Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

A New York Panel on Superhero Films reveals tidbits on GHOST RIDER and SUB-MARINER!

FIRST! by Deep Blue Sky	May 12th, 2003 01:11:16 AM
WOO!
But Seriously, Could We Get Sn R-Rated Ghost Rider? by Deep Blue Sky	May 12th, 2003 01:12:36 AM
-That'd Be Nice...Yeah- -One Of Those... :)
Um ... first ... and -- by ChaseSequence	May 12th, 2003 01:13:04 AM
-- oh yay, Ghost Rider by Mark Steven Johnson. Because Daredevil was such a good movie ... uh ...
I meant by ChaseSequence	May 12th, 2003 01:13:33 AM
third.
GHOST RIDER by Magnus_Steele	May 12th, 2003 01:13:59 AM
Should be sweet as song as Joel Silver stays the fuck away from it. Keep it dark, keep it gritty, and keep the flaming head. When will Gaiman ever bloody write a Sandman movie???!
Sixth! by Harry The Hutt	May 12th, 2003 01:59:01 AM
Is Nic Cage still in the running for Ghost Rider?
Ghost Rider! Yes!!!! by Gandalf78	May 12th, 2003 02:05:00 AM
I can't wait for this film. Ghost Rider was one of my favorites along with the Punisher. I only hope Ghost Rider is rated R. This is the kind of comic that is definatly not for kids. I hope it goes like the new Punisher film and gets an R rating.
Holy Shit! This Is GROUNDBREAKING! Now Forgive Me, While I Go by hipcheck13	May 12th, 2003 02:18:09 AM
When running stories like these why not rename the site "Ain't It Cool Shit That's Really Pointless to Discuss but Fills Space On the Page?"
It's true, DAREDEVIL completely falls apart on second viewing. by Cash Bailey	May 12th, 2003 02:28:48 AM
X-2, on the other hand, stands up very well. I saw it again today. Anyone else notice the 'PLAN B' folder on Stryker's computer? That could only be Sentinels.
Sigh... by kintar0	May 12th, 2003 02:34:14 AM
So, Mark Steven Johnson is gonna fuck up another Marvel superhero. Well, at least it's only Ghost Rider and not a character that I care about. Don't get me wrong, I'd LOVE to see a good Ghost Rider movie. I mean, at least he's not doing Fantastic Four or Wolverine or the Avengers or Captain America. It's too bad Daredevil made money because this guy needs to be exiled like Joel Schumacher. As for Sub-Mariner? Ffft, who cares? Is it even possible to make a good movie out of that property? FF is gonna be directed by the same guy that did BRING IT ON? Well, that's scary, but he hasn't already fucked up a perfectly good supero-hero yet. I mean, I liked Bring It On, for all the wrong reasons. MAYBE he can pull it off. Daredevil sucked on so many levels, I won't even go into it. Ghost Rider will suck. And this is bad for the Marvel Movie Machine. If there are too many that suck, they'll just stop making them. Whereareas I did see Daredevil in the theatre, I probably won't see Ghost Rider only because it's directed by MSJ. Just like I won't buy a comic written by J. Michael Straza-whoski because Amazing Spider-man sucks so bad right now. Same with Bruce Jones, the guy that's fucking up Incredible Hulk. The name on the comic is SPIDER-MAN, not PETER AND MARY JANE'S MARITIAL PROBLEMS. If I was writing Amazing Spider-Man I would give John Romita Jr. something to motherfucking DRAW. Not Mary Jane and Peter sitting around talking about shit for AN ENTIRE FUCKING issue. Jesus. There's a BIG difference between adding characterization and making it the whole fucking DEAL. Anyway, I don't like them, so I don't buy them. THE HULK looks like the Hulk in Ang Lee's movie, so that's a good sign. Daredevil didn't look like Daredevil. Elecktra didn't look like Elecktra. Bullseye, Jesus, don't even get me started. You'd think a director/writer would crack a fucking comic and learn a LOT rather than A LITTLE before making one of these movies. The best way for these things to make money is TO MAKE THEM FOR THE FANS FIRST, then worry about the great unwashed herd. It works for the Wachowskis.
X2 and Punisher by kintar0	May 12th, 2003 02:37:21 AM
If that picture of Thomas Jane is any indication, Punisher will suck. And the folder on Stryker's desktop that says "OPERATION: WIDE AWAKE," that's the Sentinel program. "PLAN B," that's more likely the Genosha initiative.
Watchmen by kintar0	May 12th, 2003 02:40:12 AM
You really think they'll make a Watchmen movie without fucking it up? I disagree. They'll have to change the ending. There's no way they could make a movie with that kind of ending in Bush's post-911 America. And if they change the ending, what's the fucking point? Just like if they ever made a Dark Knight Returns movie, they'd just fuck it up.
Just set a guy's head on fire. by Larry_Talbot	May 12th, 2003 03:01:08 AM
Any actor who could set their head on fire and still act would almost be guaranteed an Oscar. They'll be lining up to do it.
Wow, a chance to bash DD by Silvio Dante	May 12th, 2003 03:51:44 AM
Can't pass that. What a bad movie. Why? If you have to ask you'll never know. That Namor-thingy will be a trilogy. "Like Star Wars but underwater", I think the quote was. Sounds like it will be seriously expensive...
What I'd really like to see is a WOLVERINE solo movie. by Psyclops	May 12th, 2003 04:02:14 AM
It could be a spin-off/prequel about the Weapon X project. They could bring back Stryker, Sabretooth, maybe throw Lady Deathstrike into the mix. If they were willing to push the limits of PG-13, or just make it R-rated, it could be a damn good hardcore action flick.
Maybe I'm being pessimistic by earthworm	May 12th, 2003 04:15:42 AM
But does no-one else think that anything superhero related thats not seriously at leat in pre-production already isn't gonna get made? I mean I like X-men as much as the next guy, but sooner or later one of these is going to bomb hard, and we won't be able to move for historical epics. In fact, if either of these, the Punisher, Wonder Woman, Nick Fury or Fantastic Four get made I'll eat my own feet.
I have lost my mind on these message boards.. by kicker_of_elves	May 12th, 2003 05:10:48 AM
You see there is not one "First Poster" for me to berate and pick on so i just dont know what the fuck to do with myself now and im ranting everywhere i can, hell if i could id make a quick cool lil 3-d animation of me running by harrys face up slapping him over and over again... but i aint dat bright...
Too bad AICN... by Dolemite_fan	May 12th, 2003 05:41:48 AM
deleted the news that Nic Cage signed onto play Sub-Mariner and it was overheard by some guy that worked at the same gym Cage exercised at. You guys shouldve kept it up, just for the laughs, because having egg on your face once in awhile, is funny, right? Of course it is, I mean, this is the internet after all. Seriously, having seen DAREDEVIL I already know GHOSTRIDER will be no more than a shitty television movie, with poor writing and even poorer direction. Everyone, get your hopes down b/c with PUNISHER and GHOSTRIDER, this so-called "Marvel age" will end. Can't believe so many found X2 to be earth-shattering either.
Daredevil was so weak why give MSJ another shot at a marvel film by Tarl_Cabot	May 12th, 2003 07:21:58 AM
Daredevil was a piss poor attempt at telling Frank Miller's classic DD saga. It would have been nice if the film had a convincing, compelling love story. It would have been dutiful if MSJ remembered that Elektra was an assassin and not just a spoiled rich and GREEK girl who knew Karate.It would have been nice if the Kingpin was cast appropriately or at least if they kept hip hop tunes(and other cheesy music) off the soundtrack when MCD was introduced.Or if they had cast a real actor to play Daredevil and not some model who can't act or do martial arts for shite.And if MSJ also put our hero in a costume that didn't make him look like he was on the way to a gay pride parade...well, that would have been nice too. God that movie really falls apart the more I think about it. Bullseye and young Matt were the only good things in it...
