how many scripts or clips or photos or production sketches you see you simply cannot say the movie is shit. you havn't seen it. it is still in post production...
Sinking to Dalbatron's level...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
10:32:29 AM
I must start out by calling him a douchespout. Trust me that's worse than a douchebag. As for your concern that some of us who have read the script are not actually in the industry, let me assure you, this is one talkbacker who is. I have been a producer, animator, pre-viz coordinator, script superviser (which basically means I read a few drafts of certain scripts and caught a few typos), and I have been a director, though all that last one taught me was that I wasn't ready for the position yet. Still, I learned and passed off the job before it got to bad. I'm also in a unique position that I have actually worked for the company that has a vested interest in this film, Hasbro, and that the work for them in their Transformers world is work that they take very seriously. As for my problems with this film, they are too many to list. Yackbacker has hit on most of them and is also very much in the right mindset for how those who loved this as kids and continue to love it really feel. As for the Trannies thing, that's funny... I laughed, but I'm sure there are many "TransFans" that wouldn't. Aside from that, hey Yackbacker, how's it goin'? I just got back from being stuck in DIA (Denver) and I'm tired. Merry Chirstmas everyone.
In the main article
by Fried Gold
Dec 26th, 2006
10:33:01 AM
Prime talks about his battle with prostate cancer.
douchespout - im honoured
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
10:37:20 AM
why thankyou nonsensical for such a colourfull insult. You seem to be the exception to the rule... good luck with the directing- it takes a big man to admit when hes not capable of doing something. hang in there your time will come
yackbacker - fair enough
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
10:44:25 AM
Yes you are right. You have the right. I have that right. We all have that right. I apologise or coming down hard. It christmas and all this negativity is bad. May I offer you a glass of fesive egg nog and lets bury the hatchet. I would love to chat with you after the movie has opened and hear your comments. For the record I find previous michael bay movies to be chewing gum for the eyes.
Airports and Holidays...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
10:48:10 AM
I travel a lot for work and personal stuff. Let me tell you, a part of me actually feels like my Chirstmas was less than spectactular. I think this has to do with the fact that I spent a total of three days in airports during a five day vacation and out of the whole endevor I managed to get to see my family, but didn't get more than half the Christmas Fare, i.e. gifts. Of course gifts aren't a big deal, and really they aren't the issue. The issue is that everything that didn't arrive in Denver so it could return with me, now has to be shipped back to me once it actually arrives. This means that I get a second Christmas sometime in January, and I don't think I have time for that so it bums me out. Still, I did get to see my family, even though I missed out on two days, so I suppose that means I win. Of course having to fly on Christmas Night sucked. Anyway, I can't help but laugh at Fried Gold's comment. If the article actually had that in it, I would be picking it up for the laugh.
Furthermore
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
10:50:35 AM
I also feel the need to rebutt a few posters in here. TO that guy who figures this movie will make a ton of money anyway: that may or may not be, but how does that in any way relate to quality? There are a slew of movies that were horrible and yet made a mint (quite a few of them done by Bay, in fact). To Tobius Funke, I find it interesting that you accuse yack of getting a life when you seem to post rebuttles to him on a pretty regular basis. To paraphrase your previous question, what is worse: the poster who has a problem with said 20 year old storyline or poster who posts incessently about previous poster? The fact is, Funke, you're in the same boat as everyone else: you have an opinion and the free time to vent it here in this talkback. Finally, to the allseeingeye: I agree with you in that most everyone here needs to tone the insults down a notch or two, however, Yack isn't even approaching the level of rudeness that I've seen from those insulting Yack (at least on this TB). Heck, I'd even go so far as to say that he's right in stating that there are many people who dont mind seeing a movie for just explosions and dumb fun. Hell, there have been a few posters on this board stating exactly that opinion: "Transformers is just dumb fun that I can turn my brain off to. It'll be great!" Go ahead, Eye, scroll up and you'll see that statement made by more than a few TB'ers. Obviously, there are a great many people who prefer their dumb fun to be...well...dumb fun. Obviously, that is their perrogative, but please don't accuse Yack of snobbery because he wants more from a story line than some simple action. II find it rather telling when someone like Yack expects a director/producer/writer/creat er to not take the easy way out, to not generate cookie cutter characterization and paper-thin plot points and actually stretch those creative muscles, is slagged by so many here in this talkback. Worse, you call him names and insinnuate that he's some sort of social outcast for such an opinion. Well, if thats the case, ladies and gents, then you can put me right along side Yack, because I COMPLETELY agree with Yack on this subject. And just so you people (many of whom are very new) understand, I'm a teacher here in Buffalo, with a wife and three kids. I guess I'm some sort of social retard, too, huh?
who will join me...
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
10:51:59 AM
come on yack and non lets have that egg nog!!! Sorry to hear you xmas was not up to scratch. Airports are souless places t the best of times. Im spending my first xmas here in NZ after all my life in the UK. It was over 90 in the shade.. just not right!!
yackbacker
by BadMrWonka
Dec 26th, 2006
10:55:50 AM
I was going to ask you to please stop making logical and well-reasoned reasoned arguments about your reservations for the film, because I thought it would derail my precious "nerdguments" that I love SO much. (I love nothing more than fanboys arguing, it's like heroin) but ironically enough, there are enough wackos on here that get crazier the more calm and reasonable you are. so it works out for everyone. you get to make these trolls look silly, I get my "nerdscussion" on the transformers, and stooprider gets another rabbit for Xmas! (the masturbation aid, not the animal) hooray! flame on, bitches!
And even if the script sucks I will see this.
by kinghenryVIII
Dec 26th, 2006
10:56:50 AM
I love me some mindless fun in the heat of summer - sitting in the AC and watching something stupid, yet entertaining (EX: POTC II, Sin City, The 40-Year Old Virgin). I knew The Lost World was going to be goofy but it had cool effects and dino's. Yes, I was upset it was was different from the book but I loved it when the T Rex escaped into San Diego. It was just fun. I'm looking forward to this - Bay's flicks are mindless cluster fucks of dumbness. I loved The Rock (best James Bond movie ever), and my guilty pleasure is Bad Boys II. It's about half and half with him but somewhere, deep inside of me, big robots fighting with cool FX seems cool to me. Opinions voiced are fine - and dammit, let 'em fly. But having so much hate for Bay with pre (and post) felony threats is so fucking funny. Especially for a movie whose characters are FUCKING ROBOTS FROM A CARTOON THAT MEANT TO CASH IN ON TOYS. "I'm Megatron - bouncing on the butt of my gun handel - bouncing high in the air so I can transform into my robot self!" Queer. I'm glad they changed things up. It will dopey fun. You guys make me laugh.
black label it is then
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
10:57:42 AM
Fancy a turkey sandwich?
Yeah,
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
10:58:00 AM
Total Robot Chicken Reference... I fly enough that nothing really bothers me. Oh, and moondoggy2u, sure call yourself a social retard, but you've had sex, you're kids are proof, I think that makes you at least someone socially capable. That is unless your kids were concieved through magic. Which if they were, that's really cool, I'd like to know how you did that. Otherwise I'll just assume they were made the old fashioned way.
Yack--I'm doing just fine. Christmas was good
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
10:59:24 AM
Yeah, Yack, I think I recall you or I getting into a verbal tussle over Casino Royale. At no time did you and I start slagging at each other. And to Dalbatron, who the hell cares when the movie is getting released? It doesnt matter that Yack or myself haven't seen it--it still looks bad. You know, I've never eaten or tasted a shit sandwich, but all my cognitive abilites combined with my sense of smell and eyesight assure me that a shit sandwich will taste bad and give me a stomach ache.
stoop
by BadMrWonka
Dec 26th, 2006
10:59:48 AM
bzzzzzzzzzzzz! are you having fun with it? remember to wash between uses...
I hate to say it....
by The Midget_King
Dec 26th, 2006
11:00:04 AM
but I'm kinda with Yack on this. For what its worth, Yack hasnt said that you shouldn't see the fucking movie. I appreciate the heads up about the probable shittiness but I'll make my own decision to see this in July. And seriously, to all you jackasses making shit remarks like "20 something year old pimple face", third grade called, they want their fat kid back to laugh at in dodgeball.
moondoggy....
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
11:02:05 AM
Would you like a glass of eggnog as we are all friends now.... I suppose a slightly more delicate way of putting your point across is the old phrase ' if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck - its a duck' a personal favorite of mine...
casino royale rocked!!
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
11:06:12 AM
great movie although Craig is golums long lost brother
For the record...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
11:09:03 AM
I have said you shouldn't see this movie, but again I also have several unique qualifications that justify my reasons for saying this. I'm also of the mindset that certain things in life that helped shape who we are as people should be held to some degree of respect and if they are not then they should not be abided. (Not to sound snooty, I just couldn't think of a better word.) It's the same reason I refused to see Superman: Returns. Sure I did end up seeing it, but I never paid for it, and it took me three times to see it all the way through. Yes. Three different people dragged me to this movie. Yes. I fell asleep and missed an hour of the film the first two times. No. After I saw it all the way through I didn't miss much while sleeping. No. That hour still doesn't make that a Superman movie. Yes. I am still angry about it. Just so you know.
superman.. wow i did that
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
11:13:07 AM
het non. i did that. I have sat down 3 times now and never got past clark arriving the daily planet. That movie i believe is falls into the 'dont fuck with a classic' category. A bit like a remake of ' its a wonderfull life' remade in modern times by Harold Ramis and starring Vincent Vaughn
If you think that was cool
by Cherry Chuck
Dec 26th, 2006
11:13:57 AM
then check this out: http://tinyurl.com/wraah
How could Megatron turn into such a small gun anyway?
by I_Snake_Plissken
Dec 26th, 2006
11:14:15 AM
I really don’t get all of the bitching about this movie – I think the trailer makes it look pretty good (I like the more ominous tone). And, you’ve got to consider the source material – “ME GRIMLOCK, RRRRRRRRRRRR.” Still, I guess many of us will always wonder what “Robert Altman’s Transformers” would have been like…..
stoopider
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
11:14:17 AM
if giant fucking robots is such mindless fun, why do you care so much to go into the talkback thread and post incessently? And just so you know, Yack's opinion is hardly uninformed or illadvised. Lets run through the list: a subpar director, a paper-thin script, a listless cast of "actors," and creature/character designs that are, shall we say, a bit busy. To put it bluntly, this is a Michael Bay film with a script written by that Catwoman guy. That alone should fill most movie goers with a sense of trepidation, to say nothing of what actual fans of the franchise will say. Defend your position all you want, stooprider, but your argument seems to based upon one of faith rather than reason. Faith in MICHAEL BAY!! Oh well, some people never learn.
Speaking of Transformers
by DOGSOUP
Dec 26th, 2006
11:16:30 AM
I'd REALLY REALLY like to see Children of Men. In conclusion, they better get Kopp-Tor right in the fucking Go Bots movie.
stoop's out of batteries
by BadMrWonka
Dec 26th, 2006
11:16:38 AM
he's just getting bitchier and bitchier...but you have to appreciate the irony of this troll calling out Yack for posting just to get people's attention. bitch that's what I do! not Yack.
get your facts straight, and your thong even straighter. BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!
Didn't we go through this with Dalbatron?
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
11:17:17 AM
Stooopider, please go up and read everything. Even if you have to move your lips while doing it or read out loud to understand better. Yackbacker is just about the only one I know who is approaching this from an analytical perspective, myself included in the irrational god I hate this my personal reasons override any hope this film has with reaching me. On the bright side, this film might... and I mean MIGHT, have that one scene like the airliner rescue in Superman Returns, that makes me look at it and go "Damn! Now, that's (Insert Character Here). I doubt it though, I just don't think Bay is that clever, and the script just doesn't show that.
hey dalbatron
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
11:18:43 AM
Pass that egg nog over here, buddy ;). I agree, my previous post was unusually crass, but to my mind, Bay and the term "shit sandwich" are synonymous. A "Duck and Bay" analogy just doesnt quite grasp my attitude towards Michael Bay. Merry Christmas, by the way.
stoopider - you have now gotten silly
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
11:19:44 AM
Stoopider. i hve read rational responses to your questions and I still see you attacking Yack. I think its time for you to stop now. 'Just like daylight, a sense of perspective, being rational, sex and social interaction scares them.' is just plain rude and personal...
Well said, rjcjr9
by Captain Mal
Dec 26th, 2006
11:19:58 AM
or whatever the fuck your name is.

I am utterly flabbergasted by some folks' emotional involvement with this flick. Transformers were cool when I was 10, but *even at that age* I recognized that it was a really, really bad show. Poorly written, poorly animated, and poorly executed. I know I'm reiterating what rj said, but it's worth repeating, I think.

off to return $300 of gifts
by BadMrWonka
Dec 26th, 2006
11:20:31 AM
and then off to the casino! I love boxing day! keep this going guys, I want plenty of "nerdversation" for when I get back. I've posted more in this talkback than in any one talkback for like 3 years! tis the fucking season! ho ho ho, and Yo Eleven!
I HATE Empire magazine
by brock landers baby
Dec 26th, 2006
11:21:26 AM
I don't buy it anymore after it announced it was releasing a subscriber only exclusive Raiders of the Lost Ark cover.Anyway it's turning more and more to its website,log in for more of this or that.Well hello..that's why I bought the bloody magazine!,not so I can flip-flop between it and a bloody webshite.
MOONDOGGY is right
by kinghenryVIII
Dec 26th, 2006
11:22:32 AM
I was a bit out burst driven, having had to drive all day on Christmas - maybe had an hour with family due to driving to north NJ - from DC - for the girl friends parents (she took the train there last week since she can get off easier then I - wow - that sounded kinky - and is taking the train back Wednesday) and then drive to Delaware to visit mine, and then back again in the fog to DC, and then to work at 7 this morning. My left overs are in zip lock baggies - even the gravey that will pour out confectionous cake topping style. But I digress .... the script, I guess, will suck (haven't read it but I trust ya'll). I'm 33. I just want a disater movie with robots fighting and huge explosions so I can say "Wow, that's cool." This movie SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY MEANING ABOVE THAT. It's fucking robots fighting! It's not an allegory for something higher. Now, given the money put into this movie, maybe I should demand something better for my $10 but I doubt that will happen. But I will still put down my $10 and see it, and, even though THIS SHOULD NOT BE THE CASE, the FX will overwhelm the script and I will leave thinking "Yeah, that was cool". We do have a right to demand something better then what will more then likely be on the screen but .... it does have Speilbergs name attached to it and he bats pretty well. Nonsensical - sorry about the airport. And I thought my drive sucked. I hope you were able to finnally pop a cork.
Bionicle the Movie!
by Darksider
Dec 26th, 2006
11:23:25 AM
Did Lego buy Hasbro? That sucks. Does that mean in 20 years the Bionicles will look like the way the Transformers are supposed too?
Hey, does Murphy still haunt these TBs?
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
11:23:46 AM
nonsensical, I, too, will go see this movie, but only out of my enjoyment of those transformer cartoons WAAYY back in the eighties. Even then, I'll be purchasing a ticket to another film and simply sneak into transformers. For the record, Bay and co have not earned my interest in seeing this film. No, the creators of the eighties cartoons did that. I'm still in awe how Bay and his scriptwriters have almost single-handedly trashed my hope for this film. Oh well...
stoopider - just think now....
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
11:25:37 AM
Why is it black and white? To expect a good script and action. Godfather IV now thats plain silly. You can have great action and a brillint script. That is what people are after not just the same old ' join the dots' action fest. Yes its robots, so was Blade runner - so was westworld.
stooopider
by biggles2_22
Dec 26th, 2006
11:32:27 AM
Yes, we have seen this movie! Very observant of you. I liked it the first time I saw it in The Flinstones (the motion picture), Scooby Doo (the motion picture), and Bugs Bunny (the motion picture). See? Even your lame attempts at sarcasm are unintentionally ironic. Oh, I almost forgot. You suck.
Alright stooopider...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
11:32:46 AM
You are obviously one of those people who are there to just talk shit. I'm sure you glaze over what people have said and generalize as much as you can so that you can sound like you're reading, but you really aren't. Good on you. I'm sure you're more in that dateless wonder category than those who you are attempting to insult. If you like explosions so much go join the Army and request an immediate transfer to Iraq. You'll do well there. You and everyone else fail to realize that what is really the issue to the Fans of the "20 year old cartoon aimed at children." We see this as something of a modern classic. Sure it was animated, sure it was geared towards children, but in both the comics and the cartoons there were some great stories. As in actual STORY. The idea that this is being reduced to a pipebomb in a mailbox doesn't respect the classic nature of the story. It's the reason why Superman: Returns was not the film it could have been, and it's the reason the fans who like this are so upset. We know the story for this film is beyond flawed, and there is too great a departure fromt he source material for this film to win over the die hard fans. I know you don't understand why story is important, but when you grow up you will. Until then as Yackbacker said, "Please spend time working on your own issues. I'm done talking to you."
Casion Royale is on my list of the best
by emeraldboy
Dec 26th, 2006
11:32:50 AM
of the films of the year. Along with flags and little miss sunshine. by the way.... once upon a time there was an idea. it was a simple idea. Originally concieved by Josh Friedman, it was about a drug lord who smuggled er Snakes on a plane. The buzz around this thing was huge. This movie is going on my list of the worst movies this year and ranks amongst the worst films ever made. Can sam jackson get his coolness back after SOAP, I doubt it. I will only see TF in the cinemas after the hype over snakes which blew up in newlines face. Snakes was an abomination. see the movie then make up your own minds.
There will NEVER be a movie on the level of ALIENS!
by kinghenryVIII
Dec 26th, 2006
11:33:01 AM
EVER! I saved up my allowance for months to buy a rental copy from the movie store when it was first released. I have lost faith that ANYONE will ever do that again, hence, the pop corn flick mind set. Only Cameron and Speilberg can do that. Fuck, I'm second guessing now ....
LOL, Yack. And Jaws was just a dumb shark film
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
11:34:01 AM
I mean, for pete's sake, The Birds was just about a bunch of seagulls!! Don't you see, guys? Its people like Don Murphy, Michael Bay, and idiots like Stooopid that dont stretch, creatively. They look at some high concept and simply CEASE TRYING to make something original. Any film maker/creator can give you something with a concept, but it takes a real creative talent and dedication to take that concept to the next level, as Hitchcock, Cameron, and Ridley Scott, have (or had) proven again and again. Call it snobbery. Call it tight-assery. Call it whatever you want, but there is obviously a world of difference between viewers like Yack and viewers like stooopid, between creators like Bay, who are creatively dead, and creators like James Cameron. One obviously tries while the other just floats along in life with "dumb, mindless action." Giant Fucking Robots indeed...
stoopider.....ffs
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
11:34:15 AM
who the fuck ae you arguing with now. you sem to be ranting to o-one. look bakc over the thread. we have all moved on and made our point. it is simple.... some people feel that BAY whilst having the aility to create inredibly visceral scenes seems to lack the abitily to tie them all together with a good script. The people who rememer the ogiginal cartoon are like me mid 30's. They like intelligent scripts and great action... in the same movie
Flames on Optimus = Greedo Shooting First
by Reynard Muldrake
Dec 26th, 2006
11:35:47 AM
Though overall, I think he looks badass and don't have any major issue at all. Like Quint said - if they talk the talk and walk the walk (yeah, I went there), then I'll be sold. Anyone know if it's going to be rated 'R' or not???
ok kids are waking
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
11:43:10 AM
right guys. great to talk with you. Apologies again guys for anytnihg personal. its really early in the day here and i.ve ben holdin my 8 week daughter trying to get her to sleep. She is now but a can hear my 2 year old daughter stirring in her room so i suppose i'll be off. Hope to meet up with you guys again soon. Until then enjoy the rest of the holidays...
stoop--did you just refer to yourself in third-person?
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
11:44:08 AM
That's it, i'm done with you.
have a good one, dalbatron.
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
11:48:41 AM
By the way, Yack, I did end up seeing Casino Royale, and I walked away with mixed feelings. On one hand, the film was a pretty good film with some excellent performances. On the other hand, it didnt really have any of the nuances that I associate with Bond films. For me, it was a good film, but a bad Bond movie. Similarly, I thought Craig was a good lead, but a horrible Bond. Just my opinion, though. And yeah, he did look like the love child of Gollum and Keith Richards.
final stoopider response
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
11:48:42 AM
jesus you really are a childish cunt just fuck off...
sorry for the c word everyone
by dalbatron
Dec 26th, 2006
11:49:38 AM
but i think you agree warranted in this instance....
oh jesus, yack.
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
11:49:52 AM
that was deffinitely uncalled for ;)
hmmm....how come my response post
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
11:51:06 AM
was inserted before your eggnog and children post. weird, huh?
this is just funny...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
11:52:42 AM
Dalbatron is on the other side of the fence from Yackbacker and myself, and even he is fed up with Stooopider. You realize that makes Stooopider the jackass of the other team that even they don't like. That is if you go back to comparing this discussion to some sort of sport where two teams compete and trashtalk. I think that's basketball. (Yes, that's sarcasm too.)
nonsensical
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
11:53:12 AM
I thought basketball was the sport where everyone just elbows each other, travels 5 steps to dunk a ball, AND trashtalks each other.
Hate to say it...
by Frankenblogger
Dec 26th, 2006
11:55:08 AM
...I'm starting to like what I'm looking at. And let's face it. Is Bay really calling the shots here or is Spielberg? The trailer feels like a Spielberg film.
Oh yeah,
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
11:57:13 AM
I think you're right... so would that other one be hockey? No, that's where they go out on ice and beat the living shit out of each other. Oh! It's cricket... right? Yeah, I think it's cricket.
Oh I'm there.
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
11:58:41 AM
Going now... just a minute.
I totally agree, yack
by moondoggy2u
Dec 26th, 2006
12:09:36 PM
That trailer was pretty good, and yet because I know where those scenes come from, I'm reduced to hoping against hope that the movie will somehow miracuously be the opposite of what all my experience tells me. Oh well.
Thanks Hollywood!
by CuervoJones
Dec 26th, 2006
12:09:56 PM
While you are making stupid movies about toys, we´re making Pan´s Labyrinth and Volver. Thanks for the opportunity of kick yout ass.
Of course Hollywood is also making 300...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
12:13:34 PM
and I'm sorry, but the 300 looks freakin' amazing.
Oh, and before you get hissy...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
12:15:11 PM
They are treating this like they did Sin City, with great respect for the source material, which also happens to be Frank Miller's work. So, I don't need to see this to know it's going to be good. I can pick up the graphic novel and read it now.
Pan's
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
12:17:46 PM
I think I'm getting it here in Portland... so I'm fairly sure you will get it on your coast. Last I checked your main city was larger.
FF2 trailer
by blackwood
Dec 26th, 2006
12:32:14 PM
Yep. Has my interest piqued.

As for Transformers... I just watched the trailer again. I'm still there. My bitty heart swells whenever I see a giant robot. It's just the way I'm wired. I hope it's better than the Feb script. I hope Spielberg is more involved than we believe. I hope it lives up to that trailer, which is a very good trailer. I hope, I pine, I perish. It'll all come out in the wash, I suppose. Even if I hate it, I will still feel good that I can consider my money as a vote cast for more giant robot movies. And who knows? Maybe Spielberg will decide to take on Transformers 2.
Optimus and the robots can look good all they want...
by Bong
Dec 26th, 2006
12:39:06 PM
But it means nothing if the fundamentals (plot, characters, etc)behind a good flick are missing. And in the past we've seen how Bay has screwed these fundamentals up. I'm not falling for the hype machine again
As I said...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
12:40:08 PM
FF2 appears to be better than TF.
Yackbacker is the worst kind of cunting scum
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
12:59:44 PM
"Oh, I am allowed to have an opinion, free speech, leave me alone" it screams. Then it goes on a crusade to trash a film it know nothing about. Except, as the great Harlan Ellison points out, NO WHERE is it written that you are entitled to an opinion. As a 20 year old pimply faced virgin, it is okayed to discuss the few things you know about, like masturbation. That is, it is allowed an INFORMED opinion. It doesn't know shit about the actually movie. Therefore when it babbles here it just makes istelf look stupid, then it puts the lotion in the basket. It thinks it makes it matter. Yacker- you will never matter because your inner lack of self esteem consumes you like a black whole. You hate Murphy and Bay and your betters because hate is your only option. You cannot love, not the way you look. So we pity it and we move to the desert and we kill whoever gets in our way. The end result is this- the general public LOVES the trailer and the want te see level is through the roof. Ninety percent of the TF Fans board have embraced the movie. Indeed, over fifty percent of the Aintitshit losers have embraced it as well. As the Mighty Murphy has said, he's movie on to getting John Carter right now that he has taken control of the project from the 400 pound blind blob you all gather to fellate. Like I said on a previous talback- IT IS DONE. Nothing Yackcunter or any of you remaining haters can do will stop this from being the number two movie of 2007. It can cry it can scream but it doesn't matter anymore- and never did.
thegreekhammer likes sex with animals
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
01:08:09 PM
sorry spelling Nazi, I didn't feel you losers were worth the 30 seconds it took to re-read what I wrote. Also douchebag is one word, like when your mom calls you that you uncircumcized cheeseball.
Yackcunter, the answer is no
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
01:13:31 PM
You don't need to reply- you cannot. You are done and might as well go to Iraq where they can try to make you a man and not a load. And I am not bragging, just stating that it will be the number 2 film of 07 and you will still be a turd.
Silver Surfer Trailers is Up At Apple
by kevinwillis.net
Dec 26th, 2006
01:14:21 PM
In case nobody else has mentioned it. You'll be waiting all day for Quint or Harry or somebody to post it here. BTW, in HD too, so , cool deal. There's also a new Simpson's movie trailer, for what it's worth. Not much too it, same exact intro as the last. http://www.apple.com/trailers/
Yackcunter
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
01:22:40 PM
Next thing you'll try to make us believe you respect your family too. An empty loser like you has NO DEEP RESPECT, only venom and hate. That's why you contemplate the noose nightly. Take your bill of goods and your "allowed" non informed opinion and end it now. You're what is wrong with the world in a nutshell.
Yackbacker
by wanna_bannana
Dec 26th, 2006
01:31:50 PM
I think some people here need to loosen up with Yack and his opinion...it is just that "an opinion" and like the rest of us he has one. I personally have no problem with your opinion yack, i think you have valid points and fears about the movie. My problem lies with the fact, that we have to take your word on the fact you among a few others have read "the script" for one you have offered no solid evidence to back up your word, and the only spoilers you give are ones that are pretty common knowledge, because they have been talked about in interviews or whatnot. You have yet to offer up any solid facts, and personally your word does not mean anything to me because i do not know you. And # two the only big spoiler that would make me believe that you "have" read the script, is the fact you stated there was a big fight between megatrong and prime the last 20 minutes of the movie.....but i mean, comon, obviously those two are going to duke it out in the climax, so yet again you are not stating anything that nobody else could not come up with without reading the script. And last but not least the third reason i am not taking your word on it, is because realisticly by the time the movie comes out from the time you originally read the script, there will have been so many changes made that it will barely rezemble the original script...that is the way hollywood works. Seriously,just because you say that the trailers have shown signs that the script has not changed much, does not mean it has not..or that you have even read the script, it just means you are saying you have and then when seeing the trailer you say " see that scene was in the trailer...and that one also" offer us something substantial, that when the movie comes out we can be like "oh yah yackbacker was right" point is it feels like you are safegaurding yourself by only giving away spoilers that are common knowledge. You still have not answered my question, as to wether or not bumble bee dies trying to rescue Sam? My belief is , you cannot say yes and you cannot say no, because if you say yes, and it does not happen, your credibility is shot, and if you say "no" and it does, the same also happens. I think you are a smart guy and have good points, but we cannot be expected to take your word for it...especially when the movie has not come out yet. Voice away on your opinion, you just need to understand as well that there are going to people that either dont buy what you are saying, or who think you are "hating" on this film..because the overall point is, you are a trannie like the rest of us. And we all have our own opinions and feelings on what transformers mean to us as individuals...and what we would like to see done with them. I also get the impression you have had a subpar christmas? sorry to hear that, for what its worth i think you are one of the more rational/calm TBer's on this site...its not hard to spot a non flamer,in a see of flamers. And lets clear this up people, a flamer is not someone who voices their opinion on the movie or others attitudes. A flamer is someone who "attacks" or deals out a wackload of personal attacks for no other reason then to get attention, or says things like " Don murphy pwns to suck" or " dam you micheal bay" or is constantly dissing and degrading with no valid points. basicly someone who talks out of their ass. And for the record "trannies" was not meant as a derogatory term for transformers fans. it was a joke for what it would have been called if joel schumacher had directed the movie...after all there could be far worse directors on the flick, i have never been a Mike bay fan.. but the dude that made "dungeons and dragons" or joel schumacher,or some other Key grip or "sfx" wizard turned director..would have been far worse a prospect. bay might have made music videos before, but at least he has a number of films under his belt now, and is slowly getting better. The island is not great, but you have to admit Yack, that it is far better then his previous films...he has room for improvement. merry ho ho
phartgodd
by wanna_bannana
Dec 26th, 2006
01:38:32 PM
whats wrong with the world in a nutshell are people like you. You sit there at your computer calling yackbacker "among others" an empty loser, and saying that it is why he contemplates the noose nightly,and that he has no deep respect, only venom and hate...and yet i only see him voicing his opinion. The only one i ever consistently spewing venom and hate is you my friend. lets not confuse ourselves.
kevin willis
by wanna_bannana
Dec 26th, 2006
01:49:40 PM
I agree, i think harry and the rest of AICN staff need to start keeping on things, other sites often have updates a few days before this site. Allthough in their defense it has been the holidays and people get busy over the holidays, they cannot provide for us computer junkies all the time, thats why they created WOWC and counterstrike...we need something to keep our nerdy selves busy! while we cannot drool over updated movie news.
Pharty McPhart Phart...
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
01:53:39 PM
What blows my mind is Pharty's constant repeating that we, in this case Yack, know nothing about this movie and therefore aren't even entitled to our opinions. Multiple set reports, interviews, tons of leaked images, Michael Bay's previous films, and of course the godawful script, but none of us have seen enough yet to even have an opinion, let alone an informed one? Bullshit.

I'm guessing Phartegodd walks into each new Uwe Boll film with this same sense of wonderment and awe, I mean there's no possible way to know if a Uwe Boll film will be good until you've seen it right?

optimus cunt
by visitor_q
Dec 26th, 2006
02:07:27 PM
i cannot fucking believe the amount of people who have posted on this piece of shit i put it down to too much spare time over the xmas break, transformers is the most overated thing since lord of rings, sort it out!
visitor_q....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
02:09:52 PM
LOTR is considered great/classic literature you giant douche. Try reading something that doesn't have pictures on ever page, you might learn something.

And no, I do not believe the Transformers are even close to same level of importance and quality as LOTR, not even close.

yackbacker
by wanna_bannana
Dec 26th, 2006
02:10:14 PM
i have not seen the script anywhere on the net...so how could i see for myself? okay i will trust you on the fact that you might have read a script, but it still does not mean that it did not undergo changes. Action might have stayed the same,but dialogue and character development very well may have. You know as well as i do, there can be "alot" of changes to dialogue in post production. and after all the action is the least important part of the movie to you among others right? you want action, and bay can deliver that, it is depth you want no? something of the G1 characters to be in there, there is still a chance that they will be, but not in everyway we want them to be. That was the point that i was trying to get across that still seems to be being missed. There are many people that have to be pleased with this movie, and the director also has to add his vision to the movie, alot goes into a production this big, things will be left out or changed. How would you feel if you were to take on a movie of this scale, and the pressure that comes with it, and studio heads bearing down on you, and spielberg breathing over your shoulder saying " we should do this" "this needs to be changed" " we need to appeal to children and teens to" " you need to make people like bumblebee" this is not just a movie for the fans, it is a movie for everyone...and not everyone is going to be pleased. All i can hope for is a moment where i feel all warm and fuzzy and think " aaah there is the prime i grew up with" or a brief moment of familar feelings. it will never live up to our expectations, and that is a realistic statement to make. look at it like the scene in "hook" where all the lost boys do not believe it is pan, he looks so different,he is fat and hairy, uptight,and anal..nothing like the young pan,they dont trust him,they want to crucify him, but there is that one little boy that takes a moment and pushes the skin back on his face, and after a moment says " there you are peter"
wanna_bannana....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
02:11:38 PM
Yack posted a link to the script in an above post, that's what he meant by see for yourself.
thanks nutsack
by wanna_bannana
Dec 26th, 2006
02:25:16 PM
You and yack have some decent arguements, we dont have to agree, we just have to be civil with each others opinions. Unlike the last few posts in this thread, but the true flamers, are always noticable. i personally just dont take anything they say to heart, its like stoking a fire if you respond to those posts. I think i even used to flame when i came online, but i was a teen then and people usually grow up.
Fuck This
by AugustusGloop
Dec 26th, 2006
03:01:39 PM
Saying this is Nipples on Batman is an insult to Nipples on Batman. Michael Bay = The Paris Hilton of directing. This is his stupid skank whore video playset version of Transformers. All the people bitching about the flames are missing the fact that this version of Prime is BLUE and the flames constitute the only thing I can see as a nod to the old version, which was RED. The problem with this film (besides the simple fact it's directed by Bay) is that it's NOT Transformers in anything but name. Flames on OP is just the icing on the non-transformers cake that goes all the way down to a layer of we-can't-get-the-name-right crust. Scorponok? SCORPONOK??? WTF??? It's a fucking Decepticon. If the creature had actually existed in the REAL Transformerse universe, it would've been named fucking Scorpikon. The problem, ultimately, is that on top of a shitty script and a director who doesn't know how to do anything but blow stuff up, not one detail, but EVERY LITTLE TINY MOTHERFUCKING detail appears to be absolutely 180-degrees on all three axes WRONG. To you people complaining that fans are taking it too personally: I hauled hay in Texas summers to pay for Transformers that I still have. The first movie I saw in the theater by myself was the Transformers movie. If you don't mind what Bay's doing to this property, then you probably wouldn't mind him remaking The Wizard of Oz, but with Dorothy as a robot, but instead of the wizard, they're going to see the Witch, and instead of Oz, it's set in Iraq, oh, and Toto's a talking lizard. Fuck you. Fuck all of you. Wake me when this has bombed, so I can bitch about the next overhyped piece of shit on toast they're trying to call bruschetta.
Umm AugustusGloop....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
03:04:59 PM
While I echo many of your sentiments, I need to point out that there actually is a Scorponok in the Transformers cartoons, and he is a Decepticon.
No one answered my question....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
03:07:21 PM
With far less information about any Uwe Boll movie than we have about the TF movie, do you guys walk into a Uwe Boll movie with the same optimism and hope you exhibit for the TF movie?
To quote AugustusGloop ......
by kinghenryVIII
Dec 26th, 2006
03:15:27 PM
"If the creature had actually existed in the REAL Transformerse universe, it would've been named" - WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT? Now they have a universe? Twat-tard - the fucking shit is fake! Don't let the creatures on your under-roo's fool ya - it ain't real. But the bruschetta crack had me rolling. Nice one.
The Adventures of Donny Two-Chins
by Badger999
Dec 26th, 2006
03:24:16 PM
Just throwin' this out there for your amusement.

http://tinyurl.com/yge7m8
Jeffrey Wells at hollywood-elsewhere says....
by Kirbymanly
Dec 26th, 2006
03:26:54 PM
...that the men and women who have died in Iraq are "stiffs". I'm against the war and all but that is just heartless. Boycott Wells! Not only is he a HACK entertainment writer but now a f-ing cold, rotten bastard!
The death in this film...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
03:44:49 PM
Let's see. Yack's out, so I'll field this one. According to the script we have access to Jazz is the one who dies, not Bumblebee. Sure, there may have been a revision in the two months before shooting, but it's not likely. Plus, Bumblebee is essentially the main character after "Sam". He's not going to die. So there's your answer.
Ahh The Wonderful world of Losers
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
03:52:08 PM
Badger posts a thread where Murphy WINS an argument intelligently and then tries to use it as an attack. Badger = TOOL. GreekJammer says something is funny just because his boyfriend said it. Said little greekboy= Tool. Stoopider makes you guys realize your worthlessness, = HE gets attacked and wins hands down. AugustusGloop doesn't even know TF mythology and then lectures on it= TOOL. And goddamn, Yackcunter doesn't let us down. It talks about Murphy who makes more in a month than it makes in a year. It makes fun of the noose suggestion when it knows it has contemplated it. It should shut up or else it gets the hose. Between Phategod the IRS loser posting here from governement computers and Yackcunter the suicidal know nothing opinion stater, Harry just must be proud.
BringingMenBack to Bed-
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
03:53:38 PM
I omitted you above because that pimple you call a head is just fugly man. Murphy doesn't PAY me- I am permitted to attend to his needs. YOU are not. YOU = tool
Okay, you know what...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
03:54:52 PM
I find it funny (stupid) that people like Stoopid here are bashing and attacking anyone who doesn't think this film is going to be any good. They don't seem to get that these people aren't coming in here blind and saying it's going to suck. They are coming in here after having read the script that was completed less than two months before shooting, having seen the poor designs on paper, and now having seen them move like bouncing chickens in the trailer. You can't tell me that first animation of Vortex skipping across the airbase isn't bad animation. He bounces like a rubber ball. Anyway, people who don't like this aren't the people that Stooopid makes them out to be. They are informed people who see that this film is going in the wrong direction under the helm of a director known more for his making things explode than his quality film work. People want good films. Not fluff pieces and this film is already a fluff piece. Also, and this is to you and those like you Stooopider, try defending your position. Bring up a valid point. Don't just shout that Micheal Bay will own all your asses. He won't, honestly, and this film won't either. As for those posts up there that say this will be the number 2 film of 2007. I say sure... it will be number 2 right behind Spiderman 3, Pirates 3, FF2:Rise of the Surfer, the 300, Ratatoulli, and about a dozen other films. Number 2 from the bottom.
Thanks Nutsack
by AugustusGloop
Dec 26th, 2006
03:55:32 PM
I missed that one. According to the great and powerful wiki, Skorponok was only in the 3-part "The Rebirth" that comprised the 4th season and ended the G1 show. Never got to see that one. My bad. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S corponok KingHenry: The quote was on purpose.
Ack! Pthpbt!
by AugustusGloop
Dec 26th, 2006
03:57:38 PM
Would someone publish a formatting guide for this talkback system? Mangles words mine does it.
Oh, yeah
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
04:01:16 PM
He dies on page 103 of the script. So you know where to look.
sweet
by steff_so_funny
Dec 26th, 2006
04:13:43 PM
whatever man, pic looks awesome to me! can't wait for the movie!
BringingMenBack to Bed-
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
04:14:13 PM
Tis funny- you've never even owned a car little boy, yet you mistakenly think that I am Murphy, that Murphy uses drugs and that Murphy is a pedophile. I am PharteGodd and I am not scared of you. You are like a gnat on the back of a great gorilla- you matter not. Tell yourself how much you pwn tonight as mommy tucks your lonesome ass in.
BringingMenBack to Bed ignored BY Santa
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
04:19:13 PM
Listen- BSB- Murphy is likely in the Caribbean having a great time while you sit here WISHING you could know him. Did you see the Christmas card he posted of his gorgeous wife? Bet you'd like to meet a woman- one that wouldn't vomit when you come near. I don't go to the Stooges for comfort- I go because they are my friends. You could use some but will never have them. You are a tool used for opening the feed bins at a pork slaughterhouse. Useful to laugh at and no more.
SCRIPT LINK??
by HammeredGuy
Dec 26th, 2006
04:20:55 PM
anybody know where to find the script online?
I'm waiting...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
04:25:47 PM
I really would like Stooopider here to say something that has some merit. Go ahead and insult the people here. I don't care, and we can take it. Still, it would be nice if you didn't sound thirteen.
LINK!
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
04:27:02 PM
Before someone says we can't because we are full of crap.

http://s6.quicksharing.com/v/5 544137/primedirectivebman02_5B 1_5D.28.06.pdf

BringingMenBack to Bed ignored BY World
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 26th, 2006
04:27:16 PM
wow---- you really are an angry repressed homosexual mental patient
Oh, so you're 8.
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
04:34:29 PM
Well, that makes more sense.

Do your Mommy and Daddy know you are on the internet, little stooopider?

Oh great Stupider...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
04:43:29 PM
You see how easy that was to change a few letters and make your name reprisent you even better than it has before. Oh wait... I should have just left it alone. The fact that you are spelling that way even adds to the fact that you are a dumb illiterate sod. One that is even more stupid than it would seem. Keep up the fantastic work, you're second grade teacher would be proud.
FF2: Rise of the SS
by supermarch
Dec 26th, 2006
04:46:18 PM
FF2ROTSS

Damn. Acronyms suck.

http://www.apple.com/trailers/ fox/fantasticfourriseofthesilv ersurfer/

I Call Fantastic 4 Trailer Before U DO!!!
by Prague23
Dec 26th, 2006
04:48:15 PM
Apple.com you suckers! HA!
I don't care how good "Titanic" was...
by idahomer
Dec 26th, 2006
04:48:35 PM
I have never seen it and refuse to. They played that damn Celine Dion one too many times on the radio. (I was 25 when the Transformers came out, so really don't have an opinion, but felt like posting something.)
I'd like another talkback...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
04:48:41 PM
one that has some people who can actually back up their opinions. That would be nice.
Ah, force of habit.
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
04:51:38 PM
I tend to type that. You're instead of Your. Most of the time I'll catch it. Good for you. You're not as illiterate as you make yourself out to be. Now if the rest of your comments reflected that spark of intelligence then we'd get somewhere.
Stop it BringingSexyBack and nonsensical...
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
04:57:45 PM
... I' m laughing my head off!! MOUAHAHAHAHAHAH Stoopier is really fucking stooooooopid ain't he... he's gotta be trailer trash... Mouahahahaha!! He's always trying to shit on everyone's head yet he's a complete moron!! and nonsensical, I don't think is second grade teacher would be proud... I don't think he was able to graduate kindergarden, because ... well he was "stooopider" than everybody else... MOuahahahahahah!!... Hey Stoopider, like I said before.. Go out and give some help to the needy... Would be nice not to have you post your "stoopid" comments...
There's a lag you moron...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
04:58:49 PM
That's not a response to one of your many incessant insults.
did he just...
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
05:02:19 PM
... post something with "Borg"??? My god stoopider... Didn't think you were an ultimate nerd.. Really... "Borg"... Did you have to bring something that has "Borg" into play?? Are you already our of insults for them?.. Oh god.. go to sleep.. Tomorrow will bring back joy into your life..
MOUAHAHAAHAH!!!
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
05:05:39 PM
He's correcting me now! MOUAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAH!!.. C'mon BSB and nonsensical.. you gotta love this guy.. makes all of this talkback worth wild!... MOUAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAA! Go a-head, coreckt hus al too smithersreens!.. MOUAHAHAHAHAH!!.. We do typos, he Gets the grammer book on us! MOUAHAHAHAHHA!!! To bad you didn't do it in kindergarden... Might've graduated by the age of thirteen...
If you don't like the flames, ignore em.
by Briannicus
Dec 26th, 2006
05:06:04 PM
I'm cautiously optimistic about this, the version of the script that's up for review is from February so there's a bit of change that could have happened since then. I guess we'll just have to wait and see before coming up with a truly informed opinion.
Ooohhh... Stooopider.
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
05:07:00 PM
Does that make you hot, thinking of other talkbackers dressed as whatever fantasy you want them to fulfill for you? It sure seems like it.
"they've gathered in a circle to see who shoots first."
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
05:08:40 PM
.. and on that note... the talkback has become shallow and boring... God.. Was fun while it lasted guys... See ya Stoopider... Won't miss ya... Second time I've creamed the little tike!... I like me.. I like me a lot...
AH!...
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
05:11:07 PM
There we go.. He's back the little Dyke!... Guess he think an hour as gone by, yet he arosed himself to man milk frenzy within a few seconds...
no no no!!!!
by BadMrWonka
Dec 26th, 2006
05:11:12 PM
this isn't the nerdback that I was hoping for! stupid (stoopid) insults do not a discussion make! not to mention I lost $200 at the casino...oh well, paid for by ugly sweaters yackbacker, get us back on topic! I need my nerds arguing fix!
(for newcomers that don't know me or my proclivities, I love nerdguments!)
Damn, I really don't like that...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
05:12:42 PM
I'd rather not have you imagining any part of my body, most especially that one. If you truly want an excercise in futility then try getting ol' Stooopider here to make a real point or contribute to the talkback in a constructive way. As for Stooopid's lusting quest for my bodyparts, he's going to be pleasantly surprised at how easy they are to locate... with his mouth.
Amen to that BSB...
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
05:17:23 PM
Amen to that... Here's one for you Stoopider: Go two sea iffe u fhound yur bals. 'cose RuPaul whants a rubbdown hup is meet whole, hand he lickes u a lot.
Are you kidding me...
by nonsensical
Dec 26th, 2006
05:18:20 PM
This douche had nothing from the start. All he's done is attack everyone on a personal level. He started with Yackbacker and then moved on to whomever was in his sights.
nonsensical....
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
05:20:14 PM
Yep, he was also on other talkbacks doing the same thing... Dished it out with Yack then tried to move on to me with principles and shit.. I told him that before he questions anyone's principles he should start by having some of his own to back his stories up... Little twerp...
This is fun
by MrJJonz
Dec 26th, 2006
05:41:07 PM
I could spend hours reading fatfuckprimerib making a bad play on someones name and then stoopid typing in how he found that really funny so you are all his bitches . . . priceless. Just when you thought that you came on these sites to chat about films. Oh and about the film . . i will probably see it but that is probably because it has big robots in . . the transformers title is not needed on this film and they probably shouldn't have bothered getting the rights for it. Not sure if I'm meant to call someone a name now or not
Sorry Prague23 but I called it first
by supermarch
Dec 26th, 2006
06:42:23 PM
gotta be quicker than that, holmes
dioxholster....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
06:57:36 PM
Do you seriously think your argument is new or even has any merit? It's a movie based on an 80s cartoon and Spiderman is a movie based on a comicbook, and yet Spidermen somehow managed to capture both the look, feel, and even some of the exact story from the comicbooks and also managed to be both a great pair of movies and financial blockbusters. When a genre property is handled with a little love, respect, and talent you end up with something great like Spidey.

And for fuck's sake, saying Transformers will be the number 2 movie, even if it's fucking great, is just retarded beyond belief. Next Summer belongs to Pirates 3, Spidey 3, and Potter 5, probably in that order. Transformers will be lost in the shuffle of all of the other movies out next summer and can't possibly touch any of those other franchises.

Stooopider....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
07:39:09 PM
You really think you've done anything remotely resembling "winding geeks up" don't you? Get a fucking clue you jackass, people have been laughing at you, not with you.
SCREW YOU DON MURPHY!
by Kirbymanly
Dec 26th, 2006
07:53:51 PM
You fat fuck!
TheAllSeeingEye
by photoboy
Dec 26th, 2006
07:56:25 PM
You call me simple minded yet you're the one using terms like "simple cunt". Sounds like you're the one who needs to enlarge your vocabulary and stop shilling for Bay.
Hey Murphy!
by Kirbymanly
Dec 26th, 2006
07:56:47 PM
Go have some more Hot Pockets. I think they're done by now.
Go Go Power Rangers!
by PolyesterRage
Dec 26th, 2006
08:18:33 PM
This looks like the Mighty Morphin' Megazord.
"Power Rangers are a direct rip-off of Transformers"
by Shermdawg
Dec 26th, 2006
08:30:20 PM
Uh, no. If anything, the Rangers were inspied by Voltron.

stoopid is as stoopid does.
Voltron is Don Murphy
by Kirbymanly
Dec 26th, 2006
08:53:54 PM
...Defender of the snack bar
I don't know Yackbacker........
by Doc_Strange
Dec 26th, 2006
09:00:17 PM
A lot of people are convinced by a two minute trailer that this is going to blow them away, especially if they're willing to pay good money to go see "big, dumb fun" (their actual words!?!). Me, personally would rather see big, cerebral, timeless fun with a heart and a great script from good script writers. But I guess it's too much to ask from a movie costing in excess of $200 million. Ironic considering great, well written films that you can watch over and over again like Rocky Balboa cost only $20 million or less.....
How about a conversation?
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
09:06:36 PM
Seriously, I've spent some time on here expressing why I believe this movie will suck, and the only response I usually get is "you haven't even seen the movie yet!" Would someone kindly respond with something intelligent and explain to me what I should like about this movie, and please no "it's about robots and explosions, that should be enough!"

And for those who inevitably will respond with "you haven't seen it yet" my response will continue to be AvP and FF1 both looked just as bad as they turned out to be and we didn't even have a script for those.

This movie will kill bitches
by johnnymilkshark
Dec 26th, 2006
09:08:18 PM
I think the funniest bit about this movie is that EVERY geek who's crying about how terrible it looks is going to be buying a ticket to see it. You already know you're going to see it, just suck it up, be an adult and put up with all the stuff they changed and have a good time. When you hear a packed theatre cheering for your childhood heroes you'll feel a hell of a lot better.
AvP is a perfect example actually...
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
10:41:52 PM
Read the original script for AvP that was later turned into a Dark Horse comic and then lament what could have been. Besides being a bad movie in and of itself, AvP borrowed elements from the excellent Dark Horse script making it impossible to ever get the DH film made. It's shit like this that feeds the fury over Transformers.

Seriously, do you guys want a movie like Raiders of the Lost Ark or do you want another Tomb Raider II?

Stoopider, if Transformers was in fact about nothing but robots fighting then it would actually be better than what we're getting, because it would be about the robots. Michael Bay himself said this movie is about Sam and his first car, there's your A plot, the Transformers are all B plot. Why should knowing this fact compel me in any way to spend my money on this? Forget the designs, forget everything else, why should I spend my money on a Transformers movie that isn't even about the Transformers?

Stoopider telling off Shermdawg?
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
10:54:40 PM
This from a guy (I prefer calling him a "SelfMilker") who has more posts/replies than anyone else on every freaking talkbacks... This guy has got to be kidding, you're insulting Shermdawg for a Voltron comment and telling him he won't get the girls... How about you little twat? By the looks of things here, you spend way too much time replying and posting than concentrating on trying to get "a" girl (not including inflatable dolls now, they don't count Stoopider they probably don't try to escape while you mount them... See there.. I said "they probably" which might actually happen even with the inflatable ones)... Seriously, you should consider going out for a bit of air.. might do you some good... All that typing and whacking off will burn a whole thru your brai... wait.. no that won't work.. you must have one to burn it out... Forget that... Dude like I said before, go get yourself a copy of a tranny mag and stop your bitching to everyone, next thing we know you'll be licking someone's ass so you can make a friend here, then go to school and tell everyone that you do have a friend and tell the other kids in class that they can't come to your house and play with you and him... Jesus... Like this guy actually has a life?.. I'm guessing here but he's got to have at least 200 + posts within the last 7hrs... Even Stephen Hawking is telling you to stop jerking off and try to get yourself away from the computer for more than 5 minutes...
You're right, it's absolutely insane....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 26th, 2006
10:55:25 PM
...but I'm not the one who said it, and I'm also not the one that wrote the goddam script.

We can argue about the designs and the "talents" of Bay and Murphy, but you can't argue with Michael Bay's own words as well as the script that many of us have read. If you don't believe me then follow one of the links in this TB and read it for yourself. The Transformers are not the stars of this movie, Sam is. Peter Cullen should have been the lead in this movie, not Shia LeBeetlegeuse.

WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT
by ImJustSaying
Dec 26th, 2006
11:19:31 PM
This movie is going to suck because they're leaving out my favorite transformer, the only one with any real heart: The Brave Little Toaster, The BLT, Toasteroxentronbot. I mean, yeah, sure his transformation was a little lame (going from a toaster with bread in it to a toaster with toast in it), and maybe he does spend most of the time lost in the woods, but if you ever need someone to fuck up a junkyard trash compactor's shit (HUGE problem for the autobots... huge), he's your boy. I don't know if you realize this, but there was a sequel where the BLT went to mars. Are you wondering how the FUCK the little toaster got to motherfucking mars? He met a ceiling fan, that's fucking how. Best transformer ever. Fuck this movie for not having him in it. No, wait, just fuck this movie for resulting in the WORST TALKBACKS EVER, like this one. Jesus christ you guys... I can not wait for this movie to be over with.
LOL...
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
11:26:39 PM
Stoopider is living in his own little mind... Dude, you're a legend in your own mind... now .. go wack off ... Hangover... lol... what did you have? a whole can of Coca Cola? That's not a hangover... that's gas... When you have a hangover, you sorta just sit still and try not to operate anything that might hurt your senses... like I don't know... posting 200 comments in a couple of hours.. And from what I have to tell you, the banging of 2 teachers (Mr Hosborth, and Mr Clemens), sucking the teacher isn't really "banging a pussy"... go ask the nice reverend, he'll give it to you like he did before.. or was that your uncle? And your grandpa bangning you tomorrow thing, you should call the cops.. but wait.. I forgot that it was legal in your trailer park MOUAAHAHAHAHAHH!!!.. too funny kid..
Stoopid Troll
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 26th, 2006
11:34:32 PM
dicks are for chicks! You want to bait something, go dip your dick in a pirhana tank.
This is the worst talkback ever...
by TheRevengeOfBayouWilly
Dec 26th, 2006
11:36:31 PM
May God have mercy on your souls.
Fishfinger...
by Freefinger
Dec 26th, 2006
11:47:10 PM
I must give you the talkback since you obviously can make those name changes, wow.. Really.. I think I caught a nerve there... Was it really your uncle? Explains a whole lot... You area little retard, and that's the funny thing.. You writing you're baiting us and shit, you have the 200 + posts and most of them are retaliations against most users, guess what... It looks like school all over again for you ain't it? Everyone picking on you... Guess life ain't done with you yet... Next you'll be the loner at work, you should go to a shrink, would help you out... On that note... Have fun replying your head off 'cause I'm off the talkbacks for a couple of hours... You can do whatever you want, 'cause I won't be replying so there you go.. I'm leaving your little world, just like your mommy and daddy did when they left you behind on that dirt road, but kept the 17 yr old dog...
I prefer "pirana" with a tilde over the "n".
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 27th, 2006
12:02:41 AM
My apologies to the veteran Tb'ers for responding to an obvious troller.
Assumptions are the mother of all f**k ups
by It is not the end of the world
Dec 27th, 2006
12:25:07 AM
ahh yes, the Transformers debate I can't say for sure, if this movie will be good or bad, but from what I know so far it seems more the latter. Entertaining Yes, Intelligent No I know the original G1 story and dialog, weren't exactly in depth, or thought provoking. That doesn't mean they have to take the same approach to the movie. I have read (skimmed more like it) through the rough script They do have some interesting ideas/concepts which I liked. But they are very few and far between and I don't see how any little refinements would change my mind, cause my problems have got to do with big plot lines, which probably can't be changed Not saying this movie will be a awful movie. It just won't be a particularly good one. If anything It will be a movie that will leave you thinking "What if". But what movie based on a franchise doesn't Least the girl in it is hot thats a plus P.S I do like the picture of Optimus.
Yay Yack is back....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
12:42:09 AM
Bout time too, I think stooopid was going to go into a fetal position and cry soon because you weren't here.
Yeah it's been fun...
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
01:00:34 AM
I've been sitting here typing up some homework for my game design classes and refreshing these TalkBacks now and then.
Read it, loathed it...
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
01:24:09 AM
I've read a lot of scripts over the years. I've always had the fantasy of becoming a director or a screewriter, and my current game design classes have focused a lot on scripting and storyboarding, albeit for games, but the line between scripts for games and movies has been blurred for quite some time now.

Anyway, this script absolutely reeks of hackery. The dialogue is embarrassing, and all of the "plot twists" that the humans go through are so incredibly contrived it defies belief. SPOILERS BEYOND

First, the eBay thing and the Xbox thing are so incredibly stupid, "Lookit us, we know alls about that stuff you wacky kids are into nowadays!" "More than meets the eye!" x 3??? The idiotic way all of the humans in the movie end up in the middle of the finale. How about the forced dialogue where we find out Qatar soldier #1 has just had a baby? WOOT, there's some Oscar worthy dialogue there, I was just waiting for some old guy to say "I'm too old for this shit!" and then die in the arms of someone who cries out "He was just two days away from retirement!!! WAAAAHHH!!!"

I kinda feel bad
by BadMrWonka
Dec 27th, 2006
01:30:13 AM
I've insulted, engaged, consoled, cajoled, insoled, bemused, confused, perturbed and masturbated...and yet not a single person has acknowledged I exist...kinda disconcerting, isn't it?
I hate that fucking BadMrWonka....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
01:33:46 AM
Just today that guy insulted, engaged, consoled, cajoled, insoled, bemused, confused, perturbed and masturbated people in this TalkBack. I wish he didn't exist!

;)

Yack (more spoilers)
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
01:37:16 AM
Oh man, I completely forgot about the one dimensional NSA workers, her and her lameass cliche partner both. "I have an idea, let's lift Jeff Goldblum's character from ID4, make him a woman, and then give her a geeky counterpart so she can be all smugly superior to the men around her!" "Fucking A, great idea, it's so original!!"
What's the most embarrassing thing...
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
01:42:07 AM
...in the script? I'd have to vote for Bumblebee "peeing" on the Sector 7 guy.
GIRL: "what do you really
by It is not the end of the world
Dec 27th, 2006
01:46:35 AM
GIRL: "what do you really think of me" BOY: "I think there's more then meets the eye" oh yes...that line just captures the whole movie...and will certainly swoon the ladies.
LOL end of world....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
01:53:18 AM
SPOILERS

And in what way is she more than meets the eye? Well it turns out she's not the stuck up prom queen after all, nope she's had some "trouble" in her past and she knows more about cars than Jiffy Lube. Translation - she got knocked up in the backseat of her Momma's Buick and she aborted the child with the oil dipstick. LMFAO

NutsackMichael Bay himself said this movie is about Sam
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
01:54:41 AM
I will put $500 in escrow in one of Harry's fatrolls if you can prove this line you wrote..."Michael Bay himself said this movie is about Sam and his first car" $500 for your pussy ass and all you need to do is PROVE it. If you cannot prove it, you have to identify yourself to me to my satisfaction and never Talkback again. You got the chops to step up, puss?
Here's a question for you...
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
02:00:51 AM
SPOILERS

Wouldn't you kick your son's ass and/or kill him if you found out he was trying to sell family heirlooms on eBay? For fuck's sake, those objects would be priceless to the family, would they not? Selfish little fuck.

And another thing, Megs has been there in the presence of the AllSpark since Grandpa's expedition found him right? Why is it exactly that he didn't just grab the goddam thing and fly off to Cybertron? Nah, he's been dormant all those years because...because...because this script sucks ass and they never explain why he can all of a sudden wake up when he couldn't for nearly 100 years.

Nutsack I am calling you out still, PUSS
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:01:58 AM
the terms are clear- you PROVE something you said. You said it, why not stand by it. Prove it and I will give you $500. Fail to prove it and you never post again and ID yourself to me. If you refuse to choose either, then your TBers will know that you do not have any courage of your convictions whatsoever. You in. pussyboy?
Yackcunter NO
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:04:09 AM
Yackie- you were not bet with here because you are not worth shit. I know some people who would love to know who Hairy really is. And NO, that does not confirm Bay's quote. So Hairy Puss, you in?
Yackcunter Callete tu hole
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:05:42 AM
He said that BAY said that it is the story of a Boy and his car. Not some retard name Quint or an actor- neither of whom say that by the way. Now go away I am waiting for the coward to reply.
Yackcunter Callete tu hole
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:07:53 AM
You are still talking when you should be felching somewhere. Meanwhile, a nation is still laughing over the description of Quint as a journalist. And yes I have talked with Bay. Turd.
Yackcunter Callete tu hole
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:13:58 AM
I am under no obligation to prove something DIDN'T happen you stupid piece of shit. It didn't and I made a proposed bet with Hairy NOT You. NO ONE likes you- no one. I care if he said it- because I KNOW he didn't and dickwad quoted it as fact. Now he can prove his facts or chicken out before God and the douches here. YOU should go felch as I said before- NO ONE wants to hear from you. HAIRY- In Or OUT?
Yackcunter Callete tu hole
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:20:05 AM
No bet was made with you. A bet was offered to Hairy. The coward is weighing his choices. You cannot call anyone a name because no one listens to you.
Yackcunter Callete tu hole
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:26:15 AM
Felcher - a lawyer? Ha! You cannot even finish an argument logically. You obviously have no clients since you spend days here posting noise. My money is not dirty- please show me where I ever offered it to you? You aren't fit to brush my toilet my Felcher. There are people who want to know who Hairy is. Yes. And Phategod 1 and 2. And Bringing Sexy Back. These people already found Man of Stool and he posts no more. There are no threats. What would you do if you WERE a lawyer- argue that he has free speech of some shit? We want Hairy and Phate and a few others because we believe that their employers should know what they do. This is legal and allowed. Now go fuck yourself. Lawyer. Hilariass.
Yackcunter Callete tu hole
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:37:01 AM
Listen if you are a lawyer you are a poor one IMO and probably most of your clients are retarded or something. And admitting to being a lawyer makes you one step above human scum anyway. So IF you are you are a sucky one. A sucky scum. You must be proud. Anyway WE don't want to bring cause of actions against anyone. If we did, we'd go the RIAA route, that one or two individuals are making up lies (hmmmm...you?) for Intentional Interference in Prospective Economic Advantage. Then we supoena the IP#s of all of the mutts on here. We don't have to win- just make it hard for Hairy et al to continue. And of course, since Hairy and Phate are posting from employers' computers, make sure their employers are summoned into this with the end goal being their ruination. This, if you are a lawyer piece of shit, is perfectly legal. Either way, you are still a douche.
Yackcunter Callete tu hole
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:47:44 AM
This is boring. Hairy if you accept you can email me and we will set the escrow. If you don't ,well we all knew you were full of shit. Yackcunt- the thought of you as a lawyer still makes me smile. Ciao doucheo.
Yackcunter and the Retarded Clients
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:55:21 AM
I never said that the cause of action against Talkbackers had ANYTHING to do at all with the bet I offered. Your reading comprehension is at a third grade level- odd for a lawyer. You choose to miss my point entirely anyway- I don't have to win the lawsuit in order to win it. And as a lawyer you sure cannot make up your mind. Am I noted film producer Don Murphy or just an idiot like you?
Yackcunter and the Retarded Clients
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
02:57:42 AM
further, the RIAA reference just applied to the fact that they NEVER win their cases but they manage to win them without going to court at all. Now go away - logic is not a friend of yours.
Yackcunter Are you THAT stupid
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
03:02:40 AM
If you are a lawyer you would know that the truth is an absolute defense in court. If Phate or Haiy are posting at work and WE tell his work and they choose to fire him, that is sad but not actionable. You could ask Man of Stool, but then again, we got him before the holidays.
just imagine if Bay did LOTR
by It is not the end of the world
Dec 27th, 2006
03:16:27 AM
It would be about a boy and his first ring. A coming of age story..wow..sounds promising
300 looks great
by CuervoJones
Dec 27th, 2006
03:24:44 AM
i´m shivering with antici...pation
Jesus, go away for a few hours....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
03:41:31 AM
....and look what fucking happens!

Dear Mr. Two Chins Tarantino Bitch Slapped, first Spielberg said it was about a boy and his car in an interview with Alex Kurtzman and then the sentiment was followed by Michael Bay in an interview with Quint here at AICN. Yack has already tackled this issue, and you have unequivocally been pwned like the bitch that you are.

As for your threat, you call me a coward but where's your e-mail address I'm supposed to be using?

Me, I'm not hard to find at all, with two videos on YouTube calling your movie shit I'm pretty sure you could have found me if only your Cro-Magnon brain worked as well as our human brains do.

Oh for the record, I'm self employed, why don't you e-mail me and let me know what I'm up to so I can fire myself.

Also for the record, I'm also a fulltime student, why don't you e-mail my school and let them know how naughty I am too. God this is funny, my hippie teachers would love to know some jackass in Hollywood is threatening me, they'd laugh their Woodstock loving asses off.

BTW, you also can't touch me for my videos on YouTube, parodies don't count you ignorant fucktard.

hahahahaha
by DocPazuzu
Dec 27th, 2006
03:44:12 AM
This is the funniest TB since, er, the last Transformers TB. I've been laughing my ass off at work reading this for the past hour or so -- which isn't such a good idea at a library. Keep bringing the ownage, YackBacker. I am severely entertained!
Wait, wait, I haven't been following all of this...
by Shermdawg
Dec 27th, 2006
03:46:38 AM
Well, not like I should have been. Who exactly is PharteGoddPrime, and what did they do to Man of Stool?

Quick recap please. (And give me cues so I can hum the Transformer logo flip when needed.)
THIS is why the TF TB's are so Good
by DOGSOUP
Dec 27th, 2006
03:48:31 AM
Thank youse YackBacker, Thank youse so much...
The flames still piss me off...
by FuzzyWhisper
Dec 27th, 2006
03:55:38 AM
...but all the designs are generally cool, and the trailer looks promising. The one thing I'm hoping for is that the film won't exclusively stick to a human perspective. Transformers has always been about the Transformers themselves, not our civilization's reaction to their existence. To change that would be a mistake.
Where'd he go?
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
03:59:16 AM
Where the fuck did our fat, little punching bag go? He's probably on the phone with legal checking to see if he can sue for being pwned.

My god, just when it seemed stoopider had totally derailed this TB by being, well, stupid, along comes Phartpwnage to save the day. Pearl Harbor sucks, but we love you Phartpwned.

Yeah I read the "quote bet" thing...
by Shermdawg
Dec 27th, 2006
04:15:29 AM
But what about Mr."DON MURPHY PWNS TEH SUK" a.k.a Man of Stool?

And hoestly though, I seriously dout Pharte is actually Murphy. If it was, do ya really think Speilberg would let this shit fly? It's most likely one of the Stooges.

Oh yeah, and R.I.P. Chevy Cha...uh, I mean Gerald Ford.
Wouldn't that be sweet....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
04:20:17 AM
If I wake up tomorrow and find $500 sent to my PayPal, then next summer I will take all of my TB friends to see Don Murphy's movie on Don Murphy's dollar.

Let's see, YackBacker, PhateGod 1/2, superninja, and who else has been here in the thick of slagging this monstrosity with us? (it's almost 3 am here, so sorry if I forgot you, whoever you are) I'll even invite AllSeeingEye and my friend Mr.NiceGaius because we share passionate non-gay love for Battlestar Galactica.

Hey Donny, you can send the $500 to my PayPal using the same e-mail attached to my Transformers videos, if you're intelligent enough to find them that is.

Well goodnight all...
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
04:29:20 AM
This has easily been the most fun I've had in a TB all year long, all thanks to Pharty being such a complete and utter horse's ass.

See you all in the morning, keep the fire warm for me.

Yack + Hairy v phartegodd
by Ray k
Dec 27th, 2006
06:30:15 AM
I'm not a fan by any means of phartegodd's crap, but I do have to take issu with what you quoted against him **http://www.aintitcool.com/?q =n ode/24383 See quote: QUINT: You know... I sat down with Bay before shooting and he told me that the whole hook for him with this project wasn't the robots or the action. He said it was the human story, specifically your story, what he called the All-American story of a kid getting his first car. SHIA LABEOUF: When I met with him he said the same thing. That's why I was into it. I mean, yes it was TRANSFORMERS and oh shit! You're taking me to meet with Michael Bay, but then he was like, "It's a coming of age story."** What quint said, that refers to what got bay interested. What was said to Shia, also refers to the arc of the kids character. I'm not saying you guys are wrong, just that this quote does not actually back up what you are saying. If hairy is right and there is absolutely no real comeback on him, why not get something that actually proves what you say and make an easy 500 bucks. I could find a use for $500 in your position. Also, to the guy that posted that the TF cartoon is a modern classic? No. Just no. That's the sort of fervour that helps no-one. While I would be happy with more than just explosions and bots, sometimes we really just need reality to creep back in.
Oh, and the script argument
by Ray k
Dec 27th, 2006
06:33:09 AM
Yackbacker, if I'm right, the script you are talking about has no mention of teletraan 1. At the start of the TB (i'm in work on a helpdek, so have lots of nothing to fucking do!), there is mention of designs for teletraan 1, and prodcutions designs, etc. Is it so impossible that you did not see the final script? Of course, I could be completely wrong, but i'm rationally debating as opposed to calling people cock jugglers. Although, I now feel the need to actually call someone a cock juggler. Maybe my boss.
Looks good
by Dazzler69
Dec 27th, 2006
06:44:53 AM
Optimus prob is the closest to Gen 1 as we are going to see for visual, I am happy with it so far. Trailer looks great.
Re: the script
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
07:03:38 AM
Its not just about a boy and his first car. Its worse than that, It's also about a boy who gets bullied around in school and can't get girls to like him. Its a family movie that just happens to have big robots in it. By the way, looking at the trailer, nothing from that first draft script appears to have been changed at all.
There's hope for all you geeks out there
by It is not the end of the world
Dec 27th, 2006
07:10:25 AM
If your a geek, and you want the hot chick, all you have to do...is save the world. Hopefully befriending giant transforming robots. Simple enough right. oh....and don't forget the "you're more then meets the eye" line. Its Gold Jerry..GOLD!!
Its fine to make a family movie with "heart"
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
07:22:30 AM
It worked for the spiderman franchise so far. But TF is a different nut entirely. Its one thing to have them bonding with and protecting humans, but throwing in all these family elements really isn't necessary. Plus, I'm really not looking forward to Michael Bay stylized shots of family members embracing with flags waving, the sun setting in the background, and music swelling up.
Yack--this has to be your best performance ever
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
08:02:55 AM
Honestly, you would have thought that a man like Murphy/pharte would have better things to do with his time then flame away at the truth. Oh well...
Re: the script and ricky
by Ray k
Dec 27th, 2006
08:22:01 AM
You mean, I could see myself as spike? WOOO! Now I'm super fucking pumped for this movie! Seriously though, I would have seen it anyway, just to know. The trailer has made me look forward to it. The talkbacks have devolved into a retarded art vs spectacle argument, but we need to take lessons from the 80's here. Commando, as a piece of film is trash, but is so goddamn entertaining. It just works. As for speilbergs involvement, when has he been involved in a truly bad movie? A poster earlier on noted the trailers spielbergian qualities, and I see that too. Rambling aside, its quite possible that A) the boy and his car angle is not the whole movie, and B) if it is, the movie still doesn't suck. I'll see it in the cinema, and go back again if its cool (I don't pirate movies, i genuinely do equat it with stealing)
Remember when Yack took a vow of silence on TF?
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
08:22:58 AM
He totally did 6 months ago when those pics of Prime and Megatron surfaced. Yack was so disgusted he didn't bother posting anything and vowed not to talk about TF at all. What made you change your mind dude? Also, whats this 2006 script I'm hearing about? Its still the same shite as the 2005 draft, right? (which is an unholy amalgam of ID4, Godzilla, and National Treasure).
It looks like YackBacker and PharteGoddPrime
by kinghenryVIII
Dec 27th, 2006
09:26:57 AM
own this talkback. This is the funnist shit I've ever read! You guys .... yesterday was the first day back to work since Friday. Nothing was going on so I jumped on in to the talkback, posted some shit (trying to get a rise) and left around 5ish. I then come in today, get some stuff done and check out the talkback again .... JEBUS! Ya'll need to find some good porn, close the window shades, put a beer in one hand and your cobb in the other and go to town to relieve some of the pent up anger. Or, find so sort of progressive resitance device - like a twat. i kid. Keep it up. By the way - can you post the script link? I can't get the above to work. Thanks!
Fair enough Yack, but you're SUSPECT.
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
09:38:24 AM
Who would dare pass up an opportunity to trash a train wreck like this transformers movie? Although the action scenes do seem promising, I'll say that much. Sounds like the fucking Yankees are trying to nab Zito by the way. Be concerned, be very concerned.
stooopider
by Ray k
Dec 27th, 2006
09:39:07 AM
The mary whitehouse gags had me laughing, but apart from that, dude, calm down.
Stoopider already cured world hunger Yack
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
09:46:05 AM
Now he's currently hard at work eradicating cancer. Geez, get with the times, will ya Yack?
Yeah the Yanks just want to dump Johnson
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
09:55:39 AM
Which is a smart move on their part. He's old and creaky. Why Arizona actually wants him back is a complete and utter fucking mystery to me. Problem is, if the Yanks are able to get rid of Johnson, they'll target Zito like freaking sharks with lazer beams attached to their heads.
Stoopider: bright as Alaska in December
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
09:59:49 AM
He's the new phartegod and I love him already. Don't ever change cupcake. We love you just the way you are.
This stoopider guy beats dogs for fun
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
10:08:18 AM
Seriously, why do you enjoy beating dogs cupcake? That's pretty damn sick. After all dog baiting and AICN messageboard baiting are pretty much the same thing (except we're marginally smarter than canines). I know you bait dogs cupcake and I'm coming looking for you.
Yeah he sucks at life
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
10:14:03 AM
...but in a sad and somehow endearing sort of way. Its ok cupcake, everything is gonna be ok...
Dissapointed
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
10:32:45 AM
For awhile there i truly believed that hairy and yack were capable of a decent arguement and held alittle maturity and honor...and that pharte was the biggest flamer in the threads. But it seems i was proven wrong, you are in the same category my friends...because neither side is willing to hear other opinions or to keep an open mind, they truly believe that their opinions are the only ones that matter, and that this movie will be the movie " they think it will be" It is one thing to get excited about a movie or go "meh, not for me" but to full out roast it, or say "its going to be the best movie ever" before it is even out, is unrealistic and immature. Either way i think there are going to be quite a few people in these talkbacks who's credibility is shot after it comes out, i will see the movie and judge it from there. And strangely enough none of those script links have worked, i am alittle dissapointed, i actually thought there was going to be some discussions on the movie, not yack and hairy flaming with pharte....seriously sad.
Okay, next Christmas...
by Childe Roland
Dec 27th, 2006
10:41:04 AM
...I'm bringing my laptop on the road with me, because I don't want to miss an exchange like the above again. Funny shit, guys. Optimus is looking good, by the way. Kind of hard to believe folks are still displeased with his design.
So what's your deal, stooopider?
by Childe Roland
Dec 27th, 2006
11:33:45 AM
I mean, I've been known to belabour a point or two in talkback, but the horse you're beating has gone from dead to decomposed to fertilizing the grass that made the hay to feed a new horse already. Don't you have any other hobbies? Oh, and Yack, I'm glad you approve of the new design. I wasn't talking about you so much as anyone still whining about how he's not G1 accurate or typing the obligatory "FLAMES ON OPTIMUS=(INSERT ATTEMPTED WITTICISM HERE)" comments. Happy holidays to you and yours.
G-Force (or Gatchaman) kicked all five flavors...
by Childe Roland
Dec 27th, 2006
11:47:42 AM
...of ass, BSB. I used to dig it the most. And I was kind of touched by the fact that this superheroic team of bird-themed hi-tech ninjas employed not one, but two of the mentally handicapped (Tiny and Keyop, or whatever that speech-impaired, google-eyed kid's name was). It was very progressive of them for the time (the actual time of the original airings, I mean, obviously...not the near future in which their amphibious transforming jet with the fighter-plane tailfin and the racecar nosecone and the ability to spontaneously combust operated). If they ever make a G-Force movie, I hope they remain true to the source material and hire Jerry from Facts of Life to play Keyop. They can get Corky from Life Goes on for Tiny. That would rule.
Damn cupcake, you've got a lot of free time
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
11:48:37 AM
The more important question is what do you do for a job that allows you so much free time to beg for attention here on AICN? My initial guess is that you're the guy who cleans the dead rats from teh subway tunnels, but thats far too time consuming a job and wouldn't give you the free time to post here on AICN. So I'm guessing that you're a pug fluffer. You're the go to guy who manually helps pugs the breed. That's you cupcake.
oh jebus, you're a freaking teacher stoopider?
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
11:52:40 AM
I weep for the future. It saddens me that you are entrusted with the job of teaching children.
to quote cupcake (stoopider):
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
11:54:16 AM
"Your naivety in thinking that Bay is the first film director that's made films that kids see while he's taking drugs is excrutiatingly prevelant." Yes cupcake, not enough people knowing about childrens' films being made by drug users is a real crisis here in the US. You should look into solving that huge problem once you find the cure for homelessness. Cupcake you're a worthless dolt.
He'll be back
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
12:00:11 PM
His kind always comes back until the ban-hammer is brought down upon them.
Yack, if you mean the Transformer script that...
by Childe Roland
Dec 27th, 2006
12:03:18 PM
...leaked a while back, no. I've been avoiding it. I did the same with Batman Begins (despite moviemack daring me about a thousand times to read it and then tell him the movie might not suck). I've had some very misleading experiences with reading scripts before seeing the movies made from them (or the heavily edited/rewritten versions of them). Tarantino's/Rodriguez's From Dusk 'til Dawn was probably the biggest disappointment (the script got me all worked up, but the delivery of most of that dialogue was so shit awful...and the vampire effects so cheesey...that I wanted to lobotomize myself so I could forget seeing the movie entirely). Of course, Pulp Fiction actually looked a whole lot better on the screen than it did in script form, so that was kind of a pleasant surprise. Anyway, I usually avoid scripts and give the director the chance to make the movie before I urinate all over it or him. Film, perhaps more than any other medium, is a collaborative art form. The writer brings what usually amounts to the framework of a story while the director takes that idea and runs with it...often in directions that seem to contradict the screenplay...while the producers typically sit back, watch dailies, count money and offer unwanted opinions on how things should be shaping up. As an audience, it works best (at least for me) when I don't go into the experience with a lot of preconceived notions or color commentary from those who have strong opinions about how they'd rather things had been done. That doesn't mean I just eat and happily digest whatever's served (nine out of ten times, I'll annoy the shit out of whomever I saw a movie with by explaining in detail how I might've done it differently), but I like to give the effort its day in court before I condemn it to an eternity on my shit list.
There's an elsewhere?
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
12:04:58 PM
Is that where all the humor went? What TB did the funnyness flee to?
Yackcunter Are you THAT stupid?
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
12:12:17 PM
The answer is yes. To the Talkbackers- notice Hairy NEVER took the bet. Pussy. Man with no courage of convictions. Never to be believed again. Yackcunter gets owned again and again by stoopider and acts like it isn't happening to him. Funny shit. It is amazing that I have to talk down to Yacky who claims he is a lawyer. A lawyer who is on Aintitshit 24 hours a day. Probably the kind of lawyer who hires Mexicans to rear end Mercedes. Anyway, here is the claim- the claim is that one person using multiple handles is fabricating attacks on the film and libelling the Mighty Murphy. One supoena gets all the TB records and registrations. A few letters sent to in good faith get to the bottom of whether this is a conspiracy or not go out to their employers and IPs. Then wanks like Nutsack and Phategod (who admits to posting libel from US Government Computers) can explain to others why they have time to attack professionals and films in order to make their empty lives feel better. Yackcunt- please tell everyone here that this can NEVER work. Hairy- if you accept the bet try me at babarthemighty@hotmail.com. Stoopider- there's no longer a point- it really is a moronic cunt and it will get the hose one day soon.
yack
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
12:12:34 PM
No i do not agree, if a flamer acts immature and baits you, it does not require that you do the same...or even respond for that matter, it is harder to take someone serious when their actions are along the same lines of the flamers, and saying saying " he started it first" in so many words will not change my mind, and like the movie, i will base any judgements on what i see. I have an opinion, like you and everyone else in here, but my opinion is rooted in the fact none of us have seen this movie yet, so none of us can truly judge it "script or not" i have found many movies that other people found "one dimensional" to have meaning and depth...and the same goes for many "okay" scripts that i have given the once over to, before passing it along. Scripts pass many hands yack, and undergoes many changes before principal photography, not to mention that dialogue,and the emotional context is changed, subtext as well. When a script is written it has to get approved and greenlit, and it is usually because there is potential for a concept to work. But first it might be read over by another writing party, or tweaked to make certain things work. So if there are similarities from the script in the trailer, or if exact scenes from the script were in the trailer, it does not actually mean that the movie will "be dissapoiting" or "will suck" It means that certain liberties have been taken due to time restraints and cost, not everything will be changed, and sometimes when you read a script the scene will come across as one dimensional and hollow, because it still lacks the emotion of the actors involved, as well as the creative visual team behind it. I do not know what vision micheal bay has for this movie...but i do believe he is a director capable of pulling off this genre, and that his work has come along way since his "mtv video days" I am not a huge fan of peter jacksons early work...dead alive,the frightners,meet the feebles, were far from the quality of heavenly creatures,and lord of the rings..in terms of writing and direction. certain directors grow and learn, you do not start out a great director, you start out an "okay" director and some like the much disliked "Uwe boll" are not at all about a good movie they are purely about profit, they are con artists and charmers...they know how to wheel and deal so that they keep costs of production low by hiring washed up or third rate actors,and know that for the price that went towards making the film, they will still make a buck, trust me..i know how it works. unless you are truly submerged in the industry and know how it works, you cannot judge a movie purely by its script. everyone fan has concerns when a movie is being made from their favorite iconic cartoon or super hero, but what do you lose out of it if the movie "sucks" or is subpar with your built up expectations? you lose the cost of movie admission. But if word of mouth spreads that the movie is bad, what do the people involved with getting it made lose? They not only lose money for the studio, but their credibility as well..it is alot harder to get people to back you, or put up money without thinking " this is not worth the risk, they have a bad track record" unless of course you are Mr Boll, who proceeds with charm and gets the people involved drunk over " a dinner meeting" and then speels on about how great the movie is going to be, it is easy to make something sound exciting to a drunk man =)
lol--thats the first time in a loooong while
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
12:16:15 PM
that anyone has ever accused me of being a beta male. To those ill-informed, Yackbacker, superninja, and myself had already pulled out lawn chairs to watch this trainwreck. I may be mistaken, but I think Nice Gaius and a few other TBers were a part of that whole group. Gosh, when was that? 4 months ago or so? Oh, and stoop, somehow, Im rather dubious of your position as a highschool teacher. True, stranger things have happened, but it seems a rather odd choice of profession for one of your temperment.
childe_roland
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
12:21:39 PM
thank you, for actually understanding how the script process works...it is nice to have a grounded post that i do not have to roll my eyes at for having a lack of understanding. Your posts go a long way with me in terms of a non-ignorant frame of mind... this TB was seriously starting to lack that.
Well, I'd join in on all of this but...
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 27th, 2006
12:25:46 PM
...I'm afraid my head would explode from laughter.

PharteCowardPrime: your ways are tired, your threats are impotent, and your point of view is meaningless. However, the fact that you appear to believe that one lone Talkbacker is operating under multiple handles to libel Murphy can only mean one thing:

You are zfisk/homewrecker. May your god have mercy on your empty soul.

Carry on TUADMAHS. Carry on.

I assure you people
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
12:31:16 PM
That Phartegod is not Don murphy...mr Murphy might be alot of things,but he is not Phartegod. mr Murphy has more intelligence and charm then Phartegod
Don Murphy is the sexiest tomboy beanpole...
by Badger999
Dec 27th, 2006
12:36:45 PM
...of all time?

Discuss.
sexyback
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
12:38:22 PM
Your opinion is respected, but it really is not Murphy, it is most likely a stooge or someone pretending to be him to get you worked up
The question of Parte's identity...
by Badger999
Dec 27th, 2006
12:41:43 PM
I dunno if Pharte is really Donny Two-Chins or not, but his verbal patterns are definitely inspired by Donny's own frothy-mouthed rants from elsewhere.

Pretty funny, really.
If Don Murphy really is phartegod
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
12:46:55 PM
Then he is indeed a sad, mean little mad. He has my pitty, but not much else.
yackbacker
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
12:51:21 PM
Yes i absoloutly do admit that not all bad scripts become great movies, but that was not my arguement. And you Sir were absoloutly right when you just stated my point " there are always exceptions" it works both ways. And if a bad script does become a bad movie, then the person to blame is the person who approved the script and passed it along, as well as the person who greenlit the project...not everyone who works in hollywood has " a feel" for their job, reading a script is somewhat like trying to read a human being, you might think you know who they are,but unless you have been around people for a long time, you are only taking a blind guess, even if you have a very good idea who they are you still might not understand their true potential/nature.
"Iron Chef" is the tits
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
12:52:21 PM
Not the new americanized version, but the old, badly dubbed asian version. For my money, it doesn't get any better than watching crazy chefs scramble to figure out how to cook octopus labia.
what's up, MNG!
by DocPazuzu
Dec 27th, 2006
12:55:07 PM
I agree. As much as I'd love to jump in and help rip MurphArteGodd and stooopider new ones, I don't want to disrupt the perfectly zen-like balance of complete and utter ownage on display here. Yack's pwn-fu is indeed mighty and a beautiful thing to watch.
Slow day so I'll throw my 2cents in, again.
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 27th, 2006
12:56:31 PM
I read on another site that, according to a reviewer of the script, the Transformers make up about 30% of the film. IMO that is enough cause to rename the movie to something other than Transformers. p.s. I finally read "Make Love the Bruce Campbell Way*directors cut" F***ING hilarious!
No Reservations in Isreal was a great ep.
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 27th, 2006
12:59:13 PM
His show is tits, the one where he's ripping on ABBA is gold.
hahaha... "G1 Iron Chef"
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
01:01:12 PM
I think the flames on the woks ruined the more recent incarnation. Chairman Kaga chomping into a green pepper, turning to the camera, then grinning like a pedarest never ceases to amuse me.
To all the haters
by Fawst
Dec 27th, 2006
01:03:15 PM
You are bitching about the wrong things. Flames on Optimus = who gives a fuck? Transformers crashing into present-day earth in "protoform" or whatever they call it? What about that? Where's the bitching that they don't crash on the Ark into a volcano in prehistoric times? See, I think they missed a huge opportunity with that one. They could have made it that the crash of the Autobot and Decepticon motherships were the catalyst for the end of the dinosaurs. Oh well. And why no bitching about the lack of an energy-based mace/axe on Optimus and Megatron? It was only in the first episode, but it's G1 dammit! Blah. This level of bitching should have been reserved for the Elves coming to Man's rescue at Helm's Deep, or the Batmobile having hydraulics. In other words, it's fucking pathetic.
Heyyyyy Doc!!!!! Its been a dog's age!
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
01:03:55 PM
How are you doing, young man?
Yeah Mesa Grill is awful
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
01:07:40 PM
Bpbby Flay makes mediocre food that tastes like it could come from a Ruby Tuesday. It bothers me that he's so damn arrogant about it too. I went to Mario Batali's place, Po, a while back and was also very unimpressed. You guys been to Dinosaur BBQ in Harlem yet? It freaking rocks.
nice try, fawst, but next time, use better bait.
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
01:07:40 PM
Is anyone as sick of the term "haters" as I am? If I never hear the terms "hater" and "apologist" again, it will be too soon.
Bobby Flay pwns teh suck.
by Badger999
Dec 27th, 2006
01:11:57 PM
Masaharu Morimoto pwns teh Flay.
There is a Morimoto in NYC
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
01:12:38 PM
FYI, they opened up last spring BSB.
I miss stoopider,
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 27th, 2006
01:15:28 PM
he is missed that is!
methinks I'll look it up
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
01:17:59 PM
A huge yanks yanks fan and a german? Yikes is right. A jewish mets fan like myself would be freaking terrified to venture in there. Yeah I go to that chow wesbite all the time, it rocks. I love the messageboard topic "Got Red Lobster gift card...now what?"
Ever go to "Pommes Frites" in the east village?
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
01:24:35 PM
That place is incredible. Good fries and good sauces. Best hangover cure ever. The saturated fat ban in NYC is going to kill their business though.
Thanks lads.
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 27th, 2006
01:29:49 PM
I hope everyone had (or is still having) a nice Holiday. I don't know about you but I'm very much looking forward to the New Year.

I know that my optimism regarding this movie is really more of a fool's hope. But reading the masterful ownage displayed here seems to somehow make it all worthwhile!

And how is it that PharteCowardPrime is still posting?! Don't get me wrong, it makes for incredible entertainment. But he should be banned on general principle.

Yackbacker - my compliments to the chef. The ownage was delicious.

Yack, theres a ferrific place in Westchester
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
01:30:40 PM
its called Southbound BBQ, and its pretty damn good (for westchester anyway). Its in Valhalla. Ever go to that Candlestick place in Scarsdale? Best. Wings. Ever.
moondoggy2u, sorry :(
by Fawst
Dec 27th, 2006
01:31:11 PM
I hate that word too, why did I even use it? But if by bait you mean my complaint about the Ark, I'm not sure you can get further from the cartoon source material than that. I just find it utterly ridiculous that people are bitching about fucking flames! It's a god damn truck. That transforms. Into a robot. So long as he has a blue head with pointy things and a mask-like thing on his face, I'm happy. I also think it's funny that no one cared when that one autobot plane was really just a ripoff of the Veritech fighters from Macross. I mean, it was the same damn toy with a new paintjob and an Autobot symbol instead of skull and crossbones.
nice, I managed to misspell "terrific"
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
01:32:46 PM
I need to save this TB... I've got some serious eating and exploring to do.
Never on Schedule but always on time
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
01:38:33 PM
First I got to go after Allseeyingeye Who came after me first For only posting In TF talkbaks. I dont what it is to you But it the only subject on this site I feel the ost adimate about. For the most part your pro movie views had been the most intelligent but you started sounding like a Bay/Murphy Sycophant who wants nothing more then a Dumb Action movie so be it. Now on to AINTITSHOT (for those who don't know that is Phartgoddprime's a.k.a don murphy's first Username here. Now your trying to get me Fired well first of I am allowed to use My PC for personal use as long as it on my time 2. You are a ass. I bet if you spent half the time you do on the internet as you did Producing your Hit to flop ratio would be alot better. I find it funny you called someone a spelling Nazi seeing as how your biggest insult with me has been my spelling. I don't know what is sadder the fact that you come here and post a bunch of garbage, the fact that you welch on bets, the fact that you posted on Sycophant.net telling your alter ego to stop posting over here, Or the fact that you've called for banning of my accounts on various websites only be banned yourself. I tell you right now Don I don't care if this movie is the greatest peice of film history ever released you will never receive my $8 and If I ever meet you I will beat the Holy Shit out of Triple chinned ass.
I'm a yellow belly coward....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
01:55:15 PM
I have to ask you Mr. Chin Extreme, how exactly is there a bet to even be had at this point? Yack deftly destroyed you already, so why do you persist? Seriously, I'd take you up on your bet if there was any reason to do so, but it's over already and you lost before I had even had the chance to read your challenge.

I give you credit for posting an e-mail addy though, maybe I'll drop you a line so we can exchange Christmas cards or something.

Prime
by nevrwuz
Dec 27th, 2006
02:02:43 PM
I think the pic looks great. Im tired of all you hacks on here complaining about something you couldnt do on a good day. It could be the best thing ever and you'll still whine.
Prime whine
by nevrwuz
Dec 27th, 2006
02:02:55 PM
I think the pic looks great. Im tired of all you hacks on here complaining about something you couldnt do on a good day. It could be the best thing ever and you'll still whine.
BSB, the bet....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
02:15:35 PM
How do I take the bet when he's already lost? That's what I don't get, what's he really after?

My guess is he's looking to send me a spam bomb like he did that jegoing (sp?) guy. Whatever, the only e-mail I ever give out on-line, the one that is attached to my TF videos, already gets bombarded with spam daily, and my spam filter works just fine. If Pharty really wanted to contact me he could just go to YouTube.

The only thing I am completely sure of is that I would never get that $500 even if I showed up on his doorstep with Michael Bay himself and had Mikey repeat the boy/car thing.

Prime's gun....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
02:25:51 PM
SPOILERS

We know OP's arm morphs because of the leaked pics, I don't recall if it's in the script or not, but I think I do remember it being in there regarding BB.

I don't really get why they did it other than to make them even more complicated. It's no big deal I guess, but it definetely smacks of them trying to out-morph Venom next summer.

What I don't get is why Hasbro would allow them to make this change, it's not like they can reproduce the effect with their toys, they'll have to make replacement or add-on limbs which always drove me crazy with the original toys. Remember attaching Starscream's hands? How about the Constructicons, always hated that 1/3 of Devastator was made out of parts that didn't come from the vehicles.

Er, Ganymede,
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
02:32:25 PM
to quote you "We all know there's things we'd like to change, but that shouldn't detour us from supporting this film." Pardon me, but I'm under no obligation whatsoever to "support this film." You make it sound like this is some small indie arthouse project that needs more press and nurturing to suceed. Please, its a freaking Jerry Bruckheimer, fireball riddled summer blockbuster. And yes, If I don't like "small" details such as the movie not even remotely resemling the original source material, I'm going to speak up. Clearly our opinions about TF differ. Let me just ask you, for how much longer do you intend to apologize for this film?
Weepin' Jesus on the Cross!
by kinghenryVIII
Dec 27th, 2006
02:33:32 PM
Enough. Call each other collect! My sick sense of curiosity made me come back to the TB and you guys are still going at it! Wow. Progressive resistance device = pussy.
Fair enough, Yack.
by Childe Roland
Dec 27th, 2006
02:52:07 PM
I'm actually looking forward to the talkback after the movie comes out. Because I'm sure there will be things about this that piss me off and I suspect you might be surprised by some of what ends up on the screen. Of course, given that we're probably two of the more ambivalent spokespeople for our respective camps, that talkback exchange will probably have to wait until after the DVD comes out. Still, it should be an interesting discussion of what was, wasn't and might have been. For now I've got to get out of here because you guys are making me hungry (and I'm trying to quit second lunch as a habit). Holiday cheers to you, MNG, BSB, moondoggy, Doc P and all who enjoy a friendly, heated cinematic debate. May 2007 bring us at least one film we all have a hard time bitching about.
yackbacker
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
03:02:33 PM
You are right,Bay is not even close to the same category as Ridley Scott or Cameron...but i do see Bay for the potential he does have. I also have said the island was not a great movie but is was entertaining and did have alot more depth then his previous movies. Good point with superman returns though, in terms of expectations and what they can do to cause mixed feelings. I personally believe that Singer created a beautiful movie...and brought a completely different feel to the character while,maintaining some of the old ones....there was also to much of donners original superman in there. I looked forward to more of "bryan singers superman" but you are right again when you said "life goes on" these movies are not going to please everyone, but they are going to make money, and entertain. You have every right to want your mind to be stimulated by a film, but you also have the option of not going to a movie if the premise does not please you, it is a summer blockbuster...it is not meant to stimulate the mind or to just please the original fan base, it is meant for people who want to take their kids to a movie on a summer afternoon or in the evening...to have a fun night out,with the family. Comon yack, return of the jedi was not a solid flick with lots of substance and depth, it was full of muppets cliche's and cool action, it is filled with loopholes and is a mess in terms of writing and direction. But when i went to see it with my babysitter and a friend when i was 8 it was heaven, i was not thinking about loopholes, i was enraptured, and laughing with glee at the ewoks....even though now as an adult my opinion has changed on the movie in terms of movie making due to the career i chose, it was pure magic as a child.... and i can see how this version of transformers might be magic to a child nowadays. Oh and one more thing, as far and hits and misses are concerned, take a look at Kurt whimmers "Equilibrium" in comparison to his recent bomb "ultra violet" as far as i am concerned equilibrium was well written and an pretty decent flick, still had loopholes "like every film" and corny moments "like every film" but held my attention in terms of subtext and good script writing,and was a movie i was glad to see made. Ultra violet on the other hand i never read, but i can tell you that i thought the movie was drab and right up there with "alone in the dark" at least i finished watching alone in the dark. So just because a director makes a bunch of bad films does not mean he is not capable of making a good film, and just because a director makes a series of great films does not mean he is incapable of making a horrible film. i disliked flintstones, could not bring myself to stomach titantic, and was less then pleased by hannibal...it all comes down to personal prefference.
I think that's fair Roland....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
03:12:00 PM
I have to agree that there will inevitably be things in this movie that I will like, there were elements in FF1 that worked like Johnny and Thing. As they say, even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then. Honestly, I hope this movie kicks my ass, but I reserve the right to not be very optimistic about it.

Thanks to everyone who have made this a memorable year at AICN, it's been a lot of fun. Happy Holidays to you all, even you Pharty, you hack.

CUNT ON BUMBLEBEE = (INSERT ATTEMPTED WITTICISM HERE)
by Optimus Murphy
Dec 27th, 2006
03:27:52 PM
If Godzilla can't deliver on the simple concept of "Giant lizard of destruction destroys shit" and Alien vs. Predator can't deliver on the simple concept of "Aliens fighting Predators" then how could anyone have faith in Transformers delivering on the simple concept of "Transforming robots in a battle of good and evil." We are talking about a director who couldn't make a movie about Pearl Harbor actually about Pearl Harbor. Good one Don!!!
woah there Ganymede...
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 27th, 2006
03:37:04 PM
First off, the whole LOTR thing was fairly new and fresh when it came out due to the fact that no one had made a decent fantasy movie in a while up until that point. Secondly, this story (spoilers ahoy) in Transformers is revolves mostly around some old glasses, a boy's first car, and some big robots that fight over the aforementioned glasses. That doesn't exactly blow my hair back. Sure the action scenes will be fun. But guess what, so were the ones in Pearl Harbor and I think we can agree that was an awful movie. From what I've read and seen so far, I'm sure it'll be a fun blow em up popcorn flick that makes roughly $60 mil and that's it, more or less a repeat of The Island.
BSB - Not entirely true..
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
04:06:44 PM
It was a complaint on this very that site that if Bay went out of his way to hire A-List stars then the transformers themselves would be overshadowed by the real people. The script supposedly deals alot with the human element in the movie so i imagine that should they have employed George Clooney et al, then really the Transformers screen time would have been cut right back.

This whole lack of A-List stars has had me wondering for a while. While many people dislike Bays movies, he's not usually one to plum for nobodies in his flicks, infact he generally casts the flavour of the month, so to speak. To be honest, i think there's probably alot more TF in there than most people are giving it credit for; after all, given this movie WILL make a shitload of cash, then its surprising that many bigger actors weren't looking for a slice of that pie.

As for movie made for the fans, well, that's all true and well but there has to be a balance between what the old fans remember and what they need to attract younger fans. While many people becry Bay/Murphy/Spielberg, i have a sneaking suspicion that Hasbro have more say in this than many of you are admitting to. I mean, Hasbro stand to make a shit load of cash from the merchandising and we KNOW that they're making toys. Where's the hate for Hasbro? As people who spend shitloads of cash on THEIR products, why not lay some of the burden at their feet. Since you hate Bay, what does he owe you? Nothing. Hasbro on the other hand are the people who have betrayed you.
STAR WARS Script
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
04:17:53 PM
I remember reading a George Lucas biography and in it, many people commented on how poor the Script for Star Wars actually was. Hence the decision at Fox to have a limited initial release and the reason why Lucas made his millions on the merchandising. Lucas though scored with the aquisition of good actors. Harrison Ford, although relatively unknown at the time, was savvy enough to mold the character of Han Solo into something more than George Lucas had wrote; hence the old adage "You can write this but you can't read it". He also was boosted by Alec Guinnes, Peter Cushing and James Earl Jones. So if you want an example of a shit script and great movie, there you have it.
"You can write this shit, but you can't say it"
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
04:23:16 PM
Was the line i was looking for.

As for decisions on directing etc. I couldn't care as long as the script was good. I've not read the current script and don't intend to comment on it, but for my money, if you were to pick a writer then you should get a veteran TF writer, (Simon Furman), and have his story adapted. That, i would have hoped, would allay some of the complaints people have here but i still say that, even with the best script, some people just won't accept the designs.
Stoopider - Who's sadder?
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
04:27:00 PM
The man in his weird bubble? Or the man who tries to burst that weird bubble because he's too pathetic to have his own?

Seriously, as someone who actually wants to enjoy this movie i really wish you'd fuck right off.
Prime whiners
by nevrwuz
Dec 27th, 2006
04:31:40 PM
Everyone has to realise that Transformers is an 80's cartoon, things need to change to be somewhat realistic. They can blow 300 million on special effects and have robots righting in every scene. If it makes good money the next installments will prolly be bigger. You didnt see The X-Men wearing yellow spandex that would be stupid. The Transformers arent going to look like big kids toys. Megatron isnt going to turn into a small gun. I think everyones expectations on what they think this movie should be like will prolly be short lived but I think this will be a fun summer movie.
Well yeh, the FX played a huge role in SW's success
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
04:37:25 PM
But, he still had the benefit of a great cast. Also, the initial drafts of Star Wars were so close to "The Hidden Fortress", that Lucas had to consider licencing that story. He's always admitted that it was loosely based around Kurasowas work so it technically is an adaption of sorts though it sounds like i'm nitpicking.

I will agree though that the age of Computer FX has taken some wonder out of the movies. There's just nothing they can't do anymore. That said, CG, like any tool works better in some hands than other. While George Lucas felt CGI was the only way to tell his story and he suffered; Peter Jackson used it to enhance his story and got the accolade. I'm all for CG, (it spurred me on to choose animating for a career though i work on a different medium), just as long as it isn't overkill.
gany your Optimism is becoming annoying
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
04:37:57 PM
seeing as how you know, A. Starscream has as many lines Stan Lee in the Hulk, and looks more like Apeface. Now about this TF better then LOTR that is the most asinine statement ever written by a human being. After reading the script which can be described as a cinematic abortion, it does not begin to compare to one scene in LOTR. And for God Sake let me just say FUCK the designs let that shit go noone has said shit about the designs for the most part the main complaint is the piss poor script . and seeing as how you have not read the script Allseeing you kind of come from a half informed view now I don't know if you've read Yack's spoiler post but if you can defend that script feel free.
Who is stooop attacking
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
04:49:49 PM
he's attacking everyone the supporters and the haters. You still don't qualify for the hater of the year award I nominate AINTITSHOT A.K.A. PHARTEGOD A.K.A PHARTEGODDPRIME A.K.A DONNIE 2CHINS A.K.A DON MURPHY'S COLOSTOMY BAG, A.K.A DON MURPHY.
Phategod.
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
04:57:52 PM
I'm not getting into a pissing contest with you because, unlike most people here, you simply arent willing to accept anyones idea or willingness to wait and see. I've asked people time and again to show me something that is a final draft of the script and then i will give my critique on it. That said, even if it was finished, i'd probably still not read it since i like to go into my movies without knowing exactly what was going to happen before it does; kinda defeats the object of actually going. Tell me, when you buy a book do you automatically read the last chapter? People like Mori and Quint and Harry do this as a living, they can intepret a script and imagine how it will translate on screen. I've not seen any official staff member here review the script Yack has read but, like i said to earlier, Latino Review read the same script and gave it a positive review. Now, (and don't take this the wrong way Yack), given that Latino Review is a site dedicated to reviewing scripts and movies and, for my money, usually hit the nail on the head why should i take his word for it over a guy who reviews scripts all the time?

Speaking of the script you love to remind us was done by "catwoman guy", it was revised by Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, i think they wrote Mission Impossible 3,(which made some money i think and got good reviews), collaborated on Alias with JJ Abrams, (which is a show i enjoyed at least till season 4), and wrote The Island, (which is nowhere near as bad as you like to make it out to be). I'd also like to point out that Latino Review also refer to that script as "one of the drafts".

As for the designs. If i remember rightly phategod, your initial complaint WAS the designs. The very first image of Prime was enough to get you posting here. Please don't pretend that the designs don't piss you off.
Latino Review Script Review : http://tinyurl.com/ylk4tp
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
05:04:52 PM
Here's a snippet though of something i thought was important and what alot of people seem to be missing the point of.

"Another point I want to bring up is that the fans have to be liberal and let the filmmakers contemporize the story to some degree. For example, Laserbeak, an old Decepticon favorite of mine would be outdated if he were around today simply for the fact that cassette tapes really don’t exist anymore. Get it?"
OH YEAH
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
05:04:53 PM
as a representative of the "urban arena" Bernie Mac and Tyrese do not "Own" they suck did you see Mr. 3000, 2 fast 2 furious they were complete crap. and regardless if you think they are talented or not they are either miscast or underused. Take Bernie Mac he could have been a adequate Jazz instead he plays a used car salesman in 1 lowly scene, and Jazz is rumored to be played by DMX (Blech).
allseeingeye
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
05:15:41 PM
I can't awnser for phategod, but I am one of the guys who initially despised the designs. In fact, I still think most of the designs are far too busy, in my opinion. Sure, Optimus's over all design looks okay, but those flames really do look stupid. To say nothing of the horrible decepticon designs. For me, that was strike one. Later, I found out about the script and the attitudes that surrounded this production (Bay and Spielburg's comments) and that was strike 3. As far as I can tell, the only steps in the right direction were the hiring of Peter Cullen and the decision to use ILM as their effects house. Now, you can tell me all day long about how I should give it time and what not, but so far, I'm not liking what I'm seeing or hearing about this progect, to say nothing of the people involved.
Stoops, seriously, let it go.
by Childe Roland
Dec 27th, 2006
05:16:17 PM
I've seen these Internet grudges consume people and turn them into parodies of what one can almost imagine sitting hunched angrily, hammering the keyboard behind a spittle flecked monitor. Hell, I used to let certain talkbackers crawl right up under my skin and it showed in my posts. I became needlessly mean and petty and even bent the rules of logic (which I hold pretty dear) simply to make others' positions seem less reasonable or valid than they might have been. I played to the crowd rather than seeking a free and open exchange of ideas and enlightened discourse. And do you know what I got for it? Nothing. No cookie. No trophy that said "World's Greatest Trollslayer" or "Bringer of the Pwnage" or anything even remotely like that. Any intellectual victory you think you're claiming in here is going to be a hollow one unless you can actually get the person you're arguing against to see your point of view...to concede that there might be some validity to your perspective. And you aren't going to be able to do that unless you try to understand where they're coming from. Anything else is just flogging your own gray matter in public, and I understand that can cause blindness and hairy forehead. Is it fun to flame? Sure...if its all in good fun. But no argument (or battle) was ever won simply because someone declared himself the victor. If you're interested in reaching heightened understanding, you need to accept the legitimacy of others' perspectives and use that information as a platform from which to reach for common ground (go back to Plato for the diagram: thesis + antithesis = hypothesis, from which discussion ensues). Or you could sling personal insults and speculate about how much larger your Internet penis is than someone else's. But, to be honest, that shit's dreadfully boring and you seem like you're a brighter guy than that.
those designs Pissed most of us off
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
05:16:27 PM
especially Gany's dear ole Starscream . but its nowhere near as piss poor as that script I while Gany and his friends have enjoyed the scrip the the people I Showed it to thought it sucked and it was ultimately boring and uninspired. It's funny I don't know much about the Comic Book canon but I can only Imagine how deep it is. Trust Me that script, as any Bay movie is anything but deep. I did see the Island and beyond getting to see a Cadillac Cien I thought it was a ript off of Logan Run.
According to that site Bill Clinton Owns Transformers
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
05:18:00 PM
by the way, stooop and allseeingeye
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
05:31:51 PM
I understand why you two say, "give it a chance, give it a chance, give it a chance" to this film. Believe me, people like yackbacker, myself, and a slew of others would loved to be proven wrong. However, keep in mind that these TBs are something of a speculatory gathering; we sit and wonder whats going to happen and share opinions based on the knowledge at hand. Stooop--I realize where you're coming from, but understand that what you do is a bit different than a movie production. That said, I believe I can clarify this situation for you. Those two naysayers who doubted your ability were put in their place, correct? Why? Because they saw your work and were satisfied. Now I'll bet you that the confidence you have in your work was not always there, or at the very least was a bit shaky in the beginning stages of your craft. The reason you grow more confident in yourself and others around you is due to success, as you very well know. Well, the problem we have here is that the director of this film is not successful. In fact, critically speaking, his films are largely a joke, often annoying in their simplicity and ham-fisted plot, dialogue, and characterization. We've also seen the design work for this film and are left less than enthused. We've seen the script that was drafted only a scant few weeks before shooting and were left in, shall we say, less than less-than-enthused. And finally, movie buffs like myself have seen films and productions that followed very similar patterns as this one, and all with disasterous results (creatively speaking). All I'm saying, stooop and allseeingeye, is that we arent some naysayers who've never experienced artistic creations before. Whether or not we can actually create a movie is meaningless, we are quite familiar with bad and good movies and the ingredients that went in it. To put it simply, I can't cook to save my life, but I do know what happens when you undercook my pasta--it tastes bad.
that's fine moondoggy
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
05:39:13 PM
If what you see doesn't float your boat then thats an opinion you are entitled too. As a transformers fan myself i really want to enjoy the movie; i suppose in this case i'm a "glass is half full" kinda guy which is strange because, with me, it's usually the other way around. I will freely admit that i have, on many an occasion, drew conclusions about things, (books, movies, tv, people you name it), long before i've seen them/gave them a chance but i'm not always right; i guess thats why my dear old mother used to tell me to never judge a book by its cover.

As far as the designs go, i have no real issues with them. I was never expecting faitful Gen1 reproductions to be brought to life on screen because, (and this is my professional opinion here if that's worth anything to anyone), I have a little bit more knowledge of how CG modelling works. The designs are very similar to what i expected and i cited the Citroen advert long before any final versions were shown here or anywhere else.

Storywise, again i'm not upset that they've taken the material in a new direction. Despite what some here have convinced themselves, the cartoon and toys never really provided any deep mythos from which screenwriters could truly adapt a movie. The comic had great stories and i freely admit that; had Bay and Murphy had some common sense they'd have approached Simon Furman to pen them a story which could have been adapted. But comics are a medium with no time constraints, the story is over when it's over; a movie has to get it all done in around 2 hours. While catwoman guy is responsible for most of the script, i'd hardly say the two people who revised it are shitty. They did well last year with MI3 and i HATE the fact that the only thing that gets mentioned when the Script does is fucking Catwoman, seriously, it's like listening to some fucking propoganda minister and the irony is, I get called a stooge when i point that fact out. If i'm perfectly honest, an adaption of a 20 year old toy spin off would not sit well with me today, nor probably the kids today because they all seem to be wiseasses.

Ultimately Moondoggy, if you want to hate it, then go ahead, just don't do a phategod and act like anyone who wants to enjoy this summer movie is..well..an idiot.
Thanks a lot BSB...
by idahomer
Dec 27th, 2006
05:40:35 PM
Now I never will see Titantic.

While I don't hate the Transformer script, it isn't that good. The humor is simple, the characters unbelievable and the Robots underutilized. I certainly wouldn't bank on this for two sequels.

continued
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
05:44:10 PM
You see, for us, there is no confidence in Bay's work because it hasn't been earned. Similarly, although you didnt care very much for their opinion, those two doubtful gents were only confident in your work AFTER you had proven yourself. For most of the movie going public, to say nothing of the nerds in here, myself included, Bay has yet to earn trust and has even gone so far as to earn DIStrust. Similarly, this production has produced nothing but mediocrity SO FAR, and mediocrity combined with a weak director is a pretty bad thing. And when you add that medicrity and bad decision-making to a franchise thats as beloved to most anyone under 35 as Transformers (heck, Im a little over 40 and even I dug it), then your really asking for some negativity. I'm sorry, but I think Transformers has earned the negativity its gotten. I'm not saying that this movie couldn't turn around and prove me wrong, but I find it very hard to argue that this film hasn't earned what its gotten.
Yeh but Phategod,
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
05:45:11 PM
The script became an issue AFTER the designs and no one seems to care if it's a final script or not. They could have an oscar winning script and YOU wouldnt see the movie because of the designs. The whole script thing came along way after because, let's face it, it added weight to your complaint. If you look hard enough, you can find the fault in anything.
Whew
by TheRevengeOfBayouWilly
Dec 27th, 2006
05:45:46 PM
You know, I don't come on here that often, but I've never seen a thread desolve into such adolescent "debating" so quickly and thoroughly by (presumably) grown men who should know better. Let it the fuck go, everyone. You either like how the giant toy robots look or you don't. That's it, there's nothing more to it.
Actually Moondoggy.
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
05:53:18 PM
I had this discussion with yackbacker in another talkback..I appreciate what some people say when they say they don't like, this or that, really i do. Its just some people, and i'm singling out Phategod here, can't seem to make up their mind what to hate and talk to you like you're stupid because you don't share their opinion.

I work in the videogame industry and i've seen people tear stuff apart that they've never fucking seen or played before. I've seen, supposed, professional journalists start a hate campaign about a videogame because it doesn't feature a character from a previous iteration. Usually journos have a reason though, they don't get an exclusive or they've had their hands slapped for printing stuff they shouldnt have done. It's just a similar story here, with one person more than others to be fair, and i guess i kinda get a bit sick when i see shit like that.
Check this out
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
05:56:48 PM
this follow excerpt is from one of the Mods on Seibertron.com regarding who came out of the pool in the trailer but you can take it in reference to the entire script. (Orci (one of the writers of the script) said in an update not too long ago that the essential story is not changed. The plot and skeletal frame of the story have no chnaged.)
Not a problem, allseeing eye and scooot
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
05:56:52 PM
Allseeingeye, I completely agree with you and I myself fervently hope that this movie surprises me. I remain EXTREMELY sceptical, but I'm going to watch it anyway. And no, this negativity isn't really going to cloud my judgement because for me, its always been very, very easy to check my inhibitions at the door when it comes to films. That said, I really do dislike Bay, and certain aspects of the designs (mainly the coloring of Prime and the entire Megatron and Starscream designs). And stooop, normally, I would agree with you about waiting till after you taste something, but let me put it to you this way: on the advice of your friends/commercials/wife/whate ver, you've been trying to eat at a specific resturaunt on at least half a dozen occasions, and every time your food has come out bad. And I mean every time; sometimes too raw, sometimes too burnt, other times too salty, etc. And save for a handful of people who seem to love this stuff, you and most everyone who has eaten there have come out with stomach aches and cramps from all the bad food. Now, someone says that there is a new steak coming out that could be one of the best ways to prepare a steak, but there's a catch: its ONLY at this specific resturaunt. Now, would you be less or more likely to try that food? This example is a bit simplistic, perhaps, but surely you understand. Now, imagine we were all steak nuts and have more than a passing interest in cooking and food. We'd be out of our gords with debates and gleaming lights of hope in a dark haze of negative buzz and complaints. And all of it completely deserved.
For me, if michael Bay were a restaraunt..
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
06:03:19 PM
It'd be a hit and miss. I wouldn't necessarily go their all the time but i'd turn up if there was a special on that took my fancy. But, that said, people quite happily gobble up crap at Burger King, McDonalds and Pizza Hut; it's all down to personal taste.

Christ, now i'm reminded of the line in "As good as it gets" where Jack Nicholson says people who talk in metaphors should shampoo hios crotch.
All seeing eye--again, I agree
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
06:04:18 PM
There are most deffinitely people who are completely over the top in their criticism. This is michael Bay we're talking about, however, and like it or not, the man deserves much of this vile for a plethora of reasons. As someone who makes a living from teaching and instilling creativity in others, to say nothing of attempting it myself, I agree that naysayers suck. But that is hardly the case here, is it? We're not talking about some untried director, unknown script, or themes we've never heard of, are we? Sure, we havent seen the movie yet, but an ample amount of trepidation is deserved, is it not?
or that other movie quote
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
06:04:54 PM
"Sewer rat may taste like Pumpkin Pie but i wouldn't know 'cos i wouldn't eat the filthy motherfucker"
Actually I wont see this movie because
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
06:05:13 PM
Don Murphy is loathesome Thunder Cunt If this movie had a tight script with those designs I'd take it no movie is ever 100% you do or id not see me bitching about Organic web shooters, Gamma radiated Fathers, Frail Rouge, Bad ac ting jobs of Julian McMahon, Piss Poor Blade 3, or any other Licenses taken with established License. Oh and BSB a colostomy Bag is a A receptacle worn over the stoma to collect feces following a colostomy.
Organic webshooters
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
06:07:46 PM
Are you saying that you aren't comfortable with organic webshooters? Last i checked even the big time Spidey fans had seemed to like that.
well, there you go, stoopider
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
06:13:43 PM
This site's entire forum is dedicated to speculation and analysis of productions as they occur and as they are presented. Now, we can go into a huge diatribe about why everyone is so negative, but suffice it to say its not that most people are negative, its just that in all things, especially movies, and with rare exceptions, only a minority of a moviegoing public is going to like any one particular film. I've seen the math on this before, and to put it as briefly as I can, when you compute the average ticket price and dvd rental/purchase price, the movie going public isn't exactly a vast majority of america, but rather a third or less. Of that population, people are divided over their likes and dislikes. Something like 30% will actually watch the same movies, to say nothing of their feelings reguarding said movie. Similarly, at this web site, we are all over the board as to what we geek out about. That alone changes what we will tolerate or dislike about how said properties are treated, to say nothing of our dislikes over past movie going experiences and everyone involved in those productions. In short, at best, only 3/4 of us (and this is at the VERY BEST) will like any one movie. MOre often than not, its far less than that. And please remember, stooopider, most of us are intenseley interested in this field for one reason or another, and are usually experienced enough to determine what we like or dislike in our own methods. Just remember that there are quite a few children on this board, hence the imaturity. At my age I generally ignore rantings and just skip to the people that have shown themselves to act with maturity.
Just remember, Stooop,
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
06:26:40 PM
nearly every novel you've read had to be INITIALLY graded by the publishers and the editors who work for said publishing company. For nearly all novels, a basic outline and 2 to 3 initial chapters are presented to a publisher/editor for confirmation or denial. I understand that many, such as yourself, would prefer the publisher to read a complete story before investing, but that is the nature of the business. Similarly, for the fanboys in here, we all read up on the news of a production and occasionally trade opinions or speculations/fears and as time passes, we decide whether or not to see it. If there's enough bad information coming down the pipeline, there are many among us, myself included, who will simply not see the film, or, when pressed and are actually emotionally invested in the progect, will vent our frustrations out in these talkbacks. I dont know how long you've frequented this site, stooop, but for me, I'm pretty happy with things the way they are; its just passionate people being passionate people. No more and, thankfully, no less.
sorry that was a little incoherant
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
06:27:12 PM
I meant that no film is perfect and I don't take exception with every issue of a film I don't nitpick everything I was excited about this movie till they announced Bay as a director and he called it a Family movie. not like the term "Family movie" makes it bad it just pigeon holes a movie into a certain genre and quality that I normally tune out to, the first thing that comes to mind when a person say family movie is Spy kids. Do I hate the Designs? Yes would I bitching about still if the script rocked ? Hell no I'd be stoked that my prime was going to be saying and doing something that A. made sense and B. made me give a damn about his Character.
ganymede
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
06:27:32 PM
Don't EVER call Ewan McGregor a borging ass. Not only is he a top actor, he's really a great guy. Not the least bit pretentious, if anything he helped The Island avoid getting totally creamed. Yeh u coulda had Brad Pitt, but Troy had him and that was utter sit.
I like to see what "Urban Market" you know
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
06:35:50 PM
I'd like to see the "Urba...... Oh (Fuck this shit you know you mean black people) that will go out of there way to see a movie they wouldn't give to shits about to see Tyrese, who musically is washed up and has one good movie to his credit "Baby Boy" and I'm being generous with that. and Bernie Has not had one hit movie in his life unless you count the Kings of Comedy. And seeing as how he will probably not be featured in any trailer. It will not get a chance to Pwn it's suck to Black people.
yack
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
06:36:26 PM
You keep saying " i am let down that the movie is primarily focused" or that you are let down by the movie in one way or another...you have not seen the movie yet, you are let down by the script and the trailer and some photos...lets at least keep this on the right track . And i am far from rallied "against you" or in the frame of mind that you are a mindless flamer, with no taste, or opinion. there are very few people in these TB's that i take seriously you are one of the ones i do, the only flamer i might get amusement out of is BadMrWonka because he is a jester and thats always amusing. The rest blab and i scroll untill i find someone with something intelligent to say. I personally enjoy your debates, regardless of how uninformed they can be, some of us in hollywood do care quite abit about film, and are nerds ourselves..but overall unless it is an independent market, a profit needs to be made ,and contracts are signed with specific rules stating that studio heads will have a certain amount of creative input,especially on a project so big..there is alot going into this movie, and alot being risked..liberties will be taken to ensure that it makes the money back, if not more...i am sad to say that not everyone in hollywood is about good film yack, there is alot of greed and it is truly a money making industry...all the studio heads see are numbers. I will admit that Bay is abit of a gopher, but i assure you spielberg is not, and i am sure he has his hands in this movie. And he happens to have a very good track record of films and has been around long enough to be able to offer something to bay in terms of being a mentor. I think it is smart lowering your expectations though...like the saying goes " high expectations lead to dissapointment" better to go in with no expectations or low expectations. and i do not mind that you do not agree about my comment about summer blockbusters, but that is what it is meant to be yack, and someone else made a valid point about it being a trilogy, it has to set roots before the tree grows. Trust me i am a fan of transformers, and working in the industry i know how things can be butchered by the wrong director, but remember a script and trailer are not enough evidence to crucify a movie with...i was very iffy about batman begins, but it turned out to be a stellar movie. And alot of people loved Sin city, and it was extremely accurate and pretty much taken straight from the graphic novel, and yet i found it underwhelming and thin, with exception of mr Rutger Hauer,and i loved the graphic novel. and these TB's are so testosterone driven that i think maybe a female opinion perspective was needed.
Box Office Returns do not always = talent.
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
06:51:38 PM
Plain and simple. And the Island Bombed Cause it sucked.
well as member of the "urban market"
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
06:54:55 PM
Let me just say that there is no movie that makes it more appealing to watch because Tyrese and/or Bernie Mack is in it.
I was about to say....
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
06:55:12 PM
At least i can agree with Phategod on something. Ever see a movie called Shallow Grave? Go watch that and tell me if he's not charasmatic.
ganymede
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
06:58:03 PM
I would not go so far as to say Bay is a brilliant director. Your arguements hold no merit, or point to back them. they are hollow, offer something with substance and maybe you will be taken more serious. But after the "bernie mack is awesome" and "tyrese is a professional actor" comments, i do not believe anyone will take you seriously anyways, bernie mack is a comedian,and i do not find him funny ,he was a novelty, and tyrese is a subpar actor, not a professional. A professional actor would not be a "singer/model/actor" professional actors are educated in their field, and are dedicated, versatile....people like Sir Ben Kingsley, Sir Micheal Cane, to name a couple, and are not people who are taken lightly among their peers...and are respected, tyrese is none of these, he is also a bad casting decision as far as my opinion is concerned...and was chosen for his name among teen girls. there are aspects to this movie meant to draw in most demographics. which to back up my arguement yackbacker, is why it is called a summer blockbuster, i know you do not like this and have every right not to, but as i have said multiple times these movies are not just for fans they are for everyone, just hope that you will be able to find something of the old characters you know and love...and that you enjoy it for what it is...and not for what it could have been. We do not have to go see these movies, and you have the choice to boycott, or not hand over hard earned money, it is your perog as a ticket buyer. We will just have to see come July, i think the design for optimus is pretty catchy, and i agree that i do not find the bumblebee design appealing, nor megatron, and starscream, but we have not seen enough of the other designs yet, and they could have undergone some heavy changes since the photo leaks, thos afterall were "early" photos.
Hey, nobody calls Ewan Mcgreggor UNCHRUSIMATIC
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
07:06:35 PM
I say we take ganymede!!!
haha moondoggy...
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
07:09:42 PM
I was going to use the EXACT line myself but thought i might appear too nerdy. Touche my friend. Touche...
Geez Gany....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
07:10:31 PM
Trainspotting anyone? Fucking great movie with the "uncharismatic" Ewan McGregor in the lead. He was only uncharismatic in the PT because Lucas stopped directing 20 years ago and lost the ability to get his actors to emote. Look no further than Jake Lloyd, a kid who had been much better in others hands.
Damn You for beating me to the Transformers movie
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
07:11:14 PM
reference.
And for the record
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
07:15:15 PM
Ewan was only uncharismatic in the Phantom Menace. He was much better in Attack of the Clones and completely effing rocked in Revenge of the Sith. And anybody who feels that Revenge of the Sith wasn't a good movie will hear it from me *draws line in sand*
What I'm trying to figure out is...
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
07:17:04 PM
Tell us Gany, which of Bay's movies do you consider "big hits" as you put it? All of his movies were certainly profitable based on production costs, but throw in theatre takes, advertising, and Bay's blow habit and you're left with little or any profit. Thank god DVD rentals exist or every one of his movies would be considered complete failures...like The Island.
crosses line
by It is not the end of the world
Dec 27th, 2006
07:17:12 PM
Revenge of the Sith wasn't a good movie
I realize I'm hours late but....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
07:25:24 PM
I just have to address the Star Wars bashing. My screenwriting class used Star Wars as the perfect example of what is known in writing/literature as The Heroes Journey. Lucas borrowed from Hidden Fortress sure, but he also put together a story that uses all sorts of classic literary themes and symbolism. I dunno why, or even if, the script was considered shit based on the writing or based on nothing more than that it was sci-fi, but I've actually read it a few times over the years and I think it's pretty damn good and still holds up today.
"Bay's low habit"
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
07:26:19 PM
Lol Bay biggest hit involves a pusher and his coke nail.
yep
by It is not the end of the world
Dec 27th, 2006
07:29:58 PM
the Star Wars may have looked good on paper. But what came up on screen is a different story. But its Lucas's story, so if he is happy with it, who are we to complain
About why he was picked....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
07:34:20 PM
I read somewhere that Bay got this movie because it ended his contract with Dreamworks or something and had nothing to do with him being the best choice. Can anyone verify this? I'm going to dinner with wifey and the kids right now and don't have time to research right now.

And Pharty, no bet sabout this one, I dunno if it's fact or not. Unlike the other one, you owe me $500 you knob.

ganymede
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
07:34:47 PM
You know, McDonalds serves billions, too, but the food still consists of week old dog feces covered in burnt hair. Numbers do not denote quality, my son. Why, do you realize that Stephen King's "Tommynockers" made more money than "To Kill a Mocking bird" or that "Shawshank Redemption" was a bomb at the box office? Hell, Picasso didn't really earn that much money, either, did he?
Hairy
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
07:35:20 PM
I wasnt bashing Star Wars, the OT is sacred to me. I was merely pointing out that, to a good deal of people at the time, the script was fairly poor. I will stand by my statement though that it was the actors in the movie that made the OT and not the director, (at least for ep IV).
Oh brother
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
07:35:28 PM
there he goes with those Damn returns again.
or the script...
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
07:37:43 PM
Missed that bit at the end....
I think gany is in the
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
07:43:15 PM
"I love big dumb fun" crowd.
Hey i love big dumb fun..
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 27th, 2006
07:44:49 PM
.As long as she's blonde and has 38DD tits and max's out at size 12. Better not tell the wife that though.
He's part of the
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
07:51:32 PM
I hope this movie is good so they can make more movies about 80's cartoons with robots. But No Gany you can all but rule out a live action Macross, if it is it will probably be Direct by Paul W.S. Anderson.
You had me shook when you said Zack Penn
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
08:08:58 PM
I'm a big TF fan myself but I don't need to be in a Train Wreck to know it's fucked up. There are nipples all over this movie. and you really need a reason not to see this movie Find Don Murphy and criticize one thing anything don't insult him, don't insult the movie but make one critical statement and see what happens.
Phategod- email me
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
08:30:59 PM
babarthemighty@hotmail.com we need to talk like human beings
Don, I'll email you
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
08:36:42 PM
I guarantee you that I'll be civil, so long as you can give me honest answers as to why Bay was picked to direct, the reasoning behind optimus not being a lead in the film, for megatron only appearing in the third act, and the reason optimus prime had to have flames.
moondoggy you filthy harlot
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
08:38:28 PM
why you trying to whore your way in here? We don't want you we want the IRS guy. Here are your answers, harlot- 1- there was a short list of 5 directors who could handle the scope and action. Bay was on that list and said yes 2- Optimus is the lead Transformer in the movie- this was never going to be an animated film you dense retard 3- Megs was a choice of the writers 4- he didn't have to have flames, no one said he had to DOUCHE
my, my, my. such language
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
08:49:41 PM
I fail to understand the whoring my way in here comment, to say nothing of your animated film reference, but on the whole, thank you for confirming everything I needed to know about film producers. As for the answer to my second question, its interesting that you refer to him as the lead transformer and not the lead character. As for the flames reference, if no one said he had to have them then who felt the need to slap them on him? Granted, you're just a producer and are not answerable to the entire production, but surely someone had noticed that the script was sorely lacking in weight, characterization, and plot?
I'm on vacation so until further notice
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
08:52:19 PM
I'm just another G1 Guy.
you can't understand English Moondoggy you scrotum
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
08:54:35 PM
What animated film reference, loser? And you know nothing about film producers you are a TALKBACKER who uses a name from Gidget. I mean HELLO, you suck! He is not the main character- how could he be, idiot? This is NOT an animated film and never was supposed to be. Flames are there- why does it matter where they came from? It doesn't. Let's see- Three billion dollar Exec Prod thinks shooting script is not lacking, Billion dollar director thinks it is not lacking, longtime producer thinks it is not lacking, and asshole named moondoggy STATES as if FACT that it is lacking. Who do we listen to ? (hint- it ain't you, ass)
no worries, phate
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
08:58:11 PM
I'm still stinging from the "dense retard" bit. I swear, he speaks exactly like the highschool freshman I used to teach. Oh well, I suppose thats why I find myself watching movies less and less these days.
moondoggy you filthy harlot
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
08:58:46 PM
you taught ONE student? a Freshman? because two would have required brains, right?
UMM (sitting here giving you the benefit of the doubt)
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
08:59:08 PM
Are you going to reply to my e-mail.
ganymede
by wanna_bannana
Dec 27th, 2006
09:01:29 PM
If you have read any of my previous posts, i never said Bay sucked, i just do not agree with your statement about him being a great director, he is a "mediocre" director. And that offered up no "proof" that your opinion holds merit, all it proved is that you have an opinion like the rest of us, and that Bay can make money by putting out genre films filled with explosions,gunfire,and car chases...and i am sorry to say guy, that none of those qualities make "a great director" and it does not mean this movie will be a great film. I also hate "reguratating" the facts....and you are not going to be taken seriously by trying to force your point. Read my posts, i have hope for this movie, you however seem to be knocking down other peoples opinions and putting the label of "haters" on them just because they want a decent flick and do not like most of Bay's movies.
Ah, the ever charming Murphy
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
09:03:08 PM
Wow, a three billion dollar executive producer and a one billion dollar director. Gosh, I had no idea that that much money bought you such a respectable opinion. Hmmm, and to think, all I have is a Masters degree in history, english, and education. I'm impressed, Don, because you know how us professor types have zero ability to discern a good story from a bad one. Why, shucks, a man who makes money writing Catwoman must have far better taste than some idiot who reads about Indoeuropean mythology for a living, right? Yup, I'm deffinitely out of my league here.
Phate Baby
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
09:03:55 PM
I needed the email for the ISP #s that's all- go back to your audit...
wait--it just occurred to me
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
09:07:02 PM
Since Michael Bay has made more money than Stanley Kubrick, Stanley Kubrick must not have had as much directorial skills as Michael Bay, huh? Wow, Murphy, its no wonder youre a film producer. You, sir, have found your calling in life and I salute you.
Moonpukey
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
09:07:39 PM
Your post clinches it. You don't know shit. Those who cannot do, teach as they say. Yes- $4b buys you a respectable opinion. Professor types know how to cheat on their wives and steal tenure. YES, without question, John Rogers knows more about screenwriting than you will ever learn. You are out of your league on a playground, prof. Your masters in baking is all that will serve you well,
Moonpukey, Professer of Dook
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
09:09:28 PM
Your logic skills are lacking, pee breath. Michael Bay knows more about what makes a successful screenplay than you do. Hell, Kubrick DEAD knows more than you. I am not comparing Kubrick and Bay. I pity your porr students wasting their time with morons.
Yup, Don--nailed me cold
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
09:18:39 PM
As knowledgable as I am, since I havent written a hollywood screenplay, I can't know shit from shinolah about what is a good story versus a bad story. Why, to think, all this time I thought Catwoman was a horrible film and that writers who descend into all-too convenient plot twists, stereotypical characterization, and cliched dialogue were just taking the easy way out. Hmm, doom on me, I suppose.
Good luck Buddy
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
09:19:53 PM
1. I'm on vacation 2. thats a dummy E-mail account. 3. You totally fucked up that metaphor or saying. so you intotal made yourself look like a ass now gnay I know you've been keeping score so you see why this movie deserves to fail. Some people want to say how don murphy listens to the Transformer fans but this is truly sad. You are here tryin to get me fired or banned or whatever when You either are Don Murphy which makes you a sad human being or a Sycophant of Don Murphy which makes you worse. Thats like being a fan of the Clippers Really unrewarding and overall makes you look stupid.
well, phate, you have a good night and a nice vacation
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
09:24:40 PM
I'm with you, by the way, in my hope that this really isnt Don Murphy. For some reason, I find myself hoping that his actions arent that of a grown man who has found "success" in life. A man that angry, intolerant, and so obviously emotionally and intellectually stunted cannot possibly meet anything other than a bad end. Personally, I believe it has to be some teenager or something--it just seems too...childish, you know? G-d, I can't believe I'm actually feeling sympathetic and bummed out by some troll/possible movie producer. Honest, it really is kinda sad. Oh well... g'night.
Phate Baby
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 27th, 2006
09:28:02 PM
dummy account or not the ISP #s do not lie
whats with...
by It is not the end of the world
Dec 27th, 2006
09:35:00 PM
...people saying, because they are in the industry that they know better. Do I have to be in the music industry to know if someone sings shit, or if a band is out of tune. Bay isn't bad, he just isn't very good. I've enjoyed his movie, not really on a intellectual level. Pretty much Bays films are the movies you watch, because your not in the mood for thinking, and you just wanna see some fun. You can talk through out the movie, and still get whats going on. Thats what Transformers will be. I'm disappointed they took this approach, but its the one they took...I'm not happy about it...but I'll go along with it.
Gany and allseeingeye I want you to meet someone
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
09:38:47 PM
This is Don Murphy He is one of the Producers and is a asshole, as you can see from his previous posts. Now he has stated that he is not Don Murphy but I have run into him on another site using his real name and he post the exact same way so He is either Murphy or a student of his. whatever you think Of me i want you two to ponder something If the 2 of you where rich Hollywood producers would you give a flying Fuck what I think about our movie. heres the truth Don you have not said one Insightful, intelligent thing since you came here you insult everyone with the intelligence of a 2nd year college fratboy. This human waste is the perfect reason not to see this movie and the real amusing thing is he has drove more people away from the film then I ever could have.
I dont Use a ISP
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
09:41:24 PM
I have a cable modem.
you've been blocked for spam
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
09:54:09 PM
I could get used to yahoo.
back. I just couldn't stay away, I guess
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
09:55:11 PM
phate--i've just slogged through these TBs and I dont think he is Don. He's just some crazy teenager or 20 something kid. He tries to act older on some posts, but I'm seriously doubting he's any older than late twenties. If I had to guess, he seems to have only a highschool education and a drug/alcohol problem and is unmarried--just my assessment and could be completely off base, but its what I've gathered.
the muphyiest
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
10:00:43 PM
So Phartegoddprime asks me to email him so I make up a email account ask him wahts up then he proceeds to to say it was a ruse to gain my ISP no less a attempt to get me fired for using a computer on company time or something. But he fails to realize I've been on vacation since Mid November. Regardless Murphy's a douche.
Besides, think about it--if you had millions of dollars
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
10:01:11 PM
and were as successful as this phartegod guy claims, why the hell would you feel the need to flame bait/war? I mean, hell, I'm over forty, am married to a beautiful woman and have three really great kids, and, I feel, a really great job that leaves me feeling good about my place in the world. I'm a satisfied man and feel absolutely zero need to flame bait, namecall, or in any way, shape or form, act like a sniveling brat. Why on earth does this man, or whatever troll this is, feel that need? It has to be someone who's either very ill or very young...or both.
You'd think Doggy but
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
10:05:41 PM
I have run into murphy and he went by his real name and claimed to be Don Murphy on another website. He proceeded to act like a ass and his post contain the same bite and piss poor vocabulary as Phartegoddprime I'm not 100% sure that he is Murphy but I would say that I am 80% sure this is Don Murphy as I have history with Mr. Murphy and if this asshole is not Don Murphy, This is a close enough Facsimile of what he is like.
Crap, I forgot to post my Willem Dafoe plea in this tb.
by Shermdawg
Dec 27th, 2006
10:07:50 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again, there's NO WAY PharteGoddPrime is Murphy. I just don't buy it. But, if I'm wrong, Don, baby, cast Dafoe as Starscream. You do that, I might consider becoming a Stooge.

Seriouly though, regardless if it's really Don, his lackeys, or a common Stooge, threats of getting someone fired, banned or whatnot over a fucking movie based on a overrated cartoon (G.I.Joe and Thundercats were better. Admit it.) is beyond ridiculous. And I'm surprised, if the rumors are true involving Man_of_Stool, something like this would even be tolerated at AICN.

If these "attacks" are indeed from the Murphy camp, then it's really sad. And I mean, fucking SAD. How many people lost their jobs or whatnot due to badmouthing Rothman or Ratner last year? Someone needs to grow some thicker skin, turn the other cheek, or do what most of Hollywood does, ignore us. It's obvious you don't make adapted material for the fans, and most of the time it's a smart move, so why care what we, er, they, have to say now?

And what I said above, if this is for real, Speilberg woulda nipped it in the bud.

I haven't been there lately, but I recall seeing Mr.HEADGEEK himself all up on Murphy's MySpace buddy list, which does fuel the theory that this is just one gigantic work, and they are just sitting back having a ball reading these talkbacks, as most of us are.
well, phategod, I recall seeing a few posts of Murphy's
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
10:07:56 PM
and the cadence is similar, I'll grant you, but I'm simply flabbergasted that the man would need to defend himself on a consistant basis. I mean, you call me a bastard or dumbass or whatever and I'll laugh it off--I dont need to prove myself. Oh sure, if you are a man who is consistantly guilty of making generalizations or innacurate assumptions, I'll set you straight, but I'll not get into some schoolyard fight. Hell, I enjoy writing at my local city's newspaper and the school newspaper and even writing crappy, third-rate fiction, but I see no need to defend my work incessently--it doesnt need it. I guess this man, whoever he is, needs to learn confidence and a much stronger work ethic.
wow....and yackbacker
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
10:13:08 PM
i leave for a day and this is still raging on, lol. yackbacker, i'm sorry if i insulted the series that badly and i admit, i havnt watched any G1 eps in years...maybe theyre better than i remember. i just remember that in my younger days, the cartoon neer really did anything for me other than have a cool idea and some pretty sweet action...i just never connected with the characters and thats what i based my opinion of the writing on. maybe i should give it another try.

my main complaint with the TB discussions on the film is that its almost blind rage. aside fom the script and a few very vague teaser trailers, we really dont know what the characters are like. a movie like this can change a lot in a few months and even tho some of the stuff i saw in the nw trailer was directly liftwd from the script, i garantee you there have been heavy changes. a movie like this, no matter how much hardcore fans care about it, usually isnt given a glossy finish at the script stage. despite the love the series has, its still going to be treated with as much TLC as say, ID4 or Day After Tomorrow...both seen as big summer movies and not oscar caliber material. i just wish some of the ppl on here would have a bit more optimism. who knows? all of us might really enjoy this thing when all is said and done. im just trying to stay possitive. i certainly dont like being "shoveled shit" and actually enjoy a broad range of films, some not the best simply because i sometimes just want to zone out, so as a casual fan, im not taking a lot of the changes to heart but im just hoping for a fun movie. anyways, nothing personal to all the die-hard TF fans...just have some hope :)

hey, shermdawg, what are the rumors about man_of_stool?
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
10:15:26 PM
I also think you are quite right, sherm--this sounds like something Harry would play, at least, from what I've read about Harry. It just flies in the face of anything logical that Murphy would be posting on some dumbass (no offense) website talkback thread and flaming away with a bunch of nerds (me included). I admit, I'm here, too, but this is the only damn time I've been at this site since school went in session in august. I've got an excuse--I hope. Its gotta be something else, as Shermdawg has said. All I know is that if it really does turn out to be Murphy, I will not see this film "officially."
My Point exactly
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
10:20:16 PM
I wish I still had the post at sieber tron.com where you can see Murphy make a ass of his self. I'm pretty sure this Don but good luck on all your future endeavors.
moondoggy2u
by Shermdawg
Dec 27th, 2006
10:22:34 PM
Regarding Man_of_Stool, I forgot who it was, I really don't wanna look for he post in this and that other long as all fucking hell Tranny talkbacks, but one of the trolls that was in the thick of things stated "we took care of him before the holidays". (!)
hey, phate
by moondoggy2u
Dec 27th, 2006
10:22:46 PM
i recall reading those posts--those were the ones I read, and yes, he is indeed an ass, but this whole phartegod thing is beyond even that. I mean, we're talking about approaching a level of near insanity that I seriously doubt would go unnoticed to the film makers.
thats why he doesn't use his real name
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
10:38:04 PM
I challenge Phartegodd he has Stated that he is a College student I challenge you to come out here and on DM.net cause I know you have access. If you are indeed Not Don Murphy Post your real name and a picture of yourself on both here and DM.net. but we all know he'll see this and come with stupid grammatical correction. On another topic I don't know shat stooop is apologizing for but you clearly are not a murphy stooge as apologizing to anyone but Don Murphy is not in there DNA.
gany your taste in movies ae absolutely dreadful
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
10:45:55 PM
Eyes wide shut was shit on a stick but thats besides the point.
Eye Wide Shut was great for one reason.
by Shermdawg
Dec 27th, 2006
10:48:40 PM
It inspired one of my favorite pictorials in the, I believe, Oct. 2001 issue of Penthouse (i.e. before it went to shit). Tera Patrick, niiiiiiiiiiice. :)
i think BSB just...
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
10:49:15 PM
took stooopiders nuts and put em in his pocket, lol. owned

i wouldnt bet against DM posting on these boards...seems like something he might be able to slap himself to while crying/laughing and cutting himself

bag for people who can't shit so it holds it for them
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
10:52:47 PM
I wish I had access to someone that was a pro at...
by Shermdawg
Dec 27th, 2006
10:55:33 PM
flash animation because while on the crapper the oher night I kept coming up with funny little bits in a Robert Smigel styled short inspired by this film, the property, an these talkbacks themself. Of course now, I can't remember half of them.

lol, throughout the clip, between every skit, I'd have someone doing a Don Pardo voice saying "FLAMES ON OPTIMUS!" followed by a take on the classic logo flip.
stooop...
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
10:55:49 PM
you flat out got down on ur knees and licked his balls saying you're sorry, lol. must be nice to be the bitch of the TBs. seems like everyone hates you anyways...tis whole thread is full of ppl flaming you
Suggestion BSB....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
10:57:04 PM
You're starting to sound a lot like stoopider did earlier when he was baiting Yack, or trying to bait Yack. Just some advice from a friend.

Hey, I gotta comment on people hating on ROTJ earlier. Now I wholeheartedely agree that the Ewoks suck donkey balls and GL could have sold just as many fucking Wookie dolls as he did Ewoks, they were a horrible choice. That said, every scene on the Death Star II between Luke, Vader, and the Emperor are absolute cinematic gold, and these scenes alone make this movie more than worthwhile.

yeah err, stooop...uh...eeerrrrrr...duuuuu hhhh
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
11:01:21 PM
keep telling yurself ur special just like ur mom keeps insisting you are and thats why she wont let you move out into th world...but you know youll never leave ur moms loving mbrace becuz you know you'd miss the late night spooning sessions
Sister..
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
11:03:25 PM
I must agree with HNS about ROTJ It gave me one thing the Matrix trilogy did not....closure and the Final scenes with Luke Darth and the Emperor were priceless.
hairy
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
11:04:01 PM
dont forget that ROTJ has the best space battle in cinema history
Sorry but any term dealing with colostomy
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
11:13:02 PM
are reserved for PhartegoddPrime aka AINTITSHOT.
BSB
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
11:13:19 PM
if i want to give the wife the night off, yeah i might give em a go. anyone who runs their mouth that much must suck a mean dick.
You get no Tickets He better give me a shout out in
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
11:16:00 PM
the DVD commentary.
i second that...
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
11:22:38 PM
we hearby dub stooopider as "The Official Bitch of the AICN TBs"

this is official now...all must refer to him as such. to anything he writes on here from this day forth, just reply with "I'm Sorry"

ROTJ space battle....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
11:23:34 PM
Yeah, it is really good, and the scale is amazing, especially when you consider it was all physical models and rotoscoping.

But the Death Star scenes really are among some of the greatest cinema of all time for me. There's so much depth to all that is happening in those scenes. The part I like the most is when Luke tosses his lightsabre and the Emperor says to him that only at the end did he truly understand. It took me years to figure what the Emperor meant, but once I did it was one of those moments where I actually learned something important about life that sticks with you.

And what did he learn exactly? It's so simple, and yet it eluded me for a long, long time. Quite simply, there's always a choice. The Dark Side controls no one, you can always choose. Simple, but very deep and rich....something completely lacking in Super Giant Robot Explosion Boom Boom.

LMAO
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
11:28:10 PM
@ Super Giant Robot Explosion Boom Boom. like i said, im remaining optomistic that the film could be fun but that just made me laugh out loud.

and yeah ROTJ did have a great climax (kinda like a blow job from stooopider) thats what has made star wars stick with so many ppl i think...underneath all the FX and eye candy is a really strong msg. i hear that Mark Hammil was upset with ROTJ because he wanted Luke to actually turn to the dark side halfway thru before his redemtion. could have been interesting but i like how Luke just has a really strong will

all right I'm out peace to friends.
by Phategod1
Dec 27th, 2006
11:28:51 PM
haters need some extra Egg nog.
I'd actually like to know....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 27th, 2006
11:28:52 PM
...what stooopider thinks about the movie. He's been giving all of a lot of shit the last few days, but do you actually have any opinions about the TF movie itself stoops?
BSB
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
11:32:56 PM
LAAAAWWWWWLLLLL...well i think you have more friends than me on here seeing as i'm still pretty new so spread the word thru out the land...we must make this stick
cool deal
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
11:42:45 PM
even tho i can buy my own i guess i can never turn down free booze lol. yackbacker thought i was giving him shit earlier i think cuz i said TF wasnt written well lol. sue me, i was a TMNT and GI Joe fan as a kid ;P speaking of booze, I'm gonna go hit up a martini bar...ironically its 80's night, lol. glad i sent in the news of the Empire cover...would have used my name if i thought theyd actually run it haha. peace out man
and thanx...
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
11:43:45 PM
for not calling me "shotgun" like other illiterates on here :-|
later
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 27th, 2006
11:52:53 PM
haha yeah, maybe i should break out the acid wash jeans :P later man
I hate showing up late to the party!
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 28th, 2006
12:34:30 AM
"sorry"! Holy F**KING LOL!!! Opps, I sharted...
It's bad when you get owned in an Obit TB.
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 28th, 2006
12:54:55 AM
Bitch of the Year, if you're gonna bait TB'ers you've gotta do one thing first. When trying to choose the right TB to troll, shop smart, assclown!
Summation, or March of the Douches
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 28th, 2006
01:30:09 AM
1)- Man of Stool was removed, period. His repeated attacks on Murphy could not be tolerated. He posted on every post that Don Murphy pwns teh Suck. Go back and check. His posts, account, and job- all gone. 2)- Phategod and Hairy must go next. Phate may be on vacation, but every post has been saved. If he thinks the government will be happy to spend time on a supoena, then good for him 3)- yes Bsb, Murphy got raped by Knowles on John Carter. But I believe it will soon be announced that Murphy took it back from Jabba 4)- I went through all of Jabba's Myspace friends- weird- no Murphy. More lies. 5)- Cockbacker- it should not keep typing when it is not capable or else it gets the hose. 6)- I have been asked to stop feeding you idiots but it is so much fun. You really think that Aintitshit will protect you. So did Man of Stool. Haha!
I got colostamy bag all over me
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
01:57:17 AM
summation Don Murphy is a asshole. his Sycophant are bigger assholes. and If you really want to play hardball I'll admit what I do to my superiors the day you voluntarily request a audit.
Now I'm scared....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 28th, 2006
01:57:51 AM
You got me shaking in my boots now. Gee golly, I shor do hope Pharty and his minions don't find out who I am. Whatever am I going to do? I probably won't even sleep tonight while I hide under my bed with a flashlight and my shotgun.

Hey jackass stop threatening us, every time you do, more evidence piles up for our harrassment suit against you. AICN has YOUR IP address you cockgobbler, and I'm pretty sure they'd give it up without much of a fight in honor of a trolling bitch like yourself.

Of course, that's assuming you're not one of the AICN gang trolling in the TF TalkBacks just for laughs. I've been the board troll myself once or twice, the guy who "stirred up conversation" per the orders of the board admin.

Also, what makes you think I need "Aintitshit" or anyone else to protect me? Go ahead and track down my IP address and come on over to my house and threaten me to my face. Oh, my wife's a cop, so when you come over here and start shit with me and I proceed to kick your ass they'll take you to jail, not me.

Fuck that, I'm pretty sure my wife could get your IP addy in a matter of minutes if I asked her, in fact you gave out your e-mail address here, your IP address is mine bitch. Have a nice day douchebag.

PharteGoddPrime
by Shermdawg
Dec 28th, 2006
02:44:29 AM
A few monhs back, I believe in the Tranny talkback where the leaked script was first linked (might have been a tb for sumthin else), Don Murphy's MySpace was posted and sure enough, Harry was on his buddy list (if I reember correctly, he was wearing a St.Patty's Day hat). Now, like I said, I haven't been there in awhile (MySpace, a. is the debil, and b. crashes my browser) so it could very well be gone.

Twasn't a lie sir. Twasn't a lie.
"Murphy got raped by Knowles on John Carter"
by Shermdawg
Dec 28th, 2006
02:56:10 AM
Damn, Noah Wyle is freakier than I thought. :P
About balance to the Force....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 28th, 2006
03:26:29 AM
What does that even mean?

According to the movies there is a light side and a dark side to the Force. Seems to me that in order to bring "balance" to the Force there needs to be an equal amount of both light and dark Jedi. Therefore, and I know GL did not intend it this way, when the entire Jedi Order were slain and all that was left were 2 Jedi and 2 Sith did we not have balance?

Since this was not how it was portrayed in the movies I have to ask what a balanced Force is supposed to look like according to GL, does anyone know?

The Star Wars Prequels...
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 28th, 2006
05:12:53 AM
Suffered because the same guy directed all three of them. A guy who, (if you believe all you read), admits to actually not like directing. The reason why ESB and ROTJ are so memorable, is because the man in the directors chair had passion and could inspire his actors. George Lucas is great at coming up with ideas but not very good at encouraging his cast. I do respect his ability to write a decent yarn, (though alot of the PT was very corny; midichlorians anyone?), but when you have the charisma of a wet gravel driveway you just don't inspire people. A great deal of the PT, even with its ludicrous plot holes, would have worked with a better director.

In all honesty, i wish they'd never made the prequel trilogy. I used to love hearing the odd tidbits here and there about it but, for me at least, the story before A New Hope was always a kind of legend that each fan interpreted in his own way and could play in head sometimes. I guess that's why the PT didn't live up to alot of peoples expectations and why Transformers has the same effect on its fans too.
No
by Felicity
Dec 28th, 2006
06:02:46 AM
I dislike this new Optimus.
prequels...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
06:45:10 AM
I do agree with Yackbacker that it is all about Luke. I have to say that I think the final showdown with Vader is my favorite in the entire scene. From Vader spouting out "Sooo you have a twin sister.." to the "oh shit what have I done" look when Luke flips out, it is about Luke saving the galaxy. And my colon sucks, I agree with you that Luke is not your typical jedi. The environment that he was trained in was of course greatly different from when Kenobi was trained, and he shows great emotion. I would say he is their greatest jedi. Yackbacker, not sure if you thought the samething, but I have to admit that I didn't read your entire last two posts. War and Peace part deux...jk dude.
I am a Jedi, like my father before me
by Franklin T Marmoset
Dec 28th, 2006
06:55:41 AM
Nice words up above, YackBacker. Luke does not get enough credit from the fans, and the quote in my title is my favourite from all of the Star Wars films. The shame of the prequels, for me, is that they let that line of Luke's down so badly. Maybe if Luke had known his dad was a whining, temper tantrum-having, baby killing wife murderer he wouldn't have been so keen to bring him back to the good side.
Okay, I was wrong...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
08:38:13 AM
...stooopider clearly isn't any smarter than he seems. But BSB, are you really getting anything out of baiting him? I mean, you do have both handsa on the keyboard, right? As for Phartegod, if that's really Don Murphy I'm pretty appalled. Maybe if I were worth mega millions and had to risk so many of them so regularly on movie projects I don't fully understand, I'd need to blow off steam on the talkbacks, too. But you come off like a raging looney. And that's from someone who thinks this movie could still be decent. Anyone consider the idea that Phartey might really be from the prejudging con camp and he's just trying to make that position seem more reasonable by being as charming and witty as he is?
There's a reason no one is talking to you cupcake
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
08:52:08 AM
Its because you're not worth anyone's time. Accept this and disappear cupcake.
Roland
by moondoggy2u
Dec 28th, 2006
08:52:46 AM
I've been wondering the same thing--I think maybe it is just a farce/troll bait kind of antic. Whoever is doing it has really nailed the way Don Murphy writes, and HAS to be baiting people like yack and, to a lesser extent, myself. Of course, if it is Murphy, as you said, I'm truly disgusted. Its like he's some sort of stereotype, is it not, Roland?
Yeah, show your mom this cupcake
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
09:03:30 AM
And then once you do, be sure let me know how the shock therapy and lithium are working out for you. Deal?
Yeah, show your mom this cupcake
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
09:03:43 AM
And then once you do, be sure to let me know how the shock therapy and lithium are working out for you. Deal?
Seriously cupcake, you clearly have mental problems
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
09:14:08 AM
Showing this TB to your mommy would inevitably result in corrective psychiatric care. I'd say you're just yet another manic, A.D.D. addled 14 year old, but there's much more than that to your case. You don't seem to have any real grasp on reality, hence the habitual lying about your identity. You're clearly not comfortable with yourself and prefer anonmyous tauntung to actual dialogue. You're using this TB as a means of venting something pent up deep within you. What that is, I can't really say. I'm not kidding about this at all. In all seriousness, you really do need professional help. Assuming you're actually 14, this problem is going to develop into something much worse in the near future. I'm going to consult a DSM IV and report back with further analysis. Your mental state concerns me greatly cupcake.
Yeah Greekhammer, I heard that rumor too
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
09:16:54 AM
The Giants after Zito is not good news. Then again, the Giants suck, so we have that going for us, right? Zito said he want to play for a winning team... no way that would happen in San Fran or Texas. I still believe Zito will be a Met in 2007.
Zito...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
09:32:35 AM
Now this is more interesting than reading stoooooopider's comments. I think he'll be a Met too, though much too high priced considering that he's not overpowering and he walks to many guys for my taste. On the plus side though, he eats up a lot of innings and manages to win, considering he's played on some offensively challenged teams in Oakland. However, it wouldn't surprise me if he went somewhere else (Giants) since Mr. Boras is his agent.
Pillow and Greek:
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
09:40:33 AM
Like I said, I am not too sure about San Fran. They're not a winning team. I know they are reeling after losing Scmidt, but for reasons that are beyond me, they already gave Bonds a deal that could potentially pay him $20 million. I dont think the Giants will spend $100 million on Zito. Plus San Fran is not a pitchers park, Shea Stadium is. Seattle being interested in Zito is much more of a problem. Seattle is a pitchers park, (but they have the DH). Seattle is potentially good, and you just know Zito would love to live there. It really kills me that Boras is going to get $100 million for a guy who throws 85 mph by the way. Man I hate Boras.
Has this happend before
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
09:42:05 AM
I'm kind of new around here but I would like to know does this happen often? When the Hulk was announced and it was evident it was going to suck where there a bunch of apologist and kids jumping in putting there 2 cents in. And some how I think harry should find away to restrict this site for adults only.
Yeah this happens every few months Phategod
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
09:47:14 AM
Its just the nature of AICN. Some nutjob shows up every few months begging for attention. The problem is that this kid is on winter vacation and is too mentally unstable to be around the other 14 year olds. So he's here until the men in white suits give him his lithium, padded room, and shock therapy.
while I share your hate for Boras...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
09:51:01 AM
it also should be spread to the stupid, stupid, short-sighted owners who complain and complain about salaries, and then will dump a $40M contract on anybody. The Giants are cleary screwed up over the Bonds thing, and should have never signed him and used that money for pitching. Not smart. No one will care when Bonds becomes HR champ since the dude's head will explode any day now. And I hate Yadier Molina much more than Boras.
Buck Foras
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
09:54:40 AM
Boras is trying to hold Mets Nation hostage with his demands of 6 years at around 100 million for Zito. If the Giants are willing to pay that and Zito wants to go there and get that paycheck, More power to him. But if Zito is serious about his legacy, he ain’t going to no Giants. Right now, Omar is not budging from his 5 year 75-80 million dollar price range. In the end, I believe we can still bag him at that price.
Zito/Hulk
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
10:00:35 AM
What scares me about Zito is his lack of top notch performance in the playoffs. Say what you will about John Maine, but he came through in Game 6. The reason I mention Maine is his lack of power, much like Zito. I agree with your assessment Ricky of 5 yr contract. If he wants more, then he can tie up someone else's budget with that contract. Greek - I agree, the Hulk in action I thought was the best part of that movie (not withstanding the hulk poochies which were just a tad too silly for me). I thought the emotion that the Hulk portrayed was done pretty well.
greek..
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
10:01:49 AM
Nah, never been to Scout.com. I will however take a gander at it right now.
Yeah, Greek, every now and then
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
10:11:31 AM
I occasionally post at Metsblog too (even though Matt Cerrone totally sucks in my opinion). Lonestar Mets is always good for a laugh, so are Hotfoot, and Metstradamus.
oh Jebus Greek
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
10:21:45 AM
I just saw that rumor too. $120 fucking million? Well I hope Zito has fun not winning any championships for the next 8 years. Well if the rumor is true, we will be seeing more of Pelfrey, Humer, Maine, and Perez pitching. Not a bad thing at all.
Zito? Giants? What's next...WASPINATOR?
by zurge
Dec 28th, 2006
10:23:38 AM
Seriously, I just watched a video clip of all the deahts/destructions/disasenble of Waspinator from Beast Wars SN 1,2, & 3...and it's just extremely hilarious. Homerun.
Suppan may end up coming to town...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
10:28:25 AM
and that would work if he imagined he was pitching against the Mets every game. Cy Young award would be in the bag!
thanks Yack...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
10:34:46 AM
That way I can read who the Mets don't get, and what old bastard they sign next...yeesh
it may be a bullshit rumor
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
10:36:26 AM
Think about it: Boras wouldn’t close a deal yet. Not with the Yanks potentially looking for a starting pitcher to replace Johnson. But yeah, if the Zito thing falls through, Omar's next move is most likely to hire the oldest, most hispanic free agent pitcher out there. Go Mets.
Yacksies..
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
10:41:52 AM
What else is Pedro supposed to do with his freetime? I'm sure he'll perfect it by the time he's ready to come off the DL. I'm thinking extension after seeing that...another 2 years?
its a mets-tastic messageboard!
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
10:42:09 AM
Here's a funny link: http://tinyurl.com/yyutjk So, yeah, this is why I don’t read GQ anymore. Click on the slideshow for more images of Wright and Reyes acting very overly friendly... Very, uh, well, gay. I’m a very concerned Mets fan right now.
I'd bet my testes on the Metsies
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
10:48:04 AM
I saw someone wearing a t-shirt at Shea that said that. Cracked me up big time.
i feel ill...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
10:49:15 AM
maybe they were doing that 'shoot' before the playoffs and that's why they didn't hit worth a damn. Maybe their relationship has affected their performance. "Nice and easy"..yuck!
yacky..
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
10:50:32 AM
You bet I am a little bit depressed. I was at that last goddamn game, and it was appalling how they couldn't get one freak'n big hit in a crucial spot. They walked like eight times, and nothing. Beltran, hello Beltran, you're up to bat. Please swing. P.S. - Clorox doesn't make it go away.
Well look on the bright side pillow...
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
10:53:06 AM
At least we all now know that Carlos Beltran will never be eaten by a T-Rex.
Ricky..
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
11:06:45 AM
I disagree, I think that one AB opens the door for him to be eaten by a T-rex. Or a hulk dog.
You know how I know you're gay? You pose for GQ's Cover
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
11:10:10 AM
Yes, there might be something somewhat gay about grown men who wear tight pants and constantly spank each other. But how else are they going to reach the gay fanbase with Mike Piazza gone? Or maybe they're just auditioning for "Warriors! The Musical!" Still, David Wright (being the man) is probably being fellated by two sorority presidents as we speak.
Re: the Beltran joke
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
11:13:57 AM
What I meant was that Carlos Beltran will never be eaten by a T-Rex because he didn't move and a T-Rex's vision is based on movement... get it? get it? Ahhh, my humor is always unappreciated... ;)
I would say Piazza's "presence" is still being "felt"..
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
11:15:55 AM
just surprised it's by Wright and Reyes. But then again, maybe not. Giants can have him for that much.
re:re: the beltran joke
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
11:16:41 AM
Ahhh, and I'm an idiot sometimes. And I say he'll get eaten by a hulk dog because both had shitty appearances and both we could have done with out. (I'm reaching here trying to recover...)
You know moondoggy, I have to admit...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
11:31:40 AM
...I always run the "Could this guy be pulling an Andy Kaufman?" scenario in my head when I encounter a particularly archtypical Internet douchebag. I caught one guy doing it under multiple usernames once and was ever-so-proud of myself when he finally broke character and admitted it. I gave him props, too, because his rendition was pretty seamless (he was playing the Internet tough guy, challenging any and all who disagreed with him to a physical fight and promising to send photos of himself flexing shirtless in front of a mirror to anyone who doubted his inherent manliness after hearing his tales of queer bashing and picking fights with people who honked at him). It takes a certain something to be able to create and maintain a convincing Internet persona purely for amusement (although hopefully it's not just for one's own). This Pharte guy isn't quite that nuanced, though. There's not a lot of consistency to his style and he's quick to resort to seemingly randomly generated insults. Which is why I'm thinking he might be an intentional "Get off my side" plant meant to be the loudest and most irrational voice in favor of giving this movie a fair day in court, thereby simultaneously gassing up the naysayers and making the pre-judging and pre-dismissing seem all the more reasonable by comparison. It'd be clever if it hadn't been done about a thousand times already...and about a thousand times better in the recent past. Of course, I could be off base. I still suspect Michael Moore is really a Neocon plant designed to discredit any opposition to the current administration's practices or policies. Either that or he's just a really fat, smarmy, unjustifiably arrogant and ultimately stupid motherfucker.
a little bit too quiet...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
11:36:09 AM
And no new news, though I guess that's not too surprising. Oh look, I just saw a tumbleweed go by...
Why the heck is it so quiet today? We scared shitless!
by Shermdawg
Dec 28th, 2006
11:40:40 AM
Poor Man of Stool. "PWNS TEH SUCK" is an attack? *gulp* Then a lot of us are in trouble. ;)
Jazz...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
11:52:36 AM
I think that design does indeed look cool. I'm not sure anyone can argue that the actual transformers will look cool (regardless if they actually look like the 'character' they should be), but the movie itself will not be that good (rental). It is, after all, Michael Bay.
should say transformers will NOT look cool
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
11:53:29 AM
And Yack, it's the year-end clearance event, why wouldn't they have '07's?
What is Jazz again?
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
11:54:52 AM
A porsche, right? They did stay true to that, correct? I don't care much about his design as much as the fact that (SPOILER) he dies in the movie.
HAIRY
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 28th, 2006
12:01:10 PM
you don't get an ip unless I email you loser. cops cannot get ips without a court order, loser. if you wife is a cop then she is on the road to free herself from your fat ass, probably boning her partner. Your posting which has been recorded basically threatens several illegal acts. Court is a fun place, junior. Ask that lawyer Yacker. LOL. Ask Man of Stool.
ratchet looks like jeepers creepers
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
12:01:22 PM
is it year 23? I'm sure all the robots will look good translated on film. Just like Pearl Harbor had cool action scenes and the Island had Scarlett Johannson and Armageddon had...drillers, but that didn't make any of them good movies.
Gany, can you blush?
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
12:11:18 PM
Don't you feel the slightest bit of embarassment when you try to promote this movie to us? You do work for Dreamworks, correct? Ease up a little bit, will ya?
PharteGoddPrime
by Shermdawg
Dec 28th, 2006
12:18:57 PM
Who are you? What is your motivation? Why harass us like this? Just to get your jollys? Or is Murphy really that much of baby, that he has to go running off getting people banned, fired, or worse for a simple post, or posts that bad mouth him. If Murphy doesn't like people criticsizing him, he should not of become a public figure, plain and simple. OH NOES! SUM1 IS TALKING SMACK ABOUT ME ON TEH INTERNETS, I HAD BEST GO GET MY LAWLYERS!!!

Oh, and for the record, I'm pretty sure I've never badmouthed Don, other than me questioning his involvment in this whole thing. So don't get no ideas. I'm clean! Of course if you were here on behalf of Fox, then yeah, we might of had a problem. ;)
Shermy
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 28th, 2006
12:31:24 PM
if you think that Murphy qualifies as a public figure then you better shift lawyers, pronto. I hear there are great ones trolling this thread day and night. What WE want is to silence three or four of you in the harshest way. The rest will fall into line. Hairy is #2 and Phate is #3. There's an opening for #4 if you are interested.
does that mean Jazz will team up
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
12:31:37 PM
with Jet Li? Cradle 3 anyone?
talk about delusions of grandeur
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
12:36:33 PM
how exactly does Pharte plan on "silencing" TBers "in the harshest way"? What a delusional schmuck. Ignoring these morons sounds like a plan to me.
Of the designs I've seen so far, I dig...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
12:36:53 PM
...Prime the most. Bumblebee has actually grown on me and, if he were only a Bug or a Mini, I'd be 100% pleased with him. That helicopter looks pretty cool (are they calling him Vortex?) and Jazz is good except for the owl feet (obviously a Porsche would've been better, but his alt mode doesn't suck). Ratchet I'm pretty blah on. Don't hate him but don't really like him, either. Starscream worries me with what appear to be simian proportions and Megatron just kind of perplexes me. I'm hoping his current form is destroyed by film's end so they can bring him back as a tank or something for the next one. And I'm just assuming there will be a next one because, whether any of us overgrown kids approve or not, this movie's going to make metric assloads of money and Hasbro's going to want to sell more toys in a couple of years. In fact, based on that motive, alone, I wouldn't be surprised if ALL the surviving Transformers from this movie get a significant redesign (or at least a new paint job) for the sequel. Money's funny that way. It can make folks do the right things for the wrong reasons.
RickyDicky
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 28th, 2006
12:40:21 PM
read the thread- the silencings have become and will continue- Fatass will sell you out for a song
I don't feel like reading your drivel Pharte
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
12:40:40 PM
So just tell what you imagined you had done to all those mean talkbackers who said naughty things about Don Murphy. I'm up for a good laugh.
Childe, does that mean that PGPrime will be around..
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
12:41:16 PM
these talkbacks again? That's fantastic, first Zito, now more PGPrime. Yay. So is he really D Murphy or just some crazed stooge?
Toy sellers AND car sellers, Yack...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
12:49:28 PM
...now there's a frighteningly powerful combined force. Plus you've got the U.S. military eager to show off its hardware (does it bug them that their jet's being used as a villain, I wonder? Seems like a PR flub to me). All of this is leading me to believe that this franchise is going to be like the weather in my home town: Don't like it now? Wait five minutes and it will be completely different. You've got to admit, though, that does create a lot of windows of opportunity for them to get things right, even if only by accident or the laws of probability.
perhaps this 'series' would improve..
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
12:52:14 PM
like Harry Potter, bringing in a new director each time out. That's probably the best way for them to get things right.
Don Murphy pwns Pharte...
by idahomer
Dec 28th, 2006
12:54:15 PM
http://tinyurl.com/vpedh

Apparantly even Don is tired of this guy.

About the designs....
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 28th, 2006
12:54:50 PM
The designs are intricately detailed (ridiculously so) and the models and animations must have been a colossal bitch to create and animate. There is an extreme level of professional craftsmanship in those robots, and if ILM wins an Oscar for their work on this movie then congratulations because they deserve it.

In short, they are VERY cool looking things, but that doesn't make them Transformers in the same way that the transforming robots/vehicles in Macross are not Transformers.

No one will ever convince me that the G1 designs updated to work in full 3D wouldn't have worked for this film. By adding the proper joints to the 3D models, setting up proper links in the joints (IK chains), with proper constraints so the parts don't clip through each other, they could have given us some Transformers we can recognize.

What does it say about this movie that there is only ONE robot that is immediately recognizable?

And yet, it's still the script that really kills it for me. Visually, Wrath of Kahn is completely different from TOS, but that is still the best Star Trek I've ever seen.

yes a Cauron directed TF film
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
12:56:58 PM
...that will solve everything.
See, Yack, I think first sequels have a pretty good...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
01:10:07 PM
...track record. Godfather II, Empire Strikes Back, The Two Towers, Devil's Rejects and Texas Chainsaw Massacre II all surpassed their predecessors IMHO. I know people who say the same of Aliens, Phantasm 2, Scream 2 and Friday the 13th Part 2 (all of which I enjoy but I can't agree they were ostensibly better than the first films in those series). Second sequels (or Part 3s), on the other hand, tend to be from Satan's asshole. So if this franchise hasn't gotten a whole lot of stuff right by part 2 I'll be more inclined to write it off as a failed (from a creative standpoint) venture.
Someone should contact Quint and/or Harry...
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 28th, 2006
01:11:32 PM
...and request that PharteGoddPrime be banned immediately. Not only are his claims and threats INCREDIBLY creepy, but something doesn't gel with the post on his Master's website.

Consider this: there is legitimate bad blood between AICN and DM. Now, unless someone at AICN is playing a joke (which doesn't make a lot of sense...), there is something else going on and it has become increasingly volatile and sketchy. I say, take it to the Mods.

That's my 2 cents. Best of luck.

Ricky - how about John Hughes then?
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
01:15:00 PM
Transformers...with heart and a touching message. awwww....Uncle Prime.
The guts of the robots are fluid, but not their shells
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
01:15:59 PM
So you've got a lot of pneumatic sillyness going on beneath the shells, which don't change much at all. So its not really shape shifting metal. But it is crap nonetheless. My bigger problem is the designs of the cars. Would it have totally killed them to go with a flat nosed cab for Prime? Why did a redneck truck need to be used? To appease Bay's target audience perhaps?
Childe, also add
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
01:18:03 PM
The Wrath of Khan, First Contact, X2. The only part 3 that jumps out at me is Harry Potter.
I see your point, greekhammer, but that...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
01:21:06 PM
...assumes shape shifting and size/mass shifting are the same thing. Busting out a bit of comic geekery, if I recall correctly there are shapeshifters limited to a finite amount of mass (Mr. Fantastic and Mystique, for example). They can reconfigure their mass but not increase or decrease it (or at least couldn't by the time I stopped reading comics). Then you've got your unl;imited mass changers (like Apocalypse or Beast Boy from DC) who seem to pull or shunt extra mass from some magical source (aka the writer's ass) at will, depending on what form they want to assume. ANd then there's just your straight-up size shifters (like The Atom or any of Doc Pym's multiple personalities), who seem to be able to shift the amount of their mass but not its configuration. Seems to me the old-school transformers (circa the cartoon) were very limited shapefshifters (in that they could only switch to one or two alternate forms) and most were constrained by their size/mass limitations. Megatron, Soundwave, the cassette bots and, IIRC, the Insecticons were the only ones who could also gain or lose mass to change size. I don't think Optimus has ever been shown to do that, in any iteration (G1, Armada, Energon, etc.) without entering into some kind of robo-gestalt (more recent versions of the character show him merging with Jetfire to form some super version of himself). Ultra Magnus picked up significant mass in robot form by incorporating elements of his trailer as armor, but Prime's trailer (at least in G1) was always a mobile base.
Right on MNG, this Phartegod BS is harassment.
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
01:21:32 PM
Pharte's antics go far beyond mere creepyness in my opinion. What he's up to is borderline harassment. Yeah, harassment: "the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands". Kinda sums up what Pharte has been up to at AICN, doesn't it?
RickyDicky
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 28th, 2006
01:25:40 PM
your stupidity is showing. You cannot harass someone by definition at a public place, at least not verbally. IE, if you are feeling harassed, stop reading (you don't do that very well anyway junior) and stop sleeping with your older sister too.
BSB & Pillow: maybe a John Waters Transformers film?
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
01:27:23 PM
I'd watch that. Don Murphy clearly already likes his robots flaming.
This actually doesn't look too terrible in shape
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
01:31:51 PM
except for those ridiculous flames. The script, however, is trash and nothing can save Optimus from that.
ninja - go back to FF talkback
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
01:34:15 PM
I was rebutting your Spidey 3 trailer comparison.
Also all the moving and exposed inner parts
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
01:35:19 PM
are pointless and stupid. They're wearing armor and they are fighting a perpetual civil war. The fact that they would even look remotely organic and exposed is just, well, dumb. But they need something to distract from that turd of a script, so I imagine all that crap will keep your eyes moving in the hope you won't pay attention to the flat one-liners and insulting stereotypes of the human characters. The filmmakers just don't get it.
its harassment Pharte
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
01:35:32 PM
...and even if it wasn't your antics have been more than enough to warrant a banning. MNG is spot on.
But Two Towers was better than Fellowship, BSB...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
01:36:44 PM
...at least to me. Fellowship felt like a whole lot of introduction and backstory, which I was kind of anxious to get past given myy familiarity with the characters and conflict. Wait a minute...that sounds kind of like what a lot of folks are complaining about with this Transformer movie. And, while I'm comparing trilogies, I know Star Wars has gotten some lip service in here. That first film (A New Hope, I won't even touch those shitty, shitty prequels) really isn't as great a film as many recall. As has been pointed out, the writing was amateur hour and the only saving graces were the epic scope of the overaching theme of the thing, the kernels of truth underlying the very stereotyped characters and the blow-your-eyes-through-the-bac k-of-your-head effects. Yet I'd never recommend we just pretend Star Wars never happened simply because Empire went on to transcend the trilogy and the genre by being a fantastic film (much like Wrath of Khan...can't believe I forgot that one, pillow talk, and X2 and Spidey 2, for that matter). Nor would I recommend skipping over Fellowship if you're sitting down to watch TLOR. Sometimes the seemingly needless setup is actually necessary when looking at a series of films. I'd argue that the FF film was a perfect intro to all those characters except for Doom. Paved the way for what's looking like a pretty darned good sequel. I wish they'd taken a similar approach to Daredevil (because they just tried to cram way too much into that). Maybe the problem folks are having is with the thought that this might be "it" in terms of Transformers on film. I don't think that's a realistic expectation. Based on the number of geeks here alone who say they're going to see it, it's got some amount of appeal even within the ever-fickle fan community. Judging by the way my 6-year-old nephew talked incessantly about this (and Spider Man 3) over Christmas with his cousin, my 15-year-old nephew, it looks like it might have some cross-age-bracket appeal as well. I think they're probably already planning the sequels based on anticipated box office and toy sale revenues. Maybe in the bigger picture, this introduction tot he universe of the film won't seem so unacceptable to certain folks?
PharteGoddPrime
by Shermdawg
Dec 28th, 2006
01:38:55 PM
But purposely getting someone fired for crap that goes on here, IS harassment. You're talking about ruining peoples lives over "PWNS TEH SUCK". That's flatout crazy. Plain and simmple. Do you realize how many bullshit lawsuits (on top of all of the current bullshit lawsuits) that could be written up over whats said on the internet? Especially on sites like these? Jesus FUCKING Christ. This whole thing is nuts.
Childe...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
01:45:16 PM
I gotta disagree and say Fellowship was better. I was more pysched leaving the theatre after that one than the Two Towers. Perhaps that's because the long wait was over and I felt I was at long last rewarded with a kick ass fantasy film. And I think FF2 will be a much better film than this will be. Again, this will be like Independence Day, completely different once it is viewed outside of a theatre, and not in a good way. The extended version of DD was a lot better than the theatre version.
ganymede2010, you wanna ignore them?
by Shermdawg
Dec 28th, 2006
01:46:11 PM
What if they go after you? And you are banned, fired, or worse for something you said. Something you criticized. By ignoring them, you are "feeding the problem".
oh, and Childe..
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
01:46:27 PM
I hear what you are saying that maybe as an "introduction" movie, it'll be better viewing later on. But I can tell you that the Phantom Menace is still mucho painful to watch.
Last thing I'll say, before they put me on a hitlist...
by Shermdawg
Dec 28th, 2006
01:55:26 PM
If there was ever a time to speak up on something that has went down in a talkback, nows the time. Either through the site itself, or other means. You guys know how to reach me, I know Mori does. Please, I'd like to know, we all would, just what in the hell is going on?

Don't look for me in a Tranny talkback until the shit comes out. I don't care about getting fired as much as I do of being banned. And if I was to get kicked off this site, it certainly wouldn't be over this bullshit.

I'm out.
I hate Michael Bay...
by Sidius
Dec 28th, 2006
01:55:42 PM
..but that's because he's been making very shitty movies lately. The last movie of his that I liked was the Rock and since that everything's been garbage.

I won't critique Bay for changing the storyline of Transformers though - a story line that wasn't that great to begin with. The studio isn't making this movie for the million or so fans that actually know the true Transformers mythos. That would be financially irresponsible.

Bashing Bay by comparing him to Jackson and Raimi is just assinine. Raimi and Jackson have changed the storyline/mythos of beloved films just as much as Bay has. The last time I checked Spidey didn't shoot web from his wrist and I seem to remember a whole lot of bitching about deleted characters from the Fellowship of the Ring (Tom Bombadill anyone?).

The difference is that Raimi and Jackson still respect the fact that the story (even when changed) comes before everything else - Bay does not.

Bash Bay for his overemphasis on effects - but he and Hollywood have every right to change storylines to bring in the largest audience possible. Moviemaking is big business - not you making a stick figure 5 hour shortfilm in your basement so as to capture every nuance of the first LOTR book.

I fully expect the Transformers movie to suck but not because Optimus Prime has painted flames on his chest. It will suck because Bay gives two shits about story - he hasn't in some time.
Good point on TPM, pillow talk...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
01:56:46 PM
...but, to be fair, the sequel prequels didn't help it out much by giving it a worthwhile context. I agree on the director's cut of DD. It was much better. I still think the basic approach was off, though. I know a lot of folks were clamoring then for a non-origin superhero flick, and DD kind of was that (there was a flashback, but it wasn't the core of the narrative), but I think a little more setup of who DD was (maybe a Year One kind of approach) and why he was important to the city (as in, more of the Kingpin as a puppet master and the city as a festering blight) would have made for a better first film, with the introduction of Elektra at the end. Then the movie we got could've been cut down differently to be a leaner retelling of his doomed, defining romance and could've ended with him taking on Kingpin and losing. The third film could've been him crawling back to redemption from the bottom of the Hudson and taking the Kingpin out legally, complete with a Nuke/Super Soldier fight in Hell's Kitchen. But I digress. I suppose I could be in the minority on liking Two Towers best of the Rings movies. I do know I felt King was a bit of a let down ending (not unlike ROTJ for STar Wars), but it doesn't diminish the trilogy for me.
BSB...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
02:03:14 PM
if you use the force his costume turns to bright red.
Is that the force of contrast or tint...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
02:06:38 PM
...pillow talk? I bought a 42-inch HD flatscreen this time last year and I still don't know how to work the stupid controls. SOmedays I wish I could just transform into a gun and drop into Elvis' cold undead hands so he could shoot it.
childe needs an intervention!
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
02:09:34 PM
I'm sure you can figure it out! Force of tint of course...
unfortunately BSB...
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
02:10:34 PM
that made me laugh. Robot humor is priceless.
Shermy
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 28th, 2006
02:17:53 PM
getting someone fired for something they actually did? that's called justice.
BringingSexysCrack
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 28th, 2006
02:20:37 PM
it's not really a crusade. He just is boycotting it is all. Because the fucking killer did it to get famous .
Was "Hobots" intentional...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
02:24:33 PM
...a typo or a Freudian slip, BSB? WHichever, it made cranberry juice shoot out my nose for some reason. Maybe because my first thought was the Futurama episode where Bender was pimpin'.
BringingSexysCrack
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 28th, 2006
02:27:53 PM
please stop using his name then too
BSB: Yeah, what can I say?
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
02:32:31 PM
I work eleven hour days and I've got to do something to break them up. Still, you're avoiding the issue. Where can I get a Hobot? And, more importantly, is this the title of the movie Peter Jackson's going to make instead of the Hobbit?
Faces of Death
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 28th, 2006
02:37:36 PM
is not a remake...it is an update
Dick Bunny?!?!
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
02:38:50 PM
Okay, that tears it! This phrase is far too close to my patented catch insult, "cock monkey," which I've held exclusive rights to the use and licensing of since making it up in 1997. Whoever you are, Pharte, you can consider yourself sued.
What the hell are you people talking about?
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
02:42:22 PM
400+ posts in the last 24 hours? Are we bored or something since there are barely any updates?
We're talking about...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
02:45:58 PM
...Hobots, dick bunnies, cock monkeys, lawsuits and getting high at work. What's up with you, chrth?
Yeah, BSB...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
02:49:25 PM
...the coining of "cock monkey" was actually accidental. I was watching Happy Gilmore at 3 a.m. with a couple of friends and we were trying to discern what Sandler's character was saying during that first televised rant on the putting green. I rewound it a couple of times and drunkly proclaimed that I was near certain he had said "cock monkey," which no one else agreed with. Didn't stop them from using it the next day...and buying me another drink each time they did so. It really is quite catchy once you start tossing it around in conversation.
Childe, I agree with you on Two Towers.
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
02:51:44 PM
It got down to business. Personally, I don't think those films are so stellar in the characterization department with the exception of Gollum and they meander a bit in the setup. McKellen brings weight to Gandalf by the sheer force of his personality. Jackson is more successful at the spectacle.
I'll always be more of a FOTR fan
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
02:54:15 PM
It felt more like a road trip movie, you know? Plus there's a certain innocence to it that I enjoyed a lot. Unlike the later two movies which revolved around Frodo bitching about how heaving the ring is. There was no overwhelming sense of doom, it was just a terrific adventure story. Fellowship felt more fresh, fun, and new than the other movies. Its still my favorite of the trilogy.
heh, I dunno BSB, ask Tolkien...
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
02:57:06 PM
He envisioned the helms deep battle. Maybe because orcs, unlike goblins, aren't really built for mountain climbing?
Then you will absolutely love The Hobbit, Ricky.
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
03:01:00 PM
That's my favorite anyway.
Two Towers
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
03:02:30 PM
Ok, I want to weigh in on the debate above. Two Towers is the best of the 3 films ...

If you're talking the Extended Edition. I don't even remember the differences, but the second I watched the EE for Two Towers, I knew I would not keep the regular editions. And sure enough, I didn't.

FOTR EE was a little disappointing, I felt the only thing it improved was the Boromir v Orcs scene. Granted, worth the price for just that, but still, I expected more from it.

ROTK EE is good because they added Saruman back in ... but at the same time, they didn't do anything to improve Denethor (DAMN YOU, PETER JACKSON!). And of course, ROTK still annoys me for the "No Man May Hinder/Kill Me" change. DAMN YOU PETER JACKSON!

Granted, still love ROTK ... but DAMN YOU PETER JACKSON!

chrth
by TheRevengeOfBayouWilly
Dec 28th, 2006
03:03:41 PM
I don't know, apparently people are getting banned and fired over toy robots.
oh definitely superninja
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
03:04:06 PM
The Hobbit is my favorite of his books. It isn't weighed down by the background politics like the LOTR trilogy is. Its just a fun and engaging adventure story.
Frodo on an Eagle and Orcs v Goblins
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
03:08:20 PM
1) There are no differences between Orcs and Goblins. Did you mean Uruk-Hai (the Orc-Human hybrid)? There is no indication they could've climbed over the mountains like the Orcs from Moria could've.

2) Ok, the Frodo-on-an-Eagle thing has to stop. I've seen it for decades, and it's the stupidest idea possible. Frodo would be too vulnerable. One, he's in the air and obvious. Two, Sauron has access to flying steeds. Three, the Cracks of Doom are not necessarily accessible from the top of Mt. Doom. They are inside, down a tunnel; dropping the Ring into the volcano from above in no way guarantees the Ring finds its way into the Cracks.

Yeah crth,
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
03:09:48 PM
I meant Uruk-Hai, who would never have made it over those mountains. Good point with the eagle debunking by the way.
See, now, The Hobbit is very thematically...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
03:11:26 PM
...similar to Lord of the Rings, at least in the earlier parts of the latter book, but is far more economical in the telling of the classic reluctant hero's journey. It's nowehre near as deep, but that's the fun of it. And, unfortunately, that seems to be something Petey didn't appreciate if you look at what his plans for a Hobbit movie were. Anyway, I've always wondered why Gandalf didn't just ask an eagle to fly the ring to Mount Doom in the first place and fuck Frodo altogether (not literally, of course, although there was always the indication in the films that Gandalf might do just that). But I love the trilogy as a trilogy, just as I love The Hobbit as a distinctly separate entity set in the same world (not a prequel). Maybe my bittersweet relationships with certain series of films like Star Wars (two half-good films bookending one whizbang of an action adventure classic), The Godfather (one really good movie, one great one and then an afterbirth), The Lord of the Rings (which I can't even view as separate movies, really, but tend to enjoy the middle portion most over all) and Star Trek (which is just all the happy fuck over the place in terms of quality and consistency) have predisposed me to see a multi-film franchise coming and to reserve judgment until I've seen how the series is shaping up over time. Of course, that doen't explain how I knew Hostel was going to be ass and my absolute certainty that its sequel will be the other cheek. But exceptions prove the rule, they say.
Ricky Henderson: You don't post correctly
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
03:12:47 PM
Ricky Henderson should be referring to Ricky Henderson in the 3rd person. What's all this "I" crap?
true crth
by Ricky Henderson
Dec 28th, 2006
03:13:52 PM
Ricky Henderson forgot how Ricky Henderson should post. Ricky will do better in the future. Ricky Henderson.
Hairy
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 28th, 2006
03:19:14 PM
"No one will ever convince me that the G1 designs updated to work in full 3D wouldn't have worked for this film. By adding the proper joints to the 3D models, setting up proper links in the joints (IK chains), with proper constraints so the parts don't clip through each other, they could have given us some Transformers we can recognize."

Not even someone who does 3d modelling for a living. I'm sorry but you cannot use the toy models BECAUSE they are toy models. There is simply no way to stop clipping from occuring unless you intend for your action characters to only move their arms and legs in about 6 degrees. You are seeing the update of Gen1 to 3D here and now. Even if they'd used the exact same cars from the toys, they'd still not be what you wanted
BSB: You're missing an important point
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
03:22:02 PM
Sauron does not expect the Ring to be destroyed; to paraphrase Gandalf (or is it Elrond?), Sauron can't imagine any other situation but the wielding of the Ring by an opponent. The reason he launches the attack against Minas Tirith is because he believes that Aragorn now has the Ring (or at least access to it) and he wants to eliminate it as a stronghold before Aragorn can get there.

The situation you describe would make it very obvious to Sauron what was happening. Gandalf can not stand against the combined power of the Nazgul, and no force in the 3rd Age could assault Mordor successfully. Steath and secrecy was the only viable option.

sweet jesus!!!
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 28th, 2006
03:35:17 PM
man i missed some fun this morning, lol...thats what i get for getting completely hammered lol...BSB "You sucked so hard you nearly took the skin off, son." made me crack the fuck up. but hey, dont worry, if he bites too much i'm sure he'll say he's sorry :P
BSB: I should've been clearer
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
03:40:49 PM
Here's what Sauron knows, in chronological order:

1) There's a man called Baggins who lives in the Shire who has Gollum's ring. Or a man called Shire who lives in a land called Baggins. He sends the Nazgul to investigate.

2) The Nazgul discover the Ringbearer, but they lose him at the entrance to Rivendell.

3) Saruman reports to him that there's a group heading South (the Nazgul are out of commission at this point, so Sauron's only info is via Saruman)

4) Sauron makes contact with the Ringbearer at the falls of Rauros ... which is the entrance to Gondor. And he likely knows that the Heir of Elendil is with him (via Saruman).

5) Sauron and Saruman lose track of the Ring after the Breaking of the Fellowship and then the defeat of the Uruk-Hai by the Riders of Rohan. Wormtongue would've told Saruman that the Heir of Elendil was present with Gandalf in Rohan ... and perhaps he knew that "no one survived" the attack by the Riders ... but there is no trace of Hobbits to be found. If a Hobbit still has the Ring, it is lost. The other alternative is that Aragorn or Gandalf has it.

6) Pippin looks into the palantir at Orthanc, and is met by Sauron. Sauron probably thinks Saruman has betrayed him and sends a Nazgul(?) to investigate. The Nazgul will discover that Orthanc has obviously been attacked, and there will be no sign of Hobbits or Aragorn present.

7) Aragorn challenges Sauron and *wrests control of the palantir from him*. The same palantir that he quite recently saw a Hobbit look into. Putting 2+2 together ... Sauron launches an attack on Minas Tirith.

8) The attack on Minas Tirith fails, and an army from there approaches. This latter part is a calculated move by Gandalf, as a way of encouraging Sauron in thinking Aragorn has the Ring.

9) Frodo puts the Ring on at the Cracks of Doom, and what follows is the best paragraph in the entire book.

How's that?

Followup
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
03:44:06 PM
What I outlined above is from the book, but I don't think any of it contradicts the movies. The only one that might is #7; iirc, there's no explicit mention in the movie that Aragorn challenging Sauron for the palantir encourages an early attack on Minas Tirith.
The scary thing is that I did that from memory
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
03:48:33 PM
I can't decide if that's a good kind of scary or a bad kind.

I will post "the best paragraph in the entire book" when I get home in 10 minutes.

Of course not...
by nonsensical
Dec 28th, 2006
03:51:42 PM
Why would Bay or anyone of the other douchetards over there working on this pile of monkey shit start doing anything that could even hint at this being a Transformers related film. I mean other than the title and the placement of Autobot and Decepticon insignia there is nothing else to really sell this as a Transformers movie. Even using Peter Cullen's voice and the names of the characters isn't really going to do it. You know if Hasbro was smart they would look into creating a second G1 related property right now with a director who was passionate about the G1 story and release it in 2008 or 2009. Not to compete with the TF 2007, but to make more money and see which one really does better at the box office.
You know...
by nonsensical
Dec 28th, 2006
03:57:42 PM
I though these transformations were supposed to take 3-4 seconds. Not 8-10. That's way too long, but they gotta do what they gotta do to stretch this turd out. After all, it's not like they have a story to fall back on.
Uh, it's because the whole thing is allegory, more or
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
04:01:21 PM
less. The Eagles represent angels, and angels are messengers, they are not freewill agents who can choose to reject or accept the burden placed upon them. That is the job of men, or in this case, a Hobbit.
superninja: it's not allegory
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
04:06:56 PM
Tolkien hated that word, said on multiple occasions that LotR was not meant to be allegorical.

The word he did like was "applicability".

Besides the Eagles do plenty in the Hobbit that aren't message related. And in fact in LotR they mostly do rescuing. Of course, the fact that the Eagles are the Children of Manwe may have something to do with that.

superninja: however
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
04:09:18 PM
Gandalf is essentially an angel in the Tolkien cosmology (an Aesir by the name of Olorin), and he is forbidden from taking direct, decisive action in Middle-Earth. Saruman is similarly restricted, however, he fails to live up to his charge and thus is not restored to Valinor upon his death.

Sauron and the Balrog are also both Aesir, btw.

True Ricky Henderson story...
by idahomer
Dec 28th, 2006
04:09:21 PM
One time, Rickey was offered a seat on the team bus, the player saying that he had tenure. To which Rickey replied, "Ten years? What are you talking about? Rickey got 16, 17 years."
Not impressed...
by Cl_Kilgore
Dec 28th, 2006
04:10:03 PM
Just back from the holiday vacation, and don't really have time to read the mountain of talkbacks here. I wasn't impressed by the trailer and the transformers look like Gundam's from that anime. The whole shot of the boy and girl holding hands was awful. That tells me their plot line and characters will receive way too much screen time. It's a movie about giant robots, why do we need them? The people should be no more then extras in the movie.

I'll be waiting to rent it on DVD.

The (two) best paragraphs in the book
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
04:14:51 PM
And far away, as Frodo put on the Ring and claimed it for his own, even in Sammath Naur the very heart of his realm, the Power in Barad-dur was shaken, and the Tower trembled from its foundations to its proud and bitter crown. The Dark Lord was suddenly aware of him, and his Eye piercing all shadows looked across the plain to the door that he had made; and the magnitude of his own folly was revealed to him in a blinding flash, and all the devices of his enemies were at last laid bare. Then his wrath blazed in consuming flame, but his fear rose like a vast black smoke to choke him. For he knew his deadly peril and the thread upon which his doom now hung.

From all his policies and webs of fear and treachery, from all his strategems and wars his mind shook free; and throughout his realm a tremor ran, his slaves quailed, and his armies halted, and his captains suddenly steerless, bereft of will, wavered and despaired. For they were forgotten. The whole mind and purpose of the Power that wielded them was now bent with overwhelming force upon the Mountain. At his summons, wheeling with a rending cry, in a last desperate race there flew, faster than the winds, the Nazgul, the Ringwraiths, and with a storm of wings they hurtled southwards to Mount Doom.

Heres why I want to see the movie
by WolfmanNards
Dec 28th, 2006
04:16:19 PM
I totally want to see a love story between shia lebuff and some other worthless young actor. I dont give one shit about the transformers. I just want to see the dynamics of the love story the movie is going to have.
Messengers can deliver all kinds of things, not
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
04:21:33 PM
just messages. They can provide rescue and mete out justice. At least Biblically speaking. I know of Tolkien not liking his work labelled, etc. and it's clear there are many influences. Just like with myths and religion you find variations on common themes in many places. Didn't Manwe decide on his people's involvement in the wars of man? It is also interesting that for an angel, Gandalf never really fully realizes his power until he dies and returns, which seems to me more like Moses or a prophet, but I'm sure is reminscient of other such characters in European myth.
hee hee, funny wolfman
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
04:24:53 PM
but so true. The filmmakers really don't believe in the power of the TF myth, so they had to shackle it with every action movie cliche from the last 20 years.
superninja: you forget
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
04:29:46 PM
LotR predates European myth :)
You lost me, chrth.
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
04:39:13 PM
I was right with you up through your synopsis of the trilogy (specifically Sauron's limited awareness of the ring quest) and your very reasonable defense against the "why not have an eagle do it?" argument (although I still think an intelligent eagle would've been more than capable of a stealth mission and might have seemed even less suspicous than a couple of affectionate, hairy halflings) and your knowledge of the Silmarillion and underlying myth structure of Middle Earth is evident. But what do you mean LOTR predates European mythology? Are we talking about Celtic and Norse lore, here? Because LOTR most certainly drew from both, which existed long before Tolkien first waxed theological. And superninja, let's not overlook the obvious similarities between the return of the White Wizard and the resurrection of Aslan, which was a pretty obvious Jesus allegory (far as I know, Lewis had no compunctions about using that word). So in LOTR you've got multiple Jesus figures (Gandalf with his death and powerful return, Frodo with is sacrifice and self doubt, and Aragorn with his little detour to the underworld).
BSB
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 28th, 2006
04:48:09 PM
yeah i can see somewhere in the 200+ posts that have happened since last night lol. only a 14 year old could think that by someone accepting a "fake" appology he has "owned" them...fuckn lame...oh man i'm so lost in this TB now...LOTR is not my strong suit :( oh well, carry on. maybe i'll learn something haha
I was going to say re LoTR
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 28th, 2006
04:48:22 PM
I thought it was an allegory; a bet made between Tolkien and CS Lewis in the pub to make a religious allegory.
Sorry, I should've explained (oh, and Jesus)
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
04:53:39 PM
Tolkien was a philologist; he loved language. One of the popular ideas during his time was the idea of an ur-language, a language that predates all modern languages (what we now call Proto Indo-European). Tolkien also believed that language was the carrier for the legends and myths that exist in so many places and share so many commonalities. Therefore, if you combine the two ideas, then not only must there exist an ur-language, but an ur-legend as well.

Tolkien was consciously trying to create this with his works. He even made the comment that we're in the 6th or 7th age (whereas the bulk of LotR is the 3rd age) -- facetiously, of course. He was never insane enough to believe that the stories he was writing were the originals, but at the same time, he was trying to create stories that *could* have existed before all those we know.

One more thing about this: the temptation of Adam & Eve and the casting out from the Garden of Eden happens offscreen in the Silmarillion.

Finally, on Jesus. Iluvatar (ie God) intervenes only three times in the history of the world. First, when he removes Valinor from Ea (essentially, the 2-dimensional world becomes 3-dimensional, for sailing West -- unless you know the path through the stars -- does not reach Valinor anymore). Second, he restores Gandalf to life after his death by the Balrog.

And third, he sends Jesus to die on the Cross.

And no, I'm not kidding.

That's cute and all but if you're going to heavily
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
04:55:38 PM
borrow the least you can do is try to not claim you pre-date it. :)
superninja: I don't know ... I like the idea
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
05:04:14 PM
I should create a book that combines DaVinci Code, John Grisham, and the Bridges of Madison County and claim that the work I have created predates those :)

In all seriousness, Tolkien acknowledged the influence of the earlier works (although he says the Ring should not draw comparisons to the Ring Cycle opera-tized by Wagner (sorry, can't spell Nibel--). The Kalavela was a major influence, of course. But he does plenty of creation on his own. If you read through the original drafts of what he was trying to right, it's very obvious how his mind kept molding the work to his own design.

I just wish he had gone back and fixed the first part.

Okay, chrth...
by Childe Roland
Dec 28th, 2006
05:04:53 PM
...you were talking about within the imaginary world of Tolkien's fiction. For a second there I thought you'd gone all L. Ron Hubbard on us. Hail Xenu.
That's true, Childe. Chrth explained it very well.
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
05:06:06 PM
He was being kind of humorous too, I think, but for the most part I agree with Tolkien's idea that myth and religion are often talking about some of the same events but make different claims about causation. But even Tolkien's reference to the ur-languages goes back to the Torah.
I'm not bashing his work by any means.
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
05:10:25 PM
I wish more writers had 1/10th the imagination of that man. His work is very layered and people are still arguing over it and copying it today for a reason. However, I still land on the C.S. Lewis side of things. But that movie was a snore-fest.
I just wish Bay had 1/1000th the imagination of Tolkien
by moondoggy2u
Dec 28th, 2006
05:30:20 PM
And that, ladies and gentleman, is what started this entire thread in the first place ;)
Moondoggy, I would even settle for a larger
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
05:41:58 PM
percentage of siphoned talent, but even that would require a supernatural explanation.
No one would believe it even if you had a time
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
05:44:29 PM
machine and a talent-transferring device and broadcasted it. Then there is the Murphy Problem.
Hi superninja
by moondoggy2u
Dec 28th, 2006
05:58:26 PM
Its been a long while since I've spoken to you. How have you been doing?
I'm fine, how about yourself?
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
05:59:40 PM
I just got back from Austin, TX, and managed to avoid seeing Harry anywhere at all. :)
I'm feeling capital, Super
by moondoggy2u
Dec 28th, 2006
06:06:45 PM
I wish my break were longer, but otherwise, things are going splendidly.
The Patriot Act
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
06:19:01 PM
You know Just spent a hour researching this but then Fifox started acting up right when I was trying to post my response but Phartegoddprime did you know threatening a Government employee is considered a Act of terrorism. I just submitted your e-mail address and this page to TIGTA which the IRS version of the FBI. (Note) this is not a threat but a actual warning to PGP. and this is the last reply you'll get from me PGP regading any of your statements or actions.
stooopider
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 28th, 2006
07:41:11 PM
You're starting to remind me of a kid who has discovered a new toy. A toy called "Talkback". Yeah, I remember my first week on AICN, too.
Impressive chrth, most impressive
by just pillow talk
Dec 28th, 2006
07:46:34 PM
Obi Wan has taught you well. Can someone make stoopider go away?
there are new pics of Masterpiece Megatron up
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
08:05:45 PM
http://tinyurl.com/y6h3re This things altmode will get you killed. I love it.
"but sometimes you need to make human sacrifices"
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
08:27:23 PM
Truer words have never been spoken.
I quote Boromir: They've got a Cave Troll
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
08:30:07 PM
Phate did you really report Pharty?
by Hairy Nutsack
Dec 28th, 2006
08:41:12 PM
I spent some time today with a lawyer friend discussing harrassment laws and liability issues. He agreed there may be a case here because of the threats, but here's where it gets even better...

If a harrassment lawsuit can be brought, and this jackass works for any company linked to this movie, then his company and even Paramount pictures could potentially be named in the lawsuit.

So let's talk serious for a moment Pharty, and I'm going to drop all pretense and bullshit and just talk reality. Thumping your chest on the internet and saying "my dick is bigger than yours" is not illegal and violates no laws, but once that thumping turns into threats, then a line has been crossed, and you've crossed that line. Internet bitching and bluster should stay on the internet, but once it moves off the internet and into people's real lives then it becomes a whole different animal. You've been acting like the big man on campus and I am taking you seriously.

I am fully aware that this may all be some stupid internet prank gone awry, and frankly it's a pretty good one if it is, but threatening to take this to the next level and interfering with people's real lives is simply something that cannot be tolerated.

And since I promised to drop all pretense and bullshit I'm going to admit I lied about something. My wife is not a cop, that was just me thumping my own chest, in reality she is applying to become a cop though, and that's where that particular idea came from.

Make no mistake about something, I really did consult with a lawyer today, and while harrassment is not his area of expertise, he's a copyright lawyer, he agreed that threats, both actual or implied, are a component of harrassment lawsuits.

The ball is officially in your court now Pharty, do you think we can dispense with this bullshit, because I'd be happy to. I'm the least litigious person on the planet and want nothing to do with a lawsuit, but I cannot stand by while you threaten the livelihood of myself and others here.

BSB: But it's not torture porn like
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
09:00:01 PM
Supersize Me
Now back to the pic
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
09:02:28 PM
is it me or does it looks likt Prime has a pot belly.
Don't forget the part where Jazz races at Talledega
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
09:04:45 PM
Flames and a Pot Belly
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
09:05:38 PM
ever more proof Bay and Co. are aiming this at the Trailer park.
*sigh* My Talledega post was supposed to follow
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
09:05:45 PM
"Flames and a Pot Belly"
Guys, the bulge is there to conceal ...
by chrth
Dec 28th, 2006
09:08:39 PM
the Autobot Matrix of Leadership
did someone ask earlier what a Pontiac Solstice was
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
09:13:01 PM
Its a underpowered sports car also released by Saturn as the Sky. It has less HP then the 72 camaro Bumblee starts out as and the 2009 Camaro is supposed to have 400Hp
Call me Mr. me too
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
09:19:07 PM
I'm looking for a good 50 Inch with 1080p for less then $1,300.
I think you mean alternator
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
09:31:32 PM
and it was the Binaltech that was the RX8 which would still be better then a Solstice. But I digress is it true that you cant see the diference between 1080p and 720p if the screen is not larger then 50 inches.
I love that Pontiac Symbol emblazoned on his chest
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
09:50:56 PM
I think I got too much crap to mount it to the wall PS2, 360, Comcast,GC,X-box, DVD player, and I want to keep my security deposit so I can't do any drilling. And I think 50 inches of rear projection would be too massive.
umm $125
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
10:15:12 PM
I got my First FF game this Christmas (yeah I'm late but I heard this is the best one since VII) I'd check out ICO, Shadow of the colossus, MGS3:subsistence, and the Xenosaga trilogy (well at least the first one.
we're nowhere near the record
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
10:30:30 PM
remember Magatron and Optimus lasted for weeks and then there is something called the aquafag talkback that lasted for a whole year.
Love sly
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
10:33:24 PM
and remember Megatron has not been cast yet.
Love sly
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
10:33:25 PM
and remember Megatron has not been cast yet.
goodnight
by Phategod1
Dec 28th, 2006
10:45:34 PM
and goodluck I think I'm going to put some time in with LOZ:TP.
Yack, let me know what ya think of Apocalypto.
by superninja
Dec 28th, 2006
10:47:39 PM
I still haven't seen Lady in the Water. No one would watch it with me. AND my crap DVD player is broken. Lame to the max.
I think it was Yack that mentioned Maniac Cop
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 29th, 2006
12:50:11 AM
yeah...Bruce was in that, groovy!
I like Continuously Updated News Talkbacks...
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 29th, 2006
01:05:32 AM
who else likes C.U.N.T.? need sleep, or whats that dishsoap? ECHO...ECHo...ECho...Echo...ec ho...
Have you ever been so tired
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 29th, 2006
01:11:45 AM
that you needed rotated?
Have you ever been so Sleepy
by S-Mart shopper
Dec 29th, 2006
01:20:17 AM
you felt Dopey? and if you felt Dopey were you Happy? or are you Happy because you're a Doc who can cure a Sneezy(who is really Grumpy). These questions dwarf me into being Bashful.
@qu@f@g had a huge talkback, and PS2
by chrth
Dec 29th, 2006
05:30:45 AM
But iirc, it was a different one that caused the Phantom Zone to be created. Oh yeah! It was the 'hidden' Phantom Menace Talkback. THAT was awesome.

I'm finally getting a PS2, mainly for Guitar Hero, Amplitude, Gitaroo Man, and Beatmania (um, I like Rhythm games, mmkay?) ... plus Shadows of the Colossus (as previously mentioned), and Devil May Cry (all 3 available in a nice cheap 'anniversary' package). I think there are enough exclusive games available to make it a worthwhile investment, and by the time I get tired of those games (and the Xbox games I still haven't played), PS3 and X360 should be a lot cheaper. Second verse, same as the first.

Correction to earlier post
by chrth
Dec 29th, 2006
05:50:29 AM
I had stated that Gandalf/Olorin was one of the Aesir. That is incorrect, as 'Aesir' is a term for the Nordic gods. The word I should've used was Maiar.

Thanks to John Hodgman for using the word Aesir in reference to Ragnarok in his book 'The Areas of my Expertise' for providing the impetus for me to correct my earlier mythological folly.

Sheesh, where is everyone this morning?
by chrth
Dec 29th, 2006
07:42:49 AM
busy making the world a better place?
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
07:51:44 AM
or not
Ah, I skipped the Capone TB
by chrth
Dec 29th, 2006
08:21:28 AM
As I've seen like 2 or 3 films this year (V for Vendetta, X3, and POTC2 -- the last for free), I really can't talk about every other film on the list.
Yack: on Alternators and HDTV...
by Childe Roland
Dec 29th, 2006
08:25:39 AM
...I totally agreee that the Alternator approach would've been the best for these movie robot designs. I think what we got is clearly closer to that way of thinking (at least in body design) than it is to G1. If they'd made sure to slap G1 heads on these designs, I'll bet they'd improve by quantum leaps in a lot of folks' eyes. As for your TV stand hunt, let me know what you find. I wound up putting my TV on a low bookshelf, now full of DVDs and Xbox 360 crap. I'm looking for a hutch-like thing to put on top of the shelf so my DVR and DVD player can sit on top of the shelf but under the TV (if that makes sense) and I can free up more shelf space for movies and games. On the whole "no such thing as too massive a TV" argument, I agree with a qualifier: you can have too big a TV for a particular room. I think if I went much bigger than 42" in my living room, there'd be no place to sit where you could see the whole picture at once.
V was a good movie...
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
08:25:54 AM
Maybe I should throw that in the DVD player tonight. Though I'm hoping Jet Li's Fearless comes in the mail today. Has anyone seen that?
so would Hadji...
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
08:30:40 AM
or better yet, Bandit. Scrappy little dog! Ah, Johnny Quest was the real deal!
V was an excellent movie (but)
by chrth
Dec 29th, 2006
08:36:02 AM
I actually prefer it to the original. Most of the changes I felt improved it.

Except for the giant flippin' plothole they threw in at the end. Aarrgghh.

Gay robots?!?!?!?!
by VoteRoslin08
Dec 29th, 2006
09:04:47 AM
Man you guys are a bunch of lame-ass dorks who get laid so rarely that you feel the need to call a CGI robot gay to prove you like chicks. It's a f-ing robot, douchebags. By definition, it CANT be homosexual. Grow up and say the flames look douchie or something. PS: I'm gay, and whether prime has flames on his chest or not, I DON'T WANT TO F HIM!
Sometimes I think TFD is Moriarty in disguise
by chrth
Dec 29th, 2006
09:08:19 AM
Of course, I'm also thinking stoopider is just JJ4P.
whew!
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
09:13:05 AM
Now the talkback community is relieved that you don't want to screw Optimus Prime. You had us worried!
BAH HUMBUG!
by robnubis
Dec 29th, 2006
09:31:57 AM
i wouldnt mind the flames if optimus wasnt one of those faglol American style 18-Wheelers instead of waht he was in the cartoon and comics.
re: just pillow talk
by VoteRoslin08
Dec 29th, 2006
09:32:07 AM
not really the point, but a witty come back. I gotta give you that. the point is, how many gay guys do you see driving cars and motorcycles with giants flames down the sides? The answer is "I DON'T KNOW" because anyone driving cars and motorcycles with giants flames down the sides could be gay. however, you and I both know that adding flames to Prime was a ploy to make it look like a cooler toy for kids... not to target that gay demo who SO love being called 'flamers', btw... no really, we find it chraming. I hope whether any of you guys or gals have issues with gay people or not, (and for the record I don't think calling a CGI robot gay makes you a homophobe), I hope you can appreciate that it SUCKS that a word used correctly to describe you ('gay') is, in this situation, AT BEST being used as an adj. to convey the idea of being lame or stupid, and AT WORST trying BEYOND REASON to say "Optimus Prime has flames on his chest... THANKS A LOT GAY PEOPLE!" Its silly either way. The former only requires that people grow up, say what they mean, and replace 'gay' with 'stupid' , and latter requires a lot of soul searching and the realization that flame on a CGI trunk is HARDLY a victory for gay people... trust me... we have bigger fish to fry.
TV Stand for Yack...
by idahomer
Dec 29th, 2006
09:40:56 AM
I too have a Samsung DLP and bought the Samsung stand designed for it. It's the best way to go imho, because the stand and tv fit together seamlessly.
poopiepants..
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
09:54:11 AM
Completely agree dude. I don't think anyone really thinks that, and if they do, well they have some serious issues. And proclaiming yourself as the Yo-yo master gets the chicks...
"TV Stand for Yack"...
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
09:56:50 AM
sounds like a telethon! Operators are standing by....
"Yack стойка для Yack"
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
10:18:43 AM
da comrade!
They should make a Johnny Quest movie just
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
10:20:22 AM
so I can have my real life version of Race Bannon. He is so groovy!
I second the Quest movie!
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
10:22:13 AM
I wanna see a boat squash lizard men! Nothing better than lizard men...
Maybe they mean it's way too happy, not way
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
10:22:57 AM
too homosexual? I mean, flames on cars are pretty silly.
JPT, lobstermen are better than lizardmen
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
10:24:15 AM
but they are a close second!
gotta shout out to lizard men...
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
10:27:57 AM
because they were the villians to start it all out if I'm not mistaken. I'm sure we can fit lobsters and lizards together. After all, it is Johnny Quest, he can handle it.
Love Samsung...
by idahomer
Dec 29th, 2006
10:28:39 AM
and Johhny Quest.

We love it. I think it's the best pic and can't beat the price. Have had it a year and no problems. Just wish there were more HD channels on my cable. But I've become quite the Discovery Channel junkie.

I know the difference between Interlacing and
by Phategod1
Dec 29th, 2006
10:35:27 AM
Progressive but does anyone here have a 1080p and is it that much better then a 720p
Flames on Prime = white trash Optimus.
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
10:38:19 AM
In a way, it is mocking the original intent of the character(which was to be John Wayne-esque and Americana) pretending to pay homage. Hollywood does this all the time and thinks its cute. You can tell sometimes when a filmmaker is just rolling in trash and loving it because he's mocking it and elevating it at the same time, having it both ways. Bay is particularly masterful at this. Just my opinion.
Or maybe Bay honestly thinks that
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
10:41:08 AM
John Wayne would be driving around in a big rig with flames on the side if he were alive today? Who knows. I think it reaks of PoMo pop mockery.
look at it this way ninja...
by just pillow talk
Dec 29th, 2006
10:42:14 AM
For every Prime you have a Surfer...balance in the force is maintained.
1800p is noticibly better than 720p
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 29th, 2006
10:52:53 AM
I always said the difference between 1080i and 720p was not visible but 1080p is stunning. Mind, i wanted 1080p for games.
The Venture Bros robot is called H.E.L.P.e.R
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 29th, 2006
10:55:42 AM
And yes, i like the show.
Once more for yack
by TheAllSeeingEye
Dec 29th, 2006
11:02:53 AM
The problem with pixely LCD's is that alot of manufacturers have bust a gut to bring out cheap sets to get them into peoples homes. Here in the UK alot of people see LCD HD TV's more as a fashion accessory or status symbol; sad but true. As a result, you get crap manufacturers selling cheap ass TV's just so people can brag they have a flat panel set. If you are wanting a 1080p compatible set though, you usually find the pixel/refresh problems go out the window as you have to buy a high end TV. I just bought this one from sony http://tinyurl.com/ymaez3 - superb. Just have to keep my son from playing near it.
Just went back and read more of this talkback, and
by chrth
Dec 29th, 2006
11:32:15 AM
I have a stupid question: who is Don Murphy?
i hate to admit it
by wanna_bannana
Dec 29th, 2006
11:41:31 AM
But stoopider has a very good point about Sly in the TB's, it was a brilliant marketing ploy, and his movie has made a wackload because of it....he had alot riding on it, so stoopider is right about the fact that is was a manipulation.
yeah...
by VoteRoslin08
Dec 29th, 2006
11:42:53 AM
i kinda think the flames are lame but i'm PRETTY f-ing sure I'll be there regardless cause giant robots fighting (whether they are fighting in a way that is faithful to the cartoon) it is gonna be kickass... it just will be.
Well of course it was a PR/marketing ploy
by chrth
Dec 29th, 2006
11:46:38 AM
But come on now, does anyone really believe there's enough people at AICN to make a dent in numbers? I mean, I know the "Internet Exponential Agreement Effect"* occurs here, but that doesn't influence box office (unless the producers of a film are relying on it a la SOAP).

*The IEAE states simply that for everyone who agrees with you on something, you believe 10^x people in the world agree with you. Thus if you find four people in agreement with a forum post, you immediately assume 10,000 (10^4) people in the world agree with you. If you find 9, that means you assume a billion people do.

Yack, you're probably right about Bay.
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
11:52:05 AM
Bay thinks trashy is Americana, you can see it in all of his films. He thinks lowbrow is what plays to America. He is probably right. :)
chrth the industry pays attention to AICN
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
12:00:48 PM
it is not about the numbers who hang out, but the number of hits. More people read this site than you think.
You dont want to know
by Phategod1
Dec 29th, 2006
12:09:47 PM
trust me
Oh, I'm sure the industry cares that AICN exists
by chrth
Dec 29th, 2006
12:11:11 PM
But that doesn't mean it translates to Box Office.
I've got to second that 1080 endorsement...
by Childe Roland
Dec 29th, 2006
12:15:43 PM
...360 games look hella cool on it. Yack, I'm also looking for something more "furniturey" (or at least my wife would rather I did), so if you find anything good, pop back in here and share. Meanwhile, if I don't get to check before the New Year, everyone out there have a very happy one (even you stoops).
I'm watching Die another Day
by Phategod1
Dec 29th, 2006
12:33:01 PM
This has to be the worse James Bond Theme song ever.
funny stuff
by Cl_Kilgore
Dec 29th, 2006
12:44:37 PM
Can't keep up with this talk back. I'm over half way through and there's some of the funniest stuff on this site there though.
I like that Madonna song.
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
12:44:38 PM
It should be the theme song for Celebrity Kabbalah.
Worst James Bond theme song ever is
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
12:51:27 PM
License to Kill by Gladys Knight. Seriously. Here is the hook: "I've got a license to kill, and you know I'm going straight for your heart. I've got a license to kill, anyone who tries to tear us apart." Yuck. A majorly underrated Bond songs are Sheryl Crow's Tomorrow Never Dies and Garbage's The World Is Not Enough. Good songs, boring movies.
WOW
by tile_mcgillus
Dec 29th, 2006
12:53:04 PM
I leave AICN for a few days and Don Murphy shows up AGAIN and stirs shit up. Its really at a point where someone should just do something. I mean wow. Maybe if he made a quality product he wouldn't have to resort to such insane ramblings to try and protect his precious piece of crap.
Don Murphy...
by idahomer
Dec 29th, 2006
01:06:55 PM
is the producer. But you really should just google him to find out more. Try Overstocked.com or ranksandstands.com. But wood is pricey.
The Secret to Stupid Movies Making Ends Meet
by ye olde shiza
Dec 29th, 2006
01:16:34 PM
Michael Bay had a good idea with "The Island," and the first 15 minutes of the movie asked a few interesting questions about clones, and identity, a freedom even ... but then it just went all explosion-y, and Scarlett JoSweetTits didn't even get naked. And that's where "The Island" failed. Not only was it retarded, but it also fucked over its adolescent audience by not giving up the highly demanded goods. Come on, Bay ... if you want to rack up the moolah, you got to give up the rack!

Just look at "Swordfish." Not one person went to that movie for John Travolta's sea-monkey-looking ass, I promise. It was all about Halle Berry and the gift God gave her!

All that aside, I predict that without tits, Transformers will be ultimately forgettable, which is sad ... because the cartoon was pretty great, and the characters were a lot of fun. But no one here thinks Bay's a director capable of inserting character nuance into these giant killing machines, and his only chance to make money then is to give up the tits. Who're the main actresses in this movie? What's the rating going to be? What kind of racks are we looking at here? Is there a swimming pool scene without a giant robot in it? Is there a scene where a chic in daisy dukes rides on Optimus' big gun?

These are the big, important questions that no one's asking. Who cares about Optimus' flames? He's going to be fucking gay in this movie ... it's Michael Bay, for God's sake. That's like putting Uwe Boll on the set of the a live-action G.I.Joe or something. Everyone just pray for titties ... in 1080p, blu ray or HDDVD glory!
Yeah, I actually liked The Island. That passes as
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
01:19:15 PM
"deep" in Michael Bay land.
Michael Bay ... deep, whoa.
by ye olde shiza
Dec 29th, 2006
01:24:06 PM
True enough, "The Island" was pretty "deep" for Bay ... almost as "deep" as "The 6th Man" was for Arnold. It's too bad Spielberg wouldn't direct this thing himself. Of course, if Spielberg directed, there'd be absolutely no chance for tits in the movie ... and if Michael Bay is a cocksmoker, as is rumored, there'll be no chance for tits in Transformers, either ... shit. It's all a loss! I'm cashing in my chips and calling it a day.
The Definition of the word "gay"
by ye olde shiza
Dec 29th, 2006
01:42:27 PM
PoopiePants ... "gay" people are NOT allowed to criticize and ridicule people who, in your eyes, misuse the word "gay."

Why? Well, it's pretty simple ... homosexuals have usurped the word "gay," which in the 30's meant "happy," and turned it into a word that now stands for someone who loves/gets funky with the same sex.

You can't go chastising people for calling Optimus' flames "gay." Homosexuals aren't all "gay" people, anyway. How many angry homosexuals do you know? Well then, seeing as we've already established that "gay" means "happy," and not "pole-galloper," I think we can count you as an angry homosexual, one who clearly is not so "gay."

Optimus' flames are "gay" though ... they make the killer robot inside of him quite thrilled, actually, I know it. Look at that little LCD twinkle in his optical cavities! When he rides around town, he's strutting those flames, baby! Just waiting for a member of the Village People to jump in his backseat.

On a side note, Homos - stop stealing symbols. Come up with your own. Rainbows ... they used to be whimsical little emblems of childhood, St. Patty's Day and leprechauns. Now, you can't have a rainbow without a gay pride parade. Imagine how emasculated the University of Hawaii's "Rainbow Warriors" felt ... they even changed their name recently to just warriors.

Jeez ... you homos are just like the Nazis ... who stole the swastika from the Buddhists and gave it new meaning. Hopefully now, then, after comparing homos to sadistic killers, we'll see the true meaning of a flaming homosexual.
Does anyone use Firefox
by Phategod1
Dec 29th, 2006
01:48:35 PM
caue mine is F'ed up
It wont
by Phategod1
Dec 29th, 2006
01:50:49 PM
Load my Homepage and its running extremely slow.
If Speilberg directed it, Megatron and Optimus
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
02:06:28 PM
would hug at the end and agree to stop the violence.
If George Lucas directed it...
by idahomer
Dec 29th, 2006
02:48:14 PM
both the Transformers and the humans would sound mechanical.
If Woody Allen directed it...
by idahomer
Dec 29th, 2006
02:59:35 PM
Megatron would have a slight Optimus Complex and Bumblebee would worry that Mikalea just liked him for being a Camaro.
We're actually talking about other things
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
03:54:49 PM
besides the film, but maybe you can't read between the lines?
Hollywood Blockbuster!!!
by ye olde shiza
Dec 29th, 2006
04:02:56 PM
I can't wait for the Transformers to make 30 billion dollars in the cinema! I hope that after part one comes out, Michael Bay makes his own addition to the lineup with his TobyKeithicon, a star-spangled, red, white and blue-blooded robot that defends liberty, justice and every man's God-given right to hunt and fish, as well as the ability to wear a studded cowboy hat instead of one of those Satanic turbans.

On a serious note, has anyone watched this trailer side by side with the trailer for "Independence Day?" It's like the same movie without Will Smith making it funny.
Behind the Back?
by ye olde shiza
Dec 29th, 2006
04:12:12 PM
I noticed someone said something about talking "behind their backs." What does that mean when you're online? I'm kinda curious ... and need to know more!
I guess those goals fit with the level of discourse
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
04:15:05 PM
you are comfortable with. Enjoy.
The second film will have Fembots who
by superninja
Dec 29th, 2006
04:18:48 PM
wear bikinis and have nipples for no apparent reason. They serve beer out of them and only change into NASCAR vehicles.
The excitement builds!!!!
by ye olde shiza
Dec 29th, 2006
04:26:53 PM
I'm so excited about this movie that I'm hurling large chunks of feces at the people outside my cage!!! Woohoo!!! I even made an actual transformer out of said-feces.

It's called the MichaelBayicon. Vrooommmmmm. I'm rolling the MichaelBayicon around the newspaper that lines my cage right now ... wait ... oh no. MichaelBayicon, why?!! You were never really a transformer at all ... just a piece of shit pretending to be ...

***The post may cause ulcers in those without humor glands.***
Michael Bay on my walls ...
by ye olde shiza
Dec 29th, 2006
04:38:40 PM
Well ... to be fair, the warden doesn't let me keep the shit on my walls for very long, even though I cleverly disguise the shit as different celebrities. Michael Bay is, by far, the best shit construction I've made. And I attribute his heartiness to the amount of fiber I've been eating.

Stooopider, do you really think Transformers is going to rule the world? I mean, seriously? And now it's off to work ... 14 cents an hour making belt buckles. Who knows why the give me a computer in this place.
If Francis Ford Copola directed Transformers
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
04:51:36 PM
Megatron would be reduced to a love sick emo concert escapee who wears some pretty funky wigs.
If M. Night Shamalamma-whats his face directed TF
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
04:55:31 PM
No one would see megatron until the last thirty seconds of the film and Optimus Prime would be morose, pensive, and would quietly whisper his catchphrase, "autobots....transform....and. ...roll out."
And the twist...
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
04:56:47 PM
Spike is really young G-d and the transformers are his playtoys.
If Clint Eastwood directed The Transformers
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
04:58:31 PM
The movie would be generally forgettable 2 weeks after its initial release and receive 7 oscars, including for best director.
Moondoggy
by ye olde shiza
Dec 29th, 2006
05:02:20 PM
What if Michel Gondry directed it? Or ... better yet ... Penny Marshall?
For sweet old Francis ...
by ye olde shiza
Dec 29th, 2006
05:08:38 PM
You're probably right about a Francis Ford Coppola Transformers movie, but to back ol' Francis up, at least then we'd have a great shot of Wynona Ryder running around in the rain, with her tits bouncing up and down.

This, I fear, will be lost on ol' Michael Bay ... who may have a shot of Tyrese balls bouncing up and down, but not any gratuitous las bombas action.
Moondoggy
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
05:16:10 PM
Lends itself to the question of who you wnat to direct this?
if Penny Marshall directed Transformers
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
05:21:33 PM
The first few installments would be pretty good, but then would decline steadily until finally, we were forced to watch a film that attempts to foist some b-level actor into a starring role. Kinda like what Bay is doing now.
Who you wnat????
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
05:23:17 PM
What the deuce?? Try who you want
And by special request, if Michel Gondry directed TF
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
05:27:42 PM
The film would rely on quirky editing, self conscious cinematography, and would give me a headache in less than twenty minutes.
Mr Jonz--dont take me serioiusly
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
05:31:03 PM
Honest, I love most of the directors I was making fun of--its just a joke is all. In all seriousness, if reality were somehow bent to my wishes, i would hope that James Cameron would do it. I know its cliche, but fighting robots would be right up his area of expertise. Beyond that, I'm not really partial or impartial to anyone, other than MTV style directors--I really can't stand those guys.
Hey stoop howabout
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
05:31:26 PM
if Yack directed
Stoop
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
05:33:32 PM
I see you already answered. Phategod then?
Moondoggy
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
05:38:45 PM
Don't worry pal. Haven't been taking you seriously - just seen alot of people annoyed at Bay but not many alternative solutions. Trying to think of one myself and your suggestion of Cameron comes as close as anything. I actually think it would a trick prospect of opening this up to a wide audience and keeping fan boys pleased. Put it this way Batman Begins annoyed the hell out of me but I really liked the Hulk - guess what I like a fair bit of Batman comics and don't know much of The Hulk
Stoop . . .and
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
05:41:46 PM
If you made it?
If Spike Lee directed it...
by idahomer
Dec 29th, 2006
05:42:19 PM
South Central LA would kick some Transformer ass.
Stoop
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
05:49:40 PM
Can't beat giant robots fucking around on the big screen. Well maybe if you throw in a few bouncing tits. Can't beat them either
Ooooh stoop
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
05:54:50 PM
Never asked you if Phategodprime directed
Coin not dropped
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
06:03:48 PM
From previous TB I thought he was producing. To be honest I've never heard of Don Murphy. Although I do know of Michael Bay and that so far I've not been too keen on his films. But having said that I'll pay money to see these. Giant robots fucking around on the big screen and all that.
Ahhhh
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
06:23:30 PM
From Hell didn't do much for me . .. Style over substance ...and in a geek way it pissed of Alan Moore. Didn't mind Natural Born Killers though. Also Stoop not into the whole slagging off other Tbers type thing that goes on too much on these things. And I realise Yack, BSB etc has been as guilty as you and Pharte. I actually think TF would have been easire if it wasn't called TF but something else then more people would have been excited about this and there wouldn't be so many arguments about the appearances etc
And that precisely
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
07:11:57 PM
why I can't be fucked with shit exchanges like that between TFD and Stoopider. I'm sure there are special chatrooms that both of you can go to
Even if we have to post poetry on here
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
07:17:07 PM
we will get thread back up to the top slot--only 4 more posts to go!!
well, technically, 3 more posts to go
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
07:17:53 PM
after that last post
oops.
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
07:18:59 PM
Forgot to put a period at the end of that last sentence.
And this one should tie us with
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
07:19:54 PM
that capone's best of list.
well I'll be damned.
by moondoggy2u
Dec 29th, 2006
07:21:00 PM
That last post seemed to have put us into the lead already. Almost no point in typing this one, I guess.
Winners Moondoggy
by MrJJonz
Dec 29th, 2006
07:27:33 PM
or weiners
DAMN YOU ROTHMAN!!!!!
by Doc_Strange
Dec 29th, 2006
08:02:26 PM
Oops, I meant Damn You Michael Bay!!!!!
I know I said I was leaving, but...
by Shermdawg
Dec 29th, 2006
08:15:42 PM
since this is the most active tb, this was the place to say suthin.

Y'know I joke around a lot here at AICN, but this is from the heart... Given what's gonna happen in the next hour or so, please stay safe and keep an eye out this holiday weekend. I'm sure I'm not alone when I say I've got a uneasy feeling with what's going down.

Also, supposedly news broke that the Indy 4 script is finished, but Im willing to bet any talkback for it will be hijacked by discussions of Saddam's hanging.
Not that crap again
by Phategod1
Dec 29th, 2006
10:14:23 PM
but i do like you username.
Silent Hill 2
by Phategod1
Dec 29th, 2006
10:28:57 PM
I know I'm setting myself up for this one but I actually liked Silent Hill. I don't know how many gamers there are in this site but Silent Hill did the best job of any video game movie at capturing the spirit of the game. and there working on a PT.2.
Speaking of SIlent HIll 2
by Johnno
Dec 29th, 2006
10:35:55 PM
I mailed that French article and translation to harry a little while ago... but I guess he doesn't trust me... Bottom line, loved the first film, but at the same time wanted more... Looks like a new director will be up for part 2. Will it continue the same story? Or will it be a new one that is much more faithful tot eh second game? Or will it be a mish mash of the two? Either way, I anticipate it eagerly... but I'm much more looking forward to Origins and the 5th installment.
The 80's Lives... Indy 4 is confirmed AGAIN
by all your base
Dec 29th, 2006
11:03:11 PM
http://tinyurl.com/w64us
it was better then the Island
by Phategod1
Dec 29th, 2006
11:14:55 PM
and made more sense War of the I-need-to-see-this Worlds.
HA, HA, HA!!!
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 29th, 2006
11:31:30 PM
Now this is some funny stuff. Please tell me one of you guys had something to do with this: http://tinyurl.com/ylgarp

"Y ou know at the end of the day / action is Bay!"

So let me get this straight...
by TheRevengeOfBayouWilly
Dec 29th, 2006
11:44:24 PM
stooopider is drowning in punani but still finds time to post on here baiting toy robot enthusiasts eighty-seven times a day? ...bullshit.
BTW: I'm looking forward to your banishment, stooopider
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 30th, 2006
12:13:59 AM
It's inevitable.

AICN has had some memorable Trolls in its time. However, you are amongst some of the worst I've seen. What you are doing is blatantly obvious (i.e. Attention Whore) and, ironically, it's been done better. Hell, even PharteGodd in his prime was more effective than you. And that's saying something!

So, I can imagine how frustrating it must be for you being stuck in the basement, pounding your pudd and your keyboard, wondering when someone will finally acknowledge your pathetic, impotent pleas for attention and recognition. And I'm sure the condition of impotence is probably contributing to your misplaced, misguided, and misfired attempts at what you think will constitute "pwnage".

But since I'm giving you a sliver of my attention, I'll just say this:

Shut The Fuck Up. If you've got something constructive to say, then say it. Get to the point. Otherwise, your constant spamming of the TBs is just wasting AICN's bandwidth. Do. Not. Debate. Me. On. This.

OK, pachenko? OK.

Finis.

YackBacker
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 30th, 2006
12:24:20 AM
You should check out that link in my previous post. You'll definitely get a kick out of it. Laters.
hey MNG hows it going
by Phategod1
Dec 30th, 2006
12:56:02 AM
What do you think of primes pot belly
I'm still searching
by Phategod1
Dec 30th, 2006
01:09:06 AM
My Girlfriends got me amped a little when she say this HD that Boscov's is selling but its 720p. It seems like 1080p is the way to go. So I think I'll wait till I get my Tax return for a little more disposable cash. That and I'm thinking of refinancing my car. the payments are killing me.