Cool News
New AI Image! Haley and Jude
Hey folks, Harry here. AI fascinates me, but also because so far... no released image or shot of an actor is something that I would call CLASSIC. Instead we are seeing fairly pedestrian personality shots. The color palatte of the 'robot center looking place' that our last photo was of... well that was just rather plain and uninteresting looking. I just came out of seeing RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK in 35mm super-widescreen glory at the Alamo Drafthouse and about 3 minutes in I was reminded again of what has been missing from Steven's most recent works... Shot selection, mood, atmosphere and visual inventiveness. Now sure, so far we just have that fantastic 'created' teaser trailer... and that's been the best thing about AI so far. But if they decide to do a second trailer that has images from the film itself (something I'm not advocating... I'm enjoying the tease personally) I just hope that we see something powerfully gripping visually. So far it hasn't been too arresting. They also just opened the OFFICIAL SITE, not much there, but it does seem to insinuate that there will be more soon. Here's the latest shot....
hi
german online-magazin Spiegel Online today runs an
interview with Jan Harlan - on Kubrick, on his
documentary on Kubrick, an on AI - that includes an
image from AI (maybe you know it already - it's with
Osmond and Law, and it's attached...).
here'S the link:
CLICK HERE
It's in German but its rather intresting.
hey, and have fun - love your site!
greetings from this side of the pond
morgenthau
-
+ Expand All
-
Pretty interesting. Well, it's abvious that Jude Law plays a robot, isn't it? BTW, am I first?
-
he is playing a young Sam Donaldson. the make-up, special effects are obviously far better than anything Speilberg has ever previously worked on.
-
they like to use lots of words no one has ever heard of.
harry is obviously embiggened with the spirit of jebidiah springfeld. -
a while ago they had advanced shots of lord of the rings, and some other stuff, can't think of it now, you know, that film, what was it, yeah that one. well anyway, they seem to score a lot of exclusive pics, i have noticed this because i am currently staying in austria and all the time they ahve stuff on tv and magazines that i have not seen or heard of anywhere else. like the day after the LOTR trailer premierd they had it on tv here, was very cool, and meant i did not have to pay out to watch shitty lost souls to see the trailer. and they had this pic, ahhh it was so funny, they were talking about some liz hurley wannabe from germany who likes to flash clevage everywhere and wants to become a film star and apparently she has scored herself a part in DRIVEN, but i could not find any info on her anywhere, her name is verona something or other, well anyway in this magazine they had this little photo someone had made up of some F1 racing driver sitting in his car racing it and they had stuck Sly's big ugly head on this little fellow and it looked so funny, hahaha, so funny...well it was funny at the time when iwas actually looking at it. honestly it was, well i'll leave you alone now.
BComing Somethingorother -
jude law looks pretty cool. quite disturbing, though, dont ya reckon? harrys right about that teaser. so so cool a teaser!!! i as so awestruck by it and think this flick has a whole landscape of potential bt i really think itll turn out, ok. dunno why, nothing has disappointed me so far but it just isnt gobsmacking me besides a teaser trailer but anyone can make a good teaser for a flick. i know this isnt the tb it was mentioned on but jla as a hour long cartoon??holy shit that is cool but that means that it is jar less lkely for tv in austaralia to put it on and give it a whole hour timeslot for something thatll get the ratings of the batman show which doesnt seem tobe impressing the folks at channel 9 down here. baff3.
-
...it was there in Schindler's List, but missing from Amistad. It was there in the first twenty mins of Private Ryan.... but basically I agree with Harry, the edge is missing from his recent stuff. Raiders was a grubby, dirty film, but Spelberg just semed to effortlessly create the most memorable imagery...its far too early to tell about AI, but I really hope it looks better than these pics!
-
Or that lead singer from Placebo.
-
Looks like it is from this pic.
-
A.I. has a great teaser,and i think it would be very daring if that's ALL they showed.(as in no full trailer)That would get LOADS of people curios about the film.If they go the traditional route(ie. Cast Away)and show THE WHOLE MOVIE in the trailer,i think it would definetly take away a lot of the mystery of the film.Steven Spielberg should want the audience to go on a voyage of discovery when A.I. opens,and not have it ruined in a dumb 3 minute trailer.
-
...because Jude Law looks like Klaus Nomi! And is it me, or is little Haley Joel starting to look teenaged? I was starting to wonder if he'd ever age at all (much like Ricky Schroeder) but I think he's got the potential to transition from child star to adult actor quite seamlessly. It all depends on his choice of projects.
-
...this is a basketball movie where the son on a certain Purdue basketball coach tries to recruit a young star...
-
...is the best teaser trailer I've seen in years, and one of the best I've seen *ever*. My wife knew nothing about the movie when I showed her the trailer, and she said "wow!" when the fingerprint left a circuit-board design. It grabbed her as it did me, and it instantly put A.I. on our must-see list this year. And that music--is that from A.I., or is it temp track music or music from another film? It's *perfect*--slow, innocent, playful, a little sad--it conveyed all those emotions when I heard it. It perfectly fit the teaser as it tells us the vitals about a little boy whose love is real, but he is not. To the marketing folks: I suggest changing nothing (except maybe promoting the trailer a little more). The trailer tells me enough--I don't need to know any more (ya hear that, Zemeckis, ya bonehead?) McFly<--
-
Is it me or does Jude Law look like one of the Johnny Cab drivers from Total Recall?
-
C'mon folks. "Pedestrial" is a perfectly cromulent word.
This pic of Jude law poses the question: So, who's playing Barbie & Skipper? What's with the G.I. Joe hair? Me thinks that Jude is playing an older model of robot to Haley J's newer, life-like model. -
And I'm not entirely sure this new one is an actual scene from the movie, it could be a publicity shot. Two pictures is not enough to form an opinion on this movie, folks!
-
Why do I get the feeling this is gonna be on the news and turned into some pop-culture catch phrase in the next couple of weeks? Also, A.I. should turn out pretty interesting.
-
Boing! Boom CHAK! Boing Boom CHAK! Boing! Boom CHAKCHAKCHAKCHAK!
-
Finally, our first look at Jude Law in A.I., the sex cafe android who accompanys Haley Joel on his practically futile quest to become human. Didn't anyone on here read that Jude Law was supposed to play that part in AI (doesn't the story on the whole hankerchief/sex act thing ring any bells?)? His character even has a shape-shifting ability(which, after seeing Mystique's transformations in X-Men, should be interesting how they carry it out here). The teaser trailer is quite possibly one of the most engrossing trailers I have ever seen. All I have to say to George McFly is preach on brother, you put everything I felt about the teaser into words man, I felt nearly the same mysterious vibes (though more suspicious and eyebrow arching in nature than the practically gut-wrenching, tear inducing feelings I felt with the AI trailer) when I first saw the Eyes Wide Shut trailers. No explanation as to what the plot of the movie was, just a random collection of images that did not seem to fit together, that should be the path to take when it comes to grand, experimental concept films like AI is (which for AI I guess would entail philosophies on existentialism, I think).
I agree that for Spielberg to turn this film into the biggest commercial for an erector set ever seen would be a disaster never before seen (please god, don't let this film be turned into Bicentennial Boy or something worse).
As for visual inventiveness, i must suggest that everyone turn their attention to the AI page at Corona's Coming Attractions. They have pictures as well as links to pictures of things that are radically altered in the future world of AI (know how those damn scooters have become so popular as of late, wait until you see them converted to hover scooters in this film, although there are no pictures yet of such a thing there are rumblings from all around [info] that this rumor is true) these are little touches though, Spielberg still has yet to instill inside of us the awe we have felt with visuals in films from the past (whenever i see something that awes me i have to cue the music from Empire Strikes Back when Yoda proved to Luke Skywalker just how powerful the force is [ when he raised the X-wing fighter from the Dagobah swamps].
I really wish that this could have been Kubrick's final film instead of Eyes Wide Shut because it seems like he would be going back to the same trippy science fiction notions he showed in 2001: A Space Odyssey and, while Jude Law's character in the film does sound questionable, seems like a film everybody and their grandmother could see (PG-rated maybe, not that I would not go see it if it were R-rated, far from it, everyone would be able to experience the magic without the MPAA telling us all of the secrets. AI could have been a worthy final note in Kubrick's life (not to judge it before I see it or anything) ending with the equivalent of a mushroom cloud in visuals (it has been said that Spielberg is actually attempting to re-create and shoot some of Kubrick's more well-known shots for AI (long tracking shots, etc.).
Anyway, I'll see you all at the multiplex for the first great sci-fi head trip of 2001, read the short story Super-Toys Last All Summer by Brian Aldiss to get a better idea on what this movie is about (that is the concept/story on which the movie is based after all besides borrowing from the tale of Pinocchio). And I leave you all with these final words....Nothing can be more hollow than the future......
-
Guys - think about this in a Kubrick sense. I HOPE Spielberg was going for the 'Ken & Barbie' look. Did you all read the short story this movie is based off of? In the future we have refined ourselves to BE to very childhood model of beauty and plastic perfection. We have changed our looks to become KENS and BARBIES. For god's sake, the rich have TAPEWORMS to stay skinny in this world of the future. Don't worry if you think he looks plastic... he is meant to be that way. And for the intellectual sake of this movie, I hope I am right. -OUT-
-
Sorry, had to say it.
Very enjoyable site, folks. -
Ah just what I always wanted...a Behind the Music on Kraftwerk.
-
This actually gives me hope that Spielberg isn't going to muck this up! Maybe he can step in and save the Sprockets film next?
-
Zee reezen zat zee Chumans get zeez picjurz firzt, iz becooz zay have vayz of making peeplz talk!
-
Spielberg's recent work has been lacking "shot selection, mood, atmosphere and visual inventiveness"?! Are you kidding? Saving Private Ryan, the most innovatively shot war film ever made?! Amistad, while not always successful as a film, was authentic-looking as hell and shot with such graceful objectivity as to perfectly create it's time and place (not to mention the harrowing ship revolt). And I won't insult anyone by mentioning Schindler's List, probably the greatest period camera work in film history. I know you want the movie toy look of Raiders and E.T. I treasure that period too, but he (and we) have grown up. You don't ask the Beatles to go back to Love Me Do when they're making Abbey Road. And as for this "plain", "bland" look? This is a good thing. This is real. There's nothing more appropriate for an authentic fantasy. 2001: A Space Odyssey is often called "bland" too.
-
I hope they act as though the eyes are somewhat imperfect compared to ours, as they say, 'the eyes are the window to the soul' and these two have no soul. I hope by the end, it won't be, 'oh, he's a robot, but he learned how to love!' and so, of course he's 'real'. pigshit.
-
Is everyone else as tired as I am of Harry's new found uber cynicism?
In Harry's world it seems, nothing is ever as good/cool/classic/whatever as it should be. Hannibal is a classic love story? But Spielberg doesnt do "classic" images well anymore?
Geez. What about the red coated girl in Schindler's List? Or the first full shot of a Dino from Jurrasic Park? Or any given moment in the opening battle montage from Saving Private Ryan?
Or countless other cinematic snapshots that no other filmmaker has come close to duplicating in sheer number or sense of wonder.
Stop being such a grouch, Harry. -
Looks like Jude Law wants Haley to touch his monkey.
-
If only the movie is half as funny. And nobody better tell me it's not a comedy.
-
pedestrial -- Of or pertaining to the feet; employing the foot or feet.
-
It's Alan Cumming. I'd say he's becoming a Kubrick favorite, but where's the K-Dawg's name on A.I.?
-
Feb 23, 2001 11:16:30 AM CST
I guess the movie version of SPROCKETS is going to be made after
by iamlegolas
Let's hope Jude Law can be as good as Mike Myers.
-
I also thought either young Sam Donaldson or Gay Heartbeeps
-
I'd believe it.
-
will be as follows ----- In A.D. 2101
War was beginning.
Captain: What happen ?
Mechanic: Somebody set up us the bomb.
Operator: We get signal.
Captain: What !
Operator: Main screen turn on.
Captain: It's You !!
Cats: How are you gentlemen !!
Cats: All your base are belong to us.
Cats: You are on the way to destruction.
Captain: What you say !!
Cats: You have no chance to survive make your time.
Cats: HA HA HA HA ....
Captain: Take off every 'zig' !!
Captain: You know what you doing.
Captain: Move 'zig'.
Captain: For great justice. -
...this is disgusting imagery...like some gay 80s bullshit....Kubrick my ass!
-
Jude looks *so* DEVO in that pic...
-
Is that a bad thing? No. Well, I meant to say who cares.
-
Feb 23, 2001 12:37:06 PM CST
Kid: "I see weirdo avant garde West German television talk show
by i am_notreal
Geez! I can't believe no one thought of that yet. You guys are slipping. Although someone did point out J Law's remarkable simliarity to Dieter in that shot, maybe the Sprockets movie will be made after all.
-
Personally, I'm really not in the mood for Spielberg to instill that 'sense of childlike wonder' upon me for the umpteenth time, so if that's his approach to this film I'm not interested. That along with the idea that Osment is overexposed as a kid actor (everyone sees him as 'the kid from The Sixth Sense), Jude Law looks like a Pee Wee Herman action figure, and that I get the strange sensation of one filmmaker (Spielberg) rummaging around in the unfinished refuse of another (Kubrick). Beyond the concept, this film probably has as much Kubrick in it as the series 'Andromeda' has of Roddenberry. If it's truly Kubrickian, nobody will understand the ending (or debate it endlessly). I'll wait to see more scenes from the film, but right now what I already know about it ain't revving my engines.
-
This has got to be the most anti-heterosexual movie that there ever will be....It is definatley flamin'
-
George is right! Your trailers give away much too much Bob. As for A.I. they said last summer it stands for Alien Invasion so where the heck are the Invading Aliens? Maybe they'll fly out of Jude's butt the way them monkeys were supposed to fly out of Wayne's butt in Wayne's World!
-
Ich mag es sofort sehen!
-
How about any semblance of objectivity? Look, ze Germans! Those baby-raping backstabbing inhuman monsters! While nobody can deny the evil that was the Third Reich, the actual fighting and dying done on the battlefield was mostly done by young boys indistinguishable from each other on either side, save for their uniforms. While the D-Day sequence was awe-inspiring, the rest of the movie was little more than one-sided morality, emotional schlock, grammar school philosophy, and evil charicatures. An existentialist Dirty Dozen... answering the question 'how many lives equal one?' while never failing to drive home the point "Germans are Bad!". Yeah Steve, we get it.
-
How could anyone say "Schindler's List" and "Saving Private Ryan" lack shot selection and atmosphere? That is the most dumbfounding thing i've ever heard. I understood your point about Steven's early films having an intagible quality of enthusiasm (it's called youth, Harry. It only lasts so long), but now it sounds like you're just trying to use big words. Steven Spielberg is still the best director out there (because his only peer, the great Kubrick, is no longer with us).
-
Feb 23, 2001 4:30:19 PM CST
Yea! The return of AL Props! How many people know what I am talk
by 0007
-
I, too, recently re-watched Raiders to get in the "80's mood"... I was working on my Ataris (www.classicgaming.com/vcsp) and needed a thematic morale booster. For Raiders, I agree completely with Harry. Steve's current films lack the 'zest' of the older ones (save 1942). Say what you will about directors 'maturing', but then try to tell me that Steve has done anything in the 90's that's as fun as Raiders. Watching Raiders is to be reminded WHY movies used to be so fun. Movies may make more money than ever, but that's just because people have nothing better to do than watch them. Indy movies weren't 'important' films, but then WHY DO THEY HAVE TO BE? And why is it 'important' films are automatically better than 'non-important' ones? And on the same token, please don't use the 'dumb fun' phrase to describe Raiders, Jaws, Star Wars, or other classics. Admit it, those old films were magnificent. And each of those aforementioned films were nominated for Best Picture, mind you. "Dumb Fun" is the justified approval label for crap like Armageddon or MI:2. Were THEY nominated? And I think the change can be seen even in Indy 3, where everything was played for a laugh and seemed more like a PARADY of an Indiana Jones film. I shudder to think if they made one now... We'd be talking INDIANA JONES AND THE PHANTOM MENACE, although and Indy 4 would TROUNCE Episode 1's opening weekend. (Fanboys + Women = Zillions. Women are the key factor, just ask Cameron) Oh, and it's nice to see an animated Harry GIF that isn't NUDE for a change...
-
This kid has a lot of talent. Too bad he is going to screw his career with this piece of shit!
-
this little known hollywood commodity, poised for stardom, first caught the public eye when he was put up for sale on E-bay, before being told by the producers of this movie to remove himself! Expect big things from him in the future (and I'll be expecting my 10%)
-
I'm sick of all this Spielberg bashing. I'm sick of the lack of respect for the creative process. What have you done recently? Why don't all you fanboys go and make your own movie. I'll laugh my ass off at your "shot selection." Jeez, everybody's a critic. Lack of "shot selection?" What does that mean? Have you ever gone out and made a movie? Have you ever set up the camera, lit the scene and come up with a creative idea . . . a concept? You see a few pictures and all the sudden the movie is "crap" or "shit" or "gay." Filmmaking is hard work. It's mentally and physically exhausting. The last thing a filmmaker wants after a long day of shooting is a bunch of fanboy geeks to critique their work. You've got no say. You can't criticize and bash and disregard an artist's work. At least not until you've put something into the market. I make movies myself, none as good as any Spielberg film but I know how much physical and mental work is involved. The entertainment industry owes you nothing, if anything you owe them. They take you to wonderful places, wonderful times, and on wonderful adventures. You wouldn't know, but the greatest feeling in the world is to be able to tell a story in your own way . . . without having to be criticized by some lazy-ass, no talent computer jockeys.
-
It's that Spielberg is due for another Hook and this one just reeks of it. Child stars never make numerous good movies. Jude Law is box office poison (name a hit, we're talking Carrot Top numbers). Spielberg always sucks when he gets too in touch with his inner child, it only works in small doses. This one feels like a bag full of Get-Better Bears. If the movie is just Pinochio as a robot, you've got your Disney-esque crapfest. I hope he proves me wrong, but to quote ever Lucas character "I've got a bad feeling about..."
-
To me this look like a buddy cop movie. It look like that thing from those battery commercials. Anyway da plot be da battery guy and the kid do a TRADING PLACES thing like that Kirk Cameron Dudley Moore movie, and they have to hid that Battery Cat cuz Mister Ripley wanna fuck him in da doo doo hole. That's da plot y'all heard it first. It'll be bling blingin'.
-
Gay did not necessarily mean bad, at least in the way I used it when I said 'gay Heartbeeps'. All I meant was that Jude looked like JohnnyCab meets Priscilla, Queen of the Desert. That doesn't mean the flick is going to be bad. And Spielberg hasn't been doing all that shit hot recently...In My Humble Opinion, since Last Crusade, he's done exactly ONE great movie (Schindler's List), and a number of major disappointments (yes, I consider Jurassic to be disappointing, not counting box office and I have problems with Private Ryan)
-
All I gotta say is that image looks cool, Harry and thanks for posting it. Wow. I have not seen any of the movies Jude Law has been in, but he looks just so much robotic and sleek as Gigolo Joe. Like how Haley and Jude are both shown in a creepy chills-on-your-back scene. For all those who are piping hot mad that Kubrick is not directing AI I say you should all be quiet and listen to reason. Go over to http://www.reel.com and click on Jeffrey Wells Hollywood Confidential column and read one of his archived columns. In one of those old columns, you'll learn Kubrick never planned to direct A.I. He was a big fan of Spielberg's ET and asked Spielberg to direct AI while Kubrick was gonna produce the film. Kubrick was above all else he's been called (a genius, pretentious, over-rated, artist, a hack) was a family man with daughters to call his own. He wanted to make a family film and he likened the story of AI which he developed to the story of Pinocchio. Yes the plot of AI does sound like Bicentennial Man since that movie was estenially the story of Pinocchio as told with a grown-up robot wanting to human, AI is the story of Pinocchio with a young robot wanting to be human. Kubrick isn't turning over in his grave but laughing wherever his spirit roams. Those who hated his guts and those who worshipped him as a god should pipe down. Spielberg isn't robbing Kubrick's grave. Kubrick gave his consent for Spielberg to make AI (just as everybody complained about 2010 being a rip-off of 2001 should realize Peter Hyams who made 2010 talked to Kubrick and Kubrick asked Hyams should just make his own movie and let it be). Even Kubrick's son-in-law, Jan Harlan is co-producing the film while the rest of Kubrick's family have endorsed the project.
I admit I was unsure of AI at first and didn't even want the movie to be made but now I feel calm about it. Before anybody kicks my ass and say I'm an idiot who doesn't know anything about movies, please answer me this question...when AI opens this summer, what's the worst that's gonna happen ? At best, it'll be the movie which replaces Citizen Kane on everybody's mouth when asked what is the greatest movie ever made. At worst, it'll be like Battlefield Earth, a movie that everybody is gonna check out at the video store which it hits video to see how bad it really is (believe me, I know what I am talking about as I have worked at Hollywood Video since late 1996 and when Battlefield Earth came out on video people were eager to watch it to see how bad it was).
Anyway, those are my 2 cents and I am glad you took time out to read them and you are welcome to e-mail me with your thoughts (I love receiving mail and talking to people since I do not have any real close friends).
-
'nuff said
-
No that old saying "Those who can't do, teach." Well I never believed that, I have the up most respect for teachers. However I do think all film critics are film school wash-outs. I mean if they know even 1/100th as much about film as they claim to then why don't they write and direct a film. Roger Ebert is a prime suspect of this. He wrote two films... "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls" and "Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens". Not exactly climatic masterpieces...
And now Harry telling us what's missing from Spielberg's recent films. Harry if you think you know so much about film get off your fat ass and make one. -
I think they meant "pederast" by the way. Maybe it's Rainer Werner Fassbinder doing a guest director spot on the hit German sitcom, "Touched By an Uncle"...
-
Lost, what the fuck are you talking about when you say the X-Men fiasco? Just wondering just in case you read talkbacks over and over again like I have a bothersome tendency to do. rubby hath hit the nail right on the cinematic head and so has Jm Yoda in a certain way, his talkback makes me want to see the Contender since that film was actually made by a film critic and his talkback helps to put Ebert down on my cool list a number of spots, still, he is the only film critc along with Roeper to be on television. I kind of miss that show Chris Gore had on FX for a while till it was cancelled, plus the Filthy Critc over at big empire can be funny at times. Sorry for posting off the subject, it is after all just a matter of months until this mechanical, emotional epic hits theaters, and I can't wait..... by the by, don't look down on Harry too much as a film critc, we all have a certain way we rate movies. Hell, I guess you would probably consider me fucked up because on equal levels of my taste of films I loved Armageddon simply because it was a fun, rediculous popcorn film. I rated it purely on a completely different level of (primitive) entertainment value. I just look at it as fun and not necessarily art (not unless you are referring to special effects).On the other side of my video shelf sits Eyes Wide Shut. I look at that film in a totally different way than I do Armageddon. It goes into the art category of films. It is a film we all watch to see how well it was made. Dr. Harford's little psychosexual romp is destined to become a classic in the course of time as is Fight Club and quite hopefully this upcoming exercise in cinematic experimentation, AI.
Sorry to make you people read until your eyes burn out, its time for this bird to fly away.... -
Thanks for the heads up Lost. When I first read your talkback I thought that you meant X-Men the film itself was a fiasco and not the talkbacks that came out before it was released involving all of those homophobic hunks of shit that degraded the film before it was released. I myself did not know that Bryan Singer and Bruce Davison were both homosexuals (i had read about Ian McKellen [sp] being gay in a magazine article if my memory serves). It is thanks to your response that I am able to get my laugh in for the day. That laugh being directed to all of the narrow-minded fucks in the world who would dare to shed doubt on a film before its release and especially towards disrespectful "free-range rude" people who prefer to get their kicks making fun of people merely because they are different than they are. May they all contract gonorrhea (sp) and die.....I continue to think about whether more and more if the people that made such attacks truly knew that these people were gay or just called them a "fag" because of the prevalence of the word (on playgrounds and such, you know what I mean right?) and just to supposedly "strip them of their manhood" like they might have seen and not to necessarily make a damaging slur towards them. In a positive light, I would say hopefully this would be the case. Unfortunately, this world has the distinction of being shrouded in a negative light so I agree more with what you have written. Thanks again, and here's to Bryan Singer helming the X-Men sequel, 20th Century Fox hopefully having the tact to keep up a positive light with this outing (those executive fucks), and AI blowing the mind of every doubtful person into the wall. Viva la free informacion! (PS: Please do not think of me as 2-faced but I am kind of a fan of Eminem [although I like rock better] and like how he has pissed off some of the squares in this world. I do not agree with his homophobic lyrics but I stand by what the first amendment says in all of its profound glory; plus he has shown initiative in raising his daughter by saying that he is not going to let her listen to his own music anymore in a recent interview. It is not like he raps about only things entailing violence and domination against homosexuals, everything he raps about is not really held as anything sacred [the exception of course being his daughter]he has even rapped about killing himself in one of his songs.) Anyway I'll stop typing for now, thanks again for the heads up Lost. I sincerely hope my PS did not leave you with any hard feelings but i just wanted to establish how i felt about this subject. See you in line for AI.......
-
i happen to know a guy that works at ILM who told me that the people working on the effects for AI had to go to such lengths as keeping black screens around their cubicles so no one outside could see this project...it's human nature to develop outrageously high expectations about something this secretive. it's my opinion that no matter what is produced from this film, it's not going to meet the standards of the public. i would suggest to not expect a miracle and calm the fuck down about it. maybe try appreciating the blood and sweat that is going into the making of this movie. of course, that's just my opinion.
ps. btw, what was so wrong with hook for cryin out loud -
Try connecting the dots...
It still look the same, which I am certain "ain't my fault!;o)"
R. David
My Child Inc.
NS Scheiss
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 439 total posts 159 posts
- WTF HOLLYWOOD: SOLARBABIES -- 144 total posts 142 posts
- Herc’s Seen Tonight’s Return Of THE WALKING DEAD!! Discuss Also DOWNTON ABBEY, FEAR FACTOR, PAN AM, ONCE, SIMPSONS, DYNAMITE, LUCK, SHAMELESS, BAIT CAR, THE GRAMMYS And More!! Sunday Is Sweeps Day 11!! -- 155 total posts 140 posts
- Avid Comic Reader Hercules Does Battle With Tedium During Kevin Smith’s COMIC BOOK MEN! -- 55 total posts 45 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 196 total posts 45 posts
- I am The Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day! No, I’m the Behind the Scenes Pic of the Day! -- 35 total posts 35 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 60 total posts 34 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 127 total posts 32 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 513 total posts 29 posts
- The Sensorties Revisit The Friday Docback (And Still Smell)!! DOCTOR WHO Story #7 Again, The Coming Of Season/Series 7, And More!! -- 118 total posts 27 posts