Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Talkbacks

I will watch anything with Amy Adams
by Quin the Eskimo
Dec 13th, 2006
05:13:06 PM
even this.
Quin the Eskimo
by Quin the Eskimo
Dec 13th, 2006
05:14:38 PM
she is beautiful.
Real life dog?
by vinceklortho
Dec 13th, 2006
05:16:23 PM
honestly I thought they were going for the Roger Rabbit/Rocky & Bullwinkle animation within real life? And, yes, I love Amy Adams, so I guess that's a plus going for it? Isn't Jason Lee voicing Underdog as well or is he in the movie?
?
by vinceklortho
Dec 13th, 2006
05:17:16 PM
?
Please don't suck. Please don't suck.
by El Fuego
Dec 13th, 2006
05:20:04 PM
Oh wait, it's gonna suck? Awwwww.... seriously, I hope this doesn't suck, though. I watched Underdog every day when I was a kid and I think the potential's there, although they'll probably find ways to fuck it up.
*
by Quin the Eskimo
Dec 13th, 2006
05:20:19 PM
*
Holy Pooper Scooper!
by Evil Lincoln
Dec 13th, 2006
05:20:32 PM
This has just crushed any enthusiasm for this movie I had in me. Tennessee Tuxedo is spinning in his grave right now!
You've never heard of Amy Adams, Merrick?
by Jimmy Jazz
Dec 13th, 2006
05:20:35 PM
Get thee to a Blockbuster and check out Junebug. She wuz robbed of that Oscar! Robbed, I tell you! She also was pretty great in Catch Me If You Can and SMOKING HOT in the otherwise forgettable Cruel Intentions 2. AND she apparrently was Tara's prissy cousin in Buffy. Cool. I had forgetten about that. Anyway, I don't knwo about this, since she's only doing voicework. She has a dreamy voice, but I don't think that is enough incentive to see this.
HAHAHAHA
by kurdt420
Dec 13th, 2006
05:20:48 PM
I don't know if it's a good thing or bad, but I just can't stop laughing at that picture of Underdog in flight. Unfortunatly I don't have high hopes for this film. But hey maybe I'll be proven wrong.
"'Twould (actually) be funny if Underdog's........."
by Kai_Mah'gra
Dec 13th, 2006
05:21:18 PM
.....expression when flying was the same dopey, drugged-up expression Routh had in Superman Returns."............without all the needless multiple posing shots and lifting of large miscellaneous heavy objects, that is.
Jimmy Jazz
by Merrick
Dec 13th, 2006
05:21:38 PM
I forgot she was in it. She's mighty fine.
There's No Need To Fear?
by Alen Smithee
Dec 13th, 2006
05:22:48 PM
God help us. I believe this is the first sign of the apocalypse. -- Philipians 3:2 (I'm not kidding. LOOK IT UP)
If it's half as good as Soccer Dog, I'm there!
by The Wrong Guy
Dec 13th, 2006
05:25:39 PM
Looks hilarious.
Ok that was low........
by Kai_Mah'gra
Dec 13th, 2006
05:25:46 PM
.......even for me. Routh was nothing but a class act in a bad bad baaaaad situation. ButI do agree with Merrick vis-a-vis the promotional art. What would be funny is if Superdo.......I mean Underdog here, got to do more in his movie that the Man of Steel did in his big outing - i.e lifting heavy rocks and miscellaneous objects, stalking bitches ( the female dog type, I mean) and foiling dastardly (as in lame and ridiculous) evil real estate schemes.
She was also in The Office
by Quin the Eskimo
Dec 13th, 2006
05:26:42 PM
as the purse girl. Remember the Shrutes are hungry babies
James Belushi has no use for David Cross
by wash
Dec 13th, 2006
05:27:46 PM
http://tinyurl.com/e845g
This Is From The Guy Who Directed Quest For Camelot
by PervOmatic
Dec 13th, 2006
05:28:35 PM
And you have to even ponder if it will suck? Then you add James Belushi in to the mix (even if it's a cameo) and you just have to know that you are in for a total suck-fest.
A real dog can't shine shoes.
by Bungion Boy
Dec 13th, 2006
05:28:55 PM
Now a cartoon dog shining shoes? I have no problem with that. I don't even have problems with talking animals that look real. But with movies like Babe, the animals only ever talk to each other. Underdog in the cartoon was always interacting with people. I don't know if I can buy this. And I actually kind of liked The Rocky and Bullwinkle movie. Kind of.
I thought it was gonna be the same main character...
by Lenny Nero
Dec 13th, 2006
05:30:57 PM
...as the animated show, but in a human world, like the Rocky & Bullwinkle movie. This is a surprise, to say the least, but might get a few good chuckles out of me.
It is going to suck.
by CatVutt
Dec 13th, 2006
05:30:59 PM
One of those survey sites a few months ago sent me a full breakdown of the basic story treatment. I'll have to see if I can find it, but basically it's crap, 'Every Dog has his day' is a tagline or actually said in the movie, and it didn't seem to have anything resembling wit whatsoever in it.
This should be great!
by Nodwick
Dec 13th, 2006
05:31:45 PM
I mean, look at all the other blockbusters from live-action versions of Jay Ward-style cartoons! There's... uh... crap.
Religious zealots can fuck themselves...or go see this
by performingmonkey
Dec 13th, 2006
05:32:59 PM
You're all sinners and you know it! D'you know, I'm pleased that this place still gives me a laugh every now and then, unlike most 'comedy' movies of the last year or so (exceptions, like Borat, exist, thank fuck). It's a fucking DOG that flies. I find the 300 trailer funnier 'THIS - IS - SPARTA!!!!!!' yeah, fuck off with your overacting, Mr. Butler. Heroes sucks. Galactica rules.
Massawyrm will say
by Quin the Eskimo
Dec 13th, 2006
05:33:37 PM
It's like Dantes Inferno...but for kids! And the review headline will say "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter Hear." I really like that dude.
Bungion Boy
by CatVutt
Dec 13th, 2006
05:34:57 PM
Underdog in the treatment I read does talk to people in the movie, but the other animals don't. I can't remember why. It was really a bad read.
Cool! Samantha Bee and The Dink!
by Lenny Nero
Dec 13th, 2006
05:36:05 PM
And Warburton.
No pants?
by Anakin Whoopass
Dec 13th, 2006
05:38:32 PM
Underdog wears pants. Are they going to go with the penis or have Underdog be a bitch?
I was totally going to say this a flippin' joke...
by CatVutt
Dec 13th, 2006
05:39:19 PM
But now I really do see another damn dog in the cape. Fuck me.
Is Underdog Lady going to be in this?
by Some Dude
Dec 13th, 2006
05:40:11 PM
I want to see some sweet interpretive dance moves.
I scraped some gum off the floor...
by 2for2true
Dec 13th, 2006
05:40:12 PM
...and that story would probably sell in Hollywood, too. This really is the end of the world, you know. Waly Cox is spinning in his grave. No, wait- he's over here sitting in the corner reading Hustler. My bad.
AS A Flippin' joke...
by CatVutt
Dec 13th, 2006
05:41:22 PM
God, I hate the lack of editing capabilities on this @#%%$ thing...
Only on aintitcool news
by Quin the Eskimo
Dec 13th, 2006
05:46:05 PM
could an Underdog movie poster devolve into basing the religious. But oh well.
Kai Mah'gra: improper "vis a vis" usage
by Some Dude
Dec 13th, 2006
05:47:35 PM
Nice attempt at sounding smart, but "vis a vis" doesn't quite mean what you think it does. Next time use "about" or "regarding." They certainly aren't high-end vocabulary words, but they work well and you won't come across as pretentious or ill-informed. Good day.
Um...Question...
by jimmy_009
Dec 13th, 2006
05:48:10 PM
Why are the dog in the poster and the dog in the still image two totally different dogs?
I'm gonna go buy a penis pump and apply it to my eyes
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 13th, 2006
05:48:33 PM
so it will leave my sockets bloody, festering holes. This is gonna suck ROYALLY. A *REAL* fucking dog???? I guess there goes the whole "Shoeshine Boy" secret identity! Hollywood Must Be Destroyed (c)!
Wait - aren't those 2 different breeds of dogs?
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 13th, 2006
05:49:34 PM
Is one a.........................FAKE ?!?!?!?
Quin: It won't offend the Christianists?
by Some Dude
Dec 13th, 2006
05:49:45 PM
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Good one. Really.
Quick Question
by Pandas-R-Us
Dec 13th, 2006
05:49:54 PM
I have heard lots of references to the Underdog cartoon in American TV shows but has the actual cartoon ever appeared outside the States? I live in the UK and I've certainly never seen it and have no idea what it is about.
jimmy009 beat me to it
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 13th, 2006
05:50:27 PM
But he's right - I call donkeydicks on this fiasco.
That lady used appear Howard Stern is gonna be pissed
by Orionsangels
Dec 13th, 2006
05:52:00 PM
The underdog lady. Remember her? I know, most of us are trying not to. She would appear on howard stern dress in an underdog costume. She would say that the underdog movie could not be made without her.
Wally Cox is rolling in his grave...
by TylerDurden3395
Dec 13th, 2006
05:53:50 PM
