Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

AICN-DOWNUNDER: Geoffrey Wright's MACBETH, A POSEIDON Sinking, A STAR WARS Letdown, And More!!

Poseidon... by AmirReza	Jun 3rd, 2006 10:21:30 AM
Got Four Stars in Empire UK. Then again, the guy had just done an interview with Kurt Russell, so I think there was some behind-the-scenes ballbusting.
Ummm...about Lucasfilm... by Doctor_Sin	Jun 3rd, 2006 10:50:49 AM
Did you even bother reading they're response? Lucas doesn't view the O-OT as the 'authorized'/'appr oved'/'definitive' version. Therefore, LFL isn't going to bust their balls by trying to restore something that their boss doesn't want. The O-OT are BONUS DISCS and, as such, don't have to be anamorphic. As one TBer corrected myself and some others - that is the industry standard, to not have anamorphic bonus features like this. The restoration, time, and money went into making the SE versions. As the O-OT isn't 'The Definitive Version,' they ain't gonna sink money into it, especially as the originals are so badly degraded. If ya don't like it, then fuck you and go pop in your THX laserdiscs (like I do from time to time) and shut up and quit worrying about it. I've also got bootleg DVDs of the O-OT ported from the same laserdiscs and they look great on my normal, 36" TV.
Poseidon was hilarious (SPOILERS) by BrunoTheDog	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:05:48 AM
Best comedy of the year! When the kid in the movie jumps from the piano into the curtain, and it's obviously a large stuntman in oversized clothes, I laughed so hard I knew this movie was a bust. At first my wife was shushing me and trying to get into it, but then the flat-head screwdriver/cross came into play and that's where it lost her. Seriously, look at that cross; part of it is a flat-head. I could go on and on, but ultimately this movie has one fairly dramatic scene and the rest is just comedy gold.
Poseidon by thanner	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:06:22 AM
wow....sounds like there was more character development in "The FJ Holden"....probably better action scenes too.......
Nothing better than a month-old POSEIDON review by YackBacker	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:11:35 AM
Seriously, why the hell are these articles considered "news?" BUT WAIT, we also have a month-old Lucas-bashing conversation about the non-anamorphic O-OT DVDs! You mean THEY'RE NOT ANAMORPHIC! HOLY TITS! I know the concept of jet lag, but these AICN DOWNUNDER articles are downright silly. Ok, let's restart the whole "Lucas Sucks" chant on the TB. Better yet, just re-read this TB and comb the posts for the finer talking points: http://nitti.aintitcool.com/di splay.cgi?id=23367
YackBacker by BrunoTheDog	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:13:32 AM
Bitch bitch bitch.
"It's why I've completely given up on STAR WARS" by Trazadone	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:15:23 AM
What does that even mean? Seriously? You'll purposely avoid all things Star Wars? How dramatic and brave of you! Wow, Lucas must be shivering in his boots. My guess is that you, like all the other bitchers, will be the first in line to purchase these "inferior" versions of these films. You know you will.
AICN-Downunder: CHRIS WALKEN CONFIRMED FOR EP. II by YackBacker	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:15:27 AM
It's like the Aussies troll the archives before they write their own articles. Enjoy this little Harry-fuck-up from the Year 2000! http://www.aintitcool.com/disp lay.cgi?id=5654
I agree, BrunoTheDog by Trazadone	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:17:24 AM
I snuck into Poseidon the other day (suckers pay for movies) and couldn't believe how craptacular it was. Even without paying I want my money back.
Bruno by YackBacker	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:18:05 AM
I hope you found something informative and newsworthy in the article. I also hope that whatever cave you must have been living in not to know this "news" was warm and dry and your stay was pleasant.
chrissakes! by thanner	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:24:10 AM
bitching on a forum about someone bitching about a film on a site created to bitch about films, and now I'm finding myself bitching about someone bitching on a forum and...........damn, this cheap ass beer is screwing with me.....GODDAMMIT I want those "Ginsu" knives!.......
Apparently, Australians take longer to digest news by Rowley Birkin QC	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:40:56 AM
The only thing worse than George Lucas right now is the tired pathetic melodrama of disgruntled geeks: "I've completely given up on STAR WARS altogether... You took something I loved and bastardised my memory of it so often and in so many ways, that I've now moved past the stage of anger..." Pass the vomit bag.
Go Latauro by quantum_ken	Jun 3rd, 2006 12:00:42 PM
I actually appreciate an Australian take on news. If some of you Yanks are tired of seeing the occasional blip of 'old' news, simple- just keep quiet and go somewhere else. I don't want to start any fights but you guys are a terrible waste of bandwidth. And skin.
But, is there a rap cover of by Doctor_Sin	Jun 3rd, 2006 12:27:52 PM
"There's Got to Be a Morning After", from the original film? If not, fuck this sinking piece of turd. Oh yeah - Chris Walken in SW:EPII...I'm surprised that post hasn't 'mysteriously' been deleted. I hope Harry fired that 'spy.'
sigh... by Lazarus Long	Jun 3rd, 2006 12:46:08 PM
I love reading Latauro's reviews and Down Under news, and thought he'd be the last guy to get all whiny about the Star Wars DVDs. This Lucas apologist laughs heartily every time another fan claims betrayal and vows never to return. Dude, don't let The Force hit you on the ass on the way out.
The news on Star Wars transfers is about a month old. by Gorrister	Jun 3rd, 2006 12:52:06 PM
Fans have been up in arms for about a month or so about the Laserdisc transfers to DVD. The news came out about a day or two (if that long) after Lucas announced the original trilogy would be released as an "extra" on the re-release DVD of the 2004 "redo" of Star Wars. This release is just testing the waters. If numbers are better than they were for the sales of the repackaged 3-disc edition of the 2004 4-disc edition, then they will probably spend money on enhancing the original versions for another DVD release in a few years.
More old news. by Gorrister	Jun 3rd, 2006 12:57:31 PM
Why post Box Office results for last weekend THIS weekend? No offense, the the news this week is how Jennifer Aniston knocked X-Men out of the top spot on Friday. (according to early estimates)
Dude... by Zarles	Jun 3rd, 2006 01:27:07 PM
Grow the fuck up and get the fuck over it. Anyone who uses the words "You took something I loved and bastardised my memory of it so often and in so many ways, that I've now moved past the stage of anger" with a straight face deserves to be fuckin' bitch-slapped with a full can of Fosters. Listen here, Crocodile Dundee - how you feel about Star Wars is how I currently feel about talkbacks, thanks to whiny-ass crybaby tittysuckers like you. So fuck off, mate.
Lucus should hire Speilberg for the tv show! by Lord_Soth	Jun 3rd, 2006 01:55:12 PM
That would be cool shit!
Star Wars: The Last Tear by Azlam Orlandu	Jun 3rd, 2006 02:00:33 PM
Latauro thanks for bringing nothing to the table. I could have read that same rubbish anywhere else on the tissue for Star Wars fans called he internet.
Maybe Australia has a Time Machine by Doctor_Sin	Jun 3rd, 2006 02:50:10 PM
And this post was intended to be posted about a month ago. They need to realign their crystals an' shit. I've eaten 'roo before. Good eats.
First off, I'm a Special Editions fan... by paralyser-pro	Jun 3rd, 2006 02:57:19 PM
I mean, come on! It has all kinds of better stuff like cloud city, the sarlacc, dewbacks, the list goes on. HOWEVER, since I got my first widescreen TV set I now understand the frustration of getting a movie out that isn't anamorphic. Once you add the black bars on the side and top of the screens, you're using about 40% of your screen for actual picture! It's retarded, and why? Because someone was too cheap and lazy to enter some computer code making the DVD transfer anamorphic? Bah. If Anchor Bay had the opportunity to release these discs, you'd get an anamorphic transfer with new anamorphic extras to boot, instead of a "fuck you" to widescreen enthusiasts, the type of people that made THX big in the first place. Now, I couldn't give a damn about the Un-special Editions, and I'm not going to buy or rent them, but all those ass pirates who are pseudo-sentimental and pretentious enough to waste good money that could be saved for future Snakes on a Plane screenings, at least deserve a print that'll fit their 16:9 screen, just because it's the right thing to do.
When OT of Star Wars was altered, my bro a fan no more. by JDanielP	Jun 3rd, 2006 03:03:16 PM
For my brother, the final blow was experiencing "THE PHANTOM MENACE" ...and he has since no longer watched another Star Wars flick, new or old. Not on dvd. Nothing. And that, I feel, is sad. It's just a sad thing.
This news isn't "a month old" by Monkey Butler	Jun 3rd, 2006 03:52:45 PM
In Australia, the movie has only just come out. Fucking idiots. Yeah, laugh all you want about us getting films later than you, but y'know what? It really doesn't make any difference. I'm fairly certain that there isn't a person in the country that cries themself to sleep at night because we didn't get Poseidon at the same time as the fucking Yanks. Enjoy your shitfest a month earlier and for twice the ticket price. And about Star Wars? It's funny, I felt a similar kind of thing... 7 years ago when TPM came out and I realised that at 12 I was too old for this pathetic shit.
Monkey Butler by Darth Kong	Jun 3rd, 2006 04:16:17 PM
"Twice the price"? Do your research,.....you prat.
Heath Ledger by Foxxed	Jun 3rd, 2006 04:23:28 PM
It's amazing how being in one critically acclaimed movie and suddenly you're hot property. He's still the worst actor I've ever seen.
Oooookay... by Latauro	Jun 3rd, 2006 05:09:59 PM
What was the point of my editorial rant? Not to piss of George Lucas or Lucasfilm or any of those guys -- I honestly don't think they'd be reading this column, let alone caring about its contents. No, I was simply saying that I've lost the energy for it. Lately, every time someone mentions the words "Star Wars", it's in relation to some stupid decision ("He's deleted the original negative", "Han no longer shoots first", etc etc), and I'm getting tired of it. And, by the sounds of things, so are all of you! My point was that so long as we remain angry, at least we still care. I have stopped caring. That's all. No one has to get up in arms about it, nobody has to give two shits, but for those that enjoy reading my little editorial writings (at last count there were OVER seven of them!), it's a slightly-different perspective on the situation. For the love of Joss, please don't let it upset you. I'm sure you have better things to do with your time than get angry at somebody expressing their opinion. (Also, a note to the people who think the Poseidon review is a month old, or that the Box Office results are out of date: there's a clue in the fact that this column is titled AICN-Dwonunder... think about it...)
Leave MonkeyButler alone! by Gorrister	Jun 3rd, 2006 05:19:16 PM
If you were from Australia, you'd be an asshole too. It was originally a big penal colony, remember? Nothing but Dingos and Steve Erwin down there these days. Surprised the suicide rate isn't higher than it already is. To be fair, however, pretty much ALL of the news in this article is old, whether it be a month or a week. So it certainly does deserve some degree of ridicule.
poseidon reminds of that porno about an iceberg... by jig98	Jun 3rd, 2006 06:16:26 PM
TIT-antic. yeah.
Star Waaat? by :-o	Jun 3rd, 2006 06:54:20 PM
First things first: Fans of the original cut to not outnumber fans of the SEs. This is a fact that exists in the fantasy minds of so-called purists. Second: The new packaging is NOT to stave off the original cut from 'outselling' the SEs. This is more wishful thinking. The SEs are preferred by the general public--hands down. No argument. This is not accounting for taste, however. And if we like the matte lines, haloing, grain, crappy edits, bad sound and cameras reflected in C3PO then--we should be happy.
Star Wars by GreatWhite	Jun 3rd, 2006 08:16:11 PM
Any of you that prefer the SE's to the original versions are either very young or very stupid, or both. Whoever said the general public prefers the SE's is a moron and needs to be banned from speaking in public ever again. As for Latauro, people in this talkback have been pretty hard on the guy, but he gave good reviews and should not be blasted for seeing movies when they come out Down Under. And yes, it is a shame what Lucas is doing to SW. More than a shame, really. If Star Wars is one of the great stories of our time, then it should be available for people to watch and enjoy -- the GOOD version. Not the version where Greedo shoots first, Han has no reacton, silly CG lizards walk around, goofy robots beep, silly CG muppets sing, and Darth Vader only finds out Luke is his son in a terribly re-done scene halfway through Empire. Now flame away if you will, but if you do you're an idiot and I will have no regard for what you say. Now a note to George: turn away from the Dark Side! Turn away from yes-men and self-indulgence! Respect your fans! Respect your original vision! Okay, enough exclamation points. And sorry about the ran, but somebody in this talkback needed to start talking sense, even if it has been said before and better. Later.
I want Kevin Bloody Wilson to play Hamlet by Doctor_Sin	Jun 3rd, 2006 08:17:20 PM
I'm just sayin'.
I'm the kinda person that likes to have the last word by Monkey Butler	Jun 3rd, 2006 08:40:19 PM
So I'm gonna reply. My comment about ticket prices was an exagerration. I didn't realise how much of an exaggeration until I saw just how shit your dollar is doing. I apologise. As for the founding of our country, I'd rather live in a country founded by convicts who worked their way peacefully and democratically to independence, rather than in a country founded by religious fanatics running away from their problems.
Isn't Melbourne underworld a tautology? by Monkey Butler	Jun 3rd, 2006 08:50:52 PM
How does anyone fuck up Macbeth? Seriously, it's one of Shakespeare's best, how do you make it boring? And Lat, read The Turning by Tim Winton.
Here's what I'm thinking of doing...... by Hairy Nutsack	Jun 3rd, 2006 09:50:54 PM
I think I'm going to buy the DVDs and either leave the SE disks right there on the counter when I leave or send them back to Fox. Ether that, or I'll just not buy the new disks at all. The Pirate Bay is back up, suck hind tit Lucas!!
Could someone PLEASE explain this to me? by JediSean81	Jun 3rd, 2006 09:57:01 PM
How the hell can you come to the conclusion that the Empire wins if you watch Star Wars Eps.1-6? Does Anakin not still throw the Emporer down the reactor shaft and FINALLY bring balance to the Force by destroying the Sith? Does the Rebellion still blow up the Death Star and restore FREEDOM to the Galaxy? What about that scene where people knock over the statue of the Emporer like American Forces knocked over the Statue of Saddam? Art (preemptively) imitating life or Life imitating art- Discuss If anything the prequels (and I know I'm going to get flamed for this) make the other 3 make more sense! A few minor flaws in Revenge of the Sith didn't keep it from being one of the best movies I've ever seen, a movie so good it redeemed the "problems" with the other prequels. I just watched them all back to back the other day and they're better than I remembered them to be and not deserving of any of this bullshit that keeps on coming out of you guys' mouths. Some fanboys aren't satisfied with anything! And you call Lucas petty! Get a life, find Jesus, get a girlfriend, get a boyfriend, whatever its going to take to make you stop bitching about everything that isn't exactly the way you want it to be! There's nothing wrong with an intelligent, well thought critical analysis but this rediculous! Maybe if you guys started accepting things for the way they are instead of always wanting them to be something they're not you might actually find something that makes you happy.
YackBacker by BrunoTheDog	Jun 3rd, 2006 10:27:46 PM
This isn't news to me. I knew these DVDs were coming before it was posted here. Really, I was kidding; but your post seriously was just you bitching for the sake of being a bitch.
Well at least we can all agree the Prequels were bad... by IndustryKiller	Jun 3rd, 2006 11:10:43 PM
We can agree on that at this point right? Because that's pretty much prevailing opinion of the planet Earth....Oh c'mon people let's be pragmatic here.
"Taped Over"??? by ZombiKiller86	Jun 4th, 2006 01:12:31 AM
WTF??? Tricked into thinking that us fans were finally getting what we wanted, only to find out that what we're getting is nothing more than 40 bucks that could have been spent on copy purchased on eBay. What a fuckin' cop-out.
Those OT "Purists" Are Some Delusional Motherfuckers by Liberty Valance	Jun 4th, 2006 01:22:15 AM
I give you 10,000 angry internet fanboys convinced they speak for 100 million Star Wars aficionados. The fact is that 99% of consumers could give a fuck if they ever see the Vaseline blur under Luke's landspeeder or the scratchy white dots taking off from Tatooine again. Mr. & Mrs. Average Moviegoer care fuckall about your nostalgic desire to briefly recapture the innocence of your youth in your increasingly cynical adulthood. "Purists," you don't speak for the masses. You speak for a tiny online minority. If Threepio were here, he'd say you're all suffering from delusions of grandeur.
Most fans prefer the "originals"? Hilarious! by Razorback	Jun 4th, 2006 01:30:05 AM
I have no doubt that "most fans" have no fuckin' clue what the difference is, because "most fans" are not reading the Internet forum whinefest. You can be correct if these new releases outsell the last DVD release. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
I'm pretty sure the two posts before this one are... by IndustryKiller	Jun 4th, 2006 03:21:14 AM
from the same guy. Also I have no clue what the fuck he's talking about. Ok I do...but i'm not sure he's on the same page as everyone else.
And why do some people defend Lucas... by IndustryKiller	Jun 4th, 2006 03:32:34 AM
as if he were your dad? Telling the story from a George Lucas point of view saying what he does and doesn't have to do. I don't really care about the "George Lucas point of view". As a consumer I care about the "get the most for my money" point of view. And since that isn't happening I have every right to bitch. And yeah I know don't but the product but sometimes that doesn't send hte message and since this shit is coming out at all apparently Lucasfilm in some small way must be listening to fans gripes. I mean why defend Lucas on this? he's a billionaire sitting somewhere releasing mediocre products and making bad films. I mean is that cool with some of you? Do you like billionaires who shun you to take advantage of you? Is loving "the man" the new "sticking it to the man"? Did I miss hte memo on that? There is absolutely no logical point on not being on our side and asking for a better product as a consumer. You people must have alot of self loathing inside. Really what is to defend? He is no artistic or moral authority. He is releasing a mediocre product and you yell at us for being angry. You aren't supposed to ever thank multi billion dollar companies for pulling that shit. What kind of capitalist are you?? Sheesh!
The 2 by Darth Maui	Jun 4th, 2006 03:47:17 AM
Probably not going to buy the new SW DVDs, not because they're not perfect transfers, but because the SE's are fine by me. Not going to shell out money (or put effort into procuring them in any manner) just to show others what a purist I am, especially when nobody else really cares.
Well then, it's painfully clear what Lucas MUST do.... by BendersShinyAss	Jun 4th, 2006 03:55:26 AM
Make Episodes 7, 8 & 9. and fire Supershadow. That guy is a fucking Nutbreak.
As much as I hate some of the SW:SE's decisions by BendersShinyAss	Jun 4th, 2006 04:04:36 AM
They are better overall than the original originals. Flame all you want but I'll take new Emperor, Bigger mos-eisly, spacious cloud city, & orchestral closure over yapping ewoks anyday. But there were some BIG fuckups along the way, to be sure. personally, I would love to see a full anamorphic transfer with all the cigaret burns and jumps and skips. that shit really gets me hard.
Necrophilia by BendersShinyAss	Jun 4th, 2006 04:31:37 AM
I used to be into Necrophilia and beastiality. but after a while it was just like beating a dead horse. Where's my jpeg bitch? rockhopper1133@yahoo.com
if you no longer care than you would be happy by gunnarcannibal	Jun 4th, 2006 05:15:16 AM
If you no longer care about Star Wars than you could get over your petty complaints about useless bullshit and just watch the movies...but you do care so you still sound like a desperate fucking Star Wars nerd. So truly get over it and stop pissing on my good times by bitching about this!
ALSO by gunnarcannibal	Jun 4th, 2006 05:26:54 AM
yeah, I'll take the half second of Greedo and Han shooting at the same time and a stupid musical number if that means a better ending to Return of the Jedi, a better exploding Death Star, a Rancor without the black lines, a Cloud City that actually looks alive and so on...I like having the originals so I know my childhood is safe but in all honesty, the new ones are better...sorry, but for the sake of history and being able to view Star Wars as a film of the 70's I am glad that the untouched version will be able live on after my VHS copies have rotted away...but man, it would suck if they re-made JAWS with a CGI shark (cartoons are not scary!)...than I could understand the rage! I don't know, I see where everyone is coming from, but really...shut up.
I don't even like Star Wars by Harold The Great	Jun 4th, 2006 06:16:44 AM
But I too, like being angry at Lucas. So fuck him.
Actually, Vader knew Luke was his son after ep 4 by DigitalDong	Jun 4th, 2006 06:30:29 AM
Was I the only one who knew Vader was playing along with Palpatine in the redone scene? Hell no, cause it was that obvious. Vader had the plan of taking Palpatine out before he wore the mask, but he couldn;t do it by himself, which is why he fought Obi Wan, he wanted Obi Wan to join him. At the beggining of Empire Vader was obsessed with finding Luke cause he knew he was his son and he had his overthrow plan of Palpatine in place the whole time. Even without the SE's it was obvious. I just wish in Empire they added a scene with Vader finding 3P0 in Cloud city and letting the troppers take it to the wookie. Cause as a person who grew up with Star Wars I and countless others wondered why a damaged 3P0 was given to Chewbacca in the cell. And some people call themselves fans, lol
No better way to say you were wrong than to buy the OT by Reelheed	Jun 4th, 2006 06:50:41 AM
Vote with your bucks. I'm sorry but the special editions do suck major ass. Except the spiffy new FX. Episode 4 - Han shot first thus setting up his eventual redemption.. Episode 5 - Luke jumped. and didn't go "wheeeeee!" on the way down. put that boy on suicide watch. Episode 6 - The spirit of the real Anakin joins the other dead jedi. not some pouty girly boy. Actually its only really the Han thing that bugs me. "Lets change a character fundamentally" was never a great starting point for a revision to a classic film. Also Greedo missing looks like the shitest thing ever.
DigitalDong- How could Vader NOT know? by YackBacker	Jun 4th, 2006 08:35:28 AM
How many "Skywalker" kids are running around the galaxy? It's a slave name, it's maybe a fake one at that, but when Palpatine says to him "the young kid that blew up the death star, ya know, the one strong with the force and also named SKYWALKER- well I think it's your kid, Ani." Vader's reaction is kind of funny. "Are you suuuuuuure?" Hehehe, and now Ani is sifting through his memory to see if he ever did slide the lightsaber to Aayla Secura. Ok, I'm going back to bed now.
You know, I actually think Lucas went light on the SE's by BendersShinyAss	Jun 4th, 2006 08:39:49 AM
I remember doing one last burn to my memory before watching the SE that opening night and I must say, i was REALLY disapointed that there weren't MORE re-done VFX. Most of the shots were all exactly the same with maybe a few touches added. And I couldn't believe my fucking eyes when the death star blew and it was the same fucking shot! With a shock wave ring. what really bugs me is that Lucas was so obviously influenced by Star Trek ringed shock wave explosions. I think with a bit of imagination any one here could imagine a truely breathtaking detonation of the death star.
The Death Star Explosion by YackBacker	Jun 4th, 2006 10:38:56 AM
Absolutely on the money, Bender. The sheer volume of mass and material there doesn't just turn into little sand granules. The shockwave ring is a goofy addition. I want a re-do. And maybe a ROTS-style tracking shot of X-Wings flying through the shit over the Death Star. THAT would be pretty effin' sweet.
FX by BrunoTheDog	Jun 4th, 2006 10:52:14 AM
I wanted the battle over Yavin to be sped up and more battle shots. What was done was a cool and was an improvement, but he could have done so much more. Bah, now some fanboys are going to put a hit out on me.
modifications to the original star wars by GreatWhite	Jun 4th, 2006 11:05:54 AM
Some changes would be okay -- improving the FX, removing the squares around the TIE-fighters, that sort of thing. Even adding in scenes like Han and Jabba in Ep 4 would be fine -- if done well. But they weren't. The same mind that created Jar Jar was fully in control during the making of SW:SE and so we have that metality at the helm, and that sucks. Would you want the guy that invented Jar Jar to redo your favorite movie? I hope not. And no, I don't consider it the same mind that existed in that same skull twenty years ago. A lot went on in that skull in those twenty years, and I can only assume it wasn't good. I just wish there was enough left of that old George to respect what he had done before -- like in Flowers for Algernon when at the end the guy knew he had once been a great intellect but was now reduced to his original self. But at least he respected and admired who he had been. Not so with George. No flowers for George. Sigh.
Lucas-lovers by Fenton Meiks	Jun 4th, 2006 12:46:22 PM
One thing bores and annoys me more than both George Lucas and the "will he won't he release the original versions" saga. The sad morons (Doctor Sin, and the rest)who feel the need to berate fans of the originals for wanting them released in a decent form. OK, we get it. You love the soulless new trilogy, and get moist over the fact that CG creatures now inhabit the original trilogy at every pointless opportunity. Fair enough, I don't have a problem with that. The difference is, you can watch any of those films, in shiny, pristine anamorphic splendour, anytime you want. If it wasn't for those like myself, who paid their money and turned Lucas into the fat-walleted, goitre-necked tyrant he's become, you wouldn't have the Phantom Menace et al, which you love so much. Is it really too much to ask for those that prefer the original theatrical versions which lined Georgie's pockets to be rewarded with a bit of respect and at least given a proper dvd version, not a cynical, lazy, half-arsed laserdisc transfer? People of my generation who are Star Wars fans will always want a proper release of the films they grew up loving. Not one person my age I've spoken to about it prefers the Special Editions, therefore there will always be a clamour for the originals' release, even if we have to wait until Beardo pops his clogs. And if you can't like, tolerate or understand that, Doctor Sin, then in your own words "Fuck you".
quit hatin on lucas by teddanson37	Jun 4th, 2006 12:51:19 PM
i don't really give a flying fart about the guy. but who really wants to watch old crappy versions of the movies? if you were in a band and made a really sucky album then learned how to play the guitar and rerecorded that same album, wouldn't you rather have people remember the GOOD album instead of the craptastic one? george would just rather have people remember star wars as an epic great movie, instead of a campy 70's attempt at epic.
and i'm for real when i say... by teddanson37	Jun 4th, 2006 12:52:40 PM
who'd rather watch the old crappy versions? they make me laugh. and not in a good way.
teddanson37.... by Hairy Nutsack	Jun 4th, 2006 01:37:15 PM
It's pretty simple really, do you want to see all classic films redone with CGI? Do we want James Cameron to do an SE of Aliens? The robot vs. the queen would look fucking sweet in CGI, but fuck that shit. Some scenes do look better in the SW:SE, others are absolute abortions and completely overwhelm any good things that that they actually did accomplish in the SE. Greedo first, the original CGI Jabba (yikes), musical number in the palace, Hayden as a ghost, the ROTJ shot used for Darth boarding the Star Destroyer, erasing the body explosions, extended Mos Eisley is good but we don't need those ASS droids, and the list could go on. The point is that there are eye rolling grown enducing changes that are re-fucking-tarded and should have never happened. Keep out the Ewok song, I'm okay with that, but the obviously bad choices ruin the entire SE and make them unwatchable.
Script vs. VFX by RogueWarrior65	Jun 4th, 2006 02:49:39 PM
I think people are more pissed that Greedo fired first the second time around than they are about the revamped VFX.
I like penal colonies by Mister Man	Jun 4th, 2006 03:31:47 PM

ThaSithMaster.... by Hairy Nutsack	Jun 4th, 2006 05:10:04 PM
Oh no, someone named "ThaSithMaster" has called us dorks and 40 year old virgin fanboys, whatever are we supposed to do? You must be right there Mr. Sith, you are after all a "Master".....Geezus, why don't you go stick your Padme bubblebath dispenser up your ass, your opinion means little to nothing when you actually have some gay ass Star Wars reference in your screenname, Darth Fucktard.
ThaSithMaster vs. Hairy Nutsack by GreatWhite	Jun 4th, 2006 07:35:50 PM
I agree with Hairy Nutsack. There's a sentence I never thought I'd write. Anyway, Hairy, I suppose SithMaster likes Jar Jar, too, probably has some Jar Jar pajamas. Anybody that has the bad taste to prefer SW:SE must be a Binks man. Mesa no likey. Sure, SithMaster, the SEs looked crisper and spiffier, but Mike Meyer's Cat in the Hat looked crisp and spiffy, too, and that sucked ass. But I don't think very many fanboys would mind if George corrected the FX from the OT and cleaned it up a bit. But actually altering the basic substance of the characters? I mean, having Han shoot first was what made him so cool. And yes, that's a big deal. And I'm married with a decent job.
The only way you guys are ever gonna love SW again: by Doc_Strange	Jun 4th, 2006 08:51:26 PM
Is if Lucas dies and then someone else with some fresh ideas and has a base in fandom takes over the franchise. Personally, I want to see more movies, maybe like 3 a decade or so. I would definitely love to make some films myself which are in my mind a lot more grand in terms of scale. I always wanted to see a hot, female jedi take center stage as the main character in a trilogy. How awesome would that be? Character development would be just as important as FX and there would be absolutely no cameos from movies past. A fresh canvas to paint on, so to speak. The only links to earlier films would probably be tech and vehicles, depending on the time frame. Ahhh to dream.........
I HATE AICN-DOWNUNDER!! by scumbag	Jun 5th, 2006 12:08:52 AM
...hate it so much that I read every column just to reinforce how much I hate it, and to say so again in the talkback. And to blame Latauro for the fact that films are released later in Australia. If I had half a brain I'd stop reading columns I don't like. Fortunately I don't.
Who the fuck says 'Peace Out you' wanker! by designedforlife	Jun 5th, 2006 03:21:55 AM
If you watch the films in episodic order, the Empire comes to power, and is later destroyed by the rebels. However, that's not how they were made. Watch them in chronological order, and the Empire wins. For some reason, I find that very telling... It tell's me your a fucking idiot!
Poseidon by fxmulder35	Jun 5th, 2006 06:58:34 AM
Nope...you didn't do your job. Saw it. Liked it. Sorry. Maybe next time. But probably not.
some of you talkbackers are just plain fucking cunts by BendersShinyAss	Jun 5th, 2006 08:39:42 AM
Where are your god damn manners?
I understand where the "i don't care anymore..." by Childe Roland	Jun 5th, 2006 09:46:37 AM
...comes from, man. I really do. I felt the same way during my post-viewing analysis of The Phantom Menace. After my anger had subsided. I went through Clones and into Sith completely numb. But Sith made me angry again. Because of all the prequels, it came closest to being a good movie. So close, in fact, that if I had access to an AVID edit suite and some talented mimics (who could redo Christensen's and some of Palpatine's and Obi Wan's dialogue), I could fix it. It makes me furious that nobody ripped that turd out of Lucas' hands prior to release and polished it up so it wouldn't leave such an evil taste in so many fan mouths. So I guess Lucas succeeded with Sith in that he got me to care again. But not enough that I even considered buying yet another set of discs.
OT purists make me cry by Falcon5768	Jun 5th, 2006 10:10:24 AM
Im sorry but every freaking one of you was into the SE when they re-released it back in the day. Every fucking threater was PACKED. Im sick of the purist bitching myself, the SE is far superior to the original, even with some of the questionable changes. I happened to have the original on tape and threw it in just to remember what it looked like and I couldnt believe how BAD it looked. It was awful, especially IV. VI wasnt too bad, but then it was also the one that got the least amount of changes. V was so so (see-thru speeders, nuff said) I think the problem is of course rose colored glasses. Most of the original lovers saw the original when they where like 8, they dont realize how BAD they where now. Same thing with Star Trek TMP, until the directors cut, the people who loved that movie (and still do) just didnt realize how BAD that movie was graphically and diolog wise. The directors cut of that improve the movie a hundred fold.
Sorry....you're wrong by Fenton Meiks	Jun 5th, 2006 12:55:44 PM
Sorry Falcon, but you seem to be confused. You're mistaking how a film looks with how good it is. OF COURSE the SE DVD's look better than dodgy old VHS copies of the originals. My flatmate's DVD copy of Anaconda looks better than my VHS copy of The Maltese Falcon. Doesn't mean it's not a stinking serpent-sized turd by comparison. Also, while you're probably correct in assuming that most OT fans went to the cinema to see the SE when it was released, that does not mean they preferred it. I went along to see the SE of Star Wars, blissfully unaware of the unnecessary CGI shitfest that awaited me, and left the cinema perplexed at what had happened to one of my favourite films. I didn't go to see the others after that. Just because the cinema was packed has no bearing on how good the film was. The cinema was heaving for The Phantom Menace, Pearl Harbour, and The Matrix Reloaded, and they stunk like a nylon bag full of rotting corpses on a hot summers day. Rose-tinted glasses or not, the fact remains, cleaning a film up and digitally enhancing it is one thing, but when you make unnecessary changes to a film then call it the "definitive" version, you shouldn't be surprised when people are pissed off. For the record, Star Trek TMP was and is so bad, it almost makes the one Shatner directed look like a classic.
Totally wrong Falcon..... by Hairy Nutsack	Jun 5th, 2006 12:59:23 PM
The only thing you're right about is that we all went to see the SE, what your wrong about is that we liked them. In fact, after the abortive 'Darth returns to his SD' scene I didn't bother to see ROTJ:SE, and thank christ I didn't. ROTJ was already criticized for being the Muppet Show, and what does he do? (the answer is he added more Muppets BTW) When I watch the originals with my 5yo son I never see "bad" in the same way that when I watch my original cut of Raiders I don't see "bad", what I see is a fantastic film that is a product of its time. So I'll keep wearing my rose colored lenses and you keep enjoying the Dirty Sanchez the Goiter gives you everytime you watch the SE.
'the people who made you what you are' by Lone Fox	Jun 5th, 2006 06:43:47 PM
Get the fuck over it. You're the ones who've been bitching about Lucas since Jedi, now you think he owes you? He's self-financed every film he's made since the original SW made its money. If you've been unsatisfied for the last 20 years and are STILL handing over your hard-earned, you only have yourself to blame.
Things that make you go Hmmm.... by JediSean81	Jun 5th, 2006 07:52:49 PM
"Would you want the guy that invented Jar Jar to redo your favorite movie?" Think about this quote for a minute... Then think about it a little longer... Getting a headache yet? That's because there's absolutely no logic involved with it, espeacially when you realize thats its a reference to George Lucas and the Star Wars special editions. Yes, George Lucas created Jar Jar. But he also created Star Wars! And besides, he didn't redo someone else's movie he redid HIS movie! If you haven't realized it by now, you might need me to point out that he's a very "hit and miss" kind of guy. Its very frustrating at times. Most genius' are frustrating people in general but at least Lucas has always tried to give us something new and different. I think in time people will realize the cultural significance of all of Star Wars beyond lunch boxes and toy lightsabers. Maybe then they'll understand why its more significant to call yourself "Jedi Sean" or "The Sith Master" instead of "Hairy Nutsack". Oh and btw, a guy that calls himself a reference to any part of the male genetilia should never call someone else gay! Sigmund Freud would have a field day on you Hairy!
JediSean81 by GreatWhite	Jun 5th, 2006 10:49:15 PM
JediSean81, I'll forgive you your idiotic post because you obviously have no reasoning ability and should not be held accountable for what you say/write. If you did, you would have read my entire post and would have understood what I said about the mind that created Jar Jar. Go back, read it again. I explained it pretty clearly. And at least Hairy Nutsack has some balls.
Why don't I explain it then Freud..... by Hairy Nutsack	Jun 6th, 2006 12:47:25 PM
The name started in on-line gaming. Messages like "Bob got blasted by Pete" made me want to come up with a name that inspired "dread" in my victims, what's the last thing I'd like to get killed by? And so, after several test names, Hairy Nutsack was born. No Freudian nonsense, just plain old humor. The name has followed me around on-line for quite a few years and it's just easier to stick with it, but thanks for trying to psychoanalyze me. I would suggest that anyone with a Star Wars reference in their screename is wholly unfit to have an opinion in this debate. Talk about bias.*****Thanks GreatWhite LOL!
my gorsh you geeks need to get laid by frigginwillie	Jun 7th, 2006 08:08:41 PM
jedisean81: you need a girlfriend. And no your blow up doll doesn't count. THE MOVIES AREN'T REAL. Unfortunately your pathetic life is. I liked the review. How this shit turned into a life and death struggle for dominance about who knows more about Star Wars, WHO GIVES A FUCK.
this story is bullshit... by lynxpro	Jun 8th, 2006 10:48:25 PM
The original film for the "holy" trilogy of Star Wars films is being preserved by the National Archives. So much for the "taping over" story. Plus, the restoration project that scrubbed clean the trilogy with 600 PowerMacs to make way for the DVD release cleaned up the "original" negatives. So again, this does not wash.
ps. by lynxpro	Jun 8th, 2006 10:49:50 PM
Why buy these? There's obviously already 1080p editions waiting to be deployed on whichever format (HD-DVD or Blu-Ray) prevails...
Macbeth by crater	Jun 12th, 2006 07:40:41 AM
Hey dood, I saw the screening too. I thought it was fuckin cool man. I might be younger than 30 but i understand the shit. Reckon its good that we can do this shit too. I'm into Macbeth Geoff Wright go man.

Talkbacks

AICN-DOWNUNDER: Geoffrey Wright's MACBETH, A POSEIDON Sinking, A STAR WARS Letdown, And More!!

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks