Cool News
JURASSIC PARK 3 synopsis
Hey folks, Harry here with the latest belly-bumping account of the whirlygigs of this here JURASSIC PARK 3 thing. Angel, or Warren as I like to call him, has secured, through pretty common and straight-forward means, the 'on-the-record' set-up for the next Dino-delight. Of course if you need to know more than just this, I suggest checking out CHUD and reading Nick's account of a draft of the script. Fair thee well...
Hiya Harry;
How's it goin' ? I'll make this quick, and I'll also say I'm taking my time to write this because you seem to be one of the few people around who KNOW that JP3 is gonna be good... yeah, that's right, KNOW.
So... if you wanna check it out for yourself, go to JurassicPark.Com and click on that JP3 logo and go to the "about the film" section. However, I'll paste it here so you can save your valuable time:
"Anxious to fund research for his new theory of velociraptor intelligence, renowned paleontologist Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill) is persuaded by a wealthy adventurer (William H. Macy) and his wife (Tea Leoni) to accompany them on an aerial tour of Isla Sorna. This infamous island, once InGen's site B, has become both a primordial breeding ground for John Hammond's magnificent creations and a magnet for thrill-seekers eager to encounter them.
When a tragic accident maroons the party of seven, Grant discovers the true reason his deceptive hosts have invited him along. In their perilous attempt to escape with their lives, the dwindling group encounters terrifying new creatures undisclosed by InGen, and Grant is forced to learn the dreadful implications of his raptor intelligence theory firsthand."
Sounds cool... right now the website is pretty lame but expect it to go live on May 4 with the release of the trailer behind The Mummy Returns. Chill...
Angel
-
+ Expand All
-
First? -- this movie will suck hard-core
-
Are they REALLY REALLY expecting these actors -- one tremendously talented, one tremendously NOT -- to have chemistry and be interesting? Have you SEEN the number of writers attached to this project on the IMDB? It's worse than Gladi-frigging-ator. This is a bad idea. Not the first bad idea Spielberg has attached his name to, of course. Release some of your good movie DVDs and stop throwing money at stupid new ones!
-
Jurassic park one was awesome...
Jurassic park two sucked ass...
Jurassic park three has the potential to be good(coughthinkstarwarscough)
plus any movie, and I mean any movie with William H. Macy is freaking gold, man. -
Smells like...bacon.
-
They'd be a little better off.
Crichton had all the elements they needed to make A+ films but they didn't or couldn't use these things. What they did with the children's characters in TLW was atrocious. Then they try to go back and add things that they left out. Now we are going to have flying dinos when Crichton had those in the first book. somebody's not paying attention. As to whether it sucks, Wellllll.
It'll br prtty hard to suck harder than TLW.
-
Apr 07, 2001 6:55:48 PM CDT
7 Castaways? It's GILLIGAN'S ISLAND with DINOSAURS!!
by troublemaker2000
Just sit right back and you'll hear a tale a tale of a fateful trip! It started from this tropic port aboard this aeroship! The mate was a mighty dino man the doctor Alan Grant! They crashed on Isla Sorna yeah don't see it no you can't! Bill Macy plays Thurston Howell, his Lovey is Tea Leoni! It sounds just like Gilligan, it's made from baloney!
-
ya know
-
JP3, along with Josie and the Pussycats, are just the latest entries in "Movies Nobody Asked For". As long as I'm on the subject, why is anyone excited about "Rush Hour 2"? Did I miss something? Was this supposed to be a classic cop buddy picture on the level of "Lethal Weapon"? Please fill me in!
-
Sounds like this is gonna turn out like another rehashed JP film...hopefully Joe and Steven can save this pic from disaster..but if Alan Grant is back, who cares right???
-
Apr 07, 2001 8:34:30 PM CDT
Wakka wakka- wah? Trailer My 4th? No, trailer NOW. TRAILER NOW!!
by user id indeed!
What in God's name has Universal been doing for the past year, besides giving us half-assed DVDs and promoting "Mummy Returns" to death. Screw "Mummy Returns"!! Same people, same plot, same places, same threats, blah de blah. THIS is the movie they should be promoting! THIS is the one they should be worried about! No Spielberg director! The guy from "Jumanji"! A baker's dozen of writers! New dinosaurs! TEA LEONI!! NO MR. DNA!!!!! We've seen NO footage from this thing at all! Where was the Superbowl trailer!?? Where's the ACTUAL teaser. We've received to teaser for this highly-teasable movie! No, not the one on the DVD. NO, SHUT UP! SHUT UP!!! THAT WAS NOT AN ACTUAL TRAILER! THAT WAS SOMETHING AN INTERN MADE IN HIS BACKYARD WITH STOCK FOOTAGE AND PRE-RECORDED SOUNDS! THAT WAS NOT EVEN WORTH VIEWING! OR TALKING ABO-oh. Well, anyway, Universal, you're stoopid. This has been an Ill-Tempered Moment with User ID Indeed! Where did I come from? Frum yer bluyud!
-
You idiot! You moron! You musta fell outta the stoopid tree, and hit every branch on the way down! You've made Mihoshi cry! Mihoshi hates you! I... I know. It's all my fault... all my fault... all my fault. Whoops. Moment!
-
Anyone pick up a copy of Cinescape they say JPIII has got potential. The Spinosaur is supposed to be bigger, meaner, and badder than old Rex and does away with him pretty fast. Well i'll give it the benefit of doubt till it comes out.
-
So far, this talkback is really wacky.
-
Fuck this synopsis. What they should do, what they NEED to do is combine the two sequels that don't need to be made and have the one and only John McClain stop terrorists who have taken over an island of dinosaurs. Die Hard 4 and Jurassic Park 3 rolled into one big action blockbuster of a movie.
-
...no, not the Mary J kind. Next to chaotic bouts of mayhem, horrible disfigurements, and the end of all life as we know it, genetic manipulation's trademark symptom is wackiness. Fitting it should show up in a JP talkback. Oh, wait! I forgot one... tastier pork. That's up above "wackiness" I think. Anyhow, the movie sounds somewhat interesting... I remember one of the earliest "How To Draw" books was on dinos... it was ultra simplistic and wildly inaccurate (tails on the ground, brontosaurs, etc), but Spinosaurus was in there... I love drawing that one. So that should be wild, but... it takes out T-Rex? What? T-Rex was the largest land predator of all time, right? So they're going back to Site B, where insane people go to see if they can dodge dino-droppings and avoid being eviscerated. And of course something goes wrong. Wooo, never saw that coming, did we? It'll be fun to see the dinos again, and see the foolishly arrogant humans get stomped and such. At least there wasn't a book before the movie, so there's no really good story to get torn to pieces! Crichton wrote "The Lost World" KNOWING it'd be made into a film. It was practically ready to shoot. But it got totally reworked... the fact that he did it himself only makes it worse. That's right up there with Greedo shooting first! Gah. Bring on the wacky talkbacky.
-
I say they just use my synopsis for "The Three Musketeers Meets Godzilla", only this time the Musketeers get trapped in the vortex, land in the Jurassic era and must rescue Godzilla from some evil cavemen that want to take over the world. Stars Michael York, Oliver Platt, perfume baron Bijan and Verne "Mini-Me" Troyer as the Four Musketeers, Richard Simmons as "Count Richlieu", Jenny McCarthy and Brooke Shields as jungle maidens, "Ursula and Purcella", and John Vernon as "The Mayor Of Dinoville".
-
What is the deal with that? Are they suddenly evolving at an accelerated rate? What's going on here!!!!????? AAAAGGGHHHH!!!!!
-
All you JP haters need to chill. The first movie rocked. The second movie was not good at all, but it had a few good set pieces. Spielbergs heart wasn't in it. But the first one is fantastic entertainment. I remember seeing that movie when I was ten. It opened up a whole world of movies to me. I hope the next one rules. The synopsis sounds good.
I like it a lot better than the rumor that it was going to be about one kid getting stranded on the island and then a search party goes to save her. Sacrificing a bunch of people to save one? Would have been lame. This sounds sweet. -
Anyone remember that episode of the Critic where they spoofed JP with "Jurassic Park 2: Revenge of the raptors?" The Raptor lit a pipe and started talking about how the dinosaurs were building a crude suspension bridge to Venezuela, where they would take odd jobs under the name of Mr. Pilkington? Man I loved that show. Anyway, at this point even a plot twist like that would be an amusing premise for a JP movie. after the crap that was 'Lost World,' at least. "Or perhaps I've said too much!"
-
Why another Jurassic Park? Why not a movie based upon Mark Schulz's "Cadillacs and Dinosaurs"? This would certainly kick some major ass!
-
The real plot concerns how Dr. Grant accidentally kills a raptor while doing research at Jurassic Park, and with nothing to eat due to the fact that his food supply was stolen by a faceless Wayne Knight who survived the dinosaur attack in the original and has become sort of a boggie man that dinosaurs scare their kids with, Grant cooks the raptor meat and eats it. He discovers that it tastes like a kickass sloppy joe without the fat or preservatives. The rest of the movie deals with him trying to save the raptors from Cowboy Bud (Macey) and his wife Golddigger (Leoni) who want to start a fast food franchise that sells Sloppy Raps. Laura Dern appears as Lula Pace Fortune, the southern babe hotter than Georgia asphalt that you've always wanted to date but never got to, rather than Dr.Sadler who is like the women you do get to date and that's if you're lucky.
-
Senator Sidious here. After having been banned for mocking Pitch Black and Traffic, I have returned under a different guise. NinjaAssassin69. Under this new identity, I will continue to protest the production of a Pitch Black sequel. Anyway, after reading this article, I've deduced that Jurassic Park III actually has a chance of being good. If this plot synopsis is correct, this movie will actually have a plot. Something that was missing from The Lost World. I'm looking forward to seeing Dr. Grant again and see how time has affected him. Let us pray this movie doesn't suck. NinjaAssassin69 out.
-
All I ask is that in this movie, they cast David Arquette as...oh, just about anything. It doesn't matter as long as he gets ripped apart by velociraptors with the remains chewed up by a T-Rex...in slow motion. That would make this movie just THAT much better. Actually, if that happened in real life it would make life THAT much better. Sorry, I just really hate that moron.
-
Wasn't that a film starring Roddy Piper and Burt Ward ? "The Karate Kicking old Farts in Dino Hell" directed by Fred Olen Ray on a budget of $1:59 (keep the change).Chris Henchy was going to write the screenplay but his crayon broke. Troma were going to fund it, but they couldn't afford the paper for the script.
-
Geeez we have yet to even see a friggin 'trailer and everyone just keeps bashing the film. Sam Neil is possibly the most underrated actor there is and William H. Macey is just great. I can't believe you guys start making age cracks because of them being in the movie. I mean why the hell in God's name does every movie have to have some pasty-faced no-talent pretty boy like Ben Affleck or Matthew McConaughey... I'm thrilled to see a big budget Hollywood film where the two main actors are film veterans who can ACT. As for Tea Leoni.... She isn't half as bad as people make her out to be. I mean she's great at comedy and just OK at drama but I don't think it matters much for this film. Hell Julianne Moore is a very good actress and yet her performance in JP2 was pretty pathetic. Plus with that great bod Tea has (which I finally noticed in that Nic Cage flick) maybe she'll wear short-shorts and a skin tight top and then who the hell is gonna notice her acting? After all this is rollicking action/adventure not Shakespeare. One VERY promising apsect is it looks like there's no kids this time. In JP1 it worked but having the girl in JP2 had no purpose other then to have a "cute" scene where she uses gymnastics to kick a raptor's ass. (Oh yeah I'm sure that would happen!) I do wish they would have left the dinosaur antics out of the public eye. JP felt like something that "may have happened" but JP2 ruined that with the whole SF rampage followed by a shameless plug for CNN. Oh well. At least Joe Johnston has steadily improved as a director... Honey I shrunk the Kids was a decent kids flick, ROcketeer sucked (the old Rocketman serials are better!)Then he did some good work on "Young Indy" for his old boss George Lucas, then he made "October Sky" which was a really wonderful film. I was actually quite surprised he'd do a JP3 sequel after that film's success. Hopefully he'll keep up his track record and not sleep through it like Spielberg slept through JP2...
-
Do you think David Duchovny would mind? As for not thinking JP2. I just think when compared to the "Lost World" novel or JP1 it sucks. I still enjoy on a guilty pleasure level... It was OK (but not as good as JP1) but it fell apart quickly when they left the island. I still want to know what happened to all the crew members. The T-Rex had no way of getting out of the cargo hold and if some stow-away raptors did it there would be blood all over. It has to be the biggest plot-hole in cinematic history.
-
Then there's no hope for you. It was so incredibly stupid... It ranks right up there with "The Mummy" and "The Shadow" as one of the worst films to rip-off classic serials. Heck the serials Rocketeer ripped off where cheesy themselves but they look like high art compared to that crap. (The two serials are "Radar Men on the Moon" and "Zombies of the Stratosphere") Even "The Phantom" was a better flick! The scene on top of the Zeppelin completely shattered my patience... It would have been a great scene... In a Monthly Python film! Not to mention Dalton's character was so obviously based on Errol Flynn it was offensive (since in the film he's a Nazi).And don't even get me started on mixing fictional "famous" characters with real-life famous people in the same movie... If you want to gaze at Jennifer's tities so badly go rent any of her newer films where she bares all and quit letting your hormones convince you that wet turd of a flick is a good movie.
-
isn't Bill Macy, since he is actually VERY highly regarded by
public and media alike. I would
nominate Ed Harris, can't believe
he didn't win for Pollock. Gary
Sinise is another good choice.
As far as JP3, does anyone really
care about it at this point? Most
'real' people who don't visit
these sites have NO IDEA that
a new JP is even being released... -
Apr 08, 2001 7:58:33 AM CDT
That's the one, RobinP! JM Yoda, how do you know so much about d
by uncapie
Chris Henchy can write? The Lady Of Fatima must have preformed a miracle. Nothing like a Roddy Piper/Burt Ward movie too! Just hope the suicide prevention center doesn't have one. JM Yoda, I'd rather suck a T-Rex dick(Tastes like chicken I'm told.) then take one up the ass from what you do(He's available, dinos. Just head down to the Greyhound bus station, last stall on the left.) Christ, those dinos even pay you for it you're that good! I heard you made $100.05 cruising the boulevard last night! What I want to know is, who's the cheap dino bastard that gave you the nickle? What?! THEY ALL DID?! Forget about getting dino cells from a mosquito locked in amber, all they have to do is shove a fist up up JM Yoda's ass and they'll have all the dino sperm they want! Paging Mr. Richard Attenborough!
-
I find it extremely interesting that many of you have chosen to knock the fact that the script to this film has gone through its share of writers. Now by saying what I'm about to say, should in no way imply that JP3 is going to be a classic, but ya never know. But if you check your history in the old studio system when all of the classics were being made, each one had a team of writers. Rarely would you EVER see a screenplay written by just one person. The advantage to having it written by many is that everyone gets their ideas of a thrill involved. When you involve only one writer, you take the risk that he/she may be the only one that finds what they have written captivating or thrilling. In this business that's a huge risk and that's why we see so many flops nowadays i.e. Dude Where's My Car and Battlefield Earth. Lest we forget that in the old studio days they were out putting hundreds of films a year with usually well over 60 of them being very good! Today we see 30-35 Hollywood films released per year and maybe 10 will be truly good. So next time you knock a film with many writers think about that, maybe it's just a throw back to the way it used to be when truly good movies were being made.
Bakes -
Much has been made of the T-Rex ride to San Diego. The main question being -- how did Rex get out of the cargo hold, kill the crew, and get back in? This chain of events never happened. On closer inspection you'll see that Rex actually broke free of the restraining contraption they put him in on the island. The contraption lies mangled _on the deck_ of the ship. After the general mayhem Rex causes - it seems that somehow he was trapped in the hold by some white guy. Evidenced by the arm holding the cargo door control unit.
-
I'm sure Aesop, Homer, Aristotle and Shakespeare said the same thing. Not to mention, Dickens, Tolstoy, Conrad, Dostevsky, Louisa May Alcott, Margaret Mitchell, Hammett, Chandler, Ellroy and some other guys and gals.
-
Lots of people wrote the Bible, and that made the bestseller list for a while.
-
I think you've just proved the point. The Bible may be a bestseller, but that doesn't make it any good. Shit, even TLW had a more believable story.
-
You know, The Lost World could have been pretty good script-wise, but Spielberg sort of ruined it. Check out Koepp's original draft here:
http://www.dansjp3page.com/tlw_script.html
We're given a lot more character and plot development, and also the plot follows the book a lot closer(Although some scenes remain the same). Also, certain plot holes, like the young Rex breaking it's leg, are explained. Also, instead of the T-rex rampaging through San Diego, the movie closes with Pteranodons complicating Ian and co.'s escape plans and also Hammond's funeral.
As for JP3, www.chud.com gave a positive review of the script, and advance hype is very good. It's reportedly going to be darker than the first two films. There will be a kid, but reportedly this one is not as annoying as the ones from the first two films.
What I'm amazed at is that people don't want to see JP3 because of The Lost World, yet are excited about Episode II, although Episode I made more tresspasses than TLW. I mean, the major problems with TLW were the kid and the Rex in San Diego. In TPM, the continuity, logic, and script problems are even worse. Also, which is worse? Kelly or Anakin? A T-rex going through San Diego, or Jar-Jar Binks? Put things into perspective before you baselessly attack something.
-
hmmm...let's add the element of this movie together
talented (but overused cast)
a whole boat load of SFX
+ a sequel to a shitty sequel
a paper thin plot
-------------------------------
Jurasic Park 3
my response, "oh god please no! why agaiN! won't they ever learn." -
Silly, you forgot to put Tim Curry in your cast!
-
Even a brilliant plot will fall short. Since the first film, movie goers have seen endless renditions of believable dinosaurs and outrageaous CGI creatures. What can JP3 do that won't feel like a Discovery Channel sunday movie?
-
Serves me right for being facetious !
-
In conclusion of this article I am looking forward to JP3. It looks like they will centralize most of the action on the Island and not do a lame 50's homage like they did in TLW. I think the worst thing they did in the second sequiel was take the mystiqe off the dinosaurs by blitzing us with all sorts of creatures and more characters than you could shake a dino turd at. I thought that the scenes where Ian Malcolm's daughter was using gymnastics to beat down the Raptors was kind of corny as well and unbelievable. Hopefully this movie will be much better than TLW. If it's like the original I probably will like it. I just wished that Lost World was more like the book that I had read way before watching the movie.
-
In conclusion of this article I am looking forward to JP3. It looks like they will centralize most of the action on the Island and not do a lame 50's homage like they did in TLW. I think the worst thing they did in the second sequiel was take the mystiqe off the dinosaurs by blitzing us with all sorts of creatures and more characters than you could shake a dino turd at. I thought that the scenes where Ian Malcolm's daughter was using gymnastics to beat down the Raptors was kind of corny as well and unbelievable. Hopefully this movie will be much better than TLW. If it's like the original I probably will like it. I just wished that Lost World was more like the book that I had read way before watching the movie.
-
Apr 08, 2001 3:36:08 PM CDT
William H.Macy has come a long way since THE LAST DRAGON...
by monkey_king
What was that PSYCHO remake crap anyway, a tax write-off?
-
Once again, The Lost World was a pretty sucessful movie...it did manage to make over $600 million worldwide at the box office. A little less than it's predecessor, but still good, nonetheless. It's also a myth that it received such horrible backlash. Compare the reviews of it to Phantom Menace. The number of favorable reviews for TLW is higher than PHANTOM.
Honestly, there's a "Myth" at fanboy sites the Lost World was a critical and BO failure. This is, to put it bluntly, BS.
Believe it or not, there are a lot of people who are interested in this sequel. Actually, the synopsis is partially wrong- Grant is down in the duldrums because Ellie married another man, and due to the fact to that, Grant has little involvement in the raising of a child he and Ellie had between the films.
A thing you have to realize about the JP films is their inherit theme-FAMILY. If you realize that instead of simply dismissing it on first sight, this makes the films far more complex than you think. The first Jurassic Park had a subplot involving Grant & Ellie potentially starting a family. The second film had Ian & his daughter, and also the Rex and Stegosaur families, which are very defensive of their young. The basic message? Dinosaurs and humans actually have more in common than we think. Here's a suggestion: Be brave, and rent The Lost World with what I've just told you in mind. You'll find it's a much better film when you take all this into account.
Anyway, it looks like JP3 will continue this theme, showing Grant's shattered family and also the Kirby's estranged one.
Also, people who think the original is better than The Lost World.... do you HONESTLY think that Dennis Nedry is a better nemesis than Roland Tembo? Give me a break. -
forgive me if this has already been brought up, i haven't read the entire talk back ....
Lost World is set after JP3 right?
And in Lost World, Ian Malcolm had gone public about the dinosaurs but no-one believed him?
Now in this prequel to Lost World,
everyone knows about the dinosaurs, hence
the thrill-seekers or whatever mentioned in the synopsis ....
isn't that just plain wrong? how do they know about them?
oh yeah, I read an interview with William H Macy about two years ago
where he said he only earned like $13,000 one year 'cos of all the independent and theatre
stuff he did so he was gonna have to go do something mainstream
to pay the bills for a while ....
so i wouldn't pin all your hopes on him saving this movies ass ...
i'm probably wrong about the continuity but i just thought i'd mention it!
-
A multi-written guidebook that tells us how to run our lives and work with one another, but instead creates more problems than what we need. One section says, "Thou shall not kill", but the other says, "An eye for an eye." Like Steve Buscemi's line in "Reservoir Dogs": "Society says its okay to tip these people, but not these people over here." What I want to know is how did Noah get all those animals on the ark from all over the world, the food, the water and how many people had a hand in building the ship. They didn't have Black and Decker back then. And what about the bathroom facilities on the ship or did they just lean over the railings and let it fly, hopefully downwind. And if Caine killed able, where did that town full of people come from that he went to when there was only Adam and Eve on the planet? There's a chapter missing there.
-
Apr 08, 2001 6:21:13 PM CDT
Holy Christ, am I the only person to realize that the plot of th
by cinematt
An island where a big corporation is breeding new and terrifying species of dinosaurs? Gee, does the game "Dino Crisis" ring a bell for anyone out there? What the hell, I love summer popcorn fare regardless, so I'll still give it a looksee, and admit it most of you will too. Come to think of it, instead of JP3, why in the hell HAVEN'T they optioned the movie rights for Dino Crisis? But never mind, they're gonna royally screw up Resident Evil, so what the hell's the point?
-
D'oh!
-
he Bible has more plot holes than a Fred Olen Ray film ! (I never SAID I'd READ the damn thing !)
Flame on ! -
Apr 08, 2001 11:48:19 PM CDT
I'll be watching Vince Vaughn in MADE that weekend, thank you.
by smurfette
I can't keep track of the whole prequel/sequel thing. And I really don't give a shit. All I know is it ain't got Spielberg, and it ain't got Vaughn, so it ain't got me in line the first weekend.
-
Apr 09, 2001 2:01:43 AM CDT
Uncapie go back and finish 5th grade and quit projecting your ho
by jmyoda
-
Hugh Jackman as Jack, Rachel Wiez as Hannah, Ving Rhames as Mustapha and a CGI/animatronic Hermes. Dame Judy as Scharnhorst.
-
Apr 09, 2001 5:46:47 PM CDT
But, JM Yoda, that's not what your dad said to me last night.
by uncapie
He was very pleased!
-
Apr 09, 2001 6:40:22 PM CDT
When are people going to learn what the definition of "plot" is?
by beingbenconvitch
I get so sick and tired of hearing people whine about how such and such a movie didn't have a plot. Why? Because for almost every single movie ever produced that even vaguely hinges on the conventions of the Classical Hollywood Paradigm (in fact, almost all cinematic forms at all) has a plot, simply by virtue of being a movie.
A plot is defined as the sum of all the 'diegetic' (part of the reality of the film world) story events presented in a film, and also any 'non-diegetic' (outside of the perceived real film world....eg the black screen at the start of Dancer in the Dark as the overture plays) events/images etc presented in the course of the film.
If I were to make a film about a fly landing on an egg, there could be a number of ways I could film it.
I could have a shot of the egg, followed by a shot of the fly approaching, followed by the fly landing on the egg.
Or I could have a shot of the fly approaching something, then a shot of the egg, then another shot of the fly, another shot of the egg, and finally a shot of the fly landing on the egg.
I could perhaps have one continuous take, with the egg in the middle of the frame and the fly entering the frame from any part of the screen.
I could even take one of these methods and add the sound of an aeroplane as the fly approaches the egg, and the sound of a clucking chicken on the shots of the egg (sounds that do not form part of the diegesis).
Regardless of how banal this 'story' is, if I were to put it into filmic form, in either of the ways mentioned above, or pretty much in any other way imaginable, what you would get is a 'plot.' And each of the above are plots, and distinctly different plots at that.
Therefore, NinjaAssassin69's comment about 'The Lost World' having no plot is utterly erroneous.
An argument that a film such as 'The Lost World' (or any film at all really) lacks a plot is an argument that 'The Lost World' doesn't even exist as a film. But something tells me NinjaAssasin69's comment was not an existentialist argument...
Its perfectly fine to dispute the excellence of a film's plot, but what's all this about disputing the existence of it? -
Who's doing the music for Jurassic Park Three? Has John Williams signed on the dotted line?
No JW - No JP. -
Hate to break it to you JMYoda but Errol Flyn WAS a Nazi
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 439 total posts 159 posts
- WTF HOLLYWOOD: SOLARBABIES -- 144 total posts 142 posts
- Herc’s Seen Tonight’s Return Of THE WALKING DEAD!! Discuss Also DOWNTON ABBEY, FEAR FACTOR, PAN AM, ONCE, SIMPSONS, DYNAMITE, LUCK, SHAMELESS, BAIT CAR, THE GRAMMYS And More!! Sunday Is Sweeps Day 11!! -- 155 total posts 140 posts
- Avid Comic Reader Hercules Does Battle With Tedium During Kevin Smith’s COMIC BOOK MEN! -- 55 total posts 45 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 196 total posts 45 posts
- I am The Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day! No, I’m the Behind the Scenes Pic of the Day! -- 35 total posts 35 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 60 total posts 34 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 127 total posts 32 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 513 total posts 29 posts
- The Sensorties Revisit The Friday Docback (And Still Smell)!! DOCTOR WHO Story #7 Again, The Coming Of Season/Series 7, And More!! -- 118 total posts 27 posts