Man this looks bad. As a huge fan of the cartoon I'm appalled. After all wasn't Underdog's secret identity Shoe Shine Boy? Are you telling me that this mutt is going to be shining shoes? Hollywood has gone too far...
never heard of jason lee?
by waggy
Dec 13th, 2006
05:55:33 PM
come on, the guy is a geek icon.
Offensive, yes...
by runfoodrun
Dec 13th, 2006
05:56:07 PM
...but more importantly stupid, sophomoric, trite, boring, uninspired, did I say stupid. Are they suggesting this dog is God? Brilliant marketing for a family movie. Any way an Underdog movie anyway?
James Belushi will star in anything?
by Orionsangels
Dec 13th, 2006
05:57:36 PM
Wow, this guy will do anything for money. 'Can' the movie. You'll believe a man turns into a can of tuna, starring James Belushi! From the makers of Shrek it's an all new CG animated adventure. 'LINT' the movie. Who new a society of lint people were living in your bellybutton. Featuring the voice of James Belushi as General Fuzzball.
I read this script
by FlyingGuillotine
Dec 13th, 2006
06:00:12 PM
It's wonderful. Can't wait to see the movie. They shot it in Rhode Island.
I weep
by Bloo
Dec 13th, 2006
06:01:39 PM
a real dog!!!!!! comeon!!!!!!! *sigh* oh well, what can be done now...except avoid it like the plague
Simon Says!!!
by KarmicRelief
Dec 13th, 2006
06:05:42 PM
Damn you Michael Bay!
BEST MOVIE EVER
by Leafy McPlantsalot
Dec 13th, 2006
06:05:52 PM
I saw an early screening of UNDERDOG at MY LOCAL COLLEGE . I think it is the best movie ever made. Twice as good as RACING STRIPES .
Runfoodrun
by MrD
Dec 13th, 2006
06:07:17 PM
Suggesting the dog is God? Please. It's a play on words, based on the similar spellings. It is not even a novel gag.
Jim Belushi in a movie with "dog" in the title? Ha!
by Lance Rock
Dec 13th, 2006
06:07:19 PM
The reviews write themselves!
It's obvious his ears are in mid-flapping
by Kurzinski Valentine
Dec 13th, 2006
06:07:21 PM
mode. He's probably not going to fly at mach 3, so his ears should most likely be flapping in a slightly hilarious manner. I can't wait.
oh and as for the tagline...
by Bloo
Dec 13th, 2006
06:07:55 PM
it doesn't offend me as a christian, I actually didn't think it was that bad...
Some Dude
by Kai_Mah'gra
Dec 13th, 2006
06:08:26 PM
wow...........the Grammar-rectifier and Spell-checker. I believe one of the lowest forms of life lurking the internet just above the Troll and the shameless self-promoter. I think there's an Tolkien talkback that's just direly missing your services.......assuming, of course, you haven't already polluted it with your presence. The next time I need help in deciding whether or not I should "attempt to sound smart" the proper way, I'll be sure to call on your useless services. Until then, why not kiss my "pretentious, ill-informed" ass. M'kay?
runfoodrun
by Some Dude
Dec 13th, 2006
06:08:36 PM
Observations like yours are why people think the Christianists are so stupid. The tagline is a pun, a variation of a spoonerism. It does not mean to say that the dog is a "god." You crybabies have no problem injecting your confirmation-bias fantasies into movies like Superman Returns and Star Wars, so why should this offend you?
Jim Belushi Dog movies
by Leafy McPlantsalot
Dec 13th, 2006
06:10:53 PM
Hollywood is really on the pulse of the people. I think there has been a groundswell for another Jim Belushi dog movie since K-911 one our hearts some seven years ago. Go Hollywood!
Kai: I'll pass on the smooch.
by Some Dude
Dec 13th, 2006
06:16:19 PM
Here's the thing: you used a "difficult" word when a simple one would have sufficed. That is a form of pretense. That the use was also incorrect marks you as an idiot. While I am usually not one for harping on spelling, I am all for ripping on pretentious idiots. If you are to be pretentious, do it well. If you are to be an idiot, then don't put on airs with your language. We can see through you. Oh, and what's "an Tolkien talkback"? Do you mean "A Tolkien talkback"? Snicker. Anyway, Tolien's a'ight.
You Sir Are No Underdog
by CaptDanielRoe
Dec 13th, 2006
06:16:49 PM
I knew Underdog. That is not Underdog.
What the heck is a Christianist?
by zacdilone
Dec 13th, 2006
06:17:36 PM
Since Christian means "little Christ," than a Christian is someone who believes in little Christs?
Already sounds better than...
by Freefinger
Dec 13th, 2006
06:18:26 PM
...having an icon peep thru walls. If this movie goes against Superman Returns in any awards show, it's either going to be an easy win for this one, or pretty close in votes as far as storylines and character development.
Tolkien's a'ight, too.
by Some Dude
Dec 13th, 2006
06:21:14 PM
No Tolien, though.
Dude, this CANNOT be real.
by Zarles
Dec 13th, 2006
06:27:12 PM
Cute dogs, but no way. Not even close. If this is real, I will suck a liter of Shiner Bock out of Harry's asshole in the Gay Pride parade in San Francisco next year. Lucky for you all, I don't even know what a liter of Shiner Bock is.
waggy
by Merrick
Dec 13th, 2006
06:47:04 PM
Lee is great. In my comment, I was referring to on-screen talent (I'd forgotten about Amy Adams). To the best of my knowledge, Lee is doing voice work here -- not that there's anything wrong with that. I should have been more clear; it's been a really long day.
Zarles
by CaptDanielRoe
Dec 13th, 2006
06:59:22 PM
How hard is to check IMDB before making a statement like that? You must just be REALLY thirsty.
Jason Lee or Jason Voorhees, it doesn't matter...
by Nodwick
Dec 13th, 2006
06:59:51 PM
This film could have the cast from Clerks, Alan Rickman, Bruce Campbell, a cameo by the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man, and a space battle between the Enterprise and a Star Destroyer, and it will STILL stink. Did "Cats and Dogs" teach us nothing?
I call fake
by KCMOSHer
Dec 13th, 2006
06:59:59 PM
Several points. #1: Yes, those are two different dogs. They both appear to be beagles, but note the coloring on the muzzle: the white comes all the way down on the poster dog, while the flying dog has no white on the side at all. #2: All the credits except for Spyglass and Disney on that poster are garbled nonsense. Why release a poster image with nonsense for the credits, when the credits for this thing are a matter of public record? If this -is- real, oh sweet Lord in heaven will this movie suck. They will be raping one of the fondest memories of my youth, even with Dinklage as Barsinister.
"Underdog" Movie = "Garfield" Movie.
by buster00
Dec 13th, 2006
07:04:35 PM
And "Garfield" movie = toilet shattering diarrhea.
What kind of soulless gargoyle do ya have to be...
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 13th, 2006
07:13:34 PM
to direct in Hollywood? All your neighbors up in the hills are making real movies and you're stuck making "Underdog" and no doubt living next door to some shady porno distributor. How could this NOT be an 'Alan Smithee' film???? How do you sleep at night?
Some Dude :More Gramar for you....
by Kai_Mah'gra
Dec 13th, 2006
07:16:01 PM
.......um.......BITE ME! I mean, seriously, is that miserable (as in , sad, lame) excuse for a post, what you call a rebuttal (as in, response)? Seriously? Then I'm really really scared here; shaking in my little boots. I mean absolutely petrified( as in scared silly). But then again there's nothing quite as sad and hilarious as a grammar-police enforcer signing off his post with a ridiculous spelling mistake and then tries to correct it in a follow-up post, realizes how stupid he would look, and then tries to act like he meant it in the first place. Classic. If the pinnacle ( as in, greatest height) of achievement that you perceive (as in, see) yourself to have contributed to a talkack is to be some kind of a self-appointed grammar/spelling police and "pretentious idiots"-ripper, then you seriously need to find a more meaningful purpose to your existence on this planet. Seriously. And while you're at it, you could also try finding some better use for the space between your ears, rather than just using it to counterbalance your feet. What's wrong Cupcake? Did I hit a raw nerve back there, with my post about Brandon Ruoth? Do I smell a Superman Returns/Bryan Singer apologist or just another one of your garden-variety boneheaded nincompoops with nothing better to do than pick on grammatical and spelling errors of other people's posts on an informal INTERNET TALKBACK? You need to get a life; STAT! I'm pretty certain I've made a whole bunch more spelling and grammatical errors in here for you to feast on and to give your life meaning and fulfilment; for the next few minutes, anyway. So take your time and knock yourself out before returning with a characteristically pointless and equally idiotic (as in stupid) response, as befits your insignificance in this talkback and in life in general (pretentious enough for you, Cupcake?)

[P.S. :- in case you missed it, unpretentious-"Some Dude" little-brain:small-speak: simple-word(TM) presented in technicolor parentheses (as in brackets, like this), just for your benefit]

KCMOSHer is right about the credits
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 13th, 2006
07:17:43 PM
This is about as fake as a three dollar bill. For non-Us folks, that's pretty damn fake. I am slightly more relieved that this is fakery, however I yet again applaud AICN for posting fakery and chicanery in the name of scoopage.
Trying to envision this in Cats-vs-Dogs-scope
by Immortal_Fish
Dec 13th, 2006
07:28:36 PM
Can't see it. Should have been done like Roger Rabbit. Live action animals can't emote without looking cartoony, which is ironic given how that's the whole point with this flick.
I'm with runfoodrun
by Immortal_Fish
Dec 13th, 2006
07:36:46 PM
I'm an agnostic. Not silly-assed Michael Newdow agnostic, but more along the lines of 'I simply don't know'. Given that, "one nation under dog" honestly is kinda offensive as it urges me to think of how I'm not considered a part of Americana, given how 'dog' is the reverse of 'god'. But then, as runfoodrun wrote, "it is stupid, sophomoric, trite, boring, uninspired, did I say stupid." I'd rather focus on the lack of imagination on behalf of the marketing suits involved.
Thank You Immortal Fish
by runfoodrun
Dec 13th, 2006
07:44:18 PM
My point was that line is offensive BECAUSE IT'S SO LACKING IN CREATIVITY, and one nation under god hardly translate well to One nation under dog.
Also, Some Dud....
by runfoodrun
Dec 13th, 2006
07:45:29 PM
or dude, whatever, do you really need to stoop to defending Underdog to attach Christians? It's an Underdog movie, with a horrible tagline.
careful there runfoodrun......
by Kai_Mah'gra
Dec 13th, 2006
08:00:05 PM
.....if you keep this up, Some Dude will unleash the unthinkable on your ass and .........gasp..........correct the grammar and spelling in your post!!!! Here, I'll pre-empt him and give you what will no doubt serve as his best come-back in responding to your post: "runfoodrun, it's supposed to be "attacks Christians" not "attach Christians", you moron, can't you spell?" That's it, that's the best he'll come up with, I'm willing to bet you. Let's not forget that this is the same genius who thinks that "Christianist" is a valid enough English word to use and then proceed to correct other people's grammar; not to stoop to his level of imbecility or anything, just as an example.
Here's your tagline:
by shartron
Dec 13th, 2006
08:06:27 PM
The Shit Starts Flying on August 3rd!
no no no no no no
by kafka07
Dec 13th, 2006
08:12:10 PM
I live in Providence where this was filmed. It was kind of neat to see the film crew filming around town and actor James Belushi too. But this is hideous and wil make RI look really bad. Hopefully it will go right to dvd and minimize the damage. Oh I fear...I fear aplenty.
Some Dude, "an Tolkien talkback"...
by Immortal_Fish
Dec 13th, 2006
08:18:11 PM
...is kinda like a "Tolien" talkback, only with fewer hard consonants.
or more for that matter
by Immortal_Fish
Dec 13th, 2006
08:19:22 PM
Bottom line -- we all suck without 'an' TB edit feature. :)
kafka07, you're in RI?
by Immortal_Fish
Dec 13th, 2006
08:23:52 PM
I'm in SE MA. Fall River to be precise. Film buffs would recognize it as Foster's "Accused" stomping grounds. Anyhow, I'd heard of local the shoots and went down to see on one of the given days but was turned away when something happened that resulted in delaying filming. Granted, who wants to be a part of a hack live action Underdog, but how often does this happen in this neck of the woods. At any rate, know you have a neighbor in this TB handle.
So let me guess, when Underdog has his glasses on
by Mace Tofu
Dec 13th, 2006
08:31:26 PM
So let me guess, when Underdog has his glasses on, nobody notices that he is a dog? Danny DeVito should play Simon. Is Amy Adams Polly? Hope they keep the theme song from the TV show. Just saw Garfield 2 this week and talk about LAZY scripting. Hollywood really SUX at this "cartoon" stuff . Let me guess the plot.... Underdog has been away for 10 months ( That is 5 years in dogtime) and Polly has a puppy but Underdog dosent know he is the Father. Simon has a evil plan to buy up all the dog parks in town and turn then into low rent apartments. Can Underdog save the day . Where is my screenwriter check? This shit is too easy...
Kai: I'm sorry it hurts you to be wrong in public.
by Some Dude
Dec 13th, 2006
09:11:16 PM
I corrected my mistake. I did not pretend to have meant it, whatever that would entail. Also note, as stated above, that bad spelling is not a pet peeve of mine. I just like pointing out the mistakes of pretentious idiots, especially when they abuse words like "vis a vis." What does Routh have to do with anything? I hated that movie as much as the next guy. As for my pinnacle... probably my three-way with two delightful Russian exchange students. Yes, girls. Yes, of legal age. Yes, fit. Yes, shaved. Oh, and Christianist is a neologism inspired by the word Islamist that seems to be in vogue these days. You can substitute religionist as they are all the same.
Immortal
by Some Dude
Dec 13th, 2006
09:11:44 PM
Agreed.
runfoodrun
by Some Dude
Dec 13th, 2006
09:16:32 PM
I didn't defend Underdog. I mocked your silly interpretation of the tagline by explaining the painfully obvious joke. No, I do not think it is a funny tagline. I do think your reaction is funny, though. Good day.
Whewww, thanks Kai_Mah'gra
by runfoodrun
Dec 13th, 2006
09:16:47 PM
Good point
And you idiots thought BRANDON ROUTH was miscast?!
by Bob Cryptonight
Dec 13th, 2006
09:35:34 PM
This poster looks horrible, mainly because it lets everyone know WAY IN ADVANCE that the movie will suck. I mean...that dog looks stupid.
HOW DOPE IS THIS MOVIE
by ImJustSaying
Dec 13th, 2006
09:42:45 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHaaa haaahaa... I love it. Like.. this is the ONLY way to make an Underdog movie. See, in my mind, Underdog doesn't talk. He just flys around and does everyday dog things in a costume. This is fucking ridiculous, in the best way. Finally, a good movie worth seeing while hiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh. This is going to be better than Night at the Museum. Underdog was ass. If you think otherwise, you were a child (children are going to fucking love this movie), or you don't know what ass is. I'm going to stand in line with all my friends for this one. While hiiiiiiiigh. They should've done Rocky and Bullwinkle with a real moose and squirrel. OH SHIT, DO SECRET SQUIRREL LIKE THIS! A SQUIRREL AND A MOLE????? SOLVING INTERNATIONAL MYSTERIES????? That'd be the best... I can't wait.
This is going to be as lame as...
by johnnykool
Dec 13th, 2006
09:43:42 PM
flames on Optimus Prime. CRAP!
Isn't Peter Dinklage in this?
by Poacher
Dec 13th, 2006
10:01:52 PM
Gotta know that guy, Merrick.
Oh, I have no doubt that the movie is real...
by Zarles
Dec 13th, 2006
10:10:27 PM
...but this poster is Fakey McFakerton to the max. Although, San Francisco is rather lovely in June.
They made a corgi fly?
by YackBacker
Dec 13th, 2006
10:49:59 PM
To ANY struggling screenwriter out there thinking of packing it in, don't give up. UNDERDOG proves that any movie can get a greenlight, but you may have to sleep with someone to do it.
Brock Freakin' Sampson is in this!
by YackBacker
Dec 13th, 2006
10:53:55 PM
What are you babes cryin' about? This movie immediately has my attention.
Underdog in name only...
by Mace Tofu
Dec 13th, 2006
10:55:57 PM
From IMDB Plot Outline: A lab accident gives a hound named Shoeshine some serious superpowers -- a secret that the dog eventually shares with the young boy who becomes his owner and friend.... Soooo this has NOTHING to do with the cartoon. What a WASTE of a classic 'toon property . Calling Mr. Peabody next! As lord Vader said....Nooooooo!
Is today April 1 2007???
by JackPumpkinhead
Dec 13th, 2006
11:00:27 PM
This CANNOT be for real. Come on. If I process this correctly, this is - oh, God - a live adaptation of that old cartoon that was paired with Bullwinkle the Moose. (Which, by the way, was made into a live film and was such a success, huh?) Come on, this has to be a joke... SOMEONE SAY THIS IS NOT FOR REAL!
Oh no oh God no no no no no save me Tom Cruise!
by theJackalope
Dec 13th, 2006
11:29:05 PM
Oh Jesus effin' Christ no! I wanted to see this film -- but now? UH UH! If there really is a God then this is nothing but a bad dream or a hoax. And if John Belushi weren't his brother then Jim would be selling fertilizer from the trunk of his car.
Will He Speak In Rhyme...
by buster00
Dec 13th, 2006
11:35:01 PM
as a result of the lab accident? Will he keep a tab of acid in his ring, like in the cartoon? And as for Polly Purebred: Will she be a talking dog news reporter? And will she be singing that obnoxious goddamn "where-oh-where" song? They should've done Go-Go Gophers instead.
Hey Mattw: about that NY skyline in the poster...
by Ommadawn1959
Dec 14th, 2006
12:11:49 AM
The reason we can't aim the cameras in the direction of the WTC is that, as he did in New Orleans, our loser president has done NOTHING to repair that gaping wound in NYC. Oh. He did destroy the aircraft evidence, which is a felony.
I never thougt I'd be on of those haters...
by tjrmusic
Dec 14th, 2006
01:00:10 AM
....who says "This will suck" just from looking at an advance poster......but this really looks like it will suck.
What's worse than an Underdog movie?
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 14th, 2006
01:09:34 AM
Underdog 2, 3, 4, and the inevitable cartoon series.
Some Dude, the only thing that hurts....
by Kai_Mah'gra
Dec 14th, 2006
01:26:16 AM
.....is seeing you try to craft some form of an intelligent (in the most liberal sense of the word) response to your otherwise moronic arguments. Let's see, you said "No Tolien, though.". Yep, that definitely doesn't look to me like someone trying to backtrack and make like they actually meant "Tolien" was a valid word they meant to say.(Unless, of course, we allow for the alternative explanation, which is, that you actually meant to say "NOT Tolien, though", - which, of course, is an infinitely sadder and more idiotic situation, considering; misspelling your ill-fated self-correction to your attempt to correct someone else's grammatical errors - talk about being wrong in public. Like I said, moron.) And ah yes, your pinnacle; the imaginary girlfriend or friends with the imaginary menage trois, like we haven't heard thaaat one before. How original. Oh well, at least you managed to squeeze out the "Russian exchange students" angle; that's semi-original in a TATUesque sort of way. Let's see: 1)correcting gramar on an online forum: check. 2) reading pretentiousness in someone else's post thus revealing your own insecurities and issues: check. 3) oh and let's not forget, the imaginary girlfriend ( or friends) with the clihe sexual escapade: check check check. Yep, perfect score on the lame-O-meter of all time losers. Oh, and the fact that those words are in "vogue", as you put it, doesn't change the fact that "Christianist" is not an English word that exists in use anywhere in the formal English language, especially when Christians don't even refer to themselves that way and especially seeing as you CAN'T "substitute religionist" since it doesn't mean the same, being a more generally descriptive word not specific to CHRISTIANITY nor Islam ( Two can play that game). The only place it's valid is in that tiny little vacuous space between your ears. You of all people, 'Mr. Big-Grammar-Police on internet talkback forums' ought to know that. www.dictionary.com is just a click away. Use it. Every now and then!

