Capone's Art-House Round-Up with Ramin Bahrani's AT ANY PRICE, Mira Nair's THE RELUCTANT FUNDAMENTALIST, the Oscar-nominated KON-TIKI, and GRACELAND!!!
Hey, folks. Capone in Chicago here, with a few films that are making their way into art houses or coming out in limited release around America this week (maybe even taking up one whole screen at a multiplex near you). Do your part to support these films, or at least the good ones…
AT ANY PRICE
For admirers of the work of director Ramin Bahrani (MAN PUSH CART, CHOP SHOP, GOOBYE SOLO), you may not immediately recognize this latest work as his. It opens at a rural funeral. Some are in their Sunday best, but others are in jeans and button-down cowboy shirts. Among the crowd, we spot Henry Whipple (Dennis Quaid) and his son Dean (Zac Efron) looking solemn but not sad. As soon as the graveside prayers are concluded, Henry weasels up to the bereaved offsprings of the deceased and makes a play for their plot of land, which he's certain they're eager to get rid of. And it turns out that despite their initial disgust at his tactics, they eventually agree to his proposal.
I had to double check the credits of the film to make certain I'd remembered right that Bahrani was at the helm of AT ANY PRICE, since it features known actors (as opposed to his usual first-time or unknown actors) and was set not in a desolate corner of America where cameras rarely, if ever, aim their lenses. But there are actually two stories being told in this work: one involves the American family farm, which is under constant pressure to "expand or die," and also under attack from seed companies that force farmers to buy new seed for every harvest rather than use seed that comes from their crops. The second, more elusive tale Bahrani is telling involves the extremely messed-up Whipple family, which also includes put-upon wife Irene (Kim Dickens) and an older absentee son, who moved away as fast as he could after high school.
AT ANY PRICE is about the lies we tell ourselves and those closest to us to preserve and project some façade of healthy family living to the outside world. Henry is the consummate salesman, and he's not just selling seed to farmers; he's selling good, clean living, while he cheats on his wife and has two sons who can't stand to be around him.
Dean wants to be a NASCAR driver, and seems on the right path to do that, winning countless local races. He's dating the prettiest girl in town, Cadence (newcomer Maika Monroe), who might be the best thing this family has ever had happen to them. At various points, each family consults Cadence for some sort of interpretation of their own relationships. At one point, she even ends up on a sales call with Henry that is going south in a hurry, until she steps in and saves the day. Monroe is a rising star, with roles in upcoming films by Sofia Coppola and Jason Reitman, and she's the closest thing to true and good we have to cling to among these characters. She's a real discovery.
But the other big surprise is watching Quaid really dig his teeth into playing Henry, the man with the ready smile and quick criticism of his youngest. Quaid has lately been lost in a sea of awful romantic comedies and lesser dramas, but here, he is free to play Henry as a fully-developed person, showing all of the cracks. His countless wars of words with Dean are often ferocious and always painfully uncomfortable to watch.
AT ANY PRICE doesn't have what you might consider a traditional story flow. Henry is in trouble with the seed company for allegedly selling washing seeds, Dean quits driving for no reason, and Henry is struggling to keep hold as number one salesman in his territory (against a rival played by the great Clancy Brown). Perhaps Henry's most telling weakness is still trying to please his vicious father (Red West), whose few scenes open our eyes to what Henry has been fighting against his whole life and what he is slowly becoming to his own kids.
The final act of AT ANY PRICE features an event so out of left field that I certainly wouldn't spoil it, but I almost don't consider it part of the story being told. In many ways, it doesn't quite make sense in this context, but that doesn't make it any less shocking or compelling. I'll give Bahrani credit, I didn't see it coming. It does bring father and son together for the first time in quite some time, but I'm not sure it's in a way that either is going to be OK with as the years go on.
By the time the film concludes, we realize that much of what we've seen is about Henry trying to be a better, more honest man. Whether he has succeeded is a question for the ages, but having Quaid remind us that he's one of our greatest leading actors makes me think the film is worth its inconsistencies and jarring shifts. And it's great seeing Bahrani step out of his comfort zone and into the world at large, even if he views this country living under the same dark microscope he does his other works.
THE RELUCTANT FUNDAMENTALIST
There's not getting around it, The Reluctant Fundamentalist, the new film from the always-compelling director Mira Nair (SALAAM BOMBAY!, MONSOON WEDDING, THE NAMESAKE) is going to make some people uneasy, and that's kind of the point. And strangely enough, I haven't been this uneasy watching a film that gives us an alternate viewpoint on terrorism and conflicting vantage points on how a war on terror is waged since seeing the dark comedy FOUR LIONS a couple years back, which also happens to feature the lead actor of this film, Riz Ahmed.
Based on the controversial novel by Mohsin Hamid, THE RELUCTANT FUNDAMENTALIST is by no means a comedy; it's a serious look at the life of Pakistan-born, American-educated Changez (Ahmed) both before and after the 2001 attack on the World Trade Center. The film opens in 2011 with a meeting between Changez and an American journalist named Bobby (Liev Schreiber), a character in the novel who is never given a voice, but whom Changez tells his story to. Bobby's role is fleshed out (it's Liev Schreiber; of course you're going to give him more screen time), and he informs Changez that he's suspected of being a terrorist collaborator or leader or something that he probably doesn't want to be accused of.
Changez relays his life story of the last 10-plus years as a way to both explain why he isn't a fundamentalist and also why he'd have every right to be if he were. After excelling as a student at Princeton and a financial analyst on Wall Street (under the guidance of his boss played will great reserve by Keifer Sutherland), Changez also manages to find time for a relationship with Erica, a beautiful artist played by Kate Hudson, in probably her best performance since Almost Famous.
But when the Twin Towers are turned to rubble, Changez become just another Middle Eastern face in a part of the world that overnight begins to look upon such people with suspicion. He's strip searched at the airport, wrongfully arrested, questioned, and just generally racially profiled until the pressure becomes too much and he begins to crack. Sutherland has trained Changez well to be a master company downsizer, but he begins to see the inherent evil in such practice, and soon he's without a job and a work visa, forcing him back to Pakistan.
There's a sequence in which Changez is attending his sister's wedding and he maliciously lets slip a piece of information that devastates his father (Om Puri), and it's meant to show how American and capitalist values have corrupted him completely. It's a rough scene, and simply one of the best I've seen in quite some time. THE RELUCTANT FUNDAMENTALIST isn't inherently anti-American, but it doesn't isn't wrapped in the flag either, nor should it be. If we can't take a little criticism, that's pretty pathetic.
The dynamic between Changez and Bobby changes during the course of their conversation into one that become more and more suspect and works to divide their already strained relationship. In a way, the conversation mirrors the cultural divide that occurred between the United States and certain Middle Eastern nations in the last decade. Again, the film manages to keep itself (barely) from being overtly political, but it does ask tough questions about the knee-jerk reactionary tone we take in a crisis. It's an emotionally charged work that isn't afraid to dig deep and rip open old wounds that still have not completely healed.
But really what THE RELUCTANT FUNDAMENTALIST tackles is how much power as a society we give paranoid beliefs and unsubstantiated suspicions. I think we've seen examples of that on the news lately. Nair is a master storyteller who weaves together the personal, professional and political into this tightly wound account of how a man's life is ruined by forces out of his control, and how he, in turn, responds to these life-altering shifts.
There's a prologue in the Oscar-nominated (for Best Foreign Film) KON-TIKI that I believe is supposed to provide evidence that the lead character, Thor Heyerdahl, has been a fearless spirit since he was a child. Young Thor literally walks on thin ice and ends up plunging into the freezing water, only to be rescued by his lifelong best friend. What it showed me is that he's a reckless little shit who acts before he thinks. But this true story of famed Norwegian Heyerdahl (played as an adult by the golden-haired Pål Sverre Hagen) chronicles the path he takes from exploring the Polynesian islands with his wife Liv (Agnes Kittelsen of HAPPY HAPPY) to spending years formulating the theory that the islands were actually populated by South Americans rather than the commonly believed Asians.
Sounds exciting, right? In fact, it is, especially when a publisher suggests that the selling point of printing Heyerdahl's findings would be to re-create the journey from Columbia to Polynesia on a balsa wood raft. After wisely appealing to a rich Columbian businessman's sense of nationalism for financing the expedition, Heyerdahl and a crew of five set sail in 1947 for 100-plus days across 8,000km, with no means of rescue should something go wrong. If the mission failed, everyone on board would be dead. Between storms, whale encounters and shark attacks—all of which are beautifully realized with the real thing or special effects—there were plenty of chances for this to be a suicide mission.
Directed by Joachim Ronning and Espen Sandberg (MAX MANUS: MAN OF WAR), KON-TIKI feels like watching a well-written text book on modern exploration. We get a sense of what Heyerdahl and his team were up against, including the explorer's angry wife, who would be a single mother of two if he died, and a severe case of paranoia that the wooden raft was rotting from absorbing water or that armies of sharks were waiting just over the edge of the craft waiting for a leg or arm to enter the water.
But since this is a fairly famous journey and the movie is based on Heyerdahl's written account of the journey, there's only so much genuine drama that can be generated. Still, the film does a solid job making the Pacific Ocean seem appropriately endless and the fear that the current that is supposed to take them across it seem elusive. I'm not sure if there was at one point a Norwegian-language version of KON-TIKI, but the version I saw was almost entirely in English (and not dubbed). I don't think it make much of a difference as to whether I enjoyed the film or not, but I'd be curious to see the story in its native tongue. The film is a lightweight but effective adventure story and history lesson that actually serves to educate and entertain. There are worse ways of doing homework.
Bordering on being an exploitation film at times, Filipino-American filmmaker Ron Morales' GRACELAND is primarily a taut kidnapping drama with a deeply flawed protagonist who must perpetuate many ugly lies to keep his young daughter alive. Set in Manila in the Philippines, the film centers on Marlon (Arnold Reyes), a driver for a sleazy, corrupt politician (Menggie Cobarrubias) who has a proclivity for underage girls, sadly in abundance in this city.
Often Marlon is required to pick up and drop off these girls, who are sometimes drugged by the politician. But Marlon also is responsible for taking the politician's own daughter to and from school. The girl is friend's with Marlon's own daughter, Elvie, although the politician's wife doesn't like them going to school together in the same car. One day, the two girls skip school to go shopping, but Marlon catches them trying to sneak back into school, puts them in his car and drives away. His timing could not be worse since the grandmother of one of the politician's young victims is talking to the press about his perverse behavior and a full-blown scandal is brewing; for some reason, the politician blames Marlon and fires him. Marlon's wife is sick, and he needs the income to keep her in the hospital, so this turn of events is distressing for him.
As he's driving the girls back home, Marlon is pulled over by a cop who turns out to be part of a kidnapping ring looking to grab the politician's daughter for a big ransom. But during the kidnapping, the intended victim is shot and killed, and the kidnappers mistakenly swipe Elvie. The story gets complicated (for the players, not us), since in order to convince the politician to pay the money to get his daughter released, he must pretend the politician's daughter is still alive. When the kidnappers figure out the mistake, they're willing to play along with Marlon to get their money.
As the film goes on, it becomes clear that money is only part of what the kidnappers want from the politician and that a more personal connection exists between the two parties. Juggling the lies becomes almost more than Marlon can handle and Reyes does an incredible job keeping the tension high through his acting, while director Morales balances the high and low existence Marlon must straddle to make things go his way just for once. For good reason, the police suspect he is part of the kidnapping plot, which he technically is in an after-the-fact way. Marlon must also lie to protect the politician so that he may put up the money for Elvie's release. Everyone puts demands on Marlon, and he's trying to make them all synch up for the least bloody conclusion.
GRACELAND is a remarkable second effort from Morales (after the 2008 Melissa Leo-starring SANTA MESA), who has spent most of his film career being a key grip on other director's films. But he shows a genuine talent for exciting, nerve-wracking storytelling here. He's not afraid to be shocking, but he's also capable of holding back when it bets suits the plot and his actors. One location that is used a couple of times in the film is the massive trash dump on the city's outskirts, and it seems both the perfect setting and metaphor for many of the situations and characters we meet; you can almost smell the corruption, and it makes for some solid filmmaking.
-- Steve Prokopy
Follow Me On Twitter
Readers Talkbackcomments powered by Disqus
- Here’s A Video Of STAR WARS EPISODE VII’s Millennium Falcon, Highlighting One Little Detail… -- 410 total posts 409 posts
- Is DOCTOR STRANGE coming to us in July 2016?!! -- 409 total posts 213 posts
- Another New (And Rather Cool) INTERSTELLAR Poster!! -- 194 total posts 194 posts
- Rejoice! DEADPOOL: THE MOVIE comin' to you in February 2016!! -- 133 total posts 133 posts
- First look at footage from Genndy Tartakovsky's POPEYE! -- 94 total posts 94 posts
- Meet Bigfoot in this New Clip from EXISTS! -- 189 total posts 94 posts
- Josh Trank's FANTASTIC FOUR gets pushed back nearly two months, and knocks ASSASSIN'S CREED off the calendar! -- 90 total posts 90 posts
- 3rd PICKS & PEEKS of Sept 2014: Crichton Blus, THE PARTY, Bloody Entertainment, GODZILLA 3D & More!!! -- 677 total posts 66 posts
- This Poster For INSIDIOUS CHAPTER 3 Is Creepy And Requires Reading!! -- 60 total posts 60 posts
- Guy Ritchie brings a mermaid onto land to play his Guinevere in KNIGHTS OF THE ROUNDTABLE: KING ARTHUR! -- 55 total posts 55 posts