Logo

Cool News

Bruce Campbell in Dallas Shooting SERVICING SARAH

Published at:  Jan 16, 2001 3:50:44 AM CST

Ya have ta love the priorities of this website when we do a headline declaring this film as STARRING BRUCE CAMPBELL, when the rest of those primates in the media will CLAIM that the film really stars Matthew Perry and some chick named Elizabeth Hurley. BUT WE KNOW BETTER DON'T WE? We know what is important about this film, and since Hurley doesn't get bareassed naked, that means we Pavlovian Geek Hounds must bay over THE BRUCE! I would line up the day before this film opened if I was guaranteed Bruce Campbell was taking a chainsaw to these two after 40 minutes of the film!!!! And I reckon... so would you. Alas, the real world is fucked




Wanna meet Bruce Campbell of Evil Dead fame????
HE IS IN DALLAS FILMING A MOVIE













Hey Harry,

You can call me the Nate Dog. I live in downtown
Dallas Tx. and yesterday filming began in my
neighborhood. It's for a film called "Servicing Sarah"
and it's directed by Reginald Hudlin (the guy that
directed that SNL flick The Ladies Man) and stars
Bruce Campbell, Chandler Bing...I mean Matthew Perry,
and the IMPOSSIBLY HOT CHICK Elizabeth Hurley. They've
transformed the front of the Dallas Grand Hotel into
"The Miami Palm Hotel". Ok ok well I was able to get
the story out of the extras who were on hand for
filming:

Elizabeth Hurley is Sarah a rich pampered woman who is
used to having everything handed to her. She's married
to a rich Dallas oilman played by Bruce Campbell
(ASH!!!). Well things in this marriage aren't working
out so the husband decided to file for divorce. He's
sending these people from a processing service to
serve her with papers. At the same time...Sarah finds
out that her husband isn't being so faithful either.
Soooo...it's a comedy where both are trying serve each
other with divorce papers. Matthew Perry plays Sarah's
new love interest who happens to be an employee of the
law firm that is serving her divorce papers. The film
looks to be a romantic comedy and will be coming out
around the holidays 2001.

They have transformed the front of the Dallas Grand
Hotel into the Miami Palm hotel and have converted the
Universities center at Dallas into the lobby of a
Marriott Hotel. Soooo the beautiful city of Dallas is
now the principal photography shooting location
recreating Miami, New York, and of course Dallas.

I hope to GOD it is better than that last piece of
crap film they made here....DR. T!!!!

see IMDB Listing: SERVICING SARAH

I'll email you some of the photos I took of the set.

-The Nate Dog



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 4:20:28 AM CST

    Woohoo...

    by elwen

    This rocks...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 4:29:20 AM CST

    I hate Hurley, I hate Perry

    by mintgiver

    I'll be first in line. If Bruce Campbell is in it, just give me my tickets and pre-order my special edition DVD right now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 5:04:27 AM CST

    Bubba Ho-Tep

    by crouton

    Bubba Ho-Tep is the Bruce Campbell flick I'm looking forward to. I wonder why it hasnt been mentioned on this site? Bruce plays the LEAD--a 70 year old dude who thinks he's Elvis. He battles a mummy named Bubba Ho-Tep. Sounds pretty damn fun to me. If you don't believe me, check Bruce's official site.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 5:14:45 AM CST

    "what the fuck is the fascination you people have with Bruce Cam

    by mr_intimidation

    Mofo, get your dick out of that round anus you call a head. Bruce Campbell is the epitome of cool. He just fucking rocks. He's the everyday guy who'll put a chainsaw to your ass if you so much as look at him crosseyed. He's your next door neighbor who'll fuck your wife but still play basketball with you on Sundays. He's the kind of guy who goes to your house and slap you for being a bitch, then bend you over the couch and shove a hot poker up your ass for having your head stuck up it for so long. He's Bruce Campbell. What the fuck is there to figure out? Now go and buy more 10-cent words with that fancy edumacallit of yours. We don't need your anti-Campbell kind around her, beeyatch.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 5:22:09 AM CST

    Gimme some sugar baby!

    by theginger twit

    Raimi needs to get his talent off Spider man and into the next Evil Dead flick! That's what I think. Go ahead. Dis-agree with me. Spiderman will be shit. Even if it isn't, non of you will like it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 6:04:05 AM CST

    Re: Mr. Intimidation

    by pedant

    TO BILL BRASKEY!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 6:10:45 AM CST

    Well said 3-

    by dash101

    It is rather unfortunet that some individuals *Ahem.. Who shall not be mentioned, feel to use words such as 'cock' and 'ass' and other versions of profanity to try and prove a point. When frankly, the only point they've proven is how bloody small their vocabulary is.. sad... really..

    -dash101 out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 6:23:13 AM CST

    This is news?

    by jmb

    I can't believe this was printed on this site. I thought this site was called "Ain't it cool news." Are there going to be news stories ever time Bruce Cambell films scenes for his next video game appearance?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 6:49:18 AM CST

    Freudian analysis. ANALysis?

    by human2

    Look, I think it's largely been accepted by the scientific community that pretty much everything Freud said was fucking bollocks. I'm going to stay out of this Campbellian debate here, but please, Enema, in the future, cite some more credible sources of psychological analysis than Freud.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 6:59:38 AM CST

    Mr. Intimidation

    by howard_roark

    After reading many of your previous posts, I have come to the following conclusion: You sir, are a moron. I could go on, but frankly, you aren't worth the intellectual candle power. Moving on... This flick looks pretty formulaic to me. I can just see Bruce wearing a cowboy hat trying his best to do a campy J.R. Ewing, and Perry playing the only role he knows how to, saying things like, "Could I BE in any more trouble?". Meanwhile, Hurley does that slow, sultry, swishing walk that she does, throwing come-hither looks over her left shoulder, and... and... Okay, I guess I'm there afterall.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 8:49:55 AM CST

    to 3 bag enema and others

    by hugoheir

    Although I was glad to read your response to the above post whith all the cock and anus references (I think we all know the one I mean), you still don't seem to understand why Bruce Campbell is so important to us. If you'll read an aicn article from the past (link at the bottom), I think you'll understand a little better. Bruce is not only a great actor, but a really cool guy that sees the same faults with hollywood pictures that frequent the aicn message boards. This, combined with the fact that there are few movies with Bruce as the star, leave us always wanting more. I know you're not a campbell hater, but try for awhile to be a Bruce Campbell fan. http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/display.cgi?id=7477

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 8:52:23 AM CST

    ...and another thing

    by hugoheir

    Freud's theories on psychoanalysis revolutionized psychology. Although modern psychologists have made their own opinions on certain facets of Freud's theories, Freud is still recognized worldwide and refered to in not only modern psychology, but even in typical everyday conversation. SO BE NICE!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 9:15:32 AM CST

    Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun

    by warlord92

    Well it looks like there is going to be a romantic comedy (lame ass chick flick) that I am going to be counting down the days to see. I just hope my girl will want to go see it, so I dont have to lose all self respect & beg her go to a chick flick! Or even by myself!!! Now then I would feel really lame! Lotr trailer kicked ass!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 9:24:28 AM CST

    sharp as nails

    by reni

    Bruce is a man of the people. Having a B-Movie status doesn't make him any less valuable. And the reason people harp on about him so much here is because he's starred in 2 of the best films ever made...Basically...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 10:08:34 AM CST

    hey Reni

    by wolvie6

    He's starred in two of the WORST movies ever made!!!! Nuff said!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 10:11:11 AM CST

    Dr. T

    by studio snitch

    Come on, Altman's "Dr. T" was cool.

    Reply to Talkback

  • It's all so clear now. Here I thought that my slight erection was caused by my fond memories of a naked Liz Hurley in Austin Powers, covered only by strategically placed breakfast foods. Thanks to this on-line therapy, I now realize that my attraction is for a B-Movie actor who chainsaws baddies to a bloody stump.

    And what would Freud say about calling yourself "3 bag enema?"

    I'm still waiting for the sequel to Monkey Trouble. That Harvey Keitel is quite the actor!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 10:26:00 AM CST

    The last time their was a shooting in Dallas....

    by mother plucker

    ...everybody flipped out. Hopefully things will go a little better this time around.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 10:51:19 AM CST

    Mr. Bag?

    by fraudgawd

    First, if you have to ask about the "Bruce" thing, you wouldn'y understand.

    To suggest it is because we fans have repressed homosexual feelings for Bruce is ridiculous.

    And as for the Psych 101 lesson. Anyone who calls himself Enima Bag should not be so quick to point out other's "quirks"

    "hail to the king, baby!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 11:30:04 AM CST

    "Yes, sir, yes, sir 3 bag enema...full?"

    by uncapie

    I don't know. I kinda like it. Still, that's a lot on enema bags though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 1:11:13 PM CST

    Speaking of Freud...

    by pedant

    Often, the pioneers of a
    scientific discipline make more
    of a contribution by changing the
    way we think about and approach
    the topic than they do by making
    any actual discoveries. Freud's
    theories (really hypotheses)
    rarely pass scientific muster --
    even in a soft science like
    psychology (that was flamebait).
    He played an important role in
    kickstarting the science of the
    mind, but most of his ideas are,
    in lay terms, wacky.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 1:52:11 PM CST

    pedant and human2

    by the pardoner

    Because Freud was not a rigid, experimental, mathematical psychologist does not in any way invalidate his work. His view of human psychology (and Jung's for that matter) is more like literary (as opposed to physiologcal) analysis. Lab-rat psychology notwithstanding, Freud's models can help to find *motivations* for some kinds human behaviour. Frankly, I don't think Freud himself added all that much beyond what Shakespeare (dramatically) and Nietzsche (critically and philosophyically) had already laid out. Still, the "scientific community" has a track record of gold-plating "wacky fucking bollocks" that don't even "pass muster" on the most cursory levels, and calling it truth. Hell, Leibnitz had Newton nailed to the wall inside six months of the Principia's publication. For my money, I'd take the "soft-sciences" over throat-cancer-causing antidepressant wonder-pills that advertise on TV any day of the week.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 1:56:44 PM CST

    Oh yeah, and as for Mr. Intimidation's post...

    by the pardoner

    ... funny stuff. You have to wonder if he's even aware of what he's typing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 2:10:26 PM CST

    Where can I worship at the altar of bruce in the big d?

    by thematarife

    Will he be hanging around any places with us mere mortals?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 4:07:47 PM CST

    Mister Intimidation rarely responds to talkbacks (but since this

    by mr_intimidation

    Dear Mister Enema Bag, I have to say i didn't actually read all of your posts (how many did you post, a dozen or something?). It's okay, we believe you, you probably did go to school. In fact, I know YOU'RE SMART because ONE) you feel obliged to spend your time on a fanboy talkback site on the net with us mooks discussing the merits of Bruce Campbell. TWO) you impress us with your ability to read a psych book and copy it line by line onto your computer. THREE) you consider it impressive that some mooks (clearly intellects like yourself) had rave reviews for your 'witty and insightful' comment. FOUR) you waste your time here instead of spending your large intellect impressing college professors on lecture tours discussing the merits of a man who calls himself "ENEMA BAG" (or something likethat) on an anonymous internet sit with obviously youngsters like myself and others who hasn't hit their 20 mark yet. FIVE) you clearly spend quite a bit of time writing posts, then coming back and re-reading your own posts, the posts of others regarding your post, and then assuming that because another talkbacker with the same intellectual capacity as your own responds, that your life as a loser has somehow been legitimize. FRANKLY -- Mister enema, i don't know what's funnier -- that you think of yourself as ABOVE the rest of us fanboys (and yet you STILL keep coming here, don't you?) or that you actually think posting and then reposting to comments CONCERNING your post will legitimize your loser existence. At least the rest of us realize we're idiots. Frankly, Mister Intimidation rarely reads posts in response to his (I do have a life, you know, unlike yourself, apparently *AHEM*, but I digress), but since this is a Bruce Campbell matter, I saw fit to clear up some misconceptions. Namely that you are a little man with very little self-confidence that he needs to come on an anonymous board and spout 'intellectual dialogue' that he hopes others will see it as a sure sign of his 'smartiness.' oh yes, and i was wrong -- Bruce Campbell would STILL fuck your wife (if you could ever get one, I'm pretty sure you have a small penis), but he definitely WOULDN'T play basketball with you. Like myself, Mister Campbell HATES little pretensious pussies who thinks that because he can copy lines from a psych book that he's somehow "smart." Mommy, i can read -- I'm smart! That is the end, Mister Intimidation will no longer write any more in regards to this matter. It has been said, so it shall be ended. BEEYATCH. (Yes, yes, a man who talks about himself in the third person has issues; at least I admit it.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 4:47:15 PM CST

    See? I was right!

    by howard_roark

    He is a moron!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 6:42:33 PM CST

    click here

    by phatjacck

    who's bruce cambell?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 8:11:20 PM CST

    Mr. Intimidation

    by qatseri

    Please, stop defending yourself. You keep using the words 'we' in your posts, presumably referring to all other talkbackers and it's becoming embarrasing. Since you acknowledge being an idiot and that you 'has not yet' reached your twenties, go to an arcade and smoke pot or something. Wait until you can read and speak english before posting again.

    Thank you for your consideration.

    Peace through random violence

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 8:12:48 PM CST

    i don't get it either

    by jfantastic

    I'd just like to say that I think Mr. Enema Bag had some good points. I was also thinking there were some weird sexual references in that first post defending Bruce Campbell. I don't understand the whole Bruce Campbell thing either. He's like some kind of geek's god. And Freud is still the man, despite the fact that he had some weird ideas. But he hasn't been discredited at all. In fact, anyone who has studied psychology at all knows a lot of it is based on his ideas.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 16, 2001 10:32:14 PM CST

    wowwee!! ihas not reached my twenties yet neither!

    by kojiro

    Yet I manage to not be a fuckwit. Fancy that. If I may interject something about Freud, as I understand it he never studied mentally sound people(though they may not exsist, you know what I mean, nuts) and I know he used no scientific processes. Studying the fuct up and applying your explanation to the entire population of the world probably doesn't create the most workable theories. I'm not saying he wasn't damned intelligent, may have been brilliant,just something to keep in mind. BTW, Native American societies had a fairly advanced concept of the unconscious, but lack of a written language just might have prevented them from elaborating on it too much(thought that was rather interesting). The groundbreakers in many disciplines seem to have been those who write their theories down and make them known to the general public first. About Bruce, it's like the old Bell Atlantic cachphrase: "If you don't get it, you just don't get it" For me it's been Ash(chainsaw on hand, shotgun, and better one liners than Arnold ever had), growing up on Brisco County Jr., and in general the deliciously over the top but dead serious style of acting he is known for. This was supposed to be a short post. Damn.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 17, 2001 8:11:24 AM CST

    Pardoner...

    by pedant

    Freud's claims are not based on
    experimentation, therefore they
    are ipso facto not scientific.
    They would never pass a peer
    review today. Does that
    invalidate them? Yes and no.
    There may be truth to some of
    them, but it is not yet and may
    never be verified. In science,
    you are not innocent until
    proven guilty. All claims are
    treated with skepticism until
    verified (and even thereafter).
    It is not up to science to
    invalidate Freud's claims, it was
    up to Freud to have validated them
    in the first place. Many of them
    are, in fact, unfalsifiable,
    meaning that there is no way to
    construct an experiment that will
    either confirm or deny their
    truth. This is not science; this
    is metaphysics. If you want to
    laud him as a writer, a
    philosopher, a mystic, etc. go
    right ahead. But he was only a
    scientist in the broadest sense
    of the word. *** By the way, how
    do you think we KNOW whether or
    not a particular medication is
    correlated with an increased risk
    of cancer? It isn't Freud who's
    telling us, it's science. If you
    don't like seeing those ads on
    TV, blame the pharmaceutical
    companies, blame marketers, but
    don't blame science.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 17, 2001 10:33:49 AM CST

    Amateur analysis of my Brucian desires

    by madolan

    Freudian or not, I cannot deny my extreme sexual attraction to Bruce Campbell. I don't fear crack psychoanalysis, however, as I'm female and therefore inherently permitted to dream of giving him some sugar. I'm looking forward to this movie not for sublimation of my daydreams but as a vehicle for mass Bruce exposure. Some good names are attached to the picture; it will garner massive publicity and wide reviews. I expect it will attract Bruce Campbell virgins, thereby exposing a significant portion of the Campbell-less moviegoing public to the manly presence and talents of our beloved star. I'm all in favor of proselytizing when it comes to Bruce. Whether you claim neutrality or fervant devotion to him, the mass exposure gained by this film can only convert more fans and swell our ranks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 17, 2001 10:12:51 PM CST

    Late to the BC Party...

    by pencilsharp

    Oy. I go away for a few days, and everybody goes all Freudian on me. Now, listen kids to old man (29 in fact) Pencilsharp... FIRST: While his fundamental (fun and mental?) theories re: Id, Ego, and Superego are generally given a wide berth today, most of Freud's ideas showed more about just how wacky ol' S.F. was than anything else. Freud is dead. Let him rot... SECOND: Bruce rocks because he is the guy you wish you could be. He's good looking, famous, and well-built. And he probably could score with any wife in America (and abroad) if he put his mind to it. Fortunately, he prefers to use his talent for good rather than evil. THIRD: All this homoerotic talk lies squarely in Moriarity's animated ear and Harry's undersized wardrobe. FOURTH: None of this really matters anyway, because anyone who would post this late in the game proves his idiocy just by posting. Ergo, this entire post should be disregarded. By the way, FIFTH: will you kids please run a spellcheck on your posts *before* you take the plunge. 10-Q!
    ---------
    Day late, dollar short...Ps

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 18, 2001 11:53:11 AM CST

    The Nate Dog

    by the nate dog

    When I sent in the details I didn't expect a backlash against "The Jack Of All Trades". I mean we all know the guy is a "B" movie actor BUT he is the best in his field! Well I'm just looking forward to seeing more of Elizabeth Hurley. (Whoah Momma..Whoah Momma)I mean what did she ever see in that Cheeky Englishman Hugh Grant? "uhh uhhh pardon me officer I was feeling a bit peckish" (that was his best role) Anyways Ash is in my hood filming a flick. I'll send more info when I get it. Oh yeah and Chandler Bing is cool even if he did have a pain-pill addiction (lol)Peace and Chicken Grease!!!
    -The Nate Dog

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback