Cool News
Two AICN Regulars Review WHAT LIES BENEATH
What lies beneath WHAT LIES BENEATH? Well, ol' Father Geek is here with 2 of our long time reviewer's impressions of Harrison Ford's latest effort, or lack of... depending on how it strikes you. This supposed suspense-thriller with the 1st time teaming of Ford and Michelle Pfeiffer by Oscar-winning Director Robert Zemeckis has all the ingredents for a successful genre flick; a mysterious woman's wraithlike image haunting their home, betrayed love, strange and sinister voices, a great team of Oscar-honored behind-the-scenes collaborators, etc... etc... BUT...
CAPONE
Hey, Capone in Chicago here with my review of the latest from Robert Zemeckis, WHAT LIES BENEATH with Harrison Ford and Michelle Pfeiffer.
Be warned, I may drop some spoilers on you here out of necessity. But let me start by saying that I hate trailers: the trailer for WHAT LIES BENEATH ruins certain major plot points of this film. It tells you who in the story you should fear and what that person did to make them a suspect in the criminal activities of this film. If the trailer starts running at any more you attend in the near future, close your eyes and cover your ears. You've been warned.
It has been a full 12 hours since I saw this film and I'm still torn about how I feel. The mere fact that I'm still thinking about it should say something, I guess. There were things about this movie that I absolutely loved, and other things that annoyed the piss out of me. There's nothing I enjoy more than the old bait and switch routine. Hitchcock perfected it, and others have done it successfully over the years. Robert Zemeckis (or more precisely, character actor turned screenwriter Clark Gregg) baits and switches seemingly endless times.
The movie opens with Pfeiffer and Ford taking their daughter to college, thus leaving them alone in their house for the first time since they were married. The daughter is actually the product of Pfeiffer's first marriage to a musician who now dead (by what means I can't remember, nor does it matter). Ford is a successful research scientist at a university in New England as was his even more famous father. He is on the verge of finishing a major paper, which requires him to spend endless hours at the office, leaving Pfeiffer alone in their vast home.
The films first 30 to 40 minutes are a REAR WINDOW-style (or in this case, rear fence) mystery, as a bored Pfeiffer spies on her new neighbors, a troubled couple who fight a lot. Around the same time that the next-door wife seemingly disappears, Pfeiffer starts experiencing poltergeist-like activity in her house. Doors won't stay shut, photos fall from ledges, and finally she starts seeing the image of a pretty blonde woman in reflections in fogged-up mirror and in the water of a full bath tub. So far I am totally digging this movie. Pfeiffer and Ford have a good and believable chemistry, and there are some genuine thrills generated when Pfeiffer is alone in the house. There are a few too many fake shocks accompanied by the appropriate music cue (the dog jumps through a door, extra loud phone ringing, etc.), but it still works for me at this point.
Anyway, eventually Pfeiffer discovers that in fact the next door wife is alive and well, and WE discover that the last 30 to 40 minutes have very little to do with the actual story. Except for one small thing, the blonde ghost is still causing trouble in the house. Pfeiffer begins to see a psychiatrist (the always reliable Joe Morton), believing that maybe she's suffering from some kind of empty-nest syndrome, but she soon realizes that the ghost is real and she sets out to find out who she is and why she's bugging her.
At this point, the movie becomes more of a STIR OF ECHOES-style ghost story/murder mystery, and I probably should stop talking about the 8,000 twists and turns the story takes from this point. The movie really belongs to Michelle Pfeiffer; she's in every scene in this film and it's a solid performance from a gifted actress who's been choosing godawful films lately. Harrison Ford, despite his top billing, isn't really in the film that much, at least not until the final third, but it's a very different role than we're used to seeing him in and I appreciated that. (If you've seen the spoiler-ridden trailer, you already know what I mean.)
The script is good, but it takes so damn long to get the actual meat of the story that some people might stop caring before we get there. I was borderline. And there's a section of film toward the end where Pfeiffer is paralyzed in a bathtub filling up with water that has some of the most poorly written dialogue I've ever heard. The sequence should have been silent except for the sound of running water. As I'm sitting here writing this, I realize that I did get kind of sick of all the trickery in the screenplay. It was cool to find out that the next-door wife wasn't dead because you became extra-baffled by the ghost, but after a couple more exercises in misdirection, I got bored. The movie also feels long at 2 hours and 15 minutes, and has an all-too familiar and obvious climax.
As you can tell, I'm still not entirely sure what my final feelings are on this movie. If you are jaded by Hollywood's lame attempts to scare us with digital effects (THE HAUNTING) then perhaps you'll appreciate the simplicity of WHAT LIES BENEATH. I promise you that it will scare you in small ways and have you creeping toward the edge of your seat a few times. I only wish the screenplay had been pared down a bit and not had so many false endings piled on top of each other. I don't know. Michelle Pfeiffer is wet a lot in the movie from multiple bath and shower scenes, and from walking in the rain a lot. And that has to count for something, people. Oh, just go see the damn thing and yell at me later for telling you to.
Capone
Bishop Don "Mack" Donald
What Lies Beneath by The Bishop Don "Mack" Donald
Returning to his macabre roots, director Robert Zemeckis brings forth WHAT LIES BENEATH. A perfectly average horror/thriller film that clings to it’s empty premise by providing arid scares and zero thrills. Not grotesque enough to be disturbing, yet nowhere near compelling enough to be truly frightening. In this generation, where SCREAM and THE SIXTH SENSE rule this particular genre, BENEATH is a good example of trying too hard to please the current finicky audience by giving them something they’ve already seen.
By explaining the plot, I would be giving away crucial elements that WHAT LIES BENEATH needs to really work at an optimum level. Unfortunately, the promotional materials have already given away about two of the BENEATH twists. I’ll just stick with the basics: Norman (Harrison Ford) and Claire (Michelle Pfeiffer) live in a sumptuous lakeside home in Vermont. While Norman is away at work trying to achieve the success that his father bathed in, Claire is stuck in the home, trying to overcome her empty nest syndrome after her daughter leaves for college. In the house all by herself, Claire is visited by a ghost that seems to be taking turns terrifying her and asking for her help. Claire, fearing mental illness, tries to figure out why the ghost has chosen to haunt her.
At 125 minutes, WHAT LIES BENEATH is overlong and overblown. In the 1960’s and 70’s, horror and thriller pictures often took their time creating genuine mood and suspense, always starting small and building bigger and bigger. BENEATH starts off big, gets very small, then, in an excessive attempt to leave the paying crowd with a feeling of getting their money’s worth, features a climax that drags the picture over the two hour mark when it should have barely clocked in at 80 minutes. In it’s heart, WHAT LIES BENEATH is a schlocky, grade Z type of thriller that somehow ended up an expensive, superstar driven, first class new motion picture. The sheen of perfectionism ruins the fun, and the editor-phobic Zemeckis makes the action drag out way too long.
Having been one of the creative producers and often contributor to the late 80’s, early 90’s horror anthology TALES FROM THE CRYPT, Zemeckis is clearly working with material that would have been far more effective on that particular show (which itself spawned two feature films). A director with an impressive filmography (FORREST GUMP, BACK TO THE FUTURE, CONTACT), Zemeckis’s BENEATH bears more than a slight similarity to his 1993 dark comedy DEATH BECOMES HER. Both films share an affinity for good, if overused, special effects and also are grounded in truly ghastly material, with DEATH aiming for the funny bone, and BENEATH going instantly for chills. I like this side of Zemeckis, and BENEATH - in it’s early moments - suggests that the filmmakers are here to play. That feeling wears away once the story begins to get top-heavy with awkward coincidences and crudely integrated backstory. Backstory which can only be intended to justify the film’s climatic pandemonium.
Zemeckis is also very determined to scare the audience, often reaching far and wide to deliver "Dolby Jolts" and other cheap sound effect scares. It’s a tried and true practice in these films, but nothing aggravates more than when a director seems to have nothing more up his sleeve other than a couple of cheap shocks. Not much adds up in BENEATH to create the rich mood a horror film needs, simply because Zemeckis tires the material out with endless jolts.
What the screenplay is lacking for Harrison Ford and Michelle Pfeiffer are real characters and semi-believable motivations for their actions. What Claire suffers through and what Norman eventually resorts to are the results of very thins strands of logic. I know most people (myself included), understand that believability should never come into question in a horror film, but BENEATH plays hard and fast with it’s story in such away that to deconstruct it would be futile. We shouldn’t have to think about BENEATH’s plausibility, but the film is such a big production that you cannot enjoy BENEATH the way it should be enjoyed: in a Saturday afternoon, double-feature matinee way.
It’s nice to see Harrison Ford in something that requires more than a passing grunt. His performance in BENEATH isn’t among his best, but at least his voice rises above a whisper. It’s really Pfeiffer’s film, and she carries it nicely. Running through the typical breath-hard-and-scream horror maneuvers, she is the only one in the cast who seems to have a clue how the plot will factor her in for the climax. The same cannot be said of Ford.
I will not blow the ending for you, but BENEATH could have closed up shop quickly on a disturbing note, very reminiscent of the 1988 George Sluizer film THE VANISHING. It doesn’t though. It keeps going for another 20 minutes until you are silly with contempt. Robert Zemeckis is a real talent, a man responsible for some of the best films of the late 20th century, but his WHAT LIES BENEATH is a poor excuse for a suspense film. Hopefully the next time he decides to return to his exploitation roots, he’ll know when to say "uncle" and let the audience leave the theater begging for more. -- 4/10
-
+ Expand All
-
What the heck is the point of seeing this movie in the first place? If you watch the horrible trailer, which not only is slow as hell, but also sums up the entire movie, then you have already seen the movie. Then after that trailer was shown, Coyote Ugly's trailer came on. Dear god... The pain...
-
Jul 12, 2000 4:02:21 PM CDT
I'm FIRST to say a flame war has been declared BY the Anal-Rente
by removed_user
Harrison Ford and Michelle Pfeiffer taking their daughter to college? What futureshock this is! As a fanboy[a pumped up psychotic one at that] I must admit that I enjoyed "Sabrina" if only for former TalkSoup Host Greg Kinnear.
*On another subject: just who are the Crack Pack? These are individuals who like whining/bitching/complaining{more like pissing and moaning} a lot and use the word "ANNOYING". If some candyass said to my face that I was "annoying" I would laugh,beat the shit out of them, confinscate their money and take their woman, for only a someone, who wets their bed, candyass would say such a assinine term. -
First: The "I'm first" thing is so old that its a classic part of Talkback. Keep it up. I just love scrolling down a screwed up, reordered Talkback to have a series of "I'M FIRST!!!" messages hit me like a blast of air conditioning after running a few miles. Truly there is something to be said for being the first person to reply to newly posted review.
Second: A good trailer does not make a good movie, but a bad trailer can really make a movie predictable. So maybe there are some twists "lying beneath," but we already know most of what's down there.
Third: Following the X-Men logic...you MUST see this movie or you are an asshole! If this movie doesn't make over $100 mil, then that will be the end of the over-budgeted, mildly spooky movie genre. A bit o' sarcasm for ya. SnotMD -
Will that Zemeickis-guy EVER make a really brilliant film. IMO he's a brillaint director technically - but seems to end up with clunky scripts like "Contact"
-
What the hell is DarthPsychotic talking about? His own post had a lot of the elements he was complaining about. Oh well. I think what I'd really like to see is Harrison Ford and William Hurt in the same movie, and watch them try to out-somber each other.
-
Where is Harrison Ford? The REAL Harrison Ford. He is the "biggest box office draw ever" for a few movies he hates to admit he's in[Star Wars, Blade Runner], and he did those archaeologist movies, but refuses to make much else that's good. How many more What Lies Beneaths? How many more Hanover Streets? HOW MANY MORE RANDOM HEARTS BEFORE THIS GETS OUT OF HAND?! [sigh] This is not Han Solo. Not even post-carbonite Han Solo. This is not Indiana Jones. Not even Jack Ryan [side note: Ben Affleck? PUH-LEEZE!]. Who has stolen the Harrison Ford we all knew and loved and replaced him with a robot, only to tease us by returning him for The Fugitive and Air Force One [although perhaps his great supporting casts made it SEEM as if he had returned]! Alas, my life is ruined. Until Friday night when I see X-Men, anyway...
-
He's made some of the best: Back to the Future trilogy, Forrest Gump, Contact(the best scifi of the 90s), and now What Lies Beneath. Ford has never been better with this movie. It is the 80s all over again. I will see this movie 6 or more times. The moaning in the trailer made me want to see this one.
-
I agree with most of the film's failings as pointed out above. But, "What Lies Beneath" has some genuine surprises, a great subdued look, and some strong performances. The audience I saw the film with seemed to enjoy it as well. If you're looking for a classy ghost story that will keep you guessing, here it is. "What Lies Beneath" is not great, but it makes films like "The Haunting"(1999 version) look like an episode of Scooby Doo.
-
What's up with you people dissing King Harrison? I'll be paying to watch this man when he's an ancient, crochety old man of 80 waddling out of his limousine at his premiere on a walker! And Mark Hamill?! Good God, what a comparison! Obviously this person is too young to have seen "Corvette Summer"! Harrison is an American Institution, he is the greatest actor our country has had since Humphrey Bogart, so let's chill out on that one!
-
...'cause I hate, hate, hate spoilers, but I think I'll give this flick a chance unless it gets totally panned on release. Mitb22's description of it as "a classy ghost story that will keep you guessing" sounds pretty appealing to me. Zemeckis is a hit-and-miss director (even the largely great "Contact" had some problems), but his good stuff definitely earns my respect. Dare I suggest that his best movie overall is the lighthearted-but-witty "Romancing the Stone"? Oh, and on the topic of William Hurt's somber-essness, does anyone else think he took it a little too far in "Dark City"? A nice, offbeat movie, and I happily own the DVD, but Hurt seemed flat even for the stylized noir world-weariness he was shooting for.
-
I said it a week ago and I'll say it again, this should've been done as a USA Cable Movie or straight to video pic -- only the director and stars make it "worthy" of theatrical release. Let's give it a quick and merciful death by boycotting it and catching it on video or cable where it belongs. Over and Out and onward and upward with "Cast Away" which does look sensational -- can't win 'em all pal.
-
He is without doubt one of the most inventive, dynamic and brilliant directors ever - 2nd only to Spielberg me thinks. A true technical visionary and operatic innovator. Having left his bubblegum pics behind a decade ago with the Future Trilogy, he is now proudly wearing the label of "Middle Age Director" on his sleeve, which is why he wanted to do "Death Becomes Her" (aging) "Forrest Gump" (baby boomer of the '60s) and "Contact" (what is the meaning of life as it were and what happens to us in the great big scheme of things). "Cast Away" looks Fabulous - a modern-day take on Robinson Crusoe, helluva lot more Real than the lame "Survivor" show on CBS. So where this "What Lies Beneath" thing falls on his emotional radar range is beyond me -- as I said a week ago, I think he just wanted to do something "interesting" and offbeat in a Euro-style way (what was the name of that pic that Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie starred in back in late 60s or early 70s? That's what this thing reminds me of -- was it called "Blow Up"? Anyone?) Anyway, here's hoping that after "Cast Away" Bob Z will actually re-team with old Bob G for one more great and fantastically fun pic with a Script that the two of them Write together like in the old days, but me thinks this is unlikely -- apparently he wants to do a lowbrow horror pic for Dark Castle (Joel Silver's and Bob's new outfit -- no more Tales from the Crypt, now we're getting a remake of "13 Ghosts" on the heels of "House on Haunted Hill" (ugh was that ever annoying!) Bottom Line - how 'bout that prequel to "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" once-titled and developed but now abandoned as "Who Discovered Roger Rabbit"? Now that would be great fun indeed Mr. Z! Keep up the grand style and invite me to the "Cast Away" premiere! And we'll overlook this misfire and judge you by your entire body of work which as I stated at the intro of this monograph is Just Superb. Peace.
-
I believe the movie you're trying to remember is Don't Look Now....
-
I used to live in Jackson, WY. I was disillusioned to hear that Harrison has been a HUUUUGE pot smoker for many many years.
(When I was there, Ford suppossedly ran into a little trouble with French authorities on the set of SABRINA)
I'm surprised the media has left him alone, as it is pretty common knowledge around his friends and coworkers.
Look at his previous acting in things like WITNESS and especially MOSQUITO COAST. He had a fire that has burned out after "relaxing" for so long.
Look, I'm not on some anti pot nazi campaign. I'm just saying that it's usage has really made a fine actor EXTREMELY lazy.
-
not really, but it would be cool
-
I'm sorry but I'm 27 years old and I love the Back to The Future trilogy, it is the second best trilogy out there in my opinion. The scripts were all tightly connected and the films were all excellent. As for Contact, I really didn't like it all that much, mainly because I hated McConoughey's acting in it, and the whole ending with the so called aliens. Most all of Zemeckis' work is excellent, not only are they some of the best films, but he does a great job on tv, see the Tales From The Crypt episodes he directed, especially "Yellow" and the one about the insane Santa Claus. Masterpieces. As for WHat Lies Beneath, it looks good to me, you better beleive I will see it when it comes out, maybe I'll be lucky and see the sneak preview we are having on tuesday. As for the poster who thought William Hurt was a little dry in Dark City, I just watched it last night, and I think that was who the character was. I liked him in the film, from playing the accordian to his exasperated "Nobody Listens to Me!". I thought he was excellent, not as good as Rufus Sewell, Kiefer Sutherland, or the gorgeous Jennifer Connoly.
-
After that trailer, I don't need to see this movie. Besides Chuck N' Buck opens the same day, so I'll be checking that out instead.
-
What do you mean, the Haunting remake was "like" a Scooby Doo episode? You mean it wasn't? You've got Fred (Liam), Daphne (CZJ), Velma (Lili) and of course Shaggy (Luke). The house was owned by one of the gang's multitudinous relatives, there are supporting characters who are creepy for no reason, chase scenes, and the big payoff features revealing of the identity of the surprise villain. Goddess knows they didn't use the book or original movie for their source material, so they must have got the script from somewhere- probably just dropped Scooby and changed the names to avoid a lawsuit.
-
Ok, great, now *I'M* disillusioned. As if Ford's petulant TV interview appearances weren't enough to kill my childhood admiration for him, now this. I know that getting baked would never be Indy's thing, but the mere thought that this allegation conjers up of Han Solo bogarting someone's gange really harshes my mellow. Bummer man.
-
Every time I moan about Harrison's weak film choices for the past...well it seems like forever now...someone always mentions Blade Runner and I shuttup. But still, Harrision, buddy, we're dyin' out here. Throw us a bone. Not this crap. Excellent reviews however.
-
C'mon, you didn't think he was just smuggling *spices* for Jabba, did you? And look at that junker, the Millenium Falcon - pretty much the futuristic equivalent of a 70's stoner van, ya ask me. Bet there's even some bad airbrush art on the underside...
-
Jul 14, 2000 12:48:10 AM CDT
SFW is Correct - "Don't Look Now" is what WLB is paying homage t
by bari umenema
Apparently Spielberg came up with the idea for What Lies Beneath and hired Clark Gregg to write it. Me thinks Steven was the one who wanted to pay homage to Don't Look Now. As I recall, Sutherland and Christie's son drowned in the opening scene at the lake, then I fell asleep since it was on long ago late at night like 2:AM
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 439 total posts 165 posts
- WTF HOLLYWOOD: SOLARBABIES -- 144 total posts 142 posts
- Herc’s Seen Tonight’s Return Of THE WALKING DEAD!! Discuss Also DOWNTON ABBEY, FEAR FACTOR, PAN AM, ONCE, SIMPSONS, DYNAMITE, LUCK, SHAMELESS, BAIT CAR, THE GRAMMYS And More!! Sunday Is Sweeps Day 11!! -- 153 total posts 138 posts
- Avid Comic Reader Hercules Does Battle With Tedium During Kevin Smith’s COMIC BOOK MEN! -- 55 total posts 47 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 196 total posts 45 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 60 total posts 36 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 127 total posts 36 posts
- I am The Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day! No, I’m the Behind the Scenes Pic of the Day! -- 35 total posts 35 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 513 total posts 29 posts
- The Sensorties Revisit The Friday Docback (And Still Smell)!! DOCTOR WHO Story #7 Again, The Coming Of Season/Series 7, And More!! -- 117 total posts 26 posts