Incidentally, The fact that you see me as putting on "airs", as you put it, and being pretentious as opposed to, say, just making grammatical errors and sloppy language usage, says more about you and your sniveling (as in, whining) little insecurities and inadequacy issues than it does about me, and any pretentiousness you may want to see.

Stop and think about that very carefully for a few minutes before proceeding on to the next sentence. Done? Now think about that again, and ask yourself, what exactly it is you're revealing about yourself, by attacking that aspect of my post before responding. At this juncture it would greatly help matters to involve (or at least, invite) your brain in the process. There's a very good reason why most intelligent people don't sweat the small stuff like grammar and smelling when holding internet discourses (as in, discussion) such as this, and more pertinently (as in, relevantly) in informal (as in, casual) settings such as this. Nobody is stopping you from using unpretentious language , however you define it, so do yourself a favour and don't betray your own personality issues by reading "airs" and pretentiousness in other people's words, where none are intended.

Unless of course you were the one responsible for my English language education in my youth and have the sole prerogative (as in, right) in deciding what words I should or should not use when I speak. The lesson as always: Get. A. Life. STAT!!! Ok now, so that should be more than enough to keep you busy spell-checking and grammar-correcting and consequently bring back meaning and purpose to your insignificant little existence for the next little while, until you post more drivel and tripe, masquerading as a response. Unless of course, in your silly little mind, long posts with many words also equal attempts at pretentiousness

[P.S. :- just in case you missed it again, unpretentious-"Some Dude" little-brain:small-speak: simple-word(TM) presented in technicolor parentheses (as in brackets, like this), just for your benefit, and for the esteem-issues-impaired]

Torture Animal Porn!!!!
by DerLanghaarige
Dec 14th, 2006
01:52:11 AM
I've already seen a flying dog
by Hamtaro_Hentai
Dec 14th, 2006
02:01:07 AM
In 'Strange Brew.' Had a cape and everything. The posters look like ass.
Wasn't Peter Dinklage supposed to play
by Barry Egan
Dec 14th, 2006
02:08:46 AM
Simon Bar Sinister in this?
I don't know this Underdog
by Franklin T Marmoset
Dec 14th, 2006
02:50:40 AM
That said, I hope this film does very well at the box office. A good return on a film about a dog with superpowers would greatly increase the chances of a Beppo The Supermonkey film being produced. Come on, Beppo, the world needs you.
Kai_Mah'gra - heh
by MaccyG
Dec 14th, 2006
03:15:12 AM
heh; you said 'smelling' when you meant 'spelling'. also: calm down; the both of you.
This will only work one way...
by moviemaniac-7
Dec 14th, 2006
03:24:55 AM
... if no one involved takes it seriously and make it an R-rated feature.
"You'll Believe A Dog Can....
by Zompar Usilon
Dec 14th, 2006
03:29:47 AM
...look up. Nah, must be fake. As we all know dogs can't look up.
He's not suoer, so get the scooper.
by OtisSpofford
Dec 14th, 2006
03:59:32 AM
Thank you - that will be $5.00.
Just to really rile 'em...
by OtisSpofford
Dec 14th, 2006
04:01:10 AM
Show Underdog repairing a broken damn with the words DOG... DAMN. Dogma jokes next - anyone? Anyone?
sweet baby jesus
by the_shogun_gunslinger
Dec 14th, 2006
05:13:59 AM
NO! NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!! goddammit when will we stop dressing up animals and makin them the stars of movies. its bad enough the kids forced me to see fucking Happy Feet (where the FUCK did that rediculous preachy ending come from?!) but now...oh man if they try to make me see this, theyre grounded for a month.
I think Jim Belushi has done enough dog movies
by beastie
Dec 14th, 2006
06:42:29 AM
to kill of any normal actor's career. However, middle America seems to, still be holding onto something of this guy that reminds them of his brother.
What's next Mighty Mouse?
by Dazzler69
Dec 14th, 2006
06:52:00 AM
Come on it's for kids. But if it's done right it could be campy for adults. Dogs do stupid tricks all the time, should be no problem to have a dog shine shoes with a human owner around. I wonder if the dog will have lips moving or telepathy when speaking English?
I can't believe this fakery's skidmarks are still here
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 14th, 2006
06:54:20 AM
The two dogs are different, the credits text in the "poster" is garbled gobbledygook. The movie may be in the works, but these reek of shamtastic dupery. Just admit you got conned, AICN. It happens. But, don't leave these up this long without some kind of verification/update.
First Kingdom of Heaven, now this?
by Spandau Belly
Dec 14th, 2006
07:13:25 AM
When will Hollywood stop producing completely unrelated movies?
First Casino Royale, now this?
by Spandau Belly
Dec 14th, 2006
07:28:53 AM
When am I going to stop drawing horrible comparisons?
A real dog would be great for a KRYPTO film,but here...
by SpyGuy
Dec 14th, 2006
07:35:23 AM
...it's just fucking sad. Those loud "BLAM! THUD!" sounds you just heard were from Underdog Lady blowing her brains out and hitting the floor.
No New Ideas...
by Random Lynx
Dec 14th, 2006
07:36:05 AM
Why, why do they do this to us? Can't they come up with something new anymore? It's either recycling the same boring crap, putting out a sequel, or making a sham of an old tv show or even an older movie. This movie is going to Suck, even for the target audience of kiddies I'm sure it won't work. Underdog is anthropomorphic, he stands on two legs. I agree with the other comment they should've done a Roger Rabbit style approach (though that failed miserably with Rocky and Bullwinkle). Jeeze, what's next - Super Secret Squirrel with a gimmicky pint-size real squirrel agent? They want to do a film on a real looking dog with superpowers they should've stuck to Krypto. Folks, don't throw these jokers a bone - boycott crappy films like these until they make it worth our while to shell out $10+ to head to the theaters.
Reminds Me of the Scene In Strange Brew...
by tonagan
Dec 14th, 2006
07:53:28 AM
When the McKenzie brothers' dog, Hosehead, takes flight. That never fails to make me laugh, and I expect nothing less from this. No, I DEMAND nothing less from this.
Underdog VS Krypto
by Snookeroo
Dec 14th, 2006
08:15:49 AM
Coming next summer. Woof.
Let's face it
by Snookeroo
Dec 14th, 2006
08:28:32 AM
The producers have really failed to respect the meaning of a drug-taking super-dog who speaks in rhyme.
SUPERCHICKEN 2008
by Mace Tofu
Dec 14th, 2006
08:35:32 AM
Doctor_Sin....it's true. UNDERDOG is a reel movie. Barry and Poacher, Peter Dinklage is Simon Bar Sinister. Quin , Amy Adams is only doing Polly's voice so I guess she will look like a dog in this. : ( So HOLLYWOOD when is the SUPERCHICKEN movie coming?
Wow, it already sucks
by godzillasushi
Dec 14th, 2006
08:47:07 AM
seriously, not a CGI one that looks like the original? A real dog?
Oh My God.
by Mr Incredible
Dec 14th, 2006
08:49:43 AM
That is incredibly stupid. Hollywood, you are officially dead.
Yes, yes...
by BizarroJerry
Dec 14th, 2006
08:53:33 AM
Having a real dog in this is a bad idea. And yes, one or both of those images is faked. As a Christian, that tagline doesn't offend me, and I don't think it'll offend anybody, other than maybe the worst kinds of zealots. It reminded me of an All in the Family episode with a counterfeit bill that said "In Dog We Trust". Oh, and Amy Adams was also Will Ferrel's assistant/girlfriend in Talledega Nights.
We can only hope this is as good as Garfield
by StovetopStuffin'
Dec 14th, 2006
09:12:41 AM
At least it isn't a CG cartoon dog. (and I'm a CG artist, even). Wouldn't it be hilarious if this turned out to be a great Superhero movie? I mean, can it be worse that Fantastic Four?
Amy Adams is one of my dreamgirls
by R.C. the "Wise"
Dec 14th, 2006
09:22:52 AM
I met her on the S*ny lot this summer. Couldn't be more delightful. Plus, those eyes...smile...woooo. Still got a crush on her.
I don't remember seeing a report that is was a real dog
by IndyCollector
Dec 14th, 2006
09:33:18 AM
I thought they were just going to CGI Underdog like Garfield. Dumb.
His nemesis should be Hosehead the Strange Brew dog
by Knobules
Dec 14th, 2006
09:39:24 AM
Because both of them can fly. That would be funny. And Hosehead was drunk, sausage eating badass.
Mace Tofu - Superchicken idea
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 14th, 2006
09:53:05 AM
I love the idea of a Super Chicken movie. Now, that would be fucked up to watch a real, barnyard chicken gulping some liquid concoction that makes him a talking, upright, costume-wearing, CGI Super Chicken. It has potential for lots of 4th wall jokes. But, alas, you and I aren't making these films. A lot of cocaine-and-stripper-fed Hollywood execs, who have lost touch with not only reality but this dimension, are making these films. And they see some piece of petrified White Dog Shit (c) on the street and, in their hallucinatory daze, believe the lump of crap speaks to them and commands them to make films that keep the world's population submissive and dulled. They carry these dried hunks of shit in their pockets, rubbing them like talismans, speaking in hushed tones to the turds. Some execs can't reach proper orgasm without the fecal stones allowing them to do so. They then go on all-night binges of blow, stripper, rock, stripper, model, crank, stripper, etc, until their minds are dry and as crispy as beef jerky. Then they meet in the dead of night at some mansion in the Hollywood Hills, disrobe and rub their testicles together while humming the theme to "The Searchers." Then, one of them shrieks, as his sinuses cave in from cocaine and his penis pops blood vessels, "Let's make a goddamn Underdog movie!" As this exec collapses under the mystical weight of his own bloated excess, the others celebrate his 'genius' with several bottles of fentanyl.
Uh, the obvious talkback was
by tracheattack
Dec 14th, 2006
09:59:18 AM
nahhhh BATdog!!
Merrick
by PwnedByStallone
Dec 14th, 2006
11:09:24 AM
Someone probbakly said this already but the dog is obviously falling down for his ears to be like that. Can't stand it when fucking nerdy assholes ask STUPID questions like that. Use your brain you fucking moron.
MaccyG
by Kai_Mah'gra
Dec 14th, 2006
11:20:40 AM
.......in case you hadn't already noticed, (seeing as you're coming in late in the game), my most recent posts have been peppered with "s(m)elling" and "gramatical" errors and along with well-placed 'typos' such as the one you picked on, and deliberately placed so, just for Some Dude to pick on, and correct, seeing as that seems to be his primary and highest calling in life. Hard as it may be to believe, all you have to do to confirm this, is my comments the end of the posts inviting him to correct more grammar and sheck the spelling as seems to be his mission on the talkback. And seeing as how his grammar correction and spell-checking ended with the post tha started all this, I think we can safely (or rather hopefully) assume the point was taken.
The villain will be ...
by Freefinger
Dec 14th, 2006
11:22:48 AM
…a fish called Wanda, she will be the most villainous of villains ever to be captured on film, at the start of the movie, and she drowns a cat for trying to get to her! Then she will proceed with her plan to take over the world by hypnotizing humans and making them poop their pants, once everybody poops they then fall unconscious for the rest of their lives! And here comes SuperDog, frees the owner of Wanda who gets beaten by a guy who shares the same name as boxers shorts and he then eats the fish while her owner his tied up with French fries up his nose!!! Hence this movie is the prequel to the movie "A fish called Wanda"!!!
What the h ell is going on...
by Freefinger
Dec 14th, 2006
11:26:03 AM
.. 'bout all the grammar checking anyway!?!?! Isn't this a talkback? Isn,t this the place where people post half words or cut mid-sentence or use way to many exclamation points?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! What's with the hate people? Can't we just all get along... And bash stupid movies like UnderDog!?!!?!?!?!
It's only a matter of time until a live-action Peanuts
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 14th, 2006
11:40:23 AM
At that point, the giant black hole at the center of our universe will be revealed to all as a giant rectum and only then will we realize our place as a mole on the universe's sphincter. A chunk of undigested corn will shoot out, head our way, and smash into our planet ushering in a slow, painful death for all of humanity.
No! Wait I've got it! Its the perfect movie!
by Reelheed
Dec 14th, 2006
11:48:01 AM
Earth passes through a cloud of cosmic dust that mutates all of the animals other than humans into super animals! They can fly! They can speak! They can shoot lasers outta their eyeballs! They all beat the snot outta one another whilst humans go into hiding to survive! Domesticated animals form unlikely "buddy movie" style relationships in order to save said humans! Ends with Super dogs, cats and horses vs sharks, snakes and bears in a CGI orgy of violence! Awesome! Exclaimation mark! /waste of time and money
Kai... you'll never change.
by moto
Dec 14th, 2006
11:49:47 AM
Still writing ridiculously long rants and still throwing out terms like Bryan Singer/Superman Returns "apologist" to a Tber that wasn't even talking about SR. Oh, and as far as our old conversations regarding SR? According to Variety, Hollywood Reporter, and numerous other trades that list DVD numbers, Superman Returns DVD debuted number one in sales and rentals and proved to be one of the stronger rental debuts in recent years. You had said the DVD wouldn't sell well, would need to be packaged with the Superman boxset to make any type of commendable profit, etc. Also, as you now know, despite your belief that a sequel would not be greenlit anytime soon and that Singer would never be hired again, well your rants were once again wrong. Singer is attached, and the sequel is in development full steam. Hate to say I told you so... but I told you so. And for the last time, this whole apologist term you love to use? Can you not get past your ignorance and understand that people's viewpoints on movies are different? Just because you didn't like it doesn't mean everyone that did is an apologist. Grow up... and I look forward to a ridiculously long reply. I'll give you this... you make a talkback interesting to read. We all love to watch a train wreck don't we?
Underdog should be a Corgi
by sleepy holloway
Dec 14th, 2006
11:54:51 AM
I have a Corgi. He's pretty smart. I'll bet he could fly if he put his mind to it.
"religious zealots will go ballistic"
by Johnno
Dec 14th, 2006
12:04:59 PM
That's funny! Not that religious zealots will go ballistic (they won't! Religious zealots like dogs, and can see the goofiness in the caption) It's funny how non-religious people are quick to spout such absurd shit to make themselves feel better. Face it, you don't have any shred of credibility with us and when you usually the are ones more 'zealoted' and fit your stereotype to a T while being completely oblivious about it, you never will... So that's what makes it so funny, cuz it's true... Unless of course you're just being goofy yourself and it wasn't a serious remark but just trying to convey the thought of how amusing it would be to cause some shitstorm over a film like this... But otherwise, that's what really grinds my gears... back to you Diane...
moto
by oisin5199
Dec 14th, 2006
12:10:05 PM
Word.
moto.. SR did suck anyways...
by Freefinger
Dec 14th, 2006
12:11:04 PM
God.. I truly wished they never made it too.. Kai can go on 'bout how he hates it... I hated it too.. with a passion... It's selling, but if they would've gone the right way with it, it would've shattered any record out there... I'm one who would've bought the damn thing if it was made as it should've been... And I'm not the only one who hated it, the box office shows that... 200 millions should've been reached within half the time it did... Lots saw it, yes, but it just isn't what it should've been ... I understand Kai for that part... You might've liked it, I don't know, that's your thing, but when I read people talking about this movie as if it was true to the character? It just wasn't. Yes he does fly, eyes shoot cool lasers and all, but the character's essence just isn't there. I just hope they keep the essence of the Dog in this great new epic.... wait did I say that.. Mouahahah ... If the dog doesn't stop for a pee on an Fire Hydrant then I'm boycotting it...
ps... next great movie to be made:
by Freefinger
Dec 14th, 2006
12:11:56 PM
.. ViagraMan!
Will this Dog fight terrorists?
by Johnno
Dec 14th, 2006
12:14:20 PM
Will it fly through the skies pulling an American flag with it's mouth as it waves magnificiently in the wind?

Will it be a hero to Iraqis everywhere?

Will it put an end to Kim Jong Il's regime with it's eye lasers?

Will it save victims from a hurricane?

Will it dig down deep below the Earth and position itself to halt a massive Earthquake in Asia?

Will there be a little black sidekick or person who will say, "What's goin'on under-dawg?"

Will there be a pretty female lead either a woman or possibly a pre teen girl who is its owner for some Lois and Clark (though bestial) overtones?

Is bath water its kryptonite?
Sweet Christ. The end is nigh. This is the worst...
by anchorite
Dec 14th, 2006
12:16:40 PM
looking shit I have seen in ages. This ranks right up there with Air Bud Part 26. And The Constant Gardner, Syriana, Bobby and Valley of the Wolves.
Maybe we should support this to get a HOSEHEAD movie...
by SpyGuy
Dec 14th, 2006
12:21:15 PM
Okay, work with me here...I know this UNDERDOG flick looks to be a disaster before we even see a trailer, but if we each chip in at least a $6.50 matinee price and UNDERDOG makes a huge profit, other studios will want their own "flying dog in a cape" movie. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm hastily rewriting my STRANGE BREW 2 script at this very moment...
We MUST keep this thread the #1 Top AICN posted thread
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 14th, 2006
12:24:08 PM
Will there be dog-nipples on the suit? Will it be a muscular-molded-rubber suit? WHO THE FUCK WILL VOICE RIFF RAFF?!?!?!?!?
Freefinger
by moto
Dec 14th, 2006
12:27:28 PM
Well said. I'll say this: I understand why many fans didn't like it. Luthor's plot was a yawn (same for the original Superman too), and it ran a bit too long. And yes, they had the potential to have a movie that would break all box office records. What I did like was that Singer was ATTEMPTING to offer more than just a lame brain action flick. He tried to add some much needed depth to Superman, and I commend him for that. I still enjoyed it despite the flaws, and look forward to the sequel. Now that the characters have been reintroduced, Singer can (and will be required to by WB suits) offer the fast paced action superhero flick fans have been waiting to see.
Man of Stool, The Fool
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 14th, 2006
12:29:17 PM
He kept posting disses of the great Don Murphy so I had to have him banned. Now where were we? PhateGod 1 was chugging boners at the IRS. Transformers was pwning the site. Harry had lost John Carter of Mars. And you suck.
DemonDave should have directed this...
by Alonzo Mosely
Dec 14th, 2006
12:45:08 PM
Open the PETDOOR to TRUE EVIL...
Grammar Police
by kbass
Dec 14th, 2006
12:49:18 PM
Not that I have a "dog" in this fight but Some Dude constantly misuses his comma placement. He creates sentence fragments. It's shocking! Sigh. There. I said it. (notice the preceding sentence fragments) As for the movie I really want to see the casting decision for Sweet Polly Purebread. That is all. Carry on.
SPAM ALERT: PharteGoddPrime = Brandon Coleman
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 14th, 2006
01:11:11 PM
...away with you!
Gayus Loves Butt
by DonMurphysTool
Dec 14th, 2006
01:19:36 PM
No I am the original.
Yeah, I know you're the original, PharteCoward...
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 14th, 2006
01:26:54 PM
...but my post is definitely an "inside thing".
TUADMAHS ASSEMBLE!!!!!
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 14th, 2006
01:27:47 PM

So, is Don Murphy producing Underdog?
by Badger999
Dec 14th, 2006
01:28:12 PM
Sounds like his sort of thing.
Am I the only one who likes the tagline...
by Childe Roland
Dec 14th, 2006
01:40:47 PM
...for a reason other than its inflammatory potential with certain religious right wing nuts? It makes me laugh because it puts me in the mind of the joke about the dyslexic agnostic and it works because it turns a play on a rather pointless and inherently exclusionary phrase from the Pledge of Allegiance into...wait for it...the name of the main character. It's funny on several levels, none of which require excessive creativity to access or appreciate. That offends you? Next thing you know, you're going to tell me farts don't make you giggle.
Freefinger
by Kai_Mah'gra
Dec 14th, 2006
01:44:18 PM
Word
And for those that missed it the first time around.....
by Kai_Mah'gra
Dec 14th, 2006
01:49:26 PM
"Twould (actually) be funny if Underdog's expression when flying was the same dopey, drugged-up expression Routh had in Superman Returns."

............withou t all the needless multiple posing shots, mopey Zoolander facial expressions and perpetual and pointless lifting of large miscellaneous heavy objects, that is. And this time I mean it!

I loved the tagline as well
by toadkillerdog
Dec 14th, 2006
02:23:58 PM
I seriously doubt any religious zealot will feel any twinge about the tagline. Perhaps the producers hope they might - nothing like controversy to spur ticket sales. But come on, this is a very, very, very low brow kiddie flick. being debated on this site my grown (mostly) men and women (where?) Underdog was a decent cartoon, never my favorite as a kid, but Simon Bar Sinister kicked ass! Great name too. And I admit. Polly purebread was a fine bitch. I got a kick out of an earlier post saying that it would be hard to believe a talking dog shining shoes. The implication that it would be believable seeing a flying dog, but one shining shoes? No way! We may be taking things a bit to seriously here.
I just hope there's some full frontal nudity ....
by kinghenryVIII
Dec 14th, 2006
04:40:40 PM
on behalf of Under D. Some "lipstick" looking pink thing while he's on his back saying "scatch me scratch me" would send the parents screamin'
I miss the good old days
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 14th, 2006
04:40:50 PM
When something this crappy would be an automatic sign of some Mafia-funding or some phoned-in favor to settle gambling debts. "Downy's stock dropped! Make another Apple Dumpling Gang film!"
DOG IN SUIT! DOG IN SUIT! DOG IN SUIT!
by Johnno
Dec 14th, 2006
05:07:44 PM
Dumb looking breed of dog in superherosuit = flaming nipples on Optimus
Don Matsugoro
by BDT
Dec 14th, 2006
05:56:52 PM
First of all, the photo of the flying dog...maybe in relation to the buildings around it looks like a balloon in the Macy's parade. I guess the ears are up listening for Polly who might be in trouble. However, I am posting because in 1986, when I lived in Japan, I saw a live-action dog movie that was the bomb. It was called "The Adventures of Don Matsugoro" I try and try to find it and I find cartoon versions and sequels, but not a trace of this movie about a dog who foils the mob. Anyone on this talkback know a Japanese live-action movie from 1986 called Don Matsugoro? Also, at times like this I must reflect on the talents of Wally Cox who gave the cartoon Underdog its voice. This movie could be fun-- depends on if the studio is looking to make a decent movie or if it is looking to try and sucker parents out of their hard earned bucks by hitting every cheap trick that they "think" will make kids laugh, in this case, fire hydrant humor.
kbass.. Grammar Police...
by Freefinger
Dec 14th, 2006
06:36:57 PM
Well said! Some Dude should stop picking on fu**ing grammar and just post his shit without dumping a kilo of crap on some poor dude who was just typing away.... (Notice the extra dot) !!!!!!!! (and the extra exclamation points that are introduced for no reason at all)... Just post dude, just post...
Hey MNG...
by Freefinger
Dec 14th, 2006
06:39:49 PM
Who the hell is Brandon Coleman anyway?? IS he the guy who posts the freaking link to the bad movie "Up and away" shit flick, cause that guy needs to get his crotch re-arranged by some 400lbs man-lady with buck theeth? Other than that... Who's Brandon Coleman?
BTW... I bought 1 billion stocks...
by Freefinger
Dec 14th, 2006
06:43:10 PM
In this movie on the Hollywood Stock Exchange site! Cool thing were you buy stocks on movies and actors for fun.. No cost (I HOPE OR I'M IN DEEP SHIT IF THIS MOVIE DESN'T MAKE SERIOUS MONEY!!!!)
HOLY SHIT!!!
by Freefinger
Dec 14th, 2006
06:49:17 PM
Jason Lee is in this one????... WTF!!!?? He should fire his agent just for that! Holy shit... What happened Jason??? WHY WHY WHYYYYYYYY????
Why make Underdog with an unrecognizable
by superninja
Dec 14th, 2006
07:17:48 PM
dog?
This dog will have nothing on LASSIE!!!!
by Johnno
Dec 14th, 2006
08:22:32 PM
I just saw a movie where Lassie takes on two guys driving ATVs and still managed to find time to save all the sheep before teh family got home! And Lassie doesn't need any of that flying superhero shit!
As long as they have...
by glodene
Dec 14th, 2006
08:44:12 PM
Simon Barsinister and Polly Purebred in it, i'm cool with it. Btw, is it true that they had to shut down production for a week because Underdog & Polly got stuck while engaging in some (inappropriate) behind the scene doggy-style shenanigans?
Hands up - who says "Fake"?
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 14th, 2006
08:59:50 PM
The movie is real, but in these images there are two different dogs and the top poster image has a bunch of incomprehensible crap as "credits." I mean, it says some shit like "Directed by Yloksk Ksuojsyot" for christ's sake.
Freefinger
by Mr. Nice Gaius
Dec 14th, 2006
09:38:21 PM
Yes, that's exactly who he is. However, PharteGoddPrime is either Don Murphy or one of his stooges. He needs to be delt with in the same manner as poor Mr. Coleman. Stand your ground, Freefinger. These trolls must be spanked back under the bridge from whence they came.
wow...... I been neglecting this talkback...
by Seph_J
Dec 14th, 2006
10:30:33 PM
...seems like I didn't know what I was missing. This movie looks awesome.
Bridge?
by Freefinger
Dec 15th, 2006
12:31:38 AM
I thought they crawled out underneath a turd... Seems more appropriate with the kind of movie they're backing!... Shred their skins off and .. and.. well.. shredding the skin off is pretty brutal.. so I guess let's just stop there... oh .. and spank them back underneath the turd thing too!... Good call MNG!! If it doesn't work... I'll bring back the Freefinger clones to wreck hell on their asses!
Falsus Quintys... apparantly is in this film.
by Seph_J
Dec 15th, 2006
03:31:56 AM
Look at the credits in picture 1
Seph, it seems nobody cares but only like 3 of us
by Doctor_Sin
Dec 15th, 2006
11:50:58 AM
I've been yelling 'Fake', but the pics are still up and no explanation from AICN - guess they figure it'll quietly go away.
Christian Zealoads
by jukeofurl
Dec 17th, 2006
03:13:25 AM
That those aholes imagine they know what God thinks is offensive. I think God thinks they are morons.
this sucks!!! why?
by endofud
Apr 13th, 2007
09:27:13 PM
the new underdog looks sooooo!!! bad. why would they do this to underdog. i grew up on underdog..
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.