Xenophiliac: Good points on WATCHMEN. by Cash Bailey	May 12th, 2003 07:27:48 AM
Mori's review of Hayter's WATCHMEN draft was encouraging. As long as they bury that Sam Hamm draft in a deep, dark hole and cast David Morse as The Comedian I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. My bad on X-2. I almost give myself a stroke trying to read that stuff on the screen. That last shot of Dark Pheonix almost made me cry.
An open letter to Deep Blue Sky and Flickhead2 by Dog Of Mystery	May 12th, 2003 07:44:47 AM
If you fucking morons had more than two brain cells to rub together, you'd know that the Unc is a comic book fan. Then again, you should know that I read EVERY fucking article on this site. And, as previously established on innumerable occasions, I hate you worthless asswipe first posters. Sure, both of you attempted to comment on the state of comic book moives...AFTER you zipped in to post first. However, your comments were just about as intelligent as your first posts. In short, you're a fine pair of idiots. Congrats. Fuck first posters. Fuck them up their stupid asses.
Everything is horrible and will suck!! by Stan Gable	May 12th, 2003 09:17:11 AM
Daredevil sucked!! Spider-Man sucked!! Mark Steven Johnson sucks!! Hulk will suck!! Ian McKellen sucks both literally and figuratively!! Peyton Reed sucks so Fantastic Four will most definitely suck!! That one-shot of Thomas Jane sucked so Punisher will definitely suck!! Movies is general suck!! Harry sucks and you all suck too!!
Like everything else, Hollywood is going to beat the shit out of by Sea Bass	May 12th, 2003 10:12:00 AM
This comic book movie thing's going to get old really quick.
Ghost Rider Vs. Sub-Mariner? by mortsleam	May 12th, 2003 10:14:16 AM
Sub-Mariner splashes some water on Ghost Rider, putting out his flaming skull. Ghost Rider runs over Sub-Mariner's foot with his motorcycle, breaking his dorky little ankle wings. End of story. Wait...what's this article about? Damn, I wish I was Mark Steven Johnson's brother, so I could get my mommy to buy me a career in Hollywood to. The luckiest untalented fuckhead in the business.
Namor movie? by Blue_In_The_Face	May 12th, 2003 10:48:31 AM
Namor will be another disaster. Why? Because this solo superhero crap does not work unless you are Batman, Superman and Spideman. Also, if you are going to make a superhero movie, it should be based on the most famous properties, period. X-men has been around forever and has been very popular but Namor...well what are the press junkets going to say about this movie? "Based on a kind of...well sort of known superhero that is similar to aquaman and that likes to walk naked on the NY piers when he first confronts civilization." Give me a motherfucking break. Captain America might work, Hulk might work, but if you want to make an Iron Man movie mind as well make it an Avengers movie. You might be able to get a semi-intelligent answer from a regular, non-comic book reader as to what the Hulk or Captain America looks like but for Iron Man most might say: "The Ozzy Osbourne song?" Want me to make my point stronger? Look at Daredevil. The only reason that it pulled so much money was thanks to Ben fucking Afleck. The Batman movies sucked, yes all of them. Tim burton was a retard with his vision of the dark knight. Those movies still made money because even those retarded high school cheerleaders that watch "The Bachelor" and "Survivor" might be able to put two sentences together that actually describe Batman or Superman. The only way a movie like Ghost Rider might work is by making it into a thriller the likes of Seven, otherwise it should be called "Daredevil: My hair is on fire!" Solo superheroes that are not widely recognizable should be: a) Not made into movies. b) Incorporated into a movie that involves a wider array of characters, and by this I don't mean having thirty fucking characters that will not let the plot or their personas being developed. A Submariner trilogy the likes of Star Wars? What's next? They are going to have Y-wings and Tie Bombers too?
Fett and Blue by earthworm	May 12th, 2003 11:26:48 AM
BLUE, I think you're dead on about which properties get made. Unless there's some sort of cross genre appeal, or some kind of Ben Damon in it, these films will fail. FETT, Blade was basically an action horror, and not that hard to suspend disbelief (vampires as opposed to mermen and flaming heads.) From Hell, basically a detective movie, Road to Perdition, gangster drama, the Crow, famous death in production. None of these are your typical comic book movie. Indeed as opposed to Westerns, to get people into Comic films, past the geek factor, they have to be marketed HARD (Daredevil) or an immediatly recognisable property (Hulk, X, Batman, Spiderman) All it will take is one of the lesser know properties to tank and the cycle will be over for another 20 years. Which perhaps isn't a bad thing, less is more after all...
My point exactly, earthworm.. by Blue_In_The_Face	May 12th, 2003 11:43:12 AM
Submariner? How are they going to tie it up to be something of actual interest? Maybe if using the same formula that you described for movies like 'From Hell' and 'Blade'. The only thing that I could think of is having Namor fighting mankind for the contamination of the Oceans but it has the chance of being another 'Fire Down Below' or 'On Deadly Ground'. All they would need is for Steven Seagal to shed some of those 34,000 lbs. of fat and attach severed tweety bird wings to his ankles and you would have the Submariner movie. Oh, and please don't say shit about a Green Lantern movie people because the only way that I can see him in the bigscreen is with JLA. Which by the way, by today's comicbook movie standards the only DC property that would not look stupid in the big screen is Batman since he is a human that kicks ass. Captain America would look cool in the big screen if it has a costume similar to the one in "The Ultimates" and dealt with the hunt of of terrorists in which he is a type of a one-man-army soldier. Oh, and Thor would look gayer than that mechanic in "Adventures in Babysitting" that the little stupid girl thinks is Thor if it's not updated for an Avengers movie!
worst post ever by blingx2	May 12th, 2003 12:00:04 PM
Maybe I'm being pesimistic... how do you want your shoes prepared? There haven't been any flops yet. Sure, there will be a flop or two or more. You think after one flop their gonna stop? Spiderman and the Xmovies were huge. The hulk is gonna be huge. And all the people who come on here and bitch because they could see the green goblin's eyes under the mask, or Bulleseye wasn't wearing white boots and gloves, or bla bla bla... you still went to see them and your going continue to see them. Fags.
did you see the names on Strykers computer? by mrdanieljameslav	May 12th, 2003 12:18:30 PM

Worst post ever... by Blue_In_The_Face	May 12th, 2003 12:20:40 PM
Is that Spotless of the Mindless Eternal Sunshine whatever crap movie that Jim Carey is in it. I would fucking pay to see a Ghost Rider movie with the EXACT mask that was seen in that picture of the test makeup seen a couple of months back. It would be the funniest thing since O'Donell wore the Robin costume!
One of them was Remy LeBeau!!! Thats Gambits name!!! by mrdanieljameslav	May 12th, 2003 12:30:30 PM
ooops, pressed send too early. I suck on the interweb. But I hope you got my drift. I was watching the film with a non-comic geek, pointing out all the stuff he didnt recognise. He called me a fag. Gambit shouldve been in the movie, if only to steal Rogue from Iceman, who I must say is a bit of a wuss. Im finding it hard to get excited about Ghost Rider or Namor cause I think theyre both kinda gay. Never dug that whole 80's heavy metal vibe on Ghost Rider and Namor just swims around in his speedos riding dolphins and shit. At least Daredevil kicked some ass, which I have to admire in a disabled guy, super radar powers or no. One last thing, if (as it implies) the X films are going to go with the Pheonix story next, I hope to god they dont go all spiritual and mystic or whatever. The nice thing with the Xmen movies is that they are kind of rooted in the real world, the basis of the superheroics being scientific. I find the whole 'magical power of the universe' angle really fucking wacky. To me, the idea of seeing the Xmen going into space sucks big blue mutant cock.
Yay! A movie about a guy whose head is on fire and a guy who can by zappaman	May 12th, 2003 01:12:46 PM
Wow! This is great news! Is there anyone who thinks these won't be awesome?! My friend Scooter says he used to hold his breath underwater for a whole 30 seconds, but Namor could do it for a lot longer. We truly are blessed to be living in this time where Hollywood makes incredible films like this. Scooter says that BABY HUEY could happen any day now. I sure hope so.
Top three reasons why fanboys hate DareDevil: 1- Ben Affleck is by Uncle Sam	May 12th, 2003 01:12:51 PM
DareDevil wasn't perfect, but it was a pretty damn good superhero film no matter what. Better than all four Batman flicks, better than Blade 1, better than X-Men 1, and probably just as good as The Crow and Blade 2. I loved it anyway. - I WANT YOU, but not in that way.
Animation - isn't that kind of close to a comic book? by Kumo-Shujinkou	May 12th, 2003 01:43:22 PM
Sorry if someone already brought this up, but I got about a third of the way through the TBs and started drooling on myself. Could one or more of these properties be made as a full length ANIMATED film? I happen to think that the Batman and Batman Beyond animated movies are at least 400 Million times better than any of the live action ones. They could do a solo Wolverine movie or one of these lesser properties and go to town with traditional animation. Less budget (sure less box office zing too, but maybe, with some creative marketing, they could get some Beauty and the Beast type attention). You want to stay true to the comics while bringing the characters to life on the Silver Screen? Let's see an ANIMATED super hero movie.
Sub-Mariner costume by NidiaFan2002	May 12th, 2003 01:51:24 PM
For those fans worried about Subbie's speedos, don't forget that he had a costume back in the 70's that covered most of his body. They could use that instead of the speedo since the speedo seems to be bothering all the homophobes.
zappaman, there was a live-action Baby Huey made a few years bac by Declan_Swartz	May 12th, 2003 03:55:58 PM

zappaman, there was a live-action Baby Huey made a few years bac by Declan_Swartz	May 12th, 2003 03:56:34 PM

Worst poster ever by earthworm	May 12th, 2003 04:11:27 PM
Look asshole, I couldn't give a fuck how faithful these adptations are, the only comics I read were 2000AD, and look what I get, Sly fucking Stallone in Judge Dredd. That wasn't my point. My point was that now there's been a few successes Hollywood is going to skullfuck the genre to death by dredging out a load of characters that no one but the fanboys have heard of. And to a relative outsider, and judging by these TBs, they sound lame. I wasn't slating any movies in particular, and FYI I've not even seen DD yet, so I've been careful not to insult that one, gay jokes aside. I could go on and point out the cyclical nature of Hollywood moviemaking, but I now can't be arsed. Oh, and FETT, I wasn't actually talking about costumes per se, but I suppose you're correct anyway.
Comic book films are a legitimate genre... by Ivan_Mtl	May 12th, 2003 05:50:08 PM
Like horror movies, westerns, and science-fiction films, a "super-hero" movie is a legitimate genre. There will always be movies based on other mediums (novels, plays, television, music, toys, video games, etc.), so I don't see how appropriating comic book properties is any different. Like the other genres I mentioned, there will be "hits" and "misses", and there may even be periods of time when they become out of fashion (like biblical stories, musicals or westerns), but every once and awhile somebody will have the courage to revisit them.
Lesser known..... by SamuraiSpider	May 12th, 2003 06:21:22 PM
I think Blade and The Crow were so damned good because they existed on the outside of the endless four color parade of cloned charcter ideas. Oh, and they only had one villan per. DareDevil. Good Grief! Why would anyone repeat the trends set forth by Sir Joel, master of the Nipples and Codpieces? Thank god for the few scenes where I actually got to look at Jen Garner, all the while AC/DC blaring in my mind. No, the red one.
MSJ will have his way... by Ribbons	May 12th, 2003 06:52:01 PM
While not a supermegablockbuster, 'DareDevil' grossed over $100 million domestically, and so Sony doubtless thinks that he has just what it takes to whet the appetite of that race of humanity known as fanboys. Since Daredevil's story was "gritty" and "dark," he's a natural choice! Too bad he's too immature as a director to do dark and gritty. If only people actually listened to what was being said on these boards AFTER the film was released, they'd realize that people were dissatisfied with 'DareDevil.' But then, who gives a fuck what we shits think as long as the film makes money? I don't want him to even be involved on this project, but if you're gonna involve him creatively in some capacity, PLEASE DON'T make him the director of this movie! FIND SOMEBODY GOOD! I'll admit his Daredevil script had potential, but his own shoddy directing shot the film to hell. I'm kind of wary about 'Namor: The Sub-Mariner' because of the whole writer-director thing (with a rookie director, mind you), but I have a decent amount of respect for Self's scriptwriting capabilities, so I remain cautiously optimistic about this one until given inclination to do otherwise. Don't worry about the costumes right now, guys: there are more talented professionals than us who will work that out.
Make Movies about the Interesting Super Heros... by biglawdog1	May 12th, 2003 07:04:56 PM
... and the movies have a chance of success. Daredevil was a promising oppotunity, until they cast flavor of the year, Ben Affleck in the lead role. The costume was horrible, the main villain was horrible (the kingpin is a huge WHITE guy) and the plot was horrible. The concept was dumbed down for a "family audience". Now we've got more superhero movies in the hopper then I could shake a stick at- boring heros like Namor, "been done before heros" like the Punisher, hard to pull off super teams like the FF. Look at the successful super hero flicks, both critically and financially. Spiderman - pretty decent flick, solo hero, everybody's heard of him. X-men Uno/Dos- pretty good flick, everybody's heard of them. Batman Uno/Dos (3 was so-so and 4 makes my eyes bleed when its on cable)- really good. Arvad should have been smart with who and what he licensed out but in light of Marvel's financial troubles over the last decade, he's selling everything but the kitchen sink. Whats next ? Power Pack the movie ? God help us.
Daredevil = Seriously Underrated Film by Johnny Storm	May 12th, 2003 07:51:25 PM
I love this movie. I thought it was the best of the superhero flicks until X2 came on the scene. And that's saying a lot, especially about a Ben Affleck movie. Ghost Rider could be the best of them all.
DD Good but not Great by DC CAB	May 12th, 2003 08:18:17 PM
X2 was great. Why is MSJ directing Ghost Rider? Because it Daredevil made bling bling. $200 million world wide on an unknown character is pretty fucking good. And he's a Fucking Fan! I saw him at the Con. So Fucking deal with it. I'd rather have a fan on board than fucking Brett Ratner doing Superman!
I cannot stand you little dicks by Ribbons	May 12th, 2003 09:27:43 PM
There is nothing more frustrated than a closed argument. If you disagree with me and others about the quality of 'DareDevil,' then tell me what you liked about it. I can't fucking stand it when people float this idea of superiority by calling people whose opinions clash with theirs "little bitches," or just say "people aren't giving it the credit it deserved," "it was too subtle for you fucks," "blah blah blah." If we're wrong, please explain to us how! This is how a real conversation works, gentlemen (and some women): you post opinions, and when a conflict comes along, it gets reasoned out. Why even bother posting "I disagree with you, and know that I am superior to you and don't need to explain my affrontery. So there." What the fuck is the point of that? To make yourselves feel better? If you don't think the direction was sub-par, explain what worked about it. Let me guess, "if you have to ask, you'll never know, right?" I'd rather be able to concede gracefully than get into a dick-waving contest, so if you don't mind, tell me why you think I'm wrong in the first place instead of launching a verbal attack. It really is the worst nature of psuedononymity that talkbacking has to offer.
That's because nobody's interested in hearing your same bitching by KaptainKurt	May 13th, 2003 12:16:23 AM
You've posted dozens and dozens of attacks on DD. And you've added nothing new or interesting. So you don't like the movie--fine. But you attack it in every forum whether it calls for it or not. I thought the movie was interesting. I'm not saying it was the greatest movie of all time, just that it successfully took a different look at what it means to be a superhero. I'm not an Affleck fan, but I thought his and every performance in the film was very good. I think it was brave to show a superhero movie where the hero is conflicted and tortured and even killing himself with pain killers. The filmmakers said that they weren't trying to make another gee whiz Spider-man type of movie, but instead did a character piece. That may not be what everyone wants to see but it worked for what it was. And enough people liked it that it was a hit so I know I'm not alone in this. This is only my opinion--but it's as valid as yours. I just don't post 200 times saying the same fucking thing over and over on every board. Out.
KaptainKurt by Ribbons	May 13th, 2003 02:32:33 AM
I attack DareDevil on every forum, do I? I keep saying the same fucking thing over and over? Fine, since you've got so many "truths" stored up your ass, here's one for you: for every negative post about DareDevil, there are three others that vaguely attack said post via name-calling, just like you. Not true? Don't like it? Too bad; I decided it's true, and I'm gonna smear your name all over it. I've posted on the quality of DareDevil about 4 or 5 times, thrice in the same talkback, and one of the times I was coming to its defense. I'm not an Affleck-hater: if you've got such a notorious reputation for talkback memory then you'll recall I defended him in Moriarty's review of the film. You'll also note that I wrote a post in a trailer link very early on stating that I was glad Johnson got to make the film that he always wanted, but that doesn't necessarily mean I have to like it; I merely don't begrudge him the pleasure of success. I also agree with you that the 4 central roles were all performed well, but that doesn't necessarily make a movie good. Again, I acknowledged the promising script that Johnson wrote for the film, but a daring look at the life of a hero's story has nothing to do with direction. That was, far and away, my main problem with the film, and nothing in your post told me I was wrong except for you telling me I was wrong. People do have an inclination to foist their opinions up in front of other talkbackers, and it annoyed me when potshots were taken at DareDevil in X2 reaction boards. I DON'T take every opportunity I can to tell everybody that this movie was unsatisfying. However, since the filmmaker of DareDevil has been signed to develop Ghost Rider on the basis of being able to satisfy fans with a dark and gritty movie, I felt the need to interject that the production of the movie would be better off by finding another director, at least, to handle the job. Yeah, I know, cheap shot right? No; a cheap shot is when somebody creates falsehoods about you in order to discredit your opinion for their own petty purposes. My opinion is as valid as yours? You certainly don't seem to think so.
Ghost Rider: Casting Suggestion by Lord Brixton	May 13th, 2003 06:00:35 AM
michael jackson. who else know how it FEELS !?
thor movie by mental floss	May 13th, 2003 07:50:23 PM
saw someone bashing on the possibilty of a thor movie. think again dude! just place the whole movie action in asgard and surrounding realms and you could have something the would kick lotr down the hall. acutally i thought eomer
thor movie by mental floss	May 13th, 2003 07:51:33 PM
saw someone bashing on the possibilty of a thor movie. think again dude! just place the whole movie action in asgard and surrounding realms and you could have something the would kick lotr down the hall. acutally i thought eomer
2nd-rate superheroes, if not 3rd rate...... by Cletus Van Damme	May 14th, 2003 12:18:21 AM
....is what will kill the "Superhero movie craze." When studios start greenlighting crappy, weak characters like Sub-Mariner and Werewolf-By-Night, can Brother Voodoo and another installment of "Howard the Duck" be far behind? Fantastic Four...absolutely! Avengers...yes! Moon Knight....no. Inhumans....no. If this keeps up, how long until we see Olsen twnis-style Jubilee movies?

Talkbacks

A New York Panel on Superhero Films reveals tidbits on GHOST RIDER and SUB-MARINER!

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks