Logo

Cool News

Father Geek takes a peek at CHARLIE'S ANGELS

Published at:  Oct 27, 2000 1:15:53 AM CDT

Well geeks, when it comes to FREE preview screenings it never rains... it pours. Tonight Father Geek had the pick of 3, anyone of which as it turns out could be alot of fun. My choices were the phantastic NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS (check out this week's poll on the site), the thriller BLAIR WITCH 2: BOOK OF SHADOWS, and the surprizingly funderful CHARLIE'S ANGELS.

First off I haven't slept since 11am Wednesday morning and its now 11pm Thursday. I took Harry to the airport about 5:30 am this morning to put him on a plane for LA where he was taping an appearance on the Ben Stein TV Show to be followed by a tour of Hollywood Halloween parties this weekend.

The ANGELS preview was being shown at a multiplex in a once sleepy little farm town a few miles North of Austin off to the East of that concrete ribbon that connects Mexico City and Chicago. I had decided on this screening because I saw and enjoyed BW2 last week, and while there is NO doubt that NIGHTMARE is a far superior motion picture to either of these other flicks, I have seen it on the big screen at least a dozen times and will PAY to see it again during this current release. So to avoid the tense techie traffic fleeing their workplaces for their safe little bedroom community to our North I pulled away from Geek World Headquarters around 4pm.

I had decided to chow-down at one of the "mom & pop" eateries that can still be found in these out-of-the-way places. Well guess what? That's fast becoming just another urban myth. Taco Bells, Burger Kings, MacDonalds, Taco Cabanas littered the once farm-to-market road into small town America. Father Geek was bummed-out. Then I spotted CHARLIE'S, a barn red building in the style of a 1920's farmhouse, except NO windows, none. I parked among the dozen pickups and headed in. The room was about 20' X 50' with a 25' Bar taking up most of the space. There were 15 people inside, all males 12 wearing ball caps the other 3 cowboy hats, NO facial hair, and no one was eating, just drinking. "GAME DAY!!!" someone screams out. I sit in the corner, my back to the wall. A cel phone rings..."GAME DAY!!!" the person yells into the receiver. Over the Bar is one of those old "We Reserve the Right to Refuse Service" signs, right between the broken Lone Star Beer sign and the Pearl Beer calendar. The phone on the bar rings... "GAME DAY!!!" the bartender hollers into it. This place has style to be sure. A goodlooking blonde in a t-shirt and skintight black pants comes out of the kitchen and takes my order, a burning cigerette hanging in her lips. Another patron enters... "GAME DAY!!!", a twenty-something construction worker screams. The girl brings me my salad, nothing fancy, lots of crackers and a damn thick blue cheese dressing. Another cel phone goes off... and "GAME DAY!!!" is the answer it receives. I overhear "Willie Nelson", and "Oklahoma", and "Fuckin' Cornhuskers", and "Willie Nelson" again. The waitress reappears with my 18oz medium rare Ribeye and large baked spud. She's weathered, but very pretty. I'd say about 28 going on 40, another cig hung from the corner of her mouth. She does a little jig to no music as she heads back to the stoves, a wipe rag flying in her left hand. The steak is falling apart tender and my tater is perfect, my iced tea never got empty. I still had time to kill before the movie so I decided on the Peach cobbler that's smell had been driving me crazy since I entered the place an hour before. CHARLIE'S was just what I was looking for. As I was leaving I spotted some 8X10 photos hanging over the jukebox (it never played) one says "CHARLIE'S 1930", the other is labeled "CHARLIE'S 1942." I open the door and someone behind me screams out..."GAME DAY!!!"

I get to the theater, one of those cavernous 17 screen national chains. Souless, with little or no style. Not at all like CHARLIE'S. Suddenly it hit me... CHARLIE'S... CHARLIE'S ANGELS. Coooool! The "Line-People" had turned out in force for this flick, all the regulars were there. I've been standing in lines with many of these same people for 10 years now. We talked about the films we had each seen since last we met and I was quizzed repeatedly about BLAIR WITCH 2 and CROUCHING TIGER. Everyone seemed to agree that LADIES MAN stunk up the theater and that LUCKY NUMBERS disappointed. BAGGER VANCE got mixed reviews. They thought THE CONTENDER was good, but many couldn't handle the politics of it. Finally we move into the screening room. I'm sitting with Quint and El Cosmico who had met me at the theater.

Well ol' Father Geek has written alot, but not about the flick. Damn! Well, I liked it. It was good old fashioned mindless action comedy fun. No great storyline, no GREAT performances, but some how it really worked for me, I had a good time and that is all this movie sets out to do. Sure the fight scenes are not the best, sure some of the CGI looks like CGI, sure there are some plotholes, but I didn't care and neither did most of the people there. I had more fun with this than MI2. Maybe it was seeing Cameron Diaz dance to nothing like my waitress had done earlier, I don't know, but CHARLIE'S ANGELS did what it was susposed to for me... to me. I won't mind one bit going to see it again with Harry when he gets back in town Monday. And you know what? I bet I enjoy it even better the second time. Going into this remember where it came from. The original series was NO work of genius. It was just fun. Those original girls were NO Emmy Award winning actresses and they were NO better looking than these girls. The original series was fun escapest fare and this film fits that bill perfectly. Go see this with an open mind and a good attitude and you WILL have a great time. Alot better time than several other current release flicks offer up for sure.




    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 1:50:15 AM CDT

    wow.. that was the greatest review that never was

    by praetorian



    well, i was expecting to see a review of charlie's angels here and i got some trip to burger king instead. thanks.....

    im hoping bill murray will have a big part in this flick, he always cracks me up. later all

    Reply to Talkback

  • Then I'll pause the scene with her in a bikini...then I'll move it in slow mo...and pause it again...igh yeah,.,,

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 2:02:41 AM CDT

    Something tells me Father Geek will be voting for Dubya Bushy! D

    by troublemaker2000

    FG are you voting for your home state boy? I know Harry is for Gore but the way you narrate that review with all the Texas personalities tells me that you will be voting for Gov. Bush to be President Bush. Anyway, get some rest, yoo still have Red Planet to review next week!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 2:13:58 AM CDT

    Hmmm...

    by tids

    This review probably sums up the film... a non event!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 2:45:44 AM CDT

    Whatcha readin' for?

    by *veers*

    Sorry, couldn't help but think of Bill Hicks. 'Looks like we gots ourselves a reader!'

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 3:15:58 AM CDT

    Ahh...Saint Bill

    by lazarus long

    Just when I lose all hope with this site, someone has to go and mention Bill Hicks again. Thank the Lord. "Not what am I reading...but what am I reading FOR?" "Maybe so I don't end up a fucking waffle waitress like you." *** I saw the long trailer of Charlie's Angels, and I have to admit it does look like a hell of a lot of fun. And FG was right, the original series wasn't that great anyway. This just makes me sad that no one has gotten the Six Million Dollar Man (or better yet, The Fall Guy) off the ground. Someone needs to pull a Tarantino-Travolta and resurrect Lee Majors' career. God I love the Sci-Fi channel doing those 6M$M marathons on Mondays. *** Anyway, I love the new graphic with Harry's face turning into Father Geek's. Oh wait...The Shaggy Dog? Never mind.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 3:18:00 AM CDT

    The number one reason is so I don't end up being a fucking 'waff

    by philamental

    Hee Hee!! Yes, I was thinking of Bill Hicks too while reading this er...review.. if that's what you want to call it. I mean when Harry goes on his ramblings at least he comes back and gives the flick the same length of text. All we basically got was 'the film was fun' which we already knew when FG mentioned it at the start. Come on FG, give us more, why was it fun? Mention a few minor spoiler scenes/jokes that give us a feel for the fun. Not up to standard... sit in the corner and think about what you did! ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 3:39:13 AM CDT

    Review...We Don't Need No Stinkin' Review

    by harlow

    Father Geek...I'm glad your waitress danced a jig and all...and that you had peach cobbler. But what about the movie? I generally enjoy your reviews and I know you're not ready to be put out to pasture...so what's the deal?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 3:45:46 AM CDT

    you censored me, didn't you?

    by tommy5tone

    jeebus, just because i asked where the damn REVIEW was...i KNOW what food tastes like, i DON'T know what 'charlie's angels' is like. get over yourself, man.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 6:20:25 AM CDT

    Looks fun!

    by lighthearted1

    Now I know that everyone wants to see this movie for the many flashes of flesh that will undoubtedly be prevalent from these lovely ladies...but what this flick really needs is for Bill Murray to bare it all! Now THAT would be funny! Just a thought. Smile!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 6:57:40 AM CDT

    So uh...wheres that review?

    by neocyber

    There was supposed to be a review here right? Not just some long drawn out story tht had absolutely nothing to do with anything? I'm kind of sick of having to come to this site, trying to read a review and either finding someone's life story, or finding someone else who just can't write a decent revierw for anything. Can we please get some better reviewers insteead of people who like to hear themselves talk? That wouldn't be too much to ask right?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 8:24:17 AM CDT

    Great SCANNERS animation harry!

    by jarek

    About time someone mentioned Cronenberg on this site!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 10:24:28 AM CDT

    looks like we got ourselves a reader

    by praetorian

    well, damn you stumped me... not what am i reading but what am i reading for???

    hehehe,, i love bill hicks.
    cool to see a fellow hicks fan here...

    keep quoting veers!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 11:17:28 AM CDT

    daddy geek?

    by babygirl

    Did he actually go to the movie?

    www.musicnotes.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 11:20:42 AM CDT

    I've said it before......

    by gryphon

    .... And I'll say it again: Cameron Diaz is a nasty bitch! She is not pretty at all! She has that washed up porno star quality about her.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 1:34:56 PM CDT

    I liked this nonreview!

    by ke6lbm

    Father Geek's depiction of a great roadhouse is what we all need exposure to now and then. Places like Charlie's, and similar places around the country are cool because they are disappearing.

    Sorry for the offtopic post, but I had to say thank you to FG!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 27, 2000 9:13:04 PM CDT

    FG cut the crap

    by efihp

    I come here to read movie related tidbits, not to read Geek's friggin diary. Cut the meaningless crap.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 28, 2000 12:25:00 AM CDT

    And this is a positive review?

    by bobolarue

    So..the story has huge holes, the acting ain't that great, the special effects look cheap in spots, and the action is ho-hum. But other than that it's a great movie that everyone should go see because it's a lot of fun.

    I believe we've discovered the admission price Harry has to pay to get into those "hollywood halloween" parties this weekend.

    (sigh)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 28, 2000 4:58:30 AM CDT

    Sometimes less is more....

    by jonathane

    Have to agree with most of the other posts. If I want a Kerouac road-trip type reading experience I

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 28, 2000 1:04:45 PM CDT

    Review suited the movie

    by matt x

    i liked that review. No reason to waste much typing on the actual movie.
    The series was an Aaron Spelling jigglefest; and every episode was an excuse for many costume changes and sexy, undercover infiltrations.
    Take down the bad guys; commercial break, then little scene around the pool talking to charlie on the high-tech speakerphone.
    The end.
    sounds like the movie picked up on this premise and style perfectly.
    And Bill Murray as Bosley is great casting.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2000 9:29:44 AM CST

    Eat, and get on w/your life

    by jonleeus

    I guess it makes sense to write a few pointless paragraphs when reviewing a movie as pointless as this one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2000 1:35:31 PM CST

    C.A. review

    by silver_shadow

    Why are you guys complaining so much? There's another Charlie's Angels review right under this one (or so I'm assuming, since I haven't actually read it yet).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2000 11:09:31 AM CST

    Good Grief!

    by bleys00

    People need to lighten up. I've just been reading some of the posts, and man, you folks want everything for nothing. Last time I checked, this site wasn't being operated by BigAssMediaCo, Inc., it was being run by a private individual and his friends and family. Generally, they do a bang-up job, in my never humble opinion. I see that some of you want to whine about not liking the reviewers, or not being satisfied with a review. Um.. if you want insightful, consise, professional news, you should try CNN.com. I think they report on movies just after they come out. Harry and his friends post this stuff to share it with other people who might be interested. It's a lot of work keeping a site running like this one, and I just hate to see ungrateful people, when Harry and his friends work hard to share the coolness they hear about with us. Thanks Harry.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2000 3:56:33 PM CST

    "Sure, the film sucked..."

    by mattman

    A review would be nice.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 31, 2000 9:49:24 PM CST

    SAW IT LAST NIGHT AT A SCREENING AND WOW! WHAT A FUCKING FUN ROC

    by geekbasher 3.0

    THE MOST FUN I HAVE HAD ALL YEAR AT THE MOVIES! ROCK ON GIRRRRLS! WILL BE A HUGE HUGE HIT!

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback