Hey folks, Harry here with she who needs no introduction, but for whom the planets and stars and moons and things that float... well, float around. I am, of course, speaking of the fairest of the femmes.... Alexandra DuPont. I'm currently about 36 hours away from finally seeing SPY KIDS at the Austin Premiere... I'm giddy and anxious and ready to see this thing in like the worst ways imaginable. I know Robert is my friend and I'm quite fond of his work... but folks, Alexandra DuPont has never met him (as far as I know). She has no connections with him (as far as I know), but you'll read her review and begin to see why I'm excited for this 'kid' flick. Read....
Holla, Harcourt Fenton Knowles, Sr. Geek Paterfamilias
et al. Allow me a rare bit of self-indulgent prologue:
(a) I'm in an "establishment" with my younger brother
Maximillian, who is, I'm afraid, a bit touched. So
forgive the brevity and possible general sloppiness of
this missive, for I am distracted.
(b) I have just seen the marvelous children's film
"Spy Kids."
(b) is, of course, the point. This is a dandy
children's entertainment, well deserving of its hype
along several critical axes. So let's move along,
shall we? Again, time is short and beer is flowing, so
forgive me for hijacking Mr. H. the Strong's FAQish
format.
*****
I. One Phrase Reviewers and PR Flacks Will Use to
Describe "Spy Kids"
"Willy Wonka meets James Bond."
*****
II. Is this phrase accurate?
Yes, in that glib and reductive manner that every
reviewer who seems to be writing pitches instead of
reviews has mastered.
*****
III. So the phrase is glib and reductive, then?
Yes. "Spy Kids," despite some marketing that actually
makes it look pretty silly, amounts to more than the
above phrase (and its marketing) suggests. It's an
EXTREMELY well-crafted piece of children's
entertainment -- an attention-deficit mix of parental
comedy, kid logic, Surrealism, "1000 Fingers of Dr.
T"-esque bizarro imagery, and sharp editing and
writing. It's entertainment with real craft. It's an
image bomb. It's ADD in a film can. It's a ride -- but
a good one, for a change.
That said, I worry that filmgoers won't get a chance
to find it. I've seen more than a few Talk Backers
dismiss this film in advance because of the hype
machine (here and at Showest and elsewhere) and more
specifically because of the proffered marketing
materials. To be perfectly honest, I was doing the
same thing -- until tonight.
Here's a disclaimer: The costumes and gadgets and
effects, taken out of context, look deeply, powerfully
cartoony and stupid. The lurid color scheme -- as
featured in the PR -- hearkens more to Barry
Levinson's legendary miscarriage "Toys" than to sharp
kids' fare.
But I cannot emphasize this enough: This is a movie to
be taken as a whole, not in bits and pieces. Like
"Willie Wonka," say. The lurid colors and general
goofiness serve story here, and are part of an
airtight kid-logic universe created by director Robert
Rodriguez. After some very real missteps on Mssr. R's
part -- on "The Faculty," for example, which I found
merely competent, I thought he was beginning to lose
his *ganas*, his love for filmmaking -- he seems to
have finally found material that matches his editing
style, his attention span, and his deep and abiding
love of the goofy.
But enough gushing, for I'm not sure "gushing" is
what's warranted here. This is a really good kid's
movie, not the Second Coming of Our Lord. Here's the
breakdown at any rate:
*****
IV. THE STORY
We're introduced to this goofy world in the first damn
shot, which rather spoofily begins with the usual
helicopter-panning-up-from-the-ocean-to-a-man-made-structure
cliché, but then speeds up, cartoonlike, zipping to
the window of a gorgeous cliffside Mediterranean
estate. Yes, this is the sort of world where retired
spies live in palatial oceanside mansions and no one
ever asks why. This is also the sort of world where
robots resembling giant thumbs and jet packs and
virtual reality and sudden window-bursting entrances
and Danny Trejo as a crackerjack inventor and Alan
Cumming as a combination spymaster/children's-show
host and a general colorful luridness go unquestioned.
I know, I know: The above graf sound a bit slighting.
But really: the conceit works. Rodriguez never slows
down the pace or milks an emotion so you'll feel
insulted, not ever. You just roll with it. And you
laugh. Or, if you're age 10 or younger, perhaps you
giggle.
Anyway. So. The two deadpan spawn (Alexa Vega, Daryl
Sabara, inheriting the "Misbehavers" roles) of the
retired spies (Carla Gugino, Antonio Banderas) are
unaware of their parents' intrepid careers. That is,
until said parents are captured by Alan Cumming's
Blofeld-by-way-of-Wonka archvillain and his scheming
assistant, Mr. Minion (Tony Shaloub) -- at which point
the kids' babysitter (a TOTALLY underutilized Cheech
Marin) blows the folks' cover, and the kids are rudely
embarked on a rescue mission, which they accept
without any apparent moments of doubt.
Well-edited mayhem, sharper-than-necessary dialogue,
jet packs, sibling rivalry, doppelganger robots,
virtual reality, and dozens of silly gadgets ensue.
*****
V. WHAT'S GOOD?
I'm filling in this section last, so fatigue is taking
me. Forgive my brevity. The good VASTLY outweighs the
bad here. So, then, the following elements of "Spy
Kids" are marvy fab:
(1) The child actors. They underplay, they play their
own evil twins, they perform in complicated action
sequences, AND YOU NEVER EVER QUESTION THEM. "Spy
Kids"' light subject matter belies the enormity of
this achievement. Miss Alexa Vega, playing the older,
tougher sister, is a real find: Watch for her career
to blossom along the lines of Christina Ricci as she
reaches puberty (though one hopes she will blossom
with less angst).
(2) Nary a tear is shed. Think about that. When's the
last time a kid's movie DIDN'T feature a weeping
moppet?
(3) Antonio B. and Carla G. As the parents, they
maintain a fragile balance of cool and caring -- and
they don't fall into the usual kids'-movie parental
caricature of being mean, misunderstanding, mushy or
moronic. This, too, is an enormous achievement, to my
thinking.
(4) As usual, RR's editing and shot placement are just
utterly correct and tight as hell, though the
editing's almost too tight for its own good; see
below.
(5) The imagery -- scary robot men with giant thumbs
for heads and arms and legs, for example -- speaks to
a sort of dream logic that makes sense to kids (if
memory serves). Same with the film's
common-sense-defying storyline, which conforms to
playground fantasy play-logic in a big way. This was
the first time in years that illogical story elements
didn't irk me.
(6) The film makes for easy playground re-enactment.
Allow me to explain: The spy toys are often converted
child-friendly items (electrically charged gum, etc.)
that are readily available to enterprising pre-teens.
There's also a crackerjack action scene set in a
playground -- again, easy to re-enact on the
schoolyard.
(7) Certain jokes. The backmasked pleas for help
uttered by mutated agents enslaved on the evil
children's show. Banderas looking at the camera and
dismissing certain emotional outbursts by saying,
"Latinos."
Maybe you had to be there.
(8) The casting of Latinos throughout as heroes. The
female sibling cast as the "strong" one in the
relationship. Little reversals like that.
You get the idea.
*****
VI. WHAT'S BAD?
(1) This from Maximillian: The Dimension-made print we
saw here in Minnesota was a bit shabby. "Maybe it was
just the print we saw, but it was a bit murky,
splotchy," he said. "I'm sure Rodriguez is f***ing
furious about it."
(2) Also from Max: "Did the movie go just a LITTLE bit
too fast for the kiddies?" This is a profound
critique, and a bit double-edged because RR's haste is
also a strength, but this is maybe the only really
valid critique of the film; Rodriguez cuts so fast
it's hard to build character or deep empathy, if that
even matters here.
(3) What the blazes happened to Cheech Marin's
character? He's transmogrified and then vanishes
utterly -- a real waste. Sequel fodder, perhaps?
(4) And finally, this too from dear Maximillian:
Rather too much of the movie may go over kids' heads,
due to RR's hasty delivery of narrative information.
Our screening was packed with the fruit of the Midwest
tot population, and I mostly heard PARENTS laughing,
not their middleborn spawn. That said, children were
(a) attentive as hell during the screening, and (b)
reportedly "spazzing out" in the lobby afterward.
VII. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Wild fun. Sustained laughs. A sharp-yet-dreamlike
prepubescent mindset. Playground adventure. Take a
child. You won't suffer a bit.
Warmest,
Alexandra DuPont.
If you feel the need to get a good tongue lashing from me about your verbal and written skills, Click Here